title: Tense and aspect in sentence interpretation by children with specific language impairment.
abstract: The aim of this study was to determine whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) are sensitive to completion cues in their comprehension of tense. In two experiments, children with SLI (ages 4 ; 1 to 6 ; 4) and typically developing (TD) children (ages 3 ; 5 to 6 ; 5) participated in a sentence-to-scene matching task adapted from Wagner (2001). Sentences were in either present or past progressive and used telic predicates. Actions were performed twice in succession; the action was either completed or not completed in the first instance. In both experiments, the children with SLI were less accurate than the TD children, showing more difficulty with past than present progressive, regardless of completion cues. The TD children were less accurate with past than present progressive requests only when the past actions were incomplete. These findings suggest that children with SLI may be relatively insensitive to cues pertaining to event completion in past tense contexts.
authors.affiliation: Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. xdxl@purdue.edu
authors.forename: Laurence B
authors.initials: LB
authors.lastname: Leonard
authors.forename: Patricia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Deevy
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002648:Child; D002663:Child Language; D002675:Child, Preschool; D032882:Comprehension; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D007806:Language Disorders; D007807:Language Tests; D008037:Linguistics; D013067:Speech Perception; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2001 Oct;28(3):661-81
references.pmid: 11797543
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Feb;44(1):165-78
references.pmid: 11218100
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1984 Jun;11(2):347-74
references.pmid: 6746781
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Feb;37(1):182-92
references.pmid: 8170123
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Aug;38(4):850-63
references.pmid: 7474978
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Dec;39(6):1239-57
references.pmid: 8959609
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Aug;40(4):741-53
references.pmid: 9263940
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Jun;50(3):759-77
references.pmid: 17538114
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Feb;40(1):62-74
references.pmid: 9113859
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Feb;42(1):206-19
references.pmid: 10025555
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Dec;41(6):1412-31
references.pmid: 9859895
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Aug;42(4):943-61
references.pmid: 10450913