Learning as a possible sign of non-reflective consciousness in persons with a diagnosis of vegetative state and pervasive motor impairment.
A diagnosis of vegetative state represents a serious predicament, which basically precludes/minimizes rehabilitation perspectives. Reliability of the assessment approach in these situations is of paramount importance, but not easy to achieve. In recent studies, a learning assessment procedure has been suggested as a supplement in the diagnostic process and assessed with eight patients. The procedure involves an ABABCB sequence in which A represents baseline phases with no stimulation available, B intervention phases with stimuli delivered contingently on target responses, and C a control condition. This condition involves stimulation presented non-contingently. The patients' ability to associate responding with environmental stimuli and thus increase such responding during the B phases, and reduce it during the A and C phases, may be considered a sign of learning. Learning might be viewed as representative of forms of concrete knowledge and presumably basic levels of consciousness. Preliminary results indicate that (a) signs of learning may appear in patients with a previous diagnosis of vegetative state and (b) the presence of those signs may require a revision of their diagnostic label and a reappraisal of their rehabilitation perspectives.
Bosco
Andrea
A
Department of Psychology, University of Bari, Via Quintino Sella 268, 70100, Bari, Italy.
Lancioni
Giulio E
GE
Belardinelli
Marta Olivetti
MO
Singh
Nirbhay N
NN
O'Reilly
Mark F
MF
Sigafoos
Jeff
J
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003243:Consciousness; D018737:Hand Strength / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State / Q000175:diagnosis*; D010812:Physical Stimulation; D011596:Psychomotor Disorders; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology
Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Dec;30(5-6):481-99; discussion 499-548
18366828
Neural Netw. 2007 Jan;20(1):34-47
17010570
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 Dec;44(4):449-53
19002094
Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):1-37
11164022
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006 Mar-Apr;21(2):131-41
16569987
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Sep;2(5):293-7
19263535
Brain Inj. 2009 Feb;23(2):154-62
19191094
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Feb;51(1):S225-39
18230848
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Feb;26(2):153-4
10784300
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Apr;11(4):158-67
17324608
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 May;10(5):204-11
16603406
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1034-43
19285830
Cogn Process. 2005 Sep;6(3):177-88
18231820
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005 Jul-Sep;15(3-4):454-60
16350986
Lancet. 2006 Apr 8;367(9517):1181-92
16616561
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;118(3):597-605
17239656
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1129:130-8
18591475
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2004 Feb;15(1):263-306
15029909
Acta Neurol Belg. 2008 Sep;108(3):75-89
19115670
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985 Jul;11(3):501-18
3160813
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005 Jul-Sep;15(3-4):166-74
16350959
Funct Neurol. 2007 Jan-Apr;22(1):47-61
17509244
Psychol Sci. 2004 Nov;15(11):720-8
15482443
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Aug 1;6(8):339-344
12140084
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:57-86
11283305
Brain Inj. 2006 Mar;20(3):333-8
16537275
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):46-52
15668096
Curr Opin Neurol. 2007 Dec;20(6):609-13
17992077
Trends Neurosci. 2000 Nov;23(11):571-9
11074267
Cogn Process. 2007 Mar;8(1):1-9
17287997
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jan;7(1):12-18
12517353
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007 Jan;36(1):31-42
17285184
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 May;7(5):214-218
12757823
Cogn Process. 2009 Feb;10(1):77-88
18626674
Brain Inj. 2009 Feb;23(2):163-6
19191095
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Nov;10(11):494-501
16997611
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Apr;50(4):267-74
18312424
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997 Nov 29;352(1362):1689-95
9415920
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004 May-Jun;19(3):254-65
15247847