Extreme leg motion analysis of professional ballet dancers via MRI segmentation of multiple leg postures.
OBJECTIVE
Professional ballet dancers are subject to constant extreme motion which is known to be at the origin of many articular disorders. To analyze their extreme motion, we exploit a unique magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol, denoted as 'dual-posture' MRI, which scans the subject in both the normal (supine) and extreme (split) postures. However, due to inhomogeneous tissue intensities and image artifacts in these scans, coupled with unique acquisition protocol (split posture), segmentation of these scans is difficult. We present a novel algorithm that exploits the correlation between scans (bone shape invariance, appearance similarity) in automatically segmenting the dancer MRI images.


METHODS
While validated segmentation algorithms are available for standard supine MRI, these algorithms cannot be applied to the split scan which exhibits a unique posture and strong inter-subject variations. In this study, the supine MRI is segmented with a deformable models method. The appearance and shape of the segmented supine models are then re-used to segment the split MRI of the same subject. Models are first registered to the split image using a novel constrained global optimization, before being refined with the deformable models technique.


RESULTS
Experiments with 10 dual-posture MRI datasets in the segmentation of left and right femur bones reported accurate and robust results (mean distance error: 1.39 ± 0.31 mm).


CONCLUSIONS
The use of segmented models from the supine posture to assist the split posture segmentation was found to be equally accurate and consistent to supine results. Our results suggest that dual-posture MRI can be efficiently and robustly segmented.
Schmid
Jérôme
J
MIRALab, University of Geneva, Battelle, Building A, 7 rte de Drize, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland. schmid@miralab.ch
Kim
Jinman
J
Magnenat-Thalmann
Nadia
N
D000465:Algorithms; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000502:physiology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008954:Models, Biological; D009038:Motion; D011187:Posture; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology*
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 1):119-26
18979739
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar 21;52(6):1617-31
17327652
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:5620-3
18003287
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Dec;55(12):2731-40
19126452
Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):778-85
16857978
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 1):289-96
17354902
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2007 Dec;16(12):2879-90
18092588
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Dec;(417):112-20
14646708
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Apr;90(4):411-21
18378911
Med Image Anal. 2009 Aug;13(4):543-63
19525140
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Aug;28(8):1251-65
19211338
Phys Med Biol. 2002 Oct 7;47(19):3503-17
12408478
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 Oct;12(10):779-86
15450527
Med Image Anal. 2008 Jun;12(3):358-74
18313973
J Biomech. 2009 Mar 26;42(5):565-72
19232618
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;77:1226-30
11187517
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004 Jul;28(5):267-78
15249072
J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):263-8
15598452
Med Image Anal. 2000 Sep;4(3):219-33
11145310
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Nov;22(11):1395-406
14606673
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Aug;21(8):888-903
12472262
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 May;22(5):586-98
12846428
Med Image Anal. 2007 Aug;11(4):325-35
17482502
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Apr;41 Supp 1:3-6
12173279
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Jan;25(1):1-16
16398410
J Biomech. 2009 Jun 19;42(9):1201-5
19394944