[A prospective study on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft versus gamma irradiated allograft].
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the stability and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with gamma irradiated patellar tendon allograft compared with autograft.


METHODS
From January 2004 to October 2007, 69 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were prospectively randomized consecutively into two groups: group A (autograft, n=36) and group B (gamma irradiated allograft, n=33). In group A, there were 30 males and 6 females with an average age of 30.1 years, including 30 cases of simple ACL rupture and 6 cases of ACL rupture with medial accessory ligament injury; ACL rupture was caused by sports in 28 cases, by traffic accident in 5 cases, and by others in 3 cases; and the time from injury to operation was 1.4 months on average. In group B, there were 26 males and 7 females with an average age of 32.5 years, including 27 cases of simple ACL rupture and 6 cases of ACL rupture with medial accessory ligament injury; ACL rupture was caused by sports in 27 cases, by traffic accident in 4 cases, and by others in 2 cases; and the time from injury to operation was 1.5 months on average. There were no significant differences in general data between two groups (P > 0.05). The same arthroscopic technique was used in all ACL reconstructions done by the same surgeon. The clinical outcome was evaluated and compared by general conditions, pivot shift test, Lachman test, KT-2000 arthrometer testing, Daniel's one-leg hop test, International Knee Documental Committee (IKDC) scoring, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Tegner activity score.


RESULTS
All patients were followed up for 39.5 months (group A) and 37.6 months (group B). In group A, patella fracture occurred in 1 case and anterior knee pain in 2 cases postoperatively. No complication occurred in group B. The hospitalization times in groups A and B were (15.6 +/- 2.4) days and (15.5 +/- 1.5) days, respectively, showing no significant difference (P > 0.05). The operation time of group A was longer than that of group B and the fever time of group A was shorter than that of group B, showing significant differences (P < 0.05). At the final follow-up, there were significant differences (P < 0.05) in Lachman test and the pivot shift test between two groups, between pre- and post-operation; there. were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in Daniel's one-leg hop test, the IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores between two groups, however, there was a decreased trend in the functional and activity levels in group B. And there was significant difference between pre- and post-operation (P < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the differences between normal side and affected side were (2.4 +/- 0.6) mm in group A and (5.5 +/- 3.6) mm in group B, showing significant difference (P < 0.05). There was significant difference in tibial advancement between pre- and post-operation (P < 0.05).


CONCLUSIONS
The functional and activity level of the knee after ACL reconstruction with autograft and gamma irradiated patellar tendon allograft were similar, but anterior and rotational stability of the involved knee decreases significantly in the group with gamma irradiated patellar tendon allograft.
Tian
Shaoqi
S
Department of Joint Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao Shandong, 266003, P.R. China.
Zhang
Jihua
J
Wang
Yan
Y
Sun
Kang
K
Xia
Changsuo
C
Yu
Tengbo
T
Zhang
Cailong
C
D000328:Adult; D016118:Anterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D005720:Gamma Rays; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017847:Patellar Ligament / Q000637:transplantation*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods; D014182:Transplantation, Autologous; D014184:Transplantation, Homologous