Low ninety-day re-admission rates after emergency and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital.
BACKGROUND
Re-admission rate following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently defined as within 30 days of the initial operation. This may underestimate the true incidence and financial cost of postoperative morbidity. This study aimed to analyse re-admissions within 90 days of elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a district general hospital, and to compare outcomes to larger teaching centres.


METHODS
We undertook a retrospective analysis of all patients re-admitted within 90 days of laparoscopic cholecystectomy during an 18-month period (June 2006 to December 2007). Patient characteristics, details of the primary operation, and reasons for re-admission were identified, and a comparison of re-admissions following elective versus emergency procedures was performed.


RESULTS
A total of 326 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed during the 18-month period (246 elective, 80 emergency). No operations required conversion to an open procedure. Twenty-five patients were re-admitted within 90 days of their operation, of whom only 14 had complications directly related to their surgery (overall re-admission rate 4.3%). There was no statistical difference in re-admission rate or cause of re-admission between elective and emergency procedures. However, the mean time to re-admission following elective procedures was significantly longer (36 days; P = 0.0003).


CONCLUSIONS
Re-admission rates at our district general hospital are comparable to those reported by larger teaching centres. Current 30-day re-admission data may significantly underestimate morbidity rates and socio-economic cost following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Down
Sue K
SK
Department of General Surgery, Hinchingbrooke Hospital NHS Trust, Hinchingbrooke Park, Huntingdon, UK.
Nicolic
Marko
M
Abdulkarim
Hibba
H
Skelton
Nick
N
Harris
Adrian H
AH
Koak
Yashwant
Y
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Q000009:adverse effects*; D017558:Elective Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects; D004630:Emergencies; D004739:England; D006767:Hospitals, District / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006769:Hospitals, General / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D010359:Patient Readmission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011184:Postoperative Period; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D055815:Young Adult
JSLS. 2008 Oct-Dec;12(4):389-94
19275855
Br J Surg. 2008 Apr;95(4):472-6
17968981
World J Surg. 1992 Nov-Dec;16(6):1133-40
1455885
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004 Mar;86(2):87-90
15005924
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD006231
17054285
Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):461-7
9563529
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jan;84(1):20-2
11892728
Am Surg. 2007 Nov;73(11):1188-92
18092660
World J Surg. 2007 Jun;31(6):1298-01; discussion 1302-3
17483986
Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):1928-34
18398648
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Jan;91(1):39-42
19126334
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Jan;91(1):30-4
18990272
Gut. 1991 Mar;32(3):316-20
2013429
World J Surg. 2002 Sep;26(9):1117-21
12209240
Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb;23(2):304-12
18398646
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Aug;19(4):471-4
19489677
Am J Surg. 1997 Jun;173(6):513-7
9207165
Arch Surg. 1996 May;131(5):540-4; discussion 544-5
8624202
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jan;84(1):10-3
11890619