title: Breast fibroadenomas in the pediatric population: common and uncommon sonographic findings.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Sonography is usually requested to evaluate palpable pediatric breast lumps, and solid masses are almost always fibroadenomas. Lack of familiarity with the findings of fibroadenomas can lead to diagnostic uncertainty and sometimes unnecessary biopsy and excision. We sought to review the spectrum of sonographic findings in our cases of pathology proven pediatric fibroadenomas.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe the sonographic appearances of pathologically proven pediatric breast fibroadenomas.
  
  
  METHODS
  A query of the Department of Radiology database at our institution was performed for all patients younger than 19 years who underwent breast US from January 2001 to June 2009. A total of 332 patients were identified: 282 girls (85%) and 50 boys (15%). Ninety-one girls and no boys had a solid breast mass based on US findings. Forty-three children had a total of 49 pathologically proven breast masses with the diagnoses of fibroadenoma (44), hamartoma (1), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1), tubular adenoma (1), pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (1) and lactation changes (1). Reviews of medical records, histological results and sonographic examinations of all pathology-proven fibroadenomas were performed. US findings were characterized according to location, multiplicity, size, shape, echogenicity and homogeneity, definition of margins, posterior acoustic features and Doppler vascularity.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The vast majority of solid breast masses in girls are histologically benign. Fibroadenomas accounted for 91% of the pathologically proven solid breast masses. Common findings on US imaging are an oval shape, hypoechoic echo pattern, posterior acoustic enhancement and internal Doppler signal. Lobulations were found in 57% of the masses. Less common findings are absent internal vascular flow and complex echo pattern, while isoechoic echo pattern, posterior shadowing and angular margins are rare or unusual.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Fibroadenomas represent the most common solid mass in the breasts of girls. Sonographic appearances are usually characteristic and do not significantly differ from those found in adults. The radiologist must be aware of common and uncommon sonographic appearances of fibroadenomas in the pediatric age group and should be cautious when recommending histological confirmation based on imaging findings, as breast malignancy is extremely rare.
authors.affiliation: Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5252, USA. ramonsan@umich.edu
authors.forename: Ramon
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sanchez
authors.forename: Maria F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Ladino-Torres
authors.forename: John A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Bernat
authors.forename: Annette
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Joe
authors.forename: Michael A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: DiPietro
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D018226:Fibroadenoma / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014463:Ultrasonography; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Apr;8(2):67-70
references.pmid: 9617602
references.citation: Cancer. 1998 Feb 15;82(4):784-92
references.pmid: 9477113
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1723-30
references.pmid: 19933671
references.citation: Radiographics. 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6):1605-12
references.pmid: 11112814
references.citation: J Clin Ultrasound. 2004 Sep;32(7):317-22
references.pmid: 15293297
references.citation: J Ultrasound Med. 2001 May;20(5):491-6; quiz 498
references.pmid: 11345106
references.citation: Radiology. 1995 Jul;196(1):123-34
references.pmid: 7784555
references.citation: Radiographics. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):907-31
references.pmid: 19448124
references.citation: J Ultrasound Med. 2006 Oct;25(10):1335-8
references.pmid: 16998108
references.citation: Clin Radiol. 2008 May;63(5):511-5; discussion 516-7
references.pmid: 18374713
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Sep;191(3):659-63
references.pmid: 18716091
references.citation: Semin Diagn Pathol. 1999 Aug;16(3):235-47
references.pmid: 10490200
references.citation: Radiology. 1989 Sep;172(3):671-5
references.pmid: 2549564
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 1993 Jun;14(4):277-81
references.pmid: 8347638
references.citation: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;21(5):402-6
references.pmid: 19606032
references.citation: Acta Radiol. 2008 Dec;49(10):1104-11
references.pmid: 18855166
references.citation: Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Jan;25(1):73-5
references.pmid: 18985359
references.citation: Adolesc Med Clin. 2004 Oct;15(3):473-85
references.pmid: 15625988
references.citation: J Pediatr Surg. 1995 Feb;30(2):182-6; discussion 186-7
references.pmid: 7738735
references.citation: J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Oct;24(10):1347-54; quiz 1356-7
references.pmid: 16179617
references.citation: Pediatr Ann. 2005 Dec;34(12):931-2
references.pmid: 16419730
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 1998 Jul;23(1):3-6
references.pmid: 9648017