title: Relative contributions of three descriptive methods: implications for behavioral assessment.
abstract: This study compared the outcomes of three descriptive analysis methods-the ABC method, the conditional probability method, and the conditional and background probability method-to each other and to the results obtained from functional analyses. Six individuals who had been diagnosed with developmental delays and exhibited problem behavior participated. Functional analyses indicated that participants' problem behavior was maintained by social positive reinforcement (n = 2), social negative reinforcement (n = 2), or automatic reinforcement (n = 2). Results showed that for all but 1 participant, descriptive analysis outcomes were similar across methods. In addition, for all but 1 participant, the descriptive analysis outcome differed substantially from the functional analysis outcome. This supports the general finding that descriptive analysis is a poor means of determining functional relations.
authors: New England Center for Children and Northeastern University, USA.
authors: Sacha T
authors: ST
authors: Pence
authors: Eileen M
authors: EM
authors: Roscoe
authors: Jason C
authors: JC
authors: Bourret
authors: William H
authors: WH
authors: Ahearn
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000374:Aggression; D001321:Autistic Disorder; D002648:Child; D002653:Child Behavior Disorders; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007805:Language Development Disorders; D008297:Male; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012919:Social Behavior; D012931:Social Environment; D013223:Statistics as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D014741:Video Recording; D055815:Young Adult