title: Perceptual and neural pliability of odor objects.
abstract: A key function of the sense of smell is to guide organisms towards rewards and away from dangers. However, because relatively few volatile chemicals in the environment carry intrinsic biological value, the meaning of an odor often needs to be acquired through learning and experience. The tremendous perceptual and neural plasticity of the olfactory system provides a design that is ideal for the establishment of links between odor cues and behaviorally relevant events, promoting appropriate adaptive responses to foods, friends, foes, and mates. This article describes recent human neuroimaging data showing the dynamic effects of olfactory perceptual learning and aversive conditioning on the behavioral discrimination of odor objects, with parallel plasticity and reorganization in the posterior piriform and orbitofrontal cortices. The findings presented here highlight the important role of experience in shaping odor object perception and in ensuring the human sense of smell achieves its full perceptual potential.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Cognitive Neurology & Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. j-gottfried@northwestern.edu
authors.forename: Jay A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Gottfried
authors.forename: Keng Nei
authors.initials: KN
authors.lastname: Wu
mesh_terms: D001362:Avoidance Learning; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D009473:Neuronal Plasticity; D009812:Odorants; D055696:Olfactory Perception; D012683:Sensory Deprivation
references.citation: Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1994 Jan;19(1):146-60
references.pmid: 8167658
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Mar;5(3):199-200
references.pmid: 11865309
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 May 19;46(4):671-9
references.pmid: 15944134
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1975 Oct;13(4):221-6
references.pmid: 1191163
references.citation: Neuron. 2000 Jun;26(3):735-45
references.pmid: 10896168
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 1988 Oct;102(5):740-7
references.pmid: 3196442
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Mar;13(3):506-19
references.pmid: 11170816
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2000 Jan;83(1):139-45
references.pmid: 10634860
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Oct 24;419(6909):802
references.pmid: 12397347
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Dec;44(6):532-40
references.pmid: 3200672
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jan;99(1):386-93
references.pmid: 17959740
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1990 Oct;10(10):3402-12
references.pmid: 1976769
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1984 Mar;32(3):489-502
references.pmid: 6463130
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 Dec 21;52(6):1097-108
references.pmid: 17178411
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2000 Dec;84(6):3036-42
references.pmid: 11110830
references.citation: Dev Psychobiol. 1995 May;28(4):213-9
references.pmid: 7621984
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2007 Jan 03;14(1-2):1-16
references.pmid: 17202426
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 1985 Oct;99(5):964-78
references.pmid: 3843313
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 May;16(2):391-7
references.pmid: 2142207
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1995 Oct;57(7):1002-11
references.pmid: 8532490
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 15;21(24):9837-43
references.pmid: 11739591
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Dec;1121:102-20
references.pmid: 17846157
references.citation: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(4):205-11
references.pmid: 10867835
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 13;26(37):9548-59
references.pmid: 16971539
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 Feb 2;49(3):467-79
references.pmid: 16446149
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):523-34
references.pmid: 16791142
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2001 Nov;79(2):309-20
references.pmid: 11712849
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Dec;38(4):649-62
references.pmid: 17804260
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Aug;74(2):733-50
references.pmid: 7472378
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jul;90(1):65-72
references.pmid: 12660351
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 Jan 14;24(2):389-97
references.pmid: 14724237
references.citation: Dev Psychobiol. 1999 Sep;35(2):103-7
references.pmid: 10461124
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1996 Fall;109(3):335-51
references.pmid: 8837406
references.citation: Perception. 2001;30(3):381-91
references.pmid: 11374206
references.citation: Brain. 2002 Jan;125(Pt 1):86-101
references.pmid: 11834595
references.citation: Science. 2008 Mar 28;319(5871):1842-5
references.pmid: 18369149
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 10;103(41):15206-11
references.pmid: 17005727
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1995 Dec 25;363(4):615-641
references.pmid: 8847421
references.citation: Brain Res. 1981 Sep 21;221(1):81-107
references.pmid: 7272762
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(20):7976-8
references.pmid: 2813372
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2006 Oct;31(8):705-11
references.pmid: 16844768
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 1993 Nov 26;163(1):36-40
references.pmid: 8295728
references.citation: Behav Neural Biol. 1994 Jan;61(1):1-18
references.pmid: 7907468