Cost Analysis of Internet vs. Print Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the costs associated with Internet and print-based physical activity interventions.  METHOD: The costs associated with delivering tailored print and Internet-based interventions were estimated from a randomized controlled physical activity trial (n=167). The estimates were based on research assistant time sampling surveys, web development invoices, and other tracking procedures.  RESULTS: Web-development costs for the Internet intervention were $109,564. Taken together with the website hosting fees and staff costs, the cost per participant per month was $122.52 The cost of the print intervention was $35.81 per participant per month. However, in a break-even analysis, the Internet intervention became more cost-efficient, relative to the print intervention, when the total number of participants exceeded 352.  CONCLUSIONS: Relative to print-based interventions, Internet-based interventions may be a more cost efficient way to reach a large number of sedentary individuals.
Lewis
Beth A
BA
University of Minnesota, School of Kinesiology, 209 Cooke Hall, 1900 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Williams
David M
DM
Neighbors
Charles J
CJ
Jakicic
John M
JM
Marcus
Bess H
BH
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):156-73
18947966
N Z Med J. 2004 Dec 17;117(1207):U1216
15608809
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2002 Jul;30(3):122-8
12150571
Br J Sports Med. 1998 Sep;32(3):236-41
9773174
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD004274
16235356
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004 Feb;30(1):36-46
15018027
Ann Behav Med. 1998 Summer;20(3):174-80
9989324
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008 Jun;8(3):261-72
20528378
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
847061
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jul;19(1):1-8
10865157
Health Educ Res. 2008 Jun;23(3):427-39
18209115
Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 14;167(9):944-9
17502536
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Jul;33(1):54-64
17572313
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Nov;28(6):737-47
17616486
Prev Med. 2007 Jul;45(1):54-61
17573103