title: The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 1, baseline data.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Evidence on the survival of different restorations in general practice is scarce and so to address this need, a study was designed to monitor the outcome of Class V restorations placed in UK general practices.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective longitudinal cohort multi-centre study.
  
  
  METHODS
  UK general dental practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ten UK dentists each placed 100 Class V restorations and recorded selected clinical information at placement and at recall visits on record cards. Dentists selected materials and techniques which they felt appropriate to each clinical situation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Data cards for 11 restorations were incorrectly completed or information was missing leaving 989 for analysis. The majority of restorations were placed in patients between 51 and 60 years of age, in canines or premolars (68.4%) and under private contract (63%). Composite (40.85%) and compomer (23.46%) were the most frequently placed materials overall but were not the most frequently placed restorative by some dentists.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Different dentists use different methods to manage Class V lesions but each dentist tends to use one restorative material predominantly. There is a degree of overlap among practitioners in the materials which they employ, but clear preferences were displayed in the materials used and handling techniques.
authors.affiliation: University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, St Chads Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK. d.a.stewardson@bham.ac.uk
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Stewardson
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Thornley
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Bigg
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bromage
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Browne
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Cottam
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Dalby
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gilmour
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Horton
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Roberts
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Westoby
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Dietrich
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Burke
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001641:Bicuspid / Q000473:pathology; D002648:Child; D015331:Cohort Studies; D020770:Compomers / Q000737:chemistry; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D003481:Cuspid / Q000473:pathology; D003731:Dental Caries / Q000145:classification / Q000628:therapy; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation / Q000145:classification / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000145:classification / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents / Q000737:chemistry; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005792:General Practice, Dental / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011331:Private Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013218:State Dentistry / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016019:Survival Analysis; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D020770:Compomers; D003188:Composite Resins; D003764:Dental Materials; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements