title: What about a Disability Rights Act for Canada?: Practices and lessons from America, Australia, and the United Kingdom.
abstract: The Harper government and most national political parties are committed to a federal act for dealing with accessibility rights for persons with disabilities. The purpose of this article is to identify progressive lessons from countries with similar legislation for consideration by Canadian authorities. Countries surveyed are the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. While disability rights legislation is widely accepted to be a necessary policy initiative in light of ongoing barriers and exclusion, experience suggests that such laws are far from a sufficient response to promote access. Other policy instruments required include supportive employment programs, tax incentives, and the direct provision of basic supports.
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Prince
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia / Q000208:ethnology; D002170:Canada / Q000208:ethnology; D002961:Civil Rights / Q000191:economics / Q000193:education / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000193:education / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D035082:Federal Government / Q000266:history; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D007878:Legislation as Topic / Q000191:economics / Q000266:history; D011057:Politics; D011639:Public Opinion / Q000266:history; D011640:Public Policy / Q000191:economics / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012941:Social Responsibility; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000208:ethnology; D014481:United States / Q000208:ethnology