Red tides in the Gulf of Mexico: Where, when, and why?
[1] Independent data from the Gulf of Mexico are used to develop and test the hypothesis that the same sequence of physical and ecological events each year allows the toxic dinoflagellate Karenia brevis to become dominant. A phosphorus-rich nutrient supply initiates phytoplankton succession, once deposition events of Saharan iron-rich dust allow Trichodesmium blooms to utilize ubiquitous dissolved nitrogen gas within otherwise nitrogen-poor sea water. They and the co-occurring K. brevis are positioned within the bottom Ekman layers, as a consequence of their similar diel vertical migration patterns on the middle shelf. Upon onshore upwelling of these near-bottom seed populations to CDOM-rich surface waters of coastal regions, light-inhibition of the small red tide of ~1 ug chl l(-1) of ichthytoxic K. brevis is alleviated. Thence, dead fish serve as a supplementary nutrient source, yielding large, self-shaded red tides of ~10 ug chl l(-1). The source of phosphorus is mainly of fossil origin off west Florida, where past nutrient additions from the eutrophied Lake Okeechobee had minimal impact. In contrast, the P-sources are of mainly anthropogenic origin off Texas, since both the nutrient loadings of Mississippi River and the spatial extent of the downstream red tides have increased over the last 100 years. During the past century and particularly within the last decade, previously cryptic Karenia spp. have caused toxic red tides in similar coastal habitats of other western boundary currents off Japan, China, New Zealand, Australia, and South Africa, downstream of the Gobi, Simpson, Great Western, and Kalahari Deserts, in a global response to both desertification and eutrophication.
Walsh
J J
JJ
College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA.
Jolliff
J K
JK
Darrow
B P
BP
Lenes
J M
JM
Milroy
S P
SP
Remsen
A
A
Dieterle
D A
DA
Carder
K L
KL
Chen
F R
FR
Vargo
G A
GA
Weisberg
R H
RH
Fanning
K A
KA
Muller-Karger
F E
FE
Shinn
E
E
Steidinger
K A
KA
Heil
C A
CA
Tomas
C R
CR
Prospero
J S
JS
Lee
T N
TN
Kirkpatrick
G J
GJ
Whitledge
T E
TE
Stockwell
D A
DA
Villareal
T A
TA
Jochens
A E
AE
Bontempi
P S
PS
Nature. 2004 May 13;429(6988):171-4
15141209
Microb Ecol. 1994 Sep;28(2):255-71
24186453
Nature. 2004 May 20;429(6989):292-4
15152251
Science. 1992 Mar 20;255(5051):1561-4
17820170
Science. 1983 Dec 16;222(4629):1203-10
17806711
Nature. 2001 May 3;411(6833):66-9
11333977
Science. 1987 Jul 10;237(4811):171-5
17830924
Nat Toxins. 1994;2(4):222-7
7952947
Science. 1999 Dec 10;286(5447):2126-31
10591638
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 May;59(5):1367-75
16348931
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Sep;58(9):3122-9
1359837
Science. 2001 Nov 16;294(5546):1534-7
11711677
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Aug;59(8):2594-601
16349018
Science. 1881 Dec 10;2(77):592
17757994
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Mar;60(3):1044-7
16349210
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Nov;60(11):3989-95
16349431
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Nov;60(11):3996-4000
16349432
Science. 2005 Apr 1;308(5718):67-71
15802595
Science. 1982 Feb 5;215(4533):667-70
17842403
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2004 Aug;34(4):1753-62
15462442
Science. 1955 Mar 18;121(3142):394-5
17837228
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003 Feb 20;81(4):459-73
12491531