title: Picture detection in rapid serial visual presentation: features or identity?
abstract: A pictured object can be readily detected in a rapid serial visual presentation sequence when the target is specified by a superordinate category name such as animal or vehicle. Are category features the initial basis for detection, with identification of the specific object occurring in a second stage (Evans & Treisman, 2005), or is identification of the object the basis for detection? When 2 targets in the same superordinate category are presented successively (lag 1), only the identification-first hypothesis predicts lag 1 sparing of the second target. The results of 2 experiments with novel pictures and a wide range of categories supported the identification-first hypothesis and a transient-attention model of lag 1 sparing and the attentional blink (Wyble, Bowman, & Potter, 2009).
authors.affiliation: Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. mpotter@mit.edu
authors.forename: Mary C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Potter
authors.forename: Brad
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Wyble
authors.forename: Rijuta
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pandav
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Olejarczyk
mesh_terms: D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003118:Color Perception; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D012691:Serial Learning