title: Changes of mind in decision-making.
abstract: A decision is a commitment to a proposition or plan of action based on evidence and the expected costs and benefits associated with the outcome. Progress in a variety of fields has led to a quantitative understanding of the mechanisms that evaluate evidence and reach a decision. Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision. Without additional evidence, however, these formalisms fail to explain why a decision-maker would change their mind. Here we extend a model, developed to account for both the timing and the accuracy of the initial decision, to explain subsequent changes of mind. Subjects made decisions about a noisy visual stimulus, which they indicated by moving a handle. Although they received no additional information after initiating their movement, their hand trajectories betrayed a change of mind in some trials. We propose that noisy evidence is accumulated over time until it reaches a criterion level, or bound, which determines the initial decision, and that the brain exploits information that is in the processing pipeline when the initial decision is made to subsequently either reverse or reaffirm the initial decision. The model explains both the frequency of changes of mind as well as their dependence on both task difficulty and whether the initial decision was accurate or erroneous. The theoretical and experimental findings advance the understanding of decision-making to the highly flexible and cognitive acts of vacillation and self-correction.
authors.affiliation: Computational and Biological Learning Laboratory, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
authors.forename: Arbora
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Resulaj
authors.forename: Roozbeh
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kiani
authors.forename: Daniel M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Wolpert
authors.forename: Michael N
authors.initials: MN
authors.lastname: Shadlen
mesh_terms: D003201:Computers; D003463:Cues; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008959:Models, Neurological; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009038:Motion; D009068:Movement; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D013997:Time Factors
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 19;28(12):3017-29
references.pmid: 18354005
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:227-77
references.pmid: 9530497
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jun;9(6):467-79
references.pmid: 18464792
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1217-25
references.pmid: 12368806
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Jul 30;181(2):199-211
references.pmid: 19450621
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65
references.pmid: 17014301
references.citation: J Vis. 2005 May 02;5(5):376-404
references.pmid: 16097871
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2005 Mar 29;15(6):543-8
references.pmid: 15797023
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 25;26(4):1314-28
references.pmid: 16436619
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):284-99
references.pmid: 3973762
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Jun 15;441(7095):876-9
references.pmid: 16778890
references.citation: Nature. 1966 Oct 22;212(5060):438
references.pmid: 5970176
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Dec 26;60(6):1142-52
references.pmid: 19109917
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jun;7(6):485-91
references.pmid: 16715056
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 May;6(5):363-75
references.pmid: 15832198
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):857-60
references.pmid: 11130724
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 1;22(21):9475-89
references.pmid: 12417672
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1075-80
references.pmid: 17546027
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Oct 10;36(2):299-308
references.pmid: 12383783
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2004 Mar;27(3):161-8
references.pmid: 15036882
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Sep;7(9):907-15
references.pmid: 15332089
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
references.pmid: 17600525
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 1989;33(2-3):69-74
references.pmid: 2758304
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92
references.pmid: 11488378