title: Bilateral cochlear implants in infants: a new approach--Nucleus Hybrid S12 project.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this feasibility study was to evaluate whether the use of a shorter-length cochlear implant (10 mm) on one ear and a standard electrode (24 mm) on the contralateral ear is a viable bilateral option for children with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. A secondary purpose of this study was to determine whether the ear with the shorter-length electrode performs similarly to the standard-length electrode. Our goal was to provide an option of electrical stimulation that theoretically might preserve the structures of the scala media and organ of Corti.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study is being conducted as a repeated-measure, single-subject experiment.
  
  
  METHODS
  University of Iowa-Department of Otolaryngology.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eight pediatric patients with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss between the ages of 12 and 24 months.
  
  
  METHODS
  Nucleus Hybrid S12 10-mm electrode and a Nucleus Freedom implant in the contralateral ear.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) parent questionnaire, Early Speech Perception, Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure word test, and Children's Vowel tests will be used to evaluate speech perception and the Minnesota Child Development Inventory and Preschool Language Scales 3 test will be used to evaluate language growth.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Preliminary results for 8 children have been collected before and after the operation using the IT-MAIS. All 3 children showed incremental improvements in their IT-MAIS scores overtime. Early Speech Perception, Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure word test, and Children's Vowel word perception results indicated no difference between the individual ears for the 2 children tested. Performance compared with age-matched children implanted with standard bilateral cochlear implants showed similar results to the children implanted with Nucleus Hybrid S12 10-mm electrode and a Nucleus Freedom implant in contralateral ears.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of a shorter-length cochlear implant on one ear and a standard-length electrode on the contralateral ear might provide a viable option for bilateral cochlear implantation in children with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss. Further study of this patient population will be continued.
authors.affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1078, USA. bruce-gantz@uiowa.edu
authors.forename: Bruce J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Gantz
authors.forename: Camille C
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: Dunn
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Walker
authors.forename: Maura
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kenworthy
authors.forename: Tanya
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Van Voorst
authors.forename: Bruce
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Tomblin
authors.forename: Chris
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Turner
mesh_terms: D019929:Cochlear Implantation / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D006312:Hearing Loss, Bilateral / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006319:Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Otol Neurotol. 2010 Oct;31(8):1227-32
references.pmid: 20802370
references.citation: Nat Med. 2005 Mar;11(3):271-6
references.pmid: 15711559
references.citation: Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14 Suppl 1:32-8
references.pmid: 19390173
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 May;117(5):3091-9
references.pmid: 15957777
references.citation: Audiol Neurootol. 2010;15(1):44-56
references.pmid: 19468210
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):352-9
references.pmid: 18453885
references.citation: Laryngoscope. 2005 May;115(5):796-802
references.pmid: 15867642
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Jun 22;441(7096):984-7
references.pmid: 16791196
references.citation: Otol Neurotol. 2008 Feb;29(2):160-7
references.pmid: 18025998
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):470-82
references.pmid: 17609610
references.citation: Otol Neurotol. 2002 Mar;23(2):169-80
references.pmid: 11875346
references.citation: Am J Otol. 1995 Mar;16(2):186-99
references.pmid: 8572119
references.citation: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Jun;8(2):241-57
references.pmid: 17347777