title: Evaluation of PCR inhibitory effect of enrichment broths and comparison of DNA extraction methods for detection of Salmonella Enteritidis using real-time PCR assay.
abstract: The best enrichment broth and DNA extraction scheme was determined for rapid and sensitive detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in steamed pork using real-time PCR. The inhibitory effect of commonly used Salmonella enrichment broths, Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) and Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate with novobiocin (MKTTn), on real-time PCR was confirmed. The inhibition of PCR was statistically significant (p < 0.05) in RV and MKTTn, as compared with buffered peptone water (BPW) or phosphate-buffered saline. The inhibitory effect of the selective enrichment media was successfully removed by using a modified DNA extraction, PrepMan Ultra Reagent with an additional washing step or the DNeasy Tissue Kit. In three experiments, when applied to detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in steamed pork, the real-time PCR coupled with single 24 h enrichment with BPW performed better than double 48 h enrichment with BPW plus RV or MKTTn. The simple real-time PCR assay using BPW proved to be a rapid and sensitive test for detection of low concentrations of Salmonella Enteritidis in steamed pork samples as compared with the conventional culture method.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea.
authors.forename: Ji Yeon
authors.initials: JY
authors.lastname: Hyeon
authors.forename: In Gyun
authors.initials: IG
authors.lastname: Hwang
authors.forename: Hyo Sun
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Kwak
authors.forename: Chankyu
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: In Soo
authors.initials: IS
authors.lastname: Choi
authors.forename: Kun Ho
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Seo
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003470:Culture Media; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D005516:Food Microbiology; D006801:Humans; D008460:Meat / Q000382:microbiology*; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods; D012480:Salmonella Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012477:Salmonella enteritidis / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D013048:Specimen Handling / Q000379:methods; D013552:Swine
chemical_list: D003470:Culture Media; D004269:DNA, Bacterial
references.citation: Mutat Res. 2002 Sep 30;506-507:55-63
references.pmid: 12351145
references.citation: Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;37(5):386-91
references.pmid: 14633109
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jan;67(1):449-52
references.pmid: 11133478
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Dec;42(12):5832-6
references.pmid: 15583319
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Mar;69(3):1844-6
references.pmid: 12620880
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Oct;63(10):3741-51
references.pmid: 9327537
references.citation: Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;36(4):217-21
references.pmid: 12641714
references.citation: Food Microbiol. 2006 Sep;23(6):599-604
references.pmid: 16943057
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):995-8
references.pmid: 9157172
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Dec;70(12):7046-52
references.pmid: 15574899
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2643-6
references.pmid: 8567898
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jul;43(7):3033-7
references.pmid: 16000411
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 1992 Sep;17(1):37-45
references.pmid: 1476866
references.citation: FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005 May 1;44(2):177-82
references.pmid: 15866213
references.citation: J Food Prot. 2006 Feb;69(2):282-7
references.pmid: 16496566
references.citation: J AOAC Int. 2003 Jul-Aug;86(4):775-90
references.pmid: 14509439
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1300-7
references.pmid: 1696283
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Mar 3;40(1-2):1-8
references.pmid: 9600604