Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence.
In less than a decade, the widespread application of robotic technology to the field of urologic oncology has permanently altered the way urologists approach malignancy. The short-term benefits of minimally invasive surgery using robotic assistance (i.e., decreased blood loss, improved convalescence and ergonomic appeal), as well as a broad marketing campaign, have helped the technology gain traction in the field of urology. Although the long-term benefits of its use in urologic surgery are less clear and the costs of robotic surgery are consistently greater than those of other approaches, the numbers of prostate, kidney and bladder cancer cases continue to rise. Identifying transferable surgical processes of care that matter most for each of the robotic cases in urologic oncology (e.g., prostatectomy, cystectomy and partial nephrectomy) is a next step toward broadly improving the quality of urologic cancer care. To this end, urologic professional societies and their surgeons should aim to identify underwriters for and participate in large clinical registries and surgical quality collaboratives.
Skolarus
Ted A
TA
Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2967, USA.
Zhang
Yun
Y
Hollenbeck
Brent K
BK
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000191:economics; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012371:Robotics / Q000191:economics; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014571:Urologic Neoplasms / Q000191:economics / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*