title: Interprofessional collaborative practice within cancer teams: Translating evidence into action. A mixed methods study protocol.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A regional integrated cancer network has implemented a program (educational workshops, reflective and mentoring activities) designed to support the uptake of evidence-informed interprofessional collaborative practices (referred to in this text as EIPCP) within cancer teams. This research project, which relates to the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO) Best Practice Guidelines and other sources of research evidence, represents a unique opportunity to learn more about the factors and processes involved in the translation of evidence-based recommendations into professional practices. The planned study seeks to address context-specific challenges and the concerns of nurses and other stakeholders regarding the uptake of evidence-based recommendations to effectively promote and support interprofessional collaborative practices.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This study aims to examine the uptake of evidence-based recommendations from best practice guidelines intended to enhance interprofessional collaborative practices within cancer teams.
  
  
  METHODS
  The planned study constitutes a practical trial, defined as a trial designed to provide comprehensive information that is grounded in real-world healthcare dynamics. An exploratory mixed methods study design will be used. It will involve collecting quantitative data to assess professionals' knowledge and attitudes, as well as practice environment factors associated with effective uptake of evidence-based recommendations. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted concurrently with care providers to gather qualitative data for describing the processes involved in the translation of evidence into action from both the users' (n = 12) and providers' (n = 24) perspectives. The Graham et al. Ottawa Model of Research Use will serve to construct operational definitions of concepts, and to establish the initial coding labels to be used in the thematic analysis of the qualitative data. Quantitative and qualitative results will be merged during interpretation to provide complementary perspectives of interrelated contextual factors that enhance the uptake of EIPCP and changes in professional practices.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The information obtained from the study will produce new knowledge on the interventions and sources of support most conducive to the uptake of evidence and building of capacity to sustain new interprofessional collaborative practice patterns. It will provide new information on strategies for overcoming barriers to evidence-informed interventions. The findings will also pinpoint critical determinants of 'what works and why' taking into account the interplay between evidence, operational, relational micro-processes of care, uniqueness of patients' needs and preferences, and the local context.
authors.affiliation: Centre de Recherche Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada. dominique.tremblay2@usherbrooke.ca.
authors.forename: Dominique
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Tremblay
authors.forename: Danielle
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Drouin
authors.forename: Ariella
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Lang
authors.forename: Danièle
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Roberge
authors.forename: Judith
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ritchie
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Plante