Static balance control and lower limb strength in blind and sighted women.
The aim of the present study was to examine isokinetic and isometric strength of the knee and ankle muscles and to compare center of pressure (CoP) sway between blind and sighted women. A total of 20 women volunteered to participate in this study. Ten severe blind women (age 33.5 +/- 7.9 years; height 163 +/- 5 cm; mass 64.5 +/- 12.2 kg) and 10 women with normal vision (age 33.5 +/- 8.3 years; height 164 +/- 6 cm; mass 61.9 +/- 14.5 kg) performed 3 different tasks of increasing difficulty: Normal Quiet Stance (1 min), Tandem Stance (20 s), and One-Leg Stance (10 s). Participants stood barefoot on two adjacent force platforms and the CoP variations [peak-to-peak amplitude (CoPmax) and SD of the CoP displacement (CoPsd)] were analyzed. Sighted participants performed the tests in eyes open and eyes closed conditions. Torque/angular velocity and torque/angular position relationships were also established using a Cybex dynamometer for knee extensors and flexors as well as for ankle plantar and dorsiflexors. The main finding of this study was that the ability to control balance in both anterior/posterior and medio/lateral directions was inferior in blind than in sighted women. However, when sighted participants performed the tests blindfolded, their CoP sway increased significantly in both directions. There were no differences in most isometric and concentric strength measurements of the lower limb muscles between the blind and sighted individuals. Our results demonstrate that vision is a more prominent indicator of performance during the postural tasks compared to strength of the lower limbs. Despite similar level of strength, blind individuals performed significantly worse in all balance tests compared to sighted individuals.
Giagazoglou
Paraskevi
P
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Amiridis
Ioannis G
IG
Zafeiridis
Andreas
A
Thimara
Maria
M
Kouvelioti
Vassiliki
V
Kellis
Elefthrerios
E
D000328:Adult; D000842:Ankle / Q000502:physiology; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D006262:Health; D006801:Humans; D007717:Knee / Q000502:physiology; D035002:Lower Extremity / Q000502:physiology*; D053580:Muscle Strength / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology; D004856:Postural Balance / Q000502:physiology*; D011187:Posture; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D019415:Torque; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D019987:Persons with Visual Disabilities
J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):221-33
15477034
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Aug;79(8):994-7
9710175
Age Ageing. 2002 Mar;31(2):119-25
11937474
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;66(3):313-22
10084529
J Physiol. 1993 Sep;469:479-99
8271209
Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008 Sep;4(9):504-15
18711425
Gerontology. 1992;38(6):338-46
1473733
J Except Child. 1950 Dec;17(3):69-72
24539687
Percept Mot Skills. 2006 Aug;103(1):231-7
17037666
Neuroreport. 1993 Jun;4(6):827-9
8347832
Gait Posture. 2008 Jul;28(1):58-61
18023185
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):3024-35
17314243
Exp Brain Res. 1998 Feb;118(4):541-50
9504849
J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 Mar;68(3):202-15
9514769
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jul;49(7):884-91
11527479
J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M72-84
8126355
Acta Paediatr. 2006 Oct;95(10):1277-83
16982502
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995 May;37(5):456-63
7768345
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;59(4):310-9
2583179
Prog Brain Res. 1989;80:411-8; discussion 395-7
2699375
Int J Sports Med. 2006 May;27(5):415-8
16729385
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Apr 15;47(2):141-8
11954007
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Jun;58(6):525-30
12807923
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Jul;94(4):424-33
15843959
Age Ageing. 2004 Nov;33(6):602-7
15501837
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Feb;68(2):85-9
3813861
Brain. 2007 Aug;130(Pt 8):2097-107
17611240
Brain. 1984 Dec;107 ( Pt 4):1143-63
6509312
Nature. 1997 Sep 11;389(6647):180-3
9296495
Neurobiol Aging. 1989 Nov-Dec;10(6):727-38
2697808
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Jul;100(5):553-61
16847676
J Physiol. 1999 Feb 1;514 ( Pt 3):915-28
9882761
Trends Neurosci. 1995 Jan;18(1):36-43
7535489