title: Emergency department chief complaint and diagnosis data to detect influenza-like illness with an electronic medical record.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The purpose of syndromic surveillance is early detection of a disease outbreak. Such systems rely on the earliest data, usually chief complaint. The growing use of electronic medical records (EMR) raises the possibility that other data, such as emergency department (ED) diagnosis, may provide more specific information without significant delay, and might be more effective in detecting outbreaks if mechanisms are in place to monitor and report these data.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study is to characterize the added value of the primary ICD-9 diagnosis assigned at the time of ED disposition compared to the chief complaint for patients with influenza-like illness (ILI).
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was a retrospective analysis of the EMR of a single urban, academic ED with an annual census of over 60, 000 patients per year from June 2005 through May 2006. We evaluate the objective in two ways. First, we characterize the proportion of patients whose ED diagnosis is inconsistent with their chief complaint and the variation by complaint. Second, by comparing time series and applying syndromic detection algorithms, we determine which complaints and diagnoses are the best indicators for the start of the influenza season when compared to the Centers for Disease Control regional data for Influenza-Like Illness for the 2005 to 2006 influenza season using three syndromic surveillance algorithms: univariate cumulative sum (CUSUM), exponentially weighted CUSUM, and multivariate CUSUM.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the first analysis, 29% of patients had a different diagnosis at the time of disposition than suggested by their chief complaint. In the second analysis, complaints and diagnoses consistent with pneumonia, viral illness and upper respiratory infection were together found to be good indicators of the start of the influenza season based on temporal comparison with regional data. In all examples, the diagnosis data outperformed the chief-complaint data.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both analyses suggest the ED diagnosis contains useful information for detection of ILI. Where an EMR is available, the short time lag between complaint and diagnosis may be a price worth paying for additional information despite the brief potential delay in detection, especially considering that detection usually occurs over days rather than hours.
authors.affiliation: The George Washington University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington, D.C.
authors.forename: Larissa S
authors.initials: LS
authors.lastname: May
authors.forename: Beth Ann
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Griffin
authors.forename: Nicole Maier
authors.initials: NM
authors.lastname: Bauers
authors.forename: Arvind
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Jain
authors.forename: Marsha
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mitchum
authors.forename: Neal
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Sikka
authors.forename: Marianne
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Carim
authors.forename: Michael A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Stoto
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1262-7
references.pmid: 15576514
references.citation: MMWR Suppl. 2004 Sep 24;53:101-5
references.pmid: 15714637
references.citation: J Biomed Inform. 2005 Oct;38(5):404-15
references.pmid: 16198999
references.citation: Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Mar;9(3):393-6
references.pmid: 12643841
references.citation: MMWR Suppl. 2004 Sep 24;53:18-22
references.pmid: 15714621
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;46(5):445-55
references.pmid: 16271676
references.citation: MMWR Suppl. 2004 Sep 24;53:209-14
references.pmid: 15717394
references.citation: Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;:164-8
references.pmid: 11833477
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Sep;44(3):235-41
references.pmid: 15332065
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;47(3):265.e1
references.pmid: 16492494
references.citation: MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007 Jul 13;56(RR-6):1-54
references.pmid: 17625497
references.citation: Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Jun;20(6):355-60
references.pmid: 15179142
references.citation: MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004 May 7;53(RR-5):1-11
references.pmid: 15129191