New school in liver development: lessons from zebrafish.
There is significant overlap in the genes and pathways that control liver development and those that regulate liver regeneration, hepatic progenitor cell expansion, response to injury, and cancer. Additionally, defects in liver development may underlie some congenital and perinatal liver diseases. Thus, studying hepatogenesis is important for understanding not only how the liver forms, but also how it functions. Elegant work in mice has uncovered a host of transcription factors and signaling molecules that govern the early steps of hepatic specification; however, the inherent difficulty of studying embryogenesis in utero has driven developmental biologists to seek new systems. The rapidly developing vertebrate zebrafish is a favorite model for embryology. The power of forward genetic screens combined with live real-time imaging of development in transparent zebrafish embryos has highlighted conserved processes essential for hepatogenesis and has uncovered some exciting new players. This review presents the advantages of zebrafish for studying liver development, underscoring how studies in zebrafish and mice complement each other. In addition to their value for studying development, zebrafish models of hepatic and biliary diseases are expanding, and using these small, inexpensive embryos for drug screening has become de rigueur. Zebrafish provide a shared platform for developmental biology and translational research, offering innovative methods for studying liver development and disease. The story of hepatogenesis has something for everyone. It involves transcriptional regulation, cell-cell interaction, signaling pathways, control of cell proliferation and apoptosis, plus morphogenic processes that sculpt vasculature, parenchymal cells, and mesenchyme to form the multifaceted liver. Decades of research on liver development in mice and other vertebrates offer valuable lessons in how the multipotent endoderm is programmed to form a functional liver. Of equal importance are insights that have illuminated the mechanisms by which hepatic progenitors are activated in a damaged liver, how the adult liver regenerates, and, possibly, the basis for engineering liver cells in vitro for cell transplantation to sustain patients with liver failure. Moreover, processes that are key to liver development are often co-opted during pathogenesis. Therefore, reviewing hepatogenesis is informative for both basic and translational researchers. In this review, we bring to light the many advantages offered by the tropical freshwater vertebrate zebrafish (Danio rerio) in studying hepatogenesis. By comparing zebrafish and mice, we highlight how work in each system complements the other and emphasize novel paradigms that have been uncovered using zebrafish. Finally, we highlight exciting efforts using zebrafish to model hepatobiliary diseases.
Chu
Jaime
J
Department of Medicine/Division of Liver Diseases, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Sadler
Kirsten C
KC
D000818:Animals; D002450:Cell Communication / Q000502:physiology; D002454:Cell Differentiation / Q000502:physiology; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D008099:Liver / Q000196:embryology* / Q000473:pathology; D008107:Liver Diseases / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D051379:Mice; D015398:Signal Transduction / Q000502:physiology; D015027:Zebrafish / Q000196:embryology*
Development. 2004 Nov;131(22):5753-66
15509774
Science. 1999 Jun 18;284(5422):1998-2003
10373120
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Jan;24(1):73-5
16327811
Genes Dev. 2005 Dec 1;19(23):2900-11
16322560
Dev Cell. 2008 Nov;15(5):738-48
19000838
Toxicol Pathol. 2000 Mar-Apr;28(2):342-56
10805153
Development. 2003 Sep;130(17):3917-28
12874115
Development. 2005 Aug;132(15):3561-72
16000385
Development. 2007 Jun;134(12):2207-17
17507400
Development. 2009 Mar;136(5):865-75
19201949
Dev Biol. 2008 May 1;317(1):336-53
18367159
BMC Dev Biol. 2008 Sep 16;8:84
18796162
Science. 2001 Oct 19;294(5542):559-63
11577199
Anat Rec. 1988 Jun;221(2):619-34
2970812
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2008 Nov;7(6):454-9
19028802
Nature. 2007 Dec 6;450(7171):908-12
17994007
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007 Jun;292(6):G1578-85
17332475
Dev Dyn. 2000 Sep;219(1):84-9
10974674
FEBS Lett. 2003 Mar 13;538(1-3):125-33
12633865
Hepatology. 2005 May;41(5):956-67
15841465
Hepatology. 2008 May;47(5):1667-79
18393386
Hepatology. 2008 Jan;47(1):247-58
18038450
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jun;26(6):702-8
18500334
Genes Dev. 1999 Nov 15;13(22):2983-95
10580005
Hepatology. 2007 May;45(5):1298-305
17464972
Mech Dev. 2003 Jan;120(1):5-18
12490292
Development. 2007 Jun;134(11):2041-50
17507405
Dev Biol. 2007 Mar 15;303(2):501-13
17222402
Dev Biol. 2003 Jan 15;253(2):279-90
12645931
Mech Dev. 2001 May;103(1-2):137-9
11335121
Development. 2008 Oct;135(19):3209-18
18776143
Hepatology. 2009 Feb;49(2):443-52
19127516
Development. 2001 Mar;128(6):871-81
11222142
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2007 Jul;290(7):770-82
17516461
Curr Biol. 2008 Oct 28;18(20):1565-71
18951027
Genesis. 2001 Jul;30(3):141-3
11477693
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Nov;24(11):1402-11
17086172
Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 1;15(23):3217-29
11731484
Development. 2001 Jan;128(1):125-35
11092818
Methods Mol Biol. 2008;469:273-300
19109716
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4348
19198653
Dev Biol. 2006 Jun 15;294(2):482-96
16631158
Dev Biol. 2008 Oct 15;322(2):237-50
18687323
Gastroenterology. 2006 Nov;131(5):1561-72
17101329
Development. 2005 Sep;132(17):4005-14
16079152
Nat Genet. 2007 Mar;39(3):397-402
17259985
Blood. 2006 Feb 15;107(4):1357-65
16234353
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 30;104(5):1570-5
17242348
Development. 2008 Aug;135(16):2777-86
18635606
Science. 2007 Sep 21;317(5845):1760-4
17673620
Dev Cell. 2006 Sep;11(3):339-48
16950125
Dev Biol. 2008 Aug 1;320(1):161-74
18585699
Dev Biol. 2004 Oct 15;274(2):245-59
15385156
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Jul;3(7):499-512
12094228
Development. 2000 Oct;127(20):4303-13
11003831
Genes Dev. 2001 Aug 1;15(15):1998-2009
11485993
Nature. 2006 Aug 10;442(7103):688-91
16799568
Science. 2008 Dec 5;322(5907):1490-4
19056973