Evidence for direct retrieval of relative quantity information in a quantity judgment task: decimals, integers, and the role of physical similarity.
Participants' reaction times (RTs) in numerical judgment tasks in which one must determine which of 2 numbers is greater generally follow a monotonically decreasing function of the numerical distance between the two presented numbers. Here, I present 3 experiments in which the relative influences of numerical distance and physical similarity are assessed in just such a task using integers and decimals as stimuli. The data reveal that numerical distance is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when integers are presented. However, the physical similarity between the decade place of the standard and the probe is the primary feature controlling participants' RTs when decimals are presented. I conclude that the unique qualities of decimals do not lend themselves to share the place-coding representation of integers, thus a direct retrieval mechanism for judging the relative quantity of decimals has developed.
Cohen
Dale J
DJ
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, NC 28403-5612, USA. cohend@uncw.edu
D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D012044:Regression Analysis; D013334:Students; D013997:Time Factors
Exp Psychol. 2005;52(3):195-200
16076067
Neuropsychologia. 1983;21(3):259-63
6877579
Mem Cognit. 1980 Nov;8(6):612-22
6163942
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Aug;32(3-4):313-28; discussion 328-73
19712504
Nature. 1967 Sep 30;215(5109):1519-20
6052760
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Sep;131(3):424-42
12214756
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Mar;21(2):314-26
7738503
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1410-9
18085953
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Aug;16(3):626-41
2144576
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):487-506
20957581
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):332-6
19293103
Cognition. 1992 Aug;44(1-2):1-42
1511583
Cognition. 2001 Nov;82(1):B25-33
11672709
J Exp Psychol. 1974 Dec;103(6):1131-6
4457588
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jun;45(6):557-66
2740196
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):1150-63
16262504
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):483-96
17469981
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):66-80
15945201
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Aug;32(3-4):332-3; discussion 356-73
19712509