title: Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients.
abstract: Moral agency is the capacity to do right or wrong, whereas moral patiency is the capacity to be a target of right or wrong. Through 7 studies, the authors explored moral typecasting-an inverse relation between perceptions of moral agency and moral patiency. Across a range of targets and situations, good- and evil-doers (moral agents) were perceived to be less vulnerable to having good and evil done to them. The recipients of good and evil (moral patients), in turn, were perceived as less capable of performing good or evil actions. Moral typecasting stems from the dyadic nature of morality and explains curious effects such as people's willingness to inflict greater pain on those who do good than those who do nothing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, MA, USA. kurtgray@fas.harvard.edu
authors.forename: Kurt
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Gray
authors.forename: Daniel M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Wegner
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D019548:Crime Victims; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D028681:Moral Obligations; D009014:Morals; D010146:Pain; D010465:Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D012919:Social Behavior; D012938:Social Perception; D013240:Stereotyping; D055815:Young Adult