title: Evidence-based compared with reality-based medicine in obstetrics.
authors.affiliation: Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
authors.forename: Jeff
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Andrews
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D009774:Obstetrics; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011247:Pregnancy
references.citation: Vintzileos AM. Evidence-based compared with reality-based medicine in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1335–40.
references.citation: Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline [published erratum appears in J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:909]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:S3–56.
references.citation: Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, Cartabellotta A, Martin J, Hopayian K, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ 2005;5:1.
references.citation: Barton MB, Miller T, Wolff T, Petitti D, LeFebre M, Sawaya G, et al. How to read the new recommendation statement: methods update from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:123–7.
references.citation: Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924–6.