Use of computational fluid dynamics to study forces exerted on prey by aquatic suction feeders.
Suction feeding is the most commonly used mechanism of prey capture among aquatic vertebrates. Most previous models of the fluid flow caused by suction feeders involve making several untested assumptions. In this paper, a Chimera overset grids approach is used to solve the governing equations of fluid dynamics in order to investigate the assumptions that prey do not interact with the flow and that the flow can be modelled as a one-dimensional flow. Results show that, for small prey, both neglecting the prey and considering prey interaction give similar calculated forces exerted on the prey. However, as the prey item increases in size toward the size of the gape, its effect on the flow becomes more pronounced. This in turn affects both the magnitude of the hydrodynamic forces imparted to the prey and the time when maximum force is delivered. Maximum force is delivered most quickly to intermediate sized prey, about one-third of mouth diameter, and most slowly to prey less than 7 per cent or greater than 67 per cent of mouth diameter. This suggests that the effect of prey size on the timing of suction forces may have substantial consequences for the feeding ecology of suction feeders that are known to prefer prey between 25 and 50 per cent of mouth diameter. Moreover, for a 15 cm fish with a 15 mm gape, assuming a radial one-dimensional flow field can result in underestimating the maximum force exerted on a 5 mm diameter spherical prey 1 gape distance from the mouth by up to 28.7 per cent.
Skorczewski
Tyler
T
Graduate Group in Applied Mathematics, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. tskorc@math.ucdavis.edu
Cheer
Angela
A
Cheung
Samson
S
Wainwright
Peter C
PC
D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D049628:Body Size; D003198:Computer Simulation; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005399:Fishes / Q000502:physiology*; D009055:Mouth / Q000502:physiology; D011235:Predatory Behavior
J Exp Biol. 2005 Jul;208(Pt 14):2661-71
16000536
J R Soc Interface. 2008 Nov 6;5(28):1309-16
18397864
J R Soc Interface. 2008 Dec 6;5(29):1445-57
18544504
J Exp Biol. 2006 Jul;209(Pt 14):2713-25
16809462
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 29;358(1437):1535-42
14561344
Integr Comp Biol. 2007 Jul;47(1):96-106
21672823
J R Soc Interface. 2008 Nov 6;5(28):1291-301
18430640
J Exp Biol. 2008 Aug;211(Pt 16):2658-68
18689419
J Exp Biol. 2007 Oct;210(Pt 19):3328-36
17872986
Zoology (Jena). 2003;106(2):159-68
16351901
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2002 Nov-Dec;75(6):532-43
12601610
J R Soc Interface. 2007 Jun 22;4(14):553-60
17251163
J R Soc Interface. 2009 Feb 6;6(31):149-58
18782720