title: Cold storage and cryopreservation of tick cell lines.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Tick cell lines are now available from fifteen ixodid and argasid species of medical and veterinary importance. However, some tick cell lines can be difficult to cryopreserve, and improved protocols for short- and long-term low temperature storage will greatly enhance their use as tools in tick and tick-borne pathogen research. In the present study, different protocols were evaluated for cold storage and cryopreservation of tick cell lines derived from Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes scapularis. For short-term cold storage, cells were kept under refrigeration at 6 degrees C for 15, 30 and 45 days. For cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen, use of a sucrose-phosphate-glutamate freezing buffer (SPG) as cryoprotectant was compared with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) supplemented with sucrose. Cell viability was determined by the trypan blue exclusion test and cell morphology was evaluated in Giemsa-stained cytocentrifuge smears.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Cold storage at 6 degrees C for up to 30 days was successful in preserving R. (B.) microplus, R. (B.) decoloratus, I. ricinus and I. scapularis cell lines; lines from the latter three species could be easily re-cultivated after 45 days under refrigeration. While cell lines from all four tick species cryopreserved with 6% DMSO were successfully resuscitated, the R. (B.) decoloratus cells did not survive freezing in SPG and of the other three species, only the R. (B.) microplus cells resumed growth during the observation period.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This constitutes the first report on successful short-term refrigeration of cells derived from R. (B.) decoloratus, R. (B.) microplus, and I. ricinus, and use of SPG as an alternative to DMSO for cryopreservation, thus making an important contribution to more reliable and convenient tick cell culture maintenance.
authors.affiliation: Lehrstuhl für Vergleichende Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Leopoldstr, 5, 80802, Munich, Germany. Lygia.Passos@lmu.de.
authors.forename: Gertrud
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lallinger
authors.forename: Erich
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Zweygarth
authors.forename: Lesley
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Bell-Sakyi
authors.forename: Lygia Mf
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Passos
references.citation: Parasitology. 2004;129 Suppl:S3-14
references.pmid: 15938502
references.citation: Exp Appl Acarol. 2002;28(1-4):177-85
references.pmid: 14570129
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 1975 Jan 10;11(6):698-706
references.pmid: 1123829
references.citation: Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2009 Jan 01;14:2857-77
references.pmid: 19273240
references.citation: J Parasitol. 1991 Dec;77(6):1006-8
references.pmid: 1779279
references.citation: Exp Appl Acarol. 2009 Nov;49(3):209-19
references.pmid: 19252822
references.citation: Trends Parasitol. 2007 Sep;23(9):450-7
references.pmid: 17662657
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2007 Nov;44(6):1091-101
references.pmid: 18047211
references.citation: Exp Appl Acarol. 2006;39(3-4):347-52
references.pmid: 16779573
references.citation: J Parasitol. 1994 Aug;80(4):533-43
references.pmid: 8064520
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1950 Apr;59(4):509-22
references.pmid: 15436424
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2003 Feb 28;112(1-2):63-73
references.pmid: 12581585
references.citation: J Comp Pathol. 2004 May;130(4):285-93
references.pmid: 15053931
references.citation: Exp Appl Acarol. 1989 Aug;7(3):219-29
references.pmid: 2766897