title: Neural processing of risk.
abstract: In our everyday life, we often have to make decisions with risky consequences, such as choosing a restaurant for dinner or choosing a form of retirement saving. To date, however, little is known about how the brain processes risk. Recent conceptualizations of risky decision making highlight that it is generally associated with emotions but do not specify how emotions are implicated in risk processing. Moreover, little is known about risk processing in non-choice situations and how potential losses influence risk processing. Here we used quantitative meta-analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments on risk processing in the brain to investigate (1) how risk processing is influenced by emotions, (2) how it differs between choice and non-choice situations, and (3) how it changes when losses are possible. By showing that, over a range of experiments and paradigms, risk is consistently represented in the anterior insula, a brain region known to process aversive emotions such as anxiety, disappointment, or regret, we provide evidence that risk processing is influenced by emotions. Furthermore, our results show risk-related activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the parietal cortex in choice situations but not in situations in which no choice is involved or a choice has already been made. The anterior insula was predominantly active in the presence of potential losses, indicating that potential losses modulate risk processing.
authors.affiliation: Neurocognition of Decision Making Group, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, D-14195 Berlin, Germany. mohr@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
authors.forename: Peter N C
authors.initials: PN
authors.lastname: Mohr
authors.forename: Guido
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Biele
authors.forename: Hauke R
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Heekeren
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008606:Mental Processes / Q000502:physiology*; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D012306:Risk
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Aug;8(8):983-4
references.pmid: 16047025
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2001 Mar;127(2):267-86
references.pmid: 11316014
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 Sep 22;1290:28-51
references.pmid: 19576868
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Sep 1;47(5):763-70
references.pmid: 16129404
references.citation: Neuron. 2009 May 28;62(4):593-602
references.pmid: 19477159
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008 Mar;3(1):7-15
references.pmid: 19015090
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Sep;10(9):1214-21
references.pmid: 17676057
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 30;25(13):3304-11
references.pmid: 15800185
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2008 Mar;18(3):652-63
references.pmid: 17586603
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004 Mar;21(3):848-57
references.pmid: 15006651
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):331-48
references.pmid: 12030820
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 1;27(31):8174-7
references.pmid: 17670962
references.citation: Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):443-7
references.pmid: 15486290
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Jan;13(1):91-100
references.pmid: 11133312
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 May;13(5):209-15
references.pmid: 19362037
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 11;29(6):1648-56
references.pmid: 19211872
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Jun;6(2):141-51
references.pmid: 17007234
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2004 Sep 15;15(13):2123-7
references.pmid: 15486494
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jun;9(6):467-79
references.pmid: 18464792
references.citation: Front Neuroinform. 2009 Sep 30;3:33
references.pmid: 19826498
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 31;101(35):13091-5
references.pmid: 15322270
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):154-66
references.pmid: 16254997
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 7;29(40):12574-83
references.pmid: 19812332
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Feb;10(2):59-63
references.pmid: 16406760
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Aug 15;60(4):383-7
references.pmid: 16780813
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Apr;34(5):678-88
references.pmid: 19501615
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2158-70
references.pmid: 16574168
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 Jun 1;50(5):781-9
references.pmid: 16731515
references.citation: Brain Res. 2008 Oct 9;1234:104-15
references.pmid: 18710652
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 2009 Feb 16;78(2-3):75-9
references.pmid: 18793702
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 12;28(11):2745-52
references.pmid: 18337404
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Jul;16(3 Pt 1):765-80
references.pmid: 12169260
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):545-56
references.pmid: 18545266
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 21;29(42):13158-64
references.pmid: 19846703
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jan;10(1):59-70
references.pmid: 19096369
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):398-403
references.pmid: 18368046
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 Mar 2;49(5):757-63
references.pmid: 16504950
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Nov;28(11):1194-205
references.pmid: 17266101
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Nov;30(10):1980-8
references.pmid: 19912330
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jun;20(1):46-53
references.pmid: 15130588
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2002 Dec;77(4-5):635-9
references.pmid: 12527011
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):2907-26
references.pmid: 19172646
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15;44(2):600-9
references.pmid: 18804540
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 Aug 3;51(3):381-90
references.pmid: 16880132
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2009 May;19(5):1019-27
references.pmid: 18842669
references.citation: Science. 2005 Dec 9;310(5754):1680-3
references.pmid: 16339445
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2556-63
references.pmid: 19879367
references.citation: Cortex. 2010 Mar;46(3):354-66
references.pmid: 19552900
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):389-97
references.pmid: 18368045
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1472-84
references.pmid: 18042401
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;187(4):641-50
references.pmid: 18320179
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 Feb;29(2):537-45
references.pmid: 11239442
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jan;95(1):301-10
references.pmid: 16192329
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):155-64
references.pmid: 15846811
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Jun;19(2 Pt 1):271-80
references.pmid: 12814578
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2006 Apr;16(4):561-73
references.pmid: 16033924
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 Mar 19;1261:65-74
references.pmid: 19185567
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1439-48
references.pmid: 12948701
references.citation: Risk Anal. 2004 Apr;24(2):311-22
references.pmid: 15078302
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1999 Apr;37(4):403-11
references.pmid: 10215087