title: Effects of West Nile virus dose and extrinsic incubation temperature on temporal progression of vector competence in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus.
abstract: Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus were fed blood containing either 7.0 +/- 0.1 logs plaque-forming units (pfu)/ml (high dose) or 5.9 +/- 0.1 logs pfu/ml (low dose) of West Nile virus and held at extrinsic incubation temperatures (EIT) of 28 degrees C or 25 degrees C. Approximately 20 mosquitoes per dose were collected after incubation periods (IP) of 4, 6, 8, and 12 days postinfection (dpi). Infection rates were influenced by EIT and virus dose but not by IP. Body titer was significantly higher for mosquitoes fed the high dose and held at 28 degrees C at the later IPs (6, 8, and 12 dpi). However, leg titer was significantly higher for mosquitoes at the later IPs but did not differ between EITs or doses. Because infection rates varied with EIT and dose, there is likely a midgut infection barrier influenced by these factors that is not influenced by IP. Dissemination rates were influenced by all 3 factors consistent with the presence of a midgut escape barrier. Dissemination rate, body titer, and leg titer were dependent on IP, indicating the need to investigate multiple time points in vector competence studies to elucidate critical events in infection and dissemination.
authors.affiliation: University of Florida, Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory-IFAS, 200 9th Street Southeast, Vero Beach, FL 32962, USA.
authors.forename: Sheri L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.forename: Stephanie L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Richards
authors.forename: Walter J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Tabachnick
authors.forename: Chelsea T
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Smartt
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003465:Culex / Q000821:virology*; D007303:Insect Vectors / Q000821:virology*; D013696:Temperature; D013997:Time Factors; D014902:West Nile virus
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2006 Mar;43(2):309-17
references.pmid: 16619616
references.citation: Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Nov-Dec;7(6):1018-22
references.pmid: 11747732
references.citation: Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2005 Spring;5(1):82-9
references.pmid: 15815153
references.citation: Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2004 Summer;4(2):109-22
references.pmid: 15228811
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(11):4066-71
references.pmid: 11060069
references.citation: PLoS Pathog. 2008 Jun 27;4(6):e1000092
references.pmid: 18584026
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2002 Jan;39(1):221-5
references.pmid: 11931261
references.citation: Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Dec;8(12):1385-91
references.pmid: 12498652
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Aug;81(2):264-72
references.pmid: 19635881
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 1983;28:229-62
references.pmid: 6131642
references.citation: Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Mar;9(3):311-22
references.pmid: 12643825
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983 Sep;32(5):1130-9
references.pmid: 6625067
references.citation: J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005 Dec;21(4 Suppl):17-22
references.pmid: 16921679
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2003 May;40(3):253-8
references.pmid: 12943101
references.citation: Virology. 2005 Nov 25;342(2):252-65
references.pmid: 16137736
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Aug;77(2):365-70
references.pmid: 17690414
references.citation: Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007 Winter;7(4):629-36
references.pmid: 18021028