Advances in temporomandibular joint reconstruction.
OBJECTIVE
This article reviews the reconstructive techniques commonly employed in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgery with an emphasis on recent developments in the field.


RESULTS
TMJ reconstruction remains one of the most challenging tasks faced by surgeons who operate in the head and neck, with a variety of autogenous and alloplastic techniques available. The role of alloplastic TMJ reconstruction needs to be reassessed in light of recent literature showing excellent long-term functional outcomes, which reflect advances in prosthetic materials and surgical technique. More recently, transport distraction osteogenesis has been applied to reconstruction of the ramus-condyle unit with promising early results suggesting it may ultimately become the standard of care in selected patients providing a cost-effective approach with low morbidity and excellent functional outcomes.


CONCLUSIONS
The myriad of available TMJ reconstructive options reflect the fact that it remains an evolving field. Although no gold standard currently exists, the various techniques each have their own proponents and potential advantages and drawbacks. Ultimately, the reconstructive surgeon must consider the ablative defect and underlying pathology, the needs of the individual patient, the resources of the providing institution and the capabilities of the surgical team.
Ebrahimi
Ardalan
A
Department of Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Ashford
Bruce G
BG
D019643:Arthroplasty, Replacement; D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D002356:Cartilage / Q000637:transplantation; D005360:Fibula / Q000637:transplantation; D006801:Humans; D007595:Joint Prosthesis; D009999:Ossification, Heterotopic / Q000517:prevention & control; D019857:Osteogenesis, Distraction; D012272:Ribs / Q000637:transplantation; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D013704:Temporomandibular Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D013705:Temporomandibular Joint Disorders / Q000601:surgery
D001672:Biocompatible Materials