Maximization principles for frequency-dependent selection II: the one-locus multiallele case.
In this article we study a single-locus multiallele version of the pairwise-interaction model (PIM) in discrete and continuous time and a density-dependent version of this model (D-PIM) in continuous time. The PIM assumes that the fitnesses of genotypes are proportional to the average amount of competition resulting from pairwise interactions. Hence, fitness is frequency dependent. Our main aim is to provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of maximization principles analogous to Fisher's Fundamental Theorem for constant selection. We provide a systematic analysis and illustrate our results by concrete examples. We show that in discrete time the mean fitness is nondecreasing along every trajectory provided the interaction coefficients are nonnegative and symmetric. For asymmetric interactions this is in general not true. However, for what we call pseudo-symmetric interactions a function similar to, but in general not identical to, the mean fitness: the adjusted-mean fitness, is nondecreasing along trajectories. For asymmetric interactions, we also provide sufficient conditions for the mean fitness, and more generally for the adjusted-mean fitness, to be nondecreasing and sufficient conditions when it is not. In continuous time, we provide similar but stronger results. If the interaction coefficients are pseudo-symmetric, the adjusted-mean fitness is nondecreasing in the D-PIM.
Schneider
Kristan Alexander
KA
Department of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Nordbergstrasse 15, UZA 4, 1090, Vienna, Austria. kristan.schneider@univie.ac.at
D005075:Biological Evolution; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D056426:Genetic Loci; D014644:Genetic Variation; D008957:Models, Genetic; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012641:Selection, Genetic
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Nov;48(11):1893-7
16591013
Genetics. 2007 Jul;176(3):1729-40
17483410
Theor Popul Biol. 1984 Oct;26(2):228-64
6505981
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1983 Oct 22;219(1216):281-313
6139816
Genetics. 2004 May;167(1):499-512
15166172
Evolution. 2004 Dec;58(12):2783-7
15696755
Genetics. 1990 May;125(1):215-30
2341034
Evolution. 1996 Jun;50(3):1176-1181
28565280
J Math Biol. 2005 Apr;50(4):355-96
15614554
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1957;22:385-93
13543722
J Evol Biol. 2006 Mar;19(2):570-88
16599933
Nature. 1968 Nov 2;220(5166):501-2
5686173
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):1081-4
6940126
Anim Behav. 1999 Oct;58(4):907-916
10512664
Genetics. 2008 Nov;180(3):1547-57
18791254
Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Aug 22;261(1361):233-8
7568276
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(9):2840-2
16578777
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):438-41
16592613
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Mar;57(3):645-9
16591512
Nat Med. 2003 Jul;9(7):928-35
12819779
Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Nov;74(3):251-62
18723039
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1959;24:131-40
14445854
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988 Jul 6;319(1196):485-503
2905488
Evolution. 1982 Jan;36(1):35-43
28581100
J Math Biol. 2006 Apr;52(4):483-523
16521028
Evolution. 2006 Nov;60(11):2185-206
17236413
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 22;273(1589):969-74
16627282
Nature. 2001 Mar 15;410(6826):323
11268195
Evolution. 1948 Dec;2(4):279-94
18104586
Evolution. 1998 Aug;52(4):1057-1066
28565221
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2635-9
16321786
Theor Popul Biol. 2009 Aug;76(1):1-12
19285995
Evolution. 2001 Jun;55(6):1136-45
11475049