title: Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength.
abstract: The medial temporal lobes (MTLs) are critical for episodic memory but the functions of MTL subregions are controversial. According to memory strength theory, MTL subregions collectively support declarative memory in a graded manner. In contrast, other theories assert that MTL subregions support functionally distinct processes. For instance, one view is that perirhinal cortex (PRc) processes item information, parahippocampal cortex (PHc) processes context information, and the hippocampus binds item and context. Here, we report two experiments that tested competing predictions from these models. In these studies, subjects encoded color-word associations by imagining color either as a contextual association (context detail condition) or as a feature of the item to be encoded (item detail condition). Results showed that encoding color information as an item detail improved source recognition in amnesic patients with recollection deficits. Furthermore, event-related fMRI data from healthy subjects revealed PRc activation associated with successful retrieval of item details, whereas activation in the hippocampus and PHc was associated with recollection-based source retrieval. The qualitatively different patterns of results observed in PRc and hippocampus/PHc are inconsistent with a memory strength account and are consistent with the idea that different MTL regions process different types of episodic information.
authors.affiliation: Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA 95618, USA. radiana@ucdavis.edu
authors.forename: Rachel A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Diana
authors.forename: Andrew P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Yonelinas
authors.forename: Charan
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ranganath
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000647:Amnesia / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D001931:Brain Mapping; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010100:Oxygen / Q000097:blood; D012372:ROC Curve; D021641:Recognition, Psychology / Q000502:physiology*; D013702:Temporal Lobe / Q000098:blood supply / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D010100:Oxygen
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Mar;9(3):182-94
references.pmid: 18270514
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(10):1859-65
references.pmid: 16643967
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Dec;16(6):693-700
references.pmid: 17097284
references.citation: Hippocampus. 2007;17(3):192-200
references.pmid: 17203466
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Apr;13(4):751-8
references.pmid: 11305902
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):126-35
references.pmid: 17270487
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 6;26(36):9162-72
references.pmid: 16957073
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Dec;6(4):654-61
references.pmid: 10682209
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Nov;8(11):872-83
references.pmid: 17948032
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(2-3):109-14
references.pmid: 10524601
references.citation: Brain Res Brain Res Protoc. 2000 Feb;5(1):57-66
references.pmid: 10719266
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:123-52
references.pmid: 17417939
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2001 Feb 12;12(2):359-63
references.pmid: 11209950
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):2963-74
references.pmid: 17658561
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10541-8
references.pmid: 18923030
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2004 Dec 22;15(18):2729-33
references.pmid: 15597043
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2008 Aug 21;15(9):611-7
references.pmid: 18723430
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 11;45(10):2216-25
references.pmid: 17449068
references.citation: Hippocampus. 2008;18(7):719-28
references.pmid: 18446831
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1998 Nov;8(4):360-9
references.pmid: 9811554
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):2157-62
references.pmid: 12578977
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 18;45(11):2428-38
references.pmid: 17509626
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jan;2(1):51-61
references.pmid: 11253359
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Nov;20(6):1341-54
references.pmid: 7983467
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jan;22(1):109-23
references.pmid: 19199424
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(1):2-13
references.pmid: 14615072
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Sep;11(9):379-86
references.pmid: 17707683
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jul;34(4):730-40
references.pmid: 18605864
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):554-60
references.pmid: 18760692
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1236-41
references.pmid: 12379865
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1996 Aug 15;16(16):5233-55
references.pmid: 8756452
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2002 Oct;12(10):1048-56
references.pmid: 12217968
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2564-70
references.pmid: 16510734
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1478-89
references.pmid: 18303974