title: Increasing access to health workers in underserved areas: a conceptual framework for measuring results.
abstract: Many countries have developed strategies to attract and retain qualified health workers in underserved areas, but there is only scarce and weak evidence on their successes or failures. It is difficult to compare lessons and measure results from the few evaluations that are available. Evaluation faces several challenges, including the heterogeneity of the terminology, the complexity of the interventions, the difficulty of assessing the influence of contextual factors, the lack of baseline information, and the need for multi-method and multi-disciplinary approaches for monitoring and evaluation. Moreover, the social, political and economic context in which interventions are designed and implemented is rarely considered in monitoring and evaluating interventions for human resources for health. This paper proposes a conceptual framework that offers a model for monitoring and evaluation of retention interventions taking into account such challenges. The conceptual framework is based on a systems approach and aims to guide the thinking in evaluating an intervention to increase access to health workers in underserved areas, from its design phase through to its results. It also aims to guide the monitoring of interventions through the routine collection of a set of indicators, applicable to the specific context. It suggests that a comprehensive approach needs to be used for the design, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and review of the interventions. The framework is not intended to be prescriptive and can be applied flexibly to each country context. It promotes the use of a common understanding on how attraction and retention interventions work, using a systems perspective.
authors.affiliation: Department of Paediatrics, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
authors.forename: Luis
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Huicho
authors.forename: Marjolein
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dieleman
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: Laurence
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Codjia
authors.forename: Dina
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Balabanova
authors.forename: Gilles
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Dussault
authors.forename: Carmen
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Dolea
mesh_terms: D002983:Clinical Competence; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006280:Health Workforce / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D008507:Medically Underserved Area; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010563:Personnel Turnover; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods*; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration; D014850:Waiting Lists
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Nov 1;372(9649):1527-9
references.pmid: 18984174
references.citation: Lancet. 2004 Oct 30-Nov 5;364(9445):1603-9
references.pmid: 15519630
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2010 May;88(5):379-85
references.pmid: 20461133
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD005314
references.pmid: 19160251
references.citation: Acad Med. 2005 Aug;80(8):728-32
references.pmid: 16043525
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Apr 17;7:7
references.pmid: 19374734
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;28(1):10-8
references.pmid: 10195658
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):400-5
references.pmid: 14998803
references.citation: Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1060
references.pmid: 19530891