title: Visceral adhesions to hernia prostheses.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To report our experience with abdominal adhesion formation to various synthetic and biologic prosthetic materials in a rat ventral hernia model.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 14 prostheses, nine synthetic, four biologic, and one bioresorbable, were evaluated in the rat. Two synthetic prostheses had bioresorbable coatings and one consisted of synthetic and bioresorbable materials woven together. The model involved the removal from the midline of a 2.5 x 2.5-cm segment of full-thickness ventral abdominal wall with the test prosthetic material sewed into the defect, thus, exposing the viscera directly to one surface of the prosthesis. There were four or more rats in each group. Adhesions were assessed at autopsy 7 days after operation or later. The results were expressed as the percentage area of prosthesis surface involved.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All 14 of the tested prosthetic materials induced adhesions. Vicryl Mesh and the four biologic varieties had lesser overall adhesion coverage than the bare synthetic prostheses. Sepramesh developed the least adhesion coverage (15%). The two synthetic materials with bioresorbable coatings had smaller areas involved compared to bare synthetic prostheses.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  All of the tested prostheses attracted adhesions. Biologic prostheses had smaller areas of coverage compared to synthetic prostheses. Barrier surfaces on synthetic meshes were associated with a much lesser extent of adhesion involvement.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Mayo Mail Code 195, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. gaert015@umn.edu
authors.forename: W B
authors.initials: WB
authors.lastname: Gaertner
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Bonsack
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Delaney
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000009:adverse effects; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D005260:Female; D006555:Hernia, Ventral / Q000601:surgery*; D019736:Prostheses and Implants / Q000009:adverse effects*; D019919:Prosthesis Implantation / Q000009:adverse effects*; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D013526:Surgical Mesh / Q000009:adverse effects*; D000267:Tissue Adhesions / Q000209:etiology
chemical_list: D001672:Biocompatible Materials
references.citation: Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971 Sep;133(3):497-511
references.pmid: 4398338
references.citation: Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;88(1):101-12, ix
references.pmid: 18267164
references.citation: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Aug;46(4):356-9
references.pmid: 16866800
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Mar;190(3):271-80
references.pmid: 10703851
references.citation: Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 May-Jun;50(51):725-8
references.pmid: 12828071
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1993 Sep;218(3):239-48; discussion 248-9
references.pmid: 8373267
references.citation: World J Surg. 2007 Feb;31(2):423-9; discussion 430
references.pmid: 17180562
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2009 Mar;96(3):305-13
references.pmid: 19224521
references.citation: Hernia. 2007 Feb;11(1):57-60
references.pmid: 17119853
references.citation: Hernia. 2005 Oct;9(3):269-76
references.pmid: 16136391
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2000 Mar;231(3):436-42
references.pmid: 10714638
references.citation: Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Jan;60(1):76-80
references.pmid: 18281802
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2007 Mar;193(3):360-3; discussion 363
references.pmid: 17320535
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1993 Jul;128(7):765-70; discussion 770-1
references.pmid: 8317958
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Apr;11(2):103-6
references.pmid: 11330373
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2004 Apr;18(4):681-5
references.pmid: 15026899
references.citation: J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Oct;11(10):1275-85
references.pmid: 17674112
references.citation: Chirurg. 2002 May;73(5):474-80
references.pmid: 12089832
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Apr;198(4):543-8
references.pmid: 15051006
references.citation: Hernia. 2008 Jun;12(3):247-50
references.pmid: 18209948
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1985 Jan;72(1):70-1
references.pmid: 3155634
references.citation: Eur Surg Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;35(1):41-5
references.pmid: 12566786
references.citation: J Surg Res. 2008 May 15;146(2):241-5
references.pmid: 18314140
references.citation: J Surg Res. 2001 May 15;97(2):109-16
references.pmid: 11341785
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):578-83; discussion 583-5
references.pmid: 15383785
references.citation: Am J Surg. 1973 Sep;126(3):345-53
references.pmid: 4580750
references.citation: Radiology. 1989 Aug;172(2):387-8
references.pmid: 2664863
references.citation: Curr Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;63(4):255-8
references.pmid: 16843776
references.citation: Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Feb;152(2):141-4
references.pmid: 7209754
references.citation: Tissue Eng. 2006 Sep;12(9):2629-37
references.pmid: 16995796
references.citation: Hernia. 2003 Jun;7(2):85-8
references.pmid: 12820030
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;82(4 Pt 1):566-8
references.pmid: 8377983
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Jun;190(6):645-50
references.pmid: 10872998
references.citation: World J Surg. 2000 Jan;24(1):95-100;discussion 101
references.pmid: 10594211