The case against choice and competition.
Choice and competition are central planks of the English government's health reforms and modernisation programme. Wales and Scotland have chosen a different path, which calls into question the suggestion that in an age of consumerism there is no other way to secure overdue changes in the provision and management of health care to improve their quality and responsiveness to user preferences. Yet pro-market enthusiasts pursue their agenda in the face of evidence that calls into question the claims they make. It is a curious position for a government that is wedded to evidence-based policy to find itself in. The policy puzzle is why, despite the contested nature of the alleged virtues of choice and competition, policy-makers persist with introducing a set of reforms which appear to threaten the very values and principles they profess to uphold. An alternative reform paradigm exists which acknowledges what makes public services public. This paper sets out the key features of what rediscovering public service entails adopting the notion of co-production as a means of bringing about a new relationship between professionals and the public that remains true to the National Health Service's social purpose.
Hunter
David J
DJ
School of Medicine and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Queen's Campus, Thornaby, Stockton on Tees TS17 6BH, UK. d.j.hunter@durham.ac.uk
D002755:Choice Behavior; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D004465:Economic Competition; D005380:Financing, Government; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010358:Patient Participation; D017150:Public Sector; D013222:State Medicine / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration; D006113:United Kingdom