Beneficial and limiting factors affecting return to work after total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
BACKGROUND
A large number of patients undergoing total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasties are of working age at the time these procedures are performed. The objective of this study was to systematically review literature on the beneficial and limiting factors affecting return to work in patients undergoing TKA or THA.


METHODS
Pubmed and Embase were systematically searched to find studies that described factors that influence return to work (RTW) after surgery. The following inclusion criteria had to be met: (1) inclusion of patients with primary or revision TKA or THA; (2) description of return to work after surgery or employment status; and (3) description of a beneficial or restricting factor affecting return to work.


RESULTS
Only three studies were found that fulfilled the three inclusion criteria. Three factors were discussed: (1) the mini-posterior approach compared to the two-incision approach; (2) patient movement restrictions after surgery compared to no restrictions; and (3) patient discharge based on guidelines compared to discharge without guidelines.


CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review revealed that knowledge is sparse regarding beneficial or limiting factors affecting return to work after TKA or THA. Despite that, the results suggests that the two-incision approach is beneficial, patient movement restrictions are limiting, and patient discharge guidelines have no effect on the time patients take to RTW.
Kuijer
P P F M
PP
Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, People and Work Outpatient Clinic, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.p.kuijer@amc.nl
de Beer
M J P M
MJ
Houdijk
J H P
JH
Frings-Dresen
M H W
MH
D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000379:methods / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D020127:Recovery of Function; D014937:Work; D014938:Work Capacity Evaluation
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec;(429):239-47
15577494
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(5-6):252-4
10853889
Int Orthop. 2007 Aug;31 Suppl 1:S17-20
17668205
Hip Int. 2006;16 Suppl 4:17-22
19219824
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:156-9
17006367
Am J Med. 1994 Sep;97(3):208-13
8092168
Scand J Occup Ther. 2005 Mar;12(1):18-28
16389995
Acta Orthop Scand. 1999 Aug;70(4):343-7
10569263
Med J Aust. 2004 Mar 1;180(S5):S6-10
14984356
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1991;241:27-30
2014738
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Jul 31;7:61
16879741
Science. 1998 May 29;280(5368):1367-8
9634414
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007 Feb;3(2):78-85
17299445
Soc Sci Med F. 1981 Sep;15(2-3):107-15
7313709
Int Orthop. 2004 Oct;28(5):286-9
15480659
West J Med. 1995 Jul;163(1):26-30
7667979
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Jun;(351):135-48
9646756
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Jun;18(4):442-5
12820086
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006 Jul;78(1):70-5
16506182
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jan;65(1):6-19
17634246
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Aug 30;29(16):1295-300
17654004
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002 Oct;17(8):580-5
12243717
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Dec;84(12):1767-73
14669181
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Mar;88(2):131-3
16551399
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Feb;87(2):247-53
15687143
J Arthroplasty. 1998 Sep;13(6):647-52
9741441
Am J Med. 1998 Jul;105(1):33-40
9688019
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):139-46
11716375