Income status and approval for bariatric surgery in a publicly funded regional obesity program.
BACKGROUND
Bariatric surgery has emerged as an effective and safe treatment for severe obesity and utilization rates have increased dramatically. In private health care settings, low socioeconomic status is associated with a reduced likelihood of undergoing a bariatric procedure. Whether this relationship is also present in a universally accessible, publicly funded health care system is not currently known.


METHODS
A retrospective analysis of the Edmonton Weight Wise obesity program clinical registry was conducted. Patients who were unemployed, on long-term disability or receiving social assistance were classified as "low income" status. The remaining patients were categorized as "regular income" status. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between low income status and approval for surgery within 1 year of program entry.


RESULTS
Thirty-three (7%) of 419 patients were ineligible for surgery or excluded because of missing income status data. Of the remaining 386 patients, 72 (19%) were of low income status and 89 (23%) were approved for surgery. Low income patients were older, heavier, and had greater comorbidity. Compared to patients of regular income status, those with low income status were less likely to be approved for surgery (15.3% versus 24.8%; adjusted OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.94).


CONCLUSIONS
Within a publicly funded and universally accessible regional obesity program, lower income status patients were less likely to be approved for bariatric surgery. Further study is necessary to clarify this apparent disparity and to determine if program modifications are necessary to ensure equity across all socioeconomic strata.
Halloran
Kieran
K
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Padwal
Raj S
RS
Johnson-Stoklossa
Carlene
C
Sharma
Arya M
AM
Birch
Dan W
DW
D000328:Adult; D000416:Alberta; D050110:Bariatric Surgery / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003153:Community Health Services / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D005380:Financing, Government; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012923:Social Class
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 13;163(18):2146-8
14557211
CMAJ. 2009 Nov 24;181(11):777-8
19687104
Obes Res. 2005 Dec;13(12):2052-4
16421336
JAMA. 2006 Apr 5;295(13):1549-55
16595758
Can J Surg. 2009 Jun;52(3):229-34
19503668
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Oct;81(10 Suppl):S5-10
17036573
Eur J Intern Med. 2008 May;19(3):173-80
18395160
Surgery. 2004 Mar;135(3):288-96
14976479
Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jan;79(1):6-16
14684391
JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1909-17
16234497
Psychol Bull. 1989 Mar;105(2):260-75
2648443
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Sep;14(9):589-96
18778174
N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):741-52
17715408
JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1442-4
17895461
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 23;351(26):2683-93
15616203
JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37
15479938
J Community Health. 2006 Oct;31(5):379-92
17094646
Obes Res. 1998 Sep;6 Suppl 2:51S-209S
9813653
Arch Surg. 2003 Apr;138(4):383-8
12686524