Mitochondrial genomes of acrodont lizards: timing of gene rearrangements and phylogenetic and biogeographic implications.
BACKGROUND
Acrodonta consists of Agamidae and Chamaeleonidae that have the characteristic acrodont dentition. These two families and Iguanidae sensu lato are members of infraorder Iguania. Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of iguanian lizards still remain to be elucidated in spite of a number of morphological and molecular studies. This issue was addressed by sequencing complete mitochondrial genomes from 10 species that represent major lineages of acrodont lizards. This study also provided a good opportunity to compare molecular evolutionary modes of mitogenomes among different iguanian lineages.


RESULTS
Acrodontan mitogenomes were found to be less conservative than iguanid counterparts with respect to gene arrangement features and rates of sequence evolution. Phylogenetic relationships were constructed with the mitogenomic sequence data and timing of gene rearrangements was inferred on it. The result suggested highly lineage-specific occurrence of several gene rearrangements, except for the translocation of the tRNAPro gene from the 5' to 3' side of the control region, which likely occurred independently in both agamine and chamaeleonid lineages. Phylogenetic analyses strongly suggested the monophyly of Agamidae in relation to Chamaeleonidae and the non-monophyly of traditional genus Chamaeleo within Chamaeleonidae. Uromastyx and Brookesia were suggested to be the earliest shoot-off of Agamidae and Chamaeleonidae, respectively. Together with the results of relaxed-clock dating analyses, our molecular phylogeny was used to infer the origin of Acrodonta and historical biogeography of its descendant lineages. Our molecular data favored Gondwanan origin of Acrodonta, vicariant divergence of Agamidae and Chamaeleonidae in the drifting India-Madagascar landmass, and migration of the Agamidae to Eurasia with the Indian subcontinent, although Laurasian origin of Acrodonta was not strictly ruled out.


CONCLUSIONS
We detected distinct modes of mitogenomic evolution among iguanian families. Agamidae was highlighted in including a number of lineage-specific mitochondrial gene rearrangements. The mitogenomic data provided a certain level of resolution in reconstructing acrodontan phylogeny, although there still remain ambiguous relationships. Our biogeographic implications shed a light on the previous hypothesis of Gondwanan origin of Acrodonta by adding some new evidence and concreteness.
Okajima
Yasuhisa
Y
Department of Information and Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Natural Sciences, Nagoya City University, 1 Yamanohata, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8501, Japan.
Kumazawa
Yoshinori
Y
D000818:Animals; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D015321:Gene Rearrangement; D054629:Genome, Mitochondrial; D005843:Geography; D008116:Lizards / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics*; D010802:Phylogeny; D012361:RNA, Transfer, Pro / Q000235:genetics; D016415:Sequence Alignment; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA
D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial; D012361:RNA, Transfer, Pro
Nature. 2002 Feb 14;415(6873):784-7
11845207
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Sep;52(3):784-96
19481165
Gene. 2007 Jun 1;394(1-2):69-77
17391869
Biol Lett. 2007 Apr 22;3(2):189-92
17251121
J Mol Evol. 1989 Aug;29(2):170-9
2509717
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Apr 15;27(8):1767-80
10101183
DNA Res. 2004 Apr 30;11(2):115-25
15449544
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Feb;50(2):391-6
19026752
Gene. 2009 Jul 15;441(1-2):28-35
18598742
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Dec;15(12):1647-57
9866200
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Jun;24(6):1330-9
17379622
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Dec;49(3):1015-8
18832039
Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):543-63
17654361
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Nov;21(11):2102-10
15297599
Syst Biol. 2000 Jun;49(2):257-77
12118408
Syst Biol. 2004 Oct;53(5):735-57
15545252
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Nov;78(4):513-51
14700390
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 2;106(22):8986-91
19416880
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 22;271(1551):1967-75
15347522
Gene. 2009 Jul 15;441(1-2):12-21
18639394
Am Nat. 2006 Dec;168(6):730-41
17109316
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Nov;29(2):289-97
13678684
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Mar 22;268(1467):623-31
11297180
Nature. 1981 Apr 9;290(5806):457-65
7219534
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Apr;23(1):22-36
12182400
Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Jan;14(1):91-104
9000757
Microbiol Rev. 1992 Mar;56(1):229-64
1579111
Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):125-40
9461386
Bioinformatics. 2002 Mar;18(3):502-4
11934758
DNA Res. 2004 Apr 30;11(2):137-44
15449546
J Mol Evol. 2003 Jan;56(1):46-53
12569422
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 27;104(13):5507-9
17376871
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Dec;10(3):367-76
10051389
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):597-603
12769459
Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Oct;13(5):555-6
9367129
Gene. 2007 Feb 15;388(1-2):19-26
17118581
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Jun;39(3):881-6
16701179
Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
12912839
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D101-3
14681368
Syst Biol. 2009 Dec;58(6):641-56
20525615
J Mol Evol. 1993 Oct;37(4):380-98
7508516
Gene. 2005 Feb 14;346:249-56
15716001
J Mol Evol. 1997 Jun;44(6):660-74
9169559
Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Oct 24;9(20):5411-21
7301592
Int Rev Cytol. 1992;141:173-216
1452431
C R Biol. 2005 Oct-Nov;328(10-11):1000-8
16286089
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
9396791
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Oct;53(1):99-112
19460448
Syst Biol. 2000 Jun;49(2):233-56
12118407