Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.
How individual are visual preferences? For real-world scenes, there is high agreement in observer's preference ratings. This could be driven by visual attributes of the images but also by non-visual associations, since those are common to most individuals. To investigate this, we developed a set of novel abstract, visually diverse images. At the individual observer level both abstract and real-world images yielded robust and consistent visual preferences, and yet abstract images yielded much lower across observer agreement in preferences than did real-world images. This suggests that visual preferences are typically driven by the semantic content of stimuli, and that shared semantic interpretations then lead to shared preferences. Further experiments showed that highly individual preferences can nevertheless emerge also for real-world scenes, in contexts which de-emphasize their semantic associations.
Vessel
Edward A
EA
Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA. ed.vessel@nyu.edu
Rubin
Nava
N
D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D001504:Beauty; D002755:Choice Behavior; D004954:Esthetics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012660:Semantics; D014796:Visual Perception; D055815:Young Adult
Perception. 1982;10(6):651-66
7110879
Q J Exp Psychol. 1973 May;25(2):207-22
4515818
Neuroreport. 2007 Apr 16;18(6):525-9
17413651
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82
15582859
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):452-460
10562724
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Dec;129(4):524-9
11142866
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jul;65(1):45-55
8355141
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
9176953
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Nov;11(6):610-6
10601742
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):320-9
12934689
J Exp Psychol. 1958 Mar;55(3):289-96
13513951
Nature. 2002 Sep 26;419(6905):359-60
12353024
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):199-209
16634665
Perception. 2007;36(11):1674-81
18265847
Br J Psychol. 1980 Nov;71(Pt 4):505-24
7437674
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):1317-22
14608360
Curr Biol. 1999 Jul 1;9(13):665-71
10395537
Br J Psychol. 2003 Feb;94(Pt 1):99-110
12648392
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Dec;129(4):508-23
11142865
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Nov;12(4):496-516
2946806
Nature. 1998 Nov 26;396(6709):321-2
9845067
Psychol Sci. 2006 Aug;17(8):645-8
16913943
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
9176952
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):989-1000
11761320
Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):489-508
15527534
Spat Vis. 2007;21(1-2):149-64
18073056