title: ARG1 and ARL2 form an actin-based gravity-signaling chaperone complex in root statocytes?
abstract: Plants are acutely sensitive to the directional information provided by gravity. They have evolved statocytes, which are specialized cells that sense gravity and, upon integration of the corresponding information with that of other environmental stimuli, control the growth behavior of their organs. The cellular mechanisms that allow statocytes to sense and transduce gravitational information likely involve detecting the sedimentation of, or the tension/pressure exerted by, starch-filled amyloplasts-the presumptive statoliths-within their cytoplasm. Gravity signaling in root statocytes controls the direction of transport of signaling compounds, especially auxin, across the root cap, establishing a lateral gradient that is transmitted to cells in the elongation zone and results in gravitropic curvature. The Arabidopsis J-domain proteins ARG1 and ARL2 function as gravity-signal transducers in root statocytes. In the January issue of The Plant Journal, we reported that ARG1 and ARL2 function non-redundantly in a common gravity signaling pathway required for accumulation of the auxin efflux facilitator PIN3 on the new bottom side of statocytes following gravity stimulation, and lateral redistribution of auxin toward the new lower flank of stimulated roots. Here we present data suggesting that ARG1 physically associates with ARL2, the J-domain co-chaperone HSC70, and actin in vivo. We briefly discuss potential mechanisms by which ARG1 and ARL2 might function in gravity signaling in light of this information.
authors.affiliation: University of Wisconsin-Madison; Madison, Wisconsin USA.
authors.forename: Benjamin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Harrison
authors.forename: Patrick H
authors.initials: PH
authors.lastname: Masson
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):520-7
references.pmid: 17306539
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2006 Nov 20;175(4):571-8
references.pmid: 17116749
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2004 Mar 29;164(7):1055-64
references.pmid: 15051737
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2001 Feb 5;152(3):607-20
references.pmid: 11157986
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Sep 21;130(6):1057-70
references.pmid: 17889650
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2003 Nov;15(11):2612-25
references.pmid: 14507996
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2002 May;7(5):193-5
references.pmid: 11992820
references.citation: Dev Cell. 2007 Jul;13(1):43-56
references.pmid: 17609109
references.citation: Plant J. 2008 Jan;53(2):380-92
references.pmid: 18047472
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Dec;7(6):712-8
references.pmid: 15491921
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2005 Oct;96(5):737-43
references.pmid: 16033778
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 2;96(3):1140-5
references.pmid: 9927707
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Sep 7;443(7107):106-9
references.pmid: 16936718
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2003 Oct;8(10):498-504
references.pmid: 14557047
references.citation: Plant J. 2008 Jan;53(1):29-41
references.pmid: 17971043
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 May;30(2):475-88
references.pmid: 11395008
references.citation: Plant J. 2004 Jul;39(1):113-25
references.pmid: 15200646
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2005 Dec 2;280(48):40135-43
references.pmid: 16179350
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2004 Oct;136(2):3095-103; discussion 3002
references.pmid: 15466218
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 2003 Oct;28(10):541-7
references.pmid: 14559183
references.citation: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Jun;7(6):404-14
references.pmid: 16723976
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Sep;133(1):100-12
references.pmid: 12970478
references.citation: J Cell Sci. 2007 Dec 15;120(Pt 24):4367-76
references.pmid: 18057029