[Assessment of methodology and report quality of systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of acupuncture-moxibustion in China].
OBJECTIVE
To assess the methodology and report quality of systematic evaluation and Meta-analysis of acupuncture and moxibustion in China.


METHODS
Retrieve CBM, CNKI, WF and VIP database, collect data from the information system established by Epidata 2.1, assess the methodology and report quality by using the QQAQ and QUOROM, calculate the percentage of adequate rate.


RESULTS
Thirty-eight reviews, including twenty six systematic evaluation and twelve Meta-analyses, met the enrolled criteria. Twenty-two kinds of diseases and six diseases systems were included. The methodology quality scores were generally low (3.34 +/- 1.44). The causes of the problems were insufficient literature resource, bias in data collections and inaccurate merging methods. The report quality was relatively low in abstracts, methods, trial flow, introduction and data merging.


CONCLUSIONS
The amount of literatures on systematic evaluation and Meta-analysis of acupuncture is gradually increasing from 2002. However, the quality control is not ideal. It is important to improve the methodology and report quality.
Xiong
Jun
J
Tianjin University of TCM, Tianjin 300193, China.
Du
Yuan-hao
YH
Li
Bo
B
Shi
Lei
L
Xu
Yuan-yuan
YY
Liu
Qian
Q
Tian
Tao-tao
TT
Liu
Wei-hong
WH
Fu
Yong
Y
D015670:Acupuncture Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D002681:China; D009071:Moxibustion / Q000379:methods*