title: Vasectomy: A simple snip?
abstract: Vasectomy is one of the most common forms of permanent sterilization methods currently in use and has a failure rate of <1% in most reported series. Since failure of vasectomy may result in pregnancy, adequate counseling is essential. Couples are advised that an analysis of a semen specimen after vasectomy is required to confirm success before the use of alternative contraception is abandoned. However, measuring the success of vasectomy is complicated by a lack of consistency with regards to both the number and timing of tests and the end points accepted.
  
  
  METHODS
  A Medline search was used to identify manuscripts dealing with vasectomy, with specific attempts to identify protocols designed to confirm sterility.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Vasectomy is one of the most reliable permanent methods of contraception. However, despite its popularity, certain issues pertaining to the procedure remain unresolved. Debate continues over the relative merits of the various techniques of isolating and sealing the vasal ends. Postoperative complication rates remain minimal regardless of the technique used, and no single strategy attempting to maximize patient compliance with postoperative semen analysis has enjoyed unmitigated success. Long-term consequences, other than regret, are rare.
authors.affiliation: Glickman Urological Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
authors.forename: Nivedita Bhatta
authors.initials: NB
authors.lastname: Dhar
authors.forename: J Stephen
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Jones
references.citation: Lancet. 2000 Jul 1;356(9223):43-4
references.pmid: 10892767
references.citation: J Urol. 1975 Jan;113(1):71-4
references.pmid: 1113402
references.citation: J Am Board Fam Pract. 1991 Jan-Feb;4(1):5-9
references.pmid: 1847562
references.citation: Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1212-5
references.pmid: 15596199
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1997 Sep;68(3):552-5
references.pmid: 9314934
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1997 Feb;67(2):332-5
references.pmid: 9022612
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1978 Apr;29(4):435-41
references.pmid: 648646
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1979 Oct;32(4):460-3
references.pmid: 488436
references.citation: J Urol. 1990 Aug;144(2 Pt 1):284-6
references.pmid: 2374193
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1995 Sep;76(3):376-9
references.pmid: 7551851
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1995 Sep;76(3):371-2
references.pmid: 7551849
references.citation: BJU Int. 2007 May;99(5):1094-7
references.pmid: 17233802
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1990 Aug;66(2):211-2
references.pmid: 2390708
references.citation: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Jul 14;289(6437):77-9
references.pmid: 6428685
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2001 Feb;88(2):290-3
references.pmid: 11167883
references.citation: Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001 May;83(3):177-9
references.pmid: 11432136
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2003 Apr;79(4):1003-7
references.pmid: 12749445
references.citation: Lancet. 1994 Jul 2;344(8914):30
references.pmid: 7912302
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1997 Mar;79(3):484
references.pmid: 9117240
references.citation: BJU Int. 2006 Apr;97(4):773-6
references.pmid: 16536771
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1998 Mar;81(3):458-60
references.pmid: 9523670