Experimental and numerical determination of the mechanical response of teeth with reinforced posts.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber reinforced composite posts versus titanium posts, by both experimental testing and numerical simulation (finite element analysis (FEA)). Forty maxillary central incisors were endodontically treated to a size 45 file and then obturated using gutta-percha points and sealer with the lateral condensation technique. The teeth were divided into four groups of ten teeth each. All the posts were of similar dimensions. The first group was restored using carbon fiber reinforced posts (CB), the second and third groups were restored using glass fiber reinforced posts (DP and FW, respectively), and the fourth group (control group) was restored using conventional titanium posts (PP). Half of the specimens of every group were submitted to hydrothermal cycling (2000 cycles, at 5 °C and 55 °C, respectively). All specimens were loaded until failure at a 45° angle with respect to the longitudinal axis at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm min(-1). A two-dimensional finite element model was designed in order to simulate the experimentally obtained results. Mechanical testing revealed that teeth restored with titanium posts exhibited the highest fracture strength. Debonding of the core was the main failure mode observed in glass fiber posts, whereas vertical root fractures were observed in the titanium posts. FEA revealed that the maximum stresses were developed at the interface between the post, dentin and the composite core critical regions in all three cases. Hydrothermal cycling had no significant effect on the fracture behavior of fiber reinforced composite posts.
Papadopoulos
Triantafillos
T
Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.  trpapad@dent.uoa.gr
Papadogiannis
Dimitris
D
Mouzakis
Dionysios E
DE
Giannadakis
Konstantinos
K
Papanicolaou
George
G
D001732:Bite Force; D002244:Carbon / Q000737:chemistry*; D000077482:Carbon Fiber; D019245:Compressive Strength / Q000502:physiology; D003198:Computer Simulation; D017076:Computer-Aided Design; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D055119:Elastic Modulus / Q000502:physiology; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D005898:Glass / Q000737:chemistry*; D006244:Hardness / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007180:Incisor / Q000502:physiology* / Q000601:surgery; D008422:Materials Testing; D008954:Models, Biological; D011176:Post and Core Technique / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014025:Titanium / Q000737:chemistry*
D000077482:Carbon Fiber; C009753:fiberglass; C009495:titanium dioxide; D002244:Carbon; D014025:Titanium