title: Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  ClinicalTrials.gov is a publicly accessible, Internet-based registry of clinical trials managed by the US National Library of Medicine that has the potential to address selective trial publication. Our objectives were to examine completeness of registration within ClinicalTrials.gov and to determine the extent and correlates of selective publication.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We examined reporting of registration information among a cross-section of trials that had been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov after December 31, 1999 and updated as having been completed by June 8, 2007, excluding phase I trials. We then determined publication status among a random 10% subsample by searching MEDLINE using a systematic protocol, after excluding trials completed after December 31, 2005 to allow at least 2 y for publication following completion. Among the full sample of completed trials (n = 7,515), nearly 100% reported all data elements mandated by ClinicalTrials.gov, such as intervention and sponsorship. Optional data element reporting varied, with 53% reporting trial end date, 66% reporting primary outcome, and 87% reporting trial start date. Among the 10% subsample, less than half (311 of 677, 46%) of trials were published, among which 96 (31%) provided a citation within ClinicalTrials.gov of a publication describing trial results. Trials primarily sponsored by industry (40%, 144 of 357) were less likely to be published when compared with nonindustry/nongovernment sponsored trials (56%, 110 of 198; p<0.001), but there was no significant difference when compared with government sponsored trials (47%, 57 of 122; p = 0.22). Among trials that reported an end date, 75 of 123 (61%) completed prior to 2004, 50 of 96 (52%) completed during 2004, and 62 of 149 (42%) completed during 2005 were published (p = 0.006).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Reporting of optional data elements varied and publication rates among completed trials registered within ClinicalTrials.gov were low. Without greater attention to reporting of all data elements, the potential for ClinicalTrials.gov to address selective publication of clinical trials will be limited. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
authors.affiliation: Department of Geriatrics and Adult Development, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America. joseph.ross@mssm.edu
authors.forename: Joseph S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Ross
authors.forename: Gregory K
authors.initials: GK
authors.lastname: Mulvey
authors.forename: Elizabeth M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Hines
authors.forename: Steven E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Nissen
authors.forename: Harlan M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Krumholz
mesh_terms: D015706:Bibliometrics; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D016208:Databases, Factual; D004345:Drug Industry / Q000191:economics; D005380:Financing, Government; D006801:Humans; D033181:Information Dissemination; D020407:Internet; D009317:National Library of Medicine (U.S.); D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D011643:Publishing; D012042:Registries; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States