title: On evaluating the impact of flexibility enhancing strategies on the performance of nurse schedules.
abstract: Hospitals develop nurse schedules that cover a period of 4-6 weeks and are posted several weeks in advance. Once posted, changes to the schedule require voluntary participation by the nurses, making it difficult for hospitals to respond to changes in nursing needs and availability of nurses. At the same time, nursing needs' forecasts developed several weeks in advance are often wrong. In each hospital setting, there may exist several promising strategies to enhance scheduling flexibility and reduce the mismatch between the nursing needs and the availability of nurses. However, methodologies to evaluate such strategies, before testing them in expensive pilot implementation, do not exist. We demonstrate how such evaluations can be carried out using historical data. Furthermore, we demonstrate the use of our approach by evaluating the benefits of a strategy where nurses are divided into two cohorts and schedules are phase shifted for the two cohorts. Staggering schedules allows nursing unit managers to benefit from more frequent updating of needs' assessments without having to change work rules. Upon applying our approach to data from a large urban hospital, we discovered that in this example staggering did not improve the performance of nurse schedules. We discuss possible reasons for this result, its implications for hospital managers, and other potential uses of our approach.
authors.affiliation: Industrial & Systems Engineering Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
authors.forename: Wen-Ya
authors.initials: WY
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Diwakar
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Gupta
authors.forename: Sandra
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Potthoff
mesh_terms: D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D006801:Humans; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration*; D010561:Personnel Staffing and Scheduling / Q000458:organization & administration*
references.citation: Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul;34(7):1907-12
references.pmid: 16625126
references.citation: J Healthc Manag. 2005 Nov-Dec;50(6):389-95; discussion 396-7
references.pmid: 16372398
references.citation: JAMA. 2002 Oct 23-30;288(16):1987-93
references.pmid: 12387650
references.citation: Nurs Res. 1972 Jan-Feb;21(1):20-9
references.pmid: 4480929
references.citation: Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1195-204
references.pmid: 18007170
references.citation: Health Care Superv. 1997 Mar;15(3):10-5
references.pmid: 10165424
references.citation: Health Care Manag Sci. 2007 Sep;10(3):293-308
references.pmid: 17695139
references.citation: Socioecon Plann Sci. 1981;15(3):119-27
references.pmid: 10251179
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 1976 Summer;11(2):158-65
references.pmid: 993049
references.citation: Healthc Financ Manage. 2001 May;55(5):54-8
references.pmid: 11351811
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 May 11;5:36
references.pmid: 15885149
references.citation: Lancet. 2000 Jul 15;356(9225):185-9
references.pmid: 10963195
references.citation: Socioecon Plann Sci. 1980;14(2):97-106
references.pmid: 10246991
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2001 Jan;33(1):120-9
references.pmid: 11155116