Health and medical economics applied to integrative medicine.
Cost-benefit analyses (CBA) of every aspect of health and medical care are a necessity to address both the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of health and medical care for the purpose of allocating limited practitioner, organizational, governmental, and monetary resources while maintaining the highest quality outcomes. In response, there are an array of approaches that emphasize the full continuum of prevention, restructuring primary care, involvement of the workplace and communities, and adoption of innovative strategies and interventions ranging from genomic assessments to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Among these approaches is an integrative medicine (IM) model that is consistent with these national objectives and that uniquely and explicitly includes "evidence-based global medical strategies" in its definition. All of these strategies require rigorous, appropriate, state-of-the art medical economic analyses. Since few if any IM models have been rigorously evaluated in terms of CBA, it is possible to draw upon the cost-effectiveness research focused on a limited number of CAM modalities as well as from the work-site/corporate clinical and cost outcomes research to suggest the evidence-based foundation from which a true healthcare system will evolve.
Pelletier
Kenneth R
KR
University of Arizona School of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, and University of California (UCSF) School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA.
Herman
Patricia M
PM
Metz
R Douglas
RD
Nelson
Craig F
CF
D000529:Complementary Therapies / Q000191:economics*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006295:Health Resources / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D055048:Integrative Medicine / Q000191:economics*; D018803:Models, Economic; D009786:Occupational Health Services / Q000191:economics*; D016896:Treatment Outcome