title: A practitioner survey of opinions toward regenerative endodontics.
abstract: The success of regenerative endodontic procedures requires practitioner acceptance, but little or no evidence is available. The purpose of this survey was to collect the opinions of attendee's of the 2008 Endodontic Board of Diplomates 2008 Summer Conference on the issue of regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs). After Nova Southeastern University institutional review board approval, 100 copies of a survey were circulated, and 56 completed surveys were returned anonymously. The survey found that 96% of participants thought that more regenerative therapies should be incorporated into treatments. Although only 14% of participants had used umbilical cord or stem cell banking for themselves or a relative, 63% thought that stem cell banking would be useful to regenerate dental tissues. Most (89%) of the participants would be willing to save teeth and dental tissues for stem cell banking. These results suggest that endodontic practitioners are supportive and optimistic about the future use of REPs.
authors.affiliation: Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
authors.forename: Ingrid
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Epelman
authors.forename: Peter E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Murray
authors.forename: Franklin
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Garcia-Godoy
authors.forename: Sergio
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kuttler
authors.forename: Kenneth N
authors.initials: KN
authors.lastname: Namerow
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D018070:Biological Specimen Banks; D003815:Dentists / Q000523:psychology; D004708:Endodontics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019239:Practice Patterns, Dentists' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012038:Regeneration; D013234:Stem Cells; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D023822:Tissue Engineering / Q000941:ethics / Q000523:psychology*