A new endoscopic spine system: the first results with "Easy GO".
OBJECTIVE
Endoscopy meets increasing interest by spine surgeons. However, endoscopic results are diverging and many spinal endoscopic systems are difficult to apply and handle.


METHODS
A system for endoscopic spinal surgery was developed where the main goals were: (1) easy intraoperative handling with standard microsurgical techniques, and (2) avoidance of a prolonged learning curve. The system consists of various dilators, two different work sheaths, two different 30 degrees endoscopes, and an endoscope holder.


RESULTS
Between August 2006 and April 2008, 80 spinal surgeries were performed in degenerative lumbar spine cases (mean age 52 years, range 22-85 years). Intraoperatively, the system was easy to handle. Standard microsurgical techniques were used. Mean surgical time scored 75 min (range 28-168 min). There was no intraoperative complication, no new postoperative deficit and no infection. In four cases, the endoscope was abandoned and the procedure microsurgically continued (5%). At the last follow-up (mean FU 10 months, range 2 weeks up to 21 months), 89% of the patient were pain free (71/80). Four patients suffered from recurrent disc prolapses (5%). Another five patients (6%) were not satisfied without evidence of re-prolaps. Of those who answered the questionnaire of patient satisfaction, 83% (45/54) considered their postoperative status as excellent, 13% as good (7/54), 4% were not satisfied (2/54).


CONCLUSIONS
The Easy GO system was easy and safe to handle with the standard bimanual microsurgical technique and good postoperative results. Further studies are needed to show a significant advantage of the technique in comparison to the microsurgical standard procedure.
Oertel
Joachim M K
JM
Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitaetsmedizin, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universitaet, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. oertelj@freenet.de
Mondorf
Yvonne
Y
Gaab
Michael R
MR
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002420:Cauda Equina / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000601:surgery; D019299:Decompression, Surgical / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D017587:Diskectomy, Percutaneous / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D019723:Endoscopes / Q000592:standards; D004724:Endoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000601:surgery*; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control; D011843:Radiculopathy / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D012086:Reoperation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012585:Sciatica / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D013115:Spinal Canal / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D013126:Spinal Nerve Roots / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000601:surgery; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult