Feasibility study of semi-automated measurements of finger joint space widths.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate technical feasibility based on image capturing conditions (film-focus distance (FFD), film sensitivity, film brand, exposure level and tube voltage) that potentially alter radiographs and consequently may influence the semi-automated measurement of joint space distance (JSD) by computer-aided joint space analysis (CAJSA) in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. The radiographs of a left hand (deceased man) were acquired under systematically changing image capturing conditions (exposure level: 4-8 mAs; FFD: 90-130 cm; film sensitivity: 200/400 and tube voltage: 40-52 kV with different image modalities: conventional radiographs, original digital radiographs, digital print-outs). All JSD-measurements were performed with the CAJSA-technology (Radiogrammetry Kit, Version 1.3.6; Sectra; Sweden) at the metacarpal-phalangeal articulation. JSD-analysis was not influenced by changes of FFD, exposure level, film sensitivity or film brand. JSD showed significant variation caused by tube voltage (conventional: CV = 1.913% for Agfa and CV = 2.448% for Kodak; digital: CV = 0.741% for Philips print-outs and CV = 0.620% with original digital images versus CV = 2.185% for Siemens print-outs and 0.951% with original digital images). Computer-aided joint space analysis for JSD-measurements is unaffected by the following image capturing parameters: film-focus distance, film sensitivity, film brand and exposure level. An influence of tube voltage was detected in a lesser extent for original digital images compared to the printed digital as well as conventional versions. Consequently, a standardized tube voltage is essential for accurate reproductions of CAJSA-measurements in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.
Pfeil
Alexander
A
Department of Internal Medicine III, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. alexander.pfeil@med.uni-jena.de
Sommerfeld
Julia
J
Fröber
Rosemarie
R
Lehmann
Gabriele
G
Malich
Ansgar
A
Hansch
Andreas
A
Wolf
Gunter
G
Böttcher
Joachim
J
D001172:Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D001175:Arthrography / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*; D002102:Cadaver; D003936:Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005384:Finger Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010003:Osteoarthritis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D014962:X-Ray Film / Q000592:standards
Radiology. 2007 Dec;245(3):855-62
17951347
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 Jul;7(4):430-3
10419790
Rheumatol Int. 2009 Jan;29(3):287-95
18787830
J Clin Densitom. 2005 Spring;8(1):87-94
15722592
Rheumatol Int. 2010 Sep;30(11):1477-82
19826820
Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Sep;36(9):853-64
17508211
Med Phys. 2000 May;27(5):1185-94
10841426
Rheumatol Int. 2011 Jan;31(1):71-7
19882339
Scand J Rheumatol. 1989;18(5):291-6
2595349
Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Jun;43(6):1378-86
10857798
Rheumatol Int. 2010 Jan;30(3):409-13
19826823
Rheumatol Int. 2010 Feb;30(4):461-6
19672600
J Digit Imaging. 2008 Oct;21 Suppl 1:104-12
17384977
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Dec;52(12):3850-9
16320332
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 May;54(5):1444-50
16645974
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Jan;16(1):18-25
17631389
J Rheumatol. 1996 Feb;23(2):265-72
8882030
Rheumatol Int. 2011 Mar;31(3):361-4
20020142
Rheumatol Int. 2010 Mar;30(5):605-12
19585119
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jul;38(7):891-901
7612038
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jun;62(6):579-82
12759300
Rheumatol Int. 2009 Mar;29(5):517-24
18953542
J Digit Imaging. 2006 Sep;19(3):279-88
16628388
J Rheumatol. 2008 Jul;35(7):1288-93
18597408
J Rheumatol. 1995 May;22(5):937-43
8587086
J Rheumatol. 2001 Aug;28(8):1825-36
11508585
J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug;36(8):1825-8
19671820
Skeletal Radiol. 2004 Dec;33(12):698-703
15480639
J Rheumatol. 2007 Apr;34(4):874-83
17407243
J Rheumatol. 2009 Apr;36(4):717-23
19286851