Predator-induced changes in metabolism cannot explain the growth/predation risk tradeoff.
Defence against predators is usually accompanied by declining rates of growth or development. The classical growth/predation risk tradeoff assumes reduced activity as the cause of these declines. However, in many cases these costs cannot be explained by reduced foraging effort or enhanced allocation to defensive structures under predation risk. Here, we tested for a physiological origin of defence costs by measuring oxygen consumption in tadpoles (Rana temporaria) exposed to predation risk over short and long periods of time. The short term reaction was an increase in oxygen consumption, consistent with the "fight-or-flight" response observed in many organisms. The long term reaction showed the opposite pattern: tadpoles reduced oxygen consumption after three weeks exposure to predators, which would act to reduce the growth cost of predator defence. The results point to an instantaneous and reversible stress response to predation risk. This suggests that the tradeoff between avoiding predators and growing rapidly is not caused by changes in metabolic rate, and must be sought in other behavioural or physiological processes.
Steiner
Ulrich K
UK
Zoological Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. usteiner@stanford.edu
Van Buskirk
Josh
J
D000818:Animals; D007814:Larva / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000502:physiology; D010101:Oxygen Consumption; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D011896:Rana temporaria / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000502:physiology