title: [Induced termination of second and third trimester pregnancy in women with scarred uterus].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the suitable mode of induced termination of pregnancy at second and third trimester for women with scarred uterus.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective study was performed in 90 cases of second and third trimester pregnant women with scarred uterus, who requested termination of pregnancy due to medical indications in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from September 2002 to June 2009. The indications of termination of pregnancy were fetal anomaly, serious pregnant complication and intrauterine fetal deaths. 72 second trimester pregnant women and 18 third trimester pregnant women were included in this study. The interval time of previous operation to this pregnancy were recorded. And it was < 2 years in 20 cases and ≥ 2 years in 70 cases. The patients with normal Hepatic function began to take mifepristone and had an allergic test of Ethacridine Lactate. The method of mifepristone combined with Ethacridine Lactate were adopted when the allergic test was negative (group A, 54 cases). The method of mifepristone combined with carboprost methylate suppositories were used in the patients who had a positive reaction to the allergic test of Ethacridine Lactate, or who failed to amniotomy to inject Ethacridine Lactate because of oligohydramnios or small gestational age (group B, 36 cases). Record the detail information of every patient. (1) Age, gestational weeks, gravidity and parity. (2) The mode of previous operation (inducing the scar of uterus), previous operation time and indication. (3) The mode of induced labor in this pregnancy, the interval time from administration to uterine contraction, delivery or not and the interval time from induction to delivery. (4) Postpartum hemorrhage, the successful rate of induce labor, placental retention ratio and rupture of uterus or not.
  
  
  RESULTS
  (1) It had no significant difference between group A and group B in age, gravidity, parity and the interval time of previous operation to this pregnancy (P > 0.05). But there was significant difference between two groups in gestational weeks of induction (16 weeks vs. 25 weeks, P < 0.01). (2) It had no significant difference between two groups in successful rate of induction and postpartum hemorrhage (P > 0.05), but the time from induction to regular uterine contraction and delivery in group B was significant shorter than that of group A (P < 0.01). The rate of delivery with 24 hours in group B was 94%. It was significant higher than that of group A (13%, P < 0.01). (3) The rate of retained placenta in group B (31%, 11/35) was significant higher than group A (10%, 5/52), but the ratio of residual of placenta and membranes in group A was significant higher than that of group B (54% vs. 34%). It was no significant difference in total rate of postpartum complication between two groups. Further analysis was done in relationship of complication and the time of previous operation. It was no significant difference between the over 2 years group and the less 2 years group in the incidence rate of complications including placental retention, residual of placenta and membranes, rupture of uterus, placental abruption and postpartum hemorrhage. (4) There was 1 case of uterine rupture in group B and 1 case of placental abruption in group A.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both of methods of mifepristone combined with carboprost methylate suppositories and the mifepristone combined with Ethacridine Lactate are feasible to induced second trimester and late trimester termination of pregnancy for women with scarred uterus. But sufficient preoperation preparation and the course of induction and labor careful monitoring must be done to prevent the uterine rupture.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100026, China.
authors.forename: Li-ying
authors.initials: LY
authors.lastname: Zou
authors.forename: Ling
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Fan
mesh_terms: D000020:Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000379:methods*; D000282:Administration, Intravaginal; D000284:Administration, Oral; D000328:Adult; D002260:Carboprost / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000009:adverse effects; D002921:Cicatrix; D004975:Ethacridine / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015735:Mifepristone / Q000008:administration & dosage; D011247:Pregnancy; D011262:Pregnancy Trimester, Second; D011263:Pregnancy Trimester, Third; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013488:Suppositories; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014597:Uterine Rupture / Q000517:prevention & control; D014599:Uterus / Q000473:pathology*
chemical_list: D000020:Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; D013488:Suppositories; D015735:Mifepristone; D002260:Carboprost; D004975:Ethacridine