Selection against Robertsonian fusions involving housekeeping genes in the house mouse: integrating data from gene expression arrays and chromosome evolution.
Monobrachial homology resulting from Robertsonian (Rb) fusions is thought to contribute to chromosomal speciation through underdominance. Given the karyotypic diversity characterizing wild house mouse populations [Mus musculus domesticus, (MMU)], variation that results almost exclusively from Rb fusions (diploid numbers range from 22 to 40) and possibly whole arm reciprocal translocations (WARTs), this organism represents an excellent model for testing hypotheses of chromosomal evolution. Previous studies of chromosome size and recombination rates have failed to explain the bias for certain chromosomes to be involved more frequently than others in these rearrangements. Here, we show that the pericentromeric region of one such chromosome, MMU19, which is infrequently encountered as a fusion partner in wild populations, is significantly enriched for housekeeping genes when compared to other chromosomes in the genome. These data suggest that there is selection against breakpoints in the pericentromeric region and provide new insights into factors that constrain chromosomal reorganizations in house mice. Given the anticipated increase in vertebrate whole genome sequences, the examination of gene content and expression profiles of the pericentromeric regions of other mammalian lineages characterized by Rb fusions (i.e., other rodents, bats, and bovids, among others) is both achievable and crucial to developing broadly applicable models of chromosome evolution.
Ruiz-Herrera
Aurora
A
Departament de Biologia Cel.lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain. aurora.ruizherrera@uab.cat
Farré
Marta
M
Ponsà
Montserrat
M
Robinson
Terence J
TJ
D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D002503:Centromere / Q000235:genetics; D033481:Chromosomes, Mammalian / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D020043:Genes, Essential; D051379:Mice / Q000235:genetics*; D014178:Translocation, Genetic
BMC Genomics. 2008 Apr 16;9:172
18416810
Physiol Genomics. 2001 Dec 21;7(2):95-6
11773595
BMC Genomics. 2009 Jul 24;10:335
19630943
Genet Res. 2003 Feb;81(1):33-42
12693681
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 20;101(16):6062-7
15075390
Genet Res. 1989 Feb;53(1):29-44
2714644
Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Mar;26(5):1865-78
16479005
Evol Bioinform Online. 2009 Jul 06;5:81-90
19812728
Genome Res. 2004 Apr;14(4):507-16
15059991
Chromosoma. 1998 May;107(2):136-40
9601982
Cytogenetics. 1967;6(2):105-19
6031522
J Mol Evol. 2002 Apr;54(4):511-8
11956689
Genome Res. 2004 Oct;14(10A):1851-60
15364903
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 25;93(13):6659-64
8692874
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;96(1-4):125-9
12438788
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8786-91
16731628
Trends Genet. 2003 Jul;19(7):362-5
12850439
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(19):6350-6
17881362
Genet Res. 1974 Jun;23(3):291-306
4435357
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(21):8245-8
16593777
J Hered. 1994 Nov-Dec;85(6):455-65
7995926
Adv Genet. 1998;37:1-566
9352629
Genet Res. 2005 Dec;86(3):171-83
16303058
Annu Rev Genet. 1975;9:1-18
1108761
Genome Biol. 2009;10(11):R130
19919682
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Oct;10(10):397-402
21237083
Hereditas. 1967;58(3):284-96
5584140
Nature. 2000 Jan 13;403(6766):158
10646592
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 2;98(1):171-5
11136254
Genome Biol. 2006;7(12):R115
17156441
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):351-358
11403867
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Mar;22(3):767-75
15574806
Genome Res. 2009 May;19(5):770-7
19342477
Chromosoma. 1995 Jul;103(10):685-92
7664615
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;122(3-4):219-28
19188690
Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1107-12
11901126
Genome Biol. 2005;6(7):R56
15998445