title: Brassinosteroid-independent functions of the BRI1-associated kinase BAK1/SERK3.
abstract: Eukaryotes have evolved programmed cell death (PCD) mechanisms that play important roles in both, development and immunity.1-3 We demonstrated a requirement for the Arabidopsis thaliana leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK), BAK1/SERK3 (BRI1-Associated receptor Kinase 1/Somatic Embryogenesis Receptor Kinase 3) in regulating the containment of microbial infection-induced necrosis. BAK1-deficient plants showed constitutive expression of defense-related genes and developed spreading cell death upon infection by necrotizing pathogens that result in enhanced susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens. This reaction was not inducible by exposition of bak1 mutants to general stresses but appeared to be solely inducible by necrotizing pathogen infection. BAK1 is known to interact with the brassinosteroid receptor, BRI1, and thereby facilitates plant growth and development in a brassinolide (BL)-dependent manner.4,5 Surprisingly, the cell death-related phenotype in bak1 mutants is brassinolide-independent. In this addendum we want to present recent new data on BAK1 and discuss its role as a general regulator in plant processes being as diverse as brassinosteroid signaling in development, perception of pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and cell-death control in innate immunity.
authors.affiliation: ZMBP-Plant Biochemistry; University Tübingen; Tübingen, Germany.
authors.forename: Birgit
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Kemmerling
authors.forename: Thorsten
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nürnberger
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Dec;7(6):655-60
references.pmid: 15556039
references.citation: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:177-201
references.pmid: 16212492
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Oct;8(5):526-31
references.pmid: 16054433
references.citation: Cell. 2002 Jul 26;110(2):203-12
references.pmid: 12150928
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Jul 3;17(13):1109-15
references.pmid: 17600708
references.citation: Immunol Rev. 2004 Apr;198:249-66
references.pmid: 15199967
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Mar 15;410(6826):380-3
references.pmid: 11268216
references.citation: Plant J. 2005 Jul;43(2):165-80
references.pmid: 15998304
references.citation: Cell. 2006 Feb 24;124(4):803-14
references.pmid: 16497589
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Jul 3;17(13):1116-22
references.pmid: 17583510
references.citation: Plant J. 2003 Nov;36(3):353-65
references.pmid: 14617092
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jul 26;448(7152):497-500
references.pmid: 17625569
references.citation: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Apr;5(4):305-15
references.pmid: 15071555
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Nov;11(11):519-22
references.pmid: 17030146
references.citation: Cell. 2006 May 5;125(3):563-75
references.pmid: 16678099
references.citation: Cell. 2002 Jul 26;110(2):213-22
references.pmid: 12150929
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2006 Mar;18(3):626-38
references.pmid: 16473966
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 17;104(29):12217-22
references.pmid: 17626179
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Nov 12;396(6707):119-22
references.pmid: 9823889