Arterial input function placement for accurate CT perfusion map construction in acute stroke.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of varying arterial input function (AIF) placement on the qualitative and quantitative CT perfusion parameters.


METHODS
Retrospective analysis of CT perfusion data was performed on 14 acute stroke patients with a proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) clot. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) maps were constructed using a systematic method by varying only the AIF placement in four positions relative to the MCA clot including proximal and distal to the clot in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres. Two postprocessing software programs were used to evaluate the effect of AIF placement on perfusion parameters using a delay-insensitive deconvolution method compared with a standard deconvolution method.


RESULTS
One hundred sixty-eight CT perfusion maps were constructed for each software package. Both software programs generated a mean CBF at the infarct core of < 12 mL/100 g/min and a mean CBV of < 2 mL/100 g for AIF placement proximal to the clot in the ipsilateral hemisphere and proximal and distal to the clot in the contralateral hemisphere. For AIF placement distal to the clot in the ipsilateral hemisphere, the mean CBF significantly increased to 17.3 mL/100 g/min with delay-insensitive software and to 19.4 mL/100 g/min with standard software (p < 0.05). The mean MTT was significantly decreased for this AIF position. Furthermore, this AIF position yielded qualitatively different parametric maps, being most pronounced with MTT and CBF. Overall, CBV was least affected by AIF location.


CONCLUSIONS
For postprocessing of accurate quantitative CT perfusion maps, laterality of the AIF location is less important than avoiding AIF placement distal to the clot as detected on CT angiography. This pitfall is less severe with deconvolution-based software programs using a delay-insensitive technique than with those using a standard deconvolution method.
Ferreira
Rafael M
RM
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Lev
Michael H
MH
Goldmakher
Gregory V
GV
Kamalian
Shahmir
S
Schaefer
Pamela W
PW
Furie
Karen L
KL
Gonzalez
R Gilberto
RG
Sanelli
Pina C
PC
D000208:Acute Disease; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000465:Algorithms; D002533:Cerebral Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020244:Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery / Q000150:complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D055420:Perfusion Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D020521:Stroke / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000209:etiology*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
Stroke. 2001 Jan;32(1):175-83
11136934
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998 Sep;18(9):935-40
9740096
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976 Feb;39(2):152-8
1262889
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2005 Aug;15(3):481-501, ix
16360585
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Jan;30(1):188-93
18768719
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jun;192(6):W321-9
19457797
Arch Neurol. 2000 Aug;57(8):1161-6
10927796
Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):587-93
15064388
Radiology. 2000 Dec;217(3):886-94
11110958
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Mar;51(3):631-4
15004809
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Jan;27(1):46-50
16418354
Acad Radiol. 2004 Oct;11(10):1085-92
15530801
Magn Reson Med. 2000 Sep;44(3):466-73
10975900
Radiology. 2002 Jan;222(1):227-36
11756730
Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Jan;18(1):1-11
10642097
Neuroradiology. 2008 Sep;50(9):745-51
18509627
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Jul;50(1):164-74
12815691
Neuroradiology. 2008 Mar;50(3):227-36
18057929
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2005;4(1):27-34
16127251
Invest Radiol. 2007 Mar;42(3):147-56
17287644