title: Bias versus bias: harnessing hindsight to reveal paranormal belief change beyond demand characteristics.
abstract: Psychological change is difficult to assess, in part because self-reported beliefs and attitudes may be biased or distorted. The present study probed belief change, in an educational context, by using the hindsight bias to counter another bias that generally plagues assessment of subjective change. Although research has indicated that skepticism courses reduce paranormal beliefs, those findings may reflect demand characteristics (biases toward desired, skeptical responses). Our hindsight-bias procedure circumvented demand by asking students, following semester-long skepticism (and control) courses, to recall their precourse levels of paranormal belief. People typically remember themselves as previously thinking, believing, and acting as they do now, so current skepticism should provoke false recollections of previous skepticism. Given true belief change, therefore, skepticism students should have remembered themselves as having been more skeptical than they were. They did, at least about paranormal topics that were covered most extensively in the course. Our findings thus show hindsight to be useful in evaluating cognitive change beyond demand characteristics.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina 27412, USA. mjkane@uncg.edu
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Kane
authors.forename: Tammy J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Core
authors.forename: R Reed
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Hunt
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D003071:Cognition; D003469:Culture; D004522:Educational Status; D006801:Humans; D010268:Parapsychology; D011287:Prejudice
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2008 Jul;72(4):362-75
references.pmid: 17676336
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Oct;51(4):858-66
references.pmid: 3783430
references.citation: Memory. 2006 Apr;14(3):297-306
references.pmid: 16574586
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1994 Jul;116(1):117-42
references.pmid: 8078969
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):304-11; discussion 311-2
references.pmid: 12897366
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1967 Nov;68(5):304-5
references.pmid: 6062585
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Mar;52(3):611-9
references.pmid: 3572729
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970 Jan;14(1):23-31
references.pmid: 5435536
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2003 Dec;18(4):639-57
references.pmid: 14692854
references.citation: Pain. 1982 Jul;13(3):281-285
references.pmid: 7122113