A dual-process account of auditory change detection.
Listeners can be "deaf" to a substantial change in a scene comprising multiple auditory objects unless their attention has been directed to the changed object. It is unclear whether auditory change detection relies on identification of the objects in pre- and post-change scenes. We compared the rates at which listeners correctly identify changed objects with those predicted by change-detection models based on signal detection theory (SDT) and high-threshold theory (HTT). Detected changes were not identified as accurately as predicted by models based on either theory, suggesting that some changes are detected by a process that does not support change identification. Undetected changes were identified as accurately as predicted by the HTT model but much less accurately than predicted by the SDT models. The process underlying change detection was investigated further by determining receiver-operating characteristics (ROCs). ROCs did not conform to those predicted by either a SDT or a HTT model but were well modeled by a dual-process that incorporated HTT and SDT components. The dual-process model also accurately predicted the rates at which detected and undetected changes were correctly identified.
McAnally
Ken I
KI
Air Operations Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Melbourne, Australia. ken.mcanally@dsto.defence.gov.au
Martin
Russell L
RL
Eramudugolla
Ranmalee
R
Stuart
Geoffrey W
GW
Irvine
Dexter R F
DR
Mattingley
Jason B
JB
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D001307:Auditory Perception; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008960:Models, Psychological; D012372:ROC Curve; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D055815:Young Adult