[Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis on the integrated schistosomiasis control strategies with emphasis on infection source in Poyang Lake region].
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit on the integrated schistosomiasis control strategies with emphasis on infection source, and provide scientific basis for the improvement of schistosomiasis control strategy.


METHODS
Aiguo and Xinhe villages in Jinxian County were selected as intervention group where the new comprehensive strategy was implemented, while Ximiao and Zuxi villages in Xinzi County served as control where routine control program was implemented. New strategy of interventions included removing cattle from snail-infested grasslands and providing farmers with farm machinery, improving sanitation by supplying tap water and building lavatories and methane gas tanks, and implementing an intensive health education program. Routine interventions were carried out in the control villages including diagnosis and treatment for human and cattle, health education, and focal mollusciciding. Data were collected from retrospective investigation and field survey for the analysis and comparison of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit between intervention and control groups.


RESULTS
The control effect of the intervention group was better than that of the control. The cost for 1% decrease of infection rate per 100 people, 100 cattle, and 100 snails in intervention group was 480.01, 6 851.24, and 683.63 Yuan, respectively, which were about 2.70, 4.37 and 20.25 times as those in the control respectively. The total cost/benefit ratio (BCR) was lower than 1 (0.94 in intervention group and 0.08 in the control). But the total benefit of intervention group was higher than that of the control from 2005 to 2008. The forecasting analysis indicated that the total BCR in intervention group would be 1.13 at the 4th year and all cost could be recalled. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the BCR in intervention group changed in the range around 1.0 and that of the control ranged blow 0.5. The cost-benefit of intervention group was evidently higher than that of the control.


CONCLUSIONS
The integrated control strategy focusing on infection source control brings about triplex benefits in schistosomiasis control, social development (and ecological protection) and economic efficacy, and shows better effects and benefits than the conventional control strategy.
Lin
Dan-Dan
DD
Jiangxi Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Nanchang, China.
Zeng
Xiao-Jun
XJ
Chen
Hong-Gen
HG
Hong
Xian-Lin
XL
Tao
Bo
B
Li
Yi-Feng
YF
Xiong
Ji-Jie
JJ
Zhou
Xiao-Nong
XN
D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D012552:Schistosomiasis / Q000191:economics / Q000517:prevention & control*