Fuel and vehicle technology choices for passenger vehicles in achieving stringent CO2 targets: connections between transportation and other energy sectors.
The regionalized Global Energy Transition (GET-R 6.0) model has been modified to include a detailed description of light-duty vehicle options and used to investigate the potential impact of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and concentrating solar power (CSP) on cost-effective fuel/vehicle technologies in a carbon-constrained world. Total CO2 emissions were constrained to achieve stabilization at 400-550 ppm, by 2100, at lowesttotal system cost The dominantfuel/vehicle technologies varied significantly depending on CO2 constraint future cost of vehicle technologies, and availability of CCS and CSP. For many cases, no one technology dominated on a global scale. CCS provides relatively inexpensive low-CO2 electricity and heatwhich prolongs the use of traditional ICEVs. CSP displaces fossil fuel derived electricity, prolongs the use of traditional ICEVs, and promotes electrification of passenger vehicles. In all cases considered, CCS and CSP availability had a major impact on the lowest cost fuel/vehicle technologies, and alternative fuels are needed in response to expected dwindling oil and natural gas supply potential by the end of the century.
Grahn
M
M
Department of Energy and Environment, Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden. maria.grahn@chalmers.se
Azar
C
C
Williander
M I
MI
Anderson
J E
JE
Mueller
S A
SA
Wallington
T J
TJ
D001272:Atmosphere / Q000737:chemistry; D001336:Automobiles; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000737:chemistry*; D004736:Energy-Generating Resources; D005579:Fossil Fuels / Q000191:economics; D005742:Gasoline; D006859:Hydrogen / Q000191:economics; D012993:Solar Energy; D014186:Transportation
D005579:Fossil Fuels; D005742:Gasoline; D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D006859:Hydrogen