Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
Cochlear implant (CI) users are unable to receive masking release and the reasons are unclear. The present study examines the hypothesis that when listening to speech in fluctuating maskers, CI users cannot fuse the pieces of the message over temporal gaps because they are not able to perceive reliably the information carried by obstruent consonants (e.g., stops). To test this hypothesis, CI users were presented with sentences containing clean obstruent segments, but corrupted sonorant segments (e.g., vowels). Results indicated that CI users received masking release at low signal-to-noise ratio levels. Experiment 2 assessed the contribution of acoustic landmarks alone by presenting to CI users noise-corrupted stimuli which had clearly marked vowel/consonant boundaries, but lacking clean obstruent consonant information. These stimuli were created using noise-corrupted envelopes processed using logarithmic compression during sonorant segments and a weakly-compressive mapping function during obstruent segments. Results indicated that the use of segment-dependent compression yielded significant improvements in intelligibility, but no masking release. The results from these experiments suggest that in order for CI users to receive masking release, it is necessary to perceive reliably not only the presence and location of acoustic landmarks (i.e., vowel/consonant boundaries) but also the information carried by obstruent consonants.
Li
Ning
N
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688, USA.
Loizou
Philipos C
PC
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000465:Algorithms; D001302:Audiometry, Speech; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D012048:Correction of Hearing Impairment / Q000523:psychology*; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009622:Noise; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D019986:Persons with Hearing Disabilities / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013061:Speech Acoustics; D013065:Speech Intelligibility; D013067:Speech Perception; D013997:Time Factors
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Dec;100(6):3825-30
8969483
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jul;114(1):446-54
12880055
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Oct;88(4):1725-36
2262629
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec;124(6):3947
19206819
Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):402-11
17485989
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Apr;121(4):2312-26
17471744
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):338-46
19603890
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Nov;104(5):2570-7
9821336
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Feb;113(2):961-8
12597189
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Oct;118(4):2607-17
16266181
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Aug;116(2):1081-91
15376674
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug;122(2):1069-78
17672654
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 May;125(5):3358-72
19425676
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Mar;6(1):19-27
15735937
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Apr;111(4):1872-91
12002871
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Aug;106(2):L18-23
10462822
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63
11519582
Ear Hear. 2005 Oct;26(5):451-60
16230895
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jan;123(1):450-61
18177173
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Dec;118(6):3874-88
16419830
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):457-68
19173431
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1130-40
11519580
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 May;115(5 Pt 1):2286-94
15139640