title: Phytochrome a function in red light sensing.
abstract: Light signals perceived by the phytochrome family of red (R) and far-red (FR) light-absorbing photoreceptors direct plant growth and development throughout their lifecycle. In contrast to other family members, phyA displays rapid light-induced proteolytic degradation upon conversion to the biologically active Pfr form and mediates high irradiance responses to continuous FR. These unique properties together with limited examples of phyA function in R have resulted in an over-simplified portrayal of phyA as a FR sensor which acts predominantly in seed germination and early stages of seedling de-etiolation. In a recent work, published in The Plant Journal, we report significant phyA activity in Arabidopsis thaliana at high (>100 micromolm(-2)s(-1)) photon irradiances of R. Under these conditions, we observed retarded degradation of a pool of nuclear-localised phyA, consistent with the phenomenon of photoprotection, and showed phyBphyCphyDphyE quadruple null mutants, containing only functional phyA, to de-etiolate and survive to flowering. The photon irradiances used in this study were greater than those routinely used for photomorphogenic analysis in the laboratory but considerably lower than those commonly observed in daylight. In this addendum we present additional analyses of the phyBphyCphyDphyE mutant and discuss the possibility that phyA may perform a significant role in the growth and development of daylight-grown plants.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology; University of Leicester; Leicester, UK.
authors.forename: Keara A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Franklin
authors.forename: Garry C
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: Whitelam
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1993 Jul;5(7):757-68
references.pmid: 8364355
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1996 Jan;110(1):155-62
references.pmid: 8587979
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Mar;131(3):1340-6
references.pmid: 12644683
references.citation: Plant J. 2003 Mar;33(5):875-85
references.pmid: 12609029
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1994 May;105(1):141-149
references.pmid: 12232194
references.citation: Plant J. 2006 Dec;48(5):728-42
references.pmid: 17076805
references.citation: Planta. 1988 Oct;175(4):471-7
references.pmid: 24221928
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1998 Sep;118(1):19-25
references.pmid: 9733522
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1998 Sep;10(9):1479-87
references.pmid: 9724694
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Apr;131(4):1913-20
references.pmid: 12692350
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1999 Dec;121(4):1207-16
references.pmid: 10594107
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1993 Feb;5(2):147-57
references.pmid: 8453299
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Mar;131(3):1411-7
references.pmid: 12644690
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1998 Sep;118(1):27-35
references.pmid: 9733523
references.citation: Planta. 1972 Dec;107(4):341-50
references.pmid: 24477483
references.citation: Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49(5-6):653-64
references.pmid: 16096972
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Dec 11;426(6967):680-3
references.pmid: 14668869