title: Is the flower fluorescence relevant in biocommunication?
abstract: Flower fluorescence has been previously proposed as a potential visual signal to attract pollinators. In this work, this point was addressed by quantitatively measuring the fluorescence quantum yield (Φ(f)) for flowers of Bellis perennis (white, yellow, pink, and purple), Ornithogalum thyrsoides (petals and ovaries), Limonium sinuatum (white and yellow), Lampranthus productus (yellow), Petunia nyctaginiflora (white), Bougainvillea spectabilis (white and yellow), Antirrhinum majus (white and yellow), Eustoma grandiflorum (white and blue), Citrus aurantium (petals and stigma), and Portulaca grandiflora (yellow). The highest values were obtained for the ovaries of O. thyrsoides (Φ(f) = 0.030) and for Citrus aurantium petals (Φ(f) = 0.014) and stigma (Φ(f) = 0.013). Emitted photons as fluorescence were compared with reflected photons. It was concluded that the fluorescence emission is negligible compared to the reflected light, even for the most fluorescent samples, and it may not be considered as an optical signal in biocommunication. The work was complemented with the calculation of quantum catches for each studied flower species to describe the visual sensitization of eye photoreceptors.
authors.affiliation: INQUIMAE/Dpto. de Química Inorgánica, Analítica y Qca. Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón II, 1er piso, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
authors.forename: Analía
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Iriel
authors.forename: María Gabriela
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Lagorio
mesh_terms: D002957:Citrus / Q000502:physiology; D003116:Color; D003142:Communication; D035264:Flowers / Q000502:physiology*; D005453:Fluorescence; D008027:Light; D031442:Ornithogalum / Q000502:physiology; D017785:Photons; D013053:Spectrophotometry
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:471-510
references.pmid: 11112177
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Feb;78(1):81-118
references.pmid: 12620062
references.citation: Science. 1976 Oct 15;194(4262):341-2
references.pmid: 17738051
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Sep;190(9):759-63
references.pmid: 15316731
references.citation: Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010 Mar;9(3):342-8
references.pmid: 20221460
references.citation: Science. 2009 Jan 2;323(5910):130-3
references.pmid: 19119235
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 18;103(29):11075-80
references.pmid: 16832053
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 26;315(5811):481
references.pmid: 17255504
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Sep 15;437(7057):334
references.pmid: 16163341
references.citation: Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001 Sep;20(5):675-703
references.pmid: 11470455
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2005 Aug;96(2):217-27
references.pmid: 15953790
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Jan;170(1):23-40
references.pmid: 1573568
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Jun 22;3(3):265-7
references.pmid: 17412670
references.citation: Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2009 Mar;8(3):337-44
references.pmid: 19255674
references.citation: Plant J. 2008 May;54(4):733-49
references.pmid: 18476875
references.citation: Science. 2002 Jan 4;295(5552):92
references.pmid: 11778040
references.citation: Science. 1975 Aug 8;189(4201):476-8
references.pmid: 17781886
references.citation: Vision Res. 1994 Jun;34(11):1415-8
references.pmid: 8023451
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Jun;191(6):547-57
references.pmid: 15871026
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2004 May;91(5):228-31
references.pmid: 15146270
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(20):2022-41
references.pmid: 18590925
references.citation: Planta. 2005 Nov;222(4):586-93
references.pmid: 16177911