title: "Don't know" answers concerning somatic disease status should not be regarded as "no" responses.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  With regard to patients' self-reported somatic diseases some researchers transformed "don't know (DK)" responses into "no" responses. The present study examines the appropriateness of this procedure.
  
  
  METHODS
  Analyses were based on the nationally representative German National Health Interview and Examination Survey (GHS), which assessed both self-reported diseases and physician-diagnosed diseases (N = 7124). Prevalence rates of persons' DK responses and the corresponding prevalences of physicians' diagnoses were calculated for persons with hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure, asthma, chronic bronchitis, thyroid disease, diabetes, cancer, gout, arthrosis, arthritis and osteoporosis. Correlates of physicians' diagnosed diseases of DK cases are reported.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Between 1.6% and 9.8% of the participants responded with DK to the question of whether they have the disease. In 3.7% to 29.5% of DK cases, the physicians did regard the respective disease as being present. With regard to persons who responded with DK, the probability of a physicians' diagnosis was increased in the case of increased age and a higher number of somatic comorbidities.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The procedure of transforming DK responses into "no" answers does not appear to be recommendable.
authors.affiliation: Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany. harald.baumeister@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de
authors.forename: Harald
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Baumeister
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;57(10):1096-103
references.pmid: 15528061
references.citation: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2002;11(1):1-18
references.pmid: 12459800
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2006 Jun;29(6):1242-8
references.pmid: 16732003
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1359-66
references.pmid: 8560303
references.citation: Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Jul;31(7):1155-64
references.pmid: 17264844
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;60(6):634-42
references.pmid: 17493523