title: Comparisons of the various partial-thickness rotator cuff tears on MR arthrography and arthroscopic correlation.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the diagnostic performance of MR arthrography in the diagnosis of the various types of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears by comparing the MR imaging findings with the arthroscopic findings.
  
  
  METHODS
  The series of MR arthrography studies included 202 patients consisting of 100 patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears proved by arthroscopy and a control group of 102 patients with arthroscopically intact rotator cuffs, which were reviewed in random order. At arthroscopy, 54 articular-sided, 26 bursal-sided, 20 both articular- and bursal-sided partial-thickness tears were diagnosed. The MR arthrographies were analyzed by two radiologists for articular-sided tears, bursal-sided tears, and both articular- and bursal-sided tears of the rotator cuff. The sensitivity and specificity of each type of partial-thickness tears were determined. Kappa statistics was calculated to determine the inter- and intra-observer agreement of the diagnosis of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The sensitivity and specificity of the various types of rotator cuff tears were 85% and 90%, respectively for articular-sided tears, 62% and 95% for bursal-sided tears, as well as 45% and 99% for both articular- and bursal-sided tears. False-negative assessments were primarily observed in the diagnosis of bursal-sