Exploring kidney patients' experiences of receiving individual peer support.
BACKGROUND
Peer support schemes of various types are commonly offered to patients as an adjunct to health and social care services provided by professionals. For patients with chronic illness, peer support interventions have recently become associated with more directive attempts to increase self management and improve healthcare outcomes. There is little qualitative research on patients' experiences of one-to-one peer support.


OBJECTIVE
To explore kidney patients' experiences of receiving individual peer support.


METHODS
Two large teaching hospital renal units in South London, with peer support services for patients on the pre-dialysis care pathway.


METHODS
Qualitative telephone interviews with a purposive, maximum variation sample of 20 people who had received peer support.


RESULTS
The majority of respondents were overwhelmingly positive about their experience of peer support and its benefits. They valued peer support because it had given them access to practical information about kidney disease, based on lived experience, which helped them reach decisions about treatment. Peer supporters offered patients empathy and understanding; confirmation that they were not alone in suffering; positive role models of coping with treatment for kidney disease; and hope for the future. Peer support helped patients adapt to chronic illness by normalizing adherence to demanding treatment regimes and increasing patients' sense of empowerment and agency.


CONCLUSIONS
A brief meeting with a peer supporter delivered similar perceived benefits to those described by participants in support groups. Possible explanations for this include selection and training of peer supporters; careful matching of patients with peer supporters; and responsiveness to individual user-defined needs for information and psychosocial support.
Hughes
Jane
J
Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK. jane.hughes@kcl.ac.uk
Wood
Eleri
E
Smith
Gaynor
G
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000523:psychology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010379:Peer Group; D012657:Self-Help Groups
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12(2):65-6
17407652
BMJ. 2005 Mar 19;330(7492):628
15774990
Scand J Caring Sci. 2002 Sep;16(3):224-31
12191033
BMJ. 2006 Oct 28;333(7574):879
17040926
J Health Psychol. 2003 Nov;8(6):720-37
14670206
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):10-24
17904782
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Sep;26(6):845-74
15383044
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Oct;55(1):87-93
15476994
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;19(3):174-83
15191260
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Oct;55(1):3-15
15476984
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):321-32
12605954
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 May;53(2):141-6
15140453
Sociol Health Illn. 2007 Jan;29(1):27-45
17286704
Health Expect. 2006 Dec;9(4):359-65
17083562
J Nurs Manag. 2008 May;16(4):433-9
18405260
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):315-37
18191527
Soc Sci Med. 2006 May;62(10):2565-76
16303220