title: Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: a randomized trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the feasibility, operative time, specimen retrieval time, and effect on postoperative pain of laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses between a 10-mm transumbilical and a 10-mm transabdominal port.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fifty women with adnexal masses who were scheduled for a laparoscopic procedure between July 2008 and April 2009 were enrolled. The patients were randomized into two groups; these were patients where a transumbilical port was used for specimen retrieval (transumbilical group, n=25) and patients where a transabdominal port was used for specimen retrieval (transabdominal group, n=25). Preoperative suspicion of malignancy and indications suggesting a need for hysterectomy or myomectomy were considered to be exclusion criteria. Randomization was centralized and computer-based. Patients recorded the severity of incisional pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) with 0 meaning no pain and 10 meaning unbearable pain.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, umbilical thickness, abdominal thickness, cyst size, cyst amount, cyst weight, histology, complications and duration of hospital stay when the two groups were compared. Patients in the transumbilical group had a significantly shorter specimen retrieval time (0.7 ± 1.8 min vs. 4.9 ± 12.6 min, p=0.006) and a significantly lower postoperative day (POD) 0 VAS pain score (5.2 ± 2.1 vs. 6.6 ± 2.2, p=0.015). Significantly fewer patients in the transumbilical group had a specimen retrieval time of ≥10 min (0% vs. 20%, p=0.025) and a POD 0 VAS pain score of >5 (36% vs. 84%, p<0.001). However, the average POD 1 VAS pain score (3.2 ± 1.8, vs. 3.6 ± 1.6) and the proportion with a POD 1 VAS pain score >5 (12% vs. 12%) were similar for the two groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  When laparoscopic surgery on benign adnexal masses is carried out using a 10-mm incision wound, removal of the specimen via the umbilical port has a shorter retrieval time and produces less postoperative pain than retrieval via a lateral abdominal port.
authors: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
authors: Li-Yun
authors: LY
authors: Chou
authors: Bor-Ching
authors: BC
authors: Sheu
authors: Daw-Yuan
authors: DY
authors: Chang
authors: Su-Cheng
authors: SC
authors: Huang
authors: Szu-Yu
authors: SY
authors: Chen
authors: Wen-Chiung
authors: WC
authors: Hsu
authors: Wen-Chun
authors: WC
authors: Chang
mesh_terms: D034861:Abdominal Wall / Q000601:surgery*; D000291:Adnexal Diseases / Q000601:surgery*; D000328:Adult; D003560:Cysts / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D010149:Postoperative Pain; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014472:Umbilicus / Q000601:surgery*