Analysis of the relationship between the number of citations and the quality evaluated by experts in psychology journals.
The study analyzes the relationship between the number of citations as calculated by the IN-RECS database and the quality evaluated by experts. The articles published in journals of the Spanish Psychological Association between 1996 and 2008 and selected by the Editorial Board of Psychology in Spain were the subject of the study. Psychology in Spain is a journal that includes the best papers published throughout the previous year, chosen by the Editorial Board made up of fifty specialists of acknowledged prestige within Spanish psychology and translated into English. The number of the citations of the 140 original articles republished in Psychology in Spain was compared to the number of the citations of the 140 randomly selected articles. Additionally, the study searched for a relationship between the number of the articles selected from each journal and their mean number of citations. The number of citations received by the best articles as evaluated by experts is significantly higher than the number of citations of the randomly selected articles. Also, the number of citations is higher in the articles from the most frequently selected journals. A statistically significant relation between the quality evaluated by experts and the number of the citations was found.
Buela-Casal
Gualberto
G
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. gbuela@ugr.es
Zych
Izabela
I
D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D011584:Psychology; D011643:Publishing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*