Bacterial community dynamics during the application of a Myxococcus xanthus-inoculated culture medium used for consolidation of ornamental limestone.
In this study, we investigated under laboratory conditions the bacterial communities inhabiting quarry and decayed ornamental carbonate stones before and after the application of a Myxococcus xanthus-inoculated culture medium used for consolidation of the stones. The dynamics of the community structure and the prevalence of the inoculated bacterium, M. xanthus, were monitored during the time course of the consolidation treatment (30 days). For this purpose, we selected a molecular strategy combining fingerprinting by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) with the screening of eubacterial 16S rDNA clone libraries by DGGE and sequencing. Quantification of the inoculated strain was performed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using M. xanthus-specific primers designed in this work. Results derived from DGGE and sequencing analysis showed that, irrespective of the origin of the stone,the same carbonatogenic microorganisms were activated by the application of a M. xanthus culture. Those microorganisms were Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., and Brevibacillus sp. The monitoring of M. xanthus in the culture media of treated stones during the time course experiment showed disparate results depending on the applied technique. By culture-dependent methods, the detection of this bacterium was only possible in the first day of the treatment, showing the limitation of these conventional techniques. By PCR-DGGE analysis, M. xanthus was detected during the first 3-6 days of the experiment. At this time, the population of this bacterium in the culture media varied between 108-106 cells ml-1, as showed by qPCR analyses. Thereafter, DGGE analyses showed to be not suitable for the detection of M. xanthus in a mixed culture. Nevertheless, qPCR analysis using specific primers for M. xanthus showed to bea more sensitive technique for the detection of thisbacterium, revealing a population of 104 cells ml-1 in the culture media of both treated stones at the end of the consolidation treatment. The molecular strategy used in this study is proposed as an effective monitoring system to evaluate the impact of the application of a bacterially induced carbonate mineralization as restoration/conservation treatment for ornamental stones.
Piñar
Guadalupe
G
Institute of Applied Microbiology, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, Vienna, Austria. guadalupe.pinar@univie.ac.at
Jimenez-Lopez
Concepcion
C
Sterflinger
Katja
K
Ettenauer
Jörg
J
Jroundi
Fadwa
F
Fernandez-Vivas
Antonia
A
Gonzalez-Muñoz
Maria Teresa
MT
D002119:Calcium Carbonate; D003470:Culture Media; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D004783:Environmental Microbiology; D054892:Metagenome / Q000235:genetics; D016941:Myxococcus xanthus / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA
D003470:Culture Media; D004269:DNA, Bacterial; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; D002119:Calcium Carbonate
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Apr;62(4):1405-15
8919802
FEBS Lett. 2007 Jan 9;581(1):151-6
17184776
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Apr;57(4):1057-61
1647748
J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2002 Dec;48(6):299-308
12682868
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996 Oct;46(4):939-46
8863420
Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jan;5(1):72-4
12542715
J Bacteriol. 2000 Dec;182(23):6614-21
11073903
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 May;52(Pt 3):953-966
12054263
Methods Enzymol. 1990;183:63-98
2156132
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2002 Oct;25(3):434-9
12421081
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Mar;59(3):695-700
7683183
Chemosphere. 2007 Aug;68(10):1929-36
17418886
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Mar;54(Pt 2):419-427
15023954
Extremophiles. 2006 Aug;10(4):285-94
16489412
Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-86
10547847
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 Jan 1;47(1):65-75
19712347
J Microbiol Methods. 1999 May;36(1-2):139-45
10353808
Electrophoresis. 1992 Aug;13(8):487-94
1451682
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Oct;69(10):6056-63
14532062
J Microbiol Methods. 2001 Jun;45(2):77-87
11311392
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Jul;61(7):2798-801
7618894
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Oct;58(10):3417-8
1280061
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(5):445-53
17176765
Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Apr 25;18 Suppl:2237-317
1692117
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2002 Aug;25(2):232-40
12353878
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994 Dec 15;124(3):349-53
7851741
Microbiol Rev. 1987 Sep;51(3):365-79
3312987
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Jul;68(7):3206-14
12088996
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Apr;58(4):1284-91
16348695
FEBS Lett. 1992 Aug 10;308(1):94-6
1644205
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jan;67(1):293-9
11133458
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Apr;69(4):2182-93
12676699
J Bacteriol. 1998 May;180(9):2306-11
9573179
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Oct;67(10):4891-5
11571198
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006 Apr;70(3):281-9
16470363
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Aug;69(8):4901-9
12902285
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Apr;72(4):2637-43
16597968
Environ Microbiol. 2003 Oct;5(10):888-95
14510842
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 4;102(40):14428-33
16183740
Int Microbiol. 2005 Sep;8(3):189-94
16200497
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003 May;53(Pt 3):859-862
12807213
Microb Ecol. 2007 Jul;54(1):170-82
17364247
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jul 1;64(7):2463-72
9647816
J Bacteriol. 1991 Mar;173(6):2109-15
1848221