The modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: its time has come.
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a well known, reliable and valid stroke deficit scale. The NIHSS is simple, quick, and has shown significant reliability in diverse groups, settings, and languages. The NIHSS also contains items with poor reliability and redundancy. Recent investigations (include assessing a new training DVD, analyzing webbased or videotape certifications, and testing foreign language versions) have further detailed reliability issues. Items recurrently shown to have poor reliability include Level of Consciousness, Facial Palsy, Limb Ataxia, and Dysarthria. The modified NIHSS (mNIHSS) minimizes redundancy and eliminates poorly reliable items. The mNIHSS shows greater reliability in multiple settings and cohorts, including scores abstracted from records, when used via telemedicine, and when used in clinical trials. In a validation of the mNIHSS against the NIHSS, the number of elements with excellent agreement increased from 54% to 71%, while poor agreement decreased from 12% to 5%. Overall, 45% of NIHSS items had less than excellent reliability vs. only 29% for the mNIHSS. The mNIHSS is not the ideal stroke scale, but it is a significant improvement over the NIHSS. The mNIHSS has shown reliability at bedside, with record abstraction, with telemedicine, and in clinical trials. Since the mNIHSS is more reliable, it may allow for improved practitioner communication, improved medical care, and refinement of trial enrollments. The mNIHSS should now serve as the primary stroke clinical deficit scale for clinical and research aims. When it comes to the mNIHSS, its time has come!
Meyer
B C
BC
Department of Neurosciences, UCSD School of Medicine, Stroke Center, OPC, San Diego, CA 92103-8466, USA. bcmeyer@ucsd.edu
Lyden
P D
PD
D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D009316:National Institutes of Health (U.S.); D009460:Neurologic Examination; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D020521:Stroke / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States
Stroke. 1998 Jun;29(6):1258-9
9626306
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Apr;81(4):476-80
16610567
Stroke. 2005 Nov;36(11):2497-9
16210552
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(5-6):389-95
16888381
Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2347-54
10548669
Neurologia. 2006 May;21(4):192-202
16832774
Stroke. 2003 Jan;34(1):134-7
12511764
Stroke. 2001 Mar;32(3):656-60
11239183
Neurology. 1989 May;39(5):638-43
2710353
Stroke. 2000 Apr;31(4):858-62
10753988
Stroke. 2005 Nov;36(11):2446-9
16224093
Stroke. 1993 Aug;24(8):1178-81
8342193
Stroke. 1994 Feb;25(2):362-5
8303746
Stroke. 1999 Aug;30(8):1534-7
10436096
Stroke. 1997 Feb;28(2):307-10
9040680
Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2366-8
10548672
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007 May;109(4):317-22
17254701
Int J Stroke. 2007 Nov;2(4):281-7
18705930
Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):568-70
12574577
Stroke. 1987 Mar-Apr;18(2):528-30
3564114
Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999 Nov-Dec;9(6):323-7
10545689
Stroke. 1994 Nov;25(11):2220-6
7974549
Stroke. 1994 Sep;25(9):1746-51
8073453
Neurology. 1999 Jul 13;53(1):126-31
10408548
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 May;43(4):457-63
16146632
Neurology. 2005 Mar 22;64(6):1058-60
15781827
Stroke. 2002 May;33(5):1261-6
11988601
Arch Neurol. 1989 Jun;46(6):660-2
2730378
Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1310-7
11387492
Neurology. 2001 Apr 24;56(8):1015-20
11320171
Stroke. 1989 Jul;20(7):864-70
2749846
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008 Jul-Aug;17(4):181-6
18589337
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Mar;88(3):302-8
17321821
Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2141-5
10512919
Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2355-9
10548670