Effects of physiological noise in population analysis of diffusion tensor MRI data.
The goal of this study is to characterize the potential effect of artifacts originating from physiological noise on statistical analysis of diffusion tensor MRI (DTI) data in a population. DTI derived quantities including mean diffusivity (Trace(D)), fractional anisotropy (FA), and principal eigenvector (ε(1)) are computed in the brain of 40 healthy subjects from tensors estimated using two different methods: conventional nonlinear least-squares, and robust fitting (RESTORE). RESTORE identifies artifactual data points as outliers and excludes them on a voxel-by-voxel basis. We found that outlier data points are localized in specific spatial clusters in the population, indicating a consistency in brain regions affected across subjects. In brain parenchyma RESTORE slightly reduces inter-subject variance of FA and Trace(D). The dominant effect of artifacts, however, is bias. Voxel-wise analysis indicates that inclusion of outlier data points results in clusters of under- and over-estimation of FA, while Trace(D) is always over-estimated. Removing outliers affects ε(1) mostly in low anisotropy regions. It was found that brain regions known to be affected by cardiac pulsation - cerebellum and genu of the corpus callosum, as well as regions not previously reported, splenium of the corpus callosum-show significant effects in the population analysis. It is generally assumed that statistical properties of DTI data are homogenous across the brain. This assumption does not appear to be valid based on these results. The use of RESTORE can lead to a more accurate evaluation of a population, and help reduce spurious findings that may occur due to artifacts in DTI data.
Walker
Lindsay
L
Section on Tissue Biophysics and Biomimetics, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-5772, USA. walkerlin@mail.nih.gov
Chang
Lin-Ching
LC
Koay
Cheng Guan
CG
Sharma
Nik
N
Cohen
Leonardo
L
Verma
Ragini
R
Pierpaoli
Carlo
C
D000328:Adult; D016880:Anisotropy; D016477:Artifacts; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods*; D038524:Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jan;51(1):103-14
14705050
Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 1;44(1):83-98
18501637
Magn Reson Med. 2005 May;53(5):1088-95
15844157
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):1140-53
14568483
Med Phys. 1985 Mar-Apr;12(2):232-3
4000083
Magn Reson Med. 2002 May;47(5):888-95
11979567
Neuroimage. 2005 Jul 1;26(3):673-84
15955477
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 2):321-9
18982621
J Magn Reson. 2005 Nov;177(1):102-10
16112886
J Magn Reson B. 1994 Mar;103(3):247-54
8019776
Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19
15501092
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007 Nov;26(11):1585-97
18041273
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007 Aug;26(8):1017-34
17695123
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-25
11747097
Radiology. 1996 Dec;201(3):637-48
8939209
Magn Reson Med. 1996 Dec;36(6):893-906
8946355
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):834-46
18541490
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Aug;54(2):411-8
16032665
Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Oct;19(8):1125-8
11711237
Med Image Anal. 2006 Oct;10(5):764-85
16899392
Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Nov;22(9):1211-21
15607092
Med Image Anal. 2002 Sep;6(3):191-8
12270226
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jun;61(6):1336-49
19319973
J Magn Reson. 2006 Apr;179(2):317-22
16488635
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Feb;57(2):362-8
17260378
J Magn Reson. 2009 Jul;199(1):94-103
19346143
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Sep 15;165(1):111-21
17604116
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Jan;49(1):7-12
12509814
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Dec;54(6):1439-47
16261576
J Magn Reson. 2006 Sep;182(1):115-25
16828568
J Magn Reson. 2000 Dec;147(2):340-52
11097823