title: Systematic approach of postoperative gastric conduit complications after esophageal resection.
abstract: Complications after esophagectomy related to ischemia of the graft are dreaded. Prompt assessment of the situation is essential. The series presented describes our experience regarding the evaluation of gastric tube complications. A score is presented classifying flexible endoscopy and CT-scan findings. A retrospective analysis from the charts of 47 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer was conducted. Patients who underwent upper endoscopy during admittance were entered in this study. Findings on flexible endoscopy and CT scan were systematic scored. According to the findings, different attitudes were taken. Between January 2006 and December 2007, 47 patients underwent esophagectomy for cancer. Eleven (23%) out of 47 patients were suspected to have complications related to the viability of the anastomosis. Median period to deterioration was 5 days. In 3 (27%) patients, stent placement was the only intervention necessary. In 2 (18%) patients, stent placement was combined with drainage of abscesses in the upper mediastinum. Five (46%) patients required a new right thoracotomy, with drainage of mediastinal abscesses and empyema. In 2 patients a limited resection and a new cervical anastomosis with a stent was created. Mean intensive care admission and hospital admittance was 30.2 days and 67.9 days, respectively. Two patients (18%) died during hospital admittance. All cervical anastomosis required postoperative dilatation. No complications related to the use of flexible endoscopy were seen. An aggressive policy is adopted in patients deteriorating following esophagectomy. CT-scanning of the thorax and a flexible endoscopy of the gastric conduit should always be performed. Direct therapy should be adopted without delay.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center (VUmc), 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.scheepers@vumc.nl
authors.forename: J J G
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Scheepers
authors.forename: D L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: van der Peet
authors.forename: A A F A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Veenhof
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Heijnen
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Cuesta
mesh_terms: D000038:Abscess / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004322:Drainage; D004653:Empyema / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D016629:Esophagectomy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004944:Esophagoplasty / Q000009:adverse effects; D004947:Esophagus / Q000098:blood supply; D005260:Female; D005773:Gastroscopy; D006801:Humans; D007511:Ischemia / Q000209:etiology; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male; D008477:Mediastinal Diseases / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D008480:Mediastinitis / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology*; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects*; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D015607:Stents; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed