Protein binding hot spots and the residue-residue pairing preference: a water exclusion perspective.
BACKGROUND
A protein binding hot spot is a small cluster of residues tightly packed at the center of the interface between two interacting proteins. Though a hot spot constitutes a small fraction of the interface, it is vital to the stability of protein complexes. Recently, there are a series of hypotheses proposed to characterize binding hot spots, including the pioneering O-ring theory, the insightful 'coupling' and 'hot region' principle, and our 'double water exclusion' (DWE) hypothesis. As the perspective changes from the O-ring theory to the DWE hypothesis, we examine the physicochemical properties of the binding hot spots under the new hypothesis and compare with those under the O-ring theory.


RESULTS
The requirements for a cluster of residues to form a hot spot under the DWE hypothesis can be mathematically satisfied by a biclique subgraph if a vertex is used to represent a residue, an edge to indicate a close distance between two residues, and a bipartite graph to represent a pair of interacting proteins. We term these hot spots as DWE bicliques. We identified DWE bicliques from crystal packing contacts, obligate and non-obligate interactions. Our comparative study revealed that there are abundant unique bicliques to the biological interactions, indicating specific biological binding behaviors in contrast to crystal packing. The two sub-types of biological interactions also have their own signature bicliques. In our analysis on residue compositions and residue pairing preferences in DWE bicliques, the focus was on interaction-preferred residues (ipRs) and interaction-preferred residue pairs (ipRPs). It is observed that hydrophobic residues are heavily involved in the ipRs and ipRPs of the obligate interactions; and that aromatic residues are in favor in the ipRs and ipRPs of the biological interactions, especially in those of the non-obligate interactions. In contrast, the ipRs and ipRPs in crystal packing are dominated by hydrophilic residues, and most of the anti-ipRs of crystal packing are the ipRs of the obligate or non-obligate interactions.


CONCLUSIONS
These ipRs and ipRPs in our DWE bicliques describe a diverse binding features among the three types of interactions. They also highlight the specific binding behaviors of the biological interactions, sharply differing from the artifact interfaces in the crystal packing. It can be noted that DWE bicliques, especially the unique bicliques, can capture deep insights into the binding characteristics of protein interfaces.
Liu
Qian
Q
Bioinformatics Research Center & School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798.
Li
Jinyan
J
D001665:Binding Sites; D030562:Databases, Protein; D008958:Models, Molecular; D011487:Protein Conformation; D017510:Protein Folding; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism
D011506:Proteins; D014867:Water
Proteins. 2008 Nov 15;73(3):672-89
18491388
J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 1;256(3):623-44
8604144
BMC Struct Biol. 2005 Aug 16;5:15
16105176
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D662-6
17959648
J Mol Biol. 2007 Jan 5;365(1):1-9
17055530
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Jan 19;7:27
16423290
Brief Bioinform. 2009 May;10(3):217-32
19240123
J Proteome Res. 2005 Sep-Oct;4(5):1600-9
16212412
Proteins. 2003 Nov 15;53(3):708-19
14579361
Biophys J. 2003 Sep;85(3):1914-28
12944304
Proteins. 2007 Sep 1;68(4):803-12
17546660
Proteins. 2000 Oct 1;41(1):47-57
10944393
Bioinformatics. 2002;18 Suppl 1:S71-7
12169533
J Mol Biol. 2003 Jan 10;325(2):377-87
12488102
Proteins. 2001 May 1;43(2):89-102
11276079
Proteins. 1999 May 15;35(3):364-73
10328272
Structure. 2004 Jun;12(6):1027-38
15274922
Proteins. 2010 Feb 15;78(3):589-602
19768686
J Mol Biol. 1999 Feb 5;285(5):2177-98
9925793
Bioinformatics. 2001 Mar;17(3):284-5
11294795
J Mol Biol. 2005 Feb 4;345(5):1281-94
15644221
J Mol Biol. 2004 Feb 27;336(4):943-55
15095871
Proteins. 2002 May 15;47(3):334-43
11948787
Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 15;22(16):2012-9
16787977
J Mol Biol. 1996 Jul 26;260(4):604-20
8759323
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 9;93(1):13-20
8552589
Bioinformatics. 2009 Mar 15;25(6):743-50
19179356
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 2;102(31):10930-5
16043700
Science. 1995 Jan 20;267(5196):383-6
7529940
EMBO J. 2003 Jul 15;22(14):3486-92
12853464
J Mol Biol. 1998 Jul 3;280(1):1-9
9653027
J Mol Biol. 2001 Oct 19;313(2):399-416
11800565
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2002 Feb;12(1):14-20
11839484