title: A text of two titles: Kant's 'A renewed attempt to answer the question: "is the human race continually improving"?
abstract: The essay, 'A renewed attempt to answer the question: "Is the human race continually improving?"' appeared as Part II of Kant's 1798 publication, The conflict of the faculties, where it was subordinated under a second title: 'The conflict of the philosophy faculty with the faculty of law'. How did this new situation (and title) affects the meaning of the essay? My argument considers first, the conflict of the faculty of philosophy with the faculty of law; second, the earlier philosophy of history Kant had developed; and, finally, the revision of this position in 'A renewed attempt'. The situation of his argument in the contest between the philosophical and the legal faculties points to other veins of argumentation in Kant's political theory, particularly his appeal to a principle of publicity, but they hardly achieve the theoretical clarity or the systematic centrality they should command. They are displaced in the quest for prediction of the future history of mankind. The question of human progress exceeds the frame of the coordination of the university, and the main question must remain: what was new in Kant's approach to the question of human progress, and was it in fact an enhancement of his philosophy of history? In those terms, 'A renewed attempt' must be regarded a distinct failure. Its innovations prove problematic. Its retreats and equivocations, moreover, threaten to undermine the grander vision of Kant's philosophical history and his political theory, entangling them in an unacceptably theological recourse.
authors.affiliation: Rice University, History Department-MS #42, PO Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251-1892, USA. zammito@rice.edu
authors.forename: John H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Zammito
mesh_terms: D049671:History, 18th Century; D040821:Human Characteristics; D006801:Humans; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history*; D011584:Psychology / Q000266:history*