Detecting individual memories through the neural decoding of memory states and past experience.
A wealth of neuroscientific evidence indicates that our brains respond differently to previously encountered than to novel stimuli. There has been an upswell of interest in the prospect that functional MRI (fMRI), when coupled with multivariate data analysis techniques, might allow the presence or absence of individual memories to be detected from brain activity patterns. This could have profound implications for forensic investigations and legal proceedings, and thus the merits and limitations of such an approach are in critical need of empirical evaluation. We conducted two experiments to investigate whether neural signatures of recognition memory can be reliably decoded from fMRI data. In Exp. 1, participants were scanned while making explicit recognition judgments for studied and novel faces. Multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA) revealed a robust ability to classify whether a given face was subjectively experienced as old or new, as well as whether recognition was accompanied by recollection, strong familiarity, or weak familiarity. Moreover, a participant's subjective mnemonic experiences could be reliably decoded even when the classifier was trained on the brain data from other individuals. In contrast, the ability to classify a face's objective old/new status, when holding subjective status constant, was severely limited. This important boundary condition was further evidenced in Exp. 2, which demonstrated that mnemonic decoding is poor when memory is indirectly (implicitly) probed. Thus, although subjective memory states can be decoded quite accurately under controlled experimental conditions, fMRI has uncertain utility for objectively detecting an individual's past experiences.
Rissman
Jesse
J
Department of Psychology, Law School, and Neurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. jesse.rissman@stanford.edu
Greely
Henry T
HT
Wagner
Anthony D
AD
D001519:Behavior; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D011939:Mental Recall; D021641:Recognition, Psychology
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Jan;8(1):9-20
18236327
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Nov;16(11):1645-52
16400158
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Feb;13(2):47-54
19135404
Science. 2005 Dec 23;310(5756):1963-6
16373577
Am J Law Med. 2007;33(2-3):377-431
17910165
J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 14;29(2):508-16
19144851
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13494-9
8942962
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):1787-99
18343462
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Sep;9(9):445-53
16054861
J Neurosci. 2004 Apr 28;24(17):4172-80
15115812
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):424-30
16899397
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;3(4):323-34
15040552
Neuron. 2009 Sep 10;63(5):592-9
19755103
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(4):502-4
19092068
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan;10(1):14-23
16321563
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 10;98(8):4805-10
11287664
Hippocampus. 2006;16(5):504-20
16634088
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jun;7(6):664-72
15156146
Psychophysiology. 1991 Sep;28(5):531-47
1758929
Stanford Law Rev. 2010 Apr;62(4):1119-208
20429137
Neuron. 2008 Nov 6;60(3):412-5
18995814
Neuron. 2005 Sep 1;47(5):751-61
16129403
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Apr;16(2):130-4
16563731
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Apr;17(2):171-6
17303410
Curr Biol. 2010 Mar 23;20(6):544-7
20226665
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):523-34
16791142
Psychophysiology. 1992 Sep;29(5):504-22
1410180
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Mar;4(3):193-202
12612632
Hippocampus. 2007;17(11):1081-92
17696171
J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 16;25(11):3002-8
15772360
Neuron. 2009 Sep 10;63(5):697-708
19755111
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Sep;21(9):1766-81
18823245
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Sep;11(9):379-86
17707683
J Neurosci. 2003 May 1;23(9):3869-80
12736357
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Nov;11(11):1231
18956003
Int J Psychophysiol. 1996 Jan;21(1):15-31
8839121
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 18;45(11):2608-20
17499318
Neurocase. 2008;14(1):82-92
18569734
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2006 Oct;37(4):322-9
17073171
Curr Biol. 2009 Apr 14;19(7):546-54
19285400
J Neurosci. 2006 May 24;26(21):5835-9
16723542
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 25;106(34):14617-21
19706549