Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS).
Public trust in organizations that are involved in the management and use of new technologies affects lay judgments about the risks and benefits associated with these technologies. In turn, judgments about risks and benefits influence lay attitudes toward these technologies. The validity of this (indirect) effect of trust on lay attitudes toward new technologies, which is referred to as the causal chain account of trust, has up till now only been examined in correlational research. The two studies reported in this article used an experimental approach to more specifically test the causal chain account of trust in the context of carbon dioxide capture and storage technology (CCS). Complementing existing literature, the current studies explicitly distinguished between two different types of trust in organizations: competence-based trust (Study 1) and integrity-based trust (Study 2). In line with predictions, results showed that the organizational position regarding CCS implementation (pro versus con) more strongly affected people's risk and benefit perceptions and their subsequent acceptance of CCS when competence-based trust was high rather than low. In contrast, the organizational position had a greater impact on people's level of CCS acceptance when integrity-based trust was low rather than high.
Terwel
Bart W
BW
Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. bterwel@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Harinck
Fieke
F
Ellemers
Naomi
N
Daamen
Dancker D L
DD
D001290:Attitude; D001709:Biotechnology; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000737:chemistry*; D004777:Environment; D005260:Female; D017752:Greenhouse Effect; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010465:Perception; D011639:Public Opinion; D012306:Risk; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D035502:Trust
D002245:Carbon Dioxide