Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients.
BACKGROUND
Cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients often present with a class III malocclusion in connection with a three dimensional maxillary hypoplasia. Twenty-five to 60% of these patients need maxillary advancement. Two solutions are possible: orthognathic surgery and maxillary distraction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications of maxillary distraction in CLP patients.


METHODS
Data was collected from the records of patients treated in our surgery unit between 2000 and 2007. Among the eight patients (four male and four female), five presented with a bilateral CLP, two with a unilateral CLP, and one with a unilateral cleft lip associated to a soft palate cleft. The average age at surgery was 17 years. All underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy with a pterygomaxillary disjunction. An external distractor was used for the first two patients and an internal distractor for the six following patients. After a seven-day latency, activation was implemented at a rate of 1mm twice a day. The average period of consolidation was four months. Maxillary advancement ranged between 7 and 19mm, with an average of 12.6mm. The average follow-up was four years.


RESULTS
Complications were noted in seven patients: one intra-operative hemorrhage, one avulsion of a tooth anchored at the pterygoid process during osteotomy, three cases of device dysfunction, two cases of significant pain during activation, one loosening of the orthodontic arch in an external system, two cases of labial ulceration, and one maxillary sinusitis due to migration of a wisdom tooth.


CONCLUSIONS
Complications of maxillary distraction in CLP patients were very frequent. Most were related to the device and did not interfere with the final result. This must be taken into account when indicating distraction and choosing the device. Two types of complications can occur during distraction: those related to the osteotomy and those related to the device. The complications related to the osteotomy are linked to the cicatricial ground of previous surgery. They are not specific to distraction. The comfort of the internal device is undeniable, but the design of some models must be reviewed to improve their tolerance.
Jeblaoui
Y
Y
Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Hôpital A. Michallon, BP 217, 38043 Grenoble cedex 09, France.
Morand
B
B
Brix
M
M
Lebeau
J
J
Bettega
G
G
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D016063:Blood Loss, Surgical; D001860:Bone Plates; D002648:Child; D002971:Cleft Lip / Q000601:surgery*; D002972:Cleft Palate / Q000601:surgery*; D004868:Equipment Failure; D016267:External Fixators; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D016268:Internal Fixators; D008047:Lip Diseases / Q000209:etiology; D008297:Male; D008313:Malocclusion, Angle Class III / Q000601:surgery; D008437:Maxilla / Q000002:abnormalities / Q000601:surgery; D015523:Maxillary Sinusitis / Q000209:etiology; D008964:Molar, Third / Q000473:pathology; D024343:Open Bite / Q000209:etiology; D019226:Oral Ulcer / Q000209:etiology; D019857:Osteogenesis, Distraction / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation; D019340:Osteotomy, Le Fort / Q000379:methods; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000209:etiology; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014084:Tooth Avulsion / Q000209:etiology; D014095:Tooth, Impacted / Q000150:complications; D055815:Young Adult