Influence of photoactivation protocol and light guide distance on conversion and microleakage of composite restorations.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of light guide distance and the different photoactivation methods on the degree of conversion (DC) and microleakage of a composite.


METHODS
Three photoactivation protocols (600 mW/cm2 x 40 seconds; 400 mW/cm2 x 60 seconds or 200 mW/cm2 x 20 seconds, followed by 500 mW/cm2 x 40 seconds) and three distances from the light source (0, 3 or 7 mm) were tested. Cylindrical specimens (5 mm diameter; 2 mm tall; n=3) were prepared for the DC test (FT-Raman). Class V cavities were made in 90 bovine incisors to conduct the microleakage test. The specimens were conditioned for 15 seconds with phosphoric acid (37%), followed by application of the adhesive system Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply/Caulk). The preparations were restored in bulk. The specimens were stored for 24 hours in distilled water (37 degrees C) before being submitted to the silver-nitrate microleakage protocol. The restorations were sectioned and analyzed under 25x magnification.


RESULTS
Statistical analyses (two-way ANOVAs and Tukey test, alpha=0.05) found significance only for the factor distance (p=0.015) at the top of the composite for the DC test. Conversion was statistically lower for the 7 mm groups compared to the 0 and 3 mm groups, which were equivalent to each other. At the bottom of the specimens, none of the factors or interactions was significant (p<0.05). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that, in general, the soft-start method led to lower microleakage scores when compared to the continuous modes, mainly when associated with a distancing of 7 mm (p<0.01). With the exception of specimens irradiated with 400 mW/cm2 that did not demonstrate variations on scores for the distances tested, higher microleakage was observed for shorter distances from the light source.


CONCLUSIONS
Soft-start methods may reduce microleakage when the light guide distancing provides a low level of irradiance, which also causes a discrete reduction in the DC.
Fróes-Salgado
N R G
NR
Department of Biomaterials and Oral Biochemistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. niveafroes@gmail.com
Pfeifer
C S C
CS
Francci
C E
CE
Kawano
Y
Y
D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D003763:Dental Leakage; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D007180:Incisor; D055115:Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives; D011140:Polyurethanes / Q000737:chemistry
D000180:Acrylic Resins; C029012:Composite Dental Resin; D003188:Composite Resins; C466112:Esthet-X; D011140:Polyurethanes