title: Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single- versus a multi-item measure.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Traditional measures of pregnancy intentions that are dichotomous and retrospective do not fully capture the complexity surrounding women's plans to become pregnant.
  
  
  METHODS
  During January-June 2008, 249 women aged 15-44 awaiting pregnancy test results at family planning clinics in Pittsburgh completed a survey containing both single- and multi-item measures of pregnancy intentions. Chi-square analyses were used to assess differences between subgroups of women.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Few women were trying to become or planning for pregnancy (11% on the single-item measure; 20% on the multi-item measure), while approximately one-third of the sample were not trying to become or planning for pregnancy (31% on the single-item and 36% on the multi-item measure). The single-item measure categorized more women as ambivalent about pregnancy (58%) than did the multi-item measure (44%). Of women categorized as ambivalent by the single-item measure, 62% were also categorized as ambivalent by the multi-item measure. Overall, 68% of responses to the two measures were concordant. With both measures, women who were not planning or trying for pregnancy were more likely than those who were planning for pregnancy or who were ambivalent to indicate that they planned to have an abortion if their test was positive (27-29% vs. 0-2%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Prospective assessment of pregnancy intention with either a single- or a multi-item measure may allow for a more nuanced assessment of pregnancy intention than current measures. The multi-item measure may reduce the number of women categorized as ambivalent and aid the development of targeted contraceptive and preconception counseling interventions.
authors.affiliation: Guttmacher Institute, New York, USA. mkavanaugh@guttmacher.org
authors.forename: Megan L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Kavanaugh
authors.forename: Eleanor Bimla
authors.initials: EB
authors.lastname: Schwarz
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D010414:Pennsylvania; D011247:Pregnancy; D049168:Pregnancy, Unplanned / Q000523:psychology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Vital Health Stat 23. 1997 May;(19):1-114
references.pmid: 9201902
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;186(2):251-2
references.pmid: 11854644
references.citation: JAMA. 1996 Jan 10;275(2):113-7
references.pmid: 8531305
references.citation: Adv Popul. 1994;2:1-27
references.pmid: 12159232
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 May;58(5):426-33
references.pmid: 15082745
references.citation: Contraception. 2007 Apr;75(4):305-10
references.pmid: 17362711
references.citation: Womens Health Issues. 1997 Jul-Aug;7(4):234-40
references.pmid: 9283277
references.citation: Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):248-9
references.pmid: 10723651
references.citation: Contraception. 2006 May;73(5):520-4
references.pmid: 16627038
references.citation: Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-9, 46
references.pmid: 9494812
references.citation: Matern Child Health J. 2000 Sep;4(3):183-9
references.pmid: 11097506
references.citation: Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Jun;38(2):90-6
references.pmid: 16772190
references.citation: Demography. 1977 Nov;14(4):431-53
references.pmid: 913730
references.citation: J Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;48(2):117-22
references.pmid: 10037542
references.citation: Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Mar-Apr;35(2):94-101
references.pmid: 12729139
references.citation: Demography. 2002 Feb;39(1):199-213
references.pmid: 11852837
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):241-7
references.pmid: 11814504
references.citation: Matern Child Health J. 2007 Jan;11(1):81-9
references.pmid: 17080316
references.citation: J Nerv Ment Dis. 1974 Dec;159(6):396-406
references.pmid: 4436664
references.citation: Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):220-7
references.pmid: 10723646