title: Genetic screening: A primer for primary care.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To provide a primer for primary care professionals who are increasingly called upon to discuss the growing number of genetic screening services available and to help patients make informed decisions about whether to participate in genetic screening, how to interpret results, and which interventions are most appropriate.
  
  
  METHODS
  As part of a larger research program, a wide literature relating to genetic screening was reviewed. PubMed and Internet searches were conducted using broad search terms. Effort was also made to identify the gray literature.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Genetic screening is a type of public health program that is systematically offered to a specified population of asymptomatic individuals with the aim of providing those identified as high risk with prevention, early treatment, or reproductive options. Ensuring an added benefit from screening, as compared with standard clinical care, and preventing unintended harms, such as undue anxiety or stigmatization, depends on the design and implementation of screening programs, including the recruitment methods, education and counseling provided, timing of screening, predictive value of tests, interventions available, and presence of oversight mechanisms and safeguards. There is therefore growing apprehension that economic interests might lead to a market-driven approach to introducing and expanding screening before program effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility have been demonstrated. As with any medical intervention, there is a moral imperative for genetic screening to do more good than harm, not only from the perspective of individuals and families, but also for the target population and society as a whole.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Primary care professionals have an important role to play in helping their patients navigate the rapidly changing terrain of genetic screening services by informing them about the benefits and risks of new genetic and genomic technologies and empowering them to make more informed choices.
authors.affiliation: Family Medicine Centre, St Mary's Hospital, McGill University, 3830 Lacombe Ave, Montreal, QC H3T 1M5. anne.andermann@mcgill.ca
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Andermann
authors.forename: Ingeborg
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Blancquaert
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D030342:Genetic Diseases, Inborn / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000235:genetics; D005820:Genetic Testing; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D035583:Rare Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology; D013997:Time Factors
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):11
references.pmid: 10802643
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2000 Aug;37(8):567-71
references.pmid: 10922381
references.citation: Sci Eng Ethics. 1998 Apr;4(2):141-50
references.pmid: 11657770
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 12;357(2):154-62
references.pmid: 17625127
references.citation: Annu Rev Med. 2003;54:473-90
references.pmid: 12525682
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Apr;5(4):311-6
references.pmid: 15134075
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Apr;86(4):317-9
references.pmid: 18438522
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2005 Nov;95(11):1889-93
references.pmid: 16195526
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Jul;58(7):538-45
references.pmid: 15194712
references.citation: Am J Law Med. 1991;17(1-2):15-50
references.pmid: 1877608
references.citation: McGill Law J. 2000 May;45(2):559-66
references.pmid: 12688285
references.citation: Public Health. 2004 Apr;118(3):177-89
references.pmid: 15003407
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010 Apr;15(2):90-7
references.pmid: 20176664
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 8;5(1):e12
references.pmid: 18184033
references.citation: BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):35-8
references.pmid: 7613325
references.citation: Clin Genet. 2007 Jun;71(6):501-10
references.pmid: 17539899
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2007 May;25(5):489-90
references.pmid: 17483821
references.citation: McGill Law J. 2000 May;45(2):437-60
references.pmid: 12688281
references.citation: Community Genet. 2001 Jun;4(4):239-243
references.pmid: 12107353
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):757-8
references.pmid: 10488003
references.citation: Fam Pract. 1999 Aug;16(4):426-45
references.pmid: 10493716
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2000 Sep;51(6):821-9
references.pmid: 10972427
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):661-78
references.pmid: 17554300
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2006 Nov;32(11):635-8
references.pmid: 17074820
references.citation: Science. 1999 Dec 17;286(5448):2277-8
references.pmid: 10636788
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2007 Oct;33(4):310-7
references.pmid: 17888858
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Apr 15;157(8):667-73
references.pmid: 12697570
references.citation: Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2006 Dec 13;3:14
references.pmid: 17164009
references.citation: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jul;154(7):714-8
references.pmid: 10891024
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Oct;5(10):783-90
references.pmid: 15510169
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 2;348(1):50-8
references.pmid: 12510043
references.citation: J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007 Aug;30(4):423-9
references.pmid: 17616846
references.citation: J Med Screen. 1996;3(3):165-6
references.pmid: 8946314
references.citation: BMJ. 1998 Feb 21;316(7131):618-20
references.pmid: 9518921
references.citation: Genet Test. 2005 Summer;9(2):158-66
references.pmid: 15943557
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10;358(2):105-7
references.pmid: 18184955
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006 Apr;28(4):324-332
references.pmid: 16776912
references.citation: Annu Rev Med. 2008;59:163-75
references.pmid: 18186702
references.citation: Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(1):9-16
references.pmid: 20051674