title: Non-equilibrium phase transition in mesoscopic biochemical systems: from stochastic to nonlinear dynamics and beyond.
abstract: A theory for an non-equilibrium phase transition in a driven biochemical network is presented. The theory is based on the chemical master equation (CME) formulation of mesoscopic biochemical reactions and the mathematical method of large deviations. The large deviations theory provides an analytical tool connecting the macroscopic multi-stability of an open chemical system with the multi-scale dynamics of its mesoscopic counterpart. It shows a corresponding non-equilibrium phase transition among multiple stochastic attractors. As an example, in the canonical phosphorylation-dephosphorylation system with feedback that exhibits bistability, we show that the non-equilibrium steady-state (NESS) phase transition has all the characteristics of classic equilibrium phase transition: Maxwell construction, a discontinuous first-derivative of the 'free energy function', Lee-Yang's zero for a generating function and a critical point that matches the cusp in nonlinear bifurcation theory. To the biochemical system, the mathematical analysis suggests three distinct timescales and needed levels of description. They are (i) molecular signalling, (ii) biochemical network nonlinear dynamics, and (iii) cellular evolution. For finite mesoscopic systems such as a cell, motions associated with (i) and (iii) are stochastic while that with (ii) is deterministic. Both (ii) and (iii) are emergent properties of a dynamic biochemical network.
authors.affiliation: School of Mathematical Sciences and Centre for Computational Systems Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. gehao@fudan.edu.cn
authors.forename: Hao
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ge
authors.forename: Hong
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Qian
mesh_terms: D025461:Feedback, Physiological; D008954:Models, Biological; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D010766:Phosphorylation; D015398:Signal Transduction; D013269:Stochastic Processes
references.citation: Chaos. 2001 Mar;11(1):227-236
references.pmid: 12779456
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2007 Jan 14;126(2):024109
references.pmid: 17228945
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2004 May 15;120(19):8898-905
references.pmid: 15267825
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Aug 19;89(8):080601
references.pmid: 12190450
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Feb 23;98(8):080602
references.pmid: 17359081
references.citation: Phys Rev A. 1990 May 15;41(10):5320-5324
references.pmid: 9902917
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Oct 2;103(14):148103
references.pmid: 19905606
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Jan 21;94(2):028101
references.pmid: 15698232
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Oct;24(10):1235-40
references.pmid: 17033664
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jan 4;97(1):32-7
references.pmid: 10618366
references.citation: Syst Biol (Stevenage). 2004 Dec;1(2):230-6
references.pmid: 17051695
references.citation: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Mar;9(3):255-62
references.pmid: 18292780
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Jun 30;2(6):e80
references.pmid: 16846247
references.citation: Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2007;58:35-55
references.pmid: 17037977
references.citation: Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2007;58:113-42
references.pmid: 17059360
references.citation: J R Soc Interface. 2009 Oct 6;6(39):925-40
references.pmid: 19095615
references.citation: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009 Jun 28;11(24):4861-70
references.pmid: 19506761
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2006 Aug 10;110(31):15063-74
references.pmid: 16884217
references.citation: J Comput Sci Technol. 2010 Jan;25(1):154-168
references.pmid: 24999297
references.citation: Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1987 Dec 15;36(12):5782-5790
references.pmid: 9898868