title: Co-infection and localization of secondary symbionts in two whitefly species.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Whiteflies are cosmopolitan phloem-feeding pests that cause serious damage to many crops worldwide due to direct feeding and vectoring of many plant viruses. The sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and the greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) are two of the most widespread and damaging whitefly species. To complete their unbalanced diet, whiteflies harbor the obligatory bacterium Portiera aleyrodidarum. B. tabaci further harbors a diverse array of secondary symbionts, including Hamiltonella, Arsenophonus, Cardinium, Wolbachia, Rickettsia and Fritschea. T. vaporariorum is only known to harbor P. aleyrodidarum and Arsenophonus. We conducted a study to survey the distribution of whitefly species in Croatia, their infection status by secondary symbionts, and the spatial distribution of these symbionts in the developmental stages of the two whitefly species.
  
  
  RESULTS
  T. vaporariorum was found to be the predominant whitefly species across Croatia, while only the Q biotype of B. tabaci was found across the coastal part of the country. Arsenophonus and Hamiltonella were detected in collected T. vaporariorum populations, however, not all populations harbored both symbionts, and both symbionts showed 100% infection rate in some of the populations. Only the Q biotype of B. tabaci was found in the populations tested and they harbored Hamiltonella, Rickettsia, Wolbachia and Cardinium, while Arsenophonus and Fritschea were not detected in any B. tabaci populations. None of the detected symbionts appeared in all populations tested, and multiple infections were detected in some of the populations. All endosymbionts tested were localized inside the bacteriocyte in both species, but only Rickettsia and Cardinium in B. tabaci showed additional localization outside the bacteriocyte.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our study revealed unique co-infection patterns by secondary symbionts in B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum. Co-sharing of the bacteriocyte by the primary and different secondary symbionts is maintained through vertical transmission via the egg, and is unique to whiteflies. This system provides opportunities to study interactions among symbionts that co-inhabit the same cell in the same host: these can be cooperative or antagonistic, may affect the symbiotic contents over time, and may also affect the host by competing with the primary symbiont for space and resources.
authors.affiliation: Department of Entomology, Institute Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.
authors.forename: Marisa
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Skaljac
authors.forename: Katja
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Zanic
authors.forename: Smiljana Goreta
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Ban
authors.forename: Svetlana
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kontsedalov
authors.forename: Murad
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ghanim
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification* / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D017523:Croatia; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D005843:Geography; D006430:Hemiptera / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000382:microbiology*; D017404:In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D011156:Population Density; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics; D012338:RNA, Ribosomal, 23S / Q000235:genetics; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA; D013559:Symbiosis
chemical_list: D004269:DNA, Bacterial; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; D012338:RNA, Ribosomal, 23S
references.citation: Pest Manag Sci. 2009 Sep;65(9):939-42
references.pmid: 19479746
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Aug;68(8):4074-80
references.pmid: 12147509
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2002 Oct;11(10):2123-35
references.pmid: 12296954
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Sep;70(9):5366-72
references.pmid: 15345422
references.citation: J Morphol. 2001 Apr;248(1):22-40
references.pmid: 11268056
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 22;102(47):16919-26
references.pmid: 16195380
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1803-7
references.pmid: 12563031
references.citation: Insect Mol Biol. 2002 Dec;11(6):577-84
references.pmid: 12421415
references.citation: FASEB J. 2006 Nov;20(13):2372-4
references.pmid: 17012243
references.citation: Tissue Cell. 2008 Aug;40(4):231-42
references.pmid: 18272191
references.citation: J Invertebr Pathol. 1996 May;67(3):309-11
references.pmid: 8812613
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1467-75
references.pmid: 16461701
references.citation: Mech Dev. 2002 Feb;111(1-2):3-15
references.pmid: 11804774
references.citation: Bull Entomol Res. 2007 Aug;97(4):407-13
references.pmid: 17645822
references.citation: Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997 Oct;47(4):1140-4
references.pmid: 9336921
references.citation: PLoS Pathog. 2005 Oct;1(2):e14
references.pmid: 16228015
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 Jul;55(Pt 4):1581-1587
references.pmid: 16014485
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 23;98(22):12555-60
references.pmid: 11592990
references.citation: Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Aug;64(8):789-92
references.pmid: 18432613
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001 Jun;36(1):43-50
references.pmid: 11377772
references.citation: Trends Microbiol. 2009 Mar;17(3):95-9
references.pmid: 19230673
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Dec;69(12):7216-23
references.pmid: 14660369
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 22;275(1633):353-61
references.pmid: 18055391
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 7;273(1598):2097-106
references.pmid: 16901827
references.citation: Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Oct;39(10):668-76
references.pmid: 19683053
references.citation: Curr Microbiol. 1997 Apr;34(4):220-5
references.pmid: 9058541
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Mar;63(1):128-48
references.pmid: 10066833
references.citation: Curr Microbiol. 2004 Feb;48(2):140-4
references.pmid: 15057483
references.citation: Curr Microbiol. 2003 Jul;47(1):46-50
references.pmid: 12783192
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1999;53:71-102
references.pmid: 10547686
references.citation: FASEB J. 2008 Jul;22(7):2591-9
references.pmid: 18285399
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2001 Apr;86(Pt 4):497-505
references.pmid: 11520350
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jun 8;96(12):6814-9
references.pmid: 10359795
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jun;70(6):3401-6
references.pmid: 15184137
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2004 Mar;2(3):E68
references.pmid: 15024418
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 22;270(1529):2185-90
references.pmid: 14561283
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 May;72(5):3646-52
references.pmid: 16672513
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1999 Oct;8(10):1683-91
references.pmid: 10583831
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2008 Jan;21(1):145-161
references.pmid: 18171386
references.citation: J Invertebr Pathol. 2007 Oct;96(2):106-8
references.pmid: 17467732
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Sep;44(3):1306-19
references.pmid: 17627853
references.citation: Tissue Cell. 2006 Aug;38(4):257-61
references.pmid: 16876837
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Jul 26;412(6845):433-6
references.pmid: 11473316
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2004 Oct;186(19):6626-33
references.pmid: 15375144
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 30;94(20):10792-6
references.pmid: 9380712
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2006 Apr;51(3):294-301
references.pmid: 16598632