Quality assessment of transcriptome data using intrinsic statistical properties.
In view of potential application to biomedical diagnosis, tight transcriptome data quality control is compulsory. Usually, quality control is achieved using labeling and hybridization controls added at different stages throughout the processing of the biologic RNA samples. These control measures, however, only reflect the performance of the individual technical manipulations during the entire process and have no bearing as to the continued integrity of the RNA sample itself. Here we demonstrate that intrinsic statistical properties of the resulting transcriptome data signal and signal-variance distributions and their invariance can be identified independently of the animal species studied and the labeling protocol used. From these invariant properties we have developed a data model, the parameters of which can be estimated from individual experiments and used to compute relative quality measures based on similarity with large reference datasets. These quality measures add supplementary, non-redundant information to standard quality control estimates based on spike-in and hybridization controls, and are exploitable in data analysis. A software application for analyzing datasets as well as a reference dataset for AB1700 arrays are provided. They should allow AB1700 users to easily integrate this method into their analysis pipeline, and might instigate similar developments for other transcriptome platforms.
Brysbaert
Guillaume
G
Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques & Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire (CNRS USR3078, Université de Lille1), 91440 Bures-sur-Yvette, France.
Pellay
François-Xavier
FX
Noth
Sebastian
S
Benecke
Arndt
A
D020869:Gene Expression Profiling / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D009693:Nucleic Acid Hybridization / Q000235:genetics; D011786:Quality Control; D012313:RNA / Q000235:genetics; D012107:Research Design
D012313:RNA
Genes Dev. 2007 Mar 15;21(6):644-8
17369397
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Aug 1;29(15):E75-5
11470890
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov;4(4):212-29
17531797
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):1140-50
16964228
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(10):e72
17478523
EMBO J. 2008 Apr 9;27(7):1017-28
18354499
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):1115-22
16964225
Bioinformatics. 2003 Jul 22;19(11):1341-7
12874045
Biol Direct. 2007 Apr 11;2:9
17428341
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):1151-61
16964229
BMC Genomics. 2006 May 26;7:127
16729877
BMC Genomics. 2006 Mar 21;7:59
16551369
BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 13;5:5
14718068
J Clin Invest. 2009 Dec;119(12):3544-55
19959873
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Oct 1;31(19):5676-84
14500831
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Jan;25(1):25-6; author reply 26-7
17211383
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 22;6:307
16372901
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2006 May;4(2):90-109
16970549
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jan 1;33(Database issue):D284-8
15608197
OMICS. 2007 Spring;11(1):1-13
17411392
Methods Mol Biol. 2007;353:265-300
17332646
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2007 Feb;5(1):45-52
17572363
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):94-6
12519956
FASEB J. 2007 Oct;21(12):3262-71
17507667
Bioinformatics. 2007 Dec 1;23(23):3162-9
17933854