Community-based assessment of human rights in a complex humanitarian emergency: the Emergency Assistance Teams-Burma and Cyclone Nargis.
BACKGROUND
Cyclone Nargis hit Burma on May 2, 2008, killing over 138,000 and affecting at least 2.4 million people. The Burmese military junta, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), initially blocked international aid to storm victims, forcing community-based organizations such as the Emergency Assistance Teams-Burma (EAT) to fill the void, helping with cyclone relief and long-term reconstruction. Recognizing the need for independent monitoring of the human rights situation in cyclone-affected areas, particularly given censorship over storm relief coverage, EAT initiated such documentation efforts.


METHODS
A human rights investigation was conducted to document selected human rights abuses that had initially been reported to volunteers providing relief services in cyclone affected areas. Using participatory research methods and qualitative, semi-structured interviews, EAT volunteers collected 103 testimonies from August 2008 to June 2009; 42 from relief workers and 61 from storm survivors.


RESULTS
One year after the storm, basic necessities such as food, potable water, and shelter remained insufficient for many, a situation exacerbated by lack of support to help rebuild livelihoods and worsening household debt. This precluded many survivors from being able to access healthcare services, which were inadequate even before Cyclone Nargis. Aid efforts continued to be met with government restrictions and harassment, and relief workers continued to face threats and fear of arrest. Abuses, including land confiscation and misappropriation of aid, were reported during reconstruction, and tight government control over communication and information exchange continued.


CONCLUSIONS
Basic needs of many cyclone survivors in the Irrawaddy Delta remained unmet over a year following Cyclone Nargis. Official impediments to delivery of aid to storm survivors continued, including human rights abrogations experienced by civilians during reconstruction efforts. Such issues remain unaddressed in official assessments conducted in partnership with the SPDC. Private, community-based relief organizations like EAT are well positioned and able to independently assess human rights conditions in response to complex humanitarian emergencies such as Cyclone Nargis; efforts of this nature must be encouraged, particularly in settings where human rights abuses have been documented and censorship is widespread.
Suwanvanichkij
Voravit
V
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Public Health and Human Rights 615 N Wolfe Street Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. vsuwanva@jhsph.edu
Murakami
Noriyuki
N
Lee
Catherine I
CI
Leigh
Jen
J
Wirtz
Andrea L
AL
Daniels
Brock
B
Mahn
Mahn
M
Maung
Cynthia
C
Beyrer
Chris
C
BMJ. 1999 Aug 14;319(7207):422-6
10445925
PLoS Med. 2008 Dec 23;5(12):1689-98
19108601
PLoS Med. 2008 Apr 15;5(4):e89
18416600
J Postgrad Med. 2006 Apr-Jun;52(2):110-5
16679674
Confl Health. 2008 Mar 14;2:2
18341693