Cooperative blood-feeding and the function and implications of feeding aggregations in the sand fly, Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae).
Given the importance that the evolution of cooperation bears in evolutionary biology and the social sciences, extensive theoretical work has focused on identifying conditions that promote cooperation among individuals. In insects, cooperative or altruistic interactions typically occur amongst social insects and are thus explained by kin selection. Here we provide evidence that in Lutzomia longipalpis, a small biting fly and an important vector of leishmaniasis in the New World, cooperative blood-feeding in groups of non-kin individuals results in a strong decrease in saliva expenditure. Feeding in groups also strongly affected the time taken to initiate a bloodmeal and its duration and ultimately resulted in greater fecundity. The benefits of feeding aggregations were particularly strong when flies fed on older hosts pre-exposed to sand fly bites, suggesting that flies feeding in groups may be better able to overcome their stronger immune response. These results demonstrate that, in L. longipalpis, feeding cooperatively maximizes the effects of salivary components injected into hosts to facilitate blood intake and to counteract the host immune defences. As a result, cooperating sand flies enjoy enormous fitness gains. This constitutes, to our knowledge, the first functional explanation for feeding aggregations in this species and potentially in other hematophagous insects and a rare example of cooperation amongst individuals of a non-social insects species. The evolution of cooperative group feeding in sand flies may have important implications for the epidemiology of leishmaniasis.
Tripet
Frédéric
F
School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Clegg
Simon
S
Elnaiem
Dia-Eldin
DE
Ward
Richard D
RD
PLoS Pathog. 2007 Jun;3(6):e91
17604451
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1989 Nov-Dec;83(6):786
2617646
Med Parazitol (Mosk). 1977;46(1):23-4
875904
Insect Mol Biol. 1999 May;8(2):267-75
10380110
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2001 Apr;96(3):349-51
11313642
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Mar;70(3):278-85
15031517
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1995 Jun;89(3):327-9
7668928
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005 Nov;100(7):719-24
16410957
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1992 Jul-Sep;87(3):397-403
1343649
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(1):e365
19172187
J Exp Med. 1991 Jan 1;173(1):49-54
1985126
Science. 1988 Mar 11;239(4845):1306-8
3344436
Science. 1989 Jan 13;243(4888):212-4
2783496
Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:321-46
15355243
J Med Entomol. 1975 Jun 30;12(2):143-66
808617
Trends Parasitol. 2008 Jan;24(1):12-7
18023260
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001 May-Jun;95(3):239-43
11490989
Scand J Immunol. 2007 Aug-Sep;66(2-3):122-7
17635789
Annu Rev Entomol. 1987;32:463-78
2880553
Clin Dermatol. 1999 May-Jun;17(3):279-89
10384867
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jul 29;345(1312):223-30
7972360
Lancet. 1991 Jan 12;337(8733):67-70
1670724
Infect Immun. 1991 May;59(5):1592-8
2019430
Nature. 2004 Jul 22;430(6998):463-7
15269771
J Med Entomol. 1964 Oct;1:213-68
14222867
J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1365-76
16910958
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Mar;70(3):286-93
15031518
J Exp Med. 1998 Nov 16;188(10):1941-53
9815271
Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1986;83(4):683-6
2870860
Microbes Infect. 2000 Nov;2(14):1765-73
11137049
Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3
17158317
J Biol Chem. 1991 Jun 15;266(17):11234-6
2040631
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1972 Jul;21(4):487-91
5050097
Annu Rev Entomol. 2003;48:73-88
12194906
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1982;76(1):119-22
7080144