title: Malleability of Attitudes or Malleability of the IAT?
abstract: In the current set of experiments, we establish, and explore the consequences of, the imprecision that characterizes the attribute response labels typically employed in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). In Experiment 1, we demonstrate the malleability of the IAT, as conventionally implemented. IAT scores are shown to be influenced by perspective mindsets induced by an unrelated preceding task. Then, we explore how the malleability of the IAT can lead to the inference that attitude change has occurred even when there is very good reason to believe it has not (Experiment 2), and conversely, how it can obscure the detection of attitude change when such change is indeed likely to have occurred (Experiment 3). We provide conceptual explanations for these discrepancies and suggest methodological improvements to enhance the specificity of IAT measures.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, St. Mary's College of Maryland.
authors.forename: H Anna
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Han
authors.forename: Sandor
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Czellar
authors.forename: Michael A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Olson
authors.forename: Russell H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Fazio
references.citation: Z Exp Psychol. 2001;48(2):123-34
references.pmid: 11392980
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):1022-38
references.pmid: 11138752
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):4-27
references.pmid: 7878162
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 May;86(5):653-67
references.pmid: 15161392
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80
references.pmid: 9654756
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):139-44
references.pmid: 15948288
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):828-41
references.pmid: 11708560
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Dec;33(12):1727-40
references.pmid: 18000106
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jul;87(1):5-22
references.pmid: 15250789
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1955 Nov;51(3):629-36
references.pmid: 13286010
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;19(7):717-23
references.pmid: 18727788
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):856-68
references.pmid: 11708562
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):292-306
references.pmid: 18211178
references.citation: Alcohol Alcohol. 2007 Jul-Aug;42(4):301-7
references.pmid: 17517819
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):815-27
references.pmid: 11708559
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Sep;132(3):455-69
references.pmid: 13678378
references.citation: Soc Cogn. 2007 Oct 1;25(5):603-637
references.pmid: 19424447
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):842-55
references.pmid: 11708561
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Feb;31(2):166-80
references.pmid: 15619590
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):957-71
references.pmid: 17547482
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:297-327
references.pmid: 12172003
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1948 Sep;55(5):250-76
references.pmid: 18887584
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):969-78
references.pmid: 14599258
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216
references.pmid: 12916565
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):800-14
references.pmid: 11708558
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):774-88
references.pmid: 11708556