Systemic nature of drought-tolerance in common bean.
The response to drought at the physiological and molecular levels was studied in two common bean varieties with contrasting susceptibility to drought stress. A number of genes were found to be upregulated in the tolerant variety Pinto Villa relative to the susceptible cultivar, Carioca. The products of these genes fell in different functional categories. Further analyses of selected genes, consisting of their spatial differential expression and in situ mRNA accumulation patterns displayed interesting profiles. The drought-tolerant variety displayed a more developed root vasculature in drought conditions, when compared to the susceptible tropical bean Carioca. The in situ localization of three selected genes indicated the accumulation of their corresponding mRNAs in companion cells, sieve tubes and in developing phloem, suggesting that these, and/or the encoded proteins could constitute phloem-mobile signals. Indeed, a number of transcripts that are induced in response to water deficit accumulate in the phloem in other plant species, suggesting a general phenomenon. Moreover, the analysis of drought stress in plant varieties with contrasting tolerance to such stimulus will help to determine the role of differential expression of specific genes in response to such phenomenon, as well as other biochemical, morphological and physiological features in both cultivars.Drought-tolerant plants likely evolved a system that would allow them to maintain its vascular tissue integrity under stress. A functional phloem would then still function in the transmission of long-range signals, important for the systemic adaptation to the stress. It is expected that plants showing increased tolerance to abiotic stress, such as drought, are able to better protect their conductive tissues. This general strategy might help such plants evolve under stress conditions and colonize successfully new habitats.
Montero-Tavera
Víctor
V
Departamento de Biotecnología y Bioingeniería; Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional; México DF México.
Ruiz-Medrano
Roberto
R
Xoconostle-Cázares
Beatriz
B
Development. 1999 Oct;126(20):4405-19
10498677
Physiol Plant. 2002 Aug;115(4):550-562
12121461
Plant Cell. 2000 Jun;12(6):837-51
10852932
Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Aug;61(6):897-915
16927203
Funct Plant Biol. 2007 May;34(4):368-381
32689364
Phytochemistry. 2004 Jun;65(12):1795-804
15276438
Plant J. 2002 Jul;31(2):189-97
12121448
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:203-32
16669761
Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Aug;55(6):883-904
15604723
Physiol Plant. 2002 Apr;114(4):549-558
11975728
Science. 1999 Jan 1;283(5398):94-8
9872750
Plant Cell. 2005 Jun;17(6):1704-22
15749764
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004 Feb 20;1676(3):211-22
14984927
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Dec;7(6):641-50
15491912
Planta. 2003 Jan;216(3):387-96
12520329
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(12):3183-93
16936221
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:247-73
12221975
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Apr 11;368(3):515-21
18261981
Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Nov;41(11):1200-9
11092904
Plant Mol Biol. 2005 Dec;59(6):945-64
16307368
Plant Physiol. 2007 Feb;143(2):720-31
17208960
New Phytol. 2008;177(1):102-113
17961132
Ann Bot. 2008 Feb;101(3):311-7
17981876
Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr;134(4):1697-707
15064376
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 18;104(51):20623-8
18077346
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(6):1391-8
16531461
Plant Physiol. 2007 Jun;144(2):1029-38
17434995