Locking reconstruction double plating of distal humeral fractures: how many screws in the distal ulnar column segment in A3 fracture provide superior stability? A comparative biomechanical in vitro study.
OBJECTIVE
Two 90-degree configurations of locking reconstruction plates with different numbers of screws in the distal ulnar column segment of distal extra-articular humeral fractures with metaphyseal comminution (A3) were biomechanically investigated.


METHODS
Eight pairs of fresh-frozen human humeri were used. For paired comparison, the humeri were divided into 2 randomized groups. In both groups, double-plate osteosyntheses with locking reconstruction plates were performed in 90-degree configurations. In group 1, the posteriorly placed radial column plate exceeded the capitellum and the ulnar column plate extended into the ulnar sulcus. The ulnar plate was molded around the medial epicondyle and fixed with 3 short angular stable screws distally. In group 2, the posteriorly placed radial column plate was applied analogous to group 1. The locking reconstruction plate placed on the ulnar column was used reaching to the ulnar epicondyle, fixed with 1 long, angular, stable screw in the distal fragment. Stiffness testing for axial load and bending in static and cyclic tests were performed. In static test mode, a load was applied with a frequency of 0.1 Hz. For cyclic loading conditions, a load was applied at 1 Hz for 5000 cycles.


RESULTS
All tested specimens adequately resisted simulated physiologic loading conditions with no failure. Comparable stiffness values for axial load (P = 0.161) and significant lower stiffness values for bending (P = 0.017) in group 2 under static bending conditions were found. Considering cyclic loading conditions, no significant alterations in stiffness in each group under axial load occurred. In bending conditions, stiffness values for group 2 were significantly lower than that for group 1 (P = 0.036).


CONCLUSIONS
Under static and cyclic bending conditions, stiffness in group 2 was significantly lower than that in group 1. Nevertheless, both implant configurations showed no failure of the constructs. Based on these data, when applying locked plates in the clinical setting, more than 1 locked screw applied into the distal ulnar column of the articular segment is recommended.
Mehling
Isabella
I
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55101 Mainz, Germany. mehling@unfall.klinik.uni-mainz.de
Schmidt-Horlohé
Kay
K
Müller
Lars Peter
LP
Sternstein
Werner
W
Korner
Jan
J
Rommens
Pol Maria
PM
D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001860:Bone Plates; D001863:Bone Screws; D019245:Compressive Strength; D055119:Elastic Modulus; D004551:Elbow Joint / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006810:Humeral Fractures / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017755:Prosthesis Fitting / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D013718:Tensile Strength; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014457:Ulna / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D016474:Weight-Bearing; D000092464:Elbow Injuries