title: Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate a multimodality computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme that combines image information from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for computerized breast cancer classification.
  
  
  METHODS
  From a retrospective FFDM database with 432 lesions (255 malignant, 177 benign) and a retrospective DCE-MRI database including 476 lesions (347 malignant, 129 benign), we constructed a multimodality dataset of 213 lesions (168 malignant, 45 benign). Each lesion was present on both FFDM and DCE-MRI images and deemed to be a difficult case given the necessity of having both clinical imaging exams. Using a manually indicated lesion location (ie, a seed point on FFDM images or a region of interest on DCE-MRI images, the computer automatically segmented the mass lesions and extracted lesion features). A subset of features was selected using linear stepwise feature selection and merged by a Bayesian artificial neural network to yield an estimate of the probability of malignancy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the selected features in distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions.
  
  
  RESULTS
  With leave-one-lesion-out cross-validation on the multimodality dataset, the mammography-only features yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.74 +/- 0.04, and the DCE-MRI-only features yielded an AUC of 0.78 +/- 0.04. The combination of these two modalities, which included a spiculation feature from mammography and two kinetic features from DCE-MRI, yielded an AUC of 0.87 +/- 0.03. The improvement of combining multimodality information was statistically significant as compared to the use of single modality information alone.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A CAD scheme that combines features extracted from FFDM and DCE-MRI images may be advantageous to single-modality CAD in the task of differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. yading@uchicago.edu
authors.forename: Yading
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Yuan
authors.forename: Maryellen L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Giger
authors.forename: Hui
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Neha
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Bhooshan
authors.forename: Charlene A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Sennett
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001185:Artificial Intelligence; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008327:Mammography / Q000379:methods*; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013382:Subtraction Technique