title: Endovascular repair vs open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparative utilization trends from 2001 to 2006.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Within the past few years, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has come into use for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). In many cases, EVAR has the potential to replace traditional open surgical repair (OSR), which is more invasive, risky, and expensive. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent EVAR is replacing OSR, whether the frequency of treatment is increasing with the advent of the less invasive approach, and which specialties are performing the procedures.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Medicare Part B data sets for 2001 through 2006 were studied. Procedure volume and utilization rates per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries were determined for the 7 Current Procedural Terminology, fourth edition, procedure codes that describe EVAR and the 4 codes that describe OSR for AAA. Medicare's physician specialty codes were used to ascertain the specialties of the physician providers.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 31,965 OSRs for AAA were performed in Medicare beneficiaries in 2001, dropping to 15,665 by 2006 (-51%). In contrast, EVAR was carried out in 11,028 instances in 2001, increasing to 28,937 by 2006 (+162%). The utilization rate per 100,000 for OSR dropped from 90 to 42 (a rate decrease of 48) during the study period, while the rate for EVAR increased from 31 to 77 (a rate increase of 46). The combined utilization rate per 100,000 of the two types of interventions for AAA (EVAR and OSR) decreased from 121 in 2001 to 119 in 2006. In performing EVAR, procedure volume and market share in 2006 by specialty were 1) 22,003 procedures by surgeons, a 76% share; 2) 3,287 procedures by radiologists, an 11% share; 3) 1,915 procedures by cardiologists, a 7% share; and 4) 1,732 procedures by all other physicians, a 6% share.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Treatment for AAA seems to be an example of the responsible use of new technology by physicians. The newer, less invasive, and less risky procedure (EVAR) is replacing the older and more invasive procedure (OSR) to a considerable degree. However, the overall combined utilization rate of both types of AAA treatment has remained stable in the Medicare population. There is thus no evidence to suggest that the introduction of the newer approach has led to the overtreatment of patients. Although radiologists do have a role in EVAR, surgeons strongly predominate.
authors: Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. david.levin@jeffersonhospital.org
authors: David C
authors: DC
authors: Levin
authors: Vijay M
authors: VM
authors: Rao
authors: Laurence
authors: L
authors: Parker
authors: Andrea J
authors: AJ
authors: Frangos
authors: Jonathan H
authors: JH
authors: Sunshine
mesh_terms: D017544:Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000601:surgery*; D001807:Blood Vessel Prosthesis / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004621:Embolization, Therapeutic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015994:Incidence; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015607:Stents / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology; D014656:Vascular Surgical Procedures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*