title: Executive functioning and imitation: Increasing working memory load facilitates behavioural imitation.
abstract: If perceptual and bodily states are closely linked and if perceiving action automatically leads to corresponding activations in one's own motor system, then why do not we imitate all the time? There is evidence suggesting that executive functioning (EF) may play a moderating role in inhibiting overt imitation [e.g. Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books]. In an experiment we tested this idea. 48 participants received either a high or low working memory (WM) load and were instructed to respond to either a finger cue or spatial cue with a finger movement. Results indicate that occupying WM facilitates reaction times to finger cues while responses to simple spatial cues are unchanged. The findings suggest that imitation is indeed a dominant response and EF is needed to inhibit the spontaneous tendency to imitate.
authors.affiliation: Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.vanleeuwen@bsi.ru.nl
authors.forename: Matthijs L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: van Leeuwen
authors.forename: Rick B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: van Baaren
authors.forename: Douglas
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Martin
authors.forename: Ap
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dijksterhuis
authors.forename: Harold
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Bekkering
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D056344:Executive Function / Q000502:physiology*; D005385:Fingers / Q000294:innervation; D006801:Humans; D007100:Imitative Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*