title: Aerosol monitoring during carbon nanofiber production: mobile direct-reading sampling.
abstract: Detailed investigations were conducted at a facility that manufactures and processes carbon nanofibers (CNFs). Presented research summarizes the direct-reading monitoring aspects of the study. A mobile aerosol sampling platform, equipped with an aerosol instrument array, was used to characterize emissions at different locations within the facility. Particle number, respirable mass, active surface area, and photoelectric response were monitored with a condensation particle counter (CPC), a photometer, a diffusion charger, and a photoelectric aerosol sensor, respectively. CO and CO(2) were additionally monitored. Combined simultaneous monitoring of these metrics can be utilized to determine source and relative contribution of airborne particles (CNFs and others) within a workplace. Elevated particle number concentrations, up to 1.15 x 10(6) cm(-3), were found within the facility but were not due to CNFs. Ultrafine particle emissions, released during thermal treatment of CNFs, were primarily responsible. In contrast, transient increases in respirable particle mass concentration, with a maximum of 1.1 mg m(-3), were due to CNF release through uncontrolled transfer and bagging. Of the applied metrics, our findings suggest that particle mass was probably the most useful and practical metric for monitoring CNF emissions in this facility. Through chemical means, CNFs may be selectively distinguished from other workplace contaminants (Birch et al., in preparation), and for direct-reading monitoring applications, the photometer was found to provide a reasonable estimate of respirable CNF mass concentration. Particle size distribution measurements were conducted with an electrical low-pressure impactor and a fast particle size spectrometer. Results suggest that the dominant CNF mode by particle number lies between 200 and 250 nm for both aerodynamic and mobility equivalent diameters. Significant emissions of CO were also evident in this facility. Exposure control recommendations were described for processes as required.
authors.affiliation: Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-R5, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA. dje3@cdc.gov
authors.forename: Douglas E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: Bon Ki
authors.initials: BK
authors.lastname: Ku
authors.forename: M Eileen
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Birch
authors.forename: Kevin H
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Dunn
mesh_terms: D000336:Aerosols / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D002244:Carbon / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000032:analysis; D002248:Carbon Monoxide / Q000032:analysis; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D019570:Inhalation Exposure / Q000032:analysis / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D057139:Nanofibers / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry / Q000592:standards; D036103:Nanotechnology / Q000379:methods; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000032:analysis / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010316:Particle Size; D052638:Particulate Matter / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry; D013997:Time Factors; D017132:Workplace / Q000592:standards
chemical_list: D000336:Aerosols; D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational; D052638:Particulate Matter; D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D002244:Carbon; D002248:Carbon Monoxide
references.citation: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009 Jan;6(1):19-31
references.pmid: 18982535
references.citation: Nat Nanotechnol. 2008 Jul;3(7):423-8
references.pmid: 18654567
references.citation: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 May;4(5):341-51
references.pmid: 17454502
references.citation: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005 Nov;289(5):L698-708
references.pmid: 15951334
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jun 15;42(12):4600-6
references.pmid: 18605593
references.citation: J Environ Monit. 2005 Jul;7(7):728-35
references.pmid: 15986054
references.citation: Nanotechnology. 2006 Jul 28;17(14):3613-21
references.pmid: 19661613
references.citation: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Oct;1(10):660-71
references.pmid: 15631057
references.citation: Ann Occup Hyg. 2004 Jul;48(5):439-53
references.pmid: 15240340
references.citation: Toxicology. 2009 Mar 29;257(3):161-71
references.pmid: 19150385
references.citation: Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Apr;50(3):249-57
references.pmid: 16361396
references.citation: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008 Jun;5(6):D63-9
references.pmid: 18432476
references.citation: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Mar;7(3):127-32
references.pmid: 20017054
references.citation: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005 Dec;2(12):609-25
references.pmid: 16282165
references.citation: Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 Nov;51(8):725-38
references.pmid: 17982158
references.citation: Part Fibre Toxicol. 2005 Oct 06;2:8
references.pmid: 16209704
references.citation: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008 Oct;295(4):L552-65
references.pmid: 18658273
references.citation: Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Jan;52(1):9-21
references.pmid: 18056626