Speed-accuracy trade-offs during foraging decisions in the acellular slime mould Physarum polycephalum.
Speed-accuracy trade-offs (SATs) are thought to be a fundamental feature of biological information processing, yet most evidence of SATs comes from animals. Here, we examine SATs in the foraging decisions of an acellular, amoeboid organism: the slime mould Physarum polycephalum. Slime moulds were given a simple discrimination task: selecting the highest-quality food item from a set of three options. We investigated the effect of two stressors, light exposure and hunger, on the speed and accuracy of decision-making. We also examined the effect of task difficulty. When given a difficult discrimination task, stressed individuals tend to make faster decisions than non-stressed individuals. This effect was reversed in plasmodia given easy discrimination tasks, where stressed individuals made slower decisions than non-stressed individuals. We found evidence of SATs, such that individuals who made fast decisions were more likely to make costly errors by selecting the worst possible food option. Our results suggest that SATs occur in a wider range of taxa than previously considered.
Latty
Tanya
T
Behaviour and Genetics of Social Insects Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences A12, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. tanya.latty@sydney.edu.au
Beekman
Madeleine
M
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D008027:Light; D016839:Physarum polycephalum / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors
Science. 2010 Jan 22;327(5964):439-42
20093467
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2457-63
14667335
Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):22-7
20380191
Science. 1973 Aug 10;181(4099):574-6
17777808
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Nov 7;271(1554):2305-10
15539357
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Sep;190(9):759-63
15316731
Trends Neurosci. 2010 Jan;33(1):10-6
19819033
Res Microbiol. 2001 Nov;152(9):767-70
11763236
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65
17014301
Oecologia. 1987 Jun;72(3):360-365
28311130
J R Soc Interface. 2009 Nov 6;6(40):1065-74
19324679
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Mar;27(3):161-8
15036882
Biol Psychol. 2000 Jan;51(2-3):173-99
10686365
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 9;107(10):4607-11
20142479
J Math Biol. 2006 Aug;53(2):273-86
16770610
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jul;24(7):400-7
19409649
J Vis. 2005 May 02;5(5):376-404
16097871
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Jan 11;100(1):018101
18232821
Nature. 2000 Sep 28;407(6803):470
11028990