Substantia nigra activity level predicts trial-to-trial adjustments in cognitive control.
Effective adaptation to the demands of a changing environment requires flexible cognitive control. The medial and the lateral frontal cortices are involved in such control processes, putatively in close interplay with the BG. In particular, dopaminergic projections from the midbrain (i.e., from the substantia nigra [SN] and the ventral tegmental area) have been proposed to play a pivotal role in modulating the activity in these areas for cognitive control purposes. In that dopaminergic involvement has been strongly implicated in reinforcement learning, these ideas suggest functional links between reinforcement learning, where the outcome of actions shapes behavior over time, and cognitive control in a more general context, where no direct reward is involved. Here, we provide evidence from functional MRI in humans that activity in the SN predicts systematic subsequent trial-to-trial RT prolongations that are thought to reflect cognitive control in a stop-signal paradigm. In particular, variations in the activity level of the SN in one trial predicted the degree of RT prolongation on the subsequent trial, consistent with a modulating output signal from the SN being involved in enhancing cognitive control. This link between SN activity and subsequent behavioral adjustments lends support to theoretical accounts that propose dopaminergic control signals that shape behavior both in the presence and in the absence of direct reward. This SN-based modulatory mechanism is presumably mediated via a wider network that determines response speed in this task, including frontal and parietal control regions, along with the BG and the associated subthalamic nucleus.
Boehler
Carsten Nicolas
CN
Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany. nico.boehler@duke.edu
Bunzeck
Nico
N
Krebs
Ruth M
RM
Noesselt
Toemme
T
Schoenfeld
Mircea A
MA
Heinze
Hans-Jochen
HJ
Münte
Thomas F
TF
Woldorff
Marty G
MG
Hopf
Jens-Max
JM
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D000328:Adult; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010100:Oxygen / Q000097:blood; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D013378:Substantia Nigra / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
D010100:Oxygen
J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Jan 1;13(1):31-43
11224907
Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):443-7
15486290
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;16(6):1098-112
15298795
Prog Neurobiol. 2002 May;67(1):53-83
12126656
Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1118-21
15718473
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Jun;192(2):193-206
17277934
Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1023-6
14963333
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1120-36
16945502
J Neurosci. 2005 Dec 14;25(50):11730-7
16354931
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):251-60
15996856
Science. 2008 Feb 29;319(5867):1264-7
18309087
Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1309-12
17962524
Science. 2007 Dec 7;318(5856):1642-5
18063800
Nature. 2005 Feb 24;433(7028):873-6
15729344
Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 7;17(15):R587-9
17686426
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):971-8
16767087
Neuron. 2005 Feb 3;45(3):459-67
15694331
J Neurosci. 2000 May 15;20(10):3864-73
10804226
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):134-45
18440947
Trends Neurosci. 2009 Jun;32(6):321-8
19446348
PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4257
19165335
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):247-51
19439396
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Dec;1(3):199-207
11257908
Prog Neurobiol. 2004 Sep;74(1):1-58
15381316
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Aug;205(2):273-83
19404616
Science. 1998 May 1;280(5364):747-9
9563953
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Sep;20(9):1595-610
18345985
Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):129-40
15518930
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001 Jun;1(2):137-60
12467110
Nature. 2004 Oct 14;431(7010):760-7
15483596
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun;20(6):1021-9
18211230
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 May;33(5):647-61
18822313
J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2424-33
16510720
Neuron. 2005 Aug 18;47(4):495-501
16102533
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Jul;25(3):336-44
15852388
Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959
15482068
Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;7(4):254-66
10408769
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Dec;8(12):539-46
15556023
Neuroimage. 2008 Sep 1;42(3):1196-206
18588986
Neuroimage. 1998 Aug;8(2):140-8
9740757
Nat Neurosci. 2000 May;3(5):516-20
10769394
Psychol Sci. 2009 Dec;20(12):1473-7
19906127
Nature. 2009 Jun 11;459(7248):837-41
19448610
Psychol Rev. 2002 Oct;109(4):679-709
12374324
Hum Brain Mapp. 1996;4(1):58-73
20408186
J Neurosci. 2007 Apr 4;27(14):3743-52
17409238
J Neurosci. 2007 Dec 19;27(51):14190-8
18094258
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
11488380
Neuroimage. 1998 Jan;7(1):30-40
9500830
Neuron. 2008 Jan 24;57(2):314-25
18215627
Neuron. 2006 Aug 3;51(3):369-79
16880131
J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14311-9
19109512