title: Measuring any conscious content versus measuring the relevant conscious content: comment on Sandberg et al.
abstract: Sandberg et al. show that the Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS) scale is sensitive compared to confidence ratings and wagering in detecting accurate perception. They go on to argue that the PAS scale is hence a sensitive measure of conscious perception compared to confidence ratings, a claim disputed here. The fact that some visual content is conscious does not entail that the visual content relevant to making a discrimination is conscious. For example, if one saw a square but was only aware of seeing a flash of something, then one has not consciously seen a square. When PAS and confidence ratings come in conflict, we suggest that it is confidence ratings that more reliably indicate the conscious status of contents allowing discrimination.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, Sussex, UK. dienes@sussex.ac.uk
authors.forename: Zoltan
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Dienes
authors.forename: Anil K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Seth
mesh_terms: D001364:Awareness; D003243:Consciousness; D003657:Decision Making; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013360:Subliminal Stimulation; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D035501:Uncertainty