Two alternative models of health behaviour and recovery from activity limitations due to acute injury: A prospective study.
Cognitions influence recovery from activity limitations. In this study we aimed to independently test, compare and combine the common sense self-regulation model (CS-SRM) and social cognitive theory (SCT) in predicting recovery from activity limitations due to acute injury. Measures were gathered at two time points 5-6 weeks apart. The sample consisted of 146 university students (Mean age: 21.86, SD: 4.83, 62% female) with a heterogeneous range of injuries that limited their participation in physical activity. The dependent variable was recovery from activity limitations (Physical Functioning - Short Form-36). The predictor variables were measured using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and SCT items designed according to theoretical recommendations. Time-line (TL) and self-efficacy (SE) were significant predictors of recovery in a multivariate analysis, controlling for reported pain at Time 1. A combined model including the best predictors from both models, TL (beta = -0.25, p < 0.05, R(2) change = 0.17, p < 0.01) and SE (beta =0.31, p < 0.05, R(2) change = 0.05, p < 0.05), accounted for a significant amount of the variance in recovery from activity limitations. A combination of key variables from both models may be particularly useful for understanding the cognitive factors that influence recovery from activity limitations.
Molloy
Gerard J
GJ
Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK. g.molloy@ucl.ac.uk
Sniehotta
Falko
F
Johnston
Marie
M
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001294:Attitude to Health; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D015438:Health Behavior; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D051346:Mobility Limitation; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012606:Scotland; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D055815:Young Adult