The ethics of nonmedical sex selection.
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that there are significant ethical problems with nonmedical sex selection, and that prohibitive legislation is justified. The central argument put forward is that nonmedical sex selection is a sexist practice which promotes socially restrictive conceptions of sex, gender and family. Several steps are taken to justify this position: background information on technology and legislation is provided, the neoliberal position that is supportive of nonmedical sex selection is described, and preliminary reasons for rejecting this approach are given. A detailed description of how a harm/benefit based analysis contributes to the argument against nonmedical sex selection, and how it successfully counters most criticism, is provided. The paper concludes by suggesting that virtue ethics further strengthens the moral argument against nonmedical sex selection.
Strange
H
H
cesagen (ESRC Centre for the Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics), Cardiff University, 6 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BG, UK. StrangeHR1@cf.ac.uk
Chadwick
R
R
D026688:Bioethical Issues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000941:ethics*; D012743:Sex Preselection / Q000941:ethics*