title: Origins of the sample-size effect in explicit evaluative judgment.
abstract: This research considers situations in which individuals explicitly form attitude judgments toward a target object after considering a sample of information. Previous research shows sample-size effects under such conditions: Increasing sample size can produce more extreme judgments. Commonly, these effects are attributed to summative processes in information integration. Alternatively, this research proposes that sample size affects perceived reliability of information, which in turn affects the extremity of the subsequent judgment. Three experiments were conducted to empirically substantiate this alternative account. Experiment 1 provides evidence that participants perceive larger samples as more reliable than smaller samples. Experiment 2 demonstrates that perceived reliability mediates the sample-size effect on judgments. Experiment 3 shows that other variables, such as variability, which lowers the perceived reliability, attenuate sample-size effects. The results are explained with reference to the value account model of attitude formation, stating that implicit and explicit modes of attitude formation are guided by different principles of information integration.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Erfurt, Germany. Martina.Kaufmann@uni-erfurt.de
authors.forename: Martina
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kaufmann
authors.forename: Tilmann
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Betsch
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001290:Attitude; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011340:Problem Solving / Q000502:physiology; D018401:Sample Size; D012938:Social Perception