title: Endoplasmic reticulum continuity in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica: Evolutionary implications and a cautionary note.
abstract: Entamoeba histolytica has been described as an early branching eukaryotic parasite based on the lack of organelles such as mitochondria and peroxisomes, and on morphologic studies that concluded it possesses a vesicular endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi complex. However, a recent study from our laboratory showed that the E. histolytica ER is continuous by using an ER-targeted green fluorescent protein fusion protein and photobleaching experiments. We proposed that the vesicular ER seen earlier was likely an artifact of fixation. We now report data using an alternative fixation protocol that preserves the continuous ER morphology. These data confirm that the vesicular ER reported earlier was indeed a fixation artifact; furthermore, since we observed the same ER structure when staining for the native antigen HSP-70 in wild-type amebae, the data provide direct evidence that the continuous ER morphology we reported is correct. This work has important implications for cell biologists studying E. histolytica virulence, emphasizes the frequent need to reassess assumptions based on published data, and provides additional evidence that E. histolytica actually diverged relatively late in evolution and that many of its unusual features are likely due to loss of features during adaptation to its ecological niche.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine.
authors.forename: Archana
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Vaithilingam
authors.forename: Jose E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Teixeira
authors.forename: Christopher D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Huston
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Dec;16(12):1740-51
references.pmid: 10605115
references.citation: Epidemiol Bull. 1997 Mar;18(1):13-4
references.pmid: 9197085
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 3;92(14):6518-21
references.pmid: 7604025
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1970 Mar;19(2):215-26
references.pmid: 4315287
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Feb 24;433(7028):865-8
references.pmid: 15729342
references.citation: Parasitol Today. 1993 Jan;9(1):27-31
references.pmid: 15463662
references.citation: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2006 Feb;145(2):171-83
references.pmid: 16290089
references.citation: Infect Immun. 1999 Jun;67(6):3073-81
references.pmid: 10338523
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):367-82
references.pmid: 4327574
references.citation: Eukaryot Cell. 2008 Jul;7(7):1222-6
references.pmid: 18281599
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 15;88(8):3248-52
references.pmid: 2014248
references.citation: Res Microbiol. 2000 Oct;151(8):599-603
references.pmid: 11081575
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 1999 Nov;34(3):463-72
references.pmid: 10564488
references.citation: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998 May 1;92(2):355-9
references.pmid: 9657339
references.citation: Cell. 2002 Jul 12;110(1):119-31
references.pmid: 12151002
references.citation: Cell. 2005 Oct 7;123(1):157-70
references.pmid: 16213220
references.citation: Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Feb;17(2):723-37
references.pmid: 16314391
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Dec;27(12):2772-7
references.pmid: 2556432
references.citation: Cell Microbiol. 2005 Oct;7(10):1504-18
references.pmid: 16153248
references.citation: PLoS Pathog. 2008 Jan;4(1):e8
references.pmid: 18208324
references.citation: Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1970 Sep;64(3):293-8
references.pmid: 5500101
references.citation: Eukaryot Cell. 2005 Apr;4(4):827-31
references.pmid: 15821141