title: Heritability of longevity in Large White and Landrace sows using continuous time and grouped data models.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Using conventional measurements of lifetime, it is not possible to differentiate between productive and non-productive days during a sow's lifetime and this can lead to estimated breeding values favoring less productive animals. By rescaling the time axis from continuous to several discrete classes, grouped survival data (discrete survival time) models can be used instead.
  
  
  METHODS
  The productive life length of 12319 Large White and 9833 Landrace sows was analyzed with continuous scale and grouped data models. Random effect of herd*year, fixed effects of interaction between parity and relative number of piglets, age at first farrowing and annual herd size change were included in the analysis. The genetic component was estimated from sire, sire-maternal grandsire, sire-dam, sire-maternal grandsire and animal models, and the heritabilities computed for each model type in both breeds.
  
  
  RESULTS
  If age at first farrowing was under 43 weeks or above 60 weeks, the risk of culling sows increased. An interaction between parity and relative litter size was observed, expressed by limited culling during first parity and severe risk increase of culling sows having small litters later in life. In the Landrace breed, heritabilities ranged between 0.05 and 0.08 (s.e. 0.014-0.020) for the continuous and between 0.07 and 0.11 (s.e. 0.016-0.023) for the grouped data models, and in the Large White breed, they ranged between 0.08 and 0.14 (s.e. 0.012-0.026) for the continuous and between 0.08 and 0.13 (s.e. 0.012-0.025) for the grouped data models.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Heritabilities for length of productive life were similar with continuous time and grouped data models in both breeds. Based on these results and because grouped data models better reflect the economical needs in meat animals, we conclude that grouped data models are more appropriate in pig.
authors.affiliation: Division of Livestock Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel Str 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria. gabor.meszaros@boku.ac.at
authors.forename: Gábor
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Mészáros
authors.forename: Judit
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pálos
authors.forename: Vincent
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Ducrocq
authors.forename: Johann
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sölkner
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding; D005260:Female; D008098:Litter Size / Q000235:genetics*; D008136:Longevity / Q000235:genetics*; D010298:Parity / Q000235:genetics; D036801:Parturition / Q000235:genetics*; D011247:Pregnancy; D013552:Swine / Q000235:genetics*
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2001 Sep;84(9):2073-80
references.pmid: 11573788
references.citation: Animal. 2009 Jun;3(6):783-90
references.pmid: 22444764
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2004 Sep;87(9):3062-70
references.pmid: 15375069
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2008 Feb;86(2):432-41
references.pmid: 17998436
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2006 Nov;84(11):2914-24
references.pmid: 17032784
references.citation: Biometrics. 1978 Mar;34(1):57-67
references.pmid: 630037
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 1994 Sep;72(9):2237-46
references.pmid: 8002442
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2002 Jun;85(6):1563-77
references.pmid: 12146489
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2004 Nov;82(11):3111-7
references.pmid: 15542456
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2006 Dec;89(12):4903-6
references.pmid: 17106122
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2004 Nov;87(11):3690-703
references.pmid: 15483153
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2006 Jul;84(7):1658-65
references.pmid: 16775049