Global characterization of interferon regulatory factor (IRF) genes in vertebrates: glimpse of the diversification in evolution.
BACKGROUND
Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs), which can be identified based on a unique helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain (DBD) are a large family of transcription factors involved in host immune response, haemotopoietic differentiation and immunomodulation. Despite the identification of ten IRF family members in mammals, and some recent effort to identify these members in fish, relatively little is known in the composition of these members in other classes of vertebrates, and the evolution and probably the origin of the IRF family have not been investigated in vertebrates.


RESULTS
Genome data mining has been performed to identify any possible IRF family members in human, mouse, dog, chicken, anole lizard, frog, and some teleost fish, mainly zebrafish and stickleback, and also in non-vertebrate deuterostomes including the hemichordate, cephalochordate, urochordate and echinoderm. In vertebrates, all ten IRF family members, i.e. IRF-1 to IRF-10 were identified, with two genes of IRF-4 and IRF-6 identified in fish and frog, respectively, except that in zebrafish exist three IRF-4 genes. Surprisingly, an additional member in the IRF family, IRF-11 was found in teleost fish. A range of two to ten IRF-like genes were detected in the non-vertebrate deuterostomes, and they had little similarity to those IRF family members in vertebrates as revealed in genomic structure and in phylogenetic analysis. However, the ten IRF family members, IRF-1 to IRF-10 showed certain degrees of conservation in terms of genomic structure and gene synteny. In particular, IRF-1, IRF-2, IRF-6, IRF-8 are quite conserved in their genomic structure in all vertebrates, and to a less degree, some IRF family members, such as IRF-5 and IRF-9 are comparable in the structure. Synteny analysis revealed that the gene loci for the ten IRF family members in vertebrates were also quite conservative, but in zebrafish conserved genes were distributed in a much longer distance in chromosomes. Furthermore, all ten different members are clustered in respectively different clades; but the IRF-11 was clustered with one in sea urchin.


CONCLUSIONS
In vertebrates, the ten well-characterized IRF family members shared a relatively high degree of similarity in genomic structure and syntenic gene arrangement, implying that they might have been evolved in a similar pattern and with similar selective pressure in different classes of vertebrates. Genome and/or gene duplication, and probably gene shuffling or gene loss might have occurred during the evolution of these IRF family members, but arrangement of chromosome or its segment might have taken place in zebrafish. However, the ten IRF family members in vertebrates and those IRF-like genes in non-vertebrate deuterostomes were quite different in those analyzed characters, as they might have undergone different patterns of evolution.
Huang
Bei
B
State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430072, China.
Qi
Zhi T
ZT
Xu
Zhen
Z
Nie
Pin
P
D000818:Animals; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D056426:Genetic Loci / Q000235:genetics; D014644:Genetic Variation; D016678:Genome / Q000235:genetics; D006801:Humans; D050835:Interferon Regulatory Factors / Q000235:genetics*; D007438:Introns / Q000235:genetics; D008957:Models, Genetic; D016366:Open Reading Frames / Q000235:genetics; D010802:Phylogeny; D012689:Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid; D026801:Synteny / Q000235:genetics; D014714:Vertebrates / Q000235:genetics*
D050835:Interferon Regulatory Factors
Nat Rev Immunol. 2006 Sep;6(9):644-58
16932750
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2007 Mar 15;116(1-2):26-36
17289159
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2009 Dec;29(12):765-80
19929577
Eur J Immunol. 2007 Feb;37(2):306-9
17273997
Trends Genet. 2000 Jun;16(6):276-7
10827456
Genome Biol. 2007;8(11):R251
18039395
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):7527-32
12808152
Biochem J. 2004 Jan 15;377(Pt 2):367-78
14505489
BMC Genomics. 2006 Oct 24;7:271
17062144
Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1998 Jun;7(2):138-44
9628009
Genome Res. 2008 Jul;18(7):1112-26
18562681
Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2003 Nov;15(5):453-66
14550671
Nat Genet. 2004 May;36(5):523-7
15064762
Curr Opin Immunol. 2007 Oct;19(5):547-52
17707623
Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Nov;26(11):2539-50
19638535
Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Jul;26(7):1619-30
19369598
EMBO J. 1988 Nov;7(11):3397-405
2850164
Nat Struct Biol. 2003 Nov;10(11):913-21
14555996
Science. 1998 Nov 27;282(5394):1711-4
9831563
Nat Genet. 1998 Apr;18(4):345-9
9537416
Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):1064-71
18563158
Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Jun;22(11):3942-57
11997525
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Apr 28;9:85
19400936
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2002 Jan;22(1):59-71
11846976
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):755-63
9918945
Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:535-84
18303999
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9
17488738
Science. 2002 Dec 13;298(5601):2157-67
12481130
Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:623-55
11244049
Immunogenetics. 2006 Sep;58(9):774-84
16871414
Mol Immunol. 2008 Dec;46(2):269-85
18805586
Gene. 2009 Jun 15;439(1-2):63-70
19341784
Nat Immunol. 2006 Jul;7(7):773-82
16767092
Gene. 1999 Sep 3;237(1):1-14
10524230
Nat Immunol. 2002 Dec;3(12):1200-7
12415263
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007 Mar;64(5):542-54
17192808
Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673-80
7984417
Nature. 1998 Jan 1;391(6662):103-6
9422515