Identification and prediction of latent classes of weight-loss strategies among women.
We apply latent class analysis (LCA) to quantify multidimensional patterns of weight-loss strategies in a sample of 197 women, and explore the degree to which dietary restraint, disinhibition, and other individual characteristics predict membership in latent classes of weight-loss strategies. Latent class models were fit to a set of 14 healthy and unhealthy weight-loss strategies. BMI, weight concern, body satisfaction, depression, dietary disinhibition and restraint, and the interaction of disinhibition and restraint were included as predictors of latent class membership. All analyses were conducted with PROC LCA, a recently developed SAS procedure available for download. Results revealed four subgroups of women based on their history of weight-loss strategies: No Weight Loss Strategy (10.0%), Dietary Guidelines (26.5%), Guidelines+Macronutrients (39.4%), and Guidelines+Macronutrients+Restrictive (24.2%). BMI, weight concerns, the desire to be thinner, disinhibition, and dietary restraint were all significantly related to weight-control strategy latent class. Among women with low dietary restraint, disinhibition increases the odds of engaging in any set of weight-loss strategies vs. none, whereas among medium- and high-restraint women disinhibition increases the odds of use of unhealthy vs. healthy strategies. LCA was an effective tool for organizing multiple weight-loss strategies in order to identify subgroups of individuals who have engaged in particular sets of strategies over time. This person-centered approach provides a measure weight-control status, where the different statuses are characterized by particular combinations of healthy and unhealthy weight-loss strategies.
Lanza
Stephanie T
ST
The Methodology Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. SLanza@psu.edu
Savage
Jennifer S
JS
Birch
Leann L
LL
D000328:Adult; D015992:Body Mass Index; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000145:classification*; D004032:Diet; D005260:Female; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D015438:Health Behavior; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D009042:Motivation; D012927:Social Control, Informal; D015431:Weight Loss
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Mar;75(3):476-83
11864852
Appetite. 2008 Mar-May;50(2-3):240-5
17888542
Br J Nutr. 2004 Jun;91(6):997-1004
15182403
J Behav Med. 2004 Apr;27(2):185-204
15171106
Int J Eat Disord. 2009 May;42(4):326-31
19107829
Appetite. 2008 Jul;51(1):202-5
18342989
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 Mar;23(3):320-7
10193879
Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14(4):671-694
19953201
J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(1):71-83
3981480
Appetite. 1995 Aug;25(1):31-41
7495325
Psychol Assess. 2004 Mar;16(1):51-9
15023092
Obes Res. 1995 Mar;3(2):153-61
7719961
Appetite. 1995 Oct;25(2):115-8
8561483
Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1983;60:115-20
6823524
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2001 Jan;41(1):45-70
11152047
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jun;26(5):402-6
15165656
Dev Psychol. 2001 Sep;37(5):597-607
11552756
Eat Weight Disord. 2006 Jun;11(2):91-9
16809981
Int J Eat Disord. 1994 Nov;16(3):227-38
7833956
Health Psychol. 1995 Nov;14(6):548-55
8565929
Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):100-21
8346324
Psychol Assess. 2007 Dec;19(4):449-58
18085937
Nutrition. 1996 Oct;12(10):672-6
8936489
Dev Psychol. 2008 Mar;44(2):446-56
18331135
Prev Med. 2002 Oct;35(4):390-6
12453717
Eat Behav. 2004 Jul;5(3):199-208
15135332
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253
11234459
Addict Behav. 2001 Mar-Apr;26(2):253-66
11316380