Experimentally assessing the relative importance of predation and competition as agents of selection.
Field experiments that measure natural selection in response to manipulations of the selective regime are extremely rare, even in systems where the ecological basis of adaptation has been studied extensively. The adaptive radiation of Caribbean Anolis lizards has been studied for decades, leading to precise predictions about the influence of alternative agents of selection in the wild. Here we present experimental evidence for the relative importance of two putative agents of selection in shaping the adaptive landscape for a classic island radiation. We manipulated whole-island populations of the brown anole lizard, Anolis sagrei, to measure the relative importance of predation versus competition as agents of natural selection. We excluded or included bird and snake predators across six islands that ranged from low to high population densities of lizards, then measured subsequent differences in behaviour and natural selection in each population. Predators altered the lizards' perching behaviour and increased mortality, but predation treatments did not alter selection on phenotypic traits. By contrast, experimentally increasing population density dramatically increased the strength of viability selection favouring large body size, long relative limb length and high running stamina. Our results from A. sagrei are consistent with the hypothesis that intraspecific competition is more important than predation in shaping the selective landscape for traits central to the adaptive radiation of Anolis ecomorphs.
Calsbeek
Ryan
R
Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA. ryan.calsbeek@dartmouth.edu
Cox
Robert M
RM
D000818:Animals; D001444:Bahamas; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology; D049628:Body Size / Q000502:physiology; D003163:Competitive Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D005121:Extremities / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D005843:Geography; D008116:Lizards / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D008954:Models, Biological; D009929:Organ Size / Q000502:physiology; D010641:Phenotype; D011156:Population Density; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D012420:Running / Q000502:physiology; D012641:Selection, Genetic / Q000502:physiology*; D012911:Snakes / Q000502:physiology; D015996:Survival Rate
Science. 1967 Jan 27;155(3761):474-7
17737565
Evolution. 2008 Feb;62(2):478-84
18053075
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 7;271(1556):2501-8
15590602
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Jun;45(3):456-62
21676790
Am Nat. 2001 Mar;157(3):245-61
18707288
J Anim Ecol. 2009 May;78(3):617-24
19302322
Am Nat. 2009 Feb;173(2):176-87
19138156
Nature. 2007 May 10;447(7141):202-5
17495925
Evolution. 2007 May;61(5):1052-61
17492960
Nature. 2004 Nov 25;432(7016):505-8
15565155
Science. 1998 Mar 27;279(5359):2115-8
9516114
Evolution. 2007 Nov;61(11):2493-503
17725626
Science. 1997 Mar 28;275(5308):1934-7
9072971
Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1111
17110568
Evolution. 2010 May;64(5):1321-30
19930451
Science. 1994 Nov 4;266(5186):798-801
17730400
Evolution. 2006 Feb;60(2):362-9
16610326