Form and nature of precopulatory sexual selection in both sexes of a moth.
Sexual selection is a process that operates through intrasexual competition and intersexual choice for reproduction in both sexes. Here, we report our work on a polygamous moth, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), aiming to infer the form and nature of precopulatory sexual selection in males and females. We show that, although a number of traits measured in each sex are correlated with mating success, the primary selection trait in females appears to be abdominal thickness and that in males is aedeagus length. As the female's abdominal thickness is a reliable signal about the number and developmental stage of eggs, males who select females with thicker abdomens for mating will gain reproductive benefit, i.e., fertilizing more mature eggs. For females, earlier maturation of their eggs makes the females more likely to achieve mating earlier in an uncertain world where there is no guarantee that they will find more males in the future. Sexual selection appears to be the important force behind the evolution of fast egg maturation in females. We show that, under a male-biased sex ratio, more than 20% of mating fails within a few minutes after the aedeagus has penetrated into the female's genitalia, suggesting that females can assess the features of the male aedeagus before allowing insemination to occur. Dissection and examination of both sexes suggest that a longer aedeagus enhances mating and fertilization efficiency in this species, supporting the notion that sexual selection is a primary force in the evolution of genital variance.
Xu
Jin
J
Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Wang
Qiao
Q
D000818:Animals; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003307:Copulation; D005260:Female; D005306:Fertilization / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal; D009036:Moths / Q000502:physiology*; D012098:Reproduction; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):931-44
21676844
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Aug;9(8):289-93
21236857
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):77-81
12123301
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 7;270(1514):447-55
12641898
Behav Processes. 2009 Jan;80(1):51-9
18929628
Evolution. 1999 Feb;53(1):147-156
28565197
Nature. 2003 Nov 6;426(6962):70-4
14603319
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 7;276(1666):2369-75
19364741
Evolution. 2004 Sep;58(9):1947-70
15521454
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Feb;19(2):87-93
16701234
J Theor Biol. 2005 Feb 7;232(3):443-9
15572067
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):821-30
21676833
Evolution. 2001 Jul;55(7):1452-63
11525467
Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226
28556011
Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):411-421
10675264
Anim Behav. 1998 Oct;56(4):859-866
9790696
J Insect Physiol. 2007 Jan;53(1):93-8
17161846
Science. 2007 Dec 21;318(5858):1882-5
18096798
Science. 1992 Jun 5;256(5062):1436-9
1604317
Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1107-10
17597758
J Evol Biol. 2009 Jun;22(6):1234-41
19344382
Evolution. 1984 Jul;38(4):720-734
28555830
PLoS Biol. 2006 Nov;4(11):e356
17105343
Evolution. 1987 Nov;41(6):1149-1161
28563617
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004 Feb;79(1):121-86
15005176
J Evol Biol. 2008 Nov;21(6):1683-91
18643861