title: Category effects on stimulus estimation: shifting and skewed frequency distributions.
abstract: The category adjustment model (CAM) proposes that estimates of inexactly remembered stimuli are adjusted toward the central value of the category of which the stimuli are members. Adjusting estimates toward the average value of all category instances, properly weighted for memory uncertainty, maximizes the average accuracy of estimates. Thus far, the CAM has been tested only with symmetrical category distributions in which the central stimulus value is also the mean. We report two experiments using asymmetric (skewed) distributions in which there is more than one possible central value: one where the frequency distribution shifts over the course of time, and the other where the frequency distribution is skewed. In both cases, we find that people adjust estimates toward the category's running mean, which is consistent with the CAM but not with alternative explanations for the adjustment of stimuli toward a category's central value.
authors.affiliation: Rutgers University, Camden, New Jersey 08102, USA. seduffy@camden.rutgers.edu
authors.forename: Sean
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Duffy
authors.forename: Janellen
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Huttenlocher
authors.forename: Larry V
authors.initials: LV
authors.lastname: Hedges
authors.forename: L Elizabeth
authors.initials: LE
authors.lastname: Crawford
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D010465:Perception; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012858:Size Perception
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Apr;12(2):241-56
references.pmid: 2939181
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2000 Jul;11(4):280-4
references.pmid: 11273385
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jul;31(4):587-99
references.pmid: 16060767
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov 12;31(6):1009-20
references.pmid: 21635326
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Jun;129(2):220-41
references.pmid: 10868335
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2008 Apr;36(3):567-77
references.pmid: 18491496
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2006 Nov;9(6):597-603
references.pmid: 17059457
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1979 Jul;86(4):777-803
references.pmid: 482484
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Jun;131(2):270-86
references.pmid: 12049244
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1957 May;64(3):153-81
references.pmid: 13441853
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2004 May;66(4):665-78
references.pmid: 15311665
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):148-69
references.pmid: 9009883
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2005 Jul;33(5):840-51
references.pmid: 16383172