title: Alcohol alters men's perceptual and decisional processing of women's sexual interest.
abstract: The current investigation examines the etiology of men's errors in sexual perception after moderate alcohol use. Sensitivity and bias estimates, derived from multidimensional signal detection analysis, revealed that men's alcohol-influenced performance was associated with declining sensitivity to the distinction between women's friendliness and sexual interest. However, sensitivity to the distinction between conservative and provocative clothing was unaffected. Similarly, an alcohol dose led to an increased bias to respond that women's ambiguous cues were sexual interest (rather than friendliness) but did not influence response thresholds for clothing style. Thus, there was specificity to the perceptual and decisional changes associated with alcohol use rather than a simple degradation of men's capacity to process all dating-relevant cues in the environment. Given the link between alcohol use, sexual misperception, and acquaintance-initiated sexual coercion, understanding the etiology of sexual misperception in the context of alcohol use may inform sexual coercion prevention efforts.
authors.affiliation: Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, USA. farrisca@upmc.edu
authors.forename: Coreen
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Farris
authors.forename: Teresa A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Treat
authors.forename: Richard J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Viken
mesh_terms: D000428:Alcohol Drinking / Q000523:psychology*; D000435:Alcoholic Intoxication / Q000523:psychology; D003463:Cues; D003657:Decision Making / Q000187:drug effects; D000431:Ethanol / Q000494:pharmacology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007989:Libido; D008297:Male; D018579:Patient Selection; D012725:Sexual Behavior / Q000523:psychology*; D012938:Social Perception; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014930:Women
chemical_list: D000431:Ethanol
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):348-54
references.pmid: 18399887
references.citation: J Stud Alcohol. 2005 Sep;66(5):663-72
references.pmid: 16331852
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1971 Jun;127(12):1653-8
references.pmid: 5565851
references.citation: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Nov;12(4):243-50
references.pmid: 15571441
references.citation: J Soc Clin Psychol. 2005 Mar;24(2):129-155
references.pmid: 26500390
references.citation: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002 Apr;26(4):575-81
references.pmid: 11981135
references.citation: Psychol Assess. 2001 Dec;13(4):549-65
references.pmid: 11793898
references.citation: Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Jan;28(1):48-66
references.pmid: 17462798
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Jun;31(6):1301-9
references.pmid: 16251993
references.citation: J Stud Alcohol. 2000 Sep;61(5):688-97
references.pmid: 11022808
references.citation: J Math Psychol. 2010;54(1):137-149
references.pmid: 20607097
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Oct;17(10):869-75
references.pmid: 17100787
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1997 May;106(2):191-202
references.pmid: 9131839
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1980 Aug;48(4):419-26
references.pmid: 7400427
references.citation: Psychol Assess. 2002 Sep;14(3):239-52
references.pmid: 12214431