Superfund, hedonics, and the scales of environmental justice.
Environmental justice (EJ) is prominent in environmental policy, yet EJ research is plagued by debates over methodological procedures. A well-established economic approach, the hedonic price method, can offer guidance on one contentious aspect of EJ research: the choice of the spatial unit of analysis. Environmental managers charged with preventing or remedying inequities grapple with these framing problems. This article reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on unit choice in EJ, as well as research employing hedonic pricing to assess the spatial extent of hazardous waste site impacts. The insights from hedonics are demonstrated in a series of EJ analyses for a national inventory of Superfund sites. First, as evidence of injustice exhibits substantial sensitivity to the choice of spatial unit, hedonics suggests some units conform better to Superfund impacts than others. Second, hedonic estimates for a particular site can inform the design of appropriate tests of environmental inequity for that site. Implications for policymakers and practitioners of EJ analyses are discussed.
School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0345, USA. Douglas.Noonan@pubpolicy.gatech.edu
Douglas S
DS
Noonan
Rama Mohana R
RM
Turaga
Brett M
BM
Baden
D004777:Environment; D006256:Hazardous Waste; D012935:Social Justice
D006256:Hazardous Waste