title: Is sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence worthwhile in patients with associated pelvic floor injury?
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. d.oom@erasmusmc.nl
authors.forename: Daniëlla M J
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Oom
authors.forename: Anneke B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Steensma
authors.forename: J Jan B
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: van Lanschot
authors.forename: W Rudolph
authors.initials: WR
authors.lastname: Schouten
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001003:Anal Canal / Q000294:innervation / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D036861:Delivery, Obstetric / Q000009:adverse effects; D004599:Electric Stimulation Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D005242:Fecal Incontinence / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008160:Lumbosacral Plexus / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D017773:Pelvic Floor / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000293:injuries*; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014463:Ultrasonography