title: Gate-keeper to coronary angiography: comparison of exercise testing, myocardial perfusion SPECT and individually tailored approach for risk stratification.
abstract: We aimed to evaluate the differences between exercise testing (ET), myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) and a combination of ET and MPS based risk assessment as outlined by the guidelines with respect to their "gate-keeper" role to coronary angiography (cath) and the associated diagnostic procedural costs if prognostic considerations, as those proposed by the current guidelines and the recent literature, were taken into account. The Duke-score and the summed difference score (SDS; extent of ischemia) were assessed in 955 consecutive patients referred for MPS combined with ET. According to the guidelines and the available literature, three different algorithms for risk stratification were retrospectively applied: (1) ET based risk stratification and cath if intermediate or high risk Duke-score; (2) MPS based risk stratification and cath if SDS ≥ 8; (3) combined approach with ET as first step and MPS in case of intermediate risk Duke-score. A cath would have been suggested in every patient with either high risk Duke-score or SDS ≥ 8 in patients with intermediate risk Duke-score. The referral rate to cath was 27% according to the ET alone, 13% using MPS, and finally 12% applying the combined risk stratification. The cost of the diagnostic work-up including cath were: 615€, 1,299€, and 598€ per patient, respectively. The coronary angiography referral rate widely depends on the diagnostic modality used for risk stratification and according to the referral criteria provided by the guidelines. In the present study, the use of a stress imaging modality (MPS) and published prognostic data was associated with a lower referral rate to cath as compared to exercise testing alone and thus underlines the advantage of a risk based approach applying stress imaging in patients with intermediate risk Duke-score.
authors.affiliation: Cardiology Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Muzzarelli
authors.forename: Matthias Emil
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Pfisterer
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Müller-Brand
authors.forename: Michael Johannes
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Zellweger
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000465:Algorithms; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D017023:Coronary Angiography / Q000191:economics; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D005080:Exercise Test / Q000191:economics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D055414:Myocardial Perfusion Imaging / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000191:economics; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D013557:Switzerland; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon / Q000191:economics
references.citation: Circulation. 2004 Mar 23;109(11):1371-8
references.pmid: 15007010
references.citation: Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):763-72
references.pmid: 20189028
references.citation: Circulation. 2005 Apr 12;111(14):1771-6
references.pmid: 15809375
references.citation: Circulation. 2002 Feb 19;105(7):823-9
references.pmid: 11854122
references.citation: Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2900-7
references.pmid: 12771008
references.citation: Circulation. 1998 Feb 17;97(6):535-43
references.pmid: 9494023
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2008 Apr;49(4):550-6
references.pmid: 18344439
references.citation: Circulation. 2003 Jan 7;107(1):149-58
references.pmid: 12515758
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Oct;26(4):879-86
references.pmid: 7560612
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 14;359(7):677-87
references.pmid: 18703470
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Dec;26(7):1600-5
references.pmid: 7594092
references.citation: Eur Heart J. 2004 Apr;25(7):543-50
references.pmid: 15120050
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jan;37(1):144-52
references.pmid: 11153729
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):193-200
references.pmid: 19156480
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jun;33(7):2092-197
references.pmid: 10362225
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2503-15
references.pmid: 19502645
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 8;341(2):70-6
references.pmid: 10395630
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Nov 1;22(5):1455-64
references.pmid: 8227805
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1503-16
references.pmid: 17387127
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Sep;26(3):639-47
references.pmid: 7642853
references.citation: Circulation. 2008 Mar 11;117(10):1283-91
references.pmid: 18268144
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):655-61
references.pmid: 16344227
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 1;42(7):1161-70
references.pmid: 14522473
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 16;40(8):1531-40
references.pmid: 12392846
references.citation: Circulation. 2006 Nov 7;114(19):2070-82
references.pmid: 17088475
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1987 Jun;106(6):793-800
references.pmid: 3579066