The analysis of simple and complex auditory signals in human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic evidence from M100 modulation.
OBJECTIVE
Ecologically valid signals (e.g., vowels) have multiple components of substantially different frequencies and amplitudes that may not be equally cortically represented. In this study, we investigate a relatively simple signal at an intermediate level of complexity, two-frequency composite tones, a stimulus lying between simple sinusoids and ecologically valid signals such as speech. We aim to characterize the cortical response properties to better understand how complex signals may be represented in auditory cortex.


METHODS
Using magnetoencephalography, we assessed the sensitivity of the M100/N100m auditory-evoked component to manipulations of the power ratio of the individual frequency components of the two-frequency complexes. Fourteen right-handed subjects with normal hearing were scanned while passively listening to 10 complex and 12 simple signals. The complex signals were composed of one higher frequency and one lower frequency sinusoid; the lower frequency sinusoidal component was at one of the five loudness levels relative to the higher frequency one: -20, -10, 0, +10, +20 dB. The simple signals comprised all the complex signal components presented in isolation.


RESULTS
The data replicate and extend several previous findings: (1) the systematic dependence of the M100 latency on signal intensity and (2) the dependence of the M100 latency on signal frequency, with lower frequency signals ( approximately 100 Hz) exhibiting longer latencies than higher frequency signals ( approximately 1000 Hz) even at matched loudness levels. (3) Importantly, we observe that, relative to simple signals, complex signals show increased response amplitude-as one might predict-but decreased M100 latencies.


CONCLUSIONS
: The data suggest that by the time the M100 is generated in auditory cortex ( approximately 70 to 80 msecs after stimulus onset), integrative processing across frequency channels has taken place which is observable in the M100 modulation. In light of these data models that attribute more time and processing resources to a complex stimulus merit reevaluation, in that our data show that acoustically more complex signals are associated with robust temporal facilitation, across frequencies and signal amplitude level.
Jenkins
Julian
J
Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA. julianj@umd.edu
Idsardi
William J
WJ
Poeppel
David
D
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001303:Auditory Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D005260:Female; D006309:Hearing / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008144:Loudness Perception; D015225:Magnetoencephalography; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time; D055815:Young Adult
Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20(3):1839-47
14642493
Neuroreport. 1999 Apr 6;10(5):999-1002
10321474
BMC Neurosci. 2005 Oct 15;6:62
16225699
Psychophysiology. 2004 Sep;41(5):783-8
15318884
J Am Acad Audiol. 2001 May;12(5):223-32
11392434
Audiol Neurootol. 2001 Sep-Oct;6(5):263-78
11729329
Hear Res. 2001 Aug;158(1-2):95-101
11506941
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982 Nov;54(5):561-9
6181979
Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Jul;18(2):432-40
12887425
Hear Res. 2007 Jun;228(1-2):188-200
17434696
Neuroreport. 2000 Aug 21;11(12):2723-6
10976951
Exp Brain Res. 1980;40(2):237-40
7428878
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;117(3):643-8
16403672
Brain Lang. 1996 May;53(2):143-68
8726531
Audiol Neurootol. 2003 Jul-Aug;8(4):222-33
12811003
J Neurosci. 2007 May 9;27(19):5207-14
17494707
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):167-73
12668224
J Neurosci. 1995 Apr;15(4):2748-55
7722626
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Sep 30;165(2):297-305
17624443
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 12;97(19):10590-4
10973483
Neuroreport. 1998 Jan 5;9(1):91-4
9592054
Exp Brain Res. 1988;71(1):87-92
3416961
Neuroreport. 2005 Jun 21;16(9):933-7
15931064
Neuroreport. 2003 Dec 19;14(18):2489-92
14663216
Hear Res. 2006 Dec;222(1-2):125-32
17081712
Audiol Neurootol. 1998 Mar-Jun;3(2-3):191-213
9575385
Audiol Neurootol. 2003 Nov-Dec;8(6):322-37
14566103
Neuroimage. 2004 Feb;21(2):701-6
14980572
Psychophysiology. 1993 Sep;30(5):537-40
8416081
Psychophysiology. 2004 Jul;41(4):654-9
15189488
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Jun;16(6):835-48
16151180
Hear Res. 1993 May;67(1-2):89-97
8340282
Hear Res. 2009 Nov;257(1-2):41-52
19647788
Neuron. 2007 Jun 21;54(6):1001-10
17582338
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jan-Feb;16(1):31-9
15006034
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep;12(5):878-93
11054929
Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 15;30(3):927-37
16337814
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):150-7
19631273
Science. 1989 Oct 27;246(4929):486-8
2814476
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
5146491
BMC Neurosci. 2009 Jan 06;10:1
19126204
Psychophysiology. 1997 Sep;34(5):501-10
9299904
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 06;3(8):e2900
18682843
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Mar;17(2):114-29
10831104
Neuroimage. 2004 Sep;23(1):288-95
15325376
Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):432-46
19494778
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995 Jun;32 Suppl:S183-6
7665289
Neuroreport. 1998 Oct 5;9(14):3265-9
9831462
Neurosci Lett. 1997 Jan 17;221(2-3):145-8
9121685