A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients.
BACKGROUND
Data on the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers (PU's) among ICU patients is sparse.


OBJECTIVE
To compare PU outcomes in medial ICU patients nursed on either a reactive mattress overlay (ROHO, ROHO Inc, Belleville, IL, USA) or an active alternating pressure mattress (NIMBUS3, ArjoHuntleigh, Luton Bedfordshire, UK).


METHODS
Pilot prospective single blind randomised controlled clinical trial.


METHODS
Two types of pressure redistributing mattress.


METHODS
Two groups of eight patients.


METHODS
Patients included in the study were those at high risk (Norton scale <8) or with a PU on admission.


RESULTS
The two groups had similar patient characteristics. However, the NIMBUS 3 group presented with more ulcers per patient on admission (62.5%) and more severe ulcers (20% category 3) while four patients (50%) presented with a single superficial ulcer in the ROHO group. HEALING: The progress of the ulcers showed significant decreases in PU surface area (p=0.05), total PUSH tool score (p=0.01) in the NIMBUS 3 group compared to the ROHO group. In the NIMBUS 3 group 82% of the ulcers improved versus none in the ROHO group (p=0.002) and 18% remained stable versus 33%. None of the ulcers deteriorated in the NIMBUS 3 group versus 67% in the ROHO group (p=0.006). Full thickness wounds (Category 3) were present in 22% of the NIMBUS 3 group versus 0% of the ROHO group on admission and in 0% versus 66.7% (p=0.008) respectively at the end of the pilot study.


CONCLUSIONS
Non-blanching erythema occurred equally in both arms at baseline; skin remained intact for the NIMBUS 3 group while 50% in the ROHO group worsened with superficial tissue loss.


CONCLUSIONS
This small pilot study suggests that 'active' alternating therapy is a useful adjunct in the care of highly vulnerable patients, while the outcomes may be less favourable when using 'reactive', constant low pressure devices.
Malbrain
Manu
M
Intensive Care Unit, ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen, Campus Stuivenberg, Lange Beeldekensstraat 267, B-2060 Antwerpen 6, Belgium. manu.malbrain@skynet.be
Hendriks
Bart
B
Wijnands
Patricia
P
Denie
Dirk
D
Jans
Anita
A
Vanpellicom
Jef
J
De Keulenaer
Bart
B
D000368:Aged; D000399:Air Pressure; D001513:Beds / Q000592:standards*; D001530:Belgium; D015400:Clinical Nursing Research; D003422:Critical Care; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009730:Nursing Assessment; D056888:Patient Positioning; D010865:Pilot Projects; D003668:Pressure Ulcer / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014945:Wound Healing