Application of stereological estimates in patients with severe head injuries using CT and MR scanning images.
Severe brain damage is often followed by serious complications. Quantitative measurements, such as regional volume and surface area under various conditions, are essential for understanding functional changes in the brain and assessing prognosis. The affected brain tissue is variable, hence traditional imaging methods are not always applicable and automatic methods may not be able to match the individual observer. Stereological techniques are alternative tools in the quantitative description of biological structures, and have been increasingly applied to the human brain. In the present study, we applied stereological techniques to representative CT and MRI brain scans from five patients to describe how stereological methods, when applied to scans of trauma patients, can provide a useful supplement to the estimation of structural brain changes in head injuries. The reliability of the estimates was tested by obtaining repeated intra- and interobserver estimates of selected subdivisions of the brain in patients with acute head injury, as well as in an MR phantom. The estimates of different subdivisions showed a coefficient of variation (CV) below 12% in the patients and below 7% for phantom estimation. The validity of phantom estimates was tested by the average deviation from the true geometric values, and was below 10%. The stereological methods were compared with more traditional region-based methods performed on medical imaging, which showed a CV below 7% and bias below 14%. It is concluded that the stereological estimates may be useful tools in head injury quantification.
Eriksen
N
N
Research Laboratory for Stereology and Neuroscience, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg. forsklab@bbh.regionh
Rostrup
E
E
Andersen
K
K
Lauritzen
M J
MJ
Fabricius
M
M
Larsen
V A
VA
Dreier
J P
JP
Strong
A J
AJ
Hartings
J A
JA
Pakkenberg
B
B
D000465:Algorithms; D001921:Brain / Q000473:pathology*; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D006259:Craniocerebral Trauma / Q000150:complications; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013345:Subarachnoid Hemorrhage / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods
Neuroimage. 2005 May 15;26(1):57-65
15862205
J Anat. 1990 Oct;172:191-200
2272902
J Microsc. 1999 Mar;193(Pt 3):199-211
10348656
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2008 Jan-Feb;43(1):32-43
18684385
J Microsc. 1986 Jul;143(Pt 1):3-45
3761363
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 26;97(20):11050-5
10984517
J Anat. 1996 Aug;189 ( Pt 1):177-84
8771409
J Anat. 2007 Oct;211(4):534-55
17727624
J Microsc. 1986 Jun;142(Pt 3):259-76
3735415
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):823-30
17354849
Hippocampus. 1994 Feb;4(1):115-25
8061750
J Microsc. 1987 Sep;147(Pt 3):229-63
3430576
Br J Radiol. 1994 Nov;67(803):1067-77
7820398
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;26(6):1564-71
17968884
Br J Radiol. 2000 Jul;73(871):679-97
11089458
J Comp Neurol. 1997 Jul 28;384(2):312-20
9215725
Acad Radiol. 2007 Apr;14(4):455-62
17368215
J Comp Neurol. 1992 Dec 22;326(4):549-60
1484123
Acta Neuropathol. 1993;85(6):617-22
8337940
Trends Neurosci. 1999 Feb;22(2):51-61
10092043
J Microsc. 2002 Sep;207(Pt 3):191-210
12230489
Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Apr;24(3):265-72
16563955
Neurology. 2006 Aug 22;67(4):575-82
16924007
J Microsc. 1989 Jul;155(Pt 1):113-21
2769747
Acta Neuropathol. 2000 May;99(5):529-33
10805097