Endogenous human brain dynamics recover slowly following cognitive effort.
BACKGROUND
In functional magnetic resonance imaging, the brain's response to experimental manipulation is almost always assumed to be independent of endogenous oscillations. To test this, we addressed the possible interaction between cognitive task performance and endogenous fMRI oscillations in an experiment designed to answer two questions: 1) Does performance of a cognitively effortful task significantly change fractal scaling properties of fMRI time series compared to their values before task performance? 2) If so, can we relate the extent of task-related perturbation to the difficulty of the task?


RESULTS
Using a novel continuous acquisition "rest-task-rest" design, we found that endogenous dynamics tended to recover their pre-task parameter values relatively slowly, over the course of several minutes, following completion of one of two versions of the n-back working memory task and that the rate of recovery was slower following completion of the more demanding (n = 2) version of the task.


CONCLUSIONS
This result supports the model that endogenous low frequency oscillatory dynamics are relevant to the brain's response to exogenous stimulation. Moreover, it suggests that large-scale neurocognitive systems measured using fMRI, like the heart and other physiological systems subjected to external demands for enhanced performance, can take a considerable period of time to return to a stable baseline state.
Barnes
Anna
A
Brain Mapping Unit, Behavioural & Clinical Neurosciences Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Bullmore
Edward T
ET
Suckling
John
J
D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D003071:Cognition; D017709:Fractals; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008568:Memory; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1536-48
16632379
Neuron. 2007 Oct 4;56(1):171-84
17920023
Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1083-90; discussion 1097-9
17719799
Science. 2004 Jun 25;304(5679):1926-9
15218136
Neuroimage. 2005 Mar;25(1):141-58
15734351
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Jul;29(7):778-90
18454458
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Jun;29(6):671-82
17598166
Neurobiol Aging. 2006 Oct;27(10):1395-404
16202481
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 May;27(5):425-33
16596618
J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 10;24(45):10186-90
15537890
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):46-59
15846822
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):253-8
12506194
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Jan;24(1):59-68
15382248
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;160(4):709-19
12668360
Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S234-49
15501094
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000314
19300473
Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 Feb;12(2):61-78
11169871
N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1351-7
10536127