The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary intervention.
Public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures has been mandated in New York State for more than a decade. During that time there has been a significant decline in the unadjusted mortality after such procedures. Massachusetts joined New York in 2003 as only the second state to require case level reporting of every coronary interventional procedure performed. In this review, we explore the differences in the populations reported by the 2 states and consider possible risks of public reporting of clinical outcomes after PCI procedures, including the risk of increasing conservatism in the treatment of the sickest patients. We offer a conceptual framework to understand the potential risk-averse behavior of interventional cardiologists subject to public reporting, and offer several proposals to counteract this potential deleterious effect of reporting programs.
Resnic
Frederic S
FS
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. fresnic@partners.org
Welt
Frederick G P
FG
D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / Q000401:mortality / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000401:mortality / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008404:Massachusetts / Q000453:epidemiology; D009518:New York / Q000453:epidemiology; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D011634:Public Health; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D012306:Risk; D020379:Risk Adjustment