title: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Novel treatment interventions are advancing rapidly in the management of hip and groin disability in the physically active young to middle-aged population.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To recommend the most suitable patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires for the assessment of hip and groin disability based on a systematic review of evidence of validity, reliability and responsiveness of these instruments.
  
  
  METHODS
  MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, SportsDiscus and Web of Science were all searched up to January 2009. Two reviewers independently rated measurement properties of the PRO questionnaires in the included studies, according to a standardised criteria list.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The computerised search identified 2737 publications. Forty-one publications investigating measurement properties of PRO questionnaires assessing hip or groin disability were included in the study. Twelve different questionnaires designed for patients with hip disability and one questionnaire for patients with groin disability were identified. Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) contains adequate measurement qualities to evaluate patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) or total hip replacement (THR). Hip Outcome Score (HOS) is the best available questionnaire for evaluating hip arthroscopy, but the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire, the only identified questionnaire evaluating groin disability, does not contain adequate measurement qualities.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  HOOS is recommended for evaluating patients with hip OA undergoing non-surgical treatment and surgical interventions such as THR. HOS is recommended for evaluating patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Current and new PRO questionnaires should also be evaluated in younger patients (age <50) with hip and/or groin disability, including surgical and non-surgical patients.
authors: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amager Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Italiensvej 1, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. kristian.thorborg@amh.regionh.dk
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Thorborg
authors: E M
authors: EM
authors: Roos
authors: E M
authors: EM
authors: Bartels
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Petersen
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Hölmich
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D006119:Groin; D006552:Hernia, Inguinal / Q000523:psychology* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D006615:Hip; D006801:Humans; D059352:Musculoskeletal Pain / Q000523:psychology* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D015207:Osteoarthritis, Hip / Q000523:psychology* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000592:standards; D011788:Quality of Life; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards*; D016896:Treatment Outcome