title: Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Laparoscopic resection for the cure of rectal cancer is still a matter of debate. Laparoscopic approach is more complex and with a long learning curve, which may results in an increase in morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the impact of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer on operative outcome of a hospital in a developing country.
  
  
  METHODS
  All patients presenting with rectal cancer surgically managed by laparoscopic approach were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were total coloproctectomy, palliative procedures, and metastatic disease. The following parameters were accessed: general characteristics, technical details, mortality, and the outcome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  From January 2000 to January 2008, 60 patients with histologically proven rectal cancer were enrolled, and 43 were excluded. Mean age, 58.5 +/- 15.9 years. A 76.6% of patients had cancer-advanced stages. There were 20 anterior resections, 31 abdomino-perineal resections, and nine pull-through procedures. Conversion rate was 3.3%, and there had 3.3% of operative complications. No procedure-related death. With the mean follow-up of 33 months, 77.8% patients are alive and disease-free, 5.6% are alive with disease: distant metastasis in 2.8%, and local recurrence in 2.8%. About 16.7% have died from cancer-related causes. No port site or wound metastasis have occurred.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study showed the favorable short-term operative results in patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. The low conversion rate of 3.3%, 3.3% complication rate, and 0% of a 30-day mortality attributed to confirm the feasibility of laparoscopic approach in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer.
authors.affiliation: Department of Abdominal Emergencies Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam. phamnhuhiep@ngoaibung.com
authors.forename: Pham Nhu
authors.initials: PN
authors.lastname: Hiep
authors.forename: Pham Anh
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Vu
authors.forename: Ho Huu
authors.initials: HH
authors.lastname: Thien
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007430:Intraoperative Care; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Nov;34(11):1217-24
references.pmid: 18155389
references.citation: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;38(8):621-7
references.pmid: 15319642
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr;20(4):546-53
references.pmid: 16508815
references.citation: Surg Oncol. 2004 Aug-Nov;13(2-3):111-8
references.pmid: 15572093
references.citation: J Minim Access Surg. 2006 Dec;2(4):205-10
references.pmid: 21234147
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2005 Mar;19(3):307-10
references.pmid: 15624051
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Mar;204(3):439-46
references.pmid: 17324779
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Dec;50(12):2047-53
references.pmid: 17906896
references.citation: Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1:S65-7
references.pmid: 18035538
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1708-14
references.pmid: 17704968
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2007 Jan;245(1):1-7
references.pmid: 17197957
references.citation: Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Jun;12(2):185-8
references.pmid: 18545874