Comparative gene expression profiles between heterotic and non-heterotic hybrids of tetraploid Medicago sativa.
BACKGROUND
Heterosis, the superior performance of hybrids relative to parents, has clear agricultural value, but its genetic control is unknown. Our objective was to test the hypotheses that hybrids expressing heterosis for biomass yield would show more gene expression levels that were different from midparental values and outside the range of parental values than hybrids that do not exhibit heterosis.


RESULTS
We tested these hypotheses in three Medicago sativa (alfalfa) genotypes and their three hybrids, two of which expressed heterosis for biomass yield and a third that did not, using Affymetrix M. truncatula GeneChip arrays. Alfalfa hybridized to approximately 47% of the M. truncatula probe sets. Probe set signal intensities were analyzed using MicroArray Suite v.5.0 (MAS) and robust multi-array average (RMA) algorithms. Based on MAS analysis, the two heterotic hybrids performed similarly, with about 27% of genes showing differential expression among the parents and their hybrid compared to 12.5% for the non-heterotic hybrid. At a false discovery rate of 0.15, 4.7% of differentially expressed genes in hybrids (approximately 300 genes) showed nonadditive expression compared to only 0.5% (16 genes) in the non-heterotic hybrid. Of the nonadditively expressed genes, approximately 50% showed expression levels that fell outside the parental range in heterotic hybrids, but only one of 16 showed a similar profile in the non-heterotic hybrid. Genes whose expression differed in the parents were three times more likely to show nonadditive expression than genes whose parental transcript levels were equal.


CONCLUSIONS
The higher proportions of probe sets with expression level that differed from the parental midparent value and that were more extreme than either parental value in the heterotic hybrids compared to a non-heterotic hybrid were also found using RMA. We conclude that nonadditive expression of transcript levels may contribute to heterosis for biomass yield in alfalfa.
Li
Xuehui
X
Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA. xligalee@uga.edu
Wei
Yanling
Y
Nettleton
Dan
D
Brummer
E Charles
EC
D002678:Chimera / Q000235:genetics; D055028:Comparative Genomic Hybridization; D018744:DNA, Plant / Q000235:genetics; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D018745:Genome, Plant; D005838:Genotype; D006823:Hybrid Vigor; D000455:Medicago sativa / Q000235:genetics*; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
D018744:DNA, Plant
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 1;102(5):1572-7
15659551
Genetics. 2007 Mar;175(3):1441-50
17179097
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Mar 15;7:137
16539732
Genetics. 2005 Nov;171(3):1267-75
16020790
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Sep;113(5):831-45
16868764
Biotechniques. 1990 Feb;8(2):148-9
1690559
Genome Res. 2007 Mar;17(3):264-75
17255553
Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 1;20(16):2534-44
15117752
Genetics. 2004 Aug;167(4):1791-9
15342517
Genetics. 2006 Feb;172(2):1179-89
16204207
Plant Cell. 2003 Oct;15(10):2236-9
14523245
Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Nov;62(4-5):579-91
16941221
Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-86
10547847
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 30;8:273
17663764
Science. 2002 Apr 26;296(5568):752-5
11923494
Biostatistics. 2003 Apr;4(2):249-64
12925520
Genetics. 2006 Jan;172(1):507-17
16172500
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Jan 31;7:49
16448562
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2;103(18):6805-10
16641103
Genetics. 2005 Jan;169(1):389-97
15489529
Genetics. 2006 Aug;173(4):2199-210
16702414
BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Apr 10;8:33
18402703
Genetics. 2007 Apr;175(4):2009-17
17287529
Bioinformatics. 2005 Nov 1;21(21):3983-9
16159924
Plant Mol Biol. 2007 Jan;63(1):21-34
17006594