title: Ovulation stimulation after treatment for a molar pregnancy for or against?
abstract: The case of a 29-year-old patient who underwent invitro fertilization due to secondary sterility, after a spontaneous but molar pregnancy, is described. Afterwards there was no spontaneous conception for five years. With the couple's consent, we decided to perform in vitro fertilization, i.e., ovulation induction and the ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) method.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. miroslavagojnicdugalic@yahoo.com
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gojnic
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Dugalic
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Brankovic
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pervulov
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Vasiljevic
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fazlagic