Triage and case presentations in a chiropractic pediatric clinic.
OBJECTIVE
The use of triage in a chiropractic practice is to determine whether or not a patient who has presented to an office is in need of a referral to another health care provider. The objective of this article is to illustrate the use of triage skills in a primary care, chiropractic pediatric practice. This is examined both in the new patient setting and during visit-to-visit protocol.


METHODS
An analysis of the number of chiropractic triage visits during a 1-year period was performed on 48 new children or pregnant women and 1634 existing pediatric and pregnancy visits.


RESULTS
The average level of chiropractic triage for a new patient, whether pediatric or pregnant, was a limited level of concern (P3, green flag), with more than 85% of new patients falling into that category. Fifteen percent were at a cautionary (P2, yellow flag) level, and none were at the emergency (P1, red flag) level. Between 12% and 15% of the total of existing pediatric or pregnancy visits were at a P1 or P2 level of triage, and 11% of the total of pediatric triage visits were at the P1 level.


CONCLUSIONS
New patients rarely come to a chiropractic pediatric office in a P1-level crisis, whereas existing patients have a much higher likelihood of presenting during a P1 challenge. P2 triage levels are somewhat common, whereas P3 triage levels are the most frequent. Triage methods are a way to help place a patient in a category that can ensure an optimum, safe, and effective level of care.
Rubin
Drew
D
Adjunct Faculty, Life University, College of Chiropractic, Marietta, GA 30060; Private Practice, Marietta, GA.
Ambul Pediatr. 2002 Mar-Apr;2(2):99-103
11926840
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Apr;154(4):401-7
10768681
Can J Neurol Sci. 2005 Nov;32(4):524-8
16408586
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Oct;26(8):510-23
14569217
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):774-80
15741385
J Paediatr Child Health. 2005 Aug;41(8):424-7
16101976
Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jan;84(1):6-9
11124773
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Sep;25(7):427-49
12214185