Toward a better bioethics: commentary on "Forbidding science: some beginning reflections".
It has been argued that bioethicists too often tend to represent the interests of scientists and not of the broader polity. Indeed, bioethicists seem predisposed to discard the voices and viewpoints of all but the cognoscenti. Focusing particularly on human pluripotent stem cell research, this commentary explores a variety of characterizations of bioethics and bioethicists in relation to forbidding science. Rather than proselytizing or prohibiting, bioethicists should work in partnership with scientists and publics to craft scientifically well-informed and morally sophisticated debates about forbidding science.
Robert
Jason Scott
JS
Center for Biology and Society and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA. Jason.Robert@asu.edu
D001675:Bioethics; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D033041:Embryo Research / Q000941:ethics; D026822:Ethicists / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D028681:Moral Obligations; D039904:Pluripotent Stem Cells; D024382:Professional Role