A computational comparison of electron transfer from reduced ferredoxin to flavin adenine dinucleotide and a gold electrode.
We have carried out calculations of the electronic structure of ferredoxin and of the electronic coupling matrix element Hif for electron transfer from reduced ferredoxin to flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and to cluster models of the Au111 surface and a Au111 surface with a mercaptopyridene self-assembled monolayer (SAM). We conclude, based on Hif2, that a gold electrode is approximately 14 times less efficient as an electron acceptor than FAD and that the mercaptopyridine SAM enhances electron transfer. The magnitude of Hif is large enough for these systems that the weak coupling limit approximations may no longer be valid. However, the barrier to electron transfer in the strong coupling limit is computed to be small due to minimal geometry change between oxidized and reduced ferredoxin. MD simulations of the interaction of ferredoxin and protonated pyridine within a water solvation box indicate that the protonated pyridine does strongly orient the ferredoxin, favoring electron transfer as compared to a bare gold surface, where we speculate the orientation of the ferredoxin may be more random.
Walch
Stephen P
SP
Department of Mechanical Engineering; Stanford University; Stanford, California 94305, USA. swalch@stanford.edu
Komadina
Jason D
JD
Prinz
Fritz B
FB
D003198:Computer Simulation; D004566:Electrodes; D004579:Electron Transport; D005288:Ferredoxins / Q000737:chemistry*; D005182:Flavin-Adenine Dinucleotide / Q000737:chemistry*; D006046:Gold / Q000737:chemistry*; D008956:Models, Chemical; D008958:Models, Molecular; D011487:Protein Conformation; D013499:Surface Properties
D005288:Ferredoxins; D005182:Flavin-Adenine Dinucleotide; D006046:Gold