Regenerative healing following foetal myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVE
The adult response to myocardial infarction results in inflammation, scar formation, left ventricular dilatation, and loss of regional and global function. Regenerative scarless healing has been demonstrated in foetal dermis and tendon and is associated with diminished inflammation. We hypothesised that following foetal myocardial infarction, there would be minimal inflammation, regenerative healing, and preservation of function.


METHODS
Anteroapical myocardial infarction encompassing 20% of the left ventricle was created in adult or early gestation foetal sheep. Myocardial function was serially assessed using quantitative echocardiography. Infarct architecture was examined histologically for evidence of scar formation. Cellular inflammation, cellular proliferation, and apoptosis were assessed using immunohistochemistry.


RESULTS
In the adult sheep 4 weeks following myocardial infarction, there was a significant decline in ejection fraction (EF) (41±7.4% to 26±7.4%, p<0.05), and the akinetic myocardial segment increased in size (6.9±0.8 cm to 7.9±1.1 cm, p<0.05). By contrast, there was no decline in the foetal EF (53±8.1% to 55±8.8%) and no akinetic foetal myocardial segment 4 weeks post-infarction. The foetal infarcts lacked an inflammatory cell infiltrate and healed with minimal fibrosis, compared with the adults. Foetal infarcts also demonstrated 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU)+ proliferating cells, including cardiomyocytes, within the infarct.


CONCLUSIONS
These data demonstrate that the foetal response to myocardial infarction is dramatically different from the adult and is characterised by minimal inflammation, lack of fibrosis, myocardial proliferation and restoration of cardiac function. Diminished inflammation is associated with foetal regenerative cardiac healing following injury. Understanding the mechanisms involved in foetal myocardial regeneration may lead to applications to alter the adult response following myocardial infarction.
Herdrich
Benjamin J
BJ
The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. benjamin.herdrich@uphs.upenn.edu
Danzer
Enrico
E
Davey
Marcus G
MG
Allukian
Myron
M
Englefield
Virginia
V
Gorman
Joseph H
JH
Gorman
Robert C
RC
Liechty
Kenneth W
KW
D000818:Animals; D017209:Apoptosis / Q000502:physiology; D002921:Cicatrix / Q000473:pathology; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D005315:Fetal Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005318:Fetal Heart / Q000502:physiology*; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D012038:Regeneration / Q000502:physiology*; D012756:Sheep; D014463:Ultrasonography; D020257:Ventricular Remodeling / Q000502:physiology
J Cell Physiol. 2003 Feb;194(2):215-24
12494460
Circulation. 1979 Oct;60(4):760-6
476879
Circulation. 2008 Jan 29;117(4):e25-146
18086926
Chest. 1990 Jun;97(6):1439-45
2112081
Circulation. 2004 Sep 28;110(13):1754-60
15381645
Hypertension. 2004 Feb;43(2):229-36
14691195
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995 Jun;27(6):1281-92
8531210
Dev Cell. 2008 Oct;15(4):521-33
18854137
Circ Res. 1998 Jul 13;83(1):15-26
9670914
Cytokine. 2000 Jun;12(6):671-6
10843743
Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Dec;48(6):838-45
2596920
J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Jul;128(7):1852-60
18200061
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Jun;35(6):866-72; discussion 872-3
10873028
J Pediatr Surg. 1990 Jan;25(1):63-8; discussion 68-9
2299547
Circulation. 2000 Jun 27;101(25):2981-8
10869273
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 31;347(18):1397-402
12409541
J Surg Res. 1998 Jun;77(1):80-4
9698538
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 Nov;19(11):452-6
17986718
Circulation. 1998 Jan 27;97(3):282-9
9462531
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Oct;293(4):H2271-80
17644576
J Exp Med. 2008 Jan 21;205(1):43-51
18180311
Circulation. 2006 Nov 7;114(19):2056-64
17060376
Ann Biomed Eng. 2003 Nov;31(10):1143-52
14649488
J Pediatr Surg. 1985 Aug;20(4):315-9
4045654
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 1;100(1):35-40
17599437