title: A varying coefficient model to measure the effectiveness of mass media anti-smoking campaigns in generating calls to a Quitline.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Anti-smoking advertisements are an effective population-based smoking reduction strategy. The Quitline telephone service provides a first point of contact for adults considering quitting. Because of data complexity, the relationship between anti-smoking advertising placement, intensity, and time trends in total call volume is poorly understood. In this study we use a recently developed semi-varying coefficient model to elucidate this relationship.
  
  
  METHODS
  Semi-varying coefficient models comprise parametric and nonparametric components. The model is fitted to the daily number of calls to Quitline in Victoria, Australia to estimate a nonparametric long-term trend and parametric terms for day-of-the-week effects and to clarify the relationship with target audience rating points (TARPs) for the Quit and nicotine replacement advertising campaigns.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The number of calls to Quitline increased with the TARP value of both the Quit and other smoking cessation advertisement; the TARP values associated with the Quit program were almost twice as effective. The varying coefficient term was statistically significant for peak periods with little or no advertising.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Semi-varying coefficient models are useful for modeling public health data when there is little or no information on other factors related to the at-risk population. These models are well suited to modeling call volume to Quitline, because the varying coefficient allowed the underlying time trend to depend on fixed covariates that also vary with time, thereby explaining more of the variation in the call model.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic & Analytic Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Quang M
authors.initials: QM
authors.lastname: Bui
authors.forename: Richard M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Huggins
authors.forename: Wen-Han
authors.initials: WH
authors.lastname: Hwang
authors.forename: Victoria
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: White
authors.forename: Bircan
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Erbas
mesh_terms: D000329:Advertising; D006293:Health Promotion; D015277:Hotlines / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008402:Mass Media; D015233:Models, Statistical; D015397:Program Evaluation; D016540:Smoking Cessation / Q000379:methods*; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D013997:Time Factors; D014739:Victoria
references.citation: Tob Control. 2003 Sep;12 Suppl 2:ii53-8
references.pmid: 12878774
references.citation: Aust N Z J Med. 1984 Aug;14(4):405-7
references.pmid: 6596048
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Apr;61(4):298-301
references.pmid: 17372288
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Feb;60(2):180-2
references.pmid: 16415271
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 3;347(14):1087-93
references.pmid: 12362011
references.citation: Med J Aust. 1998 Mar 2;168(5):209-13
references.pmid: 9539898
references.citation: Tob Control. 2003 Sep;12 Suppl 2:ii40-4
references.pmid: 12878772
references.citation: Addiction. 2001 Jun;96(6):881-9
references.pmid: 11399219
references.citation: Biometrics. 2007 Sep;63(3):708-13
references.pmid: 17825004
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 May 6;84(9):677-83
references.pmid: 1569601
references.citation: Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):148-54
references.pmid: 10841850