Y grafting for coronary artery bypass: is it as good as single grafting?
OBJECTIVE
The use of multiple arterial grafting has gained popularity in recent years due to its clinical advantages when compared with conventional CABG surgery. The purpose of the present review is to focus in particular on the safety and efficacy of composite Y grafting in coronary surgery.


RESULTS
Several studies demonstrated mid-term and long-term benefits of total arterial myocardial revascularization when compared with conventional CABG, that is utilizing the left internal mammary artery and multiple veins. Nevertheless, there have been concerns whether it is safe to have a single inflow rather than multiple aorto-coronary grafts. There is evidence in literature that composite arterial grafting is nowadays a well established technique, and several configurations can be performed according to the specific patients' needs. Moreover, the use of Y grafting completely avoids aortic manipulation, especially when used in association with the off-pump technique.


CONCLUSIONS
Composite Y grafting with the exclusive use of arterial conduits is a well tolerated and effective technique. The choice of the second arterial conduit should be tailored according to the specific patients' characteristics. The association of composite arterial grafting and off-pump technique allows a no-touch technique of the ascending aorta, thereby also minimizing the risk of neurological events.
Bisleri
Gianluigi
G
Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Brescia Medical School, Brescia, Italy.
Muneretto
Claudio
C
D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000379:methods*; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D016896:Treatment Outcome