title: [Clinical study comparing at 5 years a ceramic and a ceromer used for making esthetic inlays].
abstract: Thirty-six inlays, equally divided between a vitro ceramic and a composite resin, were bonded in pair, on the same type of teeth in fifteen patients. They were followed for a mean period of 60 months. The results showed that both materials were clinically acceptable for restoring posterior teeth, even though ceramic yielded better results concerning colour match.
authors.affiliation: Sce de dentisterie restauratrice, Faculté de médecine dentaire, Université St Joseph, Beyrouth.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Khairallah
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sabbagh
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hokayem
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000538:Aluminum Silicates; D002516:Ceramics; D003188:Composite Resins; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D004955:Esthetics, Dental; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D006801:Humans; D007284:Inlays; D055115:Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008875:Middle Aged; D008963:Molar; D012823:Silicate Cement; D014075:Tooth Discoloration; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D000538:Aluminum Silicates; D003188:Composite Resins; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; C075815:IPS-Empress ceramic; C111841:ceromer; C111282:dental polyglass; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D012823:Silicate Cement