title: Ensuring quality and safety.
abstract: The certification model addresses quality and safety by directly targeting the qualifications of individuals. The practice accreditation model takes a more global approach to quality and safety and addresses the qualifications of individuals and standards for additional components of the quality chain. Although both certification and practice accreditation fundamentally are voluntary, the programs may become mandatory when enforcement mechanisms are linked to the programs via state or federal legislation or via private reimbursement policies, effectively resulting in mandatory standards. The CARE bill takes a certification approach to quality and safety by focusing on the qualifications of the individual. MIPPA takes an accreditation approach by focusing on the practice. MQSA is somewhat of a hybrid in that it takes an accreditation approach, but spells out standards for the individual that the accreditor must follow. If the practice accreditation standards require that all technologists employed in the practice be certified in the modalities performed, then the practice accreditation model and the certification model become functionally equivalent in terms of personnel qualifications. To the extent that practice accreditation models are less prescriptive regarding personnel standards, the certification model results in more stringent standards.
authors.affiliation: ARRT, 1255 Northland Drive, St Paul, MN 55120-1155, USA.
authors.forename: Jerry
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Reid
mesh_terms: D003406:Credentialing / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards*; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D011835:Radiation Protection / Q000592:standards; D011878:Radiotherapy / Q000592:standards; D017751:Safety Management / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards; D013679:Technology, Radiologic / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States