The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics.
BACKGROUND
The UK National GP Patient Survey is one of the largest ever survey programmes of patients registered to receive primary health care, inviting five million respondents to report their experience of NHS primary healthcare. The third such annual survey (2008/9) involved the development of a new survey instrument. We describe the process of that development, and the findings of an extensive pilot survey in UK primary healthcare.


METHODS
The survey was developed following recognised guidelines and involved expert and stakeholder advice, cognitive testing of early versions of the survey instrument, and piloting of the questionnaire in a cross sectional pilot survey of 1,500 randomly selected individuals from the UK electoral register with two reminders to non-respondents.


RESULTS
The questionnaire comprises 66 items addressing a range of aspects of UK primary healthcare. A response rate of 590/1500 (39.3%) was obtained. Non response to individual items ranged from 0.8% to 15.3% (median 5.2%). Participants did not always follow internal branching instructions in the questionnaire although electronic controls allow for correction of this problem in analysis. There was marked skew in the distribution of responses to a number of items indicating an overall favourable impression of care. Principal components analysis of 23 items offering evaluation of various aspects of primary care identified three components (relating to doctor or nurse care, or addressing access to care) accounting for 68.3% of the variance in the sample.


CONCLUSIONS
The GP Patient Survey has been carefully developed and pilot-tested. Survey findings, aggregated at practice level, will be used to inform the distribution of pound sterling 65 million ($107 million) of UK NHS resource in 2008/9 and this offers the opportunity for NHS service planners and providers to take account of users' experiences of health care in planning and delivering primary healthcare in the UK.
Campbell
John
J
Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. john.campbell@pms.ac.uk
Smith
Patten
P
Nissen
Sonja
S
Bower
Peter
P
Elliott
Marc
M
Roland
Martin
M
D039602:After-Hours Care / Q000592:standards; D001294:Attitude to Health; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards; D019538:Health Care Surveys / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000592:standards*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D011594:Psychometrics; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Oct;56(531):743-8
17007703
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Apr;54(8):1215-24
11989958
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec;16(6):469-77
18055893
Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):501-18
19317857
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Dec;51(11):1611-25
11072882
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;54(2):136-41
11166528
Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):542-61
19040424
Med Care. 1998 May;36(5):728-39
9596063
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13 Suppl 2:3-10
18416923
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec;16(6):462-8
18055892
Health Soc Care Community. 2003 Nov;11(6):510-8
14629582
BMJ. 2006 Jul 1;333(7557):1-2
16809674
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Mar-Apr;6(2):107-15
18332402
Health Expect. 2006 Sep;9(3):275-84
16911142
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Jul;12(3):132-7
17716414
Health Policy. 1998 Sep;45(3):175-86
10338949
BMJ. 2003 Feb 1;326(7383):258
12560279
BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Feb 20;9:13
18289385
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):699-705
15528286
BMJ. 2006 Jul 1;333(7557):19
16793783
Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):165-71
9613486