Choosing for the child with cochlear implants: a note of precaution.
Recent contributions to discussions on paediatric cochlear implantation in Norway indicate two mutually exclusive doctrines prescribing the best course of post-operative support for a child with cochlear implants; bilingually with sign language and spoken language simultaneously or primarily monolingually with speech only. This conflict constitutes an ethical problem for parents responsible for choosing between one of the two alternatives. This article puts forth the precautionary principle as a possible solution to this problem. Although scientific uncertainty exists in the case of both doctrines, there exists a scenario of possible irreversible harm to some of the children habilitated monolingually. An application of the precautionary principle may hence suggest that it is rational to agree on the bilingual approach, at least for the time-being.
Kermit
Patrick
P
Department of Social Work and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Dragvoll, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. patrick.kermit@svt.ntnu.no
D019929:Cochlear Implantation / Q000941:ethics* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D019303:Multilingualism; D010290:Parents; D012813:Sign Language; D013060:Speech; D035501:Uncertainty