title: Biased parameter estimates and inflated Type I error rates in analysis of covariance (and analysis of partial variance) arising from unreliability: alternatives and remedial strategies.
abstract: Miller and Chapman (2001) argued that 1 major class of misuse of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or its multiple regression counterpart, analysis of partial variance (APV), arises from attempts to use an ANCOVA/APV to answer a research question that is not meaningful in the 1st place. Unfortunately, there is another misuse of ANCOVAs/APVs that arises frequently in psychopathology studies even when addressing consensually meaningful research questions. This misuse arises from inflated Type I error rates in ANCOVA/APV inferential tests of the unique association of the independent variable with the dependent variable when the covariate and independent variables are correlated and measured with error. Alternatives to conventional ANCOVAs/APVs are discussed, as are steps that can be taken to minimize the impact of this bias on drawing valid inferences when conventional ANCOVAs/APVs are used.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Family Institute at Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-2710, USA. rzinbarg@northwestern.edu
authors.forename: Richard E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Zinbarg
authors.forename: Satoru
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Suzuki
authors.forename: Amanda A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Uliaszek
authors.forename: Alison R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Lewis
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D015233:Models, Statistical; D013223:Statistics as Topic / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1965 Nov;64(5):326-9
references.pmid: 5851540
references.citation: J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1962 Sep;65:145-53
references.pmid: 13880271
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990 Oct;58(5):646-56
references.pmid: 2254513
references.citation: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717-31
references.pmid: 15641418
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Feb;110(1):40-8
references.pmid: 11261398
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1967 Nov;68(5):304-5
references.pmid: 6062585
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1991 Jan;109(1):147-51
references.pmid: 2006226
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):83-104
references.pmid: 11928892
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):422-45
references.pmid: 12530702
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):578-98
references.pmid: 14674870
references.citation: Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006 Mar;98(3):253-9
references.pmid: 16611199
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):757-63
references.pmid: 9382394
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2003 Dec;18(4):639-57
references.pmid: 14692854
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Jun;62(3):488-99
references.pmid: 8063975
references.citation: Exp Aging Res. 1992 Autumn-Winter;18(3-4):117-44
references.pmid: 1459160
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2004 Mar;9(1):3-29
references.pmid: 15053717
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Aug;100(3):316-36
references.pmid: 1918611
references.citation: Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1984 May;37 ( Pt 1):1-21
references.pmid: 6733052
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1996;47:371-400
references.pmid: 8624138