title: A systematic review of three approaches for constructing physical activity messages: What messages work and what improvements are needed?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To motivate individuals to adhere to a regular physical activity regime, guidelines must be supplemented with persuasive messages that are disseminated widely. While substantial research has examined effective strategies for disseminating physical activity messages, there has been no systematic effort to examine optimal message content. This paper reviews studies that evaluate the effectiveness of three approaches for constructing physical activity messages including tailoring messages to suit individual characteristics of message recipients (message tailoring), framing messages in terms of gains versus losses (message framing), and targeting messages to affect change in self-efficacy (i.e., a theoretical determinant of behavior change).
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL databases up to July 2008. Relevant reference lists also were searched. We included intervention trials, field experiments, and laboratory-based studies that aimed to test the efficacy or effectiveness of tailored messages, framed messages and self-efficacy change messages among healthy adults. We used a descriptive approach to analyze emerging patterns in research findings. Based on this evidence we made recommendations for practice and future research.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-two studies were identified. Twelve studies evaluated message tailoring. In 10 of these studies, tailored messages resulted in greater physical activity than a control message. Six studies evaluated framed messages. Five of these studies demonstrated that gain-framed messages lead to stronger intentions to be active compared to a control message. Moreover, a gain-frame advantage was evident in three of the four studies that assessed physical activity. Four studies evaluated self-efficacy change messages. The two studies that used an experimental design provide a clear indication that individuals' beliefs can be affected by messages that incorporate types of information known to be determinants of self-efficacy. Overall, strong evidence to support definitive recommendations for optimal message content and structure was lacking.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Additional research testing the optimal content of messages used to supplement physical activity guidelines is needed. Tailored messages, gain-framed messages, and self-efficacy change messages hold promise as strategies for constructing physical activity messages and should be a focus of future research.
authors.affiliation: School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. amy.latimer@queensu.ca.
authors.forename: Amy E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Latimer
authors.forename: Lawrence R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Brawley
authors.forename: Rebecca L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Bassett
references.citation: Ann Behav Med. 2003 Summer;25(3):194-202
references.pmid: 12763714
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 1998 Nov;15(4):362-78
references.pmid: 9838978
references.citation: Prev Med. 2007 Mar;44(3):209-17
references.pmid: 17197015
references.citation: Prev Med. 2008 Nov;47(5):463-70
references.pmid: 18708086
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 14;167(9):944-9
references.pmid: 17502536
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2007 Jan;32(1):38-43
references.pmid: 17218189
references.citation: Health Promot Pract. 2010 Nov;11(6):908-16
references.pmid: 19116420
references.citation: Psychol Health Med. 2010 Dec;15(6):729-41
references.pmid: 21154024
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):673-93
references.pmid: 17592961
references.citation: Health Educ Res. 1999 Oct;14(5):653-66
references.pmid: 10510073
references.citation: Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8
references.pmid: 7455683
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2002 Aug;23(2 Suppl):98-103
references.pmid: 12133744
references.citation: CMAJ. 2007 Apr 10;176(8):S1-13
references.pmid: 17420481
references.citation: Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Jul;1(3):A11
references.pmid: 15670432
references.citation: Can J Public Health. 2007;98 Suppl 2:S170-84
references.pmid: 18213947
references.citation: J Health Commun. 2005;10 Suppl 1:137-55
references.pmid: 16377605
references.citation: Can J Public Health. 1987 Sep-Oct;78(5):S1-7
references.pmid: 3690442
references.citation: J Sports Sci. 2004 Aug;22(8):771-90
references.pmid: 15370487
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):165-73
references.pmid: 19135907
references.citation: Ann Behav Med. 2002 Summer;24(3):181-9
references.pmid: 12173675
references.citation: Br J Health Psychol. 2004 Nov;9(Pt 4):505-21
references.pmid: 15509358
references.citation: Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6
references.pmid: 4053261
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):3-19
references.pmid: 9000890
references.citation: J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114
references.pmid: 28136248
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jun;34(6 Suppl):S210-21
references.pmid: 18471601
references.citation: Ann Behav Med. 2003 Spring;25(2):92-9
references.pmid: 12704010
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5
references.pmid: 6863699
references.citation: J Health Commun. 2007 Oct-Nov;12(7):645-9
references.pmid: 17934941
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
references.pmid: 12900694
references.citation: J Med Internet Res. 2007 Sep 30;9(3):e26
references.pmid: 17942388
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2007 Jul;26(4):401-9
references.pmid: 17605559
references.citation: Can J Public Health. 2007;98 Suppl 2:S1-8
references.pmid: 18213938
references.citation: Am J Health Behav. 2003 Nov-Dec;27 Suppl 3:S227-32
references.pmid: 14672383
references.citation: J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1996 Jun;36(2):100-7
references.pmid: 8898515
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jul 03;8:141
references.pmid: 18598339
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Oct 15;22(20):2323-30
references.pmid: 9355211
references.citation: J Health Commun. 2007 Oct-Nov;12(7):623-44
references.pmid: 17934940
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2009 Jul;28(4):394-403
references.pmid: 19594262
references.citation: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:42
references.pmid: 20459786
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4 Suppl):73-107
references.pmid: 11985936
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Feb;36(2):181-92
references.pmid: 10223022
references.citation: Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;13(Pt 4):659-81
references.pmid: 17925060
references.citation: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:37
references.pmid: 20459781
references.citation: Am J Health Promot. 1998 Mar-Apr;12(4):246-53
references.pmid: 10178617
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Mar;66(3):460-73
references.pmid: 8169760
references.citation: Ann Behav Med. 1998 Summer;20(3):174-80
references.pmid: 9989324
references.citation: Am J Health Promot. 2004 Mar-Apr;18(4):283-7
references.pmid: 15011926
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jun;26(5):419-25
references.pmid: 15165658
references.citation: Br J Sports Med. 2003 Jun;37(3):197-206; discussion 206
references.pmid: 12782543