Spatial decisions and cognitive strategies of monkeys and humans based on abstract spatial stimuli in rotation test.
We showed previously that macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta) could orient in real space using abstract visual stimuli presented on a computer screen. They made correct choices according to both spatial stimuli (designed as an abstract representation of a real space) and nonspatial stimuli (pictures lacking any inner configuration information). However, we suggested that there were differences in processing spatial and nonspatial stimuli. In the present experiment we show that monkeys could also use as a cue abstract spatial stimuli rotated with respect to the real response space. We studied the ability of monkeys to decode abstract spatial information provided in one spatial frame (computer screen) and to perform spatial choices in another spatial frame (touch panel separated from the screen). We analyzed how the monkeys were affected by the type of training, whether they perceived the stimuli as "spatial" or "nonspatial," and which cues they used to decode them. We compared humans to monkeys in a similar test to find out which cognitive strategy they used and whether they perceive spatial stimuli in the same way. We demonstrated that there were two possible strategies to solve the task, simple "fitting" ignoring rotations and "remapping," when the stimulus was represented as an "abstract space" per se.
Nekovarova
Tereza
T
Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 1083 Videnska, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic. tnt@biomed.cas.cz
Nedvidek
Jan
J
Klement
Daniel
D
Bures
Jan
J
D000818:Animals; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D008253:Macaca mulatta / Q000502:physiology*; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012399:Rotation; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D013037:Spatial Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jul;33(3):191-212
17620021
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Nov 21;193(2):204-8
18588916
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):355-61
18684662
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jan;7(1):53-9
12884079
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Apr;30(2):135-47
15078123
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Nov 1;174(1):93-100
16938357
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Oct;27(4):329-44
11676084
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2005 Jul;84(1):1-8
15936678
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Oct;26(4):477-86
11056887
J Comp Psychol. 1996 Mar;110(1):55-68
8851553
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Apr;31(2):254-9; discussion 260-1
15839781
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):1-23
15945200
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):505-19
11561924
Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Apr;17(8):1695-702
12752387
Cognition. 1986 Jul;23(2):149-78
3742991
J Comp Physiol A. 1986 Jun;158(6):835-51
3735168
Nature. 1994 Jul 7;370(6484):57-9
8015605
Psychol Sci. 2002 Jul;13(4):337-41
12137136
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Apr;21(2):166-81
7738499
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jul;32(3):201-14
16834489
Science. 1971 Feb 19;171(3972):701-3
5540314
Cognition. 2002 Sep;85(2):B51-9
12127704
J Comp Physiol A. 1997 May;180(5):567-72
9163931
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):616-21
16866748
J Comp Psychol. 2002 Dec;116(4):350-6
12539930
Learn Mem. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):153-61
15054130