title: Dealing with returned manuscripts.
abstract: It is useful for authors to learn to deal with returned manuscripts with a rejection decision or a request for revision. Common reasons for rejection include contents outside the scope of the journal or inappropriate for the journal, incomplete submission, poor methodology, faulty experimental design, major flaws in the interpretation of results, extremely poor writing, and duplicated or plagiarised work. Authors should use the editor's and reviewers' comments to improve their manuscripts and resubmit elsewhere. Common reasons for revision requests include minor faults in the methodology, minor inaccuracies in data, inconsistencies among different sections of the manuscript, faulty deductions, data that do not support the conclusions, excessive data or text, poor or excessive illustrations, and poor but salvageable writing. A request for revision should be viewed positively, as it means that there is a possibility that the manuscript may still be potentially publishable, provided that all the editor's and reviewers' comments are addressed.
authors: Singapore Medical Journal, 2 College Road, Singapore. smj.editor@sma.org.sg
authors: W C G
authors: WC
authors: Peh
authors: K H
authors: KH
authors: Ng
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D017712:Peer Review, Research; D011643:Publishing; D014956:Writing