title: Reticulate evolution and taxonomic concepts in the Ranunculus auricomus complex (Ranunculaceae): insights from analysis of morphological, karyological and molecular data.
abstract: The Ranunculus auricomus complex is an interesting model system for studying the evolution and diversity of apomictic polyploid complexes. It comprises hundreds of agamospecies, usually referred to two distinct morphotypes (traditionally named "R. auricomus" and "R. cassubicus") which are connected by several intermediate forms. Here we try to elucidate the evolution of apomictic "cassubicus" morphotypes and we test criteria for different classification concepts by combining the information of molecular phylogenetic, morphological, karyological and population genetic data (AFLPs, amplified fragment length polymorphism). Phylogenetic analysis based on sequences of the nrDNA ITS and plastid data (matK, trnk, psbJ-psbA) suggest a deep split between the diploid sexual species R. notabilis ("auricomus" morphotype) from the closely related allopatric taxa R. cassubicifolius and R. carpaticola ("cassubicus"). The apomictic "cassubicus" morphotypes are not monophyletic, as one, R. hungaricus, groups with R. notabilis, which may be due to hybrid origin. Morphometric studies and ploidy level determinations via Feulgen densitometry show a transition from 4x R. hungaricus to the 6x apomictic hybrid derivatives of R. cassubicifolius and R. carpaticola. In two accessions, AFLPs and flow cytometric data suggest local gene flow among different apomictic polyploid morphotypes. Frequent facultative sexuality of apomicts may increase genetic diversity by continuous formation of new cytotypes, local hybridization and introgression, which obstructs the fixation of distinct agamospecies. We conclude that "R. cassubicus" and "R. auricomus" cannot be regarded as species but should be treated as either informal groups, or as (notho)taxa at the sectional level. To reflect the different evolutionary processes involved, we propose a separate classification of the sexual species, R. notabilis and the closely related species pair R. cassubicifolius and R. carpaticola. Based on these well-defined biological species, the apomictic biotypes can be classified as nothotaxa.
authors.affiliation: Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
authors.forename: Elvira
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hörandl
authors.forename: Johann
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Greilhuber
authors.forename: Katarina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Klímová
authors.forename: Ovidiu
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Paun
authors.forename: Eva
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Temsch
authors.forename: Khatere
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Emadzade
authors.forename: Iva
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Hodálová
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5269-73
references.pmid: 291943
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 29;358(1434):1113-21
references.pmid: 12831477
references.citation: Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):427-37
references.pmid: 8878706
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):255-60
references.pmid: 15596473
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2007 Mar;94(3):275-88
references.pmid: 21636401
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2000 Jun;49(2):369-81
references.pmid: 12118412
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
references.pmid: 9396791
references.citation: Genome. 1994 Aug;37(4):646-55
references.pmid: 18470109
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 29;358(1434):1085-93
references.pmid: 12831474
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Aug;36(2):305-27
references.pmid: 15955512
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 7;273(1604):3011-9
references.pmid: 17015349
references.citation: Bull Schweiz Akad Med Wiss. 1954 Dec;10(6):491-512
references.pmid: 14364112
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Feb;42(2):347-61
references.pmid: 16949310
references.citation: Plant J. 2000 Jan;21(1):97-108
references.pmid: 10652155
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Mar;20(3):338-50
references.pmid: 12644554
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Mar;12(3):106-17
references.pmid: 17303467
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2004 Nov;13(11):3261-73
references.pmid: 15487987
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2006 Apr;15(4):897-910
references.pmid: 16599955
references.citation: Int J Plant Sci. 2008 Dec;169(9):1219-1228
references.pmid: 20396408
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;171(1):223-36
references.pmid: 16771996
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;171(3):525-38
references.pmid: 16866956
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 1998;14(1):68-73
references.pmid: 9520503
references.citation: Eur J Histochem. 1997;41 Suppl 2:177-8
references.pmid: 9859837
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Jan;14(1):81-90
references.pmid: 9000756
references.citation: Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):783-791
references.pmid: 28561359
references.citation: Plant Ecol Divers. 2008 Nov 1;1(2):309-320
references.pmid: 20936092
references.citation: Appl Bioinformatics. 2005;4(1):65-9
references.pmid: 16000015
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Jun;92(6):490-8
references.pmid: 15026781
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2008 Apr;101(6):805-14
references.pmid: 18222910