Population health rankings as policy indicators and performance measures.
Population health rankings can be used by various actors for different purposes. This article examines those potential uses and concludes that the chief promise of population health rankings lies in 2 areas. The first is to help set agendas - stimulating awareness, motivation, and debate over means to improved health outcomes. The second is to help establish broad responsibility for population health and the need for multisectoral collaboration to improve outcomes. A new performance regime based on rankings will require more research to establish causal pathways and relative determinants of health, as well as stronger evidence about the effects of public and private interventions to guide investment strategies. Finally, leaders who develop and promote population health rankings must further develop the technical community needed to translate the response to the rankings into constructive public debate and policy development.
Oliver
Thomas R
TR
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, Madison, WI 53726, USA. troliver@wisc.edu
D003256:Community Participation; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D006292:Health Priorities; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D011634:Public Health / Q000592:standards*; D011640:Public Policy; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States