title: Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German?
abstract: This contribution seeks to measure preferences for health insurance of individuals with and without chronic conditions in two countries, Germany and the Netherlands. The objective is to test the presumption that preferences between these two subpopulations differ and to see whether having a chronic condition has a different influence on preferences depending on the country. The evidence comes from two Discrete Choice Experiments performed in 2005 (Germany) and 2006 (the Netherlands, right after a major health reform). Results point to an even more marked resistance against restrictions of physician choice among individuals with chronic conditions in both countries. Thus, the alleged beneficiaries of Disease Management Programs would have to be highly compensated for accepting the restrictions that go with them.
authors.affiliation: Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. janet.macneil@yahoo.ca
authors.forename: Janet
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: MacNeil Vroomen
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Zweifel
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D002908:Chronic Disease; D005858:Germany; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017059:Models, Econometric; D009426:Netherlands
references.citation: Health Econ Policy Law. 2006 Apr;1(Pt 2):171-88
references.pmid: 18634689
references.citation: Health Econ. 2007 Mar;16(3):243-56
references.pmid: 16981190
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):159-66
references.pmid: 11260939
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):771-81
references.pmid: 18474971
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 19;8:58
references.pmid: 18366678
references.citation: Health Econ. 2005 Oct;14(10):1079-83
references.pmid: 15852455
references.citation: Health Policy. 2007 Dec;84(2-3):162-9
references.pmid: 17485132
references.citation: Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Jun;11(3):331-41
references.pmid: 19756797