The uncertain foundation of neo-Darwinism: metaphysical and epistemological pluralism in the evolutionary synthesis.
The Evolutionary Synthesis is often seen as a unification process in evolutionary biology, one which provided this research area with a solid common theoretical foundation. As such, neo-Darwinism is believed to constitute from this time onward a single, coherent, and unified movement offering research guidelines for investigations. While this may be true if evolutionary biology is solely understood as centred around evolutionary mechanisms, an entirely different picture emerges once other aspects of the founding neo-Darwinists' views are taken into consideration, aspects potentially relevant to the elaboration of an evolutionary worldview: the tree of life, the ontological distinctions of the main cosmic entities (inert matter, biological organisms, mind), the inherent properties of self-organizing matter, evolutionary ethics, and so on. Profound tensions and inconsistencies are immediately revealed in the neo-Darwinian movement once this broader perspective is adopted. This pluralism is such that it is possible to identify at least three distinct and quasi-incommensurable epistemological/metaphysical frameworks as providing a proper foundation for neo-Darwinism. The analysis of the views of Theodosius Dobzhansky, Bernhard Rensch, and Ernst Mayr will illustrate this untenable pluralism, one which requires us to conceive of the neo-Darwinian research agenda as being conducted in more than one research programme or research tradition at the same time.
Delisle
Richard G
RG
Philosophy and Liberal Education, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. richard.delisle@uleth.ca
D005075:Biological Evolution; D001695:Biology / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D008678:Metaphysics; D012106:Research / Q000266:history; D012107:Research Design