Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging--diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether a three-dimensional isotropic resolution fast spin-echo sequence (FSE-Cube) has similar diagnostic performance as a routine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol for evaluating the cartilage, ligaments, menisci, and osseous structures of the knee joint in symptomatic patients at 3.0 T.


METHODS
This prospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed with a waiver of informed consent. FSE-Cube was added to the routine 3.0-T MR imaging protocol performed in 100 symptomatic patients (54 male patients with a median age of 32 years and 46 female patients with a median age of 33 years) who subsequently underwent arthroscopic knee surgery. All MR imaging studies were independently reviewed twice by two musculoskeletal radiologists. During the first review, the routine MR imaging protocol was used to detect cartilage lesions, ligament tears, meniscal tears, and bone marrow edema lesions. During the second review, FSE-Cube with multiplanar reformations was used to detect these joint abnormalities. With arthroscopic results as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of FSE-Cube and the routine MR imaging protocol in the detection of cartilage lesions, anterior cruciate ligament tears, and meniscal tears were calculated. Permutation tests were used to compare sensitivity and specificity values.


RESULTS
FSE-Cube had significantly higher sensitivity (P = .039) but significantly lower specificity (P = .003) than the routine MR imaging protocol for detecting cartilage lesions. There were no significant differences (P = .183-.999) in sensitivity and specificity between FSE-Cube and the routine MR imaging protocol in the detection of anterior cruciate ligament tears, medial meniscal tears, or lateral meniscal tears. FSE-Cube depicted 96.2% of medial collateral ligament tears, 100% of lateral collateral ligament tears, and 85.3% of bone marrow edema lesions identified on images obtained with the routine MR imaging protocol.


CONCLUSIONS
FSE-Cube has similar diagnostic performance as a routine MR imaging protocol for detecting cartilage lesions, cruciate ligament tears, collateral ligament tears, meniscal tears, and bone marrow edema lesions within the knee joint at 3.0 T.
Kijowski
Richard
R
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Clinical Science Center-E3/311, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792, USA. r.kijowski@hosp.wisc.edu
Davis
Kirkland W
KW
Woods
Michael A
MA
Lindstrom
Mary J
MJ
De Smet
Arthur A
AA
Gold
Garry E
GE
Busse
Reed F
RF
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000465:Algorithms; D016880:Anisotropy; D017352:Echo-Planar Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D007718:Knee Injuries / Q000473:pathology*; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000473:pathology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013113:Spin Labels; D055815:Young Adult
D013113:Spin Labels
Radiology. 1996 Jan;198(1):199-204
8539378
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2000 Jun;51(3):182-5
10914084
Invest Radiol. 1993 Feb;28(2):142-5
8444570
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jun;184(6):1740-3
15908523
Am J Sports Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;17(4):505-13
2675649
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):1026-33
19011194
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jul;24(1):168-75
16758476
Skeletal Radiol. 2003 Jul;32(7):396-402
12719928
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May;188(5):1287-93
17449772
Skeletal Radiol. 1999 Jun;28(6):305-11
10450876
Radiology. 1995 Mar;194(3):825-9
7862987
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Sep;80(9):1276-84
9759811
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Nov;167(5):1223-7
8911185
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):185-94
19221057
Acta Radiol. 1998 Mar;39(2):116-9
9529439
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 May;170(5):1215-9
9574587
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jul;181(1):280-1; author reply 281-2
12818878
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Sep;60(3):640-9
18727082
Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Dec;36(12):1141-6
17938917
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 May;162(5):1131-5
8165997
Magn Reson Med. 2006 May;55(5):1030-7
16598719
Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):526-35
18227545
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Apr;172(4):1073-80
10587150
Acta Radiol. 2007 Oct;48(8):869-74
17924218
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jun;58(3):411-5
16466674
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Nov;179(5):1159-66
12388492
Radiology. 1997 May;203(2):508-12
9114113
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
843571