Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
The availability of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) allows for possible modifications to existing dairy cattle breeding programs. Selection index calculations including genomic and phenotypic observations as index sources were used to determine the optimal number of offspring per genotyped sire with a focus on functional traits and the design of cooperator herds, and to evaluate the importance of a central station test for genotyped bull dams. Evaluation criteria to compare different breeding strategies were correlations between index and aggregate genotype (r(TI)), and the relative selection response percentage (RSR) of an index without single nucleotide polymorphism information in relation to a single nucleotide polymorphism-based index. The number of required daughter records per sire to achieve a predefined r(TI) strongly depends on the accuracy of GEBV (r(mg)) and the heritability of the trait. For a desired r(TI) of 0.8, h(2) = 0.10, and r(mg) = 0.5, at least 57 additional daughters have to be included in the genetic evaluation. Daughter records of genotyped sires are not necessary for optimal scenarios where r(mg) is greater than or equal to r(TI). There still is a substantial need for phenotypic daughter records, especially for low-heritability functional traits and r(mg) < 0.7. Phenotypic records from genotyped potential bull dams have no relevance for increasing r(TI), even with a low value for r(mg) of 0.5. Hence, genomic breeding programs should focus on recording functional traits within progeny groups, preferably in cooperator herds. For low-heritability traits and with r(mg) > 0.7, the RSR of conventional breeding programs was only 10% of RSR from genomic breeding strategies. As shown in scenarios including 2 traits in the index as well as in the aggregate genotype, the availability of highly accurate GEBV for production traits and low-accuracy GEBV for functional traits increased the risk of widening the gap between selection responses in production and functionality. Counteractions are possible, such as via higher economic weights for low-heritability functional traits. Finally, an alternative selection strategy considering only 2 pathways of selection for genotyped male calves and for cow dams was evaluated. This strategy is competitive with a 4-pathway genomic breeding program if the fraction of selected male calves for the artificial insemination program is below 1% and if selection is focused on functionality, thus pointing to substantial insufficiencies caused by low reliabilities of breeding values for cows for such traits in conventional bull dam selection schemes.
König
S
S
Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany. skoenig2@gwdg.de
Swalve
H H
HH
D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding / Q000379:methods*; D002417:Cattle / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005838:Genotype; D008297:Male; D010641:Phenotype; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Q000235:genetics; D040641:Quantitative Trait Loci / Q000235:genetics; D019655:Quantitative Trait, Heritable; D012641:Selection, Genetic / Q000235:genetics*