Predictive equations over-estimate the resting energy expenditure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients who are dependent on invasive ventilation support.
BACKGROUND
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a form of degenerative motor neuron disease. At the end stage of the disease artificial feeding is often required. Nevertheless, very little is known about the energy demand of those ALS patients who are chronically dependent on tracheostomy intermittent positive pressure ventilation. The objective of our study was to clarify the resting energy expenditure (REE) in mechanically ventilated ALS patients.


METHODS
We measured the REE of five ALS patients (four men, one female) twice during a 12 month-period using indirect calorimetry with two sampling flow settings (40 L/min and 80 L/min). The measured REEs (mREE) were compared with values calculated using five different predictive equations.


RESULTS
The mean (± SD) of all mREEs was 1130 ± 170 kcal/d. The measurements with different flow settings and at different time instances provided similar results. The mean of mREEs was 33.6% lower, as compared to the mean calculated with five different predictive equations REE (p < 0.001). Each of the predictive equations over-estimated the REE.


CONCLUSIONS
The mREE values were significantly lower for every patient than all the predicted ones. Determination of daily nutrition with predictive equations may therefore lead in mis-estimation of energy requirements. Because ALS patients may live years with artificial ventilation their nutritional support should be based on individual measurements. However, further study is needed due to the small number of subjects.
Siirala
Waltteri
W
Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8 FI-20520 Turku, Finland. tuwasi@utu.fi.
Olkkola
Klaus T
KT
Noponen
Tommi
T
Vuori
Arno
A
Aantaa
Riku
R
Acute Care. 1988-1989;14-15:91-110
3155338
Palliat Med. 1993;7(4 Suppl):49-64
7505711
Nutrition. 1989 Sep-Oct;5(5):303-11; discussion 312-3
2520314
Crit Care Med. 1989 Oct;17(10):1041-7
2676345
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005 Sep-Oct;29(5):380-7
16107602
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Sep;74(3):328-34
11522556
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Aug 10;1366(1-2):211-23
9714810
J Neurol. 1995 Oct;242(10):695-8
8568533
Neurol Clin. 1996 May;14(2):399-420
8827179
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1991 Mar;31(3):255-9
1909943
Neurology. 2003 Jul 22;61(2):171-7
12874394
Ann Neurol. 1985 Sep;18(3):271-80
4051456
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1985;724:1-206
3937340
Neurology. 2003 Jul 8;61(1):135-7
12847177
Ann Neurol. 1985 Oct;18(4):419-31
2416263
J Neurol Sci. 1994 Jul;124 Suppl:96-107
7807156
Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Feb;51(2):241-7
2305711
Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1987;4(3):167-77
3116131
Metabolism. 1988 Mar;37(3):287-301
3278194
J Neurol Sci. 1996 Aug;139 Suppl:123-8
8899671
Brain. 1995 Jun;118 ( Pt 3):707-19
7600088
Neurology. 2003 Mar 11;60(5):813-9
12629239
Arch Dis Child. 1992 Oct;67(10 Spec No):1207-11
1444562
Neurodegener Dis. 2005;2(3-4):202-7
16909026
Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1197-209
16198769
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004 Nov;7(6):635-9
15534431
Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 Dec;46(6):875-85
3687821
Am J Clin Nutr. 1986 Jul;44(1):1-19
3728346
J Physiol. 1949 Aug;109(1-2):1-9
15394301
Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 Jan;63(1):130-7
8604660
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1918 Dec;4(12):370-3
16576330
Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1502-7
15539719
J Clin Invest. 1990 Nov;86(5):1423-7
2243122
Respir Med. 2008 Mar;102(3):430-6
18023334
J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(4):361-72
18959353
Dermatol Nurs. 2002 Aug;14(4):249-2, 255-6
12240502
Helv Med Acta. 1951 Feb;18(1):23-44
14813607
Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Dec;68(6):1223-7
9846850
Clin Nutr. 2002 Oct;21(5):385-8
12381335
Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Mar;35(3):566-73
6801963