Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of adaptive e-Learning to improve dietary behaviour: protocol for a systematic review.
BACKGROUND
The composition of habitual diets is associated with adverse or protective effects on aspects of health. Consequently, UK public health policy strongly advocates dietary change for the improvement of population health and emphasises the importance of individual empowerment to improve health. A new and evolving area in the promotion of dietary behavioural change is e-Learning, the use of interactive electronic media to facilitate teaching and learning on a range of issues, including diet and health. The aims of this systematic review are to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adaptive e-Learning for improving dietary behaviours.


METHODS
The research will consist of a systematic review and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Studies will be considered for the review if they are randomised controlled trials, involving participants aged 13 or over, which evaluate the effectiveness or efficacy of interactive software programmes for improving dietary behaviour. Primary outcome measures will be those related to dietary behaviours, including estimated intakes of energy, nutrients and dietary fibre, or the estimated number of servings per day of foods or food groups. Secondary outcome measures will be objective clinical measures that are likely to respond to changes in dietary behaviours, such as anthropometry or blood biochemistry. Knowledge, self-efficacy, intention and emotion will be examined as mediators of dietary behaviour change in order to explore potential mechanisms of action. Databases will be searched using a comprehensive four-part search strategy, and the results exported to a bibliographic database. Two review authors will independently screen results to identify potentially eligible studies, and will independently extract data from included studies, with any discrepancies at each stage settled by a third author. Standardised forms and criteria will be used.A descriptive analysis of included studies will describe study design, participants, the intervention, and outcomes. Statistical analyses appropriate to the data extracted, and an economic evaluation using a cost-utility analysis, will be undertaken if sufficient data exist, and effective components of successful interventions will be investigated.


CONCLUSIONS
This review aims to provide comprehensive evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adaptive e-Learning interventions for dietary behaviour change, and explore potential psychological mechanisms of action and the effective components of effective interventions. This can inform policy makers and healthcare commissioners in deciding whether e-Learning should be part of a comprehensive response to the improvement of dietary behaviour for health, and if so which components should be present for interventions to be effective.
Edwards
Phil
P
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Phil.Edwards@lshtm.ac.uk
Felix
Lambert
L
Harris
Jody
J
Ferguson
Elaine
E
Free
Caroline
C
Landon
Jane
J
Lock
Karen
K
Michie
Susan
S
Miners
Alec
A
Murray
Elizabeth
E
D000293:Adolescent; D000886:Anthropometry; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004032:Diet; D020375:Education, Distance / Q000191:economics; D015438:Health Behavior; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D009751:Nutritional Requirements; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D000078202:Systematic Reviews as Topic
Comput Inform Nurs. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6):244-50
12464739
JAMA. 2003 Apr 9;289(14):1833-6
12684363
Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):205-23
16700634
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD001118
16034855
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92
10982317
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004 Apr;17(2):117-24
15050988
Nutr Rev. 1992 Oct;50(10):283-90
1436763
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Apr;77(4 Suppl):1028S-1034S
12663313
Public Health. 2009 Jan;123(1):e14-20
19100588
BMJ. 1997 May 3;314(7090):1311-7
9158466
J Community Health. 2002 Feb;27(1):33-51
11845940
Ann Behav Med. 1999 Fall;21(4):290-8
10721435
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008 Jun;8(3):261-72
20528378
Health Educ Res. 2001 Dec;16(6):647-60
11780705
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 09;3(7):e2619
18612430
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):35-42
9894553
Curr Med Res Opin. 2001;17(1):1-7
11464440
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Oct;33(4):336-345
17888860
Health Educ Res. 2009 Aug;24(4):699-720
19286893
BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):897-900
16223826
Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87
18624603
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Feb;83(2):100-8
15744402
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Aug;59 Suppl 1:S130-7; discussion S138-9
16052181
Health Info Libr J. 2002 Jun;19(2):98-108
12389607
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26-33
15692000
Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Feb;36(2):107-17
10223016
Health Econ. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):217-27
9226140
Am J Community Psychol. 1998 Apr;26(2):281-306
9693693
Science. 1994 Apr 22;264(5158):532-7
8160011