title: Electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to reward prediction violation.
abstract: Anterior cingulate cortex has been functionally linked to the detection of outcomes that are worse than expected using both scalp electrophysiological [event-related potential (ERP)] and hemodynamic [functional MRI (fMRI)] responses. This study used a reward prediction violation design which acquired both ERP and fMRI data from the same participants in different sessions. Both the medial frontal negativity (MFN) ERP response and anterior cingulate cortex hemodynamic activity differentiated between reward delivery and expectation with the largest MFN and anterior cingulate cortex response when predicted rewards were not delivered. Inverse modeling placed the MFN source near the anterior cingulate cortex hemodynamic activation. The fMRI study also showed increased striatal response to rewards regardless of prediction indicating dissociation of neural processing of reward and reward expectation.
authors.affiliation: Hoglund Brain Imaging Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Hoglund Brain Imaging Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA. lmartin2@kumc.edu
authors.forename: Laura E
authors.initials: LE
authors.lastname: Martin
authors.forename: Geoffrey F
authors.initials: GF
authors.lastname: Potts
authors.forename: Philip C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Burton
authors.forename: P Read
authors.initials: PR
authors.lastname: Montague
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001921:Brain / Q000098:blood supply / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002560:Cerebrovascular Circulation; D003342:Corpus Striatum / Q000098:blood supply / Q000502:physiology; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005071:Evoked Potentials; D006179:Gyrus Cinguli / Q000098:blood supply / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008606:Mental Processes / Q000502:physiology*; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D012201:Reward; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jun;21(11):3161-8
references.pmid: 15978024
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Mar 15;55(6):594-602
references.pmid: 15013828
references.citation: Science. 1998 May 1;280(5364):747-9
references.pmid: 9563953
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):284-94
references.pmid: 10731223
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 12;26(15):4063-70
references.pmid: 16611823
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Aug 15;21(16):RC159
references.pmid: 11459880
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):593-602
references.pmid: 12126500
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 8;99(1):523-8
references.pmid: 11756669
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2004 Jun 28;15(9):1519-22
references.pmid: 15194887
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2000 Jul;12(1):20-7
references.pmid: 10875899
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jul;18(7):1112-9
references.pmid: 16839285
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 Feb 25;24(8):1793-802
references.pmid: 14985419
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Mar 1;61(5):720-4
references.pmid: 16950228
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Jul;28(4):441-8
references.pmid: 15289008
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 May;3(5):516-20
references.pmid: 10769394
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Apr;985:476-8
references.pmid: 12724180
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2002 Oct;109(4):679-709
references.pmid: 12374324
references.citation: Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1023-6
references.pmid: 14963333
references.citation: Science. 1997 Mar 14;275(5306):1593-9
references.pmid: 9054347