title: Males of the orb-web spider Argiope bruennichi sacrifice themselves to unrelated females.
abstract: Costs of inbreeding can lead to total reproductive failure and inbreeding avoidance is, therefore, common. In classical sex roles with no paternal care, the selective pressure to avoid inbreeding is mostly on the female, which carries the higher costs. In some orb-web spiders, this situation is very different because females are polyandrous and males are monogynous or at most bigynous. Additionally, females of many entelegyne orb weavers are thought to bias paternity post-copulatorily towards a desired mate. This increases the selective pressure on males to adjust their investment in a mating with regard to the compatibility to a female. Here, we examine whether genetic relatedness influences mating behaviour in the orb-web spider Argiope bruennichi. We mated either a sibling or a non-sibling male to a female in single copulation trials and compared copulation duration, cannibalism rate and female fecundity. Our experiment revealed that males prolonged their copulation duration and were cannibalized more frequently when mating with a non-sibling female. Males mating with a sibling female were more likely to escape cannibalism by copulating briefly, thus presumably increasing their chances of re-mating with a more compatible female. This suggests that males can adaptively adjust their investment relating to the compatibility of a female.
authors.affiliation: Zoological Institute and Museum, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. klaaso@web.de
authors.forename: Klaas W
authors.initials: KW
authors.lastname: Welke
authors.forename: Jutta M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Schneider
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002190:Cannibalism; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal; D013112:Spiders / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 May;11(5):201-6
references.pmid: 21237809
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):145-164
references.pmid: 10973716
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S183-5
references.pmid: 14667377
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Nov 22;274(1627):2873-9
references.pmid: 17785268
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2007 May;20(3):1237-42
references.pmid: 17465934
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21-64
references.pmid: 10740892
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):714-7
references.pmid: 14562103
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2008 Feb 7;250(3):524-31
references.pmid: 18045619
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 7;276(1670):3105-11
references.pmid: 19515667
references.citation: Evolution. 1997 Jun;51(3):970-978
references.pmid: 28568583
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Mar;62(3):603-11
references.pmid: 18081715
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2005 Sep;92(9):423-6
references.pmid: 16075265
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 1948 Dec;2(Pt. 3):349-68
references.pmid: 18103134
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Sep 22;275(1647):2165-70
references.pmid: 18544507
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2009 Jul;22(7):1429-34
references.pmid: 19460080