Host-symbiont recombination versus natural selection in the response of coral-dinoflagellate symbioses to environmental disturbance.
Mutualisms between reef-building corals and endosymbiotic dinoflagellates are particularly sensitive to environmental stress, yet the ecosystems they construct have endured major oscillations in global climate. During the winter of 2008, an extreme cold-water event occurred in the Gulf of California that bleached corals in the genus Pocillopora harbouring a thermally 'sensitive' symbiont, designated Symbiodinium C1b-c, while colonies possessing Symbiodinium D1 were mostly unaffected. Certain bleached colonies recovered quickly while others suffered partial or complete mortality. In most colonies, no appreciable change was observed in the identity of the original symbiont, indicating that these partnerships are stable. During the initial phases of recovery, a third species of symbiont B1(Aiptasia), genetically identical to that harboured by the invasive anemone, Aiptasia sp., grew opportunistically and was visible as light-yellow patches on the branch tips of several colonies. However, this symbiont did not persist and was displaced in all cases by C1b-c several months later. Colonies with D1 were abundant at inshore habitats along the continental eastern Pacific, where seasonal turbidity is high relative to offshore islands. Environmental conditions of the central and southern coasts of Mexico were not sufficient to explain the exclusivity of D1 Pocillopora in these regions. It is possible that mass mortalities associated with major thermal disturbances during the 1997-1998 El Niño Southern Oscillation eliminated C1b-c holobionts from these locations. The differential loss of Pocillopora holobionts in response to thermal stress suggests that natural selection on existing variation can cause rapid and significant shifts in the frequency of particular coral-algal partnerships. However, coral populations may take decades to recover following episodes of severe selection, thereby raising considerable uncertainty about the long-term viability of these communities.
LaJeunesse
Todd C
TC
Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. tcl3@psu.edu
Smith
Robin
R
Walther
Mariana
M
Pinzón
Jorge
J
Pettay
Daniel T
DT
McGinley
Michael
M
Aschaffenburg
Matthew
M
Medina-Rosas
Pedro
P
Cupul-Magaña
Amilcar L
AL
Pérez
Andrés López
AL
Reyes-Bonilla
Hector
H
Warner
Mark E
ME
D000064:Acclimatization / Q000235:genetics; D000818:Animals; D037421:Anthozoa / Q000235:genetics*; D002140:California; D004141:Dinoflagellida / Q000235:genetics*; D004777:Environment; D005843:Geography; D011995:Recombination, Genetic; D012621:Seasons; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D013045:Species Specificity; D013312:Stress, Physiological; D013559:Symbiosis / Q000235:genetics*; D013997:Time Factors
Science. 2004 Jun 4;304(5676):1490-2
15178798
Mol Ecol. 2004 Feb;13(2):459-69
14717900
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Oct;45(1):417-22
17719244
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Mar;22(3):570-81
15537807
Nature. 2004 Aug 12;430(7001):742
15306800
Science. 2007 Dec 14;318(5857):1737-42
18079392
Nature. 1997 Jul 17;388(6639):265-9
9230434
Nature. 2004 Aug 12;430(7001):741
15306799
Mol Ecol. 2009 Feb;18(3):500-19
19161470
Adv Mar Biol. 2003;46:183-223
14601413
Nature. 2001 Jun 14;411(6839):765-6
11459046
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 7;276(1676):4139-48
19740874
Mol Ecol. 2010 Apr;19(8):1705-20
20345691
PLoS One. 2009 Jul 15;4(7):e6262
19603078
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jan;24(1):16-20
19022522
Biol Bull. 2000 Oct;199(2):126-34
11081711
Biol Bull. 2001 Dec;201(3):360-73
11751248
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 22;275(1641):1359-65
18348962
Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):929-33
12920289
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9(3):1022-5
21564826
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 29;105(30):10444-9
18645181
Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):684-9
17661235
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 22;273(1599):2305-12
16928632