Antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery before skin incision.
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the effect of a hospital-wide change in the timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis in cesarean deliveries on maternal and neonatal infections.


METHODS
In November 2004, our institution instituted guidelines recommending that the administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery be administered before skin incision rather than after umbilical-cord clamping. We reviewed all cesarean deliveries from two time periods. Group 1 received antibiotics after umbilical-cord clamping (July 2002 to November 2004). Group 2 received antibiotics before skin incision (June 2005 to August 2007). Rates of maternal and neonatal infectious complications were compared between groups.


RESULTS
There were 4,229 cesarean deliveries in group 1 and 4,781 cesarean deliveries in group 2. Compared with women receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis after umbilical-cord clamping, those administered antimicrobial prophylaxis before skin incision had lower rates of postpartum endometritis (2.2% compared with 3.9%) and wound infection (2.5% compared with 3.6%). After multivariable logistic regression, antimicrobial prophylaxis before skin incision remained associated with lower rates of endometritis (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.79) and wound infection (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.90). Antimicrobial prophylaxis before skin incision had no adverse effect on neonatal infection rates or on the evaluation of the neonate.


CONCLUSIONS
Antimicrobial prophylaxis before skin incision, compared with after cord clamping, resulted in lower rates of maternal infections and had no effect on neonatal infections. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery should occur before skin incision, consistent with basic tenets of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.


METHODS
II.
Owens
Stephanie M
SM
From the Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Brozanski
Beverly S
BS
Meyn
Leslie A
LA
Wiesenfeld
Harold C
HC
D000328:Adult; D019072:Antibiotic Prophylaxis / Q000379:methods*; D001424:Bacterial Infections / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D002585:Cesarean Section; D015331:Cohort Studies; D004716:Endometritis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D011247:Pregnancy; D011645:Puerperal Infection / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult
Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL Jr, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Pollock DA, et al. Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep 2007;122:160–6.
Gibbs RS. Clinical risk factors for puerperal infection. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55:178S–84.
Yokoe DS, Christiansen CL, Johnson R, Sands KE, Livingston J, Shtatland ES, et al. Epidemiology of and surveillance for postpartum infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:837–41.
Henderson E, Love EJ. Incidence of hospital-acquired infections associated with caesarean section. J Hosp Infect 1995;29:245–55.
Miner AL, Sands KE, Yokoe DS, Freedman J, Thompson K, Livingston JM, et al. Enhanced identification of postoperative infections among outpatients. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1931–7.
Page CP, Bohnen JM, Fletcher JR, McManus AT, Solomkin JS, Wittmann DH. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical wounds. Guidelines for clinical care [published erratum appears in Arch Surg 1993;128:410]. Arch Surg 1993;128:79–88.
Burke JF. The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 1961;50:161–8.
Classen DC, Evan RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med 1992;326:281–6.
Sullivan SA, Smith T, Chang E, Husley T, Vandorsten JP, Soper D. Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial [published erratum appears in Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:333]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:455.e1–5.
Hardin JW, Hilbe JM. Generalized estimating equations. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2003.
Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorny K, Burstin H, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:S51–61.
Fry DE. Surgical site infections and the surgical care improvement project (SCIP): evolution of national quality measures. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008;9:579–84.
Chaim W, Bashiri A, Bar-David J, Shoham-Vardi I, Mazor M. Prevalence and clinical significance of postpartum endometritis and wound infection. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2000;8:77–82.
Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2006. National vital statistics reports: vol 56 no 7. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2007.
Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writes Workgroup, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association of Critical Care Nurses, American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1706–15.
Thigpen BD, Hood WA, Chauhan S, Bufkin L, Bofill J, Magann E, et al. Timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration in the uninfected laboring gravida: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1864–8.
Kaimal AJ, Zlatnik MG, Cheng YW, Thiet M-P, Connatty E, Creedy P, et al. Effect of a change in policy regarding the timing of prophylactic antibiotics on the rate of postcesarean delivery surgical-site infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:310.e1–5.