Colloquium paper: footprints of nonsentient design inside the human genome.
Intelligent design (ID)-the latest incarnation of religious creationism-posits that complex biological features did not accrue gradually via natural evolutionary forces but, instead, were crafted ex nihilo by a cognitive agent. Yet, many complex biological traits are gratuitously complicated, function poorly, and debilitate their bearers. Furthermore, such dysfunctional traits abound not only in the phenotypes but inside the genomes of eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight several outlandish features of the human genome that defy notions of ID by a caring cognitive agent. These range from de novo mutational glitches that collectively kill or maim countless individuals (including embryos and fetuses) to pervasive architectural flaws (including pseudogenes, parasitic mobile elements, and needlessly baroque regulatory pathways) that are endogenous in every human genome. Gross imperfection at the molecular level presents a conundrum for the traditional paradigms of natural theology as well as for recent assertions of ID, but it is consistent with the notion of nonsentient contrivance by evolutionary forces. In this important philosophical sense, the science of evolutionary genetics should rightly be viewed as an ally (not an adversary) of mainstream religions because it helps the latter to escape the profound theological enigmas posed by notions of ID.
Avise
John C
JC
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. javise@uci.edu
D005075:Biological Evolution; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D016678:Genome; D015894:Genome, Human; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009696:Nucleic Acids / Q000235:genetics; D010684:Philosophy; D012067:Religion; D012641:Selection, Genetic
D009696:Nucleic Acids
J Mol Biol. 1998 Apr 3;277(3):513-7
9533876
Science. 2008 Dec 12;322(5908):1637-8
19074331
Mutat Res. 2007 Mar 1;616(1-2):46-59
17157332
Annu Rev Genet. 2005;39:359-407
16285865
PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep 4;5(10):e254
17803354
Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):60-5
18987735
Trends Genet. 2001 Nov;17(11):661-9
11672867
Cancer Invest. 2002;20(4):557-69
12094550
J Intern Med. 1999 Jul;246(1):11-23
10447221
Nature. 2008 Sep 4;455(7209):64-71
18668037
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Jun;3(6):415-28
12042769
Science. 2002 Dec 6;298(5600):1912-34
12471243
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Oct;4(10):784-90
16953248
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1984 Dec 4;307(1132):247-59
6084252
Nature. 2008 Apr 17;452(7189):872-6
18421352
J Hered. 2005 May-Jun;96(3):171-84
15653558
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1987;52:869-74
3483343
Hum Genet. 1992 Sep-Oct;90(1-2):41-54
1427786
Development. 2005 Nov;132(21):4653-62
16224045
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):1967-71
109836
Science. 2002 Aug 9;297(5583):1003-7
12169732
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2007;77:113-55
17222702
Nature. 2008 Aug 28;454(7208):1042-5
18756228
Hum Genet. 2005 Sep;117(5):411-27
15983781
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Jul;5(7):522-31
15211354
Mol Syst Biol. 2005;1:2005.0030
16729065
Nature. 2008 Sep 4;455(7209):58-63
18668040
Gene. 2006 May 24;373:134-7
16522357
Nat Genet. 2000 Apr;24(4):363-7
10742098
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104 Suppl 1:8567-73
17494753
FEBS Lett. 2005 Mar 28;579(9):1900-3
15792793
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000 Feb;57(2):235-49
10766020
Science. 2001 Feb 16;291(5507):1304-51
11181995
Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8(10):1893-900
10469842
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 24;104(17):7116-21
17438286
Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921
11237011
Hum Mutat. 2003 Jun;21(6):577-81
12754702
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5280-5
12682288
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 24;106(8):2475-6
19211793