title: Mild glucose intolerance in pregnancy and risk of cardiovascular disease: a population-based cohort study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Pregnant women commonly receive screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by use of a 50 g glucose challenge test, followed by a diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test for those whose glucose challenge test result is abnormal. Although women with gestational diabetes have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, it is not known whether mild glucose intolerance during pregnancy is also associated with cardiovascular disease. Thus, we sought to determine whether pregnant women with an abnormal glucose challenge test result but without gestational diabetes have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study that included all women in Ontario aged 20-49 years with live deliveries between April 1994 and March 1998. We excluded women with pregestational diabetes. The population was stratified into 3 cohorts: women with gestational diabetes (n = 13,888); women who received an antepartum oral glucose tolerance test (suggestive of an abnormal result of the glucose challenge test) but who did not have gestational diabetes (n = 71,831); and women who did not receive an oral glucose tolerance test (suggestive of a normal result of the glucose challenge test) (n = 349,977). The primary outcome was cardiovascular disease (admission to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, coronary bypass, coronary angioplasty, stroke or carotid endarterectomy).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Compared with women who did not receive an oral glucose tolerance test, women with gestational diabetes and women who received an oral glucose tolerance test but did not have gestational diabetes had a higher risk of cardiovascular disease over 12.3 years of median follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for women with gestational diabetes 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-2.13, p < 0.001; adjusted HR for those with an oral glucose test but not gestational diabetes 1.19, 95% CI 1.02-1.39, p = 0.03).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Mild glucose intolerance in pregnancy may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Ravi
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Retnakaran
authors.forename: Baiju R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Shah
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001786:Blood Glucose / Q000032:analysis*; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000097:blood* / Q000453:epidemiology*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000097:blood; D016640:Diabetes, Gestational / Q000097:blood; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005951:Glucose Tolerance Test; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011247:Pregnancy; D011248:Pregnancy Complications / Q000097:blood*; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012306:Risk; D012720:Severity of Illness Index
chemical_list: D001786:Blood Glucose
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613-9
references.pmid: 1607900
references.citation: CMAJ. 1998;159 Suppl 8:S1-29
references.pmid: 9834731
references.citation: J Clin Invest. 2005 Mar;115(3):485-91
references.pmid: 15765129
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Jul;87(7):3227-35
references.pmid: 12107230
references.citation: Can J Cardiol. 2003 Aug;19(9):997-1004
references.pmid: 12915926
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2002 Aug;25(8):1331-5
references.pmid: 12145230
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 1996 Dec;19(12):1351-6
references.pmid: 8941463
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2007 Jul;30(7):1783-8
references.pmid: 17416793
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2002 Mar;25(3):560-4
references.pmid: 11874947
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jul;90(7):4004-10
references.pmid: 15840755
references.citation: J Endocrinol Invest. 2005 Jan;28(1):34-8
references.pmid: 15816369
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2002 Mar;25(3):512-6
references.pmid: 11874939
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):1991-2002
references.pmid: 18463375
references.citation: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;27(2):177-82
references.pmid: 16435313
references.citation: Am Heart J. 2008 Aug;156(2):405-10
references.pmid: 18657678
references.citation: Diabetes. 1995 Apr;44(4):369-74
references.pmid: 7698502
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2008 Oct;31(10):2026-31
references.pmid: 18628572
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2006 Jan;29(1):57-62
references.pmid: 16373896
references.citation: Diabet Med. 2009 May;26(5):474-7
references.pmid: 19646185
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 1998 Dec;21(12):2111-5
references.pmid: 9839102
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):46-55
references.pmid: 19595575
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jul;90(7):3983-8
references.pmid: 15840749
references.citation: Diabetes. 2006 Feb;55(2):530-7
references.pmid: 16443791
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2004 Jul;27(7):1721-7
references.pmid: 15220253
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2006 Sep;29(9):2078-83
references.pmid: 16936156
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Nov;24(11):894-912
references.pmid: 12417905
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):1037-9
references.pmid: 18223032
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2008 Jul;31(7):1275-81
references.pmid: 18356402
references.citation: Open Med. 2007 Apr 14;1(1):e18-26
references.pmid: 20101286
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2008 Aug;31(8):1668-9
references.pmid: 18487472
references.citation: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 Aug;71(2):208-14
references.pmid: 19178531