Motivated comprehension regulation: vigilant versus eager metacognitive control.
The more accurately people assess their comprehension, the more likely they are to engage in study behaviors that precisely target gaps in their learning. However, comprehension regulation involves more than knowing when to implement a new study strategy; it also involves deciding which strategy will most effectively resolve one's confusion. In two experiments, we explored how people's motivational orientations influence which study strategies they select to regulate their comprehension. In Experiment 1, people who were motivated to vigilantly protect against potential mistakes (i.e., prevention-focused individuals) were more likely to adopt a rereading strategy than people who were motivated to eagerly pursue new learning opportunities (i.e., promotion-focused individuals). In Experiment 2, this difference in strategy use emerged specifically in response to confusing sentences that had been inserted into the text. Furthermore, by using rereading strategies to resolve their confusion, prevention-focused individuals performed better than promotion-focused individuals on a comprehension test and a transfer task.
Miele
David B
DB
Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. dmiele@columbia.edu
Molden
Daniel C
DC
Gardner
Wendi L
WL
D000293:Adolescent; D001288:Attention; D032882:Comprehension; D003221:Confusion / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000523:psychology; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D005715:Gambling / Q000523:psychology; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010988:Play and Playthings; D011932:Reading; D055815:Young Adult
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227
26821081
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):174-9
18605499
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Oct;14(4):676-86
2972804
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Nov;27(6):1424-9
11713877
Psychol Rev. 1954 Nov;61(6):401-9
13215690
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1135-45
10626368
Mem Cognit. 1987 May;15(3):247-55
3600265
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jan;80(1):5-18
11195890
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):1004-10
11105526
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jan;26(1):204-21
10682298
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):668-78
17848025
Mem Cognit. 2006 Oct;34(7):1377-97
17263064
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Mar;72(3):515-25
9120782
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
18697684
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1991 Dec;19(6):671-92
1791273
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1219-1228
19727421
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 May;80(5):693-705
11374743
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Feb;135(1):36-69
16478315
Psychol Bull. 1995 Nov;118(3):392-404
7501743
Psychol Bull. 1993 Nov;114(3):510-32
8272468
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Feb;74(2):285-93
9491583
J Gerontol. 1994 Sep;49(5):P201-12
8056945
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;84(6):1140-53
12793581
Am Psychol. 1997 Dec;52(12):1280-300
9414606
Psychol Sci. 2005 Nov;16(11):852-5
16262768
J Learn Disabil. 1984 Apr;17(4):229-33
6716009
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1267-80
16393046
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):1001-13
11761303