Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM)--a versatile tool in studying plants.
Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) enables the investigation of hydrated and uncoated plant samples and the in situ observation of dynamic processes. Water vapor in the microscope chamber takes part in secondary electron detection and charge prevention. Two ESEM modes are available and offer a broad spectrum of applications. The environmental or wet mode prevents sample dehydration by the combination of sample cooling (5°C) and a vapor pressure of 4-6 Torr. In the low vacuum mode, the maximum chamber pressure is limited to 1 Torr (corresponding to about 5% relative humidity in the chamber) and allows the simultaneous use of a backscattered electron detector for imaging material contrast. A selection of characteristic plant samples and various applications are presented as a guide to ESEM for plant scientists. Leaf surfaces, trichomes, epicuticular waxes, and inorganic surface layers represent samples being comparatively resistant to dehydration, whereas callus cells and stigmatic tissue are examples for dehydration- and beam-sensitive samples. The potential of investigating dynamic processes in situ is demonstrated by studying anther opening, by tensile testing of leaves, and by performing hydration/dehydration experiments by changing the vapor pressure. Additionally, automated block-face imaging and serial sectioning using in situ ultramicrotomy is presented. The strengths and weaknesses of ESEM are discussed and it is shown that ESEM is a versatile tool in plant science.
Stabentheiner
Edith
E
Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Graz, Schubertstrasse 51, 8010, Graz, Austria. edith.stabentheiner@uni-graz.at
Zankel
Armin
A
Pölt
Peter
P
D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000648:ultrastructure; D010944:Plants / Q000648:ultrastructure*
Nat Mater. 2003 Aug;2(8):511-6
12894259
Ann Bot. 2003 Jul;92(1):73-7
12763757
Int Endod J. 2005 Nov;38(11):775-88
16218968
Microsc Res Tech. 1993 Aug;25(5-6):354-61
8400426
Methods Cell Biol. 2008;89:391-407
19118683
New Phytol. 2008 Jul;179(2):286-317
19086285
Science. 1988 Oct 14;242(4876):309
17787659
Scanning. 2007 Nov-Dec;29(6):261-9
18076055
J Microsc. 2009 Feb;233(2):205-24
19220687
J Cell Physiol. 2005 Dec;205(3):328-34
15965928
Planta. 2009 Nov;230(6):1105-13
20183923
Small. 2009 Jun;5(12):1366-90
19507183
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2003 Dec 15;361(1813):2771-87
14667297
Micron. 2008 Dec;39(8):1049-61
18586502
J Microsc. 2009 Jan;233(1):140-8
19196420
Plant Cell Physiol. 2004 Jan;45(1):40-7
14749484
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2007 May;9(3):411-9
17143807
J Microsc. 2001 Dec;204(Pt 3):185-95
11903795
PLoS Biol. 2004 Nov;2(11):e329
15514700
Ann Bot. 2004 Oct;94(4):515-26
15306562