title: What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups.
abstract: A Freedom of Information Act lawsuit secured 100 eyewitness identification reports from Evanston, Illinois, one of three cities of the Illinois Pilot Program. The files provide empirical evidence regarding three methodological aspects of the Program's comparison of non-blind simultaneous to double-blind sequential lineups. (1) A-priori differences existed between lineup conditions. For example, the simultaneous non-blind lineup condition was more likely to involve witnesses who had already identified the suspect in a previous lineup or who knew the offender (non-stranger identifications), and this condition also entailed shorter delays between event and lineup. (2) Verbatim eyewitness comments were recorded more often in double-blind sequential than in non-blind simultaneous lineup reports (83% vs. 39%). (3) Effective lineup structure was used equally in the two lineup conditions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA. steblay@augsburg.edu
authors.forename: Nancy K
authors.initials: NK
authors.lastname: Steblay
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior; D019548:Crime Victims; D003416:Criminal Law / Q000379:methods*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007087:Illinois; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D014796:Visual Perception; D055815:Young Adult