Evidence review to investigate the support for subtypes of children with difficulty processing and integrating sensory information.
We investigated the evidence for subtypes in children with difficulty processing and integrating sensory information. Fifty-seven articles were incorporated into a systematic literature review; only 4 articles provided direct evidence for subtypes. These studies did not provide a comprehensive assessment of all sensory functions and sensory-based motor functions (i.e., praxis) and included different diagnostic groups. Therefore, generalized conclusions about subtypes could not be drawn. The other 53 studies reviewed provided meaningful information about strengths and challenges that children with difficulty processing and integrating sensory information demonstrate, but these studies were limited in scope. A principal theme was the importance of conducting comprehensive assessments of sensory-based functions, including multiple measures of sensory integrative functions such as praxis, sensory modulation, and sensory discrimination in children and adolescents with various clinical disorders. In addition, more consistency in the use of specific assessment tools will allow for synthesis of data across studies.
Davies
Patricia L
PL
Department of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, 219 Occupational Therapy, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. pdavies@lamar.colostate.edu
Tucker
Rebecca
R
D000293:Adolescent; D001289:Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity / Q000145:classification / Q000628:therapy; D002648:Child; D002659:Child Development Disorders, Pervasive / Q000145:classification / Q000628:therapy; D055317:Evidence-Based Practice; D006801:Humans; D009048:Motor Skills; D009788:Occupational Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D012678:Sensation Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000628:therapy*