Sieving experiments and pore diameter: it's not a simple relationship.
The classic sieving experiment for estimating an ion channel's diameter with successively larger ions is re-examined. Using a very reduced model of a calcium channel, it is shown that sieving experiments measure a combination of three mechanisms: the cross-sectional area available to the sieving ions (the classic interpretation), the exclusion of the sieving ions from a pore crowded with amino acid side chains that protrude into the permeation pathway, and competitive selectivity of the sieving ions with other ions in the bath (even if those are present only at trace concentrations). The latter two can be called sieving-by-crowding because they stem from the excluded volume of the amino acids in the permeation pathway. The model shows that--to a first--order approximation-sieving experiments measure the available volume inside a selectivity filter, rather than the available cross-sectional area. The two are only the same if the narrow part of the pore does not have flexible amino acid side chains interacting directly with the permeant ions; this may be true of potassium channels, but not calcium, sodium, and other channels with "crowded" selectivity filters.
Krauss
Daniel
D
Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gillespie
Dirk
D
D002118:Calcium / Q000378:metabolism; D019277:Entropy; D007473:Ion Channels / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D008954:Models, Biological; D016062:Porosity; D012964:Sodium / Q000378:metabolism; D055672:Static Electricity
D007473:Ion Channels; D012964:Sodium; D002118:Calcium
J Chem Phys. 2006 Jul 21;125(3):34901
16863379
J Gen Physiol. 1993 Dec;102(6):1107-29
8133241
J Phys Chem B. 2005 Aug 18;109(32):15598-610
16852978
J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469-92
6247422
Biophys J. 2000 Oct;79(4):1976-92
11023902
Biophys J. 1998 Sep;75(3):1287-305
9726931
Biophys J. 2008 Sep 15;95(6):2658-72
18515379
Biophys J. 2007 Sep 15;93(6):1960-80
17526571
J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 13;275(41):31778-85
10934200
Biophys J. 2009 Oct 21;97(8):2212-21
19843453
Biophys J. 2008 May 1;94(9):3486-96
18199663
J Mol Biol. 2008 Feb 8;376(1):13-22
18155244
Biophys J. 2004 Nov;87(5):3137-47
15326033
Biophys J. 2008 Jul;95(2):609-19
18390596
Biophys J. 2008 Feb 15;94(4):1169-84
17951303
Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Apr 20;98(16):168102
17501467
Biophys J. 2008 Oct;95(8):3706-14
18621826
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Dec;1788(12):2471-80
19818330
J Gen Physiol. 2009 May;133(5):497-509
19398776
Biophys J. 2006 Dec 15;91(12):4392-400
16997866
Science. 1998 Apr 3;280(5360):69-77
9525859
J Biol Chem. 2000 Nov 3;275(44):34493-500
10950957
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):7149-53
2413461
J Physiol. 2002 Feb 1;538(Pt 3):729-45
11826161