Interpretation of medical information acts by UK occupational physicians.
BACKGROUND
Difficulties arise in applying the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Access to Medical Reports Act 1988 in occupational health practice. There is no guidance on detailed aspects of applying these Acts in practice and consistent advice has proved difficult to obtain.


OBJECTIVE
To audit the understanding and practice of UK occupational physicians to see if a consensus view existed.


METHODS
A postal questionnaire sent to all UK-based Society of Occupational Medicine (SOM) members between December 2005 and June 2006. Responses were analysed using the SPSS 13.0 software.


RESULTS
Responses were received from 726 SOM members, a response rate of 48%. The study revealed wide variation and a limited consensus in practice. Significant differences existed between doctors with a Diploma in Occupational Medicine and those with higher Faculty qualifications, between part-time and full-time practitioners and between doctors who qualified pre- and post-1974.


CONCLUSIONS
The audit revealed wide variation in responding to clinical scenarios in relation to both the Access to Medical Reports and the Data Protection Acts. The findings have implications for clinical practice, policy and research. The majority of respondents reported that national guidance is needed.
Batty
Lucia
L
Department of Occupational Health and Safety, King's College Hospital, London, UK. lucia.batty@kch.nhs.uk
Glozier
Nick
N
Holland-Elliott
Kevin
K
D022126:Access to Information / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D016494:Computer Security / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D008485:Medical Audit; D009787:Occupational Medicine / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006113:United Kingdom