title: How amyloplasts, water deficit and root tropisms interact?
abstract: Hydrotropism, the differential growth of plant roots directed by a moisture gradient, is a long recognized, but not well-understood plant behavior. Hydrotropism has been characterized in the model plant Arabidopsis. Previously, it was postulated that roots subjected to water stress are capable of undergo water-directed tropic growth independent of the gravity vector because of the loss of the starch granules in root cap columella cells and hence the loss of the early steps in gravitropic signaling. We have recently proposed that starch degradation in these cells during hydrostimulation sustain osmotic stress and root growth for carrying out hydrotropism instead of reducing gravity responsiveness. In addition, we also proposed that abscisic acid (ABA) and water deficit are critical regulators of root gravitropism and hydrotropism, and thus mediate the interacting mechanism between these two tropisms. Our conclusions are based upon experiments performed with the no hydrotropic response (nhr1) mutant of Arabidopsis, which lacks a hydrotropic response and shows a stronger gravitropic response than that of wild type (WT) in a medium with an osmotic gradient.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Biología Molecular de Plantas; Instituto de Biotecnología; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México.
authors.forename: Georgina
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ponce
authors.forename: Fátima
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Rasgado
authors.forename: Gladys I
authors.initials: GI
authors.lastname: Cassab
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Feb;131(2):536-46
references.pmid: 12586878
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1991 Nov;3(11):1167-1175
references.pmid: 12324587
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Nov;133(3):1135-47
references.pmid: 14526108
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Feb;31(2):205-17
references.pmid: 18047572
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Jan;146(1):178-88
references.pmid: 18024552
references.citation: Planta. 2002 Dec;216(2):203-11
references.pmid: 12447533
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4;100(5):2987-91
references.pmid: 12594336
references.citation: J Plant Res. 1996 Sep;109(1095):335-7
references.pmid: 11539859
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 13;104(11):4724-9
references.pmid: 17360591
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2007;58(5):1143-50
references.pmid: 17244629
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2003 Jul;92(1):1-20
references.pmid: 12740212
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Jan;10(1):44-50
references.pmid: 15642523