title: Comparative toxicity assessment of ozone and activated carbon treated sewage effluents using an in vivo test battery.
abstract: Wastewater treatment plants do not eliminate micropollutants completely and are thus important point sources for these substances. Ozonation and activated carbon treatment might be beneficial for ecosystem health as these techniques provide effective barriers to organic contaminants. However, a toxicity evaluation is required to investigate toxicity reduction and to assess the potential formation of toxic oxidation byproducts during ozonation. Therefore a comparative toxicity evaluation of different treated wastewater effluents was performed on site at a half scale treatment plant equipped with an ozonation step and an activated carbon treatment step in parallel subsequent to conventional activated sludge treatment. For this purpose four invertebrate and one higher plant toxicity test were selected to assess potential biological effects on whole organisms. The reproduction test with the mudsnail Potamopyrgus antipodarum exhibited a decreased reproductive output after advanced treatment compared to conventional treatment. This indicates an effective estrogenicity removal by ozonation and activated carbon treatment and is confirmed by results of the yeast estrogen screen with a reduction of in vitro estrogenic activity by >75%. The Lumbriculus variegatus test revealed a significantly enhanced toxicity after ozonation compared to conventional treatment whereas this effect was reduced following subsequent sand filtration. When ozonation was applied, a significantly increased genotoxicity was observed, detected with the comet assay using haemolymph of the zebra mussel. Again, this effect was removed by subsequent sand filtration to the level of conventional treatment. Activated carbon treatment even resulted in a significant reduction of genotoxicity. Adverse effects after the ozone reactor are possibly a result of the formation of toxic oxidation byproducts. Biologically active sand filtration obviously is an effective barrier to such compounds.
authors.affiliation: Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Biological Sciences Division, Department Aquatic Ecotoxicology, Siesmayerstrasse 70, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany. stalter@bio.uni-frankfurt.de
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Stalter
authors.forename: Axel
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Magdeburg
authors.forename: Jörg
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Oehlmann
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002244:Carbon; D049875:Dreissena; D005374:Filtration; D010084:Oxidation-Reduction; D010126:Ozone; D012098:Reproduction; D012722:Sewage / Q000737:chemistry*; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; D012908:Snails; D018675:Toxicity Tests; D014873:Water Pollutants / Q000633:toxicity*; D018508:Water Purification / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D012722:Sewage; D014873:Water Pollutants; D010126:Ozone; D002244:Carbon; D012822:Silicon Dioxide