A dual propagation contours technique for semi-automated assessment of systolic and diastolic cardiac function by CMR.
BACKGROUND
Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is frequently performed to measure accurate LV volumes and ejection fractions, LV volume-time curves (VTC) derived ejection and filling rates are not routinely calculated due to lack of robust LV segmentation techniques. VTC derived peak filling rates can be used to accurately assess LV diastolic function, an important clinical parameter. We developed a novel geometry-independent dual-contour propagation technique, making use of LV endocardial contours manually drawn at end systole and end diastole, to compute VTC and measured LV ejection and filling rates in hypertensive patients and normal volunteers.


METHODS
39 normal volunteers and 49 hypertensive patients underwent CMR. LV contours were manually drawn on all time frames in 18 normal volunteers. The dual-contour propagation algorithm was used to propagate contours throughout the cardiac cycle. The results were compared to those obtained with single-contour propagation (using either end-diastolic or end-systolic contours) and commercially available software. We then used the dual-contour propagation technique to measure peak ejection rate (PER) and peak early diastolic and late diastolic filling rates (ePFR and aPFR) in all normal volunteers and hypertensive patients.


RESULTS
Compared to single-contour propagation methods and the commercial method, VTC by dual-contour propagation showed significantly better agreement with manually-derived VTC. Ejection and filling rates by dual-contour propagation agreed with manual (dual-contour - manual PER: -0.12 +/- 0.08; ePFR: -0.07 +/- 0.07; aPFR: 0.06 +/- 0.03 EDV/s, all P = NS). However, the time for the manual method was approximately 4 hours per study versus approximately 7 minutes for dual-contour propagation. LV systolic function measured by LVEF and PER did not differ between normal volunteers and hypertensive patients. However, ePFR was lower in hypertensive patients vs. normal volunteers, while aPFR was higher, indicative of altered diastolic filling rates in hypertensive patients.


CONCLUSIONS
Dual-propagated contours can accurately measure both systolic and diastolic volumetric indices that can be applied in a routine clinical CMR environment. With dual-contour propagation, the user interaction that is routinely performed to measure LVEF is leveraged to obtain additional clinically relevant parameters.
Feng
Wei
W
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA. fengwe1@auburn.edu
Nagaraj
Hosakote
H
Gupta
Himanshu
H
Lloyd
Steven G
SG
Aban
Inmaculada
I
Perry
Gilbert J
GJ
Calhoun
David A
DA
Dell'Italia
Louis J
LJ
Denney
Thomas S
TS
D000465:Algorithms; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003971:Diastole; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D009200:Myocardial Contraction; D015588:Observer Variation; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012984:Software; D013318:Stroke Volume; D013599:Systole; D013997:Time Factors; D016277:Ventricular Function, Left
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2000;2(4):271-8
11545126
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2005 Sep;9(3):430-46
16167698
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1995;14(2):328-38
18215836
Med Image Anal. 2004 Sep;8(3):255-65
15450220
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Sep;21(9):1167-78
12564884
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Nov;25(11):1472-82
17117776
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(3):417-26
16755827
Invest Radiol. 2006 Jan;41(1):52-62
16355040
Radiology. 2006 Jul;240(1):215-21
16793980
Comput Biol Med. 2006 Apr;36(4):389-407
15925359
Med Image Anal. 2006 Apr;10(2):286-303
16439182
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jan 1;87(1):95-9
11137841
Med Image Anal. 2004 Sep;8(3):245-54
15450219
Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Oct;96(10):743-51
17763966
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999 Oct;18(10):957-72
10628955
Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2):315-23
7249299
Acad Radiol. 2003 Dec;10(12):1349-58
14697003
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008 Jul 08;10:36
18611254
Med Image Anal. 2006 Aug;10(4):657-70
16709463
Med Image Anal. 2005 Aug;9(4):394-410
15907391
Arch Intern Med. 1988 Jan;148(1):99-109
2962556
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2004;6(3):609-17
15347125
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Nov;46(5):939-45
11675646
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Oct;23(10):1245-50
15493692
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Sep-Oct;21(5):756-65
9294570
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(5):777-83
17891615
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 May;24(5):593-603
15889547
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 1999;1(1):1-6
11550337
Invest Radiol. 2008 Jan;43(1):1-6
18097271
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2003;12(11):1427-42
18244700
Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(3):282-6
17492113
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Jan;16(1):29-37
12514632
Med Image Anal. 2004 Sep;8(3):387-401
15450231
Invest Radiol. 2005 Apr;40(4):195-203
15770137
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007 Jan;26(1):15-30
17243581