Recruitment and rate coding organisation for soleus motor units across entire range of voluntary isometric plantar flexions.
Unlike upper limb muscles, it remains undocumented as to how motor units in the soleus muscle are organised in terms of recruitment range and discharge rates with respect to their recruitment and de-recruitment thresholds. The possible influence of neuromodulation, such as persistent inward currents (PICs) on lower limb motor unit recruitment and discharge rates has also yet to be reported. To address these issues, electromyographic (EMG) activities from the soleus muscle were recorded using selective branched-wire intramuscular electrodes during ramp-and-hold contractions with intensities up to maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). The multiple single motor unit activities were then derived using a decomposition technique. The onset-offset hysteresis of motor unit discharge, i.e. a difference between recruitment and de-recruitment thresholds, as well as PIC magnitude calculated by a paired motor unit analysis were used to examine the neuromodulatory effects on discharge behaviours, such as minimum firing rate, peak firing rate and degree of increase in firing rate. Forty-two clearly identified motor units from five subjects revealed that soleus motor units are recruited progressively from rest to contraction strengths close to 95% of MVC, with low-threshold motor units discharging action potentials slower at their recruitment and with a lower peak rate than later recruited high-threshold units. This observation is in contrast to the 'onion skin phenomenon' often reported for the upper limb muscles. Based on positive correlations of the peak discharge rates, initial rates and recruitment order of the units with the magnitude of the onset-offset hysteresis and not PIC contribution, we conclude that discharge behaviours among motor units appear to be related to a variation in an intrinsic property other than PICs.
Oya
Tomomichi
T
University of Queensland, School of Human Movement Studies, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Riek
Stephan
S
Cresswell
Andrew G
AG
D000200:Action Potentials; D000328:Adult; D004576:Electromyography; D055724:Electrophysiological Phenomena; D006801:Humans; D007537:Isometric Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D009046:Motor Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000294:innervation* / Q000502:physiology*; D011999:Recruitment, Neurophysiological / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Apr;69(4):1005-8
8492143
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Aug;80(2):583-93
9705452
Brain Res. 1981 Aug 24;219(1):45-55
7260629
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;93(3):1381-92
15483059
J Physiol. 1979 Apr;289:191-201
458649
J Physiol. 1982 Aug;329:113-28
7143246
Prog Brain Res. 2004;143:77-95
14653153
Muscle Nerve. 2005 Feb;31(2):135-56
15736297
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;80(4):2023-37
9772258
Muscle Nerve. 1996 May;19(5):563-73
8618553
Can J Appl Physiol. 1997 Dec;22(6):585-97
9415831
J Physiol. 2002 Oct 15;544(2):549-65
12381826
Exp Neurol. 1988 Mar;99(3):761-4
3342852
J Physiol. 2006 Mar 15;571(Pt 3):683-93
16423860
J Physiol. 1988 Nov;405:345-67
3267153
Neuroscientist. 2008 Jun;14(3):264-75
18381974
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986 Jun-Jul;26(4):273-81
3757896
Exp Brain Res. 1995;105(2):283-90
7498381
J Neurophysiol. 2005 May;93(5):2449-59
15615827
J Neurophysiol. 1977 Nov;40(6):1432-43
925737
J Neurophysiol. 1983 Dec;50(6):1380-92
6663333
Physiol Rev. 2000 Apr;80(2):767-852
10747207
J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Dec 15;149(2):121-33
16026846
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;100(1):292-303
18463182
Exp Brain Res. 1993;95(3):517-22
8224078
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972 May;32(5):471-83
4112299
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Dec;78(6):3061-8
9405525
Physiol Rev. 1983 Apr;63(2):387-436
6340133
Pflugers Arch. 1974 Feb 18;347(1):75-88
4407539
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;87(4):1850-8
11929906
J Neurophysiol. 1986 May;55(5):1017-29
3711964
J Physiol. 1985 Feb;359:107-18
3999035
J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 1;20(17):6734-40
10964980
J Neurophysiol. 1975 Jul;38(4):933-46
1159473