Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the relative effectiveness of different policies in attracting nurses to rural areas in Kenya, South Africa and Thailand using data from a discrete choice experiment (DCE).


METHODS
A labelled DCE was designed to model the relative effectiveness of both financial and non-financial strategies designed to attract nurses to rural areas. Data were collected from over 300 graduating nursing students in each country. Mixed logit models were used for analysis and to predict the uptake of rural posts under different incentive combinations.


RESULTS
Nurses' preferences for different human resource policy interventions varied significantly between the three countries. In Kenya and South Africa, better educational opportunities or rural allowances would be most effective in increasing the uptake of rural posts, while in Thailand better health insurance coverage would have the greatest impact.


CONCLUSIONS
DCEs can be designed to help policy-makers choose more effective interventions to address staff shortages in rural areas. Intervention packages tailored to local conditions are more likely to be effective than standardized global approaches.
Blaauw
D
D
Centre for Health Policy, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa. duane.blaauw@wits.ac.za
Erasmus
E
E
Pagaiya
N
N
Tangcharoensathein
V
V
Mullei
K
K
Mudhune
S
S
Goodman
C
C
English
M
M
Lagarde
M
M
D000328:Adult; D002321:Career Choice; D004509:Education, Nursing, Continuing; D005260:Female; D006291:Health Policy; D006798:Housing; D006801:Humans; D007630:Kenya; D008297:Male; D009726:Nurses / Q000523:psychology*; D015279:Organizational Culture; D019035:Rural Health Services / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012456:Salaries and Fringe Benefits; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013019:South Africa; D013785:Thailand; D000078329:Workforce
Lancet. 2008 Nov 1;372(9649):1527-9
18984174
Cah Sociol Demogr Med. 2005 Jan-Mar;45(1):135-61
15938446
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD005314
19160251
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 04;8:247
19055827
Lancet. 2004 Sep 4-10;364(9437):900-6
15351199
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 23;8:19
18215313
J Health Econ. 2001 May;20(3):329-47
11373834
Lancet. 2008 Feb 23;371(9613):668-674
18295024
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 May 19;9:31
19454022
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Dec;13(12):1433-41
18983274
Hum Resour Health. 2006 May 27;4:12
16729892
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1060
19530891
S Afr Med J. 2001 Apr;91(4):329-36
11402906
Hum Resour Health. 2008 Sep 16;6:19
18796157
Health Econ Policy Law. 2009 Oct;4(Pt 4):527-46
19715635
Lancet. 2004 Nov 27-Dec 3;364(9449):1984-90
15567015
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1:i55-60
11533440
BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530-3
10834905
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):55-64
14619274
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Jul 24;7:62
19630965
Hum Resour Health. 2003 Nov 25;1(1):12
14641940