Cost-effective diagnostic cardiovascular imaging: when does it provide good value for the money?
To summarize the results of all original cost-utility analyses (CUAs) in diagnostic cardiovascular imaging (CVI) and characterize those technologies by estimates of their cost-effectiveness. We systematically searched the literature for original CVI CUAs published between 2000 and 2008. Studies were classified according to several variables including anatomy of interest (e.g. cerebrovascular, aorta, peripheral) and imaging modality under study (e.g. angiography, ultrasound). The results of each study, expressed as cost of the intervention to number of quality-adjusted life years saved ratio (cost/QALY) were additionally classified as favorable or not using $20,000, $50,000, and $100,000 per QALY thresholds. The distribution of results was assessed with Chi Square or Fisher exact test, as indicated. Sixty-nine percent of all cardiovascular imaging CUAs were published between 2000 and 2008. Thirty-two studies reporting 82 cost/QALY ratios were included in the final sample. The most common vascular areas studied were cerebrovascular (n = 9) and cardiac (n = 8). Sixty-six percent (21/32) of studies focused on sonography, followed by conventional angiography and CT (25%, n = 8, each). Twenty-nine (35.4%), 42 (51.2%), and 53 (64.6%) ratios were favorable at WTP $20,000/QALY, $50,000/QALY, and $100,000/QALY, respectively. Thirty (36.6%) ratios compared one imaging test versus medical or surgical interventions; 26 (31.7%) ratios compared imaging to a different imaging test and another 26 (31.7%) to no intervention. Imaging interventions were more likely (P < 0.01) to be favorable when compared to observation, medical treatment or non-intervention than when compared to a different imaging test at WTP $100,000/QALY. The diagnostic cardiovascular imaging literature has growth substantially. The studies available have, in general, favorable cost-effectiveness profiles with major determinants relating to being compared against observation, medical or no intervention instead of other imaging tests.
Otero
Hansel J
HJ
Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA. hotero@tuftsmedicalcenter.org
Rybicki
Frank J
FJ
Greenberg
Dan
D
Mitsouras
Dimitrios
D
Mendoza
Jorge A
JA
Neumann
Peter J
PJ
D015706:Bibliometrics; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000191:economics*; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000191:economics*; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D018803:Models, Economic; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D012042:Registries
Am J Med. 2001 Jan;110(1):33-40
11152863
Surgery. 2002 Aug;132(2):399-407
12219041
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005 May 25;3:13
15916702
Can J Surg. 2008 Feb;51(1):23-34
18248702
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):455-63
18647917
J Neuroimaging. 2008 Oct;18(4):355-9
18321251
Semin Vasc Surg. 1997 Jun;10(2):98-105
9203261
Emerg Radiol. 2006 Mar;12(3):133-6
16362270
Health Econ. 2006 Dec;15(12):1311-22
16786498
BMJ. 2002 Nov 16;325(7373):1135
12433761
Radiology. 2000 Jun;215(3):791-800
10831701
J Vasc Surg. 2005 May;41(5):741-51; discussion 751
15886653
Acad Radiol. 2008 Apr;15(4):462-71
18342771
Surg Clin North Am. 2004 Oct;84(5):1189-202, v
15364551
Ann Neurol. 2005 Oct;58(4):506-15
16178014
Am Heart J. 2003 May;145(5):882-7
12766748
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Jan;14(1):53-62
12525586
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 29;354(26):2822-8
16807422
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Dec;19(12):1181-91
15610328
J Nucl Med. 2000 May;41(5):800-7
10809195
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Dec;181(6):1653-61
14627591
Am Heart J. 2004 Jul;148(1):106-13
15215799
Acad Radiol. 2007 Apr;14(4):411-9
17368209
Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):101-12
15333770
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 Sep;28(3):287-95
15288633
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84
18046031
J Neuroimaging. 2002 Apr;12(2):148-52
11977910
Int J Cardiol. 2007 May 16;118(1):88-96
16949690
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Sep;2(9):736-9
17411920
CMAJ. 1992 Feb 15;146(4):473-81
1306034
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):917-25
19011188
Heart. 2008 May;94(5):e18
17575328
Circulation. 2009 Jan 27;119(3):480-6
19171871
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Sep 6;46(5):807-14
16139129
Clin Invest Med. 2002 Aug;25(4):127-33
12220039
Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Oct;87(5):975-93, vii
17936471
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 3;358(14):1509-14
18385503
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 6;353(14):1516-22
16207857
Acad Radiol. 2000 Feb;7(2):67-76
10730161
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1606-13
16226195
Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Oct;9(5):441-7
11489646
Stroke. 2004 Nov;35(11):2477-83
15459431
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;15(7):623-32
19086322
JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1253-8
8849754
Radiology. 2001 Jun;219(3):611-20
11376244
Neurology. 2008 May 27;70(22):2053-62
18420481
BMJ. 2006 Mar 25;332(7543):699-703
16495332
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Mar;25(3):213-23
12623332
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Oct;86(10):1941-8
16213235
Australas Radiol. 1995 Aug;39(3):309-13
7487774
Med Decis Making. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):161-77
17409366
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec 15;168(12):1481-7
12893647
JAMA. 2007 Jul 18;298(3):317-23
17635892