Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: the contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval.
The present study examined the extent to which differences in strategic encoding and contextual retrieval account for the relation between individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) and variation in episodic recall. Participants performed a continual distractor task under either incidental- or intentional-encoding conditions. High-WMC individuals outperformed low-WMC individuals across both encoding conditions and, notably, to a greater degree in the intentional-encoding condition. These results suggest that WMC differences in episodic recall are likely due to a combination of differences in both contextual-retrieval and strategic-encoding processes. These findings are consistent with prior work showing that high-WMC individuals are better at engaging in strategic-encoding processes during the presentation of items than are low-WMC individuals and are better at using contextual cues to focus the search on correct items during retrieval.
Unsworth
Nash
N
Departmentof Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-3013, USA. nunswor@uga.edu
Spillers
Gregory J
GJ
D001288:Attention; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall; D011581:Psychological Tests; D011932:Reading; D012691:Serial Learning
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Jan;12(1):3-15
2949048
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov;33(6):1020-34
17983310
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Sep;60(9):1227-45
17676555
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec;13(6):991-7
17484424
Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1383-90
19015498
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Mar;26(2):336-58
10764100
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):104-32
17227183
Sci Am. 1971 Aug;225(2):82-90
5089457