Environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals in the European Union: A case study with the β-blocker atenolol.
β-Adrenergic receptor blockers (β-blockers) are applied to treat high blood pressure, ischemic heart disease, and heart rhythm disturbances. Due to their widespread use and limited human metabolism, β-blockers are widely detected in sewage effluents and surface waters. β-Adrenergic receptors have been characterized in fish and other aquatic animals, so it can be expected that physiological processes regulated by these receptors in wild animals may be affected by the presence of β-blockers. Because ecotoxicological data on β-blockers are scarce, it was decided to choose the β-blocker atenolol as a case study pharmaceutical within the project ERAPharm. A starting point for the assessment of potential environmental risks was the European guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use. In Phase I of the risk assessment, the initial predicted environmental concentration (PEC) of atenolol in surface water (500 ng L−1) exceeded the action limit of 10 ng L−1. Thus, a Phase II risk assessment was conducted showing acceptable risks for surface water, for groundwater, and for aquatic microorganisms. Furthermore, atenolol showed a low potential for bioaccumulation as indicated by its low lipophilicity (log KOW = 0.16), a low potential for exposure of the terrestrial compartment via sludge (log KOC = 2.17), and a low affinity for sorption to the sediment. Thus, the risk assessment according to Phase II-Tier A did not reveal any unacceptable risk for atenolol. Beyond the requirements of the guideline, additional data on effects and fate were generated within ERAPharm. A 2-generation reproduction test with the waterflea Daphnia magna resulted in the most sensitive no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) of 1.8 mg L−1. However, even with this NOEC, a risk quotient of 0.003 was calculated, which is still well below the risk threshold limit of 1. Additional studies confirm the outcome of the environmental risk assessment according to EMEA/CHMP (2006). However, atenolol should not be considered as representative for other β-blockers, such as metoprolol, oxprenolol, and propranolol, some of which show significantly different physicochemical characteristics and varying toxicological profiles in mammalian studies.
Küster
Anette
A
German Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06813 Dessau, Germany. anette.kuester@uba.de
Alder
Alfredo C
AC
Escher
Beate I
BI
Duis
Karen
K
Fenner
Kathrin
K
Garric
Jeanne
J
Hutchinson
Thomas H
TH
Lapen
David R
DR
Péry
Alexandre
A
Römbke
Jörg
J
Snape
Jason
J
Ternes
Thomas
T
Topp
Ed
E
Wehrhan
Anne
A
Knacker
Thomas
T
D000319:Adrenergic beta-Antagonists / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity*; D000818:Animals; D001262:Atenolol / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity*; D055598:Chemical Phenomena; D054750:Ecotoxicology; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000032:analysis* / Q000633:toxicity; D005062:European Union; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry
D000319:Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; D004785:Environmental Pollutants; D014867:Water; D001262:Atenolol