A comparative study of in-gel digestions using microwave and pressure-accelerated technologies.
One of the most popular methods to prepare tryptic peptides for bottom-up proteomic analysis is in-gel digestion. To date, there have been few studies comparing various digestion methods. In this study, we compare the efficiency of several popular in-gel digestion methods, along with new technologies that may improve digestion efficiency, using a human epidermoid carcinoma cell lysate protein standard. The efficiency of each protocol was based on the average number of proteins identified and their respective sequence coverage and relative quantitation using spectral counting. The importance of this study lies in its comparison of pre-existing in-gel digestion methods with those that use newly developed technologies that may introduce the potential for a more cost-effective digestion, higher protein yield, and an overall reduction in processing time. The following four protocols were compared: an overnight in-gel digestion protocol; an overnight in-gel digestion protocol, in which we remove the vacuum centrifugation steps; in-gel digestion in a barometric pressure cycler; and in-gel digestion in a scientific microwave. Several variables were tested for increased digestion efficiency and decreased keratin contamination. Statistical analysis was performed on replicate samples to determine significant differences between protocols.
Alvarado
Rudy
R
UC Davis Proteomics Core Facility, University of California Davis Genome Center, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Tran
Diana
D
Ching
Bonnie
B
Phinney
Brett S
BS
D002294:Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Q000473:pathology; D002498:Centrifugation; D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; D006801:Humans; D008872:Microwaves; D011312:Pressure; D053719:Tandem Mass Spectrometry; D014407:Tumor Cells, Cultured
Anal Chem. 2002 Oct 15;74(20):5383-92
12403597
Anal Biochem. 1992 May 15;203(1):173-9
1524213
Anal Chem. 2001 Jun 1;73(11):2558-64
11403300
Nat Methods. 2007 Oct;4(10):787-97
17901868
Nature. 1996 Feb 1;379(6564):466-9
8559255
Proteomics. 2005 Mar;5(4):840-2
15693069
J Proteome Res. 2004 Sep-Oct;3(5):965-78
15473684
Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Oct;17(10):994-9
10504701
Anal Chem. 2003 Sep 1;75(17):4646-58
14632076
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006 Apr;5(4):769-76
16339992
Anal Biochem. 1995 Jan 1;224(1):451-5
7710111