Mutation bias favors protein folding stability in the evolution of small populations.
Mutation bias in prokaryotes varies from extreme adenine and thymine (AT) in obligatory endosymbiotic or parasitic bacteria to extreme guanine and cytosine (GC), for instance in actinobacteria. GC mutation bias deeply influences the folding stability of proteins, making proteins on the average less hydrophobic and therefore less stable with respect to unfolding but also less susceptible to misfolding and aggregation. We study a model where proteins evolve subject to selection for folding stability under given mutation bias, population size, and neutrality. We find a non-neutral regime where, for any given population size, there is an optimal mutation bias that maximizes fitness. Interestingly, this optimal GC usage is small for small populations, large for intermediate populations and around 50% for large populations. This result is robust with respect to the definition of the fitness function and to the protein structures studied. Our model suggests that small populations evolving with small GC usage eventually accumulate a significant selective advantage over populations evolving without this bias. This provides a possible explanation to the observation that most species adopting obligatory intracellular lifestyles with a consequent reduction of effective population size shifted their mutation spectrum towards AT. The model also predicts that large GC usage is optimal for intermediate population size. To test these predictions we estimated the effective population sizes of bacterial species using the optimal codon usage coefficients computed by dos Reis et al. and the synonymous to non-synonymous substitution ratio computed by Daubin and Moran. We found that the population sizes estimated in these ways are significantly smaller for species with small and large GC usage compared to species with no bias, which supports our prediction.
Mendez
Raul
R
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Fritsche
Miriam
M
Porto
Markus
M
Bastolla
Ugo
U
D001419:Bacteria / Q000235:genetics; D001426:Bacterial Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D001482:Base Composition; D003198:Computer Simulation; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009154:Mutation; D017510:Protein Folding; D055550:Protein Stability; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics*; D013045:Species Specificity
D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D011506:Proteins
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 2;93(7):2873-8
8610134
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Aug 18;347(1):1-3
16815305
Protein Sci. 1995 Oct;4(10):2107-17
8535247
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jan;84(1):166-9
3467347
Genetics. 1996 Apr;142(4):1379-82
8846914
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 21;100(2):581-6
12522265
Genetics. 2007 Jan;175(1):255-66
17110496
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):6015-9
1321432
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 1;99(20):12944-8
12235368
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000565
19609354
J Mol Biol. 2004 Nov 5;343(5):1451-66
15491623
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 9;104(41):16152-7
17913881
Science. 2004 Nov 5;306(5698):978; author reply 978
15528429
J Mol Evol. 2002 Sep;55(3):260-4
12187379
Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Dec;10(3):254-75
1013905
J Mol Evol. 1985;22(2):160-74
3934395
J Mol Biol. 2002 Jan 18;315(3):479-84
11786027
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Jul;22(7):1561-8
15814826
BMC Biol. 2007 Jul 17;5:29
17640347
J Mol Evol. 2003;57 Suppl 1:S103-19
15008407
J Virol. 2008 Dec;82(24):12589-90
18829755
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Sep;6(9):678-87
16074985
Mol Microbiol. 2006 May;60(4):820-7
16677295
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Sep 14;96(19):10689-94
10485887
Gene. 1999 Sep 30;238(1):3-14
10570978
BMC Genet. 2004 Aug 27;5:25
15333142
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 17;96(17):9716-20
10449760
J Evol Biol. 2009 Mar;22(3):515-26
19170822
Biophys Chem. 1989 Nov;34(3):187-99
2611345
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Jun;69(6 Pt 1):061909
15244619
Genetics. 2009 Oct;183(2):639-50
19620390
Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624-6
5637732
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Sep 26;4(9):e1000187
18818724
Bull Math Biol. 2002 Nov;64(6):1033-43
12508529
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 12;95(10):5545-9
9576919
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 May;18(5):750-6
11319259
J Mol Biol. 2002 Jul 5;320(2):369-87
12079393
Adv Protein Chem. 1959;14:1-63
14404936
BMC Evol Biol. 2006 May 31;6:43
16737532
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Sep 24;32(17):5036-44
15448185
J Theor Biol. 2006 Mar 21;239(2):226-35
16239014
PLoS Genet. 2007 Dec;3(12):e231
18159947
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000520
19543367
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 28;95(9):4976-81
9560213
Fold Des. 1997;2(5):261-9
9261065
Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Nov 11;89(20):208101
12443510
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4458-62
9539759
Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Nov;26(11):2595-603
19661199
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1961 Aug;47(8):1141-9
16590864
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 19;107(3):1154-9
20080608
J Mol Biol. 2001 Sep 7;312(1):289-307
11545603
BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Oct 28;4:42
15511291
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2006 Apr;23(5):547-54
16494504
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9541-6
15980155
Nature. 2002 May 23;417(6887):398
12024205
Proteins. 2002 Jan 1;46(1):105-9
11746707
Proteins. 2001 Aug 1;44(2):79-96
11391771
Trends Genet. 2004 Sep;20(9):413-6
15313549
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Feb 23;33(4):1141-53
15728743
J Mol Evol. 1985;22(4):363-5
3936938
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 9;101(10):3480-5
14990797
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1938 Sep;24(9):372-7
16588241
Naturwissenschaften. 1971 Oct;58(10):465-523
4942363
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009 Jun;73(2):249-99
19487728
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 18;102(3):606-11
15644440
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003 Sep;60(9):1852-71
14523548