title: Conservation of forest birds: evidence of a shifting baseline in community structure.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Quantifying changes in forest bird diversity is an essential task for developing effective conservation actions. When subtle changes in diversity accumulate over time, annual comparisons may offer an incomplete perspective of changes in diversity. In this case, progressive change, the comparison of changes in diversity from a baseline condition, may offer greater insight because changes in diversity are assessed over longer periods of times. Our objectives were to determine how forest bird diversity has changed over time and whether those changes were associated with forest disturbance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We used North American Breeding Bird Survey data, a time series of Landsat images classified with respect to land cover change, and mixed-effects models to associate changes in forest bird community structure with forest disturbance, latitude, and longitude in the conterminous United States for the years 1985 to 2006. We document a significant divergence from the baseline structure for all birds of similar migratory habit and nest location, and all forest birds as a group from 1985 to 2006. Unexpectedly, decreases in progressive similarity resulted from small changes in richness (<1 species per route for the 22-year study period) and modest losses in abundance (-28.7 - -10.2 individuals per route) that varied by migratory habit and nest location. Forest disturbance increased progressive similarity for Neotropical migrants, permanent residents, ground nesting, and cavity nesting species. We also documented highest progressive similarity in the eastern United States.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Contemporary forest bird community structure is changing rapidly over a relatively short period of time (e.g., approximately 22 years). Forest disturbance and forest regeneration are primary factors associated with contemporary forest bird community structure, longitude and latitude are secondary factors, and forest loss is a tertiary factor. Importantly, these findings suggest some regions of the United States may already fall below the habitat amount threshold where fragmentation effects become important predictors of forest bird community structure.
authors.affiliation: Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America. cdrittenhous@wisc.edu
authors.forename: Chadwick D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Rittenhouse
authors.forename: Anna M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Pidgeon
authors.forename: Thomas P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Albright
authors.forename: Patrick D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Culbert
authors.forename: Murray K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Clayton
authors.forename: Curtis H
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Flather
authors.forename: Chengquan
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: Jeffrey G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Masek
authors.forename: Susan I
authors.initials: SI
authors.lastname: Stewart
authors.forename: Volker C
authors.initials: VC
authors.lastname: Radeloff
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D001717:Birds; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D016208:Databases, Factual; D014197:Trees