title: Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  It is unclear how the biomechanics of dynamic posterior lumbar stabilization systems and traditional rigid pedicle screw-rod systems differ. This study examined the biomechanical response of a hinged-dynamic pedicle screw compared with a standard rigid screw used in a 1-level pedicle screw-rod construct.
  
  
  METHODS
  Unembalmed human cadaveric L3-S1 segments were tested intact, after L4-5 discectomy, after rigid pedicle screw-rod fixation, and after dynamic pedicle screw-rod fixation. Specimens were loaded using pure moments to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation while recording motion optoelectronically. Specimens were then loaded in physiological flexion-extension while applying 400 N of compression. Moment and force across instrumentation were recorded from pairs of strain gauges mounted on the interconnecting rods.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The hinged-dynamic screws allowed an average of 160% greater range of motion during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation than standard rigid screws (p < 0.03) but 30% less motion than normal. When using standard screws, bending moments and axial loads on the rods were greater than the bending moments and axial loads on the rods when using dynamic screws during most loading modes (p < 0.05). The axis of rotation shifted significantly posteriorly more than 10 mm from its normal position with both devices.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In a 1-level pedicle screw-rod construct, hinged-dynamic screws allowed a quantity of motion that was substantially closer to normal motion than that allowed by rigid pedicle screws. Both systems altered kinematics similarly. Less load was borne by the hinged screw construct, indicating that the hinged-dynamic screws allow less stress shielding than standard rigid screws.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, VKV Amerikan Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.
authors.forename: Hakan
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Bozkuş
authors.forename: Mehmet
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Senoğlu
authors.forename: Seungwon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Baek
authors.forename: Anna G U
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Sawa
authors.forename: Ali Fahir
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Ozer
authors.forename: Volker K H
authors.initials: VK
authors.lastname: Sonntag
authors.forename: Neil R
authors.initials: NR
authors.lastname: Crawford
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001863:Bone Screws; D017586:Diskectomy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000502:physiology* / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009038:Motion; D019637:Orthopedic Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D012399:Rotation; D012447:Sacrum / Q000502:physiology / Q000601:surgery; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013997:Time Factors