DNA deformations near charged surfaces: electron and atomic force microscopy views.
DNA is a very important cell structural element, which determines the level of expression of genes by virtue of its interaction with regulatory proteins. We use electron (EM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to characterize the flexibility of double-stranded DNA ( approximately 150-950 nm long) close to a charged surface. Automated procedures for the extraction of DNA contours ( approximately 10-120 nm for EM data and approximately 10-300 nm for AFM data) combined with new statistical chain descriptors indicate a uniquely two-dimensional equilibration of the molecules on the substrate surface regardless of the procedure of molecule mounting. However, in contrast to AFM, the EM mounting leads to a noticeable decrease in DNA persistence length together with decreased kurtosis. Analysis of local bending on short length scales (down to 6 nm in the EM study) shows that DNA flexibility behaves as predicted by the wormlike chain model. We therefore argue that adhesion of DNA to a charged surface may lead to additional static bending (kinking) of approximately 5 degrees per dinucleotide step without impairing the dynamic behavior of the DNA backbone. Implications of this finding are discussed.
Faas
F G A
FG
Department of Imaging Science and Technology Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Rieger
B
B
van Vliet
L J
LJ
Cherny
D I
DI
D003198:Computer Simulation; D004247:DNA / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D018625:Microscopy, Atomic Force / Q000379:methods*; D008854:Microscopy, Electron / Q000379:methods*; D008956:Models, Chemical; D008958:Models, Molecular; D009690:Nucleic Acid Conformation; D055672:Static Electricity
D004247:DNA
Biophys J. 2006 Nov 15;91(10):3607-16
16935960
J Mol Biol. 1998 Jul 3;280(1):41-59
9653030
Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Oct 7;95(15):158105
16241768
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Apr 15;27(8):1943-9
10101205
Biophys J. 2005 Oct;89(4):2558-63
16040760
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jun 10;94(12):6185-90
9177192
Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Dec 11;22(24):5497-503
7816643
J Mol Biol. 2001 Oct 19;313(2):295-307
11800558
Biopolymers. 1988 Aug;27(8):1329-31
2851336
Biopolymers. 1979 Jun;18(6):1353-73
465647
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Mar;73(3 Pt 1):031906
16605557
Biophys Chem. 2003 May 1;104(1):37-43
12834825
Biopolymers. 1997;44(4):361-403
9782776
Biophys J. 2005 Apr;88(4):2737-44
15653727
Biophys J. 2003 Oct;85(4):2507-18
14507713
Nat Nanotechnol. 2006 Nov;1(2):137-41
18654166
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Nov 15;31(22):e137
14602930
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 May;71(5 Pt 1):051905
16089569
Science. 2008 Oct 17;322(5900):446-9
18927394
J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Nov 28;129(47):14739-45
17985896
Biopolymers. 1987 Feb;26(2):315-26
2950940
Electrophoresis. 2001 Oct;22(16):3357-64
11669510
Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:265-86
3293588
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Mar 19;130(11):3486-96
18298115
Biopolymers. 1974 Jan;13(1):217-26
4818129
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Feb;71(2 Pt 1):021909
15783354
J Mol Biol. 1996 Dec 20;264(5):919-32
9000621
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 4;101(18):6969-74
15118104
J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 22;285(3):997-1009
9887263
Biopolymers. 2001-2002;61(4):261-75
12115141
Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Apr 27;98(17):178101
17501536
Biophys Chem. 1995 Jun-Jul;55(1-2):95-114
7632879
Biophys Chem. 1980 Jun;11(3-4):321-8
7407327