Supervised learning for the automated transcription of spacer classification from spoligotype films.
BACKGROUND
Molecular genotyping of bacteria has revolutionized the study of tuberculosis epidemiology, yet these established laboratory techniques typically require subjective and laborious interpretation by trained professionals. In the context of a Tuberculosis Case Contact study in The Gambia we used a reverse hybridization laboratory assay called spoligotype analysis. To facilitate processing of spoligotype images we have developed tools and algorithms to automate the classification and transcription of these data directly to a database while allowing for manual editing.


RESULTS
Features extracted from each of the 1849 spots on a spoligo film were classified using two supervised learning algorithms. A graphical user interface allows manual editing of the classification, before export to a database. The application was tested on ten films of differing quality and the results of the best classifier were compared to expert manual classification, giving a median correct classification rate of 98.1% (inter quartile range: 97.1% to 99.2%), with an automated processing time of less than 1 minute per film.


CONCLUSIONS
The software implementation offers considerable time savings over manual processing whilst allowing expert editing of the automated classification. The automatic upload of the classification to a database reduces the chances of transcription errors.
Jeffries
David J
DJ
MRC Laboratories, Fajara, The Gambia. djeffries@mrc.gm
Abernethy
Neil
N
de Jong
Bouke C
BC
D000465:Algorithms; D015373:Bacterial Typing Techniques; D005714:Gambia; D006801:Humans; D009169:Mycobacterium tuberculosis / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics*; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D012984:Software; D014376:Tuberculosis / Q000175:diagnosis
Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Nov;8(11):1306-9
12453361
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):907-14
9157152
Bioinformatics. 2008 Oct 15;24(20):2414-5
18710872
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan;42(1):474-7
14715809
Mol Cell Probes. 2005 Aug;19(4):236-44
16038791
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Dec;40(12):4628-39
12454164
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Apr 1;38(7):966-73
15034828
Bioinformatics. 2002 Feb;18(2):235-43
11847071
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 May;41(5):1963-70
12734235
Res Microbiol. 2004 Oct;155(8):647-54
15380552
Clin Chest Med. 2005 Jun;26(2):217-31, vi
15837107
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Mar;5(3):216-9
11326819
Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 Mar;5(3):174-83
15766652
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Aug;37(8):2607-18
10405410