Contribution of the intrinsic mechanical energy of the phosphodiester linkage to the relative stability of the A, BI, and BII forms of duplex DNA.
Canonical forms of duplex DNA are known to sample well-defined regions of the alpha, beta, gamma, epsilon, and zeta dihedral angles that define the conformation of the phosphodiester linkage in the backbone of oligonucleotides. While extensive studies of base composition and base sequence dependent effects on the sampling of the A, B1, and BII canonical forms of duplex DNA have been presented, our understanding of the intrinsic contribution of the five dihedral degrees of freedom associated with the phosphodiester linkage to the conformational properties of duplex DNA is still limited. To better understand this contribution, ab initio quantum mechanical (QM) calculations were performed on a model compound representative of the phosphodiester backbone to systematically sample the energetics about the alpha, beta, gamma, epsilon, and zeta dihedral angles relevant to the conformational properties of duplex DNA. Low-energy regions of dihedral potential energy surfaces are shown to correlate with the regions of dihedral space sampled in experimental crystal structures of the canonical forms of DNA, validating the utility of the model compound and emphasizing the contribution of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the phosphodiester backbone to the conformational properties of duplex DNA. Those contributions include the relative stability of the A, BI, and BII conformations of duplex DNA, where the gas-phase energetics favor the BI form over the A and BII forms. In addition, subtle features of the potential energy surfaces mimic changes in the probability distributions of alpha, beta, gamma, epsilon, and zeta dihedral angles in A, BI, and BII forms of DNA as well as with conformations sampled in single-stranded DNA. These results show that the intrinsic mechanical properties of the phosphodiester backbone make a significant contribution to conformational properties of duplex DNA observed in the condensed phase and allow for the prediction that single-stranded DNA primarily samples folded conformations thereby possibly lowering the entropic barrier to the formation of duplex DNA.
MacKerell
Alexander D
AD
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA. alex@outerbanks.umaryland.edu
D000465:Algorithms; D003198:Computer Simulation; D018360:Crystallography, X-Ray / Q000379:methods; D004247:DNA / Q000737:chemistry*; D004277:DNA, Single-Stranded / Q000737:chemistry; D008956:Models, Chemical; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D008968:Molecular Conformation; D009690:Nucleic Acid Conformation; D009841:Oligonucleotides / Q000737:chemistry; D011336:Probability; D011789:Quantum Theory; D013314:Stress, Mechanical
D004277:DNA, Single-Stranded; D009841:Oligonucleotides; D004247:DNA
Q Rev Biophys. 1996 Dec;29(4):309-68
9080547
Biophys J. 1992 Sep;63(3):751-9
1384741
Biophys J. 2007 Jun 1;92(11):3817-29
17351000
Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1987;16:93-114
3297093
J Mol Biol. 1980 Oct 15;143(1):49-72
7441761
Methods Enzymol. 1992;211:111-27
1406304
J Am Chem Soc. 1973 Apr 4;95(7):2333-44
4709237
Biopolymers. 2001-2002;61(1):61-76
11891629
Q Rev Biophys. 1978 May;11(2):179-246
353876
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1971 Apr 8;232(4):595-606
4326669
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jun;36(11):3690-706
18477633
Nature. 1953 Apr 25;171(4356):740-1
13054694
J Am Chem Soc. 2001 May 30;123(21):5044-9
11457333
J Mol Biol. 1974 Aug 25;87(4):817-33
4427376
Biopolymers. 2004 Feb 15;73(3):356-68
14755572
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(10):3330-8
17459891
Science. 1996 Feb 9;271(5250):795-9
8628994
Biopolymers. 1972 Jan;11(1):25-56
5008177
J Am Chem Soc. 2001 Jul 18;123(28):6747-55
11448177
J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 8;285(1):245-57
9878403
J Mol Biol. 1998 May 29;279(1):127-42
9636705
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970 Mar 19;204(1):49-59
5437677
J Mol Biol. 1963 Jul;7:95-9
13990617
J Biol Chem. 1989 May 15;264(14):7921-35
2722771
Biophys J. 2004 Apr;86(4):2530-7
15041689
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19;98(13):6986-8
11416174
Adv Protein Chem. 1968;23:283-438
4882249
Biochemistry. 1991 Dec 3;30(48):11388-402
1742278
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2005 Aug;23(1):13-27
15918673
FEBS Lett. 1973 Mar 1;30(2):231-235
11947100
Science. 1982 Apr 30;216(4545):475-85
7071593
Biopolymers. 1972 Jan;11(1):1-23
5008180
Biophys J. 2002 Mar;82(3):1554-69
11867468
J Am Chem Soc. 2005 May 11;127(18):6866-76
15869310
Biophys J. 2008 Jul;95(1):257-72
18326653
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1998 Dec;16(3):487-509
10052609
J Am Chem Soc. 2002 Oct 2;124(39):11802-8
12296748
Biophys J. 1999 Jun;76(6):3206-18
10354445
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2003 Jun;20(6):771-88
12744707
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(5):1376-80
2983343
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1971 Sep 24;246(3):359-64
5316821
J Mol Biol. 1967 Jul 28;27(2):369-84
6048986
J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Jan 28;126(3):698-9
14733527
Nature. 1953 Apr 25;171(4356):737-8
13054692
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2004 Feb;21(4):537-54
14692798
Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 11;21(3):561-8
8441668
J Phys Chem B. 2008 Jul 10;112(27):8188-97
18558755
J Mol Biol. 1973 Dec 5;81(2):93-105
4777309
Nature. 1986 Nov 27-Dec 3;324(6095):385-8
3785407
Structure. 1997 Oct 15;5(10):1297-311
9351805
Biopolymers. 1971;10(7):1159-67
5095090
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Oct 15;30(20):4452-9
12384592
J Phys Chem A. 2005 Feb 17;109(6):1131-6
16833422