Long bone defect models for tissue engineering applications: criteria for choice.
The replacement and repair of bone lost due to trauma, cancer, or congenital defects is a major clinical challenge. Skeletal tissue engineering is a potentially powerful strategy in modern regenerative medicine, and research in this field has increased greatly in recent years. Tissue engineering strategies seek to translate research findings in the fields of materials science, stem cell biology, and biomineralization into clinical applications, demanding the use of appropriate in vivo models to investigate bone regeneration of the long bone. However, identification of the optimal in vivo segmental bone defect model from the literature is difficult due to the use of different animal species (large and small mammals), different bones (weight-bearing and nonweight bearing), and multiple protocols, including the use of various scaffolds, cells, and bioactives. The aim of this review is to summarize the available animal models for evaluating long bone regeneration in vivo. We highlight the differences not only in species and sites but also in defect size, means of defect creation, duration of study, and fixation method. A critical evaluation of the most clinically relevant models is addressed to guide the researcher in his/her choice of the most appropriate model to use in future hypothesis-driven investigations.
Horner
Elizabeth A
EA
Skeletal Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Department of Oral Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Kirkham
Jennifer
J
Wood
David
D
Curran
Stephen
S
Smith
Mark
M
Thomson
Brian
B
Yang
Xuebin B
XB
D000818:Animals; D050280:Arm Bones / Q000473:pathology* / Q000502:physiology; D001847:Bone Diseases / Q000473:pathology* / Q000628:therapy*; D001861:Bone Regeneration / Q000502:physiology; D002755:Choice Behavior; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D006801:Humans; D007867:Leg Bones / Q000473:pathology* / Q000502:physiology; D023822:Tissue Engineering / Q000379:methods*