Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of combination therapy and monotherapy for dyslipidemia.
BACKGROUND
Statin therapy effectively prevents vascular disease, but treatment targets are often not achieved.


OBJECTIVE
To compare the benefits and harms of high-dose statin monotherapy with those of combination therapy in adults at high risk for coronary disease.


METHODS
English-language records from MEDLINE (1966 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), and the Cochrane Library (third quarter of 2008).


METHODS
A reviewer screened records, and a second reviewer verified selection of randomized, controlled trials in adult patients that compared combinations of statins and bile-acid sequestrants, fibrates, ezetimibe, niacin, or omega-3 fatty acids with statin monotherapy, as well as nonrandomized comparative studies that were longer than 24 weeks and reported clinical and harms outcomes.


METHODS
Data were abstracted for studies by using standardized forms, and study quality was rated with a standardized scale and strength of evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.


RESULTS
102 studies met eligibility criteria. The main analysis compared combination therapy with high-dose statin monotherapy in high-risk patients. Very-low-strength evidence showed that statin-ezetimibe (2 trials; n = 439) and statin-fibrate (1 trial; n = 166) combinations did not reduce mortality more than high-dose statin monotherapy. No trials compared the effect of combination therapy versus high-dose statin monotherapy on the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization procedures. Two statin-ezetimibe trials (n = 295) demonstrated higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment with combination therapy (odds ratio, 7.21 [95% CI, 4.30 to 12.08]). Trials in lower-risk patients did not show a difference in mortality.


CONCLUSIONS
Studies were generally short, focused on surrogate outcomes, and were heterogeneous in the sample's risk for coronary disease. Few studies examined treatment combinations other than statin-ezetimibe.


CONCLUSIONS
Limited evidence suggests that combinations of lipid-lowering agents do not improve clinical outcomes more than high-dose statin monotherapy. Very-low-quality evidence favors statin-ezetimibe treatment for attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals.


BACKGROUND
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Sharma
Mukul
M
University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ansari
Mohammed T
MT
Abou-Setta
Ahmed M
AM
Soares-Weiser
Karla
K
Ooi
Teik Chye
TC
Sears
Margaret
M
Yazdi
Fatemeh
F
Tsertsvadze
Alexander
A
Moher
David
D
D000924:Anticholesteremic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects*; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control; D008076:Cholesterol, HDL / Q000097:blood; D008078:Cholesterol, LDL / Q000097:blood; D004359:Drug Therapy, Combination; D050171:Dyslipidemias / Q000097:blood / Q000188:drug therapy*; D006801:Humans; D019161:Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects*; D055118:Medication Adherence; D009026:Mortality; D012307:Risk Factors
D000924:Anticholesteremic Agents; D008076:Cholesterol, HDL; D008078:Cholesterol, LDL; D019161:Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors