title: [Quality evaluation of a neuro-development follow-up program of very low birthweight infants].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Advances in perinatology have been associated with improved survival of very low birth weight (VLBW;<1500 g) infants. These children have an increased risk of future neurological and development handicaps. A set of quality indicators have been recommended for the neurodevelopment follow-up programs in this group of patients.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To analyze our neurodevelopment follow-up program according to these quality of care indicators in 5 post-discharge follow-up areas: general care; physical health; vision, hearing, speech and language; developmental and behaviour assessment; and psychosocial issues.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fifty-one VLWB patients born in 2000 who have completed our 6-year follow-up program have been retrospectively studied. The agreement between our program and the standard of quality is evaluated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A copy of a discharge summary of the patient's neonatal course is present in the medical record in 92% of the cases. The inclusion of clinical data and general medical aspects in the medical summary is heterogeneous. Somatometric evaluation for the first two years of age is always present in a filled-in graphic. The international classification of the retinopathy of the preterm (RDP) is used in 100% of the patients. An ophthalmologic examination for RDP is performed in 72% (37/51) of the infants before hospital discharge; of the other 28%, only in 6 patients the date of the outpatient examination is present. Specific evaluations and interventions are performed within the recommended period of time in most of the children with suspected or neurosensory handicaps. More than ninety per cent of the patients are referred to the neurodevelopment specialist and most of them go to the visit (90.2% between 9 and 15 months and 78.4% between 21 and 30 months). Recommendations for a psycho-educational assessment are followed in the extremely premature (BW<1000 g and/or 28 weeks of gestational age) children. The number of patients who follow the program decreases with time. Psychosocial evaluation does not usually appear in the medical records of the patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We have a good adherence to most of the recommended indicators in our follow-up program. The evaluation of these indicators is a useful tool to analyze the quality of a developmental follow-up program and to improve it.
authors.affiliation: Servicio de Neonatología, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. tagut@hsjdbcn.org
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Agut Quijano
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Conde Cuevas
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Iriondo Sanz
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Poo Argüelles
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ibáñez Fanes
authors.forename: X
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Krauel Vidal
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002657:Child Development; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D019102:Infant, Very Low Birth Weight; D009420:Nervous System / Q000254:growth & development; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012189:Retrospective Studies