Congruence of morphologically-defined genera with molecular phylogenies.
Morphologically-defined mammalian and molluscan genera (herein "morphogenera") are significantly more likely to be monophyletic relative to molecular phylogenies than random, under 3 different models of expected monophyly rates: approximately 63% of 425 surveyed morphogenera are monophyletic and 19% are polyphyletic, although certain groups appear to be problematic (e.g., nonmarine, unionoid bivalves). Compiled nonmonophyly rates are probably extreme values, because molecular analyses have focused on "problem" taxa, and molecular topologies (treated herein as error-free) contain contradictory groupings across analyses for 10% of molluscan morphogenera and 37% of mammalian morphogenera. Both body size and geographic range, 2 key macroevolutionary and macroecological variables, show significant rank correlations between values for morphogenera and molecularly-defined clades, even when strictly monophyletic morphogenera are excluded from analyses. Thus, although morphogenera can be imperfect reflections of phylogeny, large-scale statistical treatments of diversity dynamics or macroevolutionary variables in time and space are unlikely to be misleading.
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. djablons@uchicago.edu
David
D
Jablonski
John A
JA
Finarelli
D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D049628:Body Size; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005843:Geography; D008322:Mammals; D008957:Models, Genetic; D008974:Mollusca; D010802:Phylogeny