Clinical implications of the organizational and activational effects of hormones.
Debate on the relative contributions of nature and nurture to an individual's gender patterns, sexual orientation and gender identity are reviewed as they appeared to this observer starting from the middle of the last century. Particular attention is given to the organization-activation theory in comparison to what might be called a theory of psychosexual neutrality at birth or rearing consistency theory. The organization-activation theory posits that the nervous system of a developing fetus responds to prenatal androgens so that, at a postnatal time, it will determine how sexual behavior is manifest. How organization-activation was or was not considered among different groups and under which circumstances it is considered is basically understood from the research and comments of different investigators and clinicians. The preponderance of evidence seems to indicate that the theory of organization-activation for the development of sexual behavior is certain for non-human mammals and almost certain for humans. This article also follows up on previous clinical critiques and recommendations and makes some new suggestions.
Diamond
Milton
M
University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Pacific Center for Sex and Society, 1960 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. diamond@hawaii.edu
D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D012739:Gonadal Steroid Hormones / Q000502:physiology*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009452:Neuroendocrinology / Q000266:history; D012733:Sex Differentiation / Q000502:physiology*; D012725:Sexual Behavior / Q000502:physiology / Q000523:psychology*; D046468:Sexual Development / Q000502:physiology*; D012931:Social Environment
D012739:Gonadal Steroid Hormones