title: The polyamine spermine rescues Arabidopsis from salinity and drought stresses.
abstract: There are accumulating reports that polyamines are involved in abiotic stress response. However, the role played by the polyamines is not fully elucidated. In the present studies, we assessed whether spermine among the polyamines plays a certain role against high salt and drought stresses using an Arabidopsis (acl5/spms) mutant plant that does not produce spermine, and found that it was hypersensitive to those stresses. In each case the hypersensitive phenotype was mitigated by application of exogenous spermine. The spermine-deficient mutant plants also showed a phenotype resembling Ca(2+)-deficiency. The NaCl-hypersensitivity and Ca(2+)-deficiency of acl5/spms double-knockout mutant resembled the phenotypes displayed by the AtGluR2- and CAX1-overexpressing transgenic plants. The two latter genes encode a glutamate receptor-type, Ca(2+)-ion influx channel at cytoplasmic membrane and a vacuolar Ca(2+)/H(+) antiporter, respectively. The data suggest that regulated expression of the Ca(2+)-pathway members is critical to adapt to those stresses, and that spermine plays a certain role to control the stress-induced Ca(2+) dynamics. Incorporating the current information from the literature, especially regarding action of polyamines on various ion channels, we present models describing a defensive role of spermine in high salt and drought stresses in Arabidopsis.
authors.affiliation: Graduate School of Life Sciences; Tohoku University; Miyagi, Japan.
authors.forename: Tomonobu
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kusano
authors.forename: Koji
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Yamaguchi
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Berberich
authors.forename: Yoshihiro
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Takahashi
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2004 Jan 23;279(4):2922-6
references.pmid: 14583601
references.citation: Eur Biophys J. 1999;28(7):552-63
references.pmid: 10541793
references.citation: J Membr Biol. 1999 Jan 15;167(2):127-40
references.pmid: 9916144
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1997 Aug;114(4):1141-9
references.pmid: 9276943
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2001 Jan;42(1):74-84
references.pmid: 11158446
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Aug;138(4):2048-60
references.pmid: 16055687
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:247-73
references.pmid: 12221975
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2000 Nov;124(3):1315-26
references.pmid: 11080307
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jun;47:159-184
references.pmid: 15012286
references.citation: Plant J. 1997 Nov;12(5):1067-78
references.pmid: 9418048
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1999 Nov;11(11):2113-22
references.pmid: 10559438
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1994 May;6(5):669-683
references.pmid: 12244253
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1995 Nov;109(3):735-742
references.pmid: 12228628
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 2004 Jan 2;556(1-3):148-52
references.pmid: 14706842
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):404-8
references.pmid: 15772667
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Feb;6(2):66-71
references.pmid: 11173290
references.citation: Plant J. 1996 Dec;10(6):1055-69
references.pmid: 9011087
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2002;14 Suppl:S401-17
references.pmid: 12045291