Effective population size, gene flow, and species status in a narrow endemic sunflower, Helianthus neglectus, compared to its widespread sister species, H. petiolaris.
Species delimitation has long been a difficult and controversial process, and different operational criteria often lead to different results. In particular, investigators using phenotypic vs. molecular data to delineate species may recognize different boundaries, especially if morphologically or ecologically differentiated populations have only recently diverged. Here we examine the genetic relationship between the widespread sunflower species Helianthus petiolaris and its narrowly distributed sand dune endemic sister species H. neglectus using sequence data from nine nuclear loci. The two species were initially described as distinct based on a number of minor morphological differences, somewhat different ecological tolerances, and at least one chromosomal rearrangement distinguishing them; but detailed molecular data has not been available until now. We find that, consistent with previous work, H. petiolaris is exceptionally genetically diverse. Surprisingly, H. neglectus harbors very similar levels of genetic diversity (average diversity across loci is actually slightly higher in H. neglectus). It is extremely unlikely that such a geographically restricted species could maintain these levels of genetic variation in isolation. In addition, the two species show very little evidence of any genetic divergence, and estimates of interspecific gene flow are comparable to gene flow estimates among regions within H. petiolaris. These results indicate that H. petiolaris and H. neglectus likely do not represent two distinct, isolated gene pools; H. neglectus is probably more accurately thought of as a geographically restricted, morphologically and ecologically distinct subspecies of H. petiolaris rather than a separate species.
Raduski
Andrew R
AR
Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Rieseberg
Loren H
LH
Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Strasburg
Jared L
JL
Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
D051456:Gene Flow; D017343:Genes, Plant; D056426:Genetic Loci; D014644:Genetic Variation; D006368:Helianthus / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development; D010641:Phenotype; D063245:Plant Development
Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):915-25
9335623
Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Jun;26(6):1341-55
19276154
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 20;104(8):2785-90
17301231
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Jul;28(1):12-23
12801468
Evolution. 2002 Nov;56(11):2126-37
12487344
Bioinformatics. 2003 Dec 12;19(18):2496-7
14668244
Syst Biol. 2002 Feb;51(1):69-91
11943093
Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153-9
3110004
Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 1998 Jan;63(1):99-120
9480733
Genetics. 1985 Sep;111(1):147-64
4029609
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Jun;47(3):1005-17
18439841
Genetics. 1997 Mar;145(3):833-46
9055092
Syst Biol. 2007 Dec;56(6):879-86
18027281
Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):859-65
10937259
Am J Bot. 2003 Dec;90(12):1708-19
21653347
Mol Ecol. 2001 Mar;10(3):779-91
11298987
Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256-76
1145509
Genetics. 2007 Apr;175(4):1883-93
17277373
Heredity (Edinb). 2000 Apr;84 ( Pt 4):441-51
10849068
J Evol Biol. 2008 Nov;21(6):1460-9
18681916
Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
19325852
Mol Ecol. 2002 Sep;11(9):1703-15
12207721
Evolution. 1990 Sep;44(6):1498-1511
28564296
Genetics. 2004 Oct;168(2):1071-6
15514076
Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 1;22(3):341-5
16317072
Genetics. 2004 May;167(1):449-57
15166168
Evolution. 2009 Aug;63(8):2061-75
19473382
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Apr;27(4):905-20
19955477
Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585-95
2513255
Evolution. 2008 Aug;62(8):1936-50
18462213
Genetics. 1997 Mar;145(3):847-55
9055093