Rural and urban park visits and park-based physical activity.
OBJECTIVE
A physical activity disparity exists between rural and urban residents. Community parks are resources for physical activity because they are publicly provided, available at a low cost, and accessible to most residents. We examine the use of and physical activity outcomes associated with rural and urban parks.


METHODS
Onsite observations were conducted using the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) at four rural and four urban parks. Momentary sampling scans were conducted four times per day for seven days at each site.


RESULTS
A total of 6,545 park visitors were observed. Both rural and urban park visitors were observed more often at larger parks with paved trails and attended most often on weekends. Rural park visits were more frequent than urban park visits but rural visits were less physically active.


CONCLUSIONS
Although similarities were observed between rural and urban park visits, differences suggest that findings from park and physical activity studies in urban areas should not be considered representative of their rural counterparts. Given that the majority of existing park and physical activity research has been undertaken in urban settings, the need for complementary research in rural settings has been made evident through this presentation of baseline descriptive data.
Shores
Kindal A
KA
Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, College of Health and Human Performance, Carol G. Belk Building, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA. shoresk@ecu.edu
West
Stephanie T
ST
D015444:Exercise; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009043:Motor Activity; D009657:North Carolina; D019370:Observation; D011203:Poverty; D011633:Public Facilities; D011998:Recreation; D012424:Rural Population; D014505:Urban Population