title: Skin biopsy for diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy: a critically appraised topic.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patients with lower extremity sensory symptoms and pain but without clinical or standard neurophysiological examination abnormalities may have a small fiber neuropathy. Skin biopsy with intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) assessment has been promoted as a diagnostic tool for such patients.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the diagnostic utility of skin biopsy with IENFD in patients with suspected small fiber neuropathy.
  
  
  METHODS
  The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario, structured question, search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and content experts in the field of neuromuscular neurology.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One primary article was selected for review. A retrospective study using skin biopsy with IENFD detected abnormalities in 88.1% of 67 patients who had symptoms suggestive of sensory neuropathy but normal nerve conduction studies compared with 10% of healthy controls. Skin biopsy was more often abnormal in this setting than either the clinical examination (signs of small fiber impairment) or quantitative sensory testing but formal evaluation of sensitivity and specificity are compromised by inclusion of the diagnostic tests within the definition of the reference standard. Skin biopsy with IENFD was abnormal in 81% of patients clinically diagnosed with mixed large and small fiber neuropathy, 0/22 patients with large fiber neuropathy and 0/16 patients with nonperipheral neuropathic disorders.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Detection of reduced IENFD using skin biopsy may be sensitive and specific for clinically-defined syndromes consistent with small fiber neuropathy. Skin biopsy appears to have greater diagnostic utility than the neurologic examination and quantitative sensory testing, both of which rely heavily on subjective patient perception. Prospective studies that evaluate quantitative methodology (rather than modalities that rely on patient report) and do not include the diagnostic tests in the reference standard are needed. Consensus is needed regarding a reference standard definition for small fiber neuropathy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
authors.forename: Ales
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hlubocky
authors.forename: Kay
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Wellik
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Ross
authors.forename: Benn E
authors.initials: BE
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Charlene
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hoffman-Snyder
authors.forename: Bart M
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Demaerschalk
authors.forename: Dean M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Wingerchuk
mesh_terms: D001706:Biopsy; D006801:Humans; D009412:Nerve Fibers / Q000473:pathology*; D009431:Neural Conduction; D009460:Neurologic Examination; D010523:Peripheral Nervous System Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012867:Skin / Q000294:innervation* / Q000473:pathology