title: Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of self-ligating (SL) and conventionally ligated (CL) brackets during the first 20 weeks of extraction treatment.
  
  
  METHODS
  Study models of 50 consecutive patients who had premolar extractions in the maxillary and/or mandibular arch, 0.022 x 0.028-in slot brackets, and similar archwire sequences were examined. Forty-four arches received SL Damon 3MX brackets (Ormco, Glendora, Calif), and 40 arches received either CL Victory Series (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) or Mini-Diamond (Ormco) brackets. The models were evaluated for anterior arch alignment, extraction spaces, and arch dimensions at pretreatment (T0), 10 weeks (T1), and 20 weeks (T2).
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no significant differences between the SL and CL groups at 20 weeks in irregularity scores (mandibular arch, P = 0.54; maxillary arch, P = 0.81). There were no significant differences in passive extraction space closures between the SL and CL groups (mandibular arch, T0-T2, P = 0.85; maxillary arch, T0-T2, P = 0.33). Mandibular intercanine widths increased from T0 to T2: 1.96 and 2.86 mm in the SL and CL groups, respectively. This was not significant between the groups (P = 0.31). Logistic regression did not show a difference between the SL and CL bracket groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  SL brackets were no more efficient than CL brackets in anterior alignment or passive extraction space closure during the first 20 weeks of treatment. Ligation technique is only one of many factors that can influence the efficiency of treatment. Similar changes in arch dimensions occurred, irrespective of bracket type, that might be attributed to the archform of the archwires.
authors.affiliation: Discipline of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Ong
authors.forename: Hugh
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: McCallum
authors.forename: Mark P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Griffin
authors.forename: Christopher
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ho
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D004526:Efficiency; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible; D008437:Maxilla; D003765:Models, Dental; D016382:Orthodontic Appliance Design; D016910:Orthodontic Brackets; D019516:Orthodontic Space Closure / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D009969:Orthodontic Wires; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D014087:Tooth Movement Techniques / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods