Results of a multi-institutional benchmark test for cranial CT/MR image registration.
OBJECTIVE
Variability in computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MR) cranial image registration was assessed using a benchmark case developed by the Quality Assurance Review Center to credential institutions for participation in Children's Oncology Group Protocol ACNS0221 for treatment of pediatric low-grade glioma.


METHODS
Two DICOM image sets, an MR and a CT of the same patient, were provided to each institution. A small target in the posterior occipital lobe was readily visible on two slices of the MR scan and not visible on the CT scan. Each institution registered the two scans using whatever software system and method it ordinarily uses for such a case. The target volume was then contoured on the two MR slices, and the coordinates of the center of the corresponding target in the CT coordinate system were reported. The average of all submissions was used to determine the true center of the target.


RESULTS
Results are reported from 51 submissions representing 45 institutions and 11 software systems. The average error in the position of the center of the target was 1.8 mm (1 standard deviation = 2.2 mm). The least variation in position was in the lateral direction. Manual registration gave significantly better results than did automatic registration (p = 0.02).


CONCLUSIONS
When MR and CT scans of the head are registered with currently available software, there is inherent uncertainty of approximately 2 mm (1 standard deviation), which should be considered when defining planning target volumes and PRVs for organs at risk on registered image sets.
Ulin
Kenneth
K
Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI, USA.
Urie
Marcia M
MM
Cherlow
Joel M
JM
D019985:Benchmarking / Q000592:standards*; D001932:Brain Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D002648:Child; D005910:Glioma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D012984:Software; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Mar;52(1):74-83
17380097
Med Dosim. 2005 Spring;30(1):20-4
15749007
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004 Summer;5(3):66-79
15753941
J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101 Suppl 3:326-33
15537185
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Sep 1;51(1):255-60
11516875
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Mar 10;25(8):931-7
17350941
Med Phys. 2006 Dec;33(12):4557-66
17278807
Med Phys. 2007 Jul;34(7):2785-8
17821985
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004 Winter;5(1):25-35
15753931
Radiother Oncol. 2005 May;75(2):217-23
15885831