title: Early results using ultrasound-assisted liposuction as a treatment for fat necrosis in breast reconstruction.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Fat necrosis is a common complication from autologous breast reconstruction that can compromise the aesthetic outcome and can be confused with recurrent breast cancer. Removal of fat necrosis through direct excision can be difficult with lesions in the periphery and may result in contour deformities. The article describes a case series of patients with fat necrosis treated with ultrasound-assisted liposuction.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective database was created consisting of consecutive patients treated with ultrasound-assisted liposuction at a single academic institution. Patient demographics and complications were identified, including initial size of fat necrosis, number of ultrasound-assisted liposuction treatments, and final size of fat necrosis. Surgical technique was standardized over the entire series.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 54 breast reconstructions with fat necrosis treated with ultrasound-assisted liposuction. The average initial size of fat necrosis was 2.72 cm. Twenty-seven lesions (50.0 percent) were treated once, 20 (37.0 percent) were treated twice, and seven (13.0 percent) were treated three times. The final size of fat necrosis was 0.44 cm (p < 0.0001), with an average time to follow-up of 17.8 months. Complete resolution (<0.5 cm) was seen in 44 lesions (81.5 percent). Only one complication, a thermal burn, was seen from ultrasound-assisted liposuction, and this resolved with conservative management.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This case series describes the successful use of ultrasound-assisted liposuction for treatment of fat necrosis after autologous breast reconstruction. The authors find this technique to be safe, effective, and reproducible, as the majority of fat necrosis areas resolved with one or two treatments.
authors.affiliation: London, Ontario, Canada; and Boston, Mass. From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Western Ontario, and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School.
authors.forename: Agnieszka
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hassa
authors.forename: Michael S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Curtis
authors.forename: Salih
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Colakoglu
authors.forename: Adam M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Tobias
authors.forename: Bernard T
authors.initials: BT
authors.lastname: Lee
mesh_terms: D000273:Adipose Tissue / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D001940:Breast / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015187:Lipectomy / Q000379:methods*; D016462:Mammaplasty / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009336:Necrosis / Q000601:surgery; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D018084:Ultrasonography, Interventional
references.citation: Sbitany H, Amalfi AN, Langstein HN. Preferences in choosing between breast reconstruction options: A survey of female plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1781–1789.
references.citation: Rozen WM, Ashton MW. Improving outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:327–335.
references.citation: Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: History and an update on current technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:571–579.
references.citation: Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: Patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:466–475.
references.citation: Peeters WJ, Nanhekhan L, Van Ongeval C, Fabre G, Vandevoort M. Fat necrosis in deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: An ultrasound-based review of 202 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1754–1758.
references.citation: Kroll SS, Gherardini G, Martin JE, et al. Fat necrosis in free and pedicled TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1502–1507.
references.citation: Kroll SS. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:576–583.
references.citation: Caterson SA, Tobias AM, Slavin SA, Lee BT. Ultrasound-assisted liposuction as a treatment of fat necrosis after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A case report. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:614–617.
references.citation: Zocchi M. Ultrasonic liposculpturing. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1992;16:287–298.
references.citation: Keller A. The deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46:474–479.
references.citation: Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL, et al. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1640–1648.
references.citation: Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1153–1160.
references.citation: Ong WC, Chin DC, Lim J, Lim TC. A novel method of debridement of fat necrosis in reconstructed breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:946–947.
references.citation: Góes JC, Landecker A. Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty (UAL) in breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;26:1–9.
references.citation: Piliero PJ, Hubbard M, King J, Faragon JJ. Use of ultrasonography-assisted liposuction for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-associated enlargement of the dorsocervical fat pad. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1374–1377.
references.citation: Buchanan CL, Dorn PL, Fey J, et al. Locoregional recurrence after mastectomy: Incidence and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:469–474.
references.citation: van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–1150.
references.citation: McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Sclafani L, et al. Breast cancer recurrence following prosthetic, postmastectomy reconstruction: Incidence, detection, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:381–388.
references.citation: Schott AF, Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, et al. Clinical and radiologic assessments to predict breast cancer pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;92:231–298.
references.citation: Pain JA, Ebbs SR, Hern RP, Lowe S, Bradbeer JW. Assessment of breast cancer size: A comparison of methods. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1992;18:44–48.
references.citation: Heusinger K, Löhberg C, Lux MP, et al. Assessment of breast cancer tumor size depends on method, histopathology and tumor size itself. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94:17–23.
references.citation: Prati R, Minami CA, Gornbein JA, Debruhl N, Chung D, Chang HR. Accuracy of clinical evaluation of locally advanced breast cancer in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 2009;115:1194–1202.
references.citation: Herrada J, Iyer RB, Atkinson EN, Sneige N, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN. Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:1565–1569.