Forensic science standards in fast-changing environments.
Regulatory trends in forensic science point strongly to the need for exhaustive testing of all findings and tools. At the same time a number ofjurisdictions suggest ajudicial test for the admissibility of novel scientific evidence. But in fields such as computers and cellphones, the rate of change is faster than the normal times required for peer-reviewed publication. One route to admitting less-than-perfect findings from forensic science is via a reevaluation of the role of expert evidence and in particular pre-trial meetings between experts.
Sommer
Peter
P
London School of Economics and Political Science, Open University, UK. p.m.sommer@lse.ac.uk
D003201:Computers / Q000639:trends*; D005104:Expert Testimony; D044707:Forensic Sciences / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D011361:Professional Competence; D012107:Research Design