Effect of urinary versus recombinant FSH on clinical outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a systematic review.
Recent randomized trials, systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analyses have demonstrated the relative efficacy,and in some cases superiority, of urinary gonadotrophins (uFSH, human menopausal gonadotrophin) compared with recombinant FSH (rFSH). However, the effectiveness of frozen-embryo transfers (FET) following ovarian stimulation with uFSH versus rFSH in the fresh cycle has not been well investigated. The objective of this study was to determine whether there are differences in clinical outcomes in women undergoing FET according to the type of gonadotrophin used during ovarian stimulation. Following a meticulous search, all published comparative studies of FET using ovarian stimulation were reviewed. Data on clinical outcomes were extracted and systematically presented. Using the agonist long protocol for down-regulation, five trials provided extractable data for live-birth and ongoing pregnancy rates following FET, as well as the cumulative live-birth, ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates following fresh-embryo transfer and FET from the same cycle. There was no evidence of significant effect difference between the uses of uFSH versus rFSH regarding any of the outcomes. In conclusion there is insufficient evidence to determine whether the use of a certain type of gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation affects the clinical outcomes in subsequent FET.
Al-Inany
Hesham G
HG
The Egyptian IVF-ET Center, Maadi, Cairo, Egypt.
van Gelder
Pieter
P
D004624:Embryo Transfer; D005260:Female; D005640:Follicle Stimulating Hormone / Q000494:pharmacology* / Q000652:urine; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D011994:Recombinant Proteins / Q000494:pharmacology*
D011994:Recombinant Proteins; D005640:Follicle Stimulating Hormone