title: Do children prefer contingencies? An evaluation of the efficacy of and preference for contingent versus noncontingent social reinforcement during play.
abstract: Discovering whether children prefer reinforcement via a contingency or independent of their behavior is important considering the ubiquity of these programmed schedules of reinforcement. The current study evaluated the efficacy of and preference for social interaction within differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) and noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) schedules with typically developing children. Results showed that 7 of the 8 children preferred the DRA schedule; 1 child was indifferent. We also demonstrated a high degree of procedural fidelity, which suggested that preference is influenced by the presence of a contingency under which reinforcement can be obtained. These findings are discussed in terms of (a) the selection of reinforcement schedules in practice, (b) variables that influence children's preferences for contexts, and (c) the selection of experimental control procedures when evaluating the effects of reinforcement.
authors.affiliation: University of Kansas, USA.
authors.forename: Kevin C
authors.initials: KC
authors.lastname: Luczynski
authors.forename: Gregory P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Hanley
mesh_terms: D002652:Child Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003213:Conditioning, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D012056:Reinforcement, Social; D015203:Reproducibility of Results