The intentional mind and the hot hand: Perceiving intentions makes streaks seem likely to continue.
People can appear inconsistent in their intuitions about sequences of repeated events. Sometimes people believe such sequences will continue (the "hot hand"), and sometimes people believe they will reverse (the "gambler's fallacy"). These contradictory intuitions can be partly explained by considering the perceived intentionality of the agent generating the streak. The intuition that streaks will continue (reverse) should emerge in contexts involving agents that are perceived to be intentional (unintentional), and should be most common among those who are most inclined to attribute intentions to other agents. Four studies support these predictions, identifying both situational and dispositional determinants of the perceived continuity of streaks. Discussion focuses on the foundational nature of intentionality for perceptions of interdependence between events, the relationship between these findings and existing theoretical accounts, and the inverse possibility that people use perceptions of streakiness as a cue for an agent's intentionality.
Caruso
Eugene M
EM
The University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA. ecaruso@chicagobooth.edu
Waytz
Adam
A
Epley
Nicholas
N
D005715:Gambling / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D033182:Intention; D019545:Intuition / Q000502:physiology*