Subject-specific muscle synergies in human balance control are consistent across different biomechanical contexts.
The musculoskeletal redundancy of the body provides multiple solutions for performing motor tasks. We have proposed that the nervous system solves this unconstrained problem through the recruitment of motor modules or functional muscle synergies that map motor intention to action. Consistent with this hypothesis, we showed that trial-by-trial variations in muscle activation for multidirectional balance control in humans were constrained by a small set of muscle synergies. However, apparent muscle synergy structures could arise from characteristic patterns of sensory input resulting from perturbations or from low-dimensional optimal motor solutions. Here we studied electromyographic (EMG) responses for balance control across a range of biomechanical contexts, which alter not only the sensory inflow generated by postural perturbations, but also the muscle activation patterns used to restore balance. Support-surface translations in 12 directions were delivered to subjects standing in six different postural configurations: one-leg, narrow, wide, very wide, crouched, and normal stance. Muscle synergies were extracted from each condition using nonnegative matrix factorization. In addition, muscle synergies from the normal stance condition were used to reconstruct muscle activation patterns across all stance conditions. A consistent set of muscle synergies were recruited by each subject across conditions. When balance demands were extremely different from the normal stance (e.g., one-legged or crouched stance), task-specific muscle synergies were recruited in addition to the preexisting ones, rather generating de novo muscle synergies. Taken together, our results suggest that muscle synergies represent consistent motor modules that map intention to action, regardless of the biomechanical context of the task.
Torres-Oviedo
Gelsy
G
The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, 313 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322-0535, USA.
Ting
Lena H
LH
D000465:Algorithms; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology; D004576:Electromyography / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology; D008954:Models, Biological; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology*; D004856:Postural Balance / Q000502:physiology*; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology*; D011999:Recruitment, Neurophysiological / Q000502:physiology*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Sep;146(2):233-43
12195525
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Dec;7(12):1345-52
15558066
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):844-57
20007501
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Oct;10(10):1329-36
17873869
J Biomech. 2009 Jun 19;42(9):1282-7
19394023
Gait Posture. 2002 Aug;16(1):1-14
12127181
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Aug;92(2):808-23
15084643
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Dec;15(6):660-6
16275056
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Feb;85(2):605-19
11160497
Neuroscientist. 2007 Apr;13(2):138-47
17404374
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Dec;96(6):3130-46
16855111
Neuron. 2006 Nov 22;52(4):731-42
17114055
J Biomech. 2010 Feb 10;43(3):412-9
19879583
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec;92(6):3255-65
15295016
Neurosci Lett. 1989 Oct 23;105(1-2):73-8
2485889
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Dec;19(6):601-7
19828310
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 14;29(41):12807-14
19828793
J Neurophysiol. 1988 Jun;59(6):1888-905
3404210
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Dec;17(6):622-8
18304801
J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 6;25(27):6419-34
16000633
J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 15;22(14):5803-7
12122040
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 5;106(18):7601-6
19380738
J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 7;26(23):6288-97
16763036
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;92(4):2274-82
15071087
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;2004:4637-40
17271341
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;92(4):2217-38
15175364
J Neurosci. 2007 Jun 20;27(25):6832-42
17581971
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106(46):19563-8
19880747
J Biomech. 2007;40(10):2254-60
17156787
Gait Posture. 1998 Dec 1;8(3):163-174
10200406
J Neurophysiol. 1986 Jun;55(6):1369-81
3734861
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(1):93-113
10550507
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Aug;14(4):481-7
15321069
Exp Brain Res. 1994;101(1):159-64
7843295
Exp Brain Res. 1977 Oct 24;30(1):13-24
590411
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Dec;18(6):565-72
19081242
Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jan;57(1):134-46
17936363
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Feb;85(2):559-70
11160493
J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 8;28(41):10370-9
18842896
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jan;95(1):493-504
16251262
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Aug;82(2):515-25
10444651
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2455-71
18799603
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2144-56
17652413
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;100(4):2235-53
18632892
J Biomech. 2008;41(2):299-306
17980370
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 22;102(8):3076-81
15708969
J Neurosci. 2008 Feb 13;28(7):1728-32
18272693
J Orthop Res. 1988;6(6):833-9
3171763
Neural Comput. 2006 Oct;18(10):2320-42
16907628
Science. 1999 Sep 24;285(5436):2136-9
10497133
J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 23;28(4):880-92
18216196
J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 27;30(4):1322-36
20107059
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2229-52
16837662
J Biomech. 2008;41(7):1537-44
18374342
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2199-212
16394079
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec;88(6):3348-58
12466451
J Neurosci. 1988 Aug;8(8):2913-27
3411361
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Jul;5(7):532-46
15208695
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;101(6):2751-61
19321638
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;87(2):1129-31
11826077
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Mar;83(3):1469-79
10712473
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):1032-8
18094102
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Feb;77(2):826-52
9065853
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;80(4):1939-50
9772251
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Feb;81(2):544-51
10036258
J Biomech. 1998 Aug;31(8):693-703
9796669
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;103(1):573-90
19657082
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Aug;157(4):417-30
15014922
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1530-46
16775203
J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 14;27(11):2760-80
17360898
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;101(3):1235-57
19091930
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;101(3):1334-50
19118108
Science. 1992 Jun 19;256(5064):1692-5
1609282