The origins of 12-month attachment: a microanalysis of 4-month mother-infant interaction.
A microanalysis of 4-month mother-infant face-to-face communication revealed a fine-grained specification of communication processes that predicted 12-month insecure attachment outcomes, particularly resistant and disorganized classifications. An urban community sample of 84 dyads were videotaped at 4 months during a face-to-face interaction, and at 12 months during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. Four-month mother and infant communication modalities of attention, affect, touch, and spatial orientation were coded from split-screen videotape on a 1 s time base; mother and infant facial-visual "engagement" variables were constructed. We used contingency measures (multi-level time-series modeling) to examine the dyadic temporal process over time, and specific rates of qualitative features of behavior to examine the content of behavior. Self-contingency (auto-correlation) measured the degree of stability/lability within an individual's own rhythms of behavior; interactive contingency (lagged cross-correlation) measured adjustments of the individual's behavior that were correlated with the partner's previous behavior. We documented that both self- and interactive contingency, as well as specific qualitative features, of mother and infant behavior were mechanisms of attachment formation by 4 months, distinguishing 12-month insecure, resistant, and disorganized attachment classifications from secure; avoidant were too few to test. All communication modalities made unique contributions. The separate analysis of different communication modalities identified intermodal discrepancies or conflict, both intrapersonal and interpersonal, that characterized insecure dyads. Contrary to dominant theories in the literature on face-to-face interaction, measures of maternal contingent coordination with infant yielded the fewest associations with 12-month attachment, whereas mother and infant self-contingency, and infant contingent coordination with mother, yielded comparable numbers of findings. Rather than the more usual hypothesis that more contingency is "better," we partially supported our hypothesis that 12-month insecurity is associated with both higher and lower 4-month self- and interactive contingency values than secure, as a function of mother vs. infant and communication modality. Thus, in the origins of attachment security, more contingency is not necessarily better. A remarkable degree of differentiation was identified in the 4-month patterns of "future" C and D infants, classified as resistant and disorganized, respectively, at 12 months. The central feature of future C dyads was dysregulated tactile and spatial exchanges, generating approach-withdrawal patterns. The intact maternal contingent coordination overall safeguards the future C infant's interactive agency. However, future C infants likely come to expect maternal spatial/tactile impingement, and to expect to "dodge" as mothers "chase." They managed maternal touch by tuning it out, sacrificing their ability to communicate about maternal touch. They "approached" by vigilantly coordinating their facial-visual engagement with maternal facial-visual engagement, but they "withdrew" by inhibiting their facial-visual engagement coordination with maternal touch. We proposed that future C infants will have difficulty feeling sensed and known during maternal spatial/tactile impingements. The central feature of future D dyads is intrapersonal and interpersonal discordance or conflict in the context of intensely distressed infants. Lowered maternal contingent coordination, and failures of maternal affective correspondence, constituted maternal emotional withdrawal from distressed infants, compromising infant interactive agency and emotional coherence. The level of dysregulation in future D dyads was thus of an entirely different order than that of future C dyads. We proposed that the future D infant represents not being sensed and known by the mother, particularly in states of distress. We proposed that the emerging internal working model of future D infants includes confusion about their own basic emotional organization, about their mothers' emotional organization, and about their mothers' response to their distress, setting a trajectory in development which may disturb the fundamental integration of the person. The findings have rich implications for clinical intervention, with remarkable specificity for different kinds of mother and infant distress. Heightened and lowered self- and interactive contingency, in different modalities, as well as the specific behavioral qualities identified, provide a more differentiated set of concepts to guide clinical intervention.
