Implementing the essential elements of a mental health court: the experiences of a large multijurisdictional suburban county.
Mental health courts developed in the USA in the late 1990s as one means to reduce the involvement of people with mental illness in the criminal justice system. In response to the growth in number of mental health courts, the Council of State Governments led an initiative to identify essential elements of mental health courts to guide their development and implementation. This paper applies these essential elements to a municipal mental health court in a multijurisdictional, suburban county. While this court met most essential elements, they faced a number of challenges. The primary ones included not being able to advance from hearing municipal cases only to state misdemeanor and felonies, not having the resources to expand program capacity for municipal cases, and participants not being able to always access needed mental health treatment, rehabilitation, and support services. The paper concludes with implications for behavioral health administrators and direct service staff in implementing the essential elements of mental health courts.
Linhorst
Donald M
DM
School of Social Work, Saint Louis University, 3550 Lindell Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. linhorsd@slu.edu
Dirks-Linhorst
P Ann
PA
Stiffelman
Steve
S
Gianino
Janet
J
Bernsen
Herbert L
HL
Kelley
B Joyce
BJ
D003156:Community Mental Health Services / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000458:organization & administration; D003415:Crime; D003416:Criminal Law / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005260:Female; D005843:Geography; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy; D008923:Missouri; D011329:Prisoners / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology