Impact of luminal density on plaque classification by CT coronary angiography.
Non-invasive coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has the potential to characterize the composition of non-calcified coronary plaques. CT-density values characterized by Hounsfield Units (HU) may classify non-calcified plaques as fibrous or lipid-rich, but the luminal density caused by the applied contrast material influences HU in the plaques in vitro. The influence of luminal density on HU in non-calcified plaques in vivo is unknown. Hence the purpose of this study was to test whether plaque characterization by CCTA in vivo depends on luminal density. Two CCTA-scans using two different contrast protocols were obtained from 14 male patients with coronary artery disease. The two contrast protocols applied resulted in high and low luminal density. Eleven non- calcified and 13 calcified plaques were identified and confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. Luminal attenuation differed with the two contrast protocols; 326[284;367] vs. 118[103;134] HU (P < 0.00001). In non-calcified plaques mean HU-values was lower 48[28;69] vs. 11[-4;25] HU (P = 0.004) with the low density protocol. As a consequence three out of eleven non-calcified plaques (27%) were reclassified from fibrous (high) to lipid rich (low). For calcified plaques a less pronounced but still significant difference in HU-values was found with the low luminal density. 770[622;919] vs. 675[496;855] HU (P = 0.02).


CONCLUSIONS
Non-calcified plaques can be identified and classified by CCTA. However, the luminal density affects the absolute HU of both non-calcified and calcified plaques. Characterization and classification of non-calcified plaques by absolute CT values therefore requires standardization of contrast protocols.
Dalager
Maiken Glud
MG
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Brendstrupgårdsvej 100, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. maikendalager@gmail.com
Bøttcher
Morten
M
Andersen
Gratien
G
Thygesen
Jesper
J
Pedersen
Erik Morre
EM
Dejbjerg
Lone
L
Gøtzsche
Ole
O
Bøtker
Hans Erik
HE
D000368:Aged; D002114:Calcinosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D003287:Contrast Media; D017023:Coronary Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000378:metabolism; D003718:Denmark; D005355:Fibrosis; D006801:Humans; D007472:Iohexol; D008055:Lipids / Q000032:analysis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D058226:Plaque, Atherosclerotic / Q000737:chemistry / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D018084:Ultrasonography, Interventional
D003287:Contrast Media; D008055:Lipids; D007472:Iohexol
Atherosclerosis. 2007 Jan;190(1):174-80
16494883
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jul;17(7):1842-9
17245583
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Apr;37(5):1430-5
11300457
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1998 Oct;39(5):527-34
9833706
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006 Oct;26(10):2366-72
16902158
Heart. 2004 Dec;90(12):1471-5
15547032
Radiographics. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):1679-91
15537976
Circulation. 2002 Oct 22;106(17):2200-6
12390948
Coron Artery Dis. 2006 Sep;17(6):553-60
16905968
Invest Radiol. 2006 Jun;41(6):510-5
16763469
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 18;47(8 Suppl):C7-12
16631513
Atherosclerosis. 2004 Jun;174(2):243-52
15136054
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Apr;26(4):373-83
20052618
Circulation. 1995 Aug 1;92(3):657-71
7634481
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 6;46(11):2038-42
16325038
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001 Nov-Dec;25(6):900-6
11711803
Eur Radiol. 2005 Jul;15(7):1426-31
15750815
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Jul-Aug;28(4):449-54
15232374
Eur Radiol. 2005 Sep;15(9):1906-14
15806368
Circ J. 2009 Mar;73(3):497-502
19151504
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):981-8
17885074
Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):708-16
16857982
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jul;3(4):384-91
20460496
Eur Radiol. 2003 Sep;13(9):2094-8
12692681
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Feb;77(2):294-8
19716249
Eur Radiol. 2001;11(9):1607-11
11511879