title: Advanced laparoscopic training and outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
abstract: BACKGROUND: Advanced laparoscopic training is becoming a valuable asset for surgeons as more procedures are carried out in a minimally invasive fashion. The purpose of our study was to determine whether laparoscopic fellowship training affects outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. METHODS: We obtained data from a retrospective review of 110 patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy on an urgent basis from March 2002 to June 2005. We compared the outcomes of 31 patients whose surgeries were performed by a surgeon with advanced laparoscopic training with those of 79 patients whose surgeries were performed by surgeons without such training. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of demographics and time to surgery. Outcome measures included conversion rates, postoperative length of stay (LOS) and complications. There was a significant difference in conversion rates (3.2 % v. 16.5 %, p = 0.050) and postoperative LOS (1.77 v. 2.82 d, p < 0.006) between the 2 groups, but there was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in conversion rates among the surgeons without advanced training (p = 0.64). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis is associated with improved outcomes when performed by a surgeon with fellowship training in laparoscopic surgery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL.
authors.forename: Linda
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Bohacek
authors.forename: David E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Pace
references.citation: Obes Surg. 2005 Sep;15(8):1104-10
references.pmid: 16197780
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 1993 Jul-Aug;7(4):296-9
references.pmid: 8351599
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1998 Feb;133(2):173-5
references.pmid: 9484730
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2007 Jan;21(1):109-14
references.pmid: 16960670
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2007 May;21(5):805-9
references.pmid: 17180290
references.citation: Obes Surg. 2005 Mar;15(3):323-9
references.pmid: 15832432
references.citation: Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Aug;86(4):987-1004
references.pmid: 16905420
references.citation: BMJ. 1992 Aug 15;305(6850):394-6
references.pmid: 1392919
references.citation: Obes Surg. 2005 Feb;15(2):172-82
references.pmid: 15810124
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Mar;88(3):334-7
references.pmid: 8438837
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2002 Jun;16(6):954-6
references.pmid: 12163962
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2003 Aug;17(8):1288-91
references.pmid: 12739116
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1991 Jun;213(6):665-76; discussion 677
references.pmid: 1828141
references.citation: Surg Clin North Am. 1990 Dec;70(6):1249-62
references.pmid: 2147301
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2000 Apr;14(4):358-61
references.pmid: 10790555