[Vaginal descensus and prolapse. Which operative technique?].
Despite the high prevalence of genital prolapse, there are only few studies so far fulfilling the strict criteria of evidence-oriented data acquisition. On the one hand, this complicates the definition of reliable therapy recommendations, on the other hand, it sounds a note of caution in the application of therapy approaches which are new and have not yet been evaluated adequately.The systematic assessment of common therapy concepts for female genital prolapse and its accompanying pathologies has led to a better understanding of the functional and anatomical background within the last few years. Thus, any invasive anatomical correction should strictly be used with the aim of functional improvement and with evidence of persisting effectivity. Under this premise, traditional methods of vaginal and abdominal prolapse repair still come into use. The choice of the operative technique arises from carefully differentiated, interdisciplinary diagnostics and surgery should be performed in experienced centers.
Hamann
M F
MF
Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel. mhamann@urology.uni-kiel.de
Seif
C
C
D003127:Colposcopy / Q000379:methods; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D012086:Reoperation; D055502:Secondary Prevention; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*