title: Implementation of angular response function modeling in SPECT simulations with GATE.
abstract: Among Monte Carlo simulation codes in medical imaging, the GATE simulation platform is widely used today given its flexibility and accuracy, despite long run times, which in SPECT simulations are mostly spent in tracking photons through the collimators. In this work, a tabulated model of the collimator/detector response was implemented within the GATE framework to significantly reduce the simulation times in SPECT. This implementation uses the angular response function (ARF) model. The performance of the implemented ARF approach has been compared to standard SPECT GATE simulations in terms of the ARF tables' accuracy, overall SPECT system performance and run times. Considering the simulation of the Siemens Symbia T SPECT system using high-energy collimators, differences of less than 1% were measured between the ARF-based and the standard GATE-based simulations, while considering the same noise level in the projections, acceleration factors of up to 180 were obtained when simulating a planar 364 keV source seen with the same SPECT system. The ARF-based and the standard GATE simulation results also agreed very well when considering a four-head SPECT simulation of a realistic Jaszczak phantom filled with iodine-131, with a resulting acceleration factor of 100. In conclusion, the implementation of an ARF-based model of collimator/detector response for SPECT simulations within GATE significantly reduces the simulation run times without compromising accuracy.
authors.affiliation: INSERM, U650, LaTIM, IFR SclnBioS, Université de Brest, CHU Brest, Brest, F-29200, France.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Descourt
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Carlier
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Du
authors.forename: X
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Song
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Buvat
authors.forename: E C
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: Frey
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bardies
authors.forename: B M W
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Tsui
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Visvikis
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking; D003198:Computer Simulation; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
references.citation: Med Phys. 2008 Jul;35(7):3278-84
references.pmid: 18697552
references.citation: Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2007 Jun;22(3):423-30
references.pmid: 17651050
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2004 Oct 7;49(19):4543-61
references.pmid: 15552416
references.citation: Med Phys. 1999 Apr;26(4):574-608
references.pmid: 10227362
references.citation: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2008 Jan 1;55(1):560-567
references.pmid: 20811587
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2000 Jan;41(1):123-30
references.pmid: 10647615
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2003 Nov 7;48(21):R107-64
references.pmid: 14653555
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2005 Apr 21;50(8):1791-804
references.pmid: 15815096
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jun 7;52(11):3027-43
references.pmid: 17505087
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1999 Aug;44(8):N183-92
references.pmid: 10473218
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jul 7;51(13):R287-301
references.pmid: 16790908
references.citation: Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1476-85
references.pmid: 18491542
references.citation: Q J Nucl Med. 2002 Mar;46(1):48-61
references.pmid: 12072845
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Apr 7;54(7):2163-78
references.pmid: 19293466