Health technology appraisal and the courts: accountability for reasonableness and the judicial model of procedural justice.
Recommendations issued by agencies undertaking appraisals of health technologies at the national level may impact upon the availability of certain treatments and services in some publicly funded health systems, and, as such, have regularly been subject to challenge, including by way of litigation. In addition to expertise in the evaluation of evidence, fairness of procedures has been identified as a necessary component of a claim to legitimacy in such circumstances. This article analyses the assessment of courts in three jurisdictions of the fairness of decision-making by such agencies and evaluates the judicial reading of procedural justice developed in this particular context against the conditions of 'accountability for reasonableness'.
Syrett
Keith
K
Reader in Public Law and Health Policy, School of Law, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Clifton, Bristol, UK.
D001315:Australia; D003657:Decision Making; D004739:England; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D009520:New Zealand; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014852:Wales