title: Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis.
abstract: Comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis (VPE) requires reevaluation of recently processed constituents, which often necessitates retrieval of information about the elided constituent from memory. A. E. Martin and B. McElree (2008) argued that representations formed during comprehension are content addressable and that VPE antecedents are retrieved from memory via a cue-dependent direct-access pointer rather than via a search process. This hypothesis was further tested by manipulating the location of interfering material-either before the onset of the antecedent (proactive interference; PI) or intervening between antecedent and ellipsis site (retroactive interference; RI). The speed-accuracy tradeoff procedure was used to measure the time course of VPE processing. The location of the interfering material affected VPE comprehension accuracy: RI conditions engendered lower accuracy than PI conditions. Crucially, location did not affect the speed of processing VPE, which is inconsistent with both forward and backward search mechanisms. The observed time-course profiles are consistent with the hypothesis that VPE antecedents are retrieved via a cue-dependent direct-access operation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10003, USA. andrea.martin@nyu.edu
authors.forename: Andrea E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Martin
authors.forename: Brian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: McElree
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D032882:Comprehension / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D011932:Reading; D013067:Speech Perception; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):407-30
references.pmid: 17352621
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Sep;23(5):1261-74
references.pmid: 9293634
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):169-74
references.pmid: 12661680
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2006 Aug;55(2):157-166
references.pmid: 18209744
references.citation: J Psycholinguist Res. 2000 Mar;29(2):111-23
references.pmid: 10709178
references.citation: Memory. 2002 Sep-Nov;10(5-6):389-95
references.pmid: 12396651
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):37-60
references.pmid: 24214802
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 May;27(3):817-35
references.pmid: 11394682
references.citation: Science. 1973 Aug 10;181(4099):574-6
references.pmid: 17777808
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 1988 Dec;27(6):699-717
references.pmid: 25520541
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):425-30
references.pmid: 12219808