title: Variation in working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and episodic recall: a latent variable examination of differences in the dynamics of free recall.
abstract: A latent variable analysis was conducted to examine the nature of individual differences in the dynamics of free recall and cognitive abilities. Participants performed multiple measures of free recall, working memory capacity (WMC), and fluid intelligence (gF). For each free recall task, recall accuracy, recall latency, and number of intrusion errors were determined, and latent factors were derived for each. It was found that recall accuracy was negatively related to both recall latency and number of intrusions, and recall latency and number of intrusions were positively related. Furthermore, latent WMC and gF factors were positively related to recall accuracy, but negatively related to recall latency and number of intrusions. Finally, a cluster analysis revealed that subgroups of participants with deficits in focusing the search had deficits in recovering degraded representations or deficits in monitoring the products of retrieval. The results are consistent with the idea that variation in the dynamics of free recall, WMC, and gF are primarily due to differences in search set size, but differences in recovery and monitoring are also important.
authors.affiliation: University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-3013, USA. nunswor@uga.edu
authors.forename: Nash
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Unsworth
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D032882:Comprehension; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007360:Intelligence; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Sep;128(3):309-331
references.pmid: 10513398
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):189-217
references.pmid: 15149250
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Sep;19(5):1101-14
references.pmid: 8409850
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 1999 Jul;13(3):381-8
references.pmid: 10447299
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2005 Jun;10(2):178-92
references.pmid: 15998176
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 May;73(1):7-44
references.pmid: 10196073
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1196-210
references.pmid: 15521798
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):792-804
references.pmid: 16822147
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):122-49
references.pmid: 1546114
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):498-505
references.pmid: 16405146
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):769-86
references.pmid: 16523997
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1994 Sep;22(5):511-24
references.pmid: 7968547
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1954 Mar;67(1):111-8
references.pmid: 13138773
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):500-3
references.pmid: 16306992
references.citation: Memory. 2009 May;17(4):386-96
references.pmid: 19358013
references.citation: Science. 1970 Jun 26;168(3939):1601-3
references.pmid: 5420546
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):104-32
references.pmid: 17227183
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Mar;1(1):89-106
references.pmid: 24203416
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1992;43:205-34
references.pmid: 1539943
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov;33(6):1020-34
references.pmid: 17983310
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1998 Jun;13(2):256-66
references.pmid: 9640586
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1996 Mar;24(2):188-201
references.pmid: 8881322