Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during phaco-emulsification and intraocular lens implantation: national survey of smaller eye units in England.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the commonest routinely used perioperative antibiotic, the preferred route of administration and the choice of antibiotic in 'penicillin allergy' by consultant ophthalmic surgeons in England.


METHODS
A postal survey was conducted, between December 2008 and April 2009, among consultant ophthalmic surgeons working in smaller National Health Service Ophthalmic departments in England. Smaller units were defined by having a maximum of eight consultant surgeons and tend to be based in district general hospitals. The questionnaires were sent to all consultant ophthalmic surgeons irrespective of special interests. The three questions asked were: (i) Which antibiotic(s) do you use routinely for phaco-emulsification and intraocular lens implantation? (ii) What is your usual route of administration? and (iii) Which antibiotic(s) do you use when the patient states that they have 'penicillin allergy'?


RESULTS
The questionnaire was sent to 401 consultant ophthalmic surgeons and 262 consultants (65.34%) replied. Further analysis showed, 44.7% used only intracameral cefuroxime, 31.7% used only subconjunctival cefuroxime, 2.3% used only subconjunctival gentamicin, 6.9% used subconjunctival gentamicin or cefuroxime, 0.4% used subconjunctival cefotaxime, 0.4% used subconjunctival ceftazidime and 0.8% used no antibiotic prophylaxis. One hundred and three (37%) used cefuroxime in patients allergic to penicillin and 47% switched to gentamicin in this situation.


CONCLUSIONS
Routine phaco-emulsification and intraocular lens implantation is the commonest elective surgical procedure undertaken in the National Health Service and yet there is a wide variation in the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with or without 'penicillin allergy' despite The European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons recommendations in 2007. Less than half of the surgeons working in smaller ophthalmic units routinely used intracameral cefuroxime and in 'penicillin allergy' only one-third used cefuroxime. This survey highlights the reluctance of using cefuroxime in patients allergic to penicillin despite evidence to the contrary.
Nanavaty
Mayank A
MA
Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, East Sussex, UK. mayank_nanavaty@hotmail.com
Wearne
Michael J
MJ
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002511:Cephalosporins / Q000627:therapeutic use; D000075202:Contraindications; D004342:Drug Hypersensitivity / Q000453:epidemiology; D009877:Endophthalmitis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D004739:England / Q000453:epidemiology; D015818:Eye Infections, Bacterial / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D019654:Lens Implantation, Intraocular / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D009885:Ophthalmology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010406:Penicillins; D018918:Phacoemulsification / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D002511:Cephalosporins; D010406:Penicillins