In vivo modulation of foreign body response on polyurethane by surface entrapment technique.
Implanted polymeric materials, such as medical devices, provoke the body to initiate an inflammatory reaction, known as the foreign body response (FBR), which causes several complications. In this study, polyurethane (Tecoflex®, PU) surface modified with the nonionic surfactant Tween80® (PU/T80) and the cell adhesive PLL-RGD peptide (PU/PLL-RGD) by a previously described entrapment technique were implanted in the peritoneal cavity of Wistar rats for 30 days. Implants were retrieved and examined for tissue reactivity and cellular adherence by various microscopic and analytical techniques. Surface-induced inflammatory response was assessed by real-time PCR based quantification of proinflammatory cytokine transcripts, namely, TNF-α and IL-1β, normalized to housekeeping gene GAPDH. Cellular adherence and their distribution profile were assessed by microscopic examination of H&E stained implant sections. It was observed that PU/PLL-RGD followed by the bare PU surface exhibited severe inflammatory and fibrotic response with an average mean thickness of 19 and 12 μm, respectively, in 30 days. In contrast, PU/T80 surface showed only a cellular monolayer of 2-3 μm in thickness, with a mild inflammatory response and no fibrotic encapsulation. The PU/PLL-RGD peptide-modified substrate promoted an enhanced rate of macrophage cell fusion to form foreign body giant cell (FBGCs), whereas FBGCs were rarely observed on Tween80®-modified substrate. The expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β) were upregulated on PU/PLL-RGD surface followed by bare PU, whereas the cytokine expressions were significantly suppressed on PU/T80 surface. Thus, our study highlights modulation of foreign body response on polyurethane surfaces through surface entrapment technique in the form of differential responses observed on PLL-RGD and Tween80® modified surfaces with the former effective in triggering tissue cell adhesion thereby fibrous encapsulation, while the later being mostly resistant to this phenomenon.
Khandwekar
Anand P
AP
Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India.
Patil
Deepak P
DP
Hardikar
Anand A
AA
Shouche
Yogesh S
YS
Doble
Mukesh
M
D000818:Animals; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D002448:Cell Adhesion; D005549:Foreign-Body Reaction / Q000276:immunology*; D020007:Implants, Experimental; D053583:Interleukin-1beta / Q000235:genetics / Q000276:immunology; D008264:Macrophages / Q000166:cytology / Q000502:physiology; D008422:Materials Testing; D009842:Oligopeptides / Q000737:chemistry / Q000276:immunology; D011107:Polylysine / Q000737:chemistry / Q000276:immunology; D011136:Polysorbates / Q000737:chemistry; D011140:Polyurethanes / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D013499:Surface Properties; D013501:Surface-Active Agents / Q000737:chemistry; D014409:Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / Q000235:genetics / Q000276:immunology
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D053583:Interleukin-1beta; D009842:Oligopeptides; D011136:Polysorbates; D011140:Polyurethanes; D013501:Surface-Active Agents; D014409:Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; D011107:Polylysine; C062725:Tecoflex; C047981:arginyl-glycyl-aspartic acid