title: Social context influences recognition of bodily expressions.
abstract: Previous studies have shown that recognition of facial expressions is influenced by the affective information provided by the surrounding scene. The goal of this study was to investigate whether similar effects could be obtained for bodily expressions. Images of emotional body postures were briefly presented as part of social scenes showing either neutral or emotional group actions. In Experiment 1, fearful and happy bodies were presented in fearful, happy, neutral and scrambled contexts. In Experiment 2, we compared happy with angry body expressions. In Experiment 3 and 4, we blurred the facial expressions of all people in the scene. This way, we were able to ascribe possible scene effects to the presence of body expressions visible in the scene and we were able to measure the contribution of facial expressions to the body expression recognition. In all experiments, we observed an effect of social scene context. Bodily expressions were better recognized when the actions in the scenes expressed an emotion congruent with the bodily expression of the target figure. The specific influence of facial expressions in the scene was dependent on the emotional expression but did not necessarily increase the congruency effect. Taken together, the results show that the social context influences our recognition of a person's bodily expression.
authors.affiliation: Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Tilburg, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Mariska Esther
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Kret
authors.forename: Beatrice
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: de Gelder
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D004644:Emotions; D005149:Facial Expression; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009633:Nonverbal Communication; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011581:Psychological Tests; D011930:Reaction Time; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012938:Social Perception; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Sep;8(3):264-72
references.pmid: 18814463
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 Oct 30;40(3):655-64
references.pmid: 14642287
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(3-4):199-212
references.pmid: 18979376
references.citation: J Vis. 2005 Mar 18;5(3):215-29
references.pmid: 15929647
references.citation: Perception. 2005;34(10):1171-80
references.pmid: 16309112
references.citation: Perception. 1996;25(3):343-52
references.pmid: 8804097
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1974 Sep;103(3):597-600
references.pmid: 4448962
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Aug;11(8):327-32
references.pmid: 17625952
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):559-64
references.pmid: 15271002
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 23;101(47):16701-6
references.pmid: 15546983
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Apr;16(3):487-502
references.pmid: 15072683
references.citation: Emotion. 2007 Aug;7(3):487-94
references.pmid: 17683205
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):556-66
references.pmid: 2527962
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):449-54
references.pmid: 16407167
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 26;2:3
references.pmid: 21713131
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 May;18(3):531-43
references.pmid: 1534354
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):123-44
references.pmid: 12668221
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22;14(12):1084-9
references.pmid: 15203001
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1975 Sep;3(5):519-26
references.pmid: 24203874
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 Oct 31;8(13):11.1-18
references.pmid: 19146341
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Dec;127(4):398-415
references.pmid: 9857494
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2008 Sep;46(11):2615-21
references.pmid: 18541279
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):205-18
references.pmid: 8636880
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 1;24(3):771-9
references.pmid: 15652312
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):959-67
references.pmid: 17270466
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Mar;34(4):513-27
references.pmid: 19857515
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1997 Oct;34(1):72-107
references.pmid: 9325010
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2006 Sep;16(9):1249-57
references.pmid: 16306325
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1982 Apr;14(2):143-77
references.pmid: 7083801
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29
references.pmid: 15263892
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2000 Sep;41(2):176-210
references.pmid: 10968925
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 8;102(45):16518-23
references.pmid: 16260734
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;19(7):724-32
references.pmid: 18727789
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(26):3286-97
references.pmid: 17967472
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Aug;19(4):899-911
references.pmid: 8409865
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):175-8
references.pmid: 11347862
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008 Sep;3(3):270-8
references.pmid: 19015119