Static and dynamic correlates of the knee adduction moment in healthy knees ranging from normal to varus-aligned.
BACKGROUND
Individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis often present with varus knee alignment and ambulate with increased knee adduction moments. Understanding the factors that relate to the knee adduction moment in healthy individuals may provide insight into the development of this disease. Thus, this study aimed to examine the relationships of both static and dynamic lower extremity measures with the knee adduction moment. We hypothesized that the dynamic measures would be more closely related to this moment.


METHODS
Arch height index, hip abduction strength and two static measures of knee alignment were recorded for 37 young asymptomatic knees that varied from normal to varus-aligned. Overground gait analyses were also performed. Correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationships between the static and dynamic variables to the knee adduction moment. Hierarchical regression analyses were then conducted using the static measures, the dynamic measures, and the static and dynamic measures together.


RESULTS
Among the static measures, the tibial mechanical axis and the distance between the medial knee joint lines were correlated with the knee adduction moment. The best predictive static model (R(2)=0.53) included only the tibial mechanical axis. Among the dynamic variables, knee adduction and rearfoot eversion angles were correlated with the knee adduction moment. Knee adduction and rearfoot eversion, together, were the best dynamic model (R(2)=0.53). The static and dynamic measures together created the strongest of the three models (R(2)=0.59).


CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that dynamic measures slightly enhance the predictive strength of static measures when explaining variation in the knee adduction moment.
Barrios
Joaquin A
JA
300 College Park, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH45469, USA. barrios@notes.udayton.edu
Higginson
Jill S
JS
Royer
Todd D
TD
Davis
Irene S
IS
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000503:physiopathology*; D011187:Posture; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D012044:Regression Analysis; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D016474:Weight-Bearing
Orthop Clin North Am. 1994 Jul;25(3):395-403
8028883
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;98(2):102-6
18347117
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009 Jun;33(2):107-16
19367514
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Mar;43(3):311-4
14679292
JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):188-95
11448282
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005 Sep;45(3):355-9
16230987
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 May;40(5):499-505
11371657
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1959 Dec;17(4):289-317
13815872
J Biomech Eng. 1983 May;105(2):136-44
6865355
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Dec;50(12):3897-903
15593195
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep;58(9):2776-85
18759296
J Rheumatol. 2006 Nov;33(11):2271-9
17013996
Gait Posture. 2006 Dec;24(4):406-11
16412640
J Orthop Res. 2007 Jun;25(6):789-97
17343285
J Biomech. 1985;18(1):39-47
3980487
Am J Public Health. 1994 Mar;84(3):351-8
8129049
Gait Posture. 2005 Oct;22(2):138-45
16139749
J Orthop Res. 2008 Sep;26(9):1167-72
18404700
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1996 Jan;25(1):18-26
8722125
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jan;78(1):26-32
9014953
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep 15;59(9):1207-13
18759314
Phys Ther. 2000 Sep;80(9):864-71
10960934
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996 Apr;11(3):126-134
11415609
J Biomech. 1998 May;31(5):423-30
9727339
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96
9699158
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr;56(4):1204-11
17393449
Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Jul;61(7):617-22
12079903
J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc. 2003;6(1):25-34
25792930
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Apr 15;55(2):306-13
16583430