Characterisation of the passive permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes.
Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) restrict uncontrolled nucleocytoplasmic fluxes of inert macromolecules but permit facilitated translocation of nuclear transport receptors and their cargo complexes. We probed the passive barrier of NPCs and observed sieve-like properties with a dominating mesh or channel radius of 2.6 nm, which is narrower than proposed earlier. A small fraction of diffusion channels has a wider opening, explaining the very slow passage of larger molecules. The observed dominant passive diameter approximates the distance of adjacent hydrophobic clusters of FG repeats, supporting the model that the barrier is made of FG repeat domains cross-linked with a spacing of an FG repeat unit length. Wheat germ agglutinin and the dominant-negative importin beta(45-462) fragment were previously regarded as selective inhibitors of facilitated NPC passage. We now observed that they do not distinguish between the passive and the facilitated mode. Instead, their inhibitory effect correlates with the size of the NPC-passing molecule. They have little effect on small species, inhibit the passage of green fluorescent protein-sized objects >10-fold and virtually block the translocation of larger ones. This suggests that passive and facilitated NPC passage proceed through one and the same permeability barrier.
Mohr
Dagmar
D
ZMBH, Im Neuenheimer Feld 282, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frey
Steffen
S
Fischer
Torsten
T
Güttler
Thomas
T
Görlich
Dirk
D
D002463:Cell Membrane Permeability / Q000502:physiology*; D006367:HeLa Cells; D006801:Humans; D020100:Hydrogels / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D028884:Karyopherins / Q000378:metabolism; D022022:Nuclear Pore / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D028861:Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins / Q000378:metabolism
D020100:Hydrogels; D028884:Karyopherins; D028861:Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins
EMBO J. 1997 Mar 17;16(6):1153-63
9135132
Cell. 1988 Mar 11;52(5):641-53
3345567
J Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;104(2):189-200
3805121
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999;15:607-60
10611974
Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:265-306
9759490
Cell. 2007 Aug 10;130(3):512-23
17693259
J Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;111(3):807-16
2391365
J Mol Biol. 2003 Apr 18;328(1):119-30
12684002
J Biol Chem. 2001 May 18;276(20):16593-6
11283009
EMBO J. 1998 Nov 16;17(22):6587-98
9822603
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001 Dec;65(4):570-94, table of contents
11729264
J Biol Chem. 1974 May 25;249(10):3116-22
4830237
J Mol Biol. 1999 Oct 29;293(3):579-93
10543952
Nature. 2003 Aug 7;424(6949):689-94
12894213
Trends Cell Biol. 2008 Oct;18(10):456-66
18786826
Cell. 1994 Dec 2;79(5):767-78
8001116
Biophys J. 1999 Jul;77(1):217-28
10388751
J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2216-22
6501421
Cell. 1999 May 28;97(5):635-46
10367892
J Cell Biol. 2001 Jan 22;152(2):411-7
11266456
EMBO J. 2001 Mar 15;20(6):1320-30
11250898
EMBO J. 1996 Apr 15;15(8):1818-25
8617227
Nature. 1993 Oct 14;365(6447):661-3
8413630
J Biol Chem. 1987 Jul 15;262(20):9887-94
3110163
J Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;122(1):1-19
8314837
Nature. 1999 May 20;399(6733):221-9
10353244
EMBO J. 2009 Sep 2;28(17):2554-67
19680227
Curr Biol. 1998 Dec 17-31;8(25):1403-6
9889103
Cell. 1986 Jun 6;45(5):699-709
3518946
EMBO J. 1996 Oct 15;15(20):5584-94
8896452
J Cell Biol. 1998 Apr 6;141(1):31-49
9531546
Cell. 2006 Jun 16;125(6):1041-53
16777596
Genome Biol. 2001;2(9):REVIEWS0007
11574060
J Cell Sci. 1997 Dec;110 ( Pt 24):3065-70
9365276
EMBO J. 1996 Apr 15;15(8):1810-7
8617226
J Biol Chem. 2007 Feb 9;282(6):3881-8
17164246
Nature. 1975 Mar 13;254(5496):109-14
1117994
EMBO J. 2002 Jun 3;21(11):2664-71
12032079
Cell. 1992 Jun 26;69(7):1133-41
1617726
Exp Cell Res. 1987 Dec;173(2):586-95
2446896