Delayed enhancement of ascites after i.v. contrast material administration at CT: time course and clinical correlation.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence and clinical predictors of delayed contrast enhancement of ascites.


METHODS
In this retrospective study, 132 consecutive patients with ascites who underwent repeated abdominopelvic CT examinations performed within 7 days of each other were identified. These patients included 112 patients who received and 20 who did not receive i.v. contrast material at the initial CT examination. For each examination, we recorded the CT attenuation of the ascites. For the follow-up scan, the presence of delayed enhancement of ascites was defined as an increase in CT attenuation > 10 HU over baseline. The Fisher's exact test, unpaired Student's t test, and logistic regression were used to determine predictors of delayed enhancement of ascites.


RESULTS
A threshold increase in the attenuation of ascites by > 10 HU or more between the initial and follow-up CT examinations occurred only when i.v. contrast material was given with the initial examination. The increased attenuation was due to delayed contrast enhancement of ascites and occurred in 15 of the 112 patients (13%). Of the 16 patients scanned less than 1 day apart, 10 (63%) showed delayed enhancement of ascites. Delayed enhancement was not observed 3 or more days after i.v. contrast material administration. For each 1 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine level, the likelihood of delayed enhancement of ascites increased (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.11-3.69). Multivariate logistic regression showed that a short time interval between examinations (p < 0.001), increased serum creatinine level (p < 0.001), and presence of loculated ascites (p = < 0.01) were independent predictors of the magnitude of delayed enhancement of ascites.


CONCLUSIONS
Delayed contrast enhancement of ascites occurs commonly after recent prior i.v. contrast material administration and should not be mistaken for hemoperitoneum or proteinaceous fluid such as pus.
Benedetti
Nancy
N
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, Box 0628, M-372, 505 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA.
Aslam
Rizwan
R
Wang
Zhen J
ZJ
Joe
Bonnie N
BN
Fu
Yanjun
Y
Yee
Judy
J
Yeh
Benjamin M
BM
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001201:Ascites / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007223:Infant; D007472:Iohexol / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
D003287:Contrast Media; D007472:Iohexol
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Oct;161(4):787-90
8372759
Clin Radiol. 1995 Mar;50(3):182-7
7889712
Radiol Clin North Am. 2003 Nov;41(6):1183-201
14661665
Magn Reson Med. 2000 Dec;44(6):915-24
11108629
Clin Imaging. 1990 Aug;14(3):221-4
2224625
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984 Jun;8(3):443-5
6725690
Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;110(1):c48-53; discussion c54
18708727
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1989 Sep-Oct;13(5):916-7
2778154
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985 Jul-Aug;9(4):825-6
4019848
Abdom Imaging. 1996 Jan-Feb;21(1):67-8
8672977
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980 Aug;135(2):315-22
6773334