Xenotransplantation, consent and international justice.
The risk posed to the community by possible xenozoonosis after xenotransplantation suggests that some form of 'community consent' is required before whole organ animal-to-human xenotransplantation should take place. I argue that this requirement places greater obstacles in the path of ethical xenotransplantation than has previously been recognised. The relevant community is global and there are no existing institutions with democratic credentials sufficient to establish this consent. The distribution of the risks and benefits from xenotransplantation also means that consent is unlikely to be forthcoming. Proceeding on the basis of hypothetical consent to a package of global health measures that includes xenotransplantation, as Rothblatt has recently advocated, is more problematic than she acknowledges. Given that it may place the lives of citizens of poor nations at risk to benefit the citizens of wealthy nations, xenotransplantation raises significant questions of international justice.
Centre for Human Bioethics, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Robert
R
Sparrow
D000818:Animals; D003068:Coercion; D019049:Developed Countries; D003906:Developing Countries; D004196:Disease Outbreaks / Q000517:prevention & control; D014943:Global Health; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000941:ethics* / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics*; D038622:Internationality; D011322:Primary Prevention / Q000941:ethics; D012935:Social Justice / Q000941:ethics; D014183:Transplantation, Heterologous / Q000941:ethics*; D015047:Zoonoses / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000635:transmission*