title: Preference for bridging versus terminal ligands in magnesium dimers.
abstract: Magnesium dimers play important roles in inorganic and organometallic chemistry. This study evaluates the inherent bridging ability of a range of different ligands in magnesium dimers. In the first part, the Cambridge Structural Database is interrogated to establish the frequency of different types of ligands found in bridging versus terminal positions in two key structural motifs: one in which there are two bridging ligands (the D(2h) "Mg(2)(μ-X(2))" structure); the other in which there are three bridging ligands (the C(3v) "Mg(2)(μ-X(3))" structure). The most striking finding from the database search is the overwhelming preference for magnesium dimers possessing two bridging ligands. The most common bridging ligands are C-, N-, and O-based. In the second part, DFT calculations (at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d) level of theory) are carried out to examine a wider range of structural types for dimers consisting of the stoichiometries Mg(2)Cl(3)R and Mg(2)Cl(2)R(2), where R = CH(3), SiH(3), NH(2), PH(2), OH, SH, CH(2)CH(3), CH=CH(2), C≡CH, Ph, OAc, F and Br. Consistent with the database search, the most stable magnesium dimers are those that contain two bridging ligands. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the electronic effect of the bridging ligands is important in influencing the stability of the magnesium dimers. The preference for a bridging ligand, which reflects its ability to stabilize a magnesium dimer, follows the order: OH > NH(2) > C≡CH > SH > Ph > Br > PH(2) = CH=CH(2) > CH(2)CH(3) > CH(3) > SiH(3). Finally, the role that the ether solvent Me(2)O has on the stability of isomeric Mg(2)Cl(2)Me(2) dimers was studied. It was found that the first solvent molecule stabilizes the dimers, while the second solvent molecule can either have a stabilizing or destabilizing effect, depending on the isomer structure.
authors.affiliation: School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Hadi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lioe
authors.forename: Jonathan M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: White
authors.forename: Richard A J
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: O'Hair
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D002713:Chlorine / Q000737:chemistry; D003198:Computer Simulation; D056831:Coordination Complexes / Q000737:chemistry*; D018360:Crystallography, X-Ray; D019281:Dimerization; D004583:Electrons; D008024:Ligands; D008274:Magnesium / Q000737:chemistry*; D008958:Models, Molecular; D008968:Molecular Conformation; D012997:Solvents / Q000737:chemistry; D013816:Thermodynamics
chemical_list: D056831:Coordination Complexes; D008024:Ligands; D012997:Solvents; D002713:Chlorine; D008274:Magnesium
references.citation: Org Lett. 2001 Jun 14;3(12):1793-5
references.pmid: 11405713
references.citation: J Phys Chem A. 2005 Sep 22;109(37):8379-84
references.pmid: 16834230
references.citation: Acta Crystallogr B. 2002 Jun;58(Pt 3 Pt 1):380-8
references.pmid: 12037359
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2006 Aug 30;128(34):11236-49
references.pmid: 16925443
references.citation: J Org Chem. 2002 Dec 27;67(26):9346-53
references.pmid: 12492337
references.citation: J Phys Chem A. 2009 May 28;113(21):6158-65
references.pmid: 19419190