title: Functional implications of dicynodont cranial suture morphology.
abstract: Cranial suture morphology of Lystrosaurus and the generalized dicynodont Oudenodon was investigated to determine the strain environment during mastication, which in turn may indicate a difference in cranial function between the two taxa. Finite element (FE) analysis indicated that less strain accumulated in the cranium of Lystrosaurus during orthal bite simulations than in Oudenodon. Despite the overall difference in strain magnitude, moderate to high FE-predicted strain accumulated in similar areas of the cranium of both taxa. The suture morphology in these cranial regions of Lystrosaurus and Oudenodon was investigated further by examination of histological sections and supplemented by observations of serial sections and computed tomography (CT) scans. The predominant type of strain from selected blocks of finite elements that contain sutures was determined, enabling comparison of suture morphology to strain type. Drawing from strain-suture correlations established in extant taxa, the observed patterns of sutural morphology for both dicynodonts were used to deduce cranial function. The moderate to high compressive and tensile strain experienced by the infraorbital bar, zygomatic arch, and postorbital bar of Oudenodon and Lystrosaurus may have been decreased by small adjustive movements at the scarf sutures in those regions. Disparities in cranial suture morphology between the two taxa may reflect differences in cranial function. For instance, the tongue and groove morphology of the postorbital-parietal suture in Oudenodon could have withstood the higher FE-predicted tensile strain in the posterior skull roof. The scarf premaxilla-nasal suture of Lystrosaurus provided an additional region of sutural mobility in the anterior surface of the snout, suggesting that Lystrosaurus may have employed a different biting regime than Oudenodon. The morphology of several sutures sampled in this study correlated with the FE-predicted strain, although other cranial functional hypotheses remain to be tested.
authors.affiliation: Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK. Sandra.Jasinoski@uct.ac.za
authors.forename: Sandra C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Jasinoski
authors.forename: Emily J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Rayfield
authors.forename: Anusuya
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Chinsamy
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology; D001732:Bite Force; D003393:Cranial Sutures / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology*; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis / Q000379:methods; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D005580:Fossils; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D008409:Mastication / Q000502:physiology*; D010163:Paleontology / Q000379:methods; D010802:Phylogeny; D012104:Reptiles / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D012886:Skull / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity; D013284:Stomatognathic System / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed