title: Polycomb repression: It's all in the balance.
abstract: In our recent paper1 we suggested a molecular explanation for the long standing observation that plants need to be mitotically active to respond to a prolonged period of low temperatures by flowering early (vernalization).2 In Arabidopsis, vernalization is associated with the epigenetic repression of the floral repressor, FLC.3-5FLC repression is established during the low temperature treatment and is marked by the loss of chromatin marks associated with active genes and the gain of histone H3 trimethyl-lysine 27 (K27me3) at the start of transcription/translation.1 After the end of the cold treatment, this repressive modification spreads across FLC chromatin to mark the entire locus.1 In cells not undergoing mitosis, we found that FLC is repressed by low temperatures, but that this repression is only partially maintained. We concluded that DNA replication is not required for the initial response to low temperatures, but rather for the maintenance of this response. Here we discuss the implications of our observations in terms of the plasticity of chromatin modifications in plants.
authors.affiliation: CSIRO; Plant Industry; Canberra, Australia.
authors.forename: Ej
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Finnegan
authors.forename: Es
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Dennis
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2007 May;5(5):e129
references.pmid: 17439305
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Nov 20;17(22):1978-83
references.pmid: 17980595
references.citation: Cell. 2004 Dec 29;119(7):941-53
references.pmid: 15620353
references.citation: Science. 2007 Oct 19;318(5849):447-50
references.pmid: 17761849
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Dec 14;32(22):6511-8
references.pmid: 15598823
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Mar 9;128(5):877-87
references.pmid: 17320162
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 15;15(24):3286-95
references.pmid: 11751634
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 20;104(47):18439-44
references.pmid: 18003914
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jan 8;427(6970):164-7
references.pmid: 14712277
references.citation: Cell. 1980 May;20(1):55-64
references.pmid: 6993010
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 10;101(6):1525-30
references.pmid: 14732680
references.citation: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007 Mar;14(3):240-2
references.pmid: 17310255
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2004 Oct;16(10):2601-13
references.pmid: 15377760
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Oct;19(10):2975-87
references.pmid: 17921315
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Oct 5;131(1):29-32
references.pmid: 17923085
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1990 Oct 5;265(28):17157-61
references.pmid: 2211618
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1964 Sep;39(5):832-5
references.pmid: 16656010
references.citation: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007 Mar;14(3):243-5
references.pmid: 17310254
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2004 Jul;20(7):320-6
references.pmid: 15219397
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Oct 11;449(7163):731-4
references.pmid: 17713478
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 28;97(7):3753-8
references.pmid: 10716723
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Oct 11;449(7163):689-94
references.pmid: 17851529
references.citation: Plant J. 2005 Nov;44(3):420-32
references.pmid: 16236152
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Sep 21;130(6):1083-94
references.pmid: 17825402
references.citation: Cell. 2006 Apr 21;125(2):315-26
references.pmid: 16630819
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Mar 9;128(5):889-900
references.pmid: 17320163
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(18):6290-6
references.pmid: 17881378
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jan 8;427(6970):159-64
references.pmid: 14712276
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2007 Jan 12;25(1):1-14
references.pmid: 17218267