Costs of relaparotomy on-demand versus planned relaparotomy in patients with severe peritonitis: an economic evaluation within a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
Results of the first randomized trial comparing on-demand versus planned-relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis (RELAP trial) indicated no clear differences in primary outcomes. We now report the full economic evaluation for this trial, including detailed methods, nonmedical costs, further differentiated cost calculations, and robustness of different assumptions in sensitivity analyses.


METHODS
An economic evaluation was conducted from a societal perspective alongside a randomized controlled trial in 229 patients with severe secondary peritonitis and an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE)-II score >or=11 from two academic and five regional teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. After the index laparotomy, patients were randomly allocated to an on-demand or a planned-relaparotomy strategy. Primary resource-utilization data were used to estimate mean total costs per patient during the index admission and after discharge until 1 year after the index operation. Overall differences in costs between the on-demand relaparotomy strategy and the planned strategy, as well as relative differences across several clinical subgroups, were evaluated.


RESULTS
Costs were substantially lower in the on-demand group (mean, 65,768 euro versus 83,450 euro per patient in the planned group; mean absolute difference, 17,682 euro; 95% CI, 5,062 euro to e29,004 euro). Relative differences in mean total costs per patient (approximately 21%) were robust to various alternative assumptions. Planned relaparotomy consistently generated more costs across the whole range of different courses of disease (quick recovery and few resources used on one end of the spectrum; slow recovery and many resources used on the other end). This difference in costs between the two surgical strategies also did not vary significantly across several clinical subgroups.


CONCLUSIONS
The reduction in societal costs renders the on-demand strategy a more-efficient relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis. These differences were found across the full range of healthcare resources as well as across patients with different courses of disease.


BACKGROUND
ISRCTN51729393.
Opmeer
Brent C
BC
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. bcopmeer@yahoo.co.uk
Boer
Kimberly R
KR
van Ruler
Oddeke
O
Reitsma
Johannes B
JB
Gooszen
Hein G
HG
de Graaf
Peter W
PW
Lamme
Bas
B
Gerhards
Michael F
MF
Steller
E Philip
EP
Mahler
Cecilia M
CM
Obertop
Huug
H
Gouma
Dirk J
DJ
Bossuyt
Patrick Mm
PM
de Borgie
Corianne Ajm
CA
Boermeester
Marja A
MA
D018806:APACHE; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis / Q000379:methods; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006295:Health Resources / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007813:Laparotomy / Q000191:economics*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009426:Netherlands; D010538:Peritonitis / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D012086:Reoperation / Q000191:economics*; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult