title: Plasmonics of 3-D nanoshell dimers using multipole expansion and finite element method.
abstract: The spatial and spectral responses of the plasmonic fields induced in the gap of 3-D nanoshell dimers of gold and silver are comprehensively investigated and compared via theory and simulation using the multipole expansion (ME) and the finite element method (FEM) in COMSOL, respectively. The E-field in the dimer gap was evaluated and compared as a function of shell thickness, interparticle distance, and size. The E-field increased with decreasing shell thickness, decreasing interparticle distance, and increasing size, with the error between the two methods ranging from 1 to 10%, depending on the specific combination of these three variables. This error increases several fold with increasing dimer size, as the quasi-static approximation breaks down. A consistent overestimation of the plasmon's fwhm and red shifting of the plasmon peak occurs with FEM, relative to ME, and it increases with decreasing shell thickness and interparticle distance. The size effect that arises from surface scattering of electrons is addressed and shown to be especially prominent for thin shells, for which significant damping, broadening, and shifting of the plasmon band is observed; the size effect also affects large nanoshell dimers, depending on their relative shell thickness, but to a lesser extent. This study demonstrates that COMSOL is a promising simulation environment to quantitatively investigate nanoscale electromagnetics for the modeling and designing of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrates.
authors.affiliation: Fitzpatrick Institute of Photonics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
authors.forename: Christopher G
authors.initials: CG
authors.lastname: Khoury
authors.forename: Stephen J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Norton
authors.forename: Tuan
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Vo-Dinh
references.citation: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces. 2008;2008(112):18849-18859
references.pmid: 23977403
references.citation: Langmuir. 2008 Mar 4;24(5):1763-8
references.pmid: 18225937
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2008 Nov;25(11):2767-75
references.pmid: 18978855
references.citation: Science. 1997 Feb 21;275(5303):1102-6
references.pmid: 9027306
references.citation: Appl Opt. 2008 Oct 20;47(30):5557-61
references.pmid: 18936803
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2005 Jul 8;123(2):24701
references.pmid: 16050760
references.citation: Nanotechnology. 2009 Feb 11;20(6):065101
references.pmid: 19417369
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2005 Dec 1;77(23):7810-5
references.pmid: 16316192
references.citation: Nano Lett. 2008 Apr;8(4):1212-8
references.pmid: 18345644
references.citation: Anal Chem. 1994 Oct 15;66(20):3379-83
references.pmid: 7978314
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2006 Jul-Aug;11(4):044002
references.pmid: 16965159
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2008 Jul;25(7):1783-9
references.pmid: 18594636
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2006 Sep 7;110(35):17444-51
references.pmid: 16942083
references.citation: Opt Express. 2009 Jun 8;17(12):9688-703
references.pmid: 19506618
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2005 May 26;109(20):10042-51
references.pmid: 16852215
references.citation: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2006 Jan 7;8(1):165-70
references.pmid: 16482257