Post-eclosion odor experience modifies olfactory receptor neuron coding in Drosophila.
Olfactory responses of Drosophila undergo pronounced changes after eclosion. The flies develop attraction to odors to which they are exposed and aversion to other odors. Behavioral adaptation is correlated with changes in the firing pattern of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs). In this article, we present an information-theoretic analysis of the firing pattern of ORNs. Flies reared in a synthetic odorless medium were transferred after eclosion to three different media: (i) a synthetic medium relatively devoid of odor cues, (ii) synthetic medium infused with a single odorant, and (iii) complex cornmeal medium rich in odors. Recordings were made from an identified sensillum (type II), and the Jensen-Shannon divergence (D(JS)) was used to assess quantitatively the differences between ensemble spike responses to different odors. Analysis shows that prolonged exposure to ethyl acetate and several related esters increases sensitivity to these esters but does not improve the ability of the fly to distinguish between them. Flies exposed to cornmeal display varied sensitivity to these odorants and at the same time develop greater capacity to distinguish between odors. Deprivation of odor experience on an odorless synthetic medium leads to a loss of both sensitivity and acuity. Rich olfactory experience thus helps to shape the ORNs response and enhances its discriminative power. The experiments presented here demonstrate an experience-dependent adaptation at the level of the receptor neuron.
Iyengar
Atulya
A
Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Chakraborty
Tuhin Subhra
TS
Goswami
Sarit Pati
SP
Wu
Chun-Fang
CF
Siddiqi
Obaid
O
D000818:Animals; D004331:Drosophila melanogaster / Q000502:physiology*; D009812:Odorants; D018034:Olfactory Receptor Neurons / Q000502:physiology*
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:139-66
11283308
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Aug;3(8):780-5
10903570
J Neurogenet. 2009;23(1-2):210-9
19058083
Science. 1999 Oct 22;286(5440):723-8
10531051
Nature. 1999 Jul 22;400(6742):375-8
10432117
Cell. 2006 Apr 7;125(1):143-60
16615896
Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):709-13
17581587
Genetics. 2001 Nov;159(3):1059-72
11729153
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Nov;10(11):1474-82
17922008
Behav Genet. 1986 May;16(3):375-405
3092798
J Neurosci. 2001 Aug 15;21(16):6274-82
11487650
Neuron. 2003 Mar 6;37(5):827-41
12628173
Behav Brain Res. 1998 Sep;95(1):23-9
9754873
Cell. 2003 Jan 24;112(2):271-82
12553914
Neuron. 1993 Jul;11(1):1-14
8338661
J Neurobiol. 2006 Nov;66(13):1452-66
17013923
Science. 2000 Dec 22;290(5500):2319-23
11125149
Curr Biol. 2005 Sep 6;15(17):1535-47
16139208
J Comp Physiol A. 1985 Sep;157(2):263-77
3939242
Neuron. 2008 Jul 31;59(2):311-21
18667158
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Apr;65(4 Pt 1):041905
12005871
Nature. 2009 Sep 10;461(7261):277-81
19710651
J Exp Biol. 1995 May;198(Pt 5):1099-104
8627145
Neuron. 2007 Dec 6;56(5):838-50
18054860
Cell. 2000 Jul 21;102(2):147-59
10943836
Nature. 2008 Apr 24;452(7190):1007-11
18408711
Cell. 2007 Mar 23;128(6):1187-203
17382886
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 10;104(28):11826-31
17596338
Cell. 2007 Feb 9;128(3):601-12
17289577
Neural Comput. 2007 Jul;19(7):1683-719
17521276
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Apr;4(4):266-75
12671643
Biosystems. 2000 Oct-Dec;58(1-3):133-41
11164640
J Exp Biol. 2004 Jan;207(Pt 1):123-31
14638839
Curr Biol. 2008 Jun 3;18(11):803-7
18499459
Nature. 2008 Apr 24;452(7190):1002-6
18408712
Front Syst Neurosci. 2008 Jun 24;2:3
18958247
Dev Cell. 2008 May;14(5):762-74
18477458
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Mar;71(3):708-12
4207071