title: Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  GP appraisal is currently considered inadequate because it lacks robustness. Objective assessment of appraisal evidence is needed to enable judgements on professional performance to be made.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine GP appraisers' views of the acceptability, feasibility, and educational impact of external peer feedback received on three core appraisal activities undertaken as part of this study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Independent peer review and cross-sectional postal questionnaire study.
  
  
  METHODS
  NHS Scotland.
  
  
  METHODS
  One of three core appraisal activities (criterion audit, significant event analysis, or video of consultations) was undertaken by GP appraisers and subjected to peer review by trained colleagues. A follow-up postal questionnaire elicited participants' views on the potential acceptability, feasibility, and educational impact of this approach.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 164 appraisers, 80 agreed to participate; 67/80 (84%) submitted one of three appraisal materials for peer review and returned completed questionnaires. For significant event analyses (n = 44), most responders believed the peer feedback method was feasible (100%) and fair (92.5%) and would add value to appraisal (95.5%). Peer feedback on criterion audits (n = 15) was believed to be acceptable and fair (93.3%) and it was thought it would be a useful educational tool (100%). Completing a consultation video (n = 8) was perceived to be feasible as part of normal general practice (n = 5). It was unanimously agreed that assessment of videos by peers has educational impact and would help improve appraisal.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This group of GP appraisers strongly supported the role of external and independent feedback by trained peers as one approach to strengthening the existing appraisal process.
authors: Postgraduate General Practice Education, NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow. paul.bowie@nes.scot.nhs.uk
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Bowie
authors: Niall
authors: N
authors: Cameron
authors: Ian
authors: I
authors: Staples
authors: Rhona
authors: R
authors: McMillan
authors: John
authors: J
authors: McKay
authors: Murray
authors: M
authors: Lough
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards*; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D018024:Peer Review, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D012606:Scotland / Q000453:epidemiology