title: Feasibility and utility of mapping disease risk at the neighbourhood level within a Canadian public health unit: an ecological study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  We conducted spatial analyses to determine the geographic variation of cancer at the neighbourhood level (dissemination areas or DAs) within the area of a single Ontario public health unit, Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph, covering a population of 238,326 inhabitants. Cancer incidence data between 1999 and 2003 were obtained from the Ontario Cancer Registry and were geocoded down to the level of DA using the enhanced Postal Code Conversion File. The 2001 Census of Canada provided information on the size and age-sex structure of the population at the DA level, in addition to information about selected census covariates, such as average neighbourhood income.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Age standardized incidence ratios for cancer and the prevalence of census covariates were calculated for each of 331 dissemination areas in Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph. The standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for cancer varied dramatically across the dissemination areas. However, application of the Moran's I statistic, a popular index of spatial autocorrelation, suggested significant spatial patterns for only two cancers, lung and prostate, both in males (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Employing Bayesian hierarchical models, areas in the urban core of the City of Guelph had significantly higher SIRs for male lung cancer than the remainder of Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph; and, neighbourhoods in the urban and surrounding rural areas of Orangeville exhibited significantly higher SIRs for prostate cancer. After adjustment for age and spatial dependence, average household income attenuated much of the spatial pattern of lung cancer, but not of prostate cancer.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This paper demonstrates the feasibility and utility of a systematic approach to identifying neighbourhoods, within the area served by a public health unit, that have significantly higher risks of cancer. This exploratory, ecologic study suggests several hypotheses for these spatial patterns that warrant further investigations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Canadian study published in the peer-reviewed literature estimating the risk of relatively rare public health outcomes at a very small areal level, namely dissemination areas.
authors.affiliation: Population Studies and Surveillance, Cancer Care Ontario, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. eric.holowaty@cancercare.on.ca
authors.forename: Eric J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Holowaty
authors.forename: Todd A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Norwood
authors.forename: Susitha
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Wanigaratne
authors.forename: Juanjo J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Abellan
authors.forename: Linda
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Beale
mesh_terms: D016000:Cluster Analysis; D055669:Ecological and Environmental Phenomena; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology*; D009864:Ontario; D015995:Prevalence; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology; D011634:Public Health; D012111:Residence Characteristics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012424:Rural Population; D017678:Sex Distribution; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014505:Urban Population
references.citation: Stat Med. 2000 Sep 15-30;19(17-18):2217-41
references.pmid: 10960849
references.citation: Int J Health Geogr. 2005 Aug 10;4:20
references.pmid: 16092969
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2005 Jul;16(4):526-31
references.pmid: 15951671
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2 Suppl):S7-15
references.pmid: 16458793
references.citation: Eur J Public Health. 2005 Jun;15(3):262-9
references.pmid: 15755781
references.citation: Cancer. 2000 Aug 15;89(4):901-12
references.pmid: 10951356
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2 Suppl):S88-100
references.pmid: 16458795
references.citation: Stat Methods Med Res. 2005 Feb;14(1):35-59
references.pmid: 15690999
references.citation: Stat Med. 2000 Apr 30;19(8):1081-8
references.pmid: 10790681
references.citation: Stat Med. 2006 Nov 30;25(22):3929-43
references.pmid: 16435334
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(9):1016-25
references.pmid: 15198922
references.citation: Stat Med. 2000 Sep 15-30;19(17-18):2203-15
references.pmid: 10960848
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49 Suppl 2:S72-7
references.pmid: 8594138
references.citation: Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Oct 12;8:55
references.pmid: 19822013
references.citation: Comput Stat Data Anal. 2006;50(11):3243-3262
references.pmid: 19603088
references.citation: Health Policy. 2008 Aug;87(2):185-93
references.pmid: 18243396
references.citation: IARC Sci Publ. 1987;(82):1-406
references.pmid: 3329634
references.citation: Stat Methods Med Res. 2006 Aug;15(4):385-407
references.pmid: 16886738
references.citation: Int J Cancer. 2002 Feb 10;97(5):695-9
references.pmid: 11807800
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 May 2;93(9):705-9
references.pmid: 11333293
references.citation: Stat Med. 2000 Sep 15-30;19(17-18):2295-308
references.pmid: 10960854
references.citation: J Public Health Med. 2001 Mar;23(1):40-6
references.pmid: 11315692
references.citation: Int J Health Geogr. 2006 Sep 18;5:39
references.pmid: 16981996
references.citation: Int J Health Geogr. 2008 Jul 28;7:41
references.pmid: 18662387
references.citation: Int J Health Geogr. 2004 Dec 08;3(1):29
references.pmid: 15588279
references.citation: Int J Health Geogr. 2006 Nov 08;5:49
references.pmid: 17092353
references.citation: J Med Syst. 2004 Aug;28(4):385-95
references.pmid: 15366243
references.citation: Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;16(12):901-7
references.pmid: 16843007
references.citation: Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:43-56
references.pmid: 12471269
references.citation: Public Health. 2009 Feb;123(2):103-9
references.pmid: 19147163
references.citation: Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Oct;20(8):1431-40
references.pmid: 19526319
references.citation: Public Health Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;21(6):547-54
references.pmid: 15566560
references.citation: Clin Biochem. 1998 Feb;31(1):47-9
references.pmid: 9559224
references.citation: Stat Med. 1999 Dec 15;18(23):3211-20
references.pmid: 10602146
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2 Suppl):S37-49
references.pmid: 16458789
references.citation: Eur J Cancer. 2003 Sep;39(14):1973-5
references.pmid: 12957450
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(9):995-7
references.pmid: 15198919
references.citation: Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jan;6(1):A03
references.pmid: 19080009
references.citation: Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002 Apr;205(3):169-81
references.pmid: 12040915
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2 Suppl):S25-36
references.pmid: 16458787
references.citation: Stat Med. 2008 Nov 10;27(25):5111-42
references.pmid: 18712778
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(9):1026-31
references.pmid: 15198923
references.citation: Epidemiol Bull. 2004 Dec;25(4):1-9
references.pmid: 16127821
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Aug;116(8):1105-10
references.pmid: 18709139