A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
BACKGROUND
Marginal discrepancies of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using various systems have been assessed to determine the quality of the restorations and facilitate clinical use; however, studies are limited and results are ambiguous because of the sample sizes and measurement methods.


OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare changes in marginal fit of posterior fixed dental prostheses of 3 zirconia systems manufactured using CAD/CAM technology and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental protheses fabricated with the conventional lost-wax technique, before and after cementation.


METHODS
Forty standardized master steel dies with 2 abutments simulating first mandibular premolars were fabricated to receive a posterior 3-unit FDP (from first molar to first premolar) and divided into 4 groups (n=10): Lava All-Ceramic System, Procera Bridge Zirconia, VITA In-Ceram 2000 YZ, and metal ceramic (control group). All FDPs were prepared for an internal space of 50 microm. The external marginal gap of the restorations was investigated by measuring 30 points in the middle of the buccal and lingual surfaces; therefore, 60 measurements per abutment were recorded. Measurements were made with an image analysis program on the master steel model before and after conventional cementation with a glass ionomer agent (Ketac Cem Easymix). The data obtained were statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA, Duncan's multiple range post hoc test, and Student's paired t test (alpha=.05).


RESULTS
No significant differences in the vertical marginal fit before and after cementation were recorded for the analyzed groups. The marginal discrepancy of Procera abutments before and after cementation (9 +/-10 microm and 12 +/-9 microm, respectively) was less than that of the other groups. Significant differences (P=.001) were observed in marginal adaptation between Procera Bridge Zirconia and the other groups.


CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study showed that cementation did not cause a significant increase in the vertical marginal discrepancies of the FDPs and that an internal space of 50 mum provided a high precision of fit of the restorations. The accuracy of fit achieved for the 3 zirconium oxide groups analyzed was within the range of clinical acceptance, and the discrepancies were lower than in the metal ceramic group. Procera Bridge Zirconia showed the lowest vertical discrepancies.
Gonzalo
Esther
E
Department of Buccofacial Prostheses, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Suárez
Maria J
MJ
Serrano
Benjamin
B
Lozano
Jose F L
JF
D001641:Bicuspid; D002484:Cementation; D017076:Computer-Aided Design; D003735:Dental Casting Technique; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D003830:Denture, Partial, Fixed; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D016876:Metal Ceramic Alloys; D008963:Molar; D015040:Zirconium
D016876:Metal Ceramic Alloys; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D015040:Zirconium; C028541:zirconium oxide