Evaluation of young smokers and non-smokers with Electrogustometry and Contact Endoscopy.
BACKGROUND
Smoking is the cause of inducing changes in taste functionality under conditions of chronic exposure. The objective of this study was to evaluate taste sensitivity in young smokers and non-smokers and identify any differences in the shape, density and vascularisation of the fungiform papillae (fPap) of their tongue.


METHODS
Sixty-two male subjects who served in the Greek military forces were randomly chosen for this study. Thirty-four were non-smokers and 28 smokers. Smokers were chosen on the basis of their habit to hold the cigarette at the centre of their lips. Taste thresholds were measured with Electrogustometry (EGM). The morphology and density of the fungiform papillae (fPap) at the tip of the tongue were examined with Contact Endoscopy (CE).


RESULTS
There was found statistically important difference (p < 0.05) between the taste thresholds of the two groups although not all smokers presented with elevated taste thresholds: Six of them (21%) had taste thresholds similar to those of non-smokers. Differences concerning the shape and the vessels of the fungiform papillae between the groups were also detected. Fewer and flatter fPap were found in 22 smokers (79%).


CONCLUSIONS
The majority of smokers shown elevated taste thresholds in comparison to non-smokers. Smoking is an important factor which can lead to decreased taste sensitivity. The combination of methods, such as EGM and CE, can provide useful information about the vascularisation of taste buds and their functional ability.
Pavlos
Pavlidis
P
2nd ENT Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. pavlof@otenet.gr
Vasilios
Nikolaidis
N
Antonia
Anogeianaki
A
Dimitrios
Koutsonikolas
K
Georgios
Kekes
K
Georgios
Anogianakis
A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989 Mar;67(3):282-5
2927923
Br Med J. 1961 Feb 11;1(5223):384-7
13754660
Lancet. 1955 Feb 18;268(6860):377-8
13234389
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(2):68-71
10784364
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995 May;104(5):333-9
7747902
Neurology. 1959 Jan;9(1):53-61
13622896
Acta Otolaryngol. 2001 Jan;121(1):98-102
11270502
Acta Otolaryngol. 1995 Mar;115(2):314-6
7610830
J Laryngol Otol. 2000 Jun;114(6):437-40
10962676
Laryngoscope. 2006 Jul;116(7):1216-22
16826063
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2002;(546):16-26
12132616
Auris Nasus Larynx. 1986;13 Suppl 1:S1-15
3767768
Nervenarzt. 1989 Sep;60(9):572-5
2812163
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Oct;28(5):406-10
12969341
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 May;117(5):519-28
2021470
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Dec;94(6):3719-29
16107527
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2000 Apr;25(2):120-5
10816215
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1974 Mar-Apr;83(2):192-201
4817435
Chem Senses. 1994 Dec;19(6):657-65
7735845
Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2002 Oct 20;138(2):135-46
12354641
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Feb;240(2):554-64
3806411
Neuroscience. 2007 Jul 13;147(3):803-10
17560039
Med Exp Int J Exp Med. 1963;9:151-67
14083335
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2006 Mar;33(1):13-7
16171963
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004 Sep;31(3):255-9
15364360
Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1986;146:129-37
3465542
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2002;(546):27-38
12132619
Acta Otolaryngol. 1982 May-Jun;93(5-6):407-14
7102298
Arch Neurol. 2003 May;60(5):667-71
12756129
Acta Otolaryngol. 1958 Jul-Aug;49(4):294-305
13570949
Physiol Behav. 2004 Mar;81(1):1-4
15059677