Locomotor changes in length and EMG activity of feline medial gastrocnemius muscle following paralysis of two synergists.
The mechanism of the compensatory increase in electromyographic activity (EMG) of a cat ankle extensor during walking shortly after paralysis of its synergists is not fully understood. It is possible that due to greater ankle flexion in stance in this situation, muscle spindles are stretched to a greater extent and, thus, contribute to the EMG enhancement. However, also changes in force feedback and central drive may play a role. The aim of the present study was to investigate the short-term (1- to 2-week post-op) effects of lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and soleus (SO) denervation on muscle fascicle and muscle-tendon unit (MTU) length changes, as well as EMG activity of the intact medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscle in stance during overground walking on level (0%), downslope (-50%, presumably enhancing stretch of ankle extensors in stance) and upslope (+50%, enhancing load on ankle extensors) surfaces. Fascicle length was measured directly using sonomicrometry, and MTU length was calculated from joint kinematics. For each slope condition, LG-SO denervation resulted in an increase in MTU stretch and peak stretch velocity of the intact MG in early stance. MG muscle fascicle stretch and peak stretch velocity were also higher than before denervation in downslope walking. Denervation significantly decreased the magnitude of MG fascicle shortening and peak shortening velocity during early stance in level and upslope walking. MG EMG magnitude in the swing and stance phases was substantially greater after denervation, with a relatively greater increase during stance of level and upslope walking. These results suggest that the fascicle length patterns of MG muscle are significantly altered when two of its synergists are in a state of paralysis. Further, the compensatory increase in MG EMG is likely mediated by enhanced MG length feedback during downslope walking, enhanced feedback from load-sensitive receptors during upslope walking and enhanced central drive in all walking conditions.
Maas
Huub
H
School of Applied Physiology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. h.maas@fbw.vu.nl
Gregor
Robert J
RJ
Hodson-Tole
Emma F
EF
Farrell
Brad J
BJ
English
Arthur W
AW
Prilutsky
Boris I
BI
D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D000842:Ankle / Q000294:innervation; D000843:Ankle Joint / Q000503:physiopathology; D001683:Biological Clocks / Q000502:physiology; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002415:Cats; D004576:Electromyography; D005260:Female; D008124:Locomotion / Q000502:physiology*; D009121:Muscle Denervation / Q000379:methods; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000503:physiopathology*; D010243:Paralysis / Q000473:pathology*
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Apr;106(4):1169-80
19164776
J Physiol. 1982 Feb;323:307-23
7097576
J Exp Biol. 1998 Dec;201 (Pt 24):3293-307
9817827
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jan;101(1):184-97
19005003
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jan;87(1):229-39
11784745
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Sep;70(3):1009-17
8229157
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jan;101(1):360-71
19019974
J Neurophysiol. 1994 Feb;71(2):603-10
8176429
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;92(4):2093-104
15381742
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):1397-409
16207777
Brain Res. 2000 Nov 10;883(1):131-4
11063996
J Physiol. 2001 May 15;533(Pt 1):299-311
11351036
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2122-32
17652411
J Exp Biol. 1998 Jun;201(Pt 11):1681-94
9576879
Exp Brain Res. 1987;68(3):643-56
3691733
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Nov 16;860:203-15
9928313
Prog Brain Res. 1999;123:133-42
10635710
J Neurophysiol. 1976 Jan;39(1):119-42
1249597
J Biomech. 1996 Apr;29(4):417-34
8964771
J Neurophysiol. 1984 Jul;52(1):114-25
6747674
Exp Brain Res. 1991;85(2):281-99
1893981
J Neurophysiol. 1994 Feb;71(2):817-20
8176445
Am J Anat. 1982 May;164(1):67-77
7102574
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Apr;77(4):1979-93
9114249
J Physiol. 1991 May;436:219-36
2061831
J Physiol. 2009 Jan 15;587(1):13-4
19001040
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Aug;181(2):377-93
17406860
Brain Res Bull. 2008 Mar 28;75(5):507-8
18355625
Prog Brain Res. 1989;80:75-85; discussion 57-60
2634287
J Neurosci. 2001 May 15;21(10):3531-41
11331382
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;94(4):2959-69
15888524
J Physiol. 1995 Aug 15;487(1):197-209
7473249
J Morphol. 1973 Sep;141(1):1-41
4727469
Physiol Rev. 2006 Jan;86(1):89-154
16371596
J Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;65(3):648-56
2051198
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Nov;84(5):2709-14
11068014
Exp Brain Res. 1997 Dec;117(3):444-52
9438712
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Feb;81(2):758-70
10036275
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 May;21(10):2624-34
15926911
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Jul;82(1):370-81
10400965