title: The examination of peer review and publication in neurology.
abstract: Despite remarkable growth in the clinical neurology literature, there is little research on peer review and biomedical publication in neurology. Biomedical publication research encompasses every step of the research process, from the methodology to the publication of research findings. Some general medical journals have served as leaders in improving scientific publication. Many medical fields have taken it upon themselves to characterize journals and peer reviewers within their own fields. Not all of these data can be applied to the clinical neurology literature; research methodologies, article types, and the journals themselves are unique to every medical field. This article reviews current publication research in the neurology literature and concludes that, to sustain and improve upon the integrity of clinical neurology research, further study is needed of the journals and the peer review process in neurology. Otherwise, the value of clinical research findings and patient care guidelines will be diminished.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California 95817, USA. vwongmd@gmail.com
authors.forename: Victoria S S
authors.initials: VS
authors.lastname: Wong
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D016265:Conflict of Interest / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D009462:Neurology / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D017712:Peer Review, Research / Q000941:ethics / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000941:ethics / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D012109:Research Support as Topic / Q000941:ethics / Q000592:standards