Tense and aspect in sentence interpretation by children with specific language impairment.
The aim of this study was to determine whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) are sensitive to completion cues in their comprehension of tense. In two experiments, children with SLI (ages 4 ; 1 to 6 ; 4) and typically developing (TD) children (ages 3 ; 5 to 6 ; 5) participated in a sentence-to-scene matching task adapted from Wagner (2001). Sentences were in either present or past progressive and used telic predicates. Actions were performed twice in succession; the action was either completed or not completed in the first instance. In both experiments, the children with SLI were less accurate than the TD children, showing more difficulty with past than present progressive, regardless of completion cues. The TD children were less accurate with past than present progressive requests only when the past actions were incomplete. These findings suggest that children with SLI may be relatively insensitive to cues pertaining to event completion in past tense contexts.
Leonard
Laurence B
LB
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. xdxl@purdue.edu
Deevy
Patricia
P
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002648:Child; D002663:Child Language; D002675:Child, Preschool; D032882:Comprehension; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D007806:Language Disorders; D007807:Language Tests; D008037:Linguistics; D013067:Speech Perception; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis
J Child Lang. 2001 Oct;28(3):661-81
11797543
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Feb;44(1):165-78
11218100
J Child Lang. 1984 Jun;11(2):347-74
6746781
J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Feb;37(1):182-92
8170123
J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Aug;38(4):850-63
7474978
J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Dec;39(6):1239-57
8959609
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Aug;40(4):741-53
9263940
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Jun;50(3):759-77
17538114
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Feb;40(1):62-74
9113859
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Feb;42(1):206-19
10025555
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Dec;41(6):1412-31
9859895
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Aug;42(4):943-61
10450913