title: Older primary care patient views regarding antidepressants: A mixed methods approach.
abstract: BACKGROUND: Generally, the efforts to predict antidepressant use from patient demographic factors have not been fruitful.  AIM: Our objective was to generate hypotheses regarding antidepressant use among older primary care patients.  METHODS: We utilized a mixed methods design that is both hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating. Adults aged 65 years and over were recruited from primary care practices and interviewed in their homes. We examined the personal characteristics of older adults according to antidepressant use (hypothesis-testing). Participants taking antidepressants and participants not taking antidepressants were asked open-ended questions about their views on treatment for depression. Themes related to use of antidepressants were examined (hypothesis-generating).  RESULTS: Older adults taking antidepressants were more likely to be white and have more depression symptoms compared to older adults not taking antidepressants (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Positive and negative themes emerged when participants discussed antidepressant use. We linked quantitative data from the participants with the themes they endorsed to form an emerging theory about older adults' perceptions about antidepressant use.  CONCLUSION: Few personal characteristics were associated with aatidepressant use. An improved understanding of how older adults view antidepressant use, derived from multiple methods, may inform clinical practice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Hillary R
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Bogner
authors.forename: Eileen
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Cahill
authors.forename: Christine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Frauenhoffer
authors.forename: Frances K
authors.initials: FK
authors.lastname: Barg
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;157(7):1089-94
references.pmid: 10873916
references.citation: Community Genet. 2004;7(4):202-10
references.pmid: 15692195
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005 Nov;40(11):869-76
references.pmid: 16217593
references.citation: Med Care. 2003 Apr;41(4):479-89
references.pmid: 12665712
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21(2):146-51
references.pmid: 16336620
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1999 May;156(5):690-6
references.pmid: 10327900
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2000 Jan;10(1):71-83
references.pmid: 10724754
references.citation: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;18(1):33-40
references.pmid: 12497554
references.citation: Psychol Med. 2005 Aug;35(8):1205-13
references.pmid: 16116946
references.citation: Int J Psychiatry Med. 2005;35(1):41-57
references.pmid: 15977944
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;162(4):705-10
references.pmid: 15800142
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Nov;61(6):S329-39
references.pmid: 17114313
references.citation: J R Soc Med. 1998 Feb;91(2):66-71
references.pmid: 9602740