Organizational and market influences on physician performance on patient experience measures.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the extent to which medical group and market factors are related to individual primary care physician (PCP) performance on patient experience measures.


METHODS
This study employs Clinician and Group CAHPS survey data (n=105,663) from 2,099 adult PCPs belonging to 34 diverse medical groups across California. Medical group directors were interviewed to assess the magnitude and nature of financial incentives directed at individual physicians and the adoption of patient experience improvement strategies. Primary care services area (PCSA) data were used to characterize the market environment of physician practices.


METHODS
We used multilevel models to estimate the relationship between medical group and market factors and physician performance on each Clinician and Group CAHPS measure. Models statistically controlled for respondent characteristics and accounted for the clustering of respondents within physicians, physicians within medical groups, and medical groups within PCSAs using random effects.


RESULTS
Compared with physicians belonging to independent practice associations, physicians belonging to integrated medical groups had better performance on the communication ( p=.007) and care coordination ( p=.03) measures. Physicians belonging to medical groups with greater numbers of PCPs had better performance on all measures. The use of patient experience improvement strategies was not associated with performance. Greater emphasis on productivity and efficiency criteria in individual physician financial incentive formulae was associated with worse access to care ( p=.04). Physicians located in PCSAs with higher area-level deprivation had worse performance on the access to care ( p=.04) and care coordination ( p<.001) measures.


CONCLUSIONS
Physicians from integrated medical groups and groups with greater numbers of PCPs performed better on several patient experience measures, suggesting that organized care processes adopted by these groups may enhance patients' experiences. Physicians practicing in markets with high concentrations of vulnerable populations may be disadvantaged by constraints that affect performance. Future studies should clarify the extent to which performance deficits associated with area-level deprivation are modifiable.
Rodriguez
Hector P
HP
Department of Health Services, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. hrodriguez@post.harvard.edu
von Glahn
Ted
T
Rogers
William H
WH
Safran
Dana Gelb
DG
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002140:California; D003142:Communication; D003266:Continuity of Patient Care; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000458:organization & administration; D005194:Family Practice / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D006123:Group Practice / Q000458:organization & administration*; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D007193:Independent Practice Associations / Q000458:organization & administration; D008297:Male; D008389:Marketing of Health Services / Q000458:organization & administration*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008486:Physician Executives / Q000523:psychology; D010816:Physician Incentive Plans / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011361:Professional Competence / Q000592:standards*; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012044:Regression Analysis; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Nov-Dec;23(6):51-62
15537586
Implement Sci. 2007 Apr 25;2:13
17459167
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):109-126
25372572
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):1304-14
17848441
Lancet. 2008 Aug 30;372(9640):728-36
18701159
JAMA. 2005 Jul 27;294(4):473-81
16046654
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):w405-14
17426053
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Jun;64(3):235-78
17507458
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Dec 5;145(11):860-1
17146070
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Apr 8;162(7):757-65
11926848
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):287-309
12650392
JAMA. 2004 Mar 10;291(10):1246-51
15010447
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10):989-96
17890997
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Dec 5;145(11):826-33
17146067
JAMA. 1999 Jan 20;281(3):283-7
9918487
BMC Med Educ. 2008 Jan 14;8:3
18194559
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):w516-27
17595198
JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1579-86
8182810
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):188-94
12442854
Mayo Clin Proc. 1998 Feb;73(2):191-3
9473005
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):720-1
10487981
Med Care Res Rev. 2000 Sep;57(3):379-94
10981191
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21 Suppl 1:S9-15
16405711
Med Care. 2006 Feb;44(2):167-74
16434916
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1959-78
16987311
Qual Manag Health Care. 2005 Apr-Jun;14(2):66-79
15907016
Med Care. 2005 Jan;43(1):12-20
15626929
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21(1):13-21
16423118
Qual Manag Health Care. 2008 Oct-Dec;17(4):292-303
19020399
Milbank Q. 2004;82(3):457-81, table of contents
15330973
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Spring;15(1):7-22
8920566
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jul;58(1):4-12
15950831
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 4;148(5):353-7
18316754
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 1):1181-99
16899002
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Dec 4;147(11):792-4
18056664
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Nov;31(11):631-9
16335064
N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 19;339(21):1516-21
9819451
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;2(6):534-40
15576537
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1130-49
17489907
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Jul-Aug;20(4):81-96
11463094
JAMA. 2003 Jan 22-29;289(4):434-41
12533122
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1150-76
17489908
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):85-100
12500472
Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb;41(1):265-83
16430611
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Apr;65(2):167-86
18096718
PLoS Med. 2007 Jun;4(6):e191
17564486
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):110-7
17068351
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jan 10;160(1):69-76
10632307