Some thoughts on the interpretation of steady-state evoked potentials.
Steady-state evoked potentials are popular due to their easy analysis in frequency space and the availability of methods for objective response detection. However, the interpretation of steady-state responses can be challenging due to their origin as a sequence of responses to single stimuli. In the present paper, issues of signal extinction and some characteristics of higher harmonics are illustrated based on simple model data for those readers who do not regularly hobnob with frequency-space representations of data. It is important to realize that the absence of a steady-state response does not prove the lack of neural activity. For the same underlying reasons, namely constructive and destructive superposition of individual responses, comparisons of amplitudes between experimental conditions are prone to inaccuracies. Thus, before inferring physiology from steady-state responses, one should consider an alternative explanation in terms of signal composition.
Heinrich
Sven P
SP
Sektion Funktionelle Sehforschung, Univ-Augenklinik, Killianstr 5, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. sven.heinrich@uniklinik-freiburg.de
D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004596:Electroretinography; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D011930:Reaction Time