Level-dependent auditory tuning: Transducer-based active processes in hearing and best-frequency shifts.
Ears boost their sensitivity by means of active, force-generating processes that augment the minute vibrations induced by soft sounds. These processes can alter auditory frequency-tuning in a level-dependent way. In the antennal hearing organ of Drosophila, for example, the active process shifts the best frequency (BF) of the antennal sound receiver when the sound intensity is varied, tuning the receiver to conspecific songs. Here we show that this level-dependent tuning can be reproduced by an active transduction model as proposed for vertebrate hair cells and the Drosophila ear. We further show that the direction of the frequency shift depends on the system to which the molecular modules for auditory transduction connect: If this system is mass-less such as the sensory hair bundles of bullfrog saccular hair cells, the BF of the displacement response will increase as the sound intensity declines. Conversely, BF will decrease with declining intensity if the transduction modules couple to inertial systems such as the fly's antennal sound receiver or cupulae in the fish lateral line.
Nadrowski
Björn
B
Department for Cellular Neurobiology; University of Göttingen; Max-Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine; Göttingen, Germany.
Göpfert
Martin C
MC
Biophys J. 2007 Dec 1;93(11):4053-67
17704173
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Aug;9(4):389-93
10448164
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 11;102(2):325-30
15623551
Pflugers Arch. 2007 Aug;454(5):703-20
17436012
Eur Biophys J. 2006 Aug;35(6):511-6
16612585
Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):530-45
18760690
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 4;98(25):14380-5
11724945
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5514-9
12642657
Nature. 2001 Jun 21;411(6840):908
11418847
Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 5;17(11):1000-6
17524645
Neuron. 1988 May;1(3):189-99
2483095
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Aug;9(8):999-1000
16819519
Fly (Austin). 2007 Jul-Aug;1(4):238-41
18820433
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11765-72
11050207
J Comp Neurol. 2006 Nov 20;499(3):317-56
16998934
J Exp Biol. 2002 May;205(Pt 9):1199-208
11948197
Biophys Chem. 1997 Oct;68(1-3):43-52
9468609
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Feb 22;268(1465):333-9
11270428
Neuron. 2005 Nov 3;48(3):403-15
16269359
Curr Biol. 2008 Sep 23;18(18):1365-72
18789690
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 17;101(33):12195-200
15302928