Progenitor cells for regenerative medicine and consequences of ART and cloning-associated epimutations.
The "holy grail" of regenerative medicine is the identification of an undifferentiated progenitor cell that is pluripotent, patient specific, and ethically unambiguous. Such a progenitor cell must also be able to differentiate into functional, transplantable tissue, while avoiding the risks of immune rejection. With reports detailing aberrant genomic imprinting associated with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and reproductive cloning, the idea that human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) derived from surplus in vitro fertilized embryos or nuclear transfer ESCs (ntESCs) harvested from cloned embryos may harbor dangerous epigenetic errors has gained attention. Various progenitor cell sources have been proposed for human therapy, from hESCs to ntESCs, and from adult stem cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS and piPS cells). This review highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each of these technologies, with particular emphasis on epigenetic stability.
Laprise
Shari L
SL
Math/Science Division, Babson College, Babson Park, MA 02457, USA. slaprise@babson.edu
D000818:Animals; D065150:Cellular Reprogramming; D044127:Epigenesis, Genetic; D006801:Humans; D044968:Regenerative Medicine; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; D013234:Stem Cells / Q000502:physiology*