title: Are medical outcomes fungible? A survey of voters, medical administrators, and physicians.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Many analyses of medical treatments entail the aggregation of health outcomes over patients and over time. This study assessed the extent to which voters, medical administrators, and physicians consider such aggregation to be appropriate. In addition, the study assessed whether this perceived fungibility of outcomes moderates the difference between treatment recommendations in single-play decisions (for 1 patient on 1 occasion) and those in repeated-play decisions (for several patients or for 1 patient on several occasions).
  
  
  METHODS
  In a 5-contact mail survey of registered voters (n = 182, response rate = 52%), medical administrators (n = 123, 35%), and physicians (n = 95, 26%), respondents rated the fungibility of outcomes and indicated their preferred action in 1 of 3 scenarios involving changes in life expectancy or the duration of pain. They evaluated a risky, positive-expected-value treatment in a single-play decision, then in a repeated-play decision, and again in a repeated-play decision after they viewed the distribution of possible net outcomes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Perceived fungibility varied substantially across respondents in all groups, with voters giving higher fungibility ratings than administrators or physicians. Respondents' strength-of-preference ratings for treatment increased from single-play to repeated-play decisions, but these increases were moderated by perceived fungibility, as expected. When outcomes were considered fungible, treatments were much more attractive in repeated-play decisions than in single-play decisions. When outcomes were considered nonfungible, there was essentially no difference between single- and repeated-play decisions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Recommendations regarding risky medical treatments with positive expectations appear to depend, in part, on opinions about whether it is reasonable to aggregate medical outcomes over patients or over time. Such opinions vary widely among physicians and others.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. dekay.3@osu.edu
authors.forename: Michael L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: DeKay
mesh_terms: D000288:Administrative Personnel; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003625:Data Collection; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010820:Physicians; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult