title: The predictive value of the sacral base pressure test in detecting specific types of sacroiliac dysfunction.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the sacral base pressure test in diagnosing sacroiliac joint dysfunction. It also determined the predictive powers of the test in determining which type of sacroiliac joint dysfunction was present.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a double-blind experimental study with 62 participants. The results from the sacral base pressure test were compared against a cluster of previously validated tests of sacroiliac joint dysfunction to determine its validity and predictive powers. The external rotation of the feet, occurring during the sacral base pressure test, was measured using a digital inclinometer.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was no statistically significant difference in the results of the sacral base pressure test between the types of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. In terms of the results of validity, the sacral base pressure test was useful in identifying positive values of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. It was fairly helpful in correctly diagnosing patients with negative test results; however, it had only a "slight" agreement with the diagnosis for kappa interpretation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this study, the sacral base pressure test was not a valid test for determining the presence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction or the type of dysfunction present. Further research comparing the agreement of the sacral base pressure test or other sacroiliac joint dysfunction tests with a criterion standard of diagnosis is necessary.
authors.affiliation: Private Practice, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
authors.forename: Travis D
authors.initials: TD
authors.lastname: Mitchell
authors.forename: Kristina E
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Urli
authors.forename: Jacques
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Breitenbach
authors.forename: Chris
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Yelverton
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):231-8
references.pmid: 10820295
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jun 1;19(11):1243-9
references.pmid: 8073316
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 May 15;23(10):1124-8; discussion 1129
references.pmid: 9615363
references.citation: Man Ther. 1998 Feb;3(1):12-20
references.pmid: 11487296
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):258-75
references.pmid: 10820299
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1985 Nov;65(11):1671-5
references.pmid: 2932746
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981 Nov-Dec;6(6):620-8
references.pmid: 7336283
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Jan;22(1):4-9
references.pmid: 10029942
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Nov-Dec;20(9):607-17
references.pmid: 9436146
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Feb;15(2):130-2
references.pmid: 2326706
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Mar-Apr;22(3):134-8
references.pmid: 10220710
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Nov 15;21(22):2594-602
references.pmid: 8961447
references.citation: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997 Sep;26(3):155-67
references.pmid: 9276857
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 May 1;23(9):1009-15
references.pmid: 9589539
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Mar-Apr;22(3):139-43
references.pmid: 10220711
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1990 Apr;70(4):250-65; discussion 262-5
references.pmid: 2138334
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1992 Dec;72(12):903-16
references.pmid: 1454866
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1985 Jan;65(1):35-44
references.pmid: 3155567
references.citation: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999 Feb;29(2):83-9; discussion 90-2
references.pmid: 10322583
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jan 1;20(1):31-7
references.pmid: 7709277
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Feb;14(2):162-5
references.pmid: 2922636