title: Jung as psychologist of religion and Jung as philosopher of religion.
abstract: Is it possible to be both a psychologist and a philosopher? Is it possible for a psychologist, or more generally a social scientist, to use social scientific findings to make philosophical claims? Specifically, is it possible for a social scientist to use social scientific findings to determine the existence of God? Did Jung profess to be only a psychologist or also a philosopher? If he professed to be both, did he enlist his psychological findings to make philosophical claims? Specifically, did he enlist his psychological findings to determine the existence of God?
authors.forename: Robert A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Segal
mesh_terms: D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006801:Humans; D007602:Jungian Theory / Q000266:history*; D012069:Religion and Psychology; D012072:Religious Philosophies / Q000266:history*; D012942:Social Sciences