Comparative analysis of pyrosequencing and a phylogenetic microarray for exploring microbial community structures in the human distal intestine.
BACKGROUND
Variations in the composition of the human intestinal microbiota are linked to diverse health conditions. High-throughput molecular technologies have recently elucidated microbial community structure at much higher resolution than was previously possible. Here we compare two such methods, pyrosequencing and a phylogenetic array, and evaluate classifications based on two variable 16S rRNA gene regions.


RESULTS
Over 1.75 million amplicon sequences were generated from the V4 and V6 regions of 16S rRNA genes in bacterial DNA extracted from four fecal samples of elderly individuals. The phylotype richness, for individual samples, was 1,400-1,800 for V4 reads and 12,500 for V6 reads, and 5,200 unique phylotypes when combining V4 reads from all samples. The RDP-classifier was more efficient for the V4 than for the far less conserved and shorter V6 region, but differences in community structure also affected efficiency. Even when analyzing only 20% of the reads, the majority of the microbial diversity was captured in two samples tested. DNA from the four samples was hybridized against the Human Intestinal Tract (HIT) Chip, a phylogenetic microarray for community profiling. Comparison of clustering of genus counts from pyrosequencing and HITChip data revealed highly similar profiles. Furthermore, correlations of sequence abundance and hybridization signal intensities were very high for lower-order ranks, but lower at family-level, which was probably due to ambiguous taxonomic groupings.


CONCLUSIONS
The RDP-classifier consistently assigned most V4 sequences from human intestinal samples down to genus-level with good accuracy and speed. This is the deepest sequencing of single gastrointestinal samples reported to date, but microbial richness levels have still not leveled out. A majority of these diversities can also be captured with five times lower sampling-depth. HITChip hybridizations and resulting community profiles correlate well with pyrosequencing-based compositions, especially for lower-order ranks, indicating high robustness of both approaches. However, incompatible grouping schemes make exact comparison difficult.
Claesson
Marcus J
MJ
Department of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. mclaesson@bioinfo.ucc.ie
O'Sullivan
Orla
O
Wang
Qiong
Q
Nikkilä
Janne
J
Marchesi
Julian R
JR
Smidt
Hauke
H
de Vos
Willem M
WM
Ross
R Paul
RP
O'Toole
Paul W
PW
D000368:Aged; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D005798:Genes, Bacterial; D006801:Humans; D007422:Intestines / Q000382:microbiology*; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; D010802:Phylogeny; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics
D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Science. 2008 Jun 20;320(5883):1647-51
18497261
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 12;105(6):2117-22
18252821
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Mar 30;3(3):e56
17397253
J Biotechnol. 2008 Aug 31;136(1-2):3-10
18616967
PLoS Biol. 2008 Nov 18;6(11):e280
19018661
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 30;3(7):e2836
18665274
Genome Biol. 2007;8(7):R143
17659080
Genome Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):656-64
11932250
BMC Microbiol. 2007 Nov 30;7:108
18047683
PLoS Genet. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000255
19023400
Biometrics. 2002 Sep;58(3):531-9
12229987
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Mar;71(3):1501-6
15746353
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Oct;67(10):4399-406
11571135
PLoS Biol. 2007 Jul;5(7):e177
17594176
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jul 29;345(1311):101-18
7972351
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 May;102(5):1178-86
17448153
Nature. 2002 Oct 10;419(6907):575-6
12374963
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):5069-72
16820507
Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1022-3
17183309
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
17586664
Gut. 2008 Nov;57(11):1605-15
18941009
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2365-70
19164560
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul;71(7):4153-5
16000838
Environ Microbiol. 2009 Apr;11(4):914-26
19128319
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jan 1;27(1):48-57
17919270
PLoS Pathog. 2008 Feb 8;4(2):e20
18248093
Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 15;22(22):2823-4
16982706
Age (Dordr). 2009 Mar;31(1):59-66
19234769
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12115-20
16880384
Cell Host Microbe. 2008 Jun 12;3(6):417-27
18541218
Nature. 2009 Jan 22;457(7228):480-4
19043404
Science. 2005 Mar 25;307(5717):1915-20
15790844
Bioinformatics. 2002 Jan;18(1):207-8
11836235
Clin Chem. 2009 May;55(5):856-66
19264858
J Microbiol Methods. 2007 May;69(2):330-9
17391789
Nature. 2005 Sep 15;437(7057):376-80
16056220
Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jul;11(7):1736-51
19508560
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Oct;70(10):6113-22
15466557
Science. 2007 Oct 5;318(5847):97-100
17916733
Microb Ecol. 2007 Apr;53(3):371-83
17334858
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Oct;36(18):e120
18723574
Genome Res. 2007 Mar;17(3):377-86
17255551
Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jan;9(1):1
17227398
Environ Microbiol. 2007 Sep;9(9):2125-36
17686012
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 21;104(34):13780-5
17699621
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 May;68(5):2535-41
11976131
Cell. 2006 Feb 24;124(4):837-48
16497592
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D141-5
19004872
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct;64(10):3854-9
9758810
BMC Microbiol. 2008 Nov 11;8:195
19014434
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W394-9
16845035
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Jun;63(6):2397-402
9172361
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Dec;70(12):7220-8
15574920
ISME J. 2007 Aug;1(4):283-90
18043639
Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673-80
7984417
PLoS One. 2008 Jun 25;3(6):e2527
18575584
Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1635-8
15831718
Gut. 2001 Feb;48(2):198-205
11156640
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
2231712
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
15034147
Science. 2006 Jun 2;312(5778):1355-9
16741115
J Bacteriol. 1997 May;179(10):3270-6
9150223