Impact of smear layer on sealing property of root canal obturation using 3 different techniques and sealers. Part I.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to determine the influence of smear layer removal on through-and-through fluid movement along root canal fillings obturated using 3 different root canal sealers, namely AH26, Pulp Canal Sealer, and Gutta-Flow, and 3 different obturation techniques.


METHODS
The fluid transport model was used for detection of through-and-through fluid movement. Root canals of 230 human extracted teeth were mechanically instrumented using the step-back technique. The canals where the smear layer was not removed were irrigated with NaOCl 2.4%, whereas canals where the smear layer was removed were irrigated with EDTA 17% plus NaOCl 2.4%. The teeth were randomly divided into 10 experimental groups (n = 20) and 3 control groups (n = 10) and treated as follows. In group A, where no attempt was made for smear layer removal, the canals were obturated with lateral compaction of gutta-percha and AH26 as a sealer. In group B, the smear layer was removed, and canals were obturated as in group A. In group C (no attempt to remove the smear layer), the canals were obturated with System B plus Obtura II technique and AH26, whereas in group D, the smear layer was removed, and canals were obturated as in group C. The other 4 experimental groups were treated and obturated in the same way as in previous groups, respectively. The sealer that was used in those groups was the Pulp Canal Sealer. Finally, the latter 2 groups were obturated with Gutta-Flow technique. Fluid movement was measured at 24 hours and 30 days and 6 months.


RESULTS
In lateral compaction groups (with and without the smear layer), no significant differences were found regarding the ability of the same materials (AH26 and Pulp Canal Sealer) to prevent the fluid movement (P > .05). In warm obturation technique, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups (with and without the smear layer) of AH26 (P > .05). On the contrary, in groups of Pulp Canal sealer, fluid transport values were significantly less when the smear layer was removed (P < .05). Finally, no significant difference was observed between the groups of Gutta-Flow (with and without the smear layer) (P > .05).


CONCLUSIONS
Under these in vitro conditions, it seems that smear layer removal improves the ability of the filling materials to prevent the fluid movement, at least after the use of warm obturation techniques. On the contrary, smear layer removal does not seem to improve the same ability after the use of cold lateral compaction technique. Further laboratory and also clinical studies are needed in the future to compose a clear view concerning the improvement of sealing ability following smear layer removal.
Tzanetakis
Giorgos N
GN
Department of Endodontics, Dental School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Kakavetsos
Vasilios D
VD
Kontakiotis
Evangelos G
EG
D001729:Bismuth; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000517:prevention & control*; D004129:Dimethylpolysiloxanes; D004338:Drug Combinations; D004853:Epoxy Resins; D006171:Gutta-Percha; D006801:Humans; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D012388:Root Canal Irrigants; D012389:Root Canal Obturation / Q000379:methods*; D018915:Root Canal Preparation / Q000379:methods*; D012834:Silver; D016369:Smear Layer; D014025:Titanium; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement
D004129:Dimethylpolysiloxanes; D004338:Drug Combinations; D004853:Epoxy Resins; C515718:GuttaFlow; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D012388:Root Canal Irrigants; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement; D012834:Silver; C028044:epoxy resin AH-26; C076543:Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer; D006171:Gutta-Percha; D014025:Titanium; D001729:Bismuth