title: Substantia nigra activity level predicts trial-to-trial adjustments in cognitive control.
abstract: Effective adaptation to the demands of a changing environment requires flexible cognitive control. The medial and the lateral frontal cortices are involved in such control processes, putatively in close interplay with the BG. In particular, dopaminergic projections from the midbrain (i.e., from the substantia nigra [SN] and the ventral tegmental area) have been proposed to play a pivotal role in modulating the activity in these areas for cognitive control purposes. In that dopaminergic involvement has been strongly implicated in reinforcement learning, these ideas suggest functional links between reinforcement learning, where the outcome of actions shapes behavior over time, and cognitive control in a more general context, where no direct reward is involved. Here, we provide evidence from functional MRI in humans that activity in the SN predicts systematic subsequent trial-to-trial RT prolongations that are thought to reflect cognitive control in a stop-signal paradigm. In particular, variations in the activity level of the SN in one trial predicted the degree of RT prolongation on the subsequent trial, consistent with a modulating output signal from the SN being involved in enhancing cognitive control. This link between SN activity and subsequent behavioral adjustments lends support to theoretical accounts that propose dopaminergic control signals that shape behavior both in the presence and in the absence of direct reward. This SN-based modulatory mechanism is presumably mediated via a wider network that determines response speed in this task, including frontal and parietal control regions, along with the BG and the associated subthalamic nucleus.
authors.affiliation: Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany. nico.boehler@duke.edu
authors.forename: Carsten Nicolas
authors.initials: CN
authors.lastname: Boehler
authors.forename: Nico
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Bunzeck
authors.forename: Ruth M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Krebs
authors.forename: Toemme
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Noesselt
authors.forename: Mircea A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Schoenfeld
authors.forename: Hans-Jochen
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Heinze
authors.forename: Thomas F
authors.initials: TF
authors.lastname: Münte
authors.forename: Marty G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Woldorff
authors.forename: Jens-Max
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Hopf
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D000328:Adult; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010100:Oxygen / Q000097:blood; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D013378:Substantia Nigra / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D010100:Oxygen
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Jan 1;13(1):31-43
references.pmid: 11224907
references.citation: Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):443-7
references.pmid: 15486290
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;16(6):1098-112
references.pmid: 15298795
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 2002 May;67(1):53-83
references.pmid: 12126656
references.citation: Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1118-21
references.pmid: 15718473
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Jun;192(2):193-206
references.pmid: 17277934
references.citation: Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1023-6
references.pmid: 14963333
references.citation: Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1120-36
references.pmid: 16945502
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Dec 14;25(50):11730-7
references.pmid: 16354931
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):251-60
references.pmid: 15996856
references.citation: Science. 2008 Feb 29;319(5867):1264-7
references.pmid: 18309087
references.citation: Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1309-12
references.pmid: 17962524
references.citation: Science. 2007 Dec 7;318(5856):1642-5
references.pmid: 18063800
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Feb 24;433(7028):873-6
references.pmid: 15729344
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 7;17(15):R587-9
references.pmid: 17686426
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):971-8
references.pmid: 16767087
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Feb 3;45(3):459-67
references.pmid: 15694331
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 May 15;20(10):3864-73
references.pmid: 10804226
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):134-45
references.pmid: 18440947
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2009 Jun;32(6):321-8
references.pmid: 19446348
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4257
references.pmid: 19165335
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):247-51
references.pmid: 19439396
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Dec;1(3):199-207
references.pmid: 11257908
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 2004 Sep;74(1):1-58
references.pmid: 15381316
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Aug;205(2):273-83
references.pmid: 19404616
references.citation: Science. 1998 May 1;280(5364):747-9
references.pmid: 9563953
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Sep;20(9):1595-610
references.pmid: 18345985
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):129-40
references.pmid: 15518930
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001 Jun;1(2):137-60
references.pmid: 12467110
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Oct 14;431(7010):760-7
references.pmid: 15483596
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun;20(6):1021-9
references.pmid: 18211230
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 May;33(5):647-61
references.pmid: 18822313
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2424-33
references.pmid: 16510720
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Aug 18;47(4):495-501
references.pmid: 16102533
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Jul;25(3):336-44
references.pmid: 15852388
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959
references.pmid: 15482068
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;7(4):254-66
references.pmid: 10408769
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Dec;8(12):539-46
references.pmid: 15556023
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Sep 1;42(3):1196-206
references.pmid: 18588986
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1998 Aug;8(2):140-8
references.pmid: 9740757
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 May;3(5):516-20
references.pmid: 10769394
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Dec;20(12):1473-7
references.pmid: 19906127
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Jun 11;459(7248):837-41
references.pmid: 19448610
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2002 Oct;109(4):679-709
references.pmid: 12374324
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 1996;4(1):58-73
references.pmid: 20408186
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Apr 4;27(14):3743-52
references.pmid: 17409238
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Dec 19;27(51):14190-8
references.pmid: 18094258
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
references.pmid: 11488380
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1998 Jan;7(1):30-40
references.pmid: 9500830
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Jan 24;57(2):314-25
references.pmid: 18215627
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 Aug 3;51(3):369-79
references.pmid: 16880131
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14311-9
references.pmid: 19109512