The role of V1 surround suppression in MT motion integration.
Neurons in the primate extrastriate cortex are highly selective for complex stimulus features such as faces, objects, and motion patterns. One explanation for this selectivity is that neurons in these areas carry out sophisticated computations on the outputs of lower-level areas such as primary visual cortex (V1), where neuronal selectivity is often modeled in terms of linear spatiotemporal filters. However, it has long been known that such simple V1 models are incomplete because they fail to capture important nonlinearities that can substantially alter neuronal selectivity for specific stimulus features. Thus a key step in understanding the function of higher cortical areas is the development of realistic models of their V1 inputs. We have addressed this issue by constructing a computational model of the V1 neurons that provide the strongest input to extrastriate cortical middle temporal (MT) area. We find that a modest elaboration to the standard model of V1 direction selectivity generates model neurons with strong end-stopping, a property that is also found in the V1 layers that provide input to MT. With this computational feature in place, the seemingly complex properties of MT neurons can be simulated by assuming that they perform a simple nonlinear summation of their inputs. The resulting model, which has a very small number of free parameters, can simulate many of the diverse properties of MT neurons. In particular, we simulate the invariance of MT tuning curves to the orientation and length of tilted bar stimuli, as well as the accompanying temporal dynamics. We also show how this property relates to the continuum from component to pattern selectivity observed when MT neurons are tested with plaids. Finally, we confirm several key predictions of the model by recording from MT neurons in the alert macaque monkey. Overall our results demonstrate that many of the seemingly complex computations carried out by high-level cortical neurons can in principle be understood by examining the properties of their inputs.
Tsui
James M G
JM
McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute, 3801 University St., Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.
Hunter
J Nicholas
JN
Born
Richard T
RT
Pack
Christopher C
CC
D000818:Animals; D003198:Computer Simulation; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology; D008253:Macaca mulatta; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D009434:Neural Pathways / Q000502:physiology; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology; D013702:Temporal Lobe / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology
Vision Res. 1996 Oct;36(19):3061-75
8917769
Neuron. 2007 Apr 5;54(1):137-52
17408583
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:157-89
16022593
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Mar;85(3):1328-31
11248002
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Sep;9(9):686-95
19143050
J Neurosci. 2002 Jan 1;22(1):338-49
11756517
Vision Res. 1993 Jun;33(9):1207-17
8333170
Nature. 2001 Dec 20-27;414(6866):905-8
11780062
J Neurophysiol. 1965 Mar;28:229-89
14283058
Vision Res. 1998 Jun;38(13):2023-35
9797948
J Neurophysiol. 2001 May;85(5):1873-87
11353004
J Neurosci. 1994 Dec;14(12):7381-92
7996183
J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 30;26(35):8988-98
16943555
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;86(4):2011-28
11600658
Vision Res. 1993 Jul;33(10):1385-96
8333160
Vision Res. 1996 Nov;36(22):3685-94
8976998
J Neurosci. 1983 Dec;3(12):2563-86
6655500
Neuron. 2001 Jun;30(3):781-93
11430811
Neuron. 2006 Jan 5;49(1):17-24
16387636
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):284-99
3973762
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 12;96(21):12073-8
10518578
Vision Res. 1989;29(10):1371-87
2635466
Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Nov 22;266(1435):2289-94
10629979
Vision Res. 1990;30(7):1111-7
2392840
Nature. 1995 Sep 21;377(6546):237-9
7675109
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jan;95(1):284-300
16339508
J Neurosci. 2004 Mar 31;24(13):3268-80
15056706
Vision Res. 1992 Feb;32(2):203-18
1574836
Vision Res. 1997 Nov;37(21):3037-59
9425518
Exp Brain Res. 1992;88(2):389-400
1577111
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Nov;88(5):2530-46
12424292
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Aug;78(2):1045-61
9307134
Vision Res. 1998 Nov;38(22):3633-53
9893795
Exp Brain Res. 1993;96(3):519-33
8299753
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1019-25
10526343
Nature. 2001 Feb 22;409(6823):1040-2
11234012
Nature. 1982 Dec 9;300(5892):523-5
7144903
Vis Neurosci. 1995 Nov-Dec;12(6):1191-210
8962836
J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 18;26(3):893-907
16421309
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Jan 15;203(1153):405-26
34162
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov;92(5):2704-13
15269230
J Neurophysiol. 1984 Dec;52(6):1106-30
6520628
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1421-31
17041595
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;90(2):930-7
12711710
Vision Res. 1998 Mar;38(5):743-61
9604103
Perception. 2001;30(8):905-23
11578077
J Physiol. 1975 Sep;250(2):287-304
1177143
Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Aug;14(4):690-700
11556893
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Aug;2(8):733-9
10412063
Spat Vis. 1993;7(2):125-47
8347549
Vision Res. 1999 Sep;39(19):3301-20
10615497
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Oct;22(8):2049-58
16262642
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1733-50
17596412
J Neurosci. 2002 Oct 1;22(19):8633-46
12351737
Vision Res. 2004;44(15):1733-55
15135991
Vis Neurosci. 1992 Aug;9(2):181-97
1504027
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Jan;85(1):134-45
11152714
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Feb;8(2):220-8
15657600
J Neurosci. 1997 Nov 1;17(21):8621-44
9334433
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;93(3):1809-15
15483068
Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):671-80
12925280
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Jun;5(6):598-604
12021763