title: Interdisciplinary craniofacial teams compared with individual providers: is orofacial cleft care more comprehensive and do parents perceive better outcomes?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The primary objective was to examine whether children with orofacial clefts received more comprehensive care and whether their parents perceived better outcomes if the care was delivered by interdisciplinary teams compared with individual providers.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data about services received and outcomes were collected from mothers of children with orofacial clefts.
  
  
  METHODS
  Mothers of children born between 1998 and 2003 with orofacial clefts from Arkansas, Iowa, and New York who participated in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study were eligible.
  
  
  METHODS
  Services and treatments received and maternal perception of cleft care, health status, aesthetics, and speech were evaluated by team care status.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 253 children, 24% were not receiving team care. Of those with cleft lip and palate, 86% were enrolled in team care. Compared with children with team care, those without had fewer surgeries and were less likely to have seen a dentist, received a hearing test, or had a genetic consultation. Mothers of children lacking team care were twice as likely to give lower ratings for overall cleft care; maternal perceptions of global health, facial appearance, and speech did not differ by team care status.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Recommended care tended to be received more often among those with team care. A larger, longitudinal study might answer questions about whether team care provides the best care and the role that type and severity of the condition and racial/ethnic differences play in the services received and outcomes experienced.
authors.affiliation: Congenital Malformations Registry, New York State Department of Health, 547 River Street, Room 200, Troy, NY 12180, USA.
authors.forename: April A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Austin
authors.forename: Charlotte M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Druschel
authors.forename: Margaret C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Tyler
authors.forename: Paul A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Romitti
authors.forename: Imara I
authors.initials: II
authors.lastname: West
authors.forename: Peter C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Damiano
authors.forename: James M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Robbins
authors.forename: Whitney
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Burnett
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001131:Arkansas; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D002971:Cleft Lip / Q000601:surgery*; D002972:Cleft Palate / Q000601:surgery*; D003191:Comprehensive Health Care; D003729:Dental Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004955:Esthetics, Dental / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D005817:Genetic Counseling; D006304:Health Status; D006320:Hearing Tests; D006801:Humans; D007484:Iowa; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009035:Mothers / Q000523:psychology*; D009518:New York; D010348:Patient Care Team; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011788:Quality of Life; D013060:Speech; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult