Livelihoods and protection in situations of protracted conflict.
This paper presents the findings from research on livelihoods-protection linkages from the perspective of conflict-affected populations as well as agency analysis and action. The aim of the research is to understand how greater complementarity between humanitarian protection and livelihoods approaches might reduce the risks facing conflict-affected populations. The findings show that the causes of risks to livelihoods and protection are often the same, and that community responses are intimately connected, providing good rationale for linking operational approaches. There are four main ways in which this can be done. First, by targeting those confronting the greatest risks. Second, by addressing the causes of risks through advocacy and capacity-building. Third, by implementing livelihoods interventions that minimise the need to adopt unsafe livelihood strategies and that address humanitarian consequences. Fourth, by making sure that livelihoods programming does not pose additional risks.
Jaspars
Susanne
S
Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute, United Kingdom. s.jaspars@odi.org.uk
O'Callaghan
Sorcha
S
D000374:Aggression; D000533:Altruism; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003254:Consumer Advocacy; D006291:Health Policy; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D011640:Public Policy; D012066:Relief Work / Q000941:ethics*; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D012449:Safety; D012931:Social Environment; D013188:Sri Lanka; D014754:Violence / Q000517:prevention & control; D014857:Warfare