Attentional capture and hold: the oculomotor correlates of the change detection advantage for faces.
The present study investigated the influence of semantic information on overt attention. Semantic influence on attentional capture and hold mechanisms was explored by measuring oculomotor correlates of the reaction time (RT) and accuracy advantage for faces in the change detection task. We also examined whether the face advantage was due to mandatory processing of faces or an idiosyncratic strategy by participants, by manipulating preknowledge of the object category in which to expect a change. An RT and accuracy advantage was found for detecting changes in faces compared to other objects of less social and biological significance, in the form of greater attentional capture and hold. The faster attentional capture by faces appeared to overcompensate for the longer hold, to produce faster and more accurate manual responses. Preknowledge did not eliminate the face advantage, suggesting that faces receive mandatory processing when competing for attention with stimuli of less sociobiological salience.
Weaver
Matthew D
MD
School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6006, New Zealand. matt.weaver@vuw.ac.nz
Lauwereyns
Johan
J
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009520:New Zealand; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
Psychol Res. 1990;52(4):317-29
2287695
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):330-42
17767926
J Exp Psychol. 1974 Jul;103(1):62-70
4424680
Vision Res. 1997 Jun;37(12):1673-82
9231232
Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:245-77
11752486
Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):181-99
1621880
Behav Brain Res. 1996 Apr;76(1-2):181-9
8734052
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jan;69(1):5-16
9465410
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Feb 1;17(1):117-23
20945175
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1032-42
19653747
Psychol Rev. 1991 Apr;98(2):164-81
2047512
Cogn Psychol. 1991 Jul;23(3):420-56
1884598
J Vis. 2009 Nov 18;9(12):10.1-15
20053101
Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):998-1006
19000210
J Neurosci. 1984 Jul;4(7):1863-74
6737043
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Jun;22(3):563-81
8666953
Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):94-9
11294237
Percept Psychophys. 1988 Oct;44(4):369-78
3226885
Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
9384378
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):510-5
12930485
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Nov;4(4):565-72
722248
Cognition. 1999 Mar 1;70(2):191-210
10349763
J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 1;17(11):4302-11
9151747
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1048-53
16615327
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Feb;22(1):187-201
8742261
J Vis. 2007 Jul 27;7(10):15.1-8
17997684
J Vis. 2003;3(1):64-74
12678626
Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
7367577
Perception. 2009;38(4):552-68
19522323
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 7;45(1):75-92
16797607
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Winter;7(1):66-80
23961754