title: How sensitive is physician performance to alternative compensation schedules? Evidence from a large network of primary care clinics.
abstract: Despite its centrality for the provision of health care, physician compensation remains understudied, and existing studies either fail to control for time trends, cover small samples from highly particular settings, or examine empirically negligible changes in reward levels. Using a four-year sample of 59 physicians and 1.1 million encounters, we study how physicians at a network of primary care clinics responded when their salaried compensation plan was replaced with a lower salary plus substantial piece rates for encounters and select procedures. Although patient characteristics remained unchanged, physicians increased encounters by 11 to 61%, both by increasing encounters per day and days worked at the network, and increased procedures to the maximum reimbursable level.
authors.affiliation: School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. helmchen@uic.edu
authors.forename: Lorens A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Helmchen
authors.forename: Anthony T
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Lo Sasso
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008484:Medicaid / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008511:Medicine / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D018803:Models, Economic; D010820:Physicians / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012456:Salaries and Fringe Benefits / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014481:United States