title: Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine.
abstract: The morbidity of surgical procedures for spine tumors can be expected to be worse than for other conditions. This is particularly true of en bloc resections, the most technically demanding procedures. A retrospective review of prospective data from a large series of en bloc resections may help to identify risk factors, and therefore to reduce the rate of complications and to improve outcome. A retrospective study of 1,035 patients affected by spine tumors-treated from 1990 to 2007 by the same team-identified 134 patients (53.0% males, age 44 +/- 18 years) who had undergone en bloc resection for primary tumors (90) and bone metastases (44). All clinical, histological and radiological data were recorded from the beginning of the period in a specifically built database. The study was set up to correlate diagnosis, staging and treatment with the outcome. Oncological and functional results were recorded for all patients at periodic, diagnosis-related controls, until death or the latest follow-up examination (from 0 to 211 months, median 47 months, 25th-75th percentile 22-85 months). Forty-seven on the 134 patients (34.3%) suffered a total of 70 complications (0.86 events per 100 patient-years); 32 patients (68.1%) had one complication, while the rest had 2 or more. There were 41 major and 29 minor complications. Three patients (2.2%) died from complications. Of the 35 patients with a recurrent or contaminated tumor, 16 (45.7%) suffered at least one complication; by contrast, complications arose in 31 (31.3%) of the 99 patients who had had no previous treatment and who underwent the whole of their treatment in the same center (P = 0.125). The risk of major complications was seen to be more than twice as high in contaminated patients than in non-contaminated ones (OR = 2.52, 95%CI 1.01-6.30, P = 0.048). Factors significantly affecting the morbidity are multisegmental resections and operations including double contemporary approaches. A local recurrence was recorded in 21 cases (15.7%). The rate of deep infection was higher in patients who had previously undergone radiation therapy (RT), but the global incidence of complications was lower. Re-operations were mostly due to tumor recurrences, but also to hardware failures, wound dehiscence, hematomas and aortic dissection. En bloc resection is able to improve the prognosis of aggressive benign and low-grade malignant tumors in the spine; however, complications are not rare and possibly fatal. The rate of complication is higher in multisegmental resections and when double combined approach is performed, as it can be expected in more complex procedures. Re-operations display greater morbidity owing to dissection through scar/fibrosis from previous operations and possibly from RT. The treatment of recurrent cases and planned transgression to reduce surgical aggressiveness are associated with a higher rate of local recurrence, which can be considered the most severe complication. In terms of survival and quality of life, late results are worse in recurrent cases than in complicated cases. Careful treatment planning and, in the event of uncertainty, referral to a specialty center must be stressed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy. sboriani@aospine.org
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Boriani
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Bandiera
authors.forename: Rakesh
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Donthineni
authors.forename: Luca
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Amendola
authors.forename: Michele
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cappuccio
authors.forename: Federico
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: De Iure
authors.forename: Alessandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gasbarrini
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001019:Aortic Rupture / Q000401:mortality; D004868:Equipment Failure; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009026:Mortality; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D019635:Neurosurgical Procedures / Q000379:methods* / Q000401:mortality* / Q000592:standards; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000401:mortality* / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D011878:Radiotherapy / Q000009:adverse effects; D012086:Reoperation / Q000401:mortality; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013125:Spinal Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D013131:Spine / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013529:Surgical Wound Dehiscence / Q000401:mortality; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000401:mortality; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 1998;7(6):438-44
references.pmid: 9883951
references.citation: Acta Orthop Scand. 1984 Oct;55(5):491-500
references.pmid: 6507069
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Mar 15;23(6):726-32; discussion 732-3
references.pmid: 9549795
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16):1899-908
references.pmid: 16103863
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Sep;(354):189-94
references.pmid: 9755779
references.citation: Chir Organi Mov. 1998 Jan-Jun;83(1-2):53-64
references.pmid: 9718815
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Aug;(245):72-82
references.pmid: 2752635
references.citation: Orthopedics. 2002 Jan;25(1):37-42
references.pmid: 11811240
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 1;25(7):804-12
references.pmid: 10751291
references.citation: Scoliosis. 2008 Aug 05;3:9
references.pmid: 18681956
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jun;78(6):839-47
references.pmid: 8666601
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Aug 1;22(15):1773-82; discussion 1783
references.pmid: 9259790
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 1;37(1):E37-45
references.pmid: 22179322
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Feb 1;22(3):324-33
references.pmid: 9051895
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Aug;17(4):297-300
references.pmid: 15280758
references.citation: Chir Organi Mov. 1998 Jan-Jun;83(1-2):65-72
references.pmid: 9718816
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 May 1;22(9):1036-44
references.pmid: 9152458
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jul 15;20(14):1592-9
references.pmid: 7570174
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 15;31(4):493-503
references.pmid: 16481964
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Aug 15;21(16):1927-31
references.pmid: 8875727
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 15;28(18):E368-72
references.pmid: 14501938
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2001 Jan;94(1 Suppl):25-37
references.pmid: 11147865
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Sep 15;24(18):1943-51
references.pmid: 10515021
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 15;33(20):2243-7
references.pmid: 18794768