Bifid mandibular canals: cone beam computed tomography evaluation.
OBJECTIVE
For surgical procedures involving the posterior mandible, it is important to be familiar with the details of the bifid mandibular canal. To our knowledge, there have been no systematic studies evaluating the bifid mandibular canal using sectional imaging. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal using cone beam CT.


METHODS
252 patients (301 mandible sides) underwent cone beam CT between October 2004 and September 2005 and were included in this study. The cone beam CT images were evaluated for the presence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal. The patterns of bifurcation were classified into four types according to the classification of Nortjé et al (Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg 1977; 15: 55-63). The diameter of the accessory canal was classified into two categories: 50% or more and less than 50% of the diameter of the main mandibular canal.


RESULTS
Of the 301 subjects, 47 (15.6%) demonstrated a bifid mandibular canal. They were Type I in 2, Type II in 40, Type III in 0, and Type IV in 5 cases. The diameter of the accessory canal was greater than or equal to 50% of the main canal in 23, and less than 50% in 24 cases.


CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of the cone beam CT, a bifid mandibular canal was found in 15.6% of cases, a markedly higher proportion than found in previous reports using panoramic images. Cone beam CT is considered a suitable modality for detailed evaluation of bifid mandibular canals.
Kuribayashi
A
A
Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan. ami8orad@tmd.ac.jp
Watanabe
H
H
Imaizumi
A
A
Tantanapornkul
W
W
Katakami
K
K
Kurabayashi
T
T
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D054893:Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008335:Mandibular Condyle / Q000002:abnormalities* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008875:Middle Aged; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D012984:Software; D055815:Young Adult
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 May;35(3):217-8
16618859
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 Jul;28(4):245-8
10455389
J Am Dent Assoc. 1985 Jun;110(6):923-6
3860553
Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir. 1990 Mar;5(1):17-20
2130051
J Craniofac Surg. 2006 May;17(3):487-91
16770186
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980 Mar;49(3):272-3
6928313
Br J Oral Surg. 1977 Jul;15(1):55-63
268217
Aust Dent J. 2006 Mar;51(1):86-90
16669483
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Winter;4(4):327-32
2639861
J Anat. 1971 Apr;108(Pt 3):433-40
5575310
Br J Oral Surg. 1977 Nov;15(2):171-2
271020
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Mar;41(3):177-9
6572228
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005 Nov;34(6):387-8
16227485
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Apr;61(4):422-4
12684957