title: Physician incentives: cure versus prevention.
abstract: This paper distinguishes between two scenarios for the physician-patient encounter. In the cure scenario, the patient does not know whether a loss can be recovered. In the prevention scenario, the patient faces a threat but does not know whether this threat is real enough to justify preventive action. The patient wants to induce the physician both to give an accurate diagnosis and to put appropriate effort into cure or prevention. It is shown that in the cure scenario, a contingent fee solves both these incentive problems. In the prevention scenario, however, putting up with low effort makes it easier to get an accurate diagnosis, and the use of contingent fees should be limited. These results are interpreted as providing a rationale for observed exceptions to legal and ethical restrictions on the use of contingent fees. Indeed, such exceptions are often granted for cases that fit the cure scenario.
authors.affiliation: Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, Janskerkhof 12, 3512BL Utrecht, The Netherlands. : k.dejaegher@uu.nl
authors.forename: Kris
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: De Jaegher
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D017008:Negotiating; D009426:Netherlands; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians / Q000191:economics*; D011322:Primary Prevention / Q000191:economics*; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive