title: Stallion Sperm Viability, as Measured by the Nucleocounter SP-100, Is Affected by Extender and Enhanced by Single Layer Centrifugation.
abstract: On-stud assessment of stallion sperm quality can be problematic. A new instrument, the Nucleocounter SP-100, was validated for measuring stallion sperm concentration and viability. It was subsequently used to evaluate sperm viability in Kenney's extender and INRA96. There was a strong correlation between sperm concentrations measured by the Nucleocounter SP-100 and by the Bürker counting chamber (r = 0.84; P < .001). Similarly, there was a good correlation between sperm viability results from the Nucleocounter SP-100 and flow cytometric results (r = 0.73; P < .001). Sperm viability at 24 hours was significantly better for samples extended in INRA96 than in Kenney's extender (P < .001). Furthermore, sperm kinematics were better for stored samples in INRA96 than in Kenney's extender. Single Layer Centrifugation selected spermatozoa that maintained their viability better during storage for 24 hours than the uncentrifuged samples. In conclusion, the type of semen extender used and Single Layer Centrifugation were found to influence both the kinematics and viability of stallion spermatozoa. The Nucelocounter-SP100 was considered to be a useful instrument for rapidly measuring stallion sperm concentration and viability.
authors.affiliation: Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7054, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Morrell
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Johannisson
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Juntilla
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rytty
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Bäckgren
authors.forename: A-M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Dalin
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Rodriguez-Martinez
references.citation: Theriogenology. 2009 Oct 1;72(6):879-84
references.pmid: 19604571
references.citation: Theriogenology. 1999 Sep;52(4):641-58
references.pmid: 10734363
references.citation: Reprod Domest Anim. 2003 Aug;38(4):305-11
references.pmid: 12887569
references.citation: Cytotechnology. 2006 May;51(1):39-44
references.pmid: 19002893
references.citation: Equine Vet J. 2009 Jan;41(1):53-8
references.pmid: 19301582
references.citation: Theriogenology. 2003 Sep 15;60(5):867-77
references.pmid: 12935864
references.citation: Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Jun;44(3):512-7
references.pmid: 18992087
references.citation: Anim Reprod Sci. 2009 Nov;116(1-2):119-28
references.pmid: 19217226
references.citation: Theriogenology. 1998 Jul 15;50(2):229-36
references.pmid: 10734490
references.citation: Theriogenology. 2003 Oct 1;60(6):1127-38
references.pmid: 12935852
references.citation: Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Sep;107(3-4):268-75
references.pmid: 18524507
references.citation: Theriogenology. 2006 Dec;66(9):2188-94
references.pmid: 16920186
references.citation: Anim Reprod Sci. 2003 Apr 15;76(3-4):205-16
references.pmid: 12586493