Evaluation of changes in postnatal care using the "Parents' Postnatal Sense of Security" instrument and an assessment of the instrument's reliability and validity.
BACKGROUND
A sense of security is important for experiences of parenthood in the early postpartum period. The objectives of this study were to evaluate two models of postnatal care using a questionnaire incorporating the Parents' Postpartum Sense of Security (PPSS) instrument and to test the validity of the PPSS instrument.


METHODS
Postal surveys were sent to 234 mothers who had experienced two different forms of postnatal care (study group and control group) and returned by 86.8%. These two groups of mothers were compared for total scores on the PPSS instrument. Demographic variables and mothers' opinions about care interventions were also compared and these variables were tested for correlations with the total PPSS score. A regression analysis was carried out to assess areas of midwifery care which might affect a sense of security. The internal consistency and concurrent validity of the instrument were tested for the total population.


RESULTS
there were no significant differences between the groups for scores on the PPSS instrument. A total of three variables predicted 26% of the variability on the PPSS scores for the study group and five variables predicted 37% of the variability in the control group. One variable was common to both: "The midwives on the postnatal ward paid attention to the mother as an individual". There were significant correlations between the total PPSS scores and scores for postpartum talks and visits to the breastfeeding clinic. There was also a significant correlation between the single question: "I felt secure during the first postpartum week" and the total PPSS score. Tests for internal consistency and concurrent validity were satisfactory.


CONCLUSIONS
The proposed new model of care neither improved nor impaired mothers' feelings of security the week following birth. Being seen as an individual by the midwife who provides postnatal care may be an important variable for mothers' sense of postnatal security. It is possible that postpartum talks may encourage the processing of childbirth experiences in a positive direction. Availability of breastfeeding support may also add to a sense of security postpartum. The PPSS instrument has shown acceptable reliability and validity.
Kvist
Linda J
LJ
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden. linda.kvist@med.lu.se
Persson
Eva K
EK
D000328:Adult; D001942:Breast Feeding / Q000523:psychology; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008880:Midwifery; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009034:Mother-Child Relations; D009035:Mothers / Q000523:psychology*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011181:Postnatal Care / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000523:psychology; D049590:Postpartum Period / Q000523:psychology*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011581:Psychological Tests; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012449:Safety; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Midwifery. 2002 Mar;18(1):53-60
11945053
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 May;77(5):542-7
9654177
Birth. 1998 Dec;25(4):215-9
9892887
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Jan;82(1):10-7
12580833
Women Birth. 2006 Jul;19(2):39-44
16890901
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Apr;16(3):390-405
17439384
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(5):551-60
16752233
Midwifery. 2005 Dec;21(4):346-54
16024149
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Sep;20(3):323-30
16922987
Birth. 1999 Dec;26(4):255-8
10655832
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 Jul 22;8:27
18644157
Health Care Women Int. 1996 Jul-Aug;17(4):361-79
8850769
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Apr 11;6:12
16608507
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;33(3):328-39
15180196
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Nov 05;7:178
17983479
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 Jul 23;8:29
18651967
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2007 Aug-Sep;28(2-3):115-41
17604088
Birth. 2000 Sep;27(3):177-84
11251499
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Apr;102(4):282-7
7612509
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(37):1-98
14622490
Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Mar;21(1):118-25
17428223
Midwifery. 2002 Mar;18(1):72-9
11945055
Midwifery. 2010 Aug;26(4):463-8
19084301
Midwifery. 2009 Aug;25(4):449-60
18082919
Midwifery. 2009 Aug;25(4):392-402
17997204
Midwifery. 2000 Sep;16(3):186-96
10970752
BJOG. 2002 Oct;109(10):1154-63
12387470
Midwifery. 2003 Dec;19(4):267-76
14623506
Curationis. 1999 Dec;22(4):3-8
11051926