[Analysis on clinical classification and injury certification in 30 cases of acute closed head trauma].
OBJECTIVE
In order to improve accuracy of forensic expert conclusion and provide scientific and reasonable accordance for revising identifying criteria for the injury degree, correlation between clinical classification and injury certification of acute closed head trauma were explored.


METHODS
A total of 30 cases about acute closed head trauma were selected. Comparison and analysis were made about their differences and the correlation between the clinical classification and the injury degree certification.


RESULTS
Mild craniocerebral injury is equal to mild or moderate injury, moderate craniocerebral injury is equivalent to mild or severe injury, severe craniocerebral injury is mostly equivalent to severe injury.


CONCLUSIONS
There are some correlation between the clinical classification and the injury certification in acute closed head trauma. It is necessary to refer to the criteria of clinical classification when revising identifying criteria for the injury degree so as to enhance scientific rigor and rationality.
Li
Hong-xin
HX
Criminal Police Team of Huainan Public Security Bureau, Huainan 232001, China. lihongxin888@163.com
Wang
Ya-hui
YH
Xia
Wen-tao
WT
D000328:Adult; D001924:Brain Concussion / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D049429:Forensic Pathology / Q000592:standards; D016489:Head Injuries, Closed / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D006801:Humans; D015601:Injury Severity Score; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013345:Subarachnoid Hemorrhage / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology; D055815:Young Adult