Scrapie prevalence in sheep of susceptible genotype is declining in a population subject to breeding for resistance.
BACKGROUND
Susceptibility of sheep to scrapie infection is known to be modulated by the PrP genotype of the animal. In the Netherlands an ambitious scrapie control programme was started in 1998, based on genetic selection of animals for breeding. From 2002 onwards EU regulations required intensive active scrapie surveillance as well as certain control measures in affected flocks.Here we analyze the data on genotype frequencies and scrapie prevalence in the Dutch sheep population obtained from both surveillance and affected flocks, to identify temporal trends. We also estimate the genotype-specific relative risks to become a detected scrapie case.


RESULTS
We find that the breeding programme has produced a steady increase in the level of genetic scrapie resistance in the Dutch sheep population. We also find that a significant decline in the prevalence of scrapie in tested animals has occurred a number of years after the start of the breeding programme. Most importantly, the estimated scrapie prevalence level per head of susceptible genotype is also declining significantly, indicating that selective breeding causes a population effect.


CONCLUSIONS
The Dutch scrapie control programme has produced a steady rise in genetic resistance levels in recent years. A recent decline in the scrapie prevalence per tested sheep of susceptible prion protein genotype indicates that selective breeding causes the desired population effect.
Hagenaars
Thomas J
TJ
Central Veterinary Institute of Wageningen UR, AB Lelystad, the Netherlands. thomas.hagenaars@wur.nl
Melchior
Marielle B
MB
Bossers
Alex
A
Davidse
Aart
A
Engel
Bas
B
van Zijderveld
Fred G
FG
D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding; D020022:Genetic Predisposition to Disease; D005838:Genotype; D009426:Netherlands / Q000453:epidemiology; D015995:Prevalence; D012608:Scrapie / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000517:prevention & control; D012756:Sheep
Vet Rec. 2006 Jan 14;158(2):43-50
16415231
Epidemiol Infect. 2001 Aug;127(1):157-67
11561968
Prev Vet Med. 2001 Oct 11;51(3-4):269-87
11535285
BMC Vet Res. 2010 May 04;6:24
20441587
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Aug;11(8):1274-9
16102318
Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):420-4
11786878
Prev Vet Med. 2002 Dec 30;56(3):227-49
12441238
BMC Vet Res. 2008 Jun 10;4:19
18544152
BMC Vet Res. 2008 Jun 17;4:21
18559085
Proc Biol Sci. 1999 May 22;266(1423):1085-90
10380685
Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Jun;137(6):787-91
19351431
Vet Res. 2008 Jul-Aug;39(4):24
18258167
Vet Microbiol. 2007 Aug 31;123(4):320-7
17521831
J Gen Virol. 2004 Sep;85(Pt 9):2735-2740
15302967
Vet Rec. 2001 Feb 10;148(6):165-71
11258721
Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Jun;137(6):775-86
18687157
J R Soc Interface. 2008 Nov 6;5(28):1343-51
18348959
Math Biosci. 2000 Dec;168(2):117-35
11121561
Math Biosci. 2001 Dec;174(2):61-76
11730857
Rev Sci Tech. 2003 Apr;22(1):121-43
12793776
Prev Vet Med. 2005 Jul 12;69(3-4):175-87
15907568
Prev Vet Med. 2006 Jan 16;73(1):17-31
16169613
Science. 2002 Jan 11;295(5553):332-5
11719694
Vet Res. 2008 May-Jun;39(3):37
18307969
Epidemiol Infect. 2008 May;136(5):703-12
17588284
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jul 7;265(1402):1205-10
9699313