title: Antisense DNA parameters derived from next-nearest-neighbor analysis of experimental data.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The enumeration of tetrameric and other sequence motifs that are positively or negatively correlated with in vivo antisense DNA effects has been a useful addition to the arsenal of information needed to predict effective targets for antisense DNA control of gene expression. Such retrospective information derived from in vivo cellular experiments characterizes aspects of the sequence dependence of antisense inhibition that are not predicted by nearest-neighbor (NN) thermodynamic parameters derived from in vitro experiments. However, quantitation of the antisense contributions of motifs is problematic, since individual motifs are not isolated from the effects of neighboring nucleotides, and motifs may be overlapping. These problems are circumvented by a next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) analysis of antisense DNA effects in which the overlapping nature of nearest-neighbors is taken into account.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Next-nearest-neighbor triplet combinations of nucleotides are the simplest that include overlapping sequence effects and therefore can encompass interactions beyond those of nearest neighbors. We used singular value decomposition (SVD) to fit experimental data from our laboratory in which phosphorothioate-modified antisense DNAs (S-DNAs) 20 nucleotides long were used to inhibit cellular protein expression in 112 experiments involving four gene targets and two cell lines. Data were fitted using a NNN model, neglecting end effects, to derive NNN inhibition parameters that could be combined to give parameters for a set of 49 sequences that represents the inhibitory effects of all possible overlapping triplet interactions in the cellular targets of these antisense S-DNAs. We also show that parameters to describe subsets of the data, such as the mRNAs being targeted and the cell lines used, can be included in such a derivation. While NNN triplet parameters provided an adequate model to fit our data, NN doublet parameters did not.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The methodology presented illustrates how NNN antisense inhibitory information can be derived from in vivo cellular experiments. Subsequent calculations of the antisense inhibitory parameters for any mRNA target sequence automatically take into account the effects of all possible overlapping combinations of nearest-neighbors in the sequence. This procedure is more robust than the tallying of tetrameric motifs that have positive or negative antisense effects. The specific parameters derived in this work are limited in their applicability by the relatively small database of experiments that was used in their derivation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W, Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA. dongray@utdallas.edu
authors.forename: Donald M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Gray
authors.forename: Carla W
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Gray
authors.forename: Byong-Hoon
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Yoo
authors.forename: Tzu-Fang
authors.initials: TF
authors.lastname: Lou
mesh_terms: D001483:Base Sequence; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D016373:DNA, Antisense / Q000737:chemistry*; D030561:Databases, Nucleic Acid; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry; D013816:Thermodynamics
chemical_list: D016373:DNA, Antisense; D011506:Proteins
references.citation: Biopolymers. 1999;52(1):29-56
references.pmid: 10737861
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1994 Jun 10;269(23):16416-24
references.pmid: 7911467
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1998 Jan 6;37(1):61-72
references.pmid: 9425026
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 15;31(14):4211-7
references.pmid: 12853639
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Apr 02;32(6):2008-16
references.pmid: 15064360
references.citation: Oligonucleotides. 2003;13(5):313-24
references.pmid: 15000822
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1994 Sep 13;33(36):11033-9
references.pmid: 8086420
references.citation: Biopolymers. 1997 Dec;42(7):795-810
references.pmid: 10904551
references.citation: Biochemistry. 2001 Feb 20;40(7):2267-75
references.pmid: 11329296
references.citation: J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2008 Oct;6(5):919-32
references.pmid: 18942159
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Jun 07;8:184
references.pmid: 17555590
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Sep 1;31(17):4989-94
references.pmid: 12930948
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Aug 1;28(15):2862-5
references.pmid: 10908347
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1995 Sep 5;34(35):11211-6
references.pmid: 7545436
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 11;101(19):7287-92
references.pmid: 15123812
references.citation: RNA. 1999 Nov;5(11):1458-69
references.pmid: 10580474
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Feb 1;30(3):749-58
references.pmid: 11809888
references.citation: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006 May-Jun;33(5-6):533-40
references.pmid: 16700890
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 1998 Jan;16(1):59-63
references.pmid: 9447595
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 17;95(4):1460-5
references.pmid: 9465037
references.citation: J Immunol. 1994 Apr 1;152(7):3530-40
references.pmid: 7511650
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Nov 15;25(22):4429-43
references.pmid: 9358149
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1998 Sep 25;273(39):25125-31
references.pmid: 9737971
references.citation: Biopolymers. 1997 Dec;42(7):783-93
references.pmid: 10904550
references.citation: Biopolymers. 1992 Dec;32(12):1679-93
references.pmid: 1472651