title: Comparison of gating around end-expiration and end-inspiration in radiotherapy for lung cancer.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of gating around end-expiration and end-inspiration.
  
  
  METHODS
  We created five irradiation protocols to treat 15 patients with lung cancer. They were non-gated irradiation (protocol 1, P1), amplitude-based gating around end-expiration (P2) and end-inspiration (P3), and phase-based gating around end-expiration (P4) and end-inspiration (P5). We compared the lung dosimetric parameters and the treatment time.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Compared to P2, in P3 the mean lung dose was reduced by 0.5+/-0.4Gy, V20 by 1.2+/-0.9%, V10 by 1.4+/-0.8%, and V5 by 1.5+/-0.9% (p<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in these parameters between P4 and P5. At a dose rate of 600 monitor units/min (MUs/min), the average treatment time required for 100MUs was 10, 26, 64, 33, and 33 s, respectively, for P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  With amplitude-based gating, gating around end-inspiration (P3) produced a greater decrease in the lung dose, however, the treatment time was longest among the four gated protocols. There was no significant difference between the two phase-based gating protocols (P4 and P5) with respect to the radiation dose to the lungs and the treatment time.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan. tetsuo3110@iwa.bbiq.jp
authors.forename: Tetsuo
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Saito
authors.forename: Takashi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Sakamoto
authors.forename: Natsuo
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Oya
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D009068:Movement; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D012119:Respiration; D055425:Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed