title: Statistical challenges for genome-wide association studies of suicidality using family data.
abstract: The etiology of suicide is complex in nature with both environmental and genetic causes that are extremely diverse. This extensive heterogeneity weakens the relationship between genotype and phenotype and as a result, we face many challenges when studying the genetic etiology of suicide. We are now in the midst of a genetics revolution, where genotyping costs are decreasing and genotyping speed is increasing at a fast rate, allowing genetic association studies to genotype thousands to millions of SNPs that cover the entire human genome. As such, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are now the norm. In this article we address several statistical challenges that occur when studying the genetic etiology of suicidality in the age of the genetics revolution. These challenges include: (1) the large number of statistical tests; (2) complex phenotypes that are difficult to quantify; and (3) modest genetic effect sizes. We address these statistical issues in the context of family-based study designs. Specifically, we discuss several statistical extensions of family-based association tests (FBATs) that work to alleviate these challenges. As our intention is to describe how statistical methodology may work to identify disease variants for suicidality, we avoid the mathematical details of the methodologies presented.
authors.affiliation: Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, 181, Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA. rejas@channing.harvard.edu
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lasky-Su
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Lange
mesh_terms: D005190:Family; D020022:Genetic Predisposition to Disease; D055106:Genome-Wide Association Study; D005838:Genotype; D006801:Humans; D012931:Social Environment; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D013405:Suicide / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2002 Aug;23(2):165-80
references.pmid: 12214309
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2005 Jul;37(7):683-91
references.pmid: 15937480
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):607-14
references.pmid: 17701906
references.citation: Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article17
references.pmid: 16646795
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Apr;82(4):849-58
references.pmid: 18387595
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Oct;73(4):801-11
references.pmid: 14502464
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;31(1):9-17
references.pmid: 17086514
references.citation: Science. 2006 Apr 14;312(5771):279-83
references.pmid: 16614226
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;27(4):415-28
references.pmid: 15481099
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Nov 1;62(9):985-90
references.pmid: 17560555
references.citation: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008 Jan 5;147B(1):100-6
references.pmid: 17579349
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Jun;18(6):720-5
references.pmid: 20087406
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Nov;83(5):623-32
references.pmid: 18976728
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Mar;52(3):506-16
references.pmid: 8447318
references.citation: Hum Hered. 2000 Jul-Aug;50(4):211-23
references.pmid: 10782012
references.citation: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008 Dec 5;147B(8):1345-54
references.pmid: 18821565
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Feb;74(2):367-9
references.pmid: 14740322
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;26(1):61-9
references.pmid: 14691957
references.citation: Hum Hered. 2003;56(1-3):18-31
references.pmid: 14614235
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2007 Sep 10;92(1-2):245-9
references.pmid: 17585962