title: The assessment of pain quality: an item response theory analysis.
abstract: Item Response Theory (IRT) is being increasingly used to develop and evaluate outcome measures. However, many pain measures, including those that assess pain quality, have yet to be evaluated from the IRT perspective. The current study evaluated the scales of a commonly used measure of pain quality (the Pain Quality Assessment Scale, or PQAS) using IRT analyses in 3 samples of patients with chronic pain. The findings indicated variability in the precision of the scales, suggesting that all 3 of the PQAS scales are precise when pain is severe and that the Paroxysmal and Deep scales but not necessarily the Surface scale are precise when pain is of moderate or lower severity. In addition, 2 potential problems with the 11 (ie, 0 to 10) response levels used for the PQAS items were identified: (1) a high degree of overlap between adjacent response levels and (2) a lack of interval scaling. Research is needed to determine the extent to which these problems do, or do not, threaten the validity of the PQAS items and scales as outcome measures in pain clinical trials.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  IRT analyses provide important information about the psychometric and practical qualities of pain measures that is not provided by standard (classical test theory) analyses. IRT analyses of the PQAS subscales indicate that some of the scales are more precise than others at different levels of pain severity and provide important directions for further research to better understand the PQAS. IRT analyses would probably similarly provide important information concerning the utility of other measures commonly used in pain research.
authors.affiliation: Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19341, USA.
authors.forename: Clare
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Waterman
authors.forename: Timothy W
authors.initials: TW
authors.lastname: Victor
authors.forename: Mark P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Jensen
authors.forename: Errol M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Gould
authors.forename: Arnold R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Gammaitoni
authors.forename: Bradley S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Galer
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002908:Chronic Disease; D003625:Data Collection; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology; D017288:Pain Threshold; D010148:Intractable Pain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010555:Personality Inventory; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011594:Psychometrics; D011788:Quality of Life; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome