[Bibliometric study of Acta Ortopédica Mexicana].
BACKGROUND
A bibliometric review of the journal Acta Ortopédica Mexicana was performed.


METHODS
All the manuscripts received during 2008 and 2009 were analyzed to determine the rejection rate, the number of manuscripts returned for corrections, the stage of the arbitration process they were in, the number and type of manuscripts published, the number of articles received from abroad, the topics published, the number of consultations per country and the number of visits and articles consulted in their full version (PDFs).


RESULTS
We include 6 tables and one chart. Major results show that 193 manuscripts were received, which resulted in 178 articles produced with 118 images, and 15 were rejected. The articles were published in 12 issues (2 volumes), which represented 73 original papers, 37 clinical case reports, and the rest were various types of studies. We received papers from 5 countries, with Spain as the one that published the most (5). The most frequently published topics were those concerning the spine, musculoskeletal tumors, and the foot and ankle. We received 284,117 visits from 123 countries in the electronic version and overall the mean number of daily visits was around 1,000.


CONCLUSIONS
The main problem of our journal is that our international citation index is very low, since the impact factor is 0.07. Another weakness is that the papers sent for arbitration remain for a long time with our reviewers and this delays their publication.
Gómez García
Felipe
F
aomrevista@gmail.com
Matus Jiménez
Juan
J
Torres González
Rubén
R
Izaguirre Hernández
Aldo
A
Villanueva López
Iriabeth
I
D015706:Bibliometrics; D006801:Humans; D008800:Mexico; D009985:Orthopedics; D010506:Periodicals as Topic