Semantic memory activation in individuals at risk for developing Alzheimer disease.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether whole-brain, event-related fMRI can distinguish healthy older adults with known Alzheimer disease (AD) risk factors (family history, APOE epsilon4) from controls using a semantic memory task involving discrimination of famous from unfamiliar names.


METHODS
Sixty-nine cognitively asymptomatic adults were divided into 3 groups (n = 23 each) based on AD risk: 1) no family history, no epsilon4 allele (control [CON]); 2) family history, no epsilon4 allele (FH); and 3) family history and epsilon4 allele (FH+epsilon4). Separate hemodynamic response functions were extracted for famous and unfamiliar names using deconvolution analysis (correct trials only).


RESULTS
Cognitively intact older adults with AD risk factors (FH and FH+epsilon4) exhibited greater activation in recognizing famous relative to unfamiliar names than a group without risk factors (CON), especially in the bilateral posterior cingulate/precuneus, bilateral temporoparietal junction, and bilateral prefrontal cortex. The increased activation was more apparent in the FH+epsilon4 than in the FH group. Unlike the 2 at-risk groups, the control group demonstrated greater activation for unfamiliar than familiar names, predominately in the supplementary motor area, bilateral precentral, left inferior frontal, right insula, precuneus, and angular gyrus. These results could not be attributed to differences in demographic variables, cerebral atrophy, episodic memory performance, global cognitive functioning, activities of daily living, or depression.


CONCLUSIONS
Results demonstrate that a low-effort, high-accuracy semantic memory activation task is sensitive to Alzheimer disease risk factors in a dose-related manner. This increased activation in at-risk individuals may reflect a compensatory brain response to support task performance in otherwise asymptomatic older adults.
Seidenberg
M
M
Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, IL, USA.
Guidotti
L
L
Nielson
K A
KA
Woodard
J L
JL
Durgerian
S
S
Antuono
P
P
Zhang
Q
Q
Rao
S M
SM
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000544:Alzheimer Disease / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000523:psychology*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D021641:Recognition, Psychology / Q000502:physiology; D012307:Risk Factors; D012660:Semantics
Neurobiol Aging. 2006 Oct;27(10):1494-504
16225965
Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239-59
1759558
BMC Med. 2006 Jan 13;4:1
16412236
Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86
5349366
J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 1;23(3):986-93
12574428
Neurology. 1999 Oct 22;53(7):1391-6
10534240
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(5):693-703
15721182
Neuron. 2004 Sep 30;44(1):195-208
15450170
Neuropsychol Rev. 2007 Jun;17(2):127-43
17476598
Arch Neurol. 2000 Jan;57(1):72-7
10634451
J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49
7183759
Brain. 2006 May;129(Pt 5):1240-8
16537568
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
5146491
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1113-24
17583988
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Jan;28(1):59-68
16671081
Neuroimage. 2005 Jul 1;26(3):839-51
15955494
Psychol Bull. 1971 Jun;75(6):424-9
5580548
Psychol Aging. 2002 Mar;17(1):56-71
11931287
N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 17;343(7):450-6
10944562
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Sep;12(5):707-35
16961952
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
1202204
N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 19;338(8):506-11
9468467
Science. 1993 Aug 13;261(5123):921-3
8346443
Arch Neurol. 2005 Dec;62(12):1881-8
16344346
Psychol Bull. 1987 Nov;102(3):439-42
3685230
Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 1):21-36
11525331
Lancet. 1996 Jul 13;348(9020):90-3
8676723
Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
8812068