Assessment of surgical competence in North American graduate periodontics programs: a survey of current practices.
This cross-sectional study was designed to document the methods utilized by North American graduate periodontics programs in assessing their residents' surgical skills. A survey of clinical skills assessment was mailed to directors of all fifty-eight graduate periodontics programs in Canada and the United States. Thirty-four programs (59 percent) responded. The data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 15.0. The results demonstrate that the most common practice for providing feedback and documenting residents' surgical skills in the programs surveyed was daily one-on-one verbal feedback given by an instructor. The next two most commonly reported methods were a standard checklist developed at program level and a combination of a checklist and verbal comments. The majority of the programs reported that the instructors met collectively once per term to evaluate the residents' progress. The results suggest that graduate periodontics programs provide their residents frequent opportunities for daily practice with verbal feedback from instructors. However, assessment strategies identified in other health professions as beneficial in fostering the integration of clinical skills practices are not employed.
Ghiabi
Edmond
E
Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, 5981 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 1W2. eghiabi@dal.ca
Taylor
K Lynn
KL
D002170:Canada; D057189:Checklist; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004499:Education, Dental, Graduate / Q000379:methods*; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D010517:Periodontics / Q000193:education*; D013515:Surgery, Oral / Q000193:education*; D014481:United States