Differences in spawning date between populations of common frog reveal local adaptation.
Phenotypic differences between populations often correlate with climate variables, resulting from a combination of environment-induced plasticity and local adaptation. Species comprising populations that are genetically adapted to local climatic conditions should be more vulnerable to climate change than those comprising phenotypically plastic populations. Assessment of local adaptation generally requires logistically challenging experiments. Here, using a unique approach and a large dataset (>50,000 observations from across Britain), we compare the covariation in temperature and first spawning dates of the common frog (Rana temporaria) across space with that across time. We show that although all populations exhibit a plastic response to temperature, spawning earlier in warmer years, between-population differences in first spawning dates are dominated by local adaptation. Given climate change projections for Britain in 2050-2070, we project that for populations to remain as locally adapted as contemporary populations will require first spawning date to advance by approximately 21-39 days but that plasticity alone will only enable an advance of approximately 5-9 days. Populations may thus face a microevolutionary and gene flow challenge to advance first spawning date by a further approximately 16-30 days over the next 50 years.
Phillimore
Albert B
AB
Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Population Biology, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom. albert.phillimore@imperial.ac.uk
Hadfield
Jarrod D
JD
Jones
Owen R
OR
Smithers
Richard J
RJ
D000220:Adaptation, Biological; D000818:Animals; D057231:Climate Change; D005260:Female; D010063:Ovum / Q000502:physiology; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011896:Rana temporaria / Q000502:physiology*; D013696:Temperature
Science. 2001 Apr 27;292(5517):673-9
11326089
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Aug 22;273(1597):2009-16
16846907
Heredity (Edinb). 1997 Aug;79 ( Pt 2):117-27
9279008
Evolution. 2009 Aug;63(8):1954-63
19473402
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2561-9
16321776
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Jun;10(6):248-52
21237029
Monogr Popul Biol. 1977;10:1-246
409931
J Evol Biol. 2003 Sep;16(5):996-1005
14635915
Mol Ecol. 2003 Jul;12(7):1963-78
12803645
Genetics. 1993 Oct;135(2):367-74
8244001
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1783-6
15486254
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 6;105(18):6668-72
18458348
Evolution. 1977 Jun;31(2):442-444
28563226
Mol Ecol. 2008 Apr;17(8):1885-96
18363667
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 22;272(1577):2105-15
16191623
J Evol Biol. 2006 Nov;19(6):1803-12
17040377
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 7;276(1670):3167-74
19520804
Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95
11919621
Nature. 2000 Apr 13;404(6779):752-5
10783886
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):167-78
18173499
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Mar 22;275(1635):649-59
18211875
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Mar;22(3):140-7
17113679
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2007 Aug 15;365(1857):1993-2028
17569653
Evolution. 1988 Sep;42(5):1085-1089
28581161