title: Canonical visual size for real-world objects.
abstract: Real-world objects can be viewed at a range of distances and thus can be experienced at a range of visual angles within the visual field. Given the large amount of visual size variation possible when observing objects, we examined how internal object representations represent visual size information. In a series of experiments which required observers to access existing object knowledge, we observed that real-world objects have a consistent visual size at which they are drawn, imagined, and preferentially viewed. Importantly, this visual size is proportional to the logarithm of the assumed size of the object in the world, and is best characterized not as a fixed visual angle, but by the ratio of the object and the frame of space around it. Akin to the previous literature on canonical perspective, we term this consistent visual size information the canonical visual size.
authors.affiliation: Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 46-4078, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. tkonkle@mit.edu
authors.forename: Talia
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Konkle
authors.forename: Aude
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Oliva
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination / Q000502:physiology; D007600:Judgment; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012858:Size Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1951 Jan;64(1):54-67
references.pmid: 14819380
references.citation: Spat Vis. 2008;21(3-5):421-49
references.pmid: 18534113
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1991 Jul;98(3):352-76
references.pmid: 1891523
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):559-64
references.pmid: 15271002
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Mar;2(1):55-82
references.pmid: 24203590
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1975 Nov;3(6):635-47
references.pmid: 24203905
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1969 Jan;79(1):109-15
references.pmid: 5785624
references.citation: Cognition. 1989 Aug;32(3):193-254
references.pmid: 2752709
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1957 May;64(3):153-81
references.pmid: 13441853
references.citation: Child Dev. 1982 Oct;53(5):1285-90
references.pmid: 7140431
references.citation: Science. 2004 May 14;304(5673):1027-9
references.pmid: 15143286
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1965 Mar;78:120-3
references.pmid: 14270412
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1992 Fall;4(4):337-44
references.pmid: 23968127
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1959 Nov;66:387-401
references.pmid: 14438104
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1989 Apr;21(2):233-82
references.pmid: 2706928
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1977 Feb;3(1):105-18
references.pmid: 845553
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1989 Jan;17(1):87-94
references.pmid: 2913460
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jan;45(1):43-8
references.pmid: 2913569
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1975 Sep;3(5):519-26
references.pmid: 24203874
references.citation: Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):189-202
references.pmid: 25164805
references.citation: Perception. 1999;28(5):575-99
references.pmid: 10664755
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986 Mar;115(1):39-61
references.pmid: 2937873
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1964 Jun;67:507-13
references.pmid: 14155412
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1955 Sep;50(3):168-70
references.pmid: 13252191
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):371-88
references.pmid: 18004950
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Oct;14(4):641-9
references.pmid: 2972800
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Mar;15(2):179-87
references.pmid: 2522508
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Jun;129(2):220-41
references.pmid: 10868335
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references.pmid: 9176953
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1982 Apr;14(2):143-77
references.pmid: 7083801
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29
references.pmid: 15263892
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1963 Aug;66:155-62
references.pmid: 13969069
references.citation: Vision Res. 1992 Dec;32(12):2385-400
references.pmid: 1288015
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1978 Jul;10(3):356-89
references.pmid: 688748
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):60-4
references.pmid: 1729718
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Dec;11(12):520-7
references.pmid: 18024143