title: Does the contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence to the auditory Simon effect increase with practice?
abstract: In two-choice reaction tasks for which stimulus location is irrelevant, crossing the hands typically does not alter the benefit for corresponding stimulus and response locations (the Simon effect), which implies location coding of responses. However, for auditory tasks in which a consistent mapping between responding hand and tone pitch is maintained, the Simon effect may become smaller for crossed than uncrossed hands with practice, suggesting increased reliance on anatomical coding. Two experiments tested this possibility. In Exp. 1, the Simon effect tended to be smaller with crossed than uncrossed hands in the second half of 1,600 trials but not in the first half. Experiment 2 showed that this result was not due to reinstructing subjects mid-experiment about the consistent mapping of stimuli to hands. Although the Simon effect was apparent with crossed hands throughout both experiments, it tended to be slightly smaller than the effect obtained with uncrossed hands.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2081, USA. proctor@psych.purdue.edu
authors.forename: Robert W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Proctor
authors.forename: Chunhong
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Shao
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001307:Auditory Perception; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006225:Hand; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009043:Motor Activity; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010898:Pitch Perception; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2006 Oct;68(7):1059-69
references.pmid: 17355031
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1987 Aug;42(2):195-201
references.pmid: 3627940
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1970 Oct;86(1):97-102
references.pmid: 5482039
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Jun;27(3):731-51
references.pmid: 11424658
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1971 Jun;88(3):354-60
references.pmid: 5090926
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 13;104(11):4753-8
references.pmid: 17360596
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2000;63(2):148-58
references.pmid: 10946588
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2003 Feb;67(1):43-55
references.pmid: 12589449