title: Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic disease in pregnancy and the early postnatal period.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Venous thromboembolic disease (TED), although rare, is a major cause of maternal mortality and morbidity, hence methods of prophylaxis are often used for women at risk. This may include women delivered by caesarean section, those with a personal or family history of TED and women with inherited or acquired thrombophilias (conditions that predispose people to thrombosis). Many methods of prophylaxis carry a risk of side effects, and as the risk of TED is low, it is possible that the benefits of thromboprophylaxis may be outweighed by harm. Current guidelines for clinical practice are based on expert opinion only, rather than high quality evidence from randomised trials.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine the effects of thromboprophylaxis in women who are pregnant or have recently delivered and are at increased risk of TED on the incidence of venous TED and side effects of treatment.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (May 2009).
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised trials comparing one method of thromboprophylaxis with placebo or no treatment, and randomised trials comparing two (or more) methods of thromboprophylaxis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two review authors extracted data independently and resolved any discrepancies by discussion.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sixteen trials met the inclusion criteria but only 13 trials, involving 1774 women, examining a range of methods of thromboprophylaxis, contributed data for the outcomes of interest. Four of them compared methods of antenatal prophylaxis: low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) (two studies), and heparin versus no treatment (two studies). Eight studies assessed postnatal prophylaxis after caesarean section; one compared hydroxyethyl starch with unfractionated heparin; four compared heparin with placebo; and the other three compared UFH with LMWH. One study examined prophylaxis in the postnatal period.The small number of statistically significant findings in this review are largely derived from trials which are not of high methodological quality. It was not possible to assess the effects of any of these interventions on most outcomes, and especially on rare outcomes such as death, TED and osteoporosis, because of small sample sizes and the small number of trials making the same comparisons.There was some evidence of side effects associated with thromboprophylaxis.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is insufficient evidence on which to base recommendations for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the early postnatal period. Large scale randomised trials of currently-used interventions should be conducted.
authors.affiliation: Paediatric Trials Unit, Children,Youth and Women's Health Service, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5006.
authors.forename: Rebecca
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Tooher
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gates
authors.forename: Therese
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Dowswell
authors.forename: Lucy-Jane
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Davis
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D049590:Postpartum Period; D011247:Pregnancy; D011250:Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D020246:Venous Thrombosis / Q000517:prevention & control*
references.citation: Postgrad Med J. 2000 Jun;76(896):354-6
references.pmid: 10824050
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003580
references.pmid: 12804477
references.citation: BJOG. 2001 Jan;108(1):56-60
references.pmid: 11213005
references.citation: Thromb Haemost. 1990 Apr 12;63(2):319-20
references.pmid: 2141957
references.citation: J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Oct;1(10):2073-4
references.pmid: 14521585
references.citation: Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2007;37(3):211-8
references.pmid: 17726250
references.citation: J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Feb;3(2):227-9
references.pmid: 15670024
references.citation: J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jan;7(1):58-64
references.pmid: 19036070
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 16;343(20):1439-44
references.pmid: 11078768
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;100(3):408-13
references.pmid: 12220757
references.citation: Haemostasis. 1993 Nov-Dec;23(6):314-20
references.pmid: 8034237
references.citation: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 May 28;296(6635):1505-6
references.pmid: 3134089
references.citation: Br Med J. 1977 Jun 18;1(6076):1564-5
references.pmid: 871666
references.citation: Br J Haematol. 2005 Oct;131(1):80-90
references.pmid: 16173967
references.citation: Thromb Haemost. 2002 Feb;87(2):182-6
references.pmid: 11858475
references.citation: Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1996 Sep;147 Suppl 1:44
references.pmid: 8992939
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;94(4):595-9
references.pmid: 10511366
references.citation: Thromb Res. 1999 Nov 15;96(4):275-82
references.pmid: 10593430
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1975;5(5):273-6
references.pmid: 1053520
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;24(3):499-521
references.pmid: 9266575
references.citation: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Feb;77(2):170-3
references.pmid: 9512321
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD004734
references.pmid: 19160241
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Feb 10;101(1):6-14
references.pmid: 11803092
references.citation: Lancet. 2000 Apr 15;355(9212):1295-302
references.pmid: 10776741
references.citation: Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jul;98(1):163-71
references.pmid: 17598009
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD006681
references.pmid: 18843725
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191(4):1296-303
references.pmid: 15507957
references.citation: Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(3):198-9
references.pmid: 17163898
references.citation: Anaesth Intensive Care. 1987 May;15(2):163-7
references.pmid: 2440337
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Apr;28(3):280-4
references.pmid: 18569468
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1996 Dec 15;125(12):955-60
references.pmid: 8967705
references.citation: J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Apr;6(4):632-7
references.pmid: 18248600
references.citation: Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2007;34(3):143-5
references.pmid: 17937086
references.citation: J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Aug;5(8):1600-6
references.pmid: 17663731
references.citation: South Med J. 2003 Feb;96(2):146-8
references.pmid: 12630638
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Dec;90(12):1124-8
references.pmid: 6360198
references.citation: Am J Med. 1980 Jan;68(1):122-40
references.pmid: 6985765
references.citation: Br J Haematol. 2006 Nov;135(3):386-91
references.pmid: 16984390
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD005259
references.pmid: 18843687
references.citation: Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1998 Jun;9(4):343-50
references.pmid: 9690805
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Dec;76(6):1055-60
references.pmid: 2234713
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD005258
references.pmid: 18843686
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD003747
references.pmid: 19588346
references.citation: Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Sep;11(3):523-43
references.pmid: 9488790
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov;94(5 Pt 1):730-4
references.pmid: 10546719
references.citation: Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1981 Nov;101(11):925-34
references.pmid: 7034116
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 1997 Jul;12(7):1567-72
references.pmid: 9262298
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2005 Mar;83(3):684-90
references.pmid: 15749498
references.citation: Scott Med J. 1996 Jun;41(3):83-6
references.pmid: 8807703
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Sep;90(3):203-7
references.pmid: 15964002
references.citation: Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):844S-886S
references.pmid: 18574280
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;174(5):1584-9
references.pmid: 9065133
references.citation: Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Sep;11(3):489-509
references.pmid: 9488788
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Apr;93(4):348-52
references.pmid: 3964611
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jul;105(7):795-7
references.pmid: 9692422
references.citation: Am J Reprod Immunol. 1996 Apr;35(4):402-7
references.pmid: 8739461
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000492
references.pmid: 10796208
references.citation: Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1994 Aug;198(4):120-5
references.pmid: 7975797
references.citation: BMJ. 1997 Jan 25;314(7076):253-7
references.pmid: 9022487
references.citation: Thromb Haemost. 2001 Dec;86(6):1374-8
references.pmid: 11776302
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 15;143(10):697-706
references.pmid: 16287790
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 Aug;26(8):729-34
references.pmid: 15307977
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Aug;33(4):423-30
references.pmid: 17688607
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2005 Sep;84(3):770-3
references.pmid: 16169422
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;195(4):1109-13
references.pmid: 17000242
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):240-4
references.pmid: 8041538
references.citation: Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1991 Jan-Feb;195(1):10-5
references.pmid: 1711261
references.citation: BJOG. 2001 Aug;108(8):835-9
references.pmid: 11510709
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD002859
references.pmid: 15846641
references.citation: J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Oct;1(10):2070-2
references.pmid: 14521584