title: Addressing low literacy and health literacy in clinical oncology practice.
abstract: Low functional literacy and low health literacy continue to be under-recognized and are associated with poorer patient health outcomes. Health literacy is a dynamic state influenced by how well a healthcare system delivers information and services that match patients' abilities, needs and preferences. Oncology care poses considerable health literacy demands on patients who are expected to process high stakes information about complex multidisciplinary treatment over lengths of time. Much of the information provided to patients in clinical care and research is beyond their literacy levels. In this paper, we provide an overview of currently available guidelines and resources to improve how the needs of patients with diverse literacy skills are met by cancer care providers and clinics. We present recommendations for health literacy assessment in clinical practice and ways to enhance the usability of health information and services by improving written materials and verbal communication, incorporating multimedia and culturally appropriate approaches, and promoting health literacy in cancer care settings.The paper also includes a list of additional resources that can be used to develop and implement health literacy initiatives in cancer care clinics.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. sofia-garcia@northwestern.edu
authors.forename: Sofia F
authors.initials: SF
authors.lastname: Garcia
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Hahn
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Jacobs
mesh_terms: D003142:Communication; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D057220:Health Literacy; D006296:Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008495:Medical Oncology / Q000592:standards*; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic
references.citation: Med Care. 2002 May;40(5):395-404
references.pmid: 11961474
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):165-95
references.pmid: 17942272
references.citation: Fam Med. 1993 Jun;25(6):391-5
references.pmid: 8349060
references.citation: J Cancer Educ. 1994;9(1):26-9
references.pmid: 8204454
references.citation: Cancer Invest. 2001;19(7):684-91
references.pmid: 11577809
references.citation: J Oncol Manag. 2003 Sep-Oct;12(5):9-12
references.pmid: 14619989
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2004 Feb;13(2):86-95
references.pmid: 14872527
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):878-83
references.pmid: 16881951
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jun;75(3):295-301
references.pmid: 19386462
references.citation: Am J Med. 2005 Apr;118(4):371-7
references.pmid: 15808134
references.citation: Cancer Nurs. 1998 Jun;21(3):162-6
references.pmid: 9615506
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2002 Aug;92(8):1278-83
references.pmid: 12144984
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Oct;10(10):537-41
references.pmid: 8576769
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Sep;38(1):33-42
references.pmid: 14528569
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 1;21(5):836-42
references.pmid: 12610182
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Apr;84(4 Suppl 2):S35-42
references.pmid: 12692770
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 2001 Nov 2;85(9):1273-9
references.pmid: 11720460
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):747-51
references.pmid: 18310380