title: Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Pouchitis may occur following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis in approximately 30% of patients.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The primary objective was to determine the efficacy of medical therapies for pouchitis (including antibiotic, probiotic, and other agents) as substantiated by data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
  
  
  METHODS
  A search for RCTs from 1966 to October 2009 was performed using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomized controlled treatment or prevention trials of adult patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis who subsequently developed pouchitis or were at risk for pouchitis were considered for inclusion.
  
  
  METHODS
  Extracted data were converted to 2X2 tables and then synthesized in to a summary statistic using the Peto odds ratio (OR) and [95% confidence intervals], or weighted mean difference (WMD), using RevMan-5 for Mac OS 10.6.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eleven RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The efficacy of 10 different pharmacologic agents was assessed. For the treatment of acute pouchitis (4 RCTS, 5 agents), ciprofloxacin was more effective at inducing remission than metronidazole. Neither rifaximin nor lactobacillus GG were more effective than placebo, while budesonide enemas and metronidazole were similarly effective, for inducing remission of acute pouchitis. For the treatment and maintenance of remission of chronic pouchitis (4 RCTs, 4 agents), glutamine suppositories were not more effective than butyrate suppositories, and bismuth carbomer foam enemas were not more effective than placebo, while VSL#3 was more effective than placebo in maintaining remission of chronic pouchitis in patients with chronic pouchitis who achieved remission with antibiotics. For the prevention of pouchitis (3 RCTs, 2 agents), in one study VSL#3 was more effective than placebo while in another study VSL#3 was not more effective than no treatment. Allopurinol was not more effective than placebo, while inulin was more effective than placebo but the results were not clinically significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  For acute pouchitis, ciprofloxacin was more effective than metronidazole, while budesonide enemas and metronidazole were similarly effective. For chronic pouchitis, VSL#3 was more effective than placebo. For the prevention of pouchitis, VSL#3 was more effective than placebo. Larger RCTs are needed to determine the optimal agent(s) for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.
authors.affiliation: Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA, 55905.
authors.forename: Stefan D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Holubar
authors.forename: Robert R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Cima
authors.forename: William J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Sandborn
authors.forename: Darrell S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Pardi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002939:Ciprofloxacin / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003093:Colitis, Ulcerative / Q000601:surgery*; D004733:Enema; D005765:Gastrointestinal Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D008795:Metronidazole / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000517:prevention & control; D019449:Pouchitis / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000517:prevention & control; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012074:Remission Induction; D012294:Rifamycins / Q000627:therapeutic use; D000078262:Rifaximin; D013488:Suppositories
chemical_list: D005765:Gastrointestinal Agents; D012294:Rifamycins; D013488:Suppositories; D008795:Metronidazole; D002939:Ciprofloxacin; D000078262:Rifaximin