Policy-driven tobacco control.
BACKGROUND
Since the passage of Proposition 99, California's comprehensive tobacco control programme has benefited from a localised policy adoption process that allows for the innovation and diffusion of strong local tobacco control policies throughout the state.


METHODS
The policy adoption continuum is described in the context of California's smoke-free workplace movement, and the influence of policy-driven tobacco control initiatives on social norms, behaviour and the public's health was examined.


RESULTS
The Smoke-free California policy adoption continuum reflects a general approach for policy innovation and diffusion that builds social acceptance and influences social norms, while minimising unintended consequences and creating best practices in tobacco control. California's local smoke-free workplace policies have reduced secondhand smoke exposure and supported attitude and behaviour changes. The effects of local policy adoption led to the nation's first statewide smoke-free workplace law.


CONCLUSIONS
Proposition 99 created an unprecedented tobacco control infrastructure that supported local policy innovation and diffusion to influence social norms and behaviours. Tobacco control policy efforts should address campaign challenges, oppose pre-emption and confront tobacco industry influence. Advocates must be cautious of pursuing a statewide policy prematurely, as it may result in a weak and/or pre-emptive policy that can stymie local policy efforts and prolong the adoption of a meaningful statewide policy.
Francis
John A
JA
California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program, PO Box 997377, MS 7206, Sacramento, California 95899-7377, USA. johnaveryfrancis@hotmail.com
Abramsohn
Erin M
EM
Park
Hye-Youn
HY
D002140:California; D003469:Culture; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D015438:Health Behavior; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006291:Health Policy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D009787:Occupational Medicine / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012907:Smoking / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D012931:Social Environment; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control; D014029:Tobacco Use Disorder / Q000517:prevention & control; D017132:Workplace / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):26-34
11891365
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 May;57(5):522-34
17518219
JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479-86
8320788
Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):154-60
11387536
Tob Control. 2005 Dec;14(6):377-83
16319360
Tob Control. 2004 Mar;13(1):65-73
14985600
Am J Public Health. 2008 Dec;98(12):2123-33
18923118
Tob Control. 1997 Spring;6(1):41-54
9176985
Am J Public Health. 2009 Oct;99(10):1799-805
19696384
Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Jan;16(1):64-74
18181816
Am J Public Health. 1993 Sep;83(9):1214-21
8362994
Cancer. 1998 Dec 15;83(12 Suppl Robert):2717-21
9874384
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Spring;15(1):58-72
8920569
Eur J Dent Educ. 2004 Feb;8 Suppl 4:11-7
14725648
Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1 Suppl 1:S113-6
11072415
Health Educ Behav. 2008 Oct;35(5):683-97
17456855
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1:I102-9
11893820
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Fall;30(3 Suppl):75-82
12508507
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 May 23;57(20):549-52
18496503
N C Med J. 2008 Sep-Oct;69(5):355-61
19006924
Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):124-34
11387532
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jan 17;282(6259):183-5
6779940
Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1749-57
11684593
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1:i21-9
20382646