title: Regression models of atlas appearance.
abstract: Models of object appearance based on principal components analysis provide powerful and versatile tools in computer vision and medical image analysis. A major shortcoming is that they rely entirely on the training data to extract principal modes of appearance variation and ignore underlying variables (e.g., subject age, gender). This paper introduces an appearance modeling framework based instead on generalized multi-linear regression. The training of regression appearance models is controlled by independent variables. This makes it straightforward to create model instances for specific values of these variables, which is akin to model interpolation. We demonstrate the new framework by creating an appearance model of the human brain from MR images of 36 subjects. Instances of the model created for different ages are compared with average shape atlases created from age-matched sub-populations. Relative tissue volumes vs. age in models are also compared with tissue volumes vs. subject age in the original images. In both experiments, we found excellent agreement between the regression models and the comparison data. We conclude that regression appearance models are a promising new technique for image analysis, with one potential application being the representation of a continuum of mutually consistent, age-specific atlases of the human brain.
authors.affiliation: Neuroscience Program, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA. torsten@synapse.sri.com
authors.forename: Torsten
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Rohlfing
authors.forename: Edith V
authors.initials: EV
authors.lastname: Sullivan
authors.forename: Adolf
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pfefferbaum
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001921:Brain / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008953:Models, Anatomic; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013382:Subtraction Technique
references.citation: IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008 Oct;17(10):1963-8
references.pmid: 18784042
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999 Aug;18(8):712-21
references.pmid: 10534053
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jan;20(1):45-57
references.pmid: 11293691
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
references.pmid: 12391568
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 1):21-36
references.pmid: 11525331
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 15;90(24):11944-8
references.pmid: 8265653
references.citation: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998 Mar-Apr;22(2):324-33
references.pmid: 9530404
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19
references.pmid: 15501092
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jan;51(1):188-93
references.pmid: 14705060
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Dec;20(12):1398-410
references.pmid: 11811839
references.citation: Arch Neurol. 1994 Sep;51(9):874-87
references.pmid: 8080387
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1428-42
references.pmid: 15050568
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Aug;22(8):1014-25
references.pmid: 12906255
references.citation: IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006 Feb;28(2):236-50
references.pmid: 16468620