title: Airtight storage of moist wheat grain improves bioethanol yields.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Drying is currently the most frequently used conservation method for cereal grain, which in temperate climates consumes a major part of process energy. Airtight storage of moist feed grain using the biocontrol yeast Pichia anomala as biopreservation agent can substantially reduce the process energy for grain storage. In this study we tested the potential of moist stored grain for bioethanol production.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The ethanol yield from moist wheat was enhanced by 14% compared with the control obtained from traditionally (dry) stored grain. This enhancement was observed independently of whether or not P. anomala was added to the storage system, indicating that P. anomala does not impair ethanol fermentation. Starch and sugar analyses showed that during pre-treatment the starch of moist grain was better degraded by amylase treatment than that of the dry grain. Additional pre-treatment with cellulose and hemicellulose-degrading enzymes did not further increase the total ethanol yield. Sugar analysis after this pre-treatment showed an increased release of sugars not fermentable by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The ethanol yield from wheat grain is increased by airtight storage of moist grain, which in addition can save substantial amounts of energy used for drying the grain. This provides a new opportunity to increase the sustainability of bioethanol production.
authors.affiliation: Uppsala Biocenter, Department of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. volkmar.passoth@mikrob.slu.se
authors.forename: Volkmar
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Passoth
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Eriksson
authors.forename: Mats
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sandgren
authors.forename: Jerry
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ståhlberg
authors.forename: Kathleen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Piens
authors.forename: Johan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Schnürer
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006 Jan 5;93(1):56-63
references.pmid: 16196058
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Mar;61(3):1027-32
references.pmid: 7793907
references.citation: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002 Aug;13(4):345-51
references.pmid: 12323357
references.citation: Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;40(1):19-23
references.pmid: 15612997
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2006 Jan;6(1):3-13
references.pmid: 16423066
references.citation: Br Poult Sci. 2001 May;42(2):218-29
references.pmid: 11421332
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Apr;71(4):1865-9
references.pmid: 15812013
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Feb;102(2):538-47
references.pmid: 17241360
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar;74(6):1696-703
references.pmid: 18223110
references.citation: J Biotechnol. 2002 Mar 28;94(2):137-55
references.pmid: 11796168
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2002 Aug;2(3):389-94
references.pmid: 12702289
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jul;73(13):4354-6
references.pmid: 17483277
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2008 Aug;99(12):5216-25
references.pmid: 17996446
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Oct;70(10):5905-11
references.pmid: 15466531
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jan 27;311(5760):506-8
references.pmid: 16439656