Osteochondral grafting: effect of graft alignment, material properties, and articular geometry.
Osteochondral grafting for cartilage lesions is an attractive surgical procedure; however, the clinical results have not always been successful. Surgical recommendations differ with respect to donor site and graft placement technique. No clear biomechanical analysis of these surgical options has been reported. We hypothesized that differences in graft placement, graft biomechanical properties, and graft topography affect cartilage stresses and strains. A finite element model of articular cartilage and meniscus in a normal knee was constructed. The model was used to analyze the magnitude and the distribution of contact stresses, von Mises stresses, and compressive strains in the intact knee, after creation of an 8-mm diameter osteochondral defect, and after osteochondral grafting of the defect. The effects of graft placement, articular surface topography, and biomechanical properties were evaluated. The osteochondral defect generated minimal changes in peak contact stress (3.6 MPa) relative to the intact condition (3.4 MPa) but significantly increased peak von Mises stress (by 110%) and peak compressive strain (by 63%). A perfectly matched graft restored stresses and strains to near intact conditions. Leaving the graft proud by 0.5 mm generated the greatest increase in local stresses (peak contact stresses = 6.7 MPa). Reducing graft stiffness and curvature of articular surface had lesser effects on local stresses. Graft alignment, graft biomechanical properties, and graft topography all affected cartilage stresses and strains. Contact stresses, von Mises stresses, and compressive strains are biomechanical markers for potential tissue damage and cell death. Leaving the graft proud tends to jeopardize the graft by increasing the stresses and strains on the graft. From a biomechanical perspective, the ideal surgical procedure is a perfectly aligned graft with reasonably matched articular cartilage surface from a lower load-bearing region of the knee.
D D'Lima
Darryl
D
Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research & Education at Scripps Clinic, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
C Chen
Peter
P
W Colwell
Clifford
C
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;32(8):1842-8
15572310
Comput Biol Med. 2007 Mar;37(3):376-87
16796999
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):1334-44
16636354
Am J Sports Med. 1999 May-Jun;27(3):320-8
10352767
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A Suppl 2(Pt 1):19-21
11685837
Knee. 2007 Jun;14(3):177-82
17428666
Arthroscopy. 2005 Sep;21(9):1066-75
16171631
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Feb;85(2):185-92
12571292
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Dec;35(12):2014-21
17724094
Orthopedics. 1997 Jun;20(6):525-38
9195635
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 May;16(5):461-8
18292989
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Mar-Apr;29(2):201-6
11292046
J Biomech Eng. 2002 Jun;124(3):273-80
12071261
J Orthop Res. 2004 Jul;22(4):807-14
15183438
Arthroscopy. 2002 Sep;18(7):730-4
12209430
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Mar;33(3):443-60
15716263
Arthroscopy. 1997 Aug;13(4):456-60
9276052
Arthroscopy. 2001 Jan;17(1):50-5
11154367
Arthroscopy. 2004 Sep;20(7):681-90
15346108
J Biomech Eng. 2006 Feb;128(1):135-41
16532627
Med Eng Phys. 2002 Mar;24(2):85-97
11886827
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Mar;32(2):317-20
14977653
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Jul;52(7):2033-9
15986359
J Orthop Res. 1991 May;9(3):330-40
2010837
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Oct;(391 Suppl):S328-36
11603716
J Biomech. 2003 Jan;36(1):19-34
12485635
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A Suppl 2(Pt 1):22-4
11685839
Am J Sports Med. 1986 Jul-Aug;14(4):270-5
3755296
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Jul;9(5):499-507
11467899
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Sep;32(6):1451-8
15310570
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000 Sep 15;381(2):205-12
11032407
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Nov;9(8):712-9
11795990