title: Cuttlefish camouflage: context-dependent body pattern use during motion.
abstract: It is virtually impossible to camouflage a moving target against a non-uniform background, but strategies have been proposed to reduce detection and targeting of movement. Best known is the idea that high contrast markings produce 'motion dazzle', which impairs judgement of speed and trajectory. The ability of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis to change its visual appearance allows us to compare the animal's choice of patterns during movement to the predictions of models of motion camouflage. We compare cuttlefish body patterns used during movement with those expressed when static on two background types; one of which promotes low-contrast mottle patterns and the other promotes high-contrast disruptive patterns. We find that the body pattern used during motion is context-specific and that high-contrast body pattern components are significantly reduced during movement. Thus, in our experimental conditions, cuttlefish do not use high contrast motion dazzle. It may be that, in addition to being inherently conspicuous during movement, moving high-contrast patterns will attract attention because moving particles in coastal waters tend to be of small size and of low relative contrast.
authors.affiliation: School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK. s.zylinski@sussex.ac.uk
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Zylinski
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Osorio
authors.forename: A J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Shohet
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D010858:Pigmentation; D049833:Sepia / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Dec 14;9(13):13.1-10
references.pmid: 20055546
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):481-8
references.pmid: 18990673
references.citation: Biol Bull. 2006 Jun;210(3):192-200
references.pmid: 16801494
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2007 Apr;210(Pt 7):1139-47
references.pmid: 17371913
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Jul;47(16):2223-35
references.pmid: 17592739
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jun 7;274(1616):1369-75
references.pmid: 17389219
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 22;275(1651):2639-43
references.pmid: 18700203
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Mar 3;434(7029):72-4
references.pmid: 15744301
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):439-48
references.pmid: 18990667
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 18;17(24):R1044-5
references.pmid: 18088584
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):423-7
references.pmid: 18990674
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):463-70
references.pmid: 19000973
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 Jun;204(Pt 12):2119-25
references.pmid: 11441053
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):429-37
references.pmid: 19008200
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):449-61
references.pmid: 18990671
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2008 Jun;211(Pt 11):1757-63
references.pmid: 18490391
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008 Jun;194(6):577-85
references.pmid: 18414874
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1242-53
references.pmid: 18395241
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2006 Dec;209(Pt 23):4717-23
references.pmid: 17114404
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2433-8
references.pmid: 16959632
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):609-13
references.pmid: 11832937
references.citation: Rev Oculomot Res. 1993;5:159-75
references.pmid: 8420548
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 5;17(11):R400-4
references.pmid: 17550761
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):537-48
references.pmid: 18990666