Functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI: is linear correlation sufficient?
Functional connectivity (FC) analysis is a prominent approach to analyzing fMRI data, especially acquired under the resting state condition. The commonly used linear correlation FC measure bears an implicit assumption of Gaussianity of the dependence structure. If only the marginals, but not all the bivariate distributions are Gaussian, linear correlation consistently underestimates the strength of the dependence. To assess the suitability of linear correlation and the general potential of nonlinear FC measures, we present a framework for testing and estimating the deviation from Gaussianity by means of comparing mutual information in the data and its Gaussianized counterpart. We apply this method to 24 sessions of human resting state fMRI. For each session, matrix of connectivities between 90 anatomical parcel time series is computed using mutual information and compared to results from its multivariate Gaussian surrogate that conserves the correlations but cancels any nonlinearity. While the group-level tests confirmed non-Gaussianity in the FC, the quantitative assessment revealed that the portion of mutual information neglected by linear correlation is relatively minor-on average only about 5% of the mutual information already captured by the linear correlation. The marginality of the non-Gaussianity was confirmed in comparisons using clustering of the parcels-the disagreement between clustering obtained from mutual information and linear correlation was attributable to random error. We conclude that for this type of data, practical relevance of nonlinear methods trying to improve over linear correlation might be limited by the fact that the data are indeed almost Gaussian.
Hlinka
Jaroslav
J
Institute of Computer Science, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic. hlinka@cs.cas.cz
Palus
Milan
M
Vejmelka
Martin
M
Mantini
Dante
D
Corbetta
Maurizio
M
D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D005260:Female; D005583:Fourier Analysis; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D009434:Neural Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D016011:Normal Distribution; D010100:Oxygen / Q000097:blood; D012146:Rest / Q000502:physiology; D012984:Software; D055815:Young Adult
D010100:Oxygen
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;116(10):2266-301
16115797
Neuroimage. 2008 May 1;40(4):1672-85
18316208
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 May;75(5 Pt 2):056211
17677152
Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):273-89
11771995
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 21;106(29):12174-7
19584247
Neuroimage. 2005 Mar;25(1):141-58
15734351
Neuroimage. 2010 Mar;50(1):81-98
20006716
Neurophysiol Clin. 1990 Apr;20(1):1-11
2348808
Phys Rev Lett. 1994 Aug 15;73(7):951-954
10057582
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;103(1):297-321
19889849
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 29;93(22):12128-31
8901544
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):962-74
14568466
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1649-58
19520175
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Jul;29(7):762-9
18465797
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):700-11
17704812
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 7;104(32):13170-5
17670949