Scrotal signs and symptoms in the general population, the value of testis self-examination and the pitfalls of a scrotal screening programme: is the two-week rule relevant?
OBJECTIVE
Testicular symptoms/lumps are a cause of concern, anxiety and possible diagnostic dilemma for patient and general practitioner. The majority of scrotal pathology is benign in nature and results in a huge workload. The main aim of this study was to determine the relationship between scrotal symptoms, previous scrotal surgery, testicular self-examination and awareness of scrotal abnormalities. Secondarily, we sought to determine the scrotal findings in men enrolled in a consultant urologist-directed screening programme.


METHODS
There were 677 men surveyed on their performance of TSE. They were also asked about scrotal symptoms and prior surgery, before undergoing blinded physical examination by one of four consultant urologists.


RESULTS
Among the participants, 9.8% of men had scrotal symptoms with 55% of these having a normal scrotal examination and the rest having benign pathology. A number of men who had undergone previous scrotal surgery (13%) had no clinical findings detected on scrotal examination. No subject was found to have testis cancer; 20.9% had a benign scrotal or inguinal condition detected with the majority (65%) not aware of the abnormality. Men who demonstrate a superior awareness of their scrotal abnormalities were more likely to perform TSE.


CONCLUSIONS
Increased awareness of scrotal abnormalities combined with TSE may have a role in improving detection of significant testicular pathology. However, the high prevalence of benign scrotal conditions, of which most men were unaware, may serve to raise anxiety in the patient and general practitioner. We believe there is no role for a one-stop scrotal anxiety clinic, as the costs do not justify the benefits.
Casey
R G
RG
Department of Urology, Adelaide and Meath Hospital (Incorporating the National Children's Hospital), Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland. Marjorie.whiteflynn@amnch.ie
Grainger
R
R
Butler
M
M
McDermott
T E D
TE
Thornhill
J A
JA
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D055088:Early Detection of Cancer / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D006266:Health Education / Q000379:methods; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015995:Prevalence; D012611:Scrotum / Q000002:abnormalities*; D016353:Self-Examination / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D013736:Testicular Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000473:pathology; D013737:Testis / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1986 Jan-Feb;13(1):29-33
3632857
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Jan;91(1):23-4
19126332
J Pediatr. 1989 Jan;114(1):150-3
2909699
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Jul;88(4):363-6
16834856
J Behav Med. 1995 Aug;18(4):377-84
7500328
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Oct;20(4):666-71
7822601
Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Dec;19(10):1043-9
18478339
J R Soc Med. 2004 Jun;97(6):279-81
15173329
J Am Coll Health. 1991 Jan;39(4):187-90
1995657
Prev Med. 1994 Mar;23(2):206-10
8047527
Urology. 2010 Oct;76(4):915-8
20471670
Cancer Nurs. 1988 Apr;11(2):112-7
3383186
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1988 Jan-Feb;15(1):45-8
3344246
Health Educ Q. 1990 Winter;17(4):443-53
2262324
Br J Urol. 1987 May;59(5):447-51
3594102
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Oct;90(7):565-70
18701008