title: The role of tibialis posterior fatigue on foot kinematics during walking.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of localised tibialis posterior muscle fatigue on foot kinematics during walking. It was hypothesised that following fatigue, subjects would demonstrate greater forefoot and rearfoot motion during walking. It was also postulated that the magnitude of the change in rearfoot motion would be associated with standing anatomical rearfoot posture.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-nine subjects underwent an exercise fatigue protocol aimed at reducing the force output of tibialis posterior. An eight camera motion analysis system was used to evaluate 3D foot kinematics during treadmill walking both pre- and post-fatigue. The anatomical rearfoot angle was measured during standing prior to the fatigue protocol using a goniometer.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Peak rearfoot eversion remained unchanged following the fatigue protocol. Although increases in rearfoot eversion excursion were observed following fatigue, these changes were of a magnitude of questionable clinical significance (<1.0 degrees ). The magnitude of the change in rearfoot eversion due to fatigue was not associated with the anatomical measurement of standing rearfoot angle. No substantial changes in forefoot kinematics were observed following the fatigue protocol.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These data indicate that reduced force output of the tibialis posterior muscle did not alter rearfoot and forefoot motion during gait. The anatomical structure of the rearfoot was not associated with the dependence of muscular activity that an individual requires to maintain normal rearfoot kinematics during gait.
authors.affiliation: Running Injury Clinic, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. mbpohl@ucalgary.ca.
authors.forename: Michael B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Pohl
authors.forename: Melissa
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rabbito
authors.forename: Reed
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ferber
references.citation: Foot Ankle Int. 1997 Jan;18(1):43-6
references.pmid: 9013114
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2009 Jan;89(1):26-37
references.pmid: 19022863
references.citation: Gait Posture. 2007 Apr;25(4):555-64
references.pmid: 16876415
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Feb;21(2):175-83
references.pmid: 16269207
references.citation: J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008 May-Jun;47(3):219-24
references.pmid: 18455668
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jul;(316):165-72
references.pmid: 7634700
references.citation: J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;42(6):327-33
references.pmid: 14688773
references.citation: Hum Mov Sci. 2001 Jun;20(3):257-76
references.pmid: 11517672
references.citation: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999 Jun;29(6):316-25; discussion 326-30
references.pmid: 10370915
references.citation: Foot Ankle Int. 1997 Oct;18(10):644-8
references.pmid: 9347302
references.citation: Gait Posture. 2008 Feb;27(2):331-9
references.pmid: 17583511
references.citation: Gait Posture. 2007 Feb;25(2):295-302
references.pmid: 16759862
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 Jan;14(1):14-23
references.pmid: 10619086
references.citation: J Foot Ankle Res. 2009 Nov 26;2:35
references.pmid: 19939283
references.citation: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Jun;18(3):420-5
references.pmid: 17208458
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Aug;26(8):1021-7
references.pmid: 7968419
references.citation: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997 Apr;25(4):253-63
references.pmid: 9083944
references.citation: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Sep;36(9):635-44
references.pmid: 17017268
references.citation: Gait Posture. 2008 May;27(4):710-4
references.pmid: 17723303
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 May;36(5):862-7
references.pmid: 15126722
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Jan;19(1):71-7
references.pmid: 14659933