title: Nonreferral of possible soft tissue sarcomas in adults: a dangerous omission in policy.
abstract: Introduction. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes in three groups of STS patients treated in our specialist centre: patients referred immediately after an inadequate initial treatment, patients referred after a local recurrence, and patients referred directly, prior to any treatment. Patients and methods. We reviewed all our nonmetastatic extremity-STS patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We compared three patient groups: those referred directly to our centre (group A), those referred after an inadequate initial excision (group B), and patients with local recurrence (group C). Results. The study included 174 patients. Disease-free survival was 73%, 76%, and 28% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P < .001). Depth, size, and histologic grade influenced the outcome in groups A and B, but not in C. Conclusion. Initial wide surgical treatment is the main factor that determines local control, being even more important than the known intrinsic prognostic factors of tumour size, depth, and histologic grade. The influence on outcome of initial wide local excision (WLE), which is made possible by referral to a specialist centre, is paramount.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Navarra, 31080 Pamplona, Spain.
authors.forename: Juan F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Abellan
authors.forename: José M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Lamo de Espinosa
authors.forename: Julio
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Duart
authors.forename: Ana
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Patiño-García
authors.forename: Salvador
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Martin-Algarra
authors.forename: Rafael
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Martínez-Monge
authors.forename: Mikel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: San-Julian