title: The curvature and variability of wrist and arm movements.
abstract: The control of wrist rotations is critical for normal upper limb function, yet has received little attention. In this study, we characterized path shape of wrist rotations in order to better understand the biomechanical and neural factors governing their control. Subjects performed step-tracking wrist rotations in eight directions "at a comfortable speed" and "as fast as possible." For comparison, we also analyzed subjects' arm movement paths in a similar task. We found significant differences between wrist and arm movements. Wrist paths were more curved and more variable than arm paths (p < 0.001). The increased curvature and variability can be explained in part by neuromuscular noise (in actuation and sensing) which is known to increase from proximal to distal in the upper limb. The curvature and variability of wrist paths increased with movement speed (p < 0.001), further implicating (signal-dependent) noise. However, noise cannot explain all of our observations. For example, we found that wrist rotations exhibit a systematic pattern: outbound and inbound paths between the same two targets tend to veer to opposite sides of a straight line. We provide evidence indicating that this type of systematic pattern is not likely caused by noise or other neural causes, but may be explained by the unique biomechanics of the wrist.
authors.affiliation: Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. scharles@alum.mit.edu
authors.forename: Steven K
authors.initials: SK
authors.lastname: Charles
authors.forename: Neville
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Hogan
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001132:Arm / Q000502:physiology*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D012399:Rotation; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014953:Wrist / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1986 Nov;6(11):3309-18
references.pmid: 3772433
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1994;98(1):153-6
references.pmid: 8013583
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
references.pmid: 8182467
references.citation: J Biomech. 2001 Nov;34(11):1429-38
references.pmid: 11672717
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Aug 20;394(6695):780-4
references.pmid: 9723616
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2797-801
references.pmid: 16928799
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Jan;81(1):319-33
references.pmid: 9914292
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1985 Sep;5(9):2318-30
references.pmid: 4031998
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e179
references.pmid: 16700627
references.citation: J Physiol. 1983 Feb;335:519-33
references.pmid: 6875893
references.citation: Neurosci Res. 2003 May;46(1):1-10
references.pmid: 12725907
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2004 Aug;157(4):417-30
references.pmid: 15014922
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000 Feb;15(2):103-11
references.pmid: 10627326
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88(3):611-21
references.pmid: 16510829
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Oct;4(10):1020-5
references.pmid: 11547338
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1989;61(2):89-101
references.pmid: 2742921
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35
references.pmid: 12404008
references.citation: J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):981-992
references.pmid: 15844264
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(3):460-70
references.pmid: 7789452
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jul;72(1):299-313
references.pmid: 7965013
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Feb;73(2):891-5
references.pmid: 7760146
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1981;42(2):223-7
references.pmid: 7262217
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Feb;20(2):177-83
references.pmid: 15621323
references.citation: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007 Sep;15(3):327-35
references.pmid: 17894265
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1987;57(4-5):257-74
references.pmid: 3689835
references.citation: J Biomech Eng. 1982 Aug;104(3):176-81
references.pmid: 7120940
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1982;44(1):67-77
references.pmid: 7093370
references.citation: J Biomech Eng. 1988 Feb;110(1):37-41
references.pmid: 3347022
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):289-306
references.pmid: 10382616
references.citation: Science. 1999 Sep 24;285(5436):2136-9
references.pmid: 10497133
references.citation: J Biomech. 1996 Oct;29(10):1371-5
references.pmid: 8884484
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 2005 Jul;23(4):750-6
references.pmid: 16022986
references.citation: Brain. 1982 Jun;105(Pt 2):331-48
references.pmid: 7082993
references.citation: J Biomech. 1979;12(1):83-93
references.pmid: 762184
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;88(3):1533-44
references.pmid: 12205173
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Feb;20(2):166-71
references.pmid: 15621321
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Nov;74(5):2174-8
references.pmid: 8592205
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 May;81(5):2582-6
references.pmid: 10322091