A stimulus to define informatics and health information technology.
BACKGROUND
Despite the growing interest by leaders, policy makers, and others, the terminology of health information technology as well as biomedical and health informatics is poorly understood and not even agreed upon by academics and professionals in the field.


CONCLUSIONS
The paper, presented as a Debate to encourage further discussion and disagreement, provides definitions of the major terminology used in biomedical and health informatics and health information technology. For informatics, it focuses on the words that modify the term as well as individuals who practice the discipline. Other categories of related terms are covered as well, from the associated disciplines of computer science, information technology and health information management to the major application categories of applications used. The discussion closes with a classification of individuals who work in the largest segment of the field, namely clinical informatics.


CONCLUSIONS
The goal of presenting in Debate format is to provide a starting point for discussion to reach a documented consensus on the definition and use of these terms.
Hersh
William
W
Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. hersh@ohsu.edu
D005380:Financing, Government / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D008490:Medical Informatics / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D008491:Medical Informatics Applications; D008492:Medical Informatics Computing / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D014481:United States