title: Type B aortic dissections: treating the many to benefit the few?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  It is now more than a decade since aortic stent-grafts were introduced clinically to provide a less invasive and potentially less harmful therapeutic option to treat type B aortic dissections. However, recent publications on best medical treatment and quality of life in patients with chronic type B dissection support conservative treatment due to the low incidence of aneurysm formation, rupture, and disease-related complications. Against this backdrop, we analyzed our experiences and now discuss whether the availability of endografts allowed us to change indications toward a more aggressive endovascular approach to acute and non-complex type B dissections, seeking to determine which patients we should treat and which ones we should observe.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between 1997 and 2008 in our institution in Heidelberg, we treated 172 patients with acute and chronic type B dissections, most (n = 118, 69%) conservatively. However, 54 patients (40 men; mean age 57 years, range 30-82) underwent endovascular repair; 43% (n = 23) were emergency cases. Patients were followed periodically with computed tomographic angiography.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Correct stent-graft deployment was achieved in 50 (93%) patients; the left subclavian artery was intentionally covered in 30 (55%) cases. Two carotid-subclavian bypass grafts were performed at the time of the endovascular repair due to partial coverage of the left common carotid artery. The perioperative complication rate was 19% (n = 10), but there were no neurological sequelae. The 30-day mortality rate was 11% (n = 6). Over a mean 32.1+/-25 months, 4 other patients died (18.5% overall mortality rate); survival estimates by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 80.4% and 66.1% after 1 and 5 years, respectively. Complete false lumen thrombosis was observed in 32 (60%) and a persisting completely patent false lumen in 3. The aortic expansion rate was 31% (17/54) overall. No difference was found between acute and chronic dissections in terms of survival (p = 0.247).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite a minimally invasive approach, complication and mortality rates for endovascular therapy of type B aortic dissections are considerable. Endografting is limited to symptomatic patients and those with chronic large aneurysmal expansion. At this stage in stent-graft development, asymptomatic patients benefit more from conservative treatment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Germany. dittmar.boeckler@med.uniheidelberg.de
authors.forename: Dittmar
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Böckler
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hyhlik-Dürr
authors.forename: Maani
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hakimi
authors.forename: Tim Frederik
authors.initials: TF
authors.lastname: Weber
authors.forename: Philipp
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Geisbüsch