Twenty years of assessment in WORK: a narrative review.
BACKGROUND
The aim of this review was to gain an understanding of the first 20 years of contributions to WORK within the assessment domain and to reflect on the perspectives underscoring this knowledge base.


METHODS
A narrative review of assessment articles using the WORK ARTicle database was conducted. Assessment articles were searched using issues from 1990 to 2009. Descriptive data was analyzed to examine historical trends of the specific types and dimensions of articles, the regional location of the contributions, and the methodological accordance. A reflective process was used by an editorial board member of WORK to inductively interpret perspectives and contextual issues that underpinned the evolution of the assessment domain in WORK.


RESULTS
Over half of $N=$ 108 of the articles on assessment in WORK focused on establishing or reporting reliability and validity of assessments used in clinical practice or evaluation research. The majority of the assessment articles were predominantly focused on the person. Contributions of articles were from 5 regions: North America, Europe, Australia, Asia and Africa.


CONCLUSIONS
Assessment articles in WORK have contributed to the development of evidence to support assessment of the worker. These articles represent a knowledge base that emphasizes evidence-based assessments to evaluate what a person can and cannot do to participate in work. Efforts are needed to expand knowledge generation in assessment to include more evaluations on the workplace and occupation dimensions, and that also considers the worker in context.
Shaw
Lynn
L
School of Occupational Therapy, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada. leshaw@uwo.ca
Campbell
Heather
H
Jacobs
Karen
K
Prodinger
Birgit
B
D019992:Databases as Topic; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D038622:Internationality; D020452:Journalism / Q000266:history*; D016272:Occupational Health; D010506:Periodicals as Topic