Reimbursement for out-of-state burn patients is not always lower than that for in-state patients at regional burn centers.
Because burn care in the United States is regionalized, burn patients are often transported across state lines to receive their burn treatment. The authors hypothesized that there are differences between in-state and out-of-state reimbursement for burn care. This project was conducted by the American Burn Association (ABA) Government Affairs Committee through the ABA Multicenter Trials Group. Participation was open to any member of the ABA. This retrospective observational study was approved by the institutional review boards of each participating institution. Subjects were identified using registry of each site, selecting patients hospitalized for burn injuries during FY2004-FY2006 of the hospitals. Once identified by the registry, the ID numbers were used to collect billing and reimbursement data from the financial offices. Data were sorted by age (adult and pediatric), location (in state and out of state), and payor source (Medicare, Medicaid, commercial, workers compensation, and self-pay). The rate of reimbursement was calculated based on charges and recoveries. Comparisons on data of each center were performed using Student's t-test with type I error <1%. Six facilities contributed data. A total of 4850 burn patients were reviewed, of whom 3941 were in-state burn patients and 909 were out-of-state burn patients. When the results from all six states were analyzed together, reimbursement for adults from Medicaid and Medicare was higher for in-state patients than for out-of-state patients. However, when analyzed by state, Medicare reimbursement between in-state and out-of-state patients did not differ significantly. In one state (Kansas), in-state Medicaid reimbursement was higher, but in two others (Arizona and Pennsylvania), in-state Medicaid reimbursement was lower than that for out-of-state reimbursement. Reimbursement for the care of children did not differ significantly based on state of residence. From these data, we conclude that there are indeed variations between in-state and out-of-state reimbursement, but those variations differ regionally. Indeed, in some cases, out-of-state reimbursement exceeds in-state reimbursement. Careful examination of these data is necessary before recommending policy change, although consideration should be given to a national policy that guarantees uniformity of reimbursement across all payors for burn patients regardless of their state of residence.
Peck
Michael D
MD
Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA.
Pressman
Melissa A
MA
Caruso
Daniel M
DM
Edelman
Linda S
LS
Holmes
James H
JH
Hughes
William B
WB
Korentager
Richard A
RA
Saffle
Jeffrey R
JR
Voigt
David W
DW
D002053:Burn Units / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006760:Hospitalization / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007349:Insurance, Health, Reimbursement / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008484:Medicaid / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006278:Medicare / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012042:Registries; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014481:United States; D014942:Workers' Compensation / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data