Long-term safety and efficacy with paclitaxel-eluting stents: 5-year final results of the TAXUS IV clinical trial (TAXUS IV-SR: Treatment of De Novo Coronary Disease Using a Single Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent).
OBJECTIVE
The pivotal TAXUS IV (TAXUS IV-SR: Treatment of De Novo Coronary Disease Using a Single Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent) trial evaluated the long-term safety and effectiveness of the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) compared with an otherwise identical bare-metal stent (BMS) in a relatively uncomplicated population of patients with a single de novo lesion in a native coronary vessel, treated between March and July 2002.


BACKGROUND
Long-term follow-up is required to determine whether the early safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents are maintained.


METHODS
The primary end point of this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was 9-month ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) for PES versus the BMS control. Follow-up was complete in 1,230 (95.1%) of 1,294 randomized evaluable patients at 5 years.


RESULTS
Compared with BMS, PES significantly reduced TVR at 9 months (12.1% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.0001); this benefit was maintained through 5 years (27.4% vs. 16.9%; p < 0.0001), given comparable TVR rates for BMS and PES between years 1 and 5 (4.1%/year vs. 3.3%/year; respectively, p = 0.16). Similar patterns were observed for composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (32.8% BMS vs. 24.0% PES, p = 0.0001 at 5 years). Stent thrombosis was comparable for PES and BMS at 9 months (0.8% BMS vs. 0.8% PES; p = 0.98) and at 5 years (2.1% BMS vs. 2.2% PES, p = 0.87). The overall revascularization benefits of PES were consistent across multiple subgroups, including sex, diabetes, left anterior descending artery lesion location, reference vessel diameter, lesion length, and multiple stents.


CONCLUSIONS
These 5-year results demonstrate the long-term safety and sustained efficacy of PES compared with BMS in patients with noncomplex lesions. (TAXUS IV-SR: Treatment of De Novo Coronary Disease Using a Single Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent; NCT00292474).
Ellis
Stephen G
SG
Cleveland Clinic, Department of Cardiology, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. elliss@ccf.org
Stone
Gregg W
GW
Cox
David A
DA
Hermiller
James
J
O'Shaughnessy
Charles
C
Mann
Tift
T
Turco
Mark
M
Caputo
Ronald
R
Bergin
Patrick J
PJ
Bowman
Thomas S
TS
Baim
Donald S
DS
D000368:Aged; D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000401:mortality; D002317:Cardiovascular Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D048909:Diabetes Complications / Q000628:therapy; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D054855:Drug-Eluting Stents; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D053208:Kaplan-Meier Estimate; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008670:Metals; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000209:etiology; D017239:Paclitaxel / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D010975:Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D015607:Stents; D013927:Thrombosis / Q000209:etiology; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D002317:Cardiovascular Agents; D008670:Metals; D010975:Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; D017239:Paclitaxel