Functional benefit after modification of radial forearm free flap for soft palate reconstruction.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the velopharyngeal function, swallowing and speech of the conventional and modified radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for soft palate reconstruction.


METHODS
Retrospective clinical study. Twenty-eight patients who underwent oropharyngeal reconstruction with RFFF were divided into two groups: 10 patients had conventional folded RFFF and 18 patients underwent modified method.


RESULTS
The average speech intelligibility score in modified RFFF group was 8.0+/-2.4, and 6.2+/-2.2 in conventional RFFF group (P<0.05). The nasalance was 27.4+/-7.8% in modified group and 38.6+/-2.7% in conventional group during no nasal passage reading and 43.6+/-7.3% in modified group, 55.2+/-7.6% in conventional group during high nasal passage reading (P<0.05). The subjective swallowing functional score was 2.8 in modified group and 2.1 in conventional group.


CONCLUSIONS
The speech assessment and nasalance demonstrate a more favorable outcome in modified group than conventional group.
Kim
Jin-Hwan
JH
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chu
Hyung-Ro
HR
Kang
Jeong-Min
JM
Bae
Woo-Jin
WJ
Oh
So-Jung
SJ
Rho
Young-Soo
YS
Ahn
Hwoe-Young
HY
Jung
Chul-Hoon
CH