From the Cover: Osmotrophy in modular Ediacara organisms.
The Ediacara biota include macroscopic, morphologically complex soft-bodied organisms that appear globally in the late Ediacaran Period (575-542 Ma). The physiology, feeding strategies, and functional morphology of the modular Ediacara organisms (rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs) remain debated but are critical for understanding their ecology and phylogeny. Their modular construction triggered numerous hypotheses concerning their likely feeding strategies, ranging from micro-to-macrophagus feeding to photoautotrophy to osmotrophy. Macrophagus feeding in rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs is inconsistent with their lack of oral openings, and photoautotrophy in rangeomorphs is contradicted by their habitats below the photic zone. Here, we combine theoretical models and empirical data to evaluate the feasibility of osmotrophy, which requires high surface area to volume (SA/V) ratios, as a primary feeding strategy of rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs. Although exclusively osmotrophic feeding in modern ecosystems is restricted to microscopic bacteria, this study suggests that (i) fractal branching of rangeomorph modules resulted in SA/V ratios comparable to those observed in modern osmotrophic bacteria, and (ii) rangeomorphs, and particularly erniettomorphs, could have achieved osmotrophic SA/V ratios similar to bacteria, provided their bodies included metabolically inert material. Thus, specific morphological adaptations observed in rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs may have represented strategies for overcoming physiological constraints that typically make osmotrophy prohibitive for macroscopic life forms. These results support the viability of osmotrophic feeding in rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs, help explain their taphonomic peculiarities, and point to the possible importance of earliest macroorganisms for cycling dissolved organic carbon that may have been present in abundance during Ediacaran times.
Laflamme
Marc
M
Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Xiao
Shuhai
S
Kowalewski
Michał
M
D000818:Animals; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development*; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004141:Dinoflagellida / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development; D017753:Ecosystem; D005580:Fossils; D007448:Invertebrates / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development*; D008962:Models, Theoretical
Science. 2004 Aug 20;305(5687):1141-4
15256615
Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):122-6
9082983
Science. 1999 Apr 16;284(5413):493-5
10205058
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8124-9
12824461
J Paleontol. 1997 Nov;71(6):953-67
11541433
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 19;102(29):10227-32
16014417
Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):744-7
17151665
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1966 Nov;41(4):587-640
5342162
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:105-37
11544351
Nature. 2000 Sep 7;407(6800):78-80
10993076
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jan;24(1):31-40
18952316
J Phycol. 2000 Jun;36(3):453-472
29544017
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 4;105(9):3197-202
18299566
Nature. 1993 Mar 18;362(6417):239-41
8459849