Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Despite the considerable amount of evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, uncertainty remains regarding the efficacy and safety of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared to conventional ventilation in the early treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. This results in a wide variation in the clinical use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for this indication throughout the world. The reasons are an unexplained heterogeneity between trial results and a number of unanswered, clinically important questions. Do infants with different risk profiles respond differently to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation? How does the ventilation strategy affect outcomes? Does the delay--either from birth or from the moment of intubation--to the start of high-frequency oscillation modify the effect of the intervention? Instead of doing new trials, those questions can be addressed by re-analyzing the individual patient data from the existing randomized controlled trials.


METHODS
A systematic review with meta-analysis based on individual patient data. This involves the central collection, validation and re-analysis of the original individual data from each infant included in each randomized controlled trial addressing this question.The study objective is to estimate the effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on the risk for the combined outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia or a severe adverse neurological event. In addition, it will explore whether the effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation differs by the infant's risk profile, defined by gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction, severity of lung disease at birth and whether or not corticosteroids were given to the mother prior to delivery. Finally, it will explore the importance of effect modifying factors such as the ventilator device, ventilation strategy and the delay to the start of high-frequency ventilation.


CONCLUSIONS
An international collaborative group, the PreVILIG Collaboration (Prevention of Ventilator Induced Lung Injury Group), has been formed with the investigators of the original randomized trials to conduct this systematic review. In the field of neonatology, individual patient data meta-analysis has not been used previously. Final results are expected to be available by the end of 2009.
Cools
Filip
F
Department of Neonatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussels, Belgium. filip.cools@uzbrussel.be
Askie
Lisa M
LM
Offringa
Martin
M
D001997:Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D002543:Cerebral Hemorrhage / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D003625:Data Collection; D005865:Gestational Age; D006612:High-Frequency Ventilation / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007226:Infant Mortality; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007234:Infant, Premature; D007235:Infant, Premature, Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000628:therapy*; D007969:Leukomalacia, Periventricular / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D008499:Medical Records; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D015337:Multicenter Studies as Topic; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012107:Research Design; D012127:Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000628:therapy*; D012196:Review Literature as Topic; D016896:Treatment Outcome