When more is less: the fitness consequences of predators attacking more unpalatable prey when more are presented.
In 1879, Fritz Müller hypothesized that mimetic resemblance in which defended prey display the same warning signal would share the costs of predator education. Although Müller argued that predators would need to ingest a fixed number of prey with a given visual signal when learning to avoid unpalatable prey, this assumption lacks empirical support. We report an experiment which shows that, as the number of unpalatable prey presented to them increased, avian predators attacked higher numbers of those prey. We calculated that, when predators increase attacks, the fitness costs incurred by unpalatable prey can be substantial. This suggests that the survival benefits of mimicry could be lower than Müller proposed. An important finding is, however, that these costs decline in importance as the total number of available prey increases.
Rowland
Hannah M
HM
The University of Liverpool, UK. h.m.rowland@liv.ac.uk
Wiley
Elizabeth
E
Ruxton
Graeme D
GD
Mappes
Johanna
J
Speed
Michael P
MP
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D002645:Chickens; D005260:Female; D020387:Food Chain; D007858:Learning; D008954:Models, Biological; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology*
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):9181-4
11459937
Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Aug;95(8):681-95
18542902
Nature. 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):63-6
15343332
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Feb 22;271(1537):407-13
15101700
Nature. 2007 Jul 5;448(7149):64-7
17611539
Evolution. 2004 Jun;58(6):1294-302
15266978
Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):533-44
12088244