title: The missing stink: sulphur compounds can mediate a shift between fly and wasp pollination systems.
abstract: The radiation of the angiosperms is often attributed to repeated evolutionary shifts between different pollinators, as this process drives diversification of floral forms and can lead to reproductive isolation. Floral scent is an important functional trait in many pollination systems but has seldom been implicated as a key mechanism in pollinator transitions. In this study, we suggest a role for sulphur compounds in mediating a shift between specialized carrion-fly and pompilid-wasp pollination systems in Eucomis (Hyacinthaceae). Flowers of closely related Eucomis species pollinated by carrion flies or pompilid wasps have very similar greenish-white flowers, but differ markedly in floral scent chemistry (determined by GC-MS analysis of headspace extracts). Comparison of the floral colours of the four Eucomis species in the visual systems of flies and wasps suggests that colour plays little role in pollinator discrimination. Nectar properties and morphology also do not differ strongly between fly- and wasp-pollinated flowers. By comparing floral scent bouquets and experimentally manipulating the scent of plants in the field, we demonstrate that shifts between wasp and fly pollination in these four congeners can depend on the production or suppression of sulphur compounds (dimethyl disulphide and dimethyl trisulphide) in the fragrance bouquet. This suggests that mutations affecting the production of particular scent compounds could precipitate shifts between pollinators, independently of floral morphology, colour or nectar properties.
authors.affiliation: School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, , Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.
authors.forename: Adam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Shuttleworth
authors.forename: Steven D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Johnson
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003463:Cues; D004175:Diptera / Q000502:physiology*; D035264:Flowers / Q000737:chemistry; D008401:Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; D019668:Liliaceae / Q000502:physiology*; D009812:Odorants / Q000032:analysis; D054817:Pollination / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity; D013457:Sulfur Compounds / Q000032:analysis*; D014863:Wasps / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D013457:Sulfur Compounds
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Feb;190(2):105-14
references.pmid: 14652688
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):530-545
references.pmid: 19552694
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Dec 12;420(6916):625-6
references.pmid: 12478279
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2006 Dec;32(12):2657-65
references.pmid: 17131186
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2004 May;91(5):224-7
references.pmid: 15146269
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Mar;19(3):779-90
references.pmid: 17337627
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;172(3):452-68
references.pmid: 17083676
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Jun;170(5):545-63
references.pmid: 1507155
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008 Jul;194(7):617-27
references.pmid: 18437390
references.citation: Science. 2008 Aug 29;321(5893):1200-2
references.pmid: 18755975
references.citation: Am Nat. 2005 Feb;165(2):225-37
references.pmid: 15729652
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2009 Mar;103(5):715-25
references.pmid: 19116433
references.citation: Science. 2003 Oct 17;302(5644):437-8
references.pmid: 14564006
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Nov 13;426(6963):176-8
references.pmid: 14614505
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2008 Apr;101(5):641-50
references.pmid: 18272528
references.citation: Evolution. 1949 Mar;3(1):82-97
references.pmid: 18115119
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 May;84(2):259-76
references.pmid: 19382932
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2005 Oct;92(10):1624-31
references.pmid: 21646079
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 May 20;18(10):740-744
references.pmid: 18472423