Patterning of novel breast implant surfaces by enhancing silicone biocompatibility, using biomimetic topographies.
OBJECTIVE
Silicone biocompatibility is dictated by cell-surface interaction and its understanding is important in the field of implantation. The role of surface topography and its associated cellular morphology needs investigation to identify qualities that enhance silicone surface biocompatability. This study aims to create well-defined silicone topographies and examine how breast tissue-derived fibroblasts react and align to these surfaces.


METHODS
Photolithographic microelectronic techniques were modified to produce naturally inspired topographies in silicone, which were cultured with breast tissue-derived human fibroblasts. Using light, immunofluorescent and atomic force microscopy, the cytoskeletal reaction of fibroblasts to these silicone surfaces was investigated.


RESULTS
Numerous, well-defined micron-sized pillars, pores, grooves, and ridges were manufactured and characterized in medical grade silicone. Inimitable immunofluorescent microscopy represented in our high magnification images of vinculin, vimentin, and the actin cytoskeleton highlights the differences in fibroblast adhesion between fabricated silicone surfaces. These unique figures illustrate that fibroblast adhesion and the reactions these cells have to silicone can be manipulated to enhance biointegration between the implant and the breast tissue. An alteration of fibroblast phenotype was also observed, exhibiting the propensity of these surfaces to induce categorical remodeling of fibroblasts.


CONCLUSIONS
This unique study shows that fibroblast reactions to silicone topographies can be tailored to induce physiological changes in cells. This paves the way for further research necessary to develop more biocompatible constructs capable of eliminating capsular contracture by subverting the foreign body response.
Barr
S
S
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Research, Manchester Interdisciplinary Biocentre, School of Translational Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Hill
E
E
Bayat
A
A
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002 Jan 18;290(2):749-55
11785963
J Biomed Mater Res. 1995 Apr;29(4):511-8
7622536
J Cell Sci. 1991 May;99 ( Pt 1):73-7
1757503
Clin Plast Surg. 1988 Oct;15(4):533-9
3066560
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1484-9
12552122
Biomaterials. 2004 Nov;25(26):5781-8
15147824
Eplasty. 2009 Jun 16;9:e22
19606207
Trends Cell Biol. 2005 Nov;15(11):568-70
16213139
Histochem Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;105(6):415-29
8791101
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1994 Winter;18(1):75-9
8122581
Am J Physiol. 1999 Jul;277(1):C1-9
10409103
Nanotechnology. 2008 Jun 4;19(22):225304
21825759
Nat Mater. 2003 Jul;2(7):461-3
12776092
J Biomed Mater Res. 1999 Nov;47(2):204-12
10449631
J Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;124(4):619-26
8106557
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Sep 1;108(3):647-55
11698836
Cell Biol Int. 2004;28(3):229-36
14984750
Biophys J. 2008 Oct;95(7):3488-96
18599642
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1964 Jul;33:15-26
14202300
N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 6;336(10):677-82
9041097
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Jun;9(6):446-54
18464790