title: Comment on Urban et al. "Assessment of human health risks posed by consumption of fish from the Lower Passaic River (LPR), New Jersey" (2009, doi:10.1016/jscitotenv.2009.03.004).
abstract: Urban et al. (2009) presented a human health risk assessment for the Lower Passaic River that is not consistent with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) risk assessment guidance for Superfund cited in the article, because it is based on a fish ingestion rate that underestimates angler exposure to contaminated fish, does not evaluate exposure to contaminated crab, and underestimates the cancer risks and non-cancer health hazards associated with these exposure pathways. USEPA recommends that people follow the health advisories for the Lower Passaic River, available online at http://www.state.nj.us/dep/dsr/2009FishAdvisoryBrochure.pdf.
authors.forename: Walter
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Mugdan
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004032:Diet / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000032:analysis* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology; D009515:New Jersey; D018570:Risk Assessment; D045483:Rivers / Q000737:chemistry*; D017747:Seafood / Q000506:poisoning*; D014876:Water Pollution / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D055815:Young Adult