Intensive care unit safety culture and outcomes: a US multicenter study.
OBJECTIVE
Safety culture may influence patient outcomes, but evidence is limited. We sought to determine if intensive care unit (ICU) safety culture is independently associated with outcomes.


METHODS
Cohort study combining safety culture survey data with the Project IMPACT Critical Care Medicine (PICCM) clinical database.


METHODS
Thirty ICUs participating in the PICCM database.


METHODS
A total of 65 978 patients admitted January 2001-March 2005.


METHODS
None.


METHODS
Hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS).


METHODS
From December 2003 to April 2004, we surveyed study ICUs using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire-ICU version, a validated instrument that assesses safety culture across six factors. We calculated factor mean and percent-positive scores (% respondents with mean score > or =75 on a 0-100 scale) for each ICU, and generated case-mix adjusted, patient-level, ICU-clustered regression analyses to determine the independent association of safety culture and outcome.


RESULTS
We achieved a 47.9% response (2103 of 4373 ICU personnel). Culture scores were mostly low to moderate and varied across ICUs (range: 13-88, percent-positive scores). After adjustment for patient, hospital and ICU characteristics, for every 10% decrease in ICU perceptions of management percent-positive score, the odds ratio for hospital mortality was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.07-1.44; P = 0.005). For every 10% decrease in ICU safety climate percent-positive score, LOS increased 15% (95% CI: 1-30%; P = 0.03). Sensitivity analyses for non-response bias consistently associated safety climate with outcome, but also yielded some counterintuitive results.


CONCLUSIONS
In a multicenter study conducted in the USA, perceptions of management and safety climate were moderately associated with outcomes. Future work should further develop methods of assessing safety culture and association with outcomes.
Huang
David T
DT
CRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. huangdt@upmc.edu
Clermont
Gilles
G
Kong
Lan
L
Weissfeld
Lisa A
LA
Sexton
J Bryan
JB
Rowan
Kathy M
KM
Angus
Derek C
DC
D015331:Cohort Studies; D006742:Hospital Bed Capacity / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units / Q000458:organization & administration*; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D015279:Organizational Culture; D010465:Perception; D010561:Personnel Staffing and Scheduling / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017751:Safety Management / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986 Dec;57(12 Pt 1):1198-200
3800822
Anesthesiology. 2005 Sep;103(3):645-53
16129992
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 03;6:44
16584553
JAMA. 2002 Nov 6;288(17):2151-62
12413375
Anesthesiology. 2003 Dec;99(6):1251-2
14639134
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Mar;104(3):410-8
3946981
Am J Crit Care. 2003 Nov;12(6):527-34
14619358
Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):399-421
19178583
Med Care. 1991 Aug;29(8):709-26
1875739
Crit Care Med. 1994 Sep;22(9):1385-91
8062559
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):231-3
16076784
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):273-8
16076792
Med Care. 1994 May;32(5):508-25
8182978
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Apr;8(2):105-17
12820673
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 May;34(5):275-84
18491691
Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;27(9):1991-8
10507630
J Appl Psychol. 1990 Dec;75(6):682-90
11536518
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29
3928249
JAMA. 2000 Dec 6;284(21):2762-70
11105183
Crit Care Med. 2002 Dec;30(12):2765-70
12483071
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1620-9
12794396
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):165-76
17110876
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Jun;66(3):320-38
19244094
Eval Health Prof. 2007 Jun;30(2):170-85
17476029
JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1341-8
19336709
JAMA. 1993 Dec 22-29;270(24):2957-63
8254858
Hum Factors. 1984 Oct;26(5):583-9
11536592