Impact of pay for performance on inequalities in health care: systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the impact of pay for performance programmes on inequalities in the quality of health care in relation to age, sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic status.


METHODS
Systematic search and appraisal of experimental or observational studies that assessed quantitatively the impact of a monetary incentive on health care inequalities. We searched published articles in English identified in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases.


RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were identified, 20 of which were conducted in the United Kingdom and examined the impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Sixteen studies used practice level data rather than patient level data. Socioeconomic status was the most frequently examined inequality; age, sex and ethnic inequalities were less frequently assessed. There was some weak evidence that the use of financial incentives reduced inequalities in chronic disease management between socioeconomic groups. Inequalities in chronic disease management between age, sex and ethnic groups persisted after the use of such incentives.


CONCLUSIONS
Inequalities in chronic disease management have largely persisted after the introduction of the Quality and Outcome Framework. Pay for performance programmes should be designed to reduce inequalities as well as improve the overall quality of care.
Alshamsan
Riyadh
R
Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK. ra105@imperial.ac.uk
Majeed
Azeem
A
Ashworth
Mark
M
Car
Josip
J
Millett
Christopher
C
D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000628:therapy*; D054625:Healthcare Disparities / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors