A reduced number of mtSNPs saturates mitochondrial DNA haplotype diversity of worldwide population groups.
BACKGROUND
The high levels of variation characterising the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecule are due ultimately to its high average mutation rate; moreover, mtDNA variation is deeply structured in different populations and ethnic groups. There is growing interest in selecting a reduced number of mtDNA single nucleotide polymorphisms (mtSNPs) that account for the maximum level of discrimination power in a given population. Applications of the selected mtSNP panel range from anthropologic and medical studies to forensic genetic casework.


RESULTS
This study proposes a new simulation-based method that explores the ability of different mtSNP panels to yield the maximum levels of discrimination power. The method explores subsets of mtSNPs of different sizes randomly chosen from a preselected panel of mtSNPs based on frequency. More than 2,000 complete genomes representing three main continental human population groups (Africa, Europe, and Asia) and two admixed populations ("African-Americans" and "Hispanics") were collected from GenBank and the literature, and were used as training sets. Haplotype diversity was measured for each combination of mtSNP and compared with existing mtSNP panels available in the literature. The data indicates that only a reduced number of mtSNPs ranging from six to 22 are needed to account for 95% of the maximum haplotype diversity of a given population sample. However, only a small proportion of the best mtSNPs are shared between populations, indicating that there is not a perfect set of "universal" mtSNPs suitable for all population contexts. The discrimination power provided by these mtSNPs is much higher than the power of the mtSNP panels proposed in the literature to date. Some mtSNP combinations also yield high diversity values in admixed populations.


CONCLUSIONS
The proposed computational approach for exploring combinations of mtSNPs that optimise the discrimination power of a given set of mtSNPs is more efficient than previous empirical approaches. In contrast to precedent findings, the results seem to indicate that only few mtSNPs are needed to reach high levels of discrimination power in a population, independently of its ancestral background.
Salas
Antonio
A
Unidade de Xenética, Departamento de Anatomía Patolóxica e Ciencias Forenses, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain. antonio.salas@usc.es
Amigo
Jorge
J
D019295:Computational Biology; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D014644:Genetic Variation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D006239:Haplotypes / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Q000235:genetics*; D044382:Population Groups / Q000235:genetics*
D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial
Am J Hum Genet. 2005 May;76(5):883-6
15791543
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Oct;19(10):1737-51
12270900
Science. 2006 Dec 15;314(5806):1767-70
17170302
Trends Genet. 2003 May;19(5):257-62
12711217
Trends Genet. 2006 Jun;22(6):339-45
16678300
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):232-49
9915963
Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 May;17(5):693-6
19050723
Science. 2005 May 13;308(5724):1034-6
15890885
J Med Genet. 1999 Jul;36(7):505-10
10424809
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Mar;1(1):44-55
19083727
Electrophoresis. 2009 Nov;30(21):3665-73
19862743
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;71(5):1150-60
12384858
PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5112
19340307
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Jun;25(6):1209-18
18359946
Electrophoresis. 1997 Jan;18(1):52-4
9059820
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jun;68(6):1475-84
11349229
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009 Sep;3(4):261-4
19647712
Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Mar;3(1):87-112
4667078
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 May 3;168(1):1-13
16814504
BMC Med Genet. 2008 Apr 10;9:26
18402672
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Sep 30;335(3):891-9
16102729
Int J Legal Med. 2004 Jun;118(3):137-46
14760490
PLoS One. 2008 Mar 12;3(3):e1764
18335039
Curr Biol. 2009 Jan 13;19(1):1-8
19135370
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 May;62(5):1137-52
9545392
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 20;3(8):e3016
18714389
Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Nov;75(5):752-70
15457403
Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2118-21
16360789
Forensic Sci Int. 2004 Mar 10;140(2-3):251-7
15036446
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 5;105(5):1596-601
18216239
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Dec;85(6):929-33; author reply 933
20004768
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Oct;69(4):844-52
11517423
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 18;4(11):e7902
19924307
PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3988
19098988
PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e296
16187796
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Jun;84(6):740-59
19500773
J Med Genet. 1999 Jun;36(6):425-36
10874629
Forensic Sci Int. 2004 Apr 20;141(1):1-6
15066707
Ann Neurol. 2000 Aug;48(2):188-93
10939569
Nat Genet. 1999 Oct;23(2):147
10508508
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;71(5):1082-111
12395296
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 May;70(5):1152-71
11938495
Oncogene. 2004 Feb 12;23(6):1314-20
14647457
Electrophoresis. 2006 Jul;27(13):2541-50
16721903
Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Apr;15(4):400-2; author reply 402-4
17264866
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Nov;67(5):1251-76
11032788
Forensic Sci Int. 2001 Dec 27;124(2-3):97-103
11792496
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Jun;2(3):e45-8
19083815
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Feb;72(2):313-32
12536373
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 May;82(5):1130-40
18439549
Genome Res. 2004 Oct;14(10A):1832-50
15466285