title: Ancestral state reconstruction reveals multiple independent evolution of diagnostic morphological characters in the "Higher Oribatida" (Acari), conflicting with current classification schemes.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The use of molecular genetic data in phylogenetic systematics has revolutionized this field of research in that several taxonomic groupings defined by traditional taxonomic approaches have been rejected by molecular data. The taxonomic classification of the oribatid mite group Circumdehiscentiae ("Higher Oribatida") is largely based on morphological characters and several different classification schemes, all based upon the validity of diagnostic morphological characters, have been proposed by various authors. The aims of this study were to test the appropriateness of the current taxonomic classification schemes for the Circumdehiscentiae and to trace the evolution of the main diagnostic traits (the four nymphal traits scalps, centrodorsal setae, sclerits and wrinkled cuticle plus octotaxic system and pteromorphs both in adults) on the basis of a molecular phylogenetic hypothesis by means of parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian approaches.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The molecular phylogeny based on three nuclear markers (28S rDNA, ef-1alpha, hsp82) revealed considerable discrepancies to the traditional classification of the five "circumdehiscent" subdivisions, suggesting paraphyly of the three families Scutoverticidae, Ameronothridae, Cymbaeremaeidae and also of the genus Achipteria. Ancestral state reconstructions of six common diagnostic characters and statistical evaluation of alternative phylogenetic hypotheses also partially rejected the current morphology-based classification and suggested multiple convergent evolution (both gain and loss) of some traits, after a period of rapid cladogenesis, rendering several subgroups paraphyletic.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Phylogenetic studies revealed non-monophyly of three families and one genus as a result of a lack of adequate synapomorphic morphological characters, calling for further detailed investigations in a framework of integrative taxonomy. Character histories of six morphological traits indicate that their evolution followed a rather complex pattern of multiple independent gains (and losses). Thus, the observed pattern largely conflicts with current morphological classifications of the Circumdehiscentiae, suggesting that the current taxonomic classification schemes are not appropriate, apart from a recently proposed subdivision into 24 superfamilies.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Zoology, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria. sylvia.schaeffer@uni-graz.at
authors.forename: Sylvia
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Schäffer
authors.forename: Stephan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Koblmüller
authors.forename: Tobias
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Pfingstl
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sturmbauer
authors.forename: Günther
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Krisper
mesh_terms: D000053:Acari / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics; D000818:Animals; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D002467:Cell Nucleus / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D010802:Phylogeny; D016415:Sequence Alignment; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA