Measures and time points relevant for post-surgical follow-up in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a pilot study.
BACKGROUND
Rheumatic diseases commonly affect joints and other structures in the hand. Surgery is a traditional way to treat hand problems in inflammatory rheumatic diseases with the purposes of pain relief, restore function and prevent progression. There are numerous measures to choose from, and a combination of outcome measures is recommended. This study evaluated if instruments commonly used in rheumatologic clinical practice are suitable to measure outcome of hand surgery and to identify time points relevant for follow-up.


METHODS
Thirty-one patients (median age 56 years, median disease duration 15 years) with inflammatory rheumatic disease and need for post-surgical occupational therapy intervention formed this pilot study group. Hand function was assessed regarding grip strength (Grippit), pain (VAS), range of motion (ROM) (Signals of Functional Impairment (SOFI)) and grip ability (Grip Ability Test (GAT)). Activities of daily life (ADL) were assessed by means of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome (DASH) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The instruments were evaluated by responsiveness and feasibility; follow-up points were 0, 3, 6 and 12 months.


RESULTS
All instruments showed significant change at one or more follow-up points. Satisfaction with activities (COPM) showed the best responsiveness (SMR>0.8), while ROM measured with SOFI had low responsiveness at most follow-up time points. The responsiveness of the instruments was stable between 6 and 12 month follow-up which imply that 6 month is an appropriate time for evaluating short-term effect of hand surgery in rheumatic diseases.


CONCLUSIONS
We suggest a core set of instruments measuring pain, grip strength, grip ability, perceived symptoms and self-defined daily activities. This study has shown that VAS pain, the Grippit instrument, GAT, DASH symptom scale and COPM are suitable outcome instruments for hand surgery, while SOFI may be a more insensitive test. However, the feasibility of this protocol in clinical practice awaits prospective studies.
Sandqvist
Gunnel
G
Department of Rheumatology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. gunnel.sandqvist@skane.se
Johnsson
Pia Malcus
PM
Sturesson
Anna-Lena
AL
Tägil
Magnus
M
Geborek
Pierre
P
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D018771:Arthralgia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery; D001172:Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery*; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D023381:Endpoint Determination / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D018737:Hand Strength / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007596:Joints / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D053580:Muscle Strength / Q000502:physiology; D019637:Orthopedic Procedures / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012107:Research Design; D013997:Time Factors