title: The scaffold protein Ste5 directly controls a switch-like mating decision in yeast.
abstract: Evolution has resulted in numerous innovations that allow organisms to increase their fitness by choosing particular mating partners, including secondary sexual characteristics, behavioural patterns, chemical attractants and corresponding sensory mechanisms. The haploid yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae selects mating partners by interpreting the concentration gradient of pheromone secreted by potential mates through a network of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling proteins. The mating decision in yeast is an all-or-none, or switch-like, response that allows cells to filter weak pheromone signals, thus avoiding inappropriate commitment to mating by responding only at or above critical concentrations when a mate is sufficiently close. The molecular mechanisms that govern the switch-like mating decision are poorly understood. Here we show that the switching mechanism arises from competition between the MAPK Fus3 and a phosphatase Ptc1 for control of the phosphorylation state of four sites on the scaffold protein Ste5. This competition results in a switch-like dissociation of Fus3 from Ste5 that is necessary to generate the switch-like mating response. Thus, the decision to mate is made at an early stage in the pheromone pathway and occurs rapidly, perhaps to prevent the loss of the potential mate to competitors. We argue that the architecture of the Fus3-Ste5-Ptc1 circuit generates a novel ultrasensitivity mechanism, which is robust to variations in the concentrations of these proteins. This robustness helps assure that mating can occur despite stochastic or genetic variation between individuals. The role of Ste5 as a direct modulator of a cell-fate decision expands the functional repertoire of scaffold proteins beyond providing specificity and efficiency of information processing. Similar mechanisms may govern cellular decisions in higher organisms and be disrupted in cancer.
authors.affiliation: Département de Biochimie, Bio-Informatique et Génomique Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succursale centre-ville Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.
authors.forename: Mohan K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Malleshaiah
authors.forename: Vahid
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Shahrezaei
authors.forename: Peter S
authors.initials: PS
authors.lastname: Swain
authors.forename: Stephen W
authors.initials: SW
authors.lastname: Michnick
mesh_terms: D048868:Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D020928:Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases / Q000378:metabolism; D008954:Models, Biological; D009154:Mutation; D010766:Phosphorylation; D011485:Protein Binding; D054648:Protein Phosphatase 2 / Q000378:metabolism; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D029701:Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D048868:Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; C080321:STE5 protein, S cerevisiae; D029701:Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; C075580:FUS3 protein, S cerevisiae; D020928:Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; C087358:PTC1 protein, S cerevisiae; D054648:Protein Phosphatase 2
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 23;104(43):16916-21
references.pmid: 17942691
references.citation: Cell. 2009 Mar 20;136(6):1085-97
references.pmid: 19303851
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2008 Jun 6;30(5):649-56
references.pmid: 18538663
references.citation: Science. 1997 Dec 19;278(5346):2075-80
references.pmid: 9405336
references.citation: BMC Syst Biol. 2007 Aug 03;1:36
references.pmid: 17683566
references.citation: Science. 2006 Feb 10;311(5762):822-6
references.pmid: 16424299
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):6840-4
references.pmid: 6947258
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 2002 Dec;27(12):619-27
references.pmid: 12468231
references.citation: FEBS J. 2007 Feb;274(4):1046-61
references.pmid: 17257173
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2007 Mar;39(3):409-14
references.pmid: 17259986
references.citation: Biophys J. 2002 Jun;82(6):2928-33
references.pmid: 12023215
references.citation: Cell. 1990 Nov 30;63(5):1039-51
references.pmid: 2257622
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Feb 9;128(3):441-4
references.pmid: 17289565
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Jan;21(1):51-60
references.pmid: 11113180
references.citation: Science. 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1228-31
references.pmid: 8066461
references.citation: Genetics. 2001 Nov;159(3):919-28
references.pmid: 11729141
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Nov 7;16(21):2150-5
references.pmid: 17084700
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 1996 Dec;21(12):460-6
references.pmid: 9009826
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Nov 29;414(6863):514-21
references.pmid: 11734846
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2000 Dec;3(6):573-81
references.pmid: 11121776
references.citation: Cell Res. 2008 Apr;18(4):436-42
references.pmid: 18347614
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 2000 Dec;25(12):596-601
references.pmid: 11116185
references.citation: Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Dec;3(12):1051-9
references.pmid: 11781566
references.citation: Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000 Apr;12(2):211-6
references.pmid: 10712921
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Mar 1;446(7131):46-51
references.pmid: 17310144
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Nov 21;420(6913):333-6
references.pmid: 12447443
references.citation: Science. 1998 May 8;280(5365):895-8
references.pmid: 9572732
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Feb 9;128(3):519-31
references.pmid: 17289571