Designing studies that would address the multilayered nature of health care.
We review design and analytic methods available for multilevel interventions in cancer research with particular attention to study design, sample size requirements, and potential to provide statistical evidence for causal inference. The most appropriate methods will depend on the stage of development of the research and whether randomization is possible. Early on, fractional factorial designs may be used to screen intervention components, particularly when randomization of individuals is possible. Quasi-experimental designs, including time-series and multiple baseline designs, can be useful once the intervention is designed because they require few sites and can provide the preliminary evidence to plan efficacy studies. In efficacy and effectiveness studies, group-randomized trials are preferred when randomization is possible and regression discontinuity designs are preferred otherwise if assignment based on a quantitative score is possible. Quasi-experimental designs may be used, especially when combined with recent developments in analytic methods to reduce bias in effect estimates.
Murray
David M
DM
Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. dmurray@cph.osu.edu
Pennell
Michael
M
Rhoda
Dale
D
Hade
Erinn M
EM
Paskett
Electra D
ED
D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography; D016347:Medical Records Systems, Computerized; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010865:Pilot Projects; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012107:Research Design; D018401:Sample Size
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):477-85
19363188
Eval Health Prof. 2006 Dec;29(4):407-23
17102063
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413-33
17150029
CA Cancer J Clin. 1984 Nov-Dec;34(6):328-32
6437624
Clin Trials. 2006;3(3):259-71
16895043
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91
16829207
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Apr 21;96(8):594-603
15100337
Health Educ Res. 2000 Oct;15(5):615-23
11184220
Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Aug;108(2):100-2
707470
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6
10987780
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2):162-8
17673105
Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:1-25
19296774
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Apr 03;6:16
16579864
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Sep;15(9):2163-70
17890483
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1181-6
16735622
BMJ. 1997 Aug 9;315(7104):361-3
9270462
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2):155-61
17673104
Control Clin Trials. 2003 Jun;24(3):306-23
12757996
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):47-52
12571345
Eval Rev. 1996 Jun;20(3):313-37
10182207
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):423-32
14998806
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92
10982317
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1359-66
18556609
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 May;8(5):453-9
10350442
Behav Modif. 1994 Jan;18(1):6-31
8037646
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2):139-154
17673103
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):3-10
20386048
Prev Med. 1986 Sep;15(5):451-74
3534875
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001 Mar;7(2):33-40
12174398
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:607-29
18616391
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Nov 08;6:54
17092344
Control Clin Trials. 1992 Jun;13(3):190-212
1320557
Prev Sci. 2000 Mar;1(1):31-49
11507793
Eval Rev. 2001 Aug;25(4):440-53
11480307
Health Serv Res. 2000 Mar;34(7):1519-34
10737451
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):372-84
19363177
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1354-9
18556602