Effect of different walking aids on walking capacity of patients with poststroke hemiparesis.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the effects of 3 different walking aids on walking capacity, temporo-spatial gait parameters, and patient satisfaction.


METHODS
Observational study.


METHODS
University Hospital of Geneva.


METHODS
Hemiparetic inpatients (N=25) with impaired gait, at an early stage of rehabilitation, unfamiliar with any of the walking aids tested.


METHODS
On 3 consecutive days subjects used, in random order, 1 of 3 walking aids: 4-point cane, simple cane with ergonomic handgrip, and Nordic stick.


METHODS
Maximal walking distance in 6 minutes, temporo-spatial gait parameters determined with a commercial electronic gait analysis system, and patients' preference on a subjective ranking scale.


RESULTS
Walking distance was greatest with the simple cane with an ergonomic handgrip, followed by the 4-point cane and the Nordic walking stick. Walking velocity was highest with the simple cane, which was also indicated as the preferred walking aid by the patients. There was no significant difference in step length symmetry.


CONCLUSIONS
The simple cane with the ergonomic handgrip was not only preferred by patients, but was also the most efficient among 3 commonly used walking aids. It appears justified to take patients' subjective preference into account when prescribing a walking aid.
Allet
Lara
L
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. lara.allet@hcuge.ch
Leemann
Beatrice
B
Guyen
Emmanuel
E
Murphy
Laura
L
Monnin
Dominique
D
Herrmann
François R
FR
Schnider
Armin
A
D000368:Aged; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002183:Canes; D005260:Female; D020233:Gait Disorders, Neurologic / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D010291:Paresis / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D020521:Stroke / Q000150:complications*; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology*