Validation of the Pentax-AWS Airwayscope utility as an intubation device during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the ground.
OBJECTIVE
The 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation emphasize that all rescuers should minimize interruption of chest compressions even for endotracheal intubation. We previously reported that the utility of the Pentax-AWS Airwayscope (AWS) was superior to that of the Macintosh laryngoscope (McL) for securing airways during chest compression in "on the bed" simulated circumstances. However, because most cardiopulmonary arrest happens "on the ground" in the real world, we compared the utility of the McL and the AWS during chest compression on the ground and on the bed.


METHODS
Fourteen doctors training in the anesthesia department performed tracheal intubation on a manikin with the McL and the AWS in simulations "on the bed" and "on the ground".


RESULTS
In the McL trial, 6 participants failed on the bed, and 10 of them also failed on the ground during chest compression. In the AWS trial, all participants successfully secured the airway regardless of chest compression both on the bed and on the ground. With the AWS, intubation time was not lengthened because of chest compression either on the bed or on the ground. The AWS scored better than the McL on the visual analog scale in laryngoscopy and tube passage of the glottis both on the bed and on the ground.


CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that the AWS is an effective device for endotracheal intubation during chest compression not only on the bed but also on the ground.
Komasawa
Nobuyasu
N
Department of Anesthesiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Mukogawa-cho 1-1, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan. nkomazaw@hyo-med.ac.jp
Ueki
Ryusuke
R
Itani
Motoi
M
Nishi
Shin-ichi
S
Kaminoh
Yoshiroh
Y
D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D007442:Intubation, Intratracheal / Q000295:instrumentation*; D020704:Laryngoscopes; D010147:Pain Measurement; D013997:Time Factors