Inside truths: 'truth' and mental illness in the Australian asylum seeker and detention debates.
This article examines some of the key debates and interactions between the Australian government and medical profession in relation to the mental health consequences of the policy of mandatory detention of asylum seekers. It explores how, in a series of episodes between 2001 and 2005, each side claimed to represent accurately the 'true' nature of the detention system through asserting superior 'objectivity' and commitment to 'scientific truth' in their representations of the mental health of asylum seekers. Placing these debates within the particular political objectives of the Liberal Party during John Howard's term as Prime Minister, the article explores how science and medical advocacy have been characterized and made to signify larger conflicts within the Australian political arena. It shows how populist political ideas of 'elitism' have been used by the government to represent as 'elitist untruths' psychiatric research which has demonstrated a direct causal links between government border control policies and mental ill-health.
Maglen
Krista
K
Department of History, Santa Clara University.
D001315:Australia; D002648:Child; D002669:Child Welfare; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D037141:Mandatory Programs / Q000941:ethics; D008603:Mental Health; D011057:Politics; D011329:Prisoners / Q000523:psychology*; D011570:Psychiatry; D012036:Refugees / Q000523:psychology*