title: Herbivore-induced volatiles as rapid signals in systemic plant responses: how to quickly move the information?
abstract: Plants respond to local herbivory or pathogen infection with phenotypic changes, which reduce the danger of future attack. This so-called induced resistance is usually not restricted to the attacked plant organ but is also expressed in distant, so far undamaged parts of the plant. Signaling compounds such as jasmonic acid and salicylic acid have been discovered that move within the plant via the xylem or the phloem and elicit the resistance, thus acting as plant hormones. We now found that volatiles released in response to herbivore damage are required to elicit extrafloral nectar secretion in other parts of the same plant. Extrafloral nectar attracts ants and other carnivorous arthropods and serves as an effective indirect defense against herbivores. So called green leaf volatiles are released within minutes in response to tissue damage and were among the compounds that induced nectar secretion in yet undamaged parts of the damaged plant, but also in neighboring plants. Being gaseous and transported via the air, green leaf volatiles can serve a rapid within-plant communication, which moves much faster from one plant organ to the other than any plant-internal compound.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Ingeniería Genética; Irapuato Km. 9.6 Libramiento Norte, Irapuato; Guanajuato, Mexico.
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Heil
authors.forename: Juan Carlos Silva
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Bueno
references.citation: Plant J. 2007 Jan;49(1):16-26
references.pmid: 17144894
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 27;104(13):5467-72
references.pmid: 17360371
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2005 Sep;31(9):2217-22
references.pmid: 16132223
references.citation: Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):1004-6
references.pmid: 17746926
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Aug;6(4):372-8
references.pmid: 12873533
references.citation: Science. 2006 Feb 10;311(5762):812-5
references.pmid: 16469918
references.citation: Science. 2001 Mar 16;291(5511):2141-4
references.pmid: 11251117
references.citation: Oecologia. 2003 Jan;134(2):210-8
references.pmid: 12647162
references.citation: Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1997;35:235-70
references.pmid: 15012523
references.citation: Planta. 2005 Apr;220(6):900-9
references.pmid: 15599762
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jul 8;430(6996):205-8
references.pmid: 15241414
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 Jul;46(7):1093-102
references.pmid: 15879447
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Apr;87(4):922-30
references.pmid: 16676536
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4169-74
references.pmid: 7753779
references.citation: Oecologia. 2006 Jun;148(2):280-92
references.pmid: 16463175
references.citation: Science. 1983 Jul 15;221(4607):277-9
references.pmid: 17815197
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2007 Jan;2(1):1-3
references.pmid: 19704794
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):813-7
references.pmid: 16796571
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 30;98(3):1083-8
references.pmid: 11158598
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 10;101(6):1781-5
references.pmid: 14749516
references.citation: Plant J. 1998 Dec;16(5):561-9
references.pmid: 10036774