Failures and complications in patients with birth defects restored with fixed dental prostheses and single crowns on teeth and/or implants.
OBJECTIVE
To assess retrospectively, over at least 5 years, the incidences of technical and biological complications and failures in young adult patients with birth defects affecting the formation of teeth.


METHODS
All insurance cases with a birth defect that had crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) inserted more than 5 years ago were contacted and asked to participate in a reexamination.


RESULTS
The median age of the patients was 19.3 years (range 16.6-24.7 years) when prosthetic treatment was initiated. Over the median observation period of 15.7 years (range 7.4-24.9 years) and considering the treatment needs at the reexamination, 19 out of 33 patients (58%) with reconstructions on teeth remained free from all failures or complications. From the patients with FDPs and single unit crowns (SCs) on implants followed over a median observation period of 8 years (range 4.6-15.3 years), eight out of 17% or 47% needed a retreatment or repair at some point due to a failure or a complication. From the three groups of patients, the cases with amelogenesis/dentinogenesis imperfecta demonstrated the highest failure and complication rates. In the cases with cleft lip, alveolus and palate (CLAP) or hypodontia/oligodontia, 71% of the SCs and 73% of the FDPs on teeth (FDP T) remained complication free over a median observation period of about 16 years. Sixty-two percent of the SCs and 64% of the FDPs on implants remained complication free over 8 years. Complications occurred earlier with implant-supported reconstructions.


CONCLUSIONS
Because healthy, pristine teeth can be left unprepared, implant-supported SCs and FDPs are the treatment choice in young adults with birth defects resulting in tooth agenesis and in whom the edentulous spaces cannot be closed by means of orthodontic therapy. However, the trend for earlier and more frequent complications with implant-supported reconstructions in young adults, expecting many years of function with the reconstructions, has to be weighed against the benefits of keeping teeth unprepared. In cases with CLAP in which anatomical conditions render implant placement difficult and in which teeth adjacent to the cleft require esthetic corrections, the conventional FDP T still remains the treatment of choice.
Krieger
Oliver
O
School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Matuliene
Giedre
G
Hüsler
Jürg
J
Salvi
Giovanni E
GE
Pjetursson
Bjarni
B
Brägger
Urs
U
D000293:Adolescent; D000567:Amelogenesis Imperfecta / Q000628:therapy; D000848:Anodontia / Q000628:therapy; D002971:Cleft Lip / Q000150:complications*; D002972:Cleft Palate / Q000150:complications*; D003442:Crowns; D015921:Dental Implants; D019094:Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003811:Dentinogenesis Imperfecta / Q000628:therapy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009065:Mouth Rehabilitation / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014071:Tooth Abnormalities / Q000628:therapy*; D055815:Young Adult
D015921:Dental Implants