title: NMDAR-dependent control of call duration in Xenopus laevis.
abstract: Many rhythmic behaviors, such as locomotion and vocalization, involve temporally dynamic patterns. How does the brain generate temporal complexity? Here, we use the vocal central pattern generator (CPG) of Xenopus laevis to address this question. Isolated brains can elicit fictive vocalizations, allowing us to study the CPG in vitro. The X. laevis advertisement call is temporally modulated; calls consist of rhythmic click trills that alternate between fast (approximately 60 Hz) and slow (approximately 30 Hz) rates. We investigated the role of two CPG nuclei--the laryngeal motor nucleus (n.IX-X) and the dorsal tegmental area of the medulla (DTAM)--in setting rhythm frequency and call durations. We discovered a local field potential wave in DTAM that coincides with fictive fast trills and phasic activity that coincides with fictive clicks. After disrupting n.IX-X connections, the wave persists, whereas phasic activity disappears. Wave duration was temperature dependent and correlated with fictive fast trills. This correlation persisted when wave duration was modified by temperature manipulations. Selectively cooling DTAM, but not n.IX-X, lengthened fictive call and fast trill durations, whereas cooling either nucleus decelerated the fictive click rate. The N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist dAPV blocked waves and fictive fast trills, suggesting that the wave controls fast trill activation and, consequently, call duration. We conclude that two functionally distinct CPG circuits exist: 1) a pattern generator in DTAM that determines call duration and 2) a rhythm generator (spanning DTAM and n.IX-X) that determines click rates. The newly identified DTAM pattern generator provides an excellent model for understanding NDMAR-dependent rhythmic circuits.
authors.affiliation: Biology Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. ez@bu.edu
authors.forename: Erik
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Zornik
authors.forename: Abraham W
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Katzen
authors.forename: Heather J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Rhodes
authors.forename: Ayako
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Yamaguchi
mesh_terms: D000344:Afferent Pathways; D000818:Animals; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D018691:Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists / Q000494:pharmacology; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D007823:Laryngeal Nerves / Q000502:physiology*; D008526:Medulla Oblongata / Q000166:cytology* / Q000187:drug effects; D009474:Neurons / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D010507:Periodicity; D016194:Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate / Q000502:physiology*; D012701:Serotonin / Q000494:pharmacology; D013696:Temperature; D013997:Time Factors; D014633:Valine / Q000031:analogs & derivatives / Q000494:pharmacology; D014828:Vocalization, Animal / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D014982:Xenopus laevis / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D018691:Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; D016194:Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; D012701:Serotonin; C056639:2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid; D014633:Valine
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Feb 23;25(8):1965-78
references.pmid: 15728836
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 7;27(6):1485-97
references.pmid: 17287524
references.citation: Acta Physiol Scand. 1976 Jun;97(2):175-88
references.pmid: 949003
references.citation: Biochem Soc Trans. 2007 Nov;35(Pt 5):1258-63
references.pmid: 17956325
references.citation: Horm Behav. 1983 Dec;17(4):388-404
references.pmid: 6662518
references.citation: J Physiol. 1988 May;399:301-12
references.pmid: 2900333
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 16;28(3):612-21
references.pmid: 18199762
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 1994 Apr 25;171(1-2):147-50
references.pmid: 8084477
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):648-58
references.pmid: 19955293
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2007 Mar 20;501(3):303-15
references.pmid: 17245708
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Aug;82(2):1069-73
references.pmid: 10444699
references.citation: J Physiol. 2000 Dec 15;529 Pt 3:681-98
references.pmid: 11118498
references.citation: Science. 1980 Feb 1;207(4430):553-5
references.pmid: 7352269
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 12;364(1529):2517-26
references.pmid: 19651653
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1986 Feb 22;244(4):430-44
references.pmid: 3958236
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1994 Aug;72(2):565-77
references.pmid: 7983519
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Apr 22;244(1309):27-32
references.pmid: 1677193
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 1992 Sep 28;50(1-2):17-30
references.pmid: 1449644
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1993;16:207-22
references.pmid: 8460891
references.citation: Brain Res. 1989 Oct 23;500(1-2):199-208
references.pmid: 2557957
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1987 Sep;7(9):2745-55
references.pmid: 3040925
references.citation: Acta Physiol Scand. 1981 Dec;113(4):549-51
references.pmid: 6291323
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1985 Nov;5(11):2909-19
references.pmid: 2865341
references.citation: Science. 1997 Nov 7;278(5340):1122-5
references.pmid: 9353193
references.citation: Neuropharmacology. 2008 Jun;54(7):1120-7
references.pmid: 18402987
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;100(6):3134-43
references.pmid: 18829853
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1992 Fall;16(3):399-413
references.pmid: 1528527
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2004 Feb 1;67(2):353-365
references.pmid: 23457414
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1985 Dec;157(6):749-61
references.pmid: 3837111
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 May 3;26(18):4860-9
references.pmid: 16672660
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002 Mar;26(2):235-58
references.pmid: 11856561
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jun;3(6):593-9
references.pmid: 10816316
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 17;95(4):1870-5
references.pmid: 9465109
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2003 Sep 15;464(2):115-30
references.pmid: 12898606