A plasma-membrane linker for the phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C in tobacco plants.
We previously screened genes that were transcriptionally activated during the early stage of wound response in tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum), and isolated a particular clone, which encoded a membrane-located protein, designated as NtC7. Upon overexpression in tobacco plants, NtC7 conferred a marked tolerance to osmotic stress, suggesting it to be involved in maintenance of osmotic adjustments. In this study, we searched for proteins which interact with NtC7 by the yeast two-hybrid screening, and isolated a clone encoding phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C, designated as NtPI-PLC. Physical interaction between NtC7 and C2 domain of NtPI-PLC was confirmed by the pull-down assay. Expression of fused protein to green-fluorescence protein in onion epidermal cell layers indicated both proteins to predominantly localize to the plasma membrane. Their interaction in planta was shown by the bimolecular fluorescence complementation, which exhibited a clear fluorescence of reconstituted yellow fluorescence protein. Transcripts of NtC7 and NtPI-PLC were markedly increased 30 to 60 min after wounding. PI-PLC is one of key enzymes in metabolism of inositol phospholipids, which function in signal transduction and also in response to stresses including osmotic changes. It was shown to localize to plasma-membrane and, to a lesser extent, to cytosol. However, molecular mechanism of membrane localization has remained to be determined, because of the apparent lack of domains for membrane association. The present results suggest that one of such mechanisms is tethering NtPI-PLC to the plasma membrane through interaction with NtC7, which possesses a transmembrane domain at the C-terminus.
Nakamura
Kimiyo
K
Research and Education Center for Genetic Information, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.
Sano
Hiroshi
H
Curr Biol. 1996 Mar 1;6(3):325-30
8805250
Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Jun;41(6):684-91
10945337
Plant Physiol. 2003 Feb;131(2):454-62
12586870
Plant J. 2003 Apr;34(1):47-55
12662308
Plant J. 1995 Sep;8(3):381-90
7550376
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1779-84
9990101
FEBS Lett. 2001 May 25;497(2-3):165-70
11377433
Plant J. 2004 Nov;40(3):419-27
15469499
Plant Physiol. 2007 May;144(1):503-12
17369432
Plant Physiol. 2002 Sep;130(1):22-46
12226484
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 25;92(9):3903-7
7732004
Plant J. 2004 Oct;40(2):250-9
15447651
Nature. 1996 Apr 18;380(6575):595-602
8602259
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:265-306
14502992
J Biol Chem. 2002 Feb 1;277(5):3568-75
11706040
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005 Mar;43(3):249-59
15854833
Mol Cell. 2002 Apr;9(4):789-98
11983170
Trends Plant Sci. 2000 Jun;5(6):252-8
10838616
Plant J. 2007 Jul;51(1):127-39
17559512
FEBS Lett. 2000 Sep 22;481(3):240-4
11007971
Ann Bot. 2006 Dec;98(6):1179-87
17008347
Biochem J. 1995 Dec 15;312 ( Pt 3):661-6
8554502
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001 Jun;52:211-231
11337397
Biochimie. 2008 Mar;90(3):547-51
17976385