Regulation of health practitioners by trade practices and fair trading legislation.
In a variety of situations, particularly those characterised by commerciality, corporate structures and unregistered practitioners, there are major limitations to traditional regulation by health boards and councils, as well as hearings by external tribunals. Part of the difficulty lies with the ability of external bodies to award compensation to complainants/notifiers proved to have suffered adverse consequences from proven unprofessional conduct. This column advances suggestions for reform of the powers of external tribunals to redress this deficit. It also reviews the benefits of an associated form of regulation by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and offices of fair trading to enable consumer protection. It reviews recent decisions in the Federal Court of Australia and the Supreme Court of Victoria in such matters as well as recommendations in 2008 by the Victorian Health Services Commissioner.
Freckelton
Ian
I
Crockett Chambers, Melbourne, Australia. I.Freckelton@vicbar.com.au
D001315:Australia; D035881:Compensation and Redress / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003257:Consumer Product Safety; D033161:Government Regulation; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence