Neck linker length determines the degree of processivity in kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 motors.
Defining the mechanical and biochemical determinates of kinesin processivity is important for understanding how diverse kinesins are tuned for specific cellular functions. Because transmission of mechanical forces through the 14-18 amino acid neck linker domain underlies coordinated stepping, we investigated the role of neck linker length, charge, and structure in kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 motor behavior. For optimum comparison with kinesin-1, the KIF3A head and neck linker of kinesin-2 were fused to the kinesin-1 neck coil and rod. Extending the 14-residue kinesin-1 neck linker reduced processivity, and shortening the 17-residue kinesin-2 neck linker enhanced processivity. When a proline in the kinesin-2 neck linker was replaced, kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 run lengths scaled identically with neck linker length, despite moving at different speeds. In low-ionic-strength buffer, charge had a dominant effect on motor processivity, which resolves ongoing controversy regarding the effect of neck linker length on kinesin processivity. From stochastic simulations, the results are best explained by neck linker extension slowing strain-dependent detachment of the rear head along with diminishing strain-dependent inhibition of ATP binding. These results help delineate how interhead strain maximizes stepping and suggest that less processive kinesins are tuned to coordinate with other motors differently than the maximally processive kinesin-1.
Shastry
Shankar
S
Department of Bioengineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 205 Hallowell Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Hancock
William O
WO
D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000818:Animals; D029721:Drosophila Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D016547:Kinesins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D008870:Microtubules / Q000378:metabolism; D008958:Models, Molecular; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D011487:Protein Conformation; D020033:Protein Isoforms / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D011993:Recombinant Fusion Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D016415:Sequence Alignment
D029721:Drosophila Proteins; D020033:Protein Isoforms; D011993:Recombinant Fusion Proteins; D016547:Kinesins
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Nov 9;96(23):13147-52
10557288
Biochemistry. 2002 Apr 2;41(13):4437-46
11914091
J Cell Biol. 2000 Nov 27;151(5):1093-100
11086010
Science. 2000 Apr 7;288(5463):88-95
10753125
Cell Mol Bioeng. 2009 Jun 1;2(2):177-189
21544223
Curr Biol. 2009 Mar 10;19(5):442-7
19278641
EMBO J. 2010 Jan 6;29(1):93-106
19893487
Cell. 2008 Sep 19;134(6):1030-41
18805095
Methods Enzymol. 1982;85 Pt B:376-85
7121276
Biophys J. 2007 May 1;92(9):2986-95
17325011
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 13;104(7):2175-80
17287347
J Cell Biol. 1998 Mar 23;140(6):1395-405
9508772
Nat Cell Biol. 1999 Sep;1(5):288-92
10559941
Biochemistry. 2003 Oct 21;42(41):12011-8
14556632
J Biol Chem. 2003 May 16;278(20):18550-6
12626516
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jan 18;97(2):640-5
10639132
Methods Enzymol. 1991;196:478-85
2034137
Biophys J. 2005 Nov;89(5):3223-34
16100283