Waist circumference, pedometer placement, and step-counting accuracy in youth.
This study examined whether differences in waist circumference (WC) and pedometer placement (anterior vs. midaxillary vs. posterior) affect the agreement between pedometer and observed steps during treadmill and self-paced walking. Participants included 19 pairs of youth (9- 15-years-old) who were matched for sex, race, and height and stratified by WC (high WC: HWC; low WC: LWC). Participants performed 3-min treadmill-walking trials at speeds of 59, 72, and 86 m x min(-1) and a 400-m self-paced walking trial on level ground. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between pedometer and observed steps of spring-levered pedometers by WC, pedometer placement, and walking speed. In the HWC group, the posterior pedometer placement consistently agreed most closely with observed steps at all treadmill speeds and during self-paced walking. In the LWC group, no single pedometer placement consistently agreed most closely with observed steps at all treadmill speeds and during self-paced walking. We conclude that a posterior pedometer placement improves step-count accuracy in most youth with an HWC at a range of walking speeds on level ground.
Abel
Mark G
MG
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0219, USA. mark.abel@uky.edu
Hannon
James C
JC
Eisenman
Patricia A
PA
Ransdell
Lynda B
LB
Pett
Marjorie
M
Williams
Daniel P
DP
D000293:Adolescent; D000367:Age Factors; D015992:Body Mass Index; D002648:Child; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic / Q000295:instrumentation*; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D055105:Waist Circumference / Q000502:physiology*; D049629:Waist-Hip Ratio; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology*