title: Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking.
abstract: The ability to move our gaze to locations of interest facilitates interactions in everyday life. Where do participants direct gaze when multiple locations are of interest simultaneously? We previously demonstrated that, when tracking several moving targets amidst distractors in a multiple object tracking (MOT) task, participants primarily looked at a central point in between the targets (H. M. Fehd & A. E. Seiffert, 2008). This strategy of center-looking is in contrast to a target-looking strategy where participants would saccade from target to target. Here we investigated what factors influence the use of center-looking as well as its effectiveness. By decreasing object speed, we determined that center-looking is not a result of avoiding costly eye movements during tracking. Decreasing object size showed that peripheral visibility is necessary for tracking, but that center-looking continues up to the limits of peripheral visibility. Further analysis revealed that participants often engaged in both target-looking and center-looking by switching gaze from the center to targets and back again. Directly comparing participants' performance when they either did or did not include center-looking along with target-looking revealed that center-looking facilitates tracking performance. These results suggest that there is value in looking at the center that relates directly to the process of tracking multiple objects.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. hilda.m.fehd@vanderbilt.edu
authors.forename: Hilda M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Fehd
authors.forename: Adriane E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Seiffert
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Jun;31(3):592-607
references.pmid: 15982133
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2006 Feb;97(Pt 1):31-50
references.pmid: 16464286
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):390-7
references.pmid: 18488657
references.citation: Nature. 1994 Oct 6;371(6497):511-3
references.pmid: 7935763
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 May;179(3):427-42
references.pmid: 17171337
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Sep 29;337(1281):331-8; discussion 338-9
references.pmid: 1359587
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Sep;60(9):1216-26
references.pmid: 17676554
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Jul;108(1):201-9
references.pmid: 18096148
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul;9(7):349-54
references.pmid: 15953754
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2008 Oct 28;156(4):801-18
references.pmid: 18786618
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Apr;31(2):235-47
references.pmid: 15826227
references.citation: Exp Neurol. 1966 Sep;16(1):65-79
references.pmid: 5923485
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Jan 16;9(1):18.1-24
references.pmid: 19271888
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Jul;43(15):1637-53
references.pmid: 12798146
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1988;3(3):179-97
references.pmid: 3153671
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2007 May;69(4):567-77
references.pmid: 17727110
references.citation: Vision Res. 1986;26(9):1401-16
references.pmid: 3303665
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Jun;47(14):1907-23
references.pmid: 17499833
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):802-8
references.pmid: 18792507
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216
references.pmid: 11689021
references.citation: J Vis. 2005 Mar 07;5(3):177-93
references.pmid: 15929644
references.citation: J Vis. 2003;3(1):49-63
references.pmid: 12678625
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(20):2070-89
references.pmid: 18513781
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):516-23
references.pmid: 17048740
references.citation: Vision Res. 1978;18(10):1297-303
references.pmid: 726271
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2006 Jun;52(4):346-68
references.pmid: 16442088
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Dec 19;7(14):16.1-20
references.pmid: 18217811
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1992 Jul;24(3):295-340
references.pmid: 1516359
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 1995 Sep-Oct;5(5):470-81
references.pmid: 8547793
references.citation: Vision Res. 1975 Jun;15(6):719-22
references.pmid: 1138489
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references.pmid: 9176953
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Jul 14;9(7):9
references.pmid: 19761324
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Oct 30;7(13):14.1-10
references.pmid: 17997642
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jun;59(6):1101-16
references.pmid: 16885145
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001;41(25-26):3559-65
references.pmid: 11718795
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1991 Feb;8(2):440-9
references.pmid: 2007919
references.citation: Science. 1992 Jan 3;255(5040):90-2
references.pmid: 1553535
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Jul;108(1):1-25
references.pmid: 18281028
references.citation: Vision Res. 1974 Oct;14(10):997-1011
references.pmid: 4432400
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422
references.pmid: 9849112
references.citation: Perception. 1999;28(11):1311-28
references.pmid: 10755142
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):127-58
references.pmid: 11245842
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Dec;7(6):1247-57
references.pmid: 6458649
references.citation: Vision Res. 1998 Mar;38(6):895-909
references.pmid: 9624439