title: Pioglitazone versus glimepiride on coronary artery calcium progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a secondary end point of the CHICAGO study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare coronary artery calcium (CAC) progression between 2 treatment groups, pioglitazone versus glimepiride.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The CHICAGO (Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Atherosclerosis Using Pioglitazone) study demonstrated that pioglitazone significantly decreased carotid intima-media thickness progression compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The CAC level was determined at baseline and at the end of 72 weeks of treatment in the pioglitazone (n=146) and glimepiride (n=153) treatment groups using electron beam computed tomography. There was no difference in CAC progression between the treatment groups. By using backward and forward selection models, age, race/ethnicity, and baseline apolipoprotein B level predicted CAC progression. There was no relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and CAC progression during the study.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There was no difference in CAC progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with pioglitazone or glimepiride. Age, race/ethnicity, and baseline apolipoprotein B level predicted CAC progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, 515 N State St, Ste 2700, Chicago, IL 60654, USA. mdavidson@radiantresearch.com
authors.forename: Michael H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Davidson
authors.forename: Craig A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Beam
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Haffner
authors.forename: Alfonso
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Perez
authors.forename: Ralph
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: D'Agostino
authors.forename: Theodore
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Mazzone
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002114:Calcinosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000209:etiology; D002340:Carotid Artery Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000209:etiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy*; D018450:Disease Progression; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007004:Hypoglycemic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D000077205:Pioglitazone; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D013453:Sulfonylurea Compounds / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D045162:Thiazolidinediones / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D013997:Time Factors; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014463:Ultrasonography
chemical_list: D007004:Hypoglycemic Agents; D013453:Sulfonylurea Compounds; D045162:Thiazolidinediones; C057619:glimepiride; D000077205:Pioglitazone