title: Space and time in perceptual causality.
abstract: Inferring causality is a fundamental feature of human cognition that allows us to theorize about and predict future states of the world. Michotte suggested that humans automatically perceive causality based on certain perceptual features of events. However, individual differences in judgments of perceptual causality cast doubt on Michotte's view. To gain insights in the neural basis of individual difference in the perception of causality, our participants judged causal relationships in animations of a blue ball colliding with a red ball (a launching event) while fMRI-data were acquired. Spatial continuity and temporal contiguity were varied parametrically in these stimuli. We did not find consistent brain activation differences between trials judged as caused and those judged as non-caused, making it unlikely that humans have universal instantiation of perceptual causality in the brain. However, participants were slower to respond to and showed greater neural activity for violations of causality, suggesting that humans are biased to expect causal relationships when moving objects appear to interact. Our participants demonstrated considerable individual differences in their sensitivity to spatial and temporal characteristics in perceiving causality. These qualitative differences in sensitivity to time or space in perceiving causality were instantiated in individual differences in activation of the left basal ganglia or right parietal lobe, respectively. Thus, the perception that the movement of one object causes the movement of another is triggered by elemental spatial and temporal sensitivities, which themselves are instantiated in specific distinct neural networks.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology and the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.
authors.forename: Benjamin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Straube
authors.forename: Anjan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Chatterjee
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1993 Nov;21(6):785-801
references.pmid: 8289656
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):137-44
references.pmid: 18692573
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):41-7
references.pmid: 15922156
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Apr;13(2):250-5
references.pmid: 12744981
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Mar 3;1076(1):150-62
references.pmid: 16473338
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):145-52
references.pmid: 18708142
references.citation: Can J Psychol. 1968 Oct;22(5):399-407
references.pmid: 5724482
references.citation: Nature. 2009 May 28;459(7246):506
references.pmid: 19478764
references.citation: Can J Psychol. 1959 Sep;13:155-68
references.pmid: 14434584
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Sep-Oct;123(1-2):1-19
references.pmid: 16860283
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 15;33(1):391-8
references.pmid: 16935007
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 Feb;44(2):321-42
references.pmid: 1565803
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):704-13
references.pmid: 18023824
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1999 Nov 1;19(21):9480-96
references.pmid: 10531451
references.citation: Cognition. 1987 Apr;25(3):265-88
references.pmid: 3581732
references.citation: Science. 2007 Mar 30;315(5820):1860-2
references.pmid: 17395832
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2005 Sep;19(5):591-602
references.pmid: 16187877
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2001 Dec 4;12(17):3741-6
references.pmid: 11726785
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2005 May 20-27;380(1-2):138-42
references.pmid: 15854766
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2009 Aug;47(10):2133-44
references.pmid: 19375433
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jul;17(2):248-54
references.pmid: 12880896
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2003 Aug;13(8):837-44
references.pmid: 12853370
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1;36(3):511-21
references.pmid: 17499520
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jun;4(6):651-5
references.pmid: 11369948
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1957 Feb;53(2):89-93
references.pmid: 13406186
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Aug;30(8):2367-81
references.pmid: 19034897
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Sep-Oct;123(1-2):112-43
references.pmid: 16908002
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Aug;4(8):299-309
references.pmid: 10904254
references.citation: Perception. 1982;11(2):173-86
references.pmid: 7155770
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Nov;12(6):988-1000
references.pmid: 11177419
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2003 Jul;65(5):789-800
references.pmid: 12956586