A further application of the active time model to multiple concurrent variable-interval schedules.
In this experiment we show that the active time model (ATM) accurately predicts probe data from multiple concurrent VI VI schedules. Subjects were trained under a concurrent VI 30-s VI 60-s and a concurrent VI 60-s VI 120-s schedule. Two types of unreinforced probes were then conducted. The first paired the two VI 60-s stimuli. These stimuli, while equivalent in their associated absolute rates of reinforcement, differed in their relative rates of reinforcement. The second probe paired the VI 30-s stimulus with the relatively rich VI 60-s stimulus. In contrast with the first probe, these stimuli differed in their absolute rates of reinforcement, while being similar in their relative rates. During the first set of probes, birds preferred the VI 60-s stimulus trained with the VI 120-s schedule. During the second set of probes, birds were indifferent to the two stimuli. These results are less extreme than others reported in the literature. Nonetheless, we found that ATM accurately fit individual subject data in both sets of probes. In contrast a variant of scalar expectancy theory did not fit the data at either the individual or group level.
McKenzie
Andrew T
AT
Department of Psychology, Vassar College, Box 298, 124 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603, United States.
Cleaveland
J Mark
JM
D000818:Animals; D010856:Columbidae; D003198:Computer Simulation; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011336:Probability; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D013997:Time Factors