title: Threatened Selves and Differential Prejudice Expression by White and Black Perceivers.
abstract: Previous theorizing suggests that often-stigmatized individuals may be just as likely, if not more likely, than infrequently stigmatized individuals to protect self-regard by derogating members of low-status groups after receiving negative feedback from high-status others. Often-stigmatized individuals, however, can discount criticism from these high-status others as reflecting prejudice, thereby making outgroup derogation unnecessary as an esteem-protective strategy. Replicating past research, White participants in Experiment 1 expressed prejudices after receiving negative feedback from a White evaluator; as predicted, however, Black participants did not. In Experiment 2, participants instead received negative feedback from Black evaluators (evaluators more likely to threaten Black participants' self-regard). Here, contrary to previous theorizing, Black participants expressed prejudices, not toward another low-status group, but toward high-status Whites. In all, findings reveal flaws in previous assumptions that frequently stigmatized individuals may be especially prone to devalue lower-status others after rejection or negative feedback from members of higher-status groups.
authors.affiliation: University of California, Los Angeles.
authors.forename: Jenessa R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Shapiro
authors.forename: Stephen A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Mistler
authors.forename: Steven L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Neuberg
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jan;64(1):60-70
references.pmid: 8421252
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(2):156-82
references.pmid: 15869380
references.citation: Soc Cogn. 2009;27(1):
references.pmid: 24403668
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Jun;31(6):781-94
references.pmid: 15833905
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):278-91
references.pmid: 18211177
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Oct;95(4):877-98
references.pmid: 18808265
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Feb;29(2):273-84
references.pmid: 15272954
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Sep;69(3):460-81
references.pmid: 7562391