Feasibility and utility of mapping disease risk at the neighbourhood level within a Canadian public health unit: an ecological study.
BACKGROUND
We conducted spatial analyses to determine the geographic variation of cancer at the neighbourhood level (dissemination areas or DAs) within the area of a single Ontario public health unit, Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph, covering a population of 238,326 inhabitants. Cancer incidence data between 1999 and 2003 were obtained from the Ontario Cancer Registry and were geocoded down to the level of DA using the enhanced Postal Code Conversion File. The 2001 Census of Canada provided information on the size and age-sex structure of the population at the DA level, in addition to information about selected census covariates, such as average neighbourhood income.


RESULTS
Age standardized incidence ratios for cancer and the prevalence of census covariates were calculated for each of 331 dissemination areas in Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph. The standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for cancer varied dramatically across the dissemination areas. However, application of the Moran's I statistic, a popular index of spatial autocorrelation, suggested significant spatial patterns for only two cancers, lung and prostate, both in males (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Employing Bayesian hierarchical models, areas in the urban core of the City of Guelph had significantly higher SIRs for male lung cancer than the remainder of Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph; and, neighbourhoods in the urban and surrounding rural areas of Orangeville exhibited significantly higher SIRs for prostate cancer. After adjustment for age and spatial dependence, average household income attenuated much of the spatial pattern of lung cancer, but not of prostate cancer.


CONCLUSIONS
This paper demonstrates the feasibility and utility of a systematic approach to identifying neighbourhoods, within the area served by a public health unit, that have significantly higher risks of cancer. This exploratory, ecologic study suggests several hypotheses for these spatial patterns that warrant further investigations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Canadian study published in the peer-reviewed literature estimating the risk of relatively rare public health outcomes at a very small areal level, namely dissemination areas.
Holowaty
Eric J
EJ
Population Studies and Surveillance, Cancer Care Ontario, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. eric.holowaty@cancercare.on.ca
Norwood
Todd A
TA
Wanigaratne
Susitha
S
Abellan
Juanjo J
JJ
Beale
Linda
L
D016000:Cluster Analysis; D055669:Ecological and Environmental Phenomena; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology*; D009864:Ontario; D015995:Prevalence; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology; D011634:Public Health; D012111:Residence Characteristics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012424:Rural Population; D017678:Sex Distribution; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014505:Urban Population
Stat Med. 2000 Sep 15-30;19(17-18):2217-41
10960849
Int J Health Geogr. 2005 Aug 10;4:20
16092969
Epidemiology. 2005 Jul;16(4):526-31
15951671
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2 Suppl):S7-15
16458793
Eur J Public Health. 2005 Jun;15(3):262-9
15755781
Cancer. 2000 Aug 15;89(4):901-12
10951356
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2 Suppl):S88-100
16458795
Stat Methods Med Res. 2005 Feb;14(1):35-59
15690999
Stat Med. 2000 Apr 30;19(8):1081-8
10790681
Stat Med. 2006 Nov 30;25(22):3929-43
16435334
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(9):1016-25
15198922
Stat Med. 2000 Sep 15-30;19(17-18):2203-15
10960848
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49 Suppl 2:S72-7
8594138
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Oct 12;8:55
19822013
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2006;50(11):3243-3262
19603088
Health Policy. 2008 Aug;87(2):185-93
18243396
IARC Sci Publ. 1987;(82):1-406
3329634
Stat Methods Med Res. 2006 Aug;15(4):385-407
16886738
Int J Cancer. 2002 Feb 10;97(5):695-9
11807800
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 May 2;93(9):705-9
11333293
Stat Med. 2000 Sep 15-30;19(17-18):2295-308
10960854
J Public Health Med. 2001 Mar;23(1):40-6
11315692
Int J Health Geogr. 2006 Sep 18;5:39
16981996
Int J Health Geogr. 2008 Jul 28;7:41
18662387
Int J Health Geogr. 2004 Dec 08;3(1):29
15588279
Int J Health Geogr. 2006 Nov 08;5:49
17092353
J Med Syst. 2004 Aug;28(4):385-95
15366243
Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;16(12):901-7
16843007
Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:43-56
12471269
Public Health. 2009 Feb;123(2):103-9
19147163
Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Oct;20(8):1431-40
19526319
Public Health Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;21(6):547-54
15566560
Clin Biochem. 1998 Feb;31(1):47-9
9559224
Stat Med. 1999 Dec 15;18(23):3211-20
10602146
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2 Suppl):S37-49
16458789
Eur J Cancer. 2003 Sep;39(14):1973-5
12957450
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(9):995-7
15198919
Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jan;6(1):A03
19080009
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002 Apr;205(3):169-81
12040915
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2 Suppl):S25-36
16458787
Stat Med. 2008 Nov 10;27(25):5111-42
18712778
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(9):1026-31
15198923
Epidemiol Bull. 2004 Dec;25(4):1-9
16127821
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Aug;116(8):1105-10
18709139