The conceptual centrality of causal cycles.
How do causal cycles affect judgments of conceptual centrality? Generally, a feature is central to a concept to the extent that other features in the concept depend on it, thereby rendering it immutable from the concept (Sloman, Love, & Ahn, 1998). Previous research on conceptual centrality has focused primarily on features involved in four major types of dependency structures: simple cause-effect relations, causal chains, common-cause structures, and common-effect structures. Causal cycles are a fifth type of dependency structure commonly reported in people's real-life concepts, yet to date, they have been relatively ignored in research on conceptual centrality. The results of six experiments suggest that previously held assumptions about the conceptual representation of cycles are incorrect. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of theory-based concepts.
Kim
Nancy S
NS
Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115-5000, USA. n.kim@neu.edu
Luhmann
Christian C
CC
Pierce
Margaret L
ML
Ryan
Megan M
MM
D001245:Association Learning; D015984:Causality; D002965:Classification / Q000379:methods*; D003657:Decision Making; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005793:Generalization, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011337:Probability Learning; D035501:Uncertainty
Cogn Psychol. 1997 Feb;32(1):49-96
9038245
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):659-83
16822139
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Feb;41(1):128-136
19182132
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1141-59
14622052
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Dec;131(4):451-76
12500858
Dev Psychol. 2007 Mar;43(2):294-308
17352540
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):323-60
11561914
Mem Cognit. 1999 May;27(3):526-37
10355241
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Jan;87(1):1-32
14698687
Am J Psychol. 2002 Spring;115(1):33-65
11868194
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Dec;41(4):361-416
11121260
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Jun;121(2):222-36
1534834
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):635-9
17972725
Cogn Sci. 2002 Sep 1;26(5):521-562
21442007
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):517-32
14620347
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):81-8
18605484
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jan;31(1):155-65
12699151
Cognition. 1998 Dec;69(2):135-78
9894403
Cogn Psychol. 2005 May;50(3):264-314
15826612
Cognition. 1995 Mar;54(3):299-352
7720361
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:227-54
16318595