title: Assessing the efficacy of desvenlafaxine for improving functioning and well-being outcome measures in patients with major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of 9 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week clinical trials.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the effects of desvenlafaxine therapy on functioning and well-being in major depressive disorder (MDD).
  
  
  METHODS
  Total and individual item Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) scores from 8 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week desvenlafaxine clinical trials were pooled. Scores on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS(17)) work/activities and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) lassitude items were pooled from 9 studies. Outpatients with DSM-IV MDD were randomly assigned to fixed (5 studies; 50, 100, 200, or 400 mg/d; n = 1,342) or flexible (4 studies, 100-400 mg/d; n = 463) doses of desvenlafaxine or placebo (n = 1,108). Data from each patient's final evaluation were analyzed for the total population and for individual dose groups from the fixed-dose studies and were compared between groups using analysis of covariance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Compared with placebo, desvenlafaxine therapy resulted in significantly greater improvements in SDS total score (-2.0) and individual items regarding work (-0.6), social life/leisure activities (-0.8), and family life/home responsibilities (-0.7; P < .001 for all comparisons), as well as WHO-5 total score (1.7) and individual items (good spirits [0.4], calm/relaxed [0.4], active/vigorous [0.3], fresh/rested [0.3], and interest [0.3]; P < .001 for all comparisons). Desvenlafaxine treatment resulted in significant improvements on the HDRS(17) work/activities (-0.2; P < .001) and MADRS lassitude (-0.3; P < .001) items compared with placebo. Significant differences were observed for the individual fixed-dose groups on all outcomes (P < .05); there was no evidence of a dose-response relationship.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Desvenlafaxine therapy resulted in significant improvements in the functioning and well-being among MDD patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Mood Disorders Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 3B6, Canada. csoares@mcmaster.ca
authors.forename: Claudio N
authors.initials: CN
authors.lastname: Soares
authors.forename: Susan G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Kornstein
authors.forename: Michael E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Thase
authors.forename: Qin
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Jiang
authors.forename: Christine J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Guico-Pabia
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000928:Antidepressive Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003511:Cyclohexanols / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations; D003865:Major Depressive Disorder / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000523:psychology; D000069468:Desvenlafaxine Succinate; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010919:Placebos; D011594:Psychometrics; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000928:Antidepressive Agents; D003511:Cyclohexanols; D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations; D010919:Placebos; D000069468:Desvenlafaxine Succinate