title: Genetic variation in herbivore resistance and tolerance: the role of plant life-history stage and type of damage.
abstract: Information of the patterns of genetic variation in plant resistance and tolerance against herbivores and genetic trade-offs between these two defence strategies is central for our understanding of the evolution of plant defence. We found genetic variation in resistance to two specialist herbivores and in tolerance to artificial damage but not to a specialist leaf herbivore in a long-lived perennial herb. Seedlings tended to have genetic variation in tolerance to artificial damage. Genetic variation in tolerance of adult plants to artificial damage was not consistent in time. Our results suggest that the level of genetic variation in tolerance and resistance depends on plant life-history stage, type of damage and timing of estimating the tolerance relative to the occurrence of the damage, which might reflect the pattern of selection imposed by herbivory. Furthermore, we found no trade-offs between resistance and tolerance, which suggests that the two defence strategies can evolve independently.
authors.affiliation: Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Muola
authors.affiliation: Plant Ecological Genetics, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH-Zürich, ETH-Zentrum, Zürich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mutikainen
authors.affiliation: Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Laukkanen
authors.affiliation: Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lilley
authors.affiliation: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Leimu
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D029062:Apocynaceae / Q000235:genetics*; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D020387:Food Chain; D014644:Genetic Variation; D020062:Heteroptera; D009036:Moths; D036226:Seedlings; D012639:Seeds
references.citation: Barton, K.E. & Koricheva, J. 2010. The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis. Am. Nat. 175: 481-493.
references.citation: Baucom, R.S. & Mauricio, R. 2004. Fitness costs and benefits of novel herbicide tolerance in a noxious weed. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101: 13386-13390.
references.citation: Berenbaum, M.R., Zangerl, A.R. & Nitao, J.K. 1986. Constraints on chemical coevolution: wild parsnips and the parsnip webworm. Evolution 40: 1215-1228.
references.citation: Bergelson, J. & Purrington, C.B. 1996. Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. Am. Nat. 148: 536-558.
references.citation: Bergman, M. 2002. Can saliva from moose, Alces alces, affect growth responses in the sallow, Salix caprea? Oikos 96: 164-168.
references.citation: Boege, K. & Marquis, R.J. 2005. Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 441-448.
references.citation: Bordner, J., Danehower, D.A., Thacker, J.D., Kennedy, G.G., Stinner, R.E. & Wilson, K.G. 1983. Chemical basis for host selection. In: Plant Resistance to Insects (P.A. Hedin, ed.), pp. 245-264. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
references.citation: Bowers, M.D. & Puttick, G.M. 1988. Response of generalist and specialist insects to qualitative allelochemical variation. J. Chem. Ecol. 14: 319-334.
references.citation: Cates, R.G. 1980. Feeding patterns of monophagous, oligophagous, and polyphagous insect herbivores: the effect of resource abundance and plant chemistry. Oecologia 46: 22-31.
references.citation: Ehrlén, J. 2002. Assessing lifetime consequences of plant-animal interactions for the perennial herb Lathyrus vernus (Fabaceae). Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 5: 145-163.
references.citation: Eibler, E.U., Tanner, K.K., Mayer, W., Wiegreb, E. & Reger, H. 1995. HPLC-analysis of alkaloids from Cynanchum vincetoxicum. Acta Pharm. (Zagreb) 45: 487-493.
references.citation: Fineblum, W.L. & Rausher, M.D. 1995. Trade-off between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377: 517-520.
references.citation: Förare, J. 1995. The biology of the noctuid moth Abrostola asclepiadis Schiff. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Sweden. Ent. Tidskr. 116: 179-186.
references.citation: Förare, J. & Engqvist, L. 1996. Suboptimal patch and plant choice by an ovipositing monophagous moth - an insurance against bad weather? Oikos 77: 301-308.
references.citation: Fox, L.R. 1981. Defence and dynamics in plant-herbivore systems. Am. Zool. 21: 853-864.
references.citation: Haukioja, E. & Koricheva, J. 2000. Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants. Evol. Ecol. 14: 551-562.
references.citation: Jokela, J., Schmid-Hempel, P. & Rigby, M.C. 2000. Dr. Pangloss restrained by the Red Queen - steps towards a unified defence theory. Oikos 89: 267-274.
references.citation: Juenger, T., Lennartsson, T. & Tuomi, J. 2000. The evolution of tolerance to browsing in Gentianella campetris: natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evol. Ecol. 14: 393-419.
references.citation: Karban, R. & Baldwin, I.T. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
references.citation: Kelly, C.K. & Hanley, M.E. 2005. Juvenile growth and palatability in co-occurring, congeneric British herbs. Am. J. Bot. 92: 1586-1589.
references.citation: Kraft, S.A. & Denno, R.F. 1982. Feeding responses of adapted and non-adapted insects of the defensive properties of Baccharis halimifolia L. (Compositae). Oecologia 52: 156-163.
