Cost-effectiveness analysis of cognitive behaviour therapy for treatment of minor or mild-major depression in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for the economic evaluation alongside the MIND-DIA randomized controlled trial (MIND-DIA CEA).
BACKGROUND
Depression and elevated depression symptoms are more prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes than in those without diabetes and are associated with adverse health outcomes and increased total healthcare utilization. This suggests that more effective depression treatment might not only improve health outcome, but also reduce costs. However, there is a lack of evidence on (cost-) effectiveness of treatment options for minor and mild-major depression in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this paper we describe the design and methods of the economic evaluation, which will be conducted alongside the MIND-DIA trial (Cognitive behaviour therapy in elderly type 2 diabetes patients with minor or mild-major depression). The objective of the economic evaluation (MIND-DIA CEA) is to examine incremental cost-effectiveness of a diabetes specific cognitive behaviour group therapy (CBT) as compared to intensified treatment as usual (TAU) and to a guided self-help group intervention (SH).


METHODS
Patients will be followed for 15 months. During this period data on health sector costs, patient costs and societal productivity/time costs will be collected in addition to clinical data. Person-years free of moderate/severe major depression, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and cumulative costs will be estimated for each arm of the trial (CBT, TAU and SH). To determine cost-effectiveness of the CBT, differences in costs and effects between the CBT group and TAU/SH group will be calculated.


CONCLUSIONS
CBT is a potentially effective treatment option to improve quality of life and to avoid the onset of a moderate/severe major depression in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes and minor or mild-major depression. This hypothesis will be evaluated in the MIND-DIA trial. Based on these results the associated economic evaluation will provide additional evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CBT in this target population. Methodological strengths and weaknesses of the planned economic evaluation are discussed.


BACKGROUND
The MIND-DIA study has been registered at the Current Controlled Trials Register (ISRCTN58007098).
Chernyak
Nadja
N
Institute of Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Research Centre, Düsseldorf, Germany. nadja.chernyak@ddz.uni-duesseldorf.de
Petrak
Frank
F
Plack
Kristin
K
Hautzinger
Martin
M
Müller
Matthias J
MJ
Giani
Guido
G
Icks
Andrea
A
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000379:methods; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000150:complications / Q000191:economics* / Q000628:therapy*; D003865:Major Depressive Disorder / Q000150:complications / Q000191:economics / Q000628:therapy; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000150:complications / Q000191:economics* / Q000628:therapy*; D023381:Endpoint Determination / Q000379:methods; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D016896:Treatment Outcome