Inoculation theory: a framework for the reduction of skin cancer.
This paper analyzes skin cancer in detail and explains how inoculation theory, which demonstrates how attitudes can be strengthened and made resistant to counter-attitudinal persuasive messages, is a unique method for specifically targeting and conferring resistance to unprotected and excessive ultraviolet exposure to people of all ages. As many previous efforts to reduce exposure to ultraviolet rays have had minimal impact, inoculation theory is appropriate in this context because the theory has been successful in other health campaigns and may increase the efficacy of skin cancer interventions. In justifying the need for this analysis, we illustrate the prevalence and detrimental impact of skin cancer to clarify the seriousness of the disease and how people oftentimes fail to adequately shield themselves. This conceptual analysis not only has the potential to be applied in rendering subjects resistant to engaging in unprotected (and/or excessive) sunbathing and artificial tanning, but it also represents an addition to the disciplinary domains of health communication and social policy and offers clues for further exploration in this area.
Nicholson School of Communication, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jonathan
J
Matusitz
Gerald-Mark
GM
Breen
D003142:Communication; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D009381:Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology*; D010565:Persuasive Communication; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012878:Skin Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology*; D012947:Social Work / Q000379:methods*; D055108:Sunbathing / Q000193:education / Q000523:psychology; D013473:Sunscreening Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage; D014466:Ultraviolet Rays / Q000009:adverse effects*
D013473:Sunscreening Agents