Time delays in gated radiotherapy.
In gated radiotherapy, the accuracy of treatment delivery is determined by the accuracy with which both the imaging and treatment beams are gated. If the time delays (the time between the target entering/leaving the gated region and the first/last image acquired or treatment beam on/off) for the imaging and treatment systems are in the opposite directions, they may increase the required internal target volume (ITV) margin, above that indicated by the tolerance for either system measured individually. We measured a gating system's time delay on 3 fluoroscopy systems, and 3 linear accelerator treatment beams, using a motion phantom of known geometry, varying gating type (amplitude vs. phase), beam energy, dose rate, and period. The average beam on imaging time delays were -0.04 +/- 0.05 s (amplitude, 1 SD), -0.11 +/- 0.04 s (phase); while the average beam off imaging time delays were -0.18 +/- 0.08 s (amplitude) and -0.15 +/- 0.04 s (phase). The average beam on treatment time delays were 0.09 +/- 0.02 s (amplitude, 1 SD), 0.10 +/- 0.03 s (phase); while the average beam off time delays for treatment beams were 0.08 +/- 0.02 s (amplitude) and 0.07 +/- 0.02 s (phase). The negative value indicates the images were acquired early, and the positive values show the treatment beam was triggered late. We present a technique for calculating the margin necessary to account for time delays and found that the difference between the imaging and treatment time delays required a significant increase in the ITV margin in the direction of tumor motion at the gated level.
Smith
Wendy L
WL
Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N2.
Becker
Nathan
N
Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N2.
D006801:Humans; D009068:Movement; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D015656:Respiratory Mechanics / Q000502:physiology*
Med Phys. 2007 Jul;34(7):2928-38
17822001
Med Dosim. 2006 Summer;31(2):141-51
16690455
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Dec 1;57(5):1460-71
14630286
Med Phys. 1999 May;26(5):715-20
10360531
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jul 1;47(4):1121-35
10863086
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Mar 1;43(4):905-19
10098447
Br J Radiol. 2000 Sep;73(873):973-7
11064651
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Aug 21;53(16):4317-30
18653921
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006 Winter;7(1):65-76
16518318
Med Phys. 2006 Jan;33(1):145-54
16485421
Med Phys. 2000 Aug;27(8):1732-8
10984218
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Feb 7;50(3):477-90
15773724
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Dec 7;50(23):5443-62
16306644
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jul 15;53(4):822-34
12095547
Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3874-900
17089851
Med Phys. 2005 May;32(5):1293-6
15984681
Med Phys. 2007 Mar;34(3):923-34
17441238
Phys Med Biol. 1996 Jan;41(1):83-91
8685260
Phys Med Biol. 2000 Nov;45(11):3331-42
11098907
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Mar 15;64(4):1229-36
16504762
Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):815-9
16696456
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jan 7;51(1):N1-7
16357424
Med Phys. 1999 Oct;26(10):2086-91
10535624
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Aug 21;50(16):3655-67
16077219