Beebe
Beatrice
B
NYS Psychiatric Institute #108, New York, NY, USA. beebebe@pi.cpmc.columbia.edu
Jaffe
Joseph
J
Markese
Sara
S
Buck
Karen
K
Chen
Henian
H
Cohen
Patricia
P
Bahrick
Lorraine
L
Andrews
Howard
H
Feldstein
Stanley
S
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002657:Child Development; D002668:Child Rearing / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D009034:Mother-Child Relations; D009769:Object Attachment; D014743:Videotape Recording; D055815:Young Adult
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;156(4):505-24
10200728
Child Dev. 1988 Apr;59(2):467-79
3359865
Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):915-27
8706535
Science. 1977 Oct 7;198(4312):75-8
17741897
Child Dev. 1986 Jun;57(3):754-61
3720401
Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1360-76
18020817
Infancy. 2001 Oct;2(4):549-566
33451193
Am Psychol. 1989 Feb;44(2):112-9
2653124
Infant Ment Health J. 2008 Sep;29(5):442-471
28636220
Child Dev. 1992 Apr;63(2):245-59
1611931
Child Dev. 1993 Oct;64(5):1439-50
8222882
Child Dev. 2005 Sep-Oct;76(5):1044-54
16150001
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1-2):276-97
4069131
Dev Psychol. 1997 Sep;33(5):856-60
9300218
Child Dev. 2004 Mar-Apr;75(2):377-94
15056194
Child Dev. 1996 Oct;67(5):2512-26
9022253
Child Dev. 1988 Aug;59(4):1097-101
3168617
Child Dev. 1997 Aug;68(4):598-600
9306638
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Jun;197(6):383-90
19525736
Psychol Methods. 2001 Mar;6(1):18-34
11285809
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(2-3):25-52
7984164
Attach Hum Dev. 2006 Jun;8(2):89-111
16818417
Child Dev. 2005 Sep-Oct;76(5):1116-26
16150006
Child Dev. 2002 Sep-Oct;73(5):1339-52
12361304
Child Dev. 1982 Aug;53(4):991-1003
7128264
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Feb;67(1):54-63
10028209
Child Dev. 1994 Aug;65(4):971-91
7956474
Child Dev. 1991 Apr;62(2):373-84
2055128
Attach Hum Dev. 2003 Mar;5(1):38-63
12745828
Child Dev. 1996 Dec;67(6):3219-37
9071778
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Mar;3(2):131-41
8713554
Dev Psychopathol. 2003 Spring;15(2):239-57
12931826
Infant Ment Health J. 2005 Nov;26(6):570-597
28682484
Psychophysiology. 1990 Jul;27(4):363-84
2236440
Child Dev. 1994 Oct;65(5):1503-15
7982365
Int J Psychoanal. 1958 Sep-Oct;39(5):350-73
13610508
Dev Psychol. 2001 Sep;37(5):684-97
11552763
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2001;66(2):i-viii, 1-132
11428150
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2002;30:153-87
12402674
Child Dev. 1984 Jun;55(3):718-28
6734313
Bull Menninger Clin. 2001 Summer;65(3):397-410
11531135
Dev Sci. 2007 Jan;10(1):126-34
17181710
Psychoanal Study Child. 2005;60:7-46
16649674
Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):905-14
8706534
Psychol Bull. 2000 Mar;126(2):281-308
10748644
Infant Behav Dev. 2006 Jan;29(1):131-5
17138268
J Psycholinguist Res. 2003 Sep;32(5):525-39
14564991
Child Dev. 1988 Aug;59(4):1111-24
3168619
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1-2):167-93
4069127
Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):890-909
11107881
Infant Ment Health J. 2008;29(3):203-218
19122769
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1995;60(2-3):146-74
8559155
Child Dev. 1996 Aug;67(4):1780-92
8890507
Child Dev. 2000 May-Jun;71(3):684-9
10953934
Int J Psychoanal. 1996 Dec;77 ( Pt 6):1181-212
9119582
PLoS Biol. 2005 Mar;3(3):e79
15736981
Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):25-41
8711014
Science. 1983 Sep 16;221(4616):1208-10
6612338
Dev Psychol. 2007 Jan;43(1):238-52
17201522
Child Dev. 1984 Jun;55(3):936-43
6734328
Dev Psychol. 2003 Nov;39(6):976-91
14584979
Infancy. 2001 Oct;2(4):451-467
33451189
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):175-88
16420127
J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1971 Jul;10(3):501-17
5168603
Child Dev. 1997 Aug;68(4):571-91
9306636
Psychol Bull. 1997 May;121(3):437-56
9136644
Dev Psychopathol. 2004 Winter;16(1):43-68
15115064
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Sep 19;263:89-100
1060437
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003 Apr;45(4):274-81
12647930
Psychol Rev. 2000 Jul;107(3):411-29
10941275
Dev Psychol. 1999 Jan;35(1):175-88
9923473
Science. 1996 Dec 13;274(5294):1926-8
8943209
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1989;54(1-2):1-104; discussion 105-136
2770755
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(2-3):228-49
7984163
Science. 1982 Oct 8;218(4568):179-81
7123230
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(2-3):192-207
7984161
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1999;64(3):67-96; discussion 213-20
10597543
Child Dev. 1988 Feb;59(1):135-46
3342708
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1-2):233-56
4069129
Child Dev. 2001 Nov-Dec;72(6):1605-16
11768135
Dev Psychol. 2005 May;41(3):541-52
15910161
Child Dev. 2004 Mar-Apr;75(2):317-33
15056186
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Feb 21;4:10
16504035
J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1978 Winter;17(1):1-13
632477
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 2:53-61
9559760
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(2-3):3-6
7984166
Dev Psychopathol. 1999 Spring;11(2):225-49
16506532
Attach Hum Dev. 2002 Apr;4(1):3-24
12065027
Child Dev. 1992 Aug;63(4):840-58
1387067
Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):252-70
11280483