Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of ventral rectopexy (VR) surgery for treatment of rectal prolapse (RP) and rectal intussusception (RI) in adults. Method MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and other relevant databases were searched to identify studies. Randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized studies with more than 10 patients receiving ventral mesh rectopexy surgery were considered for the review.


RESULTS
Twelve nonrandomized case series studies with 728 patients in total are included in the review. Seven studies used the Orr-Loygue procedure (VR with posterior rectal mobilization to the pelvic floor) and five studies used VR without posterior rectal mobilization. Overall weighted mean percentage decrease in faecal incontinence (FI) rate was 45%. The weighted mean percentage decrease in constipation rate was 24%. Weighted mean recurrence rate was 3.4%.


CONCLUSIONS
There are limitations in published literature on VR. The available data indicate that VR has low recurrence and improves FI in patients suffering from these conditions. There is a greater reduction in postoperative constipation if VR is used without posterior rectal mobilization.
Samaranayake
C B
CB
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Luo
C
C
Plank
A W
AW
Merrie
A E H
AE
Plank
L D
LD
Bissett
I P
IP
D003248:Constipation / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy; D005242:Fecal Incontinence / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D007443:Intussusception / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D017773:Pelvic Floor / Q000601:surgery; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012005:Rectal Prolapse / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D012008:Recurrence; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D013536:Suture Techniques