Managing health(-care systems) using information health technologies.
This study aims to compare and contrast how specific information health technologies (IHTs) have been debated, how they have proliferated, and what they have enabled in Germany’s and England’s healthcare systems. For this a discourse analysis was undertaken that specifically focussed on future-scenarios articulated in policy documents and strategy papers released by relevant actors from both healthcare systems. The study reveals that the way IHTs have been debated and how they have proliferated depends on country-specific regulatory structures, their respective values, actors’ and institutions’ organized interests, and the status of health professionals. These conditions have enabled IHTs to promote a new and similar concept of patienthood in both countries, although they tend to affect practitioners’ practices more dramatically in England. The conclusion is drawn that with the usage of IHTs, healthcare systems reproduced existing patterns of health provision while also enabling a sort of convergence. Future research should investigate whether the new concept of patienthood emerging in both welfare states actually suits patients and professionals needs and requirements.
Mathar
Thomas
T
Institut für Europäische Ethnologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mohrenstrasse, Berlin, Germany. thomas.mathar@staff.hu-berlin.de
D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D004739:England; D005858:Germany; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D008490:Medical Informatics; D036301:Qualitative Research; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D013222:State Medicine
Sociol Health Illn. 2003 Jul;25(5):408-28
14498918
Int J Integr Care. 2007 Jun 25;7:e25
17637871
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Aug;57(4):697-710
12821017
Chronic Illn. 2005 Mar;1(1):15-20
17136927
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2005 Sep;16(3):176-82
16177944
Health Informatics J. 2007 Mar;13(1):57-69
17296619
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 Mar 2;132(9):458-60
17315125
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Aug;55(4):593-608
12188466
J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(1):22-6
18318925
J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(1):17-21
18318924
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Jul;26(5):617-44
15283780
JAMA. 2001 Sep 19;286(11):1349-55
11560540
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 Jan;58(1):S2-10
12496303
Chronic Illn. 2008 Jun;4(2):110-7
18583448
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2003 Dec;97(10):689-94
14997586
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jun;62(11):2613-20
16386345
J R Soc Promot Health. 2001 Sep;121(3):141
11688293
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1485-94
15893864
Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Jan;16(1):86-95
18181818
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 07;6:86
16827928
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Oct;133(40):2039-44
18819052
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Sep 19;7:148
17880693
Milbank Q. 1988;66(4):640-60
3151121
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jun;62(11):2633-45
16387399