Fracture loads of all-ceramic crowns under wet and dry fatigue conditions.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that fracture loads of fatigued dental ceramic crowns are affected by testing environment and luting cement.


METHODS
One hundred and eighty crowns were prepared from bovine teeth using a lathe. Ceramic crowns were prepared from three types of ceramic systems: an alumina-infiltrated ceramic, a lithia-disilicate-based glass ceramic, and a leucite-reinforced ceramic. For each ceramic system, 30 crowns were cemented with a composite resin cement, and the remaining 30 with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. For each ceramic system and cement, ten specimens were loaded to fracture without fatiguing. A second group (n = 10) was subjected to cyclic fatigue and fracture tested in a dry environment, and a third group (n = 10) was fatigued and fractured in distilled water. The results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test.


RESULTS
The fracture loads of ceramic crowns decreased significantly after cyclic fatigue loading (p<or= 0.05); furthermore, fracture loads of crowns fatigued in a wet environment were statistically lower than those in a dry environment (p < 0.05). Crowns luted with a composite resin cement showed statistically greater fracture loads than those luted with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (p<or= 0.05).


CONCLUSIONS
Fracture load of the three ceramic systems was found to be influenced by ceramic composition. Moreover, cement and fatigue condition influenced the fracture loads of the crown specimens evaluated in this study.
Borges
Gilberto A
GA
Department of Dental Materials and Restorative Dentistry, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, Brazil. gilberto.borges@uniube.br
Caldas
Danilo
D
Taskonak
Burak
B
Yan
Jiahau
J
Sobrinho
Lourenco Correr
LC
de Oliveira
Wildomar José
WJ
D000537:Aluminum Oxide / Q000737:chemistry; D000538:Aluminum Silicates / Q000737:chemistry; D000818:Animals; D001031:Apatites / Q000737:chemistry; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002417:Cattle; D002484:Cementation / Q000379:methods; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D003442:Crowns; D003738:Dental Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D003776:Dental Porcelain / Q000737:chemistry*; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003890:Desiccation; D005898:Glass / Q000737:chemistry; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D018020:Lithium Compounds / Q000737:chemistry; D008422:Materials Testing; D019279:Resin Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry
D000538:Aluminum Silicates; D001031:Apatites; D003188:Composite Resins; D003738:Dental Cements; C118557:Empress 2; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; C483026:In-Ceram Alumina; D018020:Lithium Compounds; C076808:Monobond S; D019279:Resin Cements; C084550:Vitremer; C506670:d.SIGN ceramic; C493120:lithia disilicate; C483027:vitadur alpha; D014867:Water; D003776:Dental Porcelain; C078519:leucite; C103502:Variolink; D000537:Aluminum Oxide