Implementation of angular response function modeling in SPECT simulations with GATE.
Among Monte Carlo simulation codes in medical imaging, the GATE simulation platform is widely used today given its flexibility and accuracy, despite long run times, which in SPECT simulations are mostly spent in tracking photons through the collimators. In this work, a tabulated model of the collimator/detector response was implemented within the GATE framework to significantly reduce the simulation times in SPECT. This implementation uses the angular response function (ARF) model. The performance of the implemented ARF approach has been compared to standard SPECT GATE simulations in terms of the ARF tables' accuracy, overall SPECT system performance and run times. Considering the simulation of the Siemens Symbia T SPECT system using high-energy collimators, differences of less than 1% were measured between the ARF-based and the standard GATE-based simulations, while considering the same noise level in the projections, acceleration factors of up to 180 were obtained when simulating a planar 364 keV source seen with the same SPECT system. The ARF-based and the standard GATE simulation results also agreed very well when considering a four-head SPECT simulation of a realistic Jaszczak phantom filled with iodine-131, with a resulting acceleration factor of 100. In conclusion, the implementation of an ARF-based model of collimator/detector response for SPECT simulations within GATE significantly reduces the simulation run times without compromising accuracy.
Descourt
P
P
INSERM, U650, LaTIM, IFR SclnBioS, Université de Brest, CHU Brest, Brest, F-29200, France.
Carlier
T
T
Du
Y
Y
Song
X
X
Buvat
I
I
Frey
E C
EC
Bardies
M
M
Tsui
B M W
BM
Visvikis
D
D
D019985:Benchmarking; D003198:Computer Simulation; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Med Phys. 2008 Jul;35(7):3278-84
18697552
Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2007 Jun;22(3):423-30
17651050
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Oct 7;49(19):4543-61
15552416
Med Phys. 1999 Apr;26(4):574-608
10227362
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2008 Jan 1;55(1):560-567
20811587
J Nucl Med. 2000 Jan;41(1):123-30
10647615
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Nov 7;48(21):R107-64
14653555
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Apr 21;50(8):1791-804
15815096
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jun 7;52(11):3027-43
17505087
Phys Med Biol. 1999 Aug;44(8):N183-92
10473218
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jul 7;51(13):R287-301
16790908
Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1476-85
18491542
Q J Nucl Med. 2002 Mar;46(1):48-61
12072845
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Apr 7;54(7):2163-78
19293466