title: Peer assessment of professionalism: a five-year experience in medical clerkship.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Faculty assessment of students' professionalism is often based upon sporadic exposure to students. Peers are in a unique position to provide valid judgments of these behaviors.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  (1) To learn if peer assessments of professional conduct correlate with traditional performance measures; (2) to determine if peer assessments of professionalism influence the designation of honors, and (3) to explore student and faculty opinions regarding peer assessment.
  
  
  METHODS
  Internal Medicine Clerkship at Southern Illinois University.
  
  
  METHODS
  Since 2001 anonymous student peer assessments of professionalism have been used in assigning clerkship grades.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Peer assessments of professionalism had weak, though significant, correlations with faculty ratings (r = 0.29), performance on the NBME subject test (r = 0.28), and performance on a cumulative performance assessment (r = 0.30), and did not change the total number of honors awarded. A majority of students (71%) felt comfortable evaluating their peers, and 77% would keep the peer evaluation procedure in place. A majority of faculty (83%) indicated that peer assessments added valuable information.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Peer assessments of professional conduct have little correlation with other performance measures, are more likely to have a positive influence on final clerkship grades, and have little impact on awarding honors.
authors.affiliation: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 701 N First Street-Room C402, PO Box 19636, Springfield, IL 62794-9636, USA. rkovach@siumed.edu
authors.forename: Regina A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Kovach
authors.forename: David S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Resch
authors.forename: Steven J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Verhulst
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002982:Clinical Clerkship / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D010379:Peer Group; D018024:Peer Review, Health Care / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D024382:Professional Role; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends