title: The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale version 2: a clinimetric evaluation in patients with severe complex neurodisability.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the clinimetric properties of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (RCS) in a neurorehabilitation inpatient sample.
  
  
  METHODS
  Observational cohort analysis in a tertiary specialist setting.
  
  
  METHODS
  179 consecutive patients (mean age 44.5 years (SD 15 years), males:females 110:69) with complex neurological disabilities, mainly following acquired brain injury.
  
  
  METHODS
  Repeat RCS ratings of the level of care, nursing, therapy and medical interventions were examined for dimensionality, repeatability, consistency and responsiveness, and compared with the Northwick Park Nursing and Therapy Dependency Scales, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Barthel Index, recorded at the start and end of treatment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The test-retest reliability confirmed the RCS to be repeatable (kappa 0.93 to 0.96) and moderately responsive to changes in levels of intervention over the course of the programme, suggesting the need for serial evaluation. Coefficient-alpha was 0.76 and item-total correlations all >0.50, with moderate to high loadings on the first principal component. Factor analysis revealed two clear factors ('Nursing/medical care,' and 'Therapies'). The RCS demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity with the Northwick Park Nursing and Therapy Dependency Scales but some ceiling effect. FIM motor and Barthel scores correlated well with basic care and nursing scores (Spearman rho -0.65 to -0.79) but less well with therapy (rho -0.26) and medical (rho -0.28 to -0.33) scores.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this cohort, the RCS provided a reliable, valid and moderately responsive profile of rehabilitation interventions, separating into two main subscales. It usefully identified medical and therapy inputs not captured by the FIM and Barthel Index, which are commonly used to define case complexity in rehabilitation.
authors: King's College London, School of Medicine, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK. lynne.turner-stokes@dial.pipex.com
authors: Lynne
authors: L
authors: Turner-Stokes
authors: Heather
authors: H
authors: Williams
authors: Richard J
authors: RJ
authors: Siegert
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D002561:Cerebrovascular Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D003858:Dependency, Psychological; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020380:Needs Assessment; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D005791:Patient Care / Q000592:standards*; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult