title: The impact of ColRS two-component system and TtgABC efflux pump on phenol tolerance of Pseudomonas putida becomes evident only in growing bacteria.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  We have recently found that Pseudomonas putida deficient in ColRS two-component system is sensitive to phenol and displays a serious defect on solid glucose medium where subpopulation of bacteria lyses. The latter phenotype is significantly enhanced by the presence of phenol in growth medium. Here, we focused on identification of factors affecting phenol tolerance of the colR-deficient P. putida.
  
  
  RESULTS
  By using transposon mutagenesis approach we identified a set of phenol-tolerant derivatives of colR-deficient strain. Surprisingly, half of independent phenol tolerant clones possessed miniTn5 insertion in the ttgABC operon. However, though inactivation of TtgABC efflux pump significantly enhanced phenol tolerance, it did not affect phenol-enhanced autolysis of the colR mutant on glucose medium indicating that phenol- and glucose-caused stresses experienced by the colR-deficient P. putida are not coupled. Inactivation of TtgABC pump significantly increased the phenol tolerance of the wild-type P. putida as well. Comparison of phenol tolerance of growing versus starving bacteria revealed that both ColRS and TtgABC systems affect phenol tolerance only under growth conditions and not under starvation. Flow cytometry analysis showed that phenol strongly inhibited cell division and to some extent also caused cell membrane permeabilization to propidium iodide. Single cell analysis of populations of the ttgC- and colRttgC-deficient strains revealed that their membrane permeabilization by phenol resembles that of the wild-type and the colR mutant, respectively. However, cell division of P. putida with inactivated TtgABC pump seemed to be less sensitive to phenol than that of the parental strain. At the same time, cell division appeared to be more inhibited in the colR-mutant strain than in the wild-type P. putida.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  ColRS signal system and TtgABC efflux pump are involved in the phenol tolerance of P. putida. However, as they affect phenol tolerance of growing bacteria only, this indicates that they participate in the regulation of processes which are active during the growth and/or cell division. Single cell analysis data indicated that the cell division step of cell cycle is particularly sensitive to the toxic effect of phenol and its inhibition can be considered as an adaptive response under conditions of phenol stress.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, 51010 Tartu, Estonia.
authors.forename: Marta
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Putrins
authors.forename: Heili
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ilves
authors.forename: Liisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lilje
authors.forename: Maia
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kivisaar
authors.forename: Rita
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hõrak
mesh_terms: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000378:metabolism / Q000633:toxicity*; D001426:Bacterial Proteins / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D002462:Cell Membrane / Q000378:metabolism; D003470:Culture Media / Q000737:chemistry; D004251:DNA Transposable Elements; D024881:Drug Resistance, Bacterial; D017353:Gene Deletion; D005947:Glucose / Q000378:metabolism; D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D016254:Mutagenesis, Insertional; D010539:Permeability; D019800:Phenol / Q000378:metabolism / Q000633:toxicity*; D011419:Propidium / Q000378:metabolism; D016958:Pseudomonas putida / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D003470:Culture Media; D004251:DNA Transposable Elements; D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins; D019800:Phenol; D011419:Propidium; D005947:Glucose
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2002 Dec;4(12):799-808
references.pmid: 12534463
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2001 Feb;39(4):1100-6
references.pmid: 11251828
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 1998 May;28(3):449-61
references.pmid: 9632250
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 14;103(7):2386-91
references.pmid: 16467145
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 2001 Aug;147(Pt 8):2149-2156
references.pmid: 11495992
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1994 Dec;176(24):7550-7
references.pmid: 8002579
references.citation: Microbiol Rev. 1995 Jun;59(2):201-22
references.pmid: 7603409
references.citation: Proteomics. 2004 Sep;4(9):2640-52
references.pmid: 15352239
references.citation: Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Jul 20;154(2):203-4
references.pmid: 895716
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2001 Sep;183(17):4941-9
references.pmid: 11489844
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2006 Mar 17;281(11):7102-9
references.pmid: 16407274
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Oct;47(10):3067-72
references.pmid: 14506010
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Jun 25;13(12):4431-43
references.pmid: 2989795
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1969 May 14;41(3):459-72
references.pmid: 4896022
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1990 Nov;172(11):6557-67
references.pmid: 2172216
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002;56:743-68
references.pmid: 12142492
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Dec;60(12):4440-4
references.pmid: 7811084
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2006 Dec;188(23):8109-17
references.pmid: 17012397
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1998 Jul;180(13):3323-9
references.pmid: 9642183
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 1995 Jul;141 ( Pt 7):1691-705
references.pmid: 7551037
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Feb;52(2):149-82
references.pmid: 12459238
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1998 Jun;180(11):2822-9
references.pmid: 9603867
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006 Nov;58(2):205-13
references.pmid: 17064262
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):1648-52
references.pmid: 377280
references.citation: BMC Mol Biol. 2009 May 16;10:46
references.pmid: 19445690
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2008 Oct;10(10):2886-93
references.pmid: 18657172
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1990 Nov;172(11):6568-72
references.pmid: 2172217
references.citation: Extremophiles. 2005 Apr;9(2):163-8
references.pmid: 15765202
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1999 Feb;181(4):1203-10
references.pmid: 9973347
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2006 Apr 28;281(17):11981-91
references.pmid: 16495222
references.citation: OMICS. 2007 Fall;11(3):233-51
references.pmid: 17883337
references.citation: Cytometry A. 2004 Oct;61(2):189-95
references.pmid: 15382024
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2004 Nov;54(3):795-807
references.pmid: 15491368
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2003 Dec;5(12):1270-80
references.pmid: 14641573
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2001 Jul;183(13):3967-73
references.pmid: 11395460
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1998 Jan;11(1):45-56
references.pmid: 9425686
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Apr;57(4):1213-7
references.pmid: 2059043