title: A cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the clinically integrated RHL evidence -based medicine course.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Evidence-based health care requires clinicians to engage with use of evidence in decision-making at the workplace. A learner-centred, problem-based course that integrates e-learning in the clinical setting has been developed for application in obstetrics and gynaecology units. The course content uses the WHO reproductive health library (RHL) as the resource for systematic reviews. This project aims to evaluate a clinically integrated teaching programme for incorporation of evidence provided through the WHO RHL. The hypothesis is that the RHL-EBM (clinically integrated e-learning) course will improve participants' knowledge, skills and attitudes, as well as institutional practice and educational environment, as compared to the use of standard postgraduate educational resources for EBM teaching that are not clinically integrated.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study will be a multicentre, cluster randomized controlled trial, carried out in seven countries (Argentina, Brazil, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Philippines, South Africa, Thailand), involving 50-60 obstetrics and gynaecology teaching units. The trial will be carried out on postgraduate trainees in the first two years of their training. In the intervention group, trainees will receive the RHL-EBM course. The course consists of five modules, each comprising self-directed e-learning components and clinically related activities, assignments and assessments, coordinated between the facilitator and the postgraduate trainee. The course will take about 12 weeks, with assessments taking place pre-course and 4 weeks post-course. In the control group, trainees will receive electronic, self-directed EBM-teaching materials. All data collection will be online.The primary outcome measures are gain in EBM knowledge, change in attitudes towards EBM and competencies in EBM measured by multiple choice questions (MCQs) and a skills-assessing questionniare administered eletronically. These questions have been developed by using questions from validated questionnaires and adapting them to the current course. Secondary outcome measure will be educational environment towards EBM which will be assessed by a specifically developed questionnaire.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The trial will determine whether the RHL EBM (clinically integrated e-leraning) course will increase knowledge, skills and attitudes towards EBM and improve the educational environment as compared to standard teaching that is not clinically integrated. If effective, the RHL-EBM course can be implemented in teaching institutions worldwide in both, low-and middle income countries as well as industrialized settings. The results will have a broader impact than just EBM training because if the approach is successful then the same educational strategy can be used to target other priority clinical and methodological areas.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ACTRN12609000198224.
authors.affiliation: WHO Collaborating Centre in Research Synthesis, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK. r.kulier@bham.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Regina
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kulier
authors.forename: Khalid S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Khan
authors.forename: A Metin
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Gulmezoglu
authors.forename: Guillermo
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Carroli
authors.forename: Jose G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Cecatti
authors.forename: Maria J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Germar
authors.forename: Pisake
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Lumbiganon
authors.forename: Suneeta
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Mittal
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pattinson
authors.forename: Jean-Jose
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Wolomby-Molondo
authors.forename: Anne-Marie
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Bergh
authors.forename: Win
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: May
references.citation: BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):1017
references.pmid: 15514348
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2007 Nov 27;7:46
references.pmid: 18042271
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2009 May 12;9:21
references.pmid: 19435520
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2006 Dec 15;6:59
references.pmid: 17173690
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2007 Jul 20;7:23
references.pmid: 17659076
references.citation: BJOG. 2007 Jan;114(1):16-23
references.pmid: 17010115
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2008 Apr 29;8:27
references.pmid: 18442424
references.citation: Med Teach. 2005 Jun;27(4):322-5
references.pmid: 16024414
references.citation: Med Teach. 2004 Sep;26(6):553-8
references.pmid: 15763835
references.citation: Med Educ. 2001 Jun;35(6):544-7
references.pmid: 11380856
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Feb 8;326(7384):319-21
references.pmid: 12574047
references.citation: Acad Med. 2006 Mar;81(3):207-12
references.pmid: 16501260
references.citation: Med Educ. 1984 Jul;18(4):284-97
references.pmid: 6738402
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1338-41
references.pmid: 12468485
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 26;7:119
references.pmid: 17655743