Super-resolution image reconstruction using diffuse source models.
Image reconstruction is central to many scientific fields, from medical ultrasound and sonar to computed tomography and computer vision. Although lenses play a critical reconstruction role in these fields, digital sensors enable more sophisticated computational approaches. A variety of computational methods have thus been developed, with the common goal of increasing contrast and resolution to extract the greatest possible information from raw data. This paper describes a new image reconstruction method named the Diffuse Time-domain Optimized Near-field Estimator (dTONE). dTONE represents each hypothetical target in the system model as a diffuse region of targets rather than a single discrete target, which more accurately represents the experimental data that arise from signal sources in continuous space, with no additional computational requirements at the time of image reconstruction. Simulation and experimental ultrasound images of animal tissues show that dTONE achieves image resolution and contrast far superior to those of conventional image reconstruction methods. We also demonstrate the increased robustness of the diffuse target model to major sources of image degradation through the addition of electronic noise, phase aberration and magnitude aberration to ultrasound simulations. Using experimental ultrasound data from a tissue-mimicking phantom containing a 3-mm-diameter anechoic cyst, the conventionally reconstructed image has a cystic contrast of -6.3 dB, whereas the dTONE image has a cystic contrast of -14.4 dB.
Ellis
Michael A
MA
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. mae3x@virginia.edu
Viola
Francesco
F
Walker
William F
WF
D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D004452:Echocardiography; D006321:Heart / Q000503:physiopathology; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D051379:Mice; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D014465:Ultrasonics
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Feb;52(2):160-70
15801305
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007 May;54(5):1045-54
17523569
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009 Feb;56(2):314-25
19251518
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Jan;27(1):99-110
18270066
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Feb;52(2):177-91
15801307
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Feb;52(2):192-207
15801308
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007 Aug;54(8):1606-13
17703664
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1987;6(3):185-92
18244020
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1990;9(1):84-93
18222753
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008 Mar;55(3):619-28
18407851
Ultrasonics. 2004 Apr;42(1-9):961-8
15047414
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Jun;25(6):712-22
16768236
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Oct;24(10):1308-22
16229417