Generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement amplitude.
Studies on generalization show the nature of how learning is encoded in the brain. Previous studies have shown rather limited generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement direction, a finding that is consistent with the idea that learning is primarily local. In contrast, studies show a broader pattern of generalization across changes in movement amplitude, suggesting a more general form of learning. To understand this difference, we performed an experiment in which subjects held a robotic manipulandum and made movements to targets along the body midline. Subjects were trained in a velocity-dependent force field while moving to a 15 cm target. After training, subjects were tested for generalization using movements to a 30 cm target. We used force channels in conjunction with movements to the 30 cm target to assess the extent of generalization. Force channels restricted lateral movements and allowed us to measure force production during generalization. We compared actual lateral forces to the forces expected if dynamics learning generalized fully. We found that, during the test for generalization, subjects produced reliably less force than expected. Force production was appropriate for the portion of the transfer movement in which velocities corresponded to those experienced with the 15 cm target. Subjects failed to produce the expected forces when velocities exceeded those experienced in the training task. This suggests that dynamics learning generalizes little beyond the range of one's experience. Consistent with this result, subjects who trained on the 30 cm target showed full generalization to the 15 cm target. We performed two additional experiments that show that interleaved trials to the 30 cm target during training on the 15 cm target can resolve the difference between the current results and those reported previously.
Mattar
Andrew A G
AA
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Ostry
David J
DJ
D000465:Algorithms; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005793:Generalization, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012371:Robotics; D055815:Young Adult
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Apr;79(4):1825-38
9535951
J Neurosci. 2000 Oct 15;20(20):7807-15
11027245
J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
8182467
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Sep;23(7):735-44
19307434
J Neurosci. 2003 Jun 15;23(12):4821-5
12832503
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Aug;84(2):853-62
10938312
J Neurosci. 2000 Dec 1;20(23):8916-24
11102502
J Neurosci. 2003 Oct 8;23(27):9032-45
14534237
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1989;12:157-83
2648948
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;89(2):1165-75
12574490
J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;22(22):9656-60
12427820
Neuroreport. 1996 Oct 2;7(14):2357-61
8951852
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 5;28(10):2426-34
18322088
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jul;78(1):554-60
9242306
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;98(6):3321-9
17928561
J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jul;72(1):299-313
7965013
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jun;97(6):3976-85
17428900
J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 28;25(39):8948-53
16192385
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):1047-51
11495973
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;102(4):2112-20
19657075
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Sep;173(4):689-97
16525798
PLoS Biol. 2003 Nov;1(2):E25
14624237
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 30;93(9):3843-6
8632977
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Sep;100(3):1455-64
18596187
Nature. 2000 Oct 12;407(6805):742-7
11048720
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):111-2
14745452