title: Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus).
abstract: Variation in male mating success is often related to rank differences. Males who are unable to monopolize oestrous females alone may engage in coalitions, thus enhancing their mating success. While studies on chimpanzees and dolphins suggest that coalitions are independent of kinship, information from female philopatric species shows the importance of kin support, especially from mothers, on the reproductive success of females. Therefore, one might expect a similar effect on sons in male philopatric species. We evaluate mating success determinants in male bonobos using data from nine male individuals from a wild population. Results reveal a steep, linear male dominance hierarchy and a positive correlation between dominance status and mating success. In addition to rank, the presence of mothers enhances the mating success of sons and reduces the proportion of matings by the highest ranking male. Mothers and sons have high association rates and mothers provide agonistic aid to sons in conflicts with other males. As bonobos are male-philopatric and adult females occupy high dominance status, maternal support extends into adulthood and females have the leverage to intervene in male conflicts. The absence of female support to unrelated males suggests that mothers gain indirect fitness benefits by supporting their sons.
authors.affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, , Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. surbeck@eva.mpg.de
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Surbeck
authors.forename: Roger
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mundry
authors.forename: Gottfried
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Hohmann
mesh_terms: D000378:Agonistic Behavior; D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D008425:Maternal Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D019974:Pan paniscus / Q000502:physiology* / Q000523:psychology; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology*; D012930:Social Dominance
references.citation: Am J Primatol. 2008 Mar;70(3):301-5
references.pmid: 17910037
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Apr 4;16(7):R239-41
references.pmid: 16581496
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3243-54
references.pmid: 19805431
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Apr 4;416(6880):496
references.pmid: 11932733
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Sep 22;272(1575):1917-22
references.pmid: 16191597
references.citation: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Sep;143(1):41-51
references.pmid: 20310060
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 22;268(1479):1941-7
references.pmid: 11564352
references.citation: Folia Primatol (Basel). 2006;77(5):364-76
references.pmid: 16912505
references.citation: Primates. 2004 Jan;45(1):59-62
references.pmid: 14505180
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Jun 7;266(1424):1189-95
references.pmid: 10406131
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1962 Dec 28;102:338-435
references.pmid: 14012344
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2008 Aug;54(2):319-24
references.pmid: 18448106
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Mar 7;16(5):R156-7
references.pmid: 16527729
references.citation: Behav Ecol. 2008 Nov;19(6):1150-1158
references.pmid: 19018288
references.citation: Science. 2003 Nov 14;302(5648):1231-4
references.pmid: 14615543
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16
references.pmid: 5875341
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Apr;16(8):1559-78
references.pmid: 17402974
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Jul;60(1):107-120
references.pmid: 10924210
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Feb 8;409(6821):681-2
references.pmid: 11217847
references.citation: Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227-67
references.pmid: 4597405