An assessment of the resolution limitation due to radiation-damage in x-ray diffraction microscopy.
X-ray diffraction microscopy (XDM) is a new form of x-ray imaging that is being practiced at several third-generation synchrotron-radiation x-ray facilities. Nine years have elapsed since the technique was first introduced and it has made rapid progress in demonstrating high-resolution three-dimensional imaging and promises few-nm resolution with much larger samples than can be imaged in the transmission electron microscope. Both life- and materials-science applications of XDM are intended, and it is expected that the principal limitation to resolution will be radiation damage for life science and the coherent power of available x-ray sources for material science. In this paper we address the question of the role of radiation damage. We use a statistical analysis based on the so-called "dose fractionation theorem" of Hegerl and Hoppe to calculate the dose needed to make an image of a single life-science sample by XDM with a given resolution. We find that for simply-shaped objects the needed dose scales with the inverse fourth power of the resolution and present experimental evidence to support this finding. To determine the maximum tolerable dose we have assembled a number of data taken from the literature plus some measurements of our own which cover ranges of resolution that are not well covered otherwise. The conclusion of this study is that, based on the natural contrast between protein and water and "Rose-criterion" image quality, one should be able to image a frozen-hydrated biological sample using XDM at a resolution of about 10 nm.
Howells
M R
MR
Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Rd., Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
Beetz
T
T
Chapman
H N
HN
Cui
C
C
Holton
J M
JM
Jacobsen
C J
CJ
Kirz
J
J
Lima
E
E
Marchesini
S
S
Miao
H
H
Sayre
D
D
Shapiro
D A
DA
Spence
J C H
JC
Starodub
D
D
Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Nov 5;87(19):195505
11690423
J Microsc. 2000 Jan;197(Pt 1):68-79
10620150
Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Jan 19;98(3):034801
17358687
Biophys J. 2000 Jun;78(6):3178-85
10827994
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Nov 24;97(21):215503
17155748
Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Aug 19;89(8):088303
12190506
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006 Oct;16(5):624-9
16938450
J Ultrastruct Res. 1971 Aug;36(3):466-82
5107051
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2004;33:157-76
15139809
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 28;103(13):4912-7
16549763
Q Rev Biophys. 2008 Aug-Nov;41(3-4):181-204
19079804
Ultramicroscopy. 1995 Oct;60(3):357-73
8525549
Acta Crystallogr A. 1995 May 1;51 ( Pt 3):237-52
7779327
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2005 May;12(Pt 3):257-60
15840908
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2000 Mar;56(Pt 3):328-41
10713520
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2008 Jan;15(Pt 1):62-73
18097080
Structure. 2003 Jan;11(1):13-9
12517336
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Aug 1;101(5):055501
18764404
Appl Opt. 1989 Aug 15;28(16):3397-404
20555712
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2006 Sep;62(Pt 9):1030-8
16929104
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2004 Sep 1;11(Pt 5):432-8
15310961
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003 Jan;20(1):40-55
12542317
Phys Rev Lett. 2004 May 14;92(19):198102
15169448
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2008 Nov;15(Pt 6):593-9
18955765
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15343-6
16219701
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2002 Nov 1;9(Pt 6):327-8
12409617
Ultramicroscopy. 1977 Aug;2(4):337-49
919076
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006 May;23(5):1179-200
16642197
Ultramicroscopy. 1979;04(2):201-10
473421
Opt Lett. 1978 Jul 1;3(1):27-9
19684685
Opt Express. 2003 Sep 22;11(19):2344-53
19471343
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2007 Jan;14(Pt 1):1-3
17211066
Science. 2002 Nov 8;298(5596):1209-13
12424373
Q Rev Biophys. 2004 Feb;37(1):3-13
17390603
Ultramicroscopy. 1998 Nov;75(2):85-104
9836467
Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):752-7
10963603
Phys Rev Lett. 2003 May 2;90(17):175501
12786079
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2009 Mar;16(Pt 2):133-42
19240325
Q Rev Biophys. 1995 Feb;28(1):33-130
7676009
J Microsc. 1978 Jan;112(1):127-38
347079