Co-infection and localization of secondary symbionts in two whitefly species.
BACKGROUND
Whiteflies are cosmopolitan phloem-feeding pests that cause serious damage to many crops worldwide due to direct feeding and vectoring of many plant viruses. The sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and the greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) are two of the most widespread and damaging whitefly species. To complete their unbalanced diet, whiteflies harbor the obligatory bacterium Portiera aleyrodidarum. B. tabaci further harbors a diverse array of secondary symbionts, including Hamiltonella, Arsenophonus, Cardinium, Wolbachia, Rickettsia and Fritschea. T. vaporariorum is only known to harbor P. aleyrodidarum and Arsenophonus. We conducted a study to survey the distribution of whitefly species in Croatia, their infection status by secondary symbionts, and the spatial distribution of these symbionts in the developmental stages of the two whitefly species.


RESULTS
T. vaporariorum was found to be the predominant whitefly species across Croatia, while only the Q biotype of B. tabaci was found across the coastal part of the country. Arsenophonus and Hamiltonella were detected in collected T. vaporariorum populations, however, not all populations harbored both symbionts, and both symbionts showed 100% infection rate in some of the populations. Only the Q biotype of B. tabaci was found in the populations tested and they harbored Hamiltonella, Rickettsia, Wolbachia and Cardinium, while Arsenophonus and Fritschea were not detected in any B. tabaci populations. None of the detected symbionts appeared in all populations tested, and multiple infections were detected in some of the populations. All endosymbionts tested were localized inside the bacteriocyte in both species, but only Rickettsia and Cardinium in B. tabaci showed additional localization outside the bacteriocyte.


CONCLUSIONS
Our study revealed unique co-infection patterns by secondary symbionts in B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum. Co-sharing of the bacteriocyte by the primary and different secondary symbionts is maintained through vertical transmission via the egg, and is unique to whiteflies. This system provides opportunities to study interactions among symbionts that co-inhabit the same cell in the same host: these can be cooperative or antagonistic, may affect the symbiotic contents over time, and may also affect the host by competing with the primary symbiont for space and resources.
Skaljac
Marisa
M
Department of Entomology, Institute Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.
Zanic
Katja
K
Ban
Smiljana Goreta
SG
Kontsedalov
Svetlana
S
Ghanim
Murad
M
D000818:Animals; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification* / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D017523:Croatia; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D005843:Geography; D006430:Hemiptera / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000382:microbiology*; D017404:In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D011156:Population Density; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics; D012338:RNA, Ribosomal, 23S / Q000235:genetics; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA; D013559:Symbiosis
D004269:DNA, Bacterial; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; D012338:RNA, Ribosomal, 23S
Pest Manag Sci. 2009 Sep;65(9):939-42
19479746
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Aug;68(8):4074-80
12147509
Mol Ecol. 2002 Oct;11(10):2123-35
12296954
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Sep;70(9):5366-72
15345422
J Morphol. 2001 Apr;248(1):22-40
11268056
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 22;102(47):16919-26
16195380
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1803-7
12563031
Insect Mol Biol. 2002 Dec;11(6):577-84
12421415
FASEB J. 2006 Nov;20(13):2372-4
17012243
Tissue Cell. 2008 Aug;40(4):231-42
18272191
J Invertebr Pathol. 1996 May;67(3):309-11
8812613
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1467-75
16461701
Mech Dev. 2002 Feb;111(1-2):3-15
11804774
Bull Entomol Res. 2007 Aug;97(4):407-13
17645822
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997 Oct;47(4):1140-4
9336921
PLoS Pathog. 2005 Oct;1(2):e14
16228015
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 Jul;55(Pt 4):1581-1587
16014485
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 23;98(22):12555-60
11592990
Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Aug;64(8):789-92
18432613
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001 Jun;36(1):43-50
11377772
Trends Microbiol. 2009 Mar;17(3):95-9
19230673
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Dec;69(12):7216-23
14660369
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 22;275(1633):353-61
18055391
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 7;273(1598):2097-106
16901827
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Oct;39(10):668-76
19683053
Curr Microbiol. 1997 Apr;34(4):220-5
9058541
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Mar;63(1):128-48
10066833
Curr Microbiol. 2004 Feb;48(2):140-4
15057483
Curr Microbiol. 2003 Jul;47(1):46-50
12783192
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1999;53:71-102
10547686
FASEB J. 2008 Jul;22(7):2591-9
18285399
Heredity (Edinb). 2001 Apr;86(Pt 4):497-505
11520350
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jun 8;96(12):6814-9
10359795
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jun;70(6):3401-6
15184137
PLoS Biol. 2004 Mar;2(3):E68
15024418
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 22;270(1529):2185-90
14561283
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 May;72(5):3646-52
16672513
Mol Ecol. 1999 Oct;8(10):1683-91
10583831
J Evol Biol. 2008 Jan;21(1):145-161
18171386
J Invertebr Pathol. 2007 Oct;96(2):106-8
17467732
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Sep;44(3):1306-19
17627853
Tissue Cell. 2006 Aug;38(4):257-61
16876837
Nature. 2001 Jul 26;412(6845):433-6
11473316
J Bacteriol. 2004 Oct;186(19):6626-33
15375144
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 30;94(20):10792-6
9380712
Microb Ecol. 2006 Apr;51(3):294-301
16598632