Why humans deviate from rational choice.
Rational choice theory predicts that humans always optimize the expected utility of options when making decisions. However, in decision-making games, humans often punish their opponents even when doing so reduces their own reward. We used the Ultimatum and Dictator games to examine the affective correlates of decision-making. We show that the feedback negativity, an event-related brain potential that originates in the anterior cingulate cortex that has been related to reinforcement learning, predicts the decision to reject unfair offers in the Ultimatum game. Furthermore, the decision to reject is positively related to more negative emotional reactions and to increased autonomic nervous system activity. These findings support the idea that subjective emotional markers guide decision-making and that the anterior cingulate cortex integrates instances of reinforcement and punishment to provide such affective markers.
Hewig
Johannes
J
Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany. hewig@biopsy.uni-jena.de
Kretschmer
Nora
N
Trippe
Ralf H
RH
Hecht
Holger
H
Coles
Michael G H
MG
Holroyd
Clay B
CB
Miltner
Wolfgang H R
WH
D000328:Adult; D000339:Affect / Q000502:physiology; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D004569:Electroencephalography; D055724:Electrophysiological Phenomena; D005260:Female; D005712:Galvanic Skin Response / Q000502:physiology; D005716:Game Theory; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D012201:Reward; D055815:Young Adult