Limited ability to extend the digits of the human hand independently with extensor digitorum.
While the human hand has an extraordinary capacity to manipulate objects, movement of its digits is usually not completely independent. These limits have been documented for extrinsic flexor muscles, although hand skills also require selectivity for extension movements. Hence, we measured the degree of independent control of the major extrinsic extensor (extensor digitorum, ED). Subjects grasped a cylinder, with the thumb perpendicular to the fingers. Load cells were connected to the proximal phalanges of the fingers and the thumb's distal phalanx. Intramuscular recordings using needle electrodes were made from the individual digital compartments of ED. Subjects were instructed to extend each digit isometrically in a voluntary ramp contraction to 50% maximal force. In total, the behaviour of 283 single motor units was analysed. More than half of the units associated with one 'test' finger were recruited inadvertently when another digit contracted to 50% maximum, with most units being recruited by extension of the adjacent digits. Usually, test motor units were recruited at higher forces by extension of fingers further from the test finger. Unexpectedly, extension of the thumb recruited many motor units acting on the little finger. Across tasks, at recruitment of the test motor units, the force produced by the test finger often differed between the voluntary and inadvertent contractions. Overall, the independent control of the output of ED is limited; this may reflect 'spill-over' of motor commands to other digital extensor compartments. This level of control of the extrinsic extensor muscles is more independent than the control of the deep extrinsic flexor muscle but less independent than that of the superficial extrinsic flexor muscle.
van Duinen
Hiske
H
Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Barker St, Randwick 2031, NSW, Australia.
Yu
Wei Shin
WS
Gandevia
Simon C
SC
D000328:Adult; D004576:Electromyography; D005260:Female; D005385:Fingers / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007537:Isometric Contraction; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009048:Motor Skills / Q000502:physiology; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology*; D011999:Recruitment, Neurophysiological
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Mar;131(2):187-95
10766271
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec;92(6):3210-20
15240764
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):57-62
12968013
Neurosci Lett. 2000 Aug 18;290(1):53-6
10925173
J Physiol. 1999 Aug 1;518 ( Pt 3):907-20
10420024
Biol Cybern. 1998 Aug;79(2):139-50
9791934
J Physiol. 2005 Aug 15;567(Pt 1):301-9
15946972
J Neurophysiol. 1989 Dec;62(6):1344-59
2600629
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;113(1):214-21
14707639
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Aug;74(2):901-4
7472394
Exp Brain Res. 2004 May;156(2):255-62
14712333
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Aug;92(2):734-42
15056692
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Jun;96(6):2293-300
15133016
J Neurosci. 2005 May 4;25(18):4560-4
15872103
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov;92(5):2802-10
15212429
J Neurophysiol. 1987 Jan;57(1):311-24
3559678
Muscle Nerve. 2003 Nov;28(5):614-22
14571465
Brain. 1987 Oct;110 ( Pt 5):1117-30
3676695
J Physiol. 2007 Sep 15;583(Pt 3):1145-54
17656436
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):550-6
17093112
J Physiol. 1989 Feb;409:451-71
2585297
J Neurophysiol. 1977 Nov;40(6):1432-43
925737
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;100(1):64-75
18463189
J Neurophysiol. 1991 Jun;65(6):1381-91
1875247
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun;91(6):2515-23
14724266
J Physiol. 1994 Sep 15;479 ( Pt 3):487-97
7837104
Brain Res. 2002 Nov 8;954(2):212-9
12414104
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;100(6):3225-35
18650306
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan;160(2):203-13
15322785
Science. 1957 Dec 27;126(3287):1345-7
13495469
Science. 1981 Nov 20;214(4523):933-6
7302570
Brain. 1990 Oct;113 ( Pt 5):1563-81
2245311
Exp Brain Res. 1998 Jul;121(1):1-6
9698184