title: Automatic tube current modulation technique for multidetector CT: is it effective with a 64-detector CT?
abstract: To investigate whether it is possible to obtain adequate images at uniform image noise levels and reduced radiation exposure with our automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) technique for 64-detector CT. The study population consisted of 64 patients with known or suspected lung or abdominal disease. We used a 64-detector CT scanner (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) and a combined angular and longitudinal tube current modulation technique (Smart mA, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) to examine 34 patients. The scanning parameters were identical; the minimum and maximum tube current thresholds were 50 and 800 mA, respectively. For study of the constant tube current technique, 30 additional patients were examined at 350 mA. The CT number and image noise (SD of the CT number) were measured in the 64 patients at six levels, i.e., the center of the left ventricle, the liver dome, the porta hepatis, the center of the spleen and the right and left renal pelvis. When we used the ATCM technique, the mean image noise ranged from 8.40 at the center of the left ventricle to 11.31 at the porta hepatis; the mean tube current ranged from 105.9 mAs at the center of the left ventricle to 169.6 mAs at the center of the spleen. The mean dose reduction rate per constant tube current at 175 mAs ranged from 3.1 to 39.5%. By use of the ATCM technique, it is possible to maintain a constant image noise level with a 64-detector CT.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kuhonji, Kumamoto, Japan. yfunama@hs.kumamoto-u.ac.jp
authors.forename: Yoshinori
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Funama
authors.forename: Kazuo
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Awai
authors.forename: Masahiro
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hatemura
authors.forename: Masamitchi
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Shimamura
authors.forename: Yumi
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Yanaga
authors.forename: Seitaro
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Oda
authors.forename: Yasuyuki
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Yamashita
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001331:Automation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007682:Kidney Pelvis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D008099:Liver / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011860:Radiography, Abdominal / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D013154:Spleen / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D015898:Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Dec;185(6):1525-30
references.pmid: 16304007
references.citation: Eur J Radiol. 2007 Mar;61(3):534-40
references.pmid: 17092681
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):619-28
references.pmid: 14739312
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Aug;236(2):671-5
references.pmid: 16040924
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 2001 Sep;74(885):836-40
references.pmid: 11560832
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):649-57
references.pmid: 15498896
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):318-25
references.pmid: 15987983
references.citation: Radiographics. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):1679-91
references.pmid: 15537976
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2006 Oct;16(10):2137-46
references.pmid: 16609862
references.citation: Radiographics. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6):1541-53
references.pmid: 12432127
references.citation: Radiology. 2003 Sep;228(3):857-63
references.pmid: 12881576
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):241-9
references.pmid: 15454622
references.citation: Radiographics. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):503-12
references.pmid: 16549613
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 2006 Jan;79(937):56-61
references.pmid: 16421406
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):515-22
references.pmid: 15358847
references.citation: Med Phys. 1999 Nov;26(11):2248-53
references.pmid: 10587205
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Mar;186(3):673-9
references.pmid: 16498094
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2000;10(2):391-4
references.pmid: 10663775
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):213-23
references.pmid: 16126917