Recruitment in retractor bulbi muscle during eyeblink conditioning: EMG analysis and common-drive model.
To analyze properly the role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of the eyeblink and nictitating membrane (NM) response, the control of conditioned response dynamics must be better understood. Previous studies have suggested that the control signal is linearly related to the CR as a result of recruitment within the accessory abducens motoneuron pool, which acts to linearize retractor bulbi muscle and NM response mechanics. Here we investigate possible recruitment mechanisms. Data came from simultaneous recordings of NM position and multiunit electromyographic (EMG) activity from the retractor bulbi muscle of rabbits during eyeblink conditioning, in which tone and periocular shock act as conditional and unconditional stimuli, respectively. Action potentials (spikes) were extracted and classified by amplitude. Firing rates of spikes with different amplitudes were analyzed with respect to NM response temporal profiles and total EMG spike firing rate. Four main regularities were revealed and quantified: 1) spike amplitude increased with response amplitude; 2) smaller spikes always appeared before larger spikes; 3) subsequent firing rates covaried for spikes of different amplitude, with smaller spikes always firing at higher rates than larger ones; and 4) firing-rate profiles were approximately Gaussian for all amplitudes. These regularities suggest that recruitment does take place in the retractor bulbi muscle during conditioned NM responses and that all motoneurons receive the same command signal (common-drive hypothesis). To test this hypothesis, a model of the motoneuron pool was constructed in which motoneurons had a range of intrinsic thresholds distributed exponentially, with threshold linearly related to EMG spike amplitude. Each neuron received the same input signal as required by the common-drive assumption. This simple model reproduced the main features of the data, suggesting that conditioned NM responses are controlled by a common-drive mechanism that enables simple commands to determine response topography in a linear fashion.
Lepora
N F
NF
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, United Kingdom. p.dean@sheffield.ac.uk.
Porrill
J
J
Yeo
C H
CH
Evinger
C
C
Dean
P
P
D000200:Action Potentials; D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003215:Conditioning, Eyelid / Q000502:physiology*; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D004576:Electromyography; D004597:Electroshock; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D009046:Motor Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D016011:Normal Distribution; D009801:Oculomotor Muscles / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology*; D011817:Rabbits; D013997:Time Factors
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):1503-16
8890270
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Sep;78(3):1531-49
9310441
Neuroscience. 1983 Dec;10(4):1317-32
6320049
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Oct;18(5):732-40
17434321
Exp Neurol. 1981 Feb;71(2):251-60
7449900
Network. 1998 Nov;9(4):R53-78
10221571
J Neurophysiol. 1988 Dec;60(6):1874-95
2466962
Neurosci Res. 1991 May;10(4):260-79
1652721
Muscle Nerve. 2000 Mar;23(3):361-7
10679712
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1646-57
16899649
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Feb;169(1):37-49
16273406
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Dec;70(6):2470-88
8120594
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1581-90
17615125
Behav Brain Res. 1983 Dec;10(2-3):393-8
6661285
J Physiol. 1974 Jan;236(1):43-55
4818515
Neuroscience. 1980;5(12):2155-62
7465049
J Neurophysiol. 1976 Jan;39(1):119-42
1249597
Biol Cybern. 1992;68(2):135-43
1486138
Prog Brain Res. 2006;151:1-42
16221584
Exp Brain Res. 1993;94(2):225-36
8359239
Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jun;29(6):330-8
16713636
Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Mar;112(3):464-71
11222968
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:1-23
15709927
J Physiol. 2003 May 15;549(Pt 1):195-205
12665614
Neuroscience. 1999;90(4):1515-28
10338317
J Physiol. 1982 Aug;329:113-28
7143246
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005 Sep;49(2):367-76
16111563
Invest Ophthalmol. 1976 Aug;15(8):654-7
955830
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Jan;83(1):441-52
10634886
Prog Brain Res. 1986;64:39-49
2873622
Brain Res. 1990 Apr 30;514(2):238-48
2357540
Learn Mem. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):427-55
14657256
Behav Neurosci. 2008 Apr;122(2):471-6
18410186
J Neurosci. 1985 Apr;5(4):941-50
3981250
Muscle Nerve. 1995 Apr;18(4):435-9
7715629
Muscle Nerve. 1988 Feb;11(2):151-9
3343991
Biol Cybern. 1992;68(2):145-54
1486139
Brain Res. 1985 Feb 18;327(1-2):203-19
3986499
Muscle Nerve. 1996 Mar;19(3):338-41
8606698
Biol Cybern. 2007 Jan;96(1):39-57
17021829
Exp Brain Res. 1995;104(3):431-48
7589295
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 5;28(10):2651-8
18322108
J Comp Neurol. 1986 Jan 15;243(3):291-308
3512626
J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 11;26(41):10569-76
17035543
Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Jan;19(1):1-10
14750958
Somatosens Mot Res. 2006 Mar-Jun;23(1-2):25-35
16846957
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Jun;69(6):561-7
2453333
Exp Brain Res. 1992;88(3):623-38
1587320
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2;91(16):7534-8
8052615
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;97(6):290-5
8536578
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;13(5):385-400
8897205
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Sep 1;2(9):322-30
21227228
Brain Res. 1987 Jul 14;415(2):281-92
3038271
Behav Neurosci. 2007 Aug;121(4):808-13
17663605
Trends Neurosci. 1994 Jul;17(7):299-305
7524216
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001 Jun;11(3):151-73
11335147
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov;92(5):2878-86
15201310
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1993 Dec;3(6):1028-34
8124071
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Sep;146(2):184-96
12195520
J Physiol. 1982 Aug;329:129-42
7143247
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Dec;978:79-92
12582043
J Neurophysiol. 1977 Jul;40(4):879-90
886372
Exp Brain Res. 1978 Feb 15;31(2):249-74
631242
Physiol Behav. 1982 May;28(5):769-75
7100278
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2074-88
17615135
Curr Opin Neurol. 2006 Feb;19(1):4-13
16415671
Exp Brain Res. 1985;60(1):87-98
4043285
J Neurosci. 1989 Jan;9(1):299-311
2913208
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2769-74
16760349