Indonesian couples' pregnancy ambivalence and contraceptive use.
BACKGROUND
Most studies on pregnancy ambivalence are based on data from women and depend on the women's perceptions to measure their partner's pregnancy intentions. Because these perceptions may not be accurate, data collected directly from men are needed to understand the role of couple dynamics in fertility behavior.


METHODS
Matched couple data from the 2002-2003 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey were used to examine contraceptive use, fertility desires and attitudes about becoming pregnant in the next few weeks-whether it would be a big problem, a small problem or no problem. Concordance between partners on these issues was evaluated. Inconsistent fertility desires and responses to the problem question are used to define ambivalence within couples. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether couples' pregnancy ambivalence was associated with contraceptive use.


RESULTS
Seventy-one percent of husbands and 54% of wives reported that a pregnancy in the next few weeks would be "no problem"; couples' concordance on this question was 64% among contraceptive users and 61% among nonusers. In the multivariate analysis, couples who were discordant on the issue of a pregnancy in the near future had 26% lower odds of using contraceptives than couples in which both partners agreed a pregnancy would be a big or small problem. Contraceptive use was also less likely for couples in which one partner wanted to delay or stop childbearing and the other wanted more children or was undecided (odds ratio, 0.4).


CONCLUSIONS
Husbands and wives influence each other's fertility attitudes and family planning use. Both husbands' and wives' pregnancy attitudes should be taken into account at the time of screening and method selection.
Barden-O'Fallon
Janine L
JL
MEASURE Evaluation Population and Reproductive Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. bardenof@email.unc.edu
Speizer
Ilene S
IS
D000328:Adult; D003142:Communication; D003267:Contraception / Q000379:methods; D003268:Contraception Behavior / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005193:Family Planning Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007214:Indonesia / Q000453:epidemiology; D008297:Male; D008393:Marriage / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011247:Pregnancy; D012923:Social Class; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D018454:Spouses / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;186(2):251-2
11854644
Soc Biol. 1999 Spring-Summer;46(1-2):1-16
10842498
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):250-1
10723653
Stud Fam Plann. 2001 Sep;32(3):244-53
11677695
Stud Fam Plann. 1993 May-Jun;24(3):163-74
8351697
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):251-2
10723654
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002 Nov-Dec;34(6):294-303
12558092
Stud Fam Plann. 1988 May-Jun;19(3):162-8
3406964
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):246-7, 260
10723650
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007 Jun;39(2):90-9
17565622
Contraception. 2008 Jan;77(1):10-21
18082661
Popul Stud (Camb). 2005 Jul;59(2):197-210
16096198
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Mar-Apr;35(2):94-101
12729139
Demography. 1998 May;35(2):229-42
9622784
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006 Dec;32(4):185-91
17237015
J Adolesc Health. 2003 Aug;33(2):79-83
12890598
Contraception. 2007 Apr;75(4):305-10
17362711
Contraception. 2006 May;73(5):520-4
16627038
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Nov-Dec;36(6):248-57
15687083
J Biosoc Sci. 2007 Sep;39(5):745-57
17107632
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
843571