title: Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the assessment of carotid stenosis.
  
  
  METHODS
  DUS, CE-MRA and DSA were performed in 56 patients included in the Carotide-angiographie par résonance magnétique-échographie-doppler-angioscanner (CARMEDAS) multicenter study with a carotid stenosis ≥ 50%. Three readers evaluated stenoses on CE-MRA and DSA (NASCET criteria). Velocities criteria were used for stenosis estimation on DUS.
  
  
  RESULTS
  CE-MRA had a sensitivity and specificity of 96-98% and 66-83% respectively for carotid stenoses ≥ 50% and a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 76-84% respectively for carotid stenoses ≥ 70%. The interobserver agreement of CE-MRA was excellent, except for moderate stenoses (50-69%). DUS had a sensitivity and specificity of 88 and 75% respectively for carotid stenoses ≥ 50% and a sensitivity and specificity of 83 and 86% respectively for carotid stenoses ≥ 70%. Combined concordant CE-MRA and DUS had a sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 85-90% respectively for carotid stenoses ≥ 50% and a sensitivity and specificity of 96-100% and 80-87% respectively for carotid stenoses ≥ 70%. The positive predictive value of the association CE-MRA and DUS for carotid stenoses ≥ 70% is calculated between 77 and 82% while the negative predictive value is calculated between 97 and 100%. CE-MRA and DUS have concordant findings in 63-72%, and the overestimations cases were recorded only for carotid stenosis ≤ 69%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Combined DUS-CE-MRA is excellent for evaluation of severe stenosis but remains debatable in moderate stenosis (50-69%) due to the risk of overestimations.
authors: Department of Radiology, University Hospital Center, hôpital de la Cavale-Blanche, boulevard Tanguy-Prigent, 29609 Brest cedex, France.
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Nonent
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Ben Salem
authors: J-M
authors: JM
authors: Serfaty
authors: V
authors: V
authors: Buthion
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Pasco-Papon
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Rotaru
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Bressollette
authors: X
authors: X
authors: Papon
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Pachai
authors: J-O
authors: JO
authors: Fortrat
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Gouny
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Badra
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Berge
authors: Y
authors: Y
authors: Le Bras
authors: J-P
authors: JP
authors: Cottier
authors: J Y
authors: JY
authors: Gauvrit
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Douek
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016893:Carotid Stenosis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D003287:Contrast Media; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D018810:Magnetic Resonance Angiography; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D018608:Ultrasonography, Doppler
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media