title: Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions.
abstract: 1. Reproductive interference is a negative interspecific sexual interaction that adversely affects the fitness of males and females during reproductive process. Theoretical studies suggest that because reproductive interference is characterized by positive frequency dependence it is far more likely to cause species exclusion than the density dependence of resource competition. However, the respective contributions of resource competition and reproductive interference to species exclusion, which have been frequently observed in many competition studies, remain unclear. 2. We show that reproductive interference is a far more critical cause of species exclusion than resource competition in the competition between Callosobruchus bean weevil species. In competition experiments over several generations, we manipulated the initial relative abundance of the adzuki bean beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis, and the southern cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. When the initial adult ratio of C. chinensis : C. maculatus were 6 : 2 and 4 : 4, C. chinensis excluded C. maculatus. However, when C. maculatus was four times more abundant than C. chinensis at the start, we observed the opposite outcome. 3. A behavioural experiment using adults of the two species revealed asymmetric reproductive interference. The fecundity and longevity of C. maculatus females, but not those of C. chinensis females, decreased when the females were kept with heterospecific males. Fecundities of females of both species decreased as the number of heterospecific males increased. In contrast, resource competition at the larval stage resulted in higher survival of C. maculatus than of C. chinensis. 4. These results suggest that the positive frequency-dependent effect of reproductive interference resulted in species exclusion, depending on the initial population ratio of the two species, and the asymmetry of the interference resulted in C. chinensis being dominant in this study, as in previous studies. Classical competition studies should be reviewed in light of this evidence for reproductive interference.
authors.affiliation: Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Otsu, Shiga, Japan. kishi@ecology.kyoto-u.ac.jp
authors.forename: Shigeki
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kishi
authors.forename: Takayoshi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nishida
authors.forename: Yoshitaka
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Tsubaki
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D007814:Larva; D008136:Longevity / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D011156:Population Density; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology*; D016019:Survival Analysis; D048889:Weevils / Q000502:physiology*