Influence of watchful waiting on satisfaction and anxiety among patients seeking care for unexplained complaints.
OBJECTIVE
We undertook a study to determine whether test-ordering strategy and other consultation-related factors influence satisfaction with and anxiety after a consultation among patients seeking care for unexplained complaints.


METHODS
A cluster-randomized clinical trial was conducted in family medicine practices in the Netherlands. Participants were 498 patients with unexplained complaints seen by 63 primary care physicians. Physicians either immediately ordered a blood test for patients or followed a 4-week watchful waiting approach. Physicians and patients completed questionnaires asking about their characteristics, satisfaction with care, and anxiety, and aspects of the consultation. The main outcomes were patient satisfaction and anxiety. Data were analyzed by multilevel logistic regression analysis.


RESULTS
Patients were generally satisfied with their consultation and had moderately low anxiety afterward (mean scores on 11-point scales, 7.3 and 3.1, respectively), with no difference between the immediate testing and watchful waiting groups (chi(2) = 2.4 and 0.3, respectively). The factors associated with higher odds of satisfaction were mainly related to physician-patient communication: patients' satisfaction with their physician generally, feeling taken seriously, and knowing the seriousness of complaints afterward; physicians' discussing testing and not considering complaints bearable; and older physician age. The same was true for factors associated with higher odds of anxiety: patients expecting testing or referral, patients not knowing the seriousness of their complaints afterward, and physicians not seeing a cause for alarm.


CONCLUSIONS
Test-ordering strategy does not influence patients' satisfaction with and anxiety after a consultation. Instead, specific aspects of physician-patient communication are important. Apparently, primary care physicians underestimate how much they can contribute to the well-being of their patients by discussing their worries.
van Bokhoven
Marloes A
MA
Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research, Maastricht University, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands. Loes.vanbokhoven@hag.unimaas.nl
Koch
Hèlen
H
van der Weijden
Trudy
T
Grol
Richard P T M
RP
Kester
Arnold D
AD
Rinkens
Paula E L M
PE
Bindels
Patrick J E
PJ
Dinant
Geert-Jan
GJ
D000328:Adult; D001007:Anxiety / Q000209:etiology*; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005260:Female; D006403:Hematologic Tests / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019370:Observation; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D013001:Somatoform Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D019564:Unnecessary Procedures