Complicity in stem cell research: the case of induced pluripotent stem cells.
Many who object to human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research because they believe it involves complicity in embryo destruction have welcomed induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) research as an ethical alternative. This opinion article aims to show that complicity arguments against hESC research are prima facie inconsistent with accepting iPSC research as it is currently done. Those who oppose hESC research on grounds of complicity should either (i) oppose iPSC research as well, (ii) advocate a radical change in the way iPSC research is done, (iii) demonstrate that complicity arguments against iPSC research are weaker than those against hESC research or (iv) reject complicity arguments against both hESC and iPSC research, either by adopting a more limited conception of complicity that allows acceptance of some hESC research, or by accepting that destroying embryos for important scientific research is not wrong.
Devolder
Katrien
K
Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. katrien.devolder@ugent.be
D002460:Cell Line; D028661:Complicity; D053595:Embryonic Stem Cells; D006801:Humans; D057026:Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; D035845:Research Embryo Creation / Q000941:ethics; D057905:Stem Cell Research / Q000941:ethics*