Use of simulated atrophy for performance analysis of brain atrophy estimation approaches.
In this paper, we study the performance of popular brain atrophy estimation algorithms using a simulated gold standard. The availability of a gold standard facilitates a sound evaluation of the measures of atrophy estimation, which is otherwise complicated. Firstly, we propose an approach for the construction of a gold standard. It involves the simulation of a realistic brain tissue loss based on the estimation of a topology preserving B-spline based deformation fields. Using this gold standard, we present an evaluation of three standard brain atrophy estimation methods (SIENA, SIENAX and BSI) in the presence of bias field inhomogeneity and noise. The effect of brain lesion load on the measured atrophy is also evaluated. Our experiments demonstrate that SIENA, SIENAX and BSI show a deterioration in their performance in the presence of bias field inhomogeneity and noise. The observed mean absolute errors in the measured Percentage of Brain Volume Change (PBVC) are 0.35% +/- 0.38, 2.03% +/- 1.46 and 0.91% +/- 0.80 for SIENA, SIENAX and BSI, respectively, for simulated whole brain atrophies in the range 0-1%.
Sharma
Swati
S
LINC-IPB (UMR CNRS-UDS 7191), Strasbourg, France. swati.sharma@linc.u-strasbg.fr
Noblet
Vincent
V
Rousseau
François
F
Heitz
Fabrice
F
Rumbach
Lucien
L
Armspach
Jean-Paul
JP
D000465:Algorithms; D001284:Atrophy / Q000473:pathology; D001921:Brain / Q000473:pathology*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008959:Models, Neurological; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013382:Subtraction Technique