Scherrer and Jost's symposium: the gene concept in 2008.
Reconsideration of the term "gene" should take into account (a) the potential clash between hierarchical levels of information discussed in the 1970s by Gregory Bateson, (b) the contrast between conventional and genome phenotypes discussed in the 1980s by Richard Grantham, and (c) the emergence in the 1990s of a new science--Evolutionary Bioinformatics--that views genomes as channels conveying multiple forms of information through the generations. From this perspective, there is conceptual continuity between the functional "gene" of Mendel and today's GenBank sequences. If the function attributed to a gene can change specifically as the result of a DNA mutation, then the mutated part of DNA can be considered as part of the gene. Conversely, even if appearing to locate within a gene, a mutation that does not change the specific function is not part of the gene, although it may change some other function to which the DNA sequence contributes. This strict definition is impractical, but serves as a guide to more workable, context-dependent, definitions. The gene is either (1) The DNA sequence that is transcribed, (2) The latter plus the immediate 5' and 3' sequences that, when mutated, specifically affect the function, (3) The latter two, plus any remote sequences that, when mutated, specifically affect the function. Attempts, such as that of Scherrer and Jost, to redefine Mendel's "gene," may be too narrowly focused on regulation to the exclusion of other important themes.
Forsdyke
Donald R
DR
Department of Biochemistry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L3N6, Canada. forsdyke@queensu.ca
D001695:Biology; D003062:Codon; D019295:Computational Biology; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D005796:Genes; D005823:Genetics; D016678:Genome; D040941:Heredity; D004854:Herpesvirus 4, Human / Q000235:genetics; D007257:Information Theory; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009154:Mutation; D010641:Phenotype
D003062:Codon
Theory Biosci. 2007 Oct;126(2-3):65-113
18087760
Science. 1994 Jul 8;265(5169):202-7
8023140
Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:817-46
12045112
J Theor Biol. 1971 Aug;32(2):293-8
5566788
J Biol Chem. 2008 Oct 31;283(44):30090-100
18757367
PLoS Biol. 2008 Nov 25;6(11):e283
19067485
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003 Apr 25;128(1):21-32
12706793
Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(6):499-521
17136579
Gene. 2000 Dec 30;261(1):127-37
11164044
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 8;105(27):9135-6
18599434
J Mol Biol. 1966 Nov 28;21(3):527-35
19768869
Trends Parasitol. 2002 Sep;18(9):411-7
12377259
J Mol Evol. 1986;24(1-2):1-11
3104608
Appl Bioinformatics. 2005;4(2):117-30
16128613
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 8;105(27):9319-24
18591662
J Virol. 2002 Mar;76(5):2480-90
11836426
Virus Res. 2002 Sep;88(1-2):71-86
12297328
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D26-31
18940867
Genes Dev. 1994 Aug 15;8(16):1867-74
7525406
J Theor Biol. 2001 Feb 21;208(4):475-91
11222051
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1962 Jun 4;7:486-90
14498283
Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2002;72:223-68
12206453
Nature. 1995 Jun 22;375(6533):685-8
7540727