title: Nd:YAG laser versus traditional scalpel. A preliminary histological analysis of specimens from the human oral mucosa.
abstract: Hyperplastic fibro-epithelial lesions are the most common tumor-like swellings in the mouth. The neodymium yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser appears to be useful for the surgical treatment of these lesions. Some controversies of laser surgery concern the accuracy of pathological diagnosis as well as the control of thermal damage on the target tissue. The aim of this study was to establish if the thermal changes induced by the Nd:YAG laser may affect the histopathological diagnosis and the evaluation of the resection margins. Furthermore, we compared the histological features of oral benign fibro-epithelial lesions excised through Nd:YAG laser and traditional scalpel. Twenty-six benign fibro-epithelial oral lesions from 26 patients, localized in the same oral subsites (cheek and buccal mucosa), were collected at the Unit of Oral Pathology and Oral Laser-assisted Surgery of the Academic Hospital of the University of Parma, Italy. Specimens were subclassified into three groups according to the tool used for the surgical excision. Group 1 included six specimens excised through Nd:YAG laser with an output power of 3.5 W and a frequency of 60 Hz (power density 488,281 W/cm2); Group 2 included nine specimens excised through Nd:YAG laser with an output power of 5 W and a frequency of 30 Hz; Group 3 included 11 specimens excised through a Bard-Parker scalpel blade no. 15c. Epithelial changes, connective tissue modifications, presence of vascular modifications, incision morphology and the overall width of tissue modification were evaluated. Differences between specimens removed with two different parameters of Nd:YAG laser were not significant with regard to stromal changes (p=0.4828) and vascular stasis (p=0.2104). Analysis of regularity of incision revealed a difference which was not statistically significant (p=1.000) between group 1 and group 2. Epithelial and stromal changes were significantly more frequent in specimens with a mean size less than 7 mm (p<0.0001). Nd:YAG laser induced serious thermal effects in small specimens (mean size less than 7 mm) independently from the frequency and power employed. The quality of incision was better and the width of overall tissue injuries was less in the specimens obtained with higher frequency and lower power (group 1: Nd:YAG laser at 3.5 W and 60 Hz).
authors.affiliation: Department of ENT/Dental/Ophthalmological and Cervico-Facial Sciences, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy. paolo.vescovi@unipr.it
authors.forename: Paolo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Vescovi
authors.forename: Luigi
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Corcione
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Meleti
authors.forename: Elisabetta
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Merigo
authors.forename: Carlo
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Fornaini
authors.forename: Maddalena
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Manfredi
authors.forename: Mauro
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bonanini
authors.forename: Paolo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Govoni
authors.forename: Jean-Paul
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Rocca
authors.forename: Samir
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Nammour
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006965:Hyperplasia / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D053685:Laser Therapy / Q000009:adverse effects; D053844:Lasers, Solid-State / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009061:Mouth Mucosa / Q000293:injuries / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D019647:Oral Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D013525:Surgical Instruments
references.citation: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Dec;27(6):577-87
references.pmid: 18092452
references.citation: J Gynecol Surg. 1994 Winter;10(4):229-34
references.pmid: 10150434
references.citation: Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Oct;25(5):381-92
references.pmid: 17975951
references.citation: J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1992 Apr;10(2):109-13
references.pmid: 10146194
references.citation: Br Dent J. 2007 Feb 24;202(4):185-91
references.pmid: 17322842
references.citation: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Jun;103(6):764-73
references.pmid: 17095269
references.citation: J Periodontol. 1998 Nov;69(11):1278-82
references.pmid: 9848538
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 1997;21(3):248-54
references.pmid: 9291081
references.citation: Am J Vet Res. 2005 Mar;66(3):500-5
references.pmid: 15822596
references.citation: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Mar;116(3):379-85
references.pmid: 9121794
references.citation: Laryngoscope. 2003 Feb;113(2):228-36
references.pmid: 12567074
references.citation: J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Jan;34(1):17-24
references.pmid: 16352435
references.citation: Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2008 Mar;9(1):13-7
references.pmid: 18380525
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;77(6):905-11
references.pmid: 2030866