Correction of axial and rotational alignment after medial and lateral releases during balanced gap TKA. A clinical study of 54 patients.
OBJECTIVE
Restoration of mechanical alignment after total knee arthroplasty can be achieved with ligament releases. Several previously described sequences and results achieved with cadaver knees, with measured resection implantation techniques, may not be applied to the balanced gap technique. We investigated the peroperative effect of stepwise soft tissue releases following the "tightest structure first" on leg axis in extension and femur rotation in flexion.


METHODS
During PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA), using a balanced gap technique in 54 patients we determined the effect of each ligament release using a navigation system while the knee was distracted with a tensor in extension and flexion. The effect on alignment in extension and on femoral rotation in flexion was measured for each release separately.


RESULTS
In more than half of the patients, one or more ligament releases were necessary. Release of the posteromedial condyle led to a minor effect on leg axis in extension and femoral rotation in flexion, release of the superficial medial collateral ligament to a few degrees, mainly in extension. Release of the iliotibial tract led to a small correction of leg alignment in extension. There was no statistically significant difference in the alignment-correcting effect of a release dependent upon the sequence in which the structure was released.


CONCLUSIONS
In PCL-retaining TKA, a stepwise "tightest structure first" protocol for ligament releases in extension with the balanced gap technique results in effective, gradual, alignment correction in extension, and limited femoral rotating effects in flexion.
Heesterbeek
Petra J C
PJ
Department of Research, Development and Education, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. p.heesterbeek@maartenskliniek.nl
Wymenga
Ate B
AB
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000503:physiopathology; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008023:Ligaments, Articular / Q000503:physiopathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology; D012086:Reoperation; D012399:Rotation
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Jun;56(4):665-74
4835814
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov;(404):24-31
12439233
Acta Orthop. 2006 Feb;77(1):149-55
16534716
J Arthroplasty. 1999 Dec;14(8):994-1004
10614893
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 4:132-5
14652405
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Oct;(120):149-54
975650
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Oct;(367):130-40
10546607
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Sep;(366):264-73
10627744
Am J Knee Surg. 1999 Fall;12(4):222-8
10626913
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):35-46
8895617
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):2000-10
17768198
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4 Suppl 1):23-7
12068398
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):168-72
7497664
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Dec;20(8):1010-4
16376256
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Jan-Feb;(192):13-22
3967412
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):315-8
11716402
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Nov;(380):72-9
11064975
Orthopade. 2005 Nov;34(11):1118, 1120-2, 1124
16075249
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;103(3):165-9
6497605
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Nov;(380):45-57
11064972
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):1015-22
18830793
Acta Orthop Scand. 1984 Feb;55(1):30-4
6702425
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):184-9
11716381
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr;18(3):313-20
12728423
J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jan;15(1):22-6
10654458
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Apr;16(3):301-5
11307126
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Sep;16(6):721-9
11547370
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Apr;21(3):428-34
16627154
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jan;(286):40-7
8425366