Influence of flap thickness on visual and refractive outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with a mechanical keratome.
OBJECTIVE
To study the effect of flap thickness on visual acuity and refractive outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using 2 blade types with a mechanical microkeratome.


METHODS
Emory Vision, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.


METHODS
This retrospective analysis was of LASIK cases performed between January 2005 and June 2006 using an Amadeus I microkeratome and an ML7090 CLB blade (blade A) or a Surepass blade (blade B). Outcomes analyzed included flap thickness, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), the enhancement rate, and surgical complications 3 months postoperatively.


RESULTS
Two hundred sixty-three eyes of 153 patients were analyzed; blade A was used in 158 eyes and blade B, in 105 eyes. The mean flap thickness was significantly thinner with blade A than with blade B (107 microm +/- 12 [SD] versus 130 +/- 20 microm) (P<.0001). There was no overall correlation with either blade between flap thickness and UDVA, CDVA, or MRSE (all r<0.2). At 3 months, there was no statistically significant difference in UDVA, CDVA, or MRSE between the 2 blade groups at 3 months (all P > .10), and there was no difference in the complication rates.


CONCLUSIONS
Flap thickness did not affect visual or refractive outcomes with a mechanical microkeratome with either blade type.
Bansal
Alok S
AS
Emory Eye Center and Emory Vision, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Doherty
Terrence
T
Randleman
J Bradley
JB
Stulting
R Doyle
RD
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003319:Corneal Stroma / Q000473:pathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007431:Intraoperative Complications; D020731:Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ / Q000295:instrumentation*; D054018:Lasers, Excimer / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009216:Myopia / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012029:Refraction, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013524:Surgical Flaps / Q000473:pathology*; D014792:Visual Acuity / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
J Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;24(1):S85-9
18269156
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 May;30(5):964-77
15130631
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug;17(4):406-12
16900036
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):279-83
16565005
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec;34(12):2073-8
19027562
J Refract Surg. 2008 May;24(5):524-9
18494346
Ophthalmology. 1999 Jan;106(1):13-20
9917775
J Refract Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;20(6):790-6
15586761
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Aug;32(8):1276-80
16863961
Ophthalmology. 2007 Aug;114(8):1482-90
17350688
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Jan;28(1):23-8
11777706
Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;42(4):592-9
17641703
J Refract Surg. 2007 Nov;23(9 Suppl):S1050-3
18047006
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jul;31(7):1357-65
16105607
J Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;25(1):33-6
19244951
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):437-43
11264134
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul;19(4):325-9
18545016
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1075-82
19486798
Ophthalmology. 2003 Feb;110(2):267-75
12578766
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;147(6):966-72, 972.e1
19327748
Eye (Lond). 2005 Dec;19(12):1290-6
15618975
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Mar;34(3):407-10
18299064
Ophthalmology. 2007 May;114(5):983-8
17337064