A summary measure of health inequalities for a pay-for-population health performance system.
A system that rewards population health must be able to measure and track health inequalities. Health inequalities have most commonly been measured in a bivariate fashion, as a joint distribution of health and another attribute such as income, education, or race/ethnicity. I argue this practice gives insufficient information to reduce health inequalities and propose a summary measure of health inequalities, which gives information both on overall health inequality and bivariate health inequalities. I introduce 2 approaches to develop a summary measure of health inequalities. The bottom-up approach defines attributes of interest, measures bivariate health inequalities related to these attributes separately, and then combines these bivariate health inequalities into a summary index. The top-down approach measures overall health inequality and then breaks it down into health inequalities related to different attributes. After describing the 2 approaches in terms of building-block measurement properties, aggregation, value, data and sample size requirements, and communication, I recommend that, when data are available, a summary measure should use the top-down approach. In addition, a strong communication strategy is necessary to allow users of the summary measure to understand how it was calculated and what it means.
Asada
Yukiko
Y
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 5790 University Ave, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada. yukiko.asada@dal.ca
D054624:Health Status Disparities; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive