Social context influences recognition of bodily expressions.
Previous studies have shown that recognition of facial expressions is influenced by the affective information provided by the surrounding scene. The goal of this study was to investigate whether similar effects could be obtained for bodily expressions. Images of emotional body postures were briefly presented as part of social scenes showing either neutral or emotional group actions. In Experiment 1, fearful and happy bodies were presented in fearful, happy, neutral and scrambled contexts. In Experiment 2, we compared happy with angry body expressions. In Experiment 3 and 4, we blurred the facial expressions of all people in the scene. This way, we were able to ascribe possible scene effects to the presence of body expressions visible in the scene and we were able to measure the contribution of facial expressions to the body expression recognition. In all experiments, we observed an effect of social scene context. Bodily expressions were better recognized when the actions in the scenes expressed an emotion congruent with the bodily expression of the target figure. The specific influence of facial expressions in the scene was dependent on the emotional expression but did not necessarily increase the congruency effect. Taken together, the results show that the social context influences our recognition of a person's bodily expression.
Kret
Mariska Esther
ME
Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Tilburg, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
de Gelder
Beatrice
B
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D004644:Emotions; D005149:Facial Expression; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009633:Nonverbal Communication; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011581:Psychological Tests; D011930:Reaction Time; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012938:Social Perception; D055815:Young Adult
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Sep;8(3):264-72
18814463
Neuron. 2003 Oct 30;40(3):655-64
14642287
Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(3-4):199-212
18979376
J Vis. 2005 Mar 18;5(3):215-29
15929647
Perception. 2005;34(10):1171-80
16309112
Perception. 1996;25(3):343-52
8804097
J Exp Psychol. 1974 Sep;103(3):597-600
4448962
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Aug;11(8):327-32
17625952
Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):559-64
15271002
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 23;101(47):16701-6
15546983
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Apr;16(3):487-502
15072683
Emotion. 2007 Aug;7(3):487-94
17683205
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):556-66
2527962
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):449-54
16407167
Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 26;2:3
21713131
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 May;18(3):531-43
1534354
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):123-44
12668221
Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22;14(12):1084-9
15203001
Mem Cognit. 1975 Sep;3(5):519-26
24203874
J Vis. 2008 Oct 31;8(13):11.1-18
19146341
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Dec;127(4):398-415
9857494
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Sep;46(11):2615-21
18541279
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):205-18
8636880
Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 1;24(3):771-9
15652312
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):959-67
17270466
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Mar;34(4):513-27
19857515
Cogn Psychol. 1997 Oct;34(1):72-107
9325010
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Sep;16(9):1249-57
16306325
Cogn Psychol. 1982 Apr;14(2):143-77
7083801
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29
15263892
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Sep;41(2):176-210
10968925
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 8;102(45):16518-23
16260734
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;19(7):724-32
18727789
Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(26):3286-97
17967472
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Aug;19(4):899-911
8409865
Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):175-8
11347862
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008 Sep;3(3):270-8
19015119