The paediatric flat foot proforma (p-FFP): improved and abridged following a reproducibility study.
BACKGROUND
Concern about a child's flat foot posture is a common reason for frequent clinical consultations for an array of health care and medical professionals. The recently developed paediatric flatfoot clinical-care pathway (FFP) has provided an evidence based approach to diagnosis and management. The intra and inter-rater/measurer reliability of the FFP has been investigated in this study.


METHODS
From a study population of 140 children aged seven to 10 years, a sample with flat feet was identified by screening with the Foot posture index (FPI-6). Subjects who scored >/= 6 on the FPI-6 for both feet became the study's flat foot sample. A same subject, repeated measure research design was used for this study which examined the reliability of the FFP in 31 children aged seven to 10 years, as rated by three examiners.


RESULTS
Approximately half of the items of the FFP showed less-than-desirable inter-rater reliability, arbitrarily set at the conventional 0.7 level (intra-class correlations). Removal of the unreliable items has produced a shorter; more relevant instrument designated the paediatric flat foot proforma (p-FFP).


CONCLUSIONS
The p-FFP is a reliable instrument for the assessment and resulting treatment actions for children with flat feet. Findings indicate that the simplified p-FFP is a reproducible instrument for the clinical assessment of flat foot in mid-childhood.
Evans
Angela Margaret
AM
School of Health Science, Division of Health Science, University of South Australia, City, East Campus, North Terrace, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia. angela.evans@unisa.edu.au.
Nicholson
Hollie
H
Zakarias
Noami
N
Instr Course Lect. 1988;37:109-10
3047232
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1989 Jul;6(3):491-509
2665922
Acta Orthop Belg. 1992;58(4):406-10
1485503
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;43(6):341-73
15605048
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jan;21(1):89-98
16182419
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
18839484
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 May;(278):177-82
1563152
J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1977 Sep;67(9):616-9
903565
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jul 07;(7):CD006311
20614443
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999 Jan;7(1):44-53
9916191
Nagoya Med J. 1972 Feb;17(3):57-79
5050758
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Jan;67(1):71-8
3968149
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1987 Jan;77(1):46-9
3820114
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003 May-Jun;93(3):203-13
12756311
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):634-9
16882817
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999 Feb;89(2):94-9
10063780
Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Jul;20(7):456-60
10437930
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Jun;28(6):715-23
17592702
Foot Ankle. 1980 Nov;1(3):143-50
7319430
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;88(1):88-93
17207681
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;85:7-10
5036934
Foot Ankle. 1989 Apr;9(5):241-5
2731836
Br Med J. 1970 Feb 21;1(5694):479-81
5435151
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Jul;71(6):800-10
2663868
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1989 Jul;6(3):477-89
2665921
Br J Hosp Med. 1979 Oct;22(4):355-7
508992
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009 May-Jun;99(3):267-8; author reply  268-9
19448182
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;99(2):178; auhtor reply 179
19299359
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986 Dec;33(6):1411-27
3024097
Clin Podiatry. 1984 Dec;1(3):535-46
6536407
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1987 Jan;77(1):2-6
3820110
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Dec;(181):7-14
6641070
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1967 Nov;49(4):628-33
6073180
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1998 Jul;15(3):481-97, vi
9684083
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008 Sep-Oct;98(5):386-93
18820042
Trop Doct. 1979 Oct;9(4):192-4
516145
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977 Jan-Feb;(122):95-101
837625