A formal test of the theory of universal common ancestry.
Universal common ancestry (UCA) is a central pillar of modern evolutionary theory. As first suggested by Darwin, the theory of UCA posits that all extant terrestrial organisms share a common genetic heritage, each being the genealogical descendant of a single species from the distant past. The classic evidence for UCA, although massive, is largely restricted to 'local' common ancestry-for example, of specific phyla rather than the entirety of life-and has yet to fully integrate the recent advances from modern phylogenetics and probability theory. Although UCA is widely assumed, it has rarely been subjected to formal quantitative testing, and this has led to critical commentary emphasizing the intrinsic technical difficulties in empirically evaluating a theory of such broad scope. Furthermore, several researchers have proposed that early life was characterized by rampant horizontal gene transfer, leading some to question the monophyly of life. Here I provide the first, to my knowledge, formal, fundamental test of UCA, without assuming that sequence similarity implies genetic kinship. I test UCA by applying model selection theory to molecular phylogenies, focusing on a set of ubiquitously conserved proteins that are proposed to be orthologous. Among a wide range of biological models involving the independent ancestry of major taxonomic groups, the model selection tests are found to overwhelmingly support UCA irrespective of the presence of horizontal gene transfer and symbiotic fusion events. These results provide powerful statistical evidence corroborating the monophyly of all known life.
Theobald
Douglas L
DL
Department of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 01778, USA. dtheobald@brandeis.edu
D000818:Animals; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D017124:Conserved Sequence; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D022761:Gene Transfer, Horizontal / Q000235:genetics; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D008957:Models, Genetic; D000069497:Origin of Life; D010802:Phylogeny; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013559:Symbiosis / Q000235:genetics
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb;23(2):254-67
16221896
Genome Res. 2005 Feb;15(2):330-40
15687296
Cell. 1987 Aug 28;50(5):667
3621342
J Mol Evol. 2002 Feb;54(2):258-66
11821918
Bioessays. 2007 Jan;29(1):74-84
17187354
Nature. 1981 Mar 12;290(5802):75-6
7207599
Nature. 1982 May 20;297(5863):197-200
7078635
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(6):2264-8
2315319
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 25;99(13):8742-7
12077305
Nat Genet. 2001 Jul;28(3):281-5
11431701
Science. 1963 Nov 22;142(3595):1083-5
14068231
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000 Jun;10(3):355-8
10851188
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 12;364(1527):2221-8
19571242
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998 Jun;8(3):380-7
9666335
Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1701-3
12805536
J Mol Biol. 1968 Dec;38(3):367-79
4887876
Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):2104-5
15647292
J Theor Biol. 2002 Oct 21;218(4):395-408
12384044
Bioinformatics. 2004 Feb 12;20(3):407-15
14960467
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 May;80(10):2981-4
6574468
J Theor Biol. 2003 Aug 7;223(3):377-85
12850457
Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
14530136
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):5088-90
270744