title: Cost-effective diagnostic cardiovascular imaging: when does it provide good value for the money?
abstract: To summarize the results of all original cost-utility analyses (CUAs) in diagnostic cardiovascular imaging (CVI) and characterize those technologies by estimates of their cost-effectiveness. We systematically searched the literature for original CVI CUAs published between 2000 and 2008. Studies were classified according to several variables including anatomy of interest (e.g. cerebrovascular, aorta, peripheral) and imaging modality under study (e.g. angiography, ultrasound). The results of each study, expressed as cost of the intervention to number of quality-adjusted life years saved ratio (cost/QALY) were additionally classified as favorable or not using $20,000, $50,000, and $100,000 per QALY thresholds. The distribution of results was assessed with Chi Square or Fisher exact test, as indicated. Sixty-nine percent of all cardiovascular imaging CUAs were published between 2000 and 2008. Thirty-two studies reporting 82 cost/QALY ratios were included in the final sample. The most common vascular areas studied were cerebrovascular (n = 9) and cardiac (n = 8). Sixty-six percent (21/32) of studies focused on sonography, followed by conventional angiography and CT (25%, n = 8, each). Twenty-nine (35.4%), 42 (51.2%), and 53 (64.6%) ratios were favorable at WTP $20,000/QALY, $50,000/QALY, and $100,000/QALY, respectively. Thirty (36.6%) ratios compared one imaging test versus medical or surgical interventions; 26 (31.7%) ratios compared imaging to a different imaging test and another 26 (31.7%) to no intervention. Imaging interventions were more likely (P < 0.01) to be favorable when compared to observation, medical treatment or non-intervention than when compared to a different imaging test at WTP $100,000/QALY. The diagnostic cardiovascular imaging literature has growth substantially. The studies available have, in general, favorable cost-effectiveness profiles with major determinants relating to being compared against observation, medical or no intervention instead of other imaging tests.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA. hotero@tuftsmedicalcenter.org
authors.forename: Hansel J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Otero
authors.forename: Frank J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Rybicki
authors.forename: Dan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Greenberg
authors.forename: Dimitrios
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Mitsouras
authors.forename: Jorge A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Mendoza
authors.forename: Peter J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Neumann
mesh_terms: D015706:Bibliometrics; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000191:economics*; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000191:economics*; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D018803:Models, Economic; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D012042:Registries
references.citation: Am J Med. 2001 Jan;110(1):33-40
references.pmid: 11152863
references.citation: Surgery. 2002 Aug;132(2):399-407
references.pmid: 12219041
references.citation: Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005 May 25;3:13
references.pmid: 15916702
references.citation: Can J Surg. 2008 Feb;51(1):23-34
references.pmid: 18248702
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):455-63
references.pmid: 18647917
references.citation: J Neuroimaging. 2008 Oct;18(4):355-9
references.pmid: 18321251
references.citation: Semin Vasc Surg. 1997 Jun;10(2):98-105
references.pmid: 9203261
references.citation: Emerg Radiol. 2006 Mar;12(3):133-6
references.pmid: 16362270
references.citation: Health Econ. 2006 Dec;15(12):1311-22
references.pmid: 16786498
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Nov 16;325(7373):1135
references.pmid: 12433761
references.citation: Radiology. 2000 Jun;215(3):791-800
references.pmid: 10831701
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 2005 May;41(5):741-51; discussion 751
references.pmid: 15886653
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2008 Apr;15(4):462-71
references.pmid: 18342771
references.citation: Surg Clin North Am. 2004 Oct;84(5):1189-202, v
references.pmid: 15364551
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 2005 Oct;58(4):506-15
references.pmid: 16178014
references.citation: Am Heart J. 2003 May;145(5):882-7
references.pmid: 12766748
references.citation: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Jan;14(1):53-62
references.pmid: 12525586
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 29;354(26):2822-8
references.pmid: 16807422
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Dec;19(12):1181-91
references.pmid: 15610328
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2000 May;41(5):800-7
references.pmid: 10809195
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Dec;181(6):1653-61
references.pmid: 14627591
references.citation: Am Heart J. 2004 Jul;148(1):106-13
references.pmid: 15215799
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2007 Apr;14(4):411-9
references.pmid: 17368209
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):101-12
references.pmid: 15333770
references.citation: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 Sep;28(3):287-95
references.pmid: 15288633
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84
references.pmid: 18046031
references.citation: J Neuroimaging. 2002 Apr;12(2):148-52
references.pmid: 11977910
references.citation: Int J Cardiol. 2007 May 16;118(1):88-96
references.pmid: 16949690
references.citation: J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Sep;2(9):736-9
references.pmid: 17411920
references.citation: CMAJ. 1992 Feb 15;146(4):473-81
references.pmid: 1306034
references.citation: Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):917-25
references.pmid: 19011188
references.citation: Heart. 2008 May;94(5):e18
references.pmid: 17575328
references.citation: Circulation. 2009 Jan 27;119(3):480-6
references.pmid: 19171871
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Sep 6;46(5):807-14
references.pmid: 16139129
references.citation: Clin Invest Med. 2002 Aug;25(4):127-33
references.pmid: 12220039
references.citation: Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Oct;87(5):975-93, vii
references.pmid: 17936471
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 3;358(14):1509-14
references.pmid: 18385503
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 6;353(14):1516-22
references.pmid: 16207857
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2000 Feb;7(2):67-76
references.pmid: 10730161
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1606-13
references.pmid: 16226195
references.citation: Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Oct;9(5):441-7
references.pmid: 11489646
references.citation: Stroke. 2004 Nov;35(11):2477-83
references.pmid: 15459431
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;15(7):623-32
references.pmid: 19086322
references.citation: JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1253-8
references.pmid: 8849754
references.citation: Radiology. 2001 Jun;219(3):611-20
references.pmid: 11376244
references.citation: Neurology. 2008 May 27;70(22):2053-62
references.pmid: 18420481
references.citation: BMJ. 2006 Mar 25;332(7543):699-703
references.pmid: 16495332
references.citation: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Mar;25(3):213-23
references.pmid: 12623332
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Oct;86(10):1941-8
references.pmid: 16213235
references.citation: Australas Radiol. 1995 Aug;39(3):309-13
references.pmid: 7487774
references.citation: Med Decis Making. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):161-77
references.pmid: 17409366
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec 15;168(12):1481-7
references.pmid: 12893647
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Jul 18;298(3):317-23
references.pmid: 17635892