Variations in tumor size and position due to irregular breathing in 4D-CT: a simulation study.
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the position and volume errors in 4D-CT caused by irregular breathing.


METHODS
A virtual 4D-CT scanner was designed to reproduce axial mode scans with retrospective resorting. This virtual scanner creates an artificial spherical tumor based on the specifications of the user, and recreates images that might be produced by a 4D-CT scanner using a patient breathing waveform. 155 respiratory waveforms of patients were used to test the variability of 4D-CT scans. Each breathing waveform was normalized and scaled to 1, 2, and 3 cm peak-to-peak motion, and artificial tumors with 2 and 4 cm radius were simulated for each scaled waveform. The center of mass and volume of resorted 4D-CT images were calculated and compared to the expected values of center of mass and volume for the artificial tumor. Intrasubject variability was investigated by running the virtual scanner over different subintervals of each patient's breathing waveform.


RESULTS
The average error in the center of mass location of an artificial tumor was less than 2 mm standard deviation for 2 cm motion. The corresponding average error in volume was less than 4%. In the worst-case scenarios, a center of mass error of 1.0 cm standard deviation and volume errors of 30%-60% at inhale were found. Systematic errors were observed in a subset of patients due to irregular breathing, and these errors were more pronounced when the tumor volume is smaller.


CONCLUSIONS
Irregular breathing during 4D-CT simulation causes systematic errors in volume and center of mass measurements. These errors are small but depend on the tumor size, motion amplitude, and degree of breathing irregularity.
Sarker
Joyatee
J
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Chu
Alan
A
Mui
Kit
K
Wolfgang
John A
JA
Hirsch
Ariel E
AE
Chen
George T Y
GT
Sharp
Gregory C
GC
D000465:Algorithms; D016477:Artifacts; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D015656:Respiratory Mechanics; D055425:Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
Med Phys. 2008 Oct;35(10):4501-12
18975697
Med Phys. 2008 Nov;35(11):4974-81
19070231
Med Phys. 2006 Feb;33(2):377-9
16532943
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006 Winter;7(1):77-85
16518319
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 15;72(4):1250-8
18823717
Med Phys. 2006 Aug;33(8):2964-74
16964875
Med Phys. 2007 May;34(5):1615-22
17555243
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jun 1;68(2):531-40
17398035
Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3874-900
17089851
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007 Jun 29;8(3):1-20
17712299
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jun 21;52(12):3515-29
17664557
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 May 1;50(1):265-78
11316572
Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):874-89
15895570