title: Public awareness in New Zealand of animal welfare legislation relating to cats.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To ascertain the levels of awareness of legislation governing the welfare of cats, and provision of basic care, including vaccination, by cat owners within two locations in New Zealand. To assess the ability of respondents to differentiate between the terms 'stray' and 'feral'.
  
  
  METHODS
  A face-to-face questionnaire, consisting of 12 questions in three sections, was distributed by volunteers within Auckland (n=255) and Kaitaia (n=99) to gather information pertinent to the study's aims. Section 1 covered respondents' personal details; Section 2, ownership and care of cats, including whether or not the cats were vaccinated against feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukaemia virus (FeLV); and Section 3, awareness of legislation and differences between the terms 'stray' and 'feral'.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, fewer than half of respondents were aware of the animal welfare legislation within New Zealand or the semantic differences between the terms 'stray' and 'feral' as they appear in the dictionary. Respondents >or=41 years old, and individuals employed in the animal-related sector, were significantly more likely to be aware of the legislation and make the correct distinction between the terms compared with those aged <or=40, and those working in a non-animal-related profession. A significantly greater percentage of cat owners (42%) provided care for cats they did not own compared with non-owners (26%). Results also indicated a large majority of cat owners may consider standard annual vaccinations to include vaccination against FIV and FeLV.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Dissemination of information about animal welfare legislation is important for the care of cats within New Zealand, and the definitions of the terms 'stray' and 'feral' need to be more clearly stated in order to prevent confusion. This is especially important when cats may be controlled using lethal measures under different legislative precedents that are not necessarily consistent with one another.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Veterinary clinics may act as a primary source for the dissemination of information about relevant welfare acts as well as preventative health care, thus improving the welfare of cats. Cat owners need to be better educated about the diseases covered by annual vaccination.
authors.affiliation: Department of Natural Sciences, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. mfarnworth@unitec.ac.nz
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Farnworth
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: N J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Adams
mesh_terms: D017087:Animal Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D000827:Animal Welfare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats; D009520:New Zealand; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014611:Vaccination