title: An empirical explanation of the speed-distance effect.
abstract: Understanding motion perception continues to be the subject of much debate, a central challenge being to account for why the speeds and directions seen accord with neither the physical movements of objects nor their projected movements on the retina. Here we investigate the varied perceptions of speed that occur when stimuli moving across the retina traverse different projected distances (the speed-distance effect). By analyzing a database of moving objects projected onto an image plane we show that this phenomenology can be quantitatively accounted for by the frequency of occurrence of image speeds generated by perspective transformation. These results indicate that speed-distance effects are determined empirically from accumulated past experience with the relationship between image speeds and moving objects.
authors.affiliation: Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. wtw3@duke.edu
authors.forename: William T
authors.initials: WT
authors.lastname: Wojtach
authors.forename: Kyongje
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Sung
authors.forename: Dale
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Purves
mesh_terms: D036262:Empirical Research; D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception; D011336:Probability; D011601:Psychophysics
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1987 Nov;7(11):3416-68
references.pmid: 3316524
references.citation: Vision Res. 1981;21(4):491-500
references.pmid: 7269327
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jun 26;423(6943):986-90
references.pmid: 12827202
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Apr;9(4):578-85
references.pmid: 16547513
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 8;101(23):8745-50
references.pmid: 15152077
references.citation: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981 Mar 6;211(1183):151-80
references.pmid: 6111795
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2006 Nov;16(11):1604-13
references.pmid: 16400160
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 6;106(1):298-303
references.pmid: 19114661
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000 Aug;10(4):438-43
references.pmid: 10981611
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):322-41
references.pmid: 3973764
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2006 Aug 21;241(4):866-75
references.pmid: 16537082
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Vision Res. 1974 Jul;14(7):519-27
references.pmid: 4423193
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):284-99
references.pmid: 3973762
references.citation: Vision Res. 1995 Oct;35(19):2697-722
references.pmid: 7483311
references.citation: J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106-54
references.pmid: 14449617
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 21;105(42):16338-43
references.pmid: 18852459
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1962 Sep;75:485-91
references.pmid: 13881416
references.citation: Perception. 1998;27(8):889-935
references.pmid: 10209632
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1075-80
references.pmid: 17546027
references.citation: Vision Res. 1984;24(1):33-9
references.pmid: 6695505
references.citation: Science. 1988 May 6;240(4853):740-9
references.pmid: 3283936
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1421-31
references.pmid: 17041595
references.citation: Vision Res. 1982;22(5):531-44
references.pmid: 7112953
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1974 Dec 1;158(3):267-93
references.pmid: 4436456
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1984 May;1(5):451-73
references.pmid: 6726493
references.citation: Vision Res. 1982;22(5):545-59
references.pmid: 7112954
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11;103(15):6013-8
references.pmid: 16595630
references.citation: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Jul 28;198(1130):1-59
references.pmid: 20635
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Jun;5(6):598-604
references.pmid: 12021763