title: Bacterial culture reduces but does not eliminate the risk of septic transfusion reactions to single-donor platelets.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Transfusion-associated bacterial sepsis is a significant risk of morbidity and mortality related to platelet (PLT) transfusions. Previously the rate of septic PLT transfusion reactions (SPTRs) to single-donor PLTs (SDPs) in our hospital was determined to be 1 in 15,098 (6.6 per 100,000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-36.9 per 100,000) transfusions. The goal of this study was to determine if bacterial testing of SDPs reduced the rate of SPTRs in our hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  An automated microbial detection system was implemented by our blood supplier in February 2004. A retrospective examination of the number of SPTRs that have occurred to SDPs at our hospital since that time was performed, using the same criteria used before bacterial screening. Transfusions over a 3.5-year period were examined. Clinical and laboratory data were gathered and correlated from transfusion reaction files and three independent computer systems.
  
  
  RESULTS
  From March 1, 2004, through August 31, 2007, there were 49,625 transfusions of SDPs with 1096 transfusion reactions reported. Only one reaction detected the same organism in two of three sites, meeting our criteria for a SPTR. The rate of SPTRs in SDPs was identified as 1 in 49,625 (2.0 per 100,000; 95% CI, 0.05-11.2 per 100,000). This represents a 69.7% reduction in the incidence of SPTRs (p = 0.41).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  With the implementation of bacterial testing, a decrease in the rate of SPTRs to SDPs from 6.6 per 100,000 to 2.0 per 100,000 transfusions was observed. Although not significant, these findings suggest a trend.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Hemapheresis and Transfusion Services Division, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. fulleral@jhmi.edu
authors.forename: Alice K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Fuller
authors.forename: Kristin M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Uglik
authors.forename: William J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Savage
authors.forename: Paul M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Ness
authors.forename: Karen E
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: King
mesh_terms: D016470:Bacteremia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000635:transmission; D001782:Blood Donors; D003428:Cross Infection / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000635:transmission; D006761:Hospitals / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D017053:Infection Control / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008828:Microbiological Techniques / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017713:Platelet Transfusion / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D018805:Sepsis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000635:transmission
references.citation: Transfusion. 2005 Dec;45(12):1845-52
references.pmid: 16371037
references.citation: Transfusion. 2001 Jul;41(7):857-61
references.pmid: 11452152
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Jan;18(1):195-204
references.pmid: 15653826
references.citation: Transfusion. 2006 Oct;46(10):1787-94
references.pmid: 17002636
references.citation: Transfusion. 2007 Mar;47(3):430-3
references.pmid: 17319822
references.citation: Transfusion. 2004 Mar;44(3):450-60
references.pmid: 14996205
references.citation: Transfusion. 2001 Dec;41(12):1493-9
references.pmid: 11778062
references.citation: Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2003;:575-89
references.pmid: 14633800
references.citation: Transfusion. 2007 Jul;47(7):1134-42
references.pmid: 17581147