The impact of boundary spanning scholarly publications and patents.
BACKGROUND
Human knowledge and innovation are recorded in two media: scholarly publication and patents. These records not only document a new scientific insight or new method developed, but they also carefully cite prior work upon which the innovation is built.


METHODS
We quantify the impact of information flow across fields using two large citation dataset: one spanning over a century of scholarly work in the natural sciences, social sciences and humanities, and second spanning a quarter century of United States patents.


CONCLUSIONS
We find that a publication's citing across disciplines is tied to its subsequent impact. In the case of patents and natural science publications, those that are cited at least once are cited slightly more when they draw on research outside of their area. In contrast, in the social sciences, citing within one's own field tends to be positively correlated with impact.
Shi
Xiaolin
X
Department of EECS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. shixl@umich.edu
Adamic
Lada A
LA
Tseng
Belle L
BL
Clarkson
Gavin S
GS
D055811:Journal Impact Factor; D010330:Patents as Topic; D011643:Publishing; D014481:United States
Science. 2008 Jul 18;321(5887):395-9
18635800
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7327-31
17452639
Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):56-63
5634379
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4803
19277205
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9
17431139
Science. 2005 Apr 29;308(5722):697-702
15860629
Science. 1965 Jul 30;149(3683):510-5
14325149
Science. 2008 Nov 21;322(5905):1259-62
18845711
PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1683
18301760
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101 Suppl 1:5266-73
14976254