The curvature and variability of wrist and arm movements.
The control of wrist rotations is critical for normal upper limb function, yet has received little attention. In this study, we characterized path shape of wrist rotations in order to better understand the biomechanical and neural factors governing their control. Subjects performed step-tracking wrist rotations in eight directions "at a comfortable speed" and "as fast as possible." For comparison, we also analyzed subjects' arm movement paths in a similar task. We found significant differences between wrist and arm movements. Wrist paths were more curved and more variable than arm paths (p < 0.001). The increased curvature and variability can be explained in part by neuromuscular noise (in actuation and sensing) which is known to increase from proximal to distal in the upper limb. The curvature and variability of wrist paths increased with movement speed (p < 0.001), further implicating (signal-dependent) noise. However, noise cannot explain all of our observations. For example, we found that wrist rotations exhibit a systematic pattern: outbound and inbound paths between the same two targets tend to veer to opposite sides of a straight line. We provide evidence indicating that this type of systematic pattern is not likely caused by noise or other neural causes, but may be explained by the unique biomechanics of the wrist.
Charles
Steven K
SK
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. scharles@alum.mit.edu
Hogan
Neville
N
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001132:Arm / Q000502:physiology*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D012399:Rotation; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014953:Wrist / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
J Neurosci. 1986 Nov;6(11):3309-18
3772433
Exp Brain Res. 1994;98(1):153-6
8013583
J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
8182467
J Biomech. 2001 Nov;34(11):1429-38
11672717
Nature. 1998 Aug 20;394(6695):780-4
9723616
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2797-801
16928799
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Jan;81(1):319-33
9914292
J Neurosci. 1985 Sep;5(9):2318-30
4031998
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e179
16700627
J Physiol. 1983 Feb;335:519-33
6875893
Neurosci Res. 2003 May;46(1):1-10
12725907
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Aug;157(4):417-30
15014922
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000 Feb;15(2):103-11
10627326
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88(3):611-21
16510829
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Oct;4(10):1020-5
11547338
Biol Cybern. 1989;61(2):89-101
2742921
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35
12404008
J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):981-992
15844264
Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(3):460-70
7789452
J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jul;72(1):299-313
7965013
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Feb;73(2):891-5
7760146
Exp Brain Res. 1981;42(2):223-7
7262217
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Feb;20(2):177-83
15621323
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007 Sep;15(3):327-35
17894265
Biol Cybern. 1987;57(4-5):257-74
3689835
J Biomech Eng. 1982 Aug;104(3):176-81
7120940
Biol Cybern. 1982;44(1):67-77
7093370
J Biomech Eng. 1988 Feb;110(1):37-41
3347022
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):289-306
10382616
Science. 1999 Sep 24;285(5436):2136-9
10497133
J Biomech. 1996 Oct;29(10):1371-5
8884484
J Orthop Res. 2005 Jul;23(4):750-6
16022986
Brain. 1982 Jun;105(Pt 2):331-48
7082993
J Biomech. 1979;12(1):83-93
762184
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;88(3):1533-44
12205173
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Feb;20(2):166-71
15621321
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Nov;74(5):2174-8
8592205
J Neurophysiol. 1999 May;81(5):2582-6
10322091