Subjective outcome assessments for cervical spine pathology: A narrative review.
BACKGROUND
Subjective outcome assessment instruments may be used to determine whether changes occur as a result of a particular treatment intervention. Since 1991, 11 outcome assessment instruments either specific to or validated for use with cervical spine pathologies have been developed and their psychometric properties critically assessed. Though a systematic review of this subject was published in 2002, it included an analysis of only 5 measures available at that time.


OBJECTIVE
To present a description of each of the 11 measures and briefly compare their psychometric properties, reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change.


METHODS
Computer-based searches of MEDLINE and CINAHL were performed to capture all data relevant to the eleven outcome assessment tools currently available.


RESULTS
Data regarding descriptions, reliability and validity of 11 outcome measures were found and collated.


CONCLUSIONS
The choice of which outcome measurement to use becomes a matter of preference based on the particular patient population each clinician treats, the ease of use for the patient and ease of scoring for the clinician, and the domains that are most relevant to a particular patient.
Resnick
Diane N
DN
Assistant Professor, Clinical Education Coordinator, University Health Center Pasadena, Southern California University of Health Sciences.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1884-9
11568699
Pain. 2003 Apr;102(3):273-281
12670669
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;47(12):1423-35
7730851
J Rheumatol. 2001 Feb;28(2):431-8
11246692
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001 Jan-Feb;19(1):41-6
11247324
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 May;27(5):331-8
9580892
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Oct 1;27(19):2116-23; discussion 2124
12394923
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Dec 1;134(11):1356-67
1755449
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
1593914
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Mar;83(3):376-82
11887120
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jan 1;26(1):78-86; discussion 87
11148650
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Aug 1;23(15):1689-98
9704377
BMJ. 1995 Jan 21;310(6973):183-6
7605431
Clin J Pain. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(4):245-50
12131066
Anesthesiology. 1971 Jan;34(1):50-9
4924784
Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):277-299
1235985
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3100-3
11124724
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Sep 1;19(17):1887-96
7997920
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40 Suppl 1:55S-69S
3597698
Pain. 2001 Dec;94(3):261-274
11731063
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15
2691207
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Mar-Apr;25(3):141-8
11986574
Nurs Econ. 1983 Jul-Aug;1(1):10-7
6350897
Health Aff (Millwood). 1988 Spring;7(1):99-106
3283013
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Feb;21(2):75-80
9502061
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jul 1;24(13):1290-4
10404569
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 1;29(3):263-8
14752347
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S217-32
2646490
Br J Rheumatol. 1994 May;33(5):469-74
8173853
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Oct;21(8):520-7
9798180
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Oct 1;18(13):1723-7
8235854
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):515-22
11880837
Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3
6450426
BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):572
9055718
Phys Ther. 1996 Apr;76(4):359-65; discussion 366-8
8606899
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Feb;81(2):170-5
10668770
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Sep;14(7):409-15
1834753
Med Care. 1999 May;37(5):469-78
10335749
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1994 Dec;94(12):1032-8
7852102
J Rehabil Med. 2002 Nov;34(6):284-7
12440803
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Oct;22(8):503-10
10543579
Health Aff (Millwood). 1988 Spring;7(1):91-8
3129349
Phys Ther. 1998 Sep;78(9):951-63
9736893