title: Three-dimensional T2-weighted MRI of the human femoral arterial vessel wall at 3.0 Tesla.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the potential use of a novel 3D turbo spin-echo (TSE) T2-weighted (T2w) technique for assessing the vessel wall in the superficial femoral artery at 3.0 T.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Magnetic resonance imaging can be used for the noninvasive assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden in the peripheral circulation. Although black-blood 2D TSE techniques have been used for femoral arterial wall imaging, these techniques require prolonged imaging time to cover a large field of view required to cover the leg. Recently, variable-flip-angle 3D TSE T2w (SPACE) has been introduced as a fast vessel wall imaging technique with submillimeter spatial resolution. A systematic investigation of the application of this technique to femoral arterial wall imaging has yet to be performed.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fifteen healthy volunteers and 3 patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) underwent 3D SPACE imaging of the superficial femoral artery at 3.0 T, with the conventional 2D TSE T2w imaging as a reference. Muscle-lumen contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and wall/lumen volumes (WV, LV) were measured at the matched locations on the 3D and 2D image sets. Statistical comparison on a per-subject basis was conducted to determine the difference and agreement between 3D SPACE and the 2D TSE techniques.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The 3D SPACE data sets enabled vessel visualization from arbitrary orientation through multiplanar reformation technique. Muscle-lumen CNR was significantly higher with 3D SPACE than with the 2D TSE (3.12 +/- 0.84 vs. 2.17 +/- 0.34, P < 0.01). This trend was confirmed when CNR efficiency (CNR(eff)) values were further compared. A similar trend was observed in PAD patients (SPACE vs. 2D TSE T2w: CNR 2.35 +/- 0.13 vs. 1.77 +/- 0.25; CNR(eff) 15.35 +/- 0.61 vs. 3.59 +/- 2.62. all P < 0.05). Measurements of WV and LV from the 3D and 2D techniques were highly correlated in volunteers and PAD patients (volunteers, WV: linear regression r2 = 0.98, LV: r2 = 0.98, P < 0.001 for both; patients, WV: linear regression r2 = 0.96, LV: r2 = 0.94, P < 0.001 for both).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We established the feasibility of using the 3D SPACE technique for vessel wall imaging in the superficial femoral artery at 3.0T. High, isotropic-resolution SPACE images, with the aid of multiplanar reformation, enable superior vessel wall visualization. Superior blood signal suppression comparable to vessel wall morphologic measurements, and superior time efficiency compared to conventional 2D TSE imaging indicate the great potential of the SPACE method as a noninvasive imaging technique for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden in PAD patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
authors.forename: Zhuoli
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Zhaoyang
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Fan
authors.forename: Timothy J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Carroll
authors.forename: YiuCho
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Chung
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Weale
authors.forename: Renate
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Jerecic
authors.forename: Debiao
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D005263:Femoral Artery / Q000473:pathology*; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D018810:Magnetic Resonance Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D016491:Peripheral Vascular Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 1998 Aug;40(2):298-310
references.pmid: 9702712
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 May;25(5):1035-43
references.pmid: 17457802
references.citation: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Feb;14(2 Pt 1):227-31
references.pmid: 12582191
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2002 Mar;47(3):616-20
references.pmid: 11870851
references.citation: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(1):33-42
references.pmid: 17178678
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Mar 21;47(6):1239-312
references.pmid: 16545667
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 May;25(5):1000-6
references.pmid: 17410562
references.citation: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(1):71-6
references.pmid: 17178683
references.citation: Am Heart J. 2008 Feb;155(2):348-55
references.pmid: 18215607
references.citation: Circulation. 2007 Feb 6;115(5):e69-171
references.pmid: 17194875
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Nov;22(5):628-33
references.pmid: 16215965
references.citation: Circulation. 1998 Aug 11;98(6):509-18
references.pmid: 9714107
references.citation: J Interv Cardiol. 2003 Apr;16(2):129-42
references.pmid: 12768916
references.citation: Radiology. 2001 Nov;221(2):285-99
references.pmid: 11687667
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Apr;12(4):209-15
references.pmid: 9127224
references.citation: Can J Cardiol. 2005 Oct;21(12):997-1006
references.pmid: 16234879
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2006 May;55(5):1030-7
references.pmid: 16598719
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Apr;25(4):815-23
references.pmid: 17345637
references.citation: Atherosclerosis. 2000 Jun;150(2):321-9
references.pmid: 10856524
references.citation: Coron Artery Dis. 2006 Sep;17(6):553-60
references.pmid: 16905968
references.citation: NMR Biomed. 2006 Oct;19(6):636-54
references.pmid: 16986119