Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research.
The current and potential uses of neuroimaging in healthcare and beyond have spurred discussion about the ethical issues related to neuroimaging and neuroimaging research. This study examined the perspectives of neuroimagers on ethical issues in their research and on the ethics review process. One hundred neuroimagers from 13 Canadian neuroscience centers completed an online survey and 35 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Neuroimagers felt that most ethical and social issues identified in the literature were dealt with adequately, well, and even very well by research ethics boards (REBs), but some issues such as incidental findings and transfer of knowledge were problematic. Neuroimagers reported a range of practical problems in the ethics review process. We aimed to gather perspectives from REB on the ethics review process, but insufficient participation by REBs prevented us from reporting their perspectives. Given shortcomings identified by neuroimagers as well as longstanding issues in Canadian ethics governance, we believe that substantial challenges exist in Canadian research ethics governance that jeopardize trust, communication, and the overall soundness of research ethics governance. Neuroimagers and REBs should consider their shared responsibilities in developing guidance to handle issues such as incidental findings, risk assessment, and knowledge transfer.
Deslauriers
C
C
Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Bell
E
E
Palmour
N
N
Pike
B
B
Doyon
J
J
Racine
E
E
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002170:Canada; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000941:ethics*; D003943:Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological / Q000941:ethics*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033162:Incidental Findings; D033181:Information Dissemination; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000941:ethics; D008297:Male; D017712:Peer Review, Research