title: Molecular description of flexibility in an antibody combining site.
abstract: Mature antibodies (Abs) that are exquisitely specific for virtually any foreign molecule may be produced by affinity maturation of naïve (or germline) Abs. However, the finite number of germline Abs available suggests that, in contrast to mature Abs, germline Abs must be broadly polyspecific so that they are able to recognize a wide range of ligands. Thus, affinity maturation must play a role in mediating Ab specificity. One biophysical property that distinguishes polyspecificity from specificity is protein flexibility; a flexible combining site is able to adopt different conformations that recognize different foreign molecules (or antigens), while a rigid combining site is locked into a conformation that is specific for a given antigen. Recent studies (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 8821-8826) have examined, at the atomic level, the structural properties that mediate changes in flexibility at four stages of affinity maturation in the 4-4-20 Ab. These studies employed molecular dynamics simulations to reveal a network of residue interactions that mediate the flexibility changes accompanying maturation. The flexibility of the Ab combining sites in these molecular systems was originally measured using three-pulse photon echo spectroscopy (3PEPS). The present investigation extends this work by providing a concrete link between structural properties of the Ab molecules and features of the spectroscopic measurements used to characterize their flexibility. Results obtained from the simulations are in good qualitative agreement with the experimental measurements and indicate that the spectroscopic signal is sensitive to protein dynamics distributed throughout the entire combining site. Thus, the simulations provide a molecular-level interpretation of the changes induced by affinity maturation of the Ab. The results suggest that 3PEPS spectroscopy in combination with molecular dynamics simulations can provide a detailed description of protein dynamics and, in this case, how it is evolved for biological function.
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. jzimm@scripps.edu
authors.forename: Jörg
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Zimmermann
authors.forename: Floyd E
authors.initials: FE
authors.lastname: Romesberg
authors.forename: Charles L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Brooks
authors.forename: Ian F
authors.initials: IF
authors.lastname: Thorpe
mesh_terms: D000906:Antibodies / Q000737:chemistry*; D001666:Binding Sites, Antibody; D007143:Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains / Q000737:chemistry; D007147:Immunoglobulin Light Chains / Q000737:chemistry; D056004:Molecular Dynamics Simulation; D011485:Protein Binding
chemical_list: D000906:Antibodies; D007143:Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains; D007147:Immunoglobulin Light Chains
references.citation: Science. 1996 Feb 23;271(5252):1086-91
references.pmid: 8599084
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Oct 19;127(41):14279-89
references.pmid: 16218622
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2005 Sep 8;109(35):16959-66
references.pmid: 16853158
references.citation: Science. 1997 Jun 13;276(5319):1665-9
references.pmid: 9180069
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2007 Aug 7;127(5):055101
references.pmid: 17688362
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2007 Nov 16;374(1):130-46
references.pmid: 17916365
references.citation: J Comput Chem. 2009 Jul 30;30(10):1545-614
references.pmid: 19444816
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 27;102(39):13867-72
references.pmid: 16162674
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13722-7
references.pmid: 16954202
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2007 Jul 19;111(28):8269-76
references.pmid: 17592867
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2005 Mar 31;109(12):5954-61
references.pmid: 16851650
references.citation: J Comput Chem. 2007 Jul 15;28(9):1572-1581
references.pmid: 17342706
references.citation: Science. 1998 Mar 20;279(5358):1929-33
references.pmid: 9506942
references.citation: Immunity. 2000 Nov;13(5):611-20
references.pmid: 11114374
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 22;104(21):8821-6
references.pmid: 17488816
references.citation: Biophys J. 2002 Apr;82(4):2244-55
references.pmid: 11916879
references.citation: Mol Immunol. 2003 Mar;39(13):801-8
references.pmid: 12617995
references.citation: Protein Eng. 1995 Aug;8(8):749-61
references.pmid: 8637844
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 1996 Jun 17;76(25):4701-4704
references.pmid: 10061359
references.citation: Biochemistry. 2008 Jul 8;47(27):7237-47
references.pmid: 18549243
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1995 May 30;34(21):6962-74
references.pmid: 7766606
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):92-7
references.pmid: 12518056
references.citation: Trends Immunol. 2004 Apr;25(4):174-9
references.pmid: 15039043
references.citation: Biochemistry. 2001 Feb 20;40(7):2011-22
references.pmid: 11329268
references.citation: J Mol Graph Model. 2004 May;22(5):377-95
references.pmid: 15099834
references.citation: J Comput Chem. 2003 Aug;24(11):1348-56
references.pmid: 12827676
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 16;101(11):3803-8
references.pmid: 15001706
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2004 Jun 18;339(5):1141-51
references.pmid: 15178254
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1995 May 30;34(21):6975-84
references.pmid: 7766607
references.citation: Biophys J. 2003 Nov;85(5):3221-36
references.pmid: 14581222
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Nov 12;125(45):13804-18
references.pmid: 14599220
references.citation: Nat Struct Biol. 2003 Jun;10(6):482-8
references.pmid: 12740607