title: Behavioral modulation of gustatory cortical activity.
abstract: Our perception of the sensory world is constantly modulated by the environment surrounding us and by our psychological state; each encounter with the same stimulus can in fact evoke very different perceptions. This phenomenological richness correlates well with the plasticity and the state-dependency observed in neural responses to sensory stimuli. This article reviews recent results on how the processing of sensory inputs varies depending on the internal state of the animal. Specifically it focuses on the gustatory system and on data showing that levels of attention and expectation modulate taste processing and gustatory cortical activity in meaningful ways. Mounting experimental evidence suggesting that expectation-dependent changes in gustatory cortical activity result from changes in the coupling between the amygdala and the cortex will also be discussed. The results presented here begin to paint a complex picture of taste, which goes beyond the framework of classical coding theories.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. alfredo.fontanini@stonybrook.edu
authors.forename: Alfredo
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fontanini
authors.forename: Donald B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Katz
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D055697:Taste Perception
references.citation: J Physiol Paris. 2006 Oct;100(4):182-93
references.pmid: 17317118
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Mar;24(2):173-98
references.pmid: 10714382
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Aug;14(4):423-7
references.pmid: 15321062
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Sep;100(3):1160-8
references.pmid: 18614753
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 25;29(8):2486-95
references.pmid: 19244523
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Jun 15;21(12):4478-89
references.pmid: 11404435
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Aug;9(4):427-35
references.pmid: 10448155
references.citation: BMC Neurosci. 2007 Sep 18;8 Suppl 3:S5
references.pmid: 17903281
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2000 Apr 1-15;69(1-2):115-8
references.pmid: 10854923
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Dec;96(6):3183-93
references.pmid: 16928791
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun;10(6):278-85
references.pmid: 16713325
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2005 May;93(5):2832-40
references.pmid: 15574797
references.citation: Brain Res. 1978 Mar 24;143(2):263-79
references.pmid: 630409
references.citation: Learn Mem. 1998 Nov-Dec;5(6):481-92
references.pmid: 10489263
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):794-800
references.pmid: 17142307