Comparison of effects of compost amendment and of single-strain inoculation on root bacterial communities of young cucumber seedlings.
Compost amendment and inoculations with specific microorganisms are fundamentally different soil treatment methods, commonly used in agriculture for the improvement of plant growth and health. Although distinct, both methods affect the rhizosphere and the plant roots. In the present study we used a 16S rRNA gene approach to achieve an overview of early consequences of these treatments on the assemblage of plant root bacterial communities. For this purpose, cucumber seedlings were grown, under controlled conditions, in perlite potting mix amended with biosolid compost or straw compost, or inoculated with Streptomyces spp. A uniform trend of response of root bacterial communities for all treatments was observed. Root bacterial density, measured as bacterial targets per plant tef gene by real-time PCR, was reduced in 31 to 67%. In addition, increased taxonomic diversity accompanied shifts in composition (alpha-diversity). The magnitude of change in these parameters relative to the perlite control varied between the different treatments but not in relation to the treatment method (compost amendments versus inoculations). Similarity between the compositions of root and of potting mix bacterial communities (beta-diversity) was relatively unchanged. The abundance of Oxalobacteraceae was >50% of the total root bacterial community in the untreated perlite. Root domination by this group subsided >10-fold (straw compost) to >600-fold (Streptomyces sp. strain S1) after treatment. Thus, loss of dominance appears to be the major phenomenon underlining the response trend of the root bacterial communities.
Ofek
Maya
M
Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization of Israel, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan, Israel.
Hadar
Yitzhak
Y
Minz
Dror
D
D001419:Bacteria / Q000235:genetics*; D001483:Base Sequence; D018553:Cucumis sativus / Q000254:growth & development / Q000382:microbiology*; D017931:DNA Primers / Q000235:genetics; D018744:DNA, Plant / Q000235:genetics; D017753:Ecosystem; D005798:Genes, Bacterial; D017343:Genes, Plant; D042802:Oxalobacteraceae / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000382:microbiology*; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012329:RNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics; D012987:Soil / Q000032:analysis; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D013302:Streptomyces / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D013559:Symbiosis
D017931:DNA Primers; D018744:DNA, Plant; D012329:RNA, Bacterial; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; D012987:Soil
Microb Ecol. 2005 Jul;50(1):73-81
16052380
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999 Feb 1;171(1):1-9
9987836
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000 Jul 1;33(1):41-49
10922502
Biodegradation. 2002;13(1):21-7
12222951
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004 Apr 1;233(1):115-23
15043877
J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99(4):816-28
16162232
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):442-3
12520046
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 May;5(5):384-92
17435792
Phytopathology. 1998 May;88(5):450-5
18944926
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001;39:103-33
11701861
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003 Apr;16(4):306-14
12744459
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2539-51
15969733
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):7750-8
16332747
Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1345-53
17601127
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006 May;56(2):207-18
16629751
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Feb 25;32(4):1363-71
14985472
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1999;37:427-446
11701830
Can J Microbiol. 2002 Jul;48(7):588-601
12224558
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Sep;71(9):4951-9
16151072
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 07;7:371
16893466
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1998;36:453-83
15012509
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Aug;66(8):3556-65
10919821
ISME J. 2007 Aug;1(4):291-9
18043640
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007 Nov;276(1):1-11
17711454
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
9254694
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
11846609
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006 May;56(2):236-49
16629753