title: Epidemiological studies of smell: discussion and perspectives.
abstract: The critical epidemiological data for estimating the prevalence of chemosensory disorders in the United States are lacking. Several reasons for this will be discussed, including the time-consuming nature of many existing tests, stimulus delivery in a large-scale study, and the rationale for inclusion in a large-scale epidemiological study. The opportunity to include measures of chemosensory function in ongoing population-based studies has greatly facilitated the collection of recent data that establish the high prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults in the U.S. population and the inability of self-report measures to capture this impairment. Epidemiological studies of the complete range of the population that involve chemosensory testing pose considerable challenges, but are critical to establishing prevalence rates. These studies have the potential to suggest prevention or intervention strategies for chemosensory impairment. Key issues, including cross-cultural issues in stimulus design, testing of special populations, cohort effects, and optimal analyses of population-based chemosensory data, are considered.
authors.affiliation: University of California, San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California 92120-4913, USA.
authors.forename: Wendy
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Claire
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Murphy
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D000857:Olfaction Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1794-9
references.pmid: 16873782
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Nov 30;855:716-22
references.pmid: 9929676
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2008 Sep;54(4):528-33
references.pmid: 18620351
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 1993 Jun;16(6):934-7
references.pmid: 8325211
references.citation: Arch Neurol. 2007 Jan;64(1):93-6
references.pmid: 17210814
references.citation: Neurobiol Aging. 1990 Jul-Aug;11(4):465-9
references.pmid: 2381506
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;64(7):802-8
references.pmid: 17606814
references.citation: JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2307-12
references.pmid: 12425708
references.citation: J Nutr Health Aging. 2006 Jul-Aug;10(4):293-5
references.pmid: 16886099
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 1999 Oct 11;159(18):2177-83
references.pmid: 10527295
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Aug;56(8):1517-21
references.pmid: 18662205
references.citation: Arch Neurol. 2004 May;61(5):661-6
references.pmid: 15148141
references.citation: Neurology. 2004 Aug 24;63(4):658-63
references.pmid: 15326238
references.citation: BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1360
references.pmid: 15863436
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 2008 Feb;63(2):167-73
references.pmid: 18067173