Which metabolic pathways generate and characterize the flux space? A comparison among elementary modes, extreme pathways and minimal generators.
Important efforts are being done to systematically identify the relevant pathways in a metabolic network. Unsurprisingly, there is not a unique set of network-based pathways to be tagged as relevant, and at least four related concepts have been proposed: extreme currents, elementary modes, extreme pathways, and minimal generators. Basically, there are two properties that these sets of pathways can hold: they can generate the flux space--if every feasible flux distribution can be represented as a nonnegative combination of flux through them--or they can comprise all the nondecomposable pathways in the network. The four concepts fulfill the first property, but only the elementary modes fulfill the second one. This subtle difference has been a source of errors and misunderstandings. This paper attempts to clarify the intricate relationship between the network-based pathways performing a comparison among them.
Llaneras
Francisco
F
Instituto de Automática e Informática Industrial, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain. kikollan@gmail.com
Picó
Jesús
J
D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D053858:Metabolic Networks and Pathways; D008954:Models, Biological; D015398:Signal Transduction
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun 01;6:135
15929789
Genome Res. 2002 May;12(5):760-9
11997342
J Theor Biol. 2007 May 21;246(2):290-308
17292923
Genome Res. 2009 Oct;19(10):1872-83
19541909
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 29;8:30
17261182
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):226-34
14734314
Nature. 2002 Nov 14;420(6912):190-3
12432396
BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 04;5:175
15527509
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2006 Dec;29(5-6):349-66
17013615
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002 Sep 30;79(7):703-12
12209793
J Theor Biol. 2003 Apr 7;221(3):309-25
12642111
Trends Biotechnol. 2003 Feb;21(2):64-9
12573854
Genome Biol. 2007;8(6):R123
17594483
Bioinformatics. 2008 Oct 1;24(19):2229-35
18676417
Genome Res. 2002 Dec;12(12):1889-900
12466293
Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 1;21(7):1203-10
15539452
J Theor Biol. 2003 Oct 7;224(3):313-24
12941590
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002 May 5;78(3):296-312
11920446
J Theor Biol. 2000 Apr 7;203(3):229-48
10716907
J Biosci Bioeng. 2002;94(6):591-9
16233355
Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 15;21(8):1739-40
15613397
Bioinformatics. 1999 Mar;15(3):251-7
10222413
Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Mar;18(3):267-8
10700136
BMC Syst Biol. 2009 Mar 06;3:30
19267928
J Biosci Bioeng. 2008 Jan;105(1):1-11
18295713
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996 Oct 5;52(1):129-40
18629859
Bioinformatics. 2002 Feb;18(2):351-61
11847093
J Math Biol. 2002 Aug;45(2):153-81
12181603
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Mar 13;7:129
16533403
J Bacteriol. 2002 Aug;184(16):4582-93
12142428
Eur J Biochem. 2003 Feb;270(3):430-9
12542693
Biotechnol Prog. 2007 Jan-Feb;23(1):168-81
17269685
Syst Biol (Stevenage). 2005 Dec;152(4):249-55
16986267
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002 Jul 20;79(2):121-34
12115428
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 May 5;86(3):251-60
15083505
Cell Biophys. 1988 Jan-Jun;12:237-53
2453282
Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 1;25(23):3158-65
19793869
Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 22;19(2):261-9
12538248
Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Mar;18(3):326-32
10700151
Trends Biotechnol. 2004 Aug;22(8):400-5
15283984
Biophys J. 2002 Jul;83(1):79-86
12080101
Biochem J. 1999 Oct 1;343 Pt 1:115-24
10493919
Biophys J. 2005 Dec;89(6):3837-45
16183876
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Apr 03;7:186
16584566
J Theor Biol. 2000 Apr 7;203(3):249-83
10716908
Metab Eng. 2006 Jan;8(1):30-45
16289779
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jun 1;23(11):1378-85
17344242
Trends Biotechnol. 1999 Feb;17(2):53-60
10087604