title: A laboratory comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation in root canals filled with Resilon.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To analyse ex vivo the integrity of the apical seal of Resilon root fillings following immediate post space preparation or after 1 week when leaving either 5 mm or 3 mm of remaining filling material.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred and fifty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth with single, straight root canals were used. Teeth were autoclaved and cleaned of debris and soft tissue. After decoronation at 16 mm length, the root canals were instrumented using the K3 rotary system to apical file size 45, 0.04 taper with intermittent irrigation using 1% sodium hypochlorite. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups with 30 teeth in each group. Group 1: control group in which the root canals were not filled. Group 2: the canals were filled with Resilon and a post space prepared immediately leaving 5 mm of apical filling. Group 3: the canals were filled and post space preparation delayed for 1 week leaving 5 mm of material apically. Group 4: post space preparation in the canals was initiated immediately after filling leaving 3 mm of material apically. Group 5: the root canals were filled and post space preparation was delayed for 1 week leaving 3 mm of material apically. Microleakage was evaluated using a fluid transport device. The results were analysed statistically using one-way anova followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was a highly significant difference amongst the groups (P < 0.001). The maximum mean leakage was observed in group 5 (141.63 x 10(-6) microL min(-1) cm(-1)) and the least microleakage in group 2 (99.87 x 10(-6) microL min(-1) cm(-1)).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Immediate post space preparation was associated with less microleakage than delayed preparation when both 5 mm and 3 mm of apical filling remained. Leaving 5 mm of Resilon provided a significantly better seal compared to leaving 3 mm of material.
authors.affiliation: Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India. k.attam@rediffmail.com
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Attam
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Talwar
mesh_terms: D055117:Curing Lights, Dental; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000145:classification*; D003786:Dental Pulp Cavity / Q000473:pathology*; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D011176:Post and Core Technique; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D012388:Root Canal Irrigants / Q000627:therapeutic use; D018915:Root Canal Preparation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D012973:Sodium Hypochlorite / Q000627:therapeutic use; D013997:Time Factors; D019227:Tooth Apex / Q000473:pathology*
chemical_list: D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D012388:Root Canal Irrigants; C486893:epiphany sealer; C486892:resilon sealer; D012973:Sodium Hypochlorite