In vivo fate tracing studies of mammalian taste cell progenitors.
In mammals, the homogeneous lingual epithelium in the process of development forms specialized placodal cells that undergo a series of morphogenetic changes to form a papilla. Taste buds appear in the papillary epithelium around birth and thus papillae serve to house the taste buds in the adult. However, evidence for a precise lineage relationship between a putative embryonic taste progenitor population and functional adult taste buds has so far been elusive and is primarily indirect. Also, mammalian taste papillae are reminiscent of epithelial appendages suggesting that the mesenchymal tissue of the papillae could be involved in the formation of these lingual structures. These major questions in the field of mammalian taste development have remained unanswered due to lack of fate mapping studies that would label embryonic cell populations and remain indelibly marked in the adult. Taking advantage of a genetic fate mapping approach to label cell populations both in the lingual epithelium and mesenchyme and following their fate during development would be an ideal way to assess each of these tissues contribution in taste bud formation. Fate mapping studies using tissue specific cre strains crossed with reporter alleles would uncover unique features in the formation of these specialized sensory cells and also provide us with an in vivo model system for taste organ specific experimental manipulations during development.
Thirumangalathu
Shoba
S
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology and the Rocky Mountain Taste & Smell Center, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA. shoba.thirumangalathu@ucdenver.edu
Barlow
Linda A
LA
D000818:Animals; D019070:Cell Lineage; D008322:Mammals; D013234:Stem Cells / Q000166:cytology*; D013650:Taste Buds / Q000166:cytology* / Q000196:embryology
J Comp Neurol. 1997 Jan 20;377(3):324-40
8989649
J Comp Neurol. 2003 Mar 3;457(2):111-22
12541313
Arch Histol Cytol. 2006 Dec;69(4):199-208
17287575
Dev Dyn. 2008 Sep;237(9):2378-93
18729215
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 13;104(7):2253-8
17284610
Cell. 2004 Aug 20;118(4):517-28
15315763
Dev Biol. 2004 Dec 15;276(2):280-300
15581865
Chem Senses. 1994 Dec;19(6):725-35
7735850
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 14;92(6):1916-20
7892199
Dev Dyn. 2006 Sep;235(9):2376-85
16871622
J Comp Neurol. 2008 Jul 10;509(2):211-24
18465790
Dev Biol. 2006 Sep 1;297(1):198-213
16828469
J Neurosci. 1992 Apr;12(4):1127-34
1348270
Curr Biol. 1998 May 21;8(11):665-8
9635195
Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2004 Jun;72(2):200-12
15269893
Chem Senses. 1997 Oct;22(5):535-45
9363353
Science. 1983 Apr 15;220(4594):268-73
17732898
J Comp Neurol. 1999 Apr 5;406(2):143-55
10096602
Chem Senses. 2005 Jan;30 Suppl 1:i54-5
15738192
Dev Biol. 2003 Feb 1;254(1):1-18
12606278
Dev Biol. 2003 Mar 15;255(2):263-77
12648489
Nat Genet. 2007 Jan;39(1):106-12
17128274
Cell Tissue Res. 2001 Jan;303(1):35-45
11236003
Development. 1997 Mar;124(5):949-57
9056771
Differentiation. 1995 Oct;59(3):155-62
7589899
Nat Genet. 1999 Jan;21(1):70-1
9916792
J Comp Neurol. 1991 Feb 8;304(2):172-86
2016415