The chemists' style of thinking.
This paper discusses the relevance of the notion of "styles of scientific thinking" introduced by Alistair Crombie and revisited by Ian Hacking, for understanding how chemistry shaped its identity. Although neither Crombie nor Hacking applied this notion to individual disciplines, it seems appropriate to use it in the case of chemistry because it helps to address a puzzling issue: how did chemists manage to shape an identity of their own, despite shifting territories and theoretical transformations? Following a presentation of the notion of style, I will argue that the stable identity of chemistry is rooted in laboratory practices, which determined the specific questions that chemists put to nature as well as the answers to their questions. The "chemical style of thinking" is characterized by (i) a specific way of knowing through making, (ii) the concern with individual materials rather than matter in general and (iii) a specific commitment to nature.
Bensaude-Vincent
Bernadette
B
Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense-Paris X, Département de philosophie ,EA 373-Histoire de la philosophie, histoire des sciences, Nanterre. bensaude@club-internet.fr
D001288:Attention; D002621:Chemistry / Q000266:history; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006801:Humans; D007360:Intelligence; D019359:Knowledge; D007753:Laboratories; D012586:Science; D013850:Thinking