Does Local Television News Coverage Cultivate Fatalistic Beliefs about Cancer Prevention?
A substantial proportion of American adults hold fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention despite evidence that a large proportion of cancer deaths are preventable. Several scholars suggest that news media coverage is one source of these beliefs, but scant evidence has been brought to bear on this assertion. We report findings from two studies that assess the plausibility of the claim that local television (TV) news cultivates fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention. Study 1 features a content analysis of an October 2002 national sample of local TV and newspaper coverage about cancer (n=122 television stations; n=60 newspapers). Study 2 describes an analysis of the 2005 Annenberg National Health Communication Survey (ANHCS, n=1,783 respondents). Study 1 indicates that local TV news stories were more likely than newspaper stories to mention cancer causes and scientific research and less likely to provide follow-up information. Study 2 reveals that local TV news viewing was positively associated with fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention. Overall, findings are consistent with the claim that local TV news coverage may promote fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention. We conclude with a discussion of study implications for cultivation theory and the knowledge gap hypothesis and suggest foci for future research.
Niederdeppe
Jeff
J
Jeff Niederdeppe, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication at Cornell University. Erika Franklin Fowler, Ph.D., is a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health Policy Scholar at the University of Michigan. Kenneth Goldstein, Ph.D., is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin. James Pribble, M.D., is a Lecturer and Researcher in the Department of Emergency Medicine at the University of Michigan.
Fowler
Erika Franklin
EF
Goldstein
Kenneth
K
Pribble
James
J