Virtue or pretense? Looking behind self-declared innocence in doping.
BACKGROUND
Social science studies of doping practices in sport rely predominantly on self-reports. Studies of psychoactive drug use indicate that self-reporting is characterised by under-reporting. Likewise doping practice is likely to be equally under-reported, if not more so. This calls for more sophisticated methods for such reporting and for independent, objective validation of its results. The aims of this study were: i) to contrast self-reported doping use with objective results from chemical hair analysis and ii) to investigate the influence of the discrepancy on doping attitudes, social projection, descriptive norms and perceived pressure to use doping.


RESULTS
A doping attitudes questionnaire was developed and combined with a response latency-based implicit association test and hair sample analysis for key doping substances in 14 athletes selected from a larger sample (N = 82) to form contrast comparison groups. Results indicate that patterns of group differences in social projection, explicit attitude about and perceived pressure to use doping, vary depending on whether the user and non-user groups are defined by self-report or objectively verified through hair analysis. Thus, self-confessed users scored higher on social projection, explicit attitude to doping and perceived pressure. However, when a doping substance was detected in the hair of an athlete who denied doping use, their self-report evidenced extreme social desirability (negative attitude, low projection and low perceived pressure) and contrasted sharply with a more positive estimate of their implicit doping attitude.


CONCLUSIONS
Hair analysis for performance enhancing substances has shown considerable potential in validating athletes' doping attitude estimations and admissions of use. Results not only confirm the need for improved self-report methodology for future research in socially-sensitive domains but also indicate where the improvements are likely to come from: as chemical validation remains expensive, a more realistic promise for large scale studies and online data collection efforts is held by measures of implicit social cognition.
Petróczi
Andrea
A
School of Life Sciences, Kingston University London, Kingston upon Thames, United Kingdom. A.Petroczi@kingston.ac.uk
Aidman
Eugene V
EV
Hussain
Iltaf
I
Deshmukh
Nawed
N
Nepusz
Tamás
T
Uvacsek
Martina
M
Tóth
Miklós
M
Barker
James
J
Naughton
Declan P
DP
D001290:Attitude; D001519:Behavior; D002853:Chromatography, Liquid; D004300:Doping in Sports / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D057230:Limit of Detection; D008297:Male; D013058:Mass Spectrometry; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D028722:Virtues; D055815:Young Adult
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jan 15;106(2-3):230-2
19740612
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2008 Apr 21;3:9
18426575
Ann Epidemiol. 2005 May;15(5):381-9
15840552
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Jan 27;156(2-3):118-23
16410161
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:297-327
12172003
Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):4-27
7878162
Int J Sports Med. 2008 Jul;29(7):607-12
18214812
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2008 Mar;46(3):239-42
18344106
Addict Behav. 2008 Sep;33(9):1131-9
18547737
J Sports Sci. 2008 Mar;26(5):447-56
18274942
Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40(3):299-311
15776978
Br Med Bull. 2008;86:95-107
18385161
J Forensic Sci. 2002 Jan;47(1):211-4
12064656
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008 Sep 05;3:19
18775068
Chem Soc Rev. 2004 Jan 10;33(1):1-13
14737504
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Apr;21(2):224-34
19903314
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Apr;34(3):347-55
17614240
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Feb;34(1):83-9
12060994
Steroids. 2009 Sep;74(9):773-8
19397917
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):17-41
19586237
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80
9654756
Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Jun;154(3):502-21
18500378
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Nov;89(5):672-85
16351361
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 May;29(5):559-67
15272990
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):97-104
17276131
Forensic Sci Int. 1999 May 17;101(3):209-16
10404632
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216
12916565
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):283-94
19439401
Am Psychol. 1996 Oct;51(10):1065-71
8870543
Health Educ Res. 2008 Feb;23(1):70-80
17301058
Sports Med. 2002;32(4):269-84
11929355
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2007 Nov 09;2:34
17996097