Six sigma analysis of minimally invasive acetabular arthroplasty: a preliminary investigation.
Minimally invasive techniques in THA may increase the difficulty of acetabular component insertion relative to the optimized position. We sought to determine the ability of eight surgeons to position an acetabular component placed using an anterior-lateral minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach with conventional instruments or computer navigation using an optical imageless protocol compared with conventional true values determined by computed tomography (CT). We introduce a new approach, the Six Sigma process capability index, to assess outliers. Using the Six Sigma process capability index (Cp > 1.3) and the criteria of Lewinnek et al. of +/- 10 degrees for adequate precision, three-dimensional (3D) CT was capable for inclination and anteversion. Computer navigation and visual cues with conventional instrumentation were precise for anteversion but not for inclination. We conclude image-free computer navigation was not better than conventional instrumentation with the surgeons' visual cues for acetabular cup placement. Six Sigma analysis allows comparison of various methods of referencing with literature controls, and our data suggest CT referencing is the most precise method.
Heck
David A
DA
Department of Surgery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Stiehl
James B
JB
D000328:Adult; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods*; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D008875:Middle Aged; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed