A sliding stem in revision total knee arthroplasty provides stability and reduces stress shielding.
OBJECTIVE
In the reconstruction of unicondylar femoral bone defects with morselized bone grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty, a stem extension appears to be critical to obtain adequate mechanical stability. Whether stability is still assured by this reconstruction technique in bicondylar defects has not been assessed. The disadvantage of relatively stiff stem extensions is that bone resorption is promoted due to stress shielding. We therefore designed a stem that would permit axial sliding movements of the articulating part relative to the intramedullary stem.


METHODS
This stem was used in the reconstruction with impaction bone grafting (IBG) of 5 synthetic distal femora with a bicondylar defect. A cyclically axial load was applied to the prosthetic condyles to assess the stability of the reconstruction. Radiostereometry was used to determine the migrations of the femoral component with a rigidly connected stem, a sliding stem, and no stem extension.


RESULTS
We found a stable reconstruction of the bicondylar femoral defects with IBG in the case of a rigidly connected stem. After disconnecting the stem, the femoral component showed substantially more migrations. With a sliding stem, rotational migrations were similar to those of a rigidly connected stem. However, the sliding stem allowed proximal migration of the condylar component, thereby compressing the IBG.


CONCLUSIONS
The presence of a functional stem extension is important for the stability of a bicondylar reconstruction. A sliding stem provides adequate stability, while stress shielding is reduced because compressive contact forces are still transmitted to the distal femoral bone.
Meijerink
Huub J
HJ
Department of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen. hjmeijerink@hotmail.com
van Loon
Corné J M
CJ
de Waal Malefijt
Maarten C
MC
van Kampen
Albert
A
Verdonschot
Nico
N
D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D016025:Bone Transplantation; D005269:Femur / Q000502:physiology / Q000601:surgery; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D010780:Photogrammetry; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012086:Reoperation; D012399:Rotation
Knee. 2009 Aug;16(4):275-9
19299144
J Arthroplasty. 1994 Dec;9(6):579-94
7699370
Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Dec;74(6):652-7
14763693
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):810-7
19034597
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May;446:99-103
16672878
J Arthroplasty. 1995 Feb;10(1):7-11
7730833
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Feb;(371):113-8
10693556
Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:167-75
10098042
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Aug;18(5):592-9
12934211
Acta Orthop Belg. 1999 Jun;65(2):154-63
10427796
J Arthroplasty. 1998 Jun;13(4):428-37
9645524
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;232:1-51
2686344
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4 Suppl 1):56-60
17570279
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Sep;(378):282-9
10987004
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Apr;82(3):436-44
10813186
Int Orthop. 1995;19(6):346-51
8567149
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Apr;(184):302-8
6705360
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Jun;16(4):533-7
11402424
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 1:S52-7
12540670
Biomaterials. 1999 Jan;20(1):85-9
9916775
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jun;90(6):821-4
18539680
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):184-94
18172954
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jan;79(1):117-22
9020459
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Jan;75(1):14-21
8421012
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Feb;17(2):150-7
11847612
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Sep;90(9):1121-7
18757949
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov;(404):145-51
12439254
Acta Orthop. 2008 Oct;79(5):683-8
18839376
Acta Orthop Scand. 1994 Jun;65(3):267-75
8042477
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 May;87(5):656-63
15855367
Acta Orthop Scand. 1996 Feb;67(1):10-2
8615092
Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Dec;73(6):630-7
12553509
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):98-105
7497692
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):9-12
2805502
Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Feb;71(1):98-101
10744003
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jan;79(1):17-25
9010182
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Jul;(208):95-9
3720148
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):217-24
14646764
J Biomech. 1988;21(9):705-20
3182875