Comparison between 64-row CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the study of lower extremities: personal experience.
OBJECTIVE
This study was undertaken to evaluate the potential of 64-row multislice computed tomography (CT) versus digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in detecting significant lesions of lower-extremity inflow and runoff arteries.


METHODS
Fifty-three patients underwent 64-row multislice CT and DSA over a mean of 36 days. The vascular tree was divided into 33 segments. Three readers independently reviewed the axial CT scans and multiplanar oblique and two- and three-dimensional reconstructions (maximum intensity projection and volume rendering) images to assess degree of stenosis according to four categories: 1 (0%-49% stenosis); 2 (50%-99% stenosis); 3 (occluded); 4 (not evaluable). In all cases, DSA was performed by arterial catheterisation.


RESULTS
In 53 patients, 1,440 segments were evaluated (infrarenal aorta and 16 arterial segments for each leg; 42 bilateral studies, 11 unilateral studies). Compared with DSA, CT angiography yielded 97.2% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 92.5% positive predictive value, 98.9% negative predictive value, 97.1% diagnostic accuracy and 95.4% concordance on the degree of stenosis.


CONCLUSIONS
Sixty-four-row multislice CT proved to be helpful in detecting haemodynamically significant lesions in peripheral arterial occlusive disease and improved the results obtained with 4- and 16-slice multidetector CT. In addition, owing to the high spatial resolution and rigorous technique, no variations in the data obtained below the knee were detected, overcoming a limitation of earlier generations of CT scanners.
Cernic
S
S
Unità Clinico Operativa di Radiologia, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy. stefanocernic@gmail.com
Pozzi Mucelli
F
F
Pellegrin
A
A
Pizzolato
R
R
Cova
M A
MA
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000792:Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D015901:Angiography, Digital Subtraction / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007717:Knee / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D007866:Leg / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D035002:Lower Extremity / Q000098:blood supply / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016491:Peripheral Vascular Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013848:Thigh / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*