Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 1: clinical metrics and benchmarks.
Physician productivity disparities are not uncommonly debated within radiology groups, sometimes in a contentious manner. Attempts to measure productivity, identify and motivate outliers, and develop equitable management policies can present challenges to private and academic practices alike but are often necessary for a variety of professional, financial, and personnel reasons. This is the first of a two-part series that will detail metrics for evaluating radiologist productivity and review published benchmarks, focusing primarily on clinical work. Issues and limitations that may prevent successful implementation of measurement systems are explored. Part 2 will expand that discussion to evaluating nonclinical administrative and academic activities, outlining advantages and disadvantages of addressing differential productivity, and introducing potential models for practices seeking to motivate physicians on the basis of both clinical and nonclinical work.
Duszak
Richard
R
Mid-South Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, Tennessee 38120, USA. rduszak@duszak.com
Muroff
Lawrence R
LR
D000465:Algorithms; D019985:Benchmarking / Q000379:methods*; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal / Q000379:methods*; D010820:Physicians / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011871:Radiology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014481:United States; D016526:Workload / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*