Reduced efficiency of magnetotaxis in magnetotactic coccoid bacteria in higher than geomagnetic fields.
Magnetotactic bacteria are microorganisms that orient and migrate along magnetic field lines. The classical model of polar magnetotaxis predicts that the field-parallel migration velocity of magnetotactic bacteria increases monotonically with the strength of an applied magnetic field. We here test this model experimentally on magnetotactic coccoid bacteria that swim along helical trajectories. It turns out that the contribution of the field-parallel migration velocity decreases with increasing field strength from 0.1 to 1.5 mT. This unexpected observation can be explained and reproduced in a mathematical model under the assumption that the magnetosome chain is inclined with respect to the flagellar propulsion axis. The magnetic disadvantage, however, becomes apparent only in stronger than geomagnetic fields, which suggests that magnetotaxis is optimized under geomagnetic field conditions. It is therefore not beneficial for these bacteria to increase their intracellular magnetic dipole moment beyond the value needed to overcome Brownian motion in geomagnetic field conditions.
Pan
Yongxin
Y
Biogeomagnetism Group, Key Laboratory of the Earth's Deep Interior, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. yxpan@mail.iggcas.ac.cn
Lin
Wei
W
Li
Jinhua
J
Wu
Wenfang
W
Tian
Lanxiang
L
Deng
Chenglong
C
Liu
Qingsong
Q
Zhu
Rixiang
R
Winklhofer
Michael
M
Petersen
Nikolai
N
D018407:Bacterial Physiological Phenomena / Q000528:radiation effects*; D002465:Cell Movement / Q000502:physiology* / Q000528:radiation effects*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D004574:Electromagnetic Fields; D008954:Models, Biological; D011829:Radiation Dosage
Science. 2006 Jan 13;311(5758):242-5
16373532
Biophys J. 2007 Aug 15;93(4):1402-12
17526564
Science. 1981 Jun 12;212(4500):1269-70
17738834
Biophys J. 1999 Jun;76(6):3323-30
10354458
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Feb;279(2):202-6
18179585
Biophys J. 2006 Aug 1;91(3):1098-107
16714352
Nature. 2006 Mar 2;440(7080):110-4
16299495
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):5748-53
12719518
Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jul;11(7):1646-57
19220399
Biophys J. 2007 Jan 15;92(2):661-70
17071652
Biophys J. 1990 Aug;58(2):549-55
19431763
Biophys J. 2005 Feb;88(2):1496-9
15556984
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008 Jul;32(4):654-72
18537832
Chem Rev. 2008 Nov;108(11):4875-98
18855486
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006 Jan;55(1):3-16
16420610
Biophys J. 1997 Aug;73(2):994-1000
9251816