Looking for sex in all the wrong places.
The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis of how issues on sexuality are captured by the World Bank's economic rationality, producing a sanitised discourse which, through its silences, further contributes to a normalised view of sexuality. Given the Bank's authority to determine what kinds of health and development programmes are established in the developing world, it is in a unique position to influence approaches to issues of gender and sexuality. An analysis of the Bank's documents reveals, however, that rather than addressing these fundamental components of some of the most pressing health emergencies of our time, its economic rationality and technocratic viewpoint has effectively silenced and sanitised the discourse on sexuality, thereby limiting what sexuality and gender-related issues can be tackled in the context of Bank sponsored programmes, and constraining efforts to advance fundamental sexual rights. Nevertheless, unexpected and paradoxical results may arise from that process, which, thus, does not necessarily lead to the furthering of a comprehensive conservative agenda.
Camarg
K R
KR
Institute of Social Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. kenneth@uerj.br
Mattos
R A
RA
D003068:Coercion; D003906:Developing Countries; D005260:Female; D014943:Global Health; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006291:Health Policy / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D028701:Patient Rights; D046269:Reproductive Rights / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D019529:Sexuality; D014480:United Nations / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*