title: [Cost analysis of the fast track concept in elective colonic surgery].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Fast track (FT) is a modern concept to enhance postoperative recovery after elective surgery. It has been approved during the last years. Beside its medical benefits, fast-track (FT) concepts may provide an economic incentive, although a cost-benefit analysis in the daily clinical routine has not yet been realised. In addition to this an elevated consumption of resources is postulated.
  
  
  METHODS
  In 2007 we prospectively studied the implementation of the FT concept for elective colonic surgery in the daily clinical routine at the Department of General Surgery of Nuremberg Hospital. In a representative subgroup of patients studied, we performed a cost-cost analysis by comparing these patients to a retrospectively analysed group that had been treated in a conventional traditional manner in 2002.
  
  
  RESULTS
  369  patients were included and treated according to the FT concept. Discharge criteria were met at the 4(th) postoperative day in median (SD 3.9  days, minimum  1, maxiumum 29  days). The rate of general postoperative complications was 24.4 % (16 % minor complications) for all patients and 6.6 % in the group of patients who were discharged within 9 postoperative days or less (n=182). With respect to the main FT items, implementation of the FT concept was considered as effective. Cost-cost analyses showed a cost reduction of 32 % in favour of patients treated with the FT concept.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study clearly shows the clinical and economic benefits of the FT concept considering health services research. Therefore further clinical implementation of the FT concept seems beneficial, not only in the view of medical aspects, but also for economic reasons.
authors.affiliation: Universität Würzburg, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Würzburg, Deutschland. jurowich_c@klinik.uniwuerzburg.de
authors.forename: C F
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Jurowich
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Reibetanz
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Krajinovic
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Larena-Avellaneda
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Isbert
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Oberender
authors.forename: C T
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Germer
authors.forename: B H A
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: von Rahden
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003082:Colectomy / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D003108:Colonic Diseases / Q000191:economics* / Q000601:surgery*; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000191:economics* / Q000601:surgery*; D017046:Cost Savings / Q000191:economics; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000191:economics; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units / Q000191:economics; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000191:economics*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics*; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000191:economics / Q000209:etiology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012002:Rectal Diseases / Q000191:economics* / Q000601:surgery*; D012007:Rectum / Q000601:surgery