Sex differences and hormonal influences on response to mechanical pressure pain in humans.
Previous studies have demonstrated that sex differences in pain responsivity can be detected using various models of experimentally induced pain. The present study employed the mechanical pressure test in order to examine potential differences in pain report among men, normally menstruating women (NMW), and women taking monophasic oral contraceptives (OCW). Testing occurred during 5 phases of the menstrual cycle (menstrual, follicular, ovulatory, luteal, and late luteal) and all participants completed 10 sessions (2 sessions per phase). Menstrual-cycle phase was estimated for OCW based on their first day of menses. Men were tested at time points that roughly corresponded to the intervals during which the different phases occurred in NMW. During the mechanical pressure test, 4 different weights were placed on the fingers, one at a time, and ratings of pain were recorded for 30 seconds. The statistical decision-making model and a forced-choice procedure were used to analyze the response data. Two variables, based on signal detection theory, were thus generated: P(A), a measure of sensory pain, and B, a measure of response bias. P(A) is believed to be a measure of pain sensitivity while B measures stoicism. NMW tended to report lower P(A) values, indicating reduced ability to discriminate among different stimulus intensities, during the menstrual and late luteal phases compared to the luteal phase. OCW reported lower B values, indicating less stoicism, during the menstrual compared to the follicular and ovulatory phases. Men tended to have significantly lower B values than OCW, but not NMW. These results demonstrate subtle menstrual-cycle effects in NMW and OCW. Sex differences were few, with more group differences and trends emerging between OCW and men, as opposed to men and NMW.


CONCLUSIONS
The lack of consistent differences between men and NMW underscores the subtle impact of sex and hormonal changes in pain report. In addition, the data obtained in NMW support the notion that changes in hormone levels during the menstrual cycle can lead to changes in pain responsivity as NMW had trends for better discrimination in menstrual phases when estradiol levels were highest.
Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
William J
WJ
Kowalczyk
Maria A
MA
Sullivan
Suzette M
SM
Evans
Adam M
AM
Bisaga
Suzanne K
SK
Vosburg
Sandra D
SD
Comer
D000328:Adult; D000698:Analgesia / Q000523:psychology; D003276:Contraceptives, Oral / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology; D004958:Estradiol / Q000032:analysis / Q000097:blood; D005260:Female; D005498:Follicular Phase / Q000502:physiology; D012739:Gonadal Steroid Hormones / Q000032:analysis / Q000097:blood*; D006801:Humans; D006930:Hyperalgesia / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008183:Luteal Phase / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D008597:Menstrual Cycle / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D017288:Pain Threshold / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D055815:Young Adult
D003276:Contraceptives, Oral; D012739:Gonadal Steroid Hormones; D004958:Estradiol