title: Clinician versus nurse symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events during chemotherapy: results of a comparison based on patient's self-reported questionnaire.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Monitoring adverse events during chemotherapy by clinicians is a standard practice but clinicians may report fewer side-effects or lower symptom severity than patients. Our aim was to compare symptoms self-reported by patients with symptoms registered by clinicians and nurses, to assess validity of a nurse reporting.
  
  
  METHODS
  From April to August 2007, a double-blind questionnaire with 13 common items graduated according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events was completed by clinicians and nurses for outpatients undergoing chemotherapy at our Medical Oncology Day Hospital Unit. Patients completed a modified questionnaire with simplified terms. They were requested to specify seriousness of symptoms with a subjective scale varying from 1 to 4. Every patient-nurse-clinician questionnaire was registered for the statistical analysis. Agreement was evaluated by Cohen's kappa coefficient.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eighty-five paired questionnaires were completed. Patients, nurses and clinicians agreed on most symptoms and toxicity grade. Agreements between patients and nurses were stronger than those between patients and physicians for the six most common symptoms: asthenia (kappa 75% versus 37%), constipation (83% versus 45%), neuropathy (82% versus 55%), mucositis (78% versus 46%) and diarrhoea (90% versus 77%). These differences mainly reflected differences in the proportion of positive agreement: nurses were more able to detect symptoms self-reported by patients than physicians. The only exception was nausea, as kappa coefficient was very good for both health professionals (91% versus 89%). When considering the different grade of toxicity by the weighted kappa coefficient, we scored again the highest agreement between patient and nurse, with weighted kappa ranging from 55% (asthenia) to 86% (diarrhoea), and the lowest agreement between patient and physician, with weighted kappa ranging from 32% (asthenia) to 74% (nausea). The agreement between physician and nurse slightly improved, with weighted kappa ranging from 41% (constipation) to 77% (nausea).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results support the validity of nurse toxicity reporting and that the nurse staff could be successfully employed in collecting toxicity data because of a greater ability to elicit information from patients than the medical staff.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Negrar, Verona, Italy.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cirillo
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Venturini
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Ciccarelli
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Coati
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Bortolami
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Verlato
mesh_terms: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009316:National Institutes of Health (U.S.); D009369:Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000451:nursing / Q000503:physiopathology*; D009726:Nurses; D010820:Physicians; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents