title: Comparison of training between 2 cycle ergometers on dynamic balance for middle-aged women.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Interval cycle training could positively influence dynamic balance in middle-aged women.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare training effects of a strength ergometer and a standard ergometer on 3 dynamic balance tests.
  
  
  METHODS
  Repeated measures.
  
  
  METHODS
  Laboratory.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventeen women were randomly assigned to standard (n = 10) or strength cycle ergometry (n = 7). A control group consisted of 7 women.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ergometry interval training (3 sessions/wk for 4 wk).
  
  
  METHODS
  Three balance tests-the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), timed up-and-go (TUG), and four-square step test (FSST)-were performed at pretraining and 4 wk posttraining.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Four SEBT directions improved and faster scores for FSST and TUG tests for the standard-cycle group were found, whereas the strength-cycle group only improved their TUG scores. No changes posttraining for the control group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Stationary cycle training should be included in the dynamic balance-rehabilitation protocol for middle-aged women.
authors: Department of Physical Therapy, University of Findlay, Findlay, OH, USA.
authors: Lucinda E
authors: LE
authors: Bouillon
authors: Douglas K
authors: DK
authors: Sklenka
authors: Amy C
authors: AC
authors: Driver
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004867:Equipment Design; D016552:Ergometry / Q000295:instrumentation*; D015444:Exercise; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D004856:Postural Balance / Q000502:physiology*