title: Histone modifications do not play a major role in salicylate-mediated suppression of jasmonate-induced PDF1.2 gene expression.
abstract: Cross-talk between salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) defense signaling pathways allows a plant to finely tune its response to the attacker encountered. In Arabidopsis, pharmacological experiments revealed that SA exerts a strong antagonistic effect on JA-responsive genes, such as PDF1.2, indicating that the SA pathway can be prioritized over the JA pathway. We investigated the putative role of histone modifications in the regulation of SA-mediated suppression of PDF1.2 transcription. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis using an antibody directed against acetylated histone H3 revealed that SA does not affect the association of this histone modification at the PDF1.2 promoter, suggesting that chromatin remodeling does not play a major role in SA/JA cross-talk.
authors.affiliation: Plant-Microbe Interactions; Institute of Environmental Biology; Department of Biology; Faculty of Science; Utrecht University; Utrecht The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Annemart
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Koornneef
authors.forename: Katja
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rindermann
authors.forename: Christiane
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gatz
authors.forename: Corné Mj
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Pieterse
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2005 Apr;17(4):1196-204
references.pmid: 15749761
references.citation: Cell Host Microbe. 2008 Jun 12;3(6):348-51
references.pmid: 18541211
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2006 Jul;18(7):1750-65
references.pmid: 16766691
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008 Aug;11(4):436-42
references.pmid: 18614393
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Jan 6;403(6765):41-5
references.pmid: 10638745
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006 Aug;9(4):414-20
references.pmid: 16753329
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2001;2(4):REVIEWS0003
references.pmid: 11305943
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2003 Mar;15(3):760-70
references.pmid: 12615947
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008 Aug;11(4):443-8
references.pmid: 18585955
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Dec;10(6):645-52
references.pmid: 17884714
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Jul;61(4-5):665-74
references.pmid: 16897482
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Apr;11(4):184-91
references.pmid: 16531096
references.citation: Plant J. 2006 May;46(3):477-91
references.pmid: 16623907
references.citation: Epigenetics. 2007 Apr-Jun;2(2):106-13
references.pmid: 17965588
references.citation: Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:545-80
references.pmid: 16078895
references.citation: Plant J. 2002 Nov;32(4):457-66
references.pmid: 12445118
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Jul;147(3):1358-68
references.pmid: 18539774
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Mar;146(3):839-44
references.pmid: 18316638
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2008 Aug;3(8):543-6
references.pmid: 19513248
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2004 Feb;16(2):319-31
references.pmid: 14742872
references.citation: Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
references.pmid: 11846609
references.citation: Plant J. 2007 Apr;50(1):128-39
references.pmid: 17397508
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Dec;12(12):564-9
references.pmid: 17997347
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Sep;139(1):5-17
references.pmid: 16166256