title: Polymer microlenses for quantifying cell sheet mechanics.
abstract: Mechanical interactions between individual cells and their substrate have been studied extensively over the past decade; however, understanding how these interactions change as cells interact with neighboring cells in the development of a cell sheet, or early stage tissue, is less developed. We use a recently developed experimental technique for quantifying the mechanics of confluent cell sheets. Living cells are cultured on a thin film of polystyrene [PS], which is attached to a patterned substrate of crosslinked poly(dimethyl siloxane) [PDMS] microwells. As cells attach to the substrate and begin to form a sheet, they apply sufficient contractile force to buckle the PS film over individual microwells to form a microlens array. The curvature for each microlens is measured by confocal microscopy and can be related to the strain and stress applied by the cell sheet using simple mechanical analysis for the buckling of thin films. We demonstrate that this technique can provide insight into the important materials properties and length scales that govern cell sheet responses, especially the role of stiffness of the substrate. We show that intercellular forces can lead to significantly different behaviors than the ones observed for individual cells, where focal adhesion is the relevant parameter.
authors.affiliation: Polymer Science & Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, 120 Governors Drive, Amherst, 01002, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Guillaume
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Miquelard-Garnier
authors.forename: Jessica A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Zimberlin
authors.forename: Christian B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: Sikora
authors.forename: Patricia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wadsworth
authors.forename: Alfred
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Crosby
references.citation: Science. 2005 Nov 18;310(5751):1139-43
references.pmid: 16293750
references.citation: Science. 1995 Feb 10;267(5199):883-5
references.pmid: 7846531
references.citation: Nat Cell Biol. 2001 May;3(5):466-72
references.pmid: 11331874
references.citation: Biophys J. 2009 Mar 4;96(5):2009-22
references.pmid: 19254561
references.citation: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2008 Sep;65(9):762-7
references.pmid: 18615631
references.citation: Biophys J. 2000 Jul;79(1):144-52
references.pmid: 10866943
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1484-9
references.pmid: 12552122
references.citation: Int J Radiat Biol. 1998 Sep;74(3):397-403
references.pmid: 9737542
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;127(6 Pt 2):1957-64
references.pmid: 7806573
references.citation: J Anat. 1971 Apr;108(Pt 3):509-17
references.pmid: 5103420
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 15;102(7):2390-5
references.pmid: 15695588
references.citation: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005 Jan;60(1):24-34
references.pmid: 15573414
references.citation: Biophys J. 2007 Dec 15;93(12):4453-61
references.pmid: 18045965
references.citation: Nat Mater. 2004 Aug;3(8):545-50
references.pmid: 15247909
references.citation: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1996;35(3):269-80
references.pmid: 8913646
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2005 Apr 26;15(8):724-31
references.pmid: 15854904
references.citation: Science. 1980 Apr 11;208(4440):177-9
references.pmid: 6987736
references.citation: J Exp Med. 1972 Apr 1;135(4):719-34
references.pmid: 4336123
references.citation: Exp Cell Res. 1969 Jan;54(1):107-10
references.pmid: 5771088