title: Mercury accumulation in caged Corbicula: rate of uptake and seasonal variation.
abstract: The uptake and seasonal fluctuations of total mercury were followed in caged and uncaged Asiatic clams, Corbicula fluminea, over a 1-year period in South River, Virginia. Mercury was rapidly accumulated in clams transplanted from a nominally uncontaminated site into cages on the contaminated South River, reaching 0.99 microg g(-1) dry mass within the first month. Resident clams moved to cages had higher mercury contents after the first month (2.04 microg g(-1) dry mass) and at all subsequent times in the study. Large monthly fluctuations in mercury were noted for both resident caged and transplant caged clams with a notable peak occurring in early spring (4.31 microg g(-1) dry mass in resident caged clams). Tissue mass of caged clams steadily increased through the winter and early spring. Adjustment of mercury concentrations for tissue mass changes indicated that the changes in mercury contents were primarily due to uptake/release rather than changes in tissue mass (concentration/dilution). The present study demonstrates the utility of using caged Corbicula as mercury biomonitors and illustrates the importance of accounting for large, short-term changes of mercury content in Corbicula when designing long-term biomonitoring studies.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Eastern Mennonite University, Harrisonburg, VA 22802, USA. neufeldd@emu.edu
authors.forename: Douglas S G
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Neufeld
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D049874:Corbicula / Q000378:metabolism*; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D008628:Mercury / Q000378:metabolism*; D012621:Seasons; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000378:metabolism*; D014877:Water Pollution, Chemical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
chemical_list: D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D008628:Mercury
references.citation: Mar Pollut Bull. 2001 Apr;42(4):329-32
references.pmid: 11381755
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2000 Oct 16;261(1-3):61-8
references.pmid: 11036977
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 1990 Sep;15(2):143-81
references.pmid: 24241559
references.citation: Environ Pollut. 1987;45(3):173-205
references.pmid: 15092750
references.citation: Aquat Toxicol. 2004 May 12;67(4):347-57
references.pmid: 15084411
references.citation: Science. 2008 Apr 18;320(5874):335
references.pmid: 18420925
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2000 Jun;40(12):1335-51
references.pmid: 10789973
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2004 Jun 5;325(1-3):209-19
references.pmid: 15144790
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;131(2):133-51
references.pmid: 11879781
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol Toxicol. 1993 Sep;106(1):131-9
references.pmid: 7903608
references.citation: Chemosphere. 1997 Dec;35(12):2817-36
references.pmid: 9415979
references.citation: Mar Pollut Bull. 2001 Jun;42(6):491-505
references.pmid: 11468927
references.citation: Science. 1977 Dec 9;198(4321):1015-20
references.pmid: 17779673
references.citation: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1993 Nov;25(4):415-21
references.pmid: 8239711
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Sep 7;407(6800):78-80
references.pmid: 10993076