title: Higher resistance to herbivory in introduced compared to native populations of a seaweed.
abstract: Non-indigenous species (NIS) are important components of global change, and in order to manage such species it is important to understand which factors affect their success. Interactions with enemies in the new range have been shown to be important for the outcome of introductions, but thus far most studies on NIS-enemy interactions have considered only specialist herbivores in terrestrial systems. Here we present the results from the first biogeographic study that compares herbivore resistance between populations in the native and new region of a non-indigenous seaweed. We show that low consumption of the non-indigenous seaweed by a generalist herbivore is caused by higher chemical defence levels and herbivore resistance in the new range-and not by the failure of the herbivore to recognise the non-indigenous seaweed as a suitable host. Since most seaweed-herbivore interactions are dominated by generalist herbivores, this pattern could be common in marine communities. Our results also reveal that traits used to predict the invasive potential of species, such as their resistance to enemies, can change during the invasion process, but not always in the way predicted by dominant theories.
authors.affiliation: Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. helena.forslund@botan.su.se
authors.forename: Helena
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Forslund
authors.forename: Sofia A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Wikström
authors.forename: Henrik
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Pavia
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D057231:Climate Change; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D049851:Gastropoda / Q000502:physiology*; D058865:Introduced Species; D010636:Phenols / Q000378:metabolism; D012624:Seaweed / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity
chemical_list: D010636:Phenols
references.citation: Oecologia. 2003 May;135(3):451-7
references.pmid: 12721836
references.citation: Oecologia. 2009 Feb;159(1):95-106
references.pmid: 18941785
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 May;152(2):245-55
references.pmid: 17225156
references.citation: Science. 2006 Mar 10;311(5766):1459-61
references.pmid: 16527979
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1981 Nov;7(6):1115-33
references.pmid: 24420835
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Feb;12(2):107-17
references.pmid: 19143824
references.citation: Oecologia. 2006 Jul;148(4):593-601
references.pmid: 16532333
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 May;87(5):1169-78
references.pmid: 16761596
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1995 Jan;21(1):45-58
references.pmid: 24233566
references.citation: Oecologia. 1989 Mar;80(1):82-6
references.pmid: 23494349
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2007 Apr;21(2):329-36
references.pmid: 17391183
references.citation: Oecologia. 1999 Sep;120(4):632-640
references.pmid: 28308315