title: Surrogate indicators of sensitivity in gynecologic cytology: can they be used to improve the measurement of sensitivity in the laboratory?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Measuring the sensitivity of screening in gynecologic cytology in real life is problematic. However, other quality measures may correlate with sensitivity, including the atypical squamous cells (ASC)/squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) ratio. Whether these other measures can function as "surrogate indicators" for sensitivity and improve the assessment of sensitivity in the laboratory is not known.
  
  
  METHODS
  We compared multiple quality measures with true screening sensitivity in a variety of situations.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The abnormal rate, ASC rate, and ASC/SIL ratio were all highly correlated (r =.83 or greater) with sensitivity when the overall laboratory sensitivity was low (85%) but became less correlated (.64 or less) or uncorrelated when the screening sensitivity was higher (88% or 95%, respectively). Sensitivity was more highly correlated with the abnormal rate than the ASC/SIL ratio at low screening sensitivity. While thresholds could be set that were highly sensitive and specific for suboptimal screening, these thresholds were often less than one standard deviation away from the mean.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The correlation of the abnormal rate and the ASC/SIL ratio with sensitivity depends on overall sensitivity. Standards to define minimum screening sensitivity can be defined, but these standards are relatively narrow. These features may limit the utility of these quality measures as surrogates for sensitivity.
authors.affiliation: Comprehensive Pathology Associates, Miami, FL, USA. andrewr@baptisthealth.net
authors.forename: Andrew A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Renshaw
authors.forename: Fadi
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Brimo
authors.forename: Manon
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Auger