Evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency of wild bird surveillance for avian influenza.
This study aimed to assess which method of wild waterbird surveillance had the greatest probability of detecting highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 during a period of surveillance activity, the cost of each method was also considered. Lake Constance is a major wintering centre for migratory waterbirds and in 2006 it was the site of an HPAI H5N1 epidemic in wild birds. Avian influenza surveillance was conducted using harmonised approaches in the three countries around the lake, Austria, Germany and Switzerland, from 2006-2009. The surveillance consisted of testing birds sampled by the following methods: live birds caught in traps, birds killed by hunters, birds caught in fishing nets, dead birds found by the public and catching live Mute Swans (Cygnus olor); sentinel flocks of Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) were also used. Scenario tree analysis was performed including sensitivity analysis, followed by assessment of cost-effectiveness. Results indicated that if HPAI H5N1 was present at 1% prevalence and assuming HPAI resulted in bird mortality, sampling dead birds found by the public and sentinel surveillance were the most sensitive approaches despite residual uncertainty over some parameters. The uncertainty over the mortality of infected birds was an influential factor. Sampling birds found dead was most cost-effective, but strongly dependent on mortality and awareness of the public. Trapping live birds was least cost-effective. Based on our results, we recommend that future HPAI H5N1 surveillance around Lake Constance should prioritise sentinel surveillance and, if high mortality is expected, the testing of birds found dead.
Knight-Jones
Theodore J D
TJ
The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Wardens house, Hawkshead lane, North Mymms, Herts., AL9 7TA, United Kingdom. tkjones@rvc.ac.uk
Hauser
Ruth
R
Matthes
Doris
D
Stärk
Katharina D C
KD
D000818:Animals; D000835:Animals, Wild; D046090:Anseriformes; D001317:Austria / Q000453:epidemiology; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005858:Germany / Q000453:epidemiology; D005585:Influenza in Birds / Q000453:epidemiology*; D008954:Models, Biological; D011159:Population Surveillance / Q000379:methods; D011634:Public Health / Q000191:economics; D013557:Switzerland / Q000453:epidemiology
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Apr;14(4):600-7
18394278
Prev Vet Med. 2007 May 16;79(2-4):98-115
17239459
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Oct;15(10):1633-6
19861060
Prev Vet Med. 2007 May 16;79(2-4):71-97
17224193
Vet Res Commun. 1988;12(2-3):125-41
3055662
Vaccine. 2007 Jul 26;25(30):5637-44
17126960
Arch Virol. 2006 Jul;151(7):1267-79
16502281
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Jan;14(1):136-42
18258093
Avian Dis. 2008 Mar;52(1):100-5
18459304
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Aug;14(8):1267-70
18680652
Science. 2006 Apr 21;312(5772):384-8
16627734
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Dec;13(12):1821-7
18258030
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Nov;12(11):1663-70
17283615
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19368-73
17158217
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009 Jan;3(1):1-14
19453436
J Clin Virol. 2006 Jan;35(1):2-13
16213784
Vet Microbiol. 2000 May 22;74(1-2):3-13
10799774
Microbiol Rev. 1992 Mar;56(1):152-79
1579108