title: Assessing dependency using self-report and indirect measures: examining the significance of discrepancies.
abstract: The present study addressed convergence between self-report and indirect approaches to assessing dependency. We were moderately successful in validating an implicit measure, which was found to be reliable, orthogonal to 2 self-report instruments, and predictive of external criteria. This study also examined discrepancies between scores on self-report and implicit measures, and has implications for their significance. The possibility that discrepancies themselves are pathological was not supported, although discrepancies were associated with particular personality profiles. Finally, this study offered additional evidence for the relation between dependency and depressive symptomatology and identified implicit dependency as contributing unique variance in predicting past major depression.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14209, USA. alexcogs@buffalo.edu
authors.forename: Alex
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cogswell
authors.forename: Lauren B
authors.initials: LB
authors.lastname: Alloy
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Karpinski
authors.forename: David A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Grant
mesh_terms: D003858:Dependency, Psychological; D003863:Depression / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards*