Ethical issues in using data from quality management programs.
Since the advent of formal, data-driven quality improvement programs in health care in the late 1980s and early 1990s, there are have been questions raised about requirements for ethical committee review of quality improvement activities. A form of consensus emerged through a series of articles published between 1996 and 2007, but there is still significant variation among ethics review committees and individual project leaders in applying broad policies on requirements for committee review and/or written informed consent by participants. Recent developments in quality management, particularly the creation and use of multi-site disease registries, have raised new questions about requirements for review and consent, since the activities often have simultaneous research and quality improvement goals. This article discusses ways in which policies designed for local quality improvement projects and data bases may be adapted to apply to multi-site registries and research projects related to them.
Nerenz
David R
DR
Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd. (K-11), Detroit, MI 48202, USA. dnerenz1@hfhs.org
D026683:Advisory Committees / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000639:trends; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000592:standards*; D009493:Neurosurgery / Q000941:ethics / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012042:Registries / Q000941:ethics / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013122:Spinal Diseases / Q000601:surgery*