Late tamoxifen in patients previously operated for breast cancer without postoperative tamoxifen: 5-year results of a single institution randomised study.
BACKGROUND
A population of breast cancer patients exists who, for various reasons, never received adjuvant post-operative tamoxifen (TAM). This study was aimed to evaluate the role of late TAM in these patients.


METHODS
From 1997 to 2003, patients aged 35 to 75 years, operated more than 2 years previously for monolateral breast cancer without adjuvant TAM, with no signs of metastases and no contraindication to TAM were randomized to TAM 20 mg/day orally for 2 years or follow-up alone. Events were categorized as locoregional relapse, distant metastases, metachronous breast cancer, tumours other than breast cancer and death from any causes, whichever occurred first. The sample size (197 patients per arm, plus 10% allowance) was based on the assumption of a 30% decrease in the number of events occurring at a rate of 5% annually in the 10 years following randomization. Four hundred and thirty-three patients were randomized in the study (TAM 217, follow-up 216). Patients characteristics (TAM/follow-up) included: median age 55/55 years, median time from surgery 25/25 months (range, 25-288/25-294), in situ carcinoma 18/24, oestrogen receptor (ER) positive in 75/68, negative in 70/57, unknown in 72/91 patients. Previous adjuvant treatment included chemotherapy in 131/120 and an LHRH analogue in 11/13 patients.


RESULTS
Thirty-six patients prematurely discontinued TAM after a median of 1 month, mostly because of subjective intolerance. Eighty-three events (TAM 39, follow-up 44) occurred: locoregional relapse in 10/8, distant metastases in 14/16, metachronous breast cancer in 4/10, other tumours in 11/10 patients. Less ER-positive secondary breast cancers occurred in the TAM treated patients than in follow-up patients (1 vs 10, p = 0.005). Event-free survival was similar in both groups of patients.


CONCLUSIONS
This 5-year analysis revealed significantly less metachronous ER-positive breast cancers in the TAM treated patients. No other statistically significant differences have emerged thus far.
Veronesi
Andrea
A
Division of Medical Oncology C, National Cancer Institute, Via Franco Gallini 2,33081 Aviano, Italy.
Miolo
Gianmaria
G
Magri
Maria D
MD
Crivellari
Diana
D
Scalone
Simona
S
Bidoli
Ettore
E
Lombardi
Davide
D
D000284:Administration, Oral; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D014408:Biomarkers, Tumor / Q000032:analysis; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000737:chemistry / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality / Q000556:secondary / Q000601:surgery*; D017024:Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D004965:Estrogen Antagonists / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007558:Italy; D053208:Kaplan-Meier Estimate; D008408:Mastectomy; D008875:Middle Aged; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D016609:Neoplasms, Second Primary; D011960:Receptors, Estrogen / Q000032:analysis; D013629:Tamoxifen / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D014408:Biomarkers, Tumor; D004965:Estrogen Antagonists; D011960:Receptors, Estrogen; D013629:Tamoxifen
Ann Oncol. 2009 May;20(5):857-61
19150951
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jul;13(7):1578-83
7602346
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Sep 16;90(18):1371-88
9747868
Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717
15894097
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Jul 7;91(13):1167-8
10393732
Ann Oncol. 2000 May;11(5):515-9
10907942
Cancer. 1964 Dec;17:1501-27
14239677
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Apr 7;96(7):516-23
15069113
Lancet. 1998 May 16;351(9114):1451-67
9605801
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Feb 21;99(4):283-90
17312305
Cancer. 1981 Jan 1;47(1):207-14
7459811
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Oct;8(10):855-61
10548312
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Sep;45(14):2496-502
19535242
Lancet. 2002 Mar 30;359(9312):1122-4
11943263
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Aug;11(8):1545-52
8336193
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Feb 21;99(4):272-82
17312304