Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: the role of onset versus offset cues.
The present study investigated whether offset cues have the same attentional consequences in the spatial Stroop effect as onset cues. Experiments 1 and 2 compared the attentional effects of onset-offset cues versus offset cues on the spatial Stroop effect, whereas Experiment 3 compared the attentional effects of onset versus offset cues. Across these experiments, independent of cue type (onset-offset or onset vs. offset) and even at long stimulus-onset asynchrony, attentional cueing did not revert into inhibition of return and was modulated by spatial Stroop with greater cueing effects for incongruent arrow's direction and position. In addition, onset-offset or onset and offset cues produced comparable cueing effects in the location-direction congruent condition, and onset-offset or onset cues produced greater facilitation than offset cues in the incongruent condition. From a different perspective, peripheral cueing modulated the spatial Stroop effect in the same direction for onset-offset or onset and offset cues, although the reduction in spatial Stroop at cued locations was smaller with offset than with onset-offset or onset cues.
Luo
Chunming
C
State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 4A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, 100101 Beijing, China.
Lupiáñez
Juan
J
Fu
Xiaolan
X
Weng
Xuchu
X
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D057190:Stroop Test
Vision Res. 2005 Mar;45(6):765-74
15639503
Braz J Med Biol Res. 1994 Jan;27(1):67-73
8173531
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 Sep;58(5):P256-9
14507931
Exp Brain Res. 2008 May;187(3):439-46
18301884
Psychol Res. 2007 Jan;71(1):77-91
16333663
Psychol Res. 1991;53(2):127-35
1946872
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(1):27-37
16021429
Curr Opin Neurol. 2007 Aug;20(4):381-6
17620870
Psychol Res. 2001;65(3):185-91
11571913
Psychol Res. 1998;61(2):107-18
9689907
Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(3):435-44
3374802
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Jan-Feb;118(1-2):101-21
15627412
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):516-30
19565432
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1992 Oct;81(1):53-74
1456080
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Oct;23(5):1353-64
9411021
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):910-28
16334062
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Apr;27(2):494-503
11318063
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Apr;22(2):367-78
8934850
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1061-7
16615329
J Gen Psychol. 1999 Oct;126(4):392-418
10555867
Psychol Res. 2008 Jul;72(4):443-50
17647015
Cogn Process. 2005 Jun;6(2):98-116
18219508
Psychol Res. 1993;55(3):208-22
8416040
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):494-500
15491903
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Apr;4(4):138-147
10740278
Psychol Res. 2003 Nov;67(4):261-5
14634813
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Dec;27(6):1433-51
11766935
Cogn Psychol. 1992 Apr;24(2):175-219
1582172
Percept Psychophys. 1997 Nov;59(8):1241-54
9401458
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Feb;64(2):318-27
12013383
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207
24203654
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):348-62
17469972
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Aug;54(3):753-73
11548033
Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Jun;59(2):75-89
16035342
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Dec;22(6):1505-13
8953232
Percept Psychophys. 1988 Apr;43(4):346-54
3362663