title: Economic evaluation of four angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the cost effectiveness of achieving JNC 7 blood pressure goals with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).
  
  
  METHODS
  Cost effectiveness of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan was compared with real world patient chart and claims data from a large US health plan. Patients 18 and older with >or=2 claims for an ARB between May 1, 2002 and December 31, 2005 were identified from the claims database. Patients with a diagnosis of hypertension in the 6-month baseline period before the first (index) ARB claim and ARB-free during baseline were included. Medical charts were randomly sampled from the cohort of identified patients; effectiveness data were obtained from charts and linked to healthcare claims and costs. These data were used to populate the decision analytic model.
  
  
  METHODS
  All-cause and hypertension-attributable costs to achieve JNC 7 goals were measured. Comparisons were made within low and high-dose strata and pooled across ARB doses.
  
  
  RESULTS
  121 472 patients were identified, and charts were randomly abstracted for 1600. Of these, 1293 patients were hypertensive at index. Baseline patient characteristics for the chart group were modestly different from the larger cohort. More patients treated with olmesartan (77.8%) than with losartan (66.5%), valasartan (68.8%), or irbesartan (68.8%) achieved JNC 7 BP goals. In pooled-dose comparisons, cost per patient reaching BP goal was $8964 (all-cause) and $2704 (hypertension-attributable) for olmesartan; compared with $10 848 and $3291 for losartan; $10 557 and $3577 for valsartan; and $13395 and $4325 for irbesartan, respectively. The trend was similar for the dose stratification analysis, except in the comparison between high-dose losartan and olmesartan, where losartan had a lower cost-effectiveness ratio.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall olmesartan was the most effective and cost-saving treatment option compared to losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan for the achievement of JNC 7 BP goals in this managed-care population.
authors.affiliation: The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Drug Use Policy and Pharmacoeconomics, Houston, TX, USA.
authors.forename: Lesley-Ann
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: Rolin
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Wade
authors.forename: Dingwei
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Dai
authors.forename: Mark J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Cziraky
authors.forename: Krishnan
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ramaswamy
authors.forename: Sumeet
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Panjabi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000804:Angiotensin II / Q000037:antagonists & inhibitors*; D047228:Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers / Q000191:economics* / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D017046:Cost Savings; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000188:drug therapy*; D007345:Insurance Claim Review; D008297:Male; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000191:economics; D008485:Medical Audit; D008875:Middle Aged; D014481:United States; D014662:Vasoconstrictor Agents / Q000191:economics* / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use
chemical_list: D047228:Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; D014662:Vasoconstrictor Agents; D000804:Angiotensin II