Molecular microbial analysis of lactobacillus strains isolated from the gut of calves for potential probiotic use.
The intestinal microbiota has an influence on the growth and health status of the hosts. This is of particular interest in animals reared using intensive farming practices. Hence, it is necessary to know more about complexity of the beneficial intestinal microbiota. The use of molecular methods has revolutionized microbial identification by improving its quality and effectiveness. The specific aim of the study was to analyze predominant species of Lactobacillus in intestinal microbial ecosystem of young calves. Forty-two lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from intestinal tract of young calves were characterized by: Amplified Ribosomal DNA Restriction Analysis (ARDRA), by using Hae III, Msp I, and Hinf I restriction enzymes, and 16S rDNA gene sequencing. ARDRA screening revealed nine unique patterns among 42 isolates, with the same pattern for 29 of the isolates. Gene fragments of 16S rDNA of 19 strains representing different patterns were sequenced to confirm the identification of these species. These results confirmed that ARDRA is a good tool for identification and discrimination of bacterial species isolated from complex ecosystem and between closely related groups. This paper provides information about the LAB species predominant in intestinal tract of young calves that could provide beneficial effects when administered as probiotic.
Soto
Lorena P
LP
Departamento de Salud Pública Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Kreder 2805 (S3080HOF) Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Frizzo
Laureano S
LS
Bertozzi
Ezequiel
E
Avataneo
Elizabeth
E
Sequeira
Gabriel J
GJ
Rosmini
Marcelo R
MR
Br J Nutr. 2002 Sep;88 Suppl 1:S29-37
12215179
Curr Microbiol. 2001 Apr;42(4):282-9
11178730
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Nov;65(11):4981-6
10543812
Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Nov 15;96(3):219-33
15454313
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov;69(11):6750-7
14602636
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003 Apr;21(4):340-6
12672580
Anaerobe. 2004 Aug;10(4):217-27
16701521
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):410S-414S
11157350
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001 Jul;36(2-3):113-121
11451515
Microbiol Rev. 1996 Jun;60(2):407-38
8801440
Syst Appl Microbiol. 1998 Dec;21(4):588-92
9924827
Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Aug 15;103(1):91-6
16084269
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002 Dec;66(4):592-616, table of contents
12456784
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Oct;1081:276-9
17135526
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Jan;68(1):114-23
11772617
J Dairy Res. 2006 Feb;73(1):20-7
16433957
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jan;74(1):208-15
17993558
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000 Jan;50 Pt 1:251-258
10826811