Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008).
In this comment, we contrast different conceptions of mind wandering that were presented in 2 recent theoretical reviews: Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). We also introduce a new perspective on the role of executive control in mind wandering by integrating empirical evidence presented in Smallwood and Schooler with 2 theoretical frameworks: Watkins's elaborated control theory and Klinger's (1971, 2009) current concerns theory. In contrast to the Smallwood-Schooler claim that mind wandering recruits executive resources, we argue that mind wandering represents a failure of executive control and that it is dually determined by the presence of automatically generated thoughts in response to environmental and mental cues and the ability of the executive-control system to deal with this interference. We present empirical support for this view from experimental, neuroimaging, and individual-differences research.
McVay
Jennifer C
JC
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina.
Kane
Michael J
MJ
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina.
D001288:Attention; D003243:Consciousness; D003463:Cues; D056344:Executive Function; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D008606:Mental Processes; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D013850:Thinking