Using the prevalence of individual species of intestinal nematode worms to estimate the combined prevalence of any species.
OBJECTIVE
To assess if a probabilistic model could be used to estimate the combined prevalence of infection with any species of intestinal nematode worm when only the separate prevalence of each species is reported, and to estimate the extent to which simply taking the highest individual species prevalence underestimates the combined prevalence.


METHODS
Data were extracted from community surveys that reported both the proportion infected with individual species and the combined proportion infected, for a minimum sample of 100 individuals. The predicted combined proportion infected was calculated based on the assumption that the probability of infection with one species was independent of infection with another species, so the probability of combined infections was multiplicative.


RESULTS
Thirty-three reports describing 63 data sets from surveys conducted in 20 countries were identified. A strong correlation was found between the observed and predicted combined proportion infected (r = 0.996, P<0.001). When the observed and predicted values were plotted against each other, a small correction of the predicted combined prevalence by dividing by a factor of 1.06 achieved a near perfect correlation between the two sets of values. The difference between the single highest species prevalence and the observed combined prevalence was on average 7% or smaller at a prevalence of <or=40%, but at prevalences of 40-80%, the difference was about 12%.


CONCLUSIONS
A simple probabilistic model of combined infection with a small correction factor is proposed as a novel method to estimate the number of individuals that would benefit from mass deworming when data are reported only for separate species.
de Silva
Nilanthi
N
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka. nrdes@sltnet.lk
Hall
Andrew
A
D000818:Animals; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D005767:Gastrointestinal Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000469:parasitology; D006376:Helminths / Q000145:classification / Q000302:isolation & purification; D006801:Humans; D009348:Nematoda / Q000145:classification* / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D009349:Nematode Infections / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000469:parasitology; D015995:Prevalence
East Afr Med J. 2000 Mar;77(3):157-61
12858892
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;33(5):1092-102
15256525
Trop Med Int Health. 2003 Nov;8(11):975-86
14629763
Parasitology. 1982 Dec;85 (Pt 3):605-13
7177706
Parasitology. 2001 Feb;122(Pt 2):233-51
11272654
Trends Parasitol. 2003 Dec;19(12):547-51
14642761
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2006 Jul-Aug;48(4):189-95
17119673
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Nov-Dec;86(6):656-7
1287936
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Mar-Apr;93(2):125-6
10450431
Trop Med Int Health. 2002 Jun;7(6):541-8
12031078
Parasitology. 1995 Dec;111 ( Pt 5):645-53
8559595
Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;28(1):169-74
10195684
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2008 Jul 4;82(27/28):237-52
18613343
Trop Med Int Health. 1996 Feb;1(1):27-34
8673819
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2000 Jan-Feb;33(1):69-73
10881121
Parasitology. 1992 Aug;105 ( Pt 1):151-7
1437273
Indian J Pediatr. 1999 Sep-Oct;66(5):669-73
10798127
East Afr Med J. 2001 Jun;78(6):283-6
12002102
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001 May-Jun;95(3):272-7
11490995