title: Evaluation of demands and needs for dental care in a sample of the Turkish population.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the demands and needs for dental care and to identify the level of dental and periodontal status in patients of different age groups visiting the Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 1000 first-visit patients (517 female and 483 male) were examined and questioned. The main complaint of each patient was recorded and considered to be a measure of demand for dental care. The World Health Organization's (WHO) basic methods were used to determine the tooth-based and orthodontic normative treatment needs. Periodontal status was determined by using the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN). In addition, prosthetic normative needs were assessed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  This study showed that patients in different age groups required different treatments and had different main complaints. In total, 89.3, 74.1 and 57.7% of the patients named periodontal, restorative and prosthetic care as their main complaint, respectively. Approximately 21% of the total did not need restorations and extractions, and only 12% of the sample did not have a normative periodontal treatment need. About half of subjects needed fixed partial dentures.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Normative treatment needs of patients were very high. Therefore, a new national strategy for oral health must be devised for Turkey. This study can assist in setting the baseline for that strategy.
authors.affiliation: DDS, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
authors.forename: Filiz
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Pekiner
authors.forename: Birsay
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Gumru
authors.forename: Mehmet Oguz
authors.initials: MO
authors.lastname: Borahan
authors.forename: Emre
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Aytugar
references.citation: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;15(4):188-91
references.pmid: 3476240
references.citation: Int Dent J. 1987 Dec;37(4):222-33
references.pmid: 3481626
references.citation: Int Dent J. 1999 Jun;49(3):153-8
references.pmid: 10858748
references.citation: Acta Odontol Scand. 2006 Apr;64(2):65-73
references.pmid: 16546847
references.citation: J Nihon Univ Sch Dent. 1991 Sep;33(3):147-51
references.pmid: 1748884
references.citation: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;31(5):351-60
references.pmid: 14667006
references.citation: J Public Health Dent. 2004 Summer;64(3):127-35
references.pmid: 15341135
references.citation: Int Dent J. 2001 Dec;51(6):451-6
references.pmid: 11789713
references.citation: Int Dent J. 1996 Feb;46(1):41-7
references.pmid: 8744916
references.citation: J Public Health Dent. 1998 Summer;58(3):250-3
references.pmid: 10101703
references.citation: Acta Odontol Scand. 2000 Dec;58(6):243-8
references.pmid: 11196398
references.citation: N Z Med J. 2004 May 21;117(1194):U892
references.pmid: 15156210
references.citation: Gerodontology. 2006 Jun;23(2):67-72
references.pmid: 16677178
references.citation: J Public Health Dent. 1994 Fall;54(4):205-10
references.pmid: 7799294
references.citation: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1985 Apr;13(2):68-9
references.pmid: 3857150
references.citation: Int Dent J. 2001 Apr;51(2):67-72
references.pmid: 11569665
references.citation: J Dent Res. 2001 May;80(5):1466-70
references.pmid: 11437221
references.citation: Spec Care Dentist. 1998 Jul-Aug;18(4):164-9
references.pmid: 10218064
references.citation: Community Dent Health. 1985 Dec;2(4):285-91
references.pmid: 3866631