Cost-effectiveness of a structured progressive task-oriented circuit class training programme to enhance walking competency after stroke: the protocol of the FIT-Stroke trial.
BACKGROUND
Most patients who suffer a stroke experience reduced walking competency and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A key factor in effective stroke rehabilitation is intensive, task-specific training. Recent studies suggest that intensive, patient-tailored training can be organized as a circuit with a series of task-oriented workstations. Primary aim of the FIT-Stroke trial is to evaluate the effects and cost-effectiveness of a structured, progressive task-oriented circuit class training (CCT) programme, compared to usual physiotherapeutic care during outpatient rehabilitation in a rehabilitation centre. The task-oriented CCT will be applied in groups of 4 to 6 patients. Outcome will be defined in terms of gait and gait-related ADLs after stroke. The trial will also investigate the generalizability of treatment effects of task-oriented CCT in terms of perceived fatigue, anxiety, depression and perceived HRQoL.


METHODS
The multicentre single-blinded randomized trial will include 220 stroke patients discharged to the community from inpatient rehabilitation, who are able to communicate and walk at least 10 m without physical, hands-on assistance. After discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, patients in the experimental group will receive task-oriented CCT two times a week for 12 weeks at the physiotherapy department of the rehabilitation centre. Control group patients will receive usual individual, face-to-face, physiotherapy. Costs will be evaluated by having each patient keep a cost diary for the first 24 weeks after randomisation. Primary outcomes are the mobility part of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-3.0) and the EuroQol. Secondary outcomes are the other domains of SIS-3.0, lower limb muscle strength, walking endurance, gait speed, balance, confidence not to fall, instrumental ADL, fatigue, anxiety, depression and HRQoL.


CONCLUSIONS
Based on assumptions about the effect of intensity of practice and specificity of treatment effects, FIT-Stroke will address two key aims. The first aim is to investigate the effects of task-oriented CCT on walking competency and HRQoL compared to usual face-to-face physiotherapy. The second aim is to reveal the cost-effectiveness of task-oriented CCT in the first 6 months post stroke. Both aims were recently recommended as priorities by the American Hearth Association and Stroke Council.
van de Port
Ingrid G L
IG
Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine Utrecht, Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, The Netherlands. i.v.d.port@dehoogstraat.nl
Wevers
Lotte
L
Roelse
Hanneke
H
van Kats
Lenneke
L
Lindeman
Eline
E
Kwakkel
Gert
G
D000339:Affect; D002985:Clinical Protocols; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities / Q000191:economics; D011788:Quality of Life; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012047:Rehabilitation Centers; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D020521:Stroke / Q000191:economics; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D016138:Walking
Stroke. 2002 Nov;33(11):2593-9
12411648
Aust J Physiother. 2004;50(4):219-24
15574110
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Jul;53(7):576-9
2391521
Stroke. 2003 Oct;34(10):2475-81
14500932
Stroke. 1998 Oct;29(10):2049-54
9756580
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Apr;81(4):409-17
10768528
Stroke. 2005 Aug;36(8):1648-55
16002757
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Oct;53(10):1667-74
16181164
Clin Rehabil. 2003 Feb;17(1):6-13
12617374
Stroke. 2003 Jul;34(7):1741-5
12775883
Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):1977-83
16081860
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jun;55(6):892-9
17537090
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
1202204
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;84(7):950-63
12881816
Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35-40
6691052
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Jul 15-30;28(13-14):823-30
16777769
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Mar;56(3):221-9
12725876
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Feb;85(2):234-9
14966707
Eur J Heart Fail. 2006 Dec;8(8):841-50
16713337
Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2146-51
10512920
Stroke. 2004 May;35(5):1230-40
15105522
Int Disabil Stud. 1991 Apr-Jun;13(2):50-4
1836787
Lancet. 1999 Jul 17;354(9174):191-6
10421300
Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Apr 15;132(8):919-23
3978515
Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3
2803071
Circulation. 2003 Mar 4;107(8):1110-6
12615787
Phys Ther. 2006 May;86(5):618-25
16649886
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD006073
17943883
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jul;12(30):iii, ix-x, 1-117
18547501
Stroke. 1998 Jan;29(1):63-8
9445330
Stroke. 1989 Oct;20(10):1407-31
2799873
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(1):40-5
16968985
Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Mar 10;22(4):181-6
10798306
Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):167-71
16322486
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov;86(11):935-51
17303962
Stroke. 2009 Jul;40(7):2450-9
19461035
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
6880820
J Gerontol. 1990 Nov;45(6):P239-43
2229948
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001920
12804415
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Aug;88(8):955-63
17678655
Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000 Sep;32(3):140-2
11028799
Stroke. 1997 Oct;28(10):1876-82
9341688
Clin Geriatr Med. 1999 Nov;15(4):833-55
10499938
Stroke. 1995 Jun;26(6):982-9
7762050
Control Clin Trials. 2002 Dec;23(6):662-74
12505244
Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2131-40
10512918
Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Jun 3-17;25(11-12):588-95
12959332
Stroke. 2004 Nov;35(11):2529-39
15472114
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Oct;12(5):353-8
14532367
Clin Rehabil. 1998 Aug;12(4):338-47
9744669
Stroke. 2004 May;35(5):1209-15
15073405
Psychol Med. 1982 May;12(2):397-408
7100362
Clin Rehabil. 2004 Aug;18(5):509-19
15293485
Phys Ther. 2000 Sep;80(9):896-903
10960937
Clin Rehabil. 2002 Mar;16(2):149-59
11911513
J Psychosom Res. 1997 Jan;42(1):17-41
9055211
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Mar;87(3):358-63
16500169