title: The derived generalization of thought suppression.
abstract: Thought suppression appears to be a relatively ineffective and even counterproductive strategy for dealing with unwanted thoughts. However, the psychological processes responsible for unsuccessful suppression are still underspecified. One process that may be implicated is derived stimulus relations, which may underlie the formation of unintentional relations that act to hamper suppression attempts. To test this prediction, participants were trained and tested for the formation of three derived equivalence relations using a match-to-sample procedure. Subsequently, they were instructed to suppress all thoughts of a particular target word that was a member of one of the three relations and were also allowed to selectively remove words that appeared on a computer screen in front of them by pressing the space bar. Results showed, as predicted, that participants not only removed the to-be-suppressed stimulus, but also removed words in derived relations with that stimulus, thus showing transformation of suppression/interference functions via derived equivalence. The theoretical implications of this demonstration, including its potential as a model for a key psychological process involved in unsuccessful thought suppression, are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, Wales. pshoopnj@swansea.ac.uk
authors.forename: Nic
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Hooper
authors.forename: Jo
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Saunders
authors.forename: Louise
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: McHugh
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D001364:Awareness; D005793:Generalization, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D033182:Intention; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012660:Semantics; D013850:Thinking; D014163:Transfer, Psychology
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Oct;16(4):372-89
references.pmid: 2230660
references.citation: Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;32(1):7-27
references.pmid: 22478511
references.citation: J Pers. 1994 Dec;62(4):616-40
references.pmid: 7861307
references.citation: Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;23(2):239-54
references.pmid: 22478349
references.citation: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;28(3):181-91
references.pmid: 9327297
references.citation: Cogn Emot. 2005 Feb 1;19(2):175-96
references.pmid: 22686600
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):125-44
references.pmid: 16812554
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):519-55
references.pmid: 1774543
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 Sep;82(2):177-95
references.pmid: 15540504
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):21-42
references.pmid: 3156941
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Sep;88(2):249-62
references.pmid: 17970418
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Mar;17(1):114-24
references.pmid: 17339120
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Sep;64(2):163-84
references.pmid: 16812766
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1991 Mar;28(2):140-53
references.pmid: 1946880
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):5-13
references.pmid: 3612492
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1998 Dec;36(12):1131-42
references.pmid: 9745798
references.citation: Behav Anal. 1986 Fall;9(2):175-90
references.pmid: 22478660
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):61-81
references.pmid: 16812685
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 May;68(5):782-92
references.pmid: 7776182
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1978;16(4):233-48
references.pmid: 718588
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):275-301
references.pmid: 9163935