title: Implementation of an insecticide-treated net subsidy scheme under a public-private partnership for malaria control in Tanzania--challenges in implementation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In the past decade there has been increasing visibility of malaria control efforts at the national and international levels. The factors that have enhanced this scenario are the availability of proven interventions such as artemisinin-based combination therapy, the wide scale use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and a renewed emphasis in indoor residual house-spraying. Concurrently, there has been a window of opportunity of financial commitments from organizations such as the Global Fund for HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM), the President's Malaria Initiative and the World Bank Booster programme.
  
  
  METHODS
  The case study uses the health policy analysis framework to analyse the implementation of a public-private partnership approach embarked upon by the government of Tanzania in malaria control - 'The Tanzania National Voucher Scheme'- and in this synthesis, emphasis is on the challenges faced by the scheme during the pre-implementation (2001 - 2004) and implementation phases (2004 - 2005). Qualitative research tools used include: document review, interview with key informants, stakeholder's analysis, force-field analysis, time line of events, policy characteristic analysis and focus group discussions. The study is also complemented by a cross-sectional survey, which was conducted at the Rufiji Health Demographic Surveillance Site, where a cohort of women of child-bearing age were followed up regarding access and use of ITNs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The major challenges observed include: the re-introduction of taxes on mosquito nets and related products, procurement and tendering procedures in the implementation of the GFATM, and organizational arrangements and free delivery of mosquito nets through a Presidential initiative.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The lessons gleaned from this synthesis include: (a) the consistency of the stakeholders with a common vision, was an important strength in overcoming obstacles, (b) senior politicians often steered the policy agenda when the policy in question was a 'crisis event', the stakes and the visibility were high, (c) national stakeholders in policy making have an advantage in strengthening alliances with international organizations, where the latter can become extremely influential in solving bottlenecks as the need arises, and (d) conflict can be turned into an opportunity, for example the Presidential initiative has inadvertently provided Tanzania with important lessons in the organization of 'catch-up' campaigns.
authors.affiliation: World Health Organization Country Office, P,O, Box 9292, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. njaur@tz.afro.who.int
authors.forename: Ritha J A
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Njau
authors.forename: Don
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: de Savigny
authors.forename: Lucy
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Gilson
authors.forename: Eleuther
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Mwageni
authors.forename: Franklin W
authors.initials: FW
authors.lastname: Mosha
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D007306:Insecticides / Q000494:pharmacology*; D008288:Malaria / Q000517:prevention & control*; D009032:Mosquito Control / Q000379:methods*; D011482:Protective Devices / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D055818:Public-Private Sector Partnerships; D013636:Tanzania
chemical_list: D007306:Insecticides
references.citation: Niger J Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;10(4):272-82
references.pmid: 18293634
references.citation: BMJ. 2001 Feb 3;322(7281):270-3
references.pmid: 11157527
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Jan-Feb;64(1-2 Suppl):57-67
references.pmid: 11425178
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;77(6 Suppl):227-31
references.pmid: 18165497
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 1994 Dec;9(4):353-70
references.pmid: 10139469
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 1996 Apr;1(2):147-54
references.pmid: 8665378
references.citation: Lancet. 1991 Oct 5;338(8771):897
references.pmid: 1681261
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 1997 Sep;2(9):855-62
references.pmid: 9315044
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000363
references.pmid: 10796535
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2002 Jun;17(2):196-201
references.pmid: 12000780
references.citation: Malar J. 2005 Jul 22;4:34
references.pmid: 16042780
references.citation: Lancet. 2003 Feb 15;361(9357):561-6
references.pmid: 12598141
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):499-504
references.pmid: 9117204
references.citation: Lancet. 2004 Jul 3-9;364(9428):95-100
references.pmid: 15234862
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 1999 Mar;4(3):160-6
references.pmid: 10223210
references.citation: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002 Jul-Aug;96(4):368-9
references.pmid: 12497970
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Jun 30;369(9580):2143-2146
references.pmid: 17597200
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep;15(3):338-45
references.pmid: 11012410
references.citation: Malar J. 2008 Jun 02;7:98
references.pmid: 18518956
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2008 Jun 10;8:205
references.pmid: 18544162
references.citation: Med Vet Entomol. 1987 Jan;1(1):37-51
references.pmid: 2979519
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Jan-Feb;64(1-2 Suppl):85-96
references.pmid: 11425181
references.citation: BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 25;7:121
references.pmid: 17961211
references.citation: Acta Trop. 1991 Aug;49(3):157-63
references.pmid: 1685296
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2007 Mar;22(2):95-102
references.pmid: 17299023
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2004 Sep;59(6):1251-61
references.pmid: 15210096
references.citation: Trop Med Parasitol. 1991 Sep;42(3):199-203
references.pmid: 1801147