Lesser tuberosity is more reliable than bicipital groove when determining orientation of humeral head in primary shoulder arthroplasty.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study was to provide statistical evaluation of position of bone landmarks of proximal humerus in relation to transepicondylar line and find out which one is the most suitable for setup of the head retroversion in case of humeral head destruction.


METHODS
We measured 185 dry humeral preparations (92 left, 93 right). Structures of interest on the proximal humerus were marked with pointers of custom made steel frame. Angular relationships between the humeral head axis and medial margin of the greater tuberosity, lateral margin of the lesser tuberosity, bicipital groove, and crest of the greater tuberosity were evaluated with respect to intramedullary axis of the proximal humeral shaft.


RESULTS
The angle between the humeral head axis and medial margin of greater tuberosity was 11.5 +/- 9.0 degrees , the angle between the lateral margin of the lesser tuberosity and the axis was 47.5 +/- 7.4 degrees , the angle between the bicipital groove and the axis was 31.6 +/- 8.8 degrees at the level of the humeral head. The angle between the crest of the greater tuberosity and the axis was 26.6 +/- 9.6 degrees in plane of the surgical neck.


CONCLUSIONS
We statistically proved that the lateral margin of lesser tuberosity is more reliable than the bicipital groove; medial margin of the greater and transepicondylar line for reconstruction of humeral head retroversion. We suggest that the lesser tuberosity should be used to determine the retroversion, especially in cases when the margin of humeral head was destructed.
Hromádka
Rastislav
R
1st Orthopaedic Clinic, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, Prague, Czech Republic. rastho@gmail.com
Kubena
Ales Antonín
AA
Pokorný
David
D
Popelka
Stanislav
S
Jahoda
David
D
Sosna
Antonín
A
D001178:Arthroplasty; D006801:Humans; D006811:Humerus / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D012785:Shoulder Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000601:surgery
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Mar-Apr;8(2):142-5
10226966
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 May;81(5):660-71
10360694
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Nov-Dec;10(6):546-9
11743533
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998 Sep-Oct;7(5):453-7
9814921
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Oct;(307):27-36
7924043
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec;17(6):947-50
18774736
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Sep;79(5):857-65
9331050
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Sep-Oct;11(5):401-12
12378157
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;15(6):675-8
17055748
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1993 Sep;2(5):255-6
22959505
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Mar-Apr;15(2):195-8
16517364
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 May;458:168-74
17224837
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82(11):1594-602
11097450
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Sep-Oct;10(5):460-3
11641704
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84(10):1753-62
12377904
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;11(4):322-6
12195248
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998 Mar-Apr;7(2):144-6
9593093
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Apr;(253):113-7
2317964
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Mar-Apr;10(2):136-9
11307076