Benchmarking for small hospitals: size didn't matter!
Benchmarking is an indispensable tool as hospital leaders face challenges to balance efficiency with safe and effective care. Selection of appropriate "like" hospitals is critical to the benchmarking aim of understanding comparative performance. Based on 10 years of observed outcome differences between small and large hospitals, the Collaborative Alliance for Nursing Outcomes (CALNOC) sought to empirically define small hospitals, and to determine if there were statistical differences between small and large hospitals for selected nursing sensitive outcome indicators. This article reports the examination of hospital size as a proxy characteristic to define "like" hospitals for the purpose of benchmarking outcomes. Findings suggest that optimal classifications into small and large hospital size based on the outcome indicators of falls, falls with injury, and hospital-acquired pressure ulcers stage 2 or worse (HAPU 2+) were not consistent with historical administrative categories based on average daily census and not consistent by outcome. Statistical differences were only found with HAPU 2+ in critical care units, with no differences in the fall outcomes. These data did not support the use of size-based categories to define like hospitals for benchmark comparisons.
Brown
Diane Storer
DS
CALNOC. diane.brown@kp.org
Aydin
Carolyn E
CE
Donaldson
Nancy
N
Fridman
Moshe
M
Sandhu
Meenu
M
D019985:Benchmarking; D002140:California; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D055317:Evidence-Based Practice; D006744:Hospital Bed Capacity, 100 to 299; D006743:Hospital Bed Capacity, under 100; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care