The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
People indicate the physical size or the parity status of small numbers faster by a left-hand key and those of larger numbers by a right-hand key. Because magnitude information is not required for successful performance in these tasks, the presence of a number-space association (the SNARC effect) has been taken to indicate the automatic activation of numerical magnitude in all tasks with numerals. In order to test this account, in a series of five experiments, we derived two consensual markers of automatic activation of irrelevant numerical magnitude, the size congruity effect (for judgments of physical size), and the Garner effect (for judgments of parity). Both markers were found independent of the SNARC effect. Consequently, we question the traditional explanation of the SNARC effect and offer an alternative account in terms of a highly overlearned stimulus-response loop.
Fitousi
Daniel
D
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. dxf28@psu.edu
Shaki
Samuel
S
Algom
Daniel
D
D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003657:Decision Making; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008433:Mathematics; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D012858:Size Perception