title: Nocturnal and seasonal patterns of carbon isotope composition of leaf dark-respired carbon dioxide differ among dominant species in a semiarid savanna.
abstract: The C isotope composition of leaf dark-respired CO(2) (δ(13)C(l)) integrates short-term metabolic responses to environmental change and is potentially recorded in the isotopic signature of ecosystem-level respiration. Species differences in photosynthetic pathway, resource acquisition and allocation patterns, and associated isotopic fractionations at metabolic branch points can influence δ(13)C(l), and differences are likely to be modified by seasonal variation in drought intensity. We measured δ(13)C(l) in two deep-rooted C(3) trees (Prosopis velutina and Celtis reticulata), and two relatively shallow-rooted perennial herbs (a C(3) dicot Viguiera dentata and a C(4) grass Sporobolus wrightii) in a floodplain savanna ecosystem in southeastern Arizona, USA during the dry pre-monsoon and wet monsoon seasons. δ(13)C(l) decreased during the nighttime and reached minimum values at pre-dawn in all species. The magnitude of nocturnal shift in δ(13)C(l) differed among species and between pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons. During the pre-monsoon season, the magnitude of the nocturnal shift in δ(13)C(l) in the deep-rooted C(3) trees P. velutina (2.8 ± 0.4‰) and C. reticulata (2.9 ± 0.2‰) was greater than in the C(3) herb V. dentata (1.8 ± 0.4‰) and C(4) grass S. wrightii (2.2 ± 0.4‰). The nocturnal shift in δ(13)C(l) in V. dentata and S. wrightii increased to 3.2 ± 0.1‰ and 4.6 ± 0.6‰, respectively, during the monsoon season, but in C(3) trees did not change significantly from pre-monsoon values. Cumulative daytime net CO(2) uptake was positively correlated with the magnitude of the nocturnal decline in δ(13)C(l) across all species, suggesting that nocturnal δ(13)C(l) may be controlled by (13)C/(12)C fractionations associated with C substrate availability and C metabolite partitioning. Nocturnal patterns of δ(13)C(l) in dominant plant species in the semiarid savanna apparently have predictable responses to seasonal changes in water availability, which is important for interpreting and modeling the C isotope signature of ecosystem-respired CO(2).
authors.affiliation: Department of Renewable Resources, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA. wei.sun@wsu.edu
authors.forename: Wei
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Sun
authors.forename: Víctor
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Resco
authors.forename: David G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Williams
mesh_terms: D019659:Asteraceae / Q000378:metabolism*; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D002247:Carbon Isotopes; D002940:Circadian Rhythm; D002952:Citric Acid Cycle; D002980:Climate; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000378:metabolism; D006109:Poaceae / Q000378:metabolism*; D029862:Prosopis / Q000378:metabolism*; D012621:Seasons; D013045:Species Specificity; D034401:Ulmaceae / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D002247:Carbon Isotopes; D002245:Carbon Dioxide
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):623-6
references.pmid: 12167857
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Feb;29(2):202-11
references.pmid: 17080636
references.citation: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21(8):1352-60
references.pmid: 17348086
references.citation: Oecologia. 2005 Jan;142(1):70-82
references.pmid: 15378343
references.citation: Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):261-3
references.pmid: 327543
references.citation: Oecologia. 2000 May;123(3):297-311
references.pmid: 28308584
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Oct;32(10):1390-400
references.pmid: 19558412
references.citation: Biochem J. 2007 Jan 1;401(1):13-28
references.pmid: 17150041
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Jan;49(1):19-29
references.pmid: 18032398
references.citation: Science. 2001 Jun 22;292(5525):2316-20
references.pmid: 11423659
references.citation: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2001;15(14):1136-40
references.pmid: 11445894
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009 Jan;181(2):400-412
references.pmid: 19121035
references.citation: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2005 Nov;7(6):592-600
references.pmid: 16388462
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009 Jan;181(2):374-386
references.pmid: 19121034
references.citation: Oecologia. 2006 Dec;150(3):453-63
references.pmid: 16955288
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1991 Jun;96(2):609-14
references.pmid: 16668229
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1961 Mar;36(2):133-8
references.pmid: 16655481
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1997 Feb 28;272(9):5382-7
references.pmid: 9038136
references.citation: Oecologia. 2003 Apr;135(2):167-75
references.pmid: 12698337
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Apr;29(4):483-96
references.pmid: 17080601
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;172(2):330-46
references.pmid: 16995920
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Jun;48:109-136
references.pmid: 15012259
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Aug;167(2):377-84
references.pmid: 15998391
references.citation: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2006;20(4):653-60
references.pmid: 16444688
references.citation: Oecologia. 2003 Aug;136(3):347-59
references.pmid: 12827485
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008;178(1):24-40
references.pmid: 18179603
references.citation: Science. 1983 Dec 2;222(4627):1009
references.pmid: 17776242