title: Olfactory learning and spike timing dependent plasticity.
abstract: Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is widely observed in organisms ranging from insects to humans and may provide a cellular mechanism for associative learning. STDP requires a millisecond-scale temporal correlation of spiking activity in pre- and postsynaptic neurons. However, animals can learn to associate a sensory cue and a reward that are presented seconds apart. Thus, for STDP to mediate associative learning, the brain must retain information about the sensory cue as spiking activity until the reinforcement signal arrives. In our recent study, we tested this requirement in the moth Manduca sexta. We characterized the odor responses of Kenyon cells, a key neuronal population for insect olfactory learning, and conditioned moths to associate an odor with a sugar water reward. By varying the amount of temporal overlap between odor-evoked spikes and the reward presentation, we found that the most learning occurred when spiking activity had no overlap with the reward presentation; further, increasing the overlap actually decreased the learning efficacy. Thus, STDP alone cannot mediate the olfactory learning in Kenyon cells. Here, we discuss possible cellular mechanisms that could bridge the temporal gap between physiological and behavioral time scales.
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, Maryland USA.
authors.forename: Iori
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Ito
authors.forename: Rose Chik-Ying
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Ong
authors.forename: Baranidharan
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Raman
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Stopfer
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2001 Dec;115(6):1224-38
references.pmid: 11770054
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 23;26(34):8702-6
references.pmid: 16928858
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:251-66
references.pmid: 18394479
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):709-13
references.pmid: 17581587
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:275-302
references.pmid: 16022597
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 May;8(5):341-54
references.pmid: 17453015
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Apr;4(4):266-75
references.pmid: 12671643
references.citation: Learn Mem. 1994 May-Jun;1(1):1-33
references.pmid: 10467583
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Nov 19;23(33):10495-502
references.pmid: 14627633
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 1986 Oct;100(5):729-44
references.pmid: 3778636
references.citation: Neuron. 1998 Mar;20(3):355-8
references.pmid: 9539111
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Jan 4;53(1):103-15
references.pmid: 17196534
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8876-81
references.pmid: 16731625
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 1983 Jun;97(2):107-19
references.pmid: 6872507
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 2008 Aug;99(2):89-103
references.pmid: 18607623
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 15;89(14):6526-30
references.pmid: 1631153
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 Jul 21;24(29):6507-14
references.pmid: 15269261
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Oct;11(10):1177-84
references.pmid: 18794840
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Oct;17(10):2443-52
references.pmid: 17220510
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):3303-13
references.pmid: 16014792