title: Compatible solutes mitigate damaging effects of salt stress by reducing the impact of stress-induced reactive oxygen species.
abstract: Under abiotic stress conditions, rapid increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels occurs within plant cells. Although their role as a major signalling agent in plants is now acknowledged, elevated ROS levels can result in an impairment of membrane integrity. Similar to our previous findings on imposition of salt stress, application of the hydroxyl radical (OH(*)) to Arabidopsis roots results in a massive efflux of K(+) from epidermal cells. This is likely to cause significant damage to cell metabolism. Since K(+) loss also occurs after salt application and salt stress leads to increased cellular ROS levels, we suggest that at least some of the detrimental effects of salinity is due to damage by its resulting ROS on K(+) homeostasis. We also observed a comparative reduction in K(+) efflux by compatible solutes after both oxidative and salt stress. Thus, we propose that under saline conditions, compatible solutes mitigate the oxidative stress damage to membrane transporters. Whether this amelioration is due to free-radical scavenging or by direct protection of transporter systems, warrants further investigation.
authors.affiliation: School of Agricultural Science; University of Tasmania; Hobart, Australia.
authors.forename: Tracey Ann
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Cuin
authors.forename: Sergey
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Shabala
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2003 Feb;54(383):657-61
references.pmid: 12554708
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2007;58(15-16):4245-55
references.pmid: 18182428
references.citation: Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Jul;30(5):507-514
references.pmid: 32689035
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2001 Feb;52(355):351-60
references.pmid: 11283180
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jun;51:463-499
references.pmid: 15012199
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Feb;131(2):676-83
references.pmid: 12586891
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 Dec;46(12):1924-33
references.pmid: 16223738
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 21;103(47):18008-13
references.pmid: 17101982
references.citation: Funct Plant Biol. 2007 Mar;34(2):150-162
references.pmid: 32689341
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Feb;131(2):385-8
references.pmid: 12586862
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Jul;30(7):875-85
references.pmid: 17547658
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Feb;6(2):66-71
references.pmid: 11173290
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2004 Aug;55(403):1733-41
references.pmid: 15208334
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2000 Feb;51(343):177-85
references.pmid: 10938824
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:247-73
references.pmid: 12221975
references.citation: Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006 Sep-Oct;8(9-10):1757-64
references.pmid: 16987029
references.citation: J Cell Sci. 2003 Jan 1;116(Pt 1):81-8
references.pmid: 12456718
references.citation: Planta. 2005 Dec;222(6):1041-50
references.pmid: 16079998
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2000 Jan;51(342):81-8
references.pmid: 10938798
references.citation: Planta. 2007 Feb;225(3):753-61
references.pmid: 16955270