title: Progesterone concentration, estradiol pretreatment, and dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone affect gonadotropin-releasing hormone-mediated luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers.
abstract: We examined whether progesterone (P4)-induced suppression of LH release in cattle can be overcome by an increased dose of exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or pretreatment with estradiol (E2). In Experiment 1, postpubertal Angus-cross heifers (N = 32) had their 2 largest ovarian follicles ablated 5 d after ovulation. Concurrently, these heifers were all given a once-used, intravaginal P4-releasing insert (CIDR), and they were randomly assigned to be given either prostaglandin F(2alpha) (Low-P4) or no treatment (High-P4) at follicle ablation, and 12 h later. Six days after emergence of a new follicular wave, half of the heifers in each group (n = 8) were given either 100 or 200 microg of GnRH i.m. Plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were higher in the Low- vs High-P4 groups, and in heifers given 200 vs 100 microg of GnRH (mean +/- SEM 15.4 +/- 2.2 vs 9.1 +/- 1.2, and 14.8 +/- 2.1 vs 9.8 +/- 1.4 ng/mL, respectively; P < or = 0.01). Ovulation rate was higher (P = 0.002) in the Low-P4 group (15/16) than in the High-P4 group (6/16), but it was not affected by GnRH dose (P = 0.4). In Experiment 2, heifers (n = 22) were treated similarly, except that 5.5 d after wave emergence, half of the heifers in each group were further allocated to be given either 0.25 mg estradiol benzoate i.m. or no treatment, and 8 h later, all heifers were given 100 microg GnRH i.m. Both groups treated with E2 (Low- and High-P4) and the Low-P4 group without E2 had higher peak plasma LH concentrations compared to the group with high P4 without E2 (12.6 +/- 1.8, 10.4 +/- 1.8, 8.7 +/- 1.3, and 3.9 +/- 1.2 ng/mL, respectively; (P < 0.04)). However, E2 pretreatment did not increase ovulation rates in response to GnRH (P = 0.6). In summary, the hypotheses that higher doses of GnRH will be more efficacious in inducing LH release and that exogenous E2 will increase LH release following treatment with GnRH were supported, but neither significantly increased ovulation rate.
authors.affiliation: Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
authors.forename: F C F
authors.initials: FC
authors.lastname: Dias
authors.forename: M G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Colazo
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Kastelic
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Mapletoft
authors.forename: G P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Adams
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Singh
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D015237:Dinoprost / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004958:Estradiol / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D005260:Female; D007987:Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D007986:Luteinizing Hormone / Q000097:blood / Q000378:metabolism*; D006080:Ovarian Follicle / Q000502:physiology; D010060:Ovulation / Q000187:drug effects; D011374:Progesterone / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000097:blood*
chemical_list: D007987:Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; D011374:Progesterone; D004958:Estradiol; D007986:Luteinizing Hormone; D015237:Dinoprost