Decentralization and health care prioritization process in Tanzania: from national rhetoric to local reality.
During the 1990s, Tanzania like many other developing countries adopted health sector reforms. The most common policy change under the health sector reforms has been decentralization, which involves the transfer of power and authority from the central level to local authorities. Based on the case study of Mbarali district in Tanzania, this paper uses a policy analysis approach to analyse the implementation of decentralized health care priority setting. Specifically, the paper examines the process, actors and contextual factors shaping decentralized health care priority setting processes. The analysis and conclusion are based on a review of documents, key informant interviews, focus group discussion, and notes from non-participant observation. The findings of the study indicate that local institutional contexts and power asymmetries among actors have a greater influence on the prioritization process at the local level than expected and intended. The paper underlines the essentially political character of the decentralization process and reiterates the need for policy analysts to pay attention to processes, institutional contexts, and the role of policy actors in shaping the implementation of the decentralization process at the district level.
Maluka
Stephen Oswald
SO
Umeå International School of Public Health, Umea University, Umea, Sweden. stephenmaluka@yahoo.co.uk
Hurtig
Anna-Karin
AK
Sebastián
Miguel San
MS
Shayo
Elizabeth
E
Byskov
Jens
J
Kamuzora
Peter
P
D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D003906:Developing Countries; D036262:Empirical Research; D006126:Group Processes; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D018166:Health Care Reform; D006291:Health Policy; D006292:Health Priorities; D006801:Humans; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D011057:Politics; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013636:Tanzania