title: [Agreement between observers with different experience in the interpretation of the stress myocardial perfusion electrocardiogram in SPECT].
abstract: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in many countries. Stress electrocardiogram (ECG) is able to detect myocardial ischemia and also has prognostic value, which may be impaired in presence of electrical baseline abnormalities. Stress myocardial single photon emission tomography (SPECT) has recognized utility yield in assessment of CAD, requiring independent interpretation of ECG and myocardial images.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To analyze stress ECG interpretation reproducibility among observers with different training level, including pre- and post-graduate medical students, compared to an experienced cardiologist and also with SPECT.
  
  
  METHODS
  We studied 95 patients under CAD evaluation, mean age 61+/-9.3 years (range: 42-85), 56% male. Interobserver correlation kappa (k) between perfusion gated (99m)Tc-Sestamibi SPECT and exercise ECG were calculated as normal/abnormal, presence of necrosis, ischemia or mixed pattern. Interobserver kappa (k) analysis was made.
  
  
  RESULTS
  49.5% stress ECG and 45% SPECT studies were abnormal at the initial report with 62.1% concordance (k: 0.24) for normal/abnormal and 58.9% for ischemia (k: 0.14). Agreement between stress ECG initial report and independent cardiologist was 89.5% (k: 0.78). The correlation between independent observers and the initial report ranged between 62.1% and 48.4%, for baseline ECG between 41.1% and 90.5% considering normal/abnormal, and between 80% and 93.7% (k: 0.59-0.87) for the presence of ischemia.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Stress ECG interpretation presented adequate interobserver reproducibility with greater agreement in the most experienced observers, confirming the importance of training.
authors.affiliation: Sección de Medicina Nuclear, Departamento de Medicina y Sección Ergometría, Centro Cardiovascular del Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. tmassardo@redclinicauchile.cl
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Massardo
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lavados
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Jaimovich
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Carmona
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Rau
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Herrera
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Quevedo
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Prat
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002309:Cardiology / Q000193:education; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D015637:Gated Blood-Pool Imaging; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D055414:Myocardial Perfusion Imaging; D009683:Nuclear Medicine / Q000193:education; D015588:Observer Variation; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon