title: A processive riboantiterminator seeks a switch to make biofilms.
abstract: Since the discovery of the first signal-sensing RNA structure by Grundy and Henkin in 1993, the list of cis-acting riboregulators has grown dramatically. Riboswitches fold into elaborate structures and respond to binding of small metabolites by altering the folding pattern of the surrounding transcript, thereby altering the gene expression programme. Riboswitches that use short-range mechanisms to control transcription attenuation and translation initiation and mediate mRNA cleavage have been characterized in many Gram-positive bacteria. Their action typically relies on alternative RNA structures that are differentially stabilized by the ligand binding. In this issue of Molecular Microbiology, Irnov and Winkler describe a novel Bacillus subtilis riboregulator called EAR that shares structural complexity with riboswitches but possesses a unique mechanism of action. EAR increases expression of exopolysaccharide genes and biofilm formation, and appears to act as a processive, long-range antiterminator, the first such example outside of Escherichia coli. While it is unclear whether EAR senses a biofilm-inducing signal, the results suggest that its action depends on yet unidentified auxiliary factors. Interestingly, efficient capsule biogenesis in E. coli and Bacteroides fragilis also depends on processive antiterminators but utilizes the protein-based mechanisms instead.
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and The RNA Group, The Ohio State University, 484 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. artsimovitch.1@osu.edu
authors.forename: Irina
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Artsimovitch
mesh_terms: D001412:Bacillus subtilis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D018441:Biofilms; D012329:RNA, Bacterial / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D013728:Terminator Regions, Genetic; D014158:Transcription, Genetic
chemical_list: D012329:RNA, Bacterial
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2008 Sep 5;31(5):683-94
references.pmid: 18775328
references.citation: Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:693-715
references.pmid: 12676794
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 9;93(1):342-6
references.pmid: 8552635
references.citation: Cell. 1993 Aug 13;74(3):475-82
references.pmid: 8348614
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1997 Nov 7;273(4):797-813
references.pmid: 9367773
references.citation: J Hered. 2009 Sep-Oct;100(5):618-23
references.pmid: 19617525
references.citation: Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1998;63:319-25
references.pmid: 10384296
references.citation: Microbiol Rev. 1995 Dec;59(4):623-45
references.pmid: 8531889
references.citation: Cell. 1996 Nov 29;87(5):893-903
references.pmid: 8945516
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2009 Dec;191(23):7288-95
references.pmid: 19801412
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2005 Oct 28;280(43):36397-408
references.pmid: 16109710
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1999 Jan;181(2):359-67
references.pmid: 9882646
references.citation: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Jun;19(3):251-9
references.pmid: 19303767
references.citation: Cell. 2001 Nov 16;107(4):437-49
references.pmid: 11719185
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2003 May 15;17(10):1281-92
references.pmid: 12756229
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 1997 Jun;24(5):1001-12
references.pmid: 9220007
references.citation: Cell. 2009 Nov 13;139(4):770-9
references.pmid: 19914169
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2001 May;7(5):993-1001
references.pmid: 11389846
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Apr;7(2):126-31
references.pmid: 15063848
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1992 Sep 25;267(27):19418-26
references.pmid: 1388170
references.citation: EMBO J. 2009 Jan 21;28(2):112-22
references.pmid: 19096362
references.citation: Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):637-48
references.pmid: 6215986
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2010 Apr;76(2):286-301
references.pmid: 20132437
references.citation: Cell. 2002 Apr 19;109(2):193-203
references.pmid: 12007406