title: A social explanation for the rise and fall of global health issues.
abstract: This paper proposes an explanation concerning why some global health issues such as HIV/AIDS attract significant attention from international and national leaders, while other issues that also represent a high mortality and morbidity burden, such as pneumonia and malnutrition, remain neglected. The rise, persistence and decline of a global health issue may best be explained by the way in which its policy community--the network of individuals and organizations concerned with the problem--comes to understand and portray the issue and establishes institutions that can sustain this portrayal. This explanation emphasizes the power of ideas and challenges interpretations of issue ascendance and decline that place primary emphasis on material, objective factors such as mortality and morbidity levels and the existence of cost-effective interventions. This explanation has implications for our understanding of strategic public health communication. If ideas in the form of issue portrayals are central, strategic communication is far from a secondary public health activity: it is at the heart of what global health policy communities do.
authors.affiliation: The Maxwell School of Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America. jrshiffm@maxwell.syr.edu
authors.forename: Jeremy
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Shiffman
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D014943:Global Health; D015658:HIV Infections; D006292:Health Priorities; D006801:Humans; D011584:Psychology
references.citation: J Int Dev. 1995 May-Jun;7(3):489-502
references.pmid: 12290763
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 6;357(10):1018-27
references.pmid: 17804846
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Sep 27;372(9644):1185-91
references.pmid: 18926279
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Mar 8;371(9615):865-9
references.pmid: 18328932
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 Nov 18;368(9549):1810-27
references.pmid: 17113431
references.citation: BMJ. 2000 Jun 24;320(7251):1726
references.pmid: 10917698
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 May 27;367(9524):1747-57
references.pmid: 16731270
references.citation: Reprod Health Matters. 2002 Nov;10(20):47-58
references.pmid: 12557642
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2006 Nov;21(6):411-20
references.pmid: 16984894
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Oct 13;370(9595):1370-9
references.pmid: 17933652
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 May 6;367(9521):1541-7
references.pmid: 16679168
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Sep 22;370(9592):1018-20
references.pmid: 17889229
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Sep 6;372(9641):805; author reply 806
references.pmid: 18774416
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):526-30
references.pmid: 16890840
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Feb 16;371(9612):608-21
references.pmid: 18206225
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2008 Mar;23(2):95-100
references.pmid: 18156161