Long-term outcome of a randomized controlled universal prevention trial through a positive parenting program: is it worth the effort?
BACKGROUND
Approximately 20% of children experience internalizing or externalizing DSM-IV-TR disorders. This prevalence rate cannot be reduced through treatment only. Effective preventive interventions are therefore urgently needed. The aim of the current investigation is to evaluate the two-year efficacy of the group Triple P parenting program administered universally for the prevention of child behavior problems.


METHODS
Based on their respective preschool, N = 280 families were randomly assigned either to the parent training or to the control group. The efficacy was analyzed using multi-source assessments, including questionnaires by mother and father, behavioral observation of mother-child interaction, and teacher evaluations.


RESULTS
At the 2-year follow-up, both parents in the Triple P intervention reported significant reductions in dysfunctional parenting behavior, and mothers also an increase in positive parenting behavior. In addition, mothers reported significant reductions in internalizing and externalizing child behavior. Single-parent mothers in the Triple P intervention did not report significant changes in parenting or child problem behavior which is primarily due to inexplicable high positive effects in single parent mothers of the control group. Neither mother-child interactions nor teacher ratings yielded significant results.


CONCLUSIONS
The results support the long-term efficacy of the Triple P - group program as a universal prevention intervention for changing parenting behavior in two-parent households, but not necessarily in single-parent mothers.
Hahlweg
Kurt
K
Technical University Braunschweig, Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy, and Assessment, Humboldtstr, 33, 38106, Germany. k.hahlweg@tu-bs.de.
Heinrichs
Nina
N
Kuschel
Annett
A
Bertram
Heike
H
Naumann
Sebastian
S
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 1998 Mar;1(1):41-60
11324077
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1988 Sep;27(5):613-8
3182627
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Oct;67(5):648-57
10535231
Prev Sci. 2005 Dec;6(4):275-86
16075192
Med J Aust. 2002 Oct 7;177(S7):S97-S100
12358565
Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Jan;26(1):86-104
16280191
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;44(9):832-6
3498458
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Feb;66(1):19-36
9489260
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;49(1):34-42
18181879
Prev Sci. 2009 Mar;10(1):1-12
19160053
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Apr;46(4):411-27
18313033
J Prim Prev. 2006 Jul;27(4):345-65
16802074
Behav Modif. 2008 Sep;32(5):659-81
18456901
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005 Feb;193(2):119-25
15684914
Am Psychol. 2005 Sep;60(6):601-14
16173893
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):624-40
10965638
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2008 Sep;11(3):114-44
18509758
BMJ. 2008 Feb 9;336(7639):318-21
18244958
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 May;36(4):567-89
18205039
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Oct;67(5):711-24
10535238
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;41(2):182-9
11837408
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Oct;67(5):631-47
10535230
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 1999 Jun;2(2):71-90
11225933
Psychol Bull. 1995 Jul;118(1):108-32
7644602
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2007 Oct-Dec;36(4):605-20
18088218
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2006 Aug;34(4):481-7
16865544
Am Psychol. 2005 Sep;60(6):628-48
16173895
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Feb;74(1):10-19
16551139