title: Reliability of a novel intracardiac electrogram method for AV And VV delay optimization and comparability to echocardiography procedure for determining optimal conduction delays in CRT patients.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Echocardiography is widely used to optimize CRT programming. A novel intracardiac electrogram method (IEGM) was recently developed as an automated programmer-based method, designed to calculate optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays and provide optimized delay values as an alternative to standard echocardiographic assessment.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This study was aimed at determining the reliability of this new method. Furthermore the comparability of IEGM to existing echocardiographic parameters for determining optimal conduction delays was verified.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eleven patients (age 62.9+/- 8.7; 81% male; 73% ischemic), previously implanted with a cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) underwent both echocardiographic and IEGM-based delay optimization.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Applying the IEGM method, concordance of three consecutively performed measurements was found in 3 (27%) patients for AV delay and in 5 (45%) patients for VV delay. Intra-individual variation between three measurements as assessed by the IEGM technique was up to 20 ms (AV: n=6; VV: n=4). E-wave, diastolic filling time and septal-to-lateral wall motion delay emerged as significantly different between the echo and IEGM optimization techniques (p < 0.05). The final AV delay setting was significantly different between both methods (echo: 126.4 +/- 29.4 ms, IEGM: 183.6 +/- 16.3 ms; p < 0.001; correlation: R = 0.573, p = 0.066). VV delay showed significant differences for optimized delays (echo: 46.4 +/- 23.8 ms, IEGM: 10.9 +/- 7.0 ms; p <0.01; correlation: R = -0.278, p = 0.407).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The automated programmer-based IEGM-based method provides a simple and safe method to perform CRT optimization. However, the reliability of this method appears to be limited. Thus, it remains difficult for the examiner to determine the optimal hemodynamic settings. Additionally, as there was no correlation between the optimal AV- and VV-delays calculated by the IEGM method and the echo optimization, the use of the IEGM method and the comparability to the echo has not been definitely clarified.
authors.affiliation: West-German Heart Center, Department of Cardiology University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany. nico.reinsch@uk-essen.de
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Reinsch
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Buhr
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Huptas
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Buck
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Konorza
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Wieneke
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Erbel