Agency, reflexivity and risk: cosmopolitan, neurotic or prudential citizen?
The purpose of this paper is to critically examine the turn to risk within sociology and to survey the relationship between structure and agency as conceived by popular strands of risk theorizing. To this end, we appraise the risk society, culture of fear and governmentality perspectives and we consider the different imaginings of the citizen constructed by each of these approaches. The paper goes on to explore what each of these visions of citizenship implies for understandings of the structure/agency dynamic as it pertains to the question of reflexivity. In order to transcend uni-dimensional notions of citizenship and to reinvigorate sociological debates about risk, we call for conceptual analyses that are contextually rooted. Exampling the importance of knowledge contests around contemporary security threats and warnings of the deleterious effects of pre-emptive modes of regulation that derive from the 'risk turn' within social science, we argue for a more nuanced embrace of reflexivity within risk theorising in order to facilitate a more dynamic critique of the images of citizenship that such theorizing promotes.
Walklate
Sandra
S
School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Liverpool, UK. s.l.walklate@liverpool.ac.uk
Mythen
Gabriel
G
D001008:Anxiety Disorders / Q000523:psychology; D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D005239:Fear / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D008402:Mass Media; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011057:Politics; D012306:Risk; D012449:Safety; D012933:Social Identification; D012945:Social Values / Q000208:ethnology*; D012961:Sociology / Q000458:organization & administration*; D035501:Uncertainty; D019366:Western World