title: Ambulatory or home measurement of blood pressure?
abstract: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure (HBPM) monitoring have been shown to be superior to conventional measurement of blood pressure in terms of reproducibility, relationship to the impact of high blood pressure on target organs, and the prediction of cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, these 2 techniques have yet to find their place in the diagnosis of hypertension and during evaluation of the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment. Although these 2 methods do not give identical results in approximately 20% of cases, their diagnostic performance and prognostic value are quite comparable. Although ABPM remains a valuable tool in clinical research, its utilization in routine clinical practice is limited by cost and availability. HBPM is increasingly employed for informed and well-managed patients, and it can help to improve control of the patient's blood pressure. Physicians involved in the management of hypertensive patients should be aware of its value in order to assist patients in their care.
authors.affiliation: Hypertension Unit, Saint André Hospital, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. philippe.gosse@chu-bordeaux.fr
authors.forename: Philippe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Gosse
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Coulon
mesh_terms: D018660:Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory / Q000191:economics / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000175:diagnosis*; D011379:Prognosis