title: Sex differences in how stress affects brain activity during face viewing.
abstract: Under stress, men tend to withdraw socially whereas women seek social support. This functional magnetic resonance imaging study indicates that stress also affects brain activity while viewing emotional faces differently for men and women. Fusiform face area response to faces was diminished by acute stress in men but increased by stress in women. Furthermore, among stressed men viewing angry faces, brain regions involved in interpreting and understanding others' emotions (the insula, temporal pole, and inferior frontal gyrus) showed reduced coordination with the fusiform face area and the amygdala, whereas the functional connectivity among these regions increased with stress for women. These findings suggest that stress influences emotional perception differently for men and women.
authors.affiliation: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. mara.mather@usc.edu
authors.forename: Mara
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mather
authors.forename: Nichole R
authors.initials: NR
authors.lastname: Lighthall
authors.forename: Lin
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Nga
authors.forename: Marissa A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Gorlick
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D005145:Face / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000523:psychology; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Pain. 2009 Sep;145(1-2):120-128
references.pmid: 19560270
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 8;105(27):9403-8
references.pmid: 18559854
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jun;10(6):397-409
references.pmid: 19469025
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2009 May;19(5):1167-74
references.pmid: 18854582
references.citation: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Jan;35(1):67-82
references.pmid: 19914001
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 1;17(11):4302-11
references.pmid: 9151747
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1370-86
references.pmid: 11707093
references.citation: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 Feb;34(2):226-237
references.pmid: 18849120
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:81-96
references.pmid: 19338504
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693-716
references.pmid: 18771388
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Jul 01;4(7):e6002
references.pmid: 19568417
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 1;42(1):393-403
references.pmid: 18514546
references.citation: Brain. 2007 Jul;130(Pt 7):1718-31
references.pmid: 17392317
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 1;30(2):452-61
references.pmid: 16326115
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Nov;7(11):1271-8
references.pmid: 15494727
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jun;7(6):477-84
references.pmid: 16688123
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Feb;23(2):137-52
references.pmid: 14964560
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
references.pmid: 12391568
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5497-502
references.pmid: 12682281
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1997 Oct;6(3):218-29
references.pmid: 9344826
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Dec;24(11):3245-54
references.pmid: 17156385
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
references.pmid: 12377157