Conflict of interest policies among institutions and organizations offering chiropractic continuing education.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study is to document and describe the policies governing conflict of interest (COI) among select organizations and institutions offering chiropractic continuing education.


METHODS
Surveys were sent to the following: all North American chiropractic colleges; major national chiropractic organizations; and state chiropractic organizations in states with more than 3500 licensed Doctors of Chiropractic. Each organization or institution was surveyed regarding written and verbal COI policies.


RESULTS
Half of the respondents in this survey indicated that they had written policies for management of COI, whereas half did not. None included most of the common elements typically outlined in continuing medical education COI policies. Content varied among the policies available for review. Relevant financial interest is the issue most often defined, and respondents generally prohibit presenters from selling products or services directly during presentations.


CONCLUSIONS
Overall, these results suggest that processes for managing COI in chiropractic CE are less robust than those previously described for continuing medical education. This study provides preliminary insight into the status of COI management in chiropractic CE.
Funk
Matthew F
MF
Assistant Professor of Clinical Services, University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic, Bridgeport, CT 06604, USA. mfunk@bridgeport.edu
Lisi
Anthony J
AJ
D002684:Chiropractic / Q000193:education*; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D004496:Education, Continuing; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D008004:Licensure / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D015279:Organizational Culture; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States