Popliteal artery-tibial plateau relationship before and after total knee replacement: a prospective ultrasound study.
It seems to be a general belief that knee flexion releases the tension on the popliteal artery (PA) and displaces it posteriorly. Furthermore, there are opinions suggesting that previous surgery may result in fibrosis and rigidity of the vessels in the posterior knee region, which can lead to tethering of the PA, bringing it closer to the posterior tibia and making it more vulnerable during revision knee surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the distance between the PA and the tibial plateau in extension and flexion of the knee before and after surgery with total knee replacement (TKR). We studied 40 consecutive patients who were about to undergo TKR. The distance between the PA and tibial plateau was measured by ultrasound bilaterally in full knee extension without quadriceps contraction and in 90 degrees knee flexion, both preoperatively and 15 weeks postoperatively. The mean preoperative distances in flexion and in extension were 7 mm (3-12) and 8 mm (4-13), respectively (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, the distances were significantly increased both in flexion, 9 mm (4-14) (p < 0.001) and in extension 9 mm (3-15) (p < 0.01). Assessment of the contralateral legs where 14 previously had been operated with TKR showed no significant difference either between flexion and extension or between pre- and postoperative measurements. In conclusions, knee flexion does not increase the distance between the artery and the proximal tibia in this osteoarthritis patient group. At 15 weeks post-TKR, there was an increased distance from the PA to the posterior tibia and assessment of the contralateral knee where previous TKR had been performed showed equal distance to the ipsi-lateral preoperative knee, suggesting that the postoperative changes at 15 weeks were due to capsular swelling.
Eriksson
Karl
K
Warringal Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. karl.eriksson@ki.se
Bartlett
John
J
D000368:Aged; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology; D008875:Middle Aged; D011150:Popliteal Artery / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D013977:Tibia / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D014463:Ultrasonography
Am Surg. 1996 May;62(5):366-8
8615563
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Jun;69(5):783-5
3597483
Arthroscopy. 2001 Mar;17(3):244-247
11239343
Am J Surg. 1988 Aug;156(2):136-8
3400813
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Jan;55(1):23-48
4691662
J Vasc Surg. 1994 Dec;20(6):927-30; discussion 930-2
7990187
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Mar;85(2):218-22
12678356
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(4):246-8
10462216
J Arthroplasty. 1999 Oct;14(7):803-9
10537254
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):384-6
7744920
Surg Radiol Anat. 1987;9(1):37-41
3112976
Am J Surg. 1992 Sep;164(3):237-40
1415922
J Arthroplasty. 1999 Oct;14(7):800-2
10537253
Arthroscopy. 1995 Dec;11(6):723-6
8679036
Knee. 2001 Dec;8(4):259-64
11706687
Br J Radiol. 1999 Mar;72(855):317-8
10396228
Knee. 2009 Mar;16(2):143-8
19046634
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Oct;(367):158-64
10546610