title: Ethylene is crucial for cotyledon greening and seedling survival during de-etiolation.
abstract: The most remarkable change of de-etiolation in seedling is chlorophyll synthesis and greening. This transition is achieved by photoreduction of dark-accumulated protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) in light. However, overaccumulation of Pchlide results in phototoxicity to plants, so appropriate accumulation and quick reduction of Pchlide are crucial for survival of seedlings during the transition from dark to light. We found that this vital process is tightly regulated by the plant gaseous hormone ethylene. Transgenic analysis using a promoter-GUS reporter system showed that the ethylene signaling was able to activate the expression of PORA (protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase A) gene in seedling cotyledons. We further found that application of ethylene rescued the greening defect of the flu mutant, which over-accumulated Pchlide in the dark. Additionally, genetic studies revealed that Ethylene Insensitive 3 (EIN3) and EIN3-like 1 (EIL1）regulate Pchlide accumulation and cotyledon greening largely independent of Phytochrome-Interacting Factor 1 (PIF1) but partly dependent on PIF3. Therefore, the ethylene signaling via EIN3/EIL1 presents a new pathway to constrain phototoxic Pchlide accumulation in darkness, and simultaneously facilitate Pchlide reduction to synthesize chlorophyll upon light exposure. Our results thus uncover an essential role of ethylene in protecting seedlings from photo-oxidative damage during the process of de-etiolation.
authors.affiliation: The National Laboratory of Protein Engineering and Plant Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
authors.forename: Shangwei
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Zhong
authors.forename: Hui
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Shi
authors.forename: Yanpeng
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Xi
authors.forename: Hongwei
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Guo
references.citation: Cell. 1996 Sep 6;86(5):703-5
references.pmid: 8797817
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 23;98(22):12826-31
references.pmid: 11606728
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998 Jun;1(3):245-50
references.pmid: 10066589
references.citation: Plant J. 2004 Dec;40(6):957-67
references.pmid: 15584960
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21431-6
references.pmid: 19948955
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998 Oct;1(5):393-8
references.pmid: 10066624
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 5;106(18):7660-5
references.pmid: 19380720
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 26;105(34):12629-34
references.pmid: 18723681
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 5;106(18):7654-9
references.pmid: 19380736
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Feb;7(1):40-9
references.pmid: 14732440
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2003 Oct;15(10):2320-32
references.pmid: 14508004
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 8;105(27):9433-8
references.pmid: 18591656
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 1996 Jun;37(4):411-21
references.pmid: 8759912
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Dec 9;18(23):1815-23
references.pmid: 19062289
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Feb;10(2):51-4
references.pmid: 15708340
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2009 May;14(5):270-9
references.pmid: 19375376
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Nov;12(11):514-521
references.pmid: 17933576