title: [Percutaneous approach in postureteroenterostomy ureteral stenosis. Experience of the Urological Department of Sf. Ioan Emergency Hospital, Bucharest].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Uretero-enteric stenosis may raise some specific problems due to difficulties concerning the retrograde access. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antegrade flexible ureteroscopic approach for this specific pathology.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between January 2002 and June 2008, a number of 7 patients underwent antegrade flexible ureteroscopy for uretero-enteric stenosis: 3 patients with stenosis of the uretero-neobladder anastomosis (Group I), 2 patients with stenosis of the uretero-sigmoidian implantation (Group II) and 2 patients with stenosis of the ureteral implantation in an ileal conduit (Group III). In Group I, we performed antegrade Nd:YAG laser star incision in 2 cases and balloon dilation in 1 case. In Group II, the antegrade Nd:YAG laser star incision was applied in 1 case and balloon dilation was performed in the other one. In Group III, we performed antegrade insertion of the guidewire followed by retrograde cold-knife incision in one case, and bipolar ureteral approach (cut-to-the-light technique) in 1 case.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean operative time was 58 min. (range 25 to 120 min). We didn't describe major intraoperative complications. Ultrasonography, IVP and isotopic renogram (in selected cases) have been the follow-up evaluation methods. Postoperatively, 2 cases from Group I and all cases from Groups II and III had a good evolution, with significant reduction of the hydronephrosis degree at 6, 12 and 18 months. One patient from Group I, in which balloon dilation of the stenosis was performed, developed recurrence at 6 months.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  According to our experience, antegrade flexible ureteroscopic approach may represent an efficient and safe technique in uretero-enteric stenosis treatment. Being a minimally invasive approach, this procedure has a reduced rate of complications and good anatomical and functional results.
authors.affiliation: Clinica de Urologie, Spitalul Clinic de Urgentă Sf. Ioan, Bucureşti, România. geavlete@gmail.com
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Geavlete
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mulţescu
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Jecu
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Georgescu
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Geavlete
mesh_terms: D002404:Catheterization; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006785:Hospitals, University; D006801:Humans; D006869:Hydronephrosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D053844:Lasers, Solid-State / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012383:Romania; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014517:Ureteral Obstruction / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology* / Q000601:surgery* / Q000628:therapy; D018666:Ureteroscopy; D014546:Urinary Catheterization / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D014547:Urinary Diversion / Q000009:adverse effects*; D014573:Urology Department, Hospital