Why is it getting more difficult to successfully artificially inseminate dairy cows?
Successfully using artificial insemination (AI) is defined as getting cows pregnant when the farmer wants them in-calf and making the best use of appropriate genetic potential. Over the past 30 to 50 years, the percentage of animals in oestrus that stand-to-be-mounted (STBM) has declined from 80% to 50%, and the duration of STBM from 15 h to 5 h; both in parallel with a reduction in first-service-pregnancy-rate from 70% to 40%. Meanwhile, the incidence of lameness and mastitis has not decreased; and it takes more than an extra 40 and 18 days, respectively, to get a lame or mastitic cow in-calf compared to healthy herd-mates. The intensity of oestrus is 50% lower in severely lame cows, and fewer lame cows ovulate. Luteal phase milk progesterone concentrations are also 50% lower in lame cows, and follicular phase oestradiol is also lower in non-ovulating lame cows compared to ovulating animals. Furthermore, lame cows that do not ovulate do not have an LH surge, and the LH pulse frequency in their late follicular phase is lower (0.53 v. 0.76 pulses/h). Thus, we suggest that the stress of lameness reduces LH pulsatility required to drive oestradiol production by the dominant follicle. The consequent low oestradiol results in less-intense oestrus behaviour and failure to initiate an LH surge; hence there is no ovulation. A series of experimental studies substantiate our hypothesis that events activating the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis interfere at both the hypothalamus and the pituitary level to disrupt LH and oestradiol secretion, and thus the expression of oestrus behaviour. Our inability to keep stress at a minimum by appropriately feeding and housing high-production cows is leading to a failure to meet genetic potential for yield and fertility. We must provide realistic solutions soon, if we want to successfully use AI to maintain a sustainable dairy industry for the future.
Dobson
H
H
Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston, Wirral CH64 7TE, UK.
Walker
S L
SL
Morris
M J
MJ
Routly
J E
JE
Smith
R F
RF
Vet Res. 1994;25(2-3):208-12
8038786
Theriogenology. 2005 Sep 1;64(4):855-66
16054491
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Sep;87(9):3029-37
15375065
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000 Apr 19;67(4):335-341
10760612
Horm Behav. 1991 Sep;25(3):295-312
1937424
Reprod Domest Anim. 2005 Jun;40(3):199-204
15943692
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Nov;82(11):2377-84
10575604
J Dairy Sci. 1984 Aug;67(8):1793-7
6541232
Anim Reprod Sci. 2002 Jul 15;72(1-2):37-46
12106964
J Anim Sci. 1989 Jun;67(6):1546-51
2768112
Theriogenology. 2004 Oct 1;62(7):1337-52
15325559
Prev Vet Med. 2002 Mar 14;53(3):167-89
11830292
Vet Rec. 1972 Jul 15;91(3):58-62
4672498
Prev Vet Med. 1997 Sep;32(1-2):1-21
9361316
J Dairy Sci. 1986 Aug;69(8):2195-202
3760306
Theriogenology. 2003 Feb;59(3-4):801-12
12517383
J Reprod Fertil. 1976 Nov;48(2):341-5
1033280
Theriogenology. 2005 Feb;63(3):950-71
15629811
J Dairy Sci. 2002 May;85(5):1150-6
12086050
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Mar;83(3):577-83
10750116
J Dairy Sci. 1997 Dec;80(12):3212-8
9436101
J Dairy Sci. 1983 May;66(5):1148-54
6875061
J Reprod Fertil. 1987 May;80(1):25-30
3298644
Vet Rec. 1989 Jul 29;125(5):103-6
2773242
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Jul;81(7):1874-82
9710754
Vet Rec. 1972 May 20;90(21):595-7
4672455
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Jun;81(6):1563-73
9684162
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Dec;82(12):2589-604
10629805
J Dairy Sci. 2001 May;84(5):1085-97
11384035
J Reprod Fertil. 2000 Nov;120(2):405-10
11058457
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Jun;84(6):1407-12
11417699
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jul;89(7):2529-38
16772571
J Dairy Sci. 1986 Nov;69(11):2925-34
3805464
Vet Rec. 2004 Jul 10;155(2):43-7
15285282
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Feb;81(2):375-81
9532490
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Nov;81(11):2890-6
9839231
Vet Rec. 1970 Jul 25;87(4):94-100
5472066
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Mar 15;202(6):938-42
8468219
Theriogenology. 2000 Jun;53(9):1783-95
10968421
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Mar;88(3):1255-63
15738259
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Apr;84(4):792-8
11352154
Anim Reprod Sci. 2003 Mar 20;76(1-2):1-12
12559716
Theriogenology. 1995 Nov;44(7):915-23
16727787
Anim Reprod Sci. 2006 Feb;91(3-4):201-14
15950407
Vet Rec. 1989 Mar 4;124(9):217-9
2929110
Res Vet Sci. 1990 Jul;49(1):25-8
2382051
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Nov;89(11):4259-66
17033013
Horm Behav. 2008 Mar;53(3):493-501
18206887
Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1987 May;115(1):63-6
3296600
Prev Vet Med. 2000 Jan 5;43(1):1-11
10665947
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Feb;90(2):649-58
17235140
N Z Vet J. 1991 Sep;39(3):88-96
16031628
Theriogenology. 2003 Feb;59(3-4):927-37
12517394
Theriogenology. 2005 Mar 15;63(5):1366-77
15725444
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Oct 15;227(8):1284-91
16266018
Prev Vet Med. 1998 Apr 16;35(1):1-9
9638775
Theriogenology. 1991 Apr;35(4):731-46
16726942
Theriogenology. 2005 Nov;64(8):1690-703
15904954
Vet Rec. 1996 Jun 8;138(23):563-7
8795183
J Anim Sci. 1996 Apr;74(4):729-35
8727992
J Dairy Sci. 1990 Oct;73(10):2749-58
2283405
Vet Rec. 1996 Nov 16;139(20):486-90
8950818
Theriogenology. 1996 Oct 15;46(6):935-59
16727958
Vet Rec. 2007 Mar 3;160(9):287-93
17337605
Prev Vet Med. 2004 Dec 15;66(1-4):247-64
15579346
J Dairy Sci. 1983 May;66(5):1128-47
6683729
Vet Rec. 1976 Dec 11;99(24):472-5
1034995
Theriogenology. 1997 Apr 15;47(6):1179-87
16728067
J Dairy Sci. 1996 Sep;79(9):1555-61
8899521
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Dec;87(12):4287-94
15545392