Exploring the basis for gender differences in the demand-withdraw pattern.
During marital conflict, wives tend to demand and husbands tend to withdraw. These behaviors were historically thought to stem from essential differences between men and women. An alternative explanation implicates one form of power differences-wives desire more change and, therefore, demand; husbands desire less change and withdraw to maintain status quo. Studying same-sex as well as cross-sex couples enables an evaluation of both explanations. We examined demand-withdraw behaviors in 63 heterosexual, gay, and lesbian couples. The demand-withdraw pattern was seen regardless of type of couple. Further, for all couples, differences in the amount of change desired in partners during a conflict interaction predicted differences in demand and withdraw behaviors. These results offer further evidence that an often-observed difference in heterosexual relationships may result from social conventions that afford men greater power and women less power.
Holley
Sarah R
SR
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-5050, USA.
Sturm
Virginia E
VE
Levenson
Robert W
RW
D000328:Adult; D001519:Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005260:Female; D018452:Homosexuality, Female / Q000523:psychology*; D018451:Homosexuality, Male / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D011209:Power, Psychological; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D018454:Spouses / Q000523:psychology*; D055815:Young Adult
J Homosex. 2003;45(1):65-91
14567654
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983 Sep;45(3):587-97
6620126
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Jun;24(3):233-42
20545396
Psychol Bull. 2001 Jul;127(4):472-503
11439708
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Jun;21(2):218-26
17605544
Psychol Aging. 1993 Jun;8(2):301-13
8323733
J Homosex. 2003;45(1):23-43
14567652
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Feb;61(1):16-27
8450102
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jul;59(1):73-81
2213491
Am Psychol. 2005 Sep;60(6):581-592
16173891
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Jun;59(3):458-63
2071731
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976 Jan;33(1):48-54
1018227