Functional neural network analysis in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using EEG and graph theory.
BACKGROUND
Although a large body of knowledge about both brain structure and function has been gathered over the last decades, we still have a poor understanding of their exact relationship. Graph theory provides a method to study the relation between network structure and function, and its application to neuroscientific data is an emerging research field. We investigated topological changes in large-scale functional brain networks in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) by means of graph theoretical analysis of resting-state EEG recordings. EEGs of 20 patients with mild to moderate AD, 15 FTLD patients, and 23 non-demented individuals were recorded in an eyes-closed resting-state. The synchronization likelihood (SL), a measure of functional connectivity, was calculated for each sensor pair in 0.5-4 Hz, 4-8 Hz, 8-10 Hz, 10-13 Hz, 13-30 Hz and 30-45 Hz frequency bands. The resulting connectivity matrices were converted to unweighted graphs, whose structure was characterized with several measures: mean clustering coefficient (local connectivity), characteristic path length (global connectivity) and degree correlation (network 'assortativity'). All results were normalized for network size and compared with random control networks.


RESULTS
In AD, the clustering coefficient decreased in the lower alpha and beta bands (p < 0.001), and the characteristic path length decreased in the lower alpha and gamma bands (p < 0.05) compared to controls. In FTLD no significant differences with controls were found in these measures. The degree correlation decreased in both alpha bands in AD compared to controls (p < 0.05), but increased in the FTLD lower alpha band compared with controls (p < 0.01).


CONCLUSIONS
With decreasing local and global connectivity parameters, the large-scale functional brain network organization in AD deviates from the optimal 'small-world' network structure towards a more 'random' type. This is associated with less efficient information exchange between brain areas, supporting the disconnection hypothesis of AD. Surprisingly, FTLD patients show changes in the opposite direction, towards a (perhaps excessively) more 'ordered' network structure, possibly reflecting a different underlying pathophysiological process.
de Haan
Willem
W
Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. w.dehaan@vumc.nl
Pijnenburg
Yolande A L
YA
Strijers
Rob L M
RL
van der Made
Yolande
Y
van der Flier
Wiesje M
WM
Scheltens
Philip
P
Stam
Cornelis J
CJ
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000544:Alzheimer Disease / Q000503:physiopathology*; D001921:Brain / Q000503:physiopathology; D003704:Dementia / Q000503:physiopathology*; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000503:physiopathology*; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999 Apr;29(2-3):169-95
10209231
Brain. 2009 Jan;132(Pt 1):213-24
18952674
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Feb;30(2):638-49
18219621
J Neurosci. 2008 Sep 10;28(37):9239-48
18784304
Neurology. 1998 Dec;51(6):1546-54
9855500
Neuropsychobiology. 2001;43(4):273-6
11340368
PLoS One. 2008 Apr 30;3(4):e0002051
18446219
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;117(9):2039-49
16859985
Neuroimage. 2006 Dec;33(4):1117-25
17023181
Schizophr Res. 2006 Oct;87(1-3):60-6
16875801
Arch Neurol. 2006 Nov;63(11):1627-31
17101833
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19518-23
17159150
Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):715-23
19027073
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Mar;19(3):524-36
18567609
Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Nov 5;87(19):198701
11690461
Biol Res. 2003;36(1):67-88
12795207
Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2
9623998
Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2007 Jul 05;1(1):3
17908336
Neuroscientist. 2006 Dec;12(6):512-23
17079517
Neuron. 2009 Apr 16;62(1):42-52
19376066
Neuroinformatics. 2004;2(2):145-62
15319512
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):186-98
19190637
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;118(4):918-27
17314065
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;24(8):865-74
19259973
Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Nov 11;89(20):208701
12443515
Neurobiol Aging. 2006 Oct;27(10):1395-404
16202481
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2003;15(2):106-14
12566600
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Apr;2(4):229-39
11283746
Neurology. 1984 Jul;34(7):939-44
6610841
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Aug;119(8):1732-1738
18490193
Neuropsychol Rev. 2003 Jun;13(2):79-92
12887040
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;119(12):2727-32
18848805
Clin Electroencephalogr. 1996 Apr;27(2):61-8
8681464
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Feb;67(2 Pt 2):026112
12636753
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;63(1):59-65
9221969
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;23(11):1191-202
18500688
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Dec;29(12):1368-78
18064590
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jan;17(1):92-9
16452642
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Jun 27;4(6):e1000100
18584043
J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 30;28(18):4756-66
18448652