Attentional control theory: anxiety, emotion, and motor planning.
The present study investigated how trait anxiety alters the balance between attentional control systems to impact performance of a discrete preplanned goal-directed motor task. Participants executed targeted force contractions (engaging the goal-directed attentional system) at the offset of emotional and non-emotional distractors (engaging the stimulus-driven attentional system). High and low anxious participants completed the protocol at two target force levels (10% and 35% of maximum voluntary contraction). Reaction time (RT), performance accuracy, and rate of change of force were calculated. Expectations were confirmed at the 10% but not the 35% target force level: (1) high anxiety was associated with slower RTs, and (2) threat cues lead to faster RTs independently of trait anxiety. These new findings suggest that motor efficiency, but not motor effectiveness is compromised in high relative to low anxious individuals. We conclude that increased stimulus-driven attentional control interferes with movements that require greater attentional resources.
Coombes
Stephen A
SA
Department of Psychiatry, and Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, 650 AHSB (M/C 994), Chicago, IL 60612, USA. scoombes@uic.edu
Higgins
Torrie
T
Gamble
Kelly M
KM
Cauraugh
James H
JH
Janelle
Christopher M
CM
D000293:Adolescent; D001007:Anxiety / Q000523:psychology*; D001143:Arousal; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007537:Isometric Contraction; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D052581:Pinch Strength; D011930:Reaction Time; D055815:Young Adult
Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Aug 15;52(4):312-7
12208638
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1988 Nov;40(4):653-70
3212208
J Occup Rehabil. 2004 Dec;14(4):281-94
15638258
Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):631-6
16102066
Emotion. 2007 Aug;7(3):465-77
17683203
Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):28-67
7878161
Behav Res Ther. 2002 Dec;40(12):1403-14
12457635
Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):336-53
17516812
J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 May;111(2):225-36
12003445
J Sports Sci. 2001 May;19(5):321-32
11354611
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Aug;32(8):1059-71
16861310
Emotion. 2008 Feb;8(1):104-13
18266520
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2002 Mar;2(1):52-63
12452584
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Mar;94(3):903-12
12571125
Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):275-84
17516806
J Sports Sci. 2002 Mar;20(3):237-51
11999479
Neuroimage. 2007 Mar;35(1):430-40
17239620
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Dec;133(4):584-600
15584808
Behav Brain Sci. 2004 Feb;27(1):3-24; discussion 24-78
15481943
Science. 2007 May 11;316(5826):904-6
17431137
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
11994752
Psychophysiology. 2007 Jan;44(1):91-7
17241144
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Sep;55(3):499-505
3171920
Emotion. 2003 Dec;3(4):327-43
14674827
Br J Psychol. 2007 Feb;98(Pt 1):15-31
17319048
Neurosci Lett. 2001 Apr 20;302(2-3):157-9
11290411
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan 1;57(1):16-20
15607295
Neuron. 2004 Dec 16;44(6):1043-55
15603746
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Jun;85(6):2613-23
11387405
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 23;101(47):16701-6
15546983
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Aug;27(8):652-61
16281289
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Dec;60(12):1585-93
17853212
Neurosci Lett. 2006 Apr 3;396(3):192-6
16376016
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):681-700
11757875
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006 Summer;18(3):342-9
16963583
J Exp Psychol. 1954 Jun;47(6):381-91
13174710
J Mot Behav. 2005 Nov;37(6):425-36
16280313
Psychol Sci. 2007 Nov;18(11):938-42
17958705
J Exp Psychol. 1966 Jun;71(6):849-57
5939364
Behav Res Ther. 1995 May;33(4):435-9
7755529
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;133(1):1-24
17201568
Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):119-24
15755225
Neuroimage. 2004 Jun;22(2):530-40
15193581
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jun;196(6):933-7
12788431
Am J Occup Ther. 1987 Mar;41(3):158-63
3318477
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Aug;29(4):439-56
17968047