Predicting soccer matches after unconscious and conscious thought as a function of expertise.
In two experiments, we investigated the effects of expertise and mode of thought on the accuracy of people's predictions. Both experts and nonexperts predicted the results of soccer matches after conscious thought, after unconscious thought, or immediately. In Experiment 1, experts who thought unconsciously outperformed participants in all other conditions. Whereas unconscious thinkers showed a correlation between expertise and accuracy of prediction, no such relation was observed for conscious thinkers or for immediate decision makers. In Experiment 2, this general pattern was replicated. In addition, experts who thought unconsciously were better at applying diagnostic information than experts who thought consciously or who decided immediately. The results are consistent with unconscious-thought theory.
Dijksterhuis
Ap
A
Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. a.dijksterhuis@psych.ru.nl
Bos
Maarten W
MW
van der Leij
Andries
A
van Baaren
Rick B
RB
D001364:Awareness; D003163:Competitive Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D009426:Netherlands; D011337:Probability Learning; D011361:Professional Competence; D012916:Soccer / Q000523:psychology*; D013850:Thinking; D014473:Unconscious, Psychology