What measured blood loss tells us about postpartum bleeding: a systematic review.
BACKGROUND
Meta-analyses of postpartum blood loss and the effect of uterotonics are biased by visually estimated blood loss.


OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review of measured postpartum blood loss with and without prophylactic uterotonics for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH).


METHODS
We searched Medline and PubMed terms (labour stage, third) AND (ergonovine, ergonovine tartrate, methylergonovine, oxytocin, oxytocics or misoprostol) AND (postpartum haemorrhage or haemorrhage) and Cochrane reviews without any language restriction.


METHODS
Refereed publications in the period 1988-2007 reporting mean postpartum blood loss, PPH (> or =500 ml) or severe PPH (> or =1000 ml) following vaginal births.


METHODS
Raw data were abstracted into Excel by one author and then reviewed by a co-author. Data were transferred to SPSS 17.0, and copied into RevMan 5.0 to perform random effects meta-analysis.


RESULTS
The distribution of average blood loss (29 studies) is similar with any prophylactic uterotonic, and is lower than without prophylaxis. Compared with no uterotonic, oxytocin and misoprostol have lower PPH (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.81; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.08, respectively) and severe PPH rates (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.29; OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.52-1.04, respectively). Oxytocin has lower PPH (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60-0.70) and severe PPH (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.91) rates than misoprostol, but not in developing countries.


CONCLUSIONS
Oxytocin is superior to misoprostol in hospitals. Misoprostol substantially lowers PPH and severe PPH. A sound assessment of the relative merits of the two drugs is needed in rural areas of developing countries, where most PPH deaths occur.
Sloan
N L
NL
Gynuity Health Projects, New York, NY, USA. nlsloan@gmail.com
Durocher
J
J
Aldrich
T
T
Blum
J
J
Winikoff
B
B
D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007749:Labor Stage, Third; D010120:Oxytocics; D006473:Postpartum Hemorrhage / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000517:prevention & control*; D011247:Pregnancy; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D013048:Specimen Handling
D010120:Oxytocics
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Oct;87(1):1-5
15464767
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1248-53
17027730
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jun;93(3):220-4
16626718
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(11):1310-4
17091409
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991 Jan 30;38(2):119-24
1995380
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jul;104(7):781-6
9236641
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):666-77
19784446
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 May;102(5):377-80
7612530
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jul;94(1):45-6
16764879
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD000494
17636640
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Jun;98(6):528-30
1873241
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 May;36(2):152-4
8798302
Anesthesiology. 1965 Jul-Aug;26:393-9
14313451
Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;49(2):91-6
15188836
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000 Oct;71(1):69-70
11044547
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 May;75(5):464-8
8677772
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;177(4):770-4
9369817
BMJ. 1988 Nov 19;297(6659):1295-300
3144366
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Aug;94(2):149-55
16828767
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Jan;24(1):12-5
14675973
BMJ. 2005 Oct 1;331(7519):723
16195287
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Nov;94 Suppl 2:S139-S140
29644697
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Mar;84(3):260-5
15715534
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Dec;22(6):999-1012
18819848
S Afr Med J. 2001 May;91(5):432-5
11455810
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct;179(4):1043-6
9790395
Aust J Midwifery. 2003 Jun;16(2):21-4
15553427
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006 Oct;32(5):489-96
16984516
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;55(1):20-7
20129226
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jul;83(7):647-50
15225189
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD001808
11687123
Lancet. 2001 Sep 1;358(9283):689-95
11551574
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Sep;22(5):463-9
12521409
Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1993 Aug 13;Doc No 83:[2305 words; 32 paragraphs]
8306013
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jan;92(1):23-6
16271721
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001 Oct;30(6):576-83
11883025
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD000201
14973949
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005 Oct;31(5):389-93
16176505
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jun;93(3):238-9
16678826
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Dec;75(3):235-41
11728483
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Nov;94 Suppl 2:S137-S138
29644683
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Nov;103(11):1068-73
8916990
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Apr;73(1):1-6
11336714
BJOG. 2005 Sep;112(9):1277-83
16101608
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Sep;105(9):971-5
9763047
Midwifery. 1990 Mar;6(1):3-17
2182978
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1066-1074
16581405
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 30;(10):CD001808
24173606
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Apr;85(4):322-3
17546315