Validation of quantitative magnetic resonance for the determination of body composition of mice.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the precision and accuracy of a quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) instrument for measuring body composition in live, non-anesthetized mice. METHODS: Forty-eight mice of varying strains, ages and body weights (15.3 to 50.2g) were scanned three times each in the QMR instrument. Animals were killed and chemical carcass analysis performed for comparison. Precision was assessed as the coefficient of variation (CV) for the triplicate scans and accuracy was determined by comparing the first QMR data with the chemical analysis. Prediction equations were generated by linear regression analysis and used in a cross-validation study in which 26 mice were scanned once each, killed, and chemical carcass analysis performed. RESULTS: The mean CV was 1.58% for fat mass (FM) and 0.78% for lean-tissue mass (LTM). QMR significantly (P<0.01) overestimated FM (7.76±5.93 vs. 6.03±5.17g) and underestimated LTM (20.73±6.19 vs. 22.48±6.75g) when compared with chemical carcass analysis. A strong relationship between QMR and chemical data (r(2)=0.99 and r(2)=0.97 for fat and LTM respectively; P<0.0001) allowed for the generation of correction equations that were applied to QMR data in the cross-validation study. There was no significant difference between data predicted from QMR and chemical carcass data for FM and LTM (P=0.15 and 0.10 respectively). CONCLUSION: The QMR instrument showed excellent precision and data was highly correlated with chemical carcass analysis. This combined with QMR's speed for whole animal analysis (95 seconds) make it a highly feasible and useful method for the determination of body composition in live, non-anesthetized mice.
Jones
A S
AS
Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Johnson
M S
MS
Nagy
T R
TR
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2003 Mar;5(2):99-105
12630934
Am J Physiol. 1998 May;274(5):E860-6
9612244
Obes Res. 2004 Jan;12(1):150-60
14742854
Obes Res. 2002 Nov;10(11):1180-7
12429883
Obes Res. 2000 Aug;8(5):392-8
10968731
Int J Body Compos Res. 2005;3(2):69-72
21552433
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Sep;285(3):E454-9
12759224
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2003 Nov;377(6):990-1002
13680051
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Mar;25(3):439-47
11319644
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002 Mar;282(3):R890-9
11832412
Proc Nutr Soc. 1988 Sep;47(3):375-85
3254535
Obes Res. 2004 Oct;12(10):1604-15
15536224
Int J Body Compos Res. 2004 Jan 1;1(4):155-160
21546985
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991 May;70(5):2164-72
1864799
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2002 Sep-Oct;75(5):489-97
12529850