Funding illness prevention and health promotion in Australia: a way forward.
BACKGROUND
Unlike pharmaceuticals and private medical services there is no single source of funding for illness prevention and health promotion and no systematic process for setting priorities in public health. There is a need to improve the efficiency of access to health funding across prevention and treatment.


CONCLUSIONS
We discuss a number of reforms to existing funding arrangements including the creation of a national Preventative Priorities Advisory Committee (PrePAC) to set priorities. We propose the establishment of a PrePAC to provide evidence and set priorities across health promotion and illness prevention, with a national dedicated fund for health promotion.


CONCLUSIONS
A national evidence-based funding system for illness prevention and health promotion would legitimise a substantial and sustained budget for health promotion, breaking down some of the barriers in a fragmented federal health care system.
Harris
Anthony
A
Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia. anthony.harris@buseco.monash.edu.au.
Mortimer
Duncan
D