Conditions under which genome-wide association studies will be positively misleading.
Genome-wide association mapping is a popular method for using natural variation within a species to generate a genotype-phenotype map. Statistical association between an allele at a locus and the trait in question is used as evidence that variation at the locus is responsible for variation of the trait. Indirect association, however, can give rise to statistically significant results at loci unrelated to the trait. We use a haploid, three-locus, binary genetic model to describe the conditions under which these indirect associations become stronger than any of the causative associations in the organism--even to the point of representing the only associations present in the data. These indirect associations are the result of disequilibrium between multiple factors affecting a single trait. Epistasis and population structure can exacerbate the problem but are not required to create it. From a statistical point of view, indirect associations are true associations rather than the result of stochastic noise: they will not be ameliorated by increasing sampling size or marker density and can be reproduced in independent studies.
Platt
Alexander
A
Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. alexander.platt@usc.edu
Vilhjálmsson
Bjarni J
BJ
Nordborg
Magnus
M
D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000235:genetics*; D016477:Artifacts; D003198:Computer Simulation; D018745:Genome, Plant / Q000235:genetics*; D055106:Genome-Wide Association Study / Q000379:methods*; D005843:Geography; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010641:Phenotype; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Q000235:genetics
Nature. 2010 Jun 3;465(7298):627-31
20336072
Genetics. 2006 Jul;173(3):1665-78
16582435
Science. 1994 Sep 30;265(5181):2037-48
8091226
Nat Genet. 2010 Apr;42(4):348-54
20208533
Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):98-101
18758442
Am Nat. 2004 Apr;163(4):489-504
15122498
Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):997-1004
11315092
Heredity (Edinb). 1994 Feb;72 ( Pt 2):175-92
8150657
PLoS Genet. 2010 Feb 12;6(2):e1000843
20169178
Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9
16862161
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jan 26;8(1):e1000294
20126254
Nat Genet. 2006 Feb;38(2):203-8
16380716
Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1211-22
1459438
Nat Genet. 2004 Apr;36(4):388-93
15052270
Ann Hum Genet. 1969 Jul;33(1):23-9
5821316
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jul;67(1):170-81
10827107
Theor Appl Genet. 1992 Dec;85(4):480-8
24197463