Clinical trials in rehabilitation: single or multiple outcomes?
In clinical trials, the choice of the primary outcome affects the study design, the sample size calculations, the data analysis, and the interpretation of the study results. Most importantly, it may determine the future of the intervention being studied. In several clinical and rehabilitation settings, a single primary outcome measure is often not sufficient to reflect the effect of an intervention because attention is focused on multiple aspects of patients' recovery. In stroke and traumatic brain injuries trials, for example, functional recovery is as important as cognitive recovery. Thus, a trial with a functional scale alone as the primary outcome would not be informative about the effectiveness of the intervention on cognitive functions. From the methodologic point of view, the choice of multiple primary outcomes presents several challenges, including selecting a measure, among several, to be used for sample size calculations; dealing with multiple comparisons; and interpreting the results. In this article, we discuss a global test procedure that allows investigators to use several binary measures as primary outcomes in a clinical trial. This procedure offers an efficient solution under very reasonable assumptions, avoids loss of power caused by multiple comparisons, has greater statistical power than any single outcome measure, and is easily interpreted and of direct clinical interest.
Bagiella
Emilia
E
Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. eb51@columbia.edu
D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000534:rehabilitation; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D023381:Endpoint Determination; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012046:Rehabilitation; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation