Comparison of properties of cortical echo delay-tuning in the short-tailed fruit bat and the mustached bat.
Target-distance computation by cortical neurons sensitive to echo delay is an essential characteristic of the auditory system of insectivorous bats. To assess if functional requirements such as detection of small insects versus larger stationary surfaces of plants are reflected in cortical properties, we compare delay-tuned neurons in a frugivorous (C. perspicillata, CP) and an insectivorous (P. parnellii, PP) bat species that belong to related families within the superfamily of Noctilionoidea. The bandwidth and shape of delay-tuning curves and the range of characteristic delays are similar in both species and hence are not related to different echolocation strategies. Most units respond at 2-6 ms echo delay with most sensitive thresholds of 20-30 dB SPL. In CP, units tuned to delays >12 ms are slightly more abundant and are more sensitive than in PP. All delay-tuned neurons in CP reliably respond to single pure-tone stimuli, whereas such responses are only observed in 49% of delay-tuned units in PP. The cortical representation of echo delay (chronotopy) covers a larger area in CP but is less precise than described in PP. Since chronotopy is absent in certain other insectivorous bat species, it is open if these differences in topography are related to echolocation behaviour.
Hagemann
Cornelia
C
Institute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of Frankfurt, Siesmayerstr. 70A, Frankfurt, Germany.
Vater
Marianne
M
Kössl
Manfred
M
D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D001303:Auditory Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D002685:Chiroptera / Q000502:physiology*; D004455:Echolocation / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D011984:Sensory Receptor Cells / Q000502:physiology; D013045:Species Specificity; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014828:Vocalization, Animal / Q000502:physiology*
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Mar;21(3):149-56
16701491
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;101(3):1560-74
19036870
Brain Res. 1988 Jun 21;453(1-2):349-52
3401773
Science. 1978 Nov 10;202(4368):645-8
705350
J Neurophysiol. 1986 Apr;55(4):776-805
3701406
Hear Res. 1995 Oct;90(1-2):185-91
8974996
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Jan;31(2):371-85
20074213
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Nov;70(5):1988-2009
8294966
Neuroreport. 1996 Jul 29;7(11):1749-55
8905657
J Neurophysiol. 1983 Jun;49(6):1573-626
6875639
J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 2;28(1):80-90
18171925
Science. 1979 Oct 19;206(4416):351-3
482944
Eur J Neurosci. 1999 Oct;11(10):3669-82
10564374
J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Apr;170(4):393-402
1625215
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):14019-24
9391145
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Jul;84(1):401-14
10899214
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Sep;82(3):1326-38
10482752
J Neurophysiol. 1993 May;69(5):1700-12
8389836
Science. 1979 Jan 5;203(4375):69-73
758681
J Neurophysiol. 1982 Oct;48(4):1011-32
7143030
Eur J Neurosci. 1991 Oct;3(11):1165-1181
12106246
J Neurosci. 1982 Jan;2(1):17-31
7054393
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;103(1):322-33
19906883
J Comp Physiol A. 1986 Sep;159(3):331-7
3772828
Nature. 1993 Aug 12;364(6438):620-3
8350920
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jun;87(6):2823-34
12037185
Network. 1998 Nov;9(4):R53-78
10221571