Assessing the effect of administering probiotics in water or as a feed supplement on broiler performance and immune response.
1. Two routes of probiotic administration in broiler farms, in water and in feed, were compared using 360 one-day-old male broiler chickens. Controls received no probiotics or antimicrobials. The water group received a probiotic preparation at a rate of 0.5 g/l, and the feed group received it at an inclusion rate of 1 g/kg. 2. Performance of broilers in terms body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) improved when probiotic was provided via drinking water, compared to the control and feed groups. Probiotic administration reduced plasma cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations. 3. Spleen (28 and 42 d) and bursa (42 d) relative weights were influenced by method of probiotic administration, which also improved T-cell dependent skin thickness response to phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) injection. The effect of challenge by dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) depended on the method of probiotic administration. 4. The method of probiotic administration can influence the performance and immune competence of birds, and administration via drinking water appears to be superior to the more conventional in-feed supplementation method.
Karimi Torshizi
M A
MA
Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, P.B. 14115-336, Tehran. karimitm@modares.ac.ir
Moghaddam
A R
AR
Rahimi
Sh
Sh
Mojgani
N
N
D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis*; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D002645:Chickens / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000276:immunology*; D004032:Diet; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D004333:Drug Administration Routes; D004912:Erythrocytes; D008221:Lymphoid Tissue / Q000187:drug effects; D008297:Male; D019936:Probiotics / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000494:pharmacology*; D012756:Sheep; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry
D014867:Water