title: Idealization in evolutionary developmental investigation: a tension between phenotypic plasticity and normal stages.
abstract: Idealization is a reasoning strategy that biologists use to describe, model and explain that purposefully departs from features known to be present in nature. Similar to other strategies of scientific reasoning, idealization combines distinctive strengths alongside of latent weaknesses. The study of ontogeny in model organisms is usually executed by establishing a set of normal stages for embryonic development, which enables researchers in different laboratory contexts to have standardized comparisons of experimental results. Normal stages are a form of idealization because they intentionally ignore known variation in development, including variation associated with phenotypic plasticity (e.g. via strict control of environmental variables). This is a tension between the phenomenon of plasticity and the practice of staging that has consequences for evolutionary developmental investigation because variation is conceptually removed as a part of rendering model organisms experimentally tractable. Two compensatory tactics for mitigating these consequences are discussed: employing a diversity of model organisms and adopting alternative periodizations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota, 831 Heller Hall, 271 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. aclove@umn.edu
authors.forename: Alan C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Love
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D014644:Genetic Variation; D048788:Growth and Development; D008018:Life Cycle Stages; D008954:Models, Biological; D010641:Phenotype; D049490:Systems Biology