title: L-Glutamate as a Novel Modifier of Root Growth and Branching: What's the Sensor?
abstract: Exogenous L-glutamate (L-Glu) has been shown to be able to elicit major changes in Arabidopsis root architecture at micromolar concentrations. The root response, which is strongly genotype-dependent, is specific to L-Glu and involves both inhibition of primary root growth and stimulation of root branching behind the primary root tip. The L-Glu appears to be sensed directly at the root tip, where it inhibits meristematic activity. An intriguing and still unanswered question is whether members of the family of Glu receptor-like genes (GLRs) have a role in mediating this response. A pharmacological approach described here, using agonists and antagonists of mammalian ionotropic Glu receptors, has failed to resolve the issue. Progress towards identifying the genes involved in the root response to L-Glu is likely to come through the application of forward and reverse genetics, in combination with quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping.
authors.affiliation: Lancaster Environment Centre; Department of Biological Sciences; Lancaster University; Lancaster UK.
authors.forename: Pia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Walch-Liu
authors.forename: Brian G
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Forde
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2006 May;97(5):875-81
references.pmid: 16339770
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2003 Jul;44(7):667-75
references.pmid: 12881494
references.citation: Planta. 2004 May;219(1):167-75
references.pmid: 14767768
references.citation: New Phytol. 1994 Aug;127(4):635-674
references.pmid: 33874383
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2000 Dec;124(4):1615-24
references.pmid: 11115879
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Nov 12;396(6707):125-6
references.pmid: 9823891
references.citation: Mol Cells. 2006 Jun 30;21(3):418-27
references.pmid: 16819306
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov;142(3):963-71
references.pmid: 17012403
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2004 Oct;45(10):1380-9
references.pmid: 15564521
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Aug;47(8):1045-57
references.pmid: 16816406
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2002 Nov;90(5):549-57
references.pmid: 12466095
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2000 Dec;124(4):1511-4
references.pmid: 11115867
references.citation: Science. 2001 May 25;292(5521):1486-7
references.pmid: 11379626
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 27;100(11):6872-7
references.pmid: 12738881
references.citation: Plant J. 2005 Aug;43(3):348-55
references.pmid: 16045471
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2006 Feb;18(2):340-9
references.pmid: 16377757
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1066-82
references.pmid: 12082126
references.citation: Plant J. 2003 Sep;35(6):800-10
references.pmid: 12969432
references.citation: Planta. 2005 Oct;222(3):418-27
references.pmid: 15864638