Failure of routine diagnostic methods to detect influenza in hospitalized older adults.
OBJECTIVE
To define the utility of using routine diagnostic methods to detect influenza in older, hospitalized adults.


METHODS
Descriptive study.


METHODS
One academic hospital and 1 community hospital during the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 influenza seasons. Participants. Hospitalized adults 50 years of age or older.


METHODS
Adults who were 50 years of age or older and hospitalized with symptoms of respiratory illness were enrolled and tested for influenza by use of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Using RT-PCR as the gold standard, we assessed the performances of rapid antigen tests and conventional influenza culture and the diagnostic use of the clinical definition of influenza-like illness.


RESULTS
Influenza was detected by use of RT-PCR in 26 (11%) of 228 patients enrolled in our study. The sensitivity of the rapid antigen test performed at bedside by research staff members was 19.2% (95% confidence interval, 8.51%-37.9%); the sensitivity of conventional influenza culture was 34.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.4%-53.8%). The ability to detect influenza with both the rapid antigen test and culture was associated with patients with a higher viral load (P=.002 and P=.001, respectively). The ability to diagnose influenza by use of the clinical definition of influenza-like illness had a higher sensitivity (80.8%) but lacked specificity (40.6%).


CONCLUSIONS
Because rapid antigen testing and viral culture have poor sensitivity (19.2% and 34.6%, respectively), neither testing method is sufficient to use to determine what type of isolation procedures to implement in a hospital setting.
Talbot
H Keipp
HK
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA. keipp.talbot@vanderbilt.edu
Williams
John V
JV
Zhu
Yuwei
Y
Poehling
Katherine A
KA
Griffin
Marie R
MR
Edwards
Kathryn M
KM
D000368:Aged; D000818:Animals; D000956:Antigens, Viral / Q000032:analysis; D002460:Cell Line; D003955:Diagnostic Tests, Routine; D005260:Female; D006760:Hospitalization / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D009980:Influenza A virus / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D009981:Influenza B virus / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D007251:Influenza, Human / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000821:virology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014776:Virus Cultivation
D000956:Antigens, Viral
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 26;167(4):354-60
17242309
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Sep;50(9):1498-503
12383146
Am J Prev Med. 1995 May-Jun;11(3):149-55
7662393
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;5(5):310-3
17870637
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002 Oct 25;51(7):1-10
12418623
J Infect Dis. 2009 Aug 15;200(4):492-500
19591575
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Mar;30(3):540-4
1372616
JAMA. 2004 Sep 15;292(11):1333-40
15367555
J Infect Dis. 2004 Feb 15;189(4):706-10
14767825
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):196-200
11136770
J Clin Virol. 2004 Mar;29(3):179-88
14962787
JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):179-86
12517228
Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):83-8
12093950
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Mar;15(3):267-73
19183404
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Dec;22(12):720-5
14605944
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jan 15;36(2):169-74
12522748
Fam Pract. 1998 Feb;15(1):16-22
9527293
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Dec 12;57(49):1329-32
19078922
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;29(10):921-6
18754739
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;58(4):413-8
17509800