Identification of network topological units coordinating the global expression response to glucose in Bacillus subtilis and its comparison to Escherichia coli.
BACKGROUND
Glucose is the preferred carbon and energy source for Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. A complex regulatory network coordinates gene expression, transport and enzymatic activities, in response to the presence of this sugar. We present a comparison of the cellular response to glucose in these two model organisms, using an approach combining global transcriptome and regulatory network analyses.


RESULTS
Transcriptome data from strains grown in Luria-Bertani medium (LB) or LB+glucose (LB+G) were analyzed, in order to identify differentially transcribed genes in B. subtilis. We detected 503 genes in B. subtilis that change their relative transcript levels in the presence of glucose. A similar previous study identified 380 genes in E. coli, which respond to glucose. Catabolic repression was detected in the case of transport and metabolic interconversion activities for both bacteria in LB+G. We detected an increased capacity for de novo synthesis of nucleotides, amino acids and proteins. A comparison between orthologous genes revealed that global regulatory functions such as transcription, translation, replication and genes relating to the central carbon metabolism, presented similar changes in their levels of expression. An analysis of the regulatory network of a subset of genes in both organisms revealed that the set of regulatory proteins responsible for similar physiological responses observed in the transcriptome analysis are not orthologous. An example of this observation is that of transcription factors mediating catabolic repression for most of the genes that displayed reduced transcript levels in the case of both organisms. In terms of topological functional units in both these bacteria, we found interconnected modules that cluster together genes relating to heat shock, respiratory functions, carbon and peroxide metabolism. Interestingly, B. subtilis functions not found in E. coli, such as sporulation and competence were shown to be interconnected, forming modules subject to catabolic repression at the level of transcription.


CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrate that the response to glucose is partially conserved in model organisms E. coli and B. subtilis, including genes encoding basic functions such as transcription, translation, replication and genes involved in the central carbon metabolism.
Vázquez
Carlos Daniel
CD
Departamentos de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo, Postal 510-3, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62250, México. cvazquez@ibt.unam.mx
Freyre-González
Julio A
JA
Gosset
Guillermo
G
Loza
José Antonio
JA
Gutiérrez-Ríos
Rosa María
RM
D001412:Bacillus subtilis / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D003470:Culture Media; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D015964:Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial; D053263:Gene Regulatory Networks; D005947:Glucose / Q000378:metabolism*; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
D003470:Culture Media; D005947:Glucose
J Bacteriol. 2004 Oct;186(19):6485-91
15375129
Proteomics. 2004 May;4(5):1465-90
15188415
Curr Microbiol. 2003 Oct;47(4):300-8
14629011
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Feb;5(2):101-13
14735121
Genetica. 2008 May;133(1):65-76
17712603
J Bacteriol. 1999 Nov;181(22):6889-97
10559153
BMC Syst Biol. 2008 Feb 26;2:20
18302748
J Mol Biol. 2006 Apr 28;358(2):614-33
16530225
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 8;95(25):14863-8
9843981
Science. 1989 Jan 27;243(4890):526-9
2492118
Mol Microbiol. 1991 Mar;5(3):575-84
1904524
Gene. 1998 Oct 23;221(2):185-90
9795209
PLoS Biol. 2004 Oct;2(10):e328
15383836
J Biol Chem. 1993 Jan 15;268(2):771-4
8419352
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jun 12;20(9):1453-4
14871861
Microbiology (Reading). 2002 Nov;148(Pt 11):3441-3455
12427936
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2005 Oct;3(5):1171-89
16278953
Trends Genet. 2005 Jan;21(1):16-20
15680508
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Dec;7(6):579-86
15556029
J Bacteriol. 2006 Feb;188(3):1103-12
16428414
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Aug;6(8):613-24
18628769
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2435-43
14597655
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Dec;5(12):917-27
17982469
J Bacteriol. 2000 Aug;182(16):4458-65
10913079
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):62-5
11752255
Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 22;20(17):3246-8
15180930
J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov;187(22):7826-39
16267306
BMC Microbiol. 2007 Jun 08;7:53
17559662
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Dec 15;29(24):5195-206
11812853
Nat Genet. 2004 May;36(5):492-6
15107850
Science. 2002 Aug 30;297(5586):1551-5
12202830
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;38(3):173-98
12870714
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:165-90
9891797
Eur J Biochem. 2001 May;268(10):3069-74
11358526
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2005 Dec;69(4):608-34
16339738
Mol Microbiol. 2003 Jul;49(1):157-65
12823818
FEBS Lett. 1998 Jun 23;430(1-2):28-36
9678589
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D394-7
16381895
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jan;73(2):499-507
17122393
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
9254694
J Bacteriol. 1992 Nov;174(22):7104-11
1429433
J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov;187(22):7655-66
16267290
BMC Genomics. 2008 Mar 17;9:128
18366643
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Sep 9;334(4):1248-53
16051192
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 13;34(12):3434-45
16840530
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
2231712
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D93-6
17962296
Genome Biol. 2008;9(6):R95
18541022
J Bacteriol. 1999 Jan;181(2):426-33
9882655