Race/Ethnicity and pregnancy decision making: the role of fatalism and subjective social standing.
OBJECTIVE
Rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States differ by race and ethnicity. We examined whether these differences might be explained by maternal fatalism and subjective social standing.


METHODS
We used data from 1070 pregnant women of sociodemographically diverse backgrounds enrolled in prenatal care in the San Francisco Bay area. Logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between attitude variables and a measure of pregnancy decision making ("not trying to get pregnant").


RESULTS
African American women were more likely than others to report not trying to get pregnant with the current pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.22-3.43, p = 0.007). Higher subjective social standing was associated with a lower likelihood of not trying among white and U.S.-born women only (AOR 0.67, p = 0.001 and AOR 0.75, p < 0.001, respectively. Fatalism was associated with not trying in bivariate but not multivariable analyses.


CONCLUSIONS
In this population, the likelihood of reporting not trying to get pregnant was higher among racial/ethnic minorities regardless of subjective social standing. Programs aimed at reduction in unintended pregnancy rates need to be targeted to a broader population of women.
Bryant
Allison S
AS
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0132, USA. bryanta@obgyn.ucsf.edu
Nakagawa
Sanae
S
Gregorich
Steven E
SE
Kuppermann
Miriam
M
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001741:Black or African American; D003469:Culture; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D011247:Pregnancy; D049168:Pregnancy, Unplanned / Q000208:ethnology* / Q000523:psychology; D012923:Social Class; D055815:Young Adult
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 May;16(4):510-6
17521254
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;95(6 Pt 1):874-80
10831984
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Mar-Apr;35(2):94-101
12729139
Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):2009-15
17018834
Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 Mar-Apr;29(2):76-81
9099571
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):198-205
15519962
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jan;60(2):297-311
15522486
Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;18(7):545-51
18504137
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-9, 46
9494812
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Jun;38(2):90-6
16772190
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):192-7
15519961
Matern Child Health J. 2002 Dec;6(4):237-46
12512765
J Health Psychol. 2007 Mar;12(2):285-300
17284493
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jul;67(2):330-40
18440111
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):678-86
17329520
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;192(6):1939-45; discussion 1945-7
15970856
J Reprod Med. 2005 Jun;50(6):389-96
16050563
Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):586-92
11129362
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002 Jul-Aug;34(4):206-11
12214911
Health Educ Behav. 2005 Aug;32(4):474-87
16009745
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;113(1):53-63
19104360
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;14(4):309-13
11101017
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001 May-Jun;30(3):275-82
11383950
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1960-80
17850528
Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):613-8
11129365
Matern Child Health J. 2006 May;10(3):265-76
16382331
Contraception. 2007 Mar;75(3):168-70
17303484
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;107(5):1087-97
16648415
Stud Fam Plann. 2009 Jun;40(2):87-100
19662801