title: Of mice (Mus musculus) and toddlers (Homo sapiens): evidence for species-general spatial reorientation.
abstract: There is ongoing debate in spatial cognition about the mechanisms by which organisms are able to reorient, or reestablish a position, in the world after losing their bearing. The traditional view is that there is an encapsulated reorientation module that can only process environmental geometry such as distances or angles (Cheng, 1986). Recently, this view has been challenged on the grounds that the reorientation mechanism is only able to accept geometric information and may instead depend on a more general ability to use relative cues. J. Huttenlocher and S. F. Lourenco (2007) demonstrated that toddlers are successfully able to reorient with continuous cues but show remarkable deficits using categorical cues that are similar in perceptual complexity for reorientation. Here, the authors show the same pattern of results with mice (Mus musculus). These findings provide evidence that there is a homologous reorientation mechanism between mice and humans. Thus, future researchers can examine the genetic basis of this important cognitive ability.
authors.affiliation: Psychology Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. atwyman@temple.edu
authors.forename: Alexandra D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Twyman
authors.forename: Nora S
authors.initials: NS
authors.lastname: Newcombe
authors.forename: Thomas J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Gould
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001070:Appetitive Behavior; D001364:Awareness; D003118:Color Perception; D003210:Concept Formation; D003463:Cues; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012858:Size Perception; D013028:Space Perception; D013045:Species Specificity