title: Quantitative Comparison of Minimum Inductance and Minimum Power Algorithms for the Design of Shim Coils for Small Animal Imaging.
abstract: High-performance shim coils are required for high-field magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Complete sets of high-power and high-performance shim coils were designed using two different methods: the minimum inductance and the minimum power target field methods. A quantitative comparison of shim performance in terms of merit of inductance (ML) and merit of resistance (MR) was made for shim coils designed using the minimum inductance and the minimum power design algorithms. In each design case, the difference in ML and the difference in MR given by the two design methods was <15%. Comparison of wire patterns obtained using the two design algorithms show that minimum inductance designs tend to feature oscillations within the current density; while minimum power designs tend to feature less rapidly varying current densities and lower power dissipation. Overall, the differences in coil performance obtained by the two methods are relatively small. For the specific case of shim systems customized for small animal imaging, the reduced power dissipation obtained when using the minimum power method is judged to be more significant than the improvements in switching speed obtained from the minimum inductance method.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
authors.forename: Parisa
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Hudson
authors.forename: Stephen D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Hudson
authors.forename: William B
authors.initials: WB
authors.lastname: Handler
authors.forename: Timothy J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Scholl
authors.forename: Blaine A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Chronik
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 1998 Feb;39(2):270-8
references.pmid: 9469710
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 1992 Aug;26(2):191-206
references.pmid: 1513247
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2001 May;45(5):765-9
references.pmid: 11323802
references.citation: Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11(7):903-20
references.pmid: 8231676
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2001 Dec;46(6):1049-53
references.pmid: 11746567
references.citation: J Magn Reson. 1998 Apr;131(2):286-94
references.pmid: 9571104