A new musculoskeletal curriculum: has it made a difference?
This study assessed whether undergraduate performance improved following the introduction in 2006 of a musculoskeletal teaching programme lasting for seven weeks. Different methods were used to deliver knowledge and skills in trauma and orthopaedic surgery, rheumatology and allied specialties. The programme combined four main elements: traditional firm-based teaching, weekly plenary sessions, a task-based workbook and additional specialist clinics. The block of 139 students who attended in its first year were assessed using a multiple choice question examination just before their final examinations in 2008. They showed a 6% improvement in performance over a control group of 130 students assessed in 2005 before the programme had commenced. There was no difference in performance between the students assessed in 2005 and a second group of 46 students from 2008 who did not attend the new teaching programme. Performance was improved by providing more focused musculoskeletal training using available resources, as well as increasing the length of the programme.
Williams
S C
SC
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, England. stephen.williams@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
Gulihar
A
A
Dias
J J
JJ
Harper
W M
WM
D000328:Adult; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards*; D003162:Competency-Based Education / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009985:Orthopedics / Q000193:education*; D012219:Rheumatology / Q000193:education*; D006113:United Kingdom; D055815:Young Adult