title: How to review scientific manuscripts and clinical case reports for Journal of Oral Implantology.
abstract: Peer review is a vital component of the publication process for the Journal of Oral Implantology (JOI), as with any scientific or professional journal. The ability to write constructive critical reviews, therefore, is a valued skill of benefit to authors, editors, and the journal. The purpose of this article is to discuss techniques for crafting useful reviews. A review should address both broad issues of wording and perception. A review should include specific issues of what to look for in each section of research papers and clinical case reports. While the article is written with JOI in mind, most guidelines expressed therein are applicable to reviewing for any journal.
authors.forename: James L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Rutkowski
authors.forename: Joseph V
authors.initials: JV
authors.lastname: Cairone
mesh_terms: D003757:Dental Implantation; D003792:Dental Records; D018865:Dental Research; D030881:Disclosure; D035081:Editorial Policies; D005246:Feedback; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D017712:Peer Review, Research / Q000379:methods*; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D013997:Time Factors