Phylogenetic community ecology needs to take positive interactions into account: Insights from colourful butterflies.
Phylogenetic community ecology uses phylogenetic relationships among species to infer the dominant processes that shape community ecological structure. This field has particularly focused on habitat filtering and competition, the latter driving divergence and competitive exclusion. However, the effects of positive interactions among species of the same guild have rarely been considered in either empirical studies or theoretical models. We have recently documented a pervasive influence of mutualism in driving adaptive convergence in ecological niche. Müllerian mimicry in butterflies is one of the best-studied examples of mutualism, where unpalatable species converge in wing pattern locally to advertise their toxicity to predators. We showed that species that share similar wing patterns are more similar in their ecology than expected given the phylogeny and co-exist at a fine spatial scale, thereby maximizing the warning signal to local predators. Evidence for competition was detected only among species with distinct wing patterns, implying that mutualistic interactions outweigh the effects of competition. Positive interactions among potential competitors are common among plants and animals. We argue that such forces should be considered in the field of phylogenetic community ecology, along-side neutral processes, habitat filtering and competition.
Elias
Marianne
M
Institute of Evolutionary Biology; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK.
Gompert
Zachariah
Z
Willmott
Keith
K
Jiggins
Chris
C
Ecol Lett. 2007 Nov;10(11):1029-36
17714492
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S14-28
16922299
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S100-8
16922306
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S123-31
16922308
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S86-99
16922305
Ecol Lett. 2008 Sep;11(9):929-36
18485001
Nature. 2007 Jul 5;448(7149):64-7
17611539
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 May 22;271(1543):1039-42
15293857
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S39-49
16922301
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Dec;19(12):639-44
16701326
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 May;22(5):250-7
17296244
Am Nat. 2004 Jun;163(6):823-43
15266381
Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Aug;95(8):681-95
18542902
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11549-55
18695216
Am Nat. 2007 Aug;170(2):271-83
17874377
Ecol Lett. 2008 Oct;11(10):995-1003
18673385
PLoS Biol. 2008 Dec 2;6(12):2642-9
19055316