Whole shaft visibility and mechanical performance for active MR catheters using copper-nitinol braided polymer tubes.
BACKGROUND
Catheter visualization and tracking remains a challenge in interventional MR.Active guidewires can be made conspicuous in "profile" along their whole shaft exploiting metallic core wire and hypotube components that are intrinsic to their mechanical performance. Polymer-based catheters, on the other hand, offer no conductive medium to carry radio frequency waves. We developed a new "active" catheter design for interventional MR with mechanical performance resembling braided X-ray devices. Our 75 cm long hybrid catheter shaft incorporates a wire lattice in a polymer matrix, and contains three distal loop coils in a flexible and torquable 7Fr device. We explored the impact of braid material designs on radiofrequency and mechanical performance.


RESULTS
The incorporation of copper wire into in a superelastic nitinol braided loopless antenna allowed good visualization of the whole shaft (70 cm) in vitro and in vivo in swine during real-time MR with 1.5 T scanner. Additional distal tip coils enhanced tip visibility. Increasing the copper:nitinol ratio in braiding configurations improved flexibility at the expense of torquability. We found a 16-wire braid of 1:1 copper:nitinol to have the optimum balance of mechanical (trackability, flexibility, torquability) and antenna (signal attenuation) properties. With this configuration, the temperature increase remained less than 2 degrees C during real-time MR within 10 cm horizontal from the isocenter. The design was conspicuous in vitro and in vivo.


CONCLUSIONS
We have engineered a new loopless antenna configuration that imparts interventional MR catheters with satisfactory mechanical and imaging characteristics. This compact loopless antenna design can be generalized to visualize the whole shaft of any general-purpose polymer catheter to perform safe interventional procedures.
Kocaturk
Ozgur
O
Translational Medicine Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. kocaturko@nhlbi.nih.gov
Saikus
Christina E
CE
Guttman
Michael A
MA
Faranesh
Anthony Z
AZ
Ratnayaka
Kanishka
K
Ozturk
Cengizhan
C
McVeigh
Elliot R
ER
Lederman
Robert J
RJ
D000497:Alloys; D000818:Animals; D001011:Aorta / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D002406:Catheterization, Peripheral / Q000295:instrumentation*; D003300:Copper; D004867:Equipment Design; D005263:Femoral Artery / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D053783:Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional / Q000295:instrumentation*; D008422:Materials Testing; D023421:Models, Animal; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D018583:Pliability; D011108:Polymers; D013348:Subclavian Artery / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D013552:Swine; D013696:Temperature; D019415:Torque
D000497:Alloys; D011108:Polymers; C013616:nitinol; D003300:Copper
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Mar;64(3):265-74
15736247
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jun;51(6):1163-72
15170836
Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):489-96
16436813
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Feb;53(2):446-55
15678524
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004 Jul 15;70(1):73-81
15199586
Magn Reson Med. 1993 Mar;29(3):411-5
8450752
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Nov;18(5):621-6
14579407
Lancet. 2003 Dec 6;362(9399):1877-82
14667742
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Oct;12(4):616-22
11042645
Magn Reson Med. 1996 Dec;36(6):816-20
8946346
Circulation. 2008 Jul 15;118(3):223-9
18574048
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Oct;12(4):590-4
11042641
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Mar;57(3):475-84
17326177
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Feb;27(2):326-38
18219686
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 May;17(5):620-4
12720274
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Aug;26(2):386-91
17610285
Invest Radiol. 1990 Dec;25(12):1325-32
2279913
Circulation. 2006 Feb 28;113(8):1093-100
16490822
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Sep;52(3):693-7
15334594
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Feb;27(2):267-75
18219681
Magn Reson Med. 2002 Dec;48(6):1096-8
12465125
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Jul;14(1):56-62
11436215
Magn Reson Med. 1997 Jan;37(1):112-8
8978639
Circulation. 2005 Aug 2;112(5):699-706
16043639
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1224-31
18046701
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;26(6):1429-35
17968897
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Jun;49(6):1163-74
12768595
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Jan;45(1):138-46
11146495
Radiology. 2001 May;219(2):527-34
11323483
Magn Reson Med. 2004 May;51(5):988-95
15122681
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Oct;12(4):632-8
11042647
Magn Reson Med. 2000 Jul;44(1):56-65
10893522
Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):558-62
15591432
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Oct;16(5):369-81
16924170
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jul 7;53(13):N249-57
18562781
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Apr;51(4):655-60
15065236
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;2004:1048-51
17271862
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Dec;54(6):1439-47
16261576
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Jun;57(6):1140-7
17534914