title: The paradox of clonality and the evolution of self-incompatibility.
abstract: In the January issue of New Phytologist Vallejo-Marín and O'Brien1 documented that in the genus Solanum (Solanaceae) clonality and self-incompatibility, a common genetic mechanism enforcing cross-fertilization, co-occur more often than expected by chance. Using a phylogenetic approach the authors showed that the statistical association between clonality and self-incompatibility persists even after taking into account phylogenetic relationships among species, uncertainty in the phylogenetic reconstruction, and associations between clonality and life history (annual/perennial). Vallejo-Marín and O'Brien1 suggest that clonality and self-incompatibility tend to co-occur because clonality, by allowing the persistence and propagation of a genotype in environments with limited pollinator or mate availability, reduces the selective pressure favoring the breakdown of self-incompatibility. In addition to promoting the maintenance of self-incompatibility, when clonality results in the spatial aggregation of genetically identical individuals, clonality may promote its breakdown by restricting pollen transfer between different genotypes. Here I call attention to these contradictory predictions of the effects of clonality on the evolution of self-incompatibility, and suggest that the outcome of this paradox depend on both the extent to which clonal propagation compensates for limited seed production, and on the extent to which clonality reduces pollen transfer between genotypes.
authors.forename: Mario
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Vallejo-Marín
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Jun;7(6):270-7
references.pmid: 12049924
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 31;103(5):1359-63
references.pmid: 16428289
references.citation: Evolution. 2005 Jan;59(1):46-60
references.pmid: 15792226
references.citation: Evolution. 1967 Dec;21(4):853-856
references.pmid: 28563079
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Oct;168(1):61-9
references.pmid: 16159321
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2005 Sep;21(9):500-5
references.pmid: 16023253
references.citation: New Phytol. 2007;173(2):415-21
references.pmid: 17204087
references.citation: Evolution. 2004 Sep;58(9):1924-35
references.pmid: 15521452