title: Dating and functional characterization of duplicated genes in the apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) by analyzing EST data.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Gene duplication is central to genome evolution. In plants, genes can be duplicated through small-scale events and large-scale duplications often involving polyploidy. The apple belongs to the subtribe Pyrinae (Rosaceae), a diverse lineage that originated via allopolyploidization. Both small-scale duplications and polyploidy may have been important mechanisms shaping the genome of this species.
  
  
  RESULTS
  This study evaluates the gene duplication and polyploidy history of the apple by characterizing duplicated genes in this species using EST data. Overall, 68% of the apple genes were clustered into families with a mean copy-number of 4.6. Analysis of the age distribution of gene duplications supported a continuous mode of small-scale duplications, plus two episodes of large-scale duplicates of vastly different ages. The youngest was consistent with the polyploid origin of the Pyrinae 37-48 MYBP, whereas the older may be related to gamma-triplication; an ancient hexapolyploidization previously characterized in the four sequenced eurosid genomes and basal to the eurosid-asterid divergence. Duplicated genes were studied for functional diversification with an emphasis on young paralogs; those originated during or after the formation of the Pyrinae lineage. Unequal assignment of single-copy genes and gene families to Gene Ontology categories suggested functional bias in the pattern of gene retention of paralogs. Young paralogs related to signal transduction, metabolism, and energy pathways have been preferentially retained. Non-random retention of duplicated genes seems to have mediated the expansion of gene families, some of which may have substantially increased their members after the origin of the Pyrinae. The joint analysis of over-duplicated functional categories and phylogenies, allowed evaluation of the role of both polyploidy and small-scale duplications during this process. Finally, gene expression analysis indicated that 82% of duplicated genes, including 80% of young paralogs, showed uncorrelated expression profiles, suggesting extensive subfunctionalization and a role of gene duplication in the acquisition of novel patterns of gene expression.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study reports a genome-wide analysis of the mode of gene duplication in the apple, and provides evidence for its role in genome functional diversification by characterising three major processes: selective retention of paralogs, amplification of gene families, and changes in gene expression.
authors.affiliation: Unidad de Fruticultura, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Avenida de Montañana 930, Zaragoza, Spain. jsanzol@aragon.es
authors.forename: Javier
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sanzol
mesh_terms: D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D020224:Expressed Sequence Tags; D020440:Gene Duplication; D020131:Genes, Duplicate; D017343:Genes, Plant; D018745:Genome, Plant; D027845:Malus / Q000235:genetics*; D005810:Multigene Family; D010802:Phylogeny; D011123:Polyploidy
references.citation: Genome Res. 2008 Dec;18(12):1944-54
references.pmid: 18832442
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2009 Jan;96(1):336-48
references.pmid: 21628192
references.citation: Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1701-3
references.pmid: 12805536
references.citation: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:1-25
references.pmid: 15832443
references.citation: Genome Res. 2006 Jul;16(7):934-46
references.pmid: 16760422
references.citation: Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Oct;13(5):555-6
references.pmid: 9367129
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 Nov;145(3):961-73
references.pmid: 17885081
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):725-36
references.pmid: 7968486
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):557-564
references.pmid: 19555435
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):463-7
references.pmid: 17721507
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Sep;19(9):1464-73
references.pmid: 12200474
references.citation: Science. 2008 Mar 14;319(5869):1527-30
references.pmid: 18339939
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):796-815
references.pmid: 11130711
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2002 Sep;89(9):1478-84
references.pmid: 21665749
references.citation: Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001 Dec;11(6):681-4
references.pmid: 11682313
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Jul;141(3):811-24
references.pmid: 16825339
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 12;102(15):5454-9
references.pmid: 15800040
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 1985 Dec;71(2):268-77
references.pmid: 24247393
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Aug;150(4):1972-80
references.pmid: 19502356
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 4;105(9):3427-32
references.pmid: 18299576
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2006;7(4):212
references.pmid: 16677430
references.citation: Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007 Dec;17(6):505-12
references.pmid: 18006297
