Hysterectomy for benign indications and risk of pelvic organ fistula disease.
OBJECTIVE
To study the association between hysterectomy for benign indications and pelvic organ fistula disease.


METHODS
We conducted a nationwide cohort study based on Swedish health care registers. The cohort consisted of 182,641 women having hysterectomy (exposed cohort) and 525,826 women not undergoing the procedure (unexposed cohort) from the Swedish Inpatient Register 1973-2003. The outcome was defined as surgery for pelvic organ fistula disease. We calculated incidence rates for fistula disease and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as a measure of relative risk.


RESULTS
We identified 853 cases of pelvic organ fistula surgery: 469 among the exposed women and 384 among the unexposed. The overall rate of fistula surgery was four times higher in the exposed compared with the unexposed cohort (rate 23.8 and 6.3 per 100,000 person-years, respectively). Overall number needed to harm was 5,700. Compared with unexposed, the risk for fistula disease was more than 20 times higher the first year after surgery (HR 21.2, 95% CI 14.9-30.2). The most common type of fistula was intestinogenital fistula (404 cases, 47%), followed by urogenital fistula (220 cases, 26%). Laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with the highest rate of fistula surgery, and subtotal abdominal hysterectomy was associated with the lowest (rate 95.9 and 13.7 per 100,000 person-years, respectively).


CONCLUSIONS
Pelvic organ fistula surgery is four times more common in women after hysterectomy compared with women not having the procedure. The highest fistula rates were observed the first year after surgery, after laparoscopic and total abdominal hysterectomy, and among older women.


METHODS
II.
Forsgren
Catharina
C
From the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet at Danderyd Hospital; and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lundholm
Cecilia
C
Johansson
Anna L V
ALV
Cnattingius
Sven
S
Altman
Daniel
D
D000328:Adult; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy; D015994:Incidence; D007412:Intestinal Fistula / Q000453:epidemiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012307:Risk Factors; D013548:Sweden; D014548:Urinary Fistula / Q000453:epidemiology*; D014591:Uterine Diseases / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D014624:Vaginal Fistula / Q000453:epidemiology*
Symmonds RE. Incontinence: vesical and urethral fistulas. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1984;27:499–514.
Lee RA, Symmonds RE, Williams TJ. Current status of genitourinary fistula. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:313–9.
Livengood CH 3rd. Colovaginal fistula. Report of a case with failure of transvaginal repair. J Reprod Med 1996;41:291–3.
Eilber KS, Kavaler E, Rodriguez LV, Rosenblum N, Raz S. Ten-year experience with transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair using tissue interposition. J Urol 2003;169:1033–6.
Kelly J, Winter HR. Reflections on the knowledge base for obstetric fistula. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007;99:S21–4.
Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Tiitinen A. Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:113–8.
Carlson KJ, Nichols DH, Schiff I. Indications for hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 1993;328:856–60.
Lundholm C, Forsgren C, Johansson AL, Cnattingius S, Altman D. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987–2003: a nationwide trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:52–8.
Farquhar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:229–34.
Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:34.e1–7.
Coulter A, McPherson K, Vessey M. Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies? Soc Sci Med 1988;27:987–94.
Nilsson A, Spetz C, Carsjö K, Nightingale R, Smedby B. Reliability of the hospital registry. The diagnostic data are better than their reputation [in Swedish]. Läkartidningen 1994;91:603–5.
Armenakas NA, Pareek G, Fracchia JA. Iatrogenic bladder perforations: longterm followup of 65 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:78–82.
Flynn MK, Amundsen CL. Delayed presentation and successful repair of a recurrent vesicovaginal fistula after hysterectomy and primary abdominal repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004;15:53–5.
Hoffman MS, Lynch C, Lockhart J, Knapp R. Injury of the rectum during vaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:274–7.
Ng CC, Chern BS, Siow AY. Retrospective study of the success rates and complications associated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007;33:512–8.
Chou DC, Rosen DM, Cario GM, Carlton MA, Lam AM, Chapman M, et al. Home within 24h of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;39:234–8.
Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S, Sculpher M, et al. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1–154.
Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005;330:1478–86.
Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C. Hysterectomy and risk for stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet 2007;370:1494–9.
Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:572.e1–6.
Härkki-Siren P, Sjöberg J, Kurki T. Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:94–8.