The biometric menagerie.
It is commonly accepted that users of a biometric system may have differing degrees of accuracy within the system. Some people may have trouble authenticating, while others may be particularly vulnerable to impersonation. Goats, wolves, and lambs are labels commonly applied to these problem users. These user types are defined in terms of verification performance when users are matched against themselves (goats) or when matched against others (lambs and wolves). The relationship between a user's genuine and impostor match results suggests four new user groups: worms, doves, chameleons, and phantoms. We establish formal definitions for these animals and a statistical test for their existence. A thorough investigation is conducted using a broad range of biometric modalities, including 2D and 3D faces, fingerprints, iris, speech, and keystroke dynamics. Patterns that emerge from the results expose novel, important, and encouraging insights into the nature of biometric match results. A new framework for the evaluation of biometric systems based on the biometric menagerie, as opposed to collective statistics, is proposed.
Yager
Neil
N
Biometix Pty Ltd, Suite 145, National Innovation Centre, Australian Technology Park, Eveleigh, NSW 1430, Australia. neil@biometix.com
Dunstone
Ted
T
D000465:Algorithms; D056667:Biometric Identification / Q000379:methods*; D003878:Dermatoglyphics; D005145:Face / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D006801:Humans; D007498:Iris / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric