title: The role of visual attention in multiple object tracking: evidence from ERPs.
abstract: We examined the role of visual attention in the multiple object tracking (MOT) task by measuring the amplitude of the N1 component of the event-related potential (ERP) to probe flashes presented on targets, distractors, or empty background areas. We found evidence that visual attention enhances targets and suppresses distractors (Experiment 1 & 3). However, we also found that when tracking load was light (two targets and two distractors), accurate tracking could be carried out without any apparent contribution from the visual attention system (Experiment 2). Our results suggest that attentional selection during MOT is flexibly determined by task demands as well as tracking load and that visual attention may not always be necessary for accurate tracking.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA. mdoran@psych.udel.edu
authors.forename: Matthew M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Doran
authors.forename: James E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Hoffman
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral / Q000502:physiology; D004569:Electroencephalography; D018913:Event-Related Potentials, P300 / Q000502:physiology*; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;13(4):167-74
references.pmid: 19269882
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Apr;44(8):763-73
references.pmid: 14967203
references.citation: Vision Res. 1999 Jan;39(2):293-306
references.pmid: 10326137
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):390-7
references.pmid: 18488657
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2007 Feb 27;414(1):65-70
references.pmid: 17207932
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 16;28(16):4183-91
references.pmid: 18417697
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Oct;11(5):583-97
references.pmid: 2932532
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):1-46
references.pmid: 11245838
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1997 Jun 20;46(1):67-71
references.pmid: 9255432
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):80-102
references.pmid: 8121961
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Feb;18(2):298-310
references.pmid: 16494688
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001;41(10-11):1409-22
references.pmid: 11322983
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Oct 7;401(6753):584-7
references.pmid: 10524624
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Jul 25;27(30):7963-73
references.pmid: 17652587
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001;41(10-11):1437-57
references.pmid: 11322985
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Nov;80(5):2657-70
references.pmid: 9819271
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):485-96
references.pmid: 8008550
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82
references.pmid: 15668100
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1988;3(3):179-97
references.pmid: 3153671
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1982 Mar;111(1):1-22
references.pmid: 6460833
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):802-8
references.pmid: 18792507
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Jun;107(3):904-31
references.pmid: 18289519
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216
references.pmid: 11689021
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):516-23
references.pmid: 17048740
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1994 May;31(3):291-308
references.pmid: 8008793
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Dec;17(12):1907-22
references.pmid: 16356328
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Feb;15(2):95-111
references.pmid: 11835601
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):432-440
references.pmid: 11058821
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references.pmid: 7605061
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Oct;44(4):369-78
references.pmid: 3226885
references.citation: Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
references.pmid: 9384378
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jul 17;424(6946):309-12
references.pmid: 12867981
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Mar 2;440(7080):91-5
references.pmid: 16382240
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr;26(2):834-46
references.pmid: 10811179
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Nov;16(11):905-12
references.pmid: 16262778
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 May 27;42(4):677-86
references.pmid: 15157427
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1981 Sep;18(5):493-513
references.pmid: 7280146
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):498-504
references.pmid: 12930483
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85
references.pmid: 11515286
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Mar;54(1):1-14
references.pmid: 10721235
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Nov;70(5):417-28
references.pmid: 2460315
references.citation: Spat Vis. 2006;19(6):485-504
references.pmid: 17278524
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):781-7
references.pmid: 9448241
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1980 Jun;109(2):160-74
references.pmid: 7381367
references.citation: Brain Res. 2007 Mar 30;1139:143-52
references.pmid: 17288996
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):217-42
references.pmid: 15631594
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1981 Sep;30(3):283-90
references.pmid: 7322804
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Oct 30;7(13):14.1-10
references.pmid: 17997642
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Aug;31(4):643-67
references.pmid: 16131240
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1000-14
references.pmid: 7964526
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1999 Mar;38(2):259-90
references.pmid: 10090804
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
references.pmid: 7367577
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
references.pmid: 17695343
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Dec;113(4):501-17
references.pmid: 6240521
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2003 May;13(5):486-99
references.pmid: 12679295
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul;9(7):349-54
references.pmid: 15953754
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54
references.pmid: 15355143
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):411-7
references.pmid: 19293115
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):188-95
references.pmid: 23972153
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Jun;123(2):161-77
references.pmid: 8014611
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jan;10(1):137-51
references.pmid: 9526088
references.citation: Vision Res. 2005 Aug;45(17):2298-309
references.pmid: 15924943
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1986 Oct;40(4):225-40
references.pmid: 3786090
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1977 Sep;14(5):456-67
references.pmid: 905483
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Nov 9;408(6809):196-9
references.pmid: 11089972
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):127-58
references.pmid: 11245842
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Jul;55(4):343-61
references.pmid: 9654384
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1995 Oct;41(2):103-46
references.pmid: 8534788
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Nov;17(4):1057-74
references.pmid: 1837297
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1984 Aug;36(2):185-98
references.pmid: 6514528
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):159-77
references.pmid: 11245843
references.citation: Science. 1977 Aug 19;197(4305):792-5
references.pmid: 887923
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Oct;33(5):1003-12
references.pmid: 17924803