A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
This prospective double blind study was undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy of oral vs vaginal misoprostol in equivalent doses (50 microg) for induction of labour. A total of 128 term pregnancies with indication for induction of labour were allocated to two groups to receive 50 microg misoprostol orally or vaginally, every 4 h until adequate contractions were achieved or a maximum of 200 microg dose. Induction to delivery interval was significantly shorter in the vaginal group compared with the oral group (14.6 h vs 22.5 h; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to mode of delivery, neonatal outcome and maternal side-effects. However, the incidence of abnormal contractility pattern was more common in the vaginal group (10/68, 14.6%) as compared with the oral group (4/60, 6.6%) (p = 0.146).
Mehrotra
S
S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George's Medical University (CSM Medical University), Lucknow, India. mehrotra.seema@gmail.com
Singh
U
U
Gupta
H P
HP
D000282:Administration, Intravaginal; D000284:Administration, Oral; D000328:Adult; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007751:Labor, Induced / Q000379:methods*; D016595:Misoprostol / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D010120:Oxytocics / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D011446:Prospective Studies; D014590:Uterine Contraction / Q000187:drug effects*; D055815:Young Adult
D010120:Oxytocics; D016595:Misoprostol