title: Level-dependent auditory tuning: Transducer-based active processes in hearing and best-frequency shifts.
abstract: Ears boost their sensitivity by means of active, force-generating processes that augment the minute vibrations induced by soft sounds. These processes can alter auditory frequency-tuning in a level-dependent way. In the antennal hearing organ of Drosophila, for example, the active process shifts the best frequency (BF) of the antennal sound receiver when the sound intensity is varied, tuning the receiver to conspecific songs. Here we show that this level-dependent tuning can be reproduced by an active transduction model as proposed for vertebrate hair cells and the Drosophila ear. We further show that the direction of the frequency shift depends on the system to which the molecular modules for auditory transduction connect: If this system is mass-less such as the sensory hair bundles of bullfrog saccular hair cells, the BF of the displacement response will increase as the sound intensity declines. Conversely, BF will decrease with declining intensity if the transduction modules couple to inertial systems such as the fly's antennal sound receiver or cupulae in the fish lateral line.
authors.affiliation: Department for Cellular Neurobiology; University of Göttingen; Max-Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine; Göttingen, Germany.
authors.forename: Björn
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Nadrowski
authors.forename: Martin C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Göpfert
references.citation: Biophys J. 2007 Dec 1;93(11):4053-67
references.pmid: 17704173
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Aug;9(4):389-93
references.pmid: 10448164
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 11;102(2):325-30
references.pmid: 15623551
references.citation: Pflugers Arch. 2007 Aug;454(5):703-20
references.pmid: 17436012
references.citation: Eur Biophys J. 2006 Aug;35(6):511-6
references.pmid: 16612585
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):530-45
references.pmid: 18760690
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 4;98(25):14380-5
references.pmid: 11724945
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5514-9
references.pmid: 12642657
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Jun 21;411(6840):908
references.pmid: 11418847
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 5;17(11):1000-6
references.pmid: 17524645
references.citation: Neuron. 1988 May;1(3):189-99
references.pmid: 2483095
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Aug;9(8):999-1000
references.pmid: 16819519
references.citation: Fly (Austin). 2007 Jul-Aug;1(4):238-41
references.pmid: 18820433
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11765-72
references.pmid: 11050207
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2006 Nov 20;499(3):317-56
references.pmid: 16998934
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2002 May;205(Pt 9):1199-208
references.pmid: 11948197
references.citation: Biophys Chem. 1997 Oct;68(1-3):43-52
references.pmid: 9468609
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Feb 22;268(1465):333-9
references.pmid: 11270428
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Nov 3;48(3):403-15
references.pmid: 16269359
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Sep 23;18(18):1365-72
references.pmid: 18789690
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 17;101(33):12195-200
references.pmid: 15302928