Cost analysis of the Geriatric Resources for Assessment and Care of Elders care management intervention.
OBJECTIVE
To provide, from the healthcare delivery system perspective, a cost analysis of the Geriatric Resources for Assessment and Care of Elders (GRACE) intervention, which is effective in improving quality of care and outcomes.


METHODS
Randomized controlled trial with physicians as the unit of randomization.


METHODS
Community-based primary care health centers.


METHODS
Nine hundred fifty-one low-income seniors aged 65 and older; 474 participated in the intervention and 477 in usual care.


METHODS
Home-based care management for 2 years by a nurse practitioner and social worker who collaborated with the primary care physician and a geriatrics interdisciplinary team and were guided by 12 care protocols for common geriatric conditions.


METHODS
Chronic and preventive care costs, acute care costs, and total costs in the full sample (n5951) and predefined high-risk (n5226) and low-risk (n5725) groups.


RESULTS
Mean 2-year total costs for intervention patients were not significantly different from those for usual care patients in the full sample ($14,348 vs $11,834; P=.20) and high-risk group ($17,713 vs $18,776; P=.38). In the high-risk group, increases in chronic and preventive care costs were offset by reductions in acute care costs, and the intervention was cost saving during the postintervention, or third, year ($5,088 vs $6,575; P<.001). Mean 2- year total costs were higher in the low-risk group ($13,307 vs $9,654; P=.01).


CONCLUSIONS
In patients at high risk of hospitalization, the GRACE intervention is cost neutral from the healthcare delivery system perspective. A cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to guide decisions about implementation in low-risk patients.
Counsell
Steven R
SR
Center for Aging Research, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. scounsel@iupui.edu
Callahan
Christopher M
CM
Tu
Wanzhu
W
Stump
Timothy E
TE
Arling
Gregory W
GW
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D019468:Disease Management; D005260:Female; D015577:Geriatric Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007196:Indiana; D008297:Male; D017146:Models, Organizational; D020380:Needs Assessment; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000191:economics*; D011203:Poverty; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D017064:Process Assessment, Health Care
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22 Suppl 3:396-402
18026808
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Nov-Dec;23(6):63-75
15584100
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jul 5;143(1):26-31
15998752
JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2673-4
18073365
Stat Med. 1999 Oct 30;18(20):2749-61
10521864
Med Care. 2002 May;40(5):416-28
11961476
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 3;358(14):1509-14
18385503
Arch Intern Med. 1999 Aug 9-23;159(15):1690-700
10448770
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Feb;14(2):95-100
18269305
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):905-12
11907291
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Oct;46(10):1191-8
9777899
Med Care. 1999 Dec;37(12):1199-206
10599601
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 4;139(9):740-7
14597458
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Oct;50(10):1741-3
12366633
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Mar;47(3):269-76
10078887
N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 2;333(18):1184-9
7565974
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Apr;49(4):351-9
11347776
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Aug;16(8):525-30
11556928
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jan;13(1):22-8
17227200
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 Apr;43(4):374-7
7706626
Int J Med Inform. 1999 Jun;54(3):225-53
10405881
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1214-20
16162565
BMJ. 1998 May 2;316(7141):1348-51
9563983
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jul;54(7):1136-41
16866688
JAMA. 2000 Dec 13;284(22):2877-85
11147984
JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2623-33
18073358