The use of vignettes within a Delphi exercise: a useful approach in empirical ethics?
There has been an increase in recent years in the use of empirical methods in healthcare ethics. Appeals to empirical data cannot answer moral questions, but insights into the knowledge, attitudes, experience, preferences and practice of interested parties can play an important part in the development of healthcare ethics. In particular, while we may establish a general ethical principle to provide explanatory and normative guidance for healthcare professionals, the interpretation and application of such general principles to actual practice still requires interpretation and judgement. And many situations in healthcare practice are complex and may involve a variety of principles, each of which may conflict with the others. Simple surveys or interview studies may not be sufficient if we wish to develop a nuanced approach to ethical practice that can be set out in guidelines, codes or directives. We do not resolve moral questions by plebiscite. In this paper, the authors argue for the use of consensus methods to develop shared understanding of ethical practice, and they argue further for the combination of the Delphi method with the use of vignettes to illustrate the kind of situations that may occur in practice. They develop their argument in part by reference to their experience of using this approach in their recent research.
Wainwright
Paul
P
Kingston University and St George's University of London, Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston, UK.
Gallagher
Ann
A
Tompsett
Hilary
H
Atkins
Christine
C
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003697:Delphi Technique; D036262:Empirical Research; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans