Energy-information trade-offs between movement and sensing.
While there is accumulating evidence for the importance of the metabolic cost of information in sensory systems, how these costs are traded-off with movement when sensing is closely linked to movement is poorly understood. For example, if an animal needs to search a given amount of space beyond the range of its vision system, is it better to evolve a higher acuity visual system, or evolve a body movement system that can more rapidly move the body over that space? How is this trade-off dependent upon the three-dimensional shape of the field of sensory sensitivity (hereafter, sensorium)? How is it dependent upon sensorium mobility, either through rotation of the sensorium via muscles at the base of the sense organ (e.g., eye or pinna muscles) or neck rotation, or by whole body movement through space? Here we show that in an aquatic model system, the electric fish, a choice to swim in a more inefficient manner during prey search results in a higher prey encounter rate due to better sensory performance. The increase in prey encounter rate more than counterbalances the additional energy expended in swimming inefficiently. The reduction of swimming efficiency for improved sensing arises because positioning the sensory receptor surface to scan more space per unit time results in an increase in the area of the body pushing through the fluid, increasing wasteful body drag forces. We show that the improvement in sensory performance that occurs with the costly repositioning of the body depends upon having an elongated sensorium shape. Finally, we show that if the fish was able to reorient their sensorium independent of body movement, as fish with movable eyes can, there would be significant energy savings. This provides insight into the ubiquity of sensory organ mobility in animal design. This study exposes important links between the morphology of the sensorium, sensorium mobility, and behavioral strategy for maximally extracting energy from the environment. An "infomechanical" approach to complex behavior helps to elucidate how animals distribute functions across sensory systems and movement systems with their diverse energy loads.
MacIver
Malcolm A
MA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Patankar
Neelesh A
NA
Shirgaonkar
Anup A
AA
D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D023702:Gymnotiformes / Q000502:physiology*; D008124:Locomotion / Q000502:physiology; D008954:Models, Biological; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D012677:Sensation / Q000502:physiology*; D013550:Swimming
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 May;89(5):2430-4
1861003
J Exp Biol. 2008 Nov;211(Pt 21):3490-503
18931321
Oecologia. 2003 Dec;137(4):502-11
14505027
J Neurosci Methods. 2000 Feb 15;95(2):133-43
10752484
J Comp Physiol A. 1999 Oct;185(4):341-52
10555268
J Exp Biol. 1999 May;202(Pt 10):1195-203
10210661
Nature. 2006 Apr 6;440(7085):757-63
16598249
Integr Comp Biol. 2002 Feb;42(1):127-34
21708701
PLoS Biol. 2007 Nov;5(11):e301
18001151
J Exp Biol. 2001 Feb;204(Pt 3):543-57
11171305
PLoS Biol. 2009 Sep;7(9):e1000203
19787026
Brain Behav Evol. 1992;40(2-3):98-111
1422810
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Sep;119(3):182-92
9743074
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Sep;24(9):2341-9
16193764
J Exp Biol. 2003 Jan;206(Pt 1):171-80
12456707
Somatosens Mot Res. 2005 Sep;22(3):97-114
16338819
J Exp Biol. 2008 Mar;211(Pt 6):1012-20
18310126
J Exp Biol. 2008 Jun;211(Pt 11):1792-804
18490395
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Aug;114(2):1120-31
12942989
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 Jun;192(6):573-86
16645885