title: Comparison of different microanastomosis training models : model accuracy and practicality.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The authors evaluated the accuracies and ease of use of several commonly used microanastomosis training models (synthetic tube, chicken wing, and living rat model).
  
  
  METHODS
  A survey was conducted among neurosurgeons and neurosurgery residents at a workshop held in 2009 at the authors' institute. Questions addressed model accuracy (similarity to real vessels and actual procedures) and practicality (availability of materials and ease of application in daily practice). Answers to each question were rated using a 5-point scale. Participants were also asked what types of training methods they would chose to improve their skills and to introduce the topic to other neurosurgeons or neurosurgery residents.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 24 participants, 20 (83.3%) responded to the survey. The living rat model was favored for model accuracy (p < 0.001; synthetic tube -0.95 +/- 0.686, chicken wing, 0.15 +/- 0.587, and rat, 1.75 +/- 0.444) and the chicken wing model for practicality (p < 0.001; synthetic tube -1.55 +/- 0.605, chicken wing, 1.80 +/- 0.523, and rat, 1.30 +/- 0.923). All (100%) chose the living rat model for improving their skills, and for introducing the subject to other neurosurgeons or neurosurgery residents, the chicken wing and living rat models were selected by 18 (90%) and 20 (100%), respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Of 3 methods examined, the chicken wing model was found to be the most practical, but the living rat model was found to represent reality the best. We recommend the chicken wing model to train surgeons who have mastered basic techniques, and the living rat model for experienced surgeons to maintain skill levels.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Gangwon, Korea.
authors.forename: Gyojun
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Hwang
authors.forename: Chang Wan
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Oh
authors.forename: Sukh Que
authors.initials: SQ
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Seung Hun
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Sheen
authors.forename: Jae Seung
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Bang
authors.forename: Hyun-Seung
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Kang
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):374-81
references.pmid: 15273564
references.citation: Surg Neurol. 1986 Sep;26(3):218-21
references.pmid: 3526597
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1985 Nov 7;313(19):1191-200
references.pmid: 2865674
references.citation: Ann Plast Surg. 1983 Apr;10(4):331-2
references.pmid: 6847097
references.citation: Surg Neurol. 2009 Dec;72(6):695-9
references.pmid: 19329164
references.citation: Surg Neurol. 2009 Mar;71(3):380-7, discussion 387
references.pmid: 18291461
references.citation: Stroke. 1985 May-Jun;16(3):397-406
references.pmid: 2860739
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2003 Jun;52(6):1495-7; discussion 1497-8
references.pmid: 12762899
references.citation: Surg Neurol. 2006 Aug;66(2):183-7
references.pmid: 16876622
references.citation: Microsurgery. 2005;25(6):500-1
references.pmid: 16134096