Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: protocol for a qualitative study.
BACKGROUND
Research funders, educators, investigators and decision makers worldwide have identified the need to improve the quality of health care by building capacity for knowledge translation (KT) research and practice. Peer-based mentorship represents a vehicle to foster KT capacity. The purpose of this exploratory study is to identify mentoring models that could be used to build KT capacity, consult with putative mentee stakeholders to understand their KT mentorship needs and preferences, and generate recommendations for the content and format of KT mentorship strategies or programs, and how they could be tested through future research.


METHODS
A conceptual framework was derived based on mentoring goals, processes and outcomes identified in the management and social sciences literature, and our research on barriers and facilitators of academic mentorship. These concepts will inform data collection and analysis. To identify useful models by which to design, implement and evaluate KT mentorship, we will review the social sciences, management, and nursing literature from 1990 to current, browse tables of contents of relevant journals, and scan the references of all eligible studies. Eligibility screening and data extraction will be performed independently by two investigators. Semi-structured interviews will be used to collect information about KT needs, views on mentorship as a knowledge sharing strategy, preferred KT mentoring program elements, and perceived barriers from clinician health services researchers representing different disciplines. Qualitative analysis of transcripts will be performed independently by two investigators, who will meet to compare findings and resolve differences through discussion. Data will be shared and discussed with the research team, and their feedback incorporated into final reports.


CONCLUSIONS
These findings could be used by universities, research institutes, funding agencies, and professional organizations in Canada and elsewhere to develop, implement, and evaluate mentorship for KT research and practice. This research will establish a theoretical basis upon which we and others can compare the cost-effectiveness of interventions that enhance KT mentorship. If successful, this program of research may increase knowledge about, confidence in, and greater utilization of KT processes, and the quality and quantity of KT research, perhaps ultimately leading to better implementation and adoption of recommended health care services.
Gagliardi
Anna R
AR
Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. anna.gagliardi@uhnresearch.ca
Perrier
Laure
L
Webster
Fiona
F
Leslie
Karen
K
Bell
Mary
M
Levinson
Wendy
W
Rotstein
Ori
O
Tourangeau
Ann
A
Morrison
Laurie
L
Silver
Ivan L
IL
Straus
Sharon E
SE
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Feb;89(1):127-36
14769125
Health Promot Int. 2007 Sep;22(3):254-60
17596543
Nurs Adm Q. 1990 Fall;15(1):20-7
2234530
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Oct 27;6:44
16253133
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
10625273
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):29-33
18330419
Acad Med. 2009 Jan;84(1):135-9
19116493
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
17872937
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Oct;9 Suppl 2:3-9
15511319
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24
16557505
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Jul;43(5):637-51
16157338
Psychol Bull. 1982 Jul;92(1):111-35
7134324
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2008 Mar-Apr;24(2):86-90
18391666
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):1058-63
17704351
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):25-36
16557511
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):978-83
17967959
Eval Program Plann. 2008 May;31(2):160-73
18336906
JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1103-15
16954490
Milbank Q. 2008 Mar;86(1):125-55
18307479
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Summer;22(3):160-9
12227238
J Prof Nurs. 1996 Sep-Oct;12(5):311-21
8871697
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):236-40
10812803
Implement Sci. 2007 Jan 04;2:1
17204143
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):239-44
12425783
Nurse Educ Pract. 2008 Jul;8(4):258-66
17988946
Contemp Nurse. 2008 Feb;27(2):194-206
18457520
CMAJ. 2006 Sep 26;175(7):763-71
17001059
BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Jun 27;9:37
18588685
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):1047-51
17967967
CMAJ. 2007 Mar 13;176(6):771-6
17353529
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Sep;75(9):757-61
16173988
J Prof Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;23(6):369-75
18053963
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Dec;60(5):513-24
17973715
Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221-48, 171-2
12841049
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(4):964-76
16314015
Acad Med. 2005 Apr;80(4):344-8
15793017
Can J Cardiol. 2002 Jun;18(6):657-61
12107423
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 23;8:110
18501005
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):1003-7
17967962
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(4):391-6
12501744
J Adv Nurs. 1999 Jan;29(1):201-7
10064300
Can Respir J. 2006 Jul-Aug;13(5):253-9
16896426
Med Teach. 2006 May;28(3):248-57
16753724
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45
12826639
J Nurs Educ. 2008 Jan;47(1):20-9
18232611
BMJ. 2003 Jan 25;326(7382):213-6
12543841
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:6-20
16053580
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Mar;53(6):691-701
16553677
Nurse Educ Pract. 2007 Jan;7(1):44-52
17689423
BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):999
15514342