title: Does segregating variation in sexual or microhabitat preferences lead to non-random mating within a population of Drosophila melanogaster?
abstract: Variation in female choice for mates has implications for the maintenance of genetic variation and the evolution of male traits. Yet, estimates of population-level variation in male mating success owing to female genotype are rare. Here, we used a panel of recombinant inbred lines to estimate the strength of selection at many genetic loci in a single generation and attempt to assess differences between females with respect to the males they mated with. We performed selection assays in a complex environment to allow differences in habitat or social group preference to be expressed. We detected directional selection at loci across the genome, but are unable to provide support for differential male success because of variation in female genotype.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, , CA 90089, USA. bradfole@usc.edu
authors.forename: Brad R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Foley
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Genissel
authors.forename: Harmon L
authors.initials: HL
authors.lastname: Kristy
authors.forename: Sergey V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: Nuzhdin
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001483:Base Sequence; D004331:Drosophila melanogaster / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D005787:Gene Frequency; D014644:Genetic Variation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D008297:Male; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA
references.citation: Am Nat. 2004 Aug;164(2):173-86
references.pmid: 15278842
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Feb;62(2):337-47
references.pmid: 18031305
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jun;19(6):323-8
references.pmid: 16701278
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 20;104(47):18577-82
references.pmid: 18003923
references.citation: Evolution. 2001 Feb;55(2):436-8
references.pmid: 11308098
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2003 May;20(5):800-4
references.pmid: 12679533
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Apr 16;3(4):e1986
references.pmid: 18414669
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:773-815
references.pmid: 11729091
references.citation: Funct Ecol. 2007 Jun;21(3):455-464
references.pmid: 19096732
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Oct;62(10):2462-72
references.pmid: 18637835
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):448-59
references.pmid: 17305810
references.citation: Am Nat. 2008 Aug;172(2):194-202
references.pmid: 18597623
references.citation: Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997 Mar;27(3):179-92
references.pmid: 9090115
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):742-5
references.pmid: 15085130
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):372-380
references.pmid: 11403870
references.citation: Evolution. 2004 Dec;58(12):2754-62
references.pmid: 15696753
references.citation: Genetics. 2008 Sep;180(1):567-82
references.pmid: 18716336