Large genomic differences between the morphologically indistinguishable diplomonads Spironucleus barkhanus and Spironucleus salmonicida.
BACKGROUND
Microbial eukaryotes show large variations in genome structure and content between lineages, indicating extensive flexibility over evolutionary timescales. Here we address the tempo and mode of such changes within diplomonads, flagellated protists with two nuclei found in oxygen-poor environments. Approximately 5,000 expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences were generated from the fish commensal Spironucleus barkhanus and compared to sequences from the morphologically indistinguishable fish parasite Spironucleus salmonicida, and other diplomonads. The ESTs were complemented with sequence variation studies in selected genes and genome size determinations.


RESULTS
Many genes detected in S. barkhanus and S. salmonicida are absent in the human parasite Giardia intestinalis, the most intensively studied diplomonad. For example, these fish diplomonads show an extended metabolic repertoire and are able to incorporate selenocysteine into proteins. The codon usage is altered in S. barkhanus compared to S. salmonicida. Sequence variations were found between individual S. barkhanus ESTs for many, but not all, protein coding genes. Conversely, no allelic variation was found in a previous genome survey of S. salmonicida. This difference was confirmed by sequencing of genomic DNA. Up to five alleles were identified for the cloned S. barkhanus genes, and at least nineteen highly expressed S. barkhanus genes are represented by more than four alleles in the EST dataset. This could be explained by the presence of a non-clonal S. barkhanus population in the culture, by a ploidy above four, or by duplications of parts of the genome. Indeed, genome size estimations using flow cytometry indicated similar haploid genome sizes in S. salmonicida and G. intestinalis (approximately 12 Mb), whereas the S. barkhanus genome is larger (approximately 18 Mb).


CONCLUSIONS
This study indicates extensive divergent genome evolution within diplomonads. Genomic traits such as codon usage, frequency of allelic sequence variation, and genome size have changed considerably between S. barkhanus and S. salmonicida. These observations suggest that large genomic differences may accumulate in morphologically indistinguishable eukaryotic microbes.
Roxström-Lindquist
Katarina
K
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jerlström-Hultqvist
Jon
J
Jørgensen
Anders
A
Troell
Karin
K
Svärd
Staffan G
SG
Andersson
Jan O
JO
D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000818:Animals; D016828:Diplomonadida / Q000145:classification* / Q000166:cytology / Q000235:genetics*; D016678:Genome; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D012487:Salmonidae / Q000469:parasitology; D016415:Sequence Alignment
Bioinformatics. 2004 Sep 22;20(14):2329-30
15059815
Science. 2007 Sep 28;317(5846):1921-6
17901334
Curr Biol. 2007 Nov 20;17(22):1984-8
17980591
Dis Aquat Organ. 2003 Sep 24;56(2):155-61
14598991
Mol Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(3):446-55
11069669
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jan;19(1):32-8
16701223
Trends Biochem Sci. 2003 Feb;28(2):91-8
12575997
Cell Microbiol. 2001 Jan;3(1):55-62
11207620
Science. 2007 Jan 12;315(5809):207-12
17218520
Protist. 2007 Apr;158(2):247-54
17292667
Curr Biol. 2003 Jan 21;13(2):94-104
12546782
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 Jul;55(Pt 4):1729-1733
16014510
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Jul;14(3):447-75
11432808
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Jan;17(1):32-43
10666704
Nat Genet. 1999 Dec;23(4):452-6
10581034
Dis Aquat Organ. 2004 Nov 23;62(1-2):93-6
15648835
BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Mar 21;6:27
16551352
Mol Microbiol. 2002 Aug;45(3):585-90
12139606
BMC Microbiol. 2008 Apr 29;8:71
18445284
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Sep 30;32(17):5231-8
15459293
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1586-91
17483113
Trends Parasitol. 2009 Feb;25(2):93-100
19135417
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
11524383
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2008 Aug;160(2):75-80
18501440
Genome Biol. 2005;6(8):R66
16086848
Curr Biol. 2005 Jan 26;15(2):185-91
15668177
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2006 Nov-Dec;53(6):531-41
17123418
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Apr;24(4):208-17
19282047
Science. 2008 Mar 14;319(5869):1530-3
18339940
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun 22;6:156
15969769
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996 Oct 18;81(1):101-10
8892309
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Nov;16(11):1484-95
10555279
Genome Res. 2004 Jun;14(6):1188-90
15173120
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003 Apr 25;128(1):11-9
12706792
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Jul 15;8:205
18627633
Science. 2000 May 19;288(5469):1211-5
10817991
J Mol Biol. 2001 Nov 9;313(5):1003-11
11700055
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Feb;67(2):880-7
11157258
Genome Biol. 2001;2(4):RESEARCH0010
11305938
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983;77(4):487-8
6636276
Acta Trop. 2008 Apr;106(1):44-53
18325480
BMC Genomics. 2007 Feb 14;8:51
17298675
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
9254694
Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90
16928733
PLoS Pathog. 2009 Aug;5(8):e1000560
19696920
Int J Parasitol. 2005 May;35(6):617-26
15862575
Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Apr 25;19(8):1905-8
2030969
Eukaryot Cell. 2002 Apr;1(2):191-9
12455954
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 9;101(10):3480-5
14990797
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D445-51
17202165
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:177-93
19575565
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005 Sep-Oct;52(5):399-451
16248873
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
9396791
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Aug;19(8):1390-4
12140252
Genome Biol. 2006;7(10):R94
17054778
Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Sep;14(9):895-901
9287422