Cognitive versus functional approaches to rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: commentary on a randomized controlled trial.
I describe the findings of one of the largest randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI) ever conducted, examine the theoretical relationship between cognitive and functional rehabilitation after TBI, and describe the historical preference for cognitive (top-down) rather than functional (bottom-up) interventions. I also contrast the goals and principles of cognitive rehabilitation and of the neurofunctional approach of Giles and Clark-Wilson (1993; Giles, 2005)--a bottom-up approach. Findings of the RCT provide empirical support for both functional and cognitive interventions following acute TBI. In addition, they provide evidence that each type of intervention offers significant advantages for a specific subpopulation. The clinical implications of these findings for occupational therapy practitioners are discussed.
Samuel Merritt University, 450 30th Street, Oakland, CA 94609, USA. ggiles@samuelmerritt.edu
Gordon Muir
GM
Giles
D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D003071:Cognition; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; D006801:Humans; D009484:Neuropsychology / Q000379:methods; D009788:Occupational Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D020127:Recovery of Function; D014481:United States