Effects of physical guidance on short-term learning of walking on a narrow beam.
Physical guidance is often used in rehabilitation when teaching patients to re-learn movements. However, the effects of guidance on motor learning of complex skills, such as walking balance, are not clear. We tested four groups of healthy subjects that practiced walking on a narrow (1.27 cm) or wide (2.5 cm) treadmill-mounted balance beam, with or without physical guidance. Assistance was given by springs attached to a hip belt that applied restoring forces towards beam center. Subjects were evaluated while walking unassisted before and after training by calculating the number of times subjects stepped off of the beam per minute of successful walking on the beam (Failures per Minute). Subjects in Unassisted groups had greater performance improvements in walking balance from pre to post compared to subjects in Assisted groups. During training, Unassisted groups had more Failures per Minute than Assisted groups. Performance improvements were smaller in Narrow Beam groups than in Wide Beam groups. The Unassisted-Wide and Assisted-Narrow groups had similar Failures per Minute during training, but the Unassisted-Wide group had much greater performance gains after training. These results suggest that physical assistance can hinder motor learning of walking balance, assistance appears less detrimental for more difficult tasks, and task-specific dynamics are important to learning independent of error experience.
Domingo
Antoinette
A
School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2214, USA. adomingo@umich.edu
Ferris
Daniel P
DP
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000534:rehabilitation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D009989:Orthotic Devices; D004856:Postural Balance / Q000502:physiology; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):971-85
11495965
Age Ageing. 1988 Nov;17(6):365-72
3266440
J Mot Behav. 1998 Dec;30(4):367-80
20037040
Gait Posture. 2004 Jun;19(3):252-62
15125914
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;82(7):511-6
12819538
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 Apr;44(3):557-75
1631322
Neural Comput. 2004 Sep;16(9):1873-86
15265326
Nature. 2000 Oct 12;407(6805):742-7
11048720
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Jan;48(1):42-50
10642020
Phys Ther. 2000 Jul;80(7):688-700
10869131
Neurology. 2006 Feb 28;66(4):484-93
16505299
Science. 1988 Nov 4;242(4879):728-35
3055293
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006 Aug 31;3:20
16945148
Gait Posture. 2009 Jan;29(1):59-64
18755590
J Biomech. 2000 Nov;33(11):1433-40
10940402
J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):212-24
15130871
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;32(1):32-8
18463553
Ann Neurol. 1995 May;37(5):574-82
7755351
J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;10(1 Suppl):S90-4
10835834
J Biomech. 2004 Jun;37(6):827-35
15111070
Spinal Cord. 1998 Nov;36(11):744-9
9848480
J Biomech. 2008;41(6):1317-23
18353335