Taboo words: the effect of emotion on memory for peripheral information.
In three experiments, we examined memory for peripheral information that occurred in the same context as emotion-inducing information. In the first two experiments, participants studied either a sentence (Experiment 1) or a pair of words (Experiments 2A-2C) containing a neutral peripheral word, as well as a neutral, negative-valence, or taboo word, to induce an emotional response. At retrieval, the participants were asked to recall the neutral peripheral word from a sentence fragment or emotion-inducing word cue. In Experiment 3, we presented word pairs at encoding and tested memory with associative recognition. In all three experiments, memory for peripheral words was enhanced when it was encoded in the presence of emotionally arousing taboo words but not when it was encoded in the presence of words that were only negative in valence. These data are consistent with priority-binding theory (MacKay et al., 2004) and inconsistent with the attention-narrowing hypothesis (Easterbrook, 1959), as well as with object-based binding theory (Mather, 2007).
Guillet
Rebecca
R
Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont 05753, USA.
Arndt
Jason
J
D001143:Arousal; D001288:Attention; D004644:Emotions; D006801:Humans; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D009949:Orientation; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D013609:Taboo; D014706:Verbal Learning
Rev Neurosci. 2004;15(4):241-51
15526549
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):79-88
16478342
Mem Cognit. 2003 Dec;31(8):1169-80
15058678
Mem Cognit. 2004 Apr;32(3):474-88
15285130
Emotion. 2002 Jun;2(2):118-34
12899186
Memory. 2004 Mar;12(2):237-47
15250188
J Exp Psychol. 1964 Feb;67:124-6
14114908
Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Dec;81(3 Pt 2):1119-22
8684902
Mem Cognit. 1996 Mar;24(2):202-16
8881323
Mem Cognit. 1992 May;20(3):277-90
1508053
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 May;134(2):258-81
15869349
Mem Cognit. 1990 Sep;18(5):496-506
2233262
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jan;36(1):182-200
18323074
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 May;34(2):286-90
12109025
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Sep;4(3):294-306
15535165
J Mem Lang. 2008 Feb;58(2):449-464
19190722
Psychol Aging. 2005 Jun;20(2):241-50
16029088
Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):3-28
8346328
Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Sep 1;5(9):394-400
11520704
Emotion. 2001 Mar;1(1):5-11
12894807
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1982 Jun;111(2):228-38
6213735
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jan;27(1):166-90
10087865
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):33-52
26151918
Brain Cogn. 1997 Oct;35(1):85-109
9339304
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jan;16(1):25-32
15660848
Psychol Bull. 2002 Mar;128(2):203-35
11931516
Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1990 Oct-Dec;25(4):195-200
2075029
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Mar;117(1):34-50
2966230
Can J Psychol. 1963 Dec;17:393-7
14088818
Behav Neurosci. 2001 Oct;115(5):983-92
11584931
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Apr;14(2):198-202
15082325
Mem Cognit. 1996 Nov;24(6):796-811
8961823
Emotion. 2004 Jun;4(2):173-88
15222854
J Exp Psychol. 1963 Feb;65:190-3
14033436
Psychol Rev. 1959 May;66(3):183-201
13658305
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Apr 30;138(3):247-58
15854792
Emotion. 2008 Apr;8(2):281-90
18410201