title: A novel method for assessing elbow pain resulting from epicondylitis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe a novel orthopedic test (Polk's test) which can assist the clinician in differentiating between me- dial and lateral epicondylitis, 2 of the most common causes of elbow pain. This test has not been previously described in the literature.
  
  
  METHODS
  The testing procedure described in this paper is easy to learn, simple to perform and may provide the clinician with a quick and effective method of differentiating between lateral and medial epicondylitis. The test also helps to elucidate normal activities of daily living that the patient may unknowingly be performing on a repetitive basis that are hindering recovery. The results of this simple test allow the clinician to make immediate lifestyle recommendations to the patient that should improve and hasten the response to subsequent treatment. It may be used in conjunction with other orthopedic testing procedures, as it correlates well with other clinical tests for assessing epicondylitis.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of Polk's Test may help the clinician to diagnostically differentiate between lateral and medial epicondylitis, as well as supply information relative to choosing proper instructions for the patient to follow as part of their treatment program. Further research, performed in an academic setting, should prove helpful in more thoroughly evaluating the merits of this test. In the meantime, clinical experience over the years suggests that the practicing physician should find a great deal of clinical utility in utilizing this simple, yet effective, diagnostic procedure.
authors.affiliation: Private Practice of Chiropractic, Santa Monica, CA.
authors.forename: Bradley S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Polkinghorn
references.citation: J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1993 Jul;93(7):778, 782-8
references.pmid: 8365926
references.citation: Clin Sports Med. 1987 Apr;6(2):259-72
references.pmid: 3319203
references.citation: Hand Clin. 1994 Feb;10(1):157-63
references.pmid: 8188776
references.citation: Hand Clin. 2000 Aug;16(3):505-8
references.pmid: 10955223
references.citation: Scand J Rehabil Med. 1983;15(1):37-41
references.pmid: 6828831
references.citation: Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;23(1):75-82
references.pmid: 1729672
references.citation: Sports Med. 1990 Mar;9(3):173-91
references.pmid: 2180031
references.citation: Magn Reson Q. 1993 Sep;9(3):188-210
references.pmid: 8398718
references.citation: Postgrad Med. 1993 Aug;94(2):39-41, 44-6, 51
references.pmid: 8341625
references.citation: J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994 Jan;2(1):1-8
references.pmid: 10708988
references.citation: Anat Clin. 1985;7(3):149-53
references.pmid: 4063113
references.citation: Postgrad Med. 1989 Oct;86(5):301-4, 307-8
references.pmid: 2678071
references.citation: Can Fam Physician. 1994 Jan;40:73-8
references.pmid: 8312757
references.citation: Int Orthop. 1995;19(2):69-71
references.pmid: 7649686