Pixelation effect removal from fiber bundle probe based optical coherence tomography imaging.
A method of eliminating pixelization effect from en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) image when a fiber bundle is used as an OCT imaging probe is presented. We have demonstrated that applying a histogram equalization process before performing a weighted-averaged Gaussian smoothing filter to the original lower gray level intensity based image not only removes the structural artifact of the bundle but also enhances the image quality with minimum blurring of object's image features. The measured contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for an image of the US Air Force test target was 14.7dB (4.9dB), after (before) image processing. In addition, by performing the spatial frequency analysis based on two-dimensional discrete Fourier transform (2-D DFT), we were able to observe that the periodic intensity peaks induced by the regularly arrayed structure of the fiber bundle can be efficiently suppressed by 41.0dB for the first nearby side lobe as well as to obtain the precise physical spacing information of the fiber grid. The proposed combined method can also be used as a straight forward image processing tool for any imaging system utilizing fiber bundle as a high-resolution imager.
Han
Jae-Ho
JH
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD, USA. jhan16@jhu.edu
Lee
Junghoon
J
Kang
Jin U
JU
D000465:Algorithms; D003196:Computer Graphics; D005336:Fiber Optic Technology; D005583:Fourier Analysis; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning / Q000379:methods; D016011:Normal Distribution; D055100:Optical Fibers; D055095:Optics and Photonics; D041623:Tomography, Optical Coherence / Q000379:methods*
Appl Opt. 2008 Sep 1;47(25):4560-8
18758526
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007 Jun;26(6):761-71
17679327
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006 Oct;53(10):2035-46
17019868
J Biomed Opt. 2005 May-Jun;10(3):034013
16229657
Phys Med Biol. 2002 Feb 21;47(4):641-55
11900196
Opt Express. 2005 Apr 4;13(7):2337-44
19495122
Opt Lett. 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1803-5
16092351
Appl Opt. 2000 Nov 10;39(32):5978-90
18354603
Opt Lett. 2004 Nov 1;29(21):2521-3
15584281
Nat Methods. 2008 Nov;5(11):935-8
18836457
Opt Express. 2008 Apr 14;16(8):5556-64
18542658
Opt Lett. 1993 Apr 15;18(8):565
19802201
Opt Express. 2001 Jul 2;9(1):24-35
19421270
Opt Express. 2007 Mar 5;15(5):2151-65
19532452
Opt Express. 2006 Sep 18;14(19):8675-84
19529248
Opt Express. 2008 Dec 22;16(26):21598-607
19104591
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 Oct;49(10):1168-72
12374341
J Microsc. 2002 Aug;207(Pt 2):108-17
12180956
J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 2007 Aug;56(4):145-51
17977979
Sensors (Basel). 2009;9(10):8215-29
22408502
J Biomed Opt. 2008 Mar-Apr;13(2):024021
18465984
Electron Lett. 2009 Oct 22;45(22):1110-1112
20454586
J Microsc. 2008 Jan;229(Pt 1):104-14
18173649
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2009 Jan;26(1):72-7
19109602
Appl Opt. 1995 Mar 20;34(9):1536-9
21037693
Opt Lett. 2000 Dec 15;25(24):1780-2
18066342
Opt Lett. 2006 Mar 15;31(6):772-4
16544619
Nat Methods. 2005 Dec;2(12):941-50
16299479
Appl Opt. 2000 Feb 10;39(5):698-703
18337944
Opt Express. 2005 Mar 7;13(5):1468-76
19495022
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 Jul;24(7):1901-10
17728812
Eur Radiol. 2009 Sep;19(9):2275-85
19424702