Neogastropod phylogenetic relationships based on entire mitochondrial genomes.
BACKGROUND
The Neogastropoda is a highly diversified group of predatory marine snails (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda). Traditionally, its monophyly has been widely accepted based on several morphological synapomorphies mostly related with the digestive system. However, recent molecular phylogenetic studies challenged the monophyly of Neogastropoda due to the inclusion of representatives of other caenogastropod lineages (e.g. Littorinimorpha) within the group. Neogastropoda has been classified into up to six superfamilies including Buccinoidea, Muricoidea, Olivoidea, Pseudolivoidea, Conoidea, and Cancellarioidea. Phylogenetic relationships among neogastropod superfamilies remain unresolved.


RESULTS
The complete mitochondrial (mt) genomes of seven Neogastropoda (Bolinus brandaris, Cancellaria cancellata, Conus borgesi, Cymbium olla, Fusiturris similis, Nassarius reticulatus, and Terebra dimidiata) and of the tonnoidean Cymatium parthenopeum (Littorinimorpha), a putative sister group to Neogastropoda, were sequenced. In addition, the partial sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the calyptraeoidean Calyptraea chinensis (Littorinimorpha) was also determined. All sequenced neogastropod mt genomes shared a highly conserved gene order with only two instances of tRNA gene translocation. Phylogenetic relationships of Neogastropoda were inferred based on the 13 mt protein coding genes (both at the amino acid and nucleotide level) of all available caenogastropod mitochondrial genomes. Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic analyses failed to recover the monophyly of Neogastropoda due to the inclusion of the tonnoidean Cymatium parthenopeum within the group. At the superfamily level, all phylogenetic analyses questioned the taxonomic validity of Muricoidea, whereas the monophyly of Conoidea was supported by most phylogenetic analyses, albeit weakly. All analyzed families were recovered as monophyletic except Turridae due to the inclusion of Terebridae. Further phylogenetic analyses based on either a four mt gene data set including two additional Littorinimorpha or combining mt and nuclear sequence data also rejected the monophyly of Neogastropoda but rendered rather unresolved topologies. The phylogenetic performance of each mt gene was evaluated under ML. The total number of resolved internal branches of the reference (whole-mt genome) topology was not recovered in any of the individual gene phylogenetic analysis. The cox2 gene recovered the highest number of congruent internal branches with the reference topology, whereas the combined tRNA genes, cox1, and atp8 showed the lowest phylogenetic performance.


CONCLUSIONS
Phylogenetic analyses based on complete mt genome data resolved a higher number of internal branches of the caenogastropod tree than individual mt genes. All performed phylogenetic analyses agreed in rejecting the monophyly of the Neogastropoda due to the inclusion of Littorinimorpha lineages within the group. This result challenges morphological evidence, and prompts for further re-evaluation of neogastropod morphological synapomorphies. The important increase in number of analyzed positions with respect to previous studies was not enough to achieve conclusive results regarding phylogenetic relationships within Neogastropoda. In this regard, sequencing of complete mtDNAs from all closely related caenogastropod lineages is needed. Nevertheless, the rapid radiation at the origin of Neogastropoda may not allow full resolution of this phylogeny based only on mt data, and in parallel more nuclear sequence data will also need to be incorporated into the phylogenetic analyses.
Cunha
Regina L
RL
Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, 28006 Madrid, Spain. rcunha@ualg.pt
Grande
Cristina
C
Zardoya
Rafael
R
D000818:Animals; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D054629:Genome, Mitochondrial; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D010802:Phylogeny; D012343:RNA, Transfer / Q000235:genetics; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA; D012908:Snails / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics*
D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial; D012343:RNA, Transfer
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2000 Dec;17(3):437-55
11133198
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Mar;42(3):717-37
17127080
Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1353-66
7498775
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Dec;29(3):641-7
14615199
Syst Biol. 2006 Apr;55(2):289-300
16611600
Toxicon. 2006 Jul;48(1):29-43
16806344
Syst Biol. 1998 Mar;47(1):61-76
12064241
Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
14530136
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Feb;9(1):55-63
9479694
Science. 2003 Mar 21;299(5614):1887-9
12649480
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Aug;21(8):1492-503
15014161
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Oct;14(10):394-398
10481201
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 May;16(5):590-601
10335652
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19;98(13):7380-3
11390961
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):540-52
10742046
Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):564-77
17654362
Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1246-7
11751242
Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Sep;13(7):933-42
8752002
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 May;39(2):562-7
16360323
Evol Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;2(1):25-34
11256414
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Feb;21(2):303-13
14660702
Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2005 Nov-Dec;7(6):645-58
16206015
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Feb;17(2):266-77
10677849
J Mol Evol. 1989 Aug;29(2):170-9
2509717
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Mar 1;25(5):955-64
9023104
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1586-91
17483113
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
11524383
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Sep;32(3):913-26
15288066
Syst Biol. 2002 Jun;51(3):492-508
12079646
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Jun;47(3):1122-34
18180170
Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Mar;13(3):525-36
8742641
BMC Genomics. 2006 Nov 06;7:284
17087824
Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):2104-5
15647292
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Aug 7;269(1500):1555-61
12184825
Malacologia. 1973;12(2):295-338
4788271
Gene. 2006 Feb 1;366(2):228-37
16307849
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Jan;46(1):215-23
17936021
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817-8
9918953
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Oct;19(10):1672-85
12270894
J Mol Evol. 1999 Mar;48(3):348-59
10093225
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Feb;38(2):459-69
16230032
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Feb 26;8:61
18302768
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
9396791