Quality of life and persisting symptoms in intensive care unit survivors: implications for care after discharge.
BACKGROUND
We assessed the quality of life of ICU survivors using SF-36 at 4 months after ICU discharge and investigated any correlation of PCS and MCS with age, illness severity and hospital or ICU length of stay. We examined the relationship between these variables, persisting physical and psychological symptoms and the perceived benefit of individual patients of follow-up.


RESULTS
For one year, adult patients admitted for multiple organ or advanced respiratory support for greater than 48 hours to a 16-bedded teaching hospital general intensive care unit were identified. Those surviving to discharge were sent a questionnaire at 4 months following ICU discharge assessing quality of life and persisting symptoms. Demographic, length of stay and illness severity data were recorded. Higher or lower scores were divided at the median value. A two-tailed Students t-test assuming equal variances was used for normally-distributed data and Mann-Whitney tests for non-parametric data.87 of 175 questionnaires were returned (50%), but only 65 had sufficient data giving a final response rate of 37%. Elderly patients had increased MCS as compared with younger patients. The PCS was inversely related to hospital LOS. There was a significant correlation between the presence of psychological and physical symptoms and desire for follow-up.


CONCLUSIONS
Younger age and prolonged hospital stay are associated with lower mental or physical quality of life and may be targets for rehabilitation. Patients with persisting symptoms at 4 months view follow-up as beneficial and a simple screening questionnaire may identify those likely to attend outpatient services.
Baldwin
Fiona J
FJ
Intensive Care Unit, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, UK. fiona.baldwin@bsuh.nhs.uk
Hinge
Denise
D
Dorsett
Joanna
J
Boyd
Owen F
OF
Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;29(3):573-80
11373423
Crit Care Med. 2003 Aug;31(8):2163-9
12973175
Chest. 2008 Feb;133(2):377-85
17925419
Crit Care Med. 2003 Oct;31(10):2456-61
14530751
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29
3928249
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul;160(1):358-67
10390426
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2293-9
10921555
Aust Crit Care. 2004 Aug;17(3):104-6, 108-13
15493858
Crit Care. 2007;11(4):R78
17629906
Anaesthesia. 2001 Jan;56(1):9-14
11167429
Anaesthesia. 1997 Mar;52(3):195-202
9124657
Crit Care. 2002 Oct;6(5):411-7
12398780
Med Care. 1995 Apr;33(4 Suppl):AS264-79
7723455
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep 1;174(5):538-44
16763220
Crit Care Med. 2004 Feb;32(2):391-8
14758153
Br J Health Psychol. 2007 Feb;12(Pt 1):65-74
17288666
Crit Care. 2006;10(5):R134
16978417
Crit Care. 2007;11(1):R27
17316451
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1094-101
12682478
Intensive Care Med. 2005 May;31(5):611-20
15803303
BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160-4
1285753
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Mar;29(3):368-77
12536269
Crit Care. 2006;10(5):R147
17042955
Aust Crit Care. 2008 Feb;21(1):6-17
18206381
Anaesthesia. 1997 Jan;52(1):15-23
9014540
BMC Anesthesiol. 2007 Jul 24;7:8
17650325
Anaesthesia. 2005 Apr;60(4):332-9
15766335