title: Written Emotional Disclosure: Testing Whether Social Disclosure Matters.
abstract: Studies suggest that written emotional disclosure can improve health. Unknown, however, is whether the presence or absence of an audience for one's disclosure matters, and whether time management control writing has any effects. Undergraduates (N = 165) with unresolved stress were randomized to 1 of 3 groups that wrote for 4 sessions: shared written disclosure (submitted to researchers), private written disclosure (not submitted), or time management control writing; or to a fourth group (no-writing control). At 3-month follow-up, the two control groups were equivalent on outcomes. Both shared and private disclosure resulted in less cognitive intrusion and avoidance than the combined control groups. Yet, shared disclosure reduced depression and interpersonal sensitivity more than either private disclosure or the control groups, and only shared disclosure reduced physical symptoms. Although truly private writing improves cognitive stress effects, shared writing has broader benefits, suggesting that social disclosure for one's writing matters.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Wayne State University.
authors.forename: Alison M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Radcliffe
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Lumley
authors.forename: Jessica
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kendall
authors.forename: Jennifer K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Stevenson
authors.forename: Joyce
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Beltran
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Apr;52(4):781-93
references.pmid: 3572739
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;73(3):549-54
references.pmid: 15982152
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Apr;72(2):165-75
references.pmid: 15065952
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Mar 2;324(7336):544
references.pmid: 11872562
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18
references.pmid: 472086
references.citation: BMJ. 2001 Jul 14;323(7304):86
references.pmid: 11451784
references.citation: JAMA. 1999 Apr 14;281(14):1304-9
references.pmid: 10208146
references.citation: Psychol Med. 1983 Aug;13(3):595-605
references.pmid: 6622612
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Apr;74(2):243-52
references.pmid: 16649869
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Feb;109(1):156-60
references.pmid: 10740948
references.citation: J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004 Sep;192(9):629-34
references.pmid: 15348980
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Mar;58(3):528-537
references.pmid: 2324942
references.citation: Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1986 Mar;37(3):241-9
references.pmid: 3957267
references.citation: J Clin Psychol. 2005 Dec;61(12):1555-70
references.pmid: 16193479
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 Aug;95(3):274-81
references.pmid: 3745650
references.citation: Ann Behav Med. 2004 Feb;27(1):50-9
references.pmid: 14979863
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Feb;66(1):174-84
references.pmid: 9489272
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1997 Feb;106(1):95-103
references.pmid: 9103721
references.citation: Ann Behav Med. 2006 Oct;32(2):135-46
references.pmid: 16972811
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:59-91
references.pmid: 10751965
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Feb;70(1):169-78
references.pmid: 11860043
references.citation: Death Stud. 2000 Mar;24(2):115-34
references.pmid: 11010659
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;67(2):326-34
references.pmid: 15784801
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;180:205-9
references.pmid: 11872511