Segmental measurement of breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema using perometry and bioimpedance spectroscopy.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) could detect localised lymphoedema of the arm and to compare BIS measurements with equivalent measures of limb volume by perometry.


METHODS
Women with mild to severe upper limb lymphoedema (n = 29) and women with no history of lymphoedema (n = 11) participated. Commencing at the ulnar styloid of the wrist, 4 × 10 cm segment measurements were made of each arm using both BIS and perometry.


RESULTS
Average BIS inter-limb ratios for the total arm and each arm segment were higher than comparable perometry measures in women with lymphoedema, but similar to perometry measures for women without lymphoedema. Limits of agreement analysis showed that the mean difference between methods varied according to segment measured, ranging from 8.5% for the uppermost segment of the arm to 16.6% for the forearm segment just below the elbow. For all limb segments, there was a positive bias towards BIS measurements, which increased as lymphoedema severity increased.


CONCLUSIONS
BIS can be used for localised measurement of lymphoedema. Because it is specific to extracellular fluid, BIS is more sensitive to localised lymphoedema than perometry.
Czerniec
Sharon A
SA
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, PO BOX 170, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW 1825, Australia.
Ward
Leigh C
LC
Lee
Mi-Joung
MJ
Refshauge
Kathryn M
KM
Beith
Jane
J
Kilbreath
Sharon L
SL
D000368:Aged; D000886:Anthropometry; D001132:Arm / Q000473:pathology; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000150:complications* / Q000601:surgery; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D058266:Dielectric Spectroscopy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008209:Lymphedema / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology; D008875:Middle Aged; D012720:Severity of Illness Index
Lymphology. 1997 Jun;30(2):77-97
9215977
Lymphology. 2000 Sep;33(3):122-35
11019400
Clin Sci (Lond). 2001 Aug;101(2):131-40
11473486
Lymphology. 2007 Mar;40(1):26-34
17539462
Lymphat Res Biol. 2009;7(2):81-5
19522677
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3536-42
18640935
Lymphology. 2001 Mar;34(1):2-11
11307661
Lymphat Res Biol. 2009;7(1):29-45
19302022
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Oct;117(3):541-7
19082708
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;38(2):169-76
8861835
Lymphat Res Biol. 2003;1(2):121-32
15624420
Cancer. 2008 Jun 15;112(12):2809-19
18428212
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Oct;78(10):889-93
18959643
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Jul;36(4):454-62
19581236
Lymphat Res Biol. 2006 Spring;4(1):51-6
16569209
Lymphat Res Biol. 2005;3(4):208-17
16379589
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Sep;117(1):177-82
18563555
Am J Surg. 1999 Oct;178(4):311-5
10587190
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
2868172
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 May;904:571-5
10865807
Lymphat Res Biol. 2005;3(1):3-15
15770081
Lymphology. 2008 Mar;41(1):18-28
18581955
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Oct;59(4):464-72
17901744
Lymphat Res Biol. 2006 Spring;4(1):47-50
16569208
Lymphat Res Biol. 2006 Spring;4(1):42-6
16569207
Cancer Invest. 2010 Jan;28(1):54-62
19916749