references.citation: Lehtilä, K. 2003. Precision of herbivore tolerance experiments with imposed and natural damage. Evolution 57: 677-680.
references.citation: Leimu, R. 2004. Variation in the mating system of Vincetoxicum hirundinaria (Asclepiadaceae) in peripherial island populations. Ann. Bot. 93: 107-113.
references.citation: Leimu, R. & Koricheva, J. 2006a. A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidences from ecological and agricultural studies. Oikos 112: 1-9.
references.citation: Leimu, R. & Koricheva, J. 2006b. A meta-analysis of genetic correlations between plant resistances to multiple enemies. Am. Nat. 168: E15-E37.
references.citation: Leimu, R. & Lehtilä, K. 2006. Effects of two types of herbivores on the population dynamics of a perennial herb. Basic Appl. Ecol. 7: 224-235.
references.citation: Leimu, R. & Syrjänen, K. 2002. Effects of population size, seed predation and plant size on male and female reproductive success in Vincetoxicum hirundinaria (Asclepiadaceae). Oikos 98: 229-238.
references.citation: Leimu, R., Riipi, M. & Staerk, D. 2005. Food preference and performance of the larvae of a specialist herbivore: variation among and within host-plant populations. Acta Oecol. 28: 325-330.
references.citation: Lennartsson, T., Tuomi, J. & Nilsson, P. 1997. Evidence for an evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris. Am. Nat. 149: 1147-1155.
references.citation: Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., Wolfinger, R.D. & Schabenberger, O. 2006. SAS for Mixed Models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
references.citation: Mauricio, R. 1998. Costs of resistance to natural enemies in field populations of the annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Am. Nat. 151: 20-28.
references.citation: Mauricio, R., Rausher, M.D. & Burdick, D. 1997. Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78: 1301-1311.
references.citation: Muola, A., Mutikainen, P., Lilley, M., Laukkanen, L., Salminen, J.P. & Leimu, R. 2010. Associations of plant fitness, leaf chemistry, and damage suggest selection mosaic in plant-herbivore interactions. Ecology, doi: 10.1890/09-0589.1.
references.citation: Núñez-Farfán, J., Fornoni, J. & Valverde, P.L. 2007. The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 541-566.
references.citation: Paige, K.N. & Whitham, T.G. 1987. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am. Nat. 129: 407-416.
references.citation: Rausher, M.D. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46: 616-626.
references.citation: Rausher, M.D. 1996. Genetic analysis of coevolution between plants and their natural enemies. Trends Genet. 12: 212-217.
references.citation: Rosenthal, G.A. & Berenbaum, M.R. 1991. Herbivores: Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites. The Chemical Participants, vol. 1. 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York.
references.citation: Rosenthal, J.P. & Kotanen, P.M. 1994. Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 145-148.
references.citation: Schoonhoven, L.M., Jermy, T. & Van Loon, J.J.A. 1998. Insect-plant Biology: From Physiology to Evolution, pp. 83-120 and 239-272. University Press, Cambridge, UK.
references.citation: Solbreck, C. 1995. Long term population dynamics of a seed-feeding insect in a landscape perspective. In: Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis (N. Cappuccino & P. Price, eds), pp. 279-301. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
references.citation: Solbreck, C. & Sillén-Tullberg, B. 1990. Population dynamics of a seed feeding bug, Lygaeus equestris. 1. Habitat patch structure and spatial dynamics. Oikos 58: 199-209.
references.citation: Staerk, D., Christensen, J., Lemmich, E., Duus, J.Ö., Olsen, C.E. & Jaroszewski, J.W. 2000. Cytotoxic activity of some phenanthroindolizidine N-oxide alkaloids from Cynanchum vincetoxicum. J. Nat. Prod. 63: 1584-1586.
references.citation: Stowe, K. 1998. Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52: 703-712.
references.citation: Stowe, K., Marquis, R.J., Hochwender, C.G. & Simms, E.L. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 565-595.
references.citation: Strauss, S. & Agrawal, A. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 179-185.
references.citation: Strauss, S.Y., Rudgers, J.A., Lau, J.A. & Irwin, R.E. 2002. Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 278-285.
references.citation: Tiffin, P. 2000. Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am. Nat. 155: 128-138.
references.citation: Tiffin, P. & Inouye, B.D. 2000. Measuring tolerance to herbivory; accuracy and precision of estimates made using natural versus imposed damage. Evolution 54: 1024-1029.
references.citation: Tiffin, P. & Rausher, M.D. 1999. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Am. Nat. 154: 700-716.
references.citation: Valverde, P.L., Fornoni, J. & Núñez-Farfán, J. 2003. Evolutionary ecology of Datura stramonium: equal plant fitness benefits of growth and resistance against herbivory. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 127-137.
references.citation: Van Der Meijden, E., Wijn, M. & Verkaar, H.J. 1988. Defense and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51: 355-363.
references.citation: Watson, M.A. 1995. Sexual differences in plant development phenology affect plant-herbivore interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 180-182.