title: Fluctuating mate preferences in a marine fish.
abstract: According to theory, directional female choice for male sexual ornaments is expected to erode underlying genetic variation. Considerable attention, in this regard, has been given to understanding the ubiquity of heritable genetic variation in both female choice and male sexual traits. One intriguing possibility emerging from this work is that persistent genetic variation could be maintained, over time, by variation in female mate preferences. Here, we report the results of a four-year study showing significant year-to-year fluctuations in mate preferences in a small marine fish, the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Although the average size of mature fish varied across years, we were unable to find direct evidence linking this variation to differences in female preferences among years. Our results, nevertheless, underscore the importance of temporal fluctuations in female mate preferences, as these can have important consequences for understanding variation in sexual traits and the intensity of sexual selection.
authors.affiliation: School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia. topi.lehtonen@sci.monash.edu.au
authors.forename: Topi K
authors.initials: TK
authors.lastname: Lehtonen
authors.forename: Bob B M
authors.initials: BB
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.forename: Kai
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lindström
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D049628:Body Size; D005260:Female; D005387:Finland; D014644:Genetic Variation; D008297:Male; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D010473:Perciformes / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D012727:Sex Characteristics
references.citation: Am Nat. 2007 Aug;170(2):184-9
references.pmid: 17874369
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Nov;78(4):575-95
references.pmid: 14700392
references.citation: Science. 2008 Jan 25;319(5862):459-62
references.pmid: 18218896
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1997 May;72(2):283-327
references.pmid: 9155244
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 May;19(5):264-71
references.pmid: 16701266
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 7;269(1486):97-104
references.pmid: 11788042
references.citation: Evolution. 2001 Aug;55(8):1644-55
references.pmid: 11580024
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2003 Nov;16(6):1065-76
references.pmid: 14640398
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jun 3;429(6991):551-4
references.pmid: 15175750
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jan 1;16(1):5-7
references.pmid: 11146131
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jan;23(1):1-3
references.pmid: 18077055
references.citation: Evolution. 1984 Jul;38(4):709-719
references.pmid: 28555816