title: Colloquium paper: adaptive specializations, social exchange, and the evolution of human intelligence.
abstract: Blank-slate theories of human intelligence propose that reasoning is carried out by general-purpose operations applied uniformly across contents. An evolutionary approach implies a radically different model of human intelligence. The task demands of different adaptive problems select for functionally specialized problem-solving strategies, unleashing massive increases in problem-solving power for ancestrally recurrent adaptive problems. Because exchange can evolve only if cooperators can detect cheaters, we hypothesized that the human mind would be equipped with a neurocognitive system specialized for reasoning about social exchange. Whereas humans perform poorly when asked to detect violations of most conditional rules, we predicted and found a dramatic spike in performance when the rule specifies an exchange and violations correspond to cheating. According to critics, people's uncanny accuracy at detecting violations of social exchange rules does not reflect a cheater detection mechanism, but extends instead to all rules regulating when actions are permitted (deontic conditionals). Here we report experimental tests that falsify these theories by demonstrating that deontic rules as a class do not elicit the search for violations. We show that the cheater detection system functions with pinpoint accuracy, searching for violations of social exchange rules only when these are likely to reveal the presence of someone who intends to cheat. It does not search for violations of social exchange rules when these are accidental, when they do not benefit the violator, or when the situation would make cheating difficult.
authors.affiliation: Center for Evolutionary Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. cosmides@psych.ucsb.edu
authors.forename: Leda
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Cosmides
authors.forename: H Clark
authors.initials: HC
authors.lastname: Barrett
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Tooby
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001519:Behavior; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003071:Cognition; D004989:Ethics; D006801:Humans; D007360:Intelligence; D008954:Models, Biological; D012919:Social Behavior
references.citation: Cognition. 2000 Oct 16;77(1):1-79
references.pmid: 10980253
references.citation: Sci Am. 1978 Apr;238(4):90-108
references.pmid: 418504
references.citation: Cognition. 1999 Oct 26;72(3):269-304
references.pmid: 10519925
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2001 Jul;29(5):757-64
references.pmid: 11531230
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):778-86
references.pmid: 15994098
references.citation: Cognition. 2000 Apr 14;75(1):29-32
references.pmid: 10815776
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2003 Sep 7;224(1):115-26
references.pmid: 12900209
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2006;1(3-4):196-219
references.pmid: 18633788
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1985 Oct;17(4):391-416
references.pmid: 4064622
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2003 Sep;58(9):697-720
references.pmid: 14584987
references.citation: Cognition. 1991 May;39(2):85-105
references.pmid: 1934982
references.citation: Cognition. 1994 Jan;51(1):1-28
references.pmid: 8149715
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2006 Dec;29(6):595-613; discussion 613-50
references.pmid: 17918647
references.citation: Cognition. 1992 May;43(2):127-71
references.pmid: 1617917
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11531-6
references.pmid: 12177408
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):289-344
references.pmid: 10789198
references.citation: Cognition. 1989 Dec;33(3):285-313
references.pmid: 2605884
references.citation: Cognition. 1989 Apr;31(3):187-276
references.pmid: 2743748
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1385-91
references.pmid: 17331743
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Apr;57(3):447-74
references.pmid: 15204136
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11537-42
references.pmid: 12177409
references.citation: Cognition. 1995 Oct;57(1):31-95
references.pmid: 7587018