title: Late termination of pregnancy: a comparison of obstetricians' experience in eight European countries.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the experience and attitude of obstetricians in Europe towards late termination of pregnancy and the factors affecting their responses.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cluster sampling cross-sectional survey. All neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)-associated maternity units were recruited (census sampling) in Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Sweden. In France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK, units were selected at random. In every recruited unit, all obstetricians with at least 6 months' experience were invited to participate.
  
  
  METHODS
  NICU-associated maternity units in eight European countries.
  
  
  METHODS
  Obstetricians with at least 6 months' clinical experience.
  
  
  METHODS
  An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was used. Multinomial logistic analysis was used to identify factors predicting the obstetricians' views about modifying the law governing late termination in their country.
  
  
  METHODS
  Obstetricians' experience of late termination of pregnancy and views about national policies.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One hundred and five units and 1530 obstetricians participated (response rates 70 and 77% respectively). The most common indications for late termination were congenital anomalies and women's physical health. Feticide was not common except in France, Luxembourg and the UK. Active euthanasia of a liveborn was practiced in France and the Netherlands. Obstetricians in Germany were more likely to feel that late termination should be more severely restricted, the opposite was true in Spain and the Netherlands. In Italy, there was dissatisfaction with current status, but opinion was divided, reflecting views on both sides of the debate.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This research outlines current practice in a difficult and sensitive area and suggests the need for more discussion and support for all those who were involved.
authors.affiliation: Reproductive Sciences Section, Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. mah6@le.ac.uk
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Habiba
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Da Frè
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Arnaud
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Bleker
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lingman
authors.forename: M M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Gomez
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Gratia
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Heyl
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Viafora
mesh_terms: D000032:Abortion, Therapeutic / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D003376:Counseling; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D007751:Labor, Induced / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D008875:Middle Aged; D009774:Obstetrics; D011247:Pregnancy; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires