Evolutionary conservation advice for despotic populations: habitat heterogeneity favours conflict and reduces productivity in Seychelles magpie robins.
Individual preferences for good habitat are often thought to have a beneficial stabilizing effect for populations. However, if individuals preferentially compete for better-quality territories, these may become hotspots of conflict. We show that, in an endangered species, this process decreases the productivity of favoured territories to the extent that differences in productivity between territories disappear. Unlike predictions from current demographic theory on site-dependent population regulation (ideal despotic distribution), we show that population productivity is reduced if resources are distributed unevenly in space. Competition for high-quality habitat can thus have detrimental consequences for populations even though it benefits individuals. Manipulating conflict (e.g. by reducing variation in habitat quality) can therefore prove an effective conservation measure in species with strong social or territorial conflict.
Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. andresls@ucr.edu
Andrés
A
López-Sepulcre
Hanna
H
Kokko
Ken
K
Norris
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D046109:Passeriformes / Q000502:physiology*; D012098:Reproduction; D012750:Seychelles; D012930:Social Dominance; D013731:Territoriality