title: Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking.
abstract: We begin with the premise that human tissue biobanking is associated with ethical ambiguities and regulatory uncertainty, and that public engagement is at least one important element in addressing such challenges. One is then confronted with how to achieve public engagement that is both meaningful and effective. In particular, how can public engagement on the topic of biobanking be implemented so that (a) it is perceived broadly as legitimate and (b) the results of the engagement are relevant and useful to the institutional and regulatory context? In this paper we build on previous work that has addressed the former point and focus primarily on the latter. We argue that one way to increase the likelihood of results of public engagement being taken up in policy is through framing the issues that are deliberated by members of the public based in part on the practical policy questions for which input is sought. In this approach, we move discussion on the social and ethical implications of biobanking from abstract principles, to their consideration in the context of local biobanking practices. This is illustrated using a practical example involving a public engagement conducted to inform institutional policy for biobanking in British Columbia, Canada.
authors.affiliation: W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. kcodoher@interchange.ubc.ca
authors.forename: Kieran C
authors.initials: KC
authors.lastname: O'Doherty
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hawkins
mesh_terms: D001675:Bioethics; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics; D003256:Community Participation; D005260:Female; D023281:Genomics / Q000379:methods*; D014943:Global Health; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics; D008297:Male; D011634:Public Health / Q000379:methods*; D011639:Public Opinion; D014015:Tissue Banks / Q000941:ethics*
references.citation: Genet Med. 2007 Mar;9(3):141-9
references.pmid: 17413418
references.citation: Public Underst Sci. 2010 Mar;19(2):212-24
references.pmid: 20533799
references.citation: Community Genet. 2007;10(3):147-58
references.pmid: 17575459
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Nov;5(11):866-73
references.pmid: 15520796
references.citation: Public Underst Sci. 2005 Jan;14(1):47-65
references.pmid: 15822248
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jul;57(2):239-51
references.pmid: 12765705
references.citation: Public Health Genomics. 2009;12(4):203-15
references.pmid: 19367089
references.citation: Pathobiology. 2007;74(4):227-38
references.pmid: 17709965
references.citation: Public Underst Sci. 2010 Jul;19(4):486-96
references.pmid: 20977185
references.citation: Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Dec 1;146A(23):3026-33
references.pmid: 19006210
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Dec;17(12):1544-9
references.pmid: 19471310
references.citation: Per Med. 2008 May;5(3):285-296
references.pmid: 29783499
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2007 Aug;4(8):e209
references.pmid: 17696640
references.citation: J Transl Med. 2009 Nov 12;7:95
references.pmid: 19909513
references.citation: Community Genet. 2007;10(3):186-98
references.pmid: 17575464
references.citation: BMC Med Ethics. 2008 Nov 14;9:17
references.pmid: 19014594