Water-filtered infrared-A radiation (wIRA) is not implicated in cellular degeneration of human skin.
BACKGROUND
Excessive exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation is involved in the complex biologic process of cutaneous aging. Wavelengths in the ultraviolet-A and -B range (UV-A and UV-B) have been shown to be responsible for the induction of proteases, e. g. the collagenase matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1), which are related to cell aging. As devices emitting longer wavelengths are widely used in therapeutic and cosmetic interventions and as the induction of MMP-1 by water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) had been discussed, it was of interest to assess effects of wIRA on the cellular and molecular level known to be possibly involved in cutaneous degeneration.


OBJECTIVE
Investigation of the biological implications of widely used water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) radiators for clinical use on human skin fibroblasts assessed by MMP-1 gene expression (MMP-1 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression).


METHODS
Human skin fibroblasts were irradiated with approximately 88% wIRA (780-1400 nm) and 12% red light (RL, 665-780 nm) with 380 mW/cm(2) wIRA(+RL) (333 mW/cm(2) wIRA) on the one hand and for comparison with UV-A (330-400 nm, mainly UV-A1) and a small amount of blue light (BL, 400-450 nm) with 28 mW/cm(2) UV-A(+BL) on the other hand. Survival curves were established by colony forming ability after single exposures between 15 minutes and 8 hours to wIRA(+RL) (340-10880 J/cm(2) wIRA(+RL), 300-9600 J/cm(2) wIRA) or 15-45 minutes to UV-A(+BL) (25-75 J/cm(2) UV-A(+BL)). Both conventional Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and quantitative real-time RT-PCR techniques were used to determine the induction of MMP-1 mRNA at two physiologic temperatures for skin fibroblasts (30 degrees C and 37 degrees C) in single exposure regimens (15-60 minutes wIRA(+RL), 340-1360 J/cm(2) wIRA(+RL), 300-1200 J/cm(2) wIRA; 30 minutes UV-A(+BL), 50 J/cm(2) UV-A(+BL)) and in addition at 30 degrees C in a repeated exposure protocol (up to 10 times 15 minutes wIRA(+RL) with 340 J/cm(2) wIRA(+RL), 300 J/cm(2) wIRA at each time).


RESULTS
Single exposure of cultured human dermal fibroblasts to UV-A(+BL) radiation yielded a very high increase in MMP-1 mRNA expression (11 +/-1 fold expression for RT-PCR and 76 +/-2 fold expression for real-time RT-PCR both at 30 degrees C, 75 +/-1 fold expression for real-time RT-PCR at 37 degrees C) and a dose-dependent decrease in cell survival. In contrast, wIRA(+RL) did not produce cell death and did not induce a systematic increase in MMP-1 mRNA expression (less than twofold expression, within the laboratory range of fluctuation) detectable with the sensitive methods applied. Additionally, repeated exposure of human skin fibroblasts to wIRA(+RL) did not induce MMP-1 mRNA expression systematically (less than twofold expression by up to 10 consecutive wIRA(+RL) exposures and analysis with real-time RT-PCR).


CONCLUSIONS
wIRA(+RL) even at the investigated disproportionally high irradiances does not induce cell death or a systematic increase of MMP-1 mRNA expression, both of which can be easily induced by UV-A radiation. Furthermore, these results support previous findings of in vivo investigations on collagenase induction by UV-A but not wIRA and show that infrared-A with appropriate irradiances does not seem to be involved in MMP-1 mediated photoaging of the skin. As suggested by previously published studies wIRA could even be implicated in a protective manner.
Gebbers
Narcisa
N
Orthopedic Cell Therapy Unit, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hirt-Burri
Nathalie
N
Scaletta
Corinne
C
Hoffmann
Gerd
G
Applegate
Lee Ann
LA
J Invest Dermatol. 1998 Oct;111(4):629-33
9764844
J Biol Chem. 1993 Jul 15;268(20):14678-81
8325845
Cancer Res. 1990 Feb 1;50(3):637-41
2297704
Exp Dermatol. 2006 Feb;15(2):130-7
16433685
Ger Med Sci. 2008 Oct 21;6:Doc11
19675738
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2003 Oct;19(5):228-34
14535893
Mech Ageing Dev. 2006 Dec;127(12):875-82
17067654
Ger Med Sci. 2008 Jul 21;6:Doc08
19675735
Exp Dermatol. 2006 Sep;15(9):692-704
16881966
Ger Med Sci. 2005 Mar 04;3:Doc01
19675718
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2001 Dec;17(6):261-5
11722751
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2000 May-Jun;204(3):85-92
10909163
J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Dec;123(6):1012-9
15610507
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994;345:181-8
8079706
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1995;32(4):299-304
8608608
Ger Med Sci. 2006 Jul 11;4:Doc05
19675696
Toxicol Lett. 2001 Apr 8;121(1):57-61
11312037
J Invest Dermatol. 2001 Dec;117(6):1437-41
11886505
Int J Mol Med. 1999 May;3(5):467-72
10202176
Br J Surg. 2006 Aug;93(8):952-60
16845694
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 5;102(14):5050-5
15790680
Mech Ageing Dev. 2005 Nov;126(11):1170-7
16118013
Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Oct 15;140(8):691-9
7942771
Adv Wound Care. 1999 Jan-Feb;12(1):35-40
10326355
Photochem Photobiol. 1996 Apr;63(4):410-2
8934751
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16024-8
12456879
J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Nov;123(5):823-31
15482467
Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(3):274-81
11573231
Int J Mol Med. 2000 Mar;5(3):247-51
10677564
J Invest Dermatol. 2002 Dec;119(6):1323-9
12485435
J Invest Dermatol. 1998 Jul;111(1):159-63
9665404
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
11846609
Biol Chem. 2007 Jun;388(6):583-92
17552905
Free Radic Biol Med. 2007 Jul 1;43(1):128-35
17561101
Arch Dermatol Res. 1982;272(3-4):229-38
7165330
J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Oct;127(10):2328-35
17508023
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1994 Jun;10(3):126-33
7947192
Free Radic Biol Med. 2002 Jun 15;32(12):1293-303
12057767
J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(3):493-502
1860881
Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(3):227-36
11295757
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1994;27(3):262-71
8020111
Ger Med Sci. 2004 Oct 29;2:Doc08
19675691
Arch Dermatol Res. 1992;284(2):92-4
1610218
Photochem Photobiol. 1996 Apr;63(4):375-7
8934740
N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 13;337(20):1419-28
9358139
J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Aug;123(2):354-60
15245436
Pain. 2006 Sep;124(1-2):201-10
16806710