title: Left axillary implantation of loop recorder.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  We compared the clinical course of 10 patients who received an implantable loop recorder (ILR) at a traditional site with 11 patients whose ILRs were implanted via a subpectoral site via a left axillary approach without complications.
  
  
  RESULTS
  R-wave amplitude was determined at implantation and during follow-up. Each patient was followed after 7 days to optimize device setting and then at 1 and 3 months. The R-wave amplitude obtained with the new technique was significantly higher and more stable than that obtained with the standard procedure. Our preliminary experience suggests that axillary access for ILR implantation is feasible, safe, well tolerated, and reliable in terms of sensing function and device performance. Moreover, it is superior aesthetically to the standard approach and carries the potential of minimizing permanent scarring after ILR extraction.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiology, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy. g.miracapillo@usl9.toscana.it
authors.forename: Gennaro
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Miracapillo
authors.forename: Alessandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Costoli
authors.forename: Luigi
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Addonisio
authors.forename: Lucia
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Gemignani
authors.forename: Enrico
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Manfredini
authors.forename: Giorgio
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Corbucci
authors.forename: Silva
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Severi
authors.forename: S Serge
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Barold
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001365:Axilla; D004562:Electrocardiography; D015716:Electrocardiography, Ambulatory / Q000295:instrumentation; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013575:Syncope / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology