Survival rate of immediately vs delayed loaded implants: analysis of the current literature.
Immediate loading of oral implants has been reported as a beneficial treatment protocol in implant dentistry that increases the comfort of the patient. However, documentation in the literature is poor regarding the clinical outcome and the peri-implant bone response of immediately loaded implants compared with the conventional loading protocol placed in different bone qualities. The aim of this report was to present the role of bone quality in the survival rate of implants using conventional or immediate loading according to the literature. A literature search analysis was performed to demonstrate the survival rate of immediately loaded implants, as well as data from the histologic and histomorphometric evaluation in comparison with conventional loaded implants. This analysis showed high survival rates of immediately loaded implants along with osseointegration, with high percentages of bone-to-implant contacts based on histologic evaluation from human and animal studies of immediately and conventionally loaded implants. This study may provide histologic and clinical evidence of the immediate loading protocol for different bone qualities.
Romanos
Georgios
G
Division of Periodontology, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Georgios_Romanos@urmc.rochester.edu
Froum
Stuart
S
Hery
Cyril
C
Cho
Sang-Choon
SC
Tarnow
Dennis
D
D000818:Animals; D015519:Bone Density; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous; D017268:Dental Prosthesis Retention; D019094:Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D006801:Humans; D016348:Osseointegration; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D016474:Weight-Bearing