Device-related risk of fire in oropharyngeal surgery: a mechanical model.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the fire risk for an electrosurgical device (Bovie) as compared with a bipolar radiofrequency ablation wand (Coblator) in a mechanical model of oropharyngeal surgery.


METHODS
An endotracheal tube was inserted into the cranial end of a degutted, whole raw chicken through which 100% oxygen was piped at 10 L/min. An electrosurgical device (15 W, coagulate mode) and bipolar radiofrequency ablation wand (9, 7, and 3 in ablate mode; 5 and 3 in coagulate mode) were activated in the central cavity. All experimental conditions were tested for 4 minutes, or until a positive result was achieved. All trials were repeated to ensure accuracy.


RESULTS
Ignition was obtained with a sustained fire when using the electrosurgical device for between 25 and 80 seconds. Under all 5 experimental conditions, no ignition or sustained fire could be produced using the radiofrequency ablation wand. After 20 sustained minutes of continuous plasma ablation in the chicken cavity without ignition, the electrosurgical device was able to ignite a fire in 25 seconds in the same cavity.


CONCLUSIONS
Although electrosurgical devices present a significant risk of fire during open cavity surgery in oxygen-enriched environments, that risk seems to be eliminated with bipolar radiofrequency plasma ablation.
Roy
Soham
S
Texas Ear Nose and Throat Consultants, Children's ENT of Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA. soham.roy@uth.tmc.edu
Smith
Lee P
LP
D000818:Animals; D002058:Burns, Electric / Q000209:etiology; D017115:Catheter Ablation / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation; D002645:Chickens; D004598:Electrosurgery / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation; D005390:Fires; D023421:Models, Animal; D013517:Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation; D013997:Time Factors