Interactions of socioeconomic position with psychosocial and environmental correlates of children's physical activity: an observational study of South Australian families.
BACKGROUND
Evidence for psychosocial and environmental correlates on children's physical activity is scattered and somewhat unconvincing. Further, the moderating influences of socioeconomic position (SEP) on these influences are largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to examine the interactions of SEP, operationalised by mother education, and predictors of children's physical activity based on the Youth Physical Activity Promotion Model.


METHODS
In 2005, a sample of South Australians (10-15 y) was surveyed on psychosocial and environmental correlates of physical activity using the Children's Physical Activity Correlates Questionnaire (n = 3300) and a parent survey (n = 1720). The following constructs were derived: 'is it worth it?' (perceived outcomes); 'am I able?' (perceived competency); 'reinforcing' (parental support); and 'enabling' (parent-perceived barriers). Self-reported physical activity was represented by a global score derived from the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents. Associations among physical activity and hypothesised correlates were tested among children with mothers of high (university educated) and low (left school at or before 15 y) SEP.


RESULTS
Among high SEP children, 'is it worth it?' emerged as a significant predictor of physical activity for boys and girls. Among low SEP children, 'is it worth it?' predicted boys' physical activity, while among girls, 'reinforcing' was the only significant predictor, explaining ~35% of the total explained variance in physical activity.


CONCLUSIONS
While perceived outcomes emerged as a consistent predictor of physical activity in this sample, parental support was a powerful limiting factor among low SEP girls. Interventions among this high risk group should focus on supporting parents to provide both emotional and instrumental support for their daughters to engage in physical activity.
Dollman
James
J
School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia. nicole.lewis@unisa.edu.au.
Lewis
Nicole R
NR
Qual Health Res. 2006 Apr;16(4):467-83
16513991
Am J Health Behav. 2004 Sep-Oct;28(5):426-36
15482972
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006;15 Suppl:15-20
16928657
Public Health Nutr. 2006 Apr;9(2):244-50
16571179
Sports Med. 2001;31(6):439-54
11394563
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003 Oct;13(5):293-8
14507294
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Feb;49(2):125-34
8606313
Chest. 2007 Nov;132(5):1608-14
17998360
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005 Jun;76(2):119-29
16128480
J Adolesc Health. 2004 Apr;34(4):279-89
15040997
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997 Dec;68(4):345-51
9421846
J Sci Med Sport. 2004 Apr;7(1 Suppl):6-19
15214597
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 May;32(5):963-75
10795788
Prev Med. 1994 May;23(3):314-21
8078852
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Oct;29(10):1344-9
9346166
Am J Public Health. 1997 Aug;87(8):1328-34
9279269
N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 5;347(10):709-15
12213941
Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48
10170434
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Sep;47(5):665-75
9690849
Prev Med. 2006 Apr;42(4):254-60
16490241
Prev Med. 2007 May;44(5):410-5
17335890
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Jan;29(1):21-31
17716952
Obes Rev. 2007 Mar;8(2):129-54
17300279
J Sch Health. 1995 Aug;65(6):213-9
7564283
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Feb;16(2):275-84
18239633
Prev Med. 2007 Feb;44(2):153-9
17157371
Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4 Suppl):73-107
11985936
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Aug;157(8):803-10
12912787
Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Jan;31(1):45-52
17173061
Pediatrics. 2000 Jun;105(6):E83
10835096
Prev Med. 2003 Jan;36(1):55-63
12473425
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005 Aug;29(4):337-42
16222931