title: Value for money? Array genomic hybridization for diagnostic testing for genetic causes of intellectual disability.
abstract: Array genomic hybridization (AGH) provides a higher detection rate than does conventional cytogenetic testing when searching for chromosomal imbalance causing intellectual disability (ID). AGH is more costly than conventional cytogenetic testing, and it remains unclear whether AGH provides good value for money. Decision analytic modeling was used to evaluate the trade-off between costs, clinical effectiveness, and benefit of an AGH testing strategy compared to a conventional testing strategy. The trade-off between cost and effectiveness was expressed via the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed via Monte Carlo simulation. The baseline AGH testing strategy led to an average cost increase of $217 (95% CI $172-$261) per patient and an additional 8.2 diagnoses in every 100 tested (0.082; 95% CI 0.044-0.119). The mean incremental cost per additional diagnosis was $2646 (95% CI $1619-$5296). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that there was a 95% probability that AGH would be cost effective if decision makers were willing to pay $4550 for an additional diagnosis. Our model suggests that using AGH instead of conventional karyotyping for most ID patients provides good value for money. Deterministic sensitivity analysis found that employing AGH after first-line cytogenetic testing had proven uninformative did not provide good value for money when compared to using AGH as first-line testing.
authors.affiliation: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. dean.regier@sickkids.ca
authors.forename: Dean A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Regier
authors.forename: Jan M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Friedman
authors.forename: Carlo A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Marra
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D015894:Genome, Human; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000235:genetics*; D009693:Nucleic Acid Hybridization; D040841:Resource Allocation / Q000379:methods
references.citation: Genet Med. 2009 Aug;11(8):570-4
references.pmid: 19478683
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Oct;77(4):606-16
references.pmid: 16175506
references.citation: Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:71-86
references.pmid: 18949852
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2006 Aug;43(8):625-33
references.pmid: 16490798
references.citation: Neurology. 2003 Feb 11;60(3):367-80
references.pmid: 12578916
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2006 Feb;43(2):180-6
references.pmid: 15980116
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Dec;73(6):1261-70
references.pmid: 14628292
references.citation: Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Dec 15;139(3):173-85
references.pmid: 16283669
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 Jan;13(1):6-25
references.pmid: 15523501
references.citation: J Med Genet. 1998 Mar;35(3):177-82
references.pmid: 9541099
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2004 Apr;41(4):241-8
references.pmid: 15060094
references.citation: Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):341-50
references.pmid: 12926584
references.citation: Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Feb 1;140(3):205-11
references.pmid: 16419101
references.citation: Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Oct 1;140(19):2063-74
references.pmid: 16917849
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jan;1151:157-66
references.pmid: 19154522
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2002 Aug;39(8):546-53
references.pmid: 12161591
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Feb;39(2):125-32
references.pmid: 9062428
references.citation: Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(7):659-85
references.pmid: 15987225
references.citation: CMAJ. 1992 Feb 15;146(4):473-81
references.pmid: 1306034
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2006 Jun;43(6):478-89
references.pmid: 16199540
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2005 Sep;42(9):699-705
references.pmid: 16141005
references.citation: Genet Med. 2007 Feb;9(2):74-9
references.pmid: 17304048
references.citation: Pediatr Neonatol. 2008 Dec;49(6):213-7
references.pmid: 19166117
references.citation: Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;115(3-4):254-61
references.pmid: 17124408
references.citation: Genet Med. 2009 Aug;11(8):575-6
references.pmid: 19623080
references.citation: Clin Genet. 2009 Jun;75(6):514-21
references.pmid: 19508416
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Sep;79(3):500-13
references.pmid: 16909388
references.citation: Clin Genet. 2007 Oct;72(4):271-87
references.pmid: 17850622