Expanding the universe of universal coverage: the population health argument for increasing coverage for immigrants.
As the US recession deepens, furthering the debate about healthcare reform is now even more important than ever. Few plans aimed at facilitating universal coverage make any mention of increasing access for uninsured non-citizens living in the US, many of whom are legally restricted from certain types of coverage. We conducted a critical review of the public health literature concerning the health status and access to health services among immigrant populations in the US. Using examples from infectious and chronic disease epidemiology, we argue that access to health services is at the intersection of the health of uninsured immigrants and the general population and that extending access to healthcare to all residents of the US, including undocumented immigrants, is beneficial from a population health perspective. Furthermore, from a health economics perspective, increasing access to care for immigrant populations may actually reduce net costs by increasing primary prevention and reducing the emphasis on emergency care for preventable conditions. It is unlikely that proposals for universal coverage will accomplish their objectives of improving population health and reducing social disparities in health if they do not address the substantial proportion of uninsured non-citizens living in the US.
Nandi
Arijit
A
Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Loue
Sana
S
Galea
Sandro
S
D054242:Emigrants and Immigrants; D054624:Health Status Disparities; D054625:Healthcare Disparities; D006801:Humans; D011634:Public Health; D014481:United States; D019472:Universal Health Insurance / Q000458:organization & administration*