title: One year's results from a server-based system for performing reject analysis and exposure analysis in computed radiography.
abstract: Rejected images represent both unnecessary radiation exposure to patients and inefficiency in the imaging operation. Rejected images are inherent to projection radiography, where patient positioning and alignment are integral components of image quality. Patient motion and artifacts unique to digital image receptor technology can result in rejected images also. We present a centralized, server-based solution for the collection, archival, and distribution of rejected image and exposure indicator data that automates the data collection process. Reject analysis program (RAP) and exposure indicator data were collected and analyzed during a 1-year period. RAP data were sorted both by reason for repetition and body part examined. Data were also stratified by clinical area for further investigation. The monthly composite reject rate for our institution fluctuated between 8% and 10%. Positioning errors were the main cause of repeated images (77.3%). Stratification of data by clinical area revealed that areas where computed radiography (CR) is seldom used suffer from higher reject rates than areas where it is used frequently. S values were log-normally distributed for examinations performed under either manual or automatic exposure control. The distributions were positively skewed and leptokurtic. S value decreases due to radiologic technology student rotations, and CR plate reader calibrations were observed. Our data demonstrate that reject analysis is still necessary and useful in the era of digital imaging. It is vital though that analysis be combined with exposure indicator analysis, as digital radiography is not self-policing in terms of exposure. When combined, the two programs are a powerful tool for quality assurance.
authors.affiliation: Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1352, Houston, TX 77030, USA. kyle.jones@mdanderson.org
authors.forename: A Kyle
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Raimund
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Polman
authors.forename: Charles E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Willis
authors.forename: S Jeff
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Shepard
mesh_terms: D016477:Artifacts; D003199:Computer Systems; D003625:Data Collection; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D001330:Electronic Data Processing; D006801:Humans; D056888:Patient Positioning; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000379:methods; D011786:Quality Control; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011873:Radiology Information Systems; D012107:Research Design; D013679:Technology, Radiologic / Q000379:methods; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D019564:Unnecessary Procedures; D014962:X-Ray Film