title: A reduced number of mtSNPs saturates mitochondrial DNA haplotype diversity of worldwide population groups.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The high levels of variation characterising the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecule are due ultimately to its high average mutation rate; moreover, mtDNA variation is deeply structured in different populations and ethnic groups. There is growing interest in selecting a reduced number of mtDNA single nucleotide polymorphisms (mtSNPs) that account for the maximum level of discrimination power in a given population. Applications of the selected mtSNP panel range from anthropologic and medical studies to forensic genetic casework.
  
  
  RESULTS
  This study proposes a new simulation-based method that explores the ability of different mtSNP panels to yield the maximum levels of discrimination power. The method explores subsets of mtSNPs of different sizes randomly chosen from a preselected panel of mtSNPs based on frequency. More than 2,000 complete genomes representing three main continental human population groups (Africa, Europe, and Asia) and two admixed populations ("African-Americans" and "Hispanics") were collected from GenBank and the literature, and were used as training sets. Haplotype diversity was measured for each combination of mtSNP and compared with existing mtSNP panels available in the literature. The data indicates that only a reduced number of mtSNPs ranging from six to 22 are needed to account for 95% of the maximum haplotype diversity of a given population sample. However, only a small proportion of the best mtSNPs are shared between populations, indicating that there is not a perfect set of "universal" mtSNPs suitable for all population contexts. The discrimination power provided by these mtSNPs is much higher than the power of the mtSNP panels proposed in the literature to date. Some mtSNP combinations also yield high diversity values in admixed populations.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The proposed computational approach for exploring combinations of mtSNPs that optimise the discrimination power of a given set of mtSNPs is more efficient than previous empirical approaches. In contrast to precedent findings, the results seem to indicate that only few mtSNPs are needed to reach high levels of discrimination power in a population, independently of its ancestral background.
authors.affiliation: Unidade de Xenética, Departamento de Anatomía Patolóxica e Ciencias Forenses, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain. antonio.salas@usc.es
authors.forename: Antonio
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Salas
authors.forename: Jorge
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Amigo
mesh_terms: D019295:Computational Biology; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D014644:Genetic Variation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D006239:Haplotypes / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Q000235:genetics*; D044382:Population Groups / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2005 May;76(5):883-6
references.pmid: 15791543
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Oct;19(10):1737-51
references.pmid: 12270900
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 15;314(5806):1767-70
references.pmid: 17170302
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2003 May;19(5):257-62
references.pmid: 12711217
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2006 Jun;22(6):339-45
references.pmid: 16678300
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):232-49
references.pmid: 9915963
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 May;17(5):693-6
references.pmid: 19050723
references.citation: Science. 2005 May 13;308(5724):1034-6
references.pmid: 15890885
references.citation: J Med Genet. 1999 Jul;36(7):505-10
references.pmid: 10424809
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Mar;1(1):44-55
references.pmid: 19083727
references.citation: Electrophoresis. 2009 Nov;30(21):3665-73
references.pmid: 19862743
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;71(5):1150-60
references.pmid: 12384858
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5112
references.pmid: 19340307
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Jun;25(6):1209-18
references.pmid: 18359946
references.citation: Electrophoresis. 1997 Jan;18(1):52-4
references.pmid: 9059820
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jun;68(6):1475-84
references.pmid: 11349229
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009 Sep;3(4):261-4
references.pmid: 19647712
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Mar;3(1):87-112
references.pmid: 4667078
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2007 May 3;168(1):1-13
references.pmid: 16814504
references.citation: BMC Med Genet. 2008 Apr 10;9:26
references.pmid: 18402672
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Sep 30;335(3):891-9
references.pmid: 16102729
references.citation: Int J Legal Med. 2004 Jun;118(3):137-46
references.pmid: 14760490
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Mar 12;3(3):e1764
references.pmid: 18335039
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 Jan 13;19(1):1-8
references.pmid: 19135370
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1998 May;62(5):1137-52
references.pmid: 9545392
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Aug 20;3(8):e3016
references.pmid: 18714389
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Nov;75(5):752-70
references.pmid: 15457403
references.citation: Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2118-21
references.pmid: 16360789
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2004 Mar 10;140(2-3):251-7
references.pmid: 15036446
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 5;105(5):1596-601
references.pmid: 18216239
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Dec;85(6):929-33; author reply 933
references.pmid: 20004768
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Oct;69(4):844-52
references.pmid: 11517423
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Nov 18;4(11):e7902
references.pmid: 19924307
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3988
references.pmid: 19098988
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e296
references.pmid: 16187796
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Jun;84(6):740-59
references.pmid: 19500773
references.citation: J Med Genet. 1999 Jun;36(6):425-36
references.pmid: 10874629
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2004 Apr 20;141(1):1-6
references.pmid: 15066707
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 2000 Aug;48(2):188-93
references.pmid: 10939569
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1999 Oct;23(2):147
references.pmid: 10508508
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;71(5):1082-111
references.pmid: 12395296
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2002 May;70(5):1152-71
references.pmid: 11938495
references.citation: Oncogene. 2004 Feb 12;23(6):1314-20
references.pmid: 14647457
references.citation: Electrophoresis. 2006 Jul;27(13):2541-50
references.pmid: 16721903
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Apr;15(4):400-2; author reply 402-4
references.pmid: 17264866
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Nov;67(5):1251-76
references.pmid: 11032788
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2001 Dec 27;124(2-3):97-103
references.pmid: 11792496
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Jun;2(3):e45-8
references.pmid: 19083815
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Feb;72(2):313-32
references.pmid: 12536373
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2008 May;82(5):1130-40
references.pmid: 18439549
references.citation: Genome Res. 2004 Oct;14(10A):1832-50
references.pmid: 15466285