title: Modeling the categorical perception of speech sounds: a step toward biological plausibility.
abstract: Our native language has a lifelong effect on how we perceive speech sounds. Behaviorally, this is manifested as categorical perception, but the neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are still unknown. Here, we constructed a computational model of categorical perception, following principles consistent with infant speech learning. A self-organizing network was exposed to a statistical distribution of speech input presented as neural activity patterns of the auditory periphery, resembling the way sound arrives to the human brain. In the resulting neural map, categorical perception emerges from most single neurons of the model being maximally activated by prototypical speech sounds, while the largest variability in activity is produced at category boundaries. Consequently, regions in the vicinity of prototypes become perceptually compressed, and regions at category boundaries become expanded. Thus, the present study offers a unifying framework for explaining the neural basis of the warping of perceptual space associated with categorical perception.
authors.affiliation: Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland. nelli.salminen@tkk.fi
authors.forename: Nelli H
authors.initials: NH
authors.lastname: Salminen
authors.forename: Hannu
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Tiitinen
authors.forename: Patrick J C
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: May
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D002663:Child Language; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology; D008606:Mental Processes / Q000502:physiology*; D008959:Models, Neurological; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology; D010700:Phonetics; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013060:Speech; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 1999 Oct;41(1):1-6
references.pmid: 10504185
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 2008 Jun;24(3):277-90
references.pmid: 17917802
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2005 Mar;3(3):e78
references.pmid: 15736980
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1993 Jan;13(1):87-103
references.pmid: 8423485
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11850-7
references.pmid: 11050219
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1982 Apr;31(4):307-14
references.pmid: 7110883
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Aug;100(2 Pt 1):1111-21
references.pmid: 8759964
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):10114-9
references.pmid: 12119383
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2001 Apr;22(2):79-90
references.pmid: 11324846
references.citation: Cognition. 2002 Jan;82(3):B101-11
references.pmid: 11747867
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13273-8
references.pmid: 17664424
references.citation: Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):606-8
references.pmid: 1736364
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Aug;27(8):636-51
references.pmid: 16281285
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 May 3;26(18):4970-82
references.pmid: 16672673
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Jan;97(1):553-62
references.pmid: 7860832
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2000 May;62(4):874-86
references.pmid: 10883591
references.citation: J Math Biol. 1982;15(3):267-73
references.pmid: 7153672
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1973 Jun 1;13(2):253-260
references.pmid: 23226880
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):22-44
references.pmid: 1546117
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Feb;47(1):46-57
references.pmid: 15072527
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1976 Dec;60(6):1381-9
references.pmid: 1010890
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Mar;7(1):53-73
references.pmid: 17598735
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Nov;106(5):2900-12
references.pmid: 10573904
references.citation: Brain Res. 1990 Dec 17;536(1-2):271-86
references.pmid: 2085753
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2000 May;62(4):843-67
references.pmid: 10883589
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1999 Apr;61(3):561-77
references.pmid: 10334101
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1957 Nov;54(5):358-68
references.pmid: 13481283
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 2;28(14):3747-58
references.pmid: 18385333
references.citation: Science. 1997 Aug 1;277(5326):684-6
references.pmid: 9235890
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Oct;98(4):1890-4
references.pmid: 7593913
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Jun;45(3):564-72
references.pmid: 12069008
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Feb;101(2):1090-105
references.pmid: 9035400
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Oct 15;28(1):59-71
references.pmid: 16023868
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Aug;50(2):93-107
references.pmid: 1945741
references.citation: Neuron. 1999 Dec;24(4):773-6
references.pmid: 10624941