title: Less is more: density influences the development of behavioural life skills in trout.
abstract: Theory suggests that habitat structure and population density profoundly influence the phenotypic development of animals. Here, we predicted that reduced rearing density and increased structural complexity promote food search ability, anti-predator response and the ability to forage on novel prey, all behavioural skills important for surviving in the wild. Brown trout were reared at three densities (conventional hatchery density, a fourth of conventional hatchery density and natural density) in tanks with or without structure. Treatment effects on behaviour were studied on trout fry and parr, whereupon 20 trout from each of the six treatment groups were released in an enclosed natural stream and recaptured after 36 days. Fry reared at natural density were faster to find prey in a maze. Moreover, parr reared at natural density were faster to eat novel prey, and showed more efficient anti-predator behaviour than fish reared at higher densities. Furthermore, parr reared at reduced densities were twice as likely to survive in the stream as trout reared at high density. In contrast, we found no clear treatment effects of structure. These novel results suggest that reduced rearing densities can facilitate the development of behavioural life skills in captive animals, thereby increasing their contribution to natural production.
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Brockmark
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Adriaenssens
authors.forename: J I
authors.initials: JI
authors.lastname: Johnsson
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D011156:Population Density; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D014337:Trout / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2009 Nov;22(11):2201-14
references.pmid: 19824931
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 7;271(1540):695-9
references.pmid: 15209102
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 May 7;271(1542):957-62
references.pmid: 15255051
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2008 Mar;77(2):229-35
references.pmid: 18217944
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1559-66
references.pmid: 12495513
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 22;273(1591):1281-6
references.pmid: 16720403
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 7;268(1472):1153-8
references.pmid: 11375103
references.citation: Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):131-40
references.pmid: 15161148
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):249-255
references.pmid: 11170714
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6948-53
references.pmid: 18474860
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 7;272(1568):1107-13
references.pmid: 16024371
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1539-47
references.pmid: 12495511
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2008 Jul 5;94(4):529-35
references.pmid: 18474383
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2006 Feb;209(Pt 3):504-9
references.pmid: 16424100
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 25;18(22):1773-7
references.pmid: 19013067
references.citation: Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):4-14
references.pmid: 15161136