Adapting Clinical Ontologies in Real-World Environments.
The desideratum of semantic interoperability has been intensively discussed in medical informatics circles in recent years. Originally, experts assumed that this issue could be sufficiently addressed by insisting simply on the application of shared clinical terminologies or clinical information models. However, the use of the term 'ontology' has been steadily increasing more recently. We discuss criteria for distinguishing clinical ontologies from clinical terminologies and information models. Then, we briefly present the role clinical ontologies play in two multicentric research projects. Finally, we discuss the interactions between these different kinds of knowledge representation artifacts and the stakeholders involved in developing interoperational real-world clinical applications. We provide ontology engineering examples from two EU-funded projects.
Stenzhorn
Holger
H
Institute for Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany and, Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Schulz
Stefan
S
Boeker
Martin
M
Smith
Barry
B
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11;:56-60
18693797
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):30-9
16221939
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Dec;64(2-3):223-40
11734388
Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(3):332-43
17492120
J Biomed Inform. 2003 Dec;36(6):478-500
14759820
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Nov;25(11):1251-5
17989687
Int J Med Inform. 1998 Feb;48(1-3):111-24
9600410
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;115:153-73
16160223
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 1998 Dec;2(4):229-42
10719533
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;102:20-38
15853262
Form Ontol Inf Syst. 2004;2004:185-195
25745641
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;:1005
16779292