title: Microdrill, CO2-laser, and piezoelectric stapedotomy: a comparative study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare 3 different devices used to perforate the stapes footplate in otosclerotic patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study design was a prospective unblinded study. It was conducted at the ENT Department of a general hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ninety subjects undergoing primary stapedotomy for otosclerosis by a senior surgeon participated. A stapedotomy operation was performed under local anesthesia with reversed sequence of surgical steps. Three different devices were used to perforate the posterior half of the footplate: a microdrill (MD), a CO2 laser (CO2), and a Piezosurgery bone device (PZS). The hole diameter was 0.7 mm. Three consecutive samples of unselected patients were recruited. All patients of each sample were operated with the same device. Main outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative air- (AC) and bone-conduction (BC) audiometry, intraoperative findings, and postoperative complications. Postoperative pure-tone audiometry was done 1 month after surgery.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The CO2 laser was used in 30 stapedotomies, the PZS in 30, and the MD was used in 30. Bone-conduction pure-tone averages did not worsen in the MD and CO2 groups. CO2 laser shows a trend toward less residual air-bone gap and more functional gain at low frequencies. Piezosurgery bone device patients lost approximately 10 dB in BC at 4,000 Hz. Significant differences in AC thresholds gain and in the residual air-bone gap were found between groups. Piezosurgery bone device patients had less gain and more residual gap at high frequencies as a result of a slight deterioration of BC threshold. A higher rate of postoperative vertigo was also found in PZS patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of the CO2 laser seems associated with the best functional results, although on a statistical basis, they do not differ significantly from that obtained with the standard MD platinotomy. The PZS stapedotomy is effective from a surgical point of view for most patients. However, it is associated with a slight but significant deterioration of BC at high frequency and at higher vertigo rate. More basic validation of the stimulation parameters is necessary for safe use of this new technology.
authors.affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy. d.cuda@ausl.pc.it
authors.forename: Domenico
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Cuda
authors.forename: Alessandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Murri
authors.forename: Paolo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mochi
authors.forename: Tommaso
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Solenghi
authors.forename: Nicoletta
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Tinelli
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000772:Anesthesia, Local; D001299:Audiometry; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D001844:Bone Conduction; D004598:Electrosurgery / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D053685:Laser Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D054020:Lasers, Gas; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010040:Otosclerosis / Q000601:surgery*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013201:Stapes Surgery / Q000379:methods*; D013525:Surgical Instruments; D016896:Treatment Outcome