title: Managing health(-care systems) using information health technologies.
abstract: This study aims to compare and contrast how specific information health technologies (IHTs) have been debated, how they have proliferated, and what they have enabled in Germany’s and England’s healthcare systems. For this a discourse analysis was undertaken that specifically focussed on future-scenarios articulated in policy documents and strategy papers released by relevant actors from both healthcare systems. The study reveals that the way IHTs have been debated and how they have proliferated depends on country-specific regulatory structures, their respective values, actors’ and institutions’ organized interests, and the status of health professionals. These conditions have enabled IHTs to promote a new and similar concept of patienthood in both countries, although they tend to affect practitioners’ practices more dramatically in England. The conclusion is drawn that with the usage of IHTs, healthcare systems reproduced existing patterns of health provision while also enabling a sort of convergence. Future research should investigate whether the new concept of patienthood emerging in both welfare states actually suits patients and professionals needs and requirements.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Europäische Ethnologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mohrenstrasse, Berlin, Germany. thomas.mathar@staff.hu-berlin.de
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Mathar
mesh_terms: D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D004739:England; D005858:Germany; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D008490:Medical Informatics; D036301:Qualitative Research; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D013222:State Medicine
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2003 Jul;25(5):408-28
references.pmid: 14498918
references.citation: Int J Integr Care. 2007 Jun 25;7:e25
references.pmid: 17637871
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Aug;57(4):697-710
references.pmid: 12821017
references.citation: Chronic Illn. 2005 Mar;1(1):15-20
references.pmid: 17136927
references.citation: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2005 Sep;16(3):176-82
references.pmid: 16177944
references.citation: Health Informatics J. 2007 Mar;13(1):57-69
references.pmid: 17296619
references.citation: Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 Mar 2;132(9):458-60
references.pmid: 17315125
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2002 Aug;55(4):593-608
references.pmid: 12188466
references.citation: J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(1):22-6
references.pmid: 18318925
references.citation: J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(1):17-21
references.pmid: 18318924
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Jul;26(5):617-44
references.pmid: 15283780
references.citation: JAMA. 2001 Sep 19;286(11):1349-55
references.pmid: 11560540
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 Jan;58(1):S2-10
references.pmid: 12496303
references.citation: Chronic Illn. 2008 Jun;4(2):110-7
references.pmid: 18583448
references.citation: Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2003 Dec;97(10):689-94
references.pmid: 14997586
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jun;62(11):2613-20
references.pmid: 16386345
references.citation: J R Soc Promot Health. 2001 Sep;121(3):141
references.pmid: 11688293
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1485-94
references.pmid: 15893864
references.citation: Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Jan;16(1):86-95
references.pmid: 18181818
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 07;6:86
references.pmid: 16827928
references.citation: Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Oct;133(40):2039-44
references.pmid: 18819052
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Sep 19;7:148
references.pmid: 17880693
references.citation: Milbank Q. 1988;66(4):640-60
references.pmid: 3151121
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jun;62(11):2633-45
references.pmid: 16387399