title: Advancing molecular imaging: a chairman's perspective on how radiology can meet the challenge.
abstract: To date, most molecular imaging techniques applied clinically have offered relatively general information about the metabolism and physiology of diseased cells and tissues. However, due to recent scientific and technological advances, much more specifically targeted molecular imaging probes (e.g., reporter gene probes, whole cell-tracking probes, and probes for localizing specific biomolecules) are now being used in preclinical research and, in some cases, translated to the clinical setting. As a result, the imaging community is poised to help lead a revolution in personalized, molecularly targeted medicine. This article considers the importance of molecular imaging for advancing research and clinical care both within individual institutions and across the medical field. It outlines specific steps that leaders in academic radiology can take to hasten progress in molecular imaging and explains why they must have the courage to reach across traditional interdisciplinary boundaries and advocate for major investments in equipment, education, and personnel.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. muellnea@mskcc.org
authors.forename: Hedvig
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hricak
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D057054:Molecular Imaging / Q000639:trends*; D011871:Radiology / Q000639:trends*; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging / Q000639:trends*
references.citation: Cancer Imaging. 2006 Oct 31;6:S52-62
references.pmid: 17114079
references.citation: Neoplasia. 2000 Jan-Apr;2(1-2):5-8
references.pmid: 10933064
references.citation: Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2008;(185 Pt 2):305-21
references.pmid: 18626608
references.citation: Mol Imaging. 2003 Oct;2(4):303-12
references.pmid: 14717329
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2000 Jun;7(6):481-3
references.pmid: 10845407
references.citation: Drug News Perspect. 2010 Mar;23(2):119-23
references.pmid: 20369077
references.citation: Radiology. 2001 May;219(2):316-33
references.pmid: 11323453
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Feb 16;293(7):855-62
references.pmid: 15713776
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2001 Jan;8(1):4-14
references.pmid: 11201455
references.citation: Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Sep;2(9):683-93
references.pmid: 12209157
references.citation: Radiology. 2002 Jan;222(1):19-24
references.pmid: 11756700
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2000 Oct;7(10):905-7
references.pmid: 11048885
references.citation: Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2008;(185 Pt 2):167-223
references.pmid: 18626603
references.citation: Lab Anim (NY). 2001 Mar;30(3):32-5
references.pmid: 11385755
references.citation: Cancer Imaging. 2005 Nov 23;5 Spec No A:S16-26
references.pmid: 16361132
references.citation: Cancer Imaging. 2005 Jun 21;5:51-7
references.pmid: 16154820
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2001 Nov;8(11):1141-53
references.pmid: 11721814
references.citation: Radiology. 2007 Jul;244(1):39-47
references.pmid: 17507723
references.citation: Cancer Imaging. 2003 Sep 02;4(1):22-4
references.pmid: 18211857
references.citation: Cancer Imaging. 2005 Nov 23;5 Spec No A:S27-32
references.pmid: 16361133