title: Beneficent persuasion: techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients' decisions.
abstract: Physicians frequently encounter patients who make decisions that contravene their long-term goals. Behavioral economists have shown that irrationalities and self-thwarting tendencies pervade human decision making, and they have identified a number of specific heuristics (rules of thumb) and biases that help explain why patients sometimes make such counterproductive decisions. In this essay, we use clinical examples to describe the many ways in which these heuristics and biases influence patients' decisions. We argue that physicians should develop their understanding of these potentially counterproductive decisional biases and, in many cases, use this knowledge to rebias their patients in ways that promote patients' health or other values. Using knowledge of decision-making psychology to persuade patients to engage in healthy behaviors or to make treatment decisions that foster their long-term goals is ethically justified by physicians' duties to promote their patients' interests and will often enhance, rather than limit, their patients' autonomy. We describe techniques that physicians may use to frame health decisions to patients in ways that are more likely to motivate patients to make choices that are less biased and more conducive to their long-term goals. Marketers have been using these methods for decades to get patients to engage in unhealthy behaviors; employers and policy makers are beginning to consider the use of similar approaches to influence healthy choices. It is time for clinicians also to make use of behavioral psychology in their interactions with patients.
authors.affiliation: Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030-4311, USA. jsswinde@bcm.edu
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Swindell
authors.forename: Amy L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: McGuire
authors.forename: Scott D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Halpern
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D003657:Decision Making; D037001:Directive Counseling; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D015438:Health Behavior; D006293:Health Promotion; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D009042:Motivation; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000941:ethics; D010565:Persuasive Communication; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics*; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D017009:Professional Autonomy
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):558-63
references.pmid: 14530226
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Nov 28;298(20):2415-7
references.pmid: 18042920
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1990 May 31;322(22):1595-9
references.pmid: 2336090
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007 Mar;13(1):11-21
references.pmid: 17385998
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 27;357(13):1340-4
references.pmid: 17898105
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 11;357(15):1465-9
references.pmid: 17928592
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2005 Jun;11(2):111-23
references.pmid: 15998183
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):327-31
references.pmid: 8778455
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2006 Nov;25(6):688-95
references.pmid: 17100497
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Nov;46(412):661-3
references.pmid: 8978112
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2002 May 13;162(9):977-80
references.pmid: 11996605
references.citation: CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 May-Jun;57(3):147-67
references.pmid: 17507441
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000134
references.pmid: 19707575
references.citation: J Health Commun. 2006 Jun;11(4):391-407
references.pmid: 16720537
references.citation: Health Psychol. 1995 Mar;14(2):178-84
references.pmid: 7789354
references.citation: BMJ. 2009 May 28;338:b2159
references.pmid: 19477893