title: Analysis of academic programs: comparing nursing and other university majors in the application of a quality, potential and cost model.
abstract: Nursing is often considered expensive in the cost analysis of academic programs. Yet nursing programs have the power to attract many students, and the national nursing shortage has resulted in a high demand for nurses. Methods to systematically assess programs across an entire university academic division are often dissimilar in technique and outcome. At a small, private, Midwestern university, a model for comprehensive program assessment, titled the Quality, Potential and Cost (QPC) model, was developed and applied to each major offered at the university through the collaborative effort of directors, chairs, deans, and the vice president for academic affairs. The QPC model provides a means of equalizing data so that single measures (such as cost) are not viewed in isolation. It also provides a common language to ensure that all academic leaders at an institution apply consistent methods for assessment of individual programs. The application of the QPC model allowed for consistent, fair assessments and the ability to allocate resources to programs according to strategic direction. In this article, the application of the QPC model to School of Nursing majors and other selected university majors will be illustrated.
authors.affiliation: Adult Advanced Practice Nursing, Yale School of Nursing, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
authors.forename: Kathy
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Booker
authors.forename: Cheryl
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hilgenberg
mesh_terms: D004508:Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D017059:Models, Econometric; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research / Q000191:economics; D012579:Schools, Nursing / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards; D014495:Universities / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards