Structure prediction for CASP8 with all-atom refinement using Rosetta.
We describe predictions made using the Rosetta structure prediction methodology for the Eighth Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. Aggressive sampling and all-atom refinement were carried out for nearly all targets. A combination of alignment methodologies was used to generate starting models from a range of templates, and the models were then subjected to Rosetta all atom refinement. For the 64 domains with readily identified templates, the best submitted model was better than the best alignment to the best template in the Protein Data Bank for 24 cases, and improved over the best starting model for 43 cases. For 13 targets where only very distant sequence relationships to proteins of known structure were detected, models were generated using the Rosetta de novo structure prediction methodology followed by all-atom refinement; in several cases the submitted models were better than those based on the available templates. Of the 12 refinement challenges, the best submitted model improved on the starting model in seven cases. These improvements over the starting template-based models and refinement tests demonstrate the power of Rosetta structure refinement in improving model accuracy.
Raman
Srivatsan
S
Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Vernon
Robert
R
Thompson
James
J
Tyka
Michael
M
Sadreyev
Ruslan
R
Pei
Jimin
J
Kim
David
D
Kellogg
Elizabeth
E
DiMaio
Frank
F
Lange
Oliver
O
Kinch
Lisa
L
Sheffler
Will
W
Kim
Bong-Hyun
BH
Das
Rhiju
R
Grishin
Nick V
NV
Baker
David
D
D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D008958:Models, Molecular; D011487:Protein Conformation; D017510:Protein Folding; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry*; D016415:Sequence Alignment / Q000379:methods*; D020539:Sequence Analysis, Protein / Q000379:methods*; D012984:Software
D011506:Proteins
Protein Sci. 2007 Feb;16(2):165-75
17189483
Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 1;21(7):951-60
15531603
Proteins. 2007;69 Suppl 8:118-28
17894356
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jun;37(11):3522-30
19357092
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 4;101(18):6946-51
15118103
Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:363-82
18410248
Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 1;24(23):2780-1
18818215
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(16):4364-74
16936316
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1961 Sep 15;47:1309-14
13683522
Science. 2005 Sep 16;309(5742):1868-71
16166519
Proteins. 1999 May 1;35(2):133-52
10223287
Protein Sci. 2002 Aug;11(8):1937-44
12142448
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):1-13
19131951
Protein Sci. 2009 Jan;18(1):229-39
19177366
Protein Sci. 2003 May;12(5):963-72
12717019
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
2231712
Proteins. 2006 Dec 1;65(4):922-9
17034045
Proteins. 2007 Dec 1;69(4):758-63
17671979
Nature. 1992 Mar 19;356(6366):263-5
1552947
Nature. 2007 Nov 8;450(7167):259-64
17934447
Bioinformatics. 2003 May 22;19(8):1015-8
12761065
Methods Enzymol. 2004;383:66-93
15063647
Nat Methods. 2009 Aug;6(8):551-2
19644455
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(17):e112
16971460
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W653-8
17517780
Database (Oxford). 2009;2009:bap003
20157476
Nature. 2004 May 20;429(6989):318-322
15152257
Proteins. 2005;61 Suppl 7:128-34
16187354
Proteins. 1999;Suppl 3:22-9
10526349
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
9254694
Bioinformatics. 2007 Apr 1;23(7):802-8
17267437
J Mol Biol. 2003 Feb 7;326(1):317-36
12547212
Proteins. 2003;53 Suppl 6:542-7
14579344