Differential functional magnetic resonance imaging response to food pictures in successful weight-loss maintainers relative to normal-weight and obese controls.
BACKGROUND
Prior research indicates that successful weight-loss maintainers (SWLs) work harder than people of normal weight to maintain their weight loss, including greater dietary restriction of fat and higher physical activity levels. However, little work to date has examined how SWLs differ biologically from normal-weight (NW) and obese controls.


OBJECTIVE
The objective was to compare the brain responses of SWLs to food pictures with those of NW and obese controls.


METHODS
Blood oxygen level-dependent responses to high- and low-energy food pictures were measured in 18 NW controls, 16 obese controls, and 17 SWLs.


RESULTS
Group differences were identified in 4 regions, which indicated significant change in activation in response to the food pictures. SWLs showed greater activation in the left superior frontal region and right middle temporal region than did NW and obese controls-a pattern of results confirmed in exploratory voxel-wise analyses. Obese controls also showed greater activation in a bilateral precentral region.


CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that SWLs show greater activation in frontal regions and primary and secondary visual cortices-a pattern consistent with greater inhibitory control in response to food cues and greater visual attention to the food cues. A greater engagement of inhibitory control regions in response to food cues as well as a greater monitoring of foods may promote control of food intake and successful weight-loss maintenance.
McCaffery
Jeanne M
JM
Miriam Hospital and Brown Medical School, Providence, RI 02903, USA. jeanne_mccaffery@brown.edu
Haley
Andreana P
AP
Sweet
Lawrence H
LH
Phelan
Suzanne
S
Raynor
Hollie A
HA
Del Parigi
Angelo
A
Cohen
Ron
R
Wing
Rena R
RR
D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000098:blood supply / Q000502:physiology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005502:Food; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009765:Obesity / Q000503:physiopathology*; D010100:Oxygen / Q000097:blood; D012016:Reference Values; D014796:Visual Perception; D015431:Weight Loss / Q000502:physiology*
D010100:Oxygen
Appetite. 1996 Aug;27(1):41-50
8879418
Int J Obes. 1989;13 Suppl 2:39-46
2613427
Obes Res. 1999 Jul;7(4):334-41
10440589
Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1381-94
12948696
Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Aug;66(2):239-46
9250100
Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
8812068
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;39(3):354-68
17964536
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 15;37(2):410-21
17566768
Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Mar;31(3):440-8
16819526
Med Clin North Am. 1989 Jan;73(1):47-66
2643008
Addict Behav. 1990;15(4):387-93
2248111
Neuroimage. 2003 Sep;20(1):404-12
14527600
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jul;82(1 Suppl):222S-225S
16002825
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Jun;76(3):442-8
18540737
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Oct;15(10):2485-94
17925475
Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):636-47
18413289
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 12;355(15):1563-71
17035649
Obes Res. 1998 May;6(3):219-24
9618126
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Mar;28(3):370-7
14676847