Decision support in urban water management based on generic scenarios: the example of NoMix technology.
Urine source separation (NoMix technology) followed by processing the concentrated nutrient solution has the potential to become a cost-efficient alternative to conventional end-of-pipe nutrient elimination. A choice of processing technologies can only be made for specific scenarios, and there is currently no methodology for analyzing generic situations. In setting up a formalized decision-support methodology (based on STEEPLED analysis), we discuss how to create such generic scenarios, how to couple them with process engineering objectives, how to define the technology requirements, and finally how to produce a realistic subset of technology alternatives. The methodology is tested in five real scenarios. We also touch on the criteria for a final choice of technology taking into account large uncertainties about the performance of real technologies. We conclude that technology development is one of the most important requirements for implementing urine source separation in practice. There is an urgent need to develop cost-efficient processing technologies that satisfy the requirements of stakeholders.
Larsen
Tove A
TA
Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland. larsen@eawag.ch
Maurer
Max
M
Eggen
Rik I L
RI
Pronk
Wouter
W
Lienert
Judit
J
D001315:Australia; D002681:China; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D005308:Fertilizers; D006707:Homes for the Aged; D006798:Housing; D006920:Hygiene; D012037:Refuse Disposal / Q000379:methods*; D013557:Switzerland; D014505:Urban Population; D014556:Urine; D014876:Water Pollution / Q000517:prevention & control; D014881:Water Supply
D005308:Fertilizers