title: Causal discounting in the presence of a stronger cue is due to bias.
abstract: People use information about the covariation between a putative cause and an outcome to determine whether a causal relationship obtains. When there are two candidate causes and one is more strongly related to the effect than is the other, the influence of the second is underestimated. This phenomenon is called causal discounting. In two experiments, we adapted paradigms for studying causal learning in order to apply signal detection analysis to this phenomenon. We investigated whether the presence of a stronger alternative makes the task more difficult (indexed by differences in d') or whether people change the standard by which they assess causality (measured by beta). Our results indicate that the effect is due to bias.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. laux@mail.utexas.edu
authors.forename: Jeffrey P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Laux
authors.forename: Kelly M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Goedert
authors.forename: Arthur B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Markman
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D003463:Cues; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):759-83
references.pmid: 17638505
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jun;60(6):753-61
references.pmid: 17514591
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):107-24
references.pmid: 15078048
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Oct;55(4):1339-62
references.pmid: 12420998
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):226-43
references.pmid: 18473655
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1992 Apr;99(2):365-82
references.pmid: 1594730
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1978 Sep;6(5):544-53
references.pmid: 24203388
references.citation: Learn Behav. 2005 May;33(2):250-63
references.pmid: 16075843
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1105-20
references.pmid: 16248753
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):590-5
references.pmid: 16102060
references.citation: Learn Behav. 2005 May;33(2):197-210
references.pmid: 16075839