title: Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant.
abstract: Invasive species can quickly transform biological communities due to their high abundance and strong impacts on native species, in part because they can be released from the ecological forces that limit native populations. However, little is known about the long-term dynamics of invasions; do invaders maintain their dominant status over long time spans, or do new ecological and evolutionary forces eventually develop to limit their populations? Alliaria petiolata is a Eurasian species that aggressively invades North American forest understories, in part due to the production of toxic phytochemicals. Here we document a marked decline in its phytotoxin production and a consequent decline in their impact on three native species, across a 50+ year chronosequence of Alliaria petiolata invasion. Genetic evidence suggests that these patterns result from natural selection for decreased phytotoxin production rather than founder effects during introduction and spread. These patterns are consistent with the finding of slowing A. petiolata population growth and rebounding native species abundance across a separate chronosequence in Illinois, U.S. These results suggest that this invader is developing evolutionary limits in its introduced range and highlight the importance of understanding the long-term processes that shape species invasions and their impacts.
authors.affiliation: Illinois Natural History Survey, Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1816 South Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. ralankau@illinois.edu
authors.forename: Richard A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Lankau
authors.forename: Victoria
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Nuzzo
authors.forename: Greg
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Spyreas
authors.forename: Adam S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Davis
mesh_terms: D005075:Biological Evolution; D019607:Brassicaceae / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development*; D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; D003710:Demography; D017753:Ecosystem; D007087:Illinois; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D013045:Species Specificity; D013997:Time Factors; D014118:Toxins, Biological / Q000032:analysis / Q000096:biosynthesis*
chemical_list: D014118:Toxins, Biological
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Nov 7;273(1602):2763-9
references.pmid: 17015321
references.citation: Science. 2007 Sep 14;317(5844):1561-3
references.pmid: 17872447
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 May;89(5):1181-7
references.pmid: 18543611
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Feb 16;439(7078):803
references.pmid: 16482148
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 1;24(11):1403-5
references.pmid: 18397895
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Apr;89(4):1043-55
references.pmid: 18481529
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 May;9(5):615-29
references.pmid: 16643306
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15529-32
references.pmid: 16230607
references.citation: Oecologia. 2005 Jun;144(1):1-11
references.pmid: 15891837
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2001 Oct;87(Pt 4):383-91
references.pmid: 11737285
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 6;104(45):17698-700
references.pmid: 17951431
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2007 Jan;33(1):85-94
references.pmid: 17146719
references.citation: J Nat Prod. 2001 Apr;64(4):440-3
references.pmid: 11325224
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2006 May;4(5):e140
references.pmid: 16623597
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2001 Jun;126(2):811-25
references.pmid: 11402209
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jun;13(6):288-94
references.pmid: 18467157