On the use of Ripley's K-function and its derivatives to analyze domain size.
Ripley's K-, H-, and L-functions are used increasingly to identify clustering of proteins in membrane microdomains. In this approach, aggregation (or clustering) is identified if the average number of proteins within a distance r of another protein is statistically greater than that expected for a random distribution. However, it is not entirely clear how the function may be used to quantitatively determine the size of domains in which clustering occurs. Here, we evaluate the extent to which the domain radius can be determined by different interpretations of Ripley's K-statistic in a theoretical, idealized context. We also evaluate the measures for noisy experimental data and use Monte Carlo simulations to separate the effects of different types of experimental noise. We find that the radius of maximal aggregation approximates the domain radius, while identifying the domain boundary with the minimum of the derivative of H(r) is highly accurate in idealized conditions. The accuracy of both measures is impacted by the noise present in experimental data; for example, here, the presence of a large fraction of particles distributed as monomers and interdomain interactions. These findings help to delineate the limitations and potential of Ripley's K in real-life scenarios.
Kiskowski
Maria A
MA
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36688, USA.
Hancock
John F
JF
Kenworthy
Anne K
AK
D000465:Algorithms; D003198:Computer Simulation; D008956:Models, Chemical; D008958:Models, Molecular; D008970:Molecular Weight; D011487:Protein Conformation; D017434:Protein Structure, Tertiary; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000648:ultrastructure*
D011506:Proteins
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15500-5
16223883
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 12;103(50):18992-7
17146050
J Biol Chem. 2005 Jun 24;280(25):24072-84
15840575
Cell. 2004 Feb 20;116(4):577-89
14980224
Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):128-33
16001074
Cell. 2004 Sep 3;118(5):591-605
15339664
Micron. 2006;37(1):14-34
16081296
Trends Cell Biol. 2004 Mar;14(3):141-7
15003623
J Cell Biol. 2005 Jun 20;169(6):965-76
15967815
Neuroscience. 2007 Jan 5;144(1):135-43
17049171
J Cell Biol. 2003 Jan 20;160(2):165-70
12527752
Eur J Immunol. 2006 Oct;36(10):2795-806
17013982
J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 27;278(26):23738-46
12692121
Methods. 2005 Oct;37(2):165-72
16288888
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 30;104(44):17370-5
17959773
Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Jan;9(1):7-14
17199125