title: Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A community surgery group was reviewed for 1 year after completion of a laparoscopic colon surgery mentoring program.
  
  
  METHODS
  A formal mentoring protocol had been established between a university center and two surgeons at a community hospital. Over 18 months, concluding August 2007, surgeons were mentored and telementored through 20 laparoscopic colon resections in their local setting. Surgeons tracked their cases for a further 12 months after the mentoring.
  
  
  RESULTS
  From September 2007 to August 2008, 30 colon resections were performed. Three of these resections (1 laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for fistula and 2 laparoscopic subtotal colectomies) were mentored and telementored as advanced procedures. Of the remaining 27 resections, 15 (56%) were laparoscopic procedures including 9 right and 5 sigmoid colectomies as well as 1 subtotal colectomy. The 15 laparascopic colon resections were performed for cancer (n = 6), polyps (n = 5), diverticular disease (n = 2), Crohn's disease (n = 1), and colonic inertia (n = 1). Five cases were converted to open surgery (33%) due to adhesions (n = 3), unclear anatomy (n = 1), and equipment failure (n = 1). The mean number of lymph nodes in the cancer cases was 15.3 + or - 3.8. Minor postoperative complications occurred in seven cases (47%), three of which involved conversions. These complications included ileus (n = 4), wound abscess (n = 2), cardiac arrhythmia (n = 1), anastomotic bleed (n = 1), and abscess (n = 1). The patients selected for open surgery consisted of seven right and three sigmoid colectomies as well as a splenic flexure resection and a dual resection. The rationale for these open surgeries were transverse colon cancer (n = 4), medical comorbidity (n = 3), colovesicle fistulas (n = 2), rectal lesion (n = 2), and carcinoid tumor (n = 1). The laparoscopic patients were younger (58.2 + or - 13.2 vs 73.8 + or - 10.6 years; P = 0.003), had longer operating times (124 + or - 28 vs 94 + or - 38 min; P = 0.026), and a shorter median hospital stay (3 vs 7 days; P = 0.006). The laparoscopic operating time improved over the mentoring experience (124 + or - 28 vs 150 + or - 43 min; P = 0.046).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The 1-year follow-up evaluation after a longitudinal mentoring program demonstrates excellent incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery into a community practice with appropriate case selection, quality cancer surgery, and a moderate conversion rate.
authors.affiliation: CSTAR (Canadian Surgical Technologies & Advanced Robotics), Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada. christopher.schlachta@lhsc.on.ca
authors.forename: Christopher M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Schlachta
authors.forename: Kevin L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Lefebvre
authors.forename: A Kent
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Sorsdahl
authors.forename: Shiva
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Jayaraman
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003082:Colectomy / Q000193:education* / Q000379:methods; D003108:Colonic Diseases / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006764:Hospitals, Community / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000592:standards*; D008297:Male; D008611:Mentors; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D017216:Telemedicine / Q000458:organization & administration*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Sep;1(3):183-8
references.pmid: 1669400
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2004 May 13;350(20):2050-9
references.pmid: 15141043
references.citation: Hernia. 2002 Mar;6(1):17-20
references.pmid: 12090574
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Sep;1(3):144-50
references.pmid: 1688289
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2007 May;193(5):589-91; discussion 591-2
references.pmid: 17434361
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2001 Mar;181(3):226-30
references.pmid: 11376576
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20;25(21):3061-8
references.pmid: 17634484
references.citation: Surg Innov. 2008 Dec;15(4):277-83
references.pmid: 19036732
references.citation: Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jul;6(7):477-84
references.pmid: 15992696
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Nov;12(11):2001-9
references.pmid: 18575941
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):954-9
references.pmid: 19474684
references.citation: Can J Surg. 2007 Aug;50(4):256-60
references.pmid: 17897513
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1634-8
references.pmid: 19067069
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2007 Mar;21(3):396-9
references.pmid: 17103274