The association between green space and cause-specific mortality in urban New Zealand: an ecological analysis of green space utility.
BACKGROUND
There is mounting international evidence that exposure to green environments is associated with health benefits, including lower mortality rates. Consequently, it has been suggested that the uneven distribution of such environments may contribute to health inequalities. Possible causative mechanisms behind the green space and health relationship include the provision of physical activity opportunities, facilitation of social contact and the restorative effects of nature. In the New Zealand context we investigated whether there was a socioeconomic gradient in green space exposure and whether green space exposure was associated with cause-specific mortality (cardiovascular disease and lung cancer). We subsequently asked what is the mechanism(s) by which green space availability may influence mortality outcomes, by contrasting health associations for different types of green space.


METHODS
This was an observational study on a population of 1,546,405 living in 1009 small urban areas in New Zealand. A neighbourhood-level classification was developed to distinguish between usable (i.e., visitable) and non-usable green space (i.e., visible but not visitable) in the urban areas. Negative binomial regression models were fitted to examine the association between quartiles of area-level green space availability and risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease (n = 9,484; 1996 - 2005) and from lung cancer (n = 2,603; 1996 - 2005), after control for age, sex, socio-economic deprivation, smoking, air pollution and population density.


RESULTS
Deprived neighbourhoods were relatively disadvantaged in total green space availability (11% less total green space for a one standard deviation increase in NZDep2001 deprivation score, p < 0.001), but had marginally more usable green space (2% more for a one standard deviation increase in deprivation score, p = 0.002). No significant associations between usable or total green space and mortality were observed after adjustment for confounders.


CONCLUSIONS
Contrary to expectations we found no evidence that green space influenced cardiovascular disease mortality in New Zealand, suggesting that green space and health relationships may vary according to national, societal or environmental context. Hence we were unable to infer the mechanism in the relationship. Our inability to adjust for individual-level factors with a significant influence on cardiovascular disease and lung cancer mortality risk (e.g., diet and alcohol consumption) will have limited the ability of the analyses to detect green space effects, if present. Additionally, green space variation may have lesser relevance for health in New Zealand because green space is generally more abundant and there is less social and spatial variation in its availability than found in other contexts.
Richardson
Elizabeth
E
School of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Pearce
Jamie
J
Mitchell
Richard
R
Day
Peter
P
Kingham
Simon
S
D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000401:mortality*; D002423:Cause of Death / Q000639:trends; D017753:Ecosystem; D004779:Environment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality*; D008297:Male; D009520:New Zealand; D012111:Residence Characteristics / Q000145:classification; D012307:Risk Factors; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014504:Urban Health
BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):611-2
16113034
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Spring;25(2):100-4
12704011
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Jun;15(3):239-46
18525377
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Dec;63(12):967-73
19833605
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Aug;61(8):681-3
17630365
Int J Environ Health Res. 2005 Oct;15(5):319-37
16416750
Am J Prev Med. 2002 Apr;22(3):188-99
11897464
Health Place. 2009 Jun;15(2):586-595
19022699
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1655-60
18994663
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;18(2):200-10
17668011
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):159-68
15694524
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jun 10;8:206
18544169
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;36(2):348-55
17182634
Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:411-47
9046565
Health Place. 2009 Jun;15(2):482-490
19038571
Health Place. 2000 Jun;6(2):67-79
10785349
Prev Med. 2008 Sep;47(3):299-303
18533242
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Apr;10(4):287-301
11319168
Science. 1984 Apr 27;224(4647):420-1
6143402
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jul;60(7):587-92
16790830
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Dec;56(12):913-8
12461111
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1200-4
10784551
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 May;62(5):e9
18431834