title: Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
abstract: How and why do moral judgments vary across the political spectrum? To test moral foundations theory (J. Haidt & J. Graham, 2007; J. Haidt & C. Joseph, 2004), the authors developed several ways to measure people's use of 5 sets of moral intuitions: Harm/care, Fairness/reciprocity, Ingroup/loyalty, Authority/respect, and Purity/sanctity. Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally. This difference was observed in abstract assessments of the moral relevance of foundation-related concerns such as violence or loyalty (Study 1), moral judgments of statements and scenarios (Study 2), "sacredness" reactions to taboo trade-offs (Study 3), and use of foundation-related words in the moral texts of religious sermons (Study 4). These findings help to illuminate the nature and intractability of moral disagreements in the American "culture war."
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA. jgraham@virginia.edu
authors.forename: Jesse
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Graham
authors.forename: Jonathan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Haidt
authors.forename: Brian A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Nosek
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000533:Altruism; D018864:Cultural Diversity; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007062:Identification, Psychological; D019545:Intuition; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009014:Morals; D011057:Politics; D012945:Social Values; D014481:United States