title: Seamounts are hotspots of pelagic biodiversity in the open ocean.
abstract: The identification of biodiversity hotspots and their management for conservation have been hypothesized as effective ways to protect many species. There has been a significant effort to identify and map these areas at a global scale, but the coarse resolution of most datasets masks the small-scale patterns associated with coastal habitats or seamounts. Here we used tuna longline observer data to investigate the role of seamounts in aggregating large pelagic biodiversity and to identify which pelagic species are associated with seamounts. Our analysis indicates that seamounts are hotspots of pelagic biodiversity. Higher species richness was detected in association with seamounts than with coastal or oceanic areas. Seamounts were found to have higher species diversity within 30-40 km of the summit, whereas for sets close to coastal habitat the diversity was lower and fairly constant with distance. Higher probability of capture and higher number of fish caught were detected for some shark, billfish, tuna, and other by-catch species. The study supports hypotheses that seamounts may be areas of special interest for management for marine pelagic predators.
authors.affiliation: Oceanic Fisheries Program, Secretariat of the Pacific Community, BPD5 98848 Noumea, New Caledonia. t.morato@gmail.com
authors.forename: Telmo
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Morato
authors.forename: Simon D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Hoyle
authors.forename: Valerie
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Allain
authors.forename: Simon J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Nicol
mesh_terms: D025041:Animal Migration; D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D009792:Oceans and Seas; D010473:Perciformes / Q000502:physiology*; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D014413:Tuna / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Feb 23;439(7079):929
references.pmid: 16495988
references.citation: Science. 2003 Jan 17;299(5605):389-92
references.pmid: 12532016
references.citation: Ecology. 1971 Jul;52(4):577-586
references.pmid: 28973811
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 19;100(17):9884-8
references.pmid: 12907699
references.citation: Science. 2001 Jul 27;293(5530):629-37
references.pmid: 11474098
references.citation: Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):787-90
references.pmid: 17082450
references.citation: Science. 1998 Feb 6;279(5352):860-3
references.pmid: 9452385
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jul;78(4):699-714
references.pmid: 19298616
references.citation: Science. 2002 Feb 15;295(5558):1280-4
references.pmid: 11847338
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853-8
references.pmid: 10706275
references.citation: Nature. 2003 May 15;423(6937):280-3
references.pmid: 12748640
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 15;314(5806):1773-6
references.pmid: 17170304
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Apr 28;434(7037):E1-2; discussion E2
references.pmid: 15858533
references.citation: Science. 2005 Aug 26;309(5739):1365-9
references.pmid: 16051749
references.citation: Science. 2004 May 21;304(5674):1104-5
references.pmid: 15155930