title: Commentary: models of academic-clinical partnerships: goods, better, best.
abstract: Elsewhere in this issue, Ovseiko and colleagues discuss organizational models for emerging academic health science centers (AHSCs) in England. In this commentary, the authors consider the advantages, or "goods," to organizing educational, clinical, and research missions within the AHSC model. Cultivating relationships among the three central missions of academic medicine yields good results for clinicians, trainees, patients, researchers, and communities, but it can also inspire all stakeholders to strive for better results. After outlining some of these benefits of current AHSC models, like those common in the United States, the authors discuss how close collaboration between U.S. and U.K. AHSC leaders could foster sharing of best practices and ultimately lead to better performance at AHSCs-emerging and established-in both nations. Providing excellent health care begins with developing the best organizational models for AHSCs, and identifying and pursuing such models should be a top priority.
authors.forename: Herbert
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Pardes
authors.forename: Harold Alan
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Pincus
mesh_terms: D000046:Academic Medical Centers / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D010317:Partnership Practice / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014481:United States