Reinvention of depression instruments by primary care clinicians.
OBJECTIVE
Despite the sophisticated development of depression instruments during the past 4 decades, the critical topic of how primary care clinicians actually use those instruments in their day-to-day practice has not been investigated. We wanted to understand how primary care clinicians use depression instruments, for what purposes, and the conditions that influence their use.


METHODS
Grounded theory method was used to guide data collection and analysis. We conducted 70 individual interviews and 3 focus groups (n = 24) with a purposeful sample of 70 primary care clinicians (family physicians, general internists, and nurse practitioners) from 52 offices. Investigators' field notes on office practice environments complemented individual interviews.


RESULTS
The clinicians described occasional use of depression instruments but reported they did not routinely use them to aid depression diagnosis or management; the clinicians reportedly used them primarily to enhance patients' acceptance of the diagnosis when they anticipated or encountered resistance to the diagnosis. Three conditions promoted or reduced use of these instruments for different purposes: the extent of competing demands for the clinician's time, the lack of objective evidence of depression, and the clinician's familiarity with the patient. No differences among the 3 clinician groups were found for these 3 conditions.


CONCLUSIONS
Depression instruments are reinvented by primary care clinicians in their real-world primary care practice. Although depression instruments were originally conceptualized for screening, diagnosing, or facilitating the management of depression, our study suggests that the real-world practice context influences their use to aid shared decision making-primarily to suggest, tell, or convince patients to accept the diagnosis of depression.
Baik
Seong-Yi
SY
School of Nursing, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. seongyi.baik@uc.edu
Gonzales
Junius J
JJ
Bowers
Barbara J
BJ
Anthony
Jean S
JS
Tidjani
Bas
B
Susman
Jeffrey L
JL
D003625:Data Collection; D003657:Decision Making; D003863:Depression / Q000175:diagnosis*; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D007406:Interview, Psychological; D008403:Mass Screening; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965 Jan;12:63-70
14221692
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;50(2):85-94
8427558
CNS Spectr. 2007 Aug;12(8 Suppl 13):1-27
17986951
JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1737-44
10568646
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;183(3):759-69
10992206
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(1):7-24
17192115
Depress Anxiety. 2004;19(3):137-45
15129415
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2515-23
15958807
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
14399272
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;3(1):31-7
15671188
Med Care. 1992 Jan;30(1):67-76
1729588
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):190-8
15121347
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD002792
16235301
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):w232-41
18445642
J Clin Psychol. 2006 Jan;62(1):123-46
16287149
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71
13688369
J Psychosom Res. 2003 Apr;54(4):279-87
12670603
J Psychosom Res. 2005 Feb;58(2):163-71
15820844
Public Health Rep. 2000 Jan-Feb;115(1):89-101
10968589
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1596-602
17874169
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):551-60
18247097
J Fam Pract. 2001 Oct;50(10):872-8
11674890
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1194-201
15550799
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
11556941
Aging (Milano). 2000 Jun;12(3):228-33
10965381
Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92
14583691
JAMA. 2008 Oct 22;300(16):1872, 1874-5
18940968