title: Peer review practices in biomedical literature: a time for change?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to collect the opinions of a cross section of published authors on current practices concerning peer review in biomedical publishing.
  
  
  METHODS
  A questionnaire on various aspects of peer review was emailed to authors, whose manuscripts were published in Gut or the British Journal of Surgery between 2001 and 2006. Authors were asked to base their responses on their overall experience with peer review in biomedical literature and not with that one particular journal.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Most respondents felt that peer review is an effective quality control mechanism and does help improve manuscripts. Although some felt that it may cause delays in publication, lead to some research being lost and may not prevent all research-related fraud, most authors felt that there was still a strong role for the peer review process as it exists today.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  An overwhelming majority of authors in our study approved of the current peer review practices in biomedical literature. A minority did however seem concerned. We discuss here the surrounding issues.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK.
authors.forename: Kamal Kumar
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Mahawar
authors.forename: Deepak
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kejariwal
authors.forename: Ajay
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Malviya
authors.forename: Rashmi
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Birla
authors.forename: Y K S
authors.initials: YK
authors.lastname: Viswanath
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D035843:Biomedical Research; D017712:Peer Review, Research; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires