A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for body dissatisfaction.
The authors examined the relative effectiveness of 3 different approaches to the experience of body dissatisfaction compared to a control and ruminative attention control condition, with respect to increasing weight and appearance satisfaction. One hundred female undergraduates (mean age = 24.38, SD = 9.39) underwent a body dissatisfaction induction procedure, which significantly decreased levels of weight and appearance satisfaction. Participants were then randomized, 20 to each of 5 groups: control, ruminative attention control, acceptance, distraction, and cognitive dissonance. With the exception of the control group, participants were briefly trained in their assigned technique and were asked to practice this over the next 5 min while repeated measures of weight and appearance satisfaction were recorded. Acceptance, cognitive dissonance, and distraction were superior to both control conditions in increasing weight satisfaction and were superior to a control condition in improving appearance satisfaction. Only acceptance was superior in improving appearance satisfaction compared to a ruminative attention control. The evidence suggests that acceptance is a promising approach to investigate further with respect to its efficacy for reducing body dissatisfaction.
Wade
Tracey
T
School of Psychology.
George
Wing Man
WM
School of Psychology.
Atkinson
Melissa
M
0000-0002-7699-2398
School of Psychology.
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D001521:Behavior Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D001828:Body Image; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D003073:Cognitive Dissonance; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D011614:Psychotherapy, Brief / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult