title: 2008 International Conference on Ectodermal Dysplasias Classification: conference report.
abstract: There are many ways to classify ectodermal dysplasia syndromes. Clinicians in practice use a list of syndromes from which to choose a potential diagnosis, paging through a volume, such as Freire-Maia and Pinheiro's corpus, matching their patient's findings to listed syndromes. Medical researchers may want a list of syndromes that share one (monothetic system) or several (polythetic system) traits in order to focus research on a narrowly defined group. Special interest groups may want a list from which they can choose constituencies, and insurance companies and government agencies may want a list to determine for whom to provide (or deny) health-care coverage. Furthermore, various molecular biologists are now promoting classification systems based on gene mutation (e.g., TP63-associated syndromes) or common molecular pathways. The challenge will be to balance comprehensiveness within the classification with usability and accessibility so that the benefits truly serve the needs of researchers, health-care providers, and ultimately the individuals and families directly affected by ectodermal dysplasias. It is also recognized that a new classification approach is an ongoing process and will require periodical reviews or updates. Whatever scheme is developed, however, will have far-reaching application for other groups of disorders for which classification is complicated by the number of interested parties and advances in diagnostic acumen. Consensus among interested parties is necessary for optimizing communication among the diverse groups whether it be for equitable distribution of funds, correctness of diagnosis and treatment, or focusing research efforts.
authors.affiliation: Division of Craniofacial Genetics, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 173 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. salinasc@musc.edu
authors.forename: Carlos F
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Salinas
authors.forename: Ronald J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Jorgenson
authors.forename: J Timothy
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.forename: John J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: DiGiovanna
authors.forename: Mary D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Fete
mesh_terms: D003226:Congresses as Topic; D032921:Consensus; D004476:Ectodermal Dysplasia / Q000145:classification* / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000235:genetics / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D008967:Molecular Biology; D009626:Terminology as Topic
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):853-5
references.pmid: 11237009
references.citation: Cell Cycle. 2007 Feb 1;6(3):262-8
references.pmid: 17224651
references.citation: Am J Med Genet. 2001 Nov 15;104(1):84
references.pmid: 11746035
references.citation: Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2004 Nov 15;131C(1):45-51
references.pmid: 15468153
references.citation: Am J Med Genet. 2002 Oct 15;112(3):284-90
references.pmid: 12357472
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Nov;81(5):1050-6
references.pmid: 17924345
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2001 Sep;38(9):579-85
references.pmid: 11546825
references.citation: Clin Genet. 2000 Dec;58(6):415-30
references.pmid: 11149610
references.citation: Hum Hered. 1971;21(4):309-12
references.pmid: 5139249
references.citation: Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1977;26(2):121-31
references.pmid: 596110
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2007 Jul;39(7):836-8
references.pmid: 17546030
references.citation: Hum Mutat. 2001 Apr;17(4):349
references.pmid: 11295832
references.citation: J Dermatol Sci. 2008 Jan;49(1):39-42
references.pmid: 17951029
references.citation: Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003 Jul;28(4):351-5
references.pmid: 12823289
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Jul 1;17(13):1968-77
references.pmid: 18364388