title: Identification of a putative receptor-ligand pair controlling cell separation in plants.
abstract: Cell separation events are important throughout the lifespan of a plant. To assure that the plant's integrity is not compromised, such events, which depend on cell wall degradation, have to be tightly controlled both in time and space. The final step of floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis is controlled by INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION (IDA), in that mutation of IDA causes a block in abscission. Overexpression results in early abscission of floral organs. In a recent article we show that this is also the case when overexpressing the related IDA-LIKE (IDL) proteins, indicating a degree of functional redundancy. Based on gene swap and deletion constructs introduced in the ida mutant and synthetic peptide assays we demonstrated that the conserved C-terminal motif (EPIP) of IDA and IDL1 was sufficient to replace IDA function. This function is dependent on the presence of the receptor-like kinases (RLK) HAESA (HAE) and HAESA-LIKE2 (HSL2), suggesting that an IDA peptide acts as a ligand interacting with these receptors. Our study further revealed that the five IDL genes are expressed at various sites where cell separation takes place. We suggest that the IDL proteins constitute a family of ligands that act through RLKs similar to HAESA and control cell separation at different sites and development stages during the life of the plant.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular Biosciences; University of Oslo; Oslo Norway.
authors.forename: Grethe-Elisabeth
authors.initials: GE
authors.lastname: Stenvik
authors.forename: Melinka A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Butenko
authors.forename: Reidunn B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Aalen
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1990 Jan;2(1):51-9
references.pmid: 1967050
references.citation: Development. 2008 Apr;135(8):1537-46
references.pmid: 18339677
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Feb;8(1):45-52
references.pmid: 15653399
references.citation: Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006 Jul-Sep;44(7-9):435-49
references.pmid: 17023165
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2003 Oct;15(10):2296-307
references.pmid: 12972671
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(14):3627-37
references.pmid: 16990374
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Jul;11(7):359-67
references.pmid: 16774842
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:131-58
references.pmid: 12221970
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Feb;140(2):726-33
references.pmid: 16407446
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2005 Jan 15;19(2):189-95
references.pmid: 15655108
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2000 Jan 1;14(1):108-17
references.pmid: 10640280
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10763-8
references.pmid: 11526204
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001 Dec;4(6):540-9
references.pmid: 11641071
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2006 Jun;18(6):1467-76
references.pmid: 16679455
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Feb;9(2):91-6
references.pmid: 15102375
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1996 Apr;110(4):1413-1429
references.pmid: 12226270