title: Embryo transfer technique: Factors affecting the viability of the corpus luteum in llamas.
abstract: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the embryo transfer (ET) maneuvers on plasma progesterone concentrations in recipient Lama glama females and the relationship between the site the embryo was transferred to and corpus luteum (CL) localization. Experiment I (effect of transcervical threading): adult non-pregnant, non-lactating llama females were randomly assigned into two groups: control group (without cervical threading, n=10) and group A (with cervical threading, n=10). In both groups, CL activity was evaluated through measurement of progesterone plasma concentrations. In group A, on Day 6 after inducing ovulation with buserelin, the cervix was threaded to evaluate the effect of the maneuver on CL viability. No significant differences were observed in mean progesterone concentrations between groups (P>0.05). Experiment II (effect of depositing PBS): females (n=66) were randomly assigned into six groups (n=10 per group and control group: n=6) to evaluate the effect of depositing PBS in different sites in the uterus in relation to the localization of the CL: group 'Left-Ipsilateral': transcervical placing of PBS in the left uterine horn (CL in left ovary); group 'Left-Contralateral': transcervical placing of PBS in the left uterine horn (CL in right ovary); group 'Right-Ipsilateral': transcervical placing of PBS in the right uterine horn (CL in right ovary); group 'Body-Left': transcervical placing of PBS in the uterine body (CL in left ovary); group 'Body-Right': transcervical placing of PBS in the uterine body (CL in right ovary) and control group. Corpus luteum activity was evaluated in all groups by measuring plasma progesterone concentrations. On Day 6 post-buserelin, the corresponding maneuver was carried out according to the group. No significant differences were found for the mean plasma progesterone concentrations between groups (P>0.05). Experiment III (effect of ET on CL viability): females (n=22) were used as embryo donors and 50 females as recipients, in order to evaluate if placing the embryo in different areas of the uterus influences CL viability. Recipients were randomly divided into five groups, according to the place in the uterus where the ET was conducted with respect to the ovary where ovulation occurred: group 'Left-Ipsilateral': ET in the left uterine horn (CL in left ovary); group 'Left-Contralateral': ET in the left uterine horn (CL in right ovary); group 'Right-Ipsilateral': ET in the right uterine horn (CL in right ovary); group 'Body-Left': ET in the uterine body (CL in left ovary) and group 'Body-Right': ET in the uterine body (CL in right ovary). Corpus luteum activity was evaluated in all groups by measuring plasma progesterone concentrations. Embryos were recovered by flushing the uterus on Day 8 after the first mating of the donor and transcervical ET was carried out in recipients 6 days after buserelin administration. Pregnancy rates were: group 'Left-Ipsilateral': 50%; group 'Left-Contralateral': 20%; group 'Right-Ipsilateral': 30%; group 'Body-Left' and 'Body-Right': 10%. No significant differences (P=0.4728) were detected between the pregnancy rates in the five groups. Threading the cervix and transcervical placing of PBS either in the uterine horns or the body did not affect plasma progesterone concentrations in the llama, indicating that the different embryo transfer maneuvers do not interfere with CL viability. To improve pregnancy rates it could be suggested that ET in the left uterine horn with an ipsilateral CL, is the most desirable option.
authors.affiliation: Instituto de Investigación y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. vtrasorras@fvet.uba.ar
authors.forename: Virginia
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Trasorras
authors.forename: María Graciela
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Chaves
authors.forename: Deborah
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Neild
authors.forename: Mariana
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gambarotta
authors.forename: Marcelo
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Aba
authors.forename: Alicia
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Agüero
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002064:Buserelin / Q000008:administration & dosage; D002161:Camelids, New World / Q000502:physiology*; D003338:Corpus Luteum / Q000502:physiology*; D004624:Embryo Transfer / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D005260:Female; D010053:Ovary; D010062:Ovulation Induction / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary; D011247:Pregnancy; D011374:Progesterone / Q000097:blood; D014599:Uterus
chemical_list: D011374:Progesterone; D002064:Buserelin