Deaf epistemologies as a critique and alternative to the practice of science: an anthropological perspective.
In the last decade, and responding to the criticism of orientalism, anthropology has engaged in a self-critical practice, working toward a postcolonial perspective on science and an epistemological stance of partial and situated knowledge (Pinxten, 2006; Pinxten & Note, 2005). In deaf studies, anthropological and sociological studies employing qualitative and ethnographic methods have introduced a paradigm shift. Concepts of deaf culture and deaf identity have been employed as political tools, contributing to the emancipation process of deaf people. However, recent anthropological studies in diverse local contexts indicate the cultural construction of these notions. From this viewpoint, deaf studies faces a challenge to reflect on the notions of culture, emancipation, and education from a nonexclusive, noncolonial perspective. Deaf studies research in a global context needs to deal with cultural and linguistic diversity in human beings and academia. This calls for epistemological reflection and new research methods.
De Clerck
Goedele A M
GA
Department of Comparative Science of Culture, Ghent University, Belgium. Goedele.DeClerk@UGent.be
D000883:Anthropology; D032882:Comprehension; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D012048:Correction of Hearing Impairment / Q000193:education*; D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D003638:Deafness / Q000208:ethnology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D060345:Education of Persons with Hearing Disabilities; D004519:Education, Special / Q000379:methods*; D004522:Educational Status; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D019359:Knowledge; D017145:Models, Educational; D019986:Persons with Hearing Disabilities / Q000534:rehabilitation; D009626:Terminology as Topic