Contrast material for abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with parallel imaging: intraindividual equimolar comparison of a macrocyclic 1.0 M gadolinium chelate and a linear ionic 0.5 M gadolinium chelate.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to compare a macrocyclic 1.0 M contrast agent with a linear ionic 0.5 M contrast agent at equimolar dosage in regard to image quality and number of vessel segments visualized at abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography.


METHODS
In an intraindividual comparative study, 15 patients (six women, nine men; mean age, 53 +/- 12.1 years; range, 25-72 years) underwent 32 1.5-T whole-body contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiographic examinations performed with parallel imaging technique. At random and in separate sessions, each patient was examined after IV injection of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol and 0.5 M linear ionic gadopentetate dimeglumine. Three-dimensional data sets were acquired in the arterial, portal venous, and venous phases with identical imaging protocols. Quantitative analysis included contrast measurements of vessels compared with adjacent background tissue (Student's t test). Qualitative analysis was performed independently by two radiologists with regard to visualization of arterial and venous vessel segments and overall image quality (Wilcoxon's test).


RESULTS
Visualization of individual vessel segments was rated significantly better after administration of 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol compared with 0.5 M linear ionic gadopentetate dimeglumine (p < 0.001). Overall image quality was superior with 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol, but the difference was not significant. Vessel-to-background contrast after injection of 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol was significantly higher (arterial phase, 0.90, p = 0.02; portal venous phase, 0.78, p = 0.0002; venous phase, 0.74, p = 0.0002) compared with 0.5 M linear ionic gadopentetate dimeglumine (arterial phase, 0.89; portal venous phase, 0.73; venous phase, 0.67).


CONCLUSIONS
At abdominal contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography, depiction of small abdominal vessels was significantly better and vessel-to-tissue contrast significantly higher with 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol than with an equimolar dose of 0.5 M linear ionic gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Hadizadeh
Dariusch Reza
DR
Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud Strasse 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany. dr.hadizadeh@uni-bonn.de
Von Falkenhausen
Marcus
M
Kukuk
Guido Matthias
GM
Schöneseiffen
Katherina
K
Gieseke
Jürgen
J
Schild
Hans Heinz
HH
Willinek
Winfried Albert
WA
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D005260:Female; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D007668:Kidney / Q000098:blood supply*; D008099:Liver / Q000098:blood supply*; D018810:Magnetic Resonance Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009942:Organometallic Compounds / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D051598:Whole Body Imaging
D003287:Contrast Media; D009942:Organometallic Compounds; C090600:gadobutrol; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA