title: Bilingualism and attention: a study of balanced and unbalanced bilingual deaf users of American Sign Language and English.
abstract: Early deafness is thought to affect low-level sensorimotor processing such as selective attention, whereas bilingualism is thought to be strongly associated with higher order cognitive processing such as attention switching under cognitive load. This study explores the effects of bimodal-bilingualism (in American Sign Language and written English) on attention switching, in order to contrast the roles of bilingual proficiency and age of acquisition in relation to cognitive flexibility among deaf adults. Results indicated a strong high-proficiency bilingual advantage in the higher order attention task. The level of proficiency in 2 languages appears to be the driving force for cognitive flexibility. However, additional data are needed to reach conclusive interpretation for the influence of age of second language acquisition on higher order attention-switching ability and associated cognitive flexibility.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. poornak@u.washington.edu
authors.forename: Poorna
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Kushalnagar
authors.forename: H Julia
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Hannay
authors.forename: Arturo E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Hernandez
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001288:Attention; D003638:Deafness / Q000453:epidemiology*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005817:Genetic Counseling; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008037:Linguistics; D008297:Male; D019303:Multilingualism; D019986:Persons with Hearing Disabilities; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012813:Sign Language; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 9;45(8):1801-11
references.pmid: 17291549
references.citation: Brain Res. 1987 Mar 10;405(2):268-83
references.pmid: 3567605
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1679-93
references.pmid: 15275924
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;14(5):687-701
references.pmid: 12167254
references.citation: Brain Res. 2007 Jun 11;1153:178-87
references.pmid: 17467671
references.citation: Brain Res. 1987 Mar 10;405(2):253-67
references.pmid: 3567604
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
references.pmid: 7367577
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54
references.pmid: 15355143
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Aug;14(2):510-20
references.pmid: 11467923
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 1985 Jul;4(3):313-27
references.pmid: 4027064
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 May;68(5):650-2
references.pmid: 10766900
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):922-9
references.pmid: 9448260
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 25;101(21):8174-9
references.pmid: 15148381
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1341-54
references.pmid: 17087588
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2000 Jul;73(3):421-31
references.pmid: 10860563
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 1;20(17):RC93
references.pmid: 10952732
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1993 Nov;114(3):510-32
references.pmid: 8272468
references.citation: Brain. 1998 Oct;121 ( Pt 10):1841-52
references.pmid: 9798741
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2002 Jan;30(1):34-45
references.pmid: 11958353
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2004 Jun;19(2):290-303
references.pmid: 15222822
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1201-6
references.pmid: 19121123
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2002 Jun;49(1):170-81
references.pmid: 12027401