title: Does food supplementation really enhance productivity of breeding birds?
abstract: Food availability influences multiple stages of the breeding cycle of birds, and supplementary feeding has helped in its understanding. Most supplementation studies have reported advancements of laying, whilst others, albeit less numerous, have also demonstrated fitness benefits such as larger clutches, shorter incubation periods, and greater hatching success. Relatively few studies, however, have investigated the effects of supplementary feeding for protracted periods across multiple stages of the breeding cycle. These effects are important to understand since long-term food supplementation of birds is recommended in urban habitats and is used as a tool to increase reproductive output in endangered species. Here, we compare the breeding phenology and productivity of blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus and great tits Parus major breeding in food-supplemented and non-supplemented blocks in a broadleaf woodland in central England over three seasons (2006-2008). Supplementation was provided continuously from several weeks pre-laying until hatching, and had multiple significant effects. Most notably, supplementation reduced brood size significantly in both species, by half a chick or more at hatching (after controlling for year and hatching date). Reduced brood sizes in supplemented pairs were driven by significantly smaller clutches in both species and, in blue tits, significantly lower hatching success. These are novel and concerning findings of food supplementation. As expected, supplementary feeding advanced laying and shortened incubation periods significantly in both species. We discuss the striking parallels between our findings and patterns in blue and great tit reproduction in urban habitats, and conclude that supplementary feeding may not always enhance the breeding productivity of birds.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Ornithology, School of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. tim.harrison@bto.org
authors.forename: Timothy J E
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Harrison
authors.forename: Jennifer A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Graham R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Martin
authors.forename: Dan E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Chamberlain
authors.forename: Stuart
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Bearhop
authors.forename: Gillian N
authors.initials: GN
authors.lastname: Robb
authors.forename: S James
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Reynolds
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding; D052284:Clutch Size; D004032:Diet; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D046109:Passeriformes / Q000502:physiology*; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal
references.citation: Science. 2002 Apr 5;296(5565):136-8
references.pmid: 11935025
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2008 Apr 23;4(2):220-3
references.pmid: 18252663
references.citation: Oecologia. 2009 Mar;159(2):463-72
references.pmid: 19034530
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2004 Dec;46(5):565-73
references.pmid: 15555498
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2323-31
references.pmid: 19324731
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Sep;157(3):369-76
references.pmid: 18604561
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2006 Mar;75(2):604-15
references.pmid: 16638013
references.citation: Oecologia. 1998 Nov;117(1-2):80-89
references.pmid: 28308509
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):737-740
references.pmid: 9784224
references.citation: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2007 Oct-Dec;154(1-3):150-60
references.pmid: 17624348