Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to evaluate the stress on the cortical bone around single body dental implants supporting mandibular complete fixed denture with rigid (Neopronto System-Neodent) or semirigid splinting system (Barra Distal System-Neodent).


METHODS
Stress levels on several system components were analyzed through finite element analysis. Focusing on stress concentration at cortical bone around single body dental implants supporting mandibular complete fixed dentures with rigid (Neopronto System-Neodent) or semirigid splinting system (Barra Distal System-Neodent), after axial and oblique occlusal loading simulation, applied in the last cantilever element.


RESULTS
The results showed that semirigid implant splinting generated lower von Mises stress in the cortical bone under axial loading. Rigid implant splinting generated higher von Mises stress in the cortical bone under oblique loading.


CONCLUSIONS
It was concluded that the use of a semirigid system for rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of immediate implant-supported fixed complete denture is recommended, because it reduces stress concentration in the cortical bone. As a consequence, bone level is better preserved, and implant survival is improved. Nevertheless, for both situations the cortical bone integrity was protected, because the maximum stress level findings were lower than those pointed in the literature as being harmful. The maximum stress limit for cortical bone (167 MPa) represents the threshold between plastic and elastic state for a given material. Because any force is applied to an object, and there is no deformation, we can conclude that the elastic threshold was not surpassed, keeping its structural integrity. If the force is higher than the plastic threshold, the object will suffer permanent deformation. In cortical bone, this represents the beginning of bone resorption and/or remodeling processes, which, according to our simulated loading, would not occur.
Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. mfonttes@uol.com.br
Marcelo Fontes
MF
Teixeira
Saturnino Aparecido
SA
Ramalho
Ivete Aparecida
IA
de Mattias Sartori
Roberto Brunow
RB
Lehmann
D003198:Computer Simulation; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous; D019094:Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D003825:Denture, Complete, Immediate; D004548:Elasticity; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D006801:Humans; D007575:Jaw, Edentulous / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D008334:Mandible / Q000502:physiology; D008954:Models, Biological; D010516:Periodontal Splints; D013314:Stress, Mechanical