title: Choices on contraceptive methods in post-abortion family planning clinic in the northeast Brazil.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In Brazil, a Ministry of Health report revealed women who underwent an abortion were predominantly in the use of contraceptive methods, but mentioned inconsistent or erroneously contraceptive use. Promoting the use of contraceptive methods to prevent unwanted pregnancies is one of the most effective strategies to reduce abortion rates and maternal morbidity and mortality. Therefore, providing post-abortion family planning services that include structured contraceptive counseling with free and easy access to contraceptive methods can be suitable. So the objective of this study is to determine the acceptance and selection of contraceptive methods followed by a post-abortion family planning counseling.
  
  
  METHODS
  A cross-sectional study was carried out from July to October 2008, enrolling 150 low income women to receive post-abortion care at a family planning clinic in a public hospital located in Recife, Brazil. The subjects were invited to take part of the study before receiving hospital leave from five different public maternities. An appointment was made for them at a family planning clinic at IMIP from the 8th to the 15th day after they had undergone an abortion. Every woman received information on contraceptive methods, side effects and fertility. Counseling was individualized and addressed them about feelings, expectations and motivations regarding contraception as well as pregnancy intention.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of all women enrolled in this study, 97.4% accepted at least one contraceptive method. Most of them (73.4%) had no previous abortion history. Forty of the women who had undergone a previous abortion, 47.5% reported undergoing unsafe abortion. Slightly more than half of the pregnancies (52%) were unwanted. All women had knowledge of the use of condoms, oral contraceptives and injectables. The most chosen method was injectables, followed by oral contraceptives and condoms. Only one woman chose an intrauterine device.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The acceptance rate of post-abortion contraceptive methods was greater and the most chosen method was the best-known one. Implementing a specialized family planning post abortion service may promote an acceptance, regardless of the chosen method. Most important is they do receive contraception if they do not wish for an immediate pregnancy.
authors.affiliation: Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof Fernando Figueira (IMIP) - Research Department - Rua dos Coelhos, 300 Boa Vista 50,070-550, Recife, Brazil. analaura@imip.org.br.
authors.forename: Ana Laura Cg
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Ferreira
authors.forename: Ariani I
authors.initials: AI
authors.lastname: Souza
authors.forename: Raitza A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Lima
authors.forename: Cynthia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Braga
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Nov;103(2):140-3
references.pmid: 18760783
references.citation: Womens Health Issues. 2002 Mar-Apr;12(2):79-95
references.pmid: 11879761
references.citation: Cad Saude Publica. 2000 Apr-Jun;16(2):377-84
references.pmid: 10883036
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):361-8
references.pmid: 17125957
references.citation: Stud Fam Plann. 2002 Jun;33(2):195-202
references.pmid: 12132639
references.citation: Contraception. 2004 Jun;69(6):481-7
references.pmid: 15157793
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2006 Sep;21(9):2296-303
references.pmid: 16751644
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 Nov 25;368(9550):1908-19
references.pmid: 17126724
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):575.e1-6
references.pmid: 17904511
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 2004 Mar;9(3):399-405
references.pmid: 14996370
references.citation: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2001 Dec;6(4):205-18
references.pmid: 11848650
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;105(3):206-9
references.pmid: 19232600
references.citation: ScientificWorldJournal. 2009 Jan 18;9:37-45
references.pmid: 19151897
references.citation: Contraception. 2008 Jan;77(1):10-21
references.pmid: 18082661
references.citation: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Dec;13(4):422-30
references.pmid: 19117259
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Apr;24(3):298-303
references.pmid: 15203633
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 Jul 31;8:32
references.pmid: 18667094
references.citation: Reprod Health Matters. 2007 Nov;15(30):134-44
references.pmid: 17938078
references.citation: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009 Feb;14(1):1-9
references.pmid: 19241296
references.citation: Rev Saude Publica. 2003 Oct;37(5):583-90
references.pmid: 14569333