title: What could underlie the trial-related signal? A response to the commentaries by Drs. Kleinschmidt and Muller, and Drs. Handwerker and Bandettini.
abstract: Here we address two recent commentaries on our finding of an anticipatory trial-related signal that could not be predicted by concurrent electrode recordings. In addition, we offer a broad discussion regarding what our findings do and do not say about local neural activity underlying imaging signals.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. ad2069@columbia.edu
authors.forename: Aniruddha
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Das
authors.forename: Yevgeniy B
authors.initials: YB
authors.lastname: Sirotin
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods*; D002560:Cerebrovascular Circulation / Q000502:physiology*; D006439:Hemodynamics / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging