title: Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling.
abstract: Computer aided modeling of anatomic deformation, allowing various techniques and protocols in radiation therapy to be systematically verified and studied, has become increasingly attractive. In this study the potential issues in deformable image registration (DIR) were analyzed based on two numerical phantoms: One, a synthesized, low intensity gradient prostate image, and the other a lung patient's CT image data set. Each phantom was modeled with region-specific material parameters with its deformation solved using a finite element method. The resultant displacements were used to construct a benchmark to quantify the displacement errors of the Demons and B-Spline-based registrations. The results show that the accuracy of these registration algorithms depends on the chosen parameters, the selection of which is closely associated with the intensity gradients of the underlying images. For the Demons algorithm, both single resolution (SR) and multiresolution (MR) registrations required approximately 300 iterations to reach an accuracy of 1.4 mm mean error in the lung patient's CT image (and 0.7 mm mean error averaged in the lung only). For the low gradient prostate phantom, these algorithms (both SR and MR) required at least 1600 iterations to reduce their mean errors to 2 mm. For the B-Spline algorithms, best performance (mean errors of 1.9 mm for SR and 1.6 mm for MR, respectively) on the low gradient prostate was achieved using five grid nodes in each direction. Adding more grid nodes resulted in larger errors. For the lung patient's CT data set, the B-Spline registrations required ten grid nodes in each direction for highest accuracy (1.4 mm for SR and 1.5 mm for MR). The numbers of iterations or grid nodes required for optimal registrations depended on the intensity gradients of the underlying images. In summary, the performance of the Demons and B-Spline registrations have been quantitatively evaluated using numerical phantoms. The results show that parameter selection for optimal accuracy is closely related to the intensity gradients of the underlying images. Also, the result that the DIR algorithms produce much lower errors in heterogeneous lung regions relative to homogeneous (low intensity gradient) regions, suggests that feature-based evaluation of deformable image registration accuracy must be viewed cautiously.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA. hzhong1@hfhs.org
authors.forename: Hualiang
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Zhong
authors.forename: Jinkoo
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Indrin J
authors.initials: IJ
authors.lastname: Chetty
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D008168:Lung / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008953:Models, Anatomic; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013382:Subtraction Technique; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5944-53
references.pmid: 19175149
references.citation: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2005 Jun;8(3):177-89
references.pmid: 16214712
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jul 21;49(14):3067-87
references.pmid: 15357182
references.citation: Z Med Phys. 2006;16(4):285-97
references.pmid: 17216754
references.citation: Inf Process Med Imaging. 2005;19:493-503
references.pmid: 17354720
references.citation: Med Phys. 2007 Jul;34(7):2785-8
references.pmid: 17821985
references.citation: Med Phys. 2008 Mar;35(3):866-78
references.pmid: 18404923
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71(1 Suppl):S28-32
references.pmid: 18406933
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 7;53(17):4533-42
references.pmid: 18677041
references.citation: Med Phys. 2005 Jun;32(6):1647-59
references.pmid: 16013724
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 2006 Sep;79 Spec No 1:S99-108
references.pmid: 16980689
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1997 Jan;42(1):123-32
references.pmid: 9015813
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2005 Jun 21;50(12):2887-905
references.pmid: 15930609
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Apr 7;54(7):1849-70
references.pmid: 19265208
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2007 Aug 21;52(16):4721-38
references.pmid: 17671331
references.citation: Med Phys. 2006 Mar;33(3):605-17
references.pmid: 16878564
references.citation: Med Phys. 2009 May;36(5):1500-11
references.pmid: 19544766
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Sep 21;54(18):5561-77
references.pmid: 19717890
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2004 Sep 7;49(17):4147-61
references.pmid: 15470929
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Nov 7;53(21):6143-65
references.pmid: 18854610
references.citation: Med Phys. 2006 Jun;33(6):1747-57
references.pmid: 16872082
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2005 Nov 7;50(21):5153-74
references.pmid: 16237247
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999 Aug;18(8):712-21
references.pmid: 10534053
references.citation: Med Image Anal. 1998 Sep;2(3):243-60
references.pmid: 9873902
references.citation: Med Phys. 2008 Mar;35(3):1094-102
references.pmid: 18404944
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jul;20(7):568-82
references.pmid: 11465464
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2006 Sep 7;51(17):4357-74
references.pmid: 16912386
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Oct 7;54(19):5815-30
references.pmid: 19741278
references.citation: Med Phys. 2007 Jan;34(1):233-45
references.pmid: 17278509
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jun 1;68(2):522-30
references.pmid: 17418960
references.citation: Med Phys. 2004 Sep;31(9):2412-5
references.pmid: 15487720
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jan 7;53(1):305-17
references.pmid: 18182705
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2007 Feb 7;52(3):685-705
references.pmid: 17228114
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jun 1;68(2):572-80
references.pmid: 17498570