title: Carbon allocation in ectomycorrhizal plants at limited optimal N supply: an attempt aat unraveling conflicting theories.
abstract: With regard to mycorrhiza, conflicting theories try to explain how the balance between fungal demand for carbohydrates and the plant’s needs for nutrients varies, resulting in conflicting predictions. In order to evaluate current concepts, we investigated some metabolic parameters, which are indicative for plant carbon allocation in response to mycorrhization at limited and optimal N supply. Pinus pinaster seedlings were inoculated with living or dead (control) cultures of Pisolithus tinctorius, supplied with ammonium at 4 (limiting) or 7% d−1 (non-limiting) N relative addition rate (RARN), and followed development for 29 days. Mycorrhizal colonization of roots was quantified by the determination of ergosterol. A series of enzymes (sucrose and trehalose metabolism, anaplerosis) and metabolites (soluble carbohydrate, including trehalose; fructose 2,6 bisphosphate, free amino acids) relevant in the C/N exchange between symbionts, and in the carbon allocation and sink strength within the plant were assayed for 2-day-intervals for up to 14 days, and at 5-day-intervals for the rest of the experiment. The first 10 days reflected the establishment of mycorrhizal interaction, and the carbon allocation to the root was higher in M plants independent of N supply. Following this period, carbon allocation became N-related, higher at low, and lower at high N supply. The belowground C investment of M plants was dependent on N availability, but not on N gain. Finally, increased belowground C allocation was accompanied by a shift from plant to fungal metabolism.
authors.affiliation: Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Centro de Biologia Aplicada, Campo Grande C2. Piso 4, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal. ambcorrea@gmail.com
authors.forename: Ana
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Corrêa
authors.forename: Rüdiger
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hampp
authors.forename: Elisabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Magel
authors.forename: Maria-Amélia
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Martins-Loução
mesh_terms: D001487:Basidiomycota / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000378:metabolism*; D002244:Carbon / Q000378:metabolism*; D038821:Mycorrhizae / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000378:metabolism*; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000378:metabolism; D028223:Pinus / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000382:microbiology*; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000378:metabolism / Q000382:microbiology
chemical_list: D002244:Carbon; D009584:Nitrogen
references.citation: Tree Physiol. 1996 Sep;16(9):787-93
references.pmid: 14871686
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Feb;165(2):599-611
references.pmid: 15720670
references.citation: Tree Physiol. 2004 Dec;24(12):1369-76
references.pmid: 15465699
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Sep;50(2):197-211
references.pmid: 12175013
references.citation: Planta. 2006 Jun;224(1):83-95
references.pmid: 16425030
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1995 May;108(1):75-83
references.pmid: 7784526
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2002 Apr;12(2):83-8
references.pmid: 12035731
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1999 Feb;119(2):489-96
references.pmid: 9952444
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2007 Mar;17(2):75-91
references.pmid: 17216499
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004 Feb;17(2):202-15
references.pmid: 14964534
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Mar;87(3):563-9
references.pmid: 16602286
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2005 Jan;15(1):65-70
references.pmid: 15558328
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008;177(2):466-479
references.pmid: 18028302
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2008 Oct;18(8):413-427
references.pmid: 18719949
references.citation: Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
references.pmid: 942051
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 1999 Aug;4(8):315-319
references.pmid: 10431221
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Feb;165(2):613-22
references.pmid: 15720671
references.citation: Planta. 2007 Jan;225(2):331-40
references.pmid: 17016715
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 1991 Oct 21;291(2):269-72
references.pmid: 1834481
references.citation: Phytopathology. 1969 Apr;59(4):411-7
references.pmid: 5811914
references.citation: New Phytol. 2007;174(2):389-398
references.pmid: 17388901
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;172(1):3-6
references.pmid: 16945083
references.citation: Phytochemistry. 2007 Jan;68(1):82-91
references.pmid: 17078984
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1988 Feb;86(2):491-6
references.pmid: 16665934
references.citation: Phytochemistry. 2007 Jan;68(1):52-67
references.pmid: 17098265
references.citation: Tree Physiol. 1996 Nov-Dec;16(11_12):1003-1008
references.pmid: 14871794
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(15):4015-23
references.pmid: 17050639