title: Detection of colo-rectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of contrast enhanced US, multidetector CT, PET/CT, and 1.5 Tesla MR with extracellular and reticulo-endothelial cell specific contrast agents.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To compare contrast-enhanced US (CE-US), multidetector-CT (MDCT), 1.5 Tesla MR with extra-cellular (Gd-enhanced) and intracellular (SPIO-enhanced) contrast agents and PET/CT, in the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 34 patients with colo-rectal adenocarcinoma underwent preoperatively CE-US, MDCT, Gd- and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging (MRI), and PET/CT. Each set of images was reviewed independently by two blinded observers. The ROC method was used to analyze the results, which were correlated with surgical findings, intraoperative US, histopathology, and MDCT follow-up.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 57 hepatic lesions were identified: 11 hemangiomas, 29 cysts, 1 focal fatty liver, 16 metastases (dimensional distribution: 5/16 < 5 mm; 3/16 between 5 mm and <10 mm; 8/16 ≥ 10 mm). Six of 34 patients were classified as positive for the presence of at least one metastasis. Considering all the metastases and those ≥ 10 mm, ROC areas showed no significant differences between Gd- and SPIO-enhanced MRI, which performed significantly better than the other modalities (P < 0.05). Considering the lesions <10 mm, ROC areas showed no significant differences between all modalities; however MRI presented a trend to perform better than the other techniques. Considering the patients, ROC areas showed no significant differences between all the modalities; however PET/CT seemed to perform better than the others.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Gd- and SPIO-enhanced MRI seem to be the most accurate modality in the identification of liver metastases from colo-rectal carcinoma. PET/CT shows a trend to perform better than the other modalities in the identification of patients with liver metastases.
authors: IBB CNR, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. pierpamainenti@hotmail.com
authors: Pier Paolo
authors: PP
authors: Mainenti
authors: Marcello
authors: M
authors: Mancini
authors: Ciro
authors: C
authors: Mainolfi
authors: Luigi
authors: L
authors: Camera
authors: Simone
authors: S
authors: Maurea
authors: Antonietta
authors: A
authors: Manchia
authors: Michela
authors: M
authors: Tanga
authors: Francesco
authors: F
authors: Persico
authors: Pietro
authors: P
authors: Addeo
authors: Dario
authors: D
authors: D'Antonio
authors: Antonio
authors: A
authors: Speranza
authors: Luigi
authors: L
authors: Bucci
authors: Giovanni
authors: G
authors: Persico
authors: Leonardo
authors: L
authors: Pace
authors: Marco
authors: M
authors: Salvatore
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000556:secondary* / Q000601:surgery; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D003287:Contrast Media; D003911:Dextrans; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005260:Female; D019788:Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA; D006801:Humans; D007472:Iohexol / Q000031:analogs & derivatives; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000556:secondary* / Q000601:surgery; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D058185:Magnetite Nanoparticles; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012372:ROC Curve; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D003911:Dextrans; D058185:Magnetite Nanoparticles; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D019788:Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; D007472:Iohexol; C038192:iopromide; C065507:ferumoxides; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA