title: Bioaccessibility, bioavailability and toxicity of commercially relevant iron- and chromium-based particles: in vitro studies with an inhalation perspective.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Production of ferrochromium alloys (FeCr), master alloys for stainless steel manufacture, involves casting and crushing processes where particles inevitably become airborne and potentially inhaled. The aim of this study was to assess potential health hazards induced by inhalation of different well-characterized iron- and chromium-based particles, i.e. ferrochromium (FeCr), ferrosiliconchromium (FeSiCr), stainless steel (316L), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), and chromium(III)oxide (Cr2O3), in different size fractions using in vitro methods. This was done by assessing the extent and speciation of released metals in synthetic biological medium and by analyzing particle reactivity and toxicity towards cultured human lung cells (A549).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The amount of released metals normalized to the particle surface area increased with decreasing particle size for all alloy particles, whereas the opposite situation was valid for particles of the pure metals. These effects were evident in artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF) of pH 4.5 containing complexing agents, but not in neutral or weakly alkaline biological media. Chromium, iron and nickel were released to very low extent from all alloy particles, and from particles of Cr due to the presence of a Cr(III)-rich protective surface oxide. Released elements were neither proportional to the bulk nor to the surface composition after the investigated 168 hours of exposure. Due to a surface oxide with less protective properties, significantly more iron was released from pure iron particles compared with the alloys. Cr was predominantly released as Cr(III) from all particles investigated and was strongly complexed by organic species of ALF. Cr2O3 particles showed hemolytic activity, but none of the alloy particles did. Fine-sized particles of stainless steel caused however DNA damage, measured with the comet assay after 4 h exposure. None of the particles revealed any significant cytotoxicity in terms of cell death after 24 h exposure.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  It is evident that particle and alloy characteristics such as particle size and surface composition are important aspects to consider when assessing particle toxicity and metal release from alloy particles compared to pure metal particles. Generated results clearly elucidate that neither the low released concentrations of metals primarily as a result of protective and poorly soluble surface oxides, nor non-bioavailable chromium complexes, nor the particles themselves of occupational relevance induced significant acute toxic response, with exception of DNA damage from stainless steel.
authors.affiliation: Div. Surface and Corrosion Science, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Drottning Kristinas väg 51, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
authors.forename: Yolanda
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Hedberg
authors.forename: Johanna
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gustafsson
authors.forename: Hanna L
authors.initials: HL
authors.lastname: Karlsson
authors.forename: Lennart
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Möller
authors.forename: Inger
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Odnevall Wallinder
mesh_terms: D001682:Biological Availability; D002470:Cell Survival / Q000187:drug effects; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D002857:Chromium / Q000493:pharmacokinetics / Q000633:toxicity*; D004249:DNA Damage; D006461:Hemolysis / Q000187:drug effects; D006801:Humans; D019570:Inhalation Exposure; D007501:Iron / Q000493:pharmacokinetics / Q000633:toxicity*; D010316:Particle Size
chemical_list: D002857:Chromium; D007501:Iron
references.citation: J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Feb;49(2):167-75
references.pmid: 10571902
references.citation: Small. 2009 Mar;5(3):389-99
references.pmid: 19148889
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Feb;117(2):241-7
references.pmid: 19270794
references.citation: J Environ Monit. 2008 Sep;10(9):1092-8
references.pmid: 18728903
references.citation: J Environ Monit. 2003 Aug;5(4):675-80
references.pmid: 12948248
references.citation: J Environ Monit. 2008 Sep;10(9):1084-91
references.pmid: 18728902
references.citation: Cancer Causes Control. 1993 Mar;4(2):75-81
references.pmid: 8386949
references.citation: Chem Res Toxicol. 2008 Sep;21(9):1726-32
references.pmid: 18710264
references.citation: Toxicol Sci. 2001 Sep;63(1):90-8
references.pmid: 11509748
references.citation: Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2008 Jan;4(1):75-93
references.pmid: 17944545
references.citation: Toxicol Lett. 2009 Jul 24;188(2):112-8
references.pmid: 19446243
references.citation: Inhal Toxicol. 2007;19 Suppl 1:189-98
references.pmid: 17886067
references.citation: Toxicol Sci. 1999 Dec;52(2):278-88
references.pmid: 10630581
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000 Apr;73(3):171-80
references.pmid: 10787132
references.citation: Toxicol Sci. 2007 Jan;95(1):270-80
references.pmid: 17030555
references.citation: Chem Res Toxicol. 2005 Jan;18(1):19-23
references.pmid: 15651844
references.citation: Nanotoxicology. 2011 Jun;5(2):269-81
references.pmid: 21117831
references.citation: Part Fibre Toxicol. 2009 Apr 30;6:14
references.pmid: 19405955
references.citation: Part Fibre Toxicol. 2007 May 30;4:4
references.pmid: 17537262
references.citation: Mutagenesis. 2002 Sep;17(5):425-9
references.pmid: 12202631
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1991 Nov 26;30(47):11238-45
references.pmid: 1958661
references.citation: Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2010 Jul;6(3):441-55
references.pmid: 20821706
references.citation: J Environ Monit. 2007 Jan;9(1):74-81
references.pmid: 17213945
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jul;113(7):823-39
references.pmid: 16002369
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Feb 15;407(5):1613-30
references.pmid: 19118868
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 1997 Jun 20;199(1-2):133-9
references.pmid: 9200856
references.citation: Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2010 Jul;6(3):456-68
references.pmid: 20821707
references.citation: Chem Res Toxicol. 2008 Mar;21(3):726-31
references.pmid: 18260651