Incorporating the prosthetic: traumatic, limb-loss, rehabilitation and refigured military bodies.
In this article, I look at the role that context of injury plays in the rehabilitation of military patients who sustained a limb amputation as a result of blast injury trauma in Afghanistan and Iraq. This article contrasts the technologically driven model of rehabilitation produced by the US Armed Forces Amputee Patient Care Program at Walter Reed Army Medical Center with a person centered approach building on work in medical anthropology. In this article, two case studies are contrasted illustrating the reasons behind the rejection of an upper extremity prosthetic device in one example and the acceptance of one in another. I argue that even in light of the incredible advances in medical technique and prosthetic technology, a body and functionality focussed rehabilitation must also pay attention to the subjective experiences of individual patients in terms of their present and their past.
Messinger
Seth D
SD
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, UMBC, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. sethm@umbc.edu
D055826:Afghan Campaign 2001-; D000671:Amputation, Surgical / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D000674:Amputees; D001132:Arm; D001134:Arm Injuries / Q000534:rehabilitation / Q000601:surgery; D001186:Artificial Limbs; D001753:Blast Injuries / Q000534:rehabilitation* / Q000601:surgery; D004219:District of Columbia; D006772:Hospitals, Military; D006801:Humans; D054542:Iraq War, 2003-2011; D007866:Leg; D007869:Leg Injuries / Q000534:rehabilitation / Q000601:surgery; D008889:Military Personnel / Q000523:psychology; D009104:Multiple Trauma / Q000534:rehabilitation