Superior vena cava perforation following the placement of a superior vena cava filter in males less than 60 years of age.
Although the utility of the superior vena cava (SVC) filter remains controversial, the safety and efficacy of SVC filters in patients with upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated or ineffective have been well described. However, few complications have been reported. Herein we describe a series of three cases of SVC perforation in three young males following the placement of SVC filters. All three patients had deep venous thrombosis on upper extremity duplex ultrasonography and contraindication to anticoagulation (n = 1) or failure of anticoagulation (n = 2). Cardiac tamponade was demonstrated on transthoracic echocardiography in all three cases. The pericardial effusion was evacuated with either median sternotomy or pericardiocentesis in two cases. One of the patients died of cardiac arrest, and an autopsy showed aortic perforation in addition to the SVC perforation. This patient underwent chest compression following the cardiac arrest. One patient was lost to follow-up, and the other patient remained asymptomatic at the 1-year follow-up. This is the first case of SVC perforation that is associated with aortic perforation after the placement of an SVC filter. Owing to this occurrence, one has to be aware of these life-threatening complications when placing an SVC filter, especially in males less than 60 years of age.
Usoh
Fred
F
Division of Vascular Sugery, Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Hingorani
Anil
A
Ascher
Enrico
E
Shiferson
Alexander
A
Tran
Victor
V
Patel
Nirav
N
Marks
Natalie
N