The anatomy of a slip: Kinetic and kinematic characteristics of slip and non-slip matched trials.
To improve understanding of slip propagation mechanisms, one could compare features of early stance phase during slips and non-slips. This study investigated the similarities and differences in kinematics and utilized COF of paired trials, defined as a matched pair of slip and non-slip trials produced by the same participant walking on the same floor condition at the same walking speed condition. Twenty-two participants produced 47 matched trial pairs while walking at 1.5, 1.8 and 2.1m/s, over a forceplate with an available COF ranging from 0.12 to 0.21. Heel displacement was captured with an infrared motion tracking system and utilized COF was derived from ground reaction forces. ANOVA revealed no significant differences between the slip and non-slip groups in horizontal heel velocity just prior to heel strike or for heel velocity or slip distance during the 20ms period following heel strike. Significant differences were found between the groups in utilized COF and horizontal heel velocity at 25 and 30ms following heel strike. Differences in heel kinematics and kinetics during early stance phase between the slip and non-slip trials are discussed. The results differ from several previous studies, likely due to methodological differences, as the present study was conducted on marginally slippery surfaces, as opposed to very low COF conditions with thick contaminant layers.
McGorry
Raymond W
RW
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Center for Physical Ergonomics, 71 Frankland Rd., Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA. raymond.mcgorry@libertymutual.com
DiDomenico
Angela
A
Chang
Chien-Chi
CC
D000058:Accidental Falls / Q000517:prevention & control*; D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005260:Female; D017276:Friction; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology*; D006365:Heel; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012107:Research Design