[Histopathological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty : use of a standardized classification system of the periprosthetic interface membrane].
BACKGROUND
The distinction between aseptic and septic loosening of a total hip arthroplasty is a diagnostic challenge. Therapy and clinical success depend on the correct diagnosis. Histopathological evaluation of the periprosthetic interface membrane is one possible diagnostic parameter; detailed analysis of tissue characteristics may reflect the cause of failure. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of a published histopathological consensus classification for the periprosthetic interface membrane in the identification of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).


METHODS
Between 2004 and 2008, a prospective analysis was performed in 106 patients who had revisions because of assumed PJI. Based on clinical presentation, radiography, and haematological screening, infection was assumed, and a joint aspiration was performed. Based on these findings, a two-stage revision was performed, with intraoperative samples for culture and histological evaluation obtained. Final diagnosis of infection was based on the interpretation of the clinical presentation and the preoperative and intraoperative findings. The basis for histopathological evaluation was the consensus classification for the periprosthetic interface membrane. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each parameter.


RESULTS
In 92 patients, a positive diagnosis of PJI could be made. Histopathology yielded the highest accuracy (0.93) in identification of PJI, identifying 86 of 92 infections (69 type II, 17 type III). In 13 of the 14 noninfected hips, histopathology correlated in 13 (93%) cases (10 type I, three type IV). The accuracies of microbiological culture, C-reactive protein, and aspiration were 0.82, 0.86, and 0.54, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
In the diagnosis of PJI, histopathological evaluation of the periprosthetic interface membrane proved very effective. To analyse the cause of prosthesis loosening, tissue samples of the periprosthetic interface membrane should be evaluated on the basis of the consensus classification in all revision surgeries.
Müller
M
M
Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Klinik für Orthopädie, Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. michael.mueller@charite.de
Morawietz
L
L
Hasart
O
O
Strube
P
P
Perka
C
C
Tohtz
S
S
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001706:Biopsy / Q000592:standards*; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000473:pathology*; D012015:Reference Standards; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Nov;27(5):1247-54
9827278
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Dec;32(12):3043-5
7883897
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1645-54
15483283
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Oct;36(10):2932-9
9738046
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):237-42
1735220
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Sep 1;33 Suppl 2:S94-106
11486305
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Jun;(117):221-40
776484
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):229-37
8020222
Swiss Med Wkly. 2005 Apr 30;135(17-18):243-51
15965826
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 May;81(5):672-83
10360695
Biomaterials. 1988 Jul;9(4):314-8
3214656
J Clin Pathol. 2006 Jun;59(6):591-7
16731601
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Feb;84(2):171-7
11861721
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88(4):869-82
16595481
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Oct;128(10):1039-46
17874243
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Feb;21(2):221-6
16520210
Orthopade. 2001 Nov;30(11):881-9
11766632
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Jan;75(1):66-76
8419393
N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 16;357(7):654-63
17699815
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Jun;65(5):575-84
6304106
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 May;42(5):2264-7
15131208
Methods Enzymol. 1999;310:566-76
10547820
J Int Med Res. 2001 Jan-Feb;29(1):7-12
11277348
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar;(420):26-31
15057075
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar;(420):18-25
15057074
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Sep;76(9):1345-59
8077264
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 May;78(5):749-54
8642032
Nucl Med Commun. 2008 Apr;29(4):331-5
18317296
Infection. 2003 Mar;31(2):99-108
12682815
J Arthroplasty. 1996 Aug;11(5):543-7
8872573
J Orthop Surg Res. 2008 Jul 21;3:31
18644107
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Feb;(311):21-39
7634577
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jul;80(4):568-72
9699813
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Oct;78(10):1553-8
8876584
Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36(6-7):410-6
15307559
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Feb;52(2):118-23
10396239