Empowering members, not overpowering them: the National Organization for Women, calls for lesbian inclusion, and California influence, 1960s-1980s.
Standard accounts of the National Organization for Women (NOW) seriously underplay the duration of tensions between heterosexual and lesbian NOW members and the ways those tensions included both racialized analogies and tactical concerns. Based on personal papers, archival sources, interviews, and a re-evaluation of printed sources, I argue that by considering the perspective of national, state, and local lesbian feminist NOW members, we see tensions from the 1960s through the 1980s that have been missed by studies that focus either on NOW or on the growth of lesbian feminism or on second-wave feminist development generally. To legitimize their position, White lesbian feminists analogized their oppression with that of racial minorities while claiming to be better feminists than heterosexual women. Their approach is significant to conceptualizing the scope of feminist issues and tactics, the ways White women's discussion of race exacerbated racial divisions, and the fate of the Equal Rights Amendment.
Pomerleau
Clark A
CA
Department of History, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203-0650, USA. capomerleau@unt.edu
D002140:California; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism / Q000266:history*; D020010:Heterosexuality; D049673:History, 20th Century; D018452:Homosexuality, Female / Q000266:history*; D006801:Humans; D009939:Organizations, Nonprofit / Q000266:history*; D014933:Women's Rights / Q000266:history*