Complex cognition and behavioural innovation in New Caledonian crows.
Apes, corvids and parrots all show high rates of behavioural innovation in the wild. However, it is unclear whether this innovative behaviour is underpinned by cognition more complex than simple learning mechanisms. To investigate this question we presented New Caledonian crows with a novel three-stage metatool problem. The task involved three distinct stages: (i) obtaining a short stick by pulling up a string, (ii) using the short stick as a metatool to extract a long stick from a toolbox, and finally (iii) using the long stick to extract food from a hole. Crows with previous experience of the behaviours in stages 1-3 linked them into a novel sequence to solve the problem on the first trial. Crows with experience of only using string and tools to access food also successfully solved the problem. This innovative use of established behaviours in novel contexts was not based on resurgence, chaining and conditional reinforcement. Instead, the performance was consistent with the transfer of an abstract, causal rule: 'out-of-reach objects can be accessed using a tool'. This suggests that high innovation rates in the wild may reflect complex cognitive abilities that supplement basic learning mechanisms.
Taylor
Alex H
AH
Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. alexhtaylor@gmail.com
Elliffe
Douglas
D
Hunt
Gavin R
GR
Gray
Russell D
RD
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003071:Cognition; D046368:Crows / Q000502:physiology*; D053001:Tool Use Behavior
Brain Behav Evol. 2008;72(2):135-44
18836259
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):273-7
16812481
Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):307-16
16941156
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 29;361(1465):23-43
16553307
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Feb;119(1):23-32
15740427
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 23;106(25):10370-5
19478068
Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):1504-7
17702575
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4436-41
11891325
Learn Behav. 2010 Feb;38(1):87-95
20065352
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 22;5(2):e9345
20179759
Science. 1987 Sep 11;237(4820):1317-23
3629243
Biol Lett. 2007 Oct 22;3(5):453-5
17609175
Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 23;17(20):R894-5
17956752
J Comp Psychol (Baltim). 1945 Dec;38:367-83
21010765
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):247-54
18796393
Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Oct;21(5):667-84; discussion 684-721
10097023
Z Tierpsychol. 1968 Feb;25(1):89-103
5698407
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 05;4(8):e6471
19654861
Nature. 1984 Mar 1-7;308(5954):61-2
6700713
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Jan;26(1):98-111
10650547
J Comp Psychol. 1987 Jun;101(2):197-201
3608425
Commun Integr Biol. 2009 Jul;2(4):311-2
19721874
Am J Primatol. 1993;31(4):241-261
31936992
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 14;106(28):E76; author reply E77
19571011
Science. 2002 Aug 9;297(5583):981
12169726