title: Symbiotic regulation of plant growth, development and reproduction.
abstract: The growth and development of rice (Oryzae sativa) seedlings was shown to be regulated epigenetically by a fungal endophyte. In contrast to un-inoculated (nonsymbiotic) plants, endophyte colonized (symbiotic) plants preferentially allocated resources into root growth until root hairs were well established. During that time symbiotic roots expanded at five times the rate observed in nonsymbiotic plants. Endophytes also influenced sexual reproduction of mature big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) plants. Two spatially distinct big sagebrush subspecies and their hybrids were symbiotic with unique fungal endophytes, despite being separated by only 380 m distance and 60 m elevation. A double reciprocal transplant experiment of parental and hybrid plants, and soils across the hybrid zone showed that fungal endophytes interact with the soils and different plant genotypes to confer enhanced plant reproduction in soil native to the endophyte and reduced reproduction in soil alien to the endophyte. Moreover, the most prevalent endophyte of the hybrid zone reduced the fitness of both parental subspecies. Because these endophytes are passed to the next generation of plants on seed coats, this interaction provides a selective advantage, habitat specificity, and the means of restricting gene flow, thereby making the hybrid zone stable, narrow and potentially leading to speciation.
authors.affiliation: U.S. Geological Survey; WFRC; Seattle, WA USA.
authors.forename: Russell J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Rodriguez
authors.forename: D Carl
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Freeman
authors.forename: E Durant
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: McArthur
authors.forename: Yong Ok
authors.initials: YO
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Regina S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Redman
references.citation: ISME J. 2008 Apr;2(4):404-16
references.pmid: 18256707
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009;182(2):314-330
references.pmid: 19236579
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008;180(2):501-510
references.pmid: 18681935
references.citation: Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1581
references.pmid: 12446900
references.citation: Evolution. 2005 Jun;59(6):1259-67
references.pmid: 16050102
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Apr;166(1):49-60
references.pmid: 15760350
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S3-13
references.pmid: 16922298
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Sep;9(9):426-32
references.pmid: 15337492
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2008 May;101(8):1243-54
references.pmid: 17766844
references.citation: Am Nat. 1947 Mar-Apr;81(797):114-33
references.pmid: 20297036