title: Saprotrophic capabilities as functional traits to study functional diversity and resilience of ectomycorrhizal community.
abstract: In an accompanying editorial Dr Petr Baldrian made a case casting doubt on our recent work addressing the saprophytic potential of ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi. Dr Baldrian's statements illustrate a very valid truth: the book is still very much open on this subject. The point he raised that the only logical reason for these fungi to be responding to high carbon demand or decreased host photosynthetic capacity by up-regulating enzymes is for the purpose of carbon acquisition is valid as well. Despite this, he makes the case that there is no compelling evidence that EM fungi exhibit saprophytic activity. The concept central to Dr Baldrian's conclusion is that even though some EM fungi possess the genes necessary for saprophytic behaviour and may even express these genes, EM fungi do not inhabit a position in the soil column that provides access to usable substrate. In this paper we present both previously published and newly obtained data that demonstrate that this assumption is erroneous, and we present arguments that place the saprophytic potential of EM fungi within a broad ecological context.
authors.affiliation: NASA-Ames Research Center, MS 239-11, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA. cullings1@earthlink.net
authors.forename: Ken
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Cullings
authors.forename: Pierre-Emmanuel
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Courty
mesh_terms: D002244:Carbon / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D017753:Ecosystem; D038821:Mycorrhizae / Q000201:enzymology / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D010788:Photosynthesis / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000235:genetics / Q000382:microbiology; D010944:Plants / Q000235:genetics / Q000382:microbiology; D011157:Population Dynamics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012987:Soil; D012988:Soil Microbiology
chemical_list: D012987:Soil; D002244:Carbon
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Nov;158(1):77-83
references.pmid: 18679722
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 7;271(1550):1799-806
references.pmid: 15315895
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Jul;167(1):309-19
references.pmid: 15948852
references.citation: Biophys J. 2003 Jun;84(6):3883-93
references.pmid: 12770894
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Jul;61(1):153-63
references.pmid: 17466024
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2002 Jul 26;277(30):26879-85
references.pmid: 11983689
references.citation: Mycol Res. 2006 Dec;110(Pt 12):1426-32
references.pmid: 17123810
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2006 May;16(3):197-206
references.pmid: 16518613
references.citation: J Basic Microbiol. 2001;41(3-4):185-227
references.pmid: 11512451
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jul;69(7):3772-6
references.pmid: 12839743
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Sep 28;407(6803):506-8
references.pmid: 11029000
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Sep;74(18):5792-801
references.pmid: 18658284
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008;178(2):230-233
references.pmid: 18312537
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009;182(3):736-750
references.pmid: 19243515
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Nov;74(21):6598-605
references.pmid: 18791033