title: Effect of methanogenic substrates on anaerobic oxidation of methane and sulfate reduction by an anaerobic methanotrophic enrichment.
abstract: Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) coupled to sulfate reduction (SR) is assumed to be a syntrophic process, in which methanotrophic archaea produce an interspecies electron carrier (IEC), which is subsequently utilized by sulfate-reducing bacteria. In this paper, six methanogenic substrates are tested as candidate-IECs by assessing their effect on AOM and SR by an anaerobic methanotrophic enrichment. The presence of acetate, formate or hydrogen enhanced SR, but did not inhibit AOM, nor did these substrates trigger methanogenesis. Carbon monoxide also enhanced SR but slightly inhibited AOM. Methanol did not enhance SR nor did it inhibit AOM, and methanethiol inhibited both SR and AOM completely. Subsequently, it was calculated at which candidate-IEC concentrations no more Gibbs free energy can be conserved from their production from methane at the applied conditions. These concentrations were at least 1,000 times lower can the final candidate-IEC concentration in the bulk liquid. Therefore, the tested candidate-IECs could not have been produced from methane during the incubations. Hence, acetate, formate, methanol, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen can be excluded as sole IEC in AOM coupled to SR. Methanethiol did inhibit AOM and can therefore not be excluded as IEC by this study.
authors.affiliation: Pollution Prevention and Control Core, UNESCO-IHE, Westvest 7, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands. r.meulepas@unesco-ihe.org
authors.forename: Roel J W
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Meulepas
authors.forename: Christian G
authors.initials: CG
authors.lastname: Jagersma
authors.forename: Ahmad F
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Khadem
authors.forename: Alfons J M
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Stams
authors.forename: Piet N L
authors.initials: PN
authors.lastname: Lens
mesh_terms: D000693:Anaerobiosis; D020564:Deltaproteobacteria / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D005417:Flavobacterium / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D007700:Kinetics; D008697:Methane / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D010084:Oxidation-Reduction; D013431:Sulfates / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D013431:Sulfates; D008697:Methane
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(11):7663-8
references.pmid: 12032340
references.citation: Science. 2001 Jul 20;293(5529):484-7
references.pmid: 11463914
references.citation: Science. 2002 Aug 9;297(5583):1013-5
references.pmid: 12169733
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Apr 29;398(6730):802-5
references.pmid: 10235261
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2000 Oct;2(5):477-84
references.pmid: 11233156
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2001 Jul;42(1):1-10
references.pmid: 12035076
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000 Feb 5;67(3):354-63
references.pmid: 10620266
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009 Aug;7(8):568-77
references.pmid: 19609258
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010 May;72(2):261-71
references.pmid: 20337708
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Jan;39(1):194-204
references.pmid: 16345488
references.citation: Bacteriol Rev. 1977 Mar;41(1):100-80
references.pmid: 860983
references.citation: Science. 2004 Sep 3;305(5689):1457-62
references.pmid: 15353801
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2002 May;4(5):296-305
references.pmid: 12080959
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jan;9(1):187-96
references.pmid: 17227423
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Nov;52(5):1037-45
references.pmid: 16347202
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996 Apr 20;50(2):136-44
references.pmid: 18626930
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jul;70(7):4048-52
references.pmid: 15240282
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Oct 5;407(6804):623-6
references.pmid: 11034209
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):878-81
references.pmid: 14685246
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Feb 25;463(7284):1071-4
references.pmid: 20182510
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2010 Feb;12(2):422-39
references.pmid: 19878267
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2006 Mar;8(3):371-82
references.pmid: 16478444
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jan;10(1):162-73
references.pmid: 17903217
references.citation: Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1167-9
references.pmid: 17835470
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Jun 23;435(7045):1098-101
references.pmid: 15973408
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jan 15;43(2):453-9
references.pmid: 19238979
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jan;7(1):98-106
references.pmid: 15643940
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Oct 19;443(7113):854-8
references.pmid: 17051217
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Oct 15;104(3):458-70
references.pmid: 19544305
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Jun;61(2):262-80
references.pmid: 9184013
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;11(12):3223-32
references.pmid: 19703218
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Apr;64(3):421-8
references.pmid: 14556037
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Oct 5;407(6804):577, 579
references.pmid: 11034193
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1125:158-70
references.pmid: 18096853
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2008 Sep;10(9):2287-98
references.pmid: 18498367
references.citation: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001 Jun;12(3):259-76
references.pmid: 11404104
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jan;71(1):467-79
references.pmid: 15640223