title: Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Management: 2nd European Rectal Cancer Consensus Conference (EURECA-CC2).
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  During the first decade of the 21st century a number of important European randomized studies were published. In order to help shape clinical practice based on best scientific evidence from the literature, the International Conference on 'Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Treatment: Looking for an European Consensus' (EURECA-CC2) was organized in Italy under the endorsement of European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), and European Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ESTRO).
  
  
  METHODS
  Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method. The document was available to all Committee members as a web-based document customized for the consensus process. Eight chapters were identified: epidemiology, diagnostics, pathology, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, treatment toxicity and quality of life, follow-up, and research questions. Each chapter was subdivided by a topic, and a series of statements were developed. Each member commented and voted, sentence by sentence thrice. Sentences upon which an agreement was not reached after voting round # 2 were openly debated during a Consensus Conference in Perugia (Italy) from 11 December to 13 December 2008. A hand-held televoting system collected the opinions of both the Committee members and the audience after each debate. The Executive Committee scored percentage consensus based on three categories: "large consensus", "moderate consensus", and "minimum consensus".
  
  
  RESULTS
  The total number of the voted sentences was 207. Of the 207, 86% achieved large consensus, 13% achieved moderate consensus, and only 3 (1%) resulted in minimum consensus. No statement was disagreed by more than 50% of the members. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the members, and the majority was voted on by >85%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This Consensus Conference represents an expertise opinion process that may help shape future programs, investigational protocols, and guidelines for staging and treatment of rectal cancer throughout Europe.
authors: Cattedra di Radioterapia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, largo Gemelli 8, Rome, Italy. vvalentini@rm.unicatt.it
authors: Vincenzo
authors: V
authors: Valentini
authors: Cynthia
authors: C
authors: Aristei
authors: Bengt
authors: B
authors: Glimelius
authors: Bruce D
authors: BD
authors: Minsky
authors: Regina
authors: R
authors: Beets-Tan
authors: Jose M
authors: JM
authors: Borras
authors: Karin
authors: K
authors: Haustermans
authors: Philippe
authors: P
authors: Maingon
authors: Jens
authors: J
authors: Overgaard
authors: Lars
authors: L
authors: Pahlman
authors: Phil
authors: P
authors: Quirke
authors: Hans-Joachim
authors: HJ
authors: Schmoll
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Sebag-Montefiore
authors: Irving
authors: I
authors: Taylor
authors: Eric
authors: E
authors: Van Cutsem
authors: Cornelius
authors: C
authors: Van de Velde
authors: Numa
authors: N
authors: Cellini
authors: Paolo
authors: P
authors: Latini
mesh_terms: D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004032:Diet; D006801:Humans; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011788:Quality of Life; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D012307:Risk Factors