title: Strength gains through lumbar lordosis restoration.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To test the hypothesis that restoring the lumbar lordosis will increase a patient's voluntary muscular strength and decrease back pain symptoms.
  
  
  METHODS
  A patient was diagnosed with mechanical low back pain. The initial radiographic study revealed a loss of the lumbar lordosis. The patient determined his maximum bench press prior to the treatment program. The treatment outcome was based upon post-intervention radiographs, a Borg pain scale, and the patient's post-intervention maximum bench press.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The treatment program consisted of warm-up exercises, spinal manipulation, rehabilitative exercises, neuromuscular re-education, and prescribed home care. The treatment period consisted of 12 visits in the first 4 weeks, followed by once weekly for another 12 weeks, for a total of 24 visits in 4 months. In the first month, the Borg scale decreased from 5/10 to 0/10, and after 4 months the lumbar lordosis was increased from 2 degrees to 31 degrees . The sacral base angle (Ferguson's angle) increased from 18 degrees to 31 degrees . The patient's maximum bench press also increased from 245 pounds to 305 pounds.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Restoration of the lumbar lordosis appears to have a positive effect on muscular strength. This study supports the previous premise that a lumbar lordosis provides an inherent mechanical advantage for strength and stability.
authors.affiliation: Private Practice of Chiropractic, Grand Blanc, MI.
authors.forename: Mark W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Morningstar
references.citation: J Chiropr Med. 2003 Spring;2(2):51-4
references.pmid: 19674595
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 May;15(5):376-82
references.pmid: 2141953
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 May;21(4):267-80
references.pmid: 9608382
references.citation: J Formos Med Assoc. 1992 Mar;91(3):329-33
references.pmid: 1354697
references.citation: J Chiropr Med. 2002 Summer;1(3):113-5
references.pmid: 19674570
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1978 Dec;3(4):336-42
references.pmid: 741240
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 2001 Aug;14(4):283-92
references.pmid: 11481549
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1997 Oct;10(5):380-6
references.pmid: 9355053
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1998 Oct;11(5):430-9
references.pmid: 9811104
references.citation: J Biomed Eng. 1986 Jul;8(3):217-23
references.pmid: 3724126
references.citation: J Sports Sci. 1994 Dec;12(6):549-59
references.pmid: 7853451
references.citation: Orthop Clin North Am. 1975 Jan;6(1):135-44
references.pmid: 123048
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1992 Sep;5(3):245-53
references.pmid: 1387820
references.citation: Clin Anat. 2003 Mar;16(2):144-7
references.pmid: 12589669
references.citation: J Orthop Sci. 2001;6(4):307-11
references.pmid: 11479757
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981 May-Jun;6(3):249-62
references.pmid: 7268545
references.citation: J Rehabil Med. 2002 May;34(3):109-13
references.pmid: 12395937
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985 Mar;10(2):154-5
references.pmid: 3159104