A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction.
BACKGROUND
Current scoring functions are not very successful in protein-ligand binding affinity prediction albeit their popularity in structure-based drug designs. Here, we propose a general knowledge-guided scoring (KGS) strategy to tackle this problem. Our KGS strategy computes the binding constant of a given protein-ligand complex based on the known binding constant of an appropriate reference complex. A good training set that includes a sufficient number of protein-ligand complexes with known binding data needs to be supplied for finding the reference complex. The reference complex is required to share a similar pattern of key protein-ligand interactions to that of the complex of interest. Thus, some uncertain factors in protein-ligand binding may cancel out, resulting in a more accurate prediction of absolute binding constants.


RESULTS
In our study, an automatic algorithm was developed for summarizing key protein-ligand interactions as a pharmacophore model and identifying the reference complex with a maximal similarity to the query complex. Our KGS strategy was evaluated in combination with two scoring functions (X-Score and PLP) on three test sets, containing 112 HIV protease complexes, 44 carbonic anhydrase complexes, and 73 trypsin complexes, respectively. Our results obtained on crystal structures as well as computer-generated docking poses indicated that application of the KGS strategy produced more accurate predictions especially when X-Score or PLP alone did not perform well.


CONCLUSIONS
Compared to other targeted scoring functions, our KGS strategy does not require any re-parameterization or modification on current scoring methods, and its application is not tied to certain systems. The effectiveness of our KGS strategy is in theory proportional to the ever-increasing knowledge of experimental protein-ligand binding data. Our KGS strategy may serve as a more practical remedy for current scoring functions to improve their accuracy in binding affinity prediction.
Cheng
Tiejun
T
State Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 345 Lingling Road, Shanghai 200032, PR China.
Liu
Zhihai
Z
Wang
Renxiao
R
D000465:Algorithms; D001665:Binding Sites; D030562:Databases, Protein; D015195:Drug Design; D008024:Ligands; D008958:Models, Molecular; D011487:Protein Conformation; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism; D013329:Structure-Activity Relationship
D008024:Ligands; D011506:Proteins
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Feb;48(2):288-95
18229906
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Mar;48(3):602-12
18293951
J Med Chem. 2004 Jun 3;47(12):2977-80
15163179
J Med Chem. 2003 Feb 13;46(4):499-511
12570372
J Mol Graph Model. 2005 Apr;23(5):395-407
15781182
J Chem Inf Model. 2005 Sep-Oct;45(5):1291-302
16180906
Proteins. 1990;8(3):195-202
2281083
J Comput Chem. 2006 Nov 30;27(15):1866-75
16983673
J Med Chem. 2004 Jun 3;47(12):3032-47
15163185
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2001 May;15(5):411-28
11394736
Chem Biol. 1995 May;2(5):317-24
9383433
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Sep-Oct;47(5):1868-76
17705464
Drug Discov Today. 2002 Oct 15;7(20):1047-55
12546894
J Comput Chem. 2006 Nov 30;27(15):1876-82
16983671
Protein Eng. 1994 Mar;7(3):385-91
8177887
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1996 Oct;10(5):427-40
8951652
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Mar-Apr;47(2):279-94
17381166
J Mol Biol. 1995 Jan 6;245(1):43-53
7823319
J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 5;49(20):5895-902
17004705
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995 Apr;5(2):224-8
7648325
J Mol Biol. 1997 Apr 4;267(3):727-48
9126849
J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 19;49(21):6177-96
17034125
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Jan-Feb;47(1):195-207
17238265
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Sep-Oct;47(5):1858-67
17685604
J Med Chem. 2005 Oct 6;48(20):6296-303
16190756
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
10592235
J Med Chem. 2004 Mar 25;47(7):1739-49
15027865
J Mol Graph Model. 2003 Jan;21(4):289-307
12479928
J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 5;46(12):2287-303
12773034
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Jul-Aug;47(4):1379-85
17530839
Nature. 2004 Dec 16;432(7019):862-5
15602552
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1997 Sep;11(5):425-45
9385547
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1994 Jun;8(3):243-56
7964925
J Med Chem. 2005 Jun 16;48(12):4111-9
15943484
Proteins. 2004 Nov 1;57(2):225-42
15340911
J Mol Biol. 1996 Aug 23;261(3):470-89
8780787
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;44(6):2114-25
15554682
Proteins. 2005 Nov 1;61(2):272-87
16106379
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1033-48
19320460
Drug Discov Today. 2009 Jun;14(11-12):562-9
19508918
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2007 May;21(5):281-306
17387436
J Mol Biol. 2000 Jan 14;295(2):337-56
10623530
Proteins. 1998 Nov 15;33(3):367-82
9829696
J Med Chem. 1999 Mar 11;42(5):791-804
10072678
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Apr;48(4):861-72
18380449
Org Biomol Chem. 2004 Nov 21;2(22):3267-73
15534704
J Chem Inf Model. 2006 Nov-Dec;46(6):2684-91
17125208
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1996 Aug;10(4):293-304
8877701
J Chem Inf Model. 2006 Mar-Apr;46(2):636-41
16562993
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Nov-Dec;47(6):2140-8
17985865
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007 Oct;11(5):494-502
17936059
Acc Chem Res. 2000 Dec;33(12):889-97
11123888
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2008 May;11(3):356-64
18428089
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002 Jan;16(1):11-26
12197663
J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 5;49(20):5912-31
17004707
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1998 Jul;12(4):309-23
9777490
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1079-93
19358517