Epistemic values in the Burgess Shale debate.
Focusing primarily on papers and books discussing the evolutionary and systematic interpretation of the Cambrian animal fossils from the Burgess Shale fauna, this paper explores the role of epistemic values in the context of a discipline (paleontology) striving to establish scientific authority within a larger domain of epistemic problems and issues (evolutionary biology). The focal point of this analysis is the repeated claims by paleontologists that the study of fossils gives their discipline a unique 'historical dimension' that makes it possible for them to unravel important aspects of evolution invisible to scientists who study the extant biosphere. The first part of the paper explores the shifting of emphasis in the writings of paleontologists between two strategies that employ opposing views on the classical positivist and physicalist ideal of science. The second part analyzes paleontologists' claims of privileged access to life's historical dimension in a situation where a theoretical upheaval occurring independent of the epistemical problem at hand completely shifts the standards for evaluating the legitimacy of various knowledge claims. Though the various strategies employed in defending the privileged historical perspective of paleontology have been disparate and, to an extent contradictory, each impinges on the acceptance of a specific epistemic ideal or set of values and success or failure of each depends on the compatibility of this ideal with the surrounding community of scientists.
Baron
Christian
C
Center for the Philosophy of Nature and Science Studies, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 København Ø, Denmark. baron@nbi.dk
D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D034462:Dissent and Disputes / Q000266:history*; D005580:Fossils; D049673:History, 20th Century; D019359:Knowledge; D008093:Literature, Modern / Q000266:history*; D010163:Paleontology / Q000266:history*