title: Hamstring strength recovery after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between graft types.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to investigate hamstring strength after harvest of 1 or 2 hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
  
  
  METHODS
  We recruited 50 individuals who had returned to regular sporting activity to participate in a comparative study at a mean of 32.5 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery (30 in semitendinosus-gracilis group and 20 in semitendinosus group). Isokinetic hamstring strength (at 60 degrees/s and 180 degrees/s with the peak torque and torque produced at 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 105 degrees of knee flexion recorded) and isometric hamstring strength (at 30 degrees, 90 degrees, and 105 degrees of knee flexion) were measured, and the standing knee flexion angle was used to evaluate functional hamstring strength recovery.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No significant differences between the groups were found in any of the isometric or isokinetic strength measures or in the standing knee flexion angle. No relation was found between the standing knee flexion angle and the isometric hamstring strength results obtained at 105 degrees of knee flexion (r(2) = 0.034).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These findings show that the choice of hamstring tendon graft-that is, semitendinosus alone or semitendinosus and gracilis-is unlikely to significantly influence postoperative hamstring strength outcomes in athletes returning to sports postoperatively. Both graft choices showed strength deficits of between 3% and 27% compared with the nonoperated limb, indicating that hamstring strength deficits persist despite successful completion of rehabilitation. The results also show that the standing knee flexion angle should not be used as a surrogate clinical measure of hamstring strength.
  
  
  METHODS
  Level III, retrospective comparative study.
authors.affiliation: Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
authors.forename: Clare L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Ardern
authors.forename: Kate E
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Webster
authors.forename: Nicholas F
authors.initials: NF
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Julian A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Feller
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D016118:Anterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000601:surgery*; D001182:Arthroscopy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D053580:Muscle Strength; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000601:surgery*; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013710:Tendons / Q000637:transplantation*; D019415:Torque; D055815:Young Adult