Ecological psychology and social psychology: it is Holt, or nothing!
What is the greatest contribution that ecological psychologists can offer social psychology? Ideally, ecological psychologists could explain how people directly perceive the unique properties of their social partners. But social partners are distinguished from mundane objects because they possess mental traits, and tradition tells us that minds cannot be seen. When considering the ideal possibility, we reject that doctrine and posit minds as perceivable. For ecological psychology, this entails asserting that minds are the types of things able to structure ambient energy. Contemporary research and theory suggests distinctly ecological ways of attacking this problem, but the problem is not new. Almost 100 years ago, Holt argued for the visibility of minds. Thus when considering these ideas, ecological psychologists face a choice that is at once about their future and their past. Extending ecological psychology's first principles into the social realm, we come to the point where we must either accept or reject Holt's arguments, and the wider context they bring. In doing so, we accept or reject our ability to study the uniquely social.
Charles
Eric P
EP
Division of Education, Humanities, and Social Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University-Altoona, 3000 Ivyside Dr., Altoona, PA 16601, USA. epc2@psu.edu
D001914:Boxing / Q000523:psychology; D004463:Ecology; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D016139:Martial Arts / Q000523:psychology; D010465:Perception / Q000502:physiology; D010684:Philosophy; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011584:Psychology; D011593:Psychology, Social; D012931:Social Environment; D012938:Social Perception