Generation of microsatellite repeat families by RTE retrotransposons in lepidopteran genomes.
BACKGROUND
Developing lepidopteran microsatellite DNA markers can be problematical, as markers often exhibit multiple banding patterns and high frequencies of non-amplifying "null" alleles. Previous studies identified sequences flanking simple sequence repeat (SSR) units that are shared among many lepidopteran species and can be grouped into microsatellite-associated DNA families. These families are thought to be associated with unequal crossing-over during DNA recombination or with transposable elements (TEs).


RESULTS
We identified full-length lepidopteran non-LTR retrotransposable elements of the RTE clade in Heliconius melpomene and Bombyx mori. These retroelements possess a single open reading frame encoding the Exonuclease/Endonuclease/Phosphatase and the Reverse Transcriptase/nLTR domains, a 5' UTR (untranslated region), and an extremely short 3' UTR that regularly consists of SSR units. Phylogenetic analysis supported previous suggestions of horizontal transfer among unrelated groups of organisms, but the diversity of lepidopteran RTE elements appears due to ancient divergence of ancestral elements rather than introgression by horizontal transfer. Similarity searches of lepidopteran genomic sequences in GenBank identified partial RTE elements, usually consisting of the 3' terminal region, in 29 species. Furthermore, we identified the C-terminal end of the Reverse Transcriptase/nLTR domain and the associated 3' UTR in over 190 microsatellite markers from 22 lepidopteran species, accounting for 10% of the lepidopteran microsatellites in GenBank. Occasional retrotransposition of autonomous elements, frequent retrotransposition of 3' partial elements, and DNA replication slippage during retrotransposition offers a mechanistic explanation for the association of SSRs with RTE elements in lepidopteran genomes.


CONCLUSIONS
Non-LTR retrotransposable elements of the RTE clade therefore join a diverse group of TEs as progenitors of SSR units in various organisms. When microsatellites are isolated using standard SSR enrichment protocols and primers designed at complementary repeated regions, amplification from multiple genomic sites can cause scoring difficulties that compromise their utility as markers. Screening against RTE elements in the isolation procedure provides one strategy for minimizing this problem.
Tay
Wee Tek
WT
Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, Department of Genetics, Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Behere
Gajanan T
GT
Batterham
Philip
P
Heckel
David G
DG
D000818:Animals; D012831:Bombyx / Q000235:genetics*; D002080:Butterflies / Q000235:genetics*; D016678:Genome; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D010802:Phylogeny; D018626:Retroelements
D018626:Retroelements
Bull Entomol Res. 2008 Oct;98(5):509-18
18826667
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W596-9
16845078
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Jul 14;7:117
17629927
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(6):2746-52
17406531
BMC Genomics. 2005 Nov 04;6:154
16271150
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Mar;18(3):384-92
11230539
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 May;18(5):848-57
11319268
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 25;93(13):6470-5
8692839
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Jun 25;7:93
17588269
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Sep;15(9):1123-34
9729877
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Oct;18(10):1849-63
11557792
Insect Mol Biol. 2007 Apr;16(2):175-85
17298557
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Nov;16(11):1427-38
10555274
Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 May 11;21(9):2117-23
8389039
Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 May 25;12(10):4127-38
6328411
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Mar 23;7:46
17381843
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 8;102(45):16303-8
16263926
Bull Entomol Res. 2005 Aug;95(4):381-92
16048686
Mol Ecol. 2004 Jun;13(6):1693-700
15140111
J Econ Entomol. 2006 Feb;99(1):155-63
16573336
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 12;6:298
16343337
Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Nov;20(11):1811-25
12832632
Mol Ecol. 2002 Mar;11(3):347-54
11918774
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Mar;24(3):621-31
17150975
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Oct;19(10):507-9
16701315
Int J Biol Sci. 2006;2(2):48-53
16733533
J Econ Entomol. 2005 Dec;98(6):2210-9
16539153
Annu Rev Genet. 2001;35:501-38
11700292
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Jun;16(6):793-805
10368957
Heredity (Edinb). 2007 May;98(5):320-8
17327875
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Sep;15(9):376-377
10931678
Plant J. 2000 Mar;21(5):495-505
10758500
Plant J. 1999 Feb;17(4):415-25
10205898
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 13;104(11):4467-72
17360547
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Oct;73(4):744-8
16222019
Curr Biol. 1997 Apr 1;7(4):R245-8
9162502
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
9254694
FEBS Lett. 1996 Feb 12;380(1-2):1-7
8603714
Nature. 1986 Aug 14-20;322(6080):652-6
3748144