title: A prospective randomized trial of mini-incision posterior and two-incision total hip arthroplasty.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The two-incision approach to THA has been controversial, with some authors reporting its use is associated with a rapid recovery whereas others report no differences in outcomes and a higher risk of perioperative complications secondary to increased surgical complexity.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  We therefore compared early postoperative variables including pain, length of stay, functional recovery, complications, and complexity of the mini-posterior and two-incision approaches to THA.
  
  
  METHODS
  We prospectively enrolled 72 patients scheduled for THA and randomized them into two groups: mini-incision posterior approach and the two-incision approach. Preoperative teaching, anesthetic protocols, implants used, and rehabilitation pathways were identical for both groups. All variables were assessed at a maximum of 1 year postoperatively.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All key outcomes were similar in the two groups: mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain during the first 3 postoperative days and the first 6 weeks, total narcotic requirements in the hospital and during the first 6 weeks, mean length of stay (51 hours versus 48 hours), and mean Harris hip scores and SF-12 scores. Achievement of functional milestones was similar between the two groups. There was one reoperation in each group. Mean operative time was longer for patients in the two-incision group (98 minutes versus 77 minutes), however the accuracy of component positioning was similar.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We found no differences in perioperative outcomes between these two approaches for THA. Variables other than the surgical approach including perioperative protocols, patient expectations, and the patient's general health may have a greater effect on outcomes such as pain during the early postoperative period, functional recovery, and length of hospital stay. The use of small incisions for THA was safe as was a shortened hospital stay in selected patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison, Suite 1063, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. craigdv@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Craig J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Della Valle
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Dittle
authors.forename: Mario
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Moric
authors.forename: Scott M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Sporer
authors.forename: Asokumar
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Buvanendran
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000698:Analgesia; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D002641:Chicago; D005260:Female; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D011446:Prospective Studies; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012086:Reoperation; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome