Protrusion and actin assembly are coupled to the organization of lamellar contractile structures.
Directed cell migration requires continuous cycles of protrusion of the leading edge and contraction to pull up the cell rear. How these spatially distributed processes are coordinated to maintain a state of persistent protrusion remains unknown. During wound healing responses of epithelial sheets, cells along the wound edge display two distinct morphologies: 'leader cells' exhibit persistent edge protrusions, while the greater majority of 'follower cells' randomly cycle between protrusion and retraction. Here, we exploit the heterogeneity in cell morphodynamic behaviors to deduce the requirements in terms of cytoskeleton dynamics for persistent and sporadic protrusion events. We used quantitative Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy (qFSM) to compare rates of F-actin assembly and flow relative to the local protrusion and retraction dynamics of the leading edge. Persistently protruding cells are characterized by contractile actomyosin structures that align with the direction of migration, with converging F-actin flows interpenetrating over a wide band in the lamella. Conversely, non-persistent protruders have their actomyosin structures aligned perpendicular to the axis of migration, and are characterized by prominent F-actin retrograde flows that end into transverse arcs. Analysis of F-actin kinetics in the lamellipodia showed that leader cells have three-fold higher assembly rates when compared to followers. To further investigate a putative relationship between actomyosin contraction and F-actin assembly, myosin II was inhibited by blebbistatin. Treated cells at the wound edge adopted a homogeneously persistent protrusion behavior, with rates matching those of leader cells. Surprisingly, we found that disintegration of actomyosin structures led to a significant decrease in F-actin assembly. Our data suggests that persistent protrusion in these cells is achieved by a reduction in overall F-actin retrograde flow, with lower assembly rates now sufficient to propel forward the leading edge. Based on our data we propose that differences in the protrusion persistence of leaders and followers originate in the distinct actomyosin contraction modules that differentially regulate leading edge protrusion-promoting F-actin assembly, and retraction-promoting retrograde flow.
Lim
James I
JI
Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Sabouri-Ghomi
Mohsen
M
Machacek
Matthias
M
Waterman
Clare M
CM
Danuser
Gaudenz
G
D008841:Actin Cytoskeleton / Q000378:metabolism; D000199:Actins / Q000502:physiology*; D000205:Actomyosin / Q000378:metabolism; D000818:Animals; D002465:Cell Movement; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D003599:Cytoskeleton / Q000378:metabolism*; D004848:Epithelium / Q000378:metabolism / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D007700:Kinetics; D008856:Microscopy, Fluorescence; D011554:Pseudopodia / Q000378:metabolism*
D000199:Actins; D000205:Actomyosin
J Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;133(6):1403-15
8682874
J Vis Exp. 2009 Aug 05;(30):
19684563
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2007;36:451-77
17477841
Cell. 2003 Feb 21;112(4):453-65
12600310
Neuron. 1988 Nov;1(9):761-72
3078414
Biophys J. 2005 Nov;89(5):3456-69
16100274
Cell. 2006 Jun 30;125(7):1361-74
16814721
Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Mar;9(3):299-309
17310241
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 30;102(35):12383-8
16113084
J Cell Biol. 2006 May 22;173(4):587-9
16717130
Exp Cell Res. 1970 Mar;59(3):393-8
4907703
J Cell Biol. 2005 Feb 14;168(4):619-31
15716379
J Cell Biol. 2008 Aug 25;182(4):631-9
18710922
Mol Biol Cell. 1993 Aug;4(8):819-36
8241568
Curr Biol. 1999 Jun 17;9(12):640-8
10375527
Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Oct;17(10):4435-45
16855019
Nat Cell Biol. 2001 May;3(5):466-72
11331874
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Apr;7(4):265-75
16607289
Curr Biol. 2002 Nov 19;12(22):1891-9
12445381
J Cell Biol. 2001 Jun 11;153(6):1175-86
11402062
J Cell Biol. 1981 Jul;90(1):187-200
7195906
Science. 2003 Mar 14;299(5613):1743-7
12637748
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):10788-93
12960404
Curr Biol. 1999 Jan 14;9(1):11-20
9889119
J Cell Biol. 1971 Jun;49(3):595-613
4933470
Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Dec;6(12):1755-68
8590803
Biophys J. 2000 Jul;79(1):191-201
10866947
J Cell Sci. 2005 Jan 1;118(Pt 1):51-63
15585576
Mol Biol Cell. 2005 Feb;16(2):507-18
15548591
Dev Cell. 2007 Nov;13(5):646-662
17981134
Cell. 1996 Feb 9;84(3):371-9
8608590
J Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;131(4):989-1002
7490299
Cell. 1992 Aug 7;70(3):401-10
1643658
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 29;101(26):9660-5
15210979
Science. 2004 Sep 17;305(5691):1782-6
15375270
J Cell Sci. 1978 Feb;29:197-212
564353
Nat Cell Biol. 1999 Aug;1(4):242-8
10559923
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Sep 16;1404(3):271-81
9739149
Cell. 1996 Feb 9;84(3):359-69
8608589
J Cell Biol. 2002 Jul 8;158(1):31-7
12105180
Cell. 2004 Feb 6;116(3):431-43
15016377
Cell. 2007 Feb 9;128(3):561-75
17289574
Nat Cell Biol. 2008 Dec;10(12):1393-400
19011623
J Cell Biol. 1999 Nov 29;147(5):1009-22
10579721
J Cell Biol. 1997 Mar 24;136(6):1287-305
9087444
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006;35:361-87
16689641
J Cell Biol. 2006 May 8;173(3):383-94
16651381
Trends Cell Biol. 2002 Mar;12(3):112-20
11859023
J Cell Biol. 2002 Jul 8;158(1):153-64
12105187
Science. 2007 Jan 5;315(5808):111-5
17204653
Biophys J. 2002 Sep;83(3):1380-94
12202364
J Cell Sci. 2004 Mar 15;117(Pt 8):1313-8
15020671
Biophys J. 2006 Feb 15;90(4):1439-52
16326902
J Biol Chem. 2006 Nov 24;281(47):35873-83
17020881
Neuron. 1996 Apr;16(4):769-82
8607995
Nature. 2009 Sep 3;461(7260):99-103
19693013
Biophys J. 2006 Nov 15;91(10):3907-20
16920834
J Cell Biol. 1985 Aug;101(2):597-602
4040521
Nat Cell Biol. 2008 Sep;10(9):1039-50
19160484
J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1505-16
3170637