title: Qualia: the geometry of integrated information.
abstract: According to the integrated information theory, the quantity of consciousness is the amount of integrated information generated by a complex of elements, and the quality of experience is specified by the informational relationships it generates. This paper outlines a framework for characterizing the informational relationships generated by such systems. Qualia space (Q) is a space having an axis for each possible state (activity pattern) of a complex. Within Q, each submechanism specifies a point corresponding to a repertoire of system states. Arrows between repertoires in Q define informational relationships. Together, these arrows specify a quale -- a shape that completely and univocally characterizes the quality of a conscious experience. Phi -- the height of this shape -- is the quantity of consciousness associated with the experience. Entanglement measures how irreducible informational relationships are to their component relationships, specifying concepts and modes. Several corollaries follow from these premises. The quale is determined by both the mechanism and state of the system. Thus, two different systems having identical activity patterns may generate different qualia. Conversely, the same quale may be generated by two systems that differ in both activity and connectivity. Both active and inactive elements specify a quale, but elements that are inactivated do not. Also, the activation of an element affects experience by changing the shape of the quale. The subdivision of experience into modalities and submodalities corresponds to subshapes in Q. In principle, different aspects of experience may be classified as different shapes in Q, and the similarity between experiences reduces to similarities between shapes. Finally, specific qualities, such as the "redness" of red, while generated by a local mechanism, cannot be reduced to it, but require considering the entire quale. Ultimately, the present framework may offer a principled way for translating qualitative properties of experience into mathematics.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Balduzzi
authors.forename: Giulio
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Tononi
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001185:Artificial Intelligence; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D003243:Consciousness; D016208:Databases, Factual; D007257:Information Theory; D008962:Models, Theoretical
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1984 Jan;4(1):309-56
references.pmid: 6198495
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):1-37
references.pmid: 11164022
references.citation: Science. 1961 Jun 2;133(3466):1749-57
references.pmid: 17829720
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Oct 27;2(10):e144
references.pmid: 17069456
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 16;93(8):3422-7
references.pmid: 8622951
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000211
references.pmid: 18989391
references.citation: J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jul-Sep;100(1-3):70-87
references.pmid: 17097864
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 16;96(6):3257-62
references.pmid: 10077671
references.citation: Neural Comput. 2002 Oct;14(10):2269-316
references.pmid: 12396564
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1019-25
references.pmid: 10526343
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Feb;6(2):119-26
references.pmid: 12555104
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003 Jul;20(7):1434-48
references.pmid: 12868647
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Aug;24(4):629-40; discussion 652-791
references.pmid: 12048947
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Jun;24(3):453-76; discussion 476-509
references.pmid: 11682799
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(6):661-73
references.pmid: 6084824
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Jul 15;41(4):1293-312
references.pmid: 18485744
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:57-87
references.pmid: 15709929
references.citation: Cortex. 2007 Aug;43(6):750-7
references.pmid: 17710826
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 1991 Jan-Feb;1(1):1-47
references.pmid: 1822724
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1954 May;61(3):183-93
references.pmid: 13167245
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr;12(4):163-9
references.pmid: 18329323
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Jun 13;4(6):e1000091
references.pmid: 18551165
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1273-302
references.pmid: 12948688
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Jun 23;435(7045):1102-7
references.pmid: 15973409
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Aug;21(4):449-67; discussion 467-98
references.pmid: 10097019
references.citation: BMC Neurosci. 2004 Nov 02;5:42
references.pmid: 15522121
references.citation: Neuroinformatics. 2004;2(2):175-82
references.pmid: 15319515
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):39-88
references.pmid: 11164023
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 23;23(16):6520-8
references.pmid: 12878693
references.citation: Neural Netw. 2000 Oct-Nov;13(8-9):861-70
references.pmid: 11156197
references.citation: Neural Netw. 2003 Nov;16(9):1325-52
references.pmid: 14622888
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul;10(7):319-26
references.pmid: 16807063