title: Asymmetric switch costs as sequential difficulty effects.
abstract: When switching between tasks of unequal difficulty, there is often a larger switch cost for the easy task than for the difficult task. The authors propose a new account of these asymmetric switch costs based on sequential difficulty effects. They argue that the asymmetry arises from impaired performance after a difficult trial regardless of whether the task switches or repeats. Empirical support for this idea is provided in two experiments on arithmetic task switching in which asymmetries are observed for secondary difficulty manipulations, even in the context of arithmetic task repetitions. The authors discuss how their sequential difficulty account might explain asymmetric restart costs in addition to asymmetric switch costs and how sequential difficulty effects might be explained by resource depletion involving executive control or working memory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. dws@cmu.edu
authors.forename: Darryl W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Schneider
authors.forename: John R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Anderson
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003657:Decision Making; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008433:Mathematics; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D009042:Motivation; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011340:Problem Solving / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012691:Serial Learning; D013334:Students; D014495:Universities
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Aug;27(4):763-97
references.pmid: 11518143
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):332-61
references.pmid: 2200075
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1973 Sep;1(3):383-6
references.pmid: 24214573
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Mar;31(2):337-50
references.pmid: 15755249
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Sep;129(3):308-39
references.pmid: 11006903
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1984 Mar;12(2):171-80
references.pmid: 6727639
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2001;25(3):315-353
references.pmid: 19079561
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1993 Jun;8(2):242-56
references.pmid: 8323728
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2000 Sep;37(5):614-25
references.pmid: 11037038
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2003 Jun;46(4):361-413
references.pmid: 12809680
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1112-7
references.pmid: 19966264
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1001-29
references.pmid: 16248748
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 2008 Jun;62(2):91-100
references.pmid: 18572986
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1994 Sep;116(2):220-44
references.pmid: 7972591
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2008 Jun;36(4):735-48
references.pmid: 18604957
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):145-51
references.pmid: 16724782
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2000;63(3-4):250-64
references.pmid: 11004879
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1477-91
references.pmid: 16393058
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):433-44
references.pmid: 16752606
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1094-102
references.pmid: 18927028
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
references.pmid: 2034749
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):978-94
references.pmid: 17683241
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):602-39
references.pmid: 18729594
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):299-315
references.pmid: 11409105
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 May;113(1):45-65
references.pmid: 12679043
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 May;136(2):241-55
references.pmid: 17500649
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2002 Jan;13(1):27-33
references.pmid: 11892775
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Jun;29(3):575-99
references.pmid: 12848327
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1986 Nov;14(6):478-87
references.pmid: 3796285
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1985 Nov;13(6):538-56
references.pmid: 3831711
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1124-40
references.pmid: 11009248
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):641-57
references.pmid: 11757873
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2003 Jul;31(5):738-45
references.pmid: 12956238
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1996 Jun;30(3):221-56
references.pmid: 8660785
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):218-37
references.pmid: 18036516
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1250-9
references.pmid: 17225506
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2002 May;44(3):297-337
references.pmid: 11971634
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):455-69
references.pmid: 12760628
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1990 Jul;18(4):407-18
references.pmid: 2381319
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2006 May;38(2):280-6
references.pmid: 16956104
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2007 Aug;55(1):37-85
references.pmid: 17078941
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jun;144(4):528-37
references.pmid: 12037637
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Mar;63(1):8-23
references.pmid: 19271811
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2010 Mar;38(2):176-85
references.pmid: 20173190
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2007 Jul;71(4):467-83
references.pmid: 16622702
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):343-67
references.pmid: 16131268
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):134-140
references.pmid: 12639695
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 8;45(7):1571-9
references.pmid: 17227678
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):1036-60
references.pmid: 15482072
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2000 Jul;28(5):774-82
references.pmid: 10983451
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1966 Feb;71(2):264-72
references.pmid: 5948188
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1958 Jan;65(1):14-21
references.pmid: 13505978
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
references.pmid: 11488380
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):370-8
references.pmid: 17352618
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2005 Mar;69(4):252-61
references.pmid: 15750868
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):128-34
references.pmid: 18605492
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2010 Apr;38(3):322-32
references.pmid: 20234022
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Feb;62(2):209-18
references.pmid: 18720281
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):117-38
references.pmid: 11204093
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):764-78
references.pmid: 11757879
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 May;29(3):362-72
references.pmid: 12776747