Chiropractic management of patients post-disc arthroplasty: eight case reports.
BACKGROUND
When conservative therapies for low back pain (LBP) are not effective, elective surgery may be proposed to these patients. Over the last 20 years, a new technology, disc replacement, has become increasingly popular because it is believed to maintain or restore the integrity of spinal movement and minimize the side-effects compared to fusion. Although disc replacement may relieve a patient from pain and related disability, soreness and stiffness of the lumbopelvic region seem to be common aftermaths of the surgery. This prospective case series was undertaken to identify and describe potential adverse events of lumbar spinal manipulation, a common therapy for low back pain, in a group of patients with symptoms after disc prostheses.


METHODS
Eight patients who underwent lumbar spine total disc replacement were referred by an orthopaedic surgeon for chiropractic treatments. These patients had 1 or 2 total lumbar disc replacements and were considered stable according to the surgical protocol but presented persistent, post-surgical, non-specific LBP or pelvic pain. They were treated with lumbar spine side posture manipulations only and received 8 to 10 chiropractic treatments based on the clinical evolution and the chiropractor's judgment. Outcome measures included benign, self-limiting, and serious adverse events after low back spinal manipulative therapy. The Oswestry Disability Index, a pain scale and the fear avoidance belief questionnaire were administered to respectively assess disability, pain and fear avoidance belief about work and physical activity. This prospective case series comprised 8 patients who all had at least 1 total disc replacement at the L4/L5 or L5/S1 level and described persistent post-surgical LBP interfering with their daily activities. Commonly-reported side-effects of a benign nature included increased pain and/or stiffness of short duration in nearly half of the chiropractic treatment period. No major or irreversible complication was noted.


CONCLUSIONS
During the short treatment period, no major complication was encountered by the patients. Moreover, the benign side-effects reported after lumbar spine manipulation were similar in nature and duration to those frequently experienced by the general population.
O'Shaughnessy
Julie
J
Département de chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
Drolet
Marc
M
Roy
Jean-François
JF
Descarreaux
Martin
M
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;5(11):1086-90
9835471
Pain Physician. 2000 Apr;3(2):167-92
16906196
J Biomech. 2006;39(4):766-75
16439247
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):195S-201S
15541667
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):350-9
18790677
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Feb 19;9:22
18284680
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(9):659-74
19028250
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 15;19(10):1117-23; discussion 1123-4
8059266
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Feb;4(2):91-7
16506474
Eur Spine J. 2006 Feb;15(2):174-82
16151716
Eur Spine J. 2003 Feb;12(1):12-20
12592542
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2834-40
9431619
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 1;29(17):1938-44
15534420
Pain. 2000 Apr;85(3):317-332
10781906
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Feb 1;20(3):312-7
7732467
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Mar-Apr;27(3):197-210
15129202
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):360-5
18809357
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jul-Aug;31(6):461-4
18722202
Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):277-299
1235985
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Sep 1;23(17):1923
9762752
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002 Jun;12(3):219-34
12086817
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 1;33(15):1701-7
18594464
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):219S-230S
15541670
Spine J. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):574-83
15363431
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 1;27(1):92-8
11805644
Eur Spine J. 2008 Jan;17(1):44-56
17972116
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15;29(8):908-13
15082995
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-91
17909209
Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):213-25
18164469
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Feb;4(2):85-90
16506473
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 1;26(23):2521-32; discussion 2532-4
11725230
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163
17495770
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 1;33(23):2566-9
18941428
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):505-14
17909211
Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2008 Jun;51(5):379-85
18501463
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504
17909210
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 15;33(2):123-31
18197095
Spine J. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):95-103
15653090
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 1;32(5):527-36
17334286
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):E405-13
19444054
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91
16025024
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Feb 1;27(3):291-6; discussion 297-8
11805694