title: Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision.
abstract: Previous studies have shown that the spatial extent of crowding in peripheral vision is reduced when a target letter and its flanking letters have opposite contrast polarity. We have examined if this reduction in crowding leads to improved reading performance. We compared the spatial extent of crowding, visual-span profiles (plots of letter-recognition accuracy versus letter position), and reading speed at 10 degrees inferior visual field, using white letters, black letters, or mixtures of white and black letters, presented on a mid-gray background. Consistent with previous studies, the spatial extent of crowding was reduced when the target and flanking letters had opposite contrast polarity. However, using mixed contrast polarity did not lead to improvements in visual-span profiles or reading speed.
authors.affiliation: School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. s.chung@berkeley.edu
authors.forename: Susana T L
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Chung
authors.forename: J Stephen
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Mansfield
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D005364:Field Dependence-Independence; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011594:Psychometrics; D011601:Psychophysics; D011932:Reading; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001 Mar;41(6):725-43
references.pmid: 11248262
references.citation: J Vis. 2002;2(2):167-77
references.pmid: 12678590
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Nov 26;7(2):24.1-11
references.pmid: 18217839
references.citation: Vision Res. 1992 Jul;32(7):1349-57
references.pmid: 1455707
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Jul;37(8):1492-501
references.pmid: 8675391
references.citation: J Vis. 2004 Dec 30;4(12):1136-69
references.pmid: 15669917
references.citation: Vision Res. 1975 Oct;15:1137-41
references.pmid: 1166614
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(9):1059-67
references.pmid: 10738065
references.citation: Vision Res. 2009 Jul;49(15):1948-60
references.pmid: 19460396
references.citation: Vision Res. 1993 Mar;33(4):539-52
references.pmid: 8503200
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001 Jun;41(14):1833-50
references.pmid: 11369047
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(5):635-54
references.pmid: 18226828
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Sep 26;383(6598):334-7
references.pmid: 8848045
references.citation: Vision Res. 1996 Sep;36(17):2665-74
references.pmid: 8917753
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(4):365-70
references.pmid: 10820616
references.citation: Perception. 1990;19(2):207-21
references.pmid: 2235288
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(25):3150-9
references.pmid: 17928026
references.citation: Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8
references.pmid: 5437004
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Mar;44(7):695-709
references.pmid: 14751554
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2000 Sep;17(9):1516-24
references.pmid: 10975361
references.citation: Vision Res. 1979;19(11):1187-95
references.pmid: 550578
references.citation: Vision Res. 1976 Jan;16(1):71-8
references.pmid: 1258390
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Mar 27;7(2):11.1-13
references.pmid: 18217826
references.citation: Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Nov;80(11):749-52
references.pmid: 14627941
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216
references.pmid: 11689021
references.citation: Vision Res. 1985;25(2):253-65
references.pmid: 4013092
references.citation: Vision Res. 1994 Jul;34(13):1723-33
references.pmid: 7941378
references.citation: J Vis. 2005 Feb 04;5(1):58-70
references.pmid: 15831067
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1995 Jul;12(7):1417-24
references.pmid: 7608786
references.citation: Vision Res. 1985;25(7):963-77
references.pmid: 4049746
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Mar 07;7(2):9.1-15
references.pmid: 18217824
references.citation: Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Nov;80(11):745-8
references.pmid: 14627940
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1994;8(2):255-79
references.pmid: 7993878
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 Jul;4(7):1304-13
references.pmid: 3625321
references.citation: Vision Res. 1992 May;32(5):895-902
references.pmid: 1604858
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Oct 26;7(2):20.1-36
references.pmid: 18217835
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am. 1976 Apr;66(4):332-8
references.pmid: 1262981
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Apr;43(4):1270-6
references.pmid: 11923275
references.citation: Vision Res. 2002 Sep;42(20):2357-69
references.pmid: 12350424
references.citation: Vision Res. 1978;18(3):335-8
references.pmid: 664307
references.citation: Vision Res. 1996 Feb;36(4):573-88
references.pmid: 8855002
references.citation: Vision Res. 1998 Oct;38(19):2949-62
references.pmid: 9797990
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Feb 01;7(2):2.1-10
references.pmid: 18217817
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am. 1963 Sep;53:1026-32
references.pmid: 14065335