title: MR imaging of knee osteoarthritis and correlation of findings with reported patient pain.
abstract: To evaluate lesion detection of MRI in knee joint osteoarthritis in patients with symptoms of pain, the correlation between MRI findings and varying degrees of reported pain was assessed. Twenty-eight patients (31 knees) with osteoarthritis were recruited for this study. The degree of knee pain was assessed by VRS scores. The knees were evaluated by plain film radiograph utilizing Kellgren-Lawrence scores. Multiple MR sequences were performed on a 1.5T MR-system, including sagittal and coronal dual fast spin echo (TR/TE 3660/11/120 ms, slice thickness 5 mm), coronal spin echo T1-weighted (TR/TE 360/9 ms, slice thickness 5 mm), sagittal fat saturated 3D-spoiled gradient-recalled echo (TR/TE 50/6 ms; slice thickness 1.5 mm; flip angle 40 degrees ), and 3D steady-state free precession (TR/TE 6/2.2 ms; slice thickness 1.6 mm; flip angle 30 degrees ) pulse sequences for the purpose of detecting abnormities of cartilage, menisci, the anterior cruciate ligaments, bone marrow edema-like lesions, osteophytes, synovitis, and joint effusions. MR findings were compared with the degree of pain using Fisher exact test with P values less than 0.05 indicating a statistically significant difference. The results showed that, of the 31 knees evaluated, mild pain was reported in 11 and severe pain in the remainder. Kellgren-Lawrence scores of all 31 evaluated OA knees were as follows: grade 1 lesions (n=6), grade 2 lesions (n=14), grade 3 lesions (n=8), and grade 4 lesions (n=3). Articular cartilaginous defects were found in 37.1% of knees. Abnormalities of the menisci and anterior cruciate ligaments, bone marrow edema-like lesions, osteophytes, synovitis, and joint effusions were detected in 32.3%, 38.7%, 45.2%, 100%, 15.1% and 67.7% of knees, respectively. Of these variables, only the differences in prevalence of joint effusions were significantly different in the mild and severe pain groups (P=0.004). It is concluded that MRI evaluates the entire joint structure of the osteoarthritic knee, demonstrating abnormalities of the cartilage, menisci, and anterior cruciate ligaments as well as bone marrow edema-like lesions, osteophytes, synovitis, and joint effusions. The difference in pain grading between OA patients reporting mild and severe degrees of pain is related to the presence of joint effusion.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. aifei1021@163.com
authors.forename: Fei
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Ai
authors.forename: Cheng
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.forename: Wei
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: John N
authors.initials: JN
authors.lastname: Morelli
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kacher
authors.forename: Xiaoming
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000473:pathology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology*; D010146:Pain / Q000473:pathology*; D010147:Pain Measurement
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Sep;56(9):2986-92
references.pmid: 17763427
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Apr;160(4):823-6
references.pmid: 8456672
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1994 Mar;84(3):351-8
references.pmid: 8129049
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):998-1007
references.pmid: 16251398
references.citation: Am J Sports Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;17(4):505-13
references.pmid: 2675649
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2007 Dec;17(12):3073-8
references.pmid: 17823802
references.citation: Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2008 Aug;34(3):689-712
references.pmid: 18687278
references.citation: Radiology. 1990 Mar;174(3 Pt 1):841-6
references.pmid: 2305068
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 17;133(8):635-46
references.pmid: 11033593
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Feb;176(2):359-64
references.pmid: 11159074
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 May;170(5):1215-9
references.pmid: 9574587
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 6;331(14):889-95
references.pmid: 8078550
references.citation: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Oct 29;10:133
references.pmid: 19874594
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):811-7
references.pmid: 16714463
references.citation: Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):373-81
references.pmid: 12563128
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Aug;(401):170-84
references.pmid: 12151894
references.citation: Radiology. 1988 Jun;167(3):757-60
references.pmid: 3363136
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jan;44(1):100-4
references.pmid: 15381791
references.citation: Radiology. 2000 Jun;215(3):835-40
references.pmid: 10831707
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Mar;52(3):794-9
references.pmid: 15751064
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 23;354(8):795-808
references.pmid: 16495392