Comparing in situ particle monitoring to microscopic counts of plankton in a drinking water reservoir.
In a one-year study, the multispecies assemblages of phytoplankton (picoplankton to microplankton) within a drinking water reservoir were counted, determined and evaluated in their size fractions using microscope enumeration (MC). The manual counts were compared with the size evaluation obtained by a light obscuring particle counter (PC) in order to evaluate its use for the monitoring practice of a drinking water reservoir. With this multispecies comparison we present a novel approach for the evaluation of automated counting systems. The picoplankton clearly remained uncounted by the PC even though its lower size limits imply an adequate match. The highest and most consistent count numbers of plankton (nano- and microplankton) and particles were obtained during the spring mass development. However, from the middle of the year onwards, the measured particle concentration surpassed the counted plankton abundances by two- to threefold indicating the rise of seston within the water column. This fraction would be missed if counted solely by MC. Further, the PC consistently undersized the biological counts, but not the minerogenic fraction represented by the manganese oxidising bacteria. Consequently, the rise and decline of Metallogenium bacteria was reliably monitored with the PC. The PC provides additional size information compared to other bulk optical sensors (turbidity, chlorophyll-a). The correlation of particles with probe measurement always exceeded the plankton coefficient, but all combinations of plankton, particle and probe measurement revealed significant linear regressions. However, the redundancy of the chlorophyll-a probes was also shown in order to explain plankton abundances. Our results indicate that background knowledge of the monitored system and cautious interpretation of data is required to allocate and understand automated particle counts. Therefore, only in combination with MC, the PC enables phytoplankton or minerogenic particle counts under frequent real-time monitoring conditions. As such it may serve as a helpful tool for example in critical situations in the management of drinking water reservoirs.
Scheifhacken
Nicole
N
Technische Universität Dresden, Neunzehnhain Ecological Station, Neunzehnhainer Str. 14, D-09514 Lengefeld, Germany. nicole.scheifhacken@tu-dresden.de
Horn
Heidi
H
Paul
Lothar
L
D018533:Biomass; D002452:Cell Count / Q000379:methods*; D048429:Cell Size; D002734:Chlorophyll / Q000032:analysis; D000077194:Chlorophyll A; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D010316:Particle Size; D010839:Phytoplankton / Q000145:classification / Q000166:cytology / Q000254:growth & development*; D014881:Water Supply / Q000032:analysis*
D002734:Chlorophyll; D000077194:Chlorophyll A