What do IPAQ questions mean to older adults? Lessons from cognitive interviews.
BACKGROUND
Most questionnaires used for physical activity (PA) surveillance have been developed for adults aged </=65 years. Given the health benefits of PA for older adults and the aging of the population, it is important to include adults aged 65+ years in PA surveillance. However, few studies have examined how well older adults understand PA surveillance questionnaires. This study aimed to document older adults' understanding of questions from the International PA Questionnaire (IPAQ), which is used worldwide for PA surveillance.


METHODS
Participants were 41 community-dwelling adults aged 65-89 years. They each completed IPAQ in a face-to-face semi-structured interview, using the "think-aloud" method, in which they expressed their thoughts out loud as they answered IPAQ questions. Interviews were transcribed and coded according to a three-stage model: understanding the intent of the question; performing the primary task (conducting the mental operations required to formulate a response); and response formatting (mapping the response into pre-specified response options).


RESULTS
Most difficulties occurred during the understanding and performing the primary task stages. Errors included recalling PA in an "average" week, not in the previous 7 days; including PA lasting <10 minutes/session; reporting the same PA twice or thrice; and including the total time of an activity for which only a part of that time was at the intensity specified in the question. Participants were unclear what activities fitted within a question's scope and used a variety of strategies for determining the frequency and duration of their activities. Participants experienced more difficulties with the moderate-intensity PA and walking questions than with the vigorous-intensity PA questions. The sitting time question, particularly difficult for many participants, required the use of an answer strategy different from that used to answer questions about PA.


CONCLUSIONS
These findings indicate a need for caution in administering IPAQ to adults aged >/=65 years. Most errors resulted in over-reporting, although errors resulting in under-reporting were also noted. Given the nature of the errors made by participants, it is possible that similar errors occur when IPAQ is used in younger populations and that the errors identified could be minimized with small modifications to IPAQ.
Heesch
Kristiann C
KC
Queensland University of Technology, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation and the School of Public Health, Brisbane, Queensland 4059, Australia. k.heesch@qut.edu.au.
van Uffelen
Jannique Gz
JG
Hill
Robert L
RL
Brown
Wendy J
WJ
J Aging Phys Act. 2006 Jan;14(1):98-114
16648654
J Adv Nurs. 2003 Apr;42(1):57-63
12641812
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Jul;36(7):1181-6
15235322
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun;33(6):962-70
11404662
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):153-62
8437031
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
12900694
J Sci Med Sport. 2003 Dec;6(4):477-91
14723397
Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):219-27
12769134
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jul;33(7):1126-41
11445760
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Sep;38(9):1584-92
16960519
Public Health Nutr. 2003 May;6(3):299-305
12740079
J Sci Med Sport. 2004 Jun;7(2):205-15
15362316
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 May;25(5):628-42
8492692
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1435-45
17762378
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Dec 03;4:62
18053188
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Apr;38(4):753-60
16679993
Am J Public Health. 1989 Aug;79(8):1053-5
2751028
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jul;41(7):1510-30
19516148
Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):229-38
12769135
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Oct;28(10):1282-91
8897386
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Mar 31;6:21
19335883
J Phys Act Health. 2008;5 Suppl 1:S30-44
18364524
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jun;34(6):486-94
18471584
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2004 Apr;28(2):128-34
15233351