Is the PRISMA-France glass half-full or half-empty? The emergence and management of polarized views regarding an integrative change process.
OBJECTIVE
The PRISMA-France pilot project is aimed at implementing an innovative case management type integration model in the 20th district of Paris. This paper apprehends the emergence of two polarized views regarding the progression of the model's spread in order to analyze the change management enacted during the process and its effects.


METHODS
A qualitative analysis was conducted based on an institutional change model.


RESULTS
Our results suggest that, according to one view, the path followed to reach the study's current level of progress was efficient and necessary to lay the foundation of a new health and social services system while according to the other, change management shortcomings were responsible for the lack of progress.


CONCLUSIONS
While neither of these two views appears entirely justified, analyzing the factors underlying their differences pinpoints some of the challenges involved in managing the spread of an integrated service delivery network. Meticulous preparation for the change management role and communication of the time and effort required for a wholesale institutional change process may be significant factors for a successful integrative endeavor.
Etheridge
Francis
F
Université de Sherbrooke, 1036, rue Belvédère Sud, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada J1H 4C4.
Couturier
Yves
Y
Trouvé
Hélène
H
Saint-Jean
Olivier
O
Somme
Dominique
D