title: Efficiency analysis of waveform shape for electrical excitation of nerve fibers.
abstract: Stimulation efficiency is an important consideration in the stimulation parameters of implantable neural stimulators. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of waveform shape and duration on the charge, power, and energy efficiency of neural stimulation. Using a population model of mammalian axons and in vivo experiments on cat sciatic nerve, we analyzed the stimulation efficiency of four waveform shapes: square, rising exponential, decaying exponential, and rising ramp. No waveform was simultaneously energy-, charge-, and power-optimal, and differences in efficiency among waveform shapes varied with pulse width (PW). For short PWs (< or = 0.1 ms), square waveforms were no less energy-efficient than exponential waveforms, and the most charge-efficient shape was the ramp. For long PW s (> or = 0.5 ms), the square was the least energy-efficient and charge-efficient shape, but across most PW s, the square was the most power-efficient shape. Rising exponentials provided no practical gains in efficiency over the other shapes, and our results refute previous claims that the rising exponential is the energy-optimal shape. An improved understanding of how stimulation parameters affect stimulation efficiency will help improve the design and programming of implantable stimulators to minimize tissue damage and extend battery life.
authors.affiliation: Biomedical Engineering Department, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. aw45@duke.edu
authors.forename: Amorn
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Wongsarnpigoon
authors.forename: John P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Woock
authors.forename: Warren M
authors.initials: WM
authors.lastname: Grill
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D001369:Axons / Q000502:physiology; D002415:Cats; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D004594:Electrophysiology; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009412:Nerve Fibers / Q000502:physiology*; D009413:Nerve Fibers, Myelinated / Q000502:physiology; D012584:Sciatic Nerve / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Apr;16(4 Pt 1):769-77
references.pmid: 7683804
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1998 Feb;118(4):477-88
references.pmid: 9504843
references.citation: Gen Physiol Biophys. 1992 Feb;11(1):69-83
references.pmid: 1499982
references.citation: Ann Biomed Eng. 1974 Sep;2(3):252-64
references.pmid: 4499993
references.citation: Neural Comput. 1997 Aug 15;9(6):1179-209
references.pmid: 9248061
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;87(2):995-1006
references.pmid: 11826063
references.citation: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1976 Jul;23(4):329-37
references.pmid: 1278925
references.citation: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000 Jan;47(1):59-67
references.pmid: 10646280
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;118(8):1889-94
references.pmid: 17581776
references.citation: Biophys J. 1999 Feb;76(2):878-88
references.pmid: 9929489
references.citation: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1992 Dec;39(12):1244-54
references.pmid: 1487287
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 1981 Sep;9(3):292-9
references.pmid: 7301072
references.citation: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005 Apr;52(4):740-3
references.pmid: 15825876
references.citation: Ann Biomed Eng. 1979;7(2):117-25
references.pmid: 533020
references.citation: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985 Jan;32(1):8-14
references.pmid: 3980038
references.citation: J Neural Eng. 2008 Mar;5(1):44-53
references.pmid: 18310810
references.citation: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990 Oct;37(10):996-1001
references.pmid: 2249872
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1970 May;32(5):553-9
references.pmid: 5438095
references.citation: Med Biol Eng. 1967 May;5(3):271-93
references.pmid: 6068939
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1946 Sep;9:387-90
references.pmid: 20997621
references.citation: J Neural Eng. 2007 Sep;4(3):227-33
references.pmid: 17873425