title: Water-filtered infrared-A radiation (wIRA) is not implicated in cellular degeneration of human skin.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Excessive exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation is involved in the complex biologic process of cutaneous aging. Wavelengths in the ultraviolet-A and -B range (UV-A and UV-B) have been shown to be responsible for the induction of proteases, e. g. the collagenase matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1), which are related to cell aging. As devices emitting longer wavelengths are widely used in therapeutic and cosmetic interventions and as the induction of MMP-1 by water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) had been discussed, it was of interest to assess effects of wIRA on the cellular and molecular level known to be possibly involved in cutaneous degeneration.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Investigation of the biological implications of widely used water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) radiators for clinical use on human skin fibroblasts assessed by MMP-1 gene expression (MMP-1 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression).
  
  
  METHODS
  Human skin fibroblasts were irradiated with approximately 88% wIRA (780-1400 nm) and 12% red light (RL, 665-780 nm) with 380 mW/cm(2) wIRA(+RL) (333 mW/cm(2) wIRA) on the one hand and for comparison with UV-A (330-400 nm, mainly UV-A1) and a small amount of blue light (BL, 400-450 nm) with 28 mW/cm(2) UV-A(+BL) on the other hand. Survival curves were established by colony forming ability after single exposures between 15 minutes and 8 hours to wIRA(+RL) (340-10880 J/cm(2) wIRA(+RL), 300-9600 J/cm(2) wIRA) or 15-45 minutes to UV-A(+BL) (25-75 J/cm(2) UV-A(+BL)). Both conventional Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and quantitative real-time RT-PCR techniques were used to determine the induction of MMP-1 mRNA at two physiologic temperatures for skin fibroblasts (30 degrees C and 37 degrees C) in single exposure regimens (15-60 minutes wIRA(+RL), 340-1360 J/cm(2) wIRA(+RL), 300-1200 J/cm(2) wIRA; 30 minutes UV-A(+BL), 50 J/cm(2) UV-A(+BL)) and in addition at 30 degrees C in a repeated exposure protocol (up to 10 times 15 minutes wIRA(+RL) with 340 J/cm(2) wIRA(+RL), 300 J/cm(2) wIRA at each time).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Single exposure of cultured human dermal fibroblasts to UV-A(+BL) radiation yielded a very high increase in MMP-1 mRNA expression (11 +/-1 fold expression for RT-PCR and 76 +/-2 fold expression for real-time RT-PCR both at 30 degrees C, 75 +/-1 fold expression for real-time RT-PCR at 37 degrees C) and a dose-dependent decrease in cell survival. In contrast, wIRA(+RL) did not produce cell death and did not induce a systematic increase in MMP-1 mRNA expression (less than twofold expression, within the laboratory range of fluctuation) detectable with the sensitive methods applied. Additionally, repeated exposure of human skin fibroblasts to wIRA(+RL) did not induce MMP-1 mRNA expression systematically (less than twofold expression by up to 10 consecutive wIRA(+RL) exposures and analysis with real-time RT-PCR).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  wIRA(+RL) even at the investigated disproportionally high irradiances does not induce cell death or a systematic increase of MMP-1 mRNA expression, both of which can be easily induced by UV-A radiation. Furthermore, these results support previous findings of in vivo investigations on collagenase induction by UV-A but not wIRA and show that infrared-A with appropriate irradiances does not seem to be involved in MMP-1 mediated photoaging of the skin. As suggested by previously published studies wIRA could even be implicated in a protective manner.
authors.affiliation: Orthopedic Cell Therapy Unit, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Narcisa
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Gebbers
authors.forename: Nathalie
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Hirt-Burri
authors.forename: Corinne
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Scaletta
authors.forename: Gerd
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Hoffmann
authors.forename: Lee Ann
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Applegate
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 1998 Oct;111(4):629-33
references.pmid: 9764844
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1993 Jul 15;268(20):14678-81
references.pmid: 8325845
references.citation: Cancer Res. 1990 Feb 1;50(3):637-41
references.pmid: 2297704
references.citation: Exp Dermatol. 2006 Feb;15(2):130-7
references.pmid: 16433685
references.citation: Ger Med Sci. 2008 Oct 21;6:Doc11
references.pmid: 19675738
references.citation: Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2003 Oct;19(5):228-34
references.pmid: 14535893
references.citation: Mech Ageing Dev. 2006 Dec;127(12):875-82
references.pmid: 17067654
references.citation: Ger Med Sci. 2008 Jul 21;6:Doc08
references.pmid: 19675735
references.citation: Exp Dermatol. 2006 Sep;15(9):692-704
references.pmid: 16881966
references.citation: Ger Med Sci. 2005 Mar 04;3:Doc01
references.pmid: 19675718
references.citation: Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2001 Dec;17(6):261-5
references.pmid: 11722751
references.citation: Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2000 May-Jun;204(3):85-92
references.pmid: 10909163
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Dec;123(6):1012-9
references.pmid: 15610507
references.citation: Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994;345:181-8
references.pmid: 8079706
references.citation: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1995;32(4):299-304
references.pmid: 8608608
references.citation: Ger Med Sci. 2006 Jul 11;4:Doc05
references.pmid: 19675696
references.citation: Toxicol Lett. 2001 Apr 8;121(1):57-61
references.pmid: 11312037
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2001 Dec;117(6):1437-41
references.pmid: 11886505
references.citation: Int J Mol Med. 1999 May;3(5):467-72
references.pmid: 10202176
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2006 Aug;93(8):952-60
references.pmid: 16845694
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 5;102(14):5050-5
references.pmid: 15790680
references.citation: Mech Ageing Dev. 2005 Nov;126(11):1170-7
references.pmid: 16118013
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Oct 15;140(8):691-9
references.pmid: 7942771
references.citation: Adv Wound Care. 1999 Jan-Feb;12(1):35-40
references.pmid: 10326355
references.citation: Photochem Photobiol. 1996 Apr;63(4):410-2
references.pmid: 8934751
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16024-8
references.pmid: 12456879
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Nov;123(5):823-31
references.pmid: 15482467
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(3):274-81
references.pmid: 11573231
references.citation: Int J Mol Med. 2000 Mar;5(3):247-51
references.pmid: 10677564
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2002 Dec;119(6):1323-9
references.pmid: 12485435
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 1998 Jul;111(1):159-63
references.pmid: 9665404
references.citation: Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
references.pmid: 11846609
references.citation: Biol Chem. 2007 Jun;388(6):583-92
references.pmid: 17552905
references.citation: Free Radic Biol Med. 2007 Jul 1;43(1):128-35
references.pmid: 17561101
references.citation: Arch Dermatol Res. 1982;272(3-4):229-38
references.pmid: 7165330
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Oct;127(10):2328-35
references.pmid: 17508023
references.citation: Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1994 Jun;10(3):126-33
references.pmid: 7947192
references.citation: Free Radic Biol Med. 2002 Jun 15;32(12):1293-303
references.pmid: 12057767
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(3):493-502
references.pmid: 1860881
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(3):227-36
references.pmid: 11295757
references.citation: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1994;27(3):262-71
references.pmid: 8020111
references.citation: Ger Med Sci. 2004 Oct 29;2:Doc08
references.pmid: 19675691
references.citation: Arch Dermatol Res. 1992;284(2):92-4
references.pmid: 1610218
references.citation: Photochem Photobiol. 1996 Apr;63(4):375-7
references.pmid: 8934740
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 13;337(20):1419-28
references.pmid: 9358139
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Aug;123(2):354-60
references.pmid: 15245436
references.citation: Pain. 2006 Sep;124(1-2):201-10
references.pmid: 16806710