Coupling a sensory hair-cell bundle to cyber clones enhances nonlinear amplification.
The vertebrate ear benefits from nonlinear mechanical amplification to operate over a vast range of sound intensities. The amplificatory process is thought to emerge from active force production by sensory hair cells. The mechano-sensory hair bundle that protrudes from the apical surface of each hair cell can oscillate spontaneously and function as a frequency-selective, nonlinear amplifier. Intrinsic fluctuations, however, jostle the response of a single hair bundle to weak stimuli and seriously limit amplification. Most hair bundles are mechanically coupled by overlying gelatinous structures. Here, we assayed the effects of mechanical coupling on the hair-bundle amplifier by combining dynamic force clamp of a hair bundle from the bullfrog's saccule with real-time stochastic simulations of hair-bundle mechanics. This setup couples the hair bundle to two virtual hair bundles, called cyber clones, and mimics a situation in which the hair bundle is elastically linked to two neighbors with similar characteristics. We found that coupling increased the coherence of spontaneous hair-bundle oscillations. By effectively reducing noise, the synergic interplay between the hair bundle and its cyber clones also enhanced amplification of sinusoidal stimuli. All observed effects of coupling were in quantitative agreement with simulations. We argue that the auditory amplifier relies on hair-bundle cooperation to overcome intrinsic noise limitations and achieve high sensitivity and sharp frequency selectivity.
Barral
Jérémie
J
Laboratoire Physico-Chimie Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Curie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France.
Dierkes
Kai
K
Lindner
Benjamin
B
Jülicher
Frank
F
Martin
Pascal
P
D006198:Hair Cells, Auditory; D046569:Neuroepithelial Cells / Q000502:physiology*; D009622:Noise
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Feb;8(2):149-55
15643426
J Neurosci. 1992 Dec;12(12):4575-85
1464757
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 4;98(25):14380-5
11724945
J Comp Physiol A. 1985 Nov;157(5):687-97
3837108
J Neurosci. 2003 Jun 1;23(11):4533-48
12805294
J Physiol. 1988 Jun;400:275-97
2458455
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 22;95(26):15321-6
9860967
Nature. 2006 Jun 8;441(7094):719-23
16760970
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Dec 18;103(25):250601
20366245
J Physiol. 2006 Oct 1;576(Pt 1):37-42
16873410
J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 8;26(10):2757-66
16525055
Biophys J. 2007 Dec 1;93(11):4053-67
17704173
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jul;11(7):746-8
18516034
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 May 29;84(22):5232-5
10990910
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 28;97(7):3183-8
10737791
Biophys J. 1988 Mar;53(3):441-7
3258166
Nature. 2005 Feb 24;433(7028):880-3
15696193
Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2009 Aug;29(4):449-60
19701785
Trends Neurosci. 1998 Apr;21(4):159-67
9554726
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jan;7(1):19-29
16371947
Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):530-45
18760690
Physiol Rev. 2001 Jul;81(3):1305-52
11427697
Physiol Rev. 2008 Jan;88(1):173-210
18195086
Neuron. 2008 May 8;58(3):333-9
18466744
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Aug;13(4):459-68
12965294
J Physiol. 1985 Jul;364:359-79
4032304
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 4;98(25):14386-91
11724944
Biophys J. 2009 Feb;96(3):1159-68
19186151
Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Oct 8;93(15):158102
15524944
Hear Res. 1993 Aug;68(2):243-52
8407610
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 2;105(48):18669-74
19015514
Hear Res. 2009 Oct;256(1-2):58-63
19573584
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 3;92(1):276-9
7816832
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):541-9
11495929
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 17;101(33):12195-200
15302928