Efficiency analysis of waveform shape for electrical excitation of nerve fibers.
Stimulation efficiency is an important consideration in the stimulation parameters of implantable neural stimulators. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of waveform shape and duration on the charge, power, and energy efficiency of neural stimulation. Using a population model of mammalian axons and in vivo experiments on cat sciatic nerve, we analyzed the stimulation efficiency of four waveform shapes: square, rising exponential, decaying exponential, and rising ramp. No waveform was simultaneously energy-, charge-, and power-optimal, and differences in efficiency among waveform shapes varied with pulse width (PW). For short PWs (< or = 0.1 ms), square waveforms were no less energy-efficient than exponential waveforms, and the most charge-efficient shape was the ramp. For long PW s (> or = 0.5 ms), the square was the least energy-efficient and charge-efficient shape, but across most PW s, the square was the most power-efficient shape. Rising exponentials provided no practical gains in efficiency over the other shapes, and our results refute previous claims that the rising exponential is the energy-optimal shape. An improved understanding of how stimulation parameters affect stimulation efficiency will help improve the design and programming of implantable stimulators to minimize tissue damage and extend battery life.
Wongsarnpigoon
Amorn
A
Biomedical Engineering Department, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. aw45@duke.edu
Woock
John P
JP
Grill
Warren M
WM
D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D001369:Axons / Q000502:physiology; D002415:Cats; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D004594:Electrophysiology; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009412:Nerve Fibers / Q000502:physiology*; D009413:Nerve Fibers, Myelinated / Q000502:physiology; D012584:Sciatic Nerve / Q000502:physiology
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Apr;16(4 Pt 1):769-77
7683804
Exp Brain Res. 1998 Feb;118(4):477-88
9504843
Gen Physiol Biophys. 1992 Feb;11(1):69-83
1499982
Ann Biomed Eng. 1974 Sep;2(3):252-64
4499993
Neural Comput. 1997 Aug 15;9(6):1179-209
9248061
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;87(2):995-1006
11826063
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1976 Jul;23(4):329-37
1278925
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000 Jan;47(1):59-67
10646280
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;118(8):1889-94
17581776
Biophys J. 1999 Feb;76(2):878-88
9929489
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1992 Dec;39(12):1244-54
1487287
Neurosurgery. 1981 Sep;9(3):292-9
7301072
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005 Apr;52(4):740-3
15825876
Ann Biomed Eng. 1979;7(2):117-25
533020
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985 Jan;32(1):8-14
3980038
J Neural Eng. 2008 Mar;5(1):44-53
18310810
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990 Oct;37(10):996-1001
2249872
J Neurosurg. 1970 May;32(5):553-9
5438095
Med Biol Eng. 1967 May;5(3):271-93
6068939
J Neurophysiol. 1946 Sep;9:387-90
20997621
J Neural Eng. 2007 Sep;4(3):227-33
17873425