title: Food-web structure in low- and high-dimensional trophic niche spaces.
abstract: A question central to modelling and, ultimately, managing food webs concerns the dimensionality of trophic niche space, that is, the number of independent traits relevant for determining consumer-resource links. Food-web topologies can often be interpreted by assuming resource traits to be specified by points along a line and each consumer's diet to be given by resources contained in an interval on this line. This phenomenon, called intervality, has been known for 30 years and is widely acknowledged to indicate that trophic niche space is close to one-dimensional. We show that the degrees of intervality observed in nature can be reproduced in arbitrary-dimensional trophic niche spaces, provided that the processes of evolutionary diversification and adaptation are taken into account. Contrary to expectations, intervality is least pronounced at intermediate dimensions and steadily improves towards lower- and higher-dimensional trophic niche spaces.
authors.affiliation: Queen's University Belfast, UK. axel@rossberg.net
authors.forename: Axel G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Rossberg
authors.forename: Ake
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Brännström
authors.forename: Ulf
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Dieckmann
mesh_terms: D005075:Biological Evolution; D003198:Computer Simulation; D020387:Food Chain; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010802:Phylogeny
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Aug 22;274(1621):1931-40
references.pmid: 17567558
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Feb 26;427(6977):835-9
references.pmid: 14985761
references.citation: Science. 2008 May 2;320(5876):658-61
references.pmid: 18451301
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):2043-51
references.pmid: 18705389
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Mar 9;404(6774):180-3
references.pmid: 10724169
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 19;102(16):5761-6
references.pmid: 15824324
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Jun 3;88(22):228102
references.pmid: 12059454
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2006 Jan 21;238(2):401-15
references.pmid: 16045940
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1988 Sep;3(9):242-5
references.pmid: 21227240
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2001 Jan 7;208(1):91-107
references.pmid: 11162055
references.citation: Evolution. 2003 Apr;57(4):717-45
references.pmid: 12778543
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1959 Nov;45(11):1607-20
references.pmid: 16590553
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Jul;12(7):652-62
references.pmid: 19453619
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2008 Mar 7;251(1):108-20
references.pmid: 18164730
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 12;103(50):19015-20
references.pmid: 17146055
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2007 May 21;246(2):260-8
references.pmid: 17292921
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2007 Jul 7;247(1):64-76
references.pmid: 17416389
references.citation: Am Nat. 2005 Jul;166(1):E1-13
references.pmid: 15937783
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 1;99(20):12917-22
references.pmid: 12235364
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 18;105(11):4191-6
references.pmid: 18337512
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Oct;74(10):4533-6
references.pmid: 16592451
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2006 Aug 7;241(3):552-63
references.pmid: 16466654