title: Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity: Impact of Different Arterial Path Length Measurements.
abstract: BACKGROUND: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) is the most established index of arterial stiffness. Yet there is no consensus on the methodology in regard to the arterial path length measurements conducted on the body surface. Currently, it is not known to what extent the differences in the arterial path length measurements affect absolute PWV values. METHODS: Two hundred fifty apparently healthy adults (127 men and 123 women, 19-79 years) were studied. Carotid-femoral PWV was calculated using (1) the straight distance between carotid and femoral sites (PWV(car-fem)), (2) the straight distance between suprasternal notch and femoral site minus carotid arterial length (PWV((ssn-fem)-(ssn-car))), (3) the straight distance between carotid and femoral sites minus carotid arterial length (PWV((car-fem)-(ssn-car))), and (4) the combined distance from carotid site to the umbilicus and from the umbilicus to femoral site minus carotid arterial length (PWV((ssn-umb-fem)-(ssn-car))). RESULTS: All the calculated PWV were significantly correlated with each other (r=0.966-0.995). PWV accounting for carotid arterial length were 16-31% lower than PWV(car-fem). PWV(car-fem) value of 12 m/sec corresponded to 8.3 m/sec for PWV((ssn-fem)-(ssn-car)), 10.0 m/sec for PWV((car-fem)-(ssn-car)), and 8.9 m/sec for PWV((ssn-umb-fem)-(ssn-car)). CONCLUSION: Different body surface measurements used to estimate arterial path length would produce substantial variations in absolute PWV values.
authors.affiliation: Cardiovascular Aging Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
authors.forename: Jun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sugawara
authors.forename: Koichiro
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hayashi
authors.forename: Takashi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Yokoi
authors.forename: Hirofumi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Tanaka
references.citation: Hypertension. 2001 Sep;38(3):434-8
references.pmid: 11566918
references.citation: Circulation. 1999 May 11;99(18):2434-9
references.pmid: 10318666
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 1;46(9):1753-60
references.pmid: 16256881
references.citation: J Hypertens. 2000 Nov;18(11):1527-35
references.pmid: 11081763
references.citation: Circulation. 1985 Feb;71(2):202-10
references.pmid: 3965165
references.citation: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Nov;1(6):739-48
references.pmid: 19356510
references.citation: Hypertension. 1999 May;33(5):1111-7
references.pmid: 10334796
references.citation: J Hypertens. 2008 Oct;26(10):2001-7
references.pmid: 18806624
references.citation: Am J Hypertens. 2001 May;14(5 Pt 1):463-8
references.pmid: 11368468
references.citation: J Hypertens. 2009 Aug;27(8):1624-30
references.pmid: 19531964
references.citation: Hypertension. 2004 Jun;43(6):1239-45
references.pmid: 15123572
references.citation: J Hypertens. 2007 Jun;25(6):1105-87
references.pmid: 17563527
references.citation: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001 Dec;21(12):2046-50
references.pmid: 11742883
references.citation: Am J Cardiol. 1987 Oct 30;60(12):68G-71G
references.pmid: 3673900
references.citation: Circulation. 1983 Jul;68(1):50-8
references.pmid: 6851054
references.citation: J Hum Hypertens. 2005 May;19(5):401-6
references.pmid: 15729378
references.citation: Hypertension. 2001 May;37(5):1236-41
references.pmid: 11358934