Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique.
According to the literature, marginal gaps below 120 μm are recommended for conventionally cemented crown restorations. Therefore, the null hypothesis tested was as follows: the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of the marginal accuracy of chair-side generated lithium disilicate crowns lies below 120 μm. Prior to definite insertion, the accuracy of 20 lithium disilicate crowns (e.max CAD LT) was evaluated by a replica technique. A light-body silicone was used to document the gap between crown and abutment. The thickness of the light-body silicone layer was examined under microscope (MM40, Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan; magnification, ×50) at four different landmarks (LM): LM1 = marginal discrepancy, LM2 = mid-axial discrepancy of the inner crown surface, LM3 = axio-occlusal discrepancy, and LM4 = mid-occlusal discrepancy. At LM1, the mean marginal discrepancy revealed 100 μm (SD, ±61 μm); the median was 81 μm. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 90 μm, and the upper bound was 110 μm. The means of internal gaps at LM2, LM3, and LM4 showed 148 μm (SD, ±61 μm), 227 μm (SD, ±83 μm), and 284 μm (SD, ±95 μm), respectively. The lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval revealed values between 137 μm (LM2) and 269 μm (LM4). The upper bounds were between 158 μm (LM2) and 300 μm (LM4). The null hypothesis was not rejected. Within the limits of the study, the chair-side generated lithium disilicate crowns exhibited a sufficient clinical accuracy.
Reich
Sven
S
Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. sreich@ukaachen.de
Uhlen
Sophia
S
Gozdowski
Stephan
S
Lohbauer
Ulrich
U
D017076:Computer-Aided Design; D003442:Crowns; D000044:Dental Abutments; D003738:Dental Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D003760:Dental Impression Materials / Q000737:chemistry*; D003761:Dental Impression Technique; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D003776:Dental Porcelain / Q000737:chemistry*; D006801:Humans; D007574:Jaw Relation Record; D011145:Polyvinyls / Q000737:chemistry; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016628:Replica Techniques; D012833:Siloxanes / Q000737:chemistry; D013499:Surface Properties; D019231:Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic; D014584:User-Computer Interface
D003738:Dental Cements; D003760:Dental Impression Materials; C520133:IPS e.max CAD LT; D011145:Polyvinyls; D012833:Siloxanes; C493120:lithia disilicate; C034183:vinyl polysiloxane; D003776:Dental Porcelain
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1979 Sep;34(9):664-9
292585
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Oct;62(4):405-8
2685240
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:73-85
17594372
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jun;67(6):786-90
1403860
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 May;67(5):594-9
1527739
Aust Dent J. 1979 Aug;24(4):225-30
397827
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Mar;65(3):357-64
2056454
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Feb;35(2):116-22
18197844
Int J Comput Dent. 2007 Jan;10(1):79-91
17455771
Aust Dent J. 1995 Feb;40(1):17-21
7710410
Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Apr;113(2):174-9
15819826
Quintessence Int. 2006 Oct;37(9):685-93
17017630
Acta Odontol Scand. 1993 Aug;51(4):201-6
8237304
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Dec;66(6):747-53
1805023
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):587-92
14714835
Dent Mater. 1985 Oct;1(5):197-9
3912241
Br Dent J. 1971 Aug 3;131(3):107-11
5283545
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Feb 01;9(2):25-32
18264522
Dent Mater. 2008 Oct;24(10):1311-5
18384869
J Dent. 2007 Jan;35(1):68-73
16781043
Int J Comput Dent. 1999 Jan;2(1):65-72
11351452
Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):383-8
17695869
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Oct;84(4):419-24
11044849
Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Dec;116(6):579-84
19049530