Comparison of a SAM splint-molded cervical collar with a Philadelphia cervical collar.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effectiveness of a SAM splint molded into a cervical collar with that of a Philadelphia cervical collar at limiting movement of the cervical spine in 5 different movements.


METHODS
This study was prospectively carried out in 13 healthy volunteer subjects. A hand-held goniometer was then used to measure degrees of maximal extension (starting in a maximally flexed position), rotation (left and right), and lateral flexion (left and right) with each collar. The results were then analyzed for the 5 independent movements using the paired t test to determine the effectiveness of the SAM splint compared with that of the Philadelphia collar.


RESULTS
There was no statistically significant difference between the Philadelphia collar and the SAM splint at limiting movement of the cervical spine in any of the measured movements or in total allowed degrees of movement.


CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study suggest that the SAM splint, when molded into a cervical collar, is as effective as the Philadelphia collar at limiting movement of the cervical spine.
McGrath
Todd
T
Drexel University College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Mecicine, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. tmcgrath@drexelmed.edu
Murphy
Crystal
C
D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000293:injuries*; D006801:Humans; D007103:Immobilization / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D009068:Movement; D009333:Neck; D009989:Orthotic Devices; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000517:prevention & control*; D013165:Splints