Muscle imbalance in volleyball players initiates scoliosis in immature spines: a screening analysis.
METHODS
Retrospective comparative study using radiographs and clinical findings.


OBJECTIVE
To test the hypothesis that asymmetric loading of immature spines in young athletes initiates scoliosis.


BACKGROUND
Scoliosis in athletes has been reported in the literature, but its causative factors have not been investigated.


METHODS
We compared the incidence, type and magnitude of scoliotic curves in volleyball players with those in the non-player population. One hundred sixteen adolescent volleyball players were grouped for selective screening. Data regarding their playing duration, handedness, age, height, and menarchal status (in girls) were recorded, along with clinical examination and radiological investigation when necessary. We analyzed data from 46,428 non-player school children, and their data were compared to athletes to determine differences.


RESULTS
Volleyball players had a statistically significant increase in the incidence of scoliotic spinal curves. Playing hand dominance was related to the curve direction. Cobb angle had no significant correlation with the duration of playing.


CONCLUSIONS
There is a five-fold increase in the incidence of mild scoliosis in volleyball players. A high percentage (41%) of asymmetry was present on the Adams forward bending test, as compared to controls. The curves were either thoracic or thoracolumbar.
Modi
Hitesh
H
Scoliosis Reseach Institute, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Srinivasalu
S
S
Smehta
Satyen
S
Yang
Jae-Hyuk
JH
Song
Hae-Ryong
HR
Suh
Seung Woo
SW
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979 Nov;61-B(4):501-8
500764
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 May;(434):40-5
15864030
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968 Feb;50(1):24-30
5641594
Lancet. 1955 Jun 18;268(6877):1245-7
14382561
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Mar;51(2):223-9
5767315
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Oct;13(10):1192-4
3061026
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972 Jul-Aug;86:121-31
5047777
J Biomech. 1970 Jul;3(4):405-16
5521554
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Aug;65(4):452-63
6874719
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949 Jul;31A(3):519-28
18146109
Am J Hum Biol. 2002 Jul-Aug;14(4):476-85
12112569
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Mar;16(3):288-92
2028300
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 Jan-Feb;7(1):50-4
7071661
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Nov 1;22(21):2495-503
9383855
Clin Sports Med. 1986 Jan;5(1):149-58
3512101
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Sep 15;18(12):1609-15
8235839
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981 Nov-Dec;6(6):560-6
7336278
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-14
3885413
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 1;25(11):1367-72
10828918
N Engl J Med. 1986 May 22;314(21):1348-53
3451741
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977 Jul-Aug;(126):17-25
598109
J Biomech. 1974 Nov;7(6):497-507
4452675
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Sep 15;18(12):1572-80
8235833
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Feb;15(2):61-4
2326712
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Sep;(390):151-62
11550861
Acta Orthop Scand. 1988 Jun;59(3):310-3
3381663
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950 Jan;32A(1):180-8, illust
15401732
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Dec;66(9):1381-7
6501335
Clin Orthop. 1958;11:111-9
13561591
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jan;18(1):20-3
8434320
J Adolesc Health. 1999 Aug;25(2):97
10447036
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 Nov-Dec;7(6):555-62
7167828
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jun 15;22(12):1292-6
9201830