title: [Life without robots : What is left for the urologist?].
abstract: The triumphal march of robots in urology seems to be unstoppable. In the meantime, a broadening of the scope for indications in urology can be observed: this applies to pyeloplasty and to a lesser degree also to partial nephrectomy and radical cystectomy. As yet no evidence has been provided that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) is superior to open surgery. Furthermore, data are available which suggest that the midterm functional results are possibly even worse than those achieved with open RP.
authors.affiliation: Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Strasse 6, 18055, Rostock, Deutschland. oliver.hakenberg@med.uni-rostock.de
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Hakenberg
mesh_terms: D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000639:trends*; D012371:Robotics / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends*; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends*; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends*