"The choice for death" and neurology.
In the last decade, "end-of-life" issues have gained prominence in political and social debates in many countries. The deliberate ending of the life of a patient upon his/her own request has become a hotly contested topic. This paper discusses the implications of this debate and of corresponding policy and legal developments for neurology. We discuss the nomenclature of the "choices for death", euthanasia, doctor-assisted suicide and palliative care as well as the social dynamics underlying these developments. We suggest that we need a more nuanced and empirically based understanding of the process of the "choice for death and its implications for medical practice."
Durnová
Anna
A
Department of Political Science, Life-Science-Governance Research Platform, University of Vienna, Universitätsstrasse 7, Vienna, Austria.
Gottweis
Herbert
H
D002755:Choice Behavior; D017281:Cost of Illness; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D033101:Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D006291:Health Policy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D010166:Palliative Care / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics; D011584:Psychology; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D009626:Terminology as Topic
BMJ. 2002 Apr 13;324(7342):905-7
11950744
N Engl J Med. 2002 May 23;346(21):1638-44
12023997
BMJ. 2009 Nov 16;339:b4362
19917578
JAMA. 1993 Nov 24;270(20):2469-74
8230624