title: Poor accuracy of methods currently used to determine umbilical catheter insertion length.
abstract: This study compares the methods of Dunn and Shukla in determining the appropriate insertion length of umbilical catheters. In July 2007, we changed our policy for umbilical catheter insertions from the method of Dunn to the method of Shukla. We report our percentage of inaccurate placement of umbilical-vein catheters (UVCs) and umbilical-artery catheters (UACs) before and after the change of policy. In the Dunn-group, 41% (28/69) of UVCs were placed directly in the correct position against 24% (20/84) in the Shukla-group. The position of the catheter-tip of UVCs in the Dunn-group and the Shukla-group was too high in 57% (39/69) and 75% (63/84) of neonates, respectively. UACs in the Dunn-group were placed directly in the correct position in 63% (24/38) compared to the 87% (39/45) of cases in Shukla-group. The position of the catheter-tip of UACs in the Dunn-group and the Shukla-group was too high in 34% (13/38) and 13% (6/45) of neonates, respectively. In conclusion, the Dunn-method is more accurate than the Shukla-method in predicting the insertion length for UVCs, whereas the Shukla-method is more accurate for UACs.
authors.affiliation: Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Gerdina H
authors.initials: GH
authors.lastname: Verheij
authors.forename: Arjan B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Te Pas
authors.forename: Ruben S G M
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Witlox
authors.forename: Vivianne E H J
authors.initials: VE
authors.lastname: Smits-Wintjens
authors.forename: Frans J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Walther
authors.forename: Enrico
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Lopriore
references.citation: Neonatology. 2008;94(1):35-7
references.pmid: 18176085
references.citation: Arch Dis Child. 1966 Feb;41(215):69-75
references.pmid: 5906629
references.citation: Radiol Clin North Am. 1999 Nov;37(6):1109-25
references.pmid: 10546669
references.citation: Radiologe. 2000 Jan;40(1):52-7
references.pmid: 10663163
references.citation: Adv Neonatal Care. 2006 Jun;6(3):127-38; quiz 139-41
references.pmid: 16750807
references.citation: Radiographics. 1991 Sep;11(5):849-63
references.pmid: 1947320
references.citation: Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep;9(5):498-501
references.pmid: 18679150
references.citation: J Pediatr. 1995 Apr;126(4):633-5
references.pmid: 7699547
references.citation: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Oct 6;151(40):2219-23
references.pmid: 17969574
references.citation: Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1986 Aug;25(8):407-8
references.pmid: 3731669
references.citation: Adv Neonatal Care. 2006 Oct;6(5):242-56; quiz 257-60
references.pmid: 17045945
references.citation: Clin Perinatol. 2005 Mar;32(1):141-56, vii
references.pmid: 15777826
references.citation: Am J Perinatol. 2007 Nov;24(10):581-5
references.pmid: 17972230
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2001 Jun;107(6):1272-6
references.pmid: 11389242
references.citation: Am J Dis Child. 1986 Aug;140(8):786-8
references.pmid: 3728405
references.citation: Anaesthesist. 2006 Aug;55(8):873-82
references.pmid: 16826417
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000505
references.pmid: 10796375
references.citation: Lancet. 1993 May 8;341(8854):1186-7
references.pmid: 8098082
references.citation: Pediatrics. 1985 Apr;75(4):725-9
references.pmid: 3982904
references.citation: J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Sep;90(9):1793-7
references.pmid: 17957920
references.citation: Am J Dis Child. 1971 Mar;121(3):213-8
references.pmid: 5551871
references.citation: J Infus Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):346-52
references.pmid: 17122690
references.citation: Am J Dis Child. 1971 Dec;122(6):499-500
references.pmid: 5156255
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):e18
references.pmid: 18843120