The SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist optimizes timing of antibiotic prophylaxis.
BACKGROUND
Surgical site infection (SSI) is an adverse event in which a close relation between process of care and outcome has been demonstrated: administration of antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the risk of SSI. In our tertiary referral centre, a SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist was developed and implemented. This multidisciplinary checklist covers the entire surgical pathway and includes, among other items, administration of antibiotic prophylaxis before induction of anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of SURPASS implementation on timing of antibiotic prophylaxis.


METHODS
A retrospective analysis was performed on two cohorts of patients: one cohort of surgical patients that underwent surgery before implementation of the checklist and a comparable cohort after implementation. The interval between administration of antibiotic prophylaxis and incision was compared between the two cohorts.


RESULTS
A total of 772 surgical procedures were included. More than half of procedures were gastro-intestinal; others were vascular, trauma and hernia repair procedures. After implementation, the checklist was used in 81.4% of procedures. The interval between administration of antibiotic prophylaxis and incision increased from 23.9 minutes before implementation of SURPASS to 29.9 minutes after implementation (p = 0.047). In procedures where the checklist was used, the interval increased to 32.9 minutes (p = 0.004). The proportion of patients that did not receive antibiotics until after the incision decreased significantly.


CONCLUSIONS
The use of the SURPASS checklist leads to better compliance with regard to the timing of antibiotic prophylaxis administration.
de Vries
Eefje N
EN
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.a.boermeester@amc.uva.nl.
Dijkstra
Lucia
L
Smorenburg
Susanne M
SM
Meijer
R Peter
RP
Boermeester
Marja A
MA
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):491-9
19144931
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Feb;15(1):32-8
16456207
Am J Surg. 1996 Jun;171(6):548-52
8678197
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;27(8):835-40
16874644
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):651-6
12584377
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Sep;169(3):219-22
2672385
J Hosp Infect. 2001 Aug;48(4):267-74
11461127
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Sep 1;33 Suppl 2:S69-77
11486302
Ann Surg. 1979 Jun;189(6):691-9
378140
Ann Surg. 2008 Jun;247(6):918-26
18520217
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Apr;18(2):121-6
19342526
Br J Surg. 1998 Sep;85(9):1232-41
9752867
Arch Surg. 1993 Jan;128(1):79-88
8418785
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90(2):226-32
18245579
Arch Surg. 1985 Jul;120(7):829-32
3160322
Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):9-15
15972163
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96
10196487
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD001181
19160191
Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Feb;9(2):196-203
12603990
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 May;206(5):814-9; discussion 819-21
18471703
Surgery. 1961 Jul;50:161-8
16722001
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001;(43):i-x, 1-668
11510252
Arch Surg. 2005 Feb;140(2):174-82
15724000
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Mar;168(3):283-9
2645669
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997 May;18(5):310-5
9154472
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 30;326(5):281-6
1728731
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Nov;20(11):725-30
10580621
Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):10-6
19561486
AORN J. 2007 Jan;85(1):173-80
17223406
Ann Surg. 1976 Oct;184(4):443-52
827989
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 1;44(7):921-7
17342642
Am J Surg. 2005 Apr;189(4):395-404
15820449
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Jun;63(2):140-7
16621135