Cryotherapy and ankle bracing effects on peroneus longus response during sudden inversion.
Cryotherapy and ankle bracing are often used in conjunction as a treatment for ankle injury. No studies have evaluated the combined effect of these treatments on reflex responses during inversion perturbation. This study examined the combined influence of ankle bracing and joint cooling on peroneus longus (PL) muscle response during ankle inversion. A 2x2 RM factorial design guided this study; the independent variables were: ankle brace condition (lace-up brace, control), and treatment (ice, control), and the dependent variables studied were PL stretch reflex latency (ms), and PL stretch reflex amplitude (% of max). Twenty-four healthy participants completed 5 trials of a sudden inversion perturbation to the ankle/foot complex under each ankle brace and cryotherapy treatment condition. No two-way interaction was observed between ankle brace and treatment conditions on PL latency (P=0.283) and amplitude (P=0.884). The ankle brace condition did not differ from control on PL latency and amplitude. Cooling the ankle joint did not alter PL latency or amplitude compared to the no-ice treatment. Ankle bracing combined with joint cooling does not have a deleterious effect on dynamic ankle joint stabilization during an inversion perturbation in normal subjects.
Department of Kinesiology, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA. mcordova@uncc.edu
Mitchell L
ML
Cordova
Lance W
LW
Bernard
Kira K
KK
Au
Timothy J
TJ
Demchak
Marcus B
MB
Stone
JoEllen M
JM
Sefton
D000843:Ankle Joint / Q000502:physiology*; D001915:Braces; D003080:Cold Temperature; D017679:Cryotherapy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007103:Immobilization / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology*; D012026:Reflex, Stretch / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult