Juridical and ethical peculiarities in doping policy.
Criticisms of the ethical justification of antidoping legislation are not uncommon in the literatures of medical ethics, sports ethics and sports medicine. Critics of antidoping point to inconsistencies of principle in the application of legislation and the unjustifiability of ethical postures enshrined in the World Anti-Doping Code, a new version of which came into effect in January 2009. This article explores the arguments concerning the apparent legal peculiarities of antidoping legislation and their ethically salient features in terms of: notions of culpability, liability and guilt; aspects of potential duplication of punishments and the limitations of athlete privacy in antidoping practice and policy. It is noted that tensions still exist between legal and ethical principles and norms that require further critical attention.
McNamee
Mike J
MJ
Swansea University, University of Wales, Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK. m.j.mcnamee@swansea.ac.uk
Tarasti
Lauri
L
D004300:Doping in Sports / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D015813:Substance Abuse Detection / Q000379:methods / Q000523:psychology