title: Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but are task specific.
abstract: It has been suggested that cognitive conflicts require effortful processing and, therefore, are aversive (Botvinick, 2007). In the present study, we compared conflicts emerging from the inhibition of a predominant response tendency in a go/no-go task with those between incompatible response activations in a Simon task in a within-subjects design, using the same type of stimuli. Whereas no-go trials elicited reduced skin conductance and pupillometric responses, but prolonged corrugator muscle activity, as compared with go trials, incompatible and compatible Simon trials were indistinguishable with respect to these parameters. Furthermore, the conflict-sensitive N2 components of the event-related brain potential were similar in amplitude, but showed significantly different scalp distributions, indicating dissociable neural generator systems. The present findings suggest the involvement of different emotional and cognitive processes in both types of cognitive conflicts-none being aversive, however. In addition, the N2 findings call into question claims of common monitoring systems for all kinds of cognitive conflicts.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. schachta@hu-berlin.de
authors.forename: Annekathrin
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Schacht
authors.forename: Olaf
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Dimigen
authors.forename: Werner
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Sommer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003265:Contingent Negative Variation / Q000502:physiology; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005712:Galvanic Skin Response; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012016:Reference Values; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb;19(2):103-8
references.pmid: 18271855
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70
references.pmid: 2186425
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2009 Nov;73(6):843-56
references.pmid: 19030874
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Jun 30;1097(1):167-80
references.pmid: 16725124
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 2;45(4):617-29
references.pmid: 16962146
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):593-602
references.pmid: 12126500
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2003 Nov;67(4):266-79
references.pmid: 14634814
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2009 Feb;80(2):246-50
references.pmid: 19022336
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jun;78(6):447-55
references.pmid: 1712280
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2008 Jul;45(4):602-7
references.pmid: 18282202
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Dec;28(6):1345-63
references.pmid: 12542132
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2007 Mar;74(3):347-57
references.pmid: 17052833
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):377-95
references.pmid: 2200076
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12321-31
references.pmid: 19793991
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Mar;3(1):17-26
references.pmid: 12822595
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1966 Feb;71(2):241-8
references.pmid: 5903011
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):343-353
references.pmid: 14979809
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1996 May;33(3):282-94
references.pmid: 8936397
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980 Jun;48(6):609-21
references.pmid: 6155251
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1993 Nov;30(6):547-58
references.pmid: 8248447
references.citation: Brain Res. 2008 Jun 18;1215:147-59
references.pmid: 18474363
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(5):701-11
references.pmid: 10689046
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2003 Sep;40(5):776-85
references.pmid: 14696731
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 May;16(3):309-22
references.pmid: 12706212
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983 Jun;9(3):360-70
references.pmid: 6223976
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):165-76
references.pmid: 15518933
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959
references.pmid: 15482068
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):215-222
references.pmid: 10827444
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 May;62(3):203-8
references.pmid: 2581760
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
references.pmid: 5146491
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Dec;20(12):1473-7
references.pmid: 19906127
references.citation: Brain. 1995 Feb;118 ( Pt 1):279-306
references.pmid: 7895011
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
references.pmid: 11488380
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):356-66
references.pmid: 18189009
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Oct 1;27(4):885-95
references.pmid: 15996878
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999 Apr;101(2-3):267-91
references.pmid: 10344188
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2008 Jan;45(1):152-70
references.pmid: 17850238
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1986 Sep;23(5):567-89
references.pmid: 3809364
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):164-71
references.pmid: 16466425
references.citation: Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98
references.pmid: 12934687