title: A review of the use of likelihood ratios in the chiropractic literature.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this review is to determine how frequently likelihood ratios (LRs) have been used or described in the chiropractic literature and to depict their appropriate use in the clinical setting.
  
  
  METHODS
  A literature search was conducted of the MEDLINE, Manual Alternative and Natural Therapy Index System, and Index to Chiropractic Literature databases, with search years encompassing 1966 through June 2006. Citations in the English language that addressed the following search terms were retrieved: likelihood ratio in combination with manipulation and chiropractic.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The searches netted a total of 64 citations: 10 in MEDLINE, 34 in the Manual Alternative and Natural Therapy Index System, and 20 in the Index to Chiropractic Literature. After eliminating articles from journals that were not focused specifically on chiropractic, duplicates, and those that did not involve LRs, 3 articles remained and were reviewed. None of the reviewed articles provided a description of LRs, and only 2 used them in a clinical context.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of LRs can be very helpful in patient management; however, LRs are rarely reported in the chiropractic literature. Accordingly, chiropractic practitioners are most likely uninformed on the subject and may not have the capacity to use them in formulating diagnoses. It is suggested that researchers increase the reporting of LRs and that chiropractic clinicians begin to make use of them in day-to-day practice.
authors.affiliation: Professor, Palmer College of Chiropractic West, Department of Research, San Jose, CA 95134.
authors.forename: Michael T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Haneline
references.citation: Med J Aust. 2004 May 3;180(9):449-54
references.pmid: 15115422
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Mar;31(3):391-7
references.pmid: 9506499
references.citation: CJEM. 2002 Sep;4(5):348-54
references.pmid: 17608981
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jun;11(6):692-4
references.pmid: 15175211
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1999 Oct;79(10):939-48
references.pmid: 10499967
references.citation: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990 Aug;114(8):852-4
references.pmid: 2375660
references.citation: JAMA. 1992 May 20;267(19):2638-44
references.pmid: 1573753
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 May;72(5):630-4
references.pmid: 11971050
references.citation: JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):703-7
references.pmid: 8309035
references.citation: Crit Care Med. 1997 Sep;25(9):1514-21
references.pmid: 9295825
references.citation: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986 Aug;110(8):689-93
references.pmid: 3755325
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989 Apr;12(2):71-8
references.pmid: 2523948
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 May;19(4):231-7
references.pmid: 8734397
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 31;293(5):257
references.pmid: 1143310
references.citation: Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(3):227-32
references.pmid: 12217073