Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality.
OBJECTIVE
To validate the risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality through its association with maternal and neonatal outcomes for all pregnancies (model 1) and in primiparous patients with singleton pregnancies (model 2).


METHODS
We constructed a population-based cohort of 845,651 patients from 401 hospitals representing all deliveries in California and Pennsylvania between 2004 and 2005. We used linked birth certificate and hospital admission records for mother and neonate to estimate the correlation between risk-adjusted cesarean delivery and a composite of adverse maternal outcomes, adverse neonatal outcomes, and four obstetric patient safety indicators from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).


RESULTS
In both models, risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates were negatively correlated with both the maternal and neonatal composite outcomes and the AHRQ patient safety indicators for birth trauma, injury with instrumented vaginal delivery, and cesarean delivery. Approximately 60% of the 107 hospitals with lower-than-expected risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates had higher-than-expected rates of at least one of the six adverse outcomes, compared with 19.6% of the hospitals with higher-than-expected risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates and 36.1% of the hospitals with expected rates (P<.001).


CONCLUSIONS
Lower-than-expected risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates in all patients or when restricted to a more homogeneous group of primiparous patients with term singleton pregnancies are associated with higher-than-expected adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Higher-than-expected risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates do not result in improved outcomes.
Srinivas
Sindhu K
SK
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania; the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania; the Center for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; and the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Fager
Corinne
C
Lorch
Scott A
SA
D002140:California; D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015897:Comorbidity; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D009774:Obstetrics / Q000592:standards*; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010298:Parity; D010414:Pennsylvania; D011247:Pregnancy; D011248:Pregnancy Complications / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care; D020379:Risk Adjustment
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;99(6):976-80
12052584
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007 Mar;62(3):207-13
17306043
Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):234-42
19169125
N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 23;349(17):1665-7
14573739
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;194(2):402-7
16458637
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):257-60
17011396
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;187(3):721-7
12237654
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;101(6):1204-12
12798526
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;190(2):395-400
14981380
Comput Biomed Res. 1997 Aug;30(4):290-305
9339323
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):288-98
12585826
Health Serv Res. 2000 Feb;34(6):1351-62
10654835
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;93(6):1025-30
10362175
BJOG. 2006 Jan;113(1):75-85
16398775
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;104(1):11-9
15228995
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 2;144(9):641-9
16670133
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;194(6):1644-51; discussion 1651-2
16643812
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995 Apr 21;44(15):303-7
7708041