title: Lessons from SARS: a retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  During severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Toronto, outpatient clinics at SickKids Hospital were closed to prevent further disease transmission. In response, a decision was made by the neonatal neuro-developmental follow up (NNFU) clinic staff to select patients with scheduled appointments to have a mail/telephone assessment using Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) or to postpone/skip their visit. The objective of this study was to compare the developmental assessment and its outcome in two groups of NNFU clinic patients, SARS versus non-SARS, over three standard clinic appointments.
  
  
  METHODS
  We compared the diagnostic accuracy (identification of developmental delay), and patient management (referral for therapy or communication of a new diagnosis) of the strategies used during SARS, April/May 2003, to the standard assessment methods used for patients seen in April/May 2005 (non-SARS). In all cases data were obtained for 3 patient visits: before, during and after these 2 months and were compared using descriptive statistics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 95 patients in the SARS group and 99 non-SARS patients. The gestational age, sex, entry diagnosis and age at the clinic visit was not different between the groups. The NNFU clinic staff mailed ASQ to 27 families during SARS, 17 (63%) were returned, and 8 of the 17 were then contacted by telephone. Criteria used to identify infants at risk selected for either mailed ASQ or phone interviews were not clearly defined in the patients' charts. There was a significant under identification of developmental delay during SARS (18% versus 45%). Of those who responded to the mailed questionnaire, referrals for therapy rates were similar to non-SARS group. The lost to follow up rate was 24% for the SARS group compared with 7% for non-SARS. There was no difference in the overall rate of developmental delay in the two groups as identified at the 'after' visit.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Poor advanced planning led to a haphazard assessment of patients during this infectious disease outbreak. Future pandemic plans should consider planning for outpatient care as well as in hospital management of patients.
authors.affiliation: Paediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Nehad
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Nasef
authors.forename: Karel
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: O'Brien
authors.forename: Lesley
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Wylie
authors.forename: Sharon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Unger
mesh_terms: D000553:Ambulatory Care; D001071:Appointments and Schedules; D002170:Canada; D002657:Child Development; D003266:Continuity of Patient Care; D003428:Cross Infection / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003625:Data Collection; D002658:Developmental Disabilities / Q000175:diagnosis*; D004196:Disease Outbreaks; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007234:Infant, Premature; D010044:Outpatient Clinics, Hospital; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D012307:Risk Factors; D045169:Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000517:prevention & control