Audience effects in the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana)-prudent male mate choice in response to perceived sperm competition risk?
BACKGROUND
Multidirectional interactions in social networks can have a profound effect on mate choice behavior; e.g., Poecilia mexicana males show weaker expression of mating preferences when being observed by a rival. This may be an adaptation to reduce sperm competition risk, which arises because commonly preferred female phenotypes will receive attention also from surrounding males, and/or because other males can copy the focal male's mate choice. Do P. mexicana males indeed respond to perceived sperm competition risk? We gave males a choice between two females and repeated the tests under one of the following conditions: (1) an empty transparent cylinder was presented (control); (2) another ("audience") male inside the cylinder observed the focal male throughout the 2nd part, or (3) the audience male was presented only before the tests, but could not eavesdrop during the actual choice tests (non-specific sperm competition risk treatments); (4) the focal male could see a rival male interact sexually with the previously preferred, or (5) with the non-preferred female before the 2nd part of the tests (specific sperm competition risk treatments).


RESULTS
The strength of individual male preferences declined slightly also during the control treatment (1). However, this decrease was more than two-fold stronger in audience treatment (2), i.e., with non-specific sperm competition risk including the possibility for visual eavesdropping by the audience male. No audience effect was found in treatments (3) and (5), but a weak effect was also observed when the focal male had seen the previously preferred female sexually interact with a rival male (treatment 4; specific sperm competition risk).


CONCLUSIONS
When comparing the two 'non-specific sperm competition risk' treatments, a very strong effect was found only when the audience male could actually observe the focal male during mate choice [treatment (2)]. This suggests that focal males indeed attempt to conceal their mating preferences so as to prevent surrounding males from copying their mate choice. When there is no potential for eavesdropping [treatment (3)], non-specific specific sperm competition risk seems to play a minor or no role. Our results also show that P. mexicana males tend to share their mating effort more equally among females when the resource value of their previously preferred mate decreases after mating with a rival male (perceived specific sperm competition risk), but this effect is comparatively weak.
Ziege
Madlen
M
Department of Ecology & Evolution, J,W, Goethe University Frankfurt, Siesmayerstrasse 70-72, D-60054 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. martin_plath@web.de.
Mahlow
Kristin
K
Hennige-Schulz
Carmen
C
Kronmarck
Claudia
C
Tiedemann
Ralph
R
Streit
Bruno
B
Plath
Martin
M
Nature. 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):475
11206533
Anim Behav. 1998 Mar;55(3):545-52
9514666
Curr Biol. 2008 Aug 5;18(15):1138-41
18674912
Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):105-13
15161145
Oecologia. 2003 Sep;137(1):62-8
12856201
Behaviour. 1969;33(1):1-38
5815891
Nature. 2007 Jan 25;445(7126):429-32
17251980
Anim Behav. 2000 Mar;59(3):467-476
10715168
Am Nat. 1992 Dec;140(6):1000-9
19426031
Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):689-693
9784218
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):9177-80
11459936
Biol Lett. 2007 Feb 22;3(1):5-7
17443951
Curr Biol. 2008 Jun 3;18(11):R462-3
18522813
Nature. 2004 Jul 22;430(6998):448-51
15269767
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):943-52
12028778
Behav Processes. 2003 May 28;63(1):53-61
12763268
Commun Integr Biol. 2008;1(2):199-203
19513259
Science. 2004 Jul 23;305(5683):487-91
15273386
Naturwissenschaften. 2003 Dec;90(12):577-82
14676956
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1549-57
12495512
Commun Integr Biol. 2009 May;2(3):282-4
19641752