Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?
Two groups of patients were treated for pertrochanteric fractures (AO/ASIF 31A1+A2) with an intramedullary hip nail. In the first group of 44 patients distal dynamic locking was used, and in the second group of 74 patients the nail was not distally locked. Comparison of the two groups of patients did not show any difference in terms of the period of fracture healing, radiological and functional results or frequency of complications. In the group with a distally locked nail the surgery took 40.4 minutes, while in the group without distal locking only 34.4 minutes. In total, we recorded only seven complications, none of which were caused by absence of distal locking of the nail. This study has shown that distal locking of IMHN is unnecessary in most pertrochanteric fractures (AO/ASIF 31A1+2). The only exceptions are comminution of the lateral wall of the greater trochanter, secondary diaphyseal fracture line, large posteromedial fragment extended distally below the level of the lesser trochanter and broad intramedullary canal.
Skála-Rosenbaum
Jirí
J
Orthopaedic Department of 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobárova 50, Prague 10, Czech Republic. skala@fnkv.cz
Bartonícek
Jan
J
Bartoska
Radek
R
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001858:Bone Nails; D005260:Female; D005594:Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D017102:Fracture Healing; D006620:Hip Fractures / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D015601:Injury Severity Score; D007431:Intraoperative Complications; D008297:Male; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D013997:Time Factors