Quantitative assessment of specificity in immunoelectron microscopy.
In immunoelectron microscopy (immuno-EM) on ultrathin sections, gold particles are used for localization of molecular components of cells. These particles are countable, and quantitative methods have been established to estimate and evaluate the density and distribution of "raw" gold particle counts from a single uncontrolled labeling experiment. However, these raw counts are composed of two distinct elements: particles that are specific (specific labeling) and particles that are not (nonspecific labeling) for the target component. So far, approaches for assessment of specific labeling and for correction of raw gold particle counts to reveal specific labeling densities and distributions have not attracted much attention. Here, we discuss experimental strategies for determining specificity in immuno-EM, and we present methods for quantitative assessment of (1) the probability that an observed gold particle is specific for the target, (2) the density of specific labeling, and (3) the distribution of specific labeling over a series of compartments. These methods should be of general utility for researchers investigating the distribution of cellular components using on-section immunogold labeling.
Lucocq
John Milton
JM
Division of Cell Biology and Immunology, School of Life Sciences, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK. j.m.lucocq@dundee.ac.uk
Gawden-Bone
Christian
C
D000818:Animals; D016591:Histocytological Preparation Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D016253:Microscopy, Immunoelectron / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011336:Probability; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013194:Staining and Labeling
Methods Cell Biol. 2008;88:131-49
18617032
J Histochem Cytochem. 2009 Dec;57(12):1103-12
19654103
J Histochem Cytochem. 1981 Apr;29(4):531-41
6265546
J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Feb;4(2):426-35
16420576
J Cell Sci. 2010 May 1;123(Pt 9):1427-37
20356925
Methods Cell Biol. 2008;88:45-58
18617027
Pancreas. 2009 Jul;38(5):e151-61
19465883
J Histochem Cytochem. 2000 Sep;48(9):1269-81
10950883
J Virol. 2001 Nov;75(22):11056-70
11602745
J Histochem Cytochem. 1987 Jan;35(1):67-74
2432113
J Cell Sci. 2009 Aug 1;122(Pt 15):2769-81
19596799
J Cell Biol. 1986 Jun;102(6):2137-46
3519622
J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 7;29(1):280-7
19129404
Trends Cell Biol. 2005 May;15(5):259-68
15866030
J Microsc. 1983 Aug;131(Pt 2):147-54
6620362
Ann Anat. 2009 Apr;191(2):153-70
19135344
EMBO J. 2004 Sep 15;23(18):3583-8
15318169
J Pain. 2009 Apr;10(4):380-90
19185544
Methods Cell Biol. 2008;88:59-82
18617028
J Microsc. 2000 Jul;199(Pt 1):1-36
10886526
Histochem Cell Biol. 2003 Apr;119(4):333-41
12695916
J Anat. 1994 Feb;184 ( Pt 1):1-13
8157482
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Oct;79(19):5939-43
6193510
Science. 2001 Feb 16;291(5507):1363-5
11233453
J Histochem Cytochem. 1977 Oct;25(10):1181-4
915241
Methods Mol Biol. 2007;408:211-21
18314585
Biochem J. 1999 Feb 1;337 ( Pt 3):575-83
9895304
J Biol Chem. 1997 Dec 12;272(50):31515-24
9395488
Biotech Histochem. 2000 Sep;75(5):203-42
11023207
J Cell Biol. 2008 Mar 24;180(6):1219-32
18347067
J Microsc. 1981 Jan;121(Pt 1):65-73
7014910
J Histochem Cytochem. 1981 May;29(5):663-71
6166664
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 25;106(34):14622-7
19667187
J Histochem Cytochem. 2004 Aug;52(8):991-1000
15258174
J Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;111(6 Pt 2):2909-21
2269660
Histochem Cell Biol. 2008 Aug;130(2):299-313
18553098
J Histochem Cytochem. 1985 Nov;33(11):1153-60
4056379
Microsc Microanal. 2008 Aug;14(4):342-8
18598569
J Microsc. 2008 Apr;230(Pt 1):9-15
18387034
Methods Cell Biol. 2008;88:347-66
18617042
Ultrastruct Pathol. 2005 May-Aug;29(3-4):319-30
16036886
Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Apr;3(4):368-75
11283610
Biochem J. 2004 Feb 1;377(Pt 3):653-63
14604433
Histochem Cell Biol. 1996 Jul;106(1):131-48
8858372
Scanning Microsc Suppl. 1989;3:7-14
2694275