title: Effects of altitude on exercise level and heart rate in patients with coronary artery disease and healthy controls.
abstract: Background. To evaluate the safety and effects of high altitude on exercise level and heart rate in patients with coronary artery disease compared with healthy controls.Methods. Eight patients with a history of an acute myocardial infarction (ejection fraction >5%) with a low-risk score were compared with seven healthy subjects during the Dutch Heart Expedition at the Aconcagua in Argentina in March 2007. All subjects underwent a maximum exercise test with a cycle ergometer at sea level and base camp, after ten days of acclimatisation, at an altitude of 4200 m. Exercise capacity and maximum heart rate were compared between groups and within subjects.Results. There was a significant decrease in maximum heart rate at high altitude compared with sea level in both the patient and the control group (166 vs. 139 beats/min, p<0.001 and 181 vs. 150 beats/min, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the decrease of the exercise level and maximum heart rate between patients and healthy controls (-31 vs. -30%, p=0.673).Conclusion. Both patients and healthy controls showed a similar decrease in exercise capacity and maximum heart rate at 4200 m compared with sea level, suggesting that patients with a history of coronary artery disease may tolerate stay and exercise at high altitude similarly to healthy controls. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:118-21.).
authors.affiliation: Department of Sports Medicine, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
authors.forename: S T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: de Vries
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Komdeur
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Aalbersberg
authors.forename: G C
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: van Enst
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Breeman
authors.forename: A W J
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: van 't Hof
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 20;345(12):892-902
references.pmid: 11565523
references.citation: Circulation. 2004 Jun 8;109(22):2737-43
references.pmid: 15159293
references.citation: J Physiol. 2002 Dec 1;545(2):715-28
references.pmid: 12456846
references.citation: Circulation. 1995 Feb 1;91(3):912-21
references.pmid: 7828326
references.citation: Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Sep 30;158(2-3):204-11
references.pmid: 17597013
references.citation: Heart. 2006 Jul;92(7):921-5
references.pmid: 16339809
references.citation: Sports Med. 1999 May;27(5):285-312
references.pmid: 10368877
references.citation: Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997 Jun;68(6):488-93
references.pmid: 9184735
references.citation: Neth Heart J. 2010 Mar;18(3):118-21
references.pmid: 20390061
references.citation: Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):215-7
references.pmid: 23851406
references.citation: Circulation. 2001 Oct 9;104(15):1785-91
references.pmid: 11591615
references.citation: Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006 Aug;13(4):617-24
references.pmid: 16874154
references.citation: High Alt Med Biol. 2001 Fall;2(3):369-76
references.pmid: 11682016
references.citation: Am J Cardiol. 1998 Feb 1;81(3):266-70
references.pmid: 9468065
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 Sep;204(Pt 18):3121-7
references.pmid: 11581325
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 1;143(9):659-72
references.pmid: 16263889
references.citation: Wilderness Environ Med. 2008 Fall;19(3):151-6
references.pmid: 18715126
references.citation: Circulation. 2003 Sep 9;108(10):1202-7
references.pmid: 12939217
references.citation: Am J Med. 2000 Oct 15;109(6):450-5
references.pmid: 11042233
references.citation: J Appl Physiol. 1974 Mar;36(3):362-5
references.pmid: 4814308
references.citation: Respir Physiol. 2000 Mar;120(1):1-11
references.pmid: 10786640