title: The Janus face of statistical adjustment: confounders versus colliders.
abstract: It has long been established that controlling for confounders is essential to delineate the causal relationship between exposure and disease. For this purpose, statistical adjustment is widely used in observational studies. However, many researchers don't acknowledge the potential pitfalls of statistical adjustment. The aim of the present paper was to demonstrate that statistical adjustment is a double edged sword. By using numerically identical examples, we show that adjustment for a common consequence of the exposure and the outcome can lead to as much bias as absence of necessary adjustment for a confounder.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Norrbacka, 6th floor, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden. imre.janszky@ki.se
authors.forename: Imre
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Janszky
authors.forename: Anders
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ahlbom
authors.forename: Anna C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Svensson
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D015984:Causality; D015986:Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D015340:Epidemiologic Research Design; D006801:Humans
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Jan 15;155(2):176-84
references.pmid: 11790682
references.citation: Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(3):163-6
references.pmid: 18224448
references.citation: Biometrics. 1946 Jun;2(3):47-53
references.pmid: 21001024