title: Are people with negative diabetes screening tests falsely reassured? Parallel group cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess whether receiving a negative test result at primary care based stepwise diabetes screening results in false reassurance.
  
  
  METHODS
  Parallel group cohort study embedded in a randomised controlled trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  15 practices (10 screening, 5 control) in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  5334 adults (aged 40-69) in the top quarter for risk of having undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (964 controls and 4370 screening attenders).
  
  
  METHODS
  Perceived personal and comparative risk of diabetes, intentions for behavioural change, and self rated health measured after an initial random blood glucose test and at 3-6 and 12-15 months later (equivalent time points for controls).
  
  
  RESULTS
  A linear mixed effects model with control for clustering by practice found no significant differences between controls and people who screened negative for diabetes in perceived personal risk, behavioural intentions, or self rated health after the first appointment or at 3-6 months or 12-15 months later. After the initial test, people who screened negative reported significantly (but slightly) lower perceived comparative risk (mean difference -0.16, 95% confidence interval -0.30 to -0.02; P=0.04) than the control group at the equivalent time point; no differences were evident at 3-6 and 12-15 months.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A negative test result at diabetes screening does not seem to promote false reassurance, whether this is expressed as lower perceived risk, lower intentions for health related behavioural change, or higher self rated health. Implementing a widespread programme of primary care based stepwise screening for type 2 diabetes is unlikely to cause an adverse shift in the population distribution of plasma glucose and cardiovascular risk resulting from an increase in unhealthy behaviours arising from false reassurance among people who screen negative. Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN99175498.
authors: General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 0SR. camp3@medschl.cam.ac.uk
authors: Charlotte A M
authors: CA
authors: Paddison
authors: Helen C
authors: HC
authors: Eborall
authors: Stephen
authors: S
authors: Sutton
authors: David P
authors: DP
authors: French
authors: Joana
authors: J
authors: Vasconcelos
authors: A Toby
authors: AT
authors: Prevost
authors: Ann-Louise
authors: AL
authors: Kinmonth
authors: Simon J
authors: SJ
authors: Griffin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001007:Anxiety / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology; D001294:Attitude to Health; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D015438:Health Behavior; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000523:psychology; D008875:Middle Aged; D010465:Perception; D012307:Risk Factors