Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control.
Electrical stimulation is emerging as a viable alternative for patients with epilepsy whose seizures are not alleviated by drugs or surgery. Its attractions are temporal and spatial specificity of action, flexibility of waveform parameters and timing, and the perception that its effects are reversible unlike resective surgery. However, despite significant advances in our understanding of mechanisms of neural electrical stimulation, clinical electrotherapy for seizures relies heavily on empirical tuning of parameters and protocols. We highlight concurrent treatment goals with potentially conflicting design constraints that must be resolved when formulating rational strategies for epilepsy electrotherapy, namely, seizure reduction versus cognitive impairment, stimulation efficacy versus tissue safety, and mechanistic insight versus clinical pragmatism. First, treatment markers, objectives, and metrics relevant to electrical stimulation for epilepsy are discussed from a clinical perspective. Then the experimental perspective is presented, with the biophysical mechanisms and modalities of open-loop electrical stimulation, and the potential benefits of closed-loop control for epilepsy.
Sunderam
Sridhar
S
University of Kentucky Center for Biomedical Engineering, Wenner-Gren Research Lab, Lexington, KY 40506-0070, USA. sus28@psu.edu
Gluckman
Bruce
B
Reato
Davide
D
Bikson
Marom
M
D000927:Anticonvulsants / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001703:Biophysics; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D004827:Epilepsy / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans
D000927:Anticonvulsants