Electromagnetic navigation for thoracic aortic stent-graft deployment: a pilot study in swine.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the feasibility of electromagnetic tracking as a method to augment conventional imaging guidance for the safe delivery, precise positioning, and accurate deployment of thoracic aortic endografts.


METHODS
Custom guide wires were fabricated, and the delivery catheters for thoracic aortic endoprostheses were retrofitted with integrated electromagnetic coil sensors to enable real-time endovascular tracking. Preprocedure thoracic computed tomographic (CT) angiograms were obtained after the placement of fiducial skin patches on the chest wall of three anesthetized swine, enabling automatic registration. The stent-graft deployment location target near the subclavian artery was selected on the preprocedure CT angiogram. Two steps were analyzed: advancing a tracked glidewire to the aortic arch and positioning the tracked stent-graft assembly by using electromagnetic guidance alone. Multiple CT scans were obtained to evaluate the accuracy of the electromagnetic tracking system by measuring the target registration error, which compared the actual position of the tracked devices to the displayed "virtual" electromagnetic-tracked position. Postdeployment CT angiography and necropsy helped confirm stent-graft position and subclavian artery patency.


RESULTS
A stent-graft was successfully delivered and deployed in each of the three animals by using real-time electromagnetic tracking alone. The mean fiducial registration error with autoregistration was 1.5 mm. Sixteen comparative scans were obtained to determine the target registration error, which was 4.3 mm +/- 0.97 (range, 3.0-6.0 mm) for the glidewire sensor coil. The mean target registration error for the stent-graft delivery catheter sensor coil was 2.6 mm +/- 0.7 (range, 1.9-3.8 mm). The mean deployment error for the stent-graft, defined as deployment deviation from the target, was 2.6 mm +/- 3.0.


CONCLUSIONS
Delivery and deployment of customized thoracic stent-grafts with use of electromagnetic tracking alone is feasible and accurate in swine. Combining endovascular electromagnetic tracking with conventional fluoroscopy may further improve accuracy and be a more realistic multimodality approach.
Abi-Jaoudeh
Nadine
N
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rm 1C365 MSC 1182 10 Center Dr, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20890, USA. naj@mail.nih.gov
Glossop
Neil
N
Dake
Michael
M
Pritchard
William F
WF
Chiesa
Alberto
A
Dreher
Matthew R
MR
Tang
Thomas
T
Karanian
John W
JW
Wood
Bradford J
BJ
D000818:Animals; D001013:Aorta, Thoracic / Q000601:surgery*; D001807:Blood Vessel Prosthesis; D004867:Equipment Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D008280:Magnetics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D010865:Pilot Projects; D019919:Prosthesis Implantation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D015607:Stents; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013552:Swine
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Dec;189(6):W357-64
18029850
Semin Vasc Surg. 2006 Mar;19(1):48-59
16533692
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Nov;132(5):1037-41
17059920
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Feb;18(2):303-7
17327566
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1 Suppl):S1-41
18083364
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006 Dec;5(6):688-91
17670684
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Jan;16(1):13-23
15640403
Semin Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;20(2):81-9
17580245
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003 Jul-Aug;26(4):347-56
14667116
Eur Surg Res. 2007;39(6):364-71
17664876
Semin Vasc Surg. 2006 Mar;19(1):40-7
16533691
Neurosurgery. 2008 Jul;63(1 Suppl 1):ONS121-7; discussion ONS127-8
18728589
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):628-36
17275319
Radiographics. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(7):1835-51
19001643
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Apr;16(4):493-505
15802449
Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):489-96
16436813
J Endovasc Ther. 2002 Oct;9(5):573-8
12431137
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Jul;32(4):820-4
19123029
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Apr;43(4):858-62
16616253
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 May;129(5):1050-5
15867779
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997 May-Jun;8(3):337-42
9152904
J Card Surg. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):429-35
12974933
J Endovasc Ther. 2008 Apr;15(2):168-76
18426279
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Jul 21;48(14):2241-51
12894982
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2006 Feb;8(1):70-5
16507240
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):332-9
16872959