title: Longitudinal research with sexual assault survivors: a methodological review.
abstract: Longitudinal research designs are relatively rare in the academic literature on rape and sexual assault despite their tremendous methodological rigor and scientific utility. In the interest of promoting wider use of such methods, we conducted a methodological review of projects that have used prospective longitudinal designs to study the occurrence of sexual victimization throughout the lifespan and/or the process of change during rape recovery (N = 32 projects). Five questions were examined: (a) What were the substantive foci of these longitudinal studies? (b) How were survivors recruited? (c) What participation rates were typical? (d) How long were participants followed over time and with what success rates? and (e) What incentives were used to increase participation? Most studies focused on postassault sequelae and recruited survivors from hospital emergency departments and other first-response help-seeking sites with highly variable participation rates. Retention rates were comparable across studies (approximately 70%).
authors: Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1116, USA. rmc@msu.edu
authors: Rebecca
authors: R
authors: Campbell
authors: Heather Brown
authors: HB
authors: Sprague
authors: Sara
authors: S
authors: Cottrill
authors: Cris M
authors: CM
authors: Sullivan
mesh_terms: D019548:Crime Victims / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies / Q000379:methods*; D009042:Motivation; D035842:Research Subjects; D012742:Sex Offenses / Q000523:psychology; D017741:Survivors / Q000523:psychology