title: Whose DNA is it anyway? European court, junk DNA, and the problem with prediction.
abstract: In this article, we discuss the implications of a recent European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) decision about the use of retained DNA profiles in criminal cases. Met with polar but equal passion from both the privacy lobby and law enforcement, this case has opened concerns regarding ethics in the nascent science of DNA profiling. Although the technology is touted as the most exciting breakthrough since fingerprinting in crime solving, there are questions regarding its use. The case decided by the ECHR intensified the debate on privacy, state control of information, and the public's right to be safe. New proposals in response, however, raise more questions than they sought to answer, ranging from unfettered data mining to the pitfalls in risk prediction.
authors.affiliation: PO Box 3544, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG40 9FA, UK. spsarkar@talktalk.net
authors.forename: Sameer P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Sarkar
authors.forename: Gwen
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Adshead
mesh_terms: D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D016172:DNA Fingerprinting / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D005006:Ethnicity / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005060:Europe; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D030661:Genetic Privacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006806:Human Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats / Q000235:genetics; D010641:Phenotype
chemical_list: D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial