Rationale for using insensitive quality control rules for today's hematology analyzers.
Diverse approaches have been used to assure the analytical quality of automated hematology; as such, there is great variation in their error detection capabilities. We summarize the intralaboratory performance of a cohort of Sysmex XE-2100's running e-Check hematology quality control (QC). The imprecisions of a median performing (50th percentile imprecision) and more imprecise [15th percentile (15P) imprecision] Sysmex XE-2100 are compared with measures of total allowable error (regulatory and physiologically based) to obtain multiples of the usual imprecision that must be detected to prevent the hematology analyzer from producing medically unacceptable results. The resultant large multiples of the usual imprecision (s) demonstrate the need for insensitive QC rules employing very broad control ranges, control rules that have been implicitly supported by hematology analyzer manufacturers for the last several decades. For today's highly precise hematology analyzers, the following control rules are strongly advised: 1(3.5s) , 1(4s) and 1(4.5s) rules (violated if a single control observation exceeds either its ±3.5, ±4.0 and ±4.5s limits, respectively). In order for the hematology laboratory to totally embrace expanded QC limits, manufacturers must make available their instruments' usual and poorer (e.g. the 15P performance) imprecision's. Users of hematology analyzers that require more sensitive but less specific rules to prevent the reporting of clinically erroneous data are advised to acquire more precise (and thus more dependable) instrumentation.
Cembrowski
George S
GS
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. cembr001@cha.ab.ca
Smith
B
B
Tung
D
D
D001322:Autoanalysis; D006403:Hematologic Tests / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D006405:Hematology / Q000295:instrumentation; D006801:Humans; D011786:Quality Control; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
Eur J Haematol Suppl. 1990;53:14-8
2279549
J Clin Pathol. 2006 Feb;59(2):146-9
16443728
Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Jan;75(1):28-33
7457426
Clin Chem. 1979 Jun;25(6):863-9
445821
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Nov;88(5):634-8
3673945
Clin Chim Acta. 1997 Apr 25;260(2):163-74
9177911
Am J Clin Pathol. 1986 Jun;85(6):719-21
3706209
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999 Nov;59(7):491-500
10667686
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Mar;83(3):337-45
3976570
Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Apr;61(4):473-81
4816793
Am J Clin Pathol. 1988 Feb;89(2):203-10
3341279
Clin Lab Haematol. 1990;12 Suppl 1:83-9
2282769