title: Growth and photosynthetic efficiency promotion of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) by endophytic bacteria.
abstract: Very little is known about the physiological interactions between plants and endophytic bacteria. We investigated the impact of three endophytic bacteria, Bacillus pumilus 2-1, Chryseobacterium indologene 2-2, and Acinetobacter johnsonii 3-1, on the photosynthetic capacity and growth of sugar beet. Endophyte-free plants were obtained first and infected with the bacteria. Measurements of total chlorophyll content revealed very significant differences between endophyte-free beet plants and some infected by endophytic bacteria. The maximum photochemical yield (Fv/Fm) was used to determine any photosynthetic effect on plants caused by biotic or abiotic factors. After 30 days of growth, there was significantly higher Fv/Fm for endophyte-infected than endophyte-free plants. The light response curves of beet showed that photosynthetic capacity was significantly increased in endophyte-infected plants. Photosynthesis of endophyte-free plants was saturated at 1,300 micromol m(-2) s(-1), whereas endophyte-infected plants were not saturated at the irradiance used. The effect seemed to be due to promotion of electron transport in the thylakoid membranes. Promotion of photosynthetic capacity in sugar beet was due to increased chlorophyll content, leading to a consequent increased carbohydrate synthesis. It is possible that the increased maximum yield of photosynthesis in sugar beet was promoted by phytohormones and produced by the bacteria.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Microbiology, Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture Science, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. syw1973@126.com
authors.forename: Yingwu
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Shi
authors.forename: Kai
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lou
authors.forename: Chun
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D000150:Acinetobacter / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology; D001407:Bacillus / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology; D001419:Bacteria / Q000254:growth & development; D027461:Beta vulgaris / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000382:microbiology*; D045247:Chryseobacterium / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology; D010788:Photosynthesis / Q000502:physiology*; D036226:Seedlings / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000382:microbiology*
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1951 Jan;26(1):192-5
references.pmid: 16654351
references.citation: Oecologia. 1990 Sep;84(2):207-214
references.pmid: 28312754
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1989 Nov;91(3):905-10
references.pmid: 16667155
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1986 Aug;81(4):997-1002
references.pmid: 16664972
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006 Mar;19(3):250-6
references.pmid: 16570655
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Feb;58(2):513-9
references.pmid: 16348643
references.citation: Oecologia. 1987 Sep;73(3):358-362
references.pmid: 28311516
references.citation: Planta. 1987 Apr;170(4):489-504
references.pmid: 24233012
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Jun;9(6):275-80
references.pmid: 15165558
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Aug;68(8):3795-801
references.pmid: 12147474
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1958 May;75(5):592-603
references.pmid: 13538930