title: Myoblast transfer in ischemic heart failure: effects on rhythm stability.
abstract: Skeletal myoblast (SM) implantation promotes recovery of myocardial function after ischemic injury. Clinical observations suggest an association of SM implantation and ventricular arrhythmias. Support for this link has been sought in animal studies, but none employing models of congestive heart failure. In a canine model of postinfarction congestive heart failure (CHF) we compared the frequency of rhythm disturbances using ambulatory electrocardiography monitoring following skeletal myoblast or saline (SAL) implantation. In 19 mongrel dogs ischemic injury and CHF were induced by intracoronary microsphere infusions. Direct intramyocardial injection of autologous skeletal myoblasts (ASM) (2.7-8.3 x 10(8) cells) or SAL controls was administered to 11 and 8 dogs, respectively. Serial echocardiography and 24-h ambulatory electrocardiography were recorded at baseline (after CHF induction) and at 4 weeks and at 8-10 weeks after injection. Comparisons between groups of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias, supraventricular arrhythmias, and measures of heart rate variability (HRV) were made at each of the three time points. LVEF increased from 41 +/- 6% to 47 +/- 2% (p < 0.03) in the ASM group, and did not change (42 +/- 6% to 40 +/- 2%, p = ns) in SAL. After injection, no differences were seen in the number of dogs demonstrating ventricular tachycardia (n = 3 vs. n = 2, p = ns) or frequent PVCs (n = 3 vs. n = 3, p = ns) in the ASM versus SAL groups, respectively. Significant changes were observed in a time-domain measure of HRV, standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR interval (in ms: 4 weeks 174 +/- 95 vs. 242 +/- 19; 8 weeks 174 +/- 78 vs. 276 +/- 78, ASM vs. SAL), but not in other time domain parameters. In this canine model of ischemic CHF, ASM implantation did not result in a significant increase in ventricular arrhythmias compared to controls animals. The potential for ASM implantation to affect time-domain parameters of HRV merits further study.
authors: Division of Cardiology, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. ws2157@columbia.edu
authors: Warren
authors: W
authors: Sherman
authors: Kun-Lun
authors: KL
authors: He
authors: Geng-Hua
authors: GH
authors: Yi
authors: Jie
authors: J
authors: Wang
authors: Jack
authors: J
authors: Harvey
authors: Myung J
authors: MJ
authors: Lee
authors: Howard
authors: H
authors: Haimes
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Lee
authors: Emma
authors: E
authors: Miranda
authors: Sunil
authors: S
authors: Kanwal
authors: Daniel
authors: D
authors: Burkhoff
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001145:Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D004285:Dogs; D015716:Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; D006333:Heart Failure / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006339:Heart Rate / Q000502:physiology*; D006439:Hemodynamics; D032446:Myoblasts / Q000637:transplantation*; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000628:therapy*; D017180:Tachycardia, Ventricular / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D014463:Ultrasonography; D016277:Ventricular Function, Left