title: [Cost analysis for navigation in knee endoprosthetics].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequent procedures in orthopaedic surgery. The outcome depends on a range of factors including alignment of the leg and the positioning of the implant in addition to patient-associated factors. Computer-assisted navigation systems can improve the restoration of a neutral leg alignment. This procedure has been established especially in Europe and North America. The additional expenses are not reimbursed in the German DRG system (Diagnosis Related Groups). In the present study a cost analysis of computer-assisted TKA compared to the conventional technique was performed.
  
  
  METHODS
  The acquisition expenses of various navigation systems (5 and 10 year depreciation), annual costs for maintenance and software updates as well as the accompanying costs per operation (consumables, additional operating time) were considered. The additional operating time was determined on the basis of a meta-analysis according to the current literature. Situations with 25, 50, 100, 200 and 500 computer-assisted TKAs per year were simulated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The amount of the incremental costs of the computer-assisted TKA depends mainly on the annual volume and the additional operating time. A relevant decrease of the incremental costs was detected between 50 and 100 procedures per year. In a model with 100 computer-assisted TKAs per year an additional operating time of 14 mins and a 10 year depreciation of the investment costs, the incremental expenses amount to <euro> 300-395 depending on the navigation system.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Computer-assisted TKA is associated with additional costs. From an economical point of view an amount of more than 50 procedures per year appears to be favourable. The cost-effectiveness could be estimated if long-term results will show a reduction of revisions or a better clinical outcome.
authors.affiliation: Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Dresden, Deutschland. Oldrich.Cerha@uniklinikum-dresden.de
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Cerha
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kirschner
authors.forename: K-P
authors.initials: KP
authors.lastname: Günther
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lützner
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005858:Germany; D017048:Health Care Costs / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D007720:Knee Prosthesis / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Sep;73(5):709-14
references.pmid: 1894655
references.citation: Knee. 2008 Mar;15(2):80-4
references.pmid: 18262789
references.citation: Int Orthop. 2006 Dec;30(6):536-40
references.pmid: 16736149
references.citation: Knee. 2008 Mar;15(2):75-9
references.pmid: 18234498
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):372-7
references.pmid: 15125124
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Aug;90(8):1039-44
references.pmid: 18669959
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Jan;59(1):77-9
references.pmid: 833180
references.citation: Orthopade. 2003 Jun;32(6):498-505
references.pmid: 12819889
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2007 Dec;22(8):1097-106
references.pmid: 18078876
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Apr;89(4):481-5
references.pmid: 17463116
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Apr;457:156-62
references.pmid: 17195810
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Apr;89(4):471-6
references.pmid: 17463114
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Feb;(299):153-6
references.pmid: 8119010
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Apr;89(4):477-80
references.pmid: 17463115
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88 Suppl 4:47-54
references.pmid: 17142434
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Feb;89(2):261-9
references.pmid: 17272438
references.citation: Orthopade. 2006 Oct;35(10):1056-65
references.pmid: 16953328
references.citation: Orthopade. 2005 Nov;34(11):1125-6, 1128-30
references.pmid: 16133155
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jul;21(6):603-9
references.pmid: 16554112
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):26-34
references.pmid: 15534515
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2007 Feb;22(2):235-40
references.pmid: 17275640
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2005 Apr;20(3):282-8
references.pmid: 15809943
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Nov;89(11):2389-97
references.pmid: 17974880
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jul;90(7):1492-500
references.pmid: 18594098
references.citation: Comput Aided Surg. 2006 Mar;11(2):77-80
references.pmid: 16782642
references.citation: J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):349-55
references.pmid: 15598463
references.citation: Orthopade. 2003 Jun;32(6):469-76
references.pmid: 12819885
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Feb;89(2):236-43
references.pmid: 17272435
references.citation: Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2006 Feb;26(2):217-9
references.pmid: 16503534
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jul;460:178-84
references.pmid: 17620811
references.citation: Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001 Feb 1;87(1):18-28
references.pmid: 11240534
references.citation: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Jun;16(6):536-43
references.pmid: 18365179
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct;20(7 Suppl 3):123-31
references.pmid: 16214013
references.citation: Orthopedics. 1999 Jul;22(7):698-702
references.pmid: 10418867