Kinetic analysis of expertise in spinal manipulative therapy using an instrumented manikin.
OBJECTIVE
The goals of this study were to measure the kinetic profile of thrust in different groups of subjects with various levels of expertise and to quantify general coordination while performing thoracic spine manipulation.


METHODS
A total of 43 students and chiropractors from the Chiropractic Department of the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières participated in this study.


METHODS
Participants were asked to complete ten consecutive thoracic spine manipulations on an instrumented manikin. Peak force, preload force, time to peak force, time to peak force variability, peak force variability, rate of force production and unloading time were compared between groups. Hand-body delay obtained by calculating the temporal lag between the onset of unloading and the onset of peak force application was also compared between groups.


RESULTS
No group difference was observed for the peak force, peak force variability and preload force variables. However, group differences were present for variables like time to peak force, time to peak force variability, rate of force production, unloading time and hand-body delay.


CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates clear differences between groups of subjects with different levels of expertise in thoracic spine manipulation. This study also demonstrates the usefulness of a simple, instrumented manikin to analyze spinal manipulation and identify important parameters related to expertise.
Descarreaux
Martin
M
Département de Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Dugas
Claude
C
Raymond
Jean
J
Normand
Martin C
MC
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1980 Oct;51(3):509-20
7423009
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 May;21(4):241-5
9608379
Exp Brain Res. 1993;94(3):499-513
8359264
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Jan;20(1):30-40
9004120
Exp Brain Res. 1987;67(2):241-52
3622687
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 May;25(4):251-62
12021744
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug;26(6):396; author reply 396
12902969
Ergonomics. 1968 Jul;11(4):345-7
5678379
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Feb;23(2):112-4
10714538
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Jul-Aug;18(6):347-52
7595108
J Neurophysiol. 1989 Aug;62(2):342-57
2769334
J Mot Behav. 1989 Sep;21(3):245-64
15136263
Am J Phys Med. 1982 Oct;61(5):229-43
7124913
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Feb;136(3):295-302
11243471
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jan;27(1):49-56
14739874
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Jul-Aug;25(6):353-61
12183693
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Jan;25(1):34-41
11898016
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jul;18(9):1206-12
8362328
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug;26(6):397; author reply 397-8
12902970
J Neurophysiol. 1989 Aug;62(2):358-68
2769335