title: Does family group decision making affect child welfare outcomes? Findings from a randomized control study.
abstract: This article describes the evaluation of two family group decision-making programs (FGDM; Fresno n = 60; Riverside n = 50) administered under the California Title IV-E Waiver Demonstration Project. This is the only evaluation using random assignment to examine FGDM. Overall, results did not indicate more positive outcomes for children receiving the intervention, but did indicate that children were not worse than those receiving traditional services; outcomes examined were related to child safety, placement stability, and permanence.
authors.affiliation: Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA. berzin@bc.edu
authors.forename: Stephanie Cosner
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Berzin
authors.forename: Ed
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Cohen
authors.forename: Karen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.forename: William C
authors.initials: WC
authors.lastname: Dawson
mesh_terms: D002140:California; D002648:Child; D002649:Child Abuse / Q000517:prevention & control*; D002669:Child Welfare / Q000191:economics; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D005380:Financing, Government / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005581:Foster Home Care / Q000191:economics / Q000523:psychology; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D008297:Male; D011368:Professional-Family Relations; D012449:Safety; D012944:Social Support; D012947:Social Work / Q000191:economics