title: Effectiveness of voice therapy in reflux-related voice disorders.
abstract: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with laryngopharyngeal reflux plays a significant role in voice disorders. A significant proportion of patients attending ear, nose, and throat clinics with voice disorders may have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). There is no controlled study of the effect of voice therapy on GERD. We assessed the effect of voice therapy in patients with dysphonia and GERD. Thirty-two patients with dysphonia and GERD underwent indirect laryngoscopy and voice analysis. Esophageal and laryngeal symptoms were assessed using the reflux symptom index (RSI). At endoscopy, esophagitis was graded according to Los Angeles classification. Patients were randomized to receive either voice therapy and omeprazole (20 mg bid) (n=16, mean [SD] age 36.1 [9.6] y; 5 men; Gp A) or omeprazole alone (n=16, age 31.8 [11.7] y; 9 men; Gp B). During voice analysis, jitter, shimmer, harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR) and normalized noise energy (NNE) were assessed using the Dr. Speech software (version 4 1998; Tigers DRS, Inc). Hoarseness and breathiness of voice were assessed using a perceptual rating scale of 0-3. Parameters were reassessed after 6 weeks, and analyzed using parametric or nonparametric tests as applicable. In Group A, 9 patients had Grade A, 3 had Grade B, and 1 had Grade C esophagitis; 3 had normal study. In Group B, 8 patients had Grade A, 2 had Grade B esophagitis, and 6 had normal study. Baseline findings: median RSI scores were comparable (Group A 20.0 [range 14-27], Group B 19.0 [15-24]). Median rating was 2.0 for hoarseness and breathiness for both groups. Values in Groups A and B for jitter 0.5 (0.6) versus 0.5 (0.8), shimmer 3.1 (2.5) versus 2.8 (2.0), HNR 23.0 (5.6) versus 23.1 (4.2), and NNE -7.3 (3.2) versus -7.2 (3.4) were similar. Post-therapy values for Groups A and B: RSI scores were 9.0 (5-13; P<0.01 as compared with baseline) and 13.0 (10-17; P<0.01), respectively. Ratings for hoarseness and breathiness were 0.5 (P<0.01) and 1.0 (P<0.01) and 2.0. Values for jitter were 0.2 (0.0; P=0.02) versus 0.4 (0.7), shimmer 1.3 (0.7; P<0.01) versus 2.3 (1.2), HNR 26.7 (2.3; P<0.01) versus 23.7 (3.2), and NNE -12.3 (3.0, P<0.01) versus -9.2 (3.4; P<0.01). Improvement in the voice therapy group was significantly better than in patients who received omeprazole alone. Dysphonia is a significant problem in GER. Treatment for GER improves dysphonia, but in addition, voice therapy enhances the improvement.
authors: Department of Audiology and Speech Therapy, BYL Nair Hospital and TN Medical College, Mumbai, India.
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Vashani
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Murugesh
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Hattiangadi
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Gore
authors: V
authors: V
authors: Keer
authors: V S
authors: VS
authors: Ramesh
authors: V
authors: V
authors: Sandur
authors: S J
authors: SJ
authors: Bhatia
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000897:Anti-Ulcer Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D055154:Dysphonia / Q000209:etiology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D004941:Esophagitis / Q000145:classification / Q000150:complications / Q000209:etiology; D005260:Female; D005764:Gastroesophageal Reflux / Q000150:complications*; D006685:Hoarseness / Q000209:etiology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D007828:Laryngoscopy; D008297:Male; D009853:Omeprazole / Q000627:therapeutic use; D014834:Voice Training
chemical_list: D000897:Anti-Ulcer Agents; D009853:Omeprazole