Agonistic encounters and brain activation in dominant and subordinate male greater long-tailed hamsters.
During an agonistic encounter test, dominant male greater long-tailed hamsters (Tscheskia triton) initiated attacks sooner and displayed higher levels of aggression and flank marking behavior than their subordinate counterparts. Accordingly, subordinate males exhibited more defensive behavior than dominant ones. Specific patterns of neuronal activation, measured by Fos-immunoreactive staining (Fos-ir), were found in the hamster brain following agonistic interactions. Increased Fos-ir was observed in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH), and medial (MeA) and anterior cortical (ACo) nuclei of the amygdala (AMYG) in both dominant and subordinate males. In contrast, dominant males had significantly higher Fos-ir densities in the medial preoptic area (MPOA) than subordinate males, whereas subordinate males expressed higher densities of Fos-ir in the anterior hypothalamus (AH) and central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA). Additionally, Fos-ir levels in the MPOA were significantly correlated with aggression and Fos-ir levels in the AH and CeA were correlated with defensive behavior. Together, our data indicate distinct patterns of neuronal activation associated with agonistic encounters in a behavior-specific manner in male greater long-tailed hamsters.
Pan
Yongliang
Y
State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, PR China.
Xu
Linxi
L
Young
Kimberly A
KA
Wang
Zuoxin
Z
Zhang
Zhibin
Z
D000378:Agonistic Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D001923:Brain Chemistry; D006224:Cricetinae; D004291:Dominance-Subordination; D008297:Male; D016760:Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos / Q000032:analysis
D016760:Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1973 Mar;38(2):543-7
4632102
Physiol Behav. 2003 Oct;80(1):95-101
14568313
Physiol Behav. 2005 Oct 15;86(3):369-78
16115657
Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1996;10(3-4):371-94
8978987
J Neurosci Methods. 1980 Dec;3(2):129-49
6110810
Physiol Behav. 2001 Nov-Dec;74(4-5):415-20
11790399
Physiol Behav. 2009 Jun 22;97(3-4):347-52
19296908
Brain Res. 2001 Apr 20;898(2):232-41
11306009
Physiol Behav. 1976 Sep;17(3):507-13
1034941
Neuroreport. 2002 Jul 19;13(10):1267-70
12151784
Physiol Behav. 2006 Jun 15;88(1-2):173-82
16687160
J Comp Neurol. 2007 Jun 20;502(6):1109-22
17444499
Neurosci Res. 1996 Oct;26(2):157-70
8953578
Neuroscience. 1995 Jun;66(3):721-36
7644033
Brain Res. 2009 Apr 10;1265:186-95
19232330
Behav Brain Res. 1983 Jul;9(1):59-81
6411099
Int J Neurosci. 1988 Aug;41(3-4):241-50
3182182
J Neuroendocrinol. 1999 Jul;11(7):547-59
10444312
Eur J Pharmacol. 2005 Dec 5;526(1-3):226-39
16263109
Brain Res. 1997 Sep 5;767(2):321-32
9367264
Brain Behav Evol. 2000 Feb;55(2):53-76
10838477
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(3):304-18
16289283
Neuroscience. 2004;127(3):611-24
15283961
Eur J Neurosci. 1998 Jan;10(1):20-33
9753110
Brain Res. 1994 Sep 26;658(1-2):112-8
7834331
J Neuroendocrinol. 1990 Apr 1;2(2):123-9
19210374
Physiol Behav. 1986;38(1):135-8
3786493
Physiol Behav. 1986;38(2):169-73
3797483
J Neurosci. 1997 Nov 15;17(22):8842-55
9348352
Physiol Behav. 2006 Oct 30;89(3):420-7
16914175
Physiol Behav. 1987;40(5):661-4
3671532
Prog Brain Res. 1998;119:395-408
10074802
Horm Behav. 2006 Aug;50(2):338-45
16753164
Trends Neurosci. 1997 Feb;20(2):78-84
9023876