Predator dietary response to prey density variation and consequences for cestode transmission.
The functional response of predators to prey density variations has previously been investigated in order to understand predation patterns. However, the consequences of functional response on parasite transmission remain largely unexplored. The rodents Microtus arvalis and Arvicola terrestris are the main prey of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in eastern France. These species are intermediate and definitive hosts of the cestode Echinococcus multilocularis. We explored the dietary and contamination responses of the red fox to variations in prey density. The dietary response differed between the two prey species: no response for M. arvalis and a type III-like (sigmoidal) response for A. terrestris that shows possible interference with M. arvalis. The fox contamination response followed a type II shape (asymptotic) for both species. We conclude that fox predation is species specific and E. multilocularis transmission is likely to be regulated by a complex combination of predation and immunologic factors. These results should provide a better understanding of the biological and ecological mechanisms involved in the transmission dynamics of trophically transmitted parasites when multiple hosts are involved. The relevance of the models of parasite transmission should be enhanced if non-linear patterns are taken into account.
Raoul
Francis
F
Department of Chrono-environment, UMR UFC/CNRS 6249 aff. INRA, University of Franche-Comté, 25030, Besançon, France. francis.raoul@univ-fcomte.fr
Deplazes
Peter
P
Rieffel
Dominique
D
Lambert
Jean-Claude
JC
Giraudoux
Patrick
P
D000818:Animals; D003411:Arvicolinae / Q000469:parasitology*; D004443:Echinococcosis / Q000635:transmission / Q000662:veterinary*; D048210:Echinococcus multilocularis; D017753:Ecosystem; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005589:Foxes / Q000469:parasitology / Q000523:psychology*; D005602:France; D011156:Population Density; D011235:Predatory Behavior
Int J Parasitol. 2003 Aug;33(9):945-54
12906878
Parasitology. 2003;127 Suppl:S121-31
15027609
Int J Parasitol. 2001 Dec;31(14):1579-88
11730784
Parasitology. 2002 Jun;124(Pt 6):631-40
12118719
Parasitology. 2009 Mar;136(3):329-37
19154652
Parasite. 2008 Mar;15(1):77-85
18416250
J Helminthol. 2008 Jun;82(2):143-51
18394209
Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 May-Jun;7(3):408-12
11384517
Parasitology. 2010 Jan;137(1):149-57
19723357
Vet Parasitol. 2008 Aug 1;155(1-2):59-66
18513873
Am Nat. 2004 Nov;164 Suppl 5:S64-78
15540143
Int J Parasitol. 2006 Jan;36(1):79-86
16199043
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2006 Sep;148(9):501-10
17024979
J Parasitol. 2005 Oct;91(5):1008-14
16419741
Acta Trop. 2004 Aug;91(3):253-65
15246931
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Jan;17(1):107-35
14726458
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2008 Jun-Jul;192(6):1119-25; discussion 1126-30
19235476
Parasitology. 2003;127 Suppl:S53-61
15027604
Parasitology. 2000 Feb;120 ( Pt 2):135-42
10726275
Vet Parasitol. 2008 Feb 14;151(2-4):212-7
18164551
Parasite Immunol. 2006 Jul;28(7):295-303
16842266