title: Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges.
abstract: In a recent paper (Reid et al., 2009) we introduced a method to calculate optimal hierarchies in the visual network that utilizes continuous, rather than discrete, hierarchical levels, and permits a range of acceptable values rather than attempting to fit fixed hierarchical distances. There, to obtain a hierarchy, the sum of deviations from the constraints that define the hierarchy was minimized using linear optimization. In the short time since publication of that paper we noticed that many colleagues misinterpreted the meaning of the term "optimal hierarchy". In particular, a majority of them were under the impression that there was perhaps only one optimal hierarchy, but a substantial difficulty in finding that one. However, there is not only more than one optimal hierarchy but also more than one option for defining optimality. Continuing the line of this work we look at additional options for optimizing the visual hierarchy: minimizing the number of violated constraints and minimizing the maximal size of a constraint violation using linear optimization and mixed integer programming. The implementation of both optimization criteria is explained in detail. In addition, using constraint sets based on the data from Felleman and Van Essen (1991), optimal hierarchies for the visual network are calculated for both optimization methods.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Giessen Giessen, Germany.
authors.forename: Antje
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Krumnack
authors.forename: Andrew T
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Reid
authors.forename: Egon
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Wanke
authors.forename: Gleb
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Bezgin
authors.forename: Rolf
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kötter
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 1991 Jan-Feb;1(1):1-47
references.pmid: 1822724
references.citation: Science. 1996 Feb 9;271(5250):776-7
references.pmid: 8628990
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 15;47(2):611-7
references.pmid: 19398021
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 May 1;20(9):3263-81
references.pmid: 10777791
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1985 Oct;5(10):2815-30
references.pmid: 3840201
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2004 Oct;10(5):476-82
references.pmid: 15359013
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2002 May;12(5):453-65
references.pmid: 11950763