title: How age influences unravelling morphology of annular lamellae - a study of interfibre cohesivity in the lumbar disc.
abstract: Although age- and degeneration-related changes in the morphology and biochemistry of the annulus fibrosus have been extensively reported, studies of tensile strength changes show only a weak correlation with maturity. Given that the disc is a tissue system in which significant levels of deformation occur with normal physiological loading, there may be structure-related properties that provide a better indicator of the influence of ageing on its function. This study is a morphological investigation of lamellar interfibre cohesivity with respect to maturity. Anterior segments of ovine lumbar discs in two age groups were cut at one of two section angles to generate intralamellar and interlamellar slices. These slices of hydrated annular tissue were subjected separately to microtensile and swelling forces, and examined using differential interference contrast microscopy. There were distinct differences in microstructural responses to transverse extension between the immature and mature intralamellar slices. The immature tissue exhibited a diffuse expansion of the array to form a fine fibrous net. In contrast, the mature tissue displayed a discontinuous expansion with the development of clefts and localized fibre buckling. A difference was also observed in the free-swelling response; the immature slices remained planar, whereas the cropped lamellar fibres in the mature slices exhibited a folded, buckled morphology. Morphological evidence from these experiments infers differences in fibre cohesivity between the immature and mature tissues, consistent with biochemical and histological studies. More extreme levels of deformation in the mature tissue could result in discontinuous opening of the fibrous arrays, which might have the potential to lead to cleft formation. These clefts may, in turn, provide micropaths through which nuclear material could extrude. Importantly, with many animal studies carried out on immature discs, the results here suggest that some caution is required with respect to extrapolating annular behaviour beyond this age group.
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
authors.forename: Meredith L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Schollum
authors.forename: Peter A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Robertson
authors.forename: Neil D
authors.initials: ND
authors.lastname: Broom
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D008297:Male; D008857:Microscopy, Interference; D012756:Sheep; D013718:Tensile Strength
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 May-Jun;7(3):184-91
references.pmid: 7112236
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 15;27(12):1378
references.pmid: 12065990
references.citation: J Biomech. 1998 Jun;31(6):535-44
references.pmid: 9755038
references.citation: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2005 Mar;3(3):125-40
references.pmid: 15778871
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2009 Mar;18(3):301-13
references.pmid: 19104850
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2691-9
references.pmid: 15564918
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):328-33
references.pmid: 17268264
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 1;31(25):2891-903
references.pmid: 17139219
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 May;15(5):402-10
references.pmid: 2363068
references.citation: J Anat. 2006 Mar;208(3):317-30
references.pmid: 16533315
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 May;16(5):520-4
references.pmid: 1711242
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Dec 1;24(23):2449-55
references.pmid: 10626306
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Feb 15;21(4):452-61
references.pmid: 8658249
references.citation: Mol Med Today. 1995 Oct;1(7):329-35
references.pmid: 9415173
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 1997 Nov;15(6):814-9
references.pmid: 9497805
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2702-10
references.pmid: 19002075
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jun 1;20(11):1307-14
references.pmid: 7660243
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Mar;11(2):149-53
references.pmid: 3704801
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 May;15(5):411-5
references.pmid: 2363069
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Feb;13(2):179-87
references.pmid: 3406838
references.citation: J Anat. 2005 Oct;207(4):299-312
references.pmid: 16191160
references.citation: J Anat. 2009 Jun;214(6):805-16
references.pmid: 19538627
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Sep 15;21(18):2149-55
references.pmid: 8893441
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Dec 15;20(24):2690-701
references.pmid: 8747247
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2711-20
references.pmid: 19002077