Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology.
Science communication has shifted considerably in Europe over the last decades. Three technology controversies on atoms, genes, and nanoscale sciences and nanotechnologies (NST) turned the style of communication from one-way information, participation and dialogues to the idea of an early and more democratic engagement of the public. Analyzing science communication developing over the three controversies, this article shows that what happened in one technology field fed forward to and contributed to shaping the subsequent field and that communication was initiated at a progressively earlier stage of technology development. The article concludes with an empirical analysis of six public engagement projects in NST, saying that the shift towards more democratic engagement of the public hasn't been as profound and complete as has been thought. This is particularly due to the continuing adoption of a simplistic contrast structure that opposes science and the public as two self-contained, antagonistic social entities.
Kurath
Monika
M
Program for Science Studies, University of Basel , Switzerland. monika.kurath@collegium.ethz.ch
Gisler
Priska
P
D001709:Biotechnology / Q000193:education / Q000266:history*; D003142:Communication / Q000266:history*; D005060:Europe; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D036103:Nanotechnology / Q000193:education / Q000266:history*; D009678:Nuclear Energy / Q000266:history*; D011640:Public Policy / Q000266:history; D012586:Science / Q000193:education / Q000266:history*; D014481:United States