Comparison of membrane assisted solvent extraction, stir bar sorptive extraction, and solid phase microextraction in analysis of tetramine in food.
Three environmentally friendly extraction techniques, membrane assisted solvent extraction (MASE), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), and headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME), were compared for the direct analysis of the highly toxic rodenticide tetramine in food. The optimized MASE method was applied to seven foods fortified with tetramine and compared to previously reported SBSE and HS-SPME results. Parameters such as the standard addition linearity (MASE (0.964-0.999), SBSE (0.966-0.999), HS-SPME (0.955-0.999)), recovery (MASE (12-86%), SBSE (36-130%), HS-SPME (50-200%)), reproducibility (MASE (3.0-30%), SBSE (4.4-9.6%), HS-SPME (1-12%)), and LOD (MASE (1.6-6.4 ng/g), SBSE (0.2-2.1 ng/g), HS-SPME (0.9-4.3 ng/g)) were compared.
De Jager
Lowri S
LS
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Perfetti
Gracia A
GA
Diachenko
Gregory W
GW
D001952:Bridged-Ring Compounds / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D005502:Food; D005504:Food Analysis / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D016014:Linear Models; D015394:Molecular Structure; D052617:Solid Phase Microextraction / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D012997:Solvents
D001952:Bridged-Ring Compounds; D012997:Solvents; C010349:tetramethylenedisulfotetramine