title: Genetic affinities within a large global collection of pathogenic Leptospira: implications for strain identification and molecular epidemiology.
abstract: Leptospirosis is an important zoonosis with widespread human health implications. The non-availability of accurate identification methods for the individualization of different Leptospira for outbreak investigations poses bountiful problems in the disease control arena. We harnessed fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis (FAFLP) for Leptospira and investigated its utility in establishing genetic relationships among 271 isolates in the context of species level assignments of our global collection of isolates and strains obtained from a diverse array of hosts. In addition, this method was compared to an in-house multilocus sequence typing (MLST) method based on polymorphisms in three housekeeping genes, the rrs locus and two envelope proteins. Phylogenetic relationships were deduced based on bifurcating Neighbor-joining trees as well as median joining network analyses integrating both the FAFLP data and MLST based haplotypes. The phylogenetic relationships were also reproduced through Bayesian analysis of the multilocus sequence polymorphisms. We found FAFLP to be an important method for outbreak investigation and for clustering of isolates based on their geographical descent rather than by genome species types. The FAFLP method was, however, not able to convey much taxonomical utility sufficient to replace the highly tedious serotyping procedures in vogue. MLST, on the other hand, was found to be highly robust and efficient in identifying ancestral relationships and segregating the outbreak associated strains or otherwise according to their genome species status and, therefore, could unambiguously be applied for investigating phylogenetics of Leptospira in the context of taxonomy as well as gene flow. For instance, MLST was more efficient, as compared to FAFLP method, in clustering strains from the Andaman island of India, with their counterparts from mainland India and Sri Lanka, implying that such strains share genetic relationships and that leptospiral strains might be frequently circulating between the islands and the mainland.
authors.affiliation: Pathogen Biology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India.
authors.forename: Kishore
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Nalam
authors.forename: Ahmed
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ahmed
authors.forename: Sundru Manjulata
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Devi
authors.forename: Paolo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Francalacci
authors.forename: Mumtaz
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Baig
authors.forename: Leonardo A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Sechi
authors.forename: Rudy A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Hartskeerl
authors.forename: Niyaz
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Ahmed
mesh_terms: D051456:Gene Flow; D008040:Genetic Linkage; D016680:Genome, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D005838:Genotype; D006801:Humans; D007919:Leptospira / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000472:pathogenicity; D007922:Leptospirosis / Q000453:epidemiology*; D010802:Phylogeny; D012015:Reference Standards
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 17;95(6):3140-5
references.pmid: 9501229
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Jul 16;3(7):e2752
references.pmid: 18648538
references.citation: Infect Genet Evol. 2009 Sep;9(5):760-8
references.pmid: 19540362
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2004 Apr;186(7):2164-72
references.pmid: 15028702
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Feb 13;3(2):e1607
references.pmid: 18270594
references.citation: J Gen Microbiol. 1993 Aug;139(8):1691-700
references.pmid: 8409911
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 May;6(5):387-94
references.pmid: 18392032
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 08;7:214
references.pmid: 17996036
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Aug;42(8):3575-80
references.pmid: 15297500
references.citation: Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Mar;14(3):505-8
references.pmid: 18325275
references.citation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008 Apr 02;2(4):e213
references.pmid: 18382606
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2009;551:129-40
references.pmid: 19521872
references.citation: Trends Microbiol. 1999 Dec;7(12):482-7
references.pmid: 10603483
references.citation: Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999 Apr;49 Pt 2:839-58
references.pmid: 10319510
references.citation: Sci Transl Med. 2010 Jan 27;2(16):16ps4
references.pmid: 20371473
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Jun 09;4(6):e5831
references.pmid: 19513110
references.citation: Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998 Jul;48 Pt 3:851-8
references.pmid: 9734039
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2006 May;4(5):e88
references.pmid: 16683862
references.citation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007 Nov 07;1(2):e120
references.pmid: 18060079
references.citation: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Feb;102(2):117-22
references.pmid: 17991499
references.citation: Brief Bioinform. 2004 Jun;5(2):150-63
references.pmid: 15260895
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr;14(2):296-326
references.pmid: 11292640
references.citation: Lancet Infect Dis. 2003 Dec;3(12):757-71
references.pmid: 14652202
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:561-88
references.pmid: 16774461
references.citation: Genetics. 1995 Oct;141(2):743-53
references.pmid: 8647407
references.citation: Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Feb 1;40(3):343-51
references.pmid: 15668855
references.citation: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006 Nov 23;5:28
references.pmid: 17121682
references.citation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007 Oct 31;1(1):e56
references.pmid: 17989782
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2007 Jun 20;8:184
references.pmid: 17584914
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Feb;43(2):539-45
references.pmid: 15695642
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006 Mar;56(Pt 3):671-673
references.pmid: 16514048
references.citation: Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005 Oct;18(5):376-86
references.pmid: 16148523