Effect of probe characteristics on the subtractive hybridization efficiency of human genomic DNA.
BACKGROUND
The detection sensitivity of low abundance pathogenic species by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be significantly enhanced by removing host nucleic acids. This selective removal can be performed using a magnetic bead-based solid phase with covalently immobilized capture probes. One of the requirements to attain efficient host background nucleic acids subtraction is the capture probe characteristics.


RESULTS
In this study we investigate how various capture probe characteristics influence the subtraction efficiency. While the primary focus of this report is the impact of probe length, we also studied the impact of probe conformation as well as the amount of capture probe attached to the solid phase. The probes were immobilized on magnetic microbeads functionalized with a phosphorous dendrimer. The subtraction efficiency was assessed by quantitative real time PCR using a single-step capture protocol and genomic DNA as target. Our results indicate that short probes (100 to 200 bp) exhibit the best subtraction efficiency. Additionally, higher subtraction efficiencies with these probes were obtained as the amount of probe immobilized on the solid phase decreased. Under optimal probes condition, our protocol showed a 90 - 95% subtraction efficiency of human genomic DNA.


CONCLUSIONS
The characteristics of the capture probe are important for the design of efficient solid phases. The length, conformation and abundance of the probes determine the capture efficiency of the solid phase.
Archer
Marie J
MJ
US Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science & Engineering, 4555 Overlook Avenue, S W, Washington, DC, 20375, USA. marie.archer@nrl.navy.mil.
Long
Nina
N
Lin
Baochuan
B
Biosens Bioelectron. 2006 Jan 15;21(7):989-97
16368479
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 05;34(11):3370-7
16822858
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 May;34(5):1209-15
8727904
Anal Chem. 1998 Apr 1;70(7):1288-96
15779144
J Chem Phys. 2004 Mar 8;120(10):4958-68
15267358
Anal Biochem. 2006 Aug 15;355(2):285-97
16764814
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Dec 15;29(24):5163-8
11812850
Clin Chem. 2007 Sep;53(9):1570-6
17660271
Biophys Chem. 1994 Jun;50(3):255-71
8011947
Biophys J. 2002 Jul;83(1):22-41
12080098
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 May;68(5):2316-25
11976103
Anal Biochem. 1995 Apr 10;226(2):325-30
7793635
Anal Biochem. 1997 Nov 15;253(2):180-9
9367501
Biophys J. 1995 Dec;69(6):2243-55
8599632
J Med Virol. 2004 Jan;72(1):1-9
14635004
Biochem J. 1991 Sep 15;278 ( Pt 3):735-40
1898362
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Apr 1;27(7):1719-27
10076004