Intrinsic biophysical diversity decorrelates neuronal firing while increasing information content.
Although examples of variation and diversity exist throughout the nervous system, their importance remains a source of debate. Even neurons of the same molecular type have notable intrinsic differences. Largely unknown, however, is the degree to which these differences impair or assist neural coding. We examined the outputs from a single type of neuron, the mitral cells of the mouse olfactory bulb, to identical stimuli and found that each cell's spiking response was dictated by its unique biophysical fingerprint. Using this intrinsic heterogeneity, diverse populations were able to code for twofold more information than their homogeneous counterparts. In addition, biophysical variability alone reduced pair-wise output spike correlations to low levels. Our results indicate that intrinsic neuronal diversity is important for neural coding and is not simply the result of biological imprecision.
Padmanabhan
Krishnan
K
Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Urban
Nathaniel N
NN
D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn; D055592:Biophysical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology*; D001703:Biophysics / Q000379:methods; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D019277:Entropy; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D051663:Kv1.2 Potassium Channel / Q000378:metabolism; D051379:Mice; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000502:physiology*; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D009830:Olfactory Bulb / Q000166:cytology*; D018408:Patch-Clamp Techniques / Q000379:methods; D013223:Statistics as Topic
D051663:Kv1.2 Potassium Channel
Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Dec 14;99(24):248103
18233494
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):563-74
16791145
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):1089-102
19052108
J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 10;28(50):13522-31
19074026
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Apr;13(4):439-49
20139975
Brain Res. 1997 Jan 16;745(1-2):189-96
9037409
Science. 2001 Feb 2;291(5505):889-94
11157170
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Oct;82(4):1786-92
10515968
Neuron. 2001 May;30(2):553-67
11395014
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e163
16689623
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:263-97
11283312
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2401-6
19181842
Nat Neurosci. 2007 May;10(5):631-9
17450136
J Neurophysiol. 1989 Jun;61(6):1161-77
2746317
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Dec;2(12):1106-13
10570488
Science. 1997 Mar 21;275(5307):1805-8
9065407
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 15;101(24):9097-102
15184670
Science. 2010 Jan 29;327(5965):587-90
20110507
Science. 2010 Jan 29;327(5965):584-7
20110506
Nature. 1996 Jul 25;382(6589):363-6
8684467
J Vis. 2006 Jul 17;6(4):484-507
16889482
Neuron. 2003 Mar 6;37(5):843-52
12628174
Cell. 1996 Nov 15;87(4):675-86
8929536
Bull Los Angel Neuro Soc. 1952 Mar-Jun;17(1-2):5-46
14944970
Science. 1995 Jun 9;268(5216):1503-6
7770778
Trends Neurosci. 2008 Aug;31(8):428-34
18603311
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 2;98(1):319-24
11120888
Nature. 1997 Nov 6;390(6655):70-4
9363891
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jan;9(1):99-107
16369481
J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 8;26(45):11709-19
17093092
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):356-62
16444270
J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 21;25(38):8776-87
16177047
J Physiol. 2002 Jul 15;542(Pt 2):355-67
12122137
Science. 2000 Jan 14;287(5451):273-8
10634775
J Neurosci Methods. 1994 Jan;51(1):95-106
8189755
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Sep;12(9):1136-44
19684589
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Nov;12(11):1424-30
19838180
Cereb Cortex. 2002 Apr;12(4):395-410
11884355
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Mar 13;84(11):2310-3
11018872
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jun;2(6):515-20
10448215
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jan;99(1):277-83
17928562
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;89(6):3143-54
12612010
J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(2):279-314
978519
J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 29;29(17):5573-86
19403824
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Apr;9(4):534-42
16547512
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Aug;2(8):539-50
11483997
J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5;26(14):3646-55
16597718
Neuron. 2009 Feb 26;61(4):570-86
19249277
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):80-7
18084286