title: From the Cover: Osmotrophy in modular Ediacara organisms.
abstract: The Ediacara biota include macroscopic, morphologically complex soft-bodied organisms that appear globally in the late Ediacaran Period (575-542 Ma). The physiology, feeding strategies, and functional morphology of the modular Ediacara organisms (rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs) remain debated but are critical for understanding their ecology and phylogeny. Their modular construction triggered numerous hypotheses concerning their likely feeding strategies, ranging from micro-to-macrophagus feeding to photoautotrophy to osmotrophy. Macrophagus feeding in rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs is inconsistent with their lack of oral openings, and photoautotrophy in rangeomorphs is contradicted by their habitats below the photic zone. Here, we combine theoretical models and empirical data to evaluate the feasibility of osmotrophy, which requires high surface area to volume (SA/V) ratios, as a primary feeding strategy of rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs. Although exclusively osmotrophic feeding in modern ecosystems is restricted to microscopic bacteria, this study suggests that (i) fractal branching of rangeomorph modules resulted in SA/V ratios comparable to those observed in modern osmotrophic bacteria, and (ii) rangeomorphs, and particularly erniettomorphs, could have achieved osmotrophic SA/V ratios similar to bacteria, provided their bodies included metabolically inert material. Thus, specific morphological adaptations observed in rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs may have represented strategies for overcoming physiological constraints that typically make osmotrophy prohibitive for macroscopic life forms. These results support the viability of osmotrophic feeding in rangeomorphs and erniettomorphs, help explain their taphonomic peculiarities, and point to the possible importance of earliest macroorganisms for cycling dissolved organic carbon that may have been present in abundance during Ediacaran times.
authors.affiliation: Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
authors.forename: Marc
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Laflamme
authors.forename: Shuhai
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Xiao
authors.forename: Michał
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kowalewski
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development*; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004141:Dinoflagellida / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development; D017753:Ecosystem; D005580:Fossils; D007448:Invertebrates / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development*; D008962:Models, Theoretical
references.citation: Science. 2004 Aug 20;305(5687):1141-4
references.pmid: 15256615
references.citation: Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):122-6
references.pmid: 9082983
references.citation: Science. 1999 Apr 16;284(5413):493-5
references.pmid: 10205058
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8124-9
references.pmid: 12824461
references.citation: J Paleontol. 1997 Nov;71(6):953-67
references.pmid: 11541433
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 19;102(29):10227-32
references.pmid: 16014417
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):744-7
references.pmid: 17151665
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1966 Nov;41(4):587-640
references.pmid: 5342162
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:105-37
references.pmid: 11544351
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Sep 7;407(6800):78-80
references.pmid: 10993076
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jan;24(1):31-40
references.pmid: 18952316
references.citation: J Phycol. 2000 Jun;36(3):453-472
references.pmid: 29544017
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 4;105(9):3197-202
references.pmid: 18299566
references.citation: Nature. 1993 Mar 18;362(6417):239-41
references.pmid: 8459849