title: Invited commentary: Evaluating epidemiologic research methods--the importance of response rate calculation.
abstract: Epidemiologic research that uses administrative records (rather than registries or clinical surveys) to identify cases for study has been increasingly restricted because of concerns about privacy, making unbiased population-based research less practicable. In their article, Nattinger et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(6):637-644) present a method for using administrative data to contact participants that has been well received. However, the methods employed for calculating and reporting response rates require further consideration, particularly the classification of untraceable cases as ineligible. Depending on whether response rates are used to evaluate the potential for bias to influence study results or to evaluate the acceptability of the method of contact, different fractions may be considered. To improve the future study of epidemiologic research methods, a consensus on the calculation and reporting of study response rates should be sought.
authors.affiliation: School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. aharris7@interchange.ubc.ca
authors.forename: M Anne
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Harris
mesh_terms: D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology; D003219:Confidentiality; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods*; D016021:Epidemiologic Studies; D005260:Female; D020408:Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007345:Insurance Claim Review / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D018579:Patient Selection; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology