An in vitro evaluation of cone-beam breast CT methods.
Tomosynthesis was developed for mammography, especially breast cancer detection. However, its limited-angular range scan and resultant data incompleteness causes strong image artifacts and distortions. To address this problem, a hybrid imaging method was proposed in our previous work, which combines tomosynthesis and low-resolution CT into a single system to produce fewer artifacts and distortions at a similar dose level. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the images reconstructed using the proposed method as compared with that using the conventional tomosynthesis method (ML-convex). For that purpose, the projection datasets are acquired in both numerical simulation and phantom experiments on our breast imaging platform. Three kinds of phantoms are used in our work, including a numerical phantom, a physical phantom and 8 in vitro phantoms made of breast specimens. In addition to visual comparison of the reconstructed images, we employ spatial resolution, image contrast, reconstruction error, and convergence rate to evaluate the results quantitatively. It is observed that the results from our method can achieve significantly higher spatial resolution, higher contrast, smaller reconstruction error and faster convergence rate. Besides, a reader study using 8 in vitro phantoms of breast specimens demonstrates the clinical potential of our method, which significantly outperforms the conventional tomosynthesis.
Zeng
Kai
K
Biomedical Engineering Department, The University of Iowa, Iowa city, IA 52242, USA.
Fajardo
Laurie L
LL
Kao
Simon
S
Franken
Edmund A
EA
Park
Jeong Mi
JM
Jing
Zhenxue
Z
Bai
Er-Wei
EW
Wang
Ge
G
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Oct 7;48(19):R65-106
14579853
Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3621-33
17089827
J Theor Biol. 1970 Dec;29(3):471-81
5492997
Radiol Clin North Am. 2004 Sep;42(5):871-84, vi
15337422
Radiology. 2003 Aug;228(2):569-75
12821770
Med Phys. 1985 Jan-Feb;12(1):65-70
3974527
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Nov-Dec;31(6):976-83
18043366
Radiology. 1984 Jan;150(1):225-9
6359264
IEEE Trans Image Process. 1995;4(10):1430-8
18291974
Radiology. 1997 Nov;205(2):399-406
9356620
Am J Prev Med. 1998 Feb;14(2):143-53
9631167
Med Phys. 2004 Sep;31(9):2636-47
15487747
Acad Radiol. 2004 May;11(5):506-15
15147615
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984 Apr;8(2):306-16
6608535
Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;38(4):861-9, x
10943283
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1972 Jan;19(1):20-8
5008409