title: Universal scaling of production rates across mammalian lineages.
abstract: Over many millions of years of independent evolution, placental, marsupial and monotreme mammals have diverged conspicuously in physiology, life history and reproductive ecology. The differences in life histories are particularly striking. Compared with placentals, marsupials exhibit shorter pregnancy, smaller size of offspring at birth and longer period of lactation in the pouch. Monotremes also exhibit short pregnancy, but incubate embryos in eggs, followed by a long period of post-hatching lactation. Using a large sample of mammalian species, we show that, remarkably, despite their very different life histories, the scaling of production rates is statistically indistinguishable across mammalian lineages. Apparently all mammals are subject to the same fundamental metabolic constraints on productivity, because they share similar body designs, vascular systems and costs of producing new tissue.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, , Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. marcusj@unm.edu
authors.forename: Marcus J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Hamilton
authors.forename: Ana D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Davidson
authors.forename: Richard M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Sibly
authors.forename: James H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Brown
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001481:Basal Metabolism; D005075:Biological Evolution; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008322:Mammals / Q000502:physiology; D008394:Marsupialia / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D009007:Monotremata / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D010920:Placenta / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D011247:Pregnancy; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):122-6
references.pmid: 9082983
references.citation: Am Nat. 2009 Jun;173(6):E185-99
references.pmid: 19374555
references.citation: Nature. 1978 May 18;273(5659):191-5
references.pmid: 347308
references.citation: Evolution. 1971 Dec;25(4):636-658
references.pmid: 28564788
references.citation: Science. 2003 Dec 12;302(5652):1899-900
references.pmid: 14671280
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 6;104(45):17707-12
references.pmid: 17940028
references.citation: Am Nat. 2007 Dec;170(6):E129-42
references.pmid: 18171160
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Oct;33(1):240-50
references.pmid: 15324852
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Apr 30;392(6679):917-20
references.pmid: 9582070
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Aug;28(2):360-85
references.pmid: 12878472
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Dec 13;450(7172):1011-9
references.pmid: 18075580
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Mar;23(3):587-97
references.pmid: 16291999
references.citation: Science. 2008 Oct 31;322(5902):736-9
references.pmid: 18974352
references.citation: Aust J Zool. 1974 Aug;22(3):277-302
references.pmid: 4475649
references.citation: Science. 2003 Dec 12;302(5652):1934-40
references.pmid: 14671295