Intraspecific genetic variation and competition interact to influence niche expansion.
Theory and empirical evidence show that intraspecific competition can drive selection favouring the use of novel resources (i.e. niche expansion). The evolutionary response to such selection depends on genetic variation for resource use. However, while genetic variation might facilitate niche expansion, genetically diverse groups may also experience weaker competition, reducing density-dependent selection on resource use. Therefore, genetic variation for fitness on different resources could directly facilitate, or indirectly retard, niche expansion. To test these alternatives, we factorially manipulated both the degree of genetic variation and population density in flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum) exposed to both novel and familiar food resources. Using stable carbon isotope analysis, we measured temporal change and individual variation in beetle diet across eight generations. Intraspecific competition and genetic variation acted on different components of niche evolution: competition facilitated niche expansion, while genetic variation increased individual variation in niche use. In addition, genetic variation and competition together facilitated niche expansion, but all these impacts were temporally variable. Thus, we show that the interaction between genetic variation and competition can also determine niche evolution at different time scales.
Agashe
Deepa
D
Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA. dagashe@oeb.harvard.edu
Bolnick
Daniel I
DI
D000818:Animals; D003163:Competitive Behavior; D014644:Genetic Variation; D011156:Population Density; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D014231:Tribolium / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 22;268(1473):1293-6
11410157
Trends Ecol Evol. 1991 Jan;6(1):26-8
21232416
Heredity (Edinb). 1988 Feb;60 ( Pt 1):119-23
3127361
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10075-9
17537912
Am Nat. 2008 Nov;172(5):733-9
18834291
Oecologia. 1988 Nov;77(3):407-413
28311959
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15;105(2):560-5
18195370
Evolution. 1993 Jun;47(3):977-981
28567895
Evolution. 2008 Jul;62(7):1571-1586
18373628
Science. 1965 Jul 23;149(3682):426-7
17809407
Nature. 1999 Jul 22;400(6742):354-7
10432112
Am Nat. 2009 Aug;174(2):255-67
19519220
Conserv Biol. 2002 Feb;16(1):109-116
35701963
Science. 1965 Nov 12;150(3698):903-5
5835792
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 22;102(8):2826-31
15710890
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 22;274(1611):839-44
17251094
Isotopes Environ Health Stud. 2007 Jun;43(2):143-54
17558751
Am Nat. 2007 Dec;170(6):807-18
18171164
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Feb 15;49:270-8
13930343
Evolution. 2004 Dec;58(12):2599-612
15696740
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1955;20:25-31; discussion, 31-2
13433552
Am Nat. 2009 Aug;174(2):268-81
19527118
Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Sep;95(3):235-42
16077737
Evolution. 2007 Feb;61(2):257-71
17348937
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jul 22;272(1571):1415-25
16011915
Am Nat. 2003 Jan;161(1):1-28
12650459
Nature. 2001 Mar 22;410(6827):463-6
11260712
Ecology. 2008 Oct;89(10):2850-9
18959322