"Some," and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment.
Scalar inferences are commonly generated when a speaker uses a weaker expression rather than a stronger alternative, e.g., John ate some of the apples implies that he did not eat them all. This article describes a visual-world study investigating how and when perceivers compute these inferences. Participants followed spoken instructions containing the scalar quantifier some directing them to interact with one of several referential targets (e.g., Click on the girl who has some of the balloons). Participants fixated on the target compatible with the implicated meaning of some and avoided a competitor compatible with the literal meaning prior to a disambiguating noun. Further, convergence on the target was as fast for some as for the non-scalar quantifiers none and all. These findings indicate that the scalar inference is computed immediately and is not delayed relative to the literal interpretation of some. It is argued that previous demonstrations that scalar inferences increase processing time are not necessarily due to delays in generating the inference itself, but rather arise because integrating the interpretation of the inference with relevant information in the context may require additional time. With sufficient contextual support, processing delays disappear.
Grodner
Daniel J
DJ
Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, PA 19081, USA. dgrodne1@swarthmore.edu <dgrodne1@swarthmore.edu>
Klein
Natalie M
NM
Carbary
Kathleen M
KM
Tanenhaus
Michael K
MK
D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D008606:Mental Processes / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D055815:Young Adult
Science. 1995 Jun 16;268(5217):1632-4
7777863
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):397-400
17576278
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 May;30(3):687-96
15099136
Cognition. 2005 Apr;95(3):275-96
15788160
Cognition. 2007 Nov;105(2):466-76
17141751
Percept Psychophys. 1993 Apr;53(4):372-80
8483701
Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):133-56
21635290
Am J Psychol. 1953 Jul;66(3):421-35
13080478
Vis cogn. 2009 Aug 1;17(6-7):979-1003
21052485
Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):439-53
19348549
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446
19884961
Cognition. 2003 Nov;90(1):51-89
14597270
Cognition. 2006 Jul;100(3):434-63
16115617
Can J Exp Psychol. 2004 Jun;58(2):121-32
15285602
Cogn Psychol. 2009 May;58(3):376-415
18976987
Cogn Psychol. 2001 Jun;42(4):317-67
11368527