title: The transcription factor MtSERF1 may function as a nexus between stress and development in somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula.
abstract: In Medicago truncatula high rates of somatic embryo formation can be induced in the Jemalong genotype 2HA by application of the hormones auxin and cytokinin. Biosynthesis of the stress-related hormone ethylene is also necessary for somatic embryogenesis (SE) and is most likely a response to wounding and the presence of auxin in the medium. We have demonstrated that expression of a gene designated Mt SOMATIC EMBRYO RELATED FACTOR 1 (MtSERF1) induced by ethylene, in the presence of auxin plus cytokinin, is essential for SE. The promoter region of this transcription factor, a member of the ERF sub-family of the AP2/ERF super family, contains putative binding sites relating to auxin and cytokinin in addition to ethylene. An additional finding was the presence of WUSCHEL (WUS) binding sites in the MtSERF1 promoter region, which is discussed. Here we also discuss the Medicago data in the context of embryogenesis studies in Arabidopsis and suggest that MtSERF1 has a key developmental role, possibly in conjunction with WUS, in regulating downstream genes required for the initiation of SE.
authors.forename: Feky R
authors.initials: FR
authors.lastname: Mantiri
authors.forename: Sergey
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kurdyukov
authors.forename: Shih-Kuang
authors.initials: SK
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Ray J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Rose
references.citation: Dev Biol. 2004 Sep 15;273(2):321-34
references.pmid: 15328016
references.citation: Development. 2007 May;134(9):1653-62
references.pmid: 17376809
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2005 Jan;17(1):61-76
references.pmid: 15598805
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2002;14 Suppl:S131-51
references.pmid: 12045274
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Apr;19(4):1221-34
references.pmid: 17449807
references.citation: Plant Cell Rep. 2006 Jul;25(7):711-22
references.pmid: 16518633
references.citation: Plant J. 2002 May;30(3):349-59
references.pmid: 12000682
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1997 Jul;9(7):1197-1210
references.pmid: 12237383
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Nov;47(11):1443-56
references.pmid: 17056621
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2002 Aug;14(8):1737-49
references.pmid: 12172019
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Feb;6(1):51-6
references.pmid: 12495751
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Apr;146(4):1622-36
references.pmid: 18235037
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2001 Nov;127(3):803-16
references.pmid: 11706164
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Jun;141(2):620-37
references.pmid: 16648215
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Sep;133(1):218-30
references.pmid: 12970488
references.citation: Development. 1996 Jan;122(1):87-96
references.pmid: 8565856
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Feb;140(2):411-32
references.pmid: 16407444
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2003 Oct 14;13(20):1768-74
references.pmid: 14561401
references.citation: Cell. 1998 Dec 11;95(6):805-15
references.pmid: 9865698
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2001 Dec;13(12):2609-18
references.pmid: 11752375
references.citation: Cell. 2004 Oct 1;119(1):109-20
references.pmid: 15454085
references.citation: Biol Chem. 1998 Jun;379(6):633-46
references.pmid: 9687012
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Apr;137(4):1250-60
references.pmid: 15749990
references.citation: Proteomics. 2004 Jul;4(7):1883-96
references.pmid: 15221745
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Oct;133(2):653-63
references.pmid: 14512519
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jul 27;317(5837):507-10
references.pmid: 17656722
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11806-11
references.pmid: 11573014
references.citation: Cell. 1998 Jun 26;93(7):1195-205
references.pmid: 9657152