Activation of bone remodeling after fatigue: differential response to linear microcracks and diffuse damage.
Recent experiments point to two predominant forms of fatigue microdamage in bone: linear microcracks (tens to a few hundred microns in length) and "diffuse damage" (patches of diffuse stain uptake in fatigued bone comprised of clusters of sublamellar-sized cracks). The physiological relevance of diffuse damage in activating bone remodeling is not known. In this study microdamage amount and type were varied to assess whether linear or diffuse microdamage has similar effects on the activation of intracortical resorption. Activation of resorption was correlated to the number of linear microcracks (Cr.Dn) in the bone (R(2)=0.60, p<0.01). In contrast, there was no activation of resorption in response to diffuse microdamage alone. Furthermore, there was no significant change in osteocyte viability in response to diffuse microdamage, suggesting that osteocyte apoptosis, which is known to activate remodeling at typical linear microcracks in bone, does not result from sublamellar damage. These findings indicate that inability of diffuse microdamage to activate resorption may be due to lack of a focal injury response. Finally, we found that duration of loading does not affect the remodeling response. In conclusion, our data indicate that osteocytes activate resorption in response to linear microcracks but not diffuse microdamage, perhaps due to lack of a focal injury-induced apoptotic response.
Herman
B C
BC
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031, USA.
Cardoso
L
L
Majeska
R J
RJ
Jepsen
K J
KJ
Schaffler
M B
MB
D000818:Animals; D016723:Bone Remodeling / Q000502:physiology*; D005221:Fatigue / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D010011:Osteocytes / Q000473:pathology; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014457:Ulna / Q000473:pathology* / Q000503:physiopathology*