title: Maize SUT1 functions in phloem loading.
abstract: The functions of dicot sucrose transporters (SUTs) in apoplastic phloem loading of sucrose are well established; however, whether SUTs similarly function in monocots was unresolved. To address this question, we recently provided genetic evidence that ZmSUT1 from maize (Zea mays) is required for efficient phloem loading. sut1-m1 mutant plants hyperaccumulate carbohydrates in leaves, are defective in loading sucrose into the phloem, and have altered biomass partitioning. Presumably due to the hyperaccumulation of soluble sugars in leaves, mutations in ZmSUT1 lead to downregulation of chlorophyll accumulation, photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. However, because we had identified only a single mutant allele, we were not able to exclude the possibility that the mutant phenotypes were instead caused by a closely linked mutation. Based on a novel aspect of the sut1 mutant phenotype, secretion of a concentrated sugar solution from leaf hydathodes, we identified an additional mutant allele, sut1-m4. This confirms that the mutation of SUT1 is responsible for the impairment in phloem loading. In addition, the sut1-m4 mutant does not accumulate transcripts, supporting the findings reported previously that the original mutant allele is also a null mutation. Collectively, these data demonstrate that ZmSUT1 functions to phloem load sucrose in maize leaves.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
authors.forename: Thomas L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Slewinski
authors.forename: Anshu
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Garg
authors.forename: Gurmukh S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Johal
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Braun
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Jan;149(1):71-81
references.pmid: 19126697
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 Jun;144(2):867-78
references.pmid: 17434986
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2009;60(3):881-92
references.pmid: 19181865
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:341-72
references.pmid: 15377224
references.citation: Planta. 1978 Jan;138(3):279-94
references.pmid: 24414058
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2001 Mar;125(3):1396-405
references.pmid: 11244119
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Sep;148(1):200-11
references.pmid: 18650401
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1990 Oct;2(10):1027-38
references.pmid: 2136626
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2003 Mar;15(3):666-80
references.pmid: 12615940
references.citation: EMBO J. 1994 Jan 1;13(1):1-7
references.pmid: 8306952
references.citation: Planta. 2008 Feb;227(3):527-38
references.pmid: 17924136
references.citation: Genetics. 2010 May;185(1):221-32
references.pmid: 20142436
references.citation: Biochem J. 1934;28(4):1422-7
references.pmid: 16745530
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1996 Apr;8(4):645-658
references.pmid: 12239395
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Dec;142(4):1511-22
references.pmid: 17071639
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):14162-7
references.pmid: 19666555
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 2007 May 25;581(12):2309-17
references.pmid: 17434165
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 1994 Mar;39(3):427-38
references.pmid: 24311134
references.citation: J Hered. 2008 Nov-Dec;99(6):661-6
references.pmid: 18723774
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Jun;7(3):235-46
references.pmid: 15134743
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1998 Sep;118(1):59-68
references.pmid: 9733526
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Jan;149(1):181-94
references.pmid: 18923021
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Mar;146(3):1085-97
references.pmid: 18218972
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 7;278(45):44320-5
references.pmid: 12954621
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2004 Jul;16(7):1827-40
references.pmid: 15208395
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 5;97(25):13979-84
references.pmid: 11087840