Press releases by academic medical centers: not so academic?
BACKGROUND
The news media are often criticized for exaggerated coverage of weak science. Press releases, a source of information for many journalists, might be a source of those exaggerations.


OBJECTIVE
To characterize research press releases from academic medical centers.


METHODS
Content analysis.


METHODS
Press releases from 10 medical centers at each extreme of U.S. News & World Report's rankings for medical research.


METHODS
Press release quality.


RESULTS
Academic medical centers issued a mean of 49 press releases annually. Among 200 randomly selected releases analyzed in detail, 87 (44%) promoted animal or laboratory research, of which 64 (74%) explicitly claimed relevance to human health. Among 95 releases about primary human research, 22 (23%) omitted study size and 32 (34%) failed to quantify results. Among all 113 releases about human research, few (17%) promoted studies with the strongest designs (randomized trials or meta-analyses). Forty percent reported on the most limited human studies--those with uncontrolled interventions, small samples (<30 participants), surrogate primary outcomes, or unpublished data--yet 58% lacked the relevant cautions.


CONCLUSIONS
The effects of press release quality on media coverage were not directly assessed.


CONCLUSIONS
Press releases from academic medical centers often promote research that has uncertain relevance to human health and do not provide key facts or acknowledge important limitations.


BACKGROUND
National Cancer Institute.
Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont 05009, USA.
Steven
S
Woloshin
Lisa M
LM
Schwartz
Samuel L
SL
Casella
Abigail T
AT
Kennedy
Robin J
RJ
Larson
D000046:Academic Medical Centers; D000818:Animals; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008402:Mass Media; D014481:United States