Relationality and social interaction.
This paper explores Bourdieu's account of a relational social space, and his relative neglect of social interaction within this framework. Bourdieu includes social capital as one of the key relational elements of his social space, but says much less about it than economic or cultural capital, and levels of social capital are rarely measured in his work. Bourdieu is reluctant to focus on the content of social networks as part of his rejection of substantialist thinking. The neglect of substantive networks creates problems for Bourdieu's framework, because many of Bourdieu's core concepts rest upon assumptions about their interactional properties (in particular, the prevalence of homophilous differential association) which are left unexamined. It is argued here that Bourdieu's neglect of the substance of social networks is related to the criticisms that Bourdieu's framework often encounters, and that this neglect bears re-examination, since it is helpful to think of the ways in which differentiated social networks contribute to the development of habitus, help form fields, and so constitute the intersubjective social relations within which sociality, and practice more generally, occur.
Bottero
Wendy
W
Sociology Department, University of Manchester. wendy.bottero@manchester.ac.uk
D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008019:Life Style; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012098:Reproduction; D012922:Social Change; D012924:Social Conditions; D012925:Social Conformity; D012933:Social Identification; D012934:Social Isolation; D012944:Social Support; D012951:Socialization; D012961:Sociology / Q000379:methods