title: [Peri-ictal SPECT in temporal lobe epilepsy: post-surgical evaluation].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of peri-ictal SPECT in localising the epileptogenic region (ER) in candidates for temporal lobectomy to treat medically refractory complex partial seizures (CPS). Interictal and ictal SPECT, MRI and video-EEG results were compared and the positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated in those patients with good surgical outcome.
  
  
  METHODS
  37 patients who had a minimum of 3 years follow-up after surgery were studied retrospectively. Pre-surgical evaluation had included video-EEG monitoring, MRI and interictal and ictal SPECT. These results were compared to the surgically treated ER and successful outcome confirmed by post-surgical clinical follow-up. 29/37 patients remained seizure-free in the post-surgical follow-up. Interictal and peri-ictal SPECT were performed using 740 MBq of 99mTc-HMPAO. Peri-ictal SPECT was ictal in 25 patients and postictal in 12.
  
  
  RESULTS
  ER concordance with video-EEG and peri-ictal SPECT was 86% (32/37 patients). It was 84% (31/37) for MRI and 54% (20/37 patients) for interictal SPECT. Peri-ictal SPECT localised the ER in 8/11 patients with discordant MRI and video-EEG results. Ictal SPECT localised the ER in the correct temporal lobe in 23/25 patients (92% concordance). In the 29 patients with a good surgical outcome, the PPV of video-EEG was 95% (27/29) and it was 90% (26/29) for both MRI and peri-ictal SPECT.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  peri-ictal brain SPECT is well able to localize ER in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Periictal SPECT concordance with ER was as good as video-EEG and MRI and its PPV was as good as that of MRI. We strongly recommend its use in the pre-surgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy, especially when MRI and EEG are discordant.
authors.affiliation: Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain. setoain@clinic.ub.es
authors.forename: X
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Setoain Perego
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Carreño Delgado
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rumià Arboix
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Donaire Pedraza
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Bargalló Alabart
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Serés Roig
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Rubí Sureda
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Boget Llucia
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pintor Pérez
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Fuster Pelfort
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pavía Segura
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Pons Pons
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D004569:Electroencephalography; D004833:Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011184:Postoperative Period; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014741:Video Recording; D055815:Young Adult