The relative effectiveness of spinal manipulation and ultrasound in mechanical pain: Pilot study.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy of spinal manipulation versus ultrasound in the treatment of patients with neck pain.


METHODS
Randomized clinical trial.


METHODS
Technikon Natal Chiropractic Clinic-Durban, South Africa


METHODS
Thirty randomly allocated subjects with neck pain, (aged between 16 and 60 years), responded to advertisements from the "college" (Technikon Natal, Department of Chiropractic), in the local newspapers and from the radio.


METHODS
Two groups of subjects were treated. Group 1 received spinal manipulation and Group 2 received ultrasound. Both groups were assessed with a CROM goniometer used for cervical range of motion assessments, algometer measurements (to assess pain thresholds), completion of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale 101 (for intensity of pain), level of disability using the CMCC Neck Disability Index, and the Short Form McGill Questionnaire to assess for the sensory dimension of pain.


RESULTS
Ultrasound increased only right rotation range of motion of the neck, whereas spinal manipulation increased left rotation, right lateral flexion (ranges of motion of the neck) and decreased disability.


CONCLUSIONS
From the results it appears that both ultrasound and adjustments are useful in treating mechanical neck pain; however, it appears that adjustments were more effective in restoring overall mobility and in decreasing cervical disability than ultrasound alone.
Moodley
Malany
M
Department of Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, South Africa.
Brantingham
James W
JW
Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-126
3785962
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Oct;15(8):495-500
1402409
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Sep;14(7):409-15
1834753
BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1291-6
8942688
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Nov;67(11):836-8
3778185
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Sep;33(254):574-9
6355460
Pain. 1995 Oct;63(1):85-91
8577494
Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):277-299
1235985
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Jan;15(1):16-23
1531487
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Jan;13(1):7-12
2324662
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Jan;13(1):17-25
2182754