title: Retrieval-induced forgetting and mental imagery.
abstract: In the present article, we present four experiments in which we examined whether mental imagery can initiate retrieval-induced forgetting. Participants were presented with word pairs (Experiments 1, 2, and 3) or narratives (Experiment 4) and then engaged in selective mental imagery about half of the details from half of the categories. The results indicated that mental imagery can produce the same pattern of impairment as retrieval practice (Experiment 1) and postevent questioning (Experiment 4). Additionally, mental imagery-invoked, retrieval-induced forgetting was found for category cued recall (Experiments 1, 3, and 4) and cued recall (Experiment 2); it was found to dissipate across a 24-h delay, but only when there was no pre-delay test (Experiment 3). Such retrieval-induced forgetting was also found for imagining from the first-person and third-person perspectives (Experiment 4). From these findings, we suggest that the underlying retrieval processes behind mental imagery can initiate retrieval-induced forgetting. The findings are discussed in terms of inhibitory processes.
authors.affiliation: Swansea University, Swansea, Wales. j.saunders@swan.ac.uk
authors.forename: Jo
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Saunders
authors.forename: Marcelle
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Fernandes
authors.forename: Liv
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Kosnes
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D001364:Awareness; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D011939:Mental Recall; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012660:Semantics
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Dec;95(4):278-97
references.pmid: 17007868
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):249-53
references.pmid: 24203660
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):148-52
references.pmid: 11340924
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):68-100
references.pmid: 7878163
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):522-30
references.pmid: 11082860
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(3):185-207
references.pmid: 15707859
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002 Jun;8(2):127-42
references.pmid: 12075691
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 1973 Feb;64(1):17-24
references.pmid: 4742442
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2002 Jul;13(4):356-60
references.pmid: 12137139
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Nov;25(6):1403-14
references.pmid: 10605828
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):964-79
references.pmid: 16248745
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):29-34
references.pmid: 17362374
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Sep;20(5):1063-87
references.pmid: 7931095
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Jun;12(3):490-4
references.pmid: 16235634
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Jul;15(7):448-53
references.pmid: 15200628
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2009 Apr;37(3):326-35
references.pmid: 19246347
references.citation: Memory. 2009 Jan;17(1):92-103
references.pmid: 19058092
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):544-70
references.pmid: 11561927
references.citation: Memory. 2002 May;10(3):215-24
references.pmid: 11958725
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec;13(6):1023-7
references.pmid: 17484429