Quantitative evaluation of electrodes for external urethral sphincter electromyography during bladder-to-urethral guarding reflex.
OBJECTIVE
Accuracy in the recording of external urethral sphincter (EUS) electromyography (EMG) is an important goal in the quantitative evaluation of urethral function. The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare electrode recordings taken during tonic activity and leak point pressure (LPP) testing.


METHODS
Several electrodes, including the surface electrode (SE), concentric electrode (CE), and wire electrode (WE), were placed on the EUS singly and simultaneously in six female Sprague-Dawley rats under urethane anesthesia. The bladder was filled via a retropubic catheter while LPP testing and EUS EMG recording were done. Quantitative baseline correction of the EUS EMG signal was performed to reduce baseline variation. Amplitude and frequency of 1-s samples of the EUS EMG signal were measured before LPP (tonic activity) and during peak LPP activity.


RESULTS
The SE, CE, and WE signals demonstrated tonic activity before LPP and an increase in activity during LPP, suggesting that the electrodes accurately recorded EUS activity during tonic activity and during the bladder-to-EUS guarding reflex, regardless of the size or location of detection areas. SE recordings required significantly less baseline correction than both CE and WE recordings. The activity in CE-recorded EMG was significantly higher than that of the SE and WE both in single and simultaneous recordings.


CONCLUSIONS
These electrodes may be suitable for testing EUS EMG activity. The SE signal had significantly less baseline variation and the CE detected local activity more sensitively than the other electrodes, which may provide insight into choosing an appropriate electrode for EUS EMG recording.
Steward
James E
JE
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave. ND20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Clemons
Jessica D
JD
Zaszczurynski
Paul J
PJ
Butler
Robert S
RS
Damaser
Margot S
MS
Jiang
Hai-Hong
HH
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D004576:Electromyography / Q000379:methods*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D011312:Pressure; D011336:Probability; D011897:Random Allocation; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D012018:Reflex; D014521:Urethra / Q000294:innervation* / Q000502:physiology; D001743:Urinary Bladder / Q000294:innervation* / Q000502:physiology; D014554:Urination / Q000502:physiology; D014563:Urodynamics
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(6):553-8
18551566
Am Fam Physician. 1979 Feb;19(2):100-9
760434
Int J Biomed Comput. 1990 Sep;26(3):211-20
2242938
Brain Res. 2002 Aug 16;946(2):290-7
12137933
Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(3):229-35
18973146
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;539(Pt B):831-9
15176326
J Urol. 1995 Jun;153(6):2004-9
7752384
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1980-5; discussion 1985
15540771
J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):1027-31
12913764
Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(4):388-96
16637068
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 2):1767-70; discussion 1770
16945643
Am J Physiol. 1993 Jun;264(6 Pt 2):R1157-63
8322969
Muscle Nerve. 1997 Dec;20(12):1525-33
9390665
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008 Oct;295(4):F1248-53
18753298
IMJ Ill Med J. 1974 Jun;145(6):497-9 passim
4152534
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;37(3):539-52, vii
18793995
Exp Neurol. 2009 Feb;215(2):342-8
19056383
Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19(1):53-69
10602248
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;118(7):1423-37
17466586