A comparison between written and spoken narratives in aphasia.
The aim of the present study was to explore how a personal narrative told by a group of eight persons with aphasia differed between written and spoken language, and to compare this with findings from 10 participants in a reference group. The stories were analysed through holistic assessments made by 60 participants without experience of aphasia and through measurement of lexical and syntactic variables. The findings showed that the participants with aphasia generally received lower ratings than the reference group, but also that stories written by participants with aphasia were rated as easier to understand, more interesting, and more coherent than the group's spoken stories. Regression analysis showed that syntax could predict several of the rated variables for the stories told by the participants with aphasia. Results point to the need to include writing training in language rehabilitation in order to increase the ability for persons with aphasia to participate in communicative situations in everyday life.
Behrns
Ingrid
I
University of Gothenburg, Sweden. ingrid.behrns@neuro.gu.se
Wengelin
Asa
A
Broberg
Malin
M
Hartelius
Lena
L
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001037:Aphasia / Q000523:psychology*; D032882:Comprehension; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D008297:Male; D008606:Mental Processes; D008875:Middle Aged; D033262:Narration; D012044:Regression Analysis; D013060:Speech; D014956:Writing