On the mental representations originating during the interaction between language and vision.
The interaction between vision and language processing is clearly of interest to both cognitive psychologists and psycholinguists. Recent research has begun to create understanding of the interaction between vision and language in terms of the representational issues involved. In this paper, we first review some of the theoretical and methodological issues in the current vision-language interaction debate. Later, we develop a model that attempts to account for effects of affordances and visual context on language-scene interaction as well as the role of sensorimotor simulation. The paper addresses theoretical issues related to the mental representations that arise when visual and linguistic systems interact.
Mishra
Ramesh Kumar
RK
Centre for Behavioural and Cognitive Science, The University of Allahabad, Psychology building, Allahabad 211002, India. rkmishra@cbcs.ac.in
Marmolejo-Ramos
Fernando
F
D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:277-92
19733763
Cogn Psychol. 2002 Dec;45(4):447-81
12480476
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Nov;4(4):565-72
722248
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):766-86
17014302
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Aug;9(8):389-96
16006171
Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:2-22
17045978
Open Neuroimag J. 2010 Jul 08;4:46-52
21379399
Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(21):2714-26
17614113
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Feb;135(1):1-11
16478313
Cognition. 2004 Sep;93(2):B79-87
15147941
Cognition. 2008 Jul;108(1):155-84
18395705
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Mar;2(3):194-203
11256080
J Mem Lang. 2007 Nov;57(4):570-595
18037980
J Vis. 2007 Jan 31;7(1):10
17461678
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Jul;3(7):264-271
10377541
Science. 1995 Jun 16;268(5217):1632-4
7777863
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):566-73
18567256
Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:243-71
10074679
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 May;30(3):687-96
15099136
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):55-71
19193366
Brain Cogn. 2009 Apr;69(3):481-9
19046798
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):787-835
18954205
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 May;10(5):227-32
16603407
Cogn Sci. 2006 May 6;30(3):481-529
21702823
Perception. 2005;34(9):1069-82
16245486
J Psycholinguist Res. 1995 Nov;24(6):409-36
8531168
Perception. 2009;38(4):479-91
19522318
Cogn Sci. 2009 Jun;33(4):583-609
20396405
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Jan;121(1):65-80
16098943
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Oct;47(12):2593-9
19463837
Cogn Sci. 2009 May;33(3):449-96
21585477
Cognition. 1999 Dec 17;73(3):247-64
10585516
Psychol Rev. 1970 Mar;77(2):73-99
5454129
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Feb;7(2):84-91
12584027
Spat Vis. 2003;16(2):125-54
12696858
Cognition. 2005 Jan;94(3):B79-89
15617669
Psychol Res. 2001 Nov;65(4):235-41
11789427
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 11;105(10):4004-9
18316728
Neuron. 2004 Jan 22;41(2):301-7
14741110
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Aug;11(8):349-55
17629544
Cognition. 1999 Jun 22;71(2):109-47
10444906
Brain Lang. 2010 Mar;112(3):189-201
19450874
Cognition. 2009 Jul;112(1):55-80
19426968
Cogn Psychol. 2007 May;54(3):218-50
16973144
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):577-609; discussion 610-60
11301525
Science. 1972 Jul 7;177(4043):77-80
5041781
Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):270-4
19285660
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):939-73; discussion 973-1031
12239892
Brain Cogn. 2010 Apr;72(3):394-9
20031292
Cognition. 2007 Jan;102(1):129-38
16434031
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506
19449261
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45
17705682
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):498-504
14585447
J Vis. 2009 Mar 13;9(3):6.1-15
19757945
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):1-14
16478336
Mem Cognit. 2004 Sep;32(6):863-73
15673175
Cognition. 2005 Feb;95(1):95-127
15629475
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):6-10
19037907
Dev Sci. 2007 Jan;10(1):75-83
17181703
Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422
9849112
Curr Biol. 2006 Jan 10;16(1):69-74
16401424
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):137-76
18762289
Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Mar;20(1):1-19; discussion 19-55
10096994