Gender differences in presentation and diagnosis of chest pain in primary care.
BACKGROUND
Chest pain is a common complaint and reason for consultation in primary care. Research related to gender differences in regard to Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) has been mainly conducted in hospital but not in primary care settings. We aimed to analyse gender differences in aetiology and clinical characteristics of chest pain and to provide gender related symptoms and signs associated with CHD.


METHODS
We included 1212 consecutive patients with chest pain aged 35 years and older attending 74 general practitioners (GPs). GPs recorded symptoms and findings of each patient and provided follow up information. An independent interdisciplinary reference panel reviewed clinical data of every patient and decided about the aetiology of chest pain at the time of patient recruitment. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify clinical predictors that help to rule in or out CHD in women and men.


RESULTS
Women showed more psychogenic disorders (women 11,2%, men 7.3%, p = 0.02), men suffered more from CHD (women 13.0%, men 17.2%, p = 0.04), trauma (women 1.8%, men 5.1%, p < 0.001) and pneumonia/pleurisy (women 1.3%, men 3.0%, p = 0.04) Men showed significantly more often chest pain localised on the right side of the chest (women 9.1%, men 25.0%, p = 0.01). For both genders known clinical vascular disease, pain worse with exercise and age were associated positively with CHD. In women pain duration above one hour was associated positively with CHD, while shorter pain durations showed an association with CHD in men. In women negative associations were found for stinging pain and in men for pain depending on inspiration and localised muscle tension.


CONCLUSIONS
We found gender differences in regard to aetiology, selected clinical characteristics and association of symptoms and signs with CHD in patients presenting with chest pain in a primary care setting. Further research is necessary to elucidate whether these differences would support recommendations for different diagnostic approaches for CHD according to a patient's gender.
Bösner
Stefan
S
Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany. boesner@staff.uni-marburg.de
Haasenritter
Jörg
J
Hani
Maren A
MA
Keller
Heidi
H
Sönnichsen
Andreas C
AC
Karatolios
Konstantinos
K
Schaefer
Juergen R
JR
Baum
Erika
E
Donner-Banzhoff
Norbert
N
D000328:Adult; D017677:Age Distribution; D000368:Aged; D001294:Attitude to Health; D002637:Chest Pain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000523:psychology; D015897:Comorbidity; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology; D005858:Germany / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000523:psychology; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011602:Psychophysiologic Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology; D012737:Sex Factors