Neuroimaging, culture, and forensic psychiatry.
The spread of neuroimaging technologies around the world has led to diverse practices of forensic psychiatry and the emergence of neuroethics and neurolaw. This article surveys the neuroethics and neurolegal literature on the use of forensic neuroimaging within the courtroom. Next, the related literature within medical anthropology and science and technology studies is reviewed to show how debates about forensic neuroimaging reflect cultural tensions about attitudes regarding the self, mental illness, and medical expertise. Finally, recommendations are offered on how forensic psychiatrists can add to this research, given their professional interface between law and medicine. At stake are the fundamental concerns that surround changing conceptions of the self, sickness, and expectations of medicine.
Aggarwal
Neil K
NK
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. neil.k.aggarwal@gmail.com
D001921:Brain / Q000473:pathology*; D003415:Crime / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000523:psychology; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging; D004532:Ego; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D011329:Prisoners / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D011379:Prognosis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014481:United States