A comparison of the efficacy and cardiorespiratory effects of four medetomidine-based anaesthetic protocols in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the anaesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of four anaesthetic protocols in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes).


METHODS
Prospective, blinded and randomized complete block design.


METHODS
Ten adult captive red foxes.


METHODS
Foxes were anaesthetized by intramuscular (IM) injection using four protocols in random order: medetomidine 40 microg kg(-1), midazolam 0.3 mg kg(-1) and butorphanol 0.1 mg kg(-1) (MMiB), medetomidine 40 microg kg(-1) and ketamine 4 mg kg(-1) (MK40/4), medetomidine 60 microg kg(-1) and ketamine 4 mg kg(-1) (MK60/4), medetomidine 40 microg kg(-1) and tiletamine/zolazepam 2 mg kg(-1) (MTZ). Time to lateral recumbency, induction time and time to recovery following IM administration of atipamezole 0.2 mg kg(-1) were recorded. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate ((f)R) and rhythm, blood pressure, rectal temperature, end-tidal CO(2) tension (Pe'Co(2)), functional oxygen saturation and presence/absence of interdigital, palpebral and ear reflexes were recorded every 10 minutes, and following administration of atipamezole. Data were analysed using two-way repeated-measures anova with Bonferroni post tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant.


RESULTS
All protocols produced profound sedation with good muscle relaxation. Only the MMiB protocol diverged significantly from the others. Induction of anaesthesia and recovery time following atipamezole were significantly longer, and f(R) and initial HR significantly lower with MMiB than with the other protocols. With all protocols, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was initially relatively high (140-156 mmHg), and decreased significantly over time. With all protocols, the administration of atipamezole resulted in a rapid, significant decrease in MAP and an increase in HR.


CONCLUSIONS
All four protocols provided anaesthetic conditions suitable for minor procedures and allowed endotracheal intubation. The cyclohexanone protocols provided quicker and more reliable inductions and recoveries than the MMiB protocol.
Bertelsen
Mads F
MF
Centre for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. mfb@zoo.dk
Villadsen
Lene
L
D000768:Anesthesia, General / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000662:veterinary*; D018681:Anesthetics, General / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000494:pharmacology*; D000818:Animals; D001794:Blood Pressure; D005260:Female; D005589:Foxes; D006339:Heart Rate; D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology; D008297:Male; D020926:Medetomidine / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000494:pharmacology*; D012119:Respiration
D018681:Anesthetics, General; D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives; D020926:Medetomidine