Coding of on-line and pre-planned movement sequences.
Recent experiments have demonstrated that complex multi-element movement sequences were coded in visual-spatial coordinates even after extensive practice, while relatively simple spatial-temporal movement sequences are coded in motor coordinates after a single practice session. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine if the control process rather than the difficulty of the sequence played a role in determining the pattern of effector transfer. To accomplish this, different concurrent feedback conditions were provided to two groups of participants during practice of the same movement sequence. The results indicated that when concurrent visual feedback was provided during the production of the movement, which was thought to encourage on-line control, the participants performed transfer tests with the contra-lateral limb better when the visual-spatial coordinates were reinstated than when the motor coordinates were reinstated. When concurrent visual feedback was not provided, which was thought to encourage pre-planned control, the opposite was observed. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that the mode of control dictates the coordinate system used to code the movement sequence rather than sequence difficulty or stage of practice as has been proposed.
Kovacs
Attila J
AJ
Texas A&M University, Department of Health and Kinesiology, TAMU 4243, College Station, TX 77845-4243, United States.
Boyle
Jason
J
Grutmatcher
Nicole
N
Shea
Charles H
CH
D056228:Feedback, Sensory; D006801:Humans; D007699:Kinesthesis; D007858:Learning; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D004856:Postural Balance; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D013028:Space Perception; D014163:Transfer, Psychology