title: [Analysis of flap thickness by anterior segment optical coherence tomography in different flap preparation styles of excimer laser surgery].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess and compare the accuracy and regularity and short-term change of corneal flap in different flap preparation styles.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eighty eyes of 40 cases were treated with laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. One hundred and fifty-five eyes of 78 cases were treated with laser in situ keratomileusis with 90 microm microkeratome flap preparation and eighty-two eyes of 42 cases were treated with laser in situ keratomileusis with 100 microm femtosecond laser flap preparation. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was used to assess the thickness of epithelial or stromal flaps created with M2 microkeratome or VisuMax femtosecond laser by the same investigator 1 hour, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, respectively. The thickness of twenty-five measuring points across each flap in LASIK, which were 1.5 mm, 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm away from vertex of cornea on the horizontal, vertical, 45 degrees and 135 degrees meridian respectively and the vertex of cornea itself, was evaluated. The results were analyzed with t-test or ANOVA by SPSS software.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The thickness of epithelial flaps was (57.91 + or - 6.76), (54.94 + or - 4.65), (54.96 + or - 2.70), (55.26 + or - 4.27) and (53.86 + or - 5.56) microm at 1 hour, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months respectively, with statistical significant difference between 1 hour and the other time points (F = 20.25, P < 0.05). The average thickness of stromal flaps on the vertex of cornea in microkeratome group was (129.16 + or - 12.10) microm, while (112.69 + or - 5.12) microm in the femtosecond laser group, which means the accuracy of flap preparation with femtosecond laser is better than with microkeratome. The absolute difference between actual and average thickness was (13.16 + or - 4.78) and (5.26 + or - 1.21) microm in the microkeratome group and femtosecond laser group, which means the reproducibility of flap preparation with femtosecond laser is better than with microkeratome as well. Flap morphology showed the feature of thin central area and thick peripheral area in microkeratome flap and uniformity in femtosecond laser flap, which illustrated the better regularity of femtosecond laser flap preparation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Anterior segment optical coherence tomography is a safe, quick and reliable facility to examine and assess flap morphology. Our results showed the accuracy and regularity of femtosecond laser flap preparation outweighed microkeratome flap preparation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China.
authors.forename: Zhi-qiang
authors.initials: ZQ
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.forename: Ye
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Xu
authors.forename: Pei-jun
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Yao
authors.forename: Bing
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Qin
authors.forename: Xing-tao
authors.initials: XT
authors.lastname: Zhou
authors.forename: Ren-yuan
authors.initials: RY
authors.lastname: Chu
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003315:Cornea / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D016039:Corneal Transplantation; D006801:Humans; D020731:Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ / Q000379:methods*; D054018:Lasers, Excimer; D009216:Myopia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D011859:Radiography; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D041623:Tomography, Optical Coherence; D055815:Young Adult