title: Femoral head size and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene at 5 to 8 years.
abstract: Wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene is reportedly independent of head size. To confirm that observation we asked in our population whether head size related to wear with one type of electron beam highly cross-linked polyethylene. Of 146 hips implanted, we evaluated complete clinical and radiographic data for 90 patients (102 hips or 70%). The minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 5.7 years; range, 5-8 years). The head size was selected intraoperatively based on the size of the acetabular component and presumed risk of dislocation. Polyethylene wear measurements were performed in one experienced laboratory using the method of Martell et al. There was no hip with pelvic or femoral osteolysis. The median linear wear rate was 0.028 mm/year (mean, 0.04 mm/year), and the median volumetric wear rate was 25.6 mm(3)/year (mean, 80.5 mm(3)/year). Median total volumetric wear was 41.0 mm(3) (mean, 98.5 mm(3)). We found no association between femoral head size and the linear wear rate, but observed an association between larger (36- and 40-mm) head size and volumetric wear rate and total volumetric wear. Although the linear wear rate of polyethylene was not related to femoral head diameter, there was greater volumetric wear (156.6 mm(3)/year) with the 36- and 40-mm heads. Pending long-term studies of large head sizes, we advise caution in using larger femoral heads in young or active patients and in those with a low risk of dislocation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
authors.affiliation: Chapel Hill Orthopedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, 101 Conner Drive, Suite 200, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA. paul_lachiewicz@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Paul F
authors.initials: PF
authors.lastname: Lachiewicz
authors.forename: Daniel S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Heckman
authors.forename: Elizabeth S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Soileau
authors.forename: Jimmi
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Mangla
authors.forename: John M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Martell
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation*; D020099:Coated Materials, Biocompatible; D005260:Female; D005270:Femur Head / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020959:Polyethylene / Q000528:radiation effects; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D011859:Radiography; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013997:Time Factors; D014025:Titanium; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D020099:Coated Materials, Biocompatible; D020959:Polyethylene; D014025:Titanium
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1816-21
references.pmid: 16085624
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4):581-9
references.pmid: 17562417
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Sep;(414):289-304
references.pmid: 12966304
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 May;90(5):556-61
references.pmid: 18450618
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2003 Aug;18(5):553-61
references.pmid: 12934205
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355):163-70
references.pmid: 9917601
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2003 Oct;18(7 Suppl 1):55-9
references.pmid: 14560412
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2001 Feb;16(2):149-60
references.pmid: 11222887
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec;(429):6-16
references.pmid: 15577460
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jun;85(6):1111-7
references.pmid: 12784011
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jan;(430):46-52
references.pmid: 15662303
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 1989 Sep;4(3):245-51
references.pmid: 2795031
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Feb;90(2):149-53
references.pmid: 18256079
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):125-9
references.pmid: 17823030
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):17-25
references.pmid: 16950057
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Nov-Dec;(121):20-32
references.pmid: 991504
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2005 Apr;20(3):379-85
references.pmid: 15809958
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Dec;(405):150-7
references.pmid: 12461367
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:153-5
references.pmid: 17006370
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Nov;89(11):1439-45
references.pmid: 17998178
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Aug;79(8):1202-10
references.pmid: 9278081
references.citation: Acta Orthop. 2007 Dec;78(6):746-54
references.pmid: 18236180
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Apr;72(4):518-28
references.pmid: 2324138
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Oct;87(10):2323-34
references.pmid: 16203901
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Nov;79(11):1635-41
references.pmid: 9384422
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Dec;(405):65-9
references.pmid: 12461357
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jan;20(1):11-9
references.pmid: 15660054
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Mar;85(3):505-11
references.pmid: 12637439
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Dec;85(12):2325-31
references.pmid: 14668501
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 2001 Dec;16(8 Suppl 1):24-30
references.pmid: 11742447
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55
references.pmid: 5783851
references.citation: Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:151-69
references.pmid: 11910059
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:53-9
references.pmid: 16741475