Victim blame in a hate crime motivated by sexual orientation.
A jury simulation paradigm was employed for two studies exploring levels of victim blame in a case of bias-motivated assault based on sexual orientation. In the first study, participants were grouped according to their score on the Index of Homophobia (IHP) scale as either reporting high or low support for gay and lesbian community members. The label of the crime (i.e., bias-motivated assault versus first-degree assault) as well as the gender of the victim were systematically varied. Results indicated that attributions of blame against the victim varied as a function of participants' attitudes toward minority sexual orientation. As extra-legal factors likely contribute to victim blame in these cases, the second study explored such factors as location and "provocation." Jurors in the second study read a transcript depicting an attack on a gay man by a man in either a local bar (i.e., not a gay bar) or a gay bar. Within location conditions, jurors were presented with either "provocation" by the victim (i.e., asking the perpetrator to dance and putting his arm around him) or alternatively no provocation was presented. Results revealed significant differences of victim blame depending on condition. Participants in both the local bar and provocation present conditions were more likely to blame the victim for the attack than those in the gay bar or provocation-absent conditions. Implications for hate crime law and attribution theory within the courtroom are discussed.
Plumm
Karyn M
KM
Psychology Department, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA.
Terrance
Cheryl A
CA
Henderson
Vanessa R
VR
Ellingson
Heather
H
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003415:Crime; D019548:Crime Victims; D005260:Female; D006252:Hate; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D012725:Sexual Behavior; D055815:Young Adult