title: A second national survey of health-related quality of life questionnaires in head and neck oncology.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  With an increasing number of publications on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following head and neck cancer, the recognition of a number of well-validated questionnaires and a growing awareness of the potential role of HRQOL in practice, it was our aim to repeat the survey of 2002 reported in the Annals to see how practice changed.
  
  
  METHODS
  A postal survey of members of the British Association of Head and Neck Oncologists was undertaken in January 2006 with reminders sent in February, March and April.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The response was 50% (106 of 210) of which 53% were using or had used HRQOL questionnaires. The main reasons for not using HRQOL questionnaires were that they were too time-consuming or intrusive in a clinic setting and that there was a lack of resources.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Clinicians still see the use of questionnaires as a research-tool only, rather than an adjunct to giving patient information, promoting choice, and identifying patients with problems. The burden on HRQOL evaluation in routine clinical practice remains a substantial barrier. Advances with IT support in clinic should make it easier to collect and use these data in the future. As surgeons, we still need to be persuaded of the benefits of HRQOL outcomes in our practice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leeds and St James University Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
authors.forename: Anastasios N
authors.initials: AN
authors.lastname: Kanatas
authors.forename: Hisham M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Mehanna
authors.forename: Derek
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Lowe
authors.forename: Simon N
authors.initials: SN
authors.lastname: Rogers
mesh_terms: D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D011788:Quality of Life; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*