The tissue efficiency of common reconstructive design and modification.
BACKGROUND
Facial reconstructive techniques are capable of restoring a normal anatomic appearance despite the tissue loss resulting from skin cancer removal. Because none of these techniques recreate the lost tissue, most of these techniques require the removal of additional normal tissue in the form of Burow's triangles to achieve this goal.


OBJECTIVE
To analyze the quantity and potential variability of redundant tissue loss encountered during the use of conventional reconstructive techniques through the calculation of tissue efficiency.


METHODS
Conventional reconstructive designs were applied to a standard circular defect using computer-aided design software to determine the surface area of each closure design. Tissue efficiency was defined as the surface area of the defect divided by the total surface area of tissue loss after reconstruction.


RESULTS
Island pedicle flaps (78.5%) and rhombic flaps (68.0%) offer the highest degree of tissue conservation among conventional flap designs.


CONCLUSIONS
The majority of flap designs offer a significant improvement in tissue efficiency over the standard linear closure; they simply result in less overall tissue loss. A number of design modifications can limit or even reduce additional tissue loss while gaining significant advantages in flap mobility or tissue recruitment.
Barlow
James O
JO
Beatrice Keller Clinic, Sun City, Arizona 85375, USA. jamesobarlow@gmail.com
D001830:Body Surface Area; D001837:Body Weights and Measures; D017076:Computer-Aided Design; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D012878:Skin Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*