Predictors of treatment preference for mandibular fracture.
BACKGROUND
Patient treatment preferences do not necessarily remain stable over time.


OBJECTIVE
This study focuses on predictors of patient treatment choice and on the extent to which patients are willing to take risks by choosing surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for mandibular fracture.


METHODS
Surveys of African-American and Hispanic adults receiving treatment at King/Drew Medical Center for either a mandibular fracture (n = 98) or third-molar removal (n = 105) were used to investigate patterns of patient preference over the course of a 4-month study period using generalized estimating equations controlling for age, gender, income, and fracture versus third-molar patient. The study examined the effects of symptom rating and a"standard gamble" measure reflecting a patient's willingness to accept scarring or nerve damage. This analysis is based on 169 patients who participated in four waves of data collection.


RESULTS
The most salient predictor of patient treatment was the standard gamble measure at 1-month follow-up. Subjects with higher risk tolerance were more likely to select surgery versus jaw wiring. A higher likelihood of choosing surgery was associated with higher income and greater symptom severity. Fracture patients were more likely to select surgery compared with third-molar patients.


CONCLUSIONS
The significance of symptom severity 1-month post-surgery raises an important issue regarding the healing process. Moreover, the significance of standard gamble as a predictor of treatment choice for mandibular fracture should encourage other researchers to use this measure of willingness to accept risk when studying acute conditions such as jaw fracture.
Der-Martirosian
Claudia
C
UCLA School of Dentistry Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA. cdermart@aol.com
Gironda
Melanie W
MW
Black
Edward E
EE
Belin
Thomas R
TR
Atchison
Kathryn A
KA
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making; D005592:Fracture Fixation / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D019248:Jaw Fixation Techniques / Q000523:psychology; D016014:Linear Models; D008337:Mandibular Fractures / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D008875:Middle Aged; D008964:Molar, Third / Q000601:surgery; D057240:Patient Preference / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012309:Risk-Taking; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D014081:Tooth Extraction / Q000523:psychology; D014481:United States; D055815:Young Adult
Intern Med. 2005 Feb;44(2):107-13
15750269
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;28(2):119-25
10730720
Aust Dent J. 2002 Jun;47(2):131-7
12139266
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3):273-9
2927183
Laryngoscope. 2006 Mar;116(3):427-30
16540903
Br J Plast Surg. 1996 Mar;49(2):79-84
8733344
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Feb;41(2):89-98
6571887
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Jun;61(6):713-8
12796884
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Sep;58(9):950-8
10981974
Lupus. 2003;12(5):370-6
12765300
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993 May;75(5):549-50
8488018
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Feb;37(1):52-7
10203223
Med Decis Making. 2001 Jul-Aug;21(4):295-306
11475386
Dent Clin North Am. 2003 Jan;47(1):141-57, xi
12519011
J Public Health Dent. 2006 Winter;66(1):37-43
16570749
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Apr 24;166(8):890-5
16636215
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Dec;65(12):2430-7
18022465
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1996;11(1):49-56
9046627
J Dent Res. 2002 Jul;81(7):446-50
12161453
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Aug;61(8):861-70
12905435
Br Dent J. 2003 Mar 22;194(6):321-7; discussion 317
12682659
Med Decis Making. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6):506-13
12458981
Cancer. 2006 May 1;106(9):1865-74
16568450