title: Quantitative measures of sexual selection reveal no evidence for sex-role reversal in a sea spider with prolonged paternal care.
abstract: Taxa in which males alone invest in postzygotic care of offspring are often considered good models for investigating the proffered relationships between sexual selection and mating systems. In the pycnogonid sea spider Pycnogonum stearnsi, males carry large egg masses on their bodies for several weeks, so this species is a plausible candidate for sex-role reversal (greater intensity of sexual selection on females than on males). Here, we couple a microsatellite-based assessment of the mating system in a natural population with formal quantitative measures of genetic fitness to investigate the direction of sexual selection in P. stearnsi. Both sexes proved to be highly polygamous and showed similar standardized variances in reproductive and mating successes. Moreover, the fertility (number of progeny) of males and females appeared to be equally and highly dependent on mate access, as shown by similar Bateman gradients for the two sexes. The absence of sex-role reversal in this population of P. stearnsi is probably attributable to the fact that males are not limited by brooding space but have evolved an ability to carry large numbers of progeny. Body length was not a good predictor of male mating or reproductive success, so the aim of future studies should be to determine what traits are the targets of sexual selection in this species.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. fbarreto@ucsd.edu
authors.forename: Felipe S
authors.initials: FS
authors.lastname: Barreto
authors.forename: John C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Avise
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001181:Arthropods / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D005260:Female; D005298:Fertility; D007814:Larva / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development; D008297:Male; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D010332:Paternal Behavior; D012737:Sex Factors
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Jan 08;9:6
references.pmid: 19133131
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Dec 22;269(1509):2533-9
references.pmid: 12573067
references.citation: Evolution. 2009 Jul;63(7):1673-84
references.pmid: 19228185
references.citation: Am Nat. 2004 Oct;164(4):E83-9
references.pmid: 15459886
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Jun;16(12):2596-606
references.pmid: 17561916
references.citation: Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215-23
references.pmid: 327542
references.citation: Am Nat. 2004 Oct;164(4):444-56
references.pmid: 15459877
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 7;267(1444):677-80
references.pmid: 10821612
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:139-65
references.pmid: 11112166
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2008 Sep;17(18):4164-75
references.pmid: 18684134
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2008 Jan;21(1):30-38
references.pmid: 18034802
references.citation: Nature. 1991 May 2;351(6321):58-60
references.pmid: 2027382
references.citation: Evolution. 2009 Mar;63(3):674-83
references.pmid: 19087183
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 1948 Dec;2(Pt. 3):349-68
references.pmid: 18103134
references.citation: Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):424-431
references.pmid: 28307857
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Mar;14(3):723-32
references.pmid: 15723664
references.citation: Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226
references.pmid: 28556011
references.citation: Biotechniques. 1999 Sep;27(3):500-2, 504-7
references.pmid: 10489609
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106 Suppl 1:10009-16
references.pmid: 19528645
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Jun 8;441(7094):742-5
references.pmid: 16760976
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2003 Feb;12(2):475-84
references.pmid: 12535097
references.citation: Hum Biol. 1958 Feb;30(1):1-13
references.pmid: 13513111
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Jul;7(7):237-41
references.pmid: 21236017