title: Relative validities of 3-day food records and the food frequency questionnaire.
abstract: The food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) has been used as an important dietary assessment tool in epidemiologic studies, but the usefulness of the FFQ has been debated in recent years. This study was performed to evaluate the relative validities of 3-day food records and the semi-quantitative FFQ. A total of 124 subjects finished 3-day food records (FRs) during each of the four seasons, as well as the FFQ from December 2002 to May 2004. The FFQ was a food based semi-quantitative FFQ including 103 items. Three-day FRs from each season and a randomly selected season were compared with the remaining 9-day FRs. The remaining 9-day FRs, as a reference measurement, were also compared with the FFQ. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the 3-day FRs and the 9-day FRs were between 0.14 and 0.56. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the FFQ and the 9-day FRs ranged between 0.07 and 0.41. Average proportions of classification into the same quartiles, adjacent quartiles, and distant quartiles between the 3-day FRs and the 9-day FRs were 35.8%, 40.5%, and 5.2%, respectively. On average, the proportions of classification into the same quartiles, adjacent quartiles, and distant quartiles between the FFQ and the 9-day FRs were 31.1%, 39.4%, and 6.9%, respectively. Three-day FRs showed higher correlations and higher agreement proportions of quartile classification with the 9-day FRs than did the FFQ, but both relative validities of 3-day FRs and the FFQ appear to be acceptable as dietary assessment tools. Further studies for validating food intake by reliable biomarkers are necessary.
authors.affiliation: Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, 17 Haengdang-dong, Sungdong-gu, Seoul 133-791, Korea.
authors.forename: Yoon Jung
authors.initials: YJ
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.forename: Mi Kyung
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Se Hee
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Hwang
authors.forename: Younjhin
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Ahn
authors.forename: Jae Eun
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Shim
authors.forename: Dong Hyun
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Kim
references.citation: Lancet. 2003 Jul 19;362(9379):212-4
references.pmid: 12885485
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Aug;106(8):1209-17
references.pmid: 16863716
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Jul;95(7):781-8; quiz 789-90
references.pmid: 7797809
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26 Suppl 1:S137-51
references.pmid: 9126542
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 13;345(11):790-7
references.pmid: 11556298
references.citation: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Dec;61(12):1435-41
references.pmid: 17299477
references.citation: Public Health Nutr. 2002 Jun;5(3):487-96
references.pmid: 12003662
references.citation: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Oct;15(10):1759-60
references.pmid: 17021349
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jul;122(1):51-65
references.pmid: 4014201
references.citation: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Dec;14(12):2826-8
references.pmid: 16364996
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 20;337(21):1491-9
references.pmid: 9366580
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Dec;56(6):1019-24
references.pmid: 1442652
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Apr;65(4 Suppl):1220S-1228S; discussion 1229S-1231S
references.pmid: 9094926
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;30(2):309-17
references.pmid: 11369735
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;35(4):1011-21
references.pmid: 16672309