Alternative Model-Based and Design-Based Frameworks for Inference From Samples to Populations: From Polarization to Integration.
A model-based framework, due originally to R. A. Fisher, and a design-based framework, due originally to J. Neyman, offer alternative mechanisms for inference from samples to populations. We show how these frameworks can utilize different types of samples (nonrandom or random vs. only random) and allow different kinds of inference (descriptive vs. analytic) to different kinds of populations (finite vs. infinite). We describe the extent of each framework's implementation in observational psychology research. After clarifying some important limitations of each framework, we describe how these limitations are overcome by a newer hybrid model/design-based inferential framework. This hybrid framework allows both kinds of inference to both kinds of populations, given a random sample. We illustrate implementation of the hybrid framework using the High School and Beyond data set.
Sterba
Sonya K
SK
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Stat Methods Med Res. 1996 Sep;5(3):263-81
8931196
Psychol Methods. 2003 Dec;8(4):524-34
14664687
Psychol Methods. 2003 Dec;8(4):497-517
14664685
N Engl J Med. 1983 Nov 24;309(21):1291-9
6633587
Stat Methods Med Res. 1996 Sep;5(3):239-61
8931195