title: Does the truth interfere with our ability to deceive?
abstract: Does the truth interfere with our ability to respond deceptively? We considered this question in the present study by examining the effects of a task set (i.e., selecting truthful or untruthful responses), both by comparing two presentations of the same task and through transfer to a different task. All participants carried out the task either under the instructions to respond both correctly and incorrectly (Experiment 1) or under the instructions to respond truthfully and deceptively (Experiment 2); the order of instructions was counterbalanced. In Experiment 2, after completing the main task, the participants also performed a Stroop task. The findings suggested that deceptive responses took longer overall, regardless of the order of instructions. Moreover, the experience of responding deceptively versus truthfully led to faster responding on a subsequent Stroop test. Although there may well be processes unique to deceptive responding, the evidence suggests that overcoming interference is a process shared by deceptive and nondeceptive tasks.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, England. m.osman@ucl.ac.uk
authors.forename: Magda
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Osman
authors.forename: Shelley
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Channon
authors.forename: Sian
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Fitzpatrick
mesh_terms: D008192:Deception; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time; D057190:Stroop Test; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D055815:Young Adult