Temperament trait of sensory processing sensitivity moderates cultural differences in neural response.
This study focused on a possible temperament-by-culture interaction. Specifically, it explored whether a basic temperament/personality trait (sensory processing sensitivity; SPS), perhaps having a genetic component, might moderate a previously established cultural difference in neural responses when making context-dependent vs context-independent judgments of simple visual stimuli. SPS has been hypothesized to underlie what has been called inhibitedness or reactivity in infants, introversion in adults, and reactivity or responsivness in diverse animal species. Some biologists view the trait as one of two innate strategies-observing carefully before acting vs being first to act. Thus the central characteristic of SPS is hypothesized to be a deep processing of information. Here, 10 European-Americans and 10 East Asians underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing simple visuospatial tasks emphasizing judgments that were either context independent (typically easier for Americans) or context dependent (typically easier for Asians). As reported elsewhere, each group exhibited greater activation for the culturally non-preferred task in frontal and parietal regions associated with greater effort in attention and working memory. However, further analyses, reported here for the first time, provided preliminary support for moderation by SPS. Consistent with the careful-processing theory, high-SPS individuals showed little cultural difference; low-SPS, strong culture differences.
Aron
Arthur
A
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA. arthur.aron@sunysb.edu
Ketay
Sarah
S
Hedden
Trey
T
Aron
Elaine N
EN
Rose Markus
Hazel
H
Gabrieli
John D E
JD
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D044466:Asian People; D001921:Brain / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D001931:Brain Mapping; D003469:Culture; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology; D009424:Nervous System Physiological Phenomena; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010465:Perception / Q000502:physiology; D010551:Personality; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D012677:Sensation / Q000502:physiology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013694:Temperament; D044465:White People; D055815:Young Adult
J Pers. 1990 Mar;58(1):293-311
2198340
Neuron. 2004 Feb 5;41(3):473-87
14766185
Adv Study Behav. 2008;38:227-281
24991063
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Feb;31(2):181-97
15619591
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Aug;9(8):646-54
18641669
Am Psychol. 2002 May;57(5):341-51
12025764
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Jun;5(2):252-61
16180631
Psychol Bull. 1992 Sep;112(2):239-58
1454894
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;3(4):255-74
15040547
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;19(1):12-7
18181784
Science. 1999 Mar 12;283(5408):1657-61
10073923
Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):885-908
19883141
Psychosom Med. 1995 Sep-Oct;57(5):411-22
8552730
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):15825-30
18838685
J Neurosci. 1999 Oct 1;19(19):RC28
10493773
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 May;78(5):956-64
10821201
Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):291-310
11381831
J Psychosom Res. 1989;33(2):167-75
2724193
Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Spring;17(2):303-28
16761547
Psychol Sci. 2003 May;14(3):201-6
12741741
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Aug;73(2):345-68
9248053
Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):716-36
8255955
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Jan;6(1):38-47
20203139
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 Feb;29(1):3-38
15652252