title: Predictive factors for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer.
abstract: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been utilized as an alternative treatment to endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the complications associated with esophageal ESD and elucidate predictive factors for post-ESD stenosis. The study enrolled a total of 42 lesions of superficial esophageal cancer in 33 consecutive patients who underwent ESD in our department. We retrospectively reviewed ESD-associated complications and comparatively analyzed regional and technical factors between cases with and without post-ESD stenosis. The regional factors included location, endoscopic appearance, longitudinal and circumferential tumor sizes, depth of invasion, and lymphatic and vessel invasion. The technical factors included longitudinal and circumferential sizes of mucosal defects, muscle disclosure and cleavage, perforation, and en bloc resection. Esophageal stenosis was defined when a standard endoscope (9.8 mm in diameter) failed to pass through the stenosis. The results showed no cases of delayed bleeding, three cases of insidious perforation (7.1%), two cases of endoscopically confirmed perforation followed by mediastinitis (4.8%), and seven cases of esophageal stenosis (16.7%). Monovalent analysis indicated that the longitudinal and circumferential sizes of the tumor and mucosal defect were significant predictive factors for post-ESD stenosis (P < 0.005). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the highest sensitivity and specificity for a circumferential mucosal defect size of more than 71% (100 and 97.1%, respectively), followed by a circumferential tumor size of more than 59% (85.7 and 97.1%, respectively). It is of note that the success rate of en bloc resection was 95.2%, and balloon dilatation was effective for clinical symptoms in all seven patients with post-ESD stenosis. In conclusion, the most frequent complication with ESD was esophageal stenosis, for which the sizes of the tumor and mucosal defect were significant predictive factors. Although ESD enables large en bloc resection of esophageal cancer, practically, in cases with a lesion more than half of the circumference, great care must be taken because of the high risk of post-ESD stenosis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan.
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Mizuta
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Nishimori
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Kuratani
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Higashidani
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kohsaki
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Onishi
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002404:Catheterization / Q000379:methods*; D004210:Dissection; D016145:Endoscopy, Digestive System; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D004940:Esophageal Stenosis / Q000453:epidemiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009092:Mucous Membrane / Q000601:surgery; D009361:Neoplasm Invasiveness; D012372:ROC Curve; D019233:Retreatment; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity