Is it really medicine? The traditional and alternative medicine act and informal health economy in the Philippines.
This article examines one developing country's (Philippines) experience in legalizing the age-old but controversial practice and use of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM). The case studies in this article shed light on the problems, challenges, and opportunities offered by herbal therapies, natural products, and alternative healing methods, and the policy context in which they exist. The study finds that normative, axiological, and ethical considerations underlie the legitimacy of TCAM. These become critical when the scientific basis or validity of a therapy, product, or modality is at issue and political consensus is not readily available. The study suggests that both the objective and subjective aspects of TCAM be carefully evaluated in the process of integrating the informal and formal health care systems in developing countries. That, in turn, would require proactive regulatory and development-oriented roles on the part of their governments.
Mendoza
Roger Lee
RL
205 Hadleigh Drive, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003, USA. profdrmendoza@yahoo.com
D000529:Complementary Therapies / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D033161:Government Regulation; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D010679:Philippines; D011050:Policy Making; D011634:Public Health