title: Species richness of yeast communities in floral nectar of southern Spanish plants.
abstract: Floral nectar of insect-pollinated plants often contains dense yeast populations, yet little quantitative information exists on patterns and magnitude of species richness of nectar-dwelling yeasts in natural plant communities. This study evaluates yeast species richness at both the plant community and plant species levels in a montane forest area in southern Spain, and also explores possible correlations between the incidence of different yeast species in nectar and their reported tolerance to high sugar concentrations, and between yeast diversity and pollinator composition. Yeast species occurring in a total of 128 field-collected nectar samples from 24 plant species were identified by sequencing the D1/D2 domain of the large subunit rDNA, and rarefaction-based analyses were used to estimate yeast species richness at the plant community and plant species levels, using nectar drops as elemental sampling units. Individual nectar samples were generally characterized by very low species richness (1.2 yeast species/sample, on average), with the ascomycetous Metschnikowia reukaufii and Metschnikowia gruessii accounting altogether for 84.7% of the 216 isolates identified. Other yeasts recorded included species in the genera Aureobasidium, Rhodotorula, Cryptococcus, Sporobolomyces, and Lecythophora. The shapes and slopes of observed richness accumulation curves were quite similar for the nectar drop and plant species approaches, but the two approaches yielded different expected richness estimates. Expected richness was higher for plant species-based than for nectar drop-based analyses, showing that the coverage of nectar yeast species occurring in the region would be improved by sampling additional host plant species. A significant correlation was found between incidence of yeast species in nectar and their reported ability to grow in a medium containing 50% glucose. Neither diversity nor incidence of yeasts was correlated with pollinator composition across plant species.
authors.affiliation: Estación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Avenida Américo Vespucio s/n, Isla de La Cartuja, 41092, Seville, Spain. maribelpozo@ebd.csic.es
authors.forename: María I
authors.initials: MI
authors.lastname: Pozo
authors.forename: Carlos M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Herrera
authors.forename: Pilar
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bazaga
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D007313:Insecta / Q000502:physiology; D057048:Plant Nectar; D010944:Plants / Q000382:microbiology*; D013030:Spain; D015003:Yeasts / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification*
chemical_list: D057048:Plant Nectar
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1917
references.pmid: 16809531
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Nov;73(21):7059-66
references.pmid: 17827313
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2008 Mar;95(3):315-20
references.pmid: 21632356
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2008 Sep;10(9):2200-10
references.pmid: 18637951
references.citation: Mycol Res. 2005 Mar;109(Pt 3):261-5
references.pmid: 15912941
references.citation: Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):433-41
references.pmid: 16011689
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2001 Apr;1(1):1-8
references.pmid: 12702457
references.citation: Can J Microbiol. 1999 Feb;45(2):172-7
references.pmid: 10380650
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2003 Dec;4(3):253-8
references.pmid: 14654429
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 Jul;52(Pt 4):1423-1433
references.pmid: 12148659
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003 Jan;53(Pt 1):367-372
references.pmid: 12656196
references.citation: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2007 Jul;92(1):37-42
references.pmid: 17205379
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):540-52
references.pmid: 10742046
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 1985 Mar;11(1):51-8
references.pmid: 24221239
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2004 Dec;5(3):253-61
references.pmid: 15556087
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Mar;71(3):1501-6
references.pmid: 15746353
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Oct;67(10):4399-406
references.pmid: 11571135
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1415-23
references.pmid: 19208669
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jul 29;345(1311):101-18
references.pmid: 7972351
references.citation: Genetics. 2008 Mar;178(3):1615-22
references.pmid: 18245835
references.citation: Can J Microbiol. 2004 Nov;50(11):923-34
references.pmid: 15644909
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 7;277(1682):747-54
references.pmid: 19889702
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 3;103(1):117-22
references.pmid: 16368757
references.citation: Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):212-9
references.pmid: 10821281
references.citation: Parasitol Today. 1995 Aug;11(8):306-10
references.pmid: 15275331
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2007 Jun;7(4):595-603
references.pmid: 17346260
references.citation: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1998 May;73(4):331-71
references.pmid: 9850420
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 Nov 1;50(2):87-100
references.pmid: 19712367