Peritoneal dialysis without a physical peritoneal dialysis unit.
Under certain circumstances when patients need peritoneal dialysis (PD) but no physical unit or official staff are available, one has to improvise ways to serve such patients. In this study we describe our experience with such patients without a physical peritoneal dialysis unit.


METHODS
Since 1997 we trained 33 patients, mean age 61.7 +/- 12.8 years old. Catheter implantation was done in another hospital on them as out-patients. We used trained nurses made available by the company that supplies the PD solution. After 2004 the whole training was done at patients' home, after having been accepted by the patients.


RESULTS
Catheter implantation was successful in all 33 patients. Catheter was removed from 2 patients (one and 4 years after implantation) because of relapsing peritonitis in the first and fungal infection in the second. The overall peritonitis rate was 0.18 episodes/patient year or one episode every 63.5 patient months. Actuarial patient survival was 90%, at one year, 83% at second year and 55% at third year. First and second year technique survival were 96%, and 90% respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
Our results, should encourage those who want to provide peritoneal dialysis to their patients even when a physical peritoneal dialysis unit is not available.
Grapsa
E I
EI
Renal Unit, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece. grapse@otenet.gr
Klimopoulos
S
S
Tseke
P
P
Papaioannou
N
N
Tzanatos
H
H
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002408:Catheters, Indwelling; D005260:Female; D006547:Hernia / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D010531:Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D010538:Peritonitis / Q000209:etiology; D011788:Quality of Life; D016896:Treatment Outcome