title: The six minute walk test accurately estimates mean peak oxygen uptake.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Both Peak Oxygen Uptake (peak VO2), from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and the distance walked during a Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWD) are used for following the natural history of various diseases, timing of procedures such as transplantation and for assessing the response to therapeutic interventions. However, their relationship has not been clearly defined.
  
  
  METHODS
  We determined the ability of 6 MWD to predict peak VO2 using data points from 1,083 patients with diverse cardiopulmonary disorders. The patient data came from a study we performed and 10 separate studies where we were able to electronically convert published scattergrams to bivariate points. Using Linear Mixed Model analysis (LMM), we determined what effect factors such as disease entity and different inter-site testing protocols contributed to the magnitude of the standard error of estimate (SEE).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The LMM analysis found that only 0.16 ml/kg/min or about 4% of the SEE was due to all of the inter-site testing differences. The major source of error is the inherent variability related to the two tests. Therefore, we were able to create a generalized equation that can be used to predict peak VO2 among patients with different diseases, who have undergone various exercise protocols, with minimal loss of accuracy. Although 6 MWD and peak VO2 are significantly correlated, the SEE is unacceptably large for clinical usefulness in an individual patient. For the data as a whole it is 3.82 ml/kg/min or 26.7% of mean peak VO2. Conversely, the SEE for predicting the mean peak VO2 from mean 6 MWD for the 11 study groups is only 1.1 ml/kg/min.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A generalized equation can be used to predict peak VO2 from 6 MWD. Unfortunately, like other prediction equations, it is of limited usefulness for individual patients. However, the generalized equation can be used to accurately estimate mean peak VO2 from mean 6 MWD, among groups of patients with diverse diseases without the need for cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The equation is:
authors.affiliation: Baylor College of Medicine, 3333 Richmond Ave, Houston, Texas 77098, USA. rross@bcm.tmc.edu
authors.forename: Robert M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Ross
authors.forename: Jayasimha N
authors.initials: JN
authors.lastname: Murthy
authors.forename: Istvan D
authors.initials: ID
authors.lastname: Wollak
authors.forename: Andrew S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Jackson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006976:Hypertension, Pulmonary / Q000503:physiopathology*; D016014:Linear Models; D017563:Lung Diseases, Interstitial / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010101:Oxygen Consumption / Q000502:physiology*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D029424:Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / Q000503:physiopathology*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology*