A predictive model for the early identification of patients at risk for a prolonged intensive care unit length of stay.
BACKGROUND
Patients with a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay account for a disproportionate amount of resource use. Early identification of patients at risk for a prolonged length of stay can lead to quality enhancements that reduce ICU stay. This study developed and validated a model that identifies patients at risk for a prolonged ICU stay.


METHODS
We performed a retrospective cohort study of 343,555 admissions to 83 ICUs in 31 U.S. hospitals from 2002-2007. We examined the distribution of ICU length of stay to identify a threshold where clinicians might be concerned about a prolonged stay; this resulted in choosing a 5-day cut-point. From patients remaining in the ICU on day 5 we developed a multivariable regression model that predicted remaining ICU stay. Predictor variables included information gathered at admission, day 1, and ICU day 5. Data from 12,640 admissions during 2002-2005 were used to develop the model, and the remaining 12,904 admissions to internally validate the model. Finally, we used data on 11,903 admissions during 2006-2007 to externally validate the model.


RESULTS
The variables that had the greatest impact on remaining ICU length of stay were those measured on day 5, not at admission or during day 1. Mechanical ventilation, PaO2: FiO2 ratio, other physiologic components, and sedation on day 5 accounted for 81.6% of the variation in predicted remaining ICU stay. In the external validation set observed ICU stay was 11.99 days and predicted total ICU stay (5 days + day 5 predicted remaining stay) was 11.62 days, a difference of 8.7 hours. For the same patients, the difference between mean observed and mean predicted ICU stay using the APACHE day 1 model was 149.3 hours. The new model's r2 was 20.2% across individuals and 44.3% across units.


CONCLUSIONS
A model that uses patient data from ICU days 1 and 5 accurately predicts a prolonged ICU stay. These predictions are more accurate than those based on ICU day 1 data alone. The model can be used to benchmark ICU performance and to alert physicians to explore care alternatives aimed at reducing ICU stay.
Kramer
Andrew A
AA
Cerner Corporation, Suite 500, Vienna, Virginia 22182, USA. akramer@cerner.com
Zimmerman
Jack E
JE
D015331:Cohort Studies; D003625:Data Collection; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units; D007902:Length of Stay; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D011379:Prognosis; D012121:Respiration, Artificial / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D014481:United States
Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2232-7
18664778
Crit Care Med. 2000 Oct;28(10):3465-73
11057802
Chest. 2004 Dec;126(6):1905-9
15596691
Med Care. 2003 Mar;41(3):386-97
12618642
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;29(1):45-50
11176159
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jun;32(6):1272-6
15187505
Crit Care Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1694-700
16096443
Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1793-800
9824069
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):1530-5
17452930
Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):724-30
18209667
Chest. 2008 Sep;134(3):520-526
18641110
JAMA. 2008 Oct 8;300(14):1685-90
18840842
Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1922-7; quiz 1936
16148460
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Feb;45(2):93-101
1573439
Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):342-50
10708164
Am J Crit Care. 2004 Jul;13(4):335-45
15293587
Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;29(4):753-8
11373463
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 May;55(5):775-9
17493200
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;31(1):45-51
12544992
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2041-7
18552694
Neurocrit Care. 2008;8(2):271-5
17874227
Chest. 1999 Mar;115(3):793-801
10084494
Chest. 1991 Dec;100(6):1619-36
1959406
Ann Intern Med. 1993 May 15;118(10):753-61
8470850
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):427-33
18091554
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 May;47(5):508-15
12699506
Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):3031-9
19633543
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;28(6):2090-3
10890670
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jun;33(6):1266-71
15942342
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Mar;28(3):324-31
11904663
Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):2517-29
16932234
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Aug;33(8):1329-36
17541552
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1378-88
16557153
Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug;30(8):1803-7
12163797
Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):349-54
15699838
Crit Care Med. 2005 May;33(5):930-9
15891316
Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2238-43
18596631
Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):954-9
16608944
Crit Care Med. 1997 Sep;25(9):1594-600
9295838
Chest. 2007 Jan;131(1):85-93
17218560
Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1317-26
9710088
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008 Sep;12(3):153-66
18805850
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 May;75(5):445-9
10807071
Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul;27(7):1319-24
10446826
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Sep;26(9):1319-25
11089759
Crit Care Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):2553-60
17893625
J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):205-13
19682848
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 May;27(5):493-9
16671031
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1628-38
19321858
J Trauma. 2007 Jan;62(1):147-50
17215746
Crit Care Med. 1994 Sep;22(9):1359-72
8062557
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):1060-7
19125233
Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Oct;14(5):403-10
12389806
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310
16540951