Regional variations in diagnostic practices.
BACKGROUND
Current methods of risk adjustment rely on diagnoses recorded in clinical and administrative records. Differences among providers in diagnostic practices could lead to bias.


METHODS
We used Medicare claims data from 1999 through 2006 to measure trends in diagnostic practices for Medicare beneficiaries. Regions were grouped into five quintiles according to the intensity of hospital and physician services that beneficiaries in the region received. We compared trends with respect to diagnoses, laboratory testing, imaging, and the assignment of Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) among beneficiaries who moved to regions with a higher or lower intensity of practice.


RESULTS
Beneficiaries within each quintile who moved during the study period to regions with a higher or lower intensity of practice had similar numbers of diagnoses and similar HCC risk scores (as derived from HCC coding algorithms) before their move. The number of diagnoses and the HCC measures increased as the cohort aged, but they increased to a greater extent among beneficiaries who moved to regions with a higher intensity of practice than among those who moved to regions with the same or lower intensity of practice. For example, among beneficiaries who lived initially in regions in the lowest quintile, there was a greater increase in the average number of diagnoses among those who moved to regions in a higher quintile than among those who moved to regions within the lowest quintile (increase of 100.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 89.6 to 112.1; vs. increase of 61.7%; 95% CI, 55.8 to 67.4). Moving to each higher quintile of intensity was associated with an additional 5.9% increase (95% CI, 5.2 to 6.7) in HCC scores, and results were similar with respect to laboratory testing and imaging.


CONCLUSIONS
Substantial differences in diagnostic practices that are unlikely to be related to patient characteristics are observed across U.S. regions. The use of clinical or claims-based diagnoses in risk adjustment may introduce important biases in comparative-effectiveness studies, public reporting, and payment reforms.
Song
Yunjie
Y
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA.
Skinner
Jonathan
J
Bynum
Julie
J
Sutherland
Jason
J
Wennberg
John E
JE
Fisher
Elliott S
ES
D019937:Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D006278:Medicare / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011157:Population Dynamics; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D020379:Risk Adjustment; D014481:United States
Health Care Financ Rev. 2004 Summer;25(4):119-41
15493448
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):w34-47
16464904
Arch Intern Med. 1988 Aug;148(8):1753-6
3041938
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR19-32
15471777
N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 2;355(18):1845-7
17079757
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):288-98
12585826
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Apr;160(4):783-5
8456665
J Health Econ. 2004 Mar;23(2):369-89
15019762
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):813-23
18474975
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):273-87
12585825
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5):386-93
17446824
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):740
12364300
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):548-57
20031892
JAMA. 2000 Jun 14;283(22):2975-8
10865276
Health Serv Res. 1994 Oct;29(4):435-60
7928371
Am J Surg Pathol. 1992 Dec;16(12):1133-43
1463092
Arch Intern Med. 2001 Oct 22;161(19):2351-5
11606151
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1838-40
8053752
N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2117-27
14645640
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 29;328(17):1237-43
8464435
N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1493-9
7969300
N Engl J Med. 1985 Jun 20;312(25):1604-8
4000199
Med Care. 2010 Feb;48(2):125-32
20057328