Trigeminal electrophysiology: a 2 x 2 matrix model for differential diagnosis between temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain.
BACKGROUND
Pain due to temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) often has the same clinical symptoms and signs as other types of orofacial pain (OP). The possible presence of serious neurological and/or systemic organic pathologies makes differential diagnosis difficult, especially in early disease stages. In the present study, we performed a qualitative and quantitative electrophysiological evaluation of the neuromuscular responses of the trigeminal nervous system. Using the jaw jerk reflex (JJ) and the motor evoked potentials of the trigeminal roots ((b)R-MEPs) tests, we investigated the functional and organic responses of healthy subjects (control group) and patients with TMD symptoms (TMD group).


METHODS
Thirty-three patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms and 36 control subjects underwent two electromyographic (EMG) tests: the jaw jerk reflex test and the motor evoked potentials of the trigeminal roots test using bilateral electrical transcranial stimulation. The mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum values were computed for the EMG absolute values. The ratio between the EMG values obtained on each side was always computed with the reference side as the numerator. For the TMD group, this side was identified as the painful side (pain side), while for the control group this was taken as the non-preferred masticatory side (non-preferred side). The 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles were also calculated.


RESULTS
Analysis of the ratios (expressed as percentages) between the values obtained on both sides revealed a high degree of symmetry in the (b)R-MEPs % in the control (0.93 +/- 0.12%) and TMD (0.91 +/- 0.22%) groups. This symmetry indicated organic integrity of the trigeminal root motor fibers and correct electrode arrangement. A degree of asymmetry of the jaw jerk's amplitude between sides (ipJJ%), when the mandible was kept in the intercuspal position, was found in the TMD group (0.24% +/- 0.14%) with a statistically significant difference in relation to the control group (0.61% +/- 0.2%). This asymmetry seemed to be primarily due to a failure to facilitate the reflex on the painful side in intercuspal position.


CONCLUSIONS
In this 2 x 2 matrix diagnostic model, three different types of headache may be identified: 1) those due to organic pathologies directly and indirectly involving the trigeminal nervous system denoted as "Organic Damage"; 2) those in TMD patients; 3) other types of orofacial pain in subjects who could erroneously be considered healthy, denoted as Orofacial Pain "OP". This category of patient should be considered at risk, as organic neurological pathologies could be present and yet not directly affect the trigeminal system, at least in the early stages of the disease.
Frisardi
Gianni
G
"Epochè" Orofacial Pain Center, Nettuno (Rome), Italy. frisardi@tin.it
Chessa
Giacomo
G
Sau
Gianfranco
G
Frisardi
Flavio
F
D000328:Adult; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D004568:Electrodiagnosis / Q000379:methods*; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology; D005157:Facial Pain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008340:Mandibular Nerve / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000503:physiopathology; D008410:Masticatory Muscles / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012018:Reflex / Q000502:physiology; D013705:Temporomandibular Joint Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D014276:Trigeminal Nerve / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D020433:Trigeminal Nerve Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology