A yeast's eye view of mammalian reproduction: cross-species gene co-expression in meiotic prophase.
BACKGROUND
Meiotic prophase is a critical stage in sexual reproduction. Aberrant chromosome recombination during this stage is a leading cause of human miscarriages and birth defects. However, due to the experimental intractability of mammalian gonads, only a very limited number of meiotic genes have been characterized. Here we aim to identify novel meiotic genes important in human reproduction through computational mining of cross-species and cross-sex time-series expression data from budding yeast, mouse postnatal testis, mouse embryonic ovary, and human fetal ovary.


RESULTS
Orthologous gene pairs were ranked by order statistics according to their co-expression profiles across species, allowing us to infer conserved meiotic genes despite obvious differences in cellular synchronicity and composition in organisms. We demonstrated that conserved co-expression networks could successfully recover known meiotic genes, including homologous recombination genes, chromatin cohesion genes, and genes regulating meiotic entry. We also showed that conserved co-expression pairs exhibit functional connections, as evidenced by the annotation similarity in Gene Ontology and overlap with physical interactions. More importantly, we predicted six new meiotic genes through their co-expression linkages with known meiotic genes, and subsequently used the genetically more amenable yeast system for experimental validation. The deletion mutants of all six genes showed sporulation defects, equivalent to a 100% validation rate.


CONCLUSIONS
We identified evolutionarily conserved gene modules in meiotic prophase by integrating cross-species and cross-sex expression profiles from budding yeast, mouse, and human. Our co-expression linkage analyses confirmed known meiotic genes and identified several novel genes that might be critical players in meiosis in multiple species. These results demonstrate that our approach is highly efficient to discover evolutionarily conserved novel meiotic genes, and yeast can serve as a valuable model system for investigating mammalian meiotic prophase.
Li
Yunfei
Y
School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, PO Box 647520, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Lam
Ka-sum
KS
Dasgupta
Nairanjana
N
Ye
Ping
P
D000818:Animals; D017124:Conserved Sequence; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D053263:Gene Regulatory Networks; D006801:Humans; D051379:Mice; D011418:Prophase / Q000235:genetics*; D012333:RNA, Messenger / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012098:Reproduction / Q000235:genetics*; D004718:Saccharomycetales / Q000166:cytology* / Q000235:genetics*; D013045:Species Specificity
D012333:RNA, Messenger
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Oct;2(10):769-76
11584304
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D449-51
14681454
Reproduction. 2003 Apr;125(4):447-56
12683916
Trends Genet. 2000 Sep;16(9):395-403
10973068
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D263-6
18055500
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 8;102(6):1974-9
15687504
Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):249-55
12934013
Genomics. 1999 Jun 15;58(3):270-80
10373325
J Cell Biol. 1998 Aug 10;142(3):635-49
9700155
Mol Syst Biol. 2005;1:2005.0026
16729061
Biol Reprod. 2004 Jul;71(1):319-30
15028632
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 26;99(24):15530-5
12432101
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;90(3-4):330-6
11124544
Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Dec;17(12):7230-6
9372955
Chromosoma. 2006 Jun;115(3):241-9
16547726
EMBO J. 2003 Feb 17;22(4):786-96
12574115
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Dec;5(12):983-97
15573136
PLoS Genet. 2008 Apr 25;4(4):e1000053
18437200
Genetics. 1985 Aug;110(4):609-46
3896926
Development. 2007 Oct;134(19):3401-11
17715177
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D572-4
17135203
Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:2006.0005
16732191
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D535-9
16381927
Trends Genet. 2008 Feb;24(2):86-93
18192063
Science. 2008 Feb 1;319(5863):620-4
18239126
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D767-72
18988627
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):248-50
12519993
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
10802651
J Biol Chem. 1999 May 14;274(20):14500-7
10318877
Cell Tissue Res. 2007 Apr;328(1):207-21
17431699
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 14;100(21):12201-6
14526100
Genome Biol. 2006;7(3):R20
16542486
FEBS Lett. 1998 Sep 11;435(1):89-95
9755865
J Androl. 2003 May-Jun;24(3):332-42
12721208
Biol Reprod. 2005 Feb;72(2):492-501
15496517
Science. 1998 Oct 23;282(5389):699-705
9784122
Biol Reprod. 2009 Aug;81(2):438-43
19369649
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D561-5
17145710
BMC Syst Biol. 2007 Nov 21;1:54
18031580
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D196-201
18158298
Genes Cells. 1997 Jan;2(1):65-79
9112441
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104(20):8346-51
17483452
Bioinformatics. 2003 Jul 1;19(10):1275-83
12835272
J Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;119(3):513-21
1400588
Nature. 2002 Jul 25;418(6896):387-91
12140549
Science. 2008 Feb 1;319(5863):617-20
18239125
Science. 2004 Feb 6;303(5659):808-13
14764870
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6987-92
18458337
Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Oct 15;16 Spec No. 2:R203-8
17911163
Mol Cell. 2000 Feb;5(2):243-54
10882066
J Proteome Res. 2006 Jul;5(7):1543-54
16823961
Nat Genet. 2000 Dec;26(4):415-23
11101837
Mol Cell Biol. 1997 May;17(5):2688-97
9111339