Limitations of an optimum sustainable population or potential biological removal approach for conserving marine mammals: Pacific walrus case study.
Decision rules are the agreed-upon points at which specific management interventions are initiated. For marine mammal management under the U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), decision rules are usually based on either a numeric population or biological-removal approach. However, for walrus and other ice-associated pinnipeds, the inability to reliably assess population numbers or biological removals highlights a significant gap in the MMPA, particularly when the Arctic environment is rapidly changing. We describe the MMPA's ecosystem-based management goals, and why managers have bypassed these goals in favor of an approach that depends upon numerical population assessment. We then revisit the statute's primary goals in light of current knowledge about the Pacific walrus ecosystem and new developments in environmental governance. We argue that to monitor and respond to changes in the walrus ecosystem, decision rules should be based on scientific criteria that depend less on the currently-impractical goal of accurately enumerating population size and trends, or removals from that population. Rather, managers should base decisions on ecological needs and observed ecological changes. To implement this approach would require an amendment to the MMPA that supports filling the gap in management with achievable decision rules. Alternatively, walrus and other ice-associated pinnipeds will remain largely unmanaged during a period of profound environmental change.
Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA. mrobards@mmc.gov
Martin D
MD
Robards
John J
JJ
Burns
Chanda L
CL
Meek
Annette
A
Watson
D000818:Animals; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D017753:Ecosystem; D008386:Marine Biology; D014856:Walruses