title: Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM)--a versatile tool in studying plants.
abstract: Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) enables the investigation of hydrated and uncoated plant samples and the in situ observation of dynamic processes. Water vapor in the microscope chamber takes part in secondary electron detection and charge prevention. Two ESEM modes are available and offer a broad spectrum of applications. The environmental or wet mode prevents sample dehydration by the combination of sample cooling (5°C) and a vapor pressure of 4-6 Torr. In the low vacuum mode, the maximum chamber pressure is limited to 1 Torr (corresponding to about 5% relative humidity in the chamber) and allows the simultaneous use of a backscattered electron detector for imaging material contrast. A selection of characteristic plant samples and various applications are presented as a guide to ESEM for plant scientists. Leaf surfaces, trichomes, epicuticular waxes, and inorganic surface layers represent samples being comparatively resistant to dehydration, whereas callus cells and stigmatic tissue are examples for dehydration- and beam-sensitive samples. The potential of investigating dynamic processes in situ is demonstrated by studying anther opening, by tensile testing of leaves, and by performing hydration/dehydration experiments by changing the vapor pressure. Additionally, automated block-face imaging and serial sectioning using in situ ultramicrotomy is presented. The strengths and weaknesses of ESEM are discussed and it is shown that ESEM is a versatile tool in plant science.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Graz, Schubertstrasse 51, 8010, Graz, Austria. edith.stabentheiner@uni-graz.at
authors.forename: Edith
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Stabentheiner
authors.forename: Armin
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Zankel
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pölt
mesh_terms: D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000648:ultrastructure; D010944:Plants / Q000648:ultrastructure*
references.citation: Nat Mater. 2003 Aug;2(8):511-6
references.pmid: 12894259
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2003 Jul;92(1):73-7
references.pmid: 12763757
references.citation: Int Endod J. 2005 Nov;38(11):775-88
references.pmid: 16218968
references.citation: Microsc Res Tech. 1993 Aug;25(5-6):354-61
references.pmid: 8400426
references.citation: Methods Cell Biol. 2008;89:391-407
references.pmid: 19118683
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008 Jul;179(2):286-317
references.pmid: 19086285
references.citation: Science. 1988 Oct 14;242(4876):309
references.pmid: 17787659
references.citation: Scanning. 2007 Nov-Dec;29(6):261-9
references.pmid: 18076055
references.citation: J Microsc. 2009 Feb;233(2):205-24
references.pmid: 19220687
references.citation: J Cell Physiol. 2005 Dec;205(3):328-34
references.pmid: 15965928
references.citation: Planta. 2009 Nov;230(6):1105-13
references.pmid: 20183923
references.citation: Small. 2009 Jun;5(12):1366-90
references.pmid: 19507183
references.citation: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2003 Dec 15;361(1813):2771-87
references.pmid: 14667297
references.citation: Micron. 2008 Dec;39(8):1049-61
references.pmid: 18586502
references.citation: J Microsc. 2009 Jan;233(1):140-8
references.pmid: 19196420
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2004 Jan;45(1):40-7
references.pmid: 14749484
references.citation: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2007 May;9(3):411-9
references.pmid: 17143807
references.citation: J Microsc. 2001 Dec;204(Pt 3):185-95
references.pmid: 11903795
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2004 Nov;2(11):e329
references.pmid: 15514700
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2004 Oct;94(4):515-26
references.pmid: 15306562