title: Is endocrine surgery research dying?
abstract: Surgeon-scientists are uniquely positioned to make improvements in patient care. With stagnant NIH funding and increased grant applications, government-sponsored endocrine surgery research may be declining, thus compromising the training of future surgical investigators. We evaluated if NIH-sponsored endocrine surgery research has decreased. Grant funding of all United States active and senior members of the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) in 1998 and 2008 was obtained from the NIH Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects (CRISP) database. All NIH grants between 1996-1998 and 2006-2008 were abstracted. There were 210 and 260 eligible members in 1998 and 2008, respectively. From 2006-2008, fewer members (8% vs. 13%, P = 0.05) had NIH funding for all research, and fewer members (3% vs. 6%, P = 0.05) were funded for endocrine surgery research. Grants per funded member did not decrease for all research (1.3+/-0.1 vs. 1.3+/-0.1, P = 0.99) or endocrine surgery research (1.2+/-0.1 vs. 1.1+/-0.1, P = 0.95). Of 24 members who had funding from 1996-1998, 8 (33%) maintained funding, while 4 of 12 (33%) maintained funding for endocrine surgery research. We conclude that fewer AAES members have funding after a ten-year period. Two-thirds of investigators no longer have funding, but the average number of grants per funded member is the same. This suggests that investigators are able to obtain and maintain funding once established, but fewer investigators are able to achieve this funding. Endocrine surgery training programs must continue to emphasize the development of future surgeon-scientists.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Madison, WI, USA.
authors.forename: Joel T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Adler
authors.forename: Herbert
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Chen
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):222-3
references.pmid: 18216526
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2002 Sep;236(3):277-86; discussion 286-7
references.pmid: 12192314
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 1990 Jul;12(1):84-90
references.pmid: 2197446
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2001 Feb;136(2):154-7
references.pmid: 11177131
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):217-21
references.pmid: 18216525
references.citation: Surgery. 1958 Jul;44(1):1-10
references.pmid: 13556440
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):573-7
references.pmid: 15383784
references.citation: Cancer Treat Rep. 1984 Jun;68(6):825-9
references.pmid: 6733697
references.citation: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Apr;119(4 Pt 2):S29-32
references.pmid: 10727959
references.citation: J Surg Res. 2004 Feb;116(2):197-201
references.pmid: 15013356
references.citation: J Surg Res. 1985 Sep;39(3):209-15
references.pmid: 3897712
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1996 Sep;224(3):239-54
references.pmid: 8813253
references.citation: Aust N Z J Surg. 1989 Mar;59(3):197-8
references.pmid: 2930372
references.citation: Science. 2008 Aug 29;321(5893):1144
references.pmid: 18755947