A comparison of direct laryngoscopic views depending on pillow height.
OBJECTIVE
This study was conducted to determine the optimal pillow height for the best laryngoscopic view.


METHODS
Fifty patients were enrolled and preanesthetic airway evaluations were recorded. After induction of anesthesia, the Macintosh 3 blade was used for direct laryngoscopy without a pillow or with a pillow 3, 6, or 9 cm high in randomized order while the laryngeal view was imaged continuously on a monitor of the integrated video system. The best direct laryngoscopic view was sought for in each condition and graded by one anesthesiologist. The correlations between the preanesthetic airway assessments and the pillow height providing the best laryngoscopic view were analyzed.


RESULTS
The laryngoscopic view with the 9-cm pillow was significantly superior to that with other pillows and without a pillow (P < 0.001). The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack and Lehane grade 3) was 16% without a pillow. In these cases, laryngoscopic views were improved with a 9-cm pillow. In five patients with a short neck (<15 cm), better laryngoscopic view was observed with a 3- or 6-cm pillow compared with the 9-cm pillow. Neck length had a significant correlation (rho = 0.326, P = 0.027) with the pillow height providing the best laryngoscopic views.


CONCLUSIONS
We recommend the use of a 9-cm pillow during direct laryngoscopy in the sniffing position. In contrast, pillows <9 cm appear to be advantageous in short-necked patients.
Park
Sang-Heon
SH
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Park
Hee-Pyoung
HP
Jeon
Young-Tae
YT
Hwang
Jung-Won
JW
Kim
Jin-Hee
JH
Bahk
Jae-Hyon
JH
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007828:Laryngoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011187:Posture