title: Automatic and strategic measures as predictors of mirror gazing among individuals with body dysmorphic disorder symptoms.
abstract: The current study tests cognitive-behavioral models of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) by examining the relationship between cognitive biases and correlates of mirror gazing. To provide a more comprehensive picture, we investigated both relatively strategic (i.e., available for conscious introspection) and automatic (i.e., outside conscious control) measures of cognitive biases in a sample with either high (n = 32) or low (n = 31) BDD symptoms. Specifically, we examined the extent that (1) explicit interpretations tied to appearance, as well as (2) automatic associations and (3) strategic evaluations of the importance of attractiveness predict anxiety and avoidance associated with mirror gazing. Results indicated that interpretations tied to appearance uniquely predicted self-reported desire to avoid, whereas strategic evaluations of appearance uniquely predicted peak anxiety associated with mirror gazing, and automatic appearance associations uniquely predicted behavioral avoidance. These results offer considerable support for cognitive models of BDD, and suggest a dissociation between automatic and strategic measures.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400, USA. emc2t@virginia.edu
authors.forename: Elise M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Clerkin
authors.forename: Bethany A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Teachman
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001504:Beauty; D001828:Body Image; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D055096:Optical Devices / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011336:Probability; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D012649:Self Concept; D013001:Somatoform Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis
references.citation: CNS Spectr. 2002 Jun;7(6):435-6, 441-3
references.pmid: 15107765
references.citation: Z Exp Psychol. 2001;48(2):85-93
references.pmid: 11392985
references.citation: Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):17-22
references.pmid: 9133747
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2000 Jan;107(1):101-26
references.pmid: 10687404
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(1):16-32
references.pmid: 16834477
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;150(2):302-8
references.pmid: 8422082
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2007 Aug;45(8):1791-811
references.pmid: 17341415
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216
references.pmid: 12916565
references.citation: Body Image. 2004 Jan;1(1):113-25
references.pmid: 18089145
references.citation: J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22(3):540-7
references.pmid: 17624717
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Aug;83(2):380-93
references.pmid: 12150235
references.citation: Compr Psychiatry. 2004 Jan-Feb;45(1):10-5
references.pmid: 14671731
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Aug;169(2):196-201
references.pmid: 8871796
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80
references.pmid: 9654756
references.citation: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Feb;35(1):63-78
references.pmid: 17171538
references.citation: Cogn Emot. 2008;22(7):1327-1339
references.pmid: 25125771
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2001 Dec;39(12):1381-93
references.pmid: 11758697