title: [What is most important is what comes across : Urological guidelines from the target group's point of view].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Guidelines are developed to improve the quality of patient care. The effect of German urologic guidelines has not been evaluated so far. Therefore, we aimed to systematically investigate the acceptance, use, and quality of the published guidelines from a user's perspective.
  
  
  METHODS
  A link to an online questionnaire concerning use and barriers to the application of guidelines was distributed via e-mail by the German Society of Urology (DGU). German urologists' opinions on differences in national guideline quality were evaluated regarding prostate cancer (PCA), bladder cancer, germ cell tumors (GCT), renal cell carcinomas, and erectile dysfunction.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Four hundred sixty-seven German urologists participated. More than 90% of the participants considered guidelines to be helpful. The Internet as the main tool for guideline distribution was favored by 28.4%, followed by publication in Urologe A. The main barrier to guideline usage was attributed to the lack of up-to date clinical data. Guidelines for GCT scored best in all quality categories and reached the highest level of use (65.8%), and 40.5% of participating urologists considered the additional establishment of comprehensive care centers for GCT as more effective for quality improvement than guideline development alone. For the other urologic tumors, especially PCA, guideline development was favored as a tool for quality improvement.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  More than 90% of participating urologists accept clinical guidelines as useful instruments in clinical practice and for therapeutic decisions. Our results should be integrated into guideline dissemination and implementation strategies in order to achieve a higher degree of treatment conformation to guidelines.
authors.affiliation: Klinik für Urologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. jonas.busch@charite.de
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Busch
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Röllig
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Weissbach
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Kempkensteffen
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hinz
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Jahnke
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schostak
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lein
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Weikert
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Stephan
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Deger
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ollenschläger
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schrader
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005858:Germany; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010820:Physicians / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D014572:Urology / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*