title: When more is less: the fitness consequences of predators attacking more unpalatable prey when more are presented.
abstract: In 1879, Fritz Müller hypothesized that mimetic resemblance in which defended prey display the same warning signal would share the costs of predator education. Although Müller argued that predators would need to ingest a fixed number of prey with a given visual signal when learning to avoid unpalatable prey, this assumption lacks empirical support. We report an experiment which shows that, as the number of unpalatable prey presented to them increased, avian predators attacked higher numbers of those prey. We calculated that, when predators increase attacks, the fitness costs incurred by unpalatable prey can be substantial. This suggests that the survival benefits of mimicry could be lower than Müller proposed. An important finding is, however, that these costs decline in importance as the total number of available prey increases.
authors.affiliation: The University of Liverpool, UK. h.m.rowland@liv.ac.uk
authors.forename: Hannah M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Rowland
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Wiley
authors.forename: Graeme D
authors.initials: GD
authors.lastname: Ruxton
authors.forename: Johanna
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Mappes
authors.forename: Michael P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Speed
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D002645:Chickens; D005260:Female; D020387:Food Chain; D007858:Learning; D008954:Models, Biological; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):9181-4
references.pmid: 11459937
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Aug;95(8):681-95
references.pmid: 18542902
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):63-6
references.pmid: 15343332
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Feb 22;271(1537):407-13
references.pmid: 15101700
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jul 5;448(7149):64-7
references.pmid: 17611539
references.citation: Evolution. 2004 Jun;58(6):1294-302
references.pmid: 15266978
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):533-44
references.pmid: 12088244