Mapping the human membrane proteome: a majority of the human membrane proteins can be classified according to function and evolutionary origin.
BACKGROUND
Membrane proteins form key nodes in mediating the cell's interaction with the surroundings, which is one of the main reasons why the majority of drug targets are membrane proteins.


RESULTS
Here we mined the human proteome and identified the membrane proteome subset using three prediction tools for alpha-helices: Phobius, TMHMM, and SOSUI. This dataset was reduced to a non-redundant set by aligning it to the human genome and then clustered with our own interactive implementation of the ISODATA algorithm. The genes were classified and each protein group was manually curated, virtually evaluating each sequence of the clusters, applying systematic comparisons with a range of databases and other resources. We identified 6,718 human membrane proteins and classified the majority of them into 234 families of which 151 belong to the three major functional groups: receptors (63 groups, 1,352 members), transporters (89 groups, 817 members) or enzymes (7 groups, 533 members). Also, 74 miscellaneous groups with 697 members were determined. Interestingly, we find that 41% of the membrane proteins are singlets with no apparent affiliation or identity to any human protein family. Our results identify major differences between the human membrane proteome and the ones in unicellular organisms and we also show a strong bias towards certain membrane topologies for different functional classes: 77% of all transporters have more than six helices while 60% of proteins with an enzymatic function and 88% receptors, that are not GPCRs, have only one single membrane spanning alpha-helix. Further, we have identified and characterized new gene families and novel members of existing families.


CONCLUSIONS
Here we present the most detailed roadmap of gene numbers and families to our knowledge, which is an important step towards an overall classification of the entire human proteome. We estimate that 27% of the total human proteome are alpha-helical transmembrane proteins and provide an extended classification together with in-depth investigations of the membrane proteome's functional, structural, and evolutionary features.
Almén
Markus Sällman
MS
Department of Neuroscience, Functional Pharmacology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. helgi.schioth@neuro.uu.se
Nordström
Karl J V
KJ
Fredriksson
Robert
R
Schiöth
Helgi B
HB
D000465:Algorithms; D030562:Databases, Protein; D004798:Enzymes / Q000737:chemistry; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D006801:Humans; D008565:Membrane Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000145:classification / Q000502:physiology*; D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins / Q000737:chemistry; D005810:Multigene Family; D010802:Phylogeny; D017433:Protein Structure, Secondary; D020543:Proteome / Q000737:chemistry*; D011956:Receptors, Cell Surface / Q000737:chemistry; D017386:Sequence Homology, Amino Acid; D040681:Structural Homology, Protein
D004798:Enzymes; D008565:Membrane Proteins; D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins; D020543:Proteome; D011956:Receptors, Cell Surface
In Silico Biol. 2006;6(5):379-86
17274767
Mol Pharmacol. 2005 May;67(5):1414-25
15687224
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 12;6:298
16343337
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D588-92
18984617
Trends Genet. 2000 Jun;16(6):276-7
10827456
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2001 Oct;66(10):1174-86
11736639
Traffic. 2007 Feb;8(2):89-96
17181773
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D319-21
16381876
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D281-8
18039703
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D690-7
19033362
Trends Biochem Sci. 2002 Oct;27(10):514-20
12368087
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
2231712
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Dec;7(12):909-18
17139331
Science. 2002 Dec 6;298(5600):1912-34
12471243
Pflugers Arch. 2004 Feb;447(5):465-8
14624363
Science. 2005 May 27;308(5726):1321-3
15919996
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
10802651
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D181-6
16381841
J Mol Biol. 2004 May 14;338(5):1027-36
15111065
J Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;117(1):143-55
1313436
Int Rev Cytol. 2002;214:103-59
11893164
Nature. 2008 Mar 13;452(7184):234-8
18305481
Sci STKE. 2003 Jun 17;2003(187):RE9
12815191
J Mol Biol. 1970 Mar;48(3):443-53
5420325
FEBS Lett. 2003 Jul 3;546(1):65-72
12829238
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D169-74
18836194
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):755-63
9918945
Genome Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):656-64
11932250
J Cell Sci. 2006 Apr 15;119(Pt 8):1537-46
16569668
J Mol Biol. 2001 Jan 19;305(3):567-80
11152613
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 4;104(49):19428-33
18040051
J Intern Med. 2007 Jun;261(6):543-57
17547710
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(4):378-9
9632836
Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921
11237011
Gene. 2002 Jan 23;283(1-2):209-17
11867227
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 25;103(30):11142-7
16847258
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 Mar;1778(3):631-45
18036336
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008 Apr;7(4):339-57
18382464
Proteomics. 2004 Jul;4(7):1985-8
15221759