Reforming medical governance in Europe. What is it about institutions?
This article presents a cross-national analytical framework for understanding current attempts to reform medical governance - in particular, those by third parties to control the practice of medicine. The framework pays particular attention to the ways in which institutions shape policy reform. The article also outlines the main comparative findings of case studies of selected reforms and associated processes of negotiations in Denmark, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom. These four countries were selected because they are characterised by theoretically interesting variations in the institutional contexts of medical governance. The analysis suggests that although all the four countries have pushed for more control over the way in which doctors practise medicine, in response to similar imperatives, each country differs in the path it has taken. More specifically, the instruments and techniques brought to bear in each case vary considerably and are directed by a country's political institutions towards a unique path.
Burau
Viola
V
Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark. viola@ps.au.dk
Wilsford
David
D
France
George
G
D005060:Europe; D018166:Health Care Reform; D016134:Organizational Policy; D011057:Politics; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000458:organization & administration; D017009:Professional Autonomy