title: Geographic variation in public health spending: correlates and consequences.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine the extent of variation in public health agency spending levels across communities and over time, and to identify institutional and community correlates of this variation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Three cross-sectional surveys of the nation's 2,900 local public health agencies conducted by the National Association of County and City Health Officials in 1993, 1997, and 2005, linked with contemporaneous information on population demographics, socioeconomic characteristics, and health resources.
  
  
  METHODS
  A longitudinal cohort design was used to analyze community-level variation and change in per-capita public health agency spending between 1993 and 2005. Multivariate regression models for panel data were used to estimate associations between spending, institutional characteristics, health resources, and population characteristics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The top 20 percent of communities had public health agency spending levels >13 times higher than communities in the lowest quintile, and most of this variation persisted after adjusting for differences in demographics and service mix. Local boards of health and decentralized state-local administrative structures were associated with higher spending levels and lower risks of spending reductions. Local public health agency spending was inversely associated with local-area medical spending.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The mechanisms that determine funding flows to local agencies may place some communities at a disadvantage in securing resources for public health activities.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Policy & Management, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. gpmays@uams.edu
authors.forename: Glen P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Mays
authors.forename: Sharla A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D005102:Health Expenditures; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D017059:Models, Econometric; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D011635:Public Health Administration / Q000191:economics*; D015980:Public Health Practice / Q000191:economics*; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014481:United States
references.citation: Milbank Q. 2007 Sep;85(3):533-59
references.pmid: 17718667
references.citation: J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):103-14
references.pmid: 17299313
references.citation: Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Oct;24(10):518-40
references.pmid: 9801951
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2000 Dec;90(12):1913-6
references.pmid: 11111265
references.citation: Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:195-233
references.pmid: 16533115
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):273-87
references.pmid: 12585825
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):335-8
references.pmid: 15757916
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):923-33
references.pmid: 16835170
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):60-76
references.pmid: 11900187
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2007 Feb;32(2):173-4
references.pmid: 17234491
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1981 Oct;71(10):1109-15
references.pmid: 7270759
references.citation: J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(2):170-80
references.pmid: 8764390
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):920-7
references.pmid: 16943404
references.citation: J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):227-32
references.pmid: 17299332
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):288-98
references.pmid: 12585826
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):523-31
references.pmid: 16449584
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):48-59
references.pmid: 11900186
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Aug;22(4):993-1020
references.pmid: 9334916
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 2000 Feb;34(6):1351-62
references.pmid: 10654835
references.citation: J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 Sep-Oct;10(5):435-43
references.pmid: 15552769
references.citation: J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):188-93
references.pmid: 17299324
references.citation: Science. 1973 Dec 14;182(4117):1102-8
references.pmid: 4750608
references.citation: J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1996 Winter;18(3):288-303
references.pmid: 10158617
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 4;328(9):621-7
references.pmid: 8429854
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1997 Jan;87(1):91-5
references.pmid: 9065234
references.citation: Inquiry. 2000-2001 Winter;37(4):389-410
references.pmid: 11252448
references.citation: J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(4):460-83
references.pmid: 9009540
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2004 Jun;94(6):1019-26
references.pmid: 15249309
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2001 Aug;91(8):1235-9
references.pmid: 11499110
references.citation: Int J Health Plann Manage. 2006 Jul-Sep;21(3):239-70
references.pmid: 17044549
references.citation: Public Health Rep. 2001;116 Suppl 1:50-67
references.pmid: 11889275
references.citation: Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:341-56
references.pmid: 15015924
references.citation: J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):289-98
references.pmid: 18408554