title: Laparoscopic management of incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
abstract: Laparoscopy provides an enticing alternative for incontinence and pelvic floor procedures that would otherwise require a laparotomy or that would be difficult vaginally. Despite some data suggesting lower cure rates with the laparoscopic Burch when compared with the open approach or trans-vaginal tape, the safety and relative efficacy of the laparoscopic procedure support its continued use. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy seems to yield comparable outcomes when compared with the open approach and is associated with a shorter hospitalization. Although laparoscopic paravaginal defect, cystocele, and rectocele repairs are technically feasible and may have a role as a concomitant procedure, a vaginal approach is more appropriate for an isolated operation.
authors: Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, USA. fricka@ccf.org
authors: Anna C
authors: AC
authors: Frick
authors: Marie Fidela R
authors: MF
authors: Paraiso
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D013536:Suture Techniques; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D014563:Urodynamics; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*