Accountability of foundation trusts in the English NHS: views of directors and governors.
OBJECTIVE
To map and describe the formal accountability relationships of foundation trusts in England and to explore the interpretations of these relationships by the key actors.


METHODS
Documentary analysis and interviews with chief executives, chairs, directors and governors in six acute trusts and two Strategic Health Authorities.


RESULTS
Although vertical accountability to the Department of Health (via Strategic Health Authorities) has, in formal terms, been removed some foundation trusts continue to be held to accountability by Strategic Health Authorities, albeit informally. Directors of foundation trusts perceive strong accountable to their regulator, Monitor, particularly for financial performance, but there is some confusion about where accountability for quality of care rests. Horizontal lines of accountability to the local population (through Local Involvement Networks and local government Overview and Scrutiny Committees) remain weak.


CONCLUSIONS
Contrary to the major policy objectives of giving greater autonomy to foundation trusts and making them more accountable to the local population, they continue to look towards the Department of Health rather than to the local population and its representatives. The accountability of foundation trusts needs to be simplified, clarified and strengthened.
The King's Fund, London W1G 0AN, UK. a.dixon@kingsfund.org.uk
Anna
A
Dixon
John
J
Storey
Arturo Alvarez
AA
Rosete
D004739:England; D006270:Health Facility Administrators / Q000523:psychology*; D006779:Hospitals, Public; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013222:State Medicine; D014341:Trustees / Q000523:psychology*