The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
The survivorship of contemporary resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip using metal-on-metal bearings is better than that of first generation designs, but short-term failures still occur. The most common reasons for failure are fracture of the femoral neck, loosening of the component, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, reaction to metal debris and malpositioning of the component. In 2008 the Australian National Joint Registry reported an inverse relationship between the size of the head component and the risk of revision in resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Hips with a femoral component size of </= 44 mm have a fivefold increased risk of revision than those with femoral components of >/= 55 mm irrespective of gender. We have reviewed the literature to explore this observation and to identify possible reasons including the design of the implant, loading of the femoral neck, the orientation of the component, the production of wear debris and the effects of metal ions, penetration of cement and vascularity of the femoral head. Our conclusion is that although multifactorial, the most important contributors to failure in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip are likely to be the design and geometry of the component and the orientation of the acetabular component.
Shimmin
A J
AJ
Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Australia. ashimmin@optusnet.com.au
Walter
W L
WL
Esposito
C
C
D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D005270:Femur Head / Q000098:blood supply; D005272:Femur Neck / Q000503:physiopathology; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012039:Regional Blood Flow; D013314:Stress, Mechanical