Cranial base superimposition for 3-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes.
BACKGROUND
The recent emphases on soft tissues as the limiting factor in treatment and on soft-tissue relationships in establishing the goals of treatment has made 3-dimensional (3D) analysis of soft tissues more important in diagnosis and treatment planning. It is equally important to be able to detect changes in the facial soft tissues produced by growth or treatment. This requires structures of reference for superimposition and a way to display the changes with quantitative information.


METHODS
In this study, we outlined a technique for quantifying facial soft-tissue changes viewed in cone-beam computed tomography data, using fully automated voxel-wise registrations of the cranial base surface. The assessment of soft-tissue changes is done by calculation of the Euclidean surface distances between the 3D models. Color maps are used for visual assessment of the location and the quantification of changes.


RESULTS
This methodology allows a detailed examination of soft-tissue changes with growth or treatment.


CONCLUSIONS
Because of the lack of stable references with 3D photogrammetry, 3D photography, and laser scanning, soft-tissue changes cannot be accurately quantified by these methods.
Cevidanes
Lucia H C
LH
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. cevidanl@dentistry.unc.edu
Motta
Alexandre
A
Proffit
William R
WR
Ackerman
James L
JL
Styner
Martin
M
D054893:Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; D005145:Face / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D007834:Lasers; D008445:Maxillofacial Development; D010780:Photogrammetry; D010781:Photography; D019291:Skull Base / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D012984:Software; D013382:Subtraction Technique
Med Image Anal. 1998 Mar;2(1):37-60
10638852
J Anat. 2006 Jun;208(6):769-84
16761977
Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Oct 15;138A(3):247-53
16158436
Angle Orthod. 1997;67(5):327-36
9347106
Angle Orthod. 2006 Sep;76(5):773-8
17029509
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jul;128(1):16-26
16027621
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jun;119(7):2192-2199
17519721
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Jul-Aug;21(4):567-81
9216760
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Nov 10;163(1-2):10-7
16337353
Psychiatry Res. 2002 Aug 20;115(1-2):15-35
12165365
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000 Nov;19(11):1053-63
11204843
IEEE Trans Image Process. 1996;5(10):1435-47
18290061
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997 Apr;16(2):187-98
9101328
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):305-10
17346584
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Jun;57(6):662-5; discussion 666
10368089
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999 Aug;18(8):712-21
10534053
Am J Orthod. 1979 Jun;75(6):599-617
287374
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jul;37(7):641-6
18539435
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84
18046031
Am J Orthod. 1983 Oct;84(4):313-22
6578682
Br J Radiol. 2004;77 Spec No 2:S140-53
15677356
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 Jul;33(4):497-504
18584237
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):94-9
19577154
Med Image Anal. 1997 Apr;1(3):225-43
9873908
Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Apr;8(4):129-32
21236128
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1989;34(3):193-7
2473674
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):106-14
18504152
J Craniofac Surg. 2006 May;17(3):477-83
16770184
J Orthod. 2004 Mar;31(1):62-70
15071154
Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15(8):917-27
9322211
J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Mar;20(2):297-307
19276829
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2007 May;11(3):274-87
17521077
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;36(5):423-8
17428638
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
16545965
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005 Nov;34(6):369-75
16227481