Combined use of fluorescent dyes and flow cytometry to quantify the physiological state of Pichia pastoris during the production of heterologous proteins in high-cell-density fed-batch cultures.
Matching both the construction of a recombinant strain and the process design with the characteristics of the target protein has the potential to significantly enhance bioprocess performance, robustness, and reproducibility. The factors affecting the physiological state of recombinant Pichia pastoris Mut(+) (methanol utilization-positive) strains and their cell membranes were quantified at the individual cell level using a combination of staining with fluorescent dyes and flow cytometric enumeration. Cell vitalities were found to range from 5 to 95% under various process conditions in high-cell-density fed-batch cultures, with strains producing either porcine trypsinogen or horseradish peroxidase extracellularly. Impaired cell vitality was observed to be the combined effect of production of recombinant protein, low pH, and high cell density. Vitality improved when any one of these stress factors was excluded. At a pH value of 4, which is commonly applied to counter proteolysis, recombinant strains exhibited severe physiological stress, whereas strains without heterologous genes were not affected. Physiologically compromised cells were also found to be increasingly sensitive to methanol when it accumulated in the culture broth. The magnitude of the response varied when different reporters were combined with either the native AOX1 promoter or its d6* variant, which differ in both strength and regulation. Finally, the quantitative assessment of the physiology of individual cells enables the implementation of innovative concepts in bioprocess development. Such concepts are in contrast to the frequently used paradigm, which always assumes a uniform cell population, because differentiation between the individual cells is not possible with methods commonly used.
Hyka
Petr
P
Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Institute of Biotechnology, Campus Grüental, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Züllig
Thomas
T
Ruth
Claudia
C
Looser
Verena
V
Meier
Christian
C
Klein
Joachim
J
Melzoch
Karel
K
Meyer
Hans-Peter
HP
Glieder
Anton
A
Kovar
Karin
K
D001709:Biotechnology / Q000379:methods; D049109:Cell Proliferation; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D003470:Culture Media; D005434:Flow Cytometry / Q000379:methods*; D005456:Fluorescent Dyes / Q000378:metabolism*; D000432:Methanol / Q000378:metabolism; D010641:Phenotype; D010843:Pichia / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D011994:Recombinant Proteins / Q000096:biosynthesis* / Q000235:genetics
D003470:Culture Media; D005456:Fluorescent Dyes; D011994:Recombinant Proteins; D000432:Methanol
Protein Expr Purif. 2003 Apr;28(2):321-30
12699697
Cytometry. 1999 Oct 1;37(2):156-9
10486528
Protein Expr Purif. 2000 Dec;20(3):472-84
11087687
Microbiology (Reading). 2006 Jun;152(Pt 6):1719-1729
16735735
J Biotechnol. 1999 Oct 8;75(2-3):251-64
10553662
FEMS Yeast Res. 2004 Nov;5(2):179-89
15489201
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul;36(12):e76
18539608
J Biotechnol. 2007 Jun 30;130(3):236-46
17566583
Biochem J. 1983 Sep 15;214(3):657-63
6226283
Yeast. 1993 Jan;9(1):77-84
8382891
BMC Genomics. 2008 Aug 19;9:390
18713468
J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Mar;52(3):379-88
12531507
Biotechnol Prog. 2006 Nov-Dec;22(6):1465-73
17137292
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jun;73(12):3993-4000
17483273
Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5
5432063
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005 Oct 5;92(1):69-78
16142799
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999 Jun 20;63(6):705-11
10397827
Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jun 25;19(12):3185-92
1905801
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000 Oct 5;70(1):1-8
10940857
Biotechnol Prog. 2001 Sep-Oct;17(5):951-7
11587589
J Biotechnol. 2004 Apr 29;109(3):239-54
15066762
Microbes Infect. 2000 Oct;2(12):1523-35
11099939
J Biotechnol. 2003 Apr 10;102(1):45-53
12668313
Biotechnol Prog. 2001 May-Jun;17(3):495-502
11386871
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003 Aug 5;83(3):344-52
12783490
EMBO J. 1992 Jul;11(7):2583-93
1628622
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;71(5):2239-43
15870306
Methods Mol Biol. 1998;103:107-20
9680637
Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Jun;27(6):561-6
19465926
Mol Biotechnol. 2000 Sep;16(1):23-52
11098467
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997 Nov 5;56(3):279-86
18636643
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001 Aug 20;74(4):344-52
11410859
Cytometry. 2001 Jul 1;44(3):179-87
11429768
J Proteome Res. 2009 Mar;8(3):1380-92
19216534
Protein Expr Purif. 2004 Jan;33(1):110-22
14680968
Protein Expr Purif. 2002 Feb;24(1):18-24
11812218
J Biotechnol. 2003 May 8;102(3):281-90
12730003
Mol Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(2):469-79
11136466
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002 Aug 20;79(4):438-49
12115407
Cytometry. 1994 Dec 1;17(4):302-9
7875037
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Feb 20;85(4):367-75
14755554
Cytometry A. 2009 Feb;75(2):86-9
19097169
Gene. 1991 Sep 15;105(2):205-12
1937016
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006 Oct;72(4):837-44
16525778
Microb Cell Fact. 2008 Apr 04;7:11
18394160
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006 Apr 5;93(5):871-9
16320364
Yeast. 2004 Feb;21(3):249-63
14968430
J Biotechnol. 1997 May 9;54(3):161-74
9208486
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2004;89:197-223
15217160
Biochem J. 1992 Aug 1;285 ( Pt 3):965-72
1497632
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2005 Oct;27(6):399-406
16080002
J Biotechnol. 2004 Sep 30;113(1-3):121-35
15380652
J Biol Chem. 1998 Jul 31;273(31):19453-8
9677365