title: Colloquium paper: a role for relaxed selection in the evolution of the language capacity.
abstract: Explaining the extravagant complexity of the human language and our competence to acquire it has long posed challenges for natural selection theory. To answer his critics, Darwin turned to sexual selection to account for the extreme development of language. Many contemporary evolutionary theorists have invoked incredibly lucky mutation or some variant of the assimilation of acquired behaviors to innate predispositions in an effort to explain it. Recent evodevo approaches have identified developmental processes that help to explain how complex functional synergies can evolve by Darwinian means. Interestingly, many of these developmental mechanisms bear a resemblance to aspects of Darwin's mechanism of natural selection, often differing only in one respect (e.g., form of duplication, kind of variation, competition/cooperation). A common feature is an interplay between processes of stabilizing selection and processes of relaxed selection at different levels of organism function. These may play important roles in the many levels of evolutionary process contributing to language. Surprisingly, the relaxation of selection at the organism level may have been a source of many complex synergistic features of the human language capacity, and may help explain why so much language information is "inherited" socially.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. deacon@berkeley.edu
authors.forename: Terrence W
authors.initials: TW
authors.lastname: Deacon
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001921:Brain / Q000473:pathology; D003142:Communication; D044127:Epigenesis, Genetic; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008954:Models, Biological; D008957:Models, Genetic; D012641:Selection, Genetic
references.citation: Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1860 Apr;25(50):367-404
references.pmid: 30164232
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Dec;6(12):917-27
references.pmid: 16341072
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Dec;6(12):881-92
references.pmid: 16341069
references.citation: Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1331-7
references.pmid: 7896112
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Jun;14(6):611-8
references.pmid: 9190062
references.citation: J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2012 Nov;317(9):561-70
references.pmid: 22927235
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Feb;23(4):847-56
references.pmid: 16519650
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1994 May 6;269(18):13685-8
references.pmid: 8175804
references.citation: Science. 1896 Nov 20;4(99):733-40
references.pmid: 17735249
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2006 Jun;29(3):259-80; discussion 280-325
references.pmid: 17214017
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1016:724-35
references.pmid: 15313802
references.citation: Science. 1984 Sep 21;225(4668):1258-65
references.pmid: 6474175
references.citation: Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1987;52:875-90
references.pmid: 3454296
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 1987;30(1-2):102-17
references.pmid: 3304526
references.citation: Science. 1973 Dec 21;182(4118):1271-2
references.pmid: 4752221
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Aug;15(4):444-53
references.pmid: 16026978
references.citation: Science. 1995 Sep 1;269(5228):1265-7
references.pmid: 7652574
references.citation: Science. 1980 Oct 10;210(4466):153-7
references.pmid: 7414326
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Feb;12(1):14-25
references.pmid: 11861160
references.citation: Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):421-8
references.pmid: 7705642
references.citation: Science. 1988 Dec 9;242(4884):1437-41
references.pmid: 2462279
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1016:749-77
references.pmid: 15313804
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1994 Dec 20;5(18):2697-701
references.pmid: 7535122
references.citation: Science. 1896 Nov 27;4(100):786-9
references.pmid: 17734840
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 1997;49(4):179-213
references.pmid: 9096908
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 Oct 18;1472(1-2):408-11
references.pmid: 10572964
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1981 Dec 1;203(2):227-56
references.pmid: 7309922