Patient recall in advanced education in prosthodontics programs in the United States.
OBJECTIVE
This study surveyed program directors of Advanced Education Programs in Prosthodontics (AEPP) in the United States to determine the extent, type, incidence, and perceived effectiveness of implemented recall systems.


METHODS
Surveys were sent to AEPP directors across the United States to assess their program's recall protocol. This survey first identified whether an active recall program existed. For programs with recall systems, rigor in promoting ongoing oral health was surveyed by focusing on recall frequency, patient tracking protocol, involved personnel, interaction with other university departments, provided clinical procedures, and therapy completion protocol. Whether the directors perceived that their recall system was successful was also investigated.


RESULTS
Thirty-three of 46 programs responded, giving a response rate of 72%. Of these 33 programs, only 21 (64%) had an active recall system, although 30 (91%) believed recall to be important. Twelve (57%) directors with recall programs considered their system to be effective.


CONCLUSIONS
Prosthodontic program directors felt their program's recall effectiveness could be improved. Due to the numerous potential benefits of an active recall system, AEPPs should consider implementing or enhancing their recall programs. Further studies are indicated to determine specific criteria that describe an effective recall system for prosthodontic programs within the context of patient health promotion, program curriculum, and financial ramifications.
Afshari
Fatemeh S
FS
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Koslow
Alyson H
AH
Knoernschild
Kent L
KL
Sukotjo
Cortino
C
D001071:Appointments and Schedules; D004499:Education, Dental, Graduate; D006801:Humans; D011476:Prosthodontics / Q000193:education*; D017010:Reminder Systems; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States