title: Binaral rivalry between the nostrils and in the cortex.
abstract: When two different images are presented to the two eyes, we perceive alternations between seeing one image and seeing the other. Termed binocular rivalry, this visual phenomenon has been known for over a century and has been systematically studied in recent years at both the behavioral and neural levels. A similar phenomenon has been documented in audition. Here we report the discovery of alternating olfactory percepts when two different odorants are presented to the two nostrils. This binaral rivalry involves both cortical and peripheral (olfactory receptor) adaptations. Our discovery opens up new avenues to explore the workings of the olfactory system and olfactory awareness.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, MS-25, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
authors.forename: Wen
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Zhou
authors.forename: Denise
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Chen
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D006801:Humans; D009666:Nose / Q000502:physiology*; D009812:Odorants; D009833:Olfactory Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D055696:Olfactory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D012903:Smell / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1964 Jan;67:22-6
references.pmid: 14113912
references.citation: Science. 1999 Oct 22;286(5440):711-5
references.pmid: 10531048
references.citation: Nature. 1974 Sep 27;251(5473):307-9
references.pmid: 4427654
references.citation: J Appl Physiol. 1964 May;19:369-73
references.pmid: 14173530
references.citation: Vision Res. 1982;22(7):787-800
references.pmid: 7123863
references.citation: Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;63:44-69
references.pmid: 16733332
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Mar;48(8):994-1001
references.pmid: 18329066
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Nov;10(11):502-11
references.pmid: 16997612
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Nov 4;402(6757):35
references.pmid: 10573415
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):496-9
references.pmid: 16244649
references.citation: Science. 2006 Feb 3;311(5761):666-70
references.pmid: 16456082
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Nov 12;28(46):11989-97
references.pmid: 19005064
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Oct 24;16(20):2023-9
references.pmid: 17055981
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Apr;13(4):547-60
references.pmid: 11305885
references.citation: Perception. 1980;9(2):223-31
references.pmid: 7375329
references.citation: J Anat. 1965 Oct;99(Pt 4):791-813
references.pmid: 5867169
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Dec 11;426(6967):623-9
references.pmid: 14668854
references.citation: Nature. 1977 Jul 7;268(5615):50-2
references.pmid: 887144
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Apr 18;380(6575):621-4
references.pmid: 8602261
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jan 23;259(1354):71-6
references.pmid: 7700878
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 1992 May;8(5):469-78
references.pmid: 1586647
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2000 Jan;83(1):537-51
references.pmid: 10634894
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Aug 18;47(4):581-92
references.pmid: 16102540
references.citation: J Anat. 1971 Oct;110(Pt 1):25-37
references.pmid: 4110864
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jan;96(1):145-67
references.pmid: 2648445