Theoretical ingredients of a Casimir analog computer.
We derive a correspondence between the contour integration of the Casimir stress tensor in the complex-frequency plane and the electromagnetic response of a physical dissipative medium in a finite real-frequency bandwidth. The consequences of this correspondence are at least threefold: First, the correspondence makes it easier to understand Casimir systems from the perspective of conventional classical electromagnetism, based on real-frequency responses, in contrast to the standard imaginary-frequency point of view based on Wick rotations. Second, it forms the starting point of finite-difference time-domain numerical techniques for calculation of Casimir forces in arbitrary geometries. Finally, this correspondence is also key to a technique for computing quantum Casimir forces at micrometer scales using antenna measurements at tabletop (e.g., centimeter) scales, forming a type of analog computer for the Casimir force. Superficially, relationships between the Casimir force and the classical electromagnetic Green's function are well known, so one might expect that any experimental measurement of the Green's function would suffice to calculate the Casimir force. However, we show that the standard forms of this relationship lead to infeasible experiments involving infinite bandwidth or exponentially growing fields, and a fundamentally different formulation is therefore required.
Rodriguez
Alejandro W
AW
Department of Physics and Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
McCauley
Alexander P
AP
Joannopoulos
John D
JD
Johnson
Steven G
SG
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Feb 1;100(4):040405
18352246
Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Aug 24;99(8):080401
17930932
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Jul 24;103(4):040401
19659331
Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Jan 14;106(2):020403
21405206
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Sep 4;103(10):103602
19792309
Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Oct 26;99(17):170403
17995304
Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Apr 23;104(16):160402
20482030
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Mar 3;96(8):080403
16606157
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Nov 7;101(19):190404
19113247
Science. 2008 Feb 29;319(5867):1209-11
18309076
Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Dec 24;87(26):260402
11800828
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Sep 18;103(12):120401
19792414
Science. 2001 Mar 9;291(5510):1941-4
11239149
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Dec 1;97(22):220405
17155784