title: Evolution of self-compatibility in Arabidopsis by a mutation in the male specificity gene.
abstract: Ever since Darwin's pioneering research, the evolution of self-fertilisation (selfing) has been regarded as one of the most prevalent evolutionary transitions in flowering plants. A major mechanism to prevent selfing is the self-incompatibility (SI) recognition system, which consists of male and female specificity genes at the S-locus and SI modifier genes. Under conditions that favour selfing, mutations disabling the male recognition component are predicted to enjoy a relative advantage over those disabling the female component, because male mutations would increase through both pollen and seeds whereas female mutations would increase only through seeds. Despite many studies on the genetic basis of loss of SI in the predominantly selfing plant Arabidopsis thaliana, it remains unknown whether selfing arose through mutations in the female specificity gene (S-receptor kinase, SRK), male specificity gene (S-locus cysteine-rich protein, SCR; also known as S-locus protein 11, SP11) or modifier genes, and whether any of them rose to high frequency across large geographic regions. Here we report that a disruptive 213-base-pair (bp) inversion in the SCR gene (or its derivative haplotypes with deletions encompassing the entire SCR-A and a large portion of SRK-A) is found in 95% of European accessions, which contrasts with the genome-wide pattern of polymorphism in European A. thaliana. Importantly, interspecific crossings using Arabidopsis halleri as a pollen donor reveal that some A. thaliana accessions, including Wei-1, retain the female SI reaction, suggesting that all female components including SRK are still functional. Moreover, when the 213-bp inversion in SCR was inverted and expressed in transgenic Wei-1 plants, the functional SCR restored the SI reaction. The inversion within SCR is the first mutation disrupting SI shown to be nearly fixed in geographically wide samples, and its prevalence is consistent with theoretical predictions regarding the evolutionary advantage of mutations in male components.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Plant Biology, University Research Priority Program in Systems Biology/Functional Genomics & Zürich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Takashi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Tsuchimatsu
authors.forename: Keita
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Suwabe
authors.forename: Rie
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Shimizu-Inatsugi
authors.forename: Sachiyo
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Isokawa
authors.forename: Pavlos
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pavlidis
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Städler
authors.forename: Go
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Suzuki
authors.forename: Seiji
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Takayama
authors.forename: Masao
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Watanabe
authors.forename: Kentaro K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Shimizu
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D017343:Genes, Plant / Q000235:genetics*; D006239:Haplotypes / Q000235:genetics; D006824:Hybridization, Genetic / Q000235:genetics; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D009154:Mutation / Q000235:genetics*; D011058:Pollen / Q000502:physiology; D054817:Pollination; D012098:Reproduction / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: Plant J. 2007 May;50(3):391-400
references.pmid: 17425715
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31;106(13):5246-51
references.pmid: 19307580
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005;56:467-89
references.pmid: 15862104
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Sep;23(9):1741-50
references.pmid: 16782760
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):913-6
references.pmid: 10706292
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000426
references.pmid: 19300485
references.citation: Science. 1999 Nov 26;286(5445):1697-700
references.pmid: 10576728
references.citation: Genes Genet Syst. 2006 Oct;81(5):355-9
references.pmid: 17159297
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2000 Dec;9(12):2109-18
references.pmid: 11123622
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1993 May;5(5):531-9
references.pmid: 8518554
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1451-2
references.pmid: 19346325
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Mar;13(3):128-36
references.pmid: 18296103
references.citation: Plant J. 1998 Dec;16(6):735-43
references.pmid: 10069079
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2001 Mar;13(3):627-43
references.pmid: 11251101
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Jan;19(1):94-106
references.pmid: 17237349
references.citation: Science. 2002 Jul 12;297(5579):247-9
references.pmid: 12114625
references.citation: Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1805-17
references.pmid: 11290732
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2008 May 16;4(5):e1000075
references.pmid: 18483550
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1990 Aug;2(8):755-67
references.pmid: 2152125
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Oct 4;413(6855):534-8
references.pmid: 11586363
references.citation: Science. 2007 Aug 24;317(5841):1070-2
references.pmid: 17656687
references.citation: Genet Res (Camb). 2008 Feb;90(1):47-60
references.pmid: 18289400
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(2):704-14
references.pmid: 18179433
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 17;17(8):734-40
references.pmid: 17412590