On the roles of colour and scent in a specialized floral mimicry system.
OBJECTIVE
Sexually deceptive orchids achieve cross-pollination by mimicking the mating signals of female insects, generally hymenopterans. This pollination mechanism is often highly specific as it is based primarily on the mimicry of mating signals, especially the female sex pheromones of the targeted pollinator. Like many deceptive orchids, the Mediterranean species Ophrys arachnitiformis shows high levels of floral trait variation, especially in the colour of the perianth, which is either green or white/pinkinsh within populations. The adaptive significance of perianth colour polymorphism and its influence on pollinator visitation rates in sexually deceptive orchids remain obscure.


METHODS
The relative importance of floral scent versus perianth colour in pollinator attraction in this orchid pollinator mimicry system was evaluated by performing floral scent analyses by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and behavioural bioassays with the pollinators under natural conditions were performed.


RESULTS
The relative and absolute amounts of behaviourally active compounds are identical in the two colour morphs of O. arachnitiformis. Neither presence/absence nor the colour of the perianth (green versus white) influence attractiveness of the flowers to Colletes cunicularius males, the main pollinator of O. arachnitiformis.


CONCLUSIONS
Chemical signals alone can mediate the interactions in highly specialized mimicry systems. Floral colour polymorphism in O. arachnitiformis is not subjected to selection imposed by C. cunicularius males, and an interplay between different non-adaptive processes may be responsible for the maintenance of floral colour polymorphism both within and among populations.
Vereecken
Nicolas J
NJ
Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, Free University of Brussels/Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F.D. Roosevelt 50 CP 160/12, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium. nicolas.vereecken@ulb.ac.be
Schiestl
Florian P
FP
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D001516:Bees / Q000502:physiology; D035264:Flowers / Q000502:physiology*; D005602:France; D009812:Odorants; D029595:Orchidaceae / Q000502:physiology*; D010858:Pigmentation / Q000502:physiology*; D054817:Pollination / Q000502:physiology; D011157:Population Dynamics
Annu Rev Entomol. 2009;54:425-46
19067636
Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Aug;7(8):255-9
21236024
Evolution. 1997 Jun;51(3):715-723
28568581
Am Nat. 1998 Nov;152(5):696-705
18811344
Ann Bot. 2009 Aug;104(3):497-506
19001428
J Exp Biol. 2007 Apr;210(Pt 8):1398-405
17401122
Evolution. 2005 Jul;59(7):1449-63
16153031
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 27;105(21):7484-8
18508972
Ann Bot. 2007 Oct;100(4):757-65
17684024
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Apr;15(4):140-143
10717682
J Evol Biol. 2008 Jul;21(4):958-65
18507700
J Chem Ecol. 2005 Aug;31(8):1765-87
16222807
Am J Bot. 2005 Oct;92(10):1624-31
21646079
Am J Bot. 1997 Oct;84(10):1383
21708546
Phytochemistry. 2005 Jan;66(2):203-13
15652577
Oecologia. 1997 Feb;109(3):414-426
28307539
Ann Bot. 2008 Dec;102(6):911-22
18819948
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Sep;20(9):487-94
16701425
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6253-5
11353863
Science. 1971 Jan 15;171(3967):203-5
17751330
J Exp Biol. 2009 May;212(Pt 9):1365-70
19376957
J Chem Ecol. 2006 May;32(5):917-27
16739013
Evolution. 1996 Dec;50(6):2207-2220
28565662
Naturwissenschaften. 2005 Jun;92(6):255-64
15931514
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Feb;22(2):71-9
17055107
Am J Bot. 2002 Nov;89(11):1772-8
21665604
Oecologia. 2004 Feb;138(3):405-13
14666418
J Chem Ecol. 1981 Mar;7(2):427-36
24420488
Am Nat. 2003 Apr;161(4):537-52
12776883
J Chem Ecol. 2003 Jan;29(1):1-14
12647849
Evolution. 1987 May;41(3):599-606
28563812