Frequency response of lift control in Drosophila.
The flight control responses of the fruitfly represent a powerful model system to explore neuromotor control mechanisms, whose system level control properties can be suitably characterized with a frequency response analysis. We characterized the lift response dynamics of tethered flying Drosophila in presence of vertically oscillating visual patterns, whose oscillation frequency we varied between 0.1 and 13 Hz. We justified these measurements by showing that the amplitude gain and phase response is invariant to the pattern oscillation amplitude and spatial frequency within a broad dynamic range. We also showed that lift responses are largely linear and time invariant (LTI), a necessary condition for a meaningful analysis of frequency responses and a remarkable characteristic given its nonlinear constituents. The flies responded to increasing oscillation frequencies with a roughly linear decrease in response gain, which dropped to background noise levels at about 6 Hz. The phase lag decreased linearly, consistent with a constant reaction delay of 75 ms. Next, we estimated the free-flight response of the fly to generate a Bode diagram of the lift response. The limitation of lift control to frequencies below 6 Hz is explained with inertial body damping, which becomes dominant at higher frequencies. Our work provides the detailed background and techniques that allow optomotor lift responses of Drosophila to be measured with comparatively simple, affordable and commercially available techniques. The identification of an LTI, pattern velocity dependent, lift control strategy is relevant to the underlying motion computation mechanisms and serves a broader understanding of insects' flight control strategies. The relevance and potential pitfalls of applying system identification techniques in tethered preparations is discussed.
Graetzel
Chauncey F
CF
Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nelson
Bradley J
BJ
Fry
Steven N
SN
D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004331:Drosophila melanogaster / Q000502:physiology*; D056228:Feedback, Sensory; D005260:Female; D005426:Flight, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation
Trends Neurosci. 1989 Aug;12(8):297-306
2475948
Curr Biol. 2009 Jan 13;19(1):R36-47
19138592
J Exp Biol. 2002 Apr;205(Pt 8):1087-96
11919268
Kybernetik. 1968 Jun;4(6):199-208
5731498
J R Soc Interface. 2011 Feb 6;8(55):171-85
20525744
Science. 2003 Apr 18;300(5618):495-8
12702878
Curr Biol. 2007 Feb 20;17(4):329-35
17291757
J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Jan 30;167(2):127-39
17854905
J Exp Biol. 1997 Apr;200(Pt 7):1133-43
9131808
J Exp Biol. 1996;199(Pt 1):237-44
9317712
Biol Cybern. 1999 Feb;80(2):109-16
12440388
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):729-36
15582376
J Exp Biol. 2008 Jul;211(Pt 13):2026-45
18552291
J Exp Biol. 2007 Dec;210(Pt 24):4319-34
18055621
J Exp Biol. 2005 Jun;208(Pt 12):2303-18
15939772
Curr Biol. 2008 Mar 11;18(5):368-74
18328703
J Exp Biol. 2002 Sep;205(Pt 18):2785-98
12177144
J Exp Biol. 1999 Jun;202 (Pt 11):1481-90
10229694
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2002 Jul;188(6):419-37
12122462
J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Jun 15;171(1):110-7
18405978
J Exp Biol. 2003 Jan;206(Pt 2):295-302
12477899
Br J Psychol. 1958 Aug;49(3):182-94
13572790
Curr Biol. 2008 Apr 22;18(8):R339-41
18430633
J Exp Biol. 2008 Feb;211(Pt 3):341-53
18203989
J Exp Biol. 2010 Apr;213(Pt 8):1366-75
20348349
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2000;44:93-120
10605643
J Exp Biol. 2006 Nov;209(Pt 22):4533-45
17079723
J Exp Biol. 2010 Feb 15;213(4):602-12
20118311
Trends Neurosci. 2002 Feb;25(2):96-102
11814562
Rev Oculomot Res. 1993;5:239-63
8420551
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1602-14
16687623
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Dec;12(6):699-706
12490262
J Exp Biol. 2009 Apr;212(Pt 8):1120-30
19329746
Nature. 1998 Oct 15;395(6703):654
9790186
Neuron. 2008 Jul 31;59(2):322-35
18667159
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2007 Jul;193(7):787-99
17551735
Science. 2009 Apr 10;324(5924):252-5
19359586
Curr Biol. 2006 May 9;16(9):R309-14
16682333
Vision Res. 1999 Aug;39(16):2749-66
10492835
Kybernetik. 1973 May;12(4):185-203
4718020