Correlation Network Analysis reveals a sequential reorganization of metabolic and transcriptional states during germination and gene-metabolite relationships in developing seedlings of Arabidopsis.
BACKGROUND
Holistic profiling and systems biology studies of nutrient availability are providing more and more insight into the mechanisms by which gene expression responds to diverse nutrients and metabolites. Less is known about the mechanisms by which gene expression is affected by endogenous metabolites, which can change dramatically during development. Multivariate statistics and correlation network analysis approaches were applied to non-targeted profiling data to investigate transcriptional and metabolic states and to identify metabolites potentially influencing gene expression during the heterotrophic to autotrophic transition of seedling establishment.


RESULTS
Microarray-based transcript profiles were obtained from extracts of Arabidopsis seeds or seedlings harvested from imbibition to eight days-old. 1H-NMR metabolite profiles were obtained for corresponding samples. Analysis of transcript data revealed high differential gene expression through seedling emergence followed by a period of less change. Differential gene expression increased gradually to day 8, and showed two days, 5 and 7, with a very high proportion of up-regulated genes, including transcription factor/signaling genes. Network cartography using spring embedding revealed two primary clusters of highly correlated metabolites, which appear to reflect temporally distinct metabolic states. Principle Component Analyses of both sets of profiling data produced a chronological spread of time points, which would be expected of a developmental series. The network cartography of the transcript data produced two distinct clusters comprising days 0 to 2 and days 3 to 8, whereas the corresponding analysis of metabolite data revealed a shift of day 2 into the day 3 to 8 group. A metabolite and transcript pair-wise correlation analysis encompassing all time points gave a set of 237 highly significant correlations. Of 129 genes correlated to sucrose, 44 of them were known to be sucrose responsive including a number of transcription factors.


CONCLUSIONS
Microarray analysis during germination and establishment revealed major transitions in transcriptional activity at time points potentially associated with developmental transitions. Network cartography using spring-embedding indicate that a shift in the state of nutritionally important metabolites precedes a major shift in the transcriptional state going from germination to seedling emergence. Pair-wise linear correlations of transcript and metabolite levels identified many genes known to be influenced by metabolites, and provided other targets to investigate metabolite regulation of gene expression during seedling establishment.
Allen
Elizabeth
E
School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL572UW, UK.
Moing
Annick
A
Ebbels
Timothy Md
TM
Maucourt
Mickaël
M
Tomos
A Deri
AD
Rolin
Dominique
D
Hooks
Mark A
MA
D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism*; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D018506:Gene Expression Regulation, Plant / Q000502:physiology*; D018525:Germination / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D055442:Metabolome / Q000502:physiology*; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; D025341:Principal Component Analysis; D036226:Seedlings / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism*
Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Apr;13(4):165-71
18329321
Plant Cell. 1997 Jul;9(7):1055-1066
12237375
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e99-107
16873528
EMBO Rep. 2003 Oct;4(10):989-93
12973302
Plant Cell. 1990 Oct;2(10):1027-38
2136626
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2006 Apr 15;448(1-2):45-59
16460663
Proteomics. 2004 Jan;4(1):78-83
14730673
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(9):1883-97
16449380
Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov;142(3):839-54
16963520
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):8961-5
11470909
New Phytol. 2005 Oct;168(1):9-24
16159317
Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Feb;9(2):57-9
15106586
Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan;143(1):156-71
17085508
Plant Mol Biol. 2009 Mar;69(4):361-73
18688730
Plant J. 1999 Sep;19(6):667-77
10571852
Plant J. 2005 Mar;41(5):697-709
15703057
Anal Chem. 1999 Jul 1;71(13):2554-7
21662801
Trends Plant Sci. 2003 Mar;8(3):110-6
12663220
Plant J. 2006 Jun;46(5):805-22
16709196
Curr Biol. 2005 Nov 22;15(22):1998-2006
16303558
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001 Feb;12(1):82-6
11167078
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 6;101(27):10205-10
15199185
Funct Plant Biol. 2004 Oct;31(9):889-902
32688957
J Biol Chem. 2005 Jan 28;280(4):2780-7
15533942
Biochem Soc Trans. 2001 May;29(Pt 2):283-7
11356168
Physiol Plant. 2008 Feb;132(2):190-8
18251860
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jul;14(3):267-74
15254870
Curr Med Chem. 2004 Aug;11(16):2195-204
15279558
BMC Syst Biol. 2008 Apr 04;2:31
18387196
Plant Cell. 2004 Oct;16(10):2705-18
15367715
Anal Chem. 2009 Apr 15;81(8):2884-94
19298059
J Biol Chem. 2005 Jul 8;280(27):25590-5
15866872
Plant J. 2007 Oct;52(1):133-46
17672844
Plant Cell. 2002 Sep;14(9):2161-73
12215513
J Exp Bot. 2005 Jul;56(417):1887-96
15911562
Phytochemistry. 2003 Mar;62(6):949-57
12590122
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000326
19300494
Plant Cell. 2003 Jul;15(7):1591-604
12837949
Plant Physiol. 2007 Apr;143(4):1669-79
17322332
Plant Cell. 2005 Nov;17(11):2954-65
16243903
Plant J. 2002 Nov;32(3):317-28
12410810
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 10;104(15):6478-83
17420480
Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Oct;11(10):508-16
16949327
Cell Immunol. 1991 Aug;136(1):95-104
2060027
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4939-44
18344319
Plant J. 2006 Nov;48(3):380-9
17010112
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 29;91(7):2507-11
8146146
New Phytol. 2006;171(3):501-23
16866955
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jun;51:49-81
15012186
Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 Feb;50(2):330-40
19109301
Plant Physiol. 2005 Mar;137(3):1130-8
15734908
J Plant Res. 2006 Mar;119(2):115-23
16463203
Plant Cell. 2007 Apr;19(4):1192-208
17449805
Plant J. 2002 Sep;31(5):639-47
12207653
Plant Physiol. 2009 Mar;149(3):1505-28
19144766
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 May 9;97(10):5669-74
10805817
Plant Cell. 2005 Dec;17(12):3257-81
16299223
Plant Physiol. 2006 Oct;142(2):509-25
16920880
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:675-709
16669778
Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep;136(1):2621-32
15375207
Plant Cell. 2008 Mar;20(3):509-23
18364465
Mol Genet Genomics. 2004 Apr;271(3):249-56
14963767
Plant Physiol. 2006 Dec;142(4):1589-602
17028152
Science. 2004 Sep 24;305(5692):1937-41
15448264
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001 Jun;4(3):247-53
11312136
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007 Jun;20(6):659-70
17555274
Plant Cell. 2006 Aug;18(8):1887-99
16844907
Plant J. 2003 Apr;34(1):67-75
12662310
Plant Physiol. 2008 May;147(1):143-55
18359847
Genome Biol. 2006;7(8):R76
16916443
Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep;68(16-18):2163-75
17544461
Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep;136(1):2556-76
15347784
Exp Cell Res. 2007 Jul 15;313(12):2531-49
17574548
Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jan;13(1):36-43
18160330
Biochem Soc Trans. 2005 Feb;33(Pt 1):269-71
15667323