Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL.
BACKGROUND
most biomedical ontologies are represented in the OBO Flatfile Format, which is an easy-to-use graph-based ontology language. The semantics of the OBO Flatfile Format 1.2 enforces a strict predetermined interpretation of relationship statements between classes. It does not allow flexible specifications that provide better approximations of the intuitive understanding of the considered relations. If relations cannot be accurately expressed then ontologies built upon them may contain false assertions and hence lead to false inferences. Ontologies in the OBO Foundry must formalize the semantics of relations according to the OBO Relationship Ontology (RO). Therefore, being able to accurately express the intended meaning of relations is of crucial importance. Since the Web Ontology Language (OWL) is an expressive language with a formal semantics, it is suitable to de ne the meaning of relations accurately.


RESULTS
we developed a method to provide definition patterns for relations between classes using OWL and describe a novel implementation of the RO based on this method. We implemented our extension in software that converts ontologies in the OBO Flatfile Format to OWL, and also provide a prototype to extract relational patterns from OWL ontologies using automated reasoning. The conversion software is freely available at http://bioonto.de/obo2owl, and can be accessed via a web interface.


CONCLUSIONS
explicitly defining relations permits their use in reasoning software and leads to a more flexible and powerful way of representing biomedical ontologies. Using the extended langua0067e and semantics avoids several mistakes commonly made in formalizing biomedical ontologies, and can be used to automatically detect inconsistencies. The use of our method enables the use of graph-based ontologies in OWL, and makes complex OWL ontologies accessible in a graph-based form. Thereby, our method provides the means to gradually move the representation of biomedical ontologies into formal knowledge representation languages that incorporates an explicit semantics. Our method facilitates the use of OWL-based software in the back-end while ontology curators may continue to develop ontologies with an OBO-style front-end.
Hoehndorf
Robert
R
European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK. rh497@cam.ac.uk
Oellrich
Anika
A
Dumontier
Michel
M
Kelso
Janet
J
Rebholz-Schuhmann
Dietrich
D
Herre
Heinrich
H
D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval / Q000379:methods*; D012660:Semantics; D018875:Vocabulary, Controlled
Genome Biol. 2005;6(5):R44
15892872
Genome Biol. 2005;6(2):R21
15693950
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
10802651
Rev Electron Comun Inf Inov Saude. 2009 Mar 1;3(1):31-45
20640238
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:741-6
17108603
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Feb;44(1):87-93
20226267
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 09;8:377
17925014
J Biomed Semantics. 2010 Mar 31;1(1):4
20618982
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Nov;25(11):1251-5
17989687
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 15;23(14):1868-70
17496317
Genome Biol. 2005;6(5):R46
15892874
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Feb;44(1):42-7
20363364