Multi-jurisdictional expert opinion for improving children's environmental health protection.
Expert opinion from Canada, the United States and European Union countries was solicited to examine the regulatory and non-regulatory approaches used to protect children's environmental health. Thirty-five experts were interviewed by telephone from June 2004 to March 2005 using an open-ended survey questionnaire. Experts were asked to name legislative and non-legislative tools used to protect children's environmental health in their jurisdiction as well as the effectiveness of approaches taken, barriers, facilitators, methods of evaluation, and recommendations for improving children's health protection. A number of common themes were revealed by experts in different countries as well as novel approaches that could be used to improve children's environmental health. Determining what types of governance and non-governance instruments are most effective based on experience from other jurisdictions, allows for the determination of common, effective, policy choice from shared children's health environmental risks. It also provides a broad classification of different approaches that have been used for children's environmental health. Three main areas suggested for strengthening children's environmental health protection included: research and surveillance, institutional organization, and regulatory capacity.
McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. mtyshenk@uottawa.ca
Michael G
MG
Tyshenko
Michelle C
MC
Turner
Lorraine
L
Craig
Daniel
D
Krewski
D002170:Canada; D002648:Child; D002669:Child Welfare; D003625:Data Collection; D004782:Environmental Health; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000633:toxicity; D005060:Europe; D006801:Humans; D011050:Policy Making; D011640:Public Policy; D018570:Risk Assessment; D014481:United States
D004785:Environmental Pollutants