Patient and health professional views on rehabilitation practices and outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis:a focus group study.
BACKGROUND
There is worldwide variation in rehabilitation practices after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and no agreement on which interventions will lead to optimal short and long term patient outcomes. As a first step in the development of clinical practice guidelines for post-acute rehabilitation after THA and TKA, we explored experiences and attitudes about rehabilitation practices and outcomes in groups of individuals identified as key stakeholders.


METHODS
Separate focus groups and interviews were conducted with patients (THA or TKA within past year) and three health professional groups: allied health professionals (AHPs), orthopaedic surgeons, and other physicians, in Canada and the United States. Pairs of moderators led the focus groups using a standardized discussion guide. Discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis within and across groups identified key themes.


RESULTS
Eleven focus groups and eight interviews took place in six sites. Patients (n = 32) varied in age, stage of recovery, and surgical and rehabilitation experiences. Health professionals (n = 44) represented a range of disciplines, practice settings and years of experience. Six key themes emerged: 1) Let's talk (issues related to patient-health professional and inter-professional communication); 2) Expecting the unexpected (observations about unanticipated recovery experiences); 3) It's attitude that counts (the importance of the patient's positive attitude and participation in recovery); 4) It takes all kinds of support (along the continuum of care); 5) Barriers to recovery (at patient, provider and system levels), and 6) Back to normal (reflecting diversity of expected outcomes). Patients offered different, but overlapping views compared to health professionals regarding rehabilitation practices and outcomes following THA and TKA.


CONCLUSIONS
Results will inform subsequent phases of guideline development and ensure stakeholders' perspectives shape the priorities, content and scope of the guidelines.
Westby
Marie D
MD
Rehabilitation Sciences Research Graduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. marie.westby@vch.ca
Backman
Catherine L
CL
D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D002170:Canada; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006282:Health Personnel; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D015207:Osteoarthritis, Hip / Q000601:surgery; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000601:surgery; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):730-7
18438917
Knee. 2007 Dec;14(6):417-23
17596949
Orthopedics. 2009 Mar;32(3):168
19309063
Orthop Nurs. 2000 Jan-Feb;19(1):49-57, 62
11062624
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009;6(3):130-48
19656354
Am J Nurs. 2008 May;108(5):54-63; quiz 63-4
18434802
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:21-6
17603386
N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 2;349(14):1350-9
14523144
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr 15;59(4):481-8
18383407
Can J Surg. 1998 Jun;41(3):188-95
9627543
Arthritis Care Res. 2000 Jun;13(3):129-36
14635286
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295-301
19150199
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):144-50
16950077
BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302
7633241
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2003 Dec 8-10;20(1):1-34
17308549
Int J Nurs Pract. 1999 Sep;5(3):143-6
10769623
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1981 May;20(2):65-70
7280482
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003 Mar;15(2):160-2
12598806
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;145:231-48
19592797
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):92-9
17223004
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jun;78(6):835-8
8666600
J Rheumatol. 2004 May;31(5):973-5
15124259
Med Clin North Am. 2003 Sep;87(5):1115-45
14621334
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jan 15;61(1):1-3
19116964
Orthop Nurs. 2003 Nov-Dec;22(6):429-36
14705473
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
10625273
J Interprof Care. 2009 Jan;23(1):41-51
19142782
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):7-24
17355579
Phys Ther. 2009 Feb;89(2):125-35
19074618
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):27-36
14646737
BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):50-2
10617534
J Rheumatol. 2002 Jun;29(6):1273-9
12064846
Aging (Milano). 1999 Apr;11(2):73-82
10386166
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Oct;463:7-12
17960669
J Rheumatol. 2003 Apr;30(4):877-9
12672220
Healthc Pap. 2006;7(1):34-9; discussion 74-7
16914938
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr;18(3):371-6
12728433
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Jul;14(3):174-82
19541877
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 May;85(4):495-8
12793551
Orthop Nurs. 2002 May-Jun;21(3):37-44; quiz 45-7
12101937
Qual Health Res. 2000 May;10(3):293-308
10947477
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Nov;86(11):2435-9
15523015
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jul;83(7):1005-12
11451969
Int J Rehabil Res. 2000 Dec;23(4):253-9
11192561
J Rheumatol. 2006 Jun;33(6):1159-66
16755665
Can J Occup Ther. 2006 Jun;73(3):153-62
16871857
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jan 15;61(1):100-7
19116969
Orthop Nurs. 2000 Mar-Apr;19(2):77-85
11062639
Arthritis Care Res. 1995 Sep;8(3):132-3
7654795
Open Med. 2007 Apr 14;1(1):e27-36
20101287
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(8):1-91
23074477