Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005.
BACKGROUND
Sexual transmitted infections (STIs) have increased in Germany and other countries in Europe since the mid-nineties. To obtain a better picture of diagnostic methods used in STI testing institutions in Germany, we performed a nationwide survey amongst STI specialists in order to evaluate the quality of STI reports and provide recommendations to harmonize and possibly improve STI diagnostics in Germany.


METHODS
We asked sentinel physicians and randomly chosen gynaecologists, urologists and dermato-venerologists, about the diagnostic methods used in 2005 to diagnose HIV, chlamydia (CT), gonorrhoea (GO) and syphilis (SY) in a national cross-sectional survey in order to recognize potential problems and provide recommendations.


RESULTS
A total of 739/2287 (32%) physicians participated. Of all participants, 80% offered tests for HIV, 84% for CT, 83% for GO and 83% for SY. Of all participants who performed HIV testing, 90% requested an antibody test, 3% a rapid test and 1% a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). For CT testing, NAAT was used in 33% and rapid tests in 34% of participants. GO resistance testing was performed by 31% of the participants. SY testing was performed in 98% by serology.


CONCLUSIONS
Diagnostic methods for STI vary highly among the participants. Diagnostic guidelines should be reviewed and harmonised to ensure consistent use of the optimal STI diagnostic methods.
Gilsdorf
Andreas
A
Field Epidemiology Training Program, Berlin, Germany. GilsdorfA@rki.de
Hofmann
Alexandra
A
Hamouda
Osamah
O
Bremer
Viviane
V
D002690:Chlamydia Infections / Q000175:diagnosis*; D019411:Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Q000592:standards*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005858:Germany; D006069:Gonorrhea / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D013587:Syphilis / Q000175:diagnosis*
Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Dec;32(12):725-8
16314767
Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jan;33(1):11-7
16385216
Sex Transm Infect. 2005 Apr;81(2):173-9
15800099
J Mol Diagn. 2006 Feb;8(1):3-15
16436629
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1324-7
12039830
Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Jul;34(7):513-8
17277611
Euro Surveill. 2006 Sep;11(9):157-60
17075160
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 May;25(5):318-22
16733613
Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jan;33(1):6-7
16385214
Euro Surveill. 2008 Jun 26;13(26):
18761917
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2008 Dec;22(4):601-617
18954754
Sex Transm Infect. 2009 Sep;85(5):322-5
19406739
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008 May;61(3):216-8
18503174
Int J STD AIDS. 2005 Jun;16(6):430-2
15969778
Adolesc Med Clin. 2004 Jun;15(2):287-99
15449846
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jan;47(1):59-63
18987174
Int J STD AIDS. 2002 Jan;13(1):22-4
11802925
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002 Oct 18;51(RR-15):1-38; quiz CE1-4
12418541
Eur Urol. 2003 Jul;44(1):1-7
12814668
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 Apr;50(4):399-411
17443295
Int J STD AIDS. 2001 Oct;12 Suppl 3:7-13
11589791
Lancet. 2006 Dec 2;368(9551):2001-16
17141708
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Feb;48(2):497-502
20007388