Is mechanical embolectomy performed in nonanesthetized patients effective?
OBJECTIVE
In centers performing endovascular treatment for patients with AIS, there is variability in placing patients under general anesthesia. Nonanesthetized patients might move during the procedure leading to complications and prolonging the time to revascularization due to lack of cooperation. However, general anesthesia can lead to a delay of the procedure, an inability to assess the patient during the procedure, and fluctuations of blood pressure. Our center does not routinely either use general anesthesia or sedate patients. We report our experience with nonanesthetized patients undergoing emergent mechanical embolectomy.


METHODS
We performed a retrospective analysis of 66 consecutive patients enrolled in the MERCI Registry at our center from June 2007 to June 2009. A univariate statistical analysis was performed by using the Fisher exact test for categoric variables and the Student t test for continuous variables in comparing use of general anesthesia with nonanesthetized patient demographics, procedural times, procedural complications, good outcome, and mortality.


RESULTS
Nine patients (13.6%) were placed under general anesthesia, and 57 (86.4%) were awake. Higher baseline NIHSS scores and older age were statistically associated with general anesthesia. No significant difference occurred between groups in the time to groin puncture or procedural times. Revascularization rates were 77% for general anesthesia patients and 70% for nonanesthetized patients (P = .331). The nonanesthetized group had better outcomes, but we did not control these outcomes for other factors. Complications were much more frequent in the general anesthesia patients (22%) than in the nonanesthetized patients (3.5%) (P = .0288).


CONCLUSIONS
Performing mechanical embolectomy in nonanesthetized patients at our institution does not prolong procedure time, decrease revascularization rates, increase complication rates, or decrease good outcome. Mechanical embolectomy in nonanesthetized patients is effective and should be considered an option in the treatment of the patient with AIS.
Sugg
R M
RM
Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA. Rsugg@saint-lukes.org
Jackson
A S
AS
Holloway
W
W
Martin
C O
CO
Akhtar
N
N
Rymer
M
M
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000768:Anesthesia, General; D002548:Cerebral Revascularization / Q000379:methods*; D017128:Embolectomy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020766:Intracranial Embolism / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012042:Registries; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014851:Wakefulness
Stroke. 2008 Apr;39(4):1205-12
18309168
Neurology. 2005 Jan 25;64(2):386-8
15668451
J Neurosurg. 2001 Jun;94(6):880-5
11409514
N Engl J Med. 1985 Apr 4;312(14):932-6
4038784
Anesth Prog. 1991 Jul-Oct;38(4-5):172-86
1819969
JAMA. 1999 Dec 1;282(21):2003-11
10591382
Stroke. 2009 Aug;40(8):2761-8
19590057
Stroke. 2001 Feb;32(2):438-41
11157179
Stroke. 2007 Apr;38(4):1281-5
17332466
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Apr;52(4):457-67
11285598
Stroke. 2005 Feb;36(2):292-6
15625300
Stroke. 2006 Apr;37(4):986-90
16527997
Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2092-7
19390066
Stroke. 2007 Jan;38(1):80-4
17122433
Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):263-6
16339467
South Med J. 2006 Nov;99(11):1230-3
17195418
Anesth Analg. 1985 Feb;64(2):143-74
3882022
Stroke. 1999 Dec;30(12):2598-605
10582984
Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2360-5
10548671