title: Microsaccades are different from saccades in scene perception.
abstract: Eye-fixation durations are among the best and most widely used measures of ongoing cognition in visual tasks, e.g., reading, visual search or scene perception. However, fixations are characterized by ongoing motor activity (or fixational eye movements) with microsaccades as their most pronounced components. Recent work demonstrated the similarities of microsaccades and inspection saccades. Here, we show that distinct properties of microsaccades and inspection saccades can be found in a scene perception task, based on descriptive measures (e.g., a bimodal amplitude distribution) as well as functional characteristics (e.g., inter saccadic-event intervals and generating processes). Besides these specific differences, microsaccade rates produced by individual participants in a fixation paradigm are correlated with microsaccade rates extracted from fixations in scene perception, indicating a common neurophysiological basis. Finally, we observed that slow fixational eye movements, called drift, are significantly reduced during long fixations in scene viewing, which informs about the control of eye movements in scene viewing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Haus 14, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. mergen@uni-potsdam.de
authors.forename: Konstantin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Mergenthaler
authors.forename: Ralf
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Engbert
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Science. 2009 Feb 13;323(5916):940-3
references.pmid: 19213919
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Jun;15(6):431-6
references.pmid: 15147499
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):382-405
references.pmid: 20438231
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2009 Sep;32(9):463-75
references.pmid: 19716186
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Apr;43(9):1035-45
references.pmid: 12676246
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):498-504
references.pmid: 14585447
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 Aug 06;8(11):5.1-23
references.pmid: 18831599
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2;103(18):7192-7
references.pmid: 16632611
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jun 14;447(7146):851-4
references.pmid: 17568745
references.citation: Science. 1965 Dec 10;150(3702):1459-60
references.pmid: 5855207
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 Dec 18;8(14):21.1-18
references.pmid: 19146322
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):566-73
references.pmid: 18567256
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506
references.pmid: 19449261
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2006;154:177-92
references.pmid: 17010710
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Mar;5(3):229-40
references.pmid: 14976522
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 Nov 04;8(14):15.1-9
references.pmid: 19146316