The utility of superficial abdominal reflex in the initial diagnosis of scoliosis: a retrospective review of clinical characteristics of scoliosis with syringomyelia.
BACKGROUND
With increasing use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), underlying syringomyelia is increasingly found in patients with presumed idiopathic scoliosis. To determine the indications for MRI in the differential diagnosis of scoliosis, several clinical characteristics of syringomyelia have been reported. Neurological signs, particularly abnormal superficial abdominal reflex (SAR), are important in establishing the initial diagnosis of scoliosis. However, the prevalence of abnormal SAR in patients with scoliosis and the sensitivity of this sign in predicting syringomyelia are not well known. We aimed to determine the diagnostic utility of SAR and other characteristics of syringomyelia in patients with scoliosis.


METHODS
We reviewed the medical records of 93 patients with scoliosis, 90 of whom underwent corrective surgery. All patients underwent MRI to determine the presence of syringomyelia. Mean age at surgery was 12.5 years. Abnormal SAR was defined as unilateral or bilateral absence or hyporeflexia of SAR. We calculated indices of diagnostic utility of abnormal SAR for non-idiopathic scoliosis and for syringomyelia. Abnormal SAR, left thoracic curve pattern, gender, and curve flexibility were compared between scoliosis with syringomyelia and idiopathic scoliosis. Logistic regression analysis was performed with the existence of syringomyelia as the dependent variable and curve flexibility as the independent variable.


RESULTS
Abnormal SAR was observed in 20 patients (prevalence 22%). All 6 patients with myopathic scoliosis displayed bilateral absence of SAR. The sensitivity of abnormal SAR for non-idiopathic scoliosis was 38%, with 96% specificity, 90% PPV (positive predictive value), and 60% NPV (negative predictive value). Syringomyelia was identified in 9 of the 93 patients (9.7%); 8 of these had abnormal SAR. The sensitivity of abnormal SAR for syringomyelia in presumed idiopathic scoliosis was 89%, with 95% specificity, 80% PPV, and 98% NPV. Gender, abnormal neurological findings, and curve flexibility differed significantly between patients with syringomyelia and those with idiopathic scoliosis (P < 0.05). In the logistic regression model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.79 and the cut-off value of curve flexibility for syringomyelia was 50% (P = 0.08).


CONCLUSIONS
Abnormal SAR was a useful indicator not only for syringomyelia, but also for myogenic scoliosis.
Fujimori
Takahito
T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. takahito-f@hotmail.co.jp.
Iwasaki
Motoki
M
Nagamoto
Yukitaka
Y
Sakaura
Hironobu
H
Oshima
Kazuya
K
Yoshikawa
Hideki
H
Radiology. 1993 Jan;186(1):247-53
8416573
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2346-9
12438982
Childs Nerv Syst. 2006 Sep;22(9):1154-7
16541292
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jan 1;29(1):51-8
14699276
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jun 15;19(12):1406-9
8066525
Australas Radiol. 1999 Nov;43(4):461-5
10901960
Neurosurgery. 1981 Oct;9(4):356-65
7301079
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Sep;77(5):762-7
7559706
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):314-7
8666649
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Apr;83(4):577-9
11315788
J Pediatr Orthop. 1990 May-Jun;10(3):351-4
2355078
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969 May;51(2):338-43
5770414
J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):128-33
18157058
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2327-33
17906574
J Pediatr Orthop. 1997 Jan-Feb;17(1):105-8
8989711
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 1;28(13):1410-7
12838099
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 15;35(2):182-5
20081514
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jun;17(6 Suppl):S109-16
1631709
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Sep 15;18(12):1591-2
8235836
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 15;27(2):E23-8
11805676
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Dec;84(12):2230-4
12473713
Eur Spine J. 2005 Nov;14(9):849-53
15756608
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jul 1;27(13):1451-5
12131745
J Pediatr Orthop. 1995 Mar-Apr;15(2):187-92
7745091
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15;28(8):806-14
12698125
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 15;28(18):2147-51
14501927
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Apr 15;22(8):855-8
9127917
Acta Orthop Scand. 1979 Aug;50(4):407-10
495062
J Pediatr Orthop. 1996 May-Jun;16(3):350-3
8728636
J Pediatr Orthop. 1994 May-Jun;14(3):309-17
8006160
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 1;30(1):108-14
15626990
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Nov 1;22(21):2537-41
9383861
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Aug;65(4):472-3
6874721
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jan 15;23(2):206-10
9474727
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jun 15;22(12):1313-7; discussion 1318
9201833
Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct;16(10):1629-35
17701226