title: Microarray and real-time PCR analyses of the responses of high-arctic soil bacteria to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation treatments.
abstract: High-Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content, and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at the Canadian high-Arctic stations of Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach). Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR targeting key functional genes. The results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon-ring-hydroxylating dioxygenases were observed 1 month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e., ex situ versus in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation.
authors.affiliation: Biotechnology Research Institute, National Research Council of Canada, Montréal, QC, Canada.
authors.forename: Etienne
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Yergeau
authors.forename: Mélanie
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Arbour
authors.forename: Roland
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Brousseau
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Juck
authors.forename: John R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Lawrence
authors.forename: Luke
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Masson
authors.forename: Lyle G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Whyte
authors.forename: Charles W
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Greer
mesh_terms: D001110:Arctic Regions; D001419:Bacteria / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism*; D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D044822:Biodiversity; D002170:Canada; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal / Q000235:genetics; D006838:Hydrocarbons / Q000378:metabolism*; D046228:Microarray Analysis; D012329:RNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D012989:Soil Pollutants / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D004269:DNA, Bacterial; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal; D006838:Hydrocarbons; D012329:RNA, Bacterial; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; D012989:Soil Pollutants
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 Sep 1;49(3):401-17
references.pmid: 19712290
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Jun 1;53(1):141-55
references.pmid: 16329936
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Apr;71(4):2036-45
references.pmid: 15812036
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002 Aug;59(4-5):551-6
references.pmid: 12172625
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Feb 1;51(3):375-88
references.pmid: 16329885
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Sep 15;36(18):3977-84
references.pmid: 12269751
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Mar 15;40(6):2011-7
references.pmid: 16570629
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Aug 1;41(2):141-50
references.pmid: 19709248
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Feb;59(2):466-75
references.pmid: 17313586
references.citation: Can J Microbiol. 1996 Mar;42(3):252-8
references.pmid: 8868232
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 May 1;19(7):796-802
references.pmid: 12724288
references.citation: Can J Microbiol. 1996 Feb;42(2):99-106
references.pmid: 8742353
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 2008 May;73(2):148-59
references.pmid: 18329116
references.citation: ISME J. 2007 May;1(1):67-77
references.pmid: 18043615
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):207-10
references.pmid: 11752295
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jul;64(7):2578-84
references.pmid: 9647833
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000 Sep 1;33(3):241-249
references.pmid: 11098075
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Dec;61(4):533-616
references.pmid: 9409151
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol. 1996 Jan;16(1):36-41
references.pmid: 8820018
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Mar;73(5):1532-43
references.pmid: 17220254
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 1995 Nov;30(3):297-307
references.pmid: 24185566
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000 Apr 1;32(1):17-23
references.pmid: 10779615
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2007 Apr;53(3):371-83
references.pmid: 17334858
references.citation: ISME J. 2007 Jun;1(2):163-79
references.pmid: 18043626
references.citation: Extremophiles. 2006 Jun;10(3):171-9
references.pmid: 16514512
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul;71(7):4117-20
references.pmid: 16000830
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2009 May;57(4):598-610
references.pmid: 18685886
references.citation: ISME J. 2009 Mar;3(3):340-51
references.pmid: 19020556
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2006 Oct;52(3):523-32
references.pmid: 16944337
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Dec;68(12):5933-42
references.pmid: 12450813
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 1990;154(4):317-22
references.pmid: 2244784