title: Extracellular matrix stiffness and architecture govern intracellular rheology in cancer.
abstract: Little is known about the complex interplay between the extracellular mechanical environment and the mechanical properties that characterize the dynamic intracellular environment. To elucidate this relationship in cancer, we probe the intracellular environment using particle-tracking microrheology. In three-dimensional (3D) matrices, intracellular effective creep compliance of prostate cancer cells is shown to increase with increasing extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, whereas modulating ECM stiffness does not significantly affect the intracellular mechanical state when cells are attached to two-dimensional (2D) matrices. Switching from 2D to 3D matrices induces an order-of-magnitude shift in intracellular effective creep compliance and apparent elastic modulus. However, for a given matrix stiffness, partial blocking of beta1 integrins mitigates the shift in intracellular mechanical state that is invoked by switching from a 2D to 3D matrix architecture. This finding suggests that the increased cell-matrix engagement inherent to a 3D matrix architecture may contribute to differences observed in viscoelastic properties between cells attached to 2D matrices and cells embedded within 3D matrices. In total, our observations show that ECM stiffness and architecture can strongly influence the intracellular mechanical state of cancer cells.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
authors.forename: Erin L
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Baker
authors.forename: Roger T
authors.initials: RT
authors.lastname: Bonnecaze
authors.forename: Muhammad H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Zaman
mesh_terms: D018929:Cell Culture Techniques / Q000379:methods; D045744:Cell Line, Tumor; D003198:Computer Simulation; D055119:Elastic Modulus; D005109:Extracellular Matrix; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D040542:Mechanotransduction, Cellular; D008954:Models, Biological; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000503:physiopathology*; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014783:Viscosity
references.citation: Acta Biomater. 2007 Jul;3(4):413-38
references.pmid: 17540628
references.citation: Eur Biophys J. 2006 Oct;35(8):713-9
references.pmid: 16871382
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2002 Dec 20;13(18):2411-5
references.pmid: 12499839
references.citation: Biomacromolecules. 2003 May-Jun;4(3):713-22
references.pmid: 12741789
references.citation: Nature. 1981 Mar 19;290(5803):249-51
references.pmid: 7207616
references.citation: Biophys J. 2000 Jul;79(1):144-52
references.pmid: 10866943
references.citation: Methods Cell Biol. 2007;83:115-40
references.pmid: 17613307
references.citation: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007 Nov;293(5):C1568-75
references.pmid: 17670893
references.citation: Soft Matter. 2007 Feb 14;3(3):299-306
references.pmid: 32900146
references.citation: Cell. 1996 Feb 9;84(3):359-69
references.pmid: 8608589
references.citation: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005 Jan;60(1):24-34
references.pmid: 15573414
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 2006 May;154 Suppl 1:11-5
references.pmid: 16712711
references.citation: Biophys J. 2006 Dec 1;91(11):4296-305
references.pmid: 16963507
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2008 May 1;22(9):1231-43
references.pmid: 18451110
references.citation: Mol Oncol. 2007 Jun;1(1):84-96
references.pmid: 18516279
references.citation: Phys Fluids (1994). 2007;19(10):103102
references.pmid: 19816550
references.citation: Science. 2005 Nov 18;310(5751):1139-43
references.pmid: 16293750
references.citation: Biophys J. 2008 Apr 1;94(7):2914-25
references.pmid: 18178662
references.citation: Biophys J. 2006 Jun 15;90(12):4712-9
references.pmid: 16581841
references.citation: Science. 2001 Nov 23;294(5547):1708-12
references.pmid: 11721053
references.citation: Biophys J. 2001 Apr;80(4):1744-57
references.pmid: 11259288
references.citation: Biophys J. 2008 Dec 15;95(12):6052-9
references.pmid: 18805929
references.citation: Biophys J. 2006 Apr 15;90(8):3012-8
references.pmid: 16461391
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Apr;98(4):1547-53
references.pmid: 15772065
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2003 Jan 20;160(2):267-77
references.pmid: 12527751
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1997 Apr 7;137(1):231-45
references.pmid: 9105051
references.citation: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2008 Jun;7(3):215-25
references.pmid: 17619206
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 5;103(27):10259-10264
references.pmid: 16793927
references.citation: Cell. 2000 Jan 7;100(1):57-70
references.pmid: 10647931
references.citation: Trends Cell Biol. 2004 Apr;14(4):160-6
references.pmid: 15066633
references.citation: Cancer Cell. 2005 Sep;8(3):241-54
references.pmid: 16169468
references.citation: J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2004 Oct;9(4):325-42
references.pmid: 15838603
references.citation: Biophys J. 2004 Jan;86(1 Pt 1):617-28
references.pmid: 14695306
references.citation: Biophys J. 2006 Nov 1;91(9):3499-507
references.pmid: 16891369
references.citation: Biophys J. 2007 Dec 15;93(12):4453-61
references.pmid: 18045965
references.citation: Biophys J. 2002 Dec;83(6):3162-76
references.pmid: 12496086
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2003 Dec 12;278(50):50393-401
references.pmid: 13679362
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 18;103(29):10889-94
references.pmid: 16832052
references.citation: J Cell Sci. 2006 May 1;119(Pt 9):1760-8
references.pmid: 16636071
references.citation: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000 Nov;279(5):C1345-50
references.pmid: 11029281