[To cure: to become oneself or become different?].
The parallel evolution of lifestyles and medicine calls into question the objectives of the therapeutical relationship. Leading-edge technology, the allotransplant radically questions what curing means: is it about becoming oneself again or another person? This paper studies this dilemma from three standpoints. First, in an aesthetics perspective, the transplant surgery refers to an implicit definition of what is an acceptable body, which introduces a tension between vascular supply, immunology and beauty. How far can we favour one or the other? Secondly, in a religious perspective, transplant contributes to the mimetic desire: how can we regulate this desire in a society that increasingly values the body? Finally, from a philosophical standpoint, allotransplant questions my personal relationship with my body: beyond its technological requirements, we have to determine, in the public and private spheres, if individuals have or are bodies. What responsibility does medicine assume, as an institution and a community of agents, in this anthropological choice?
Carvallo
S
S
LEPS-EA, université de Lyon-I, Ecully, France. Sarah.Carvallo@ec-lyon.fr
D000885:Anthropology, Physical / Q000941:ethics; D004954:Esthetics; D006801:Humans; D010684:Philosophy; D011788:Quality of Life; D012067:Religion; D014184:Transplantation, Homologous / Q000941:ethics*