Modeling the categorical perception of speech sounds: a step toward biological plausibility.
Our native language has a lifelong effect on how we perceive speech sounds. Behaviorally, this is manifested as categorical perception, but the neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are still unknown. Here, we constructed a computational model of categorical perception, following principles consistent with infant speech learning. A self-organizing network was exposed to a statistical distribution of speech input presented as neural activity patterns of the auditory periphery, resembling the way sound arrives to the human brain. In the resulting neural map, categorical perception emerges from most single neurons of the model being maximally activated by prototypical speech sounds, while the largest variability in activity is produced at category boundaries. Consequently, regions in the vicinity of prototypes become perceptually compressed, and regions at category boundaries become expanded. Thus, the present study offers a unifying framework for explaining the neural basis of the warping of perceptual space associated with categorical perception.
Salminen
Nelli H
NH
Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland. nelli.salminen@tkk.fi
Tiitinen
Hannu
H
May
Patrick J C
PJ
D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D002663:Child Language; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology; D008606:Mental Processes / Q000502:physiology*; D008959:Models, Neurological; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology; D010700:Phonetics; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013060:Speech; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*
J Neurobiol. 1999 Oct;41(1):1-6
10504185
J Comput Neurosci. 2008 Jun;24(3):277-90
17917802
PLoS Biol. 2005 Mar;3(3):e78
15736980
J Neurosci. 1993 Jan;13(1):87-103
8423485
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11850-7
11050219
Percept Psychophys. 1982 Apr;31(4):307-14
7110883
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Aug;100(2 Pt 1):1111-21
8759964
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):10114-9
12119383
Ear Hear. 2001 Apr;22(2):79-90
11324846
Cognition. 2002 Jan;82(3):B101-11
11747867
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13273-8
17664424
Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):606-8
1736364
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Aug;27(8):636-51
16281285
J Neurosci. 2006 May 3;26(18):4970-82
16672673
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Jan;97(1):553-62
7860832
Percept Psychophys. 2000 May;62(4):874-86
10883591
J Math Biol. 1982;15(3):267-73
7153672
Percept Psychophys. 1973 Jun 1;13(2):253-260
23226880
Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):22-44
1546117
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Feb;47(1):46-57
15072527
J Acoust Soc Am. 1976 Dec;60(6):1381-9
1010890
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Mar;7(1):53-73
17598735
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Nov;106(5):2900-12
10573904
Brain Res. 1990 Dec 17;536(1-2):271-86
2085753
Percept Psychophys. 2000 May;62(4):843-67
10883589
Percept Psychophys. 1999 Apr;61(3):561-77
10334101
J Exp Psychol. 1957 Nov;54(5):358-68
13481283
J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 2;28(14):3747-58
18385333
Science. 1997 Aug 1;277(5326):684-6
9235890
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Oct;98(4):1890-4
7593913
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Jun;45(3):564-72
12069008
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Feb;101(2):1090-105
9035400
Neuroimage. 2005 Oct 15;28(1):59-71
16023868
Percept Psychophys. 1991 Aug;50(2):93-107
1945741
Neuron. 1999 Dec;24(4):773-6
10624941