Biomechanical and in vivo evaluation of experimental closure devices of the annulus fibrosus designed for a goat nucleus replacement model.
Promising strategies are being developed to replace or regenerate the herniated nucleus pulposus. However, clinical efficacy of these methods has still to be addressed, and the lack of appropriate annulus closure techniques is increasingly being recognised as a major limiting factor. In the current study, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of novel annulus closure devices (ACDs) was performed. These devices are intended to be used in adjunct to nucleus replacement therapies in an experimental goat study. After a standardised discectomy had been performed, different ACDs were implanted solely or in addition to a collagen nucleus replacement implant. Biomechanical effects and axial failure load were assessed in vitro and followed by in vivo evaluation in a goat model. On axial compression, the average axial failure load for ACDs with four barb rings was significantly higher compared to the implants with five barb rings. The increased range of flexion-extension and latero-flexion observed after discectomy were restored to the normal range after implantation of the implants. Positive findings with the four-ring ACD were confirmed in goats after a follow-up of 2 weeks in vivo. However, after 6 weeks most implants (n = 16) showed signs of destruction and displacement. Although there seemed to be a tendency towards better results when ACDs were placed in addition to the nucleus replacements, these differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, two endplate reactions extending into the subchondral bone were observed, most likely due to continuous friction between the ACD and the vertebrae. Although current results are encouraging first steps towards the development of an efficient ACD for animal models, further optimisation is necessary. Current results also show that one cannot rely on in vitro biomechanical studies with annulus closure techniques, and these should always be confirmed in vivo in a large animal model.
Bron
Johannes L
JL
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Postbox 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
van der Veen
Albert J
AJ
Helder
Marco N
MN
van Royen
Barend J
BJ
Smit
Theodoor H
TH
D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D017586:Diskectomy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006041:Goats; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*
J Orthop Res. 2009 May;27(5):620-6
18991343
J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2000 Feb;18(1):29-32
11189109
Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):329-37
16683121
Front Biosci. 2008 Jan 01;13:1507-25
17981645
Eur Spine J. 2002 Apr;11(2):137-44
11956920
Eur Spine J. 2008 Sep;17(9):1131-48
18584218
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Apr 15;24(8):755-62
10222525
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Nov;11(9):914-27
3824069
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Jul;46:1077-92
14193834
Med Hypotheses. 2008;70(2):361-8
17624684
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Nov;440:149-56
16239799
J Orthop Res. 2006 Jun;24(6):1292-8
16649177
Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Jul;38(3):363-72; abstract vi
17629984
Spine J. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):85-94
15653089
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:6401-6
18003487
Acta Orthop Scand. 1965;35:314-28
14295432
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):102-8
12533579
Eur Spine J. 2006 Aug;15 Suppl 3:S433-8
16868784
Eur Spine J. 2009 Mar;18(3):301-13
19104850
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Sep;9(3):307-13
18928230
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Sep 1;25(17):2165-70
10973397