title: What do fish make of mirror images?
abstract: Fish act aggressively towards their mirror image suggesting that they consider it another individual, whereas in some mammals behavioural response to mirrors may be an evidence of self-recognition. Since fish cannot self-recognize, we asked whether they could distinguish between fighting a mirror image and fighting a real fish. We compared molecular, physiological and behavioural responses in each condition and found large differences in brain gene expression levels. Although neither levels of aggressive behaviour nor circulating androgens differed between these conditions, males fighting a mirror image had higher immediate early gene (IEG) expression in brain areas homologous to the amygdala and hippocampus than controls. Since amygdalar responses are associated with fear and fear conditioning in other species, higher levels of brain activation when fighting a mirror suggest fish experience fear in response to fights with a mirror image. Clearly, the fish recognize something unusual about the mirror image and the differential brain response may reflect a cognitive distinction.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Stanford University, CA, USA. desjarjk@stanford.edu
authors.forename: Julie K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Desjardins
authors.forename: Russell D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Fernald
mesh_terms: D000374:Aggression / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology; D023681:Cichlids / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D051766:Early Growth Response Protein 1 / Q000235:genetics; D015870:Gene Expression; D017781:Genes, Immediate-Early; D016762:Genes, fos; D008297:Male; D012930:Social Dominance
chemical_list: D051766:Early Growth Response Protein 1
references.citation: J Comput Biol. 2005 Oct;12(8):1047-64
references.pmid: 16241897
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1968 Dec;70(6):782-93
references.pmid: 4894587
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 15;90(16):7794-8
references.pmid: 8356086
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jan 30;166(2):291-5
references.pmid: 16143408
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 2002 Feb-Mar 1;57(3-4):499-503
references.pmid: 11923018
references.citation: Nature. 1997 Dec 11;390(6660):604-7
references.pmid: 9403688
references.citation: Nature. 1995 Nov 9;378(6553):182-6
references.pmid: 7477320
references.citation: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1998 Apr;23(3):219-43
references.pmid: 9695128
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Nov;74(3):185-216
references.pmid: 11031127
references.citation: Brain Res. 2000 Jul 7;870(1-2):170-8
references.pmid: 10869515
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 2005 Sep 15;66(4-6):365-70
references.pmid: 16144616
references.citation: Nature. 1987 Oct 1-7;329(6138):441-2
references.pmid: 3116433
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2006 Feb 20;494(6):903-43
references.pmid: 16385483
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16279-84
references.pmid: 12461180
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1992 May 15;319(3):359-86
references.pmid: 1351063
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e363
references.pmid: 16216088
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 2002 Feb-Mar 1;57(3-4):397-9
references.pmid: 11922997
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1985 Aug 8;238(2):202-17
references.pmid: 4044911
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2009;74(2):110-20
references.pmid: 19729898