Human rights and rehabilitation outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this article is to introduce rehabilitation professionals to the rapidly growing literature on human rights particularly as it relates to health and rehabilitation. The article aims to stimulate further discussion and debate concerning the place of human rights in rehabilitation practice.


METHODS
Some important milestones in the recent history of the human rights movement are briefly outlined, and some important terms in the rights literature are explained. The Ward and Birgden model of the structure of human rights is then described as an example of a rights perspective that might have particular relevance for health and social services and rehabilitation.


RESULTS
A rehabilitation case study is presented as an example of how the Ward and Birgden model could have practical relevance when deciding on the most important outcomes for an individual in rehabilitation.


CONCLUSIONS
Human rights are playing an increasing role in the struggle to improve health and healthcare globally. They also have important implications for rehabilitation practitioners and researchers and should form the core of any ethical framework for rehabilitation. It might even be argued that rights and dignity are themselves valued outcomes for rehabilitation.
Siegert
Richard J
RJ
Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, School of Medicine at Guy's, King's College an St Thomas' Hospitals, Weston Education Centre, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom. richard.siegert@kcl.ac.uk
Ward
Tony
T
Playford
E Diane
ED
D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D009626:Terminology as Topic