Relative in vitro rates of attachment and penetration of hydrogel soft contact lenses by haplotypes of fusarium.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the relative abilities of different haplotypes of the Fusarium solani (FSSC)-Fusarium oxysporum (FOSC) complexes to attach to and invade hydrogel contact lenses.


METHODS
Silicone hydrogel and traditional hydroxyethylmethacrylate soft contact lenses were exposed to conidia [10 ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)] of different haplotypes of fusaria associated with the Fusarium keratitis outbreak of 2004-2006. Select lenses and fungi were examined under conditions of organic enrichment. The lenses were incubated with shaking at ambient temperatures, then examined microscopically for the presence of penetration pegs (PPs).


RESULTS
Attachment to and penetration of balafilcon A lenses in PBS within 96 hours were observed with representative isolates of FSSC 1-a, 1-b, and 2-d. Densities and coiled morphology of the PPs were similar. Eight of 8 FOSC failed to attach and form PP in PBS without prior sorption of organics by the lens. Generally, FSSC 1 isolates showed more rapid development of PP. Representatives of all haplotypes, including FSSC 2-c (ATCC 36031, a standard challenge strain), showed at least sparse attachment and penetration of the balafilcon A lens and, to a lesser degree, the lotrafilcon A lens. The development of PP in etafilcon A and galyfilcon A lenses required extended incubations (>21 days) relative to balafilcon A lenses.


CONCLUSIONS
Attachment to and penetration of unworn hydrogel soft contact lenses by Fusarium varied with the strain and lens type rather than with the clinical, environmental, or geographic source of the isolates. Without organic enrichment of the lenses, penetration was more rapid and extensive by representatives of FSSC 1. Penetration was slow and less extensive under these conditions with FOSC and FSSC 2-c and 3. Organic enrichment of the lenses typically favored development of PP by the FOSC. Attachment and penetration of lenses occurred sooner and to a greater extent with surface-treated silicone hydrogel lenses than with the hydroxyethylmethacrylate lens.
Ahearn
Donald G
DG
Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. dgahearn@mindspring.com
Ahear
Donald G
DG
Zhang
Shangtong
S
Stulting
R Doyle
RD
Schwam
Brian L
BL
Simmons
Robert B
RB
Ward
Michael A
MA
Pierce
George E
GE
Crow
Sidney A
SA
D002448:Cell Adhesion; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D003263:Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic / Q000382:microbiology*; D005670:Fusarium / Q000502:physiology*; D006239:Haplotypes; D020100:Hydrogels; D008689:Methacrylates; D016533:Mycological Typing Techniques; D012828:Silicones; D005466:Fluorocarbons
D020100:Hydrogels; D008689:Methacrylates; D012828:Silicones; C523195:balafilcon A; C114176:etafilcon; C540499:galyfilcon A; C481129:lotrafilcon A; D005466:Fluorocarbons