Rectocele or stool quality: what matters more for symptoms  of obstructed defecation?
BACKGROUND
Rectocele is a common condition seen inpatients presenting with symptoms of obstructed defecation.We designed a prospective observational study to investigate the relative roles of rectocele and stool quality for such symptoms.


METHODS
Two hundred and forty-two women were assessed in a tertiary urogynaecological unit in a prospective observational study. History taking included questions regarding chronic constipation, incomplete bowel emptying, straining at stool and vaginal digitation,as well as symptoms of prolapse. Stool quality was assessed using the Bristol Stool Form Scale. Rectocele was diagnosed using translabial ultrasound and defined asa diverticulum of the anterior vaginal wall measuring 10 mm or more in depth.


RESULTS
The mean age was 53 (17-85) years. Patients reported frequent straining at stool (30%), chronic constipation(20%), vaginal digitation (15%) and incomplete bowel emptying (35%). Median stool quality was 4 (1-7).Ninety-seven women (40%) were found to have a true rectocele on imaging. Vaginal digitation was the only symptom significantly associated with true rectocele. Other symptoms of obstructed defecation were associated with stool quality rather than rectocele. Stool quality was not a confounder of the relationship between true rectocele and symptoms when tested by regression analysis.


CONCLUSIONS
Stool quality seems to be of greater relevance in the aetiology of symptoms of obstructed defecation than the presence of a rectocele. This was true even when using imaging criteria for a true rectocele rather than just surface anatomy.
Dietz
H P
HP
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia. hpdietz@bigpond.com
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015897:Comorbidity; D003248:Constipation / Q000453:epidemiology*; D003672:Defecation / Q000502:physiology; D005243:Feces; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D020047:Rectocele / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D014463:Ultrasonography; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000453:epidemiology; D055815:Young Adult
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Apr;99(4):310-3
1581277
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(2):96-9
10384970
Tech Coloproctol. 2009 Mar;13(1):17-25; discussion 25-6
19288249
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;26(1):73-7
15973648
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;18(5):511-4
11844174
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004 Jan;19(1):60-7
12761642
Tech Coloproctol. 2001 Dec;5(3):163-4
11875684
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;180(4):815-23
10203649
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;31(5):567-71
18409183
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;23(1):80-92
14971006
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Feb;45(2):239-45; discussion 245-8
11852339
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Dec;45(6):505-8
16401217
Gut. 1989 Dec;30(12):1737-49
2612988
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997 Sep;32(9):920-4
9299672
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Oct;45(5):391-4
16171474