title: Reporting of ethics-related methods in epidemiological research.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This paper describes the variety of ways that information about ethics-related methods are included or not included in public health research articles.
  
  
  METHODS
  Information about the ethics-related content of all articles published in nine highly-respected public health journals in 2006 was extracted.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 989 primary analyses, 73% of the articles commented on ethics committee approval or exemption, 63% mentioned participant consent and 9% indicated whether or not inducement or compensation was given. 84% of articles mentioned a funding source, but fewer than 4% identified any potential conflict of interest. Reporting rates for committee review and consent were higher for experimental than for observational studies and were comparatively higher in studies conducted among potentially vulnerable populations like children and residents of low income countries.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  More complete reporting would facilitate the design, evaluation and comparison of future research studies.
authors.affiliation: Department of Global & Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA. kjacobse@gmu.edu
authors.forename: K H
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Jacobsen