Funding food science and nutrition research: financial conflicts and scientific integrity.
There has been significant public debate about the susceptibility of research to biases of various kinds. The dialogue has extended to the peer-reviewed literature, scientific conferences, the mass media, government advisory bodies, and beyond. Whereas biases can come from myriad sources, the overwhelming focus of the discussion to date has been on industry-funded science. Given the critical role that industry has played and will continue to play in the research process, the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) North America Working Group on Guiding Principles has, in this article, proposed conflict-of-interest guidelines regarding industry funding to protect the integrity and credibility of the scientific record, particularly with respect to health, nutrition, and food-safety science. Eight principles are enumerated, which specify the ground rules for industry-sponsored research. This article, which issues a challenge to the broader scientific community to address all bias issues, is only a first step; the document is intended to be dynamic, prompting ongoing discussion and refinement. In the conduct of public/private research relationships, all relevant parties shall 1) conduct or sponsor research that is factual, transparent, and designed objectively, and, according to accepted principles of scientific inquiry, the research design will generate an appropriately phrased hypothesis and the research will answer the appropriate questions, rather than favor a particular outcome; 2) require control of both study design and research itself to remain with scientific investigators; 3) not offer or accept remuneration geared to the outcome of a research project; 4) ensure, before the commencement of studies, that there is a written agreement that the investigative team has the freedom and obligation to attempt to publish the findings within some specified time frame; 5) require, in publications and conference presentations, full signed disclosure of all financial interests; 6) not participate in undisclosed paid authorship arrangements in industry-sponsored publications or presentations; 7) guarantee accessibility to all data and control of statistical analysis by investigators and appropriate auditors/reviewers; 8) require that academic researchers, when they work in contract research organizations (CRO) or act as contract researchers, make clear statements of their affiliation; and require that such researchers publish only under the auspices of the CRO.
Rowe
Sylvia
S
SR Strategy LLC, Washington, DC, USA.
Alexander
Nick
N
Clydesdale
Fergus M
FM
Applebaum
Rhona S
RS
Atkinson
Stephanie
S
Black
Richard M
RM
Dwyer
Johanna T
JT
Hentges
Eric
E
Higley
Nancy A
NA
Lefevre
Michael
M
Lupton
Joanne R
JR
Miller
Sanford A
SA
Tancredi
Doris L
DL
Weaver
Connie M
CM
Woteki
Catherine E
CE
Wedral
Elaine
E
D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D019649:Food Industry / Q000191:economics; D005524:Food Technology / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D052756:Nutritional Sciences / Q000191:economics*; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards; D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations / Q000592:standards; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011642:Publications / Q000592:standards; D012109:Research Support as Topic; D012586:Science / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States
D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations