Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT: current issues.
Computed tomography offers many advantages over routine radiographs in screening for lung cancer, and it is clear that low-dose spiral CT screening can more frequently find considerably smaller lung cancers than previous detection tools. Recently, investigators have performed low-dose spiral CT scanning for screening of lung cancer, and have suggested that CT screening can depict lung cancers at smaller sizes and at earlier stages. With technological advances in spiral CT scanners, the detection rate of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules has markedly increased, with higher rates noted with thinner collimation of CT scanning. Unfortunately, the majority of these have proved to be benign, i.e. false positive results. If, even in part, CT features could be found to predict benign nodules without follow-up, the false-positive rate would be reduced, and consequently, the cost, emotional stress, radiation dose, morbidity and mortality associated with interventional procedures would also be reduced. There have been several studies trying to establish reliable CT features for benign lesions in small pulmonary nodules and to determine their outcome. Although these efforts have not completely resolved the issue of false positive results, it is expected that lessons will be learnt on how to manage these small nodules through experience with screening in the near future. Because pulmonary nodules on CT are much more common in Korea than in western countries, the management algorithm for screening CT-detected nodules should be modified according to different circumstances, with consensus among related physicians and radiologists. In addition, to enhance patient care and avoid misunderstanding of inherent limitation of CT screening by the screening subjects, physicians, hospital managers as well as radiologists should provide proper information regarding CT screening to the screenees.
Ahn
Myeong Im
MI
Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea. ami@catholic.ac.kr
Radiology. 2003 Nov;229(2):603; author reply 603-4
14595156
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Oct;179(4):837-42
12239021
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Apr;180(4):955-64
12646435
Radiology. 1996 Dec;201(3):798-802
8939234
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 15;20(4):911-20
11844811
Chest. 1985 May;87(5):662-7
3987379
Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):164-8
14990809
Radiology. 2003 Mar;226(3):756-61
12601181
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jun;180(6):1736-7; author reply 1737
12760953
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001 Sep-Oct;25(5):753-6
11584236
Lancet. 1999 Jul 10;354(9173):99-105
10408484
J Thorac Imaging. 2001 Jan;16(1):65-8
11149694
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 May;180(5):1255-63
12704034
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Apr;77(4):329-33
11936927
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jan 5;84(1):25-32
11139308
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Nov 15;168(10):1167-73
12882756
Chest. 1998 Mar;113(3):703-6
9515846
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Sep;167(3):629-30
8751667
Radiology. 2002 Mar;222(3):773-81
11867800
Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):489-93
12563144
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002 Jul-Aug;26(4):553-7
12218819
Chest. 2004 Apr;125(4):1522-9
15078769