Epidemiological typing of clinical isolates of Achromobacter xylosoxidans: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods.
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the utility of different typing methods for Achromobacter xylosoxidans clinical isolates. Ninety-two blood culture isolates of A. xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans were collected over a 25-month period. The typeability, discriminatory power and reproducibility of commonly used phenotypic and genotypic methods, such as resistotyping, plasmid profiling, whole-cell protein fingerprinting, random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), were compared. All 92 isolates were typeable by all of the methods used, with comparable reproducibility. PFGE showed the highest discriminatory power (98.9%), but whole-cell protein profiling showed better correlation with epidemiological data without significant loss in discriminatory power (94%). Whole-cell protein profiling is a reliable epidemiological tool for the analysis of A. xylosoxidans; PFGE is the most discriminatory.
Kaur
M
M
Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Ray
P
P
Bhatty
M
M
Sharma
M
M
D042441:Achromobacter denitrificans / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000502:physiology; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016470:Bacteremia / Q000382:microbiology*; D015373:Bacterial Typing Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D005838:Genotype; D016905:Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections / Q000382:microbiology*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017720:Molecular Epidemiology / Q000379:methods; D010641:Phenotype; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D055815:Young Adult