title: A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the psychometric evidence relating to Constant-Murley score.
  
  
  METHODS
  A search of 3 databases (Medline, CINAHL, and EMBASE) and a manual search yielded 35 relevant publications. Pairs of raters used structured tools to analyze these articles, through critical appraisal and data extraction. A descriptive synthesis of the psychometric evidence was then performed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Quality ratings of 23% of the studies reviewed reached a level of 75% or higher. Studies evaluating the content validity of the Constant-Murley score suggest that the description in the original publication is insufficient to accomplish standardization between centers and evaluators. Despite this limitation, the Constant-Murley score correlates strongly (>or= 0.70) with shoulder-specific questionnaires, reaches acceptable benchmarks (rho > 0.80) for its reliability coefficients, and is responsive (effect sizes and standardized response mean > 0.80) for detecting improvement after intervention in a variety of shoulder pathologies.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This systematic review provides evidence to support the use of the Constant-Murley score for specific clinical and research applications but underscores the need for greater standardization and precaution when interpreting scores. Methods to improve standardization and measurement precision are needed. Responsiveness has been shown to be excellent, but some properties still need be evaluated, particularly those related to the absolute errors of measurement and minimal clinically important difference.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Given the widespread acceptance for usage of the Constant-Murley score in clinical studies and early indications that the measure is responsive, studies defining more rigid standardization of the tools/procedures are needed.
  
  
  METHODS
  Level 1.
authors: School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada. jean-sebastien.roy.1@ulaval.ca
authors: Jean-Sébastien
authors: JS
authors: Roy
authors: Joy C
authors: JC
authors: MacDermid
authors: Linda J
authors: LJ
authors: Woodhouse
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living / Q000523:psychology; D001172:Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Q000175:diagnosis; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000175:diagnosis; D008297:Male; D015588:Observer Variation; D011594:Psychometrics; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D012785:Shoulder Joint / Q000503:physiopathology*; D020069:Shoulder Pain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards