The nature of expertise in fingerprint examiners.
Latent print examinations involve a complex set of psychological and cognitive processes. This article summarizes existing work that has addressed how training and experience creates changes in latent print examiners. Experience appears to improve overall accuracy, increase visual working memory, and lead to configural processing of upright fingerprints. Experts also demonstrate a narrower visual filter and, as a group, tend to show greater consistency when viewing ink prints. These findings address recent criticisms of latent print evidence, but many open questions still exist. Cognitive scientists are well positioned to conduct studies that will improve the training and practices of latent print examiners, and suggestions for becoming involved in fingerprint research are provided.
Busey
Thomas A
TA
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. busey@indiana.edu
Parada
Francisco J
FJ
D003878:Dermatoglyphics; D005060:Europe; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014481:United States
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Feb;26(1):86-112
10696607
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 May;62(5):1023-40
19034812
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 5;102(14):5286-90
15795377
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Sep;10(1-2):145-58
10978702
Neuroreport. 2000 Jan 17;11(1):69-74
10683832
Vision Res. 2005 Feb;45(4):431-48
15610748
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):161-7
20382914
J Vis. 2007 Jun 28;7(8):15
17685822
Acad Radiol. 1996 Feb;3(2):137-44
8796654
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):54-64
17209910