Assessing differential effects: applying regression mixture models to identify variations in the influence of family resources on academic achievement.
Developmental scientists frequently seek to understand effects of environmental contexts on development. Traditional analytic strategies assume similar environmental effects for all children, sometimes exploring possible moderating influences or exceptions (e.g., outliers) as a secondary step. These strategies are poorly matched to ecological models of human development that posit complex individual by environment interactions. An alternative conceptual framework is proposed that tests the hypothesis that the environment has differential (nonuniform) effects on children. A demonstration of the utility of this framework is provided by examining the effects of family resources on children's academic outcomes in a multisite study (N = 6,305). Three distinctive groups of children were identified, including 1 group particularly resilient to influence of low levels of family resources. Predictors of group differences including parenting and child demographics are tested, the replicability of the results are examined, and findings are contrasted with those obtained with traditional regression interaction effects. This approach is proposed as a partial solution to advance theories of the environment, social ecological systems research, and behavioral genetics to create well-tailored environments for children.
Van Horn
M Lee
ML
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Barnwell College, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. vanhorn@sc.edu
Jaki
Thomas
T
Masyn
Katherine
K
Ramey
Sharon Landesman
SL
Smith
Jessalyn A
JA
Antaramian
Susan
S
D002648:Child; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D004522:Educational Status; D005006:Ethnicity; D005190:Family; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012931:Social Environment; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):318-36
11280487
Child Dev. 1992 Jun;63(3):573-82
1600823
Dev Psychol. 2003 Mar;39(2):189-200
12661881
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):933-52
16351338
Dev Psychopathol. 1999 Winter;11(1):143-69
10208360
Am Psychol. 1998 Feb;53(2):185-204
9491747
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;31(2):422-9
11980807
Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Spring;9(2):291-319
9201446
Psychol Methods. 2004 Mar;9(1):3-29
15053717
Biometrics. 1999 Jun;55(2):463-9
11318201
Dev Psychopathol. 1998 Spring;10(2):143-64
9635219
Child Care Health Dev. 1987 Mar-Apr;13(2):111-25
3581439
Am Psychol. 2000 Feb;55(2):218-32
10717969
Future Child. 1997 Summer-Fall;7(2):55-71
9299837
Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281-302
13245896
Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Spring;9(2):193-9
9201442
Dev Psychol. 2003 Nov;39(6):1020-35
14584982
Stat Med. 1993 Jul 15;12(13):1259-68
8210825
Am Psychol. 1998 Feb;53(2):205-20
9491748
Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):1000-11
9383622
Psychol Methods. 2006 Mar;11(1):36-53
16594766
Child Dev. 1998 Jun;69(3):803-16
9680686
Psychol Methods. 2003 Sep;8(3):369-77; discussion 384-93
14596497
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
3806354