Ethical considerations of research in disaster-stricken populations.
Recently, emphasis has been placed on improving and expanding research in disaster response and the treatment of disaster-stricken populations. However, research in these settings presents unique ethical challenges with which the scientific and biomedical ethics communities continue to struggle. At the core of the controversy is the question of how best to balance the critical need for research with the equally important obligation to respect and protect the interests of research participants within the unique stress of a disaster. This concern stems from the potential of increased vulnerability of individuals stricken by disaster over and above their usual vulnerability to risk and exploitation as research subjects. Ethical principles that must be considered in these situations are the same as those that are important when conducting any human research: respect for persons, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. This paper explores the ethical challenges that accompany inadequate resources and personnel, the potential vulnerability of research participants, the dual role of physician-researcher, and the importance of the public's perception and trust are explored. It then proposes a number of potential avenues through which to conduct ethically justifiable research that could answer many of the pressing questions in disaster medicine and response.
Jesus
John E
JE
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, West CC-2, One Deaconess Road, Boston, MA 02215, USA. jjesus@bidmc.harvard.edu
Michael
Glen E
GE
D004190:Disasters; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D054527:Mass Casualty Incidents; D011634:Public Health; D012066:Relief Work; D012107:Research Design; D035862:Vulnerable Populations