title: Comparative efficacy of an organic Acid blend and bacitracin methylene disalicylate as growth promoters in broiler chickens: effects on performance, gut histology, and small intestinal milieu.
abstract: This study evaluated the efficacy of organic acids as a growth promoter for broiler chickens relative to antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs). Broiler chickens were supplemented with graded doses of an organic acid blend (OAB, 1 g and 2 g/kg diet) and bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD, 0.5 g and 1 g/kg diet) for 35 days. Supplementation of OAB improved (P < .001) feed conversion ratio (FCR) and increased protein accretion (P < .001). Dietary acidification caused pH of the gizzard to decline linearly (P < .01) with the dose of supplemental OAB. In the lower intestine, pH remained unaffected by dietary treatments. Unlike BMD, supplemental OAB selectively promoted growth of lactobacilli in the small intestine. Moreover, compared to BMD, OAB tended to maintain the villi in the small intestine at a greater height. Although benefits of exceeding the dose of supplemental organic acids more than 1 g/kg diet are not always conspicuous, based on the live weight and feed conversion data, supplementation of 2 g organic acid per kg diet may be recommended for total replacement of AGPs in broiler diet.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, West Bengal University of Animal & Fishery Sciences, 37 Kshudiram Bose Sarani, Kolkata, West Bengal 700037, India.
authors.forename: Saikat
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Samanta
authors.forename: Sudipto
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Haldar
authors.forename: Tapan Kumar
authors.initials: TK
authors.lastname: Ghosh
references.citation: Poult Sci. 1994 Nov;73(11):1766-70
references.pmid: 7862617
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 1988 Feb;66(2):574-84
references.pmid: 3372395
references.citation: Adv Microb Physiol. 1998;39:205-34
references.pmid: 9328648
references.citation: Nutr Res Rev. 1999 Jun;12(1):117-45
references.pmid: 19087448
references.citation: Poult Sci. 2000 Nov;79(11):1566-70
references.pmid: 11092326
references.citation: Vet Rec. 1985 May 4;116(18):502
references.pmid: 4013039
references.citation: Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1973 Mar;223(2):348-55
references.pmid: 4145842
references.citation: J Food Prot. 1989 Sep;52(9):670-673
references.pmid: 31003285
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Sep;70(9):5208-13
references.pmid: 15345401
references.citation: Vet Rec. 1988 Oct 15;123(16):416-21
references.pmid: 3201669
references.citation: Poult Sci. 1988 Aug;67(8):1225-8
references.pmid: 3064065
references.citation: Br Poult Sci. 1991 Mar;32(1):67-78
references.pmid: 2049631
references.citation: J Appl Bacteriol. 1993 Jul;75(1):18-24
references.pmid: 8365950
references.citation: Poult Sci. 2000 Sep;79(9):1311-9
references.pmid: 11020077
references.citation: Br Poult Sci. 1997 Mar;38(1):59-65
references.pmid: 9088614
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2000 Jul;78(7):1875-84
references.pmid: 10907830