Monitoring of risk perceptions and correlates of precautionary behaviour related to human avian influenza during 2006 - 2007 in the Netherlands: results of seven consecutive surveys.
BACKGROUND
Avian influenza (AI) is a public health challenge because of ongoing spread and pandemic potential. Non-pharmaceutical measures are important to prevent the spread of AI and to contain a pandemic. The effectiveness of such measures is largely dependent on the behaviour of the population. Risk perception is a central element in changing behaviour. This study aimed to investigate perceived vulnerability, severity and precautionary behaviour related to AI in the Netherlands during seven consecutive surveys in 2006 - 2007 as well as possible trends in risk perception and self-reported precautionary behaviours.


METHODS
Seven web-based surveys were conducted including 3,840 respondents over a one-year period. Time trends were analyzed with linear regression analyses. Multivariate analysis was used to study determinants of precautionary behaviour.


RESULTS
While infection with AI was considered a very severe health problem with mean score of 4.57 (scale 1 - 5); perceived vulnerability was much lower, with a mean score of 1.69. While perceived severity remained high, perceived vulnerability decreased slightly during a one-year period covering part of 2006 and 2007. Almost half of the respondents (46%) reported taking one or more preventive measures, with 36% reporting to have stayed away from (wild) birds or poultry. In multivariate logistic regression analysis the following factors were significantly associated with taking preventive measures: time of the survey, higher age, lower level of education, non-Dutch ethnicity, vaccinated against influenza, higher perceived severity, higher perceived vulnerability, higher self efficacy, lower level of knowledge, more information about AI, and thinking more about AI. Self efficacy was a stronger predictor of precautionary behaviour for those who never or seldom think about AI (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.9 - 2.7), compared to those who think about AI more often (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.9).


CONCLUSIONS
The fact that perceived severity of AI appears to be high and remains so over time offers a good point of departure for more specific risk communications to promote precautionary actions. Such communications should aim at improving knowledge about the disease and preventive actions, and focus on perceived personal vulnerability and self efficacy in taking preventive measures.
de Zwart
Onno
O
Division of Infectious Disease Control, Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. dezwarto@ggd.rotterdam.nl
Veldhuijzen
Irene K
IK
Richardus
Jan Hendrik
JH
Brug
Johannes
J
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000818:Animals; D018562:Disease Transmission, Infectious / Q000517:prevention & control*; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007251:Influenza, Human / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000517:prevention & control*; D020407:Internet; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009426:Netherlands / Q000453:epidemiology; D040242:Risk Reduction Behavior; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult; D015047:Zoonoses / Q000453:epidemiology*
BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 15;7:18
17359545
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Feb;35(1):38-49
17276790
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 3;101(5):1356-61
14745020
J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114
28136248
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Oct;12(10):1620-1
17176595
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Apr 1;38(7):925-31
15034821
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Jan;12(1):88-94
16494723
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;13(2):290-3
17479894
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jun 15;40(12):1713-20
15909256
Risk Anal. 1999 Aug;19(4):689-701
10765431
Health Psychol. 2007 Mar;26(2):136-45
17385964
Health Psychol. 1988;7(4):355-86
3049068
Health Psychol. 2006 Jan;25(1):82-90
16448301
Health Psychol. 1984;3(5):431-57
6536498
Health Educ Monogr. 1978 Winter;6(4):394-405
299611
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Aug;10(8):1486-9
15496256
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Nov;57(11):864-70
14600111
Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;42(Pt 1):55-73
12713756
Risk Anal. 2006 Jun;26(3):617-30
16834622
Science. 1987 Apr 17;236(4799):280-5
3563507
BMC Public Health. 2007 Aug 15;7:208
17697389
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Jan;12(1):81-7
16494722
Risk Anal. 1998 Feb;18(1):85-93
9523446
Prev Med. 2006 Nov;43(5):406-10
16860379
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Mar;52(3):596-604
3572727
JAMA. 2007 Aug 8;298(6):644-54
17684187
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Nov;10(11):1900-6
15550198
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jun;60(11):2629-39
15814187
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Nov;57(11):857-63
14600110
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 May;11(5):677-82
15890118
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;13(9):1307-13
18252100
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Dec;63(12):3113-23
16978751
Risk Anal. 1998 Dec;18(6):805-11
9972583
Am Psychol. 2003 Sep;58(9):723-30
14584989
BMC Public Health. 2007 Apr 02;7:48
17407563