title: Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
abstract: Recognition of periodically interrupted sentences (with an interruption rate of 1.5 Hz, 50% duty cycle) was investigated under conditions of spectral degradation, implemented with a noiseband vocoder, with and without additional unprocessed low-pass filtered speech (cutoff frequency 500 Hz). Intelligibility of interrupted speech decreased with increasing spectral degradation. For all spectral degradation conditions, however, adding the unprocessed low-pass filtered speech enhanced the intelligibility. The improvement at 4 and 8 channels was higher than the improvement at 16 and 32 channels: 19% and 8%, on average, respectively. The Articulation Index predicted an improvement of 0.09, in a scale from 0 to 1. Thus, the improvement at poorest spectral degradation conditions was larger than what would be expected from additional speech information. Therefore, the results implied that the fine temporal cues from the unprocessed low-frequency speech, such as the additional voice pitch cues, helped perceptual integration of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded speech, especially when the spectral degradations were severe. Considering the vocoder processing as a cochlear implant simulation, where implant users' performance is closest to 4 and 8-channel vocoder performance, the results support additional benefit of low-frequency acoustic input in combined electric-acoustic stimulation for perception of temporally degraded speech.
authors.affiliation: Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. d.baskent@med.umcg.nl
authors.forename: Deniz
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Başkent
authors.forename: Monita
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Chatterjee
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001301:Audiometry, Pure-Tone; D001302:Audiometry, Speech; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010898:Pitch Perception; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013061:Speech Acoustics; D013065:Speech Intelligibility; D013067:Speech Perception; D013997:Time Factors; D014833:Voice Quality; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Hear Res. 2010 Feb;260(1-2):54-62
references.pmid: 19922784
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Mar;117(3 Pt 1):1351-61
references.pmid: 15807023
references.citation: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Mar;6(1):19-27
references.pmid: 15735937
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Mar;125(3):1658-65
references.pmid: 19275323
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63
references.pmid: 11519582
references.citation: Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14 Suppl 1:8-13
references.pmid: 19390170
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1973 Sep;54(3):661-7
references.pmid: 4754389
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Mar;107(3):1671-84
references.pmid: 10738820
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1992 Mar;51(3):211-7
references.pmid: 1561046
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Apr;115(4):1729-35
references.pmid: 15101651
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Dec;36(6):1276-85
references.pmid: 8114494
references.citation: Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):303-4
references.pmid: 7569981
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Jan;67(1):318-26
references.pmid: 7354199
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2010 Feb;31(1):63-9
references.pmid: 20050394
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):489-93
references.pmid: 19546806
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Apr;119(4):2417-26
references.pmid: 16642854
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Sep;122(3):1336
references.pmid: 17927396
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Feb;113(2):1073-80
references.pmid: 12597200
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Oct;128(4):EL169-74
references.pmid: 20968321
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 May;115(5 Pt 1):2286-94
references.pmid: 15139640
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Jul;80(1):50-7
references.pmid: 3745665
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Aug;128(2):881-9
references.pmid: 20707457
references.citation: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2002 Jun;3(2):185-99
references.pmid: 12162368
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):190-210
references.pmid: 20689036
references.citation: Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009;61(5):263-8
references.pmid: 19696487
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jun;87(6):2592-605
references.pmid: 2373794
references.citation: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Jun;8(2):241-57
references.pmid: 17347777
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):EL37-41
references.pmid: 20136176