title: Is health, measured by work ability index, affected by 12-hour rotating shift schedules?
abstract: Two forms of continuously forward rotating 12-h shift schedules exist at BASF's Ludwigshafen site. These shift schedules were compared with a daytime working system to investigate potential differential effects on employee's health status assessed with the Work Ability Index (WAI). In the 3 x 12 system, a 12-h day shift is followed 24 h later by a 12-h night shift, and after a day off the employee returns to the day shift. The 4 x 12 schedule follows the same pattern except that there are 2 days off between the night and next day shift. A total of 924 participants (278 3 x 12 and 321 4 x 12 shiftworkers and 325 day workers) were recruited. A self-administered questionnaire was used to obtain information about shiftwork schedule, demographic characteristics, and lifestyle and social factors, and the WAI was applied. The outcomes of interest were the WAI sum score and its seven dimensions. In examining the relationship with the WAI categories, a Proportional Odds Model (POM) was used to identify the potential determinants. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the impact of age on single dimensions of WAI after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Increasing age and obesity (BMI > or = 30) were the only significant determinants of poorer WAI. Although a positive association was found linking the second WAI dimension (work ability in relation to job demands) with age, an inverse association was demonstrated consistently between age and the third and fourth WAI dimensions, i.e., number of diagnosed diseases and estimated work impairment due to disease, after adjustment for potential confounders. The age-dependency was moderate overall, but seemed to be stronger among shift- than day workers, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant differential impact of the working time systems on the WAI sum score or on the individual WAI dimensions. Thus, there is no indication of an excessive adverse health impact of these shift schedules compared to day work, to the extent that health can be measured by the WAI.
authors.affiliation: Department of Occupational Medicine and Health Protection, BASF Societas Europaea, Ludwigshafen, Germany. mei.yong@basf.com
authors.forename: Mei
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Yong
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Nasterlack
authors.forename: Rolf-Peter
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Pluto
authors.forename: Kathrin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Elmerich
authors.forename: Dorothee
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Karl
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Knauth
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001071:Appointments and Schedules; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005858:Germany; D006262:Health; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D009765:Obesity / Q000503:physiopathology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014937:Work; D014940:Work Schedule Tolerance