Electric acoustic stimulation in patients with postlingual severe high-frequency hearing loss: clinical experience.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to describe audiological outcomes and surgical considerations in electric acoustic stimulation for patients with severe to profound high-frequency hearing loss.


METHODS
In this latest series of patients in our center, all patients were supplied with the new (atraumatic) Flex EAS MED-EL electrode. Eleven patients (age 7.62-71.32 years) with profound high-frequency hearing loss were implanted with this electrode, which was designed to preserve residual hearing despite the intracochlear insertion of an electrode array. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon (W.G.).


RESULTS
The rate of complete or partial hearing preservation was 100% after a mean follow-up period of 7.85 months (range 0.95-15.65 months).


CONCLUSIONS
This study proves that both refined surgical techniques and atraumatic electrodes are mandatory to preserve residual hearing after cochlear implantation. Flexible, thin, and free-fitting straight electrodes, such as the MED-EL Flex EAS electrode used in this study, seem to most accurately meet the requirements for hearing preservation in electric acoustic stimulation.
Arnoldner
Christoph
C
Helbig
Silke
S
Wagenblast
Jens
J
Baumgartner
Wolf-Dieter
WD
Hamzavi
Jafar-Sasan
JS
Riss
Dominik
D
Gstoettner
Wolfgang
W
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001299:Audiometry; D002648:Child; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006309:Hearing / Q000502:physiology*; D034381:Hearing Loss / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult