Efficacy of cleaning products for C. difficile: environmental strategies to reduce the spread of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in geriatric rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE
To review the evidence for the efficacy of products used for environmental or hand cleaning on the rates of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD).


METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for articles pertinent to the efficacy of cleaning products against C. difficile or studies with outcomes related to rates of CDAD. Evidence was level II.


RESULTS
Minimizing the incidence of CDAD in geriatric rehabilitation units is essential to achieving the goals of increasing patient function and independence for discharge into the community. Attention to environmental control of C. difficile and its spores by health care workers and patient visitors is an important secondary prevention strategy.


CONCLUSIONS
Chlorine-releasing agents are more effective than detergents for killing spores produced by C. difficile. No level I evidence is available to determine if the use of chlorine-releasing agents has an effect on rates of CDAD. Hand-washing is currently the recommended strategy for reducing transmission of C. difficile. Alcohol gels do not inactivate C. difficile spores; however, increased use of alcohol hand gel has not been associated with higher rates of CDAD.
Macleod-Glover
Nora
N
Saint-Vincent Hospital, Bruyère Continuing Care, 60 Cambridge St N, Ottawa, ON K1R 7A5. nmacleodglover@bruyere.org
Sadowski
Cheryl
C
D000368:Aged; D001427:Bacterial Toxins / Q000302:isolation & purification; D016360:Clostridioides difficile; D003015:Clostridium Infections / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000635:transmission; D003902:Detergents; D003967:Diarrhea / Q000382:microbiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D004203:Disinfection / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006757:Hospital Units; D006796:Household Work / Q000379:methods*; D006797:Housekeeping, Hospital / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay
D001427:Bacterial Toxins; D003902:Detergents
Am J Infect Control. 2005 Aug;33(6):320-5
16061137
Lancet. 2000 Oct 14;356(9238):1324
11073024
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005 Jul;26(7):650-3
16092747
Can Commun Dis Rep. 1998 Dec;24 Suppl 8:i-xi, 1-55, i-xi, 1-57
11195271
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 May;27(5):479-83
16671029
BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 21;7:61
17584935
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;29 Suppl 1:S81-92
18840091
CMAJ. 2005 Oct 25;173(9):1037-42
16179431
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001 Aug;7(8):405-10
11591202
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;28(8):920-5
17620238
South Med J. 2007 Aug;100(8):782-6
17713303
Postgrad Med J. 2005 Jun;81(956):367-9
15937201
J Hosp Infect. 2008 Oct;70(2):136-41
18694613
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;24(10):765-8
14587940
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Jul;14(7):1031-8
18598621
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002 Mar;23(3):137-40
11918118
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Jun;54(2):109-14
12818583
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Sep;58(9):M813-9
14528037
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 1;46(3):447-50
18181742
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Oct;31(4):995-1000
11049782
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002 Oct 25;51(RR-16):1-45, quiz CE1-4
12418624
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Sep;62(3):601-7
18468995
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD005955
17253572
BMJ. 2005 Sep 3;331(7515):498-501
16141157
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jun;53(6 Suppl):S245-56
15963180
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Jun;57(2):144-8
15183245
Vaccine. 2004 Feb 17;22(7):848-56
15040937
J Hosp Infect. 2002 Jan;50(1):42-7
11825051
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):205-7
17265404
JAMA. 2009 Mar 4;301(9):954-62
19190304