title: Splint for base-of-thumb osteoarthritis: a randomized trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Some guidelines recommend splinting for base-of-thumb osteoarthritis, despite lack of evidence of efficacy.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the efficacy and acceptability of a splint for base-of-thumb osteoarthritis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Multicenter, randomized trial. Randomization was computer-generated, and allocation was concealed by faxing centralized treatment assignment to investigators at the time of enrollment. Patients and investigators were not blinded to assignment, and patients self-reported outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  2 tertiary care hospitals in France.
  
  
  METHODS
  112 patients (101 women) with base-of-thumb osteoarthritis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Custom-made neoprene splint (n = 57) or usual care (n = 55).
  
  
  METHODS
  Primary outcome was change in pain level assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) (range, 0 to 100 mm) from baseline to 1 month. Secondary outcomes were change in measures of hand disability at 1 month and change in pain level and measures of disability at 12 months. Tolerance and adherence with the splint were recorded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At 1 month, no difference in change occurred in pain level from baseline in the intervention and control groups (adjusted mean change, -10.1 vs. -10.7; between-group difference, 0.6 [95% CI, -7.9 to 9.1]; P = 0.89). Disability was assessed by the Cochin Hand Function Scale score (range, 0 to 90) or patient-perceived disability (VAS, 0 to 100 mm). At 12 months, change in pain from baseline was greater in the intervention group than in the control group (adjusted mean change, -22.2 vs. -7.9; between-group difference, -14.3 [CI, -23.4 to -5.2]; P = 0.002). The Cochin Hand Function Scale score was -1.9 versus 4.3 (between-group difference, -6.3 [CI, -10.9 to -1.7]; P = 0.008) and patient-perceived disability was -11.6 versus 1.5 (between-group difference, -13.1 [CI, -21.8 to -4.4]; P = 0.003). At 12 months, 86% of the intervention group had worn the splint for more than 5 nights a week, and no adverse effects were observed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients, health care providers, and outcome assessors were not blinded.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  For patients with base-of-thumb osteoarthritis, wearing a splint had no effect on pain at 1 month but improved pain and disability at 12 months.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National.
authors.affiliation: Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
authors.forename: François
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Rannou
authors.forename: Jérôme
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dimet
authors.forename: Isabelle
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Boutron
authors.forename: Gabriel
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Baron
authors.forename: Fouad
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Fayad
authors.forename: Yann
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Macé
authors.forename: Johann
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Beaudreuil
authors.forename: Pascal
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Richette
authors.forename: Philippe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Ravaud
authors.forename: Michel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Revel
authors.forename: Serge
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Poiraudeau
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement; D010003:Osteoarthritis / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D010146:Pain / Q000209:etiology; D059408:Pain Management; D010349:Patient Compliance; D013165:Splints / Q000009:adverse effects; D013933:Thumb / Q000503:physiopathology; D016896:Treatment Outcome