Evaluation of an algorithm for estimating a patient's life threat risk from an ambulance call.
BACKGROUND
Utilizing a computer algorithm, information from calls to an ambulance service was used to calculate the risk of patients being in a life-threatening condition (life threat risk), at the time of the call. If the estimated life threat risk was higher than 10%, the probability that a patient faced a risk of dying was recognized as very high and categorized as category A+. The present study aimed to review the accuracy of the algorithm.


METHODS
Data collected for six months from the Yokohama new emergency system was used. In the system, emergency call workers interviewed ambulance callers to obtain information necessary to assess triage, which included consciousness level, breathing status, walking ability, position, and complexion. An emergency patient's life threat risk was then estimated by a computer algorithm applying logistic models. This study compared the estimated life threat risk occurring at the time of the emergency call to the patients' state or severity of condition, i.e. death confirmed at the scene by ambulance crews, resulted in death at emergency departments, life-threatening condition with occurrence of cardiac and/or pulmonary arrest (CPA), life-threatening condition without CPA, serious but not life-threatening condition, moderate condition, and mild condition. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of the algorithm for categorizing A+ were calculated.


RESULTS
The number of emergency dispatches over the six months was 73,992. Triage assessment was conducted for 68,692 of these calls. The study targets account for 88.8% of patients who were involved in triage calls. There were 2,349 cases where the patient had died or had suffered CPA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of the algorithm at predicting cases that would result in a death or CPA were 80.2% (95% confidence interval: 78.6% - 81.8%), 96.0% (95.8% - 96.1%), 42.6% (41.1% - 44.0%), 99.2% (99.2% - 99.3%), 19.9 (18.8 - 21.1), and 0.21 (0.19 - 0.22), respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
A patient's life threat risk was quantitatively assessed at the moment of the emergency call with a moderate level of accuracy.
Ohshige
Kenji
K
Department of Public Health, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan. kenoh@med.yokohama-cu.ac.jp
Kawakami
Chihiro
C
Mizushima
Shunsaku
S
Moriwaki
Yoshihiro
Y
Suzuki
Noriyuki
N
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000465:Algorithms; D000552:Ambulances; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical; D004631:Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007564:Japan; D008875:Middle Aged; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D015599:Trauma Severity Indices; D014218:Triage / Q000592:standards*; D055815:Young Adult