Artefacts of apes, humans, and others: towards comparative assessment and analysis.
This paper explores issues of technology and artefacts in a comparative cross-species frame, using archaeological examples and modern data sets to illustrate points about process and content. It develops the argument that regardless of species, artefacts have a special significance as external projections of the mind, often necessitating cognitive judgements on the basis of several variables and subject to influences by cultural tradition, functional needs, and raw materials. In humans, apes, and other tool using animals, behaviour overlaps in some respects and is vastly different in others. Overlapping aspects are worth seeking out and exploiting, as they provide opportunities to investigate factors influencing variation and to gain insights into cognition. Recent primatological research establishes much more foundation for continuity, but many of the details of artefacts and their variation remain to be explored. This paper presents case studies of variability and standardisation that suggest the limits on variation are as tight in some chimpanzee produced artefacts as in many produced by humans, and functional constraints appear to operate more strongly on some parts of artefacts than others. Thus, degree of standardisation cannot be used as a simple index to 'refinement,' but the widespread overlap in standardisation between human and nonhuman artefacts greatly expands the scope for study.
Gowlett
J A J
JA
British Academy Centenary Project, SACE (School of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology), University of Liverpool, L69 3GS, UK. gowlett@liv.ac.uk
D000818:Animals; D016477:Artifacts; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001695:Biology / Q000639:trends; D003210:Concept Formation; D046368:Crows / Q000502:physiology; D003469:Culture; D004867:Equipment Design; D015186:Hominidae / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D002679:Pan troglodytes / Q000502:physiology; D013045:Species Specificity