What's in the input? Frequent frames in child-directed speech offer distributional cues to grammatical categories in Spanish and English.
Recent analyses have revealed that child-directed speech contains distributional regularities that could, in principle, support young children's discovery of distinct grammatical categories (noun, verb, adjective). In particular, a distributional unit known as the frequent frame appears to be especially informative (Mintz, 2003). However, analyses have focused almost exclusively on the distributional information available in English. Because languages differ considerably in how the grammatical forms are marked within utterances, the scarcity of cross-linguistic evidence represents an unfortunate gap. We therefore advance the developmental evidence by analyzing the distributional information available in frequent frames across two languages (Spanish and English), across sentence positions (phrase medial and phrase final), and across grammatical forms (noun, verb, adjective). We selected six parent-child corpora from the CHILDES database (three English; three Spanish), and analyzed the input when children were aged 2 ; 6 or younger. In each language, frequent frames did indeed offer systematic cues to grammatical category assignment. We also identify differences in the accuracy of these frames across languages, sentences positions and grammatical classes.
Weisleder
Adriana
A
Stanford University, USA.
Waxman
Sandra R
SR
D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002663:Child Language; D003463:Cues; D004739:England; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D012660:Semantics; D013030:Spain
Cognition. 2003 Nov;90(1):91-117
14597271
Cogn Psychol. 1997 Apr;32(3):183-218
9125905
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 26;99(24):15822-6
12429858
Cognition. 1997 May;63(2):121-70
9233082
Cognition. 1999 Sep 30;72(2):B11-21
10553673
Infancy. 2005 Mar;7(2):183-206
33430549
J Child Lang. 1999 Feb;26(1):163-75
10217893
Dev Sci. 2009 Apr;12(3):396-406
19371362
Cognition. 1987 Aug;26(3):269-86
3677573
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul;30(5):678-86
12219885
Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):431-6
12219809