Commentary: Ensuring health statistics in conflict are evidence-based.
The author argues that measuring mortality in conflict settings is fraught with limitations which mostly result in under-estimation of mortality. Some recent publications on this subject have been based upon convenient surveillance processes, or even press reports. The author calls for vigilance against such studies and argues that war related surveillance-based mortality estimates should include measures of sensitivity and representativeness.
Roberts
Leslie F
LF
Program on Forced Migration and Health, Columbia University. lfr2102@columbia.edu.
Lancet. 2004 Nov 20-26;364(9448):1857-64
15555665
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):384-9
18087906
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1992 Jul 24;41(RR-13):1-76
1326713
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1585-8
19369663
Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22 Suppl 1:S56-63
8307676
Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22 Suppl 1:S15-9
8307670
Confl Health. 2009 Nov 06;3:9
19895676
Nature. 2009 Dec 17;462(7275):911-4
20016600