Sealing ability of retrofilling materials following various root-end cavity preparation techniques.
The aim of this study is to compare the sealing efficacy of the retrograde cavity preparations prepared and filled with different equipment and materials. In the study, low speed burs, ultrasonic or Er, Cr:YSGG laser devices were used for cavity preparations and ProRoot MTA and MTA-Angelus as filling materials. Seventy-eight single-rooted teeth were instrumented, root filled, and grouped. Root-end cavities were prepared and filled by using the following: Group 1: Low-speed carbide bur + ProRoot MTA; Group 2: Low-speed bur + MTA-Angelus; Group 3: Ultrasonic retrotips + ProRoot MTA; Group 4: Ultrasonic retrotips + MTA-Angelus; Group 5: Er, Cr:YSGG laser tips + ProRoot MTA; Group 6: Er, Cr:YSGG laser tips + MTA-Angelus. Microleakage was measured using a fluid filtration technique. Differences in the fluid movement among groups were analyzed with a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and LSD test. The results showed a significant difference between the groups prepared with laser and carbide bur (p < 0.05). No difference was found between root-end filling materials (p > 0.05). According to the results of the study, the cavities prepared with Er, Cr:YSGG laser demonstrated significantly lower microleakage in all the filling materials considered.
Koçak
Mustafa Murat
MM
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Kozlu, 67600, Zonguldak, Turkey. mmuratkocak@yahoo.com
Koçak
Sibel
S
Aktuna
Serkan
S
Görücü
Jale
J
Yaman
Sis Darendeliler
SD
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003442:Crowns; D003731:Dental Caries / Q000628:therapy*; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003813:Dentistry; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D053844:Lasers, Solid-State / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials / Q000737:chemistry*; D014070:Tooth / Q000737:chemistry*; D019227:Tooth Apex
D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials
Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Jan;25(1):145-50
19277818
Lasers Med Sci. 2009 Jan;24(1):75-80
18027063
Int Endod J. 2003 Sep;36(9):586-90
12950571
J Endod. 1994 Jun;20(6):279-82
7931024
Braz Dent J. 2005;16(2):149-55
16475611
J Endod. 1994 Apr;20(4):159-63
8035153
Braz Dent J. 2006;17(4):323-7
17262147
J Endod. 1993 Dec;19(12):591-5
8151252
J Endod. 2004 Jun;30(6):406-9
15167467
Int Endod J. 2007 Aug;40(8):590-602
17511788
J Endod. 1999 Mar;25(3):197-205
10321187
Aust Endod J. 2006 Apr;32(1):35-9
16603044
Gen Dent. 2007 Jan-Feb;55(1):27-32
17333962
J Endod. 1995 Sep;21(9):443-5
8537784
Br Dent J. 2000 Mar 11;188(5):266-8
10758689
Endod Rep. 1992;7(1):6-9
1289078
Implant Dent. 2004 Jun;13(2):165-70
15179093
Dent Clin North Am. 1997 Jul;41(3):541-54
9248690
Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(4):371-4
11344519
Photomed Laser Surg. 2004 Aug;22(4):291-7
15345170
Braz Oral Res. 2005 Apr-Jun;19(2):119-22
16292444
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Mar;95(3):345-7
12627108
J Endod. 2005 Nov;31(11):821-3
16249727
J Endod. 2000 Feb;26(2):72-5
11194375
Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(2):111-6
15334613
J Dent. 1998 Sep;26(7):585-9
9754747
J Endod. 2009 May;35(5):741-4
19410096
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Summer;33(4):305-10
19725236
Int Endod J. 2004 Jun;37(6):403-7
15186248
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Aug;80(2):207-13
7552887