title: Organic vs inorganic: What makes the major contribution to osmotic adjustment in bacteria?
abstract: In order to survive hyperosmotic stress bacteria should adjust their cell turgor to altered conditions by increasing the intracellular osmolality. The classical view is that bacterial osmotic adjustment is achieved via accumulation of so-called "compatible solutes"-some organic osmolytes that can be accumulated in the cytosol at high concentrations without interfering with cell metabolism. In our recently published paper,11 we have shown that in the absence of osmolytes in the environment uptake of inorganic ions (and, specifically, K(+)) is central to osmotic adjustment in E. coli under hyperosmotic stress conditions. Here we show that optimal E. coli growth, observed at 2% NaCl, corresponds to an osmotic balance between external and internal osmolality within bacterial cells. This is achieved by the regulation of net K(+) fluxes across the bacterial membrane. We suggest that the role of compatible solutes in osmotic adjustment in bacteria is indirect and confined to the fine tuning of a number of ion channels and transporters in order to achieve osmotic balance.
authors.affiliation: Menzies Research Institute; University of Tasmania; Tasmania, Australia.
authors.forename: Lana
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Shabala
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000 Jul;24(3):263-90
references.pmid: 10841973
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Dec;58(12):3959-63
references.pmid: 1476439
references.citation: Lancet. 1991 Jun 8;337(8754):1412
references.pmid: 1674781
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1991;45:569-606
references.pmid: 1741624
references.citation: New Phytol. 1985 Sep;101(1):25-77
references.pmid: 33873830
references.citation: Adv Microb Physiol. 1995;37:272-328
references.pmid: 8540423
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006 May;30(3):472-86
references.pmid: 16594966
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jan;11(1):137-48
references.pmid: 18793315
references.citation: EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3157-64
references.pmid: 1505513
references.citation: Int Rev Cytol. 1996;165:1-52
references.pmid: 8900956
references.citation: Planta. 2007 Feb;225(3):753-61
references.pmid: 16955270
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 1998 Jul;81(7):1810-7
references.pmid: 9710748
references.citation: Bacteriol Rev. 1976 Dec;40(4):803-46
references.pmid: 1008746
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Mar;63(1):230-62
references.pmid: 10066837
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 May;23(5):190-4
references.pmid: 9612084