Innovative health reform models: pay-for-performance initiatives.
Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs have the potential to improve overall quality of care by narrowing gaps between what national care guidelines recommend and those treatments actually delivered in routine community practice. P4P is also viewed as a tool to promote more efficient use of healthcare resources while improving patient outcomes. P4P provides financial incentives for quality of service instead of quantity of service. Despite the promise of healthcare quality, concerns have been raised that P4P may have potential unintended consequences for patients, physicians, and hospitals. The shortcomings of many traditional P4P programs have fueled the emergence of new and innovative models of payment reform. P4P and newer models that link reimbursement with quality and efficiency show promise to improve patient outcomes and lower costs, but multiple approaches are needed to ensure that future initiatives provide value for key stakeholders, including patients, providers, and payers.
Glickman
Seth W
SW
Outcomes Research and Assessment Group, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715, USA.
Peterson
Eric D
ED
D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D055317:Evidence-Based Practice; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends