Validation and comparison of two frailty indexes: The MOBILIZE Boston Study.
OBJECTIVE
To validate two established frailty indexes and compare their ability to predict adverse outcomes in a diverse, elderly, community-dwelling sample of men and women.


METHODS
Prospective observational study.


METHODS
A diverse defined geographic area of Boston.


METHODS
Seven hundred sixty-five community-dwelling participants in the Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly Boston Study.


METHODS
Two published frailty indexes, recurrent falls, disability, overnight hospitalization, emergency department (ED) visits, chronic medical conditions, self-reported health, physical function, cognitive ability (including executive function), and depression. One index was developed from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) and the other from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS).


RESULTS
The SOF frailty index classified 77.1% as robust, 18.7% as prefrail, and 4.2% as frail. The CHS frailty index classified 51.2% as robust, 38.8% as prefrail, and 10.0% as frail. Both frailty indexes (SOF; CHS) were similar in their ability to predict key geriatric outcomes such as recurrent falls (hazard ratio (HR)(frail)=2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.2-4.0; HR(frail)=1.9, 95% CI=1.2-3.1), overnight hospitalization (odds ratio (OR)(frail)=3.5, 95% CI=1.5-8.0; OR(frail)=4.4, 95% CI=2.4-8.2), ED visits (OR(frail)=3.5, 95% CI=1.4,8.8; OR(frail)=3.1, 95% CI=1.6-5.9), and disability (OR(frail)=5.4, 95% CI=2.3-12.3; OR(frail)=7.7, 95% CI=4.0-14.7), as well as chronic medical conditions, physical function, cognitive ability, and depression.


CONCLUSIONS
Two established frailty indexes were validated using an independent elderly sample of diverse men and women; both indexes were good at distinguishing geriatric conditions and predicting recurrent falls, overnight hospitalization, and ED visits according to level of frailty. Although both indexes are good measures of frailty, the simpler SOF index may be easier and more practical in a clinical setting.
Kiely
Dan K
DK
Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, 1200 Centre St, Boston, MA 02131, USA. kiely@hrca.harvard.edu
Cupples
L Adrienne
LA
Lipsitz
Lewis A
LA
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001900:Boston; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000453:epidemiology; D015897:Comorbidity; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D016330:Frail Elderly; D015577:Geriatric Assessment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D057187:Independent Living; D007360:Intelligence; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D004856:Postural Balance; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9
14044222
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Feb 25;168(4):382-9
18299493
Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86
5349366
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Mar;59(3):255-63
15031310
Am J Med. 2005 Nov;118(11):1225-31
16271906
J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94
8126356
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 May;64(5):588-94
9598672
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Mar;61(3):262-6
16567375
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Aug;53(8):1321-30
16078957
J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49
7183759
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Oct;51(10):1439-44
14511165
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Sep;56(9):1744-9
18662198
N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 2;332(9):556-61
7838189
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Apr;55(4):M221-31
10811152
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;15(6):548-61
10861923
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999 Sep;54(5):P328-33
10542825
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Jul;62(7):744-51
17634322
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
1202204
J Clin Neuropsychol. 1981 May;3(1):53-63
7276196
Clin Neuropsychol. 1999 Aug;13(3):348-58
10726605
BMC Geriatr. 2008 Jul 18;8:16
18638389
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):153-62
8437031
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005 Dec;17(6):465-71
16485864
J Neurol Sci. 1969 Jul-Aug;9(1):39-48
5820858
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56
11253156
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Aug;55(8):1216-23
17661960
Neuropsychologia. 1974 Jul;12(3):323-30
4421777
Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Sep;124(3):372-88
3740038