title: Comparison of conventional and molecular detection of respiratory viruses in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Sensitive detection of respiratory viruses is important for early diagnosis of infection in patients following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). To evaluate the relative sensitivity of respiratory virus detection in specimens from HCT recipients, we compared the results of conventional and quantitative molecular methods.
  
  
  METHODS
  We tested 688 nasal wash samples collected prospectively from 131 patients during the first 100 days after HCT by viral culture, fluorescent antibody staining (FA), and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza virus types A (FluA) and B (FluB), and parainfluenza virus types 1 (PIV1) and 3 (PIV3). Testing for human metapneumovirus (MPV) was performed only by PCR. Data regarding 10 respiratory symptoms were collected with each sample.
  
  
  RESULTS
  By any method 37 specimens were positive for a respiratory virus; 34 were positive by PCR, 15 by culture, and 6 by FA. Four specimens were positive by all 3 methods (3 RSV, 1 FluA). One specimen was positive for PIV1, and 2 were positive for rhinovirus by culture alone. Specimens positive by PCR alone included 2 RSV, 2 PIV1, 8 PIV3, and 8 MPV. In 10 specimens positive for RSV, PIV, or influenza virus collected from patients reporting no respiratory symptoms, 9, 4, and 1 specimen were positive by PCR, culture, and FA, respectively. Overall, specimens positive only by PCR had significantly fewer viral copies/mL (mean log(10)=4.32) than specimens positive by both PCR and culture (mean log(10)=5.75; P=0.002) or PCR and FA (mean log(10)=6.83; P<0.001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  FA testing alone did not detect a significant proportion of respiratory virus-positive samples in HCT recipients, especially in patients with no respiratory symptoms and patients with PIV detection. PCR increased the yield of positive specimens 2 times relative to culture and more than 4 times relative to FA. Detection of respiratory viruses by PCR alone was associated with lower virus quantities and with fewer reported respiratory symptoms compared with concomitant detection by both PCR and conventional methods, indicating that PCR may be important to detect asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic stages of respiratory viral infections.
authors.affiliation: University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. kuypers@u.washington.edu
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kuypers
authors.forename: A P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cent
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Corey
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Boeckh
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005455:Fluorescent Antibody Technique / Q000379:methods*; D018380:Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006801:Humans; D009296:Nasal Cavity / Q000821:virology*; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods*; D012327:RNA Virus Infections / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000821:virology*; D012328:RNA Viruses / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification; D012137:Respiratory System / Q000821:virology*; D012141:Respiratory Tract Infections / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000821:virology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014776:Virus Cultivation / Q000379:methods*