Inbreeding tolerance and fitness costs in wild bottlenose dolphins.
In wild populations, inbreeding tolerance is expected to evolve where the cost of avoidance exceeds that of tolerance. We show that in a wild population of bottlenose dolphins found in East Shark Bay, Western Australia, levels of inbreeding are higher than expected by chance alone, and demonstrate that inbreeding is deleterious to female fitness in two independent ways. We found that inbred females, and females with inbred calves, have reduced fitness (lower calving success). We further show that one of the costs of inbreeding is extended weaning age, and that females' earlier calves are more likely to be inbred. While the exact causes of inbreeding remain obscure, our results indicate that one factor is female age, and thus experience. Any inbreeding avoidance mechanisms such as female evasion of kin, or male dispersal, do not seem to be completely effective in this population, which supports the view that inbreeding avoidance does not always evolve wherever inbreeding incurs a cost.
Frère
Céline H
CH
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia. c.frere@uq.edu.au
Krützen
Michael
M
Kopps
Anna M
AM
Ward
Patrick
P
Mann
Janet
J
Sherwin
William B
WB
D000367:Age Factors; D000818:Animals; D050681:Bottle-Nosed Dolphin / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005838:Genotype; D007178:Inbreeding; D008297:Male; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal; D014886:Weaning
Mol Ecol. 2009 May;18(10):2297-306
19389162
Science. 1979 Nov 30;206(4422):1101-3
493997
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16723-8
16275917
Curr Biol. 2007 Feb 6;17(3):225-9
17276915
Mol Ecol. 2009 Jul;18(13):2746-65
19500255
Trends Ecol Evol. 1988 Sep;3(9):230-3
21227237
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 7;270(1514):497-502
12641904
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 28;361(1466):235-59
16612884
Nature. 2007 Feb 22;445(7130):912-4
17287726
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(7):2496-500
2320570
Evolution. 2006 Mar;60(3):467-75
16637492
EXS. 1994;68:91-105
8032141
Science. 2008 Feb 8;319(5864):813-6
18258915
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Feb 7;268(1464):263-7
11217896
Evolution. 1989 Mar;43(2):258-275
28568555
Mol Ecol. 2001 Jul;10(7):1835-44
11472550
PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3868
19066625
Evolution. 1999 Aug;53(4):1259-1267
28565537
Mol Ecol. 2004 Jul;13(7):1975-90
15189218
Mol Ecol. 2004 Oct;13(10):3021-31
15367117
Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Nov;8(6):1263-6
21586016
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 7;268(1480):2021-7
11571049
Evolution. 1998 Feb;52(1):240-250
28568167
Mol Ecol. 2006 Dec;15(14):4659-65
17107491
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 1;89(3):987-90
11607275
J Hered. 2007 Jan-Feb;98(1):93-6
17150977
Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225
28568501
Nature. 2003 Mar 6;422(6927):35
12621424
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Dec;19(12):613-5
16701322
Mol Ecol. 2009 Apr;18(7):1491-503
19298267
Mol Ecol. 2005 Feb;14(2):599-612
15660949
Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(5):1099-106
17305863
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Mar;9(2):531-4
21564684
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
19185386
Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1097-113
9632497
Am Nat. 2003 Nov;162(5):638-52
14618541
Mol Ecol. 1997 Jul;6(7):695-6
9226950