title: Biotic and abiotic stress responses through calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) signaling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
abstract: Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) sense the calcium concentration changes in plant cells and play important roles in signaling pathways for disease resistance and various stress responses as indicated by emerging evidences. Among the 20 wheat CDPK genes studied, 10 were found to respond to drought, salinity and ABA treatments. Consistent with previous observations, one CDPK gene was shown to respond to multiple abiotic stresses in wheat suggesting that CDPKs could be converging points for multiple signaling pathways. Among the 12 wheat CDPK genes that were responsive to Blumeria graminis tritici (Bgt) infection or the treatment of hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), eight also responded to abiotic stresses, suggesting a cross-talk between biotic and abiotic stress signaling pathways. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that some of these genes were closely related to CDPKs from other species, whose functions have been partially studied, suggesting similar functions wheat CDPK genes. Combining the up-to-date knowledge of CDPK functions and our observations, a model was developed to project the possible roles of wheat CDPK genes in the signaling of biotic and abiotic stress responses.
authors.affiliation: National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI) and Institute of Crop Sciences; Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences (CAAS); Beijing, P. R. China.
authors.forename: Aili
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Xiang
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Charles H
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Leseberg
authors.forename: Jizeng
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Jia
authors.forename: Long
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Mao
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Mar;19(3):1065-80
references.pmid: 17400895
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007 Oct;20(10):1213-21
references.pmid: 17918623
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Aug;6(8):372-9
references.pmid: 11495791
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2000 May;12(5):803-16
references.pmid: 10810151
references.citation: New Phytol. 2001 Jul;151(1):7-33
references.pmid: 33873376
references.citation: Plant J. 2000 Aug;23(3):319-27
references.pmid: 10929125
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998 Oct;1(5):428-33
references.pmid: 10066614
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Oct;19(10):3019-36
references.pmid: 17921317
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 2008 Mar;66(4):429-43
references.pmid: 18185910
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Jun;6(6):262-7
references.pmid: 11378468
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1998 Apr;10(4):585-98
references.pmid: 9548984
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2000 Aug;12(8):1425-40
references.pmid: 10948260
references.citation: Plant J. 2000 Aug;23(4):441-50
references.pmid: 10972870
references.citation: EMBO J. 2001 Oct 15;20(20):5556-67
references.pmid: 11597999
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 26;102(30):10736-41
references.pmid: 16027369
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Jun;41(6):692-701
references.pmid: 10945338
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2001 Nov;42(11):1228-33
references.pmid: 11726707