title: Is evolutionary history repeatedly rewritten in light of new fossil discoveries?
abstract: Mass media and popular science journals commonly report that new fossil discoveries have 'rewritten evolutionary history'. Is this merely journalistic hyperbole or is our sampling of systematic diversity so limited that attempts to derive evolutionary history from these datasets are premature? We use two exemplars-catarrhine primates (Old World monkeys and apes) and non-avian dinosaurs-to investigate how the maturity of datasets can be assessed. Both groups have been intensively studied over the past 200 years and so should represent pinnacles in our knowledge of vertebrate systematic diversity. We test the maturity of these datasets by assessing the completeness of their fossil records, their susceptibility to changes in macroevolutionary hypotheses and the balance of their phylogenies through study time. Catarrhines have shown prolonged stability, with discoveries of new species being evenly distributed across the phylogeny, and thus have had little impact on our understanding of their fossil record, diversification and evolution. The reverse is true for dinosaurs, where the addition of new species has been non-random and, consequentially, their fossil record, tree shape and our understanding of their diversification is rapidly changing. The conclusions derived from these analyses are relevant more generally: the maturity of systematic datasets can and should be assessed before they are exploited to derive grand macroevolutionary hypotheses.
authors.affiliation: Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, , Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK. james.tarver@bristol.ac.uk
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Tarver
authors.forename: P C J
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Donoghue
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Benton
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D051079:Catarrhini / Q000145:classification* / Q000502:physiology; D025061:Dinosaurs / Q000145:classification* / Q000502:physiology; D005580:Fossils; D010802:Phylogeny
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2009 Mar;22(3):446-59
references.pmid: 19210589
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 22;276(1667):2667-74
references.pmid: 19403535
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2009 Dec;58(6):573-85
references.pmid: 20525610
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 7;275(1650):2483-90
references.pmid: 18647715
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Apr 22;3(2):201-4
references.pmid: 17284405
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 22;260(1359):329-33
references.pmid: 7630899
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 15;21(8):1709-10
references.pmid: 15572466
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Dec;53(3):808-25
references.pmid: 19682589
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Jun 23;8:178
references.pmid: 18573195
references.citation: Evolution. 1992 Dec;46(6):1818-1826
references.pmid: 28567767
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 29;348(1326):405-21
references.pmid: 7480112