The practice of classification and the theory of evolution, and what the demise of Charles Darwin's tree of life hypothesis means for both of them.
Debates over the status of the tree of life (TOL) often proceed without agreement as to what it is supposed to be: a hierarchical classification scheme, a tracing of genomic and organismal history or a hypothesis about evolutionary processes and the patterns they can generate. I will argue that for Darwin it was a hypothesis, which lateral gene transfer in prokaryotes now shows to be false. I will propose a more general and relaxed evolutionary theory and point out why anti-evolutionists should take no comfort from disproof of the TOL hypothesis.
Doolittle
W Ford
WF
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. ford@dal.ca
D005075:Biological Evolution; D002965:Classification / Q000379:methods*; D022761:Gene Transfer, Horizontal / Q000235:genetics*; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010802:Phylogeny