Protocol for the saMS trial (supportive adjustment for multiple sclerosis): a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy to supportive listening for adjustment to multiple sclerosis.
BACKGROUND
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an incurable, chronic, potentially progressive and unpredictable disease of the central nervous system. The disease produces a range of unpleasant and debilitating symptoms, which can have a profound impact including disrupting activities of daily living, employment, income, relationships, social and leisure activities, and life goals. Adjusting to the illness is therefore particularly challenging. This trial tests the effectiveness of a Cognitive Behavioural intervention compared to Supportive Listening to assist adjustment in the early stages of MS.


METHODS
This is a two arm randomized multi-centre parallel group controlled trial. 122 consenting participants who meet eligibility criteria will be randomly allocated to receive either Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Supportive Listening. Eight one hour sessions of therapy (delivered over a period of 10 weeks) will be delivered by general nurses trained in both treatments. Self-report questionnaire data will be collected at baseline (0 weeks), mid-therapy (week 5 of therapy), post-therapy (15 weeks) and at six months (26 weeks) and twelve months (52 weeks) follow-up. Primary outcomes are distress and MS-related social and role impairment at twelve month follow-up. Analysis will also consider predictors and mechanisms of change during therapy. In-depth interviews to examine participants' experiences of the interventions will be conducted with a purposively sampled sub-set of the trial participants. An economic analysis will also take place.


CONCLUSIONS
This trial is distinctive in its aims in that it aids adjustment to MS in a broad sense. It is not a treatment specifically for depression. Use of nurses as therapists makes the interventions potentially viable in terms of being rolled out in the NHS. The trial benefits from incorporating patient input in the development and evaluation stages. The trial will provide important information about the efficacy, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of the interventions as well as mechanisms of psychosocial adjustment.


BACKGROUND
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91377356.
Moss-Morris
Rona
R
School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK . remm@soton.ac.uk
Dennison
Laura
L
Yardley
Lucy
L
Landau
Sabine
S
Roche
Suzanne
S
McCrone
Paul
P
Chalder
Trudie
T
D000203:Activities of Daily Living / Q000523:psychology; D000328:Adult; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D009103:Multiple Sclerosis / Q000191:economics / Q000523:psychology*; D018579:Patient Selection; D011788:Quality of Life; D012917:Social Adjustment; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(8):1099-108
7597463
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;62(9):1007-14
16143732
Health Psychol. 1999 Jul;18(4):376-82
10431939
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Dec;69(6):942-9
11777121
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;76(11):1539-43
16227547
Psychother Psychosom. 1997;66(6):286-92
9403917
Stat Methods Med Res. 2010 Jun;19(3):237-70
19608601
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
6685237
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Jul;40(4):1028-33
6480837
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):259-75
17621471
J Neurol. 2007 Jan;254(1):1-13
17508135
Mult Scler. 2009 Jul;15(7):876-84
19168601
J Behav Med. 1997 Oct;20(5):433-45
9415854
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2002;32(2):155-65
12269596
Br J Clin Psychol. 1988 Nov;27(4):349-58
3214688
BMC Med. 2006 Apr 07;4:9
16603058
Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Dec 2;25(23):1291-303
14617435
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 May;180:461-4
11983645
J Psychosom Res. 2004 Mar;56(3):355-61
15046974
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 19;148(4):295-309
18283207
Arch Neurol. 1993 Jun;50(6):599-603
8503796
Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Mar;29(2):141-53
19167801
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 20;26(26):4719-45
17476649
Br J Clin Psychol. 2007 Sep;46(Pt 3):253-72
17697477
Health Psychol. 1999 Jul;18(4):383-92
10431940
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jan;51(462):19-24
11271868
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008;29(2):101-14
18293219
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;76(4):469-75
15774430
J Psychosom Res. 2003 Jun;54(6):503-11; discussion 513-4
12781303
Mult Scler. 2001 Jun;7(3):201-6
11475445
Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Apr 15;22(6):288-93
10864132
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
3806354
J Neurol. 2001 May;248(5):416-21
11437165
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7
16731240
Mult Scler. 2007 Jan;13(1):58-66
17294612
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):663-94
11304107
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jul;87(7):935-43
16813781
Aging Ment Health. 2003 May;7(3):182-5
12775398
Health Soc Work. 2005 Aug;30(3):203-12
16190296
Ann Behav Med. 1997 Summer;19(3):287-94
9603703
Acta Neurol Scand. 2003 Dec;108(6):389-95
14616290
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Apr;68(2):356-61
10780138
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD004431
16437487
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(24):2129-35
7157043
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;159(11):1862-8
12411220