title: Comparison of premier CAMPY enzyme immunoassay (EIA), ProSpecT Campylobacter EIA, and ImmunoCard STAT! CAMPY tests with culture for laboratory diagnosis of Campylobacter enteric infections.
abstract: Campylobacter enteritis is a food-borne or waterborne illness caused almost exclusively by Campylobacter jejuni and, to a lesser extent, by Campylobacter coli. These organisms produce indistinguishable clinical diseases and together represent the second most common cause of bacterial diarrhea in the United States and the leading cause of enteric infection throughout the world. The conventional approach to the laboratory diagnosis of Campylobacter enteritis is based on the recovery of the organism from a stool specimen, which requires the use of a specialized medium incubated at 42°C for several days in an artificially created microaerophilic environment. Recently, several commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have been developed for the direct detection of C. jejuni and C. coli in stool specimens. This study compared conventional culture with three EIA methods, the Premier CAMPY EIA (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH), the ProSpecT Campylobacter EIA (Remel, Lenexa, KS), and the ImmunoCard STAT! CAMPY test (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH), for the detection of C. jejuni and C. coli in 485 patient stool samples. Discordant results were arbitrated by using an in-house, real-time PCR assay that was developed and validated by a public health reference laboratory. Following analyses of the discrepant specimens by PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of both the Premier CAMPY and ProSpecT Campylobacter EIAs were 99.3% and 98%, respectively, while the ImmunoCard STAT! CAMPY test had a sensitivity of 98.5% and a specificity of 98.2%. By use of the PCR test as the reference standard, culture detected 127 of 135 Campylobacter-positive stool specimens, yielding a sensitivity of 94.1%. These results showed that the three EIAs evaluated in this study provide a rapid and reliable alternative for the laboratory diagnosis of enteric infections with C. jejuni and C. coli and that conventional culture may no longer be recognized as the "gold standard" for diagnosis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. granatop@upstate.edu
authors.forename: Paul A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Granato
authors.forename: Li
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Iris
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Holiday
authors.forename: Russell A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Rawling
authors.forename: Susan M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Novak-Weekley
authors.forename: Tammy
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Quinlan
authors.forename: Kimberlee A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Musser
mesh_terms: D001431:Bacteriological Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D002169:Campylobacter Infections / Q000175:diagnosis*; D017000:Campylobacter coli / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D016123:Campylobacter jejuni / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D004751:Enteritis / Q000382:microbiology*; D005243:Feces / Q000382:microbiology; D006801:Humans; D007124:Immunoenzyme Techniques / Q000379:methods; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014481:United States
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jul;11(3):555-67
references.pmid: 9665983
references.citation: Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Apr 15;32(8):1201-6
references.pmid: 11283810
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Sep;25(9):1747-52
references.pmid: 3654945
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Oct;38(10):3853-5
references.pmid: 11015419
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Apr;17(2):348-69
references.pmid: 15084505
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Nov;9(11):1085-90
references.pmid: 14616724
references.citation: J Clin Pathol. 1984 Aug;37(8):956-7
references.pmid: 6381549
references.citation: Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Sep;80(3):388-90
references.pmid: 6192707
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jan;41(1):330-6
references.pmid: 12517869
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):803-7
references.pmid: 6355160
references.citation: Br Med J. 1977 Jul 2;2(6078):9-11
references.pmid: 871765
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Aug;38(8):3076-9
references.pmid: 10921981
references.citation: J Clin Pathol. 1982 Apr;35(4):462-7
references.pmid: 7042765
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):853-5
references.pmid: 6863504
references.citation: J Med Microbiol. 2005 Nov;54(Pt 11):1043-1047
references.pmid: 16192435
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jan;96(1):62-3
references.pmid: 6172065
references.citation: J Infect Dis. 1997 Dec;176 Suppl 2:S106-14
references.pmid: 9396692
references.citation: Mol Cell Probes. 2004 Aug;18(4):275-82
references.pmid: 15271389
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jul;3(3):219-26
references.pmid: 2200604
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jan;38(1):286-91
references.pmid: 10618103
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):1008-10
references.pmid: 6630456
references.citation: J Food Prot. 1992 Sep;55(9):663-666
references.pmid: 31084121
references.citation: Lancet. 1990 Mar 10;335(8689):584-6
references.pmid: 1968583
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):840-3
references.pmid: 3771769
references.citation: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Apr 10;58(13):333-7
references.pmid: 19357633
references.citation: Pathology. 2004 Aug;36(4):343-4
references.pmid: 15370134
references.citation: Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Oct;10(10):1863-7
references.pmid: 15504280
references.citation: J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2005 Jun;10(2):94-112
references.pmid: 15958123