title: Brassinosteroids, de-etiolation and the re-emerging art of plant hormone quantification.
abstract: An increase in the use of molecular techniques has provided a significant insight into the function of genes, and how they are regulated and interact. However, in the field of plant hormone physiology, the increased use of these techniques has been accompanied by a reduction in the direct measurement of plant hormone levels by physiochemical methods. Instead, the transcript (mRNA) levels of genes involved in hormone metabolism are often used to predict endogenous hormone levels. The validity of this approach was recently tested by comparing the expression of a range of genes involved in BR synthesis, catabolism and perception, with the actual endogenous BR levels in pea seedlings grown under different light conditions.1,2 Based on this comparison, we now argue that gene expression analysis alone is not always a reliable indicator of endogenous hormone levels.
authors.affiliation: School of Plant Science; University of Tasmania; Hobart, Tasmania Australia.
authors.forename: Gregory M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Symons
authors.forename: James B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Reid
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Dec;133(4):1843-53
references.pmid: 14605219
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):741-5
references.pmid: 16193053
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2001 Dec;13(12):2589-607
references.pmid: 11752374
references.citation: Cell. 1999 Nov 24;99(5):463-72
references.pmid: 10589675
references.citation: Physiol Plant. 2002 Jun;115(2):311-319
references.pmid: 12060251
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 May;141(1):299-309
references.pmid: 16531479
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Oct;142(2):553-63
references.pmid: 16905669
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Mar 8;446(7132):199-202
references.pmid: 17344852
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1991 May;3(5):445-459
references.pmid: 12324600
references.citation: Plant J. 2005 Mar;41(5):710-21
references.pmid: 15703058
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2002 Sep;130(1):504-13
references.pmid: 12226529
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2005 May 6;280(18):17873-9
references.pmid: 15710611
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2008 Feb;95(2):133-45
references.pmid: 21632339
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2000 May;123(1):93-100
references.pmid: 10806228
references.citation: Planta. 2003 Jan;216(3):422-31
references.pmid: 12520333
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2001 Apr;13(4):843-52
references.pmid: 11283340
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 Mar;143(3):1163-72
references.pmid: 17220364
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Feb;140(2):548-57
references.pmid: 16407451
references.citation: Plant J. 2005 Apr;42(2):262-9
references.pmid: 15807787
references.citation: Science. 1996 Apr 19;272(5260):398-401
references.pmid: 8602526
references.citation: Cell. 2001 Jun 1;105(5):625-36
references.pmid: 11389832
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 Apr;143(4):1894-904
references.pmid: 17322341
references.citation: Planta. 2008 Apr;227(5):1115-25
references.pmid: 18214530
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Oct;6(10):443-5
references.pmid: 11590041