Assessment of actin cytoskeleton and nuclei in bovine blastocysts developed under different culture conditions using a novel computer program.
This study was performed to investigate the effects, in terms of nuclear material and actin cytoskeleton quantities (fluorescent pixel counts), of four different bovine blastocyst culturing techniques (in vitro, stepwise in vitro-to-in vivo, or purely in vivo). Cumulus oocyte complexes from abattoir-sourced ovaries were matured in vitro and allocated to four groups: IVP-group embryos developed up to blastocyst stage in vitro. Gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT)-group oocytes were co-incubated with semen for 4 h before transfer to oviducts of heifers. Following in vitro fertilization, cleaved embryos (day 2 of embryo development, day 2-7 group) were transferred into oviducts on day 2. Multiple ovulation embryo transfer (MOET)-group embryos were obtained by superovulating and inseminating heifers; the heifers' genital tracts were flushed at day 7 of blastocyst development. Within each group, ten blastocysts were selected to be differentially dyed (for nuclei and actin cytoskeleton) with fluorescent stains. A novel computer program (ColorAnalyzer) provided differential pixel counts representing organelle quantities. Blastocysts developed only in vivo (MOET group) showed significantly more nuclear material than did blastocysts produced by any other technique. In terms of actin cytoskeleton quantity, blastocysts produced by IVP and by day 2-7 transfer did not differ significantly from each other. Gamete intra-fallopian transfer- and MOET-group embryos showed significantly larger quantities of actin cytoskeleton when compared with any other group and differed significantly from each other. The results of this study indicate that culturing under in vitro conditions, even with part time in vivo techniques, may adversely affect the quantity of blastocyst nuclear material and actin cytoskeleton. The software employed may be useful for culture environment evaluation/developmental competence assessment.
Kuzmany
A
A
Reproduction Centre Wieselburg, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria. anna.kuzmany@boku.ac.at
Havlicek
V
V
Brem
G
G
Walter
I
I
Besenfelder
U
U
D000199:Actins / Q000032:analysis*; D000818:Animals; D001755:Blastocyst / Q000502:physiology / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D002417:Cattle / Q000196:embryology*; D002467:Cell Nucleus / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D003599:Cytoskeleton / Q000737:chemistry / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D046149:Embryo Culture Techniques / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D004624:Embryo Transfer / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000662:veterinary; D015181:Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer / Q000662:veterinary; D007315:Insemination, Artificial / Q000662:veterinary; D008297:Male; D012984:Software; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary
D000199:Actins