Agreement between physicians and non-physician clinicians in starting antiretroviral therapy in rural Uganda.
BACKGROUND
The scarcity of physicians in sub-Saharan Africa - particularly in rural clinics staffed only by non-physician health workers - is constraining access to HIV treatment, as only they are legally allowed to start antiretroviral therapy in the HIV-positive patient. Here we present a pilot study from Uganda assessing agreement between non-physician clinicians (nurses and clinical officers) and physicians in their decisions as to whether to start therapy.


METHODS
We conducted the study at 12 government antiretroviral therapy sites in three regions of Uganda, all of which had staff trained in delivery of antiretroviral therapy using the WHO Integrated Management of Adult and Adolescent Illness guidelines for chronic HIV care. We collected seven key variables to measure patient assessment and the decision as to whether to start antiretroviral therapy, the primary variable of interest being the Final Antiretroviral Therapy Recommendation. Patients saw either a clinical officer or nurse first, and then were screened identically by a blinded physician during the same clinic visit. We measured inter-rater agreement between the decisions of the non-physician health workers and physicians in the antiretroviral therapy assessment variables using simple and weighted Kappa analysis.


RESULTS
Two hundred fifty-four patients were seen by a nurse and physician, while 267 were seen by a clinical officer and physician. The majority (>50%) in each arm of the study were in World Health Organization Clinical Stages I and II and therefore not currently eligible for antiretroviral therapy according to national antiretroviral therapy guidelines. Nurses and clinical officers both showed moderate to almost perfect agreement with physicians in their Final Antiretroviral Therapy Recommendation (unweighted kappa=0.59 and kappa=0.91, respectively). Agreement was also substantial for nurses versus physicians for assigning World Health Organization Clinical Stage (weighted kappa=0.65), but moderate for clinical officers versus physicians (kappa=0.44).


CONCLUSIONS
Both nurses and clinical officers demonstrated strong agreement with physicians in deciding whether to initiate antiretroviral therapy in the HIV patient. This could lead to immediate benefits with respect to antiretroviral therapy scale-up and decentralization to rural areas in Uganda, as non-physician clinicians--particularly clinical officers--demonstrated the capacity to make correct clinical decisions to start antiretroviral therapy. These preliminary data warrant more detailed and multicountry investigation into decision-making of non-physician clinicians in the management of HIV disease with antiretroviral therapy, and should lead policy-makers to more carefully explore task-shifting as a shorter-term response to addressing the human resource crisis in HIV care and treatment.
Vasan
Ashwin
A
Partners In Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. avasan@med.umich.edu
Kenya-Mugisha
Nathan
N
Seung
Kwonjune J
KJ
Achieng
Marion
M
Banura
Patrick
P
Lule
Frank
F
Beems
Megan
M
Todd
Jim
J
Madraa
Elizabeth
E
Lancet. 2008 Feb 23;371(9613):682-684
18295026
Ann Soc Belg Med Trop. 1981;60 Suppl:5-54
7340706
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Apr;10(4):300-4
15807792
N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 13;357(24):2510-4
18077816
Lancet. 2004 Jul 3-9;364(9428):103-7
15234864
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 15;143(10):729-36
16287794
Hum Resour Health. 2006 Jan 26;4:1
16438710
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Jun;82(6):400
15356929
Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):505-10
16890837
J Infect Dis. 2007 Dec 1;196 Suppl 3:S464-8
18181695
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
843571
Lancet. 2007 Dec 22;370(9605):2158-63
17574662
Int Nurs Rev. 2006 Dec;53(4):290-6
17083418
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972 Dec 1;114(7):942-9
4645135
BMJ. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):819-23
11934775