An evaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo.
Five alternative techniques, each of which had been successfully used by one of the participating companies, were evaluated in the assessment of the eye-irritation potential of 32 samples. The 32 samples included chemical ingredients and preparations from household cleaning product, personal care, and cosmetic categories. Historical data from rabbit eye irritation tests in vivo existed for each sample; it was therefore not necessary to carry out any tests in vivo as part of this evaluation exercise. The five alternative methods used were the silicon microphysiometer test, the Microtox test, the neutral red uptake assay, the chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) and the hen egg test-chorioallantoic membrane assay (HETCAM). Three of the assays were conducted in two laboratories, allowing an interlaboratory comparison of performance to be made. The CAMVA assay was carried out on 10-day-old as well as on 14-day-old fertile eggs. Correlations between the data sets in vivo and in vitro were determined for the five assays. The results demonstrated that for the materials tested, all of the assays show some promise as alternative methods to the rabbit eye test in vivo in the prediction of eye irritation, and that the reproducibility of results of those techniques carried out in two laboratories was very good. The results from 14-day and 10-day CAMVA assays were virtually identical. It is recommended that a larger-scale validation exercise be carried out to demonstrate the ultimate usefulness of these alternative procedures in the safety evaluation process.
Bagley
D M
DM
Colgate-Palmolive Co., 909 River Road, PO Box 1343, Piscataway, NJ 08855-1343, USA.
Bruner
L H
LH
de Silva
O
O
Cottin
M
M
O'Brien
K A
KA
Uttley
M
M
Walker
A P
AP