Exploring a taxonomy for aggression against women: can it aid conceptual clarity?
The assessment of aggression against women is demanding primarily because assessment strategies do not share a common language to describe reliably the wide range of forms of aggression women experience. The lack of a common language impairs efforts to describe these experiences, understand causes and consequences of aggression against women, and develop effective intervention and prevention efforts. This review accomplishes two goals. First, it applies a theoretically and empirically based taxonomy to behaviors assessed by existing measurement instruments. Second, it evaluates whether the taxonomy provides a common language for the field. Strengths of the taxonomy include its ability to describe and categorize all forms of aggression found in existing quantitative measures. The taxonomy also classifies numerous examples of aggression discussed in the literature but notably absent from quantitative measures. Although we use existing quantitative measures as a starting place to evaluate the taxonomy, its use is not limited to quantitative methods. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed.
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. scook@sgsu.edu
Sarah
S
Cook
Dominic
D
Parrott
D000374:Aggression / Q000145:classification* / Q000523:psychology; D018585:Battered Women / Q000145:classification; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011581:Psychological Tests; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods*; D018875:Vocabulary, Controlled; D016387:Women's Health