Learning that a cocaine reward is smaller than expected: A test of Redish's computational model of addiction.
The present experiment tested the prediction of Redish's (2004) computational model of addiction that drug reward expectation continues to grow even when the received drug reward is smaller than expected. Initially, rats were trained to press two levers, each associated with a large dose of cocaine. Then, the dose associated with one of the levers was substantially reduced. Thus, when rats first pressed the reduced-dose lever, they expected a large cocaine reward, but received a small one. On subsequent choice tests, preference for the reduced-dose lever was reduced, demonstrating that rats learned to devalue the reduced-dose lever. The finding that rats learned to lower reward expectation when they received a smaller-than-expected cocaine reward is in opposition to the hypothesis that drug reinforcers produce a perpetual and non-correctable positive prediction error that causes the learned value of drug rewards to continually grow. Instead, the present results suggest that standard error-correction learning rules apply even to drug reinforcers.
Marks
Katherine R
KR
Psychology Department, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA. km1127a@american.edu
Kearns
David N
DN
Christensen
Chesley J
CJ
Silberberg
Alan
A
Weiss
Stanley J
SJ
D000818:Animals; D002491:Central Nervous System Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D003042:Cocaine / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D019970:Cocaine-Related Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D051381:Rats; D020318:Rats, Long-Evans; D012201:Reward
D002491:Central Nervous System Agents; D003042:Cocaine
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jul;80(1):1-27
9658025
Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1944-7
15591205
Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(10):2838-42
15548229
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):391-431
17072591
Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Aug;31(4):415-37; discussion 437-87
18662461
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Apr;31(2):247-53
15839780
Nature. 2001 Jul 5;412(6842):43-8
11452299
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007 Apr;86(4):774-7
17445874
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1993 Sep-Dec;18(3):247-91
8401595
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Aug;10(8):1020-8
17603481
Brain Res Rev. 2008 Aug;58(2):322-39
18055018
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:473-500
10845072