Duration discrimination in crossmodal sequences.
Four duration-discrimination experiments were carried out to compare crossmodal and unimodal timing conditions. For all experiments, participants were presented with two sequences, each consisting of 1 or 4 time intervals (marked by 2 or 5 signals), and asked to indicate whether the interval(s) of the second sequence was (were) shorter or longer than the interval(s) of the first. Markers in the first and second sequences were, respectively, tones and flashes (experiment 1), flashes and tones (experiment 2), both flashes (experiment 3), and both tones (experiment 4). In all modality conditions, except when using only tones (experiment 4), increasing the number of repetitions of the variable interval reduced duration-discrimination thresholds, independently of whether the fixed interval was presented first or second within the sequence pair. Moreover, judgments about sequence timing were best for tones-tones sequence pairs, worst for flashes-flashes sequence pairs, and intermediate for crossmodal (flashes-tones or tones-flashes) sequences. Finally, presenting a fixed interval in the first sequence resulted in better discrimination than presenting a variable interval in the first sequence. Implications for theories of timing are discussed.
Grondin
Simon
S
Ecole de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1A 0V6, Canada. simon.grondin@psy.ulaval.ca
McAuley
Devin
D
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D004056:Differential Threshold; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult