Cue integration outside central fixation: a study of grasping in depth.
We assessed the usefulness of stereopsis across the visual field by quantifying how retinal eccentricity and distance from the horopter affect humans' relative dependence on monocular and binocular cues about 3D orientation. The reliabilities of monocular and binocular cues both decline with eccentricity, but the reliability of binocular information decreases more rapidly. Binocular cue reliability also declines with increasing distance from the horopter, whereas the reliability of monocular cues is virtually unaffected. We measured how subjects integrated these cues to orient their hands when grasping oriented discs at different eccentricities and distances from the horopter. Subjects relied increasingly less on binocular disparity as targets' retinal eccentricity and distance from the horopter increased. The measured cue influences were consistent with what would be predicted from the relative cue reliabilities at the various target locations. Our results showed that relative reliability affects how cues influence motor control and that stereopsis is of limited use in the periphery and away from the horopter because monocular cues are more reliable in these regions.
Greenwald
Hal S
HS
Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, USA. hgreenwald@bcs.rochester.edu
Knill
David C
DC
D000328:Adult; D003463:Cues; D003867:Depth Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D009949:Orientation; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011601:Psychophysics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012160:Retina / Q000502:physiology; D012684:Sensory Thresholds; D015348:Vision, Binocular / Q000502:physiology; D015349:Vision, Monocular / Q000502:physiology; D014794:Visual Fields