The greenhouse gas emissions performance of cellulosic ethanol supply chains in Europe.
BACKGROUND
Calculating the greenhouse gas savings that may be attributed to biofuels is problematic because production systems are inherently complex and methods used to quantify savings are subjective. Differing approaches and interpretations have fuelled a debate about the environmental merit of biofuels, and consequently about the level of policy support that can be justified. This paper estimates and compares emissions from plausible supply chains for lignocellulosic ethanol production, exemplified using data specific to the UK and Sweden. The common elements that give rise to the greatest greenhouse gas emissions are identified and the sensitivity of total emissions to variations in these elements is estimated. The implications of including consequential impacts including indirect land-use change, and the effects of selecting alternative allocation methods on the interpretation of results are discussed.


RESULTS
We find that the most important factors affecting supply chain emissions are the emissions embodied in biomass production, the use of electricity in the conversion process and potentially consequential impacts: indirect land-use change and fertiliser replacement. The large quantity of electricity consumed during enzyme manufacture suggests that enzymatic conversion processes may give rise to greater greenhouse gas emissions than the dilute acid conversion process, even though the dilute acid process has a somewhat lower ethanol yield.


CONCLUSIONS
The lignocellulosic ethanol supply chains considered here all lead to greenhouse gas savings relative to gasoline An important caveat to this is that if lignocellulosic ethanol production uses feedstocks that lead to indirect land-use change, or other significant consequential impacts, the benefit may be greatly reduced.Co-locating ethanol, electricity generation and enzyme production in a single facility may improve performance, particularly if this allows the number of energy intensive steps in enzyme production to be reduced, or if other process synergies are available. If biofuels policy in the EU remains contingent on favourable environmental performance then the multi-scale nature of bioenergy supply chains presents a genuine challenge. Lignocellulosic ethanol holds promise for emission reductions, but maximising greenhouse gas savings will not only require efficient supply chain design but also a better understanding of the spatial and temporal factors which affect overall performance.
Slade
Raphael
R
Imperial Centre for Energy Policy and Technology, Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK. raphael.slade@imperial.ac.uk
Bauen
Ausilio
A
Shah
Nilay
N
Science. 2008 Feb 29;319(5867):1238-40
18258860
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jan;26(1):8-9
18183002
Science. 2008 Feb 29;319(5867):1235-8
18258862
Biotechnol Prog. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):1421-9
15458326
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009 Feb 03;2(1):3
19192294
Sci Total Environ. 2000 Jun 8;255(1-3):135-43
10898401
Science. 2006 Jan 27;311(5760):506-8
16439656