Supplemental energy and extruded-expelled cottonseed meal as a supplemental protein source for beef cows consuming low-quality forage.
Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of supplemental energy and extruded-expelled cottonseed meal (ECSM; 30.6% CP; 44% NDF, 10.2% fat; DM basis) as a protein supplement (SUP) to spring-calving beef cows (n = 96; 535 kg initial BW; 5.4 initial BCS) consuming low-quality forage during late gestation and early lactation. Supplementation of ECSM was compared with 2 traditional cottonseed meal-based SUP. For all experiments, SUP provided equal CP. On a DM basis, SUP included 1) a blend of 76% wheat middlings and 18% solvent-extracted cottonseed meal (WMCSM); 2) solvent-extracted cottonseed meal (CSM); and 3) delinted, extruded-expelled cottonseed meal (ECSM). In Exp. 1, cows were individually fed SUP 3 d/wk until calving and 4 d/wk during lactation; total SUP period was 95 d. Tall-grass prairie hay (4.4% CP; 74% NDF; DM basis) was provided during the SUP period. Changes in cow BW during gestation (P = 0.23), over the SUP period (P = 0.27), and over the 301-d experiment (P = 0.56) were similar. Changes in BCS were similar during gestation (P = 0.78), over the SUP period (P = 0.95) and over the 301-d experiment (P = 0.37). Calf birth weights (P = 0.21) and BW at weaning (P = 0.76) were not different. Percentage of cows exhibiting luteal activity at the beginning of breeding season (P = 0.59), AI conception rate (P = 0.71), and pregnancy rate at weaning (P = 0.88) were not different. In Exp. 2, 18 cows in early lactation from Exp. 1 were used to determine the effect of SUP on hay intake and digestion. Hay intake tended (P = 0.10) to be greater for CSM than ECSM. Intake of OM and DM was greater for WMCSM (P <or= 0.02) compared with CSM and ECSM; likewise, digested DMI and OM intake were greater (P <or= 0.02) for WMCSM. Apparent total tract digestibility of crude fat was greater for ECSM than CSM (P = 0.03). In Exp. 3, cows (n = 20/treatment) of similar days postpartum were machine-milked to determine SUP effect on milk production and composition. Butterfat, protein, lactose, and milk urea N were not different (P > 0.10). Similarly, 24-h milk production was not different (P = 0.25). Neither greater energy intake of cows consuming WMCSM nor greater fat intake of cows consuming ECSM influenced cow performance measures or calf weaning weight. Cow response to SUP with ECSM compared with traditional cottonseed meal-based SUP indicates that ECSM is a viable source of supplemental protein for beef cows consuming low-quality forage.
Winterholler
S J
SJ
Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Lalman
D L
DL
Hudson
M D
MD
Goad
C L
CL
D000821:Animal Feed / Q000592:standards*; D000818:Animals; D001724:Birth Weight / Q000502:physiology; D001824:Body Constitution / Q000502:physiology; D001835:Body Weight / Q000502:physiology; D002417:Cattle / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D003369:Cottonseed Oil / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D004044:Dietary Proteins / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D004063:Digestion / Q000502:physiology; D004435:Eating / Q000502:physiology; D002149:Energy Intake / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007774:Lactation / Q000502:physiology; D008892:Milk / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D011247:Pregnancy; D011897:Random Allocation; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology; D012621:Seasons
D003369:Cottonseed Oil; D004044:Dietary Proteins