title: (Part of) the case for a pragmatic approach to validity: comment on De Houwer, Teige-Mocigemba, Spruyt, and Moors (2009).
abstract: In their review of validity of the Implicit Association Test and affective priming, J. De Houwer, S. Teige-Mocigemba, A. Spruyt, and A. Moors identified validity with establishment of "basic theoretical understanding" of the measures. It is agreed that theoretical understanding has an important role in making measures more valid and useful. Nevertheless, the authors conclude that scientific advancement will more often be well served by prioritizing pragmatic goals of establishing the predictive validity of the measures and their adequate sensitivity to individual differences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology,University of Virginia.
authors.forename: Brian A
authors.identifier: 0000-0001-6797-5476
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Nosek
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Washington.
authors.forename: Anthony G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Greenwald
mesh_terms: D000339:Affect / Q000502:physiology*; D001244:Association; D001290:Attitude; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology; D010556:Personality Tests; D011581:Psychological Tests / Q000592:standards*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis