title: Incorporating Historical Control Data When Comparing Tumor Incidence Rates.
abstract: Animal carcinogenicity studies, such as those conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), focus on detecting trends in tumor rates across dose groups. Over time, the NTP has compiled vast amounts of data on tumors in control animals. Currently, this information is used informally, without the benefit of statistical tests for carcinogenicity that directly incorporate historical data on control animals. This article proposes a survival-adjusted test for detecting dose-related trends in tumor incidence rates, which incorporates data on historical control rates and formally accounts for variation in these rates among studies. An extensive simulation, based on a wide range of realistic situations, demonstrates that the proposed test performs well in comparison to the current NTP test, which does not incorporate historical control data. In particular, our test can aid in interpreting the occurrence of a few tumors in treated animals that are rarely seen in controls. One such example, which motivates our work, concerns the analysis of histiocytic sarcoma in the NTP's 2-year cancer bioassay of benzophenone. Whereas the occurrence of three histiocytic sarcomas in female rats was not significant according to the current NTP testing procedure (P = 0.074), it was highly significant (P = 0.004) when control data from six recent historical studies were included and our test was applied to the combined data.
authors.forename: Shyamal D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Peddada
authors.forename: Gregg E
authors.initials: GE
authors.lastname: Dinse
authors.forename: Grace E
authors.initials: GE
authors.lastname: Kissling
references.citation: Biometrics. 2001 Dec;57(4):1219-27
references.pmid: 11764263
references.citation: Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2000 Sep;492:1-306
references.pmid: 12563348
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Nov;63:217-24
references.pmid: 4076086
references.citation: Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2006 Feb;(533):1-264
references.pmid: 16741556
references.citation: Biometrics. 1993 Dec;49(4):1126-35
references.pmid: 8117906
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Apr;114(4):537-41
references.pmid: 16581542
references.citation: Biometrics. 1992 Jun;48(2):459-78
references.pmid: 1637972
references.citation: Biometrics. 2002 Dec;58(4):906-16
references.pmid: 12495145
references.citation: Biometrics. 1988 Jun;44(2):417-31
references.pmid: 3390507
references.citation: Biometrics. 1986 Jun;42(2):343-9
references.pmid: 3755626
references.citation: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1995 Feb;21(1):52-9; discussion 81-6
references.pmid: 7784636
references.citation: Hum Exp Toxicol. 2003 Oct;22(10):541-9
references.pmid: 14655720
references.citation: Biometrics. 2002 Jun;58(2):403-12
references.pmid: 12071414
references.citation: Biometrics. 1982 Jun;38(2):457-62
references.pmid: 7115873
references.citation: Biometrics. 1996 Dec;52(4):1478-85
references.pmid: 8962464
references.citation: Biometrics. 1993 Sep;49(3):793-801
references.pmid: 8241374
references.citation: Toxicol Pathol. 1984;12(2):126-35
references.pmid: 11478313