Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on-line responses to a sudden change in target position.
Goal-directed movements are executed under the permanent supervision of the central nervous system, which continuously processes sensory afferents and triggers on-line corrections if movement accuracy seems to be compromised. For arm reaching movements, visual information about the hand plays an important role in this supervision, notably improving reaching accuracy. Here, we tested whether visual feedback of the hand affects the latency of on-line responses to an external perturbation when reaching for a visual target. Two types of perturbation were used: visual perturbation consisted in changing the spatial location of the target and kinesthetic perturbation in applying a force step to the reaching arm. For both types of perturbation, the hand trajectory and the electromyographic (EMG) activity of shoulder muscles were analysed to assess whether visual feedback of the hand speeds up on-line corrections. Without visual feedback of the hand, on-line responses to visual perturbation exhibited the longest latency. This latency was reduced by about 10% when visual feedback of the hand was provided. On the other hand, the latency of on-line responses to kinesthetic perturbation was independent of the availability of visual feedback of the hand. In a control experiment, we tested the effect of visual feedback of the hand on visual and kinesthetic two-choice reaction times--for which coordinate transformation is not critical. Two-choice reaction times were never facilitated by visual feedback of the hand. Taken together, our results suggest that visual feedback of the hand speeds up on-line corrections when the position of the visual target with respect to the body must be re-computed during movement execution. This facilitation probably results from the possibility to map hand- and target-related information in a common visual reference frame.
Reichenbach
Alexandra
A
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Thielscher
Axel
A
Peer
Angelika
A
Bülthoff
Heinrich H
HH
Bresciani
Jean-Pierre
JP
D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D003491:Cybernetics; D004576:Electromyography; D006804:Ergonomics; D056228:Feedback, Sensory; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand; D006801:Humans; D007699:Kinesthesis / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008959:Models, Neurological; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
Percept Psychophys. 2004 May;66(4):535-44
15311654
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Aug;157(4):468-71
15007583
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Oct;7(5):1019-30
6457106
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003 Jun;28(2):81-91
12827987
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Aug;151(4):524-35
12830346
J Exp Psychol. 1969 Jun;80(3):567-9
5786157
Psychol Rev. 1973 Nov;80(6):489-509
4757060
J Physiol. 2007 Sep 15;583(Pt 3):1107-15
17656434
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jun;93(6):3200-13
15659526
Exp Brain Res. 1986;62(2):303-11
3709715
J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 26;26(30):7791-810
16870725
Nature. 1986 Apr 24-30;320(6064):748-50
3703000
J Exp Psychol. 1962 Mar;63:289-93
13906889
J Physiol. 1987 Jul;388:397-419
3079553
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Aug;5(4):497-503
7488852
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Oct;146(4):451-9
12355273
J Physiol. 1982 May;326:65-77
7108809
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Apr;125(4):410-6
10323286
J Neurosci. 2003 Aug 6;23(18):6982-92
12904459
Brain. 1981 Mar;104(Pt 1):167-86
7470841
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct;84(4):2175-80
11024106
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):423-431
11058820
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jan;130(2):159-68
10672469
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;109(5):397-401
9851296
J Neurophysiol. 1976 Sep;39(5):925-35
978238
Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;108(2):115-23
15455794
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Oct;158(3):385-90
15316706
Exp Brain Res. 1993;93(2):324-31
8491271
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jul;3(7):729-36
10862707
Exp Brain Res. 1990;81(2):303-12
2397758
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jan;176(2):267-80
16896981
J Neurophysiol. 1983 Feb;49(2):548-64
6834087
Nature. 1980 May 22;285(5762):227
7374773
Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1948 Oct;1(Pt. 2):85-103
18102699
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Apr;8(4):490-7
15793578
Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1880-2
7569931
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Oct;152(3):341-52
12904935
Vision Res. 1969 Oct;9(10):1247-58
5360604
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;79(6):3272-8
9636126
J Neurosci. 2004 Mar 31;24(13):3223-34
15056701
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1995 Nov;90(1-3):333-48
8525875
J Mot Behav. 2000 Sep;32(3):277-86
10975275
J Neurophysiol. 1992 Feb;67(2):455-69
1569469
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):96-107
11690606
J Exp Psychol. 1968 May;77(1):14-8
5663585
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:303-30
9056716
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1026-31
10526344
PLoS One. 2007 Dec 19;2(12):e1336
18092002
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006 Jun;16(3):236-49
16111896
Neuron. 1998 Jan;20(1):15-24
9459438
J Mot Behav. 1994 Sep;26(3):283-95
15757844
J Neurophysiol. 1990 Jan;63(1):161-72
2299380
Brain. 2001 Sep;124(Pt 9):1832-40
11522585
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):111-2
14745452
Percept Psychophys. 1983 Aug;34(2):161-8
6634374
J Neurosci. 2002 Feb 1;22(3):1108-13
11826139
Brain Res Bull. 2006 Apr 28;69(4):404-15
16624672
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;81(3):1355-64
10085361
Curr Biol. 2002 May 14;12(10):834-7
12015120