Cost and workforce implications of subjecting all physicians to aviation industry work-hour restrictions.
BACKGROUND
Efforts to improve patient safety have attempted to incorporate aviation industry safety standards. We sought to evaluate the cost and workforce implications of applying aviation duty-hour restrictions to the entire practicing physician workforce.


METHODS
The work hours and personnel deficit for United States residents and practicing physicians that would be created by the adoption of aviation standards were calculated.


RESULTS
Application of aviation standards to the resident workforce creates an estimated annual cost of $6.5 billion, requiring a 174% increase in the number of residents to meet the deficit. Its application to practicing physicians creates an additional annual cost of $80.4 billion, requiring a 71% increase in the physician workforce. Adding in the aviation industry's mandatory retirement age (65 years) increases annual costs by $10.5 billion. The cost per life-year saved would be $1,035,227.


CONCLUSIONS
Application of aviation duty-hour restrictions to the United States health care system would be prohibitively costly. Alternate approaches for improving patient safety are warranted.
School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA. Michael.J.Payette.02@alum.dartmouth.org
Michael
M
Payette
Abhishek
A
Chatterjee
William B
WB
Weeks
D001359:Aviation; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D013502:General Surgery / Q000191:economics*; D010820:Physicians / Q000191:economics*; D013997:Time Factors; D014481:United States; D000078329:Workforce; D016526:Workload / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*