title: Estimation of enterococci input from bathers and animals on a recreational beach using camera images.
abstract: Enterococci, are used nationwide as a water quality indicator of marine recreational beaches. Prior research has demonstrated that enterococci inputs to the study beach site (located in Miami, FL) are dominated by non-point sources (including humans and animals). We have estimated their respective source functions by developing a counting methodology for individuals to better understand their non-point source load impacts. The method utilizes camera images of the beach taken at regular time intervals to determine the number of people and animal visitors. The developed method translates raw image counts for week days and weekend days into daily and monthly visitation rates. Enterococci source functions were computed from the observed number of unique individuals for average days of each month of the year, and from average load contributions for humans and for animals. Results indicate that dogs represent the larger source of enterococci relative to humans and birds.
authors.affiliation: Division of Applied Marine Physics, Rosenstiel School, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA. jwang@rsmas.miami.edu
authors.forename: John D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Helena M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Solo-Gabriele
authors.forename: Amir M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Abdelzaher
authors.forename: Lora E
authors.initials: LE
authors.lastname: Fleming
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001493:Bathing Beaches / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D004285:Dogs; D016983:Enterococcus / Q000254:growth & development*; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D010781:Photography; D012621:Seasons; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D014873:Water Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D014876:Water Pollution / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
chemical_list: D014873:Water Pollutants
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Dec 1;88(2-3):133-45
references.pmid: 14596986
references.citation: Water Res. 2007 Aug;41(16):3585-94
references.pmid: 17575998
references.citation: Water Res. 2007 Jan;41(1):3-10
references.pmid: 17113123
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 1998 Dec;85 Suppl 1:101S-107S
references.pmid: 21182698
references.citation: Water Res. 2004 Jul;38(13):3119-31
references.pmid: 15261551
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Aug 1;37(15):3275-82
references.pmid: 12966970
references.citation: Mar Pollut Bull. 2009 Nov;58(11):1649-56
references.pmid: 19664785
references.citation: Water Res. 2010 Jul;44(13):3763-72
references.pmid: 20605185
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99(2):348-53
references.pmid: 16033466
references.citation: Fla J Environ Health. 2004 Jan 1;184:29
references.pmid: 20151031
references.citation: Water Sci Technol. 2005;51(3-4):199-207
references.pmid: 15850191
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2001 Jun 15;35(12):2407-16
references.pmid: 11432541
references.citation: Water Res. 2009 Oct;43(18):4610-6
references.pmid: 19646730
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct;71(10):5929-34
references.pmid: 16204506