Update experience of surgery for acute limb ischaemia in a district general hospital - are we getting any better?
BACKGROUND
The aims of this study were to audit results of a 10-year experience of surgery for acute limb ischaemia (ALI) in terms of limb salvage and mortality rates, and to compare results with a historical published series from our unit.


METHODS
All emergency operations performed during the period 1993-2003 were identified from theatre registers and patient notes reviewed to determine indications for, and outcome of, surgery. Data were compared to a similar cohort who underwent surgery from 1980 to 1990.


RESULTS
There was a 33% increase in workload from 87 to 116 patients between the two time periods. The number of patients with idiopathic ALI reduced (24% versus 4%; P < 0.05), and there were fewer smokers (71% versus 39%; P < 0.05) and a greater number of claudicants (17% versus 35%; P < 0.05) in those treated from 1993-2003. Latterly, more patients underwent pre-operative heparinisation (33% versus 80%; P < 0.05), received prophylactic antibiotics (14% versus 63%; P < 0.05), and had anaesthetic presence in theatre (46% versus 88%; P < 0.05). There was also a reduction in local anaesthetic procedures (80% versus 41%; P < 0.05). Despite increased pre-operative (15% versus 47%; P < 0.05) and on-table imaging (0% versus 16%; P < 0.05) technical success did not improve. Whilst complication rates were identical at 62%, there were fewer cardiovascular complications in the recent cohort. The 30-day mortality rate for embolectomy fell from 45% to 33%. Multivariate analysis revealed age > 70 years, prolonged symptom duration, ASA score > or = III, lack of prophylactic antibiotics, absence of an anaesthetist, and operations performed under local anaesthetic to be associated with increased risk of mortality. Factors adversely affecting limb salvage included prolonged duration from symptom onset to operation, and a history of claudication or smoking.


CONCLUSIONS
Despite improvements in pre- and peri-operative management, arterial embolectomy/thrombectomy remains a procedure with a high morbidity and mortality. Further attempts to improve outcome must be directed at early diagnosis and referral as delay from symptom onset to surgery is a major determinant of outcome.
Morris-Stiff
G
G
Department of Surgery, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, Rhondda Cynon Taf, UK.
D'Souza
J
J
Raman
S
S
Paulvannan
S
S
Lewis
M H
MH
D000208:Acute Disease; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000671:Amputation, Surgical / Q000401:mortality / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017128:Embolectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000401:mortality*; D005121:Extremities / Q000098:blood supply*; D006767:Hospitals, District; D006769:Hospitals, General; D006801:Humans; D007383:Intermittent Claudication / Q000453:epidemiology; D007511:Ischemia / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*; D023821:Limb Salvage / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008485:Medical Audit; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000401:mortality*; D012907:Smoking / Q000453:epidemiology; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000453:epidemiology