title: [Vaginal pelvic repair. Always with mesh or not?].
abstract: Several surgical methods are possible when aiming at reconstruction of pelvic organ prolapse in women, and the experienced surgeon implements the knowledge gained from open, laparoscopic, and vaginal techniques. These feature different rates of success and relapse as well as different complication risks. Because of the accumulating morbidity of aging patients, there is a search for a safe minimally invasive technique. With the advent of synthetic meshes, surgeons have used them frequently and often uncritically for reconstruction of the female pelvic floor. In these cases the vaginal approach is preferred as opposed to alternative techniques, as it is less invasive and allows for better convalescence. Furthermore, this approach leads to low complication and relapse rates even when synthetic meshes are omitted.
authors: Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. hagen.loertzer@med.uni-goettingen.de
authors: H
authors: H
authors: Loertzer
authors: R H
authors: RH
authors: Ringert
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Fechner
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Thelen
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Kümmel
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Strauss
mesh_terms: D020884:Colpotomy / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*