Invasive plant integration into native plant-pollinator networks across Europe.
The structure of plant-pollinator networks has been claimed to be resilient to changes in species composition due to the weak degree of dependence among mutualistic partners. However, detailed empirical investigations of the consequences of introducing an alien plant species into mutualistic networks are lacking. We present the first cross-European analysis by using a standardized protocol to assess the degree to which a particular alien plant species (i.e. Carpobrotus affine acinaciformis, Impatiens glandulifera, Opuntia stricta, Rhododendron ponticum and Solanum elaeagnifolium) becomes integrated into existing native plant-pollinator networks, and how this translates to changes in network structure. Alien species were visited by almost half of the pollinator species present, accounting on average for 42 per cent of the visits and 24 per cent of the network interactions. Furthermore, in general, pollinators depended upon alien plants more than on native plants. However, despite the fact that invaded communities received more visits than uninvaded communities, the dominant role of alien species over natives did not translate into overall changes in network connectance, plant linkage level and nestedness. Our results imply that although supergeneralist alien plants can play a central role in the networks, the structure of the networks appears to be very permeable and robust to the introduction of invasive alien species into the network.
Vilà
Montserrat
M
Estación Biológica de Doñana- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EDB-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain. montse.vila@ebd.csic.es
Bartomeus
Ignasi
I
Dietzsch
Anke C
AC
Petanidou
Theodora
T
Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf
I
Stout
Jane C
JC
Tscheulin
Thomas
T
D000818:Animals; D017753:Ecosystem; D005060:Europe; D007313:Insecta / Q000502:physiology*; D010944:Plants / Q000145:classification*; D054817:Pollination / Q000502:physiology*
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Dec 7;269(1508):2395-9
12495480
Ecol Lett. 2009 Jul;12(7):716-28
19453616
Ecol Lett. 2007 Jul;10(7):539-50
17542933
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):65-93
10740893
Curr Biol. 2007 Feb 20;17(4):341-6
17275300
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 22;271(1557):2605-11
15615687
Ecol Lett. 2006 Mar;9(3):281-6
16958893
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 22;274(1613):1101-8
17301021
Ecol Lett. 2008 Jun;11(6):564-75
18363716
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9383-7
12881488
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Mar;23(3):123-30
18262307
Ecol Lett. 2006 Aug;9(8):912-9
16913932
Nature. 2007 Aug 23;448(7156):925-8
17713534
PLoS Biol. 2008 Feb;6(2):e31
18271628
Science. 2006 Apr 21;312(5772):431-3
16627742
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Apr;21(4):208-16
16701087
Ann Bot. 2003 Dec;92(6):807-34
14612378
Oecologia. 1989 Nov;81(3):289-294
28311178
Oecologia. 2008 Apr;155(4):761-70
18188603