During visual word recognition, phonology is accessed within 100 ms and may be mediated by a speech production code: evidence from magnetoencephalography.
Debate surrounds the precise cortical location and timing of access to phonological information during visual word recognition. Therefore, using whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated the spatiotemporal pattern of brain responses induced by a masked pseudohomophone priming task. Twenty healthy adults read target words that were preceded by one of three kinds of nonword prime: pseudohomophones (e.g., brein-BRAIN), where four of five letters are shared between prime and target, and the pronunciation is the same; matched orthographic controls (e.g., broin-BRAIN), where the same four of five letters are shared between prime and target but pronunciation differs; and unrelated controls (e.g., lopus-BRAIN), where neither letters nor pronunciation are shared between prime and target. All three priming conditions induced activation in the pars opercularis of the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFGpo) and the left precentral gyrus (PCG) within 100 ms of target word onset. However, for the critical comparison that reveals a processing difference specific to phonology, we found that the induced pseudohomophone priming response was significantly stronger than the orthographic priming response in left IFG/PCG at approximately 100 ms. This spatiotemporal concurrence demonstrates early phonological influences during visual word recognition and is consistent with phonological access being mediated by a speech production code.
Wheat
Katherine L
KL
Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Cornelissen
Piers L
PL
Frost
Stephen J
SJ
Hansen
Peter C
PC
D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D005071:Evoked Potentials; D005260:Female; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D015225:Magnetoencephalography; D008297:Male; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010700:Phonetics; D011932:Reading; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 May;19(5):761-75
17488203
Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;112(8):1553-61
11459696
Q J Exp Psychol. 1967 Nov;19(4):327-33
6080917
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997 Sep;44(9):867-80
9282479
Radiology. 2004 Jan;230(1):77-87
14645885
Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Feb;28(2):217-25
19695825
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jun;17(6):1476-85
16926241
Psychol Sci. 2003 Jul;14(4):385-8
12807416
Brain. 1999 Nov;122 ( Pt 11):2119-32
10545397
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 16;103(20):7865-70
16682637
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Dec;123(4):331-53
7996120
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Aug;92(2):1153-64
15056683
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 15;39(4):1788-802
18155612
Neuroreport. 1998 Jul 13;9(10):2195-200
9694199
PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5359
19396362
Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Oct;23(2):120-7
15340934
Neuroimage. 2005 May 1;25(4):1056-67
15850724
Percept Psychophys. 1997 Oct;59(7):1059-68
9360478
Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1021-6
17201781
Neuroimage. 2006 May 1;30(4):1383-400
16460964
Neuron. 2004 Apr 22;42(2):323-34
15091346
Neuroimage. 2002 Jul;16(3 Pt 1):638-50
12169249
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996 Jan;16(1):7-22
8530558
Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1819-25
15275938
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Apr;18(4):837-45
17652461
Dyslexia. 2000 Apr-Jun;6(2):133-51
10840513
Brain Topogr. 2004 Spring;16(3):139-58
15162912
Biol Psychol. 2009 Jan;80(1):84-94
18456383
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Feb;30(1):151-62
14769074