title: Effect of negative air ions on the potential for bacterial contamination of plastic medical equipment.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In recent years there has been renewed interest in the use of air ionizers to control the spread of infection in hospitals and a number of researchers have investigated the biocidal action of ions in both air and nitrogen. By comparison, the physical action of air ions on bacterial dissemination and deposition has largely been ignored. However, there is clinical evidence that air ions might play an important role in preventing the transmission of Acinetobacter infection. Although the reasons for this are unclear, it is hypothesized that a physical effect may be responsible: the production of air ions may negatively charge items of plastic medical equipment so that they repel, rather than attract, airborne bacteria. By negatively charging both particles in the air and items of plastic equipment, the ionizers minimize electrostatic deposition on these items. In so doing they may help to interrupt the transmission of Acinetobacter infection in certain healthcare settings such as intensive care units.
  
  
  METHODS
  A study was undertaken in a mechanically ventilated room under ambient conditions to accurately measure changes in surface potential exhibited by items of plastic medical equipment in the presence of negative air ions. Plastic items were suspended on nylon threads, either in free space or in contact with a table surface, and exposed to negative ions produced by an air ionizer. The charge build-up on the specimens was measured using an electric field mill while the ion concentration in the room air was recorded using a portable ion counter.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The results of the study demonstrated that common items of equipment such as ventilator tubes rapidly developed a large negative charge (i.e. generally >-100V) in the presence of a negative air ionizer. While most items of equipment tested behaved in a similar manner to this, one item, a box from a urological collection and monitoring system (the only item made from styrene acrylonitrile), did however develop a positive charge in the presence of the ionizer.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The findings of the study suggest that the action of negative air ionizers significantly alters the electrostatic landscape of the clinical environment, and that this has the potential to cause any Acinetobacter-bearing particles in the air to be strongly repelled from some plastic surfaces and attracted to others. In so doing, this may prevent critical items of equipment from becoming contaminated with the bacterium.
authors.affiliation: Bradford Infection Group, School of Engineering, Design and Technology, University of Bradford, Bradford BD71DP, UK.
authors.forename: Simon J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Shepherd
authors.forename: Clive B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: Beggs
authors.forename: Caroline F
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Kevin G
authors.initials: KG
authors.lastname: Kerr
authors.forename: Catherine J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Noakes
authors.forename: P Andrew
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Sleigh
mesh_terms: D000150:Acinetobacter / Q000302:isolation & purification; D000388:Air / Q000032:analysis*; D000391:Air Microbiology; D004560:Electricity; D004864:Equipment and Supplies / Q000382:microbiology*; D006801:Humans; D017053:Infection Control / Q000379:methods; D007477:Ions / Q000032:analysis*; D010969:Plastics
chemical_list: D007477:Ions; D010969:Plastics
references.citation: J Hosp Infect. 1995 Mar;29(3):189-99
references.pmid: 7615936
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):228-34
references.pmid: 11136776
references.citation: J Hosp Infect. 1998 Feb;38(2):147-8
references.pmid: 9522293
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Feb 27;298(1):50-8
references.pmid: 4575054
references.citation: J Hosp Infect. 1987 Mar;9(2):110-9
references.pmid: 2883217
references.citation: J Hosp Infect. 2002 Feb;50(2):110-4
references.pmid: 11846537
references.citation: Int J Biometeorol. 1964 Aug;8(1):27-37
references.pmid: 4868023
references.citation: Am J Infect Control. 2008 May;36(4):250-9
references.pmid: 18455045
references.citation: J Hosp Infect. 1987 Nov;10(3):265-72
references.pmid: 2891755
references.citation: Am J Med. 1984 Nov;77(5):834-8
references.pmid: 6496537
references.citation: J Hosp Infect. 1990 Feb;15(2):177-82
references.pmid: 1969441
references.citation: BMC Microbiol. 2007 Apr 17;7:32
references.pmid: 17439657
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 1999 Dec;87(6):889-97
references.pmid: 10664912
references.citation: Atmos Environ (1994). 2004 Sep;38(29):4815-4823
references.pmid: 32834730
references.citation: Nature. 1979 Oct 4;281(5730):400-1
references.pmid: 225679
references.citation: Intensive Care Med. 2006 Feb;32(2):315-317
references.pmid: 16432675