title: A molecular view of the cholesterol condensing effect in DOPC lipid bilayers.
abstract: The condensing effect of cholesterol in dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC) lipid bilayers was systematically investigated via atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Fourteen independent 200 ns simulations, spanning the entire range of cholesterol mole fraction (x(c)) in DOPC bilayers (i.e., from x(c) = 0 to 0.66), were performed at 323 K. The molecular areas occupied by DOPC and cholesterol at different distances from the bilayer center were analyzed using a slicing method based on the VDW radii of atoms. Curiously, while the average area per lipid and the cholesterol tilt angle, with respect to the bilayer normal, both show monotonic decreases as x(c) increases, the average bilayer height shows a significant decrease for x(c) > 0.35, following an initial increase. The calculated partial-specific areas of lipids clearly show the condensing effect of cholesterol. The VDW areal analysis showed that the condensing effect is limited only to the cholesterol sterol ring region, where the acyl chains of DOPC are severely compressed by cholesterol. As x(c) increases, the headgroups of DOPC gradually expand along the bilayer-aqueous interface to occupy more lateral area. Thus, it confirmed a key prediction of the umbrella model. At high cholesterol mole fractions, the calculated area per DOPC and area per cholesterol using some existing methods showed an inconsistent result: both increase while the overall area per lipid decreases. The inconsistency stems from the problematic assumption that cholesterol and DOPC have cylindrical shape and the same height. Our results showed that the total area of a PC/cholesterol bilayer is primarily determined by the molecular packing in the cholesterol sterol ring region. An alternative analysis of area per molecule within this region is proposed, which takes into account the cholesterol tilt angle and the practical incompressibility of cholesterol sterol rings. The new calculation shows that the majority of the area lost due to the cholesterol condensing effect is taken from PC molecules.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA.
authors.forename: Mohammad
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Alwarawrah
authors.forename: Jian
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dai
authors.forename: Juyang
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Huang
mesh_terms: D002784:Cholesterol / Q000737:chemistry*; D008051:Lipid Bilayers / Q000737:chemistry*; D056004:Molecular Dynamics Simulation; D015394:Molecular Structure; D010713:Phosphatidylcholines / Q000737:chemistry*; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry
chemical_list: D008051:Lipid Bilayers; D010713:Phosphatidylcholines; D014867:Water; D002784:Cholesterol; C017251:1,2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine
references.citation: J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1701-18
references.pmid: 16211538
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 Mar 4;1417(2):232-45
references.pmid: 10082799
references.citation: Chem Phys Lipids. 2006 Sep;143(1-2):1-10
references.pmid: 16737691
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1996 May 7;35(18):5696-704
references.pmid: 8639529
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 10;106(10):3654-8
references.pmid: 19225105
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 2009;455:329-64
references.pmid: 19289212
references.citation: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004 Aug;60(Pt 8):1355-63
references.pmid: 15272157
references.citation: Biophys J. 1997 May;72(5):2002-13
references.pmid: 9129804
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001 Mar 9;1511(1):156-67
references.pmid: 11248214
references.citation: Biochemistry. 2004 Dec 14;43(49):15318-28
references.pmid: 15581344
references.citation: Biophys J. 1999 Apr;76(4):2142-57
references.pmid: 10096908
references.citation: Chem Phys Lipids. 1982 Nov;31(3):275-82
references.pmid: 7172343
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1990 Jan 16;29(2):451-64
references.pmid: 2302384
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967;135(5):835-43
references.pmid: 6065681
references.citation: Biophys J. 2003 Apr;84(4):2192-206
references.pmid: 12668428
references.citation: Langmuir. 2008 Jun 1;24(13):6858-65
references.pmid: 18517226
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Jan;1788(1):97-121
references.pmid: 18823938
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Jan;1788(1):86-96
references.pmid: 18930019
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2010 Jan 21;114(2):840-8
references.pmid: 20041657
references.citation: Biophys J. 2004 Aug;87(2):1092-100
references.pmid: 15298913
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 Feb 4;1417(1):89-100
references.pmid: 10076038
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 27;104(13):5372-7
references.pmid: 17372226
references.citation: Nature. 1976 Apr 22;260(5553):727-9
references.pmid: 1264248
references.citation: Biophys J. 2005 Sep;89(3):1827-32
references.pmid: 15994905
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2007 Sep 20;111(37):11021-31
references.pmid: 17718554
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Jan;1788(1):122-35
references.pmid: 18817748
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996 Oct 29;1286(3):183-223
references.pmid: 8982283
references.citation: Biophys J. 2004 Aug;87(2):1076-91
references.pmid: 15298912
references.citation: Biophys J. 2004 Mar;86(3):1532-44
references.pmid: 14990480
references.citation: Chem Phys Lipids. 1976 Oct;17(2-3 SPEC NO):251-63
references.pmid: 1033045
references.citation: Biophys J. 2008 Sep 15;95(6):2792-805
references.pmid: 18515383