title: "The bigger the network the bigger the bowl of cherries...": exploring the acceptability of, and preferences for, an ongoing support network for known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers.
abstract: There is increasing evidence to suggest that the ongoing information and support needs of BRCA gene mutation carriers are not being met. This qualitative study investigated preferences for an on-going support network for mutation carriers in Wales, UK. Seventeen female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers participated in focus groups which explored their current and on-going information and psychological support needs. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed. The results reflected a diversity of experiences and support needs. The majority of participants felt they and their families would benefit from an on-going 'support network' which should incorporate information-provision alongside elements of a traditional support group alongside, internet-based support such as web-based chat forums, matching schemes and professionally led workshops. Some degree of professional input into any such initiative was believed to be important. This study has informed the development of an appropriate support network based on a hub and spoke model to help carriers and their families adapt to living and coping with their genetic risk.
authors.affiliation: East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK. lisa.hughes@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Hughes
authors.forename: Ceri
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Phelps
mesh_terms: D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000235:genetics / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D019398:Genes, BRCA1; D024522:Genes, BRCA2; D006580:Genetic Carrier Screening; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009154:Mutation; D010051:Ovarian Neoplasms / Q000235:genetics / Q000523:psychology; D012944:Social Support; D014852:Wales
references.citation: Am J Med Genet. 2001 Jan 1;98(1):15-24
references.pmid: 11426450
references.citation: J Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;12(1):103-14
references.pmid: 17158844
references.citation: Fam Cancer. 2003;2(2):119-21
references.pmid: 14649669
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 2003 Nov 17;89(10):1834-6
references.pmid: 14612888
references.citation: Clin Genet. 2002 Aug;62(2):121-7
references.pmid: 12220449
references.citation: J Genet Couns. 2007 Aug;16(4):433-56
references.pmid: 17594133
references.citation: Cancer. 2004 Nov 15;101(10):2327-40
references.pmid: 15478194
references.citation: J Genet Couns. 2006 Dec;15(6):409-31
references.pmid: 17106634
references.citation: CMAJ. 2001 Apr 3;164(7):1005-9
references.pmid: 11314429
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2005 Dec;14(12):1060-74
references.pmid: 15937976
references.citation: CMAJ. 2001 Sep 18;165(6):740; author reply 740, 742
references.pmid: 11584558
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Dec;67(6):1494-504
references.pmid: 11063672
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2000 May;18(10):2135-42
references.pmid: 10811679
references.citation: Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Mar 15;125A(3):267-72
references.pmid: 14994235
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):700-6
references.pmid: 16446344
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 2004 Nov 15;91(10):1787-94
references.pmid: 15505627
references.citation: J Genet Couns. 2003 Feb;12(1):61-76
references.pmid: 26142384
references.citation: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 May;13(5):875-81
references.pmid: 15159322
references.citation: Breast Dis. 2006-2007;27:127-36
references.pmid: 17917144