The impact of statistical adjustment on conditional standard errors of measurement in the assessment of physician communication skills.
The use of standardized patients to assess communication skills is now an essential part of assessing a physician's readiness for practice. To improve the reliability of communication scores, it has become increasingly common in recent years to use statistical models to adjust ratings provided by standardized patients. This study employed ordinary least squares regression to adjust ratings, and then used generalizability theory to evaluate the impact of these adjustments on score reliability and the overall standard error of measurement. In addition, conditional standard errors of measurement were computed for both observed and adjusted scores to determine whether the improvements in measurement precision were uniform across the score distribution. Results indicated that measurement was generally less precise for communication ratings toward the lower end of the score distribution; and the improvement in measurement precision afforded by statistical modeling varied slightly across the score distribution such that the most improvement occurred in the upper-middle range of the score scale. Possible reasons for these patterns in measurement precision are discussed, as are the limitations of the statistical models used for adjusting performance ratings.
Raymond
Mark R
MR
National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, PA, USA. mraymond@nbme.org
Clauser
Brian E
BE
Furman
Gail E
GE
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003142:Communication; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004501:Education, Medical; D004521:Educational Measurement; D004522:Educational Status; D006801:Humans; D016018:Least-Squares Analysis; D016014:Linear Models; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D012044:Regression Analysis