title: A quality improvement intervention to facilitate the transition of older adults from three hospitals back to their homes.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To study the feasibility and effectiveness of a discharge planning intervention.
  
  
  METHODS
  Quasi-experimental pre-post study design.
  
  
  METHODS
  General medicine wards at three hospitals: an academic medical center, a community teaching hospital, and a community-based nonteaching hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  All patients aged 65 and older admitted to the hospitalist services.
  
  
  METHODS
  The intervention toolkit had five core elements: admission form with geriatric cues, facsimile to the primary care provider, interdisciplinary worksheet to identify barriers to discharge, pharmacist-physician collaborative medication reconciliation, and predischarge planning appointments.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty-day readmission and return to emergency department rates and patient satisfaction with discharge. Odds ratios were determined, and site effects were examined accordig to interaction terms and Breslow Day statistics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Two hundred thirty-seven patients were followed during the preintervention period, and 185 were exposed to the intervention. Patients characteristics were similar across the two time periods. The proportion of patients with high-quality transitions home, measured according to Coleman's Care Transition Measures, increased from 68% to 89% (odds ratio (OR)=3.49, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.06-5.92). Return to the emergency department within 3 days of discharge was lower in the intervention period (10% vs 3%, OR=0.25, 95% CI=0.10-0.62). At 30 days, there was a lower rate of readmission (22% vs 14%, OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.34-0.97) and fewer visits to the emergency department (21% vs 14%, OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.36-1.03) (P=.06).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  When hospitalized elderly patients are treated with consideration of their specific needs, healthcare outcomes can be improved.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Bayview Medical Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA.
authors.forename: Param
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Dedhia
authors.forename: Steve
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kravet
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bulger
authors.forename: Tony
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hinson
authors.forename: Anirudh
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sridharan
authors.forename: Ken
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kolodner
authors.forename: Scott
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Howell
mesh_terms: D000046:Academic Medical Centers; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019090:Case Management / Q000592:standards; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D015577:Geriatric Assessment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D020445:Hospitalists; D006764:Hospitals, Community; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D057187:Independent Living; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D008297:Male; D016017:Odds Ratio; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000592:standards; D010351:Patient Discharge / Q000592:standards*; D010359:Patient Readmission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States; D014600:Utilization Review / Q000706:statistics & numerical data