The incidence of bariatric surgery has plateaued in the U.S.
BACKGROUND
Estimates of the procedure incidence for bariatric surgery have been derived primarily from surveys of bariatric surgeons or from inpatient data sources. New population-representative databases of outpatient surgery are available that enable accurate estimations of bariatric surgery case volumes.


METHODS
The 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey, National Inpatient Sample, and National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery were assessed for bariatric surgery procedures. Data were compared with inpatient data from 1993 to 2007. Procedure costs were estimated.


RESULTS
The incidence of bariatric surgery has plateaued at approximately 113,000 cases per year. Open gastric bypass now constitutes only 3% of all cases but costs $4,800 less than laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic gastric banding is performed in 37% of all bariatric surgery cases and costs the same as laparoscopic gastric bypass to perform. Complication rates have fallen from 10.5% in 1993 to 7.6% of all cases in 2006. Bariatric surgery costs the health economy at least $1.5 billion annually.


CONCLUSIONS
Despite predictions of continued growth of bariatric surgery, it appears that the annual incidence for these operations has remained stable since 2003. Most operations are performed laparoscopically, but open gastric bypass is substantially less costly than laparoscopic operations. Despite its simplicity, laparoscopic gastric banding costs the same as gastric bypass. There is no cost savings associated with ambulatory bariatric surgery.
Livingston
Edward H
EH
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA. edward.livingston@utsouthwestern.edu
D050110:Bariatric Surgery / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D009767:Obesity, Morbid / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987 Feb;35(2):109-14
3805552
Surgery. 2004 Mar;135(3):288-96
14976479
Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Feb;55(2 Suppl):586S-590S
1733133
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1758-61
12365960
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998 Jan;22(1):39-47
9481598
J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;6(6):855-60; discussion 861
12504224
Adv Surg. 2006;40:99-106
17163097
WMJ. 1998 Oct;97(9):20-1, 24-5, 27-37
9810255
Ann Surg. 2002 Nov;236(5):576-82
12409663
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):751-6; discussion 757-8
12796570
Ann Surg. 1995 Sep;222(3):339-50; discussion 350-2
7677463
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Jan 24;154(2):193-200
8285814
Ann Surg. 2002 Nov;236(5):554-9
12409659
Ann Intern Med. 1991 Dec 15;115(12):956-61
1952493
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 30;361(5):445-54
19641201
Arch Surg. 2009 Apr;144(4):319-25; discussion 325
19380644
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Aug;17(4):239-44
17710042
Surg Endosc. 2005 May;19(5):616-20
15759185
JAMA. 2001 Sep 12;286(10):1195-200
11559264
Am J Surg. 2004 Aug;188(2):105-10
15249233
J Gastrointest Surg. 1997 May-Jun;1(3):213-20; discussion 220
9834350
Arch Surg. 2007 Oct;142(10):979-87
17938312
Obes Surg. 2004 Oct;14(9):1157-64
15527627
JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1909-17
16234497
Arch Surg. 2006 Jan;141(1):71-4; discussion 75
16415414
JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1918-24
16234498
Obes Res. 2003 Dec;11(12):1519-25
14694217
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):233-42
18650633