Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: differentiation of malignant and benign tumors by endoscopic ultrasound findings of mural nodules.
OBJECTIVE
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs)have a wide pathologic spectrum and it is difficult to differentiate malignant from benign tumors. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of malignancy using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS).


METHODS
In our institute, main duct type and mixed type IPMNs, branch duct type IPMNs with mural nodules, and IPMNs with coexistent invasive ductal cancer were indications for surgery. Eighty-seven IPMNs (14 main duct, 25 mixed, and 48 branch duct type) were resected and CE-EUS findings were compared with pathologic findings. Twelve clinicopathological variables and CE-EUS morphologic findings were assessed.Mural nodules defined as blood flow supplied protrusions were classified into 4 types: type I: low papillary nodule, type II: polypoid nodule, type III:papillary nodule, and type IV: invasive nodule.


RESULTS
Forty-two, 26, 16, and 3 were pathologically diagnosed as adenoma,noninvasive carcinoma, invasive IPMNs, and coexistent invasive ductal cancer, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that types III/IV mural nodule (odds ratio = 10.8; 95% confidential intervals = 2.75-56.1) and symptomatic IPMNs (odds ratio = 4.31; 95% confidential intervals = 1.37-14.7) were significant for malignancy. For mural nodule diameter, invasive IPMNs were significantly larger, but types III and IV mural nodules were more frequently associated with malignancy, particularly invasive cancer, at 88.9% and 91.7%, respectively. The diagnosis of IPMNs with types III or IV mural nodule as malignant resulted in a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 92.9%, and accuracy of 75.9%.


CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, new morphologic criteria were useful to identify the malignant potentials of IPMNs.
Ohno
Eizaburo
E
Department of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hirooka
Yoshiki
Y
Itoh
Akihiro
A
Ishigami
Masatoshi
M
Katano
Yoshiaki
Y
Ohmiya
Naoki
N
Niwa
Yasumasa
Y
Goto
Hidemi
H
D002288:Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D044963:Biopsy, Fine-Needle; D021441:Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003287:Contrast Media; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D019160:Endosonography / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D009092:Mucous Membrane / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D009361:Neoplasm Invasiveness / Q000473:pathology*; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D016017:Odds Ratio; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology*; D011336:Probability; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
D003287:Contrast Media