Reinforcing Abstinence and Treatment Participation among Offenders in a Drug Diversion Program: Are Vouchers Effective?
This study assessed a 26-week voucher-based intervention to reinforce abstinence and participation in treatment-related activities among substance-abusing offenders court referred to outpatient treatment under drug diversion legislation (California's Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act). Standard treatment consisted of criminal justice supervision and an evidence-based model for treating stimulant abuse. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups, standard treatment (ST) only, ST plus vouchers for testing negative, ST plus vouchers for performing treatment plan activities, and ST plus vouchers for testing negative and/or performing treatment plan activities. Results indicate that voucher-based reinforcement of negative urines and of treatment plan tasks (using a flat reinforcement schedule) showed no statistically significant effects on measures of retention or drug use relative to the standard treatment protocol. It is likely that criminal justice contingencies had a stronger impact on participants' treatment retention and drug use than the relatively low-value vouchers awarded as part of the treatment protocol.
Hall
Elizabeth A
EA
Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles.
Prendergast
Michael L
ML
Roll
John M
JM
Warda
Umme
U
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2005;31(3):393-401
16161725
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Oct;72(5):839-54
15482042
Addict Behav. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):887-910
12369474
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2000 Apr-Jun;32(2):157-64
10908003
Addiction. 2006 Nov;101(11):1546-60
17034434
Am J Psychiatry. 1993 May;150(5):763-9
8480823
Addiction. 2006 Feb;101(2):192-203
16445548
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):723-57
15595948
Behav Anal. 2004 Fall;27(2):209-30
22478430
Psychol Med. 1983 Aug;13(3):595-605
6622612
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992 Feb;180(2):101-10
1737971
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Oct;65(5):803-10
9337499
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;74(3):592-601
16822115
Addict Behav. 1980;5(4):333-40
7211531
Crime Delinq. 2006;52(1):52-76
18174915
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Winter;15(4):493-503
6130059
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001 Jan;20(1):33-44
11239726
Addiction. 2004 Jun;99(6):708-17
15139869
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct;74(5):955-66
17032099
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Sep;35(2):125-36
17997267
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Jun;65(3):421-8
9170765
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996 Jul;41(3):197-207
8842632
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Sep 30;144(1):91-3
16905197
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;51(7):568-76
8031230
Eval Rev. 2003 Oct;27(5):479-505
14531316
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;62(10):1148-56
16203960
Psychol Addict Behav. 2001 Sep;15(3):171-6
11563793
J Addict Dis. 1997;16(4):41-50
9328808
Addiction. 2007 Feb;102(2):271-81
17222282
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1983 Oct;171(10):606-10
6619823
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):495-504; quiz 504-5
8995832
Science. 1970 Jul 17;169(3942):301-3
5450360
J Hist Behav Sci. 2006 Summer;42(3):203-20
16817179