title: Determining relative importance of variables in developing and validating predictive models.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Multiple regression models are used in a wide range of scientific disciplines and automated model selection procedures are frequently used to identify independent predictors. However, determination of relative importance of potential predictors and validating the fitted models for their stability, predictive accuracy and generalizability are often overlooked or not done thoroughly.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using a case study aimed at predicting children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who are at low risk of Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS), we propose and compare two strategies, bootstrapping and random split of data, for ordering potential predictors according to their relative importance with respect to model stability and generalizability. We also propose an approach based on relative increase in percentage of explained variation and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for developing models where variables from our ordered list enter the model according to their importance. An additional data set aimed at identifying predictors of prostate cancer penetration is also used for illustrative purposes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Age is chosen to be the most important predictor of TLS. It is selected 100% of the time using the bootstrapping approach. Using the random split method, it is selected 99% of the time in the training data and is significant (at 5% level) 98% of the time in the validation data set. This indicates that age is a stable predictor of TLS with good generalizability. The second most important variable is white blood cell count (WBC). Our methods also identified an important predictor of TLS that was otherwise omitted if relying on any of the automated model selection procedures alone. A group at low risk of TLS consists of children younger than 10 years of age, without T-cell immunophenotype, whose baseline WBC is < 20 x 10(9)/L and palpable spleen is < 2 cm. For the prostate cancer data set, the Gleason score and digital rectal exam are identified to be the most important indicators of whether tumor has penetrated the prostate capsule.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our model selection procedures based on bootstrap re-sampling and repeated random split techniques can be used to assess the strength of evidence that a variable is truly an independent and reproducible predictor. Our methods, therefore, can be used for developing stable and reproducible models with good performances. Moreover, our methods can serve as a good tool for validating a predictive model. Previous biological and clinical studies support the findings based on our selection and validation strategies. However, extensive simulations may be required to assess the performance of our methods under different scenarios as well as check their sensitivity to a random fluctuation in the data.
authors.affiliation: Child Heath Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. joseph@utstat.toronto.edu
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Beyene
authors.forename: Eshetu G
authors.initials: EG
authors.lastname: Atenafu
authors.forename: Jemila S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Hamid
authors.forename: Teresa
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: To
authors.forename: Lillian
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Sung
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D054198:Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma / Q000150:complications*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012372:ROC Curve; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012307:Risk Factors; D015275:Tumor Lysis Syndrome / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology