Experimental evidence for limited vocal recognition in a wild primate: implications for the social complexity hypothesis.
Although monitoring social information is a key aspect of the social complexity hypothesis, surprisingly little work has compared social knowledge across different species of wild animals. In the present study, I use playback experiments to test for individual recognition in wild male geladas (Theropithecus gelada) to compare with published accounts of social knowledge in chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). Geladas and baboons are closely related primates living in socially complex groups that differ dramatically in group size-geladas routinely associate with more than 10 times the number of conspecifics than do baboons. Using grunts from non-rival males to simulate approaches, I examined the strength of a subject male's response when the 'approach' was from the direction of (i) non-rival males (control), or (ii) rival males (a more salient stimulus if playback grunts are not recognized by the subject). I compared responses separately based on the degree of social overlap between the caller and the subject. Responses indicate that male geladas, unlike baboons, do not use vocalizations to recognize all of the individuals they regularly encounter. This represents, to my knowledge, the first documented evidence of 'missing' social knowledge in a natural primate population. The sharp distinction between baboons and geladas suggests that geladas are either unable or unmotivated to keep track of the individual identity of other males in their multi-level society-even males with whom they have a large degree of social overlap. Thus, these results are consistent with the central assumption of the social complexity hypothesis that social cognition is costly.
Bergman
Thore J
TJ
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. thore@umich.edu
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000818:Animals; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D048549:Papio ursinus / Q000502:physiology / Q000523:psychology; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal; D012919:Social Behavior; D016671:Theropithecus / Q000502:physiology / Q000523:psychology*; D014828:Vocalization, Animal
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 May;101(5 Pt 1):2951-63
9165741
Contrib Primatol. 1979;16:125-54
101334
Science. 2003 Nov 14;302(5648):1234-6
14615544
Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Feb 22;263(1367):173-7
8728982
Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1103-1109
10877888
Science. 1966 Jul 29;153(3735):501-6
5938775
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4436-41
11891325
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):65-9
17188553
Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 3;17(7):619-23
17346970
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 7;276(1670):3099-104
19515668
Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):67-75
10413542
Behav Genet. 1988 Jul;18(4):495-510
3056387
J Evol Biol. 2009 Mar;22(3):644-9
19170823
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 22;273(1583):207-15
16555789
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jun;113(6):3390-402
12822809
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 22;269(1499):1423-8
12137570
Am J Primatol. 1992;28(1):61-71
31941224
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Nov;13(2):348-59
10603263
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1990;55(3-4):109-32
2262173
Science. 2003 Nov 14;302(5648):1231-4
14615543
Evolution. 2007 Dec;61(12):2811-21
17908248