Strength of tobacco control in rural communities.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to: (a) describe the Strength of Tobacco Control (SoTC) capacity, efforts and resources in rural communities, and (b) examine the relationships between SoTC scores and sociodemographic, political, and health-ranking variables.


METHODS
Data were collected during the baseline preintervention phase of a community-based randomized, controlled trial. Rural counties were selected using stratified random sampling (n = 39). Key informant interviews were employed. The SoTC, originally developed and tested with states, was adapted to a county-level measure assessing capacity, efforts, and resources. Univariate analysis and bivariate correlations assessed the SoTC total score and construct scores, as well as their relationships. Multiple regression examined the relationships of county-level sociodemographic, political, and health-ranking variables with SoTC total and construct scores.


RESULTS
County population size was positively correlated with capacity (r = 0.44; P < .01), efforts (r = 0.54; P= .01), and SoTC total score (r = 0.51; P < .01). Communities with more resources for tobacco control had better overall county health rankings (r = .43; P < .01). With population size, percent Caucasian, tobacco production, and smoking prevalence as potential predictors of SoTC total score, only population size was significant.


CONCLUSIONS
SoTC scores may be useful in determining local tobacco control efforts and appropriate planning for additional public health interventions and resources. Larger rural communities were more likely to have strong tobacco control programs than smaller communities. Smaller rural communities may need to be targeted for training and technical assistance. Leadership development and allocation of resources are needed in all rural communities to address disparities in tobacco use and tobacco control policies.
York
Nancy L
NL
School of Nursing, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Box 453018, Las Vegas, NV 89154-3018, USA. nancy.york@unlv.edu
Rayens
Mary Kay
MK
Zhang
Mei
M
Jones
Lisa G
LG
Casey
Baretta R
BR
Hahn
Ellen J
EJ
D006293:Health Promotion / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D007629:Kentucky; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012424:Rural Population; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Q000517:prevention & control
D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution
J Rural Health. 2004 Winter;20(1):7-16
14964923
Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):286-92
14759944
Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1 Suppl 1:S113-6
11072415
Am J Public Health. 1998 Aug;88(8):1193-8
9702146
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jun;34(6):519-22
18471589
Prim Care. 1999 Sep;26(3):433-61
10436282
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Nov 19;95(22):1681-91
14625259
BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):333-7
10926588
Eval Rev. 1999 Jun;23(3):259-80
10538783
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):941-3
12036784
Psychosom Med. 2004 May-Jun;66(3):411-21
15184705
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A104
17875248
J Rural Health. 2008 Spring;24(2):116-24
18397444
Addiction. 2003 Aug;98(8):1111-7
12873245
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Jul 8;54(26):649-53
16001014