title: The views of doctors in their first year of medical practice on the lasting impact of a preparation for house officer course they undertook as final year medical students.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The UK General Medical Council recommends that medical students have the opportunity of shadowing the outgoing new doctor whose post they will soon undertake. At the University of Nottingham the two-week shadowing period was preceded by two weeks of lectures/seminars wherein students followed sessions on topics such as common medical/surgical emergencies, contracts, time management, surviving the first two years of clinical practice, careers advice and so on. The present study aimed to gain a better knowledge and understanding of the lasting impact of a four-week preparation course for new Foundation Year 1 doctors [F1 s - interns]. The objectives chosen to achieve this aim were: 1/ to determine the extent to which the lecture/seminar course and shadowing period achieved their stated aim of smoothing the transition from life as a medical student to work as a new doctor; 2/ to evaluate perceptions of the importance of various forms of knowledge in easing the transition between medical student and new doctor
  
  
  METHODS
  In the spring of 2007, 90 graduates from Nottingham were randomly selected and then emailed a link to a short, online survey of quantitative and qualitative questions. Of these 76 responded. Analysis of quantitative data was carried out using SPSS 16.0 and employed McNemar's test. Analysis of the qualitative data was carried out using the constant comparative method.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Only 31% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that the lecture/seminar part of the course prepared them well for their first FY1 post; 14% agreed that during their first job they drew on the knowledge gained during the lecture/seminar course; 94% strongly agreed or agreed that the shadowing part of the course was more useful than the lecture/seminar part. Experiential knowledge gained in the shadowing was the most highly valued, followed by procedural knowledge with propositional knowledge coming far behind.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our study shows that new doctors retrospectively value most the knowledge they are able to transfer to the workplace and value least material which seems to repeat what they had learned for their final exams.
authors.affiliation: University of Nottingham and East Midlands Healthcare Workforce Deanery, Nottingham UK.
authors.forename: Catherine B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: Matheson
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Matheson
authors.forename: John H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Saunders
authors.forename: Claire
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Howarth
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000379:methods*; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital; D008611:Mentors; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom