Crossing the divide: infants discriminate small from large numerosities.
Although young infants have repeatedly demonstrated successful numerosity discrimination across large sets when the number of items in the sets changes twofold (E. M. Brannon, S. Abbott, & D. J. Lutz, 2004; J. N. Wood & E. S. Spelke, 2005; F. Xu & E. S. Spelke, 2000), they consistently fail to discriminate a twofold change in number when one set is large and the other is small (<4 items; F. Feigenson, S. Carey, & M. Hauser, 2002; F. Xu, 2003). It has been theorized that this failure reflects an incompatibility in representational systems for small and large sets. The authors investigated the ability of 7-month-old infants to compare small and large sets over a variety of conditions. Results reveal that infants can successfully discriminate small from large sets when given a fourfold change, but not a twofold change, in number. The implications of these results are discussed in light of current theories of number representation.
Cordes
Sara
S
Duke University Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Durham, NC 27708, USA. scordes@duke.edu
Brannon
Elizabeth M
EM
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D002657:Child Development; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003210:Concept Formation / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011340:Problem Solving / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology