title: Novel solid-state-detector dedicated cardiac camera for fast myocardial perfusion imaging: multicenter comparison with standard dual detector cameras.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the diagnostic performance of a new dedicated ultrafast solid-state cardiac camera (Discovery NM 530c [DNM]) with standard dual detector cameras (S-SPECT) in myocardial perfusion imaging. The primary goal was a per-patient analysis of diagnostic performance of the DNM using S-SPECT as the reference standard.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In total, 168 patients underwent one-day Tc-99m tetrofosmin rest/stress myocardial perfusion SPECT. DNM and S-SPECT images were obtained with the same injected doses. The DNM camera uses an array of cadmium zinc telluride pixilated detectors and a multipinhole collimator simultaneously imaging all cardiac views with no moving parts. Rest and stress acquisition times were 4 and 2 minutes for DNM and 14 and 12 minutes for S-SPECT. Two blinded readers independently interpreted all scans on a patient level and on a vascular territory level using a standard five-point scale. Interobserver differences were resolved by a third observer. Agreement between DNM and S-SPECT for presence or absence of myocardial perfusion defects on a per-patient analysis was 91.9% and 92.5%, respectively. Correlation coefficients of rest and stress left ventricular ejection fractions were 0.87 (P < .01) and 0.90 (P < .01).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The diagnostic performance of DNM is comparable to that of S-SPECT on a per-patient basis. However, superior image quality can be achieved with significantly shorter acquisition times with DNM because of improved count sensitivity and image contrast over S-SPECT.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. festeve@emory.edu
authors.forename: Fabio P
authors.initials: FP
authors.lastname: Esteves
authors.forename: Paolo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Raggi
authors.forename: Russell D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Folks
authors.forename: Zohar
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Keidar
authors.forename: J Wells
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Askew
authors.forename: Shmuel
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Rispler
authors.forename: Michael K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: O'Connor
authors.forename: Liudmilla
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Verdes
authors.forename: Ernest V
authors.initials: EV
authors.lastname: Garcia
mesh_terms: D004867:Equipment Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D006801:Humans; D007557:Israel; D055414:Myocardial Perfusion Imaging / Q000295:instrumentation*; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012666:Semiconductors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon / Q000295:instrumentation*; D014481:United States
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1999 Apr;40(4):650-9
references.pmid: 10210225
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2008 Jul;49(7):1080-9
references.pmid: 18552149
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):e39-60
references.pmid: 18022099
references.citation: Med Phys. 2006 May;33(5):1259-68
references.pmid: 16752560
references.citation: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Mar;2(3):273-82
references.pmid: 19356571
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4):547-63
references.pmid: 18674723
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2009 Apr;50(4):635-43
references.pmid: 19339672
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2004 Oct 7;49(19):4579-92
references.pmid: 15552418
references.citation: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Mar;1(2):156-63
references.pmid: 19356422
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jul;14(4):555-65
references.pmid: 17679065
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1994 Mar;39(3):425-37
references.pmid: 15551591