title: Genome-wide identification and analysis of the chicken basic helix-loop-helix factors.
abstract: Members of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of transcription factors play important roles in a wide range of developmental processes. In this study, we conducted a genome-wide survey using the chicken (Gallus gallus) genomic database, and identified 104 bHLH sequences belonging to 42 gene families in an effort to characterize the chicken bHLH transcription factor family. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that chicken has 50, 21, 15, 4, 8, and 3 bHLH members in groups A, B, C, D, E, and F, respectively, while three members belonging to none of these groups were classified as ''orphans". A comparison between chicken and human bHLH repertoires suggested that both organisms have a number of lineage-specific bHLH members in the proteomes. Chromosome distribution patterns and phylogenetic analyses strongly suggest that the bHLH members should have arisen through gene duplication at an early date. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment statistics showed 51 top GO annotations of biological processes counted in the frequency. The present study deepens our understanding of the chicken bHLH transcription factor family and provides much useful information for further studies using chicken as a model system.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road No.2, Beijing 100093, China.
authors.forename: Wu-Yi
authors.initials: WY
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: Chun-Jiang
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Zhao
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22;94(15):7799-806
references.pmid: 9223266
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Mar 02;7:33
references.pmid: 17335570
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Nov 24;350(3):648-56
references.pmid: 17027923
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Dec 9;432(7018):761-4
references.pmid: 15592415
references.citation: Mamm Genome. 2009 Apr;20(4):236-46
references.pmid: 19306043
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 13;94(10):5172-6
references.pmid: 9144210
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1999 May;48(5):501-16
references.pmid: 10198117
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
references.pmid: 14530136
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references.pmid: 12912839
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9
references.pmid: 17488738
references.citation: Nature. 1993 May 6;363(6424):38-45
references.pmid: 8479534
references.citation: Genome Res. 2001 May;11(5):754-70
references.pmid: 11337472
references.citation: Cell. 1989 Mar 10;56(5):777-83
references.pmid: 2493990
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
references.pmid: 9396791
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Jan;20(2):429-40
references.pmid: 10611221
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Dec 9;432(7018):695-716
references.pmid: 15592404
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 2009 Jun;68(6):629-40
references.pmid: 19449054
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
references.pmid: 11524383
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2002;3(6):RESEARCH0030
references.pmid: 12093377
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2003 Aug;15(8):1749-70
references.pmid: 12897250
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36(Web Server issue):W358-63
references.pmid: 18487275
references.citation: Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Jun;8(3):275-82
references.pmid: 1633570