title: Techniques for cesarean section.
abstract: The effects of complete methods of cesarean section (CS) were compared. Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of intention to perform CS using different techniques was carried out. Joel-Cohen-based CS compared with Pfannenstiel CS was associated with reduced blood loss, operating time, time to oral intake, fever, duration of postoperative pain, analgesic injections, and time from skin incision to birth of the baby. Misgav-Ladach compared with the traditional method was associated with reduced blood loss, operating time, time to mobilization, and length of postoperative stay for the mother. Joel-Cohen-based methods have advantages compared with Pfannenstiel and traditional (lower midline) CS techniques. However, these trials do not provide information on serious and long-term outcomes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fort Hare, East London, South Africa.
authors.forename: Justus G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Hofmeyr
authors.forename: Natalia
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Novikova
authors.forename: Matthews
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mathai
authors.forename: Archana
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Shah
mesh_terms: D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic