Avian population consequences of climate change are most severe for long-distance migrants in seasonal habitats.
One consequence of climate change is an increasing mismatch between timing of food requirements and food availability. Such a mismatch is primarily expected in avian long-distance migrants because of their complex annual cycle, and in habitats with a seasonal food peak. Here we show that insectivorous long-distance migrant species in The Netherlands declined strongly (1984-2004) in forests, a habitat characterized by a short spring food peak, but that they did not decline in less seasonal marshes. Also, within generalist long-distance migrant species, populations declined more strongly in forests than in marshes. Forest-inhabiting migrant species arriving latest in spring declined most sharply, probably because their mismatch with the peak in food supply is greatest. Residents and short-distance migrants had non-declining populations in both habitats, suggesting that habitat quality did not deteriorate. Habitat-related differences in trends were most probably caused by climate change because at a European scale, long-distance migrants in forests declined more severely in western Europe, where springs have become considerably warmer, when compared with northern Europe, where temperatures during spring arrival and breeding have increased less. Our results suggest that trophic mismatches may have become a major cause for population declines in long-distance migrants in highly seasonal habitats.
Both
Christiaan
C
Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, PO Box 14, 9750 Haren, The Netherlands. c.both@rug.nl
Van Turnhout
Chris A M
CA
Bijlsma
Rob G
RG
Siepel
Henk
H
Van Strien
Arco J
AJ
Foppen
Ruud P B
RP
D025041:Animal Migration; D000818:Animals; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology*; D057231:Climate Change; D003710:Demography; D017753:Ecosystem; D005060:Europe; D012621:Seasons; D014197:Trees