Differences in attention to food and food intake between overweight/obese and normal-weight females under conditions of hunger and satiety.
Starting from an addiction model of obesity, the present study examined differences in attention for food-related stimuli and food intake between overweight/obese and normal-weight women under conditions of hunger and satiety. Twenty-six overweight/obese (BMI: 30.00+/-4.62) and 40 normal-weight (BMI: 20.63+/-1.14) females were randomly assigned to a condition of hunger or satiety. Three indexes of attention were employed, all including pictures of food items: an eye-tracking paradigm (gaze direction and duration), a visual probe task (reaction times), and a recording of electrophysiological brain activity (amplitude of the P300 event-related potential). In addition, the acute food intake of participants was assessed using a bogus taste task. In general, an attentional bias towards food pictures was found in all participants. No differences between groups or conditions were observed in the eye-tracking data. The visual probe task revealed an enhanced automatic orientation towards food cues in hungry versus satiated, and in overweight/obese versus normal-weight individuals, but no differences between groups or conditions in maintained attention. The P300 amplitude showed that only in normal-weight participants the intentional allocation of attention to food pictures was enhanced in hunger versus satiety. In hungry overweight/obese participants, the P300 bias for food pictures was not clearly present, although an increased food intake was observed especially in this group. In conclusion, various attention-related tasks yielded various results, suggesting that they measure different underlying processes. Strikingly, overweight/obese individuals appear to automatically direct their attention to food-related stimuli, to a greater extent than normal-weight individuals, particularly when food-deprived. Speculatively, hungry overweight/obese individuals also appear to use cognitive strategies to reduce a maintained attentional bias for food stimuli, perhaps in an attempt to prevent disinhibited food intake. However, in order to draw firm conclusions, replication studies are needed.
Nijs
Ilse M T
IM
Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. nijs@fsw.eur.nl
Muris
Peter
P
Euser
Anja S
AS
Franken
Ingmar H A
IH
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D004435:Eating / Q000523:psychology*; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005508:Food Deprivation / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D006815:Hunger / Q000502:physiology*; D009765:Obesity / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology; D050177:Overweight / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012527:Satiation / Q000502:physiology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013851:Thinness / Q000523:psychology; D055815:Young Adult