The measurement equivalence of Big Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education.
Previous findings suggest that the Big-Five factor structure is not guaranteed in samples with lower educational levels. The present study investigates the Big-Five factor structure in two large samples representative of the German adult population. In both samples, the Big-Five factor structure emerged only in a blurry way at lower educational levels, whereas for highly educated persons it emerged with textbook-like clarity. Because well-educated persons are most comparable to the usual subjects of psychological research, it might be asked if the Big Five are limited to such persons. Our data contradict this conclusion. There are strong individual differences in acquiescence response tendencies among less highly educated persons. After controlling for this bias the Big-Five model holds at all educational levels.
Rammstedt
Beatrice
B
Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, GESIS, Mannheim, Germany.
Goldberg
Lewis R
LR
Borg
Ingwer
I
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):723-35
14561125
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Dec;59(6):1216-29
2283588
Multivariate Behav Res. 1999 Jan 1;34(1):89-102
26825130
AJS. 1977 May;82(6):1289-317
889001
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):261-5
15301631
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Apr;94(4):718-37
18361680
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Sep;75(3):729-50
9781409
Psychol Bull. 1958 Jul;55(4):243-52
13567967
Ment Retard. 1981 Apr;19(2):53-8
7231176
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):356-66
14769090