Medial temporal lobe activity can distinguish between old and new stimuli independently of overt behavioral choice.
We collected fMRI data and confidence ratings as participants performed a recognition memory task that intermixed recently studied words and new (non-studied) words. We first replicated a typical finding from such studies; namely, increasing activity in medial temporal lobe structures with increasing confidence in the old/new decision. Because there are greater proportions of old items at higher confidence levels, such activity could be related to the confidence ratings or to whether items are old or new. When activity associated with old and new items was analyzed separately, we found that activity in the hippocampus bilaterally, as well as in anterior parahippocampal gyrus, was associated with the actual old/new status of the items rather than to which items participants believed to be old. Accordingly, activity in the medial temporal lobe can be modulated by the old/new status of stimuli and does not always track the behavioral response.
Kirwan
C Brock
CB
Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Shrager
Yael
Y
Squire
Larry R
LR
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D013702:Temporal Lobe / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception; D014936:Word Association Tests; D055815:Young Adult
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Feb;13(2):47-54
19135404
Magn Reson Med. 1995 May;33(5):636-47
7596267
Neuron. 2005 Sep 1;47(5):751-61
16129403
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9685-90
15980148
Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 15;29(4):1150-60
16303318
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Oct;96(4):1902-11
16738210
Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
8812068
J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 16;25(11):3002-8
15772360
Neuron. 2005 Oct 20;48(2):359-71
16242414
Hippocampus. 2003;13(2):301-4
12699337
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Nov;8(11):872-83
17948032
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Apr;19(4):659-71
9576651
Science. 1997 Apr 11;276(5310):264-6
9092477
Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 1):67-76
11525338
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 23;98(22):12760-6
11592989
J Neurosci. 2006 May 24;26(21):5835-9
16723542
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):959-66
17133381
Neuroimage. 2006 Dec;33(4):1188-93
17029986
Brain Res. 2007 Apr 20;1142:159-68
17306237
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 9;93(1):321-5
8552630
Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15;44(2):319-27
18929669
J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10541-8
18923030
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8660-5
8710927
Microsc Res Tech. 1998 Oct 1;43(1):8-15
9829453
Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):547-53
18760691
Hippocampus. 2006;16(5):504-20
16634088
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jun;7(6):664-72
15156146
Hippocampus. 1999;9(6):637-43
10641756
Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Jun;55(2):149-89
9618747
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Aug;10(8):358-62
16843039