title: Eliciting individual preferences for health care: a case study of perinatal care.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To demonstrate how a discrete choice experiment (DCE) can be used to elicit individuals' preferences for health care and how these preferences can be incorporated into a cost-benefit analysis.
  
  
  METHODS
  A DCE which elicited preferences for three perinatal services: specialist nurse appointments; home visits from a trained lay visitor; and home-help. Cost was included to obtain a monetary measure of the value that individuals place on the services. In total, 292 women who had previously participated in a randomized trial of alternative forms of pre-natal care were interviewed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The most preferred service configuration consisted of three nurse appointments and two home visits before birth and 4 h of home-help per week for the first 4 weeks after birth. On average, women are willing to pay $371 for this package. A package that excluded home-help was valued at $122 whilst provision of three nurse appointments only was valued at $97. The predicted uptake of the services ranged from 37% to 93% depending on the woman's experience with the service, whether or not it was her first child and her level of education.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The willingness to pay values were much higher than the costs for nurse appointments, suggesting this service produces a net social benefit. The willingness to pay for the package including both the nurse appointments and home visits only just exceeded the costs of the package, suggesting there is a relatively high chance that this package produces a net social loss.
authors.affiliation: Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. m.vanderpol@abdn.ac.uk
authors.forename: Marjon
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: van der Pol
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Shiell
authors.forename: Flora
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Au
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Jonhston
authors.forename: Suzanne
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tough
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000416:Alberta; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D005382:Financing, Personal; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D057240:Patient Preference; D018743:Perinatal Care / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Pediatrics. 1986 Jan;77(1):16-28
references.pmid: 3510017
references.citation: Birth. 2001 Dec;28(4):254-63
references.pmid: 11903214
references.citation: J Health Econ. 2006 May;25(3):520-37
references.pmid: 16243406
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2006 Dec;56(6):657-68
references.pmid: 17118044
references.citation: Health Econ. 2000 Apr;9(3):267-70
references.pmid: 10790707
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):535-46
references.pmid: 10075178
references.citation: Med Care. 1993 Feb;31(2):155-74
references.pmid: 8433578
references.citation: Health Econ. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):261-73
references.pmid: 9226144
references.citation: Birth. 2006 Sep;33(3):183-94
references.pmid: 16948718
references.citation: Future Child. 1999 Spring-Summer;9(1):44-65, 190-1
references.pmid: 10414010
references.citation: Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(9):855-68
references.pmid: 16942121
references.citation: Health Expect. 1999 Dec;2(4):235-244
references.pmid: 11281900
references.citation: Prenat Diagn. 2005 Dec;25(13):1206-11
references.pmid: 16353286
references.citation: Womens Health Issues. 2000 Sep-Oct;10(5):240-7
references.pmid: 10980441