title: Comparison of patient and clinician perspectives in the assessment of antipsychotic medication adherence.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Factors influencing patient and clinician perspectives in the assessment of medication adherence have never been compared.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study used baseline and 12-month follow-up data from the QUATRO study, an international multicentre study. At baseline, information on patient sociodemographic characteristics, treatment factors, psychopathology, functioning and experience of antipsychotic side effects was gathered. After 12 months of follow-up, psychopathology, functioning and patient experience of antipsychotic side effects were measured once more, and a patient and clinician rating of adherence was obtained by means of the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) and the Compliance Rating Scale (CRS).
  
  
  RESULTS
  During the recruitment period, 409 subjects with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were recruited. Patients were more often men and single. Mean age was 41.5 years. At the time of the assessment, more than 40% were unemployed and on average had been on antipsychotic treatment for more than 10 years. Nearly 70% were receiving second-generation antipsychotics, and 50% received adherence therapy during the 12 months after enrollment. The relationship between the MARS and the CRS scores showed only a small overlap (correlation coefficient = 0.26). In the multivariate model, the only factor significantly associated with both patient and clinician ratings of adherence was psychopathology. Unemployment and poor subjective tolerability of antipsychotics were significantly associated with low levels of patient ratings of adherence. Conversely, length of treatments and use of newer antipsychotics were significantly associated with better clinician ratings of adherence.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patient and clinician ratings of adherence do not measure the same dimension. Factors that may positively affect adherence in terms of compliance with prescribed medication regimens may not affect patients' views on adherence, and this should be taken into consideration when planning and negotiating treatment modalities with each individual patient suffering from schizophrenia.
authors: Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology,Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. corrado.barbui@univr.it
authors: Corrado
authors: C
authors: Barbui
authors: Martijn
authors: M
authors: Kikkert
authors: Maria Angela
authors: MA
authors: Mazzi
authors: Thomas
authors: T
authors: Becker
authors: Jonathan
authors: J
authors: Bindman
authors: Aart
authors: A
authors: Schene
authors: Michela
authors: M
authors: Nosè
authors: Hedda
authors: H
authors: Helm
authors: Graham
authors: G
authors: Thornicroft
authors: Michele
authors: M
authors: Tansella
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D014150:Antipsychotic Agents / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D055118:Medication Adherence / Q000523:psychology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D015337:Multicenter Studies as Topic; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D011788:Quality of Life / Q000523:psychology; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012559:Schizophrenia / Q000188:drug therapy*; D012565:Schizophrenic Psychology; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
chemical_list: D014150:Antipsychotic Agents