title: Regulation of ALF promoter activity in Xenopus oocytes.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In this report we evaluate the use of Xenopus laevis oocytes as a matched germ cell system for characterizing the organization and transcriptional activity of a germ cell-specific X. laevis promoter.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The promoter from the ALF transcription factor gene was cloned from X. laevis genomic DNA using a PCR-based genomic walking approach. The endogenous ALF gene was characterized by RACE and RT-PCR for transcription start site usage, and by sodium bisulfite sequencing to determine its methylation status in somatic and oocyte tissues. Homology between the X. laevis ALF promoter sequence and those from human, chimpanzee, macaque, mouse, rat, cow, pig, horse, dog, chicken and X. tropicalis was relatively low, making it difficult to use such comparisons to identify putative regulatory elements. However, microinjected promoter constructs were very active in oocytes and the minimal promoter could be narrowed by PCR-mediated deletion to a region as short as 63 base pairs. Additional experiments using a series of site-specific promoter mutants identified two cis-elements within the 63 base pair minimal promoter that were critical for activity. Both elements (A and B) were specifically recognized by proteins present in crude oocyte extracts based on oligonucleotide competition assays. The activity of promoter constructs in oocytes and in transfected somatic Xenopus XLK-WG kidney epithelial cells was quite different, indicating that the two cell types are not functionally equivalent and are not interchangeable as assay systems.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall the results provide the first detailed characterization of the organization of a germ cell-specific Xenopus promoter and demonstrate the feasibility of using immature frog oocytes as an assay system for dissecting the biochemistry of germ cell gene regulation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
authors.forename: Dan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Abbas
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Raza
authors.forename: Jeff
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: DeJong
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001483:Base Sequence; D015152:Blotting, Northern; D019175:DNA Methylation; D017931:DNA Primers; D024202:Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D006801:Humans; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D009865:Oocytes / Q000378:metabolism*; D011401:Promoter Regions, Genetic; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012689:Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid; D013045:Species Specificity; D014157:Transcription Factors / Q000235:genetics*; D029867:Xenopus Proteins / Q000235:genetics*; D014982:Xenopus laevis
chemical_list: D017931:DNA Primers; C485620:GTF2A1L protein, Xenopus; D014157:Transcription Factors; D029867:Xenopus Proteins
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Mar 14;380(6570):162-5
references.pmid: 8600391
references.citation: Biol Reprod. 2004 Sep;71(3):933-41
references.pmid: 15151936
references.citation: Development. 2004 Nov;131(21):5297-308
references.pmid: 15456720
references.citation: Gene Expr Patterns. 2006 Apr;6(4):409-19
references.pmid: 16412700
references.citation: Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2084-7
references.pmid: 11557891
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1999 Jun 18;274(25):18040-8
references.pmid: 10364255
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2000 Jan 7;275(1):122-8
references.pmid: 10617594
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2005 Apr 1;19(7):794-803
references.pmid: 15774719
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2001 Mar;7(3):509-15
references.pmid: 11463376
references.citation: Science. 2001 May 11;292(5519):1153-5
references.pmid: 11352070
references.citation: Dev Biol. 1992 Sep;153(1):150-7
references.pmid: 1516744
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 14;101(37):13525-30
references.pmid: 15345743
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2002 Sep 13;277(37):34208-16
references.pmid: 12107178
references.citation: Gene. 2006 Jan 17;366(1):39-50
references.pmid: 16326034
references.citation: Differentiation. 2005 Feb;73(1):1-17
references.pmid: 15733063
references.citation: Genome Res. 2007 Dec;17(12):1797-808
references.pmid: 17984227
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2002 May 17;277(20):17765-74
references.pmid: 11889132
references.citation: Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1998 Aug;9(4):467-74
references.pmid: 9813194
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Aug;5(8):1940-7
references.pmid: 3018538
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 2003 Jul;28(7):391-8
references.pmid: 12878007
references.citation: Biol Reprod. 2001 Feb;64(2):507-17
references.pmid: 11159353
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2004 Oct 29;279(44):45291-9
references.pmid: 15308660
references.citation: Mech Dev. 2001 Aug;106(1-2):3-23
references.pmid: 11472831
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2006 Nov 10;281(45):34288-98
references.pmid: 16966320
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 14;278(46):45586-93
references.pmid: 12923189
references.citation: BMC Biol. 2007 Jul 25;5:31
references.pmid: 17651506
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Mar 14;380(6570):159-62
references.pmid: 8600390
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Nov;19(11):7327-35
references.pmid: 10523621
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Mar;1789(3):161-6
references.pmid: 19437618