The learning curve for endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging.
BACKGROUND
Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is an emerging technique for preoperative rectal cancer staging. It is an operator-dependent examination with accuracy closely related to endosonographer experience. In this study, we prospectively analyzed our results of ERUS staging for rectal cancer, aiming to determine its accuracy and to define the learning curve of the procedure.


METHODS
Between July 2007 and August 2009, consecutive patients with rectal cancer were recruited for preoperative ERUS staging performed by a single colorectal surgeon. We compared results of ERUS tumor (uT) and nodal (uN) staging with pathological staging of surgical specimens in patients who had surgery without neoadjuvant chemoradiation. To evaluate the learning-curve effect on ERUS, patients were divided into two equal halves for analysis (early group and late group).


RESULTS
In the 26-month study period, 50 patients (36 males) with median age of 67 years (range 47-89 years) underwent ERUS staging. The overall accuracy rates of uT and uN staging were 86 and 66%. For uT staging, 10% of tumors were overstaged and 4% were understaged. For uN staging, 22% of patients were overstaged and 12% were understaged. With experience accumulation from early group to late group, accuracy improvement was observed in uN staging (52 vs. 80%, P = 0.037), while the accuracy rate remained consistently high in uT staging (84 vs. 88%, P = 1.0).


CONCLUSIONS
ERUS was accurate in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. It was an easy-to-learn procedure for accurate tumor staging, but considerable experience was required to attain accuracy for nodal staging.
Li
Jimmy C M
JC
Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, SAR, China. jimmylicm@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
Liu
Shirley Y W
SY
Lo
Anthony W I
AW
Hon
Sophie S F
SS
Ng
Simon S M
SS
Lee
Janet F Y
JF
Leung
Ka Lau
KL
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019160:Endosonography / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D059032:Learning Curve; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging / Q000379:methods*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology*
Radiology. 1994 Mar;190(3):709-14
8115616
Colorectal Dis. 2005 Sep;7(5):486-91
16108886
Radiographics. 1997 May-Jun;17(3):609-26
9153700
Eur Radiol. 2000;10(4):653-60
10795550
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Oct;22(10):1261-8
17294198
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Jul;80(1):4-12
16730086
Am J Surg. 1993 Dec;166(6):638-41; discussion 641-2
8273841
Mayo Clin Proc. 1990 Dec;65(12):1571-7
2255220
N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 14;355(11):1114-23
16971718
Tech Coloproctol. 2004 Nov;8 Suppl 1:s170-3
15655612
Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 Aug;33(8):654-9
2198147
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1993 May 29;123(21):1111-4
8511544
Br J Surg. 1991 Jul;78(7):785-8
1873701
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Jan;45(1):10-5
11786756
Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Oct;40(10):1180-6
9336113
Chirurg. 1990 Aug;61(8):587-91
2226028
Dis Colon Rectum. 1985 Jan;28(1):42-6
3882360
Am J Surg. 2002 Aug;184(2):126-30
12169355
Ann Surg. 1997 Apr;225(4):432-8
9114803
Dis Colon Rectum. 1986 Apr;29(4):234-42
3512199
Dis Colon Rectum. 1986 Dec;29(12):810-3
3539556
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Sep;44(9):1302-9
11584204
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Feb;43(2):193-7
10696893
N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 3;336(14):980-7
9091798
Radiology. 1989 Feb;170(2):319-22
2643135
Br J Surg. 1989 Mar;76(3):276-9
2655811
Surgery. 1998 Mar;123(3):264-9
9526517
Scand J Surg. 2003;92(2):125-9
12841552