[Using fingerprints for health diagnosis: computerised scanning validation].
OBJECTIVE
Validating the computerised scanning of fingerprints as a health diagnosis instrument.


METHODS
A sample of n=15 individuals, two investigators X and two sample methods X. Cummins and Midlo's protocol was used as follows: computerized (M1) and traditional (M2).


RESULTS
M1 had greater quantitative capacity for identifying the number of lines. M1 was more efficient, having a higher level of positivity. There was no significant difference between intra- (M1 and M2) and inter-investigator (investigator 1 x investigator 2) observations, thereby showing M1 reproducibility and reliability. There were significant differences between the mean values of the squares of inter-investigator differences (M2's amplitude was 4 times greater).


CONCLUSIONS
The results showed the efficiency of M1 in processing genetic marker images-fingerprints, thus validating the computerized prototype as a diagnostic instrument health instrument.
Nodari-Junior
Rudy José
RJ
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina-Joaçaba, Santa Catarina, Brasil. rudynodari.junior@unoesc.edu.br
Heberle
Alexandre
A
Ferreira-Emygdio
Rogério
R
Irany-Knackfuss
Maria
M
D001938:Brazil; D003878:Dermatoglyphics; D003933:Diagnosis; D001330:Electronic Data Processing; D006801:Humans