Conservation of recombination hotspots in yeast.
Meiotic recombination does not occur randomly along a chromosome, but instead tends to be concentrated in small regions, known as "recombination hotspots." Recombination hotspots are thought to be short-lived in evolutionary time due to their self-destructive nature, as gene conversion favors recombination-suppressing alleles over recombination-promoting alleles during double-strand repair. Consistent with this expectation, hotspots in humans are highly dynamic, with little correspondence in location between humans and chimpanzees. Here, we identify recombination hotspots in two lineages of the yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus, and compare their locations to those found previously in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Surprisingly, we find considerable overlap between the two species, despite the fact that they are at least 10 times more divergent than humans and chimpanzees. We attribute this unexpected result to the low frequency of sex and outcrossing in these yeasts, acting to reduce the population genetic effect of biased gene conversion. Traces from two other signatures of recombination, namely high mutagenicity and GC-biased gene conversion, are consistent with this interpretation. Thus, recombination hotspots are not inevitably short-lived, but rather their persistence through evolutionary time will be determined by the frequency of outcrossing events in the life cycle.
Tsai
Isheng J
IJ
Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.
Burt
Austin
A
Koufopanou
Vassiliki
V
D001482:Base Composition; D015825:Chromosomes, Fungal / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D006239:Haplotypes / Q000235:genetics; D009154:Mutation / Q000235:genetics; D011995:Recombination, Genetic / Q000235:genetics*; D012440:Saccharomyces / Q000235:genetics*; D013045:Species Specificity
Nat Genet. 2005 Apr;37(4):429-34
15723063
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Nov;25(11):2439-44
18723832
Nature. 1989 Jul 27;340(6231):318-20
2546083
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 May;23(5):911-8
16407459
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005;59:135-53
15877535
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 10;97(21):11383-90
11027339
Bioinformatics. 2002 Feb;18(2):337-8
11847089
Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jan;11(1):322-8
1986228
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1181-97
12082137
Science. 2009 Apr 17;324(5925):389-92
19286520
Mol Cell. 2004 Feb 13;13(3):389-401
14967146
Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun 1;21(11):2791-3
15814564
Trends Genet. 2003 Jun;19(6):330-8
12801726
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 13;94(10):5213-8
9144217
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 May;2(5):360-9
11331902
Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):35-9
2537472
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4957-62
18344325
Science. 2008 Mar 7;319(5868):1395-8
18239090
Genetics. 2006 Oct;174(2):901-13
16951062
Nature. 2008 Jul 24;454(7203):479-85
18615017
Genome Res. 2007 Aug;17(8):1219-27
17623807
Genetics. 2005 Apr;169(4):2319-33
15687277
Nature. 2003 May 15;423(6937):241-54
12748633
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 8;105(27):9272-7
18583475
Trends Genet. 2006 Jul;22(7):375-87
16730849
Nat Genet. 2005 Jun;37(6):601-6
15880103
Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 4;17(23):2003-12
18060788
Genetics. 2002 Dec;162(4):2049-52
12524370
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Jan;8(1):23-34
17146469
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22;94(15):8058-63
9223314
Bioinformatics. 2006 Dec 15;22(24):3061-6
17060358
Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2213-33
14704198
Science. 2005 Apr 1;308(5718):107-11
15705809
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9755-9
1946399
Trends Genet. 2007 Jun;23(6):301-9
17434233
Cell. 2003 Feb 21;112(4):423-40
12600308
Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):965-72
7672595
Nat Genet. 2009 May;41(5):625-9
19349985
PLoS Biol. 2007 Dec;5(12):e324
18076285
Genetics. 2004 Jan;166(1):43-52
15020405
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Sep;23(9):494-501
18656281