Visual evidence.
Visual and other demonstrative evidence has become increasingly prevalent in American and other courtrooms in recent years. However, there have been relatively few experimental studies of the effects of this kind of evidence in legal settings. As a consequence, little is known about when and how it affects legal decision making. In this article, I survey the extant research, including studies of photographs, videos, computer animations, and PowerPoint displays. The research shows that visual evidence affects legal decisions in some circumstances but not in others. It also indicates that visual evidence sometimes enhances legal judgment by improving recall and understanding but sometimes impairs judgment by prompting undue emotional responses, cognitive and perceptual biases, and/or peripheral processing. The limitations of the research are discussed, and directions for future research are suggested.
Feigenson
Neal
N
Quinnipiac University School of Law, Hamden, Connecticut 06518-1908, USA. neal.feigenson@quinnipiac.edu
D003415:Crime; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007603:Jurisprudence; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology; D010781:Photography / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012106:Research; D014481:United States; D014741:Video Recording / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology
Law Hum Behav. 1998 Apr;22(2):165-203
9566121
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2006 Dec;12(4):197-206
17154769
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Apr;30(2):183-202
16786406
Law Hum Behav. 1997 Oct;21(5):485-501
9374603
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):343-52
17803985
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Sep;30(5):960-8
15355129
Law Hum Behav. 2003 Feb;27(1):109-26
12647470
Psychol Sci. 2006 Apr;17(4):305-10
16623687
J Pers Assess. 1985 Dec;49(6):659-64
16367463