title: Comment on Anderson and Ones (in press).
abstract: The "erratum and addendum" by Anderson and Ones (this issue) does not state unambiguously that participants' HPI scale scores were incorrectly matched with their scores on the other inventories' scales, nor does it mention the existence of other errors in the scoring of the OPQ and BPI scales. We demonstrate these errors, and we recommend the retraction of the articles by Anderson and Ones (2003) and Ones and Anderson (2002).
authors.affiliation: Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
authors.forename: Lewis R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Goldberg
authors.forename: Kibeom
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Michael C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Ashton