title: Plant cell wall characterization using scanning probe microscopy techniques.
abstract: Lignocellulosic biomass is today considered a promising renewable resource for bioenergy production. A combined chemical and biological process is currently under consideration for the conversion of polysaccharides from plant cell wall materials, mainly cellulose and hemicelluloses, to simple sugars that can be fermented to biofuels. Native plant cellulose forms nanometer-scale microfibrils that are embedded in a polymeric network of hemicelluloses, pectins, and lignins; this explains, in part, the recalcitrance of biomass to deconstruction. The chemical and structural characteristics of these plant cell wall constituents remain largely unknown today. Scanning probe microscopy techniques, particularly atomic force microscopy and its application in characterizing plant cell wall structure, are reviewed here. We also further discuss future developments based on scanning probe microscopy techniques that combine linear and nonlinear optical techniques to characterize plant cell wall nanometer-scale structures, specifically apertureless near-field scanning optical microscopy and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy.
authors.affiliation: Chemical and Biosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA. John_Yarbrough@nrel.gov
authors.forename: John M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Yarbrough
authors.forename: Michael E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Himmel
authors.forename: Shi-You
authors.initials: SY
authors.lastname: Ding
references.citation: Ultramicroscopy. 2004 Nov;101(2-4):47-54
references.pmid: 15450651
references.citation: Biophys J. 2002 Jul;83(1):502-9
references.pmid: 12080137
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2001 Jan;125(1):131-4
references.pmid: 11154315
references.citation: Biophys J. 1996 Mar;70(3):1138-43
references.pmid: 8785273
references.citation: Science. 2008 Dec 19;322(5909):1857-61
references.pmid: 19095943
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jun 1;97(2):214-23
references.pmid: 17318910
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 12;105(6):2226-31
references.pmid: 18256186
references.citation: Biotechniques. 2006 Aug;41(2):137, 139, 141 passim
references.pmid: 16925014
references.citation: Science. 2004 Dec 24;306(5705):2206-11
references.pmid: 15618507
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2001 Oct;127(2):551-65
references.pmid: 11598229
references.citation: Planta. 2003 Jun;217(2):283-9
references.pmid: 12783336
references.citation: Biophys J. 1993 Mar;64(3):896-7
references.pmid: 19431877
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001 Jul;56(1-2):17-34
references.pmid: 11499926
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Dec 1;101(5):913-25
references.pmid: 18781690
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Feb 8;54(3):597-606
references.pmid: 16448156
references.citation: J Microsc. 2003 Oct;212(Pt 1):53-61
references.pmid: 14516362
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Jun 4;92(22):220801
references.pmid: 15245207
references.citation: Rev Sci Instrum. 2007 Jan;78(1):016101
references.pmid: 17503950
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Nov 26;125(47):14300-6
references.pmid: 14624578
references.citation: Science. 2007 Feb 9;315(5813):804-7
references.pmid: 17289988
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2002 Dec;43(12):1407-20
references.pmid: 12514238
references.citation: Biophys J. 2000 Aug;79(2):1139-45
references.pmid: 10920043
references.citation: J Struct Biol. 2004 Oct;148(1):131-5
references.pmid: 15363793