Estimation of percentage body fat by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: evaluation by in vivo human elemental composition.
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely applied for estimating body fat. The percentage of body mass as fat (%fat) is predicted from a DXA-estimated R(ST) value defined as the ratio of soft tissue attenuation at two photon energies (e.g., 40 keV and 70 keV). Theoretically, the R(ST) concept depends on the mass of each major element in the human body. The DXA R(ST) values, however, have never been fully evaluated by measured human elemental composition. The present investigation evaluated the DXA R(ST) value by the total body mass of 11 major elements and the DXA %fat by the five-component (5C) model, respectively. Six elements (i.e. C, N, Na, P, Cl and Ca) were measured by in vivo neutron activation analysis, and potassium (i.e. K) by whole-body (40)K counting in 27 healthy adults. Models were developed for predicting the total body mass of four additional elements (i.e. H, O, Mg and S). The elemental content of soft tissue, after correction for bone mineral elements, was used to predict the R(ST) values. The DXA R(ST) values were strongly associated with the R(ST) values predicted from elemental content (r = 0.976, P < 0.001), although there was a tendency for the elemental-predicted R(ST) to systematically exceed the DXA-measured R(ST) (mean +/- SD, 1.389 +/- 0.024 versus 1.341 +/- 0.024). DXA-estimated %fat was strongly associated with 5C %fat (24.4 +/- 12.0% versus 24.9 +/- 11.1%, r = 0.983, P < 0.001). DXA R(ST) is evaluated by in vivo elemental composition, and the present study supports the underlying physical concept and accuracy of the DXA method for estimating %fat.
Wang
ZiMian
Z
Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. zw28@columbia.edu
Heymsfield
Steven B
SB
Chen
Zhao
Z
Zhu
Shankuan
S
Pierson
Richard N
RN
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon / Q000379:methods*; D050154:Adiposity; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D055815:Young Adult
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
2868172
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Dec;89(6):2365-72
11090591
Radiat Res. 1980 Nov;84(2):239-52
7443984
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Feb;94(2):499-506
12531910
Am J Clin Nutr. 1989 Jun;49(6):1283-9
2729167
Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Jul;56(1):19-28
1609756
Basic Life Sci. 1990;55:309-15
2088285
J Chronic Dis. 1982;35(6):419-28
7076785
Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Apr;55(4):764-70
1550056
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 May;83(5):1047-54
16685045
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):1285-90
15121943
J Bone Miner Res. 1991 Apr;6(4):411-5
1858524
Am J Physiol. 1974 Jan;226(1):206-12
4809882
Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jun;51(6):1106-12
2349926
Ann ICRP. 1995;25(2):1-80
8659813
Ann ICRP. 2002;32(3-4):5-265
14506981
Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Jun;53(6):1339-44
2035460
Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):254-63
18566177
Am J Physiol. 1991 Aug;261(2 Pt 1):E190-8
1872381
Am J Physiol. 1996 Dec;271(6 Pt 1):E941-51
8997211
Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Sep;72(3):694-701
10966886
J Appl Physiol. 1969 Jul;27(1):96-100
5786976
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Nov;76(5):968-74
12399267
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1975 Mar;123(3):631-7
164784
Basic Life Sci. 1993;60:345-50
8110147
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Aug;89(2):613-20
10926645