Direct Associations or Internal Transformations? Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying Sequential Learning Behavior.
We evaluate two broad classes of cognitive mechanisms that might support the learning of sequential patterns. According to the first, learning is based on the gradual accumulation of direct associations between events based on simple conditioning principles. The other view describes learning as the process of inducing the transformational structure that defines the material. Each of these learning mechanisms predict differences in the rate of acquisition for differently organized sequences. Across a set of empirical studies, we compare the predictions of each class of model with the behavior of human subjects. We find that learning mechanisms based on transformations of an internal state, such as recurrent network architectures (e.g., Elman, 1990), have difficulty accounting for the pattern of human results relative to a simpler (but more limited) learning mechanism based on learning direct associations. Our results suggest new constraints on the cognitive mechanisms supporting sequential learning behavior.
Gureckis
Todd M
TM
New York University.
Love
Bradley C
BC
Psychol Res. 2005 Jun;69(5-6):383-98
15944860
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Nov;15(6):1047-60
2530305
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Mar;4(3):91-99
10689343
Psychol Rev. 1981 Mar;88(2):135-70
7291377
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Sep;2(9):775-6
10461210
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Jul;9(4):522-33
23968215
Cognition. 2003 Feb;87(1):1-32
12499105
Psychol Rev. 1995 Jul;102(3):419-457
7624455
J Cogn Neurosci. 1994 Fall;6(4):359-76
23961731
Percept Psychophys. 1999 Aug;61(6):1178-99
10497436
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):395-429
15065915
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1977 Oct;41(6):433-47
920227
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):483-98
11294445
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):658-80
11757874
J Exp Psychol. 1951 Apr;41(4):291-7
14850645
Bull Math Biol. 1990;52(1-2):99-115; discussion 73-97
2185863
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Jun;7(2):90-108
17672381
Am J Psychol. 1965 Dec;78(4):567-74
5839924
Psychol Rev. 1958 Nov;65(6):386-408
13602029
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):309-32
15065912
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Sep;120(3):235-53
1836490
J Exp Psychol. 1959 Feb;57(2):105-14
13641581
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Apr;83(4):1615-26
3372872
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):458-67
12018498
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Aug;3(8):289
10431181
Appl Opt. 1987 Dec 1;26(23):4919-30
20523470
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):829-35
12613690
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Sep;2(9):844-7
10461225
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Summer;7(3):311-36
23961864
Science. 1999 Jan 1;283(5398):77-80
9872745
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jul;8(7):301-6
15242689
Cognition. 1993 Sep;48(3):223-42
8269697
Neural Comput. 2001 Sep;13(9):2093-118
11516359
Neuron. 2003 Mar 27;37(6):1013-25
12670429