title: Plant nucleotide cyclases: an increasingly complex and growing family.
abstract: Second messengers have a key role in linking environmental stimuli to physiological responses. One such messenger, cGMP, has long been known to be critical to many different processes in higher plants while guanylyl cyclases (GCs), enzymes that catalyse the formation of cGMP from GTP have largely remained elusive. This is somewhat surprising considering that the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii contains >90 annotated GCs. We have recently shown (PLoS ONE 2(5): e449) that a recombinant cytoplasmic domain of the Arabidopsis brassinosteroid receptor AtBRI has GC activity in vitro. This finding may suggest that other leucine-rich receptor kinases such as the phystosulfokine receptor may also confer GC activity as it has a high degree of similarity in the domain that has been delineated as essential for catalysis. In addition, the discovery of increasing complexities in the molecular architecture of higher plant nucleotide cyclases (NCs) is entirely compatible with findings in Chlamydomonas where such domains appear in >20 different combinations suggesting a role in highly diverse and complex signaling events.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biotechnology; University of the Western Cape; Bellville, South Africa.
authors.forename: Stuart
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Meier
authors.forename: Cathal
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Seoighe
authors.forename: Lusisizwe
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Kwezi
authors.forename: Helen
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Irving
authors.forename: Chris
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gehring
references.citation: Nat Chem Biol. 2005 Jun;1(1):53-9
references.pmid: 16407994
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 2004 Oct;29(10):524-6
references.pmid: 15450606
references.citation: New Phytol. 2003 Jul;159(1):11-35
references.pmid: 33873677
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 18;95(17):10328-33
references.pmid: 9707647
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D235-9
references.pmid: 14681402
references.citation: Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2005 Oct;9(5):441-6
references.pmid: 16125437
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Dec 21;96(26):14753-8
references.pmid: 10611285
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1995 Mar;105(3):309-28
references.pmid: 7769379
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):13414-9
references.pmid: 9391039
references.citation: Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):78-83
references.pmid: 2563900
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Aug;8(4):390-6
references.pmid: 15922651
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1999 Nov;121(3):753-61
references.pmid: 10557223
references.citation: Plant J. 2006 Mar;45(5):700-11
references.pmid: 16460505
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1996 Dec;8(12):2325-2333
references.pmid: 12239379
references.citation: Front Biosci. 2005 May 01;10:1485-98
references.pmid: 15769639
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 2004 Jul 2;569(1-3):317-20
references.pmid: 15225654
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2003 Feb 21;278(8):6490-4
references.pmid: 12482758
references.citation: Development. 2004 Jun;131(11):2707-14
references.pmid: 15128654
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2005 Apr;17(4):1205-16
references.pmid: 15749766
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2003 Aug;19(8):415-7
references.pmid: 12902157
references.citation: PLoS One. 2007 May 23;2(5):e449
references.pmid: 17520012
references.citation: New Phytol. 1999 Sep;143(3):427-455
references.pmid: 33862890