Using the entomological inoculation rate to assess the impact of vector control on malaria parasite transmission and elimination.
BACKGROUND
Prior studies have shown that annual entomological inoculation rates (EIRs) must be reduced to less than one to substantially reduce the prevalence of malaria infection. In this study, EIR values were used to quantify the impact of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), and source reduction (SR) on malaria transmission. The analysis of EIR was extended through determining whether available vector control tools can ultimately eradicate malaria.


METHODS
The analysis is based primarily on a review of all controlled studies that used ITN, IRS, and/or SR and reported their effects on the EIR. To compare EIRs between studies, the percent difference in EIR between the intervention and control groups was calculated.


RESULTS
Eight vector control intervention studies that measured EIR were found: four ITN studies, one IRS study, one SR study, and two studies with separate ITN and IRS intervention groups. In both the Tanzania study and the Solomon Islands study, one community received ITNs and one received IRS. In the second year of the Tanzania study, EIR was 90% lower in the ITN community and 93% lower in the IRS community, relative to the community without intervention; the ITN and IRS effects were not significantly different. In contrast, in the Solomon Islands study, EIR was 94% lower in the ITN community and 56% lower in the IRS community. The one SR study, in Dar es Salaam, reported a lower EIR reduction (47%) than the ITN and IRS studies. All of these vector control interventions reduced EIR, but none reduced it to zero.


CONCLUSIONS
These studies indicate that current vector control methods alone cannot ultimately eradicate malaria because no intervention sustained an annual EIR less than one. While researchers develop new tools, integrated vector management may make the greatest impact on malaria transmission. There are many gaps in the entomological malaria literature and recommendations for future research are provided.
Shaukat
Ayesha M
AM
Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. amsha2@bu.edu
Breman
Joel G
JG
McKenzie
F Ellis
FE
D000818:Animals; D000852:Anopheles / Q000469:parasitology* / Q000502:physiology; D004772:Entomology; D006801:Humans; D007299:Insect Bites and Stings / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000469:parasitology*; D007303:Insect Vectors / Q000469:parasitology* / Q000502:physiology; D007814:Larva / Q000469:parasitology / Q000502:physiology; D008288:Malaria / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000635:transmission*; D009032:Mosquito Control / Q000379:methods*
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000 May;62(5):545-51
11289662
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):655-65
19784445
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Jan-Feb;93(1):4-11
10492776
Malar J. 2007 Sep 25;6:131
17894879
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 14;103(46):17560-3
17085587
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993 Sep;49(3):290-300
8372952
Lancet Infect Dis. 2002 Oct;2(10):618-27
12383612
Malar J. 2008 Dec 11;7 Suppl 1:S4
19091038
Malar J. 2004 Jun 04;3:13
15180900
J Med Entomol. 2001 May;38(3):451-4
11372973
Malar J. 2009 Jan 23;8:19
19166589
Trop Med Int Health. 1998 Aug;3(8):619-31
9735932
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Jan-Feb;64(1-2 Suppl):1-11
11425172
Med Vet Entomol. 1993 Oct;7(4):333-8
8268487
JAMA. 2004 Jun 2;291(21):2571-80
15173148
PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4050
19115000
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e5107
19333402
Adv Parasitol. 2002;52:235-64
12521262
Malar J. 2003 Sep 10;2:28
14585106
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Feb;68(2):169-76
12641407
PLoS Biol. 2007 Mar;5(3):e42
17311470
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Sep;27(5):357-75
15225985
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Jul;61(1):109-13
10432066