title: Normal appendiceal diameter in children: does choice of CT oral contrast (VoLumen versus Gastrografin) make a difference?
abstract: Appendicitis is a common pediatric emergency and one of the most common causes for surgical exploration in the pediatric patient. Imaging has become an essential tool in the evaluation of the child with suspected appendicitis, aiming to avoid misdiagnosis and to facilitate early surgery, thus decreasing potential morbidity from ruptured appendicitis. The objective of this paper is to compare the luminal diameter of the normal appendix by computed tomography (CT) when utilizing the traditionally used high-attenuation oral contrast material (OCM), Gastrografin, and the relatively new neutral agent VoLumen, with the goal of establishing normal appendiceal size parameters for this neutral OCM. Twenty-six cases of VoLumen-enhanced CT studies of the abdomen and pelvis were identified, of which 13 met the inclusion criteria. These were randomly matched to age control Gastrografin CT examinations. Appendiceal diameters (from wall to wall) were measured in three orthogonal planes and the average of these was recorded. We show that there is no statistical difference between normal appendiceal diameters in patients with a VoLumen-opacified CT versus a Gastrografin-enhanced CT (p = 0.8) being 5.0 +/- 1.3 and 5.1 +/- 1.5 mm, respectively. Chart review revealed no clinical suspicion of appendicitis prior to imaging or on discharge diagnosis in the patients included in this study. The rate of nonvisualization of the appendix with VoLumen in our study was 31%, which equals previously published estimates in children. In summary, as VoLumen use increases in the evaluation of abdominal pathology in the ailing child, we provide guidelines to identify the normal appendix when utilizing this oral contrast agent.
authors.affiliation: The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA. victoria@email.chop.edu
authors.forename: Teresa
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Victoria
authors.forename: Soroosh
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Mahboubi
mesh_terms: D000284:Administration, Oral; D000293:Adolescent; D001065:Appendix / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D001466:Barium Sulfate; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003287:Contrast Media; D003974:Diatrizoate Meglumine; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009929:Organ Size; D012015:Reference Standards; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D001466:Barium Sulfate; D003974:Diatrizoate Meglumine
references.citation: Pediatr Radiol. 2009 May;39(5):500-5
references.pmid: 19221730
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Jan;176(1):37-41
references.pmid: 11133535
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Feb;176(2):497-500
references.pmid: 11159103
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Feb;168(2):405-9
references.pmid: 9016216
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2008 May;18(5):868-73
references.pmid: 18183403
references.citation: World J Surg. 2005 Dec;29(12):1557-62
references.pmid: 16331342
references.citation: Radiology. 2009 Feb;250(2):378-86
references.pmid: 19098225
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Nov;169(5):1275-80
references.pmid: 9353441
references.citation: Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 May;45(3):411-22, vii
references.pmid: 17601500
references.citation: Abdom Imaging. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):48-53
references.pmid: 16252139
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Oct;241(1):83-94
references.pmid: 16928974