Long-term social bonds promote cooperation in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.
Reciprocal altruism, one of the most probable explanations for cooperation among non-kin, has been modelled as a Prisoner's Dilemma. According to this game, cooperation could evolve when individuals, who expect to play again, use conditional strategies like tit-for-tat or Pavlov. There is evidence that humans use such strategies to achieve mutual cooperation, but most controlled experiments with non-human animals have failed to find cooperation. One reason for this could be that subjects fail to cooperate because they behave as if they were to play only once. To assess this hypothesis, we conducted an experiment with monogamous zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) that were tested in a two-choice apparatus, with either their social partner or an experimental opponent of the opposite sex. We found that zebra finches maintained high levels of cooperation in an iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game only when interacting with their social partner. Although other mechanisms may have contributed to the observed difference between the two treatments, our results support the hypothesis that animals do not systematically give in to the short-term temptation of cheating when long-term benefits exist. Thus, our findings contradict the commonly accepted idea that reciprocal altruism will be rare in non-human animals.
St-Pierre
Angèle
A
Département des Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7.
Larose
Karine
K
Dubois
Frédérique
F
D000533:Altruism; D000818:Animals; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D005260:Female; D046369:Finches / Q000502:physiology*; D005716:Game Theory; D005717:Games, Experimental; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010152:Pair Bond