title: [Post-utilitarianism and the Prioritisation Debate].
abstract: Pure utilitarianism has come to be a rare position in the ethics of health resource allocation. Most authors favour a combination of a utility-maximising criterion with other criteria, notably fairness-related ones. Classical utilitarianism, though, claimed to be a moral theory that is already fair by itself. Trying to combine a utilitarian starting point with fairness-related ideas originating from anti-utilitarian criticism may result in inconsistent axiologies. The article is a report of discussions arguing the point.
authors.affiliation: Universität Leipzig, Institut für Philosophie, Leipzig. Weyma.Luebbe@psk.uni-regensburg.de
authors.forename: Weyma
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Lübbe
mesh_terms: D002961:Civil Rights / Q000941:ethics / Q000592:standards; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000941:ethics* / Q000592:standards; D028663:Ethical Theory; D005858:Germany; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals