Symbolic control of visual attention: semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention.
Humans routinely use spatial language to control the spatial distribution of attention. In so doing, spatial information may be communicated from one individual to another across opposing frames of reference, which in turn can lead to inconsistent mappings between symbols and directions (or locations). These inconsistencies may have important implications for the symbolic control of attention because they can be translated into differences in cue validity, a manipulation that is known to influence the focus of attention. This differential validity hypothesis was tested in Experiment 1 by comparing spatial word cues that were predicted to have high learned spatial validity ("above/below") and low learned spatial validity ("left/right"). Consistent with this prediction, when two measures of selective attention were used, the results indicated that attention was less focused in response to "left/right" cues than in response to "above/below" cues, even when the actual validity of each of the cues was equal. In addition, Experiment 2 predicted that spatial words such as "left/right" would have lower spatial validity than would other directional symbols that specify direction along the horizontal axis, such as "<--/-->" cues. The results were also consistent with this hypothesis. Altogether, the present findings demonstrate important semantic-based constraints on the spatial distribution of attention.
Gibson
Bradley S
BS
Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA. bgibson@nd.edu
Scheutz
Matthias
M
Davis
Gregory J
GJ
D001288:Attention; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D012660:Semantics; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D013561:Symbolism