title: Translation of neurological biomarkers to clinically relevant platforms.
abstract: Like proteomics more generally, neuroproteomics has recently been linked to the discovery of biochemical markers of central nervous system (CNS) injury and disease. Although neuroproteomics has enjoyed considerable success in discovery of candidate biomarkers, there are a number of challenges facing investigators interested in developing clinically useful platforms to assess biomarkers for damage to the CNS. These challenges include intrinsic physiological complications such as the blood-brain barrier. Effective translation of biomarkers to clinical practice also requires development of entirely novel pathways and product development strategies. Drawing from lessons learned from applications of biomarkers to traumatic brain injury, this study outlines major elements of such a pathway. As with other indications, biomarkers can have three major areas of application: (1) drug development; (2) diagnosis and prognosis; (3) patient management. Translation of CNS biomarkers to practical clinical platforms raises a number of integrated elements. Biomarker discovery and initial selection needs to be integrated at the earliest stages with components that will allow systematic prioritization and triage of biomarker candidates. A number of important criteria need to be considered in selecting clinical biomarker candidates. Development of proof of concept assays and their optimization and validation represent an often overlooked feature of biomarker translational research. Initial assay optimization should confirm that assays can detect biomarkers in relevant clinical samples. Since access to human clinical samples is critical to identification of biomarkers relevant to injury and disease as well as for assay development, design of human clinical validation studies is an important component of translational biomarker research platforms. Although these clinical studies share much in common with clinical trials for assessment of drug therapeutic efficacy, there are a number of considerations unique to these efforts. Finally, platform selection and potential assay commercialization need to be considered. Decisions regarding whether or not to seek FDA approval also significantly influence translational research structures.
authors.affiliation: Clinical Department, Banyan Biomarkers Inc., Alachua, FL, USA. rhayes@bayanbio.com
authors.forename: Ronald L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Hayes
authors.forename: Gillian
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Robinson
authors.forename: Uwe
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Muller
authors.forename: Kevin K W
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Wang
mesh_terms: D001681:Biological Assay / Q000379:methods*; D015415:Biomarkers / Q000378:metabolism*; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000378:metabolism; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D006801:Humans; D009419:Nerve Tissue Proteins / Q000032:analysis*; D040901:Proteomics / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D057170:Translational Research, Biomedical
chemical_list: D015415:Biomarkers; D009419:Nerve Tissue Proteins