Interpopulation differences in competitive effect and response of the mosquito Aedes aegypti and resistance to invasion by a superior competitor.
Geographic variation in species interactions can have major effects on species distributions and can be important for the resistance of resident communities to invasive species. We tested the hypothesis that coexistence or replacement of a resident North American mosquito Aedes aegypti with the invasive Aedes albopictus is affected by interpopulation variation in the inherent competitive ability of A. aegypti and variation in the fecundity-size relationship. We postulated that such variation creates differential population-level outcomes of competition with A. albopictus. We compared competitive abilities of eight North American populations of A. aegypti, four populations sympatric to A. albopictus, and four populations allopatric to A. albopictus. Competition among larvae from each A. aegypti population and a single A. albopictus population was tested in laboratory microcosms in a response-surface design. We found origin of A. aegypti influences its competitive response to competition from A. albopictus and competitive effect on A. albopictus. A. aegypti from allopatric sites preformed better in competition with A. albopictus than did A. aegypti from sympatric sites because they had a stronger average effect on A. albopictus. This average was strongly influenced by the allopatric population from Miami. Competitive effect and response were uncorrelated among populations, indicating inconsistent ranking of A. aegypti in competitive effect and response. Although A. albopictus is generally a superior competitor to A. aegypti, a stronger competitive effect of particular A. aegypti populations on invading A. albopictus may contribute to competition-mediated biotic resistance to the invader. These results suggest that interpopulation variation in competitive ability of A. aegypti may contribute to failure of A. albopictus to invade parts of the southeastern United States and offer evidence of a contribution to biotic resistance by an inferior competitor. Geographic variation in competitive ability may be common and one general cause of variation in invasion success and impact.
Leisnham
Paul T
PT
School of Biological Sciences, Behavior, Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Section, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61761-4120, USA. leisnham@umd.edu
Juliano
S A
SA
D000330:Aedes / Q000254:growth & development*; D000818:Animals; D003163:Competitive Behavior; D005260:Female; D005431:Florida; D058865:Introduced Species; D008297:Male; D055820:New Orleans; D052287:Oviparity; D011158:Population Growth
Ecology. 2009 Sep;90(9):2405-13
19769119
Oecologia. 2002 Feb 1;130(3):458-469
20871747
Ecol Lett. 2008 Aug;11(8):852-66
18422638
Ecology. 2005 Dec;86(12):3279-3288
19096729
J Am Mosq Control Assoc Suppl. 1988 Dec;1:1-39
3068349
J Med Entomol. 2008 Mar;45(2):210-21
18402136
Ecology. 2005 Dec;86(12):3289-95
17450188
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7):1770-80
16922326
Monogr Popul Biol. 1982;17:1-296
7162524
J Med Entomol. 2002 Jul;39(4):699-704
12144308
J Med Entomol. 2008 May;45(3):375-83
18533429
Oecologia. 2004 May;139(4):583-93
15024640
J Med Entomol. 1995 Jul;32(4):554-62
7650719
J Vector Ecol. 2004 Dec;29(2):277-84
15707287
J Med Entomol. 2005 Jul;42(4):559-70
16119544
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 22;275(1633):463-71
18077250
Am Nat. 2001 Feb;157(2):126-40
18707267
Science. 2000 May 5;288(5467):852-4
10797006
Monogr Ser World Health Organ. 1962;47:13-191
13885800
Ecol Lett. 2008 Jul;11(7):674-81
18400019
Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:233-66
11729075
J Med Entomol. 1989 Jul;26(4):260-71
2769704
Med Vet Entomol. 2009 Mar;23(1):62-8
19239615
Annu Rev Entomol. 2009;54:37-56
19067629
Oecologia. 1998 Jun;115(1-2):137-148
28308444
J Vector Ecol. 2002 Jun;27(1):86-95
12125878
J Med Entomol. 1999 May;36(3):313-20
10337101