Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional model of anterior vaginal wall position at rest and maximal strain in women with and without prolapse.
OBJECTIVE
Two-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrates apical support and vaginal length contribute to anterior wall prolapse (AWP). This paper describes a novel three-dimensional technique to examine the vagina and its relationship to pelvic sidewalls at rest and Valsalva.


METHODS
Twenty women (10 with AWP and 10 with normal support) underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging at rest and Valsalva. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the pelvic bones and anterior vaginal wall were created to assess morphologic changes occurring in prolapse.


RESULTS
In women with AWP, Valsalva caused downward translation of the vagina along its length. A transition point separated a proximal region supported by levator muscles and a distal, unsupported region no longer in contact with the perineal body. In this latter region, sagittal and frontal plane "cupping" occurs. The distal vagina rotated inferiorly along an arc centered on the inferior pubis.


CONCLUSIONS
Downward translation, cupping, and distal rotation are three novel characteristics of AWP demonstrated by this three-dimensional technique.
Larson
Kindra A
KA
Pelvic Floor Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. kindral@med.umich.edu
Hsu
Yvonne
Y
Chen
Luyun
L
Ashton-Miller
James A
JA
DeLancey
John O L
JO
D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D012146:Rest; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000175:diagnosis*; D014621:Vagina / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D014636:Valsalva Maneuver
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):554.e1-6
19168171
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6
9083302
Radiology. 2002 May;223(2):501-8
11997560
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;111(4):891-8
18378748
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;187(1):93-8
12114894
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):324-32
16880302
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):1438-43
16579933
J Biomech. 2009 Jul 22;42(10):1371-1377
19481208
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):548.e1-6
18455530
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1837-40
17132485
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;183(6):1365-73; discussion 1373-4
11120498
Lancet. 2007 Mar 24;369(9566):1027-38
17382829
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;98(1):40-4
11430954
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Feb;17(2):195-201
15915320
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jan;19(1):137-42
17579801
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001 Apr;56(4):239-46
11285437
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;175(6):1418-21; discussion 1421-2
8987919
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):600-609
19701041
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Dec;171(6):1607-10
9843296
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):795-806
15746674