Faecal incontinence after first instrumental vaginal delivery using Thierry's spatulas.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of faecal incontinence after first vaginal delivery and to assess the impact of Thierry's spatulas-assisted delivery.


METHODS
A prospective observational study of primiparas who underwent a vaginal delivery at term was conducted. Faecal incontinence was assessed at 2 and 6 months postpartum by a questionnaire (Wexner score >or=5 was considered significant). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.


RESULTS
Five hundred thirty-eight women were recruited with undergoing 176 spatulas-assisted deliveries and 362 spontaneous vaginal deliveries. The response rate was 85.9% (2 months) and 80.5% (6 months). The prevalence of faecal incontinence was similar between the two groups at 2 months (14.3% and 9.7%). Episiotomy (odds ratio [OR] = 5.0) and maternal age over 35 years (OR = 4.1) were independently associated with faecal incontinence after adjustment.


CONCLUSIONS
Anal symptoms are common after the first vaginal delivery. Thierry's spatulas do not increase the prevalence of faecal incontinence after delivery given that an episiotomy is performed.
Parant
Olivier
O
CHU de Toulouse, Service de gynécologie obstétrique, Hôpital Paule de Viguier, 330 avenue de Grande-Bretagne, 31059, Toulouse, France. olivier.parant@wanadoo.fr
Simon-Toulza
Caroline
C
Cristini
Christelle
C
Vayssiere
Christophe
C
Arnaud
Catherine
C
Reme
Jean-Michel
JM
D000328:Adult; D036861:Delivery, Obstetric / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation; D005242:Fecal Incontinence / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015995:Prevalence; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D014621:Vagina
Gut. 1999 Jan;44(1):77-80
9862829
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Dec;37 Suppl 8:S222-30
19268199
Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97
8416784
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006 Mar;34(3):275-9
16622908
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;175(5):1325-30
8942509
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Mar;29(3):232-239
17346493
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(3):177-81
10430011
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Apr;106(4):324-30
10426238
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2005 Dec;34(8):795-801
16319771
BJOG. 2000 Nov;107(11):1360-5
11117762
BJOG. 2008 Mar;115(4):421-34
18271879
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Sep 10;110(1):39-42
12932869
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1543-9; discussion 1549-50
14710059
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2000 Jan;28(1):15-22
10774113
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Oct;45(5):405-9
16171477
N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 23;329(26):1905-11
8247054
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(1):104-8
17999693
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Aug;92(8):824-8
4027205
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(2):117-120; discussion 121
11374509
Br J Surg. 2003 Nov;90(11):1333-7
14598410
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jan;104(1):46-50
8988696
BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3
19035944
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):281-8
17267825
CMAJ. 2002 Feb 5;166(3):326-30
11868640
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;196(3):217.e1-5
17346526
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;104(6):1397-402
15572505
BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):887-91
8173367
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jul;48(7):1432-6
15933796
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jun;17(4):407-17
16572280