Chromosomal anomalies influence parental treatment decisions in relation to prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease.
This study aimed to identify the variables that influence parental treatment decisions after a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). The authors reviewed all cases of prenatally diagnosed structural CHD from August 1998 to December 2006 at their center. The following variables were studied as potential predictors of parental intent to treat: maternal age, race, insurance status, obstetric history, fetal gender, univentricular versus biventricular cardiac physiology, and fetal chromosomal abnormality. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. In the review, 252 consecutive cases of prenatally diagnosed CHD were identified. Of these, 204 women pursued full medical treatment, whereas 25 women sought termination of pregnancy or comfort care. Parental intent to treat was unknown for 23 cases. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified fetal chromosomal abnormality as the only variable that influenced parental intent to treat (odds ratio [OR], 14.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.28-62.66; p = 0.0006). An associated chromosomal abnormality rather than the severity of the heart defect influences the decision to choose termination of pregnancy or comfort care for a fetus with prenatally diagnosed CHD. Women were 14 times more likely to terminate a pregnancy or seek comfort care for a fetus with CHD if a chromosomal abnormality was present.
Zyblewski
Sinai C
SC
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. chois@musc.edu
Hill
Elizabeth G
EG
Shirali
Girish
G
Atz
Andrew
A
Forbus
Geoffrey
G
Gonzalez
Javier
J
Hlavacek
Anthony
A
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000649:Amniocentesis; D002309:Cardiology; D002869:Chromosome Aberrations; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003657:Decision Making; D004452:Echocardiography / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006330:Heart Defects, Congenital / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000196:embryology / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D016015:Logistic Models; D008423:Maternal Age; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D016017:Odds Ratio; D010290:Parents / Q000523:psychology*; D011247:Pregnancy; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal; D055815:Young Adult
J Pediatr. 2006 Feb;148(2):213-6
16492431
Cardiol Young. 2004 Feb;14(1):32-8
15237668
Circulation. 2001 Mar 6;103(9):1269-73
11238272
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Mar 1;97(5):720-4
16490445
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 15;83(12):1649-53
10392870
Heart. 1999 Jul;82(1):34-9
10377306
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9
8970487
Prenat Diagn. 2004 Dec 30;24(13):1136-42
15614846
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 May;23(6):1452-8
8176106
Prenat Diagn. 2004 Dec 30;24(13):1143-9
15614843
Semin Perinatol. 2005 Dec;29(6):401-4
16533654
Stat Med. 1999 Mar 30;18(6):681-94
10204197
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Dec;28(7):1805-9
8962570
Pediatr Cardiol. 2004 May-Jun;25(3):299-306
15360120
Pediatr Cardiol. 2002 Jul-Aug;23(4):449-53
12170364
Pediatrics. 2001 Jun;107(6):1277-82
11389243
Am J Perinatol. 2006 May;23(4):241-5
16625498
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;81(5 ( Pt 1)):679-82
8469453