Asymmetric control of cycle period by the spinal locomotor rhythm generator in the adult cat.
During walking, a change in speed is accomplished by varying the duration of the stance phase, while the swing phase remains relatively invariant. To determine if this asymmetry in the control of locomotor cycles is an inherent property of the spinal central pattern generator (CPG), we recorded episodes of fictive locomotion in decerebrate cats with or without a complete spinal transection (acute or chronic). During fictive locomotion, stance and swing phases typically correspond to extension and flexion phases, respectively. The extension and flexion phases were determined by measuring the duration of extensor and flexor bursts, respectively. In the vast majority of locomotor episodes, cycle period varied more with the extension phase. This was found without phasic sensory feedback, supraspinal structures, pharmacology or sustained stimulation. We conclude that the control of walking speed is governed by an asymmetry within the organization of the spinal CPG, which can be modified by extraneous factors.
Frigon
Alain
A
Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central des Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec, Department of Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. alain.frigon@umontreal.ca
Gossard
Jean-Pierre
JP
D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002415:Cats; D003655:Decerebrate State / Q000503:physiopathology; D055724:Electrophysiological Phenomena; D056228:Feedback, Sensory / Q000502:physiology; D008124:Locomotion / Q000502:physiology*; D008636:Mesencephalon / Q000502:physiology; D008959:Models, Neurological; D010507:Periodicity; D013116:Spinal Cord / Q000502:physiology*; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology
J Neurosci. 2007 Nov 7;27(45):12267-76
17989292
Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jan;57(1):183-91
17928060
Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jan;57(1):64-76
17905441
J Neurosci. 2003 Apr 1;23(7):2789-96
12684465
J Neurophysiol. 1989 Jul;62(1):162-73
2754470
J Physiol. 1988 Nov;405:1-37
3076600
Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jan;57(1):134-46
17936363
J Physiol. 2007 Aug 15;583(Pt 1):115-28
17569737
J Neurophysiol. 2009 May;101(5):2201-3
19279156
Biofizika. 1966;11(4):659-66
6000625
Neurosci Lett. 1994 Apr 25;171(1-2):147-50
8084477
Exp Brain Res. 1984;54(1):133-49
6321220
Exp Brain Res. 1986;64(1):217-24
3021506
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:279-306
16776587
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Apr;75(4):1472-82
8727391
Exp Brain Res. 1990;82(3):536-46
2292272
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Aug;94(2):1057-65
15800075
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1247-57
17151226
Prog Neurobiol. 1996 Aug;49(5):481-515
8895997
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Jun;109(3):393-8
8817269
J Physiol. 2009 Mar 15;587(Pt 6):1217-31
19171658
Exp Brain Res. 1979 Jan 15;34(2):241-61
421750
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1983;521:1-75
6582764
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;100(6):3043-54
18829847
J Neurosci. 2004 Dec 15;24(50):11317-27
15601938
J Neurophysiol. 1988 Dec;60(6):2014-36
3236059
J Physiol. 2009 Feb 15;587(Pt 4):713-9
19218620
J Morphol. 1973 Sep;141(1):1-41
4727469
Physiol Rev. 2006 Jan;86(1):89-154
16371596
Brain Res. 1979 Apr 6;165(1):177-82
427583
Adv Neurol. 1988;47:425-53
3278525