title: Blocking and triggering of plant immunity by Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrPto.
abstract: Bacterial effectors are double-edged swords that enhance bacterial virulence in susceptible plants while trigger resistance in plants carrying cognate resistance proteins. A well-known example of this is Pseudomonas syringae protein AvrPto that is delivered into plant cells through the type III secretion system. AvrPto inhibits immune responses in Arabidopsis plants but triggers resistance in some tomato plants carrying cognate resistance proteins Pto, a serine/threonine kinase, and Prf, a nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat protein. In a recent structural study we showed that AvrPto is an inhibitor of the Pto protein kinase. Because Pto closely resemble the kinase domain of receptor kinases, which include pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) crucial for plants to detect invading pathogens, we tested the possibility that PRRs such as FLS2 and EFR are targeted by AvrPto in susceptible plants. Indeed, AvrPto is capable of binding the FLS2 and EFR kinases to block plant immune responses when expressed in protoplasts. In Arabidopsis plants containing FLS2, the P. syringae strain lacking avrPto is compromised in its ability to multiply. However, the defect of the avrPto-deletion strain was alleviated in fls2 plants, indicating a role of AvrPto in overcoming FLS2-mediated resistance. Interestingly, the FLS2-AvrPto and Pto-AvrPto interactions share significant similarity, raising the tantalizing possibility that Pto has evolved as a molecular decoy of the intended targets of AvrPto.
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Biological Sciences; Changping District, Beijing China.
authors.forename: Na
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Zong
authors.forename: Tingting
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Xiang
authors.forename: Yan
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Zou
authors.forename: Jijie
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chai
authors.forename: Jian-Min
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Zhou
references.citation: Cell. 2003 Feb 7;112(3):379-89
references.pmid: 12581527
references.citation: Science. 1996 Dec 20;274(5295):2060-3
references.pmid: 8953033
references.citation: Cell. 1996 Jul 12;86(1):123-33
references.pmid: 8689679
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2006 Feb;18(2):465-76
references.pmid: 16377758
references.citation: Cell. 2002 Mar 22;108(6):743-54
references.pmid: 11955429
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Sep 13;449(7159):243-7
references.pmid: 17694048
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 17;104(29):12217-22
references.pmid: 17626179
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Aug;10(4):349-57
references.pmid: 17625953
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Aug;10(4):335-41
references.pmid: 17652011
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8577-82
references.pmid: 12817082
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):323-9
references.pmid: 17108957
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jul 26;448(7152):497-500
references.pmid: 17625569
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Dec;23(12):454-6
references.pmid: 9868361
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Jan 8;18(1):74-80
references.pmid: 18158241
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 3;102(18):6496-501
references.pmid: 15845764
references.citation: Science. 2005 Jun 17;308(5729):1783-6
references.pmid: 15845874
references.citation: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Aug;7(8):601-11
references.pmid: 16936700
references.citation: Cell. 2006 May 5;125(3):563-75
references.pmid: 16678099
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Jun;13(6):592-8
references.pmid: 10830258
references.citation: Science. 2003 Aug 29;301(5637):1230-3
references.pmid: 12947197
references.citation: Cell. 2003 Feb 7;112(3):369-77
references.pmid: 12581526
references.citation: Cell. 2006 May 19;125(4):749-60
references.pmid: 16713565
references.citation: Cell. 2006 Feb 24;124(4):803-14
references.pmid: 16497589