title: The site of airway obstruction among patients of emphysema: role of impulse oscillometry.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To detect the site of airway obstruction in patients of emphysema by impulse oscillometry (IOS) and to compare its observatios with flow volume loop (FV loop) studies.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-five patients of emphysema were subjected to both impulse oscillometry (IOS) and conventional spirometry. The resulting impedance spectra by IOS and FV loop were utilized to identify the site of airway obstruction in each of the patients. Both methods applied were also compared for sensitivity to identify airway and specify the site of obstruction.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Four patients were excluded from the final analysis as their impedance spectra showed significant upper airway influence, which would have made the localization of the site of airway obstruction by IOS invalid. Both IOS and FV loop could detect airway obstruction in all 21 patients. FV loop localized the site of obstruction as combined central and peripheral airways in 15 patients (71.4%) and as peripheral in 6 (28.6%).The IOS however, revealed the presence of the predominant site of obstruction peripheral in all the 21 patients, and both central and peripheral obstruction in 5 patients (23.8%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  IOS had proven to be advantageous over FV loop studies as it could identify central and peripheral airway obstruction separately and established the predominant site of obstruction.
authors.affiliation: MD, DM, Professor of Medicine Chief, Pulmonary Medicine and Sleep Center, Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi - 110 002, India.
authors.forename: Hs
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hira
authors.forename: Jitender
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Munjal
authors.forename: Sanjay
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Zachariah
authors.forename: Mr
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Chauhan
authors.forename: Anshu
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Singh
references.citation: J Appl Physiol. 1973 Feb;34(2):143-53
references.pmid: 4686346
references.citation: Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1202-18
references.pmid: 1952453
references.citation: J Appl Physiol. 1967 Mar;22(3):395-401
references.pmid: 4960137
references.citation: Eur Respir J. 1999 Apr;13(4):761-6
references.pmid: 10362037
references.citation: Am J Med. 1974 Aug;57(2):171-82
references.pmid: 4843891
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1968 Jun 20;278(25):1355-60
references.pmid: 5650164
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1973 Feb 22;288(8):395-8
references.pmid: 4684043
references.citation: Am J Med. 1972 Jun;52(6):725-37
references.pmid: 5030170
references.citation: Chest. 1982 May;81(5):586-91
references.pmid: 7075278
references.citation: Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975 Jun;111(6):755-62
references.pmid: 1137244
references.citation: Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Sep;132(3):712-4
references.pmid: 4037543
references.citation: Clin Chest Med. 1983 Sep;4(3):337-50
references.pmid: 6357598
references.citation: J Clin Invest. 1975 Nov;56(5):1210-30
references.pmid: 1184746
references.citation: J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 May;44(5):728-37
references.pmid: 649475
references.citation: Chest. 1976 Jan;69(1):51-5
references.pmid: 1244288
references.citation: J Clin Invest. 1973 Sep;52(9):2117-28
references.pmid: 4727452