'Experience talks': physician prioritisation of contrasting interventions to optimise management of acute cough in general practice.
BACKGROUND
Uptake of interventions to improve quality of care by clinicians is variable and is influenced by clinicians' attitudes. The influence of clinicians' experience with an intervention on their preference for adopting interventions is largely unknown.


METHODS
Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews exploring views and attitudes towards an illness-focused intervention (specific communication skills training) and a disease-focused intervention (C-reactive protein, or CRP, point-of-care testing) to optimize management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) among general practitioners (GPs) who had used both interventions for two years in a randomised trial (exposed GPs), and GPs without experience of either intervention (non-exposed GPs).


RESULTS
All but two of the ten non-exposed GPs indicated that they would prioritize implementation of the disease-focused intervention of CRP testing over communication skills training, while all but one GP in the exposed group said that they would prioritize the illness-focused approach of communication skills training as it was more widely applicable, whereas CRP testing was confirmatory and useful in a subgroups of patients.


CONCLUSIONS
There are differences in attitudes to prioritizing contrasting interventions for optimising LRTI management among GPs with and without experience of using the interventions, although GPs in both groups recognised the importance of both approaches to optimise management of acute cough. GPs' experiences with and attitudes towards interventions need to be taken into account when planning rollout of interventions aimed at changing clinical practice.
Cals
Jochen W L
JW
Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. j.cals@hag.unimaas.nl
Butler
Christopher C
CC
Dinant
Geert-Jan
GJ