title: Turbulent dispersal promotes species coexistence.
abstract: Several recent advances in coexistence theory emphasize the importance of space and dispersal, but focus on average dispersal rates and require spatial heterogeneity, spatio-temporal variability or dispersal-competition tradeoffs to allow coexistence. We analyse a model with stochastic juvenile dispersal (driven by turbulent flow in the coastal ocean) and show that a low-productivity species can coexist with a high-productivity species by having dispersal patterns sufficiently uncorrelated from those of its competitor, even though, on average, dispersal statistics are identical and subsequent demography and competition is spatially homogeneous. This produces a spatial storage effect, with an ephemeral partitioning of a 'spatial niche', and is the first demonstration of a physical mechanism for a pure spatiotemporal environmental response. 'Turbulent coexistence' is widely applicable to marine species with pelagic larval dispersal and relatively sessile adult life stages (and perhaps some wind-dispersed species) and complements other spatial and temporal storage effects previously documented for such species.
authors.affiliation: Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131, USA.
authors.forename: Heather A
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Berkley
authors.forename: Bruce E
authors.initials: BE
authors.lastname: Kendall
authors.forename: Satoshi
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Mitarai
authors.forename: David A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Siegel
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003163:Competitive Behavior; D017753:Ecosystem; D005399:Fishes / Q000502:physiology*; D008954:Models, Biological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012623:Seawater; D014872:Water Movements
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Jul;88(7):1716-25
references.pmid: 17645018
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1991 Jan;6(1):26-8
references.pmid: 21232416
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 2000 Nov;58(3):211-37
references.pmid: 11120650
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Jun;11(6):296-301
references.pmid: 16697244
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Sep;88(9):2240-7
references.pmid: 17918402
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2007 Feb;10(2):95-104
references.pmid: 17257097
references.citation: Am Nat. 2005 Oct;166(4):E75-94
references.pmid: 16224698
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Mar;12(3):E9-E11
references.pmid: 19245586
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Feb;87(2):319-25
references.pmid: 16637357
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 1997 Dec;52(3):167-78
references.pmid: 9466959
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 1;105(26):8974-9
references.pmid: 18577590
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1989 Dec;4(12):381-5
references.pmid: 21227385
references.citation: Science. 1999 Mar 5;283(5407):1528-30
references.pmid: 10066174
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 May;87(5):1179-88
references.pmid: 16761597
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Jun;9(3):317-28
references.pmid: 785673
references.citation: Am Nat. 2004 Nov;164(5):633-50
references.pmid: 15540153