System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of "system-sanctioned change".
Despite extensive evidence of climate change and environmental destruction, polls continue to reveal widespread denial and resistance to helping the environment. It is posited here that these responses are linked to the motivational tendency to defend and justify the societal status quo in the face of the threat posed by environmental problems. The present research finds that system justification tendencies are associated with greater denial of environmental realities and less commitment to pro-environmental action. Moreover, the effects of political conservatism, national identification, and gender on denial of environmental problems are explained by variability in system justification tendencies. However, this research finds that it is possible to eliminate the negative effect of system justification on environmentalism by encouraging people to regard pro-environmental change as patriotic and consistent with protecting the status quo (i.e., as a case of "system-sanctioned change"). Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Feygina
Irina
I
New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. irina.feygina@nyu.edu
Jost
John T
JT
Goldsmith
Rachel E
RE
D000293:Adolescent; D001290:Attitude; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D003625:Data Collection; D003717:Denial, Psychological; D005260:Female; D057232:Global Warming / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D009519:New York City; D011582:Psychological Theory; D055815:Young Adult