Quantitative measures of sexual selection reveal no evidence for sex-role reversal in a sea spider with prolonged paternal care.
Taxa in which males alone invest in postzygotic care of offspring are often considered good models for investigating the proffered relationships between sexual selection and mating systems. In the pycnogonid sea spider Pycnogonum stearnsi, males carry large egg masses on their bodies for several weeks, so this species is a plausible candidate for sex-role reversal (greater intensity of sexual selection on females than on males). Here, we couple a microsatellite-based assessment of the mating system in a natural population with formal quantitative measures of genetic fitness to investigate the direction of sexual selection in P. stearnsi. Both sexes proved to be highly polygamous and showed similar standardized variances in reproductive and mating successes. Moreover, the fertility (number of progeny) of males and females appeared to be equally and highly dependent on mate access, as shown by similar Bateman gradients for the two sexes. The absence of sex-role reversal in this population of P. stearnsi is probably attributable to the fact that males are not limited by brooding space but have evolved an ability to carry large numbers of progeny. Body length was not a good predictor of male mating or reproductive success, so the aim of future studies should be to determine what traits are the targets of sexual selection in this species.
Barreto
Felipe S
FS
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. fbarreto@ucsd.edu
Avise
John C
JC
D000818:Animals; D001181:Arthropods / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D005260:Female; D005298:Fertility; D007814:Larva / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development; D008297:Male; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D010332:Paternal Behavior; D012737:Sex Factors
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Jan 08;9:6
19133131
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Dec 22;269(1509):2533-9
12573067
Evolution. 2009 Jul;63(7):1673-84
19228185
Am Nat. 2004 Oct;164(4):E83-9
15459886
Mol Ecol. 2007 Jun;16(12):2596-606
17561916
Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215-23
327542
Am Nat. 2004 Oct;164(4):444-56
15459877
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 7;267(1444):677-80
10821612
Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:139-65
11112166
Mol Ecol. 2008 Sep;17(18):4164-75
18684134
J Evol Biol. 2008 Jan;21(1):30-38
18034802
Nature. 1991 May 2;351(6321):58-60
2027382
Evolution. 2009 Mar;63(3):674-83
19087183
Heredity (Edinb). 1948 Dec;2(Pt. 3):349-68
18103134
Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):424-431
28307857
Mol Ecol. 2005 Mar;14(3):723-32
15723664
Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226
28556011
Biotechniques. 1999 Sep;27(3):500-2, 504-7
10489609
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106 Suppl 1:10009-16
19528645
Nature. 2006 Jun 8;441(7094):742-5
16760976
Mol Ecol. 2003 Feb;12(2):475-84
12535097
Hum Biol. 1958 Feb;30(1):1-13
13513111
Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Jul;7(7):237-41
21236017