title: Differential transcriptomic responses of Biomphalaria glabrata (Gastropoda, Mollusca) to bacteria and metazoan parasites, Schistosoma mansoni and Echinostoma paraensei (Digenea, Platyhelminthes).
abstract: A 70-mer-oligonucleotide-based microarray (1152 features) that emphasizes stress and immune responses factors was constructed to study transcriptomic responses of the snail Biomphalaria glabrata to different immune challenges. In addition to sequences with relevant putative ID and Gene Ontology (GO) annotation, the array features non-immune factors and unknown B. glabrata ESTs for functional gene discovery. The transcription profiles of B. glabrata (3 biological replicates, each a pool of 5 snails) were recorded at 12h post-wounding, exposure to Gram negative or Gram positive bacteria (Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus, respectively), or infection with compatible trematode parasites (Schistosoma mansoni or Echinostoma paraensei, 20 miracidia/snail), relative to controls, using universal reference RNA. The data were subjected to Significance Analysis for Microarrays (SAM), with a false positive rate (FPR) <or=10%. Wounding yielded a modest differential expression profile (27 up/21 down) with affected features mostly dissimilar from other treatments. Partially overlapping, yet distinct expression profiles were recorded from snails challenged with E. coli (83 up/20 down) or M. luteus (120 up/42 down), mostly showing up-regulation of defense and stress-related features. Significantly altered expression of selected immune features indicates that B. glabrata detects and responds differently to compatible trematodes. Echinostoma paraensei infection was associated mostly with down-regulation of many (immune-) transcripts (42 up/68 down), whereas S. mansoni exposure yielded a preponderance of up-regulated features (140 up/23 down), with only few known immune genes affected. These observations may reflect the divergent strategies developed by trematodes during their evolution as specialized pathogens of snails to negate host defense responses. Clearly, the immune defenses of B. glabrata distinguish and respond differently to various immune challenges.
authors: Center for Evolutionary and Theoretical Immunology, Biology MSC03 2020, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. coenadem@unm.edu
authors: Coen M
authors: CM
authors: Adema
authors: Patrick C
authors: PC
authors: Hanington
authors: Cheng-Man
authors: CM
authors: Lun
authors: George H
authors: GH
authors: Rosenberg
authors: Anthony D
authors: AD
authors: Aragon
authors: Barbara A
authors: BA
authors: Stout
authors: Mara L
authors: ML
authors: Lennard Richard
authors: Paul S
authors: PS
authors: Gross
authors: Eric S
authors: ES
authors: Loker
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001419:Bacteria / Q000276:immunology*; D001700:Biomphalaria / Q000235:genetics* / Q000276:immunology* / Q000382:microbiology / Q000469:parasitology; D004449:Echinostoma / Q000276:immunology*; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; D010271:Parasites / Q000276:immunology*; D012333:RNA, Messenger / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012550:Schistosoma mansoni / Q000276:immunology*; D013312:Stress, Physiological / Q000235:genetics / Q000276:immunology; D013997:Time Factors; D014158:Transcription, Genetic
chemical_list: D012333:RNA, Messenger