Are laboratories useful fiction? A comparison of Norwegian and Australian undergraduate nursing skills laboratories.
Drawing on the findings from studies in Australia and Norway that explored the use of laboratories in the preparation of nursing students for entry to practice, this article identifies the pedagogical challenges for the undergraduate education of nurses. The findings from both countries are compared and, in spite of distinct differences in the level of financial investment, there are striking similarities between the ways in which laboratories are used in the two countries. The laboratories were designed to predominately represent acute care hospital environments. The participants demonstrated a high level of commitment and strongly held beliefs in the laboratory as a safe place to facilitate self-paced learning and as an environment where students can practice until they become competent and confident. However, at the same time, there was a striking lack of evidence to support these views. The participants in both countries reported a common approach to instruction: a process of teacher demonstration, followed by student repetition and practice. Variability in students' motivation also was reported and the participants especially expressed concern for those students with a low level of interest in the basic skills associated with personal care. The possibilities and limitations of using skill laboratories as part of the practical preparation for nursing are discussed, using the metaphor of laboratories as "fiction".
Wellard
Sally J
SJ
School of Nursing, University of Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia. s.wellard@ballarat.edu.au
Heggen
Kristin M
KM
D000328:Adult; D001315:Australia; D019411:Clinical Laboratory Techniques; D003479:Curriculum; D004506:Education, Nursing / Q000379:methods*; D004521:Educational Measurement; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D009664:Norway; D011361:Professional Competence; D013338:Students, Nursing; D055815:Young Adult