title: Two distinct Omp85 paralogs in the chloroplast outer envelope membrane are essential for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana.
abstract: Homologs of a bacterial beta-barrel protein, Omp85, ubiquitously exist in the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts. Those in non-photosynthetic bacteria and mitochondria are responsible for beta-barrel protein sorting to the outer membranes, and thus are essential for viability of the organisms. There are two distinct Omp85 homologs in chloroplasts of the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. One of them, Toc75, functions as the main protein import translocation channel, and was shown to be indispensable from a very early stage of embryogenesis. By contrast, the role of another homolog, OEP80, remains elusive. Recently, we showed that disruption of the OEP80 gene causes embryo abortion in A. thaliana at a stage later than that affected by TOC75 knockout. This indicates that the two chloroplastic Omp85 homologs are both essential for viability of plants from very early stages of development, but may have distinct functions. Defining the functional and evolutionary relationships of Toc75 and OEP80 by further studies should advance our understanding of the importance of plastids during embryogenesis, as well as that of the molecular details of plastid biogenesis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Plant Sciences; University of California; Davis, California USA.
authors.forename: Shih-Chi
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Hsu
authors.forename: Ramesh
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Patel
authors.forename: Jocelyn
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bédard
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Jarvis
authors.forename: Kentaro
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Inoue
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2004 Jul;135(3):1206-20
references.pmid: 15266054
references.citation: Plant J. 2004 Aug;39(3):354-65
references.pmid: 15255865
references.citation: EMBO Rep. 2002 Jun;3(6):557-62
references.pmid: 12034753
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):862-6
references.pmid: 14685243
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2003 Dec 5;278(49):48520-3
references.pmid: 14570913
references.citation: Science. 2003 Jan 10;299(5604):262-5
references.pmid: 12522254
references.citation: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006 Jan;8(1):18-30
references.pmid: 16435266
references.citation: Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49(5-6):557-77
references.pmid: 16096965
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Sep;148(1):235-45
references.pmid: 18621981
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2004 Jan 5;164(1):19-24
references.pmid: 14699090
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 Jul-Aug;1777(7-8):557-63
references.pmid: 18423394
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Jun;138(2):715-33
references.pmid: 15908591
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007;61:191-214
references.pmid: 17506684
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008 Jul;179(2):257-285
references.pmid: 19086173
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2007 May;12(5):189-95
references.pmid: 17416546
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2005 Dec;58(5):1216-25
references.pmid: 16313611
references.citation: Mol Membr Biol. 2005 Jan-Apr;22(1-2):73-86
references.pmid: 16092526