title: Ectomycorrhizal fungi and their enzymes in soils: is there enough evidence for their role as facultative soil saprotrophs?
abstract: Although ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi are generally regarded as dependent upon the supply of carbon from their plant hosts, some recent papers have postulated a role for these fungi in the saprotrophic acquisition of carbon from soil. This theory was mainly based on the increase in enzymatic activity during periods of low photosynthate supply from tree hosts and emergence of the theory has led to a question about the overall influence of saprotrophy by ECM fungi on soil carbon turnover. However, I argue here that there is still not enough evidence to confirm this proposed function. My argument is based on inference from several lines of observation and concern over several aspects of the past studies. First, ECM fungi mainly inhabit deeper soil horizons, in which the availability of carbon compounds with positive energetic value is low. Second, the ability of ECM fungi to produce ligninolytic enzymes and cellulases is much weaker than that of saprotrophic basidiomycetes. This is most apparent in the low copy abundance of corresponding genes in the sequenced genomes of ECM species Laccaria bicolor and Amanita bisporigenes compared to the saprotrophic species Galerina marginata. I offer alternative hypotheses to explain the past observations of increased enzyme activity during starvation periods. These include, the induction of autolytic processes in ECM fungal mycelia or an attack on the host tissues to support escape from a dying root and to allow for a search for new hosts.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the ASCR, v.v.i., Vídenská 1083, 14220 Praha 4, Czech Republic. baldrian@biomed.cas.cz
authors.forename: Petr
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Baldrian
mesh_terms: D000545:Amanita / Q000201:enzymology / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development; D001487:Basidiomycota / Q000201:enzymology / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development; D002244:Carbon / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D016681:Genome, Fungal; D055399:Laccaria / Q000201:enzymology / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development; D008031:Lignin / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D038821:Mycorrhizae / Q000145:classification / Q000201:enzymology* / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development; D009930:Organic Chemicals / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000201:enzymology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000382:microbiology; D012987:Soil / Q000032:analysis*; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D013217:Starvation / Q000201:enzymology / Q000382:microbiology
chemical_list: D009930:Organic Chemicals; D012987:Soil; D002244:Carbon; D008031:Lignin
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Nov;158(1):77-83
references.pmid: 18679722
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 Nov 1;50(3):245-53
references.pmid: 19712364
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2005 Jun;15(4):235-45
references.pmid: 15221576
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008;180(2):296-310
references.pmid: 19138220
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006 Mar;30(2):215-42
references.pmid: 16472305
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Sep;71(9):5544-50
references.pmid: 16151147
references.citation: New Phytol. 2007;173(3):611-620
references.pmid: 17244056
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008 May;32(3):501-21
references.pmid: 18371173
references.citation: ISME J. 2009 Oct;3(10):1218-21
references.pmid: 19516282
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 2008 Mar;66(3):243-57
references.pmid: 18292958
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2005 Nov;50(4):570-9
references.pmid: 16341831
references.citation: J Basic Microbiol. 2006;46(5):387-99
references.pmid: 17009294
references.citation: Fungal Genet Biol. 2009 May;46(5):427-35
references.pmid: 19373972