Color-coding improves parental understanding of body mass index charting.
OBJECTIVE
To assess parental understanding of body mass index (BMI) and BMI percentiles by using standard versus color-coded charts; to investigate how parental literacy and/or numeracy (quantitative skills) affects that understanding.


METHODS
A convenience sample of 163 parents of children aged 2 to 8 years at 2 academic pediatric centers completed a demographics questionnaire, the mathematics portion of the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-3R), the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA), and an "Understanding BMI" questionnaire, which included parallel BMI charting questions to compare understanding of standard versus color-coded BMI charting. Outcomes included parental-reported versus actual understanding of BMI, the odds (obtained by generalized estimating equations) of answering parallel questions correctly by using standard versus color-coded charting, and odds of answering questions correctly on the basis of numeracy and literacy.


RESULTS
Many parents (60%) reported knowing what BMI was, but only 30% could define it even roughly correctly. When parents used color-coded charts, they had greater odds of answering parallel BMI charting questions correctly than when they used standard charts (mean, 88% vs 65% correct; pooled adjusted odds ratio, 4.32; 95% confidence interval, 3.14-5.95; P < .01). Additionally, parents with lower numeracy (K-5 level) benefited more from color-coded charts (increased from 51% to 81% correct) than did higher numeracy parents (high school level or greater), who performed well with both charts (89% vs 99% correct).


CONCLUSIONS
Parents consistently performed better with color-coded than standard BMI charts. Color-coding was particularly helpful for lower numeracy parents. Future studies should investigate whether these results translate into the office setting and whether understanding motivates parents to implement important lifestyle changes.
Oettinger
Matthew D
MD
Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7225, USA.
Finkle
Joanne P
JP
Esserman
Denise
D
Whitehead
Lisa
L
Spain
Thomas K
TK
Pattishall
Steven R
SR
Rothman
Russell L
RL
Perrin
Eliana M
EM
D000328:Adult; D015992:Body Mass Index; D002648:Child; D003116:Color; D032882:Comprehension; D004522:Educational Status; D057238:Growth Charts; D057220:Health Literacy; D006801:Humans; D010290:Parents / Q000523:psychology*
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Nov;31(5):391-8
17046410
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Jun;103(6):721-8
12778044
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007 Oct;46(8):689-97
17579096
Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 2):210-4
12093997
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007 Jun;19(3):354-61
17505200
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):737-46
18490687
Pediatrics. 2003 May;111(5 Pt 2):1226-31
12728143
J Asthma. 2006 Nov;43(9):705-10
17092853
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Jan;15(1):225-32
17228051
J Pediatr. 2004 Apr;144(4):455-60
15069392
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2003 Apr;42(3):235-45
12739922
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1464-71
19482755
Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 Feb;59(2):307-16
8310979
Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Sep;38(1):33-42
14528569
Am J Med Sci. 2004 Aug;328(2):88-93
15311167
Pediatrics. 2000 Dec;106(6):1380-6
11099592
Ambul Pediatr. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):150-6
15913408
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):e94-101
15995022
Obes Res. 2003 Nov;11(11):1362-8
14627757
Pediatrics. 2008 Sep;122(3):e682-8
18762503
Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1138-46
11331699
Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120 Suppl 4:S164-92
18055651
Prev Med. 2004 Feb;38(2):172-4
14715208
Obes Res. 2004 Feb;12(2):275-83
14981220
Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 2):222-8
12093999
Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1):38-44
17261481
J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Oct;10(10):537-41
8576769