A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II.
BACKGROUND
Practice guidelines (PGs) are systematically developed statements intended to assist in patient, practitioner, and policy decisions. The AGREE II is the revised and updated standard tool for guideline development, reporting and evaluation. It is comprised of 23 items and a user's Manual. The AGREE II is ready for use.


OBJECTIVE
To develop, execute, and evaluate the impact of two internet-based educational interventions designed to accelerate the capacity of stakeholders to use the AGREE II: a multimedia didactic tutorial with a virtual coach, and a higher intensity training program including both the didactic tutorial and an interactive practice exercise component.


METHODS
Participants (clinicians, developers, and policy makers) will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Condition one, didactic tutorial -- participants will go through the on-line AGREE II tutorial supported by a virtual coach and review of the AGREE II prior to appraising the test PG. Condition two, tutorial + practice -- following the multimedia didactic tutorial with a virtual coach, participants will review the on-line AGREE II independently and use it to appraise a practice PG. Upon entering their AGREE II score for the practice PG, participants will be given immediate feedback on how their score compares to expert norms. If their score falls outside a predefined range, the participant will receive a series of hints to guide the appraisal process. Participants will receive an overall summary of their performance appraising the PG compared to expert norms. Condition three, control arm -- participants will receive a PDF copy of the AGREE II for review and to appraise the test PG on-line. All participants will then rate one of ten test PGs with the AGREE II. The outcomes of interest are learners' performance, satisfaction, self-efficacy, mental effort, and time-on-task; comparisons will be made across each of the test groups.


CONCLUSIONS
Our research will test innovative educational interventions of various intensities and instructional design to promote the adoption of AGREE II and to identify those strategies that are most effective for training. The results will facilitate international capacity to apply the AGREE II accurately and with confidence and to enhance the overall guideline enterprise.
Brouwers
Melissa C
MC
McMaster University, Department of Oncology and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. mbrouwer@mcmaster.ca
Makarski
Julie
J
Levinson
Anthony J
AJ
Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Dec 08;4:25
17156457
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Sep 12;8:38
18789150
JAMA. 2008 Sep 10;300(10):1181-96
18780847
JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-65
10535437
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):18-23
12571340
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Feb;8(6):iii-iv, 1-72
14960256
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):85-93
20078759
CMAJ. 2010 Jul 13;182(10):E472-8
20513779
Healthc Pap. 2003;3(3):10-22
12811083
CMAJ. 2010 Jul 13;182(10):1045-52
20513780