title: The horizontal disparity direction vs. the stimulus disparity direction in the perception of the depth of two-dimensional patterns.
abstract: Horizontal binocular disparity has long been the conventional predictor of stereo depth. Surprisingly, an alternative predictor fairs just as well. This alternative predicts the relative depth of two stimuli from the relation between their disparity vectors, without regard to horizontal disparities. These predictions can differ; horizontal disparities accurately predict the perceived depth of a grating and a plaid only when the grating is vertical, while the vector calculation accurately predicts it at all except near-horizontal grating orientations. For spatially two-dimensional stimulus pairs, such as plaids, dots, and textures, the predictions cannot be distinguished when the stimuli have the same disparity direction or when the disparity direction of one of the stimuli is horizontal or has a magnitude of zero. These are the conditions that have prevailed in earlier studies. We tested whether the perceived depth of two-dimensional stimuli depends on relative horizontal disparity magnitudes or on relative disparity magnitudes along a disparity axis. On both measures tested-depth matches and depth-interval matches-the perceived depth of plaids varied with their horizontal disparities and not with disparity direction differences as observed for grating-plaid pairs. Differences in disparity directions as great as 120 degrees did not affect depth judgments. This result, though opposite the grating-plaid data, is consistent with them and provides a view into the construction of orientation-invariant disparity representations.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA. bfarell@syr.edu
authors.forename: Bart
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Farell
authors.forename: Yu-Chin
authors.initials: YC
authors.lastname: Chai
authors.forename: Julian M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Fernandez
mesh_terms: D003867:Depth Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008029:Lighting; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: Vision Res. 1991;31(7-8):1337-50
references.pmid: 1891822
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1983 May;49(5):1148-67
references.pmid: 6864243
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1314-29
references.pmid: 11800459
references.citation: Science. 1980 May 9;208(4444):615-7
references.pmid: 7367885
references.citation: Vision Res. 2009 Aug;49(17):2209-16
references.pmid: 19540869
references.citation: Vision Res. 1978;18(3):351-2
references.pmid: 664311
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Sep 04;9(10):3.1-19
references.pmid: 19810784
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jan;87(1):191-208
references.pmid: 11784742
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references.pmid: 9176953
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):633-6
references.pmid: 12167860
references.citation: Perception. 2006;35(9):1219-32
references.pmid: 17120842
references.citation: AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954 Apr;53(4):495-504
references.pmid: 14360880
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Aug;82(2):909-24
references.pmid: 10444686
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1978 Apr 14;31(4):523-45
references.pmid: 658179
references.citation: Vision Res. 2005 Jan;45(1):75-89
references.pmid: 15571739
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1986 Jul;56(1):243-59
references.pmid: 3746399
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 1988;1(4):395-414
references.pmid: 3154808
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1293-313
references.pmid: 11800458
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Oct 15;395(6703):689-93
references.pmid: 9790188
references.citation: J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(2):327-42
references.pmid: 6065881
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: J Vis. 2004 Mar 30;4(3):209-23
references.pmid: 15086311
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(24):2479-92
references.pmid: 13129536
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 6;26(36):9098-106
references.pmid: 16957066
references.citation: Vision Res. 2006 Jan;46(1-2):1-13
references.pmid: 16129469