title: Evolving the ingredients for reciprocity and spite.
abstract: Darwin never provided a satisfactory account of altruism, but posed the problem beautifully in light of the logic of natural selection. Hamilton and Williams delivered the necessary satisfaction by appealing to kinship, and Trivers showed that kinship was not necessary as long as the originally altruistic act was conditionally reciprocated. From the late 1970s to the present, the kinship theories in particular have been supported by considerable empirical data and elaborated to explore a number of other social interactions such as cooperation, selfishness and punishment, giving us what is now a rich description of the nature of social relationships among organisms. There are, however, two forms of theoretically possible social interactions-reciprocity and spite-that appear absent or nearly so in non-human vertebrates, despite considerable research efforts on a wide diversity of species. We suggest that the rather weak comparative evidence for these interactions is predicted once we consider the requisite socioecological pressures and psychological mechanisms. That is, a consideration of ultimate demands and proximate prerequisites leads to the prediction that reciprocity and spite should be rare in non-human animals, and common in humans. In particular, reciprocity and spite evolved in humans because of adaptive demands on cooperation among unrelated individuals living in large groups, and the integrative capacities of inequity detection, future-oriented decision-making and inhibitory control.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, , Cambridge, MA, USA. mdh102559@gmail.com
authors.forename: Marc
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hauser
authors.forename: Katherine
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: McAuliffe
authors.forename: Peter R
authors.initials: PR
authors.lastname: Blake
mesh_terms: D000533:Altruism; D000818:Animals; D005190:Family; D006801:Humans; D012641:Selection, Genetic