Inferring population histories using cultural data.
The question as to whether cultures evolve in a manner analogous to that of genetic evolution can be addressed by attempting to reconstruct population histories using cultural data. As others have argued, this can only succeed if cultures are isolated enough to maintain and pass on a central core of traditions that can be modified over time. In this study we used a set of cultural data (canoe design traits from Polynesia) to look for the kinds of patterns and relationships normally found in population genetic studies. After developing new techniques to accommodate the peculiarities of cultural data, we were able to infer an ancestral region (Fiji) and a sequence of cultural origins for these Polynesian societies. In addition, we found evidence of cultural exchange, migration and a serial founder effect. Results were stronger when analyses were based on functional traits (presumably subject to natural selection and convergence) rather than symbolic or stylistic traits (probably subject to cultural selection for rapid divergence). These patterns strongly suggest that cultural evolution, while clearly affected by cultural exchange, is also subject to some of the same processes and constraints as genetic evolution.
Rogers
Deborah S
DS
Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. dsrogers@stanford.edu
Feldman
Marcus W
MW
Ehrlich
Paul R
PR
D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D003468:Cultural Evolution; D003710:Demography; D004641:Emigration and Immigration; D006801:Humans; D011114:Polynesia; D013997:Time Factors
Hum Genomics. 2004 Jan;1(2):87-97
15601537
Hum Genet. 2005 Dec;118(3-4):366-71
16189711
Nat Genet. 1998 Nov;20(3):278-80
9806547
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Aug;63(2):613-24
9683581
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Jan;82(1):194-8
18179899
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 22;271(1547):1443-50
15306315
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 21;95(15):9047-52
9671802
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 20;93(4):1381-5
8643640
Nat Genet. 2007 Jan;39(1):31-40
17159977
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 1;92(16):7585-9
11607569
J Hum Evol. 2009 Feb;56(2):175-91
19062074
Science. 2002 Dec 20;298(5602):2381-5
12493913
Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Jan;46(1):144-55
1967206
Genetics. 2002 Jan;160(1):289-303
11805064
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jun;18(6):1057-69
11371594
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6002-6
3166138
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Feb;68(2):432-43
11170891
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2299-306
19324763
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Aug;28(2):171-85
12878457
Hum Genet. 1989 Oct;83(3):257-63
2793169
Science. 2008 Feb 22;319(5866):1100-4
18292342
Nature. 2007 Jul 19;448(7151):346-8
17637668
PLoS Genet. 2008 Sep 26;4(9):e1000200
18818760
Science. 2009 Jan 23;323(5913):479-83
19164742
PLoS Genet. 2008 Jan;4(1):e19
18208337
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 4;105(9):3416-20
18287028
Nat Genet. 2009 Jan;41(1):66-70
19098910
Hum Biol. 2002 Jun;74(3):413-30
12180764
Sci Prog. 2001;84(Pt 3):157-81
11732155
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):291-300
18796400
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 1;102(44):15942-7
16243969
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11008-13
12167671
PLoS Genet. 2005 Dec;1(6):e70
16355252
Nature. 2000 Jun 29;405(6790):1052-5
10890445
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009
12490681
Hum Mutat. 2001 Apr;17(4):271-80
11295824
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000 Oct;113(2):151-68
11002202
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008 May;136(1):108-13
18161847
Bioessays. 2006 Mar;28(3):290-300
16479583
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Jun;22(6):1506-17
15814828
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Nov;23(11):2234-44
16923821