title: Comments on "Simoens, S. Health economic assessment: a methodological primer. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 2950-2966"-New Zealand in fact has no cost-effectiveness threshold.
abstract: The Journal recently incorrectly ascribed cost-effectiveness thresholds to New Zealand, alongside other countries. New Zealand has no such thresholds when deciding the funding of pharmaceuticals. As we fund pharmaceuticals within a fixed budget, and cost-effectiveness is only one of nine decision criteria used to inform decisions, thresholds cannot be inferred or calculated. Thresholds inadequately account for opportunity cost and affordability, and are incompatible with budgets and maximising health gains. In New Zealand, pharmaceutical investments can only be considered 'cost-effective' when prioritised against other proposals at the time, and threshold levels must inevitably vary with available funds and the other criteria.
authors.affiliation: NZ Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC), 40 Mercer Street, Wellington 6143, New Zealand. scott.metcalfe@pharmac.govt.nz
authors.forename: Scott
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Metcalfe
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Grocott
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D016527:Drug Costs; D017048:Health Care Costs; D009520:New Zealand; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years