title: Large genomic differences between the morphologically indistinguishable diplomonads Spironucleus barkhanus and Spironucleus salmonicida.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Microbial eukaryotes show large variations in genome structure and content between lineages, indicating extensive flexibility over evolutionary timescales. Here we address the tempo and mode of such changes within diplomonads, flagellated protists with two nuclei found in oxygen-poor environments. Approximately 5,000 expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences were generated from the fish commensal Spironucleus barkhanus and compared to sequences from the morphologically indistinguishable fish parasite Spironucleus salmonicida, and other diplomonads. The ESTs were complemented with sequence variation studies in selected genes and genome size determinations.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Many genes detected in S. barkhanus and S. salmonicida are absent in the human parasite Giardia intestinalis, the most intensively studied diplomonad. For example, these fish diplomonads show an extended metabolic repertoire and are able to incorporate selenocysteine into proteins. The codon usage is altered in S. barkhanus compared to S. salmonicida. Sequence variations were found between individual S. barkhanus ESTs for many, but not all, protein coding genes. Conversely, no allelic variation was found in a previous genome survey of S. salmonicida. This difference was confirmed by sequencing of genomic DNA. Up to five alleles were identified for the cloned S. barkhanus genes, and at least nineteen highly expressed S. barkhanus genes are represented by more than four alleles in the EST dataset. This could be explained by the presence of a non-clonal S. barkhanus population in the culture, by a ploidy above four, or by duplications of parts of the genome. Indeed, genome size estimations using flow cytometry indicated similar haploid genome sizes in S. salmonicida and G. intestinalis (approximately 12 Mb), whereas the S. barkhanus genome is larger (approximately 18 Mb).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study indicates extensive divergent genome evolution within diplomonads. Genomic traits such as codon usage, frequency of allelic sequence variation, and genome size have changed considerably between S. barkhanus and S. salmonicida. These observations suggest that large genomic differences may accumulate in morphologically indistinguishable eukaryotic microbes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
authors.forename: Katarina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Roxström-Lindquist
authors.forename: Jon
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Jerlström-Hultqvist
authors.forename: Anders
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Jørgensen
authors.forename: Karin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Troell
authors.forename: Staffan G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Svärd
authors.forename: Jan O
authors.initials: JO
authors.lastname: Andersson
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000818:Animals; D016828:Diplomonadida / Q000145:classification* / Q000166:cytology / Q000235:genetics*; D016678:Genome; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D012487:Salmonidae / Q000469:parasitology; D016415:Sequence Alignment
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2004 Sep 22;20(14):2329-30
references.pmid: 15059815
references.citation: Science. 2007 Sep 28;317(5846):1921-6
references.pmid: 17901334
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Nov 20;17(22):1984-8
references.pmid: 17980591
references.citation: Dis Aquat Organ. 2003 Sep 24;56(2):155-61
references.pmid: 14598991
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(3):446-55
references.pmid: 11069669
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jan;19(1):32-8
references.pmid: 16701223
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 2003 Feb;28(2):91-8
references.pmid: 12575997
references.citation: Cell Microbiol. 2001 Jan;3(1):55-62
references.pmid: 11207620
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 12;315(5809):207-12
references.pmid: 17218520
references.citation: Protist. 2007 Apr;158(2):247-54
references.pmid: 17292667
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2003 Jan 21;13(2):94-104
references.pmid: 12546782
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 Jul;55(Pt 4):1729-1733
references.pmid: 16014510
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Jul;14(3):447-75
references.pmid: 11432808
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Jan;17(1):32-43
references.pmid: 10666704
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1999 Dec;23(4):452-6
references.pmid: 10581034
references.citation: Dis Aquat Organ. 2004 Nov 23;62(1-2):93-6
references.pmid: 15648835
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Mar 21;6:27
references.pmid: 16551352
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2002 Aug;45(3):585-90
references.pmid: 12139606
references.citation: BMC Microbiol. 2008 Apr 29;8:71
references.pmid: 18445284
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Sep 30;32(17):5231-8
references.pmid: 15459293
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1586-91
references.pmid: 17483113
references.citation: Trends Parasitol. 2009 Feb;25(2):93-100
references.pmid: 19135417
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
references.pmid: 11524383
references.citation: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2008 Aug;160(2):75-80
references.pmid: 18501440
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2005;6(8):R66
references.pmid: 16086848
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2005 Jan 26;15(2):185-91
references.pmid: 15668177
references.citation: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2006 Nov-Dec;53(6):531-41
references.pmid: 17123418
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Apr;24(4):208-17
references.pmid: 19282047
references.citation: Science. 2008 Mar 14;319(5869):1530-3
references.pmid: 18339940
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun 22;6:156
references.pmid: 15969769
references.citation: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996 Oct 18;81(1):101-10
references.pmid: 8892309
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Nov;16(11):1484-95
references.pmid: 10555279
references.citation: Genome Res. 2004 Jun;14(6):1188-90
references.pmid: 15173120
references.citation: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003 Apr 25;128(1):11-9
references.pmid: 12706792
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Jul 15;8:205
references.pmid: 18627633
references.citation: Science. 2000 May 19;288(5469):1211-5
references.pmid: 10817991
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2001 Nov 9;313(5):1003-11
references.pmid: 11700055
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Feb;67(2):880-7
references.pmid: 11157258
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2001;2(4):RESEARCH0010
references.pmid: 11305938
references.citation: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983;77(4):487-8
references.pmid: 6636276
references.citation: Acta Trop. 2008 Apr;106(1):44-53
references.pmid: 18325480
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2007 Feb 14;8:51
references.pmid: 17298675
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
references.pmid: 9254694
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90
references.pmid: 16928733
references.citation: PLoS Pathog. 2009 Aug;5(8):e1000560
references.pmid: 19696920
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 2005 May;35(6):617-26
references.pmid: 15862575
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Apr 25;19(8):1905-8
references.pmid: 2030969
references.citation: Eukaryot Cell. 2002 Apr;1(2):191-9
references.pmid: 12455954
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 9;101(10):3480-5
references.pmid: 14990797
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D445-51
references.pmid: 17202165
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:177-93
references.pmid: 19575565
references.citation: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005 Sep-Oct;52(5):399-451
references.pmid: 16248873
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
references.pmid: 9396791
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Aug;19(8):1390-4
references.pmid: 12140252
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2006;7(10):R94
references.pmid: 17054778
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Sep;14(9):895-901
references.pmid: 9287422