The contribution of spatial cues to memory: direction, but not cue, changes support response reversal learning.
In four experiments, rats were trained on a response problem followed by three reversals. Rats that changed rooms between acquisition and reversals learned the reversals in fewer trials than rats that remained in the same room, even when distal visual cues were limited. Changes in orientation, even in the same room, also facilitated response reversal learning. The advantage observed with changes in orientation across reversals does not appear to be due to differences in local views or to different start positions. Direction changes, but not cue changes, may support response reversal learning by taking advantage of the natural interaction between responses and direction when one map is used.
Wright
Sandra L
SL
Department of Psychology, Sir Wilfred Grenfell College, Corner Brook, NL, Canada. swright@swgc.mun.ca
Williams
Dene
D
Evans
John H
JH
Skinner
Darlene M
DM
Martin
Gerard M
GM
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D001362:Avoidance Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D008297:Male; D018782:Maze Learning / Q000502:physiology; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D051381:Rats; D020318:Rats, Long-Evans; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*