title: Response to open peer commentaries on "Prenatal diagnosis and abortion for congenital abnormalities: is it ethical to provide one without the other?".
authors.affiliation: Donaghue Initiative in Biomedical and Behavioral Research Ethics, Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, Yale University/ISPS, 77 Prospect Street, New Haven CT 06520, USA. a.j.ballantyne@gmail.com
authors.forename: Angela
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ballantyne
authors.forename: Ainsley
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Newson
authors.forename: Florencia
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Luna
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ashcroft
mesh_terms: D000025:Abortion, Eugenic / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D000029:Abortion, Legal / Q000941:ethics; D033421:Beginning of Human Life; D000013:Congenital Abnormalities / Q000175:diagnosis*; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006295:Health Resources / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000941:ethics; D028681:Moral Obligations; D011247:Pregnancy; D011275:Pregnancy, Unwanted / Q000941:ethics / Q000523:psychology; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis / Q000941:ethics*; D012743:Sex Preselection / Q000941:ethics; D012935:Social Justice; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000209:etiology