The importance of functional impairment to mental health outcomes: a case for reassessing our goals in depression treatment research.
Outcomes in depression treatment research include both changes in symptom severity and functional impairment. Symptom measures tend to be the standard outcome but we argue that there are benefits to considering functional outcomes. An exhaustive literature review shows that the relationship between symptoms and functioning remains unexpectedly weak and often bidirectional. Changes in functioning often lag symptom changes. As a result, functional outcomes might offer depression researchers more critical feedback and better guidance when studying depression treatment outcomes. The paper presents a case for the necessity of both functional and symptom outcomes in depression treatment research by addressing three aims-1) review the research relating symptoms and functioning, 2) provide a rationale for measuring both outcomes, and 3) discuss potential artifacts in measuring functional outcomes. The three aims are supported by an empirical review of the treatment outcome and epidemiological literatures.
McKnight
Patrick E
PE
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, MSN 3F5, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030-4400, United States. pmcknigh@gmu.edu
Kashdan
Todd B
TB
D003865:Major Depressive Disorder / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy*; D004651:Employment / Q000523:psychology; D005246:Feedback; D006040:Goals; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D011584:Psychology; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards*; D012919:Social Behavior