The use of 3D surface scanning for the measurement and assessment of the human foot.
BACKGROUND
A number of surface scanning systems with the ability to quickly and easily obtain 3D digital representations of the foot are now commercially available. This review aims to present a summary of the reported use of these technologies in footwear development, the design of customised orthotics, and investigations for other ergonomic purposes related to the foot.


METHODS
The PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were searched. Reference lists and experts in the field were also consulted to identify additional articles. Studies in English which had 3D surface scanning of the foot as an integral element of their protocol were included in the review.


RESULTS
Thirty-eight articles meeting the search criteria were included. Advantages and disadvantages of using 3D surface scanning systems are highlighted. A meta-analysis of studies using scanners to investigate the changes in foot dimensions during varying levels of weight bearing was carried out.


CONCLUSIONS
Modern 3D surface scanning systems can obtain accurate and repeatable digital representations of the foot shape and have been successfully used in medical, ergonomic and footwear development applications. The increasing affordability of these systems presents opportunities for researchers investigating the foot and for manufacturers of foot related apparel and devices, particularly those interested in producing items that are customised to the individual. Suggestions are made for future areas of research and for the standardization of the protocols used to produce foot scans.
Telfer
Scott
S
School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK. scott.telfer@gcu.ac.uk.
Woodburn
James
J
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;93(1):1-5
12533548
Hum Factors. 2004 Summer;46(2):304-15
15359679
Ergonomics. 2008 Nov;51(11):1693-709
18941975
Ergonomics. 2004 Oct 10;47(12):1301-17
15370849
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2011 May-Jun;101(3):198-207
21622631
Appl Ergon. 2009 Jul;40(4):767-74
18937935
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008 Sep;32(3):356-62
18677672
J Surg Res. 2000 Jun 15;91(2):106-10
10839957
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1991;205(2):109-15
1840716
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD006801
18646168
Burns. 2000 Mar;26(2):156-70
10716359
Appl Ergon. 2009 Mar;40(2):267-79
18513701
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Nov;82(11):842-6
14566151
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006 Jul-Aug;96(4):330-43
16868327
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Apr;33(4):605-11
11283437
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002 May;92(5):261-8
12015406
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Nov-Dec;40(6):517-26
15077664
Ergonomics. 2009 Aug;52(8):999-1008
19629814
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):634-9
16882817
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Feb;55(2 Pt 1):784-90
18270017
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1990 Nov;5(4):229-35
23916283
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Jul;57(7):1750-6
20211798
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jul;32(7):1068-75
18414422
Med Eng Phys. 2008 Apr;30(3):269-77
17584519
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;99(5):383-90
19767544
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;96(1):9-18
16415278