Working memory and verbal fluency deficits following cerebellar lesions: relation to interindividual differences in patient variables.
Findings concerning cognitive impairment in patients with focal cerebellar lesions tend to be inconsistent and usually reflect a mild deficit. Patient variables such as lesion age and the age at lesion onset might affect functional reorganization and contribute to the variability of the findings. To assess this issue, 14 patients with focal vascular cerebellar lesions and 14 matched healthy control subjects performed a verbal working memory and a verbal long-term memory task as well as verbal fluency tasks. Patients showed deficits in working memory and verbal fluency, while recall of complex narrative material was intact. Verbal fluency performance correlated significantly with age in the patient group, with more severe impairments in older patients, suggesting that age at lesion onset is a critical variable for cognitive outcome. In controls, no significant correlations with age were observed. Taken together, our findings support the idea of cerebellar involvement in nonmotor functions and indicate the relevance of interindividual differences in regard to clinical parameters after focal cerebellar damage.
Peterburs
Jutta
J
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitaetsstrasse 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany. jutta.peterburs@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Bellebaum
Christian
C
Koch
Benno
B
Schwarz
Michael
M
Daum
Irene
I
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002531:Cerebellum / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests
Brain. 2005 Jul;128(Pt 7):1525-35
15872017
J Neurosci. 1997 Dec 15;17(24):9675-85
9391022
Brain Lang. 1998 Sep;64(2):215-30
9710490
Neuroimage. 2005 Jan 15;24(2):332-8
15627576
Cerebellum. 2007;6(3):177-83
17786813
Brain. 2006 Feb;129(Pt 2):306-20
16317024
Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15;44(2):489-501
18835452
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Dec 12;194(2):214-22
18692526
Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):342-5
8455719
Neurosurgery. 2008 Sep;63(3):487-97; discussion 497
18812960
Brain. 1998 Nov;121 ( Pt 11):2175-87
9827776
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(9):1227-37
15949507
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;75(11):1524-31
15489381
Brain. 1999 Jan;122 ( Pt 1):87-97
10050897
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Jun;150(6):545-50; discussion 550
18512000
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1196-208
11931923
Brain Lang. 2008 Sep;106(3):204-10
18158178
Brain. 2000 May;123 ( Pt 5):1041-50
10775548
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998 Nov;4(6):539-46
10050358
Cerebellum. 2007;6(3):193-201
17786815
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009 Mar;33(1):45-54
19265770
Neuropsychologia. 2007 May 15;45(9):2016-24
17379262
Neurology. 2004 Dec 14;63(11):2132-5
15596762
Neurology. 1992 Aug;42(8):1493-6
1641142
Brain. 1998 Apr;121 ( Pt 4):561-79
9577385
Cerebellum. 2008;7(3):433-43
18592331
Brain Lang. 2008 May;105(2):99-111
17905426
Cerebellum. 2007;6(3):254-67
17786822
Cerebellum. 2007;6(3):242-53
17786821
Behav Neurosci. 1993 Jun;107(3):411-9
8329131
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;3(4):255-74
15040547
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Feb;66(2):155-61
10071093
J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 1;19(13):5632-43
10377369
Cerebellum. 2007;6(3):184-92
17786814
Neuroreport. 2000 Jun 26;11(9):1997-2000
10884059
Brain. 2008 Oct;131(Pt 10):2742-50
18757465
Cerebellum. 2007;6(3):202-13
17786816
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008 Sep;110(8):763-73
18602745
Eur J Neurol. 2006 Feb;13(2):161-70
16490047
Science. 1997 Mar 28;275(5308):1940-3
9072973
J Neurol. 2007 Sep;254(9):1193-203
17380238
Brain. 1992 Feb;115 Pt 1:155-78
1559151
Science. 1994 Oct 21;266(5184):458-61
7939688
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Jul;9(4):462-75
23968211