Herbivore-specific, density-dependent induction of plant volatiles: honest or "cry wolf" signals?
Plants release volatile chemicals upon attack by herbivorous arthropods. They do so commonly in a dose-dependent manner: the more herbivores, the more volatiles released. The volatiles attract predatory arthropods and the amount determines the probability of predator response. We show that seedlings of a cabbage variety (Brassica oleracea var. capitata, cv Shikidori) also show such a response to the density of cabbage white (Pieris rapae) larvae and attract more (naive) parasitoids (Cotesia glomerata) when there are more herbivores on the plant. However, when attacked by diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) larvae, seedlings of the same variety (cv Shikidori) release volatiles, the total amount of which is high and constant and thus independent of caterpillar density, and naive parasitoids (Cotesia vestalis) of diamondback moth larvae fail to discriminate herbivore-rich from herbivore-poor plants. In contrast, seedlings of another cabbage variety of B. oleracea (var. acephala: kale) respond in a dose-dependent manner to the density of diamondback moth larvae and attract more parasitoids when there are more herbivores. Assuming these responses of the cabbage cultivars reflect behaviour of at least some genotypes of wild plants, we provide arguments why the behaviour of kale (B. oleracea var acephala) is best interpreted as an honest signaling strategy and that of cabbage cv Shikidori (B. oleracea var capitata) as a "cry wolf" signaling strategy, implying a conflict of interest between the plant and the enemies of its herbivores: the plant profits from being visited by the herbivore's enemies, but the latter would be better off by visiting other plants with more herbivores. If so, evolutionary theory on alarm signaling predicts consequences of major interest to students of plant protection, tritrophic systems and communication alike.
Shiojiri
Kaori
K
Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Shiga, Japan.
Ozawa
Rika
R
Kugimiya
Soichi
S
Uefune
Masayoshi
M
van Wijk
Michiel
M
Sabelis
Maurice W
MW
Takabayashi
Junji
J
D000818:Animals; D001937:Brassica / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000502:physiology; D002080:Butterflies / Q000187:drug effects; D004924:Escape Reaction / Q000187:drug effects; D005260:Female; D007814:Larva / Q000187:drug effects; D008297:Male; D009036:Moths / Q000187:drug effects; D036226:Seedlings / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D013045:Species Specificity; D055549:Volatile Organic Compounds / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000494:pharmacology
D055549:Volatile Organic Compounds
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 26;102(30):10742-6
16020532
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jan 7;270(1510):69-76
12590773
Nature. 2006 Mar 30;440(7084):663-6
16572169
Am Nat. 1993 Oct;142(4):646-70
19425964
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 22;272(1579):2417-22
16243694
Front Zool. 2006 Jan 05;3:1
16393347
J Chem Ecol. 2003 Dec;29(12):2651-66
14969353
Oecologia. 2006 Mar;147(3):455-60
16341892
J Chem Ecol. 1990 Nov;16(11):3091-118
24263298
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4169-74
7753779
Am Nat. 1999 Jul;154(1):69-88
29587500
Exp Appl Acarol. 2001;25(1):55-64
11508529
Science. 2005 Sep 23;309(5743):2070-2
16179482
IMA J Math Appl Med Biol. 1984;1(1):123-33
6600090
Heredity (Edinb). 2002 Nov;89(5):371-9
12399996
J Chem Ecol. 1990 Nov;16(11):3043-52
24263295
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 7;103(45):16672-6
17075049
Science. 1990 Nov 30;250(4985):1251-3
17829213