Repeated eyewitness identification procedures: memory, decision making, and probative value.
Two experiments examined the effects of multiple identification procedures on identification responses, confidence, and similarity relationships. When the interval between first and second identification procedures was long (Experiment 1), correct and false identifications increased, but the probative value of a suspect identification changed little; consistent witnesses were more confident than inconsistent witnesses; and the similarity relationships between suspect and foils were unchanged. When the interval between first and second identification procedures was short (Experiment 2), suspect identification rates changed little, but foil identifications increased significantly; confidence for all identifications increased; consistent witnesses were more confident than inconsistent witnesses; and similarity relationships changed such that witnesses were less likely to identify the suspect as being the best match to the perpetrator.
Godfrey
Ryan D
RD
Psychology Department, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. ryan.godfrey@email.ucr.edu
Clark
Steven E
SE
D003418:Criminology / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D012933:Social Identification