Was Wright right? The canonical genetic code is an empirical example of an adaptive peak in nature; deviant genetic codes evolved using adaptive bridges.
The canonical genetic code is on a sub-optimal adaptive peak with respect to its ability to minimize errors, and is close to, but not quite, optimal. This is demonstrated by the near-total adjacency of synonymous codons, the similarity of adjacent codons, and comparisons of frequency of amino acid usage with number of codons in the code for each amino acid. As a rare empirical example of an adaptive peak in nature, it shows adaptive peaks are real, not merely theoretical. The evolution of deviant genetic codes illustrates how populations move from a lower to a higher adaptive peak. This is done by the use of "adaptive bridges," neutral pathways that cross over maladaptive valleys by virtue of masking of the phenotypic expression of some maladaptive aspects in the genotype. This appears to be the general mechanism by which populations travel from one adaptive peak to another. There are multiple routes a population can follow to cross from one adaptive peak to another. These routes vary in the probability that they will be used, and this probability is determined by the number and nature of the mutations that happen along each of the routes. A modification of the depiction of adaptive landscapes showing genetic distances and probabilities of travel along their multiple possible routes would throw light on this important concept.
Seaborg
David M
DM
Foundation for Biological Conservation and Research, 1888 Pomar Way, Walnut Creek, CA 94598-1424, USA. davidseaborg@juno.com
D000220:Adaptation, Biological / Q000235:genetics*; D000818:Animals; D003210:Concept Formation; D036262:Empirical Research; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005815:Genetic Code / Q000502:physiology*; D014644:Genetic Variation / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D019368:Nature