title: Do perfectionists raise their standards after success? An experimental examination of the revaluation of standard setting in perfectionism.
abstract: Setting high standards is one of the core aspects of perfectionism. Shafran, Cooper, and Fairburn (2002) proposed that individuals with self-imposed perfectionism raise their standards after they successfully meet them. This study examines whether individuals with self-imposed perfectionism raise their goal after the feedback of success. Fifty-three college students, whose self-oriented perfectionism (SOP; Hewitt & Flett, 1991) was assessed, performed a task with a goal, and received feedback of success. Following the feedback, they were asked to choose (a) the same goal or (b) a more difficult goal for the next task. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the greater the SOP, the more likely the participants were to choose the difficult goal. The theoretical and clinical implications for the standard setting of perfectionism were discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Denmark Hill, London, United Kingdom. osamu.kobori@iop.kcl.ac.uk <osamu.kobori@iop.kcl.ac.uk>
authors.forename: Osamu
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Kobori
authors.forename: Maiko
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hayakawa
authors.forename: Yoshihiko
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Tanno
mesh_terms: D000124:Achievement; D001240:Aspirations, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D016017:Odds Ratio; D010552:Personality Assessment; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012649:Self Concept; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult