title: Glutamate dehydrogenase and glutamine synthetase are regulated in response to nitrogen availability in Myocbacterium smegmatis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The assimilation of nitrogen is an essential process in all prokaryotes, yet a relatively limited amount of information is available on nitrogen metabolism in the mycobacteria. The physiological role and pathogenic properties of glutamine synthetase (GS) have been extensively investigated in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, little is known about this enzyme in other mycobacterial species, or the role of an additional nitrogen assimilatory pathway via glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), in the mycobacteria as a whole. We investigated specific enzyme activity and transcription of GS and as well as both possible isoforms of GDH (NAD+- and NADP+-specific GDH) under varying conditions of nitrogen availability in Mycobacterium smegmatis as a model for the mycobacteria.
  
  
  RESULTS
  It was found that the specific activity of the aminating NADP+-GDH reaction and the deaminating NAD+-GDH reaction did not change appreciably in response to nitrogen availability. However, GS activity as well as the deaminating NADP+-GDH and aminating NAD+-GDH reactions were indeed significantly altered in response to exogenous nitrogen concentrations. Transcription of genes encoding for GS and the GDH isoforms were also found to be regulated under our experimental conditions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The physiological role and regulation of GS in M. smegmatis was similar to that which has been described for other mycobacteria, however, in our study the regulation of both NADP+- and NAD+-GDH specific activity in M. smegmatis appeared to be different to that of other Actinomycetales. It was found that NAD+-GDH played an important role in nitrogen assimilation rather than glutamate catabolism as was previously thought, and is it's activity appeared to be regulated in response to nitrogen availability. Transcription of the genes encoding for NAD+-GDH enzymes seem to be regulated in M. smegmatis under the conditions tested and may contribute to the changes in enzyme activity observed, however, our results indicate that an additional regulatory mechanism may be involved. NADP+-GDH seemed to be involved in nitrogen assimilation due to a constitutive aminating activity. The deaminating reaction, however was observed to change in response to varying ammonium concentrations which suggests that NADP+-GDH is also regulated in response to nitrogen availability. The regulation of NADP+-GDH activity was not reflected at the level of gene transcription thereby implicating post-transcriptional modification as a regulatory mechanism in response to nitrogen availability.
authors.affiliation: DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical TB Research, Department of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg, South Africa. carrie@sun.ac.za
authors.forename: Catriona J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Harper
authors.forename: Don
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Hayward
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kidd
authors.forename: Ian
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Wiid
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: van Helden
mesh_terms: D001426:Bacterial Proteins / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D015964:Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial; D015971:Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic; D005969:Glutamate Dehydrogenase / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D005974:Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D018698:Glutamic Acid / Q000378:metabolism; D053858:Metabolic Networks and Pathways; D008954:Models, Biological; D020102:Mycobacterium smegmatis / Q000201:enzymology / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D009243:NAD / Q000378:metabolism; D009249:NADP / Q000378:metabolism; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D009243:NAD; D018698:Glutamic Acid; D009249:NADP; D005969:Glutamate Dehydrogenase; D005974:Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase; D009584:Nitrogen
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1973 Sep 10;248(17):6122-8
references.pmid: 4146916
references.citation: Eur J Biochem. 1992 Nov 1;209(3):851-9
references.pmid: 1358610
references.citation: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009 Aug 15;19(16):4790-3
references.pmid: 19560924
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2000 Aug;37(4):964-77
references.pmid: 10972815
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998 Oct 1;167(1):51-6
references.pmid: 9785451
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 25;93(13):6527-31
references.pmid: 8692849
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2008 Jul;190(14):4894-902
references.pmid: 18469098
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Dec 18;205(2):361-7
references.pmid: 11750828
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2000 Oct;182(20):5715-20
references.pmid: 11004169
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2007 Aug;189(15):5626-33
references.pmid: 17526698
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 2009 Jan 22;583(2):301-7
references.pmid: 19114043
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2005 Nov;58(4):1157-72
references.pmid: 16262797
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1989 May;171(5):2372-7
references.pmid: 2708309
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2000 Dec 15;275(50):39529-42
references.pmid: 10924516
references.citation: Microbiol Rev. 1995 Dec;59(4):604-22
references.pmid: 8531888
references.citation: Mol Vis. 2007 Nov 07;13:2083-95
references.pmid: 18079684
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2002 Mar;131(3):559-67
references.pmid: 11867281
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1990 Sep;172(9):4927-35
references.pmid: 1975578
references.citation: Eur J Biochem. 1991 Dec 18;202(3):1189-96
references.pmid: 1765079
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 1999 Sep;145 ( Pt 9):2313-2322
references.pmid: 10517584
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 May 1;30(9):e36
references.pmid: 11972351
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1999 Jan;181(2):469-76
references.pmid: 9882660
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1997 Sep 5;272(36):22728-35
references.pmid: 9278431
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 1999 Apr;32(2):223-32
references.pmid: 10231480
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2008 Feb;67(4):861-80
references.pmid: 18179599
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1967 Mar;93(3):1045-55
references.pmid: 6025412
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Dec;58(12):4032-7
references.pmid: 1335719
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1996 Jun 21;259(4):589-607
references.pmid: 8683567
references.citation: Anal Biochem. 1979 May;95(1):275-85
references.pmid: 40453
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2005 Jul 29;350(5):953-63
references.pmid: 15978616
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Oct;615(2):299-308
references.pmid: 7417453
references.citation: J Gen Microbiol. 1970 Dec;64(2):187-94
references.pmid: 4995907
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1999 Nov;181(21):6670-8
references.pmid: 10542168
references.citation: J Clin Pathol. 1983 Dec;36(12):1357-61
references.pmid: 6418768
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2001 Jan;183(2):490-9
references.pmid: 11133942
references.citation: Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol. 1986 Nov-Dec;137B(3):231-7
references.pmid: 2891360
references.citation: J Biotechnol. 2009 Jun 15;142(2):114-22
references.pmid: 19394370
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jan 4;97(1):418-23
references.pmid: 10618433
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Oct;50(4):1014-20
references.pmid: 2867738
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2008 Jan 25;283(4):2439-53
references.pmid: 18055464
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 1991 Jul 8;285(1):35-8
references.pmid: 1906012
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 1998 Oct;170(5):319-30
references.pmid: 9818351
references.citation: Infect Immun. 2001 Oct;69(10):6348-63
references.pmid: 11553579
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1974 Dec 25;249(24):7922-8
references.pmid: 4372225
references.citation: J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;17(1):20-9
references.pmid: 18824837
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Sep 27;91(20):9342-6
references.pmid: 7937767
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2008 Nov;190(21):7108-16
references.pmid: 18689485
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 2003 Mar;179(3):184-90
references.pmid: 12610723
references.citation: Infect Immun. 2003 Jan;71(1):456-64
references.pmid: 12496196
references.citation: IUBMB Life. 2008 Oct;60(10):643-50
references.pmid: 18493948
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1993 Apr;175(7):2116-24
references.pmid: 8458854
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2008 Dec;70(6):1408-23
references.pmid: 19019160
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1984 Oct;76(2):536-40
references.pmid: 16663876
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003;57:155-76
references.pmid: 12730324
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1985 Jan 5;181(1):147-9
references.pmid: 3981633
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2006 May 5;281(18):12300-7
references.pmid: 16522631
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2002 Oct;46(2):331-47
references.pmid: 12406212