Separating past and future autobiographical events in memory: evidence for a reality monitoring asymmetry.
After thinking about the past and imagining the future, how do people separate these real and imagined events in memory? We had subjects engage in past and future autobiographical elaboration, then later take memory tests that required them to recollect these earlier generated events. In Experiment 1, testing memory for previously generated past or future autobiographical events led to fewer source memory confusions than did an elaborative control task, suggesting that the distinctive features of autobiographical elaboration improved subsequent retrieval monitoring accuracy. In Experiment 2, we directly compared retrieval monitoring accuracy for previously generated past and future autobiographical events and found that subjects made fewer source confusions when searching memory for future events. This asymmetry suggests that the features characterizing future elaborations (e.g., cognitive operations) were used more effectively during reality monitoring than were the features characterizing past elaborations (e.g., perceptual details), and has implications for future-oriented theories of memory.
McDonough
Ian M
IM
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. imcdono@uchicago.edu
Gallo
David A
DA
D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D005201:Fantasy; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D033182:Intention; D007600:Judgment; D008016:Life Change Events; D011939:Mental Recall; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011936:Reality Testing; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D014706:Verbal Learning