Cost effectiveness of etoricoxib versus celecoxib and non-selective NSAIDS in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.
To evaluate the cost effectiveness of etoricoxib (90 mg/day) relative to celecoxib (200 or 400 mg/day), and the non-selective NSAIDs naproxen (1000 mg/day) and diclofenac (150 mg/day) in the initial treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from the UK NHS perspective. A Bayesian cost-effectiveness model was developed to estimate the costs and benefits associated with initiating AS treatment with etoricoxib, celecoxib, diclofenac or naproxen. Efficacy, safety and medical resource and cost data were obtained from the literature. The obtained efficacy estimates were synthesized with a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Treatment benefit and degree of disease activity, as reflected with Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores, were related to QALYs and AS-specific costs (related to BASDAI). Other cost outcomes related to drug acquisition, and gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety. Uncertainty in the source data was translated into uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates and therefore decision uncertainty. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. There was a >98% probability that treatment with etoricoxib results in greater QALYs than the other interventions. Over a 30-year time horizon, starting AS treatment with etoricoxib was associated with about 0.4 more QALYs than the other interventions. At 2 years there was a 77% probability that etoricoxib had the lowest cost. This increased to >99% at 30 years. Etoricoxib is expected to save 13 620 UK pounds (year 2007 values) relative to celecoxib (200/400 mg), 9957 UK pounds relative to diclofenac and 9863 UK pounds relative to naproxen. For a willingness-to-pay ceiling ratio of 20 000 UK pounds per QALY, there was a >97% probability that etoricoxib was the most cost-effective treatment. Additional analysis with different assumptions, including celecoxib 200 mg, and ignoring cost-offsets associated with improvements in disease activity, supported these findings. This economic evaluation suggests that, from the UK NHS perspective, etoricoxib is the most cost-effective initial NSAID treatment for AS patients.
Jansen
Jeroen P
JP
Mapi Values, 133 Portland Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. jeroen.jansen@mapivalues.com
Gaugris
Sabine
S
Choy
Ernest H
EH
Ostor
Andrew
A
Nash
Julian T
JT
Stam
Wiro
W
D000894:Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D000068579:Celecoxib; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D052246:Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004008:Diclofenac / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D016527:Drug Costs; D064420:Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions / Q000191:economics; D000077613:Etoricoxib; D006801:Humans; D008390:Markov Chains; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D018803:Models, Economic; D009288:Naproxen / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011720:Pyrazoles / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D011725:Pyridines / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013167:Spondylitis, Ankylosing / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000191:economics; D013449:Sulfonamides / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D013450:Sulfones / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D006113:United Kingdom
D000894:Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; D052246:Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; D011720:Pyrazoles; D011725:Pyridines; D013449:Sulfonamides; D013450:Sulfones; D004008:Diclofenac; D009288:Naproxen; D000068579:Celecoxib; D000077613:Etoricoxib