references.citation: Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1151-5
references.pmid: 11073452
references.citation: Sci STKE. 2001 Dec 18;2001(113):re22
references.pmid: 11752632
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):141-5
references.pmid: 10592205
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2007 Oct;39(10):1256-60
references.pmid: 17828263
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Mar;140(3):793-804
references.pmid: 16524980
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Jan 15;457(7227):327-31
references.pmid: 19029881
references.citation: Science. 2002 Apr 5;296(5565):92-100
references.pmid: 11935018
references.citation: Int J Biol Macromol. 2003 Nov;33(1-3):19-22
references.pmid: 14599579
references.citation: Physiol Plant. 2008 Nov;134(3):473-85
references.pmid: 18636985
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jun;36(10):3420-35
references.pmid: 18445632
references.citation: Genome Res. 2004 May;14(5):988-95
references.pmid: 15123596
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Feb 19;8:18
references.pmid: 18284697
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2004 Jul;2(7):E206
references.pmid: 15252449
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Oct;148(2):993-1003
references.pmid: 18715958
references.citation: Tree Physiol. 2007 Jun;27(6):817-25
references.pmid: 17331900
references.citation: Plant J. 2007 Jun;50(6):967-81
references.pmid: 17461790
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Nov;25(11):2445-55
references.pmid: 18728074
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb;23(2):469-78
references.pmid: 16280546
references.citation: Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;123(1-4):17-26
references.pmid: 19287135
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2004 Jun 01;4:10
references.pmid: 15171794
references.citation: Chromosome Res. 2009;17(5):699-717
references.pmid: 19802709
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2004 Jul;16(7):1667-78
references.pmid: 15208399
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1998 May;15(5):583-9
references.pmid: 9580988
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2004 Jul;16(7):1679-91
references.pmid: 15208398
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Jul;77(1):78-88
references.pmid: 15918152
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Dec;148(4):1772-81
references.pmid: 18952863
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Aug 21;6:64
references.pmid: 16923188
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 May;141(1):147-66
references.pmid: 16531485
references.citation: Genome Res. 1997 Oct;7(10):986-95
references.pmid: 9331369
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:433-53
references.pmid: 19575588
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6
references.pmid: 16081474
references.citation: Genome Res. 2006 Jun;16(6):738-49
references.pmid: 16702410
references.citation: Annu Rev Genet. 2000;34:401-437
references.pmid: 11092833
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references.pmid: 12912839
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Apr;20(4):633-43
references.pmid: 12679546
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Jul;147(3):985-1003
references.pmid: 18487361
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008 Feb;7(2):347-69
references.pmid: 17934214
references.citation: Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1596-604
references.pmid: 16973872
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9
references.pmid: 17488738
references.citation: Bioessays. 1998 Oct;20(10):785-8
references.pmid: 10200118
references.citation: Gene. 2008 May 15;414(1-2):85-94
references.pmid: 18378100
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
references.pmid: 9254694
references.citation: Genome Res. 2008 Dec;18(12):1924-37
references.pmid: 18836034
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 15;22(16):2020-7
references.pmid: 16787968
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2005 Apr 14;5:28
references.pmid: 15831095
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Aug;10(8):551-64
references.pmid: 19597530
references.citation: Genome. 2004 Oct;47(5):868-76
references.pmid: 15499401
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2002 Dec;18(12):609-13
references.pmid: 12446139
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2009 Aug;21(8):2203-19
references.pmid: 19706795
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 7;106(14):5737-42
references.pmid: 19325131
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Oct;10(10):725-32
references.pmid: 19652647
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673-80
references.pmid: 7984417
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Oct;17(10):1483-98
references.pmid: 11018155
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2008 Oct 30;9(10):235
references.pmid: 18983710
references.citation: Comput Appl Biosci. 1996 Aug;12(4):357-8
references.pmid: 8902363
references.citation: Oecologia. 2002 Oct;133(2):112-119
references.pmid: 28547297
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Aug;19(8):2329-48
references.pmid: 17720868
references.citation: Biol Cell. 2001 Sep;93(1-2):81-7
references.pmid: 11730326
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Dec 29;8:344
references.pmid: 19113991