title: Sieving experiments and pore diameter: it's not a simple relationship.
abstract: The classic sieving experiment for estimating an ion channel's diameter with successively larger ions is re-examined. Using a very reduced model of a calcium channel, it is shown that sieving experiments measure a combination of three mechanisms: the cross-sectional area available to the sieving ions (the classic interpretation), the exclusion of the sieving ions from a pore crowded with amino acid side chains that protrude into the permeation pathway, and competitive selectivity of the sieving ions with other ions in the bath (even if those are present only at trace concentrations). The latter two can be called sieving-by-crowding because they stem from the excluded volume of the amino acids in the permeation pathway. The model shows that--to a first--order approximation-sieving experiments measure the available volume inside a selectivity filter, rather than the available cross-sectional area. The two are only the same if the narrow part of the pore does not have flexible amino acid side chains interacting directly with the permeant ions; this may be true of potassium channels, but not calcium, sodium, and other channels with "crowded" selectivity filters.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Krauss
authors.forename: Dirk
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Gillespie
mesh_terms: D002118:Calcium / Q000378:metabolism; D019277:Entropy; D007473:Ion Channels / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D008954:Models, Biological; D016062:Porosity; D012964:Sodium / Q000378:metabolism; D055672:Static Electricity
chemical_list: D007473:Ion Channels; D012964:Sodium; D002118:Calcium
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2006 Jul 21;125(3):34901
references.pmid: 16863379
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1993 Dec;102(6):1107-29
references.pmid: 8133241
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2005 Aug 18;109(32):15598-610
references.pmid: 16852978
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469-92
references.pmid: 6247422
references.citation: Biophys J. 2000 Oct;79(4):1976-92
references.pmid: 11023902
references.citation: Biophys J. 1998 Sep;75(3):1287-305
references.pmid: 9726931
references.citation: Biophys J. 2008 Sep 15;95(6):2658-72
references.pmid: 18515379
references.citation: Biophys J. 2007 Sep 15;93(6):1960-80
references.pmid: 17526571
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 13;275(41):31778-85
references.pmid: 10934200
references.citation: Biophys J. 2009 Oct 21;97(8):2212-21
references.pmid: 19843453
references.citation: Biophys J. 2008 May 1;94(9):3486-96
references.pmid: 18199663
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2008 Feb 8;376(1):13-22
references.pmid: 18155244
references.citation: Biophys J. 2004 Nov;87(5):3137-47
references.pmid: 15326033
references.citation: Biophys J. 2008 Jul;95(2):609-19
references.pmid: 18390596
references.citation: Biophys J. 2008 Feb 15;94(4):1169-84
references.pmid: 17951303
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Apr 20;98(16):168102
references.pmid: 17501467
references.citation: Biophys J. 2008 Oct;95(8):3706-14
references.pmid: 18621826
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Dec;1788(12):2471-80
references.pmid: 19818330
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 2009 May;133(5):497-509
references.pmid: 19398776
references.citation: Biophys J. 2006 Dec 15;91(12):4392-400
references.pmid: 16997866
references.citation: Science. 1998 Apr 3;280(5360):69-77
references.pmid: 9525859
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2000 Nov 3;275(44):34493-500
references.pmid: 10950957
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):7149-53
references.pmid: 2413461
references.citation: J Physiol. 2002 Feb 1;538(Pt 3):729-45
references.pmid: 11826161