The accuracy of clinical symptoms and signs for the diagnosis of serious bacterial infection in young febrile children: prospective cohort study of 15 781 febrile illnesses.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate current processes by which young children presenting with a febrile illness but suspected of having serious bacterial infection are diagnosed and treated, and to develop and test a multivariable model to distinguish serious bacterial infections from self limiting non-bacterial illnesses. Design Two year prospective cohort study. Setting The emergency department of The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.


METHODS
Children aged less than 5 years presenting with a febrile illness between 1 July 2004 and 30 June 2006.


METHODS
A standardised clinical evaluation that included mandatory entry of 40 clinical features into the hospital's electronic record keeping system was performed by physicians. Serious bacterial infections were confirmed or excluded using standard radiological and microbiological tests and follow-up. Main outcome measures Diagnosis of one of three key types of serious bacterial infection (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and bacteraemia), and the accuracy of both our clinical decision making model and clinician judgment in making these diagnoses.


RESULTS
We had follow-up data for 93% of the 15 781 instances of febrile illnesses recorded during the study period. The combined prevalence of any of the three infections of interest (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or bacteraemia) was 7.2% (1120/15 781, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.7% to 7.5%), with urinary tract infection the diagnosis in 543 (3.4%) cases of febrile illness (95% CI 3.2% to 3.7%), pneumonia in 533 (3.4%) cases (95% CI 3.1% to 3.7%), and bacteraemia in 64 (0.4%) cases (95% CI 0.3% to 0.5%). Almost all (>94%) of the children with serious bacterial infections had the appropriate test (urine culture, chest radiograph, or blood culture). Antibiotics were prescribed acutely in 66% (359/543) of children with urinary tract infection, 69% (366/533) with pneumonia, and 81% (52/64) with bacteraemia. However, 20% (2686/13 557) of children without bacterial infection were also prescribed antibiotics. On the basis of the data from the clinical evaluations and the confirmed diagnosis, a diagnostic model was developed using multinomial logistic regression methods. Physicians' diagnoses of bacterial infection had low sensitivity (10-50%) and high specificity (90-100%), whereas the clinical diagnostic model provided a broad range of values for sensitivity and specificity.


CONCLUSIONS
Emergency department physicians tend to underestimate the likelihood of serious bacterial infection in young children with fever, leading to undertreatment with antibiotics. A clinical diagnostic model could improve decision making by increasing sensitivity for detecting serious bacterial infection, thereby improving early treatment.
Craig
Jonathan C
JC
Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Williams
Gabrielle J
GJ
Jones
Mike
M
Codarini
Miriam
M
Macaskill
Petra
P
Hayen
Andrew
A
Irwig
Les
L
Fitzgerald
Dominic A
DA
Isaacs
David
D
McCaskill
Mary
M
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001424:Bacterial Infections / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000188:drug therapy; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005334:Fever / Q000382:microbiology*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012720:Severity of Illness Index
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):311-6
11483793
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):729-34
12236276
Pediatrics. 1994 Sep;94(3):390-6
8065869
Am J Dis Child. 1980 Feb;134(2):176-81
7352443
Fam Pract. 2005 Aug;22(4):367-74
15897210
N Engl J Med. 1973 Jun 21;288(25):1309-12
4145198
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Feb;12(2):111-4
8426766
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1695-701
16651326
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Dec;28(12):1119-20
19858774
Acta Clin Belg. 2006 Jul-Aug;61(4):161-5
17091911
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Jun;31(6):679-87
9624306
Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36(4):296-301
15198188
J Pediatr. 1985 Dec;107(6):855-60
4067741
J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(1):145-66
18161546
Stat Med. 2003 Feb 28;22(4):639-59
12590419
JAMA. 2009 Mar 11;301(10):1060-2
19278949
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 May;10(5):858-64
15200820
JAMA. 2004 Mar 10;291(10):1203-12
15010441
BMC Pediatr. 2005 Apr 05;5(1):4
15811182
Stat Med. 1992 Dec;11(16):2093-109
1293671
JAMA. 2002 Jun 19;287(23):3103-9
12069673
J Pediatr. 1995 Jun;126(6):877-81
7776087
J Paediatr Child Health. 2000 Jun;36(3):221-5
10849220
JAMA. 1998 Mar 18;279(11):875-7
9516004
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jul;57(540):538-46
17727746
Pediatrics. 1982 Nov;70(5):802-9
7133831
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Aug;8(8):781-7
11483452
Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):1-6
12507953
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Oct;22(10):689-99
17047467
JAMA. 1992 May 20;267(19):2650-2
1573756