Shared probe design and existing microarray reanalysis using PICKY.
BACKGROUND
Large genomes contain families of highly similar genes that cannot be individually identified by microarray probes. This limitation is due to thermodynamic restrictions and cannot be resolved by any computational method. Since gene annotations are updated more frequently than microarrays, another common issue facing microarray users is that existing microarrays must be routinely reanalyzed to determine probes that are still useful with respect to the updated annotations.


RESULTS
PICKY 2.0 can design shared probes for sets of genes that cannot be individually identified using unique probes. PICKY 2.0 uses novel algorithms to track sharable regions among genes and to strictly distinguish them from other highly similar but nontarget regions during thermodynamic comparisons. Therefore, PICKY does not sacrifice the quality of shared probes when choosing them. The latest PICKY 2.1 includes the new capability to reanalyze existing microarray probes against updated gene sets to determine probes that are still valid to use. In addition, more precise nonlinear salt effect estimates and other improvements are added, making PICKY 2.1 more versatile to microarray users.


CONCLUSIONS
Shared probes allow expressed gene family members to be detected; this capability is generally more desirable than not knowing anything about these genes. Shared probes also enable the design of cross-genome microarrays, which facilitate multiple species identification in environmental samples. The new nonlinear salt effect calculation significantly increases the precision of probes at a lower buffer salt concentration, and the probe reanalysis function improves existing microarray result interpretations.
Chou
Hui-Hsien
HH
Department of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, and Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-3223, USA. hhchou@iastate.edu
D030541:Databases, Genetic; D016678:Genome; D023281:Genomics / Q000379:methods; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D015345:Oligonucleotide Probes / Q000737:chemistry*; D012984:Software
D015345:Oligonucleotide Probes
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 26;99(24):15687-92
12429852
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Oct 23;10:347
19849862
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3746-50
3459152
BMC Genomics. 2007 Mar 27;8:81
17389046
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e424-30
16873503
Plant J. 2007 Feb;49(3):565-77
17181774
Plant Physiol. 2005 May;138(1):18-26
15888674
Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 22;20(17):2893-902
15180932
Bioinformatics. 2004 Aug 4;20 Suppl 1:i186-93
15262798
Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 11;18(21):6409-12
2243783
BMC Microbiol. 2008 Jun 18;8:99
18564427
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006 Oct;36(10):769-78
17027843
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2003 Jul;1(2):343-61
15290776
Proc IEEE Comput Soc Bioinform Conf. 2002;1:54-63
15838123
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Apr;37(6):1726-39
19208645
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 May 1;28(9):1929-34
10756193
PLoS Pathog. 2006 Jun;2(6):e52
16789837
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jul;73(14):4631-8
17526797
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;502:193-226
19082558
Biochemistry. 1997 Aug 26;36(34):10581-94
9265640
BMC Plant Biol. 2007 May 16;7:22
17506877
PLoS One. 2008 Oct 06;3(10):e3337
18836531
J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 5;188(3):415-31
3525846
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D883-7
17145706
Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2006 Jun;1(2):200-8
20483251
Genome Biol. 2008;9(12):R181
19099579
Biochemistry. 1996 Mar 19;35(11):3555-62
8639506
Biochemistry. 2004 Mar 30;43(12):3537-54
15035624
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Aug;69(8):4927-34
12902288