title: Biomechanical testing of new meniscal repair techniques containing ultra high-molecular weight polyethylene suture.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of current meniscal repair techniques containing ultra high-molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture with and without cyclic loading.
  
  
  METHODS
  Vertical longitudinal cuts made in porcine menisci were secured with a single repair device. Noncycled and cycled (500 cycles) biomechanical tests were performed on the following groups: group 1, No. 2-0 Mersilene vertical suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ); group 2, No. 2-0 Orthocord vertical suture (DePuy Mitek, Westwood, MA); group 3, No. 0 Ultrabraid vertical suture (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA); group 4, No. 2-0 FiberWire vertical suture (Arthrex, Naples, FL); group 5, vertically oriented mattress suture by use of an Ultra FasT-Fix device (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy) with No. 0 Ultrabraid; group 6, vertically oriented mattress suture by use of a RapidLoc A2 device (DePuy Mitek) with No. 2-0 Orthocord suture; group 7, vertically oriented stitch by use of a MaxFire device with MaxBraid PE suture (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN); and group 8, an obliquely oriented stitch of No. 0 UHMWPE suture inserted by use of a CrossFix device (Cayenne Medical, Scottsdale, AZ). Endpoints were failure loads, failure modes, stiffness, and cyclic displacement.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean single-pull loads were calculated for Ultra FasT-Fix (121 N), FiberWire (110 N), MaxFire (130 N), Mersilene (84 N), Orthocord (124 N), RapidLoc A2 (86 N), CrossFix (77 N), and Ultrabraid (109 N). After 500 cyclic loads, the Orthocord (222 N) repair was stronger than the others: Ultra FasT-Fix (110 N), FiberWire (117 N), MaxFire (132 N), Mersilene (89 N), RapidLoc A2 (108 N), CrossFix (95 N), and Ultrabraid (126 N) (P < .05). Ultrabraid suture showed significantly more elongation over 500 cycles than the other repairs (P < .05). The principal failure mode associated with the single destructive pull (suture breakage) changed to pulling through the meniscus after cyclic loading for most devices. Knot slippage or device failure was seldom observed as the failure mode with these techniques.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Self-adjusting, UHMWPE suture-containing meniscal repair devices (Ultra FasT-Fix, RapidLoc A2, and MaxFire) were comparable to the isolated UHMWPE-containing suture repairs on single-failure load testing. UHMWPE-containing suture repairs are stronger than braided polyester suture repairs, but pure UHMWPE suture (Ultrabraid) elongated more during cycling. Orthocord suture is significantly stronger than the other meniscal repair techniques after cyclic loading (P < .05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Meniscal repair techniques using UHMWPE containing sutures provide greater strength than earlier generations of meniscal repair techniques.
authors.affiliation: Plano Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Spine Center, Plano, Texas 75093, USA.
authors.forename: F Alan
authors.initials: FA
authors.lastname: Barber
authors.forename: Morley A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Herbert
authors.forename: F Alexander
authors.initials: FA
authors.lastname: Schroeder
authors.forename: Jorge
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Aziz-Jacobo
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Sutker
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology*; D004867:Equipment Design; D008592:Menisci, Tibial / Q000601:surgery; D023421:Models, Animal; D020959:Polyethylene; D013536:Suture Techniques; D013552:Swine; D000070600:Tibial Meniscus Injuries
chemical_list: D020959:Polyethylene