title: Participation of older newly-diagnosed cancer patients in an observational prospective pilot study: an example of recruitment and retention.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There have been few prospective observational studies which recruited older newly-diagnosed cancer patients, and of these only some have reported information on the number needed to screen to recruit their study sample, and the number and reasons for refusal and drop-out. This paper reports on strategies to recruit older newly-diagnosed cancer patients prior to treatment into an observational prospective pilot study and to retain them during a six-month period.
  
  
  METHODS
  Medical charts of all patients in the Segal Cancer Centre aged 65 and over were screened and evaluated for inclusion. Several strategies to facilitate recruitment and retention were implemented. Reasons for exclusion, refusal and loss to follow-up were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to report the reasons for refusal and loss to follow-up. A non-response analysis using chi-square tests and t-tests was conducted to compare respondents to those who refused to participate and to compare those who completed the study to those who were lost to follow-up. A feedback form with open-ended questions was administered following the last interview to obtain patient's opinions on the length of the interviews and conduct of this pilot study.
  
  
  RESULTS
  3060 medical charts were screened and 156 eligible patients were identified. Of these 112 patients participated for a response rate of 72%. Reasons for refusal were: feeling too anxious (40%), not interested (25%), no time (12.5%), too sick (5%) or too healthy (5%) or other reasons (5%). Ninety-one patients participated in the six-month follow-up (retention 81.3%), seven patients refused follow-up (6.2%) and fourteen patients died (12.5%) during the course of the study. The median time to conduct the baseline interview was 45 minutes and 57% of baseline interviews were conducted at home. Most patients enjoyed participation and only five felt that the interviews were too long.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  It was feasible to recruit newly-diagnosed cancer patients prior to treatment although it required considerable time and effort. Once patients were included, the retention rate was high despite the fact that most were undergoing active cancer treatment.
authors: Solidage Research Group, Université de Montréal/McGill University Research Group on Frailty and Aging, Montreal, Canada. martine.puts@utoronto.ca
authors: Martine T E
authors: MT
authors: Puts
authors: Johanne
authors: J
authors: Monette
authors: Veronique
authors: V
authors: Girre
authors: Christina
authors: C
authors: Wolfson
authors: Michele
authors: M
authors: Monette
authors: Gerald
authors: G
authors: Batist
authors: Howard
authors: H
authors: Bergman
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology*; D018579:Patient Selection; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015983:Selection Bias; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires