Indoor concentrations of nicotine in low-income, multi-unit housing: associations with smoking behaviours and housing characteristics.
OBJECTIVE
An analysis of airborne nicotine measurements collected in 49 low-income, multi-unit residences across the Greater Boston Area.


METHODS
Nicotine concentrations were determined using passive monitors placed in homes over a one-week sampling period and air exchange rates (AER) were sampled using the perfluorocarbon tracer technique. Residents were surveyed through a questionnaire about smoking behaviour and a visual inspection was conducted to collect information on housing characteristics contributing to secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. Using a mass balance model to account for the air exchange rate, volume of the home and sorption and re-emission of nicotine on indoor surfaces, the effective smoking rate (SR(eff)) was determined for each residence.


RESULTS
Nicotine levels ranged from the limit of detection to 26.92 microg/m(3), with a mean of 2.20 microg/m(3) and median of 0.13 microg/m(3). Nicotine measurements were significantly associated with the number of smokers in the household and the number of cigarettes smoked in the home. The results of this study suggest that questionnaire reports can provide a valid estimate of residential exposure to tobacco smoke. In addition, this study found evidence that tobacco smoke contamination in low-income housing developments is not limited to homes with smokers (either residing in the home or visiting). The frequent report of tobacco smoke odour coming from other apartments or hallways resulted in increased levels of nicotine concentrations and SR(eff) in non-smoking homes, suggestive of SHS infiltration from neighbouring units.


CONCLUSIONS
These findings have important implications for smoking regulations in multi-unit homes and highlight the need to reduce involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke among low-income housing residents.
Kraev
T A
TA
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Adamkiewicz
G
G
Hammond
S K
SK
Spengler
J D
JD
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016902:Air Pollution, Indoor / Q000032:analysis*; D001900:Boston / Q000453:epidemiology; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000032:analysis; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D062665:Epidemiological Monitoring; D005260:Female; D006798:Housing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009538:Nicotine / Q000032:analysis*; D011204:Poverty Areas; D012907:Smoking / Q000453:epidemiology*; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Q000032:analysis
D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution; D009538:Nicotine
Am J Public Health. 2008 Jan;98(1):85-91
18048798
Health Psychol. 1994 Nov;13(6):516-20
7889906
Environ Sci Technol. 1987 May 1;21(5):494-7
22296139
Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):e74-9
19117850
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1996 Oct-Dec;6(4):473-502
9087866
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Oct;29(3):218-20
16168872
Addict Behav. 1998 Jul-Aug;23(4):567-71
9698987
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2004;14 Suppl 1:S95-109
15118751
Tob Control. 2007 Oct;16(5):e5
17897974
Epidemiology. 2000 May;11(3):350-2
10784258
Environ Health. 2004 Dec 07;3(1):13
15585065
Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):18-24
11433049
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Apr;108(4):301-7
10753087
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Jul;140(1):197-201
2751165
Occup Environ Med. 2006 Nov;63(11):766-72
16912089
Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Mar 1;36(5):846-53
11918006
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006 Oct 27;55(42):1145-8
17065979