Examining demographic and situational factors on animal cruelty motivations.
Because of the limited number of studies that have examined the motives for childhood animal cruelty, researchers continue to suggest that further systematic study is needed. In a replication of the Hensley and Tallichet study and based on survey data from 180 inmates at one medium- and one maximum-security prison in a southern U.S. state, the present study seeks to further develop this understanding by examining the impact of demographic and situational factors on a range of animal cruelty motivations. Of the 180 inmates, 103 (57%) committed acts of animal cruelty. Logistic regression analyses revealed that respondents who committed childhood animal cruelty out of anger were less likely to cover up their behavior and to be upset by their actions but were more likely to have repeated it. Those who committed animal cruelty to shock others were more likely to reside in urban areas and to have done it alone. Furthermore, respondents who committed animal cruelty for sexual reasons were more likely to have covered up their actions and to have engaged in it repeatedly.
Hensley
Christopher
C
Department of Criminal Justice (Dept. 3203), 615 McCallie Avenue, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA. Christopher-Hensley@utc.edu
Tallichet
Suzanne E
SE
Dutkiewicz
Erik L
EL
D000328:Adult; D000786:Anger; D000827:Animal Welfare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D000818:Animals; D002648:Child; D006252:Hate; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D011329:Prisoners / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology*; D012008:Recurrence; D012307:Risk Factors; D012742:Sex Offenses / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D012931:Social Environment