title: A fast and highly sensitive blood culture PCR method for clinical detection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Salmonella Typhi causes an estimated 21 million new cases of typhoid fever and 216,000 deaths every year. Blood culture is currently the gold standard for diagnosis of typhoid fever, but it is time-consuming and takes several days for isolation and identification of causative organisms. It is then too late to initiate proper antibiotic therapy. Serological tests have very low sensitivity and specificity, and no practical value in endemic areas. As early diagnosis of the disease and prompt treatment are essential for optimal management, especially in children, a rapid sensitive detection method for typhoid fever is urgently needed. Although PCR is sensitive and rapid, initial research indicated similar sensitivity to blood culture and lower specificity. We developed a fast and highly sensitive blood culture PCR method for detection of Salmonella Typhi, allowing same-day initiation of treatment after accurate diagnosis of typhoid.
  
  
  METHODS
  An ox bile tryptone soy broth was optimized for blood culture, which allows the complete lysis of blood cells to release intracellular bacteria without inhibiting the growth of Salmonella Typhi. Using the optimised broth Salmonella Typhi bacteria in artificial blood samples were enriched in blood culture and then detected by a PCR targeting the fliC-d gene of Salmonella Typhi.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Tests demonstrated that 2.4% ox bile in blood culture not only lyzes blood cells completely within 1.5 hours so that the intracellular bacteria could be released, but also has no inhibiting effect on the growth of Salmonella Typhi. Three hour enrichment of Salmonella Typhi in tryptone soya broth containing 2.4% ox bile could increase the bacterial number from 0.75 CFU per millilitre of blood which is similar to clinical typhoid samples to the level which regular PCR can detect. The whole blood culture PCR assay takes less than 8 hours to complete rather than several days for conventional blood culture.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This novel blood culture PCR method is superior in speed and sensitivity to both conventional blood culture and PCR assays. Its use in clinical diagnosis may allow early detection of the causative organism and facilitate initiation of prompt treatment among patients with typhoid fever.
authors.affiliation: Oxford Vaccine Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Liqing.Zhou@paediatrics.ox.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Liqing
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Zhou
authors.forename: Andrew J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Pollard
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D015373:Bacterial Typing Techniques; D001646:Bile; D042241:Early Diagnosis; D006801:Humans; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods*; D012485:Salmonella typhi / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014435:Typhoid Fever / Q000097:blood / Q000175:diagnosis*
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Jan;76(1):139-43
references.pmid: 17255243
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 28;347(22):1770-82
references.pmid: 12456854
references.citation: Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008 Jul;61(4):313-4
references.pmid: 18653978
references.citation: J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008 Dec 01;2(6):469-74
references.pmid: 19745526
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2004 May;82(5):346-53
references.pmid: 15298225
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978 Jul;27(4):795-800
references.pmid: 686246
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1966 Mar;91(3):945-52
references.pmid: 5929769
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Apr;39(4):1571-6
references.pmid: 11283089
references.citation: J Hyg (Lond). 1931 Jan;31(1):35-55
references.pmid: 20475081
references.citation: BMJ. 2006 Jul 8;333(7558):78-82
references.pmid: 16825230
references.citation: East Afr Med J. 1994 Mar;71(3):183-8
references.pmid: 7956866
references.citation: Arch Intern Med (Chic). 1946 Dec;78(6):629-61
references.pmid: 20278487
references.citation: J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008 Dec 01;2(6):421-5
references.pmid: 19745517
references.citation: J Pathol Bacteriol. 1946 Jul;58(3):359-65
references.pmid: 20283071
references.citation: J Lab Clin Med. 1955 Jul;46(1):128-34
references.pmid: 14392407
references.citation: Infect Genet Evol. 2002 Dec;2(2):107-10
references.pmid: 12797986
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2008 May;46(5):1861-6
references.pmid: 18367574
references.citation: Indian Pediatr. 2006 Oct;43(10):875-83
references.pmid: 17079830
references.citation: Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 May;32(3):207-19
references.pmid: 18261798
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1439-43
references.pmid: 8314983
references.citation: Jpn J Infect Dis. 2001 Dec;54(6):237-9
references.pmid: 11862006
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 2008 Jan;72(1):98-102
references.pmid: 18053601
references.citation: J Infect Chemother. 2003 Sep;9(3):233-7
references.pmid: 14513391
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jan;43(1):431-2
references.pmid: 15635006
references.citation: Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Jan;137(1):102-7
references.pmid: 18413005