The comparison of birth outcomes and birth experiences of low-risk women in different sized midwifery practices in the Netherlands.
OBJECTIVE
To examine maternal birth outcomes and birth experiences of low-risk women in the Netherlands in different sized midwifery practices.


METHODS
Descriptive study using postal questionnaires six weeks after the estimated due date.


METHODS
Women were recruited from urban, semi-rural and rural areas from small-sized practices (1-2 midwives), medium-sized practices (3-4 midwives) or large-sized practices (5 or more).


METHODS
718 Dutch speaking women with uncomplicated pregnancies, a representative sample of women in 143 midwifery practices in the Netherlands who had given birth in the period between 20 April and 20 May 2007.


METHODS
Distribution of place of birth categories and intervention categories, birth experience, woman-midwife relationship and presence of own midwife after referral. Data were analyzed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).


RESULTS
Women in practices with a maximum of two midwives were significantly more likely to experience lower rates of referral, interventions in general and specifically pain relief by means of pethidine, CTG registration and unplanned caesarean sections. Women with a maximum of two midwives were significantly more likely to know their midwife or midwives and were more frequently supported by their own midwife after referral in comparison to women in practices with more than two midwives. The presence of the woman's own midwife added value to the birth experience. Women with a maximum of two midwives had higher levels of a positive birth experience than women in practices with more than two midwives.


CONCLUSIONS
Midwifery practices with a maximum of two midwives contribute to non-interventionist birth and a positive birth experience.


CONCLUSIONS
Awareness of the study results and further study is recommended to discuss reorganization of care in order to achieve significant reductions on referral and interventions during childbirth and positive maternal birth experiences.
Fontein
Yvonne
Y
Glasgow Caledonian University, Govan Mbeki, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom. yvonne.fontein@gcal.ac.uk
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000701:Analgesics, Opioid; D002585:Cesarean Section; D005260:Female; D006700:Home Childbirth / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008614:Meperidine / Q000627:therapeutic use; D008880:Midwifery / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration*; D009426:Netherlands; D009723:Nurse-Patient Relations; D007744:Obstetric Labor Complications / Q000453:epidemiology*; D010146:Pain / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000209:etiology; D036801:Parturition / Q000523:psychology*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D057184:Practice Patterns, Nurses'; D011247:Pregnancy; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D012944:Social Support; D055815:Young Adult
D000701:Analgesics, Opioid; D008614:Meperidine