title: Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on-line responses to a sudden change in target position.
abstract: Goal-directed movements are executed under the permanent supervision of the central nervous system, which continuously processes sensory afferents and triggers on-line corrections if movement accuracy seems to be compromised. For arm reaching movements, visual information about the hand plays an important role in this supervision, notably improving reaching accuracy. Here, we tested whether visual feedback of the hand affects the latency of on-line responses to an external perturbation when reaching for a visual target. Two types of perturbation were used: visual perturbation consisted in changing the spatial location of the target and kinesthetic perturbation in applying a force step to the reaching arm. For both types of perturbation, the hand trajectory and the electromyographic (EMG) activity of shoulder muscles were analysed to assess whether visual feedback of the hand speeds up on-line corrections. Without visual feedback of the hand, on-line responses to visual perturbation exhibited the longest latency. This latency was reduced by about 10% when visual feedback of the hand was provided. On the other hand, the latency of on-line responses to kinesthetic perturbation was independent of the availability of visual feedback of the hand. In a control experiment, we tested the effect of visual feedback of the hand on visual and kinesthetic two-choice reaction times--for which coordinate transformation is not critical. Two-choice reaction times were never facilitated by visual feedback of the hand. Taken together, our results suggest that visual feedback of the hand speeds up on-line corrections when the position of the visual target with respect to the body must be re-computed during movement execution. This facilitation probably results from the possibility to map hand- and target-related information in a common visual reference frame.
authors.affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
authors.forename: Alexandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Reichenbach
authors.forename: Axel
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Thielscher
authors.forename: Angelika
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Peer
authors.forename: Heinrich H
authors.initials: HH
authors.lastname: Bülthoff
authors.forename: Jean-Pierre
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Bresciani
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D003491:Cybernetics; D004576:Electromyography; D006804:Ergonomics; D056228:Feedback, Sensory; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand; D006801:Humans; D007699:Kinesthesis / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008959:Models, Neurological; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2004 May;66(4):535-44
references.pmid: 15311654
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2004 Aug;157(4):468-71
references.pmid: 15007583
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Oct;7(5):1019-30
references.pmid: 6457106
references.citation: Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003 Jun;28(2):81-91
references.pmid: 12827987
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Aug;151(4):524-35
references.pmid: 12830346
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1969 Jun;80(3):567-9
references.pmid: 5786157
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1973 Nov;80(6):489-509
references.pmid: 4757060
references.citation: J Physiol. 2007 Sep 15;583(Pt 3):1107-15
references.pmid: 17656434
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jun;93(6):3200-13
references.pmid: 15659526
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1986;62(2):303-11
references.pmid: 3709715
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 26;26(30):7791-810
references.pmid: 16870725
references.citation: Nature. 1986 Apr 24-30;320(6064):748-50
references.pmid: 3703000
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1962 Mar;63:289-93
references.pmid: 13906889
references.citation: J Physiol. 1987 Jul;388:397-419
references.pmid: 3079553
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Aug;5(4):497-503
references.pmid: 7488852
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Oct;146(4):451-9
references.pmid: 12355273
references.citation: J Physiol. 1982 May;326:65-77
references.pmid: 7108809
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1999 Apr;125(4):410-6
references.pmid: 10323286
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Aug 6;23(18):6982-92
references.pmid: 12904459
references.citation: Brain. 1981 Mar;104(Pt 1):167-86
references.pmid: 7470841
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct;84(4):2175-80
references.pmid: 11024106
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):423-431
references.pmid: 11058820
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jan;130(2):159-68
references.pmid: 10672469
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;109(5):397-401
references.pmid: 9851296
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1976 Sep;39(5):925-35
references.pmid: 978238
references.citation: Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;108(2):115-23
references.pmid: 15455794
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2004 Oct;158(3):385-90
references.pmid: 15316706
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1993;93(2):324-31
references.pmid: 8491271
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jul;3(7):729-36
references.pmid: 10862707
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1990;81(2):303-12
references.pmid: 2397758
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jan;176(2):267-80
references.pmid: 16896981
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1983 Feb;49(2):548-64
references.pmid: 6834087
references.citation: Nature. 1980 May 22;285(5762):227
references.pmid: 7374773
references.citation: Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1948 Oct;1(Pt. 2):85-103
references.pmid: 18102699
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Apr;8(4):490-7
references.pmid: 15793578
references.citation: Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1880-2
references.pmid: 7569931
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Oct;152(3):341-52
references.pmid: 12904935
references.citation: Vision Res. 1969 Oct;9(10):1247-58
references.pmid: 5360604
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;79(6):3272-8
references.pmid: 9636126
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 Mar 31;24(13):3223-34
references.pmid: 15056701
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1995 Nov;90(1-3):333-48
references.pmid: 8525875
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 2000 Sep;32(3):277-86
references.pmid: 10975275
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1992 Feb;67(2):455-69
references.pmid: 1569469
references.citation: Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):96-107
references.pmid: 11690606
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1968 May;77(1):14-8
references.pmid: 5663585
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:303-30
references.pmid: 9056716
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1026-31
references.pmid: 10526344
references.citation: PLoS One. 2007 Dec 19;2(12):e1336
references.pmid: 18092002
references.citation: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006 Jun;16(3):236-49
references.pmid: 16111896
references.citation: Neuron. 1998 Jan;20(1):15-24
references.pmid: 9459438
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 1994 Sep;26(3):283-95
references.pmid: 15757844
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1990 Jan;63(1):161-72
references.pmid: 2299380
references.citation: Brain. 2001 Sep;124(Pt 9):1832-40
references.pmid: 11522585
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):111-2
references.pmid: 14745452
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1983 Aug;34(2):161-8
references.pmid: 6634374
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2002 Feb 1;22(3):1108-13
references.pmid: 11826139
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 2006 Apr 28;69(4):404-15
references.pmid: 16624672
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;81(3):1355-64
references.pmid: 10085361
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2002 May 14;12(10):834-7
references.pmid: 12015120