The effect of victim information on causality judgments in a rape trial scenario.
D. M. Rempala and F. B. Bernieri (2005) showed that in a date-rape trial scenario, increasing the amount of neutral, nondiagnostic information (i.e., information unrelated to the case) about the rape victim decreases the percentage of guilt verdicts. The authors attempted to determine the causal mechanism for this phenomenon. Participants read 1 of 4 rape trial scenarios (which differed only in the amount of non diagnostic information about the defendant and victim), then provided a verdict and rated the targets on several dimensions. The authors replicated pattern of guilt verdicts in the Rempala and Bernieri study (p < .05), and a path analysis indicated that increased victim information altered causality judgments, which then affected guilt verdicts.
Rempala
Daniel M
DM
University of Hawaii, Department of Psychology, Honolulu, HI 96822-2216, USA. rempala@hawaii.edu
Geers
Andrew L
AL
D000328:Adult; D003380:Courtship; D019548:Crime Victims / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D003657:Decision Making; D004645:Empathy; D005260:Female; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D009820:Ohio; D011902:Rape / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012737:Sex Factors; D013334:Students; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014495:Universities; D055815:Young Adult