An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–IV–TR) currently conceptualizes personality disorders (PDs) as categorical syndromes that are distinct from normal personality. However, an alternative dimensional viewpoint is that PDs are maladaptive expressions of general personality traits. The dimensional perspective postulates that personality pathology exists at a more extreme level of the latent trait than does general personality. This hypothesis was examined using item response theory analyses comparing scales from two personality pathology instruments—the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ; Livesley & Jackson, in press) and the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; Clark, 1993; Clark, Simms, Wu, & Casillas, in press)—with scales from an instrument designed to assess normal range personality, the NEO Personality Inventory–Revised (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992). The results indicate that respective scales from these instruments assess shared latent constructs, with the NEO PI-R providing more information at the lower (normal) range and the DAPP-BQ and SNAP providing more information at the higher (abnormal) range. Nevertheless, the results also demonstrated substantial overlap in coverage. Implications of the findings are discussed with respect to the study and development of items that would provide specific discriminations along underlying trait continua.
Samuel
Douglas B
DB
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, USA. douglas.samuel@yale.edu
Simms
Leonard J
LJ
Clark
Lee Anna
LA
Livesley
W John
WJ
Widiger
Thomas A
TA
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D039721:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010551:Personality / Q000145:classification*; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000523:psychology*; D010555:Personality Inventory / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010556:Personality Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult
Assessment. 2006 Jun;13(2):119-37
16672728
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Feb;116(1):166-75
17324027
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):494-504
16351373
Assessment. 2000 Dec;7(4):365-78
11151962
J Pers Assess. 2003 Oct;81(2):168-78
12946923
Assessment. 2000 Dec;7(4):347-64
11151961
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 May;112(2):193-202
12784828
J Pers Assess. 1996 Jun;66(3):488-524
8667144
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):657-66
14674877
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Nov;75(5):1350-62
9866192
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Mar;61(3):323-45
15468325
Twin Res. 2002 Oct;5(5):342-6
12537856
Psychol Assess. 2004 Jun;16(2):155-68
15222812
J Pers Disord. 2005 Apr;19(2):131-55
15899713
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1326-42
18708274
Psychol Assess. 2005 Mar;17(1):28-43
15769226
J Pers. 2008 Dec;76(6):1623-48
19012660
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jan;88(1):139-57
15631580
J Pers Assess. 2001 Oct;77(2):339-58
11693863
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:227-57
16903806