title: Meal patterns of mice under systematically varying approach and unit costs for food in a closed economy.
abstract: Several field and experimental studies have investigated the behavioral economics of food intake. In the laboratory, operant behavior has been used to emulate cost and to generate demand functions that express the relationship between the price of food and amount consumed. There have been few such studies of motivated food seeking and intake in mice, and none has reported demand functions. Using albino (CD1) male mice, the present study compares food intake and meal patterns across a series of ratio cost schedules. The first experiment examined unit price. A closed economy was used in which the mice were in the test chambers for 23 h/day and earned all of their food via either a nose poke or lever press response under fixed (FUP5, FUP10, FUP25, FUP50), variable (VUP10, VUP20, VUP50), and progressive (PUP1.25, PUP1.5, PUP1.75) unit prices. Mice were run for 4 days at each cost. There were no consistent differences between the first and last day indicating that behavioral adjustments to schedule changes occurred rapidly. When averaged across all price schedules, mice in the nose poke group consumed more food than their lever press counterparts but the overall shapes of the demand curves did not differ between the two operant responses, with intake decreasing as price increased. The number of meals taken per day differed between two meal-defining criteria that we applied, and there were some differences between the types of unit price schedule. In the second experiment, approach cost in the form of nose poke responses was required to activate a response device (lever) on which a fixed unit price for food was in force. These approach and unit costs were varied systematically. Meal number decreased, and meal size increased, with increasing approach cost even though nose pokes accounted for only a small fraction of the total response activity. Thus, meal patterns in mice are sensitive to approach cost while total amount consumed is more sensitive to unit price. These data are discussed in terms of the concept of foraging cost as either a unitary or a multidimensional variable.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2250, USA.
authors.forename: Deniz
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Atalayer
authors.forename: Neil E
authors.initials: NE
authors.lastname: Rowland
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001066:Appetite / Q000502:physiology; D001835:Body Weight / Q000502:physiology; D003216:Conditioning, Operant / Q000502:physiology; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004435:Eating / Q000502:physiology* / Q000523:psychology*; D005523:Food Supply / Q000191:economics*; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule