Effect of hospital and surgeon volume on patient outcomes following treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review assessed the efficacy of centralisation for the treatment of unruptured and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Patient outcomes achieved by low and high volume hospitals/surgeons, including morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay, were used as proxy measures of efficacy.


METHODS
Systematic review was designed to identify, assess and report on peer-reviewed articles reporting outcomes from unruptured and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. No language restriction was placed on the databases searched.


METHODS
Only peer-reviewed journals articles were included.


METHODS
To ensure the contemporary nature of this review, only studies published between January 1997 and June 2007 were sought. Studies were included if they reported on at least one volume type and patient outcome.


RESULTS
Twenty two studies were included in this review. In the majority of group assessments, the number of studies reporting statistical significance was similar to the number of studies reporting no statistical significance.


CONCLUSIONS
The paucity of studies reporting statistically significant results demonstrates that although this evidence exists, its potential to be overstated must also be taken into account when drawing conclusions as to its efficacy for twenty first century healthcare systems.
Marlow
N E
NE
Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Barraclough
B
B
Collier
N A
NA
Dickinson
I C
IC
Fawcett
J
J
Graham
J C
JC
Maddern
G J
GJ
D017544:Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000601:surgery*; D006761:Hospitals / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D010820:Physicians / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014656:Vascular Surgical Procedures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*