title: Complex cognition and behavioural innovation in New Caledonian crows.
abstract: Apes, corvids and parrots all show high rates of behavioural innovation in the wild. However, it is unclear whether this innovative behaviour is underpinned by cognition more complex than simple learning mechanisms. To investigate this question we presented New Caledonian crows with a novel three-stage metatool problem. The task involved three distinct stages: (i) obtaining a short stick by pulling up a string, (ii) using the short stick as a metatool to extract a long stick from a toolbox, and finally (iii) using the long stick to extract food from a hole. Crows with previous experience of the behaviours in stages 1-3 linked them into a novel sequence to solve the problem on the first trial. Crows with experience of only using string and tools to access food also successfully solved the problem. This innovative use of established behaviours in novel contexts was not based on resurgence, chaining and conditional reinforcement. Instead, the performance was consistent with the transfer of an abstract, causal rule: 'out-of-reach objects can be accessed using a tool'. This suggests that high innovation rates in the wild may reflect complex cognitive abilities that supplement basic learning mechanisms.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. alexhtaylor@gmail.com
authors.forename: Alex H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Douglas
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Elliffe
authors.forename: Gavin R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Hunt
authors.forename: Russell D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Gray
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003071:Cognition; D046368:Crows / Q000502:physiology*; D053001:Tool Use Behavior
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2008;72(2):135-44
references.pmid: 18836259
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):273-7
references.pmid: 16812481
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):307-16
references.pmid: 16941156
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 29;361(1465):23-43
references.pmid: 16553307
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2005 Feb;119(1):23-32
references.pmid: 15740427
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 23;106(25):10370-5
references.pmid: 19478068
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):1504-7
references.pmid: 17702575
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4436-41
references.pmid: 11891325
references.citation: Learn Behav. 2010 Feb;38(1):87-95
references.pmid: 20065352
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Feb 22;5(2):e9345
references.pmid: 20179759
references.citation: Science. 1987 Sep 11;237(4820):1317-23
references.pmid: 3629243
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Oct 22;3(5):453-5
references.pmid: 17609175
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 23;17(20):R894-5
references.pmid: 17956752
references.citation: J Comp Psychol (Baltim). 1945 Dec;38:367-83
references.pmid: 21010765
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):247-54
references.pmid: 18796393
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Oct;21(5):667-84; discussion 684-721
references.pmid: 10097023
references.citation: Z Tierpsychol. 1968 Feb;25(1):89-103
references.pmid: 5698407
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Aug 05;4(8):e6471
references.pmid: 19654861
references.citation: Nature. 1984 Mar 1-7;308(5954):61-2
references.pmid: 6700713
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Jan;26(1):98-111
references.pmid: 10650547
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 1987 Jun;101(2):197-201
references.pmid: 3608425
references.citation: Commun Integr Biol. 2009 Jul;2(4):311-2
references.pmid: 19721874
references.citation: Am J Primatol. 1993;31(4):241-261
references.pmid: 31936992
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 14;106(28):E76; author reply E77
references.pmid: 19571011
references.citation: Science. 2002 Aug 9;297(5583):981
references.pmid: 12169726