Location restrictions on smoking: assessing their differential impacts and consequences in the workplace.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze existing evidence on the impact of two types of location restrictions on smoking: workplace bans and bans in hospitality settings, and to assess the extent to which they differentially affect subpopulations.


METHODS
A review of international studies on location restrictions on smoking published between 1990-2007.


RESULTS
Although workplace smoking bans reduce exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) at work, their effects on overall cigarette consumption and smoking prevalence may be uneven across the population. Bans in hospitality settings reduce SHS exposure among workers, but have potentially uneven effects based on the interactions between gender, socio-economic status (SES) and ethnicity. The unintended consequences of smoking bans are also more likely to be experienced by low SES groups.


CONCLUSIONS
Although location restrictions on smoking reduce SHS exposure and may serve to positively impact smoking behaviours, there is preliminary evidence that they may have a reduced impact on subpopulations such as low-income groups, although further research is needed.
Bell
Kirsten
K
Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC. kbell@bccancer.bc.ca
McCullough
Lucy
L
Devries
Karen
K
Jategaonkar
Natasha
N
Greaves
Lorraine
L
Richardson
Lindsay
L
D016902:Air Pollution, Indoor / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003132:Commerce / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012309:Risk-Taking; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D011049:Social Control Policies; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Q000517:prevention & control*; D017132:Workplace / Q000145:classification / Q000592:standards*
D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution