Virtual standardized patients: an interactive method to examine variation in depression care among primary care physicians.
BACKGROUND: Some primary care physicians provide less than optimal care for depression (Kessler et al., Journal of the American Medical Association 291, 2581-90, 2004). However, the literature is not unanimous on the best method to use in order to investigate this variation in care. To capture variations in physician behaviour and decision making in primary care settings, 32 interactive CD-ROM vignettes were constructed and tested. AIM AND METHOD: The primary aim of this methods-focused paper was to review the extent to which our study method - an interactive CD-ROM patient vignette methodology - was effective in capturing variation in physician behaviour. Specifically, we examined the following questions: (a) Did the interactive CD-ROM technology work? (b) Did we create believable virtual patients? (c) Did the research protocol enable interviews (data collection) to be completed as planned? (d) To what extent was the targeted study sample size achieved? and (e) Did the study interview protocol generate valid and reliable quantitative data and rich, credible qualitative data? FINDINGS: Among a sample of 404 randomly selected primary care physicians, our voice-activated interactive methodology appeared to be effective. Specifically, our methodology - combining interactive virtual patient vignette technology, experimental design, and expansive open-ended interview protocol - generated valid explanations for variations in primary care physician practice patterns related to depression care.
Hooper
Lisa M
LM
Department of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, & Counseling, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Weinfurt
Kevin P
KP
Cooper
Lisa A
LA
Mensh
Julie
J
Harless
William
W
Kuhajda
Melissa C
MC
Epstein
Steven A
SA
Med Care. 2003 Apr;41(4):479-89
12665712
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Nov;26(11):644-53
11098427
J Eval Clin Pract. 1997 Feb;3(1):23-57
9238607
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Dec;65(6):674-95
18832109
Psychosomatics. 2001 Nov-Dec;42(6):482-9
11815683
Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec;41(6):2182-200
17116115
Acad Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;30(6):505-15
17139022
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Mar;42(5):769-76
8685745
N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 25;340(8):618-26
10029647
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 16;141(10):813-4
15545682
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jan;14(1):39-48
9893090
CMAJ. 1998 Jan 27;158(2):205-7
9469142
Arch Fam Med. 1993 Oct;2(10):1061-6
8111487
Psychosom Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;56(2):128-35
8008799
JAMA. 1997 Sep 3;278(9):790-1
9286845
BMJ. 1997 Apr 19;314(7088):1170-3
9146391
JAMA. 2004 Jun 2;291(21):2581-90
15173149
Med Care. 1998 Mar;36(3):385-96
9520962
J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Mar;43(1):92-106
11949199
Am J Med Qual. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):151-7
15951521
Ann Rheum Dis. 1983 Dec;42(6):644-7
6651368
Acad Med. 1993 Feb;68(2):153-7
8431238
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Sep;14(9):569-80
10491249
BMJ. 2002 Sep 28;325(7366):679
12351358
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):584-9
16808740
Health Serv Res. 1997 Aug;32(3):343-66
9240285
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):291-4
12356955
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):675-82
9382379
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;27(3):305-8
8599488
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 16;141(10):771-80
15545677
JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1715-22
10755498
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;3(1):7-14
15671185
J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;20(1):28-35
17204732