Comparison of nonsurgical root canal treatment and single-tooth implants.
BACKGROUND
The aim of this review was to compare the differences between nonsurgical root canal treatment and single-tooth implants. With the emerging field of implant dentistry gaining acceptance, the choice to retain a diseased tooth through the use of root canal therapy or extract it and replace the tooth with an implant-supported crown has become controversial. Many practitioners consider the single-tooth implant as a reasonable alternative to the preservation of a diseased tooth.


METHODS
An extensive search of the dental literature was accomplished to identify publications related to the differences in root canal therapy and dental implants. Several comparative studies were also considered.


RESULTS
The treatment modalities were reviewed with respect to outcome measures and study design, success/failure, functional rehabilitation and psychological differences, complications related to treatment, cost differences, and factors influencing treatment planning considerations.


CONCLUSIONS
With the reviewed information in hand, the practitioner should be better prepared to determine which treatment option is most appropriate for each individual patient.
Wilford Hall U.S.A.F. Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas 78236, USA.
Michael F
MF
Morris
Timothy C
TC
Kirkpatrick
Richard E
RE
Rutledge
William G
WG
Schindler
D019250:Dental Implants, Single-Tooth / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics / Q000523:psychology; D019094:Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; D003788:Dental Pulp Diseases / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D012390:Root Canal Therapy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics / Q000523:psychology; D016896:Treatment Outcome