title: On the use of Ripley's K-function and its derivatives to analyze domain size.
abstract: Ripley's K-, H-, and L-functions are used increasingly to identify clustering of proteins in membrane microdomains. In this approach, aggregation (or clustering) is identified if the average number of proteins within a distance r of another protein is statistically greater than that expected for a random distribution. However, it is not entirely clear how the function may be used to quantitatively determine the size of domains in which clustering occurs. Here, we evaluate the extent to which the domain radius can be determined by different interpretations of Ripley's K-statistic in a theoretical, idealized context. We also evaluate the measures for noisy experimental data and use Monte Carlo simulations to separate the effects of different types of experimental noise. We find that the radius of maximal aggregation approximates the domain radius, while identifying the domain boundary with the minimum of the derivative of H(r) is highly accurate in idealized conditions. The accuracy of both measures is impacted by the noise present in experimental data; for example, here, the presence of a large fraction of particles distributed as monomers and interdomain interactions. These findings help to delineate the limitations and potential of Ripley's K in real-life scenarios.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36688, USA.
authors.forename: Maria A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Kiskowski
authors.forename: John F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Hancock
authors.forename: Anne K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Kenworthy
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D003198:Computer Simulation; D008956:Models, Chemical; D008958:Models, Molecular; D008970:Molecular Weight; D011487:Protein Conformation; D017434:Protein Structure, Tertiary; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000648:ultrastructure*
chemical_list: D011506:Proteins
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15500-5
references.pmid: 16223883
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 12;103(50):18992-7
references.pmid: 17146050
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2005 Jun 24;280(25):24072-84
references.pmid: 15840575
references.citation: Cell. 2004 Feb 20;116(4):577-89
references.pmid: 14980224
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):128-33
references.pmid: 16001074
references.citation: Cell. 2004 Sep 3;118(5):591-605
references.pmid: 15339664
references.citation: Micron. 2006;37(1):14-34
references.pmid: 16081296
references.citation: Trends Cell Biol. 2004 Mar;14(3):141-7
references.pmid: 15003623
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2005 Jun 20;169(6):965-76
references.pmid: 15967815
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2007 Jan 5;144(1):135-43
references.pmid: 17049171
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2003 Jan 20;160(2):165-70
references.pmid: 12527752
references.citation: Eur J Immunol. 2006 Oct;36(10):2795-806
references.pmid: 17013982
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 27;278(26):23738-46
references.pmid: 12692121
references.citation: Methods. 2005 Oct;37(2):165-72
references.pmid: 16288888
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 30;104(44):17370-5
references.pmid: 17959773
references.citation: Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Jan;9(1):7-14
references.pmid: 17199125