Phylogenetic and multivariate analyses to determine the effects of different tillage and residue management practices on soil bacterial communities.
Bacterial communities are important not only in the cycling of organic compounds but also in maintaining ecosystems. Specific bacterial groups can be affected as a result of changes in environmental conditions caused by human activities, such as agricultural practices. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of different forms of tillage and residue management on soil bacterial communities by using phylogenetic and multivariate analyses. Treatments involving zero tillage (ZT) and conventional tillage (CT) with their respective combinations of residue management, i.e., removed residue (-R) and kept residue (+R), and maize/wheat rotation, were selected from a long-term field trial started in 1991. Analysis of bacterial diversity showed that soils under zero tillage and crop residue retention (ZT/+R) had the highest levels of diversity and richness. Multivariate analysis showed that beneficial bacterial groups such as fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. and Burkholderiales were favored by residue retention (ZT/+R and CT/+R) and negatively affected by residue removal (ZT/-R). Zero-tillage treatments (ZT/+R and ZT/-R) had a positive effect on the Rhizobiales group, with its main representatives related to Methylosinus spp. known as methane-oxidizing bacteria. It can be concluded that practices that include reduced tillage and crop residue retention can be adopted as safer agricultural practices to preserve and improve the diversity of soil bacterial communities.
Ceja-Navarro
Javier A
JA
Laboratory of Soil Ecology, Department of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Cinvestav, Avenida Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Mexico, D.F., Mexico. javiercnav@gmail.com
Rivera-Orduña
Flor N
FN
Patiño-Zúñiga
Leonardo
L
Vila-Sanjurjo
Antón
A
Crossa
José
J
Govaerts
Bram
B
Dendooven
Luc
L
D000383:Agriculture / Q000379:methods*; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000302:isolation & purification; D044822:Biodiversity; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D006801:Humans; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010802:Phylogeny; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D014908:Triticum / Q000254:growth & development; D003313:Zea mays / Q000254:growth & development
D004269:DNA, Bacterial; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Aug;70(8):4800-6
15294817
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Mar;71(3):1501-6
15746353
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000 Oct;24(4):487-506
10978548
Microbiol Rev. 1992 Dec;56(4):662-76
1480114
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Jul;25(7):1253-6
18397919
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001 Jan;25(1):39-67
11152940
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Mar;64(3):1106-14
16349516
Plant Cell. 1996 Oct;8(10):1683-1698
12239358
J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Mar;52(3):389-93
12531508
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Nov;62(2):142-60
17892477
Biodegradation. 1994 Dec;5(3-4):145-59
7765830
Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov;5(11):1111-20
14641591
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Apr;57(4):1070-4
1647749
J Bacteriol. 1998 Sep;180(18):4765-74
9733676
J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(6):1079-86
12752818
Environ Microbiol. 1999 Feb;1(1):15-21
11207714
Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Oct 11;17(19):7843-53
2798131
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 May;74(9):2717-27
18310425
Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):671-7
12167873
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Feb;62(2):316-22
8593035
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jul;70(7):4012-20
15240277
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 12;363(1491):543-55
17720669
Mol Microbiol. 2003 Oct;50(2):563-75
14617179
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
9396791
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
2231712
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Sep;67(9):4374-6
11526051
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Dec;59(12):4065-73
8285706