title: Bioconservation of deteriorated monumental calcarenite stone and identification of bacteria with carbonatogenic activity.
abstract: The deterioration of the stone built and sculptural heritage has prompted the search and development of novel consolidation/protection treatments that can overcome the limitations of traditional ones. Attention has been drawn to bioconservation, particularly bacterial carbonatogenesis (i.e. bacterially induced calcium carbonate precipitation), as a new environmentally friendly effective conservation strategy, especially suitable for carbonate stones. Here, we study the effects of an in situ bacterial bioconsolidation treatment applied on porous limestone (calcarenite) in the sixteenth century San Jeronimo Monastery in Granada, Spain. The treatment consisted in the application of a nutritional solution (with and without Myxococcus xanthus inoculation) on decayed calcarenite stone blocks. The treatment promoted the development of heterotrophic bacteria able to induce carbonatogenesis. Both the consolidation effect of the treatment and the response of the culturable bacterial community present in the decayed stone were evaluated. A significant surface strengthening (consolidation) of the stone, without altering its surface appearance or inducing any detrimental side effect, was achieved upon application of the nutritional solution. The treatment efficacy was independent of the presence of M. xanthus (which is known as an effective carbonatogenic bacterium). The genetic diversity of 116 bacterial strains isolated from the stone, of which 113 strains showed carbonatogenic activity, was analysed by repetitive extragenic palindromic-polymerase chain reaction (REP-PCR) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The strains were distributed into 31 groups on the basis of their REP-PCR patterns, and a representative strain of each group was subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Analysis of these sequences showed that isolates belong to a wide variety of phylogenetic groups being closely related to species of 15 genera within the Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and the Actinobacteria. This study shows that the abundant carbonatogenic bacteria present in the decayed stone are able to effectively consolidate the degraded stone by producing new calcite (and vaterite) cement if an adequate nutritional solution is used. The implications of these results for the conservation of cultural heritage are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Microbiologia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva s/n, Granada, Spain.
authors.forename: Fadwa
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Jroundi
authors.forename: Antonia
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fernández-Vivas
authors.forename: Carlos
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Rodriguez-Navarro
authors.forename: Eulogio J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Bedmar
authors.forename: María Teresa
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: González-Muñoz
mesh_terms: D001419:Bacteria / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D002119:Calcium Carbonate / Q000032:analysis*; D003252:Construction Materials / Q000382:microbiology*; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D004783:Environmental Microbiology; D016941:Myxococcus xanthus / Q000378:metabolism; D010802:Phylogeny; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics; D013030:Spain
chemical_list: D004269:DNA, Bacterial; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; D002119:Calcium Carbonate
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20
references.pmid: 7463489
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2009 Apr;11(4):733-40
references.pmid: 19207574
references.citation: Langmuir. 2008 Mar 18;24(6):2772-8
references.pmid: 18237223
references.citation: J Basic Microbiol. 2008 Apr;48(2):118-24
references.pmid: 18383223
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1973 Jan;113(1):33-7
references.pmid: 4345921
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1991 Jan;173(2):697-703
references.pmid: 1987160
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2006 Jan;51(1):51-64
references.pmid: 16391878
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jan;43(1):199-207
references.pmid: 15634972
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Apr;69(4):2182-93
references.pmid: 12676699
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9
references.pmid: 17488738
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2007 Aug;68(10):1929-36
references.pmid: 17418886
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
references.pmid: 3447015
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 1999 May;36(1-2):115-22
references.pmid: 10353805
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Dec 25;19(24):6823-31
references.pmid: 1762913
references.citation: Biodegradation. 2006 Aug;17(4):357-67
references.pmid: 16491305
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Aug;66(8):3454-63
references.pmid: 10919806
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Sep;73(17):5671-5
references.pmid: 17601804
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jul;70(7):4230-41
references.pmid: 15240306
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999 Dec 1;181(1):55-62
references.pmid: 10564789
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2007 Jan;189(1):228-35
references.pmid: 17085570
references.citation: Anal Biochem. 2007 Jul 1;366(1):102-4
references.pmid: 17434438
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2006 Oct;8(10):1753-63
references.pmid: 16958756
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Apr;61(2):103-9
references.pmid: 12655451
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Jun 1;38(11):3040-6
references.pmid: 15224733
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Jul;58(7):2180-7
references.pmid: 1637156
references.citation: Int Microbiol. 2008 Jun;11(2):91-100
references.pmid: 18645959
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Mar;70(3):1627-32
references.pmid: 15006787
references.citation: Syst Appl Microbiol. 2001 Jul;24(2):303-10
references.pmid: 11518336
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98(1):73-83
references.pmid: 15610419
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Apr;72(4):2856-63
references.pmid: 16597992