title: Medical spending differences in the United States and Canada: the role of prices, procedures, and administrative expenses.
abstract: The United States far outspends Canada on health care, but the sources of additional spending are unclear. We evaluated the importance of incomes, administration, and medical interventions in this difference. Pooling various sources, we calculated medical personnel incomes, administrative expenses, and procedure volume and intensity for the United States and Canada. We found that Canada spent $1589 per capita less on physicians and hospitals in 2002. Administration accounted for the largest share of this difference (39%), followed by incomes (31%), and more intensive provision of medical services (14%). Whether this additional spending is wasteful or warranted is unknown.
authors.affiliation: Health Services and Policy Analysis Program, Graduate Division, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA. apozen@berkeley.edu
authors.forename: Alexis
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pozen
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Cutler
mesh_terms: D002170:Canada; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D005102:Health Expenditures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000191:economics; D006298:Health Services Administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D012456:Salaries and Fringe Benefits / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014481:United States
references.citation: Med Econ. 2003 Nov 7;80(21):31-2, 35-7
references.pmid: 14666866
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 21;349(8):801-3
references.pmid: 12930934
references.citation: Am J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 15;96(6):815-21
references.pmid: 16169368
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 May-Jun;22(3):89-105
references.pmid: 12757275
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 1992 Spring;11(1):21-43
references.pmid: 1577377
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 27;331(17):1130-5
references.pmid: 7935638
references.citation: Med Econ. 2003 Sep 18;80(19):71-2, 76-9
references.pmid: 14571859
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 21;349(8):768-75
references.pmid: 12930930
references.citation: Circulation. 2004 Sep 28;110(13):1754-60
references.pmid: 15381645
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 11;165(13):1506-13
references.pmid: 16009866
references.citation: JAMA. 1993 Apr 7;269(13):1661-6
references.pmid: 8455299
references.citation: J Econ Perspect. 1992 Summer;6(3):3-21
references.pmid: 10128078
references.citation: Inquiry. 2000 Fall;37(3):304-16
references.pmid: 11111287
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Nov;86(11):2435-9
references.pmid: 15523015
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 18;328(11):779-84
references.pmid: 8123063
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1997 May 22;336(21):1500-5
references.pmid: 9154770