title: Microfluidic electromanipulation with capacitive detection for the mechanical analysis of cells.
abstract: The mechanical behavior of cells offers insight into many aspects of their properties. We propose an approach to the mechanical analysis of cells that uses a combination of electromanipulation for stimulus and capacitance for sensing. To demonstrate this approach, polystyrene spheres and yeast cells flowing in a 25 mumx100 mum microfluidic channel were detected by a perpendicular pair of gold thin film electrodes in the channel, spaced 25 mum apart. The presence of cells was detected by capacitance changes between the gold electrodes. The capacitance sensor was a resonant coaxial radio frequency cavity (2.3 GHz) coupled to the electrodes. The presence of yeast cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and polystyrene spheres resulted in capacitance changes of approximately 10 and 100 attoFarad (aF), respectively, with an achieved capacitance resolution of less than 2 aF in a 30 Hz bandwidth. The resolution is better than previously reported in the literature, and the capacitance changes are in agreement with values estimated by finite element simulations. Yeast cells were trapped using dielectrophoretic forces by applying a 3 V signal at 1 MHz between the electrodes. After trapping, the cells were displaced using amplitude and frequency modulated voltages to produce modulated dielectrophoretic forces. Repetitive displacement and relaxation of these cells was observed using both capacitance and video microscopy.
authors.forename: G A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Ferrier
authors.forename: A N
authors.initials: AN
authors.lastname: Hladio
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Thomson
authors.forename: G E
authors.initials: GE
authors.lastname: Bridges
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hedayatipoor
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Olson
authors.forename: M R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Freeman
references.citation: Biophys J. 1999 Feb;76(2):1145-51
references.pmid: 9916046
references.citation: Opt Express. 2006 Apr 3;14(7):3056-64
references.pmid: 19516446
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1992 Jul;37(7):1499-517
references.pmid: 1631195
references.citation: Biophys J. 2001 Jan;80(1):531-41
references.pmid: 11159423
references.citation: Biophys J. 2001 Aug;81(2):767-84
references.pmid: 11463624
references.citation: Acta Biomater. 2005 Jan;1(1):15-30
references.pmid: 16701777
references.citation: Trends Biotechnol. 1997 Oct;15(10):426-32
references.pmid: 9351287
references.citation: J Membr Biol. 1976 Aug 26;28(2-3):169-80
references.pmid: 787528
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 26;97(20):10687-90
references.pmid: 10995481
references.citation: Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2004 Jan 1;92(1):22-42
references.pmid: 19684877
references.citation: Lab Chip. 2006 May;6(5):682-92
references.pmid: 16652185
references.citation: Lab Chip. 2001 Sep;1(1):76-82
references.pmid: 15100895
references.citation: Cytometry A. 2004 Jun;59(2):203-9
references.pmid: 15170599
references.citation: Biomicrofluidics. 2008 May 06;2(2):24103
references.pmid: 19693406
references.citation: Biophys J. 1996 Oct;71(4):2192-200
references.pmid: 8889195
references.citation: Biomicrofluidics. 2008 Aug 11;2(3):34105
references.pmid: 19693372
references.citation: Biophys J. 1996 Jul;71(1):495-506
references.pmid: 8804632