Completeness of retail pharmacy claims data: implications for pharmacoepidemiologic studies and pharmacy practice in elderly patients.
BACKGROUND
In the elderly (those aged >or=65 years), retail pharmacy claims are used to study drug use among the uninsured after drug policy changes, to prevent drug-drug interactions and duplication of therapy, and to guide medication therapy management. Claims include only prescriptions filled at 1 pharmacy location or within 1 pharmacy chain and do not include prescriptions filled at outside pharmacies, potentially limiting research accuracy and pharmacy-based safety interventions.


OBJECTIVE
The aims of this study were to assess elderly patients' pharmacy loyalty and to identify predictors of using multiple pharmacies.


METHODS
Patients enrolled in the Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly (PACE) pharmacy benefit program with corresponding Medicare claims in the state of Pennsylvania comprised the study cohort. Among patients with pharmacy claims from all pharmacies used in 2004-2005, a primary pharmacy was defined as the pharmacy where at least 50% of a patient's prescriptions were filled. The number of pharmacies/chains used and prescriptions filled in 2005 was calculated. Predictors of using multiple pharmacies in 2005 were age, female gender, white race, urban residency, comorbidities, number of distinct chemical drugs (unique medications) used, and number of prescriptions filled, which were all assessed in 2004.


RESULTS
In total, pharmacy claims data from 182,116 patients (147,718 women [81.1%]; mean [SD] age, 78.8 [7.1] years; 168,175 white [92.3%]; 76,580 [42.1%] residing in an urban zip code area) were included. Of the 182,116 PACE patients in the study, a primary pharmacy was identified for 180,751 patients (99.3%). In 2005, patients filled an average of 59.3 prescriptions, with 57.0 prescriptions (96.1%) having been filled at the primary pharmacy. Compared with patients who used <or=5 unique medications in 2004, patients who used 6 to 9 unique medications had 1.38 times (95% CI, 1.34-1.43), and patients who used >or=15 unique medications had a 2.66 times (95% CI, 2.53-2.80) greater likelihood of using multiple pharmacies in 2005. Patients aged >or=85 years were 1.07 times (95% CI, 1.04-1.11) as likely to use multiple pharmacies compared with patients aged 65 to 74 years.


CONCLUSIONS
This study found that patients aged >or=65 years were loyal to their primary pharmacy, offering reassurance to researchers and pharmacists who use retail pharmacy claims data to evaluate and/or to improve safe and appropriate medication use among the elderly. Care should be used in analyzing claims or managing the drug regimens of patients using multiple medications or patients aged >or=85 years; they are more likely to use multiple pharmacies and thus are more likely to have missing prescription information.
Polinski
Jennifer M
JM
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA. jpolinski@partners.org
Schneeweiss
Sebastian
S
Levin
Raisa
R
Shrank
William H
WH
D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003157:Community Pharmacy Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007356:Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008297:Male; D006278:Medicare / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010414:Pennsylvania; D017891:Pharmacoepidemiology / Q000379:methods*; D044469:Racial Groups; D012737:Sex Factors; D014481:United States