title: Human medial temporal lobe damage can disrupt the perception of single objects.
abstract: The idea that the medial temporal lobe (MTL), traditionally viewed as an exclusive memory system, may also subserve higher-order perception has been debated fiercely. To support this suggestion, monkey and human lesion studies have demonstrated that perirhinal cortex damage impairs complex object discrimination. The interpretation of these findings has, however, been disputed because these impairments may reflect a primary deficit in MTL-mediated working memory processes or, in the case of human patients, undetected damage to visual processing regions beyond the MTL. To address these issues, this study investigated object perception in two human amnesic patients who were chosen on the basis of their lesion locations and suitability for detailed neuroimaging investigation. A neuropsychological task with minimal working memory demands was administered in which participants assessed the structural coherency of single novel objects. Critically, only the patient with perirhinal atrophy was impaired. Moreover, volumetric and functional neuroimaging data demonstrated that this deficit cannot be attributed to the dysfunction of visual cortical areas. Additional analyses of eye-movement patterns during the perceptual task revealed an inability of this patient to detect structural incoherency consistently. This study uses a combination of techniques to provide strong evidence that the perirhinal cortex subserves perception and suggests that the MTL perceptual-mnemonic debate cannot be dismissed on the basis of anatomy or a working memory impairment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom. andy.lee@psy.ox.ac.uk
authors.forename: Andy C H
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Sarah R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Rudebeck
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D009929:Organ Size; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013702:Temporal Lobe / Q000293:injuries / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Hippocampus. 2005;15(6):782-97
references.pmid: 16010661
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8135-9
references.pmid: 7667258
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 1;29(26):8329-34
references.pmid: 19571124
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 1;17(11):4302-11
references.pmid: 9151747
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1370-86
references.pmid: 11707093
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar;10(3):100-7
references.pmid: 16469525
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:99-122
references.pmid: 17417938
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2000 Sep-Oct;7(5):273-8
references.pmid: 11040258
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:279-306
references.pmid: 15217334
references.citation: Arch Neurol. 1997 Dec;54(12):1521-31
references.pmid: 9400362
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):2963-74
references.pmid: 17658561
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 15;21(24):9824-36
references.pmid: 11739590
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 7;27(10):2548-59
references.pmid: 17344392
references.citation: Hippocampus. 2010 Mar;20(3):389-401
references.pmid: 19499575
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Nov;23(6):1344-61
references.pmid: 9372604
references.citation: Hippocampus. 1998;8(4):330-9
references.pmid: 9744420
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 2;25(44):10239-46
references.pmid: 16267231
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jul;18(7):1087-97
references.pmid: 16839283
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Feb;23(2):137-52
references.pmid: 14964560
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Feb;17(3):649-60
references.pmid: 12581183
references.citation: Hippocampus. 2007;17(1):34-48
references.pmid: 17143905
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):61-6
references.pmid: 15647593
references.citation: Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56
references.pmid: 11516708
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 May 10;26(19):5198-203
references.pmid: 16687511
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(1):1-11
references.pmid: 15488899
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Apr 9;392(6676):598-601
references.pmid: 9560155
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19
references.pmid: 15501092
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Apr;3(4):142-151
references.pmid: 10322468
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2007 Dec 17;14(12):821-32
references.pmid: 18086825
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):1484-8
references.pmid: 17764947
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
references.pmid: 12377157
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Apr;19(4):659-71
references.pmid: 9576651
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2002 Jan;15(2):365-74
references.pmid: 11849302
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Feb 22;26(8):2235-40
references.pmid: 16495450
references.citation: Learn Mem. 1999 Nov-Dec;6(6):572-99
references.pmid: 10641763
references.citation: Behav Neurol. 2000;12(4):191-200
references.pmid: 11568431
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 May 15;45(9):2135-46
references.pmid: 17316712
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1990 Mar;119(1):5-24
references.pmid: 2141064
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jul;11(7):834-42
references.pmid: 18552840
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 Sep 13;31(5):865-73
references.pmid: 11567623
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2008 Mar;18(3):683-96
references.pmid: 17615247
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;12(10):388-96
references.pmid: 18760955