title: Data analysis of epidemiological studies: part 11 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  An important objective of epidemiological research is to identify risk factors for disease. Depending on the particular question being asked, cohort studies, case-control studies, or cross-sectional studies are conducted.
  
  
  METHODS
  Methods of data analysis in different types of epidemiological studies are illustrated through examples with fictive data. Important measures of frequency and effect will be introduced. Different regression models will be presented as examples of complex analytical methods.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Important frequency measures in cohort studies are incidence and mortality. Important effect measures such as the relative risk (RR), hazard ratio (HR), standardized incidence ratio (SIR), standardized mortality ratio (SMR), and odds ratio (OR) can also be calculated. In case-control or cross-sectional studies, the OR can be calculated as an effect measure. In cross-sectional studies, prevalence is the most important frequency measure. The interpretation of different frequency measures and effect measures will be discussed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The measures to be calculated and the analyses to be performed in an epidemiological study depend on the research questions being asked, the study type, and the available data.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
authors.forename: Meike
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ressing
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Blettner
authors.forename: Stefanie J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Klug
mesh_terms: D015706:Bibliometrics; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D015340:Epidemiologic Research Design; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D012586:Science / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
references.citation: Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007;132 Suppl 1:e45-7
references.pmid: 17530597
references.citation: IARC Sci Publ. 1987;(82):1-406
references.pmid: 3329634
references.citation: Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Oct;106(41):664-8
references.pmid: 19946431
references.citation: Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Mar;106(11):184-9
references.pmid: 19568374
references.citation: Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007;132 Suppl 1:e12-4
references.pmid: 17530584
references.citation: Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007;132 Suppl 1:e33-5
references.pmid: 17530593
references.citation: Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007;132 Suppl 1:e42-4
references.pmid: 17530596
references.citation: J Community Health. 2001 Feb;26(1):39-50
references.pmid: 11297189
references.citation: Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007;132 Suppl 1:e30-2
references.pmid: 17530592
references.citation: Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Sep;106(36):578-83
references.pmid: 19890414
references.citation: Eur J Public Health. 2001 Mar;11(1):97-101
references.pmid: 11276580
references.citation: IARC Sci Publ. 1980;(32):5-338
references.pmid: 7216345
references.citation: Eur J Cancer Prev. 1996 Aug;5(4):259-66
references.pmid: 8894563
references.citation: Lancet. 2003 Aug 9;362(9382):419-27
references.pmid: 12927427
references.citation: Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Nov;106(48):795-800
references.pmid: 20038982
references.citation: Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 May;106(19):335-9
references.pmid: 19547734