title: Cell division and the ESCRT complex: A surprise from the archaea.
abstract: The Archaea constitute the third domain of life, a separate evolutionary lineage together with the Bacteria and the Eukarya.1 Species belonging to the Archaea contain a surprising mix of bacterial (metabolism, life style, genomic organization) and eukaryotic (replication, transcription, translation) features.2 The archaeal kingdom comprises two main phyla, the Crenarchaeota and the Euryarchaeota. Regarding the cell division process in archaeal species (reviewed in ref. 3), members of the Euryarchaeota rely on an FtsZ-based cell division mechanism4 whereas, previously, no division genes had been detected in the crenarchaea. However, we recently reported the discovery of the elusive cell division machinery in crenarchaea from the genus Sulfolobus.5 The minimal machinery consists of three genes, which we designated cdvA, B and C (for cell division), organized into an operon that is widely conserved among crenarchaea. The gene products polymerize between segregating nucleoids at the early mitotic stage, forming a complex that remains associated with the leading edge of constriction throughout cytokinesis. Interestingly, CdvB and CdvC were shown to be related to the eukaryotic ESCRT-III protein sorting machinery (reviewed in ref. 6), indicating shared common ancestry and mechanistic similarities to endosomal vesicle formation and viral (HIV) budding in eukaryotes. We also demonstrated that the cdv operon is subject to checkpoint-like regulation, and that the genes display a complementary phylogenetic distribution within the Archaea domain relative to FtsZ-dependent division systems.5 Here, the findings are further explored and discussed, and topics for further investigation are suggested.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular Evolution; Evolutionary Biology Center; Uppsala University; Uppsala, Sweden.
authors.forename: Thijs Jg
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Ettema
authors.forename: Rolf
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bernander
references.citation: Extremophiles. 2009 Jan;13(1):67-79
references.pmid: 18972064
references.citation: J Virol. 2006 Aug;80(15):7625-35
references.pmid: 16840341
references.citation: Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008 Feb;20(1):4-11
references.pmid: 18222686
references.citation: Genome Res. 1999 Jul;9(7):608-28
references.pmid: 10413400
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4576-9
references.pmid: 2112744
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2007 Dec;189(23):8708-18
references.pmid: 17905990
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 2;105(48):18942-6
references.pmid: 18987308
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2007;8(10):R220
references.pmid: 17931420
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 1996 Jul;21(2):313-9
references.pmid: 8858586
references.citation: J Virol. 2008 May;82(10):4874-83
references.pmid: 18337566
references.citation: J Virol. 2007 Sep;81(17):9050-60
references.pmid: 17553870
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90
references.pmid: 16928733
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 20;104(8):2939-44
references.pmid: 17307872
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005 Dec;8(6):662-8
references.pmid: 16249118
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 2;105(48):18653-4
references.pmid: 19033202
references.citation: Science. 2008 Dec 12;322(5908):1710-3
references.pmid: 19008417
references.citation: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:395-425
references.pmid: 15473846
references.citation: Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006;35:277-98
references.pmid: 16689637
references.citation: Science. 2004 Jan 23;303(5657):531-4
references.pmid: 14739459