Changes of mind in decision-making.
A decision is a commitment to a proposition or plan of action based on evidence and the expected costs and benefits associated with the outcome. Progress in a variety of fields has led to a quantitative understanding of the mechanisms that evaluate evidence and reach a decision. Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision. Without additional evidence, however, these formalisms fail to explain why a decision-maker would change their mind. Here we extend a model, developed to account for both the timing and the accuracy of the initial decision, to explain subsequent changes of mind. Subjects made decisions about a noisy visual stimulus, which they indicated by moving a handle. Although they received no additional information after initiating their movement, their hand trajectories betrayed a change of mind in some trials. We propose that noisy evidence is accumulated over time until it reaches a criterion level, or bound, which determines the initial decision, and that the brain exploits information that is in the processing pipeline when the initial decision is made to subsequently either reverse or reaffirm the initial decision. The model explains both the frequency of changes of mind as well as their dependence on both task difficulty and whether the initial decision was accurate or erroneous. The theoretical and experimental findings advance the understanding of decision-making to the highly flexible and cognitive acts of vacillation and self-correction.
Resulaj
Arbora
A
Computational and Biological Learning Laboratory, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
Kiani
Roozbeh
R
Wolpert
Daniel M
DM
Shadlen
Michael N
MN
D003201:Computers; D003463:Cues; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008959:Models, Neurological; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009038:Motion; D009068:Movement; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D013997:Time Factors
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 19;28(12):3017-29
18354005
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:227-77
9530497
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jun;9(6):467-79
18464792
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1217-25
12368806
J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Jul 30;181(2):199-211
19450621
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65
17014301
J Vis. 2005 May 02;5(5):376-404
16097871
Curr Biol. 2005 Mar 29;15(6):543-8
15797023
J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 25;26(4):1314-28
16436619
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):284-99
3973762
Nature. 2006 Jun 15;441(7095):876-9
16778890
Nature. 1966 Oct 22;212(5060):438
5970176
Neuron. 2008 Dec 26;60(6):1142-52
19109917
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jun;7(6):485-91
16715056
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 May;6(5):363-75
15832198
Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):857-60
11130724
J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 1;22(21):9475-89
12417672
Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1075-80
17546027
Neuron. 2002 Oct 10;36(2):299-308
12383783
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Mar;27(3):161-8
15036882
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Sep;7(9):907-15
15332089
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
17600525
Brain Behav Evol. 1989;33(2-3):69-74
2758304
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92
11488378