Phyllotaxis as an example of the symbiosis of mechanical forces and biochemical processes in living tissue.
Phyllotaxis, the arrangement of a plant's phylla (flowers, bracts, stickers) near its shoot apical meristem (SAM), has intrigued natural scientists for centuries. Even today, the reasons for the observed patterns and their special properties, the physical and chemical mechanisms which give rise to strikingly similar configurations in a wide variety of plants, the almost-constant golden divergence angle, the almost constant plastichrone ratio, the choices of parastichy numbers and the prevalence of Fibonacci sequences to which these numbers belong, are at best only partially understood. Our goals in this Addendum are: To give a brief overview of current thinking on possible mechanisms for primordia (the bumps on the plant surface which eventually mature into fully developed structures such as leaves or florets) formation and give a descriptive narrative of the mathematical models which encode various hypotheses.To emphasize the point that patterns, whether they be phyllotactic configurations on plant surfaces or convection cells on the sun's surface, are macroscopic objects whose behaviors are determined more by symmetries of the proposed model and less by microscopic details. Because of this, the identification of observations with the predications of a particular model can only be made with confidence when the match coincides over a range of circumstances and parameters.To discuss some of the key results of the proposed models and, in particular, introduce the prediction of a new and, in principle, measurable invariant in plant phyllotaxis.To introduce a new model of primordia formation which is more in keeping with the pictures and paradigms of Hofmeister,1 Snow & Snow,2 and Douady and Couder3,4 which see primordia as forming in a fairly narrow annular zone surrounding the plant's SAM separating a region of undifferentiated cells from a fully developed patterned state.To consider the challenge of phyllotaxis in the broader context of pattern formation in biological tissue which responds to both mechanical and biochemical processes.
Newell
Alan C
AC
Department of Mathematics; University of Arizona; Tucson, Arizona USA.
Shipman
Patrick D
PD
Sun
Zhiying
Z
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 31;103(5):1301-6
16432192
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Mar;81(3 Pt 1):031905
20365768
Nature. 2003 Nov 20;426(6964):255-60
14628043
Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Apr 23;92(16):168102
15169264
Plant Physiol. 1974 Dec;54(6):863-9
16658991
J Theor Biol. 2005 Jul 7;235(1):71-83
15833314
J Theor Biol. 2005 Sep 21;236(2):154-97
16005308
J Plant Growth Regul. 2000 Mar;19(1):7-18
11010988
Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Apr;60(6):905-14
16724260
Plant Cell. 2000 Apr;12(4):507-18
10760240
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1952 Jul 10;139(897):545-66
14957860
Am J Bot. 1999 Aug;86(8):1059-76
10449383
New Phytol. 2005 Feb;165(2):373-89
15720650
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 31;103(5):1633-8
16415160
New Phytol. 2006;170(4):711-22
16684233
Plant Cell. 1993 Dec;5(12):1725-1738
12271053
J Theor Biol. 2008 Apr 7;251(3):421-39
18207165
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004 Aug;14(4):367-74
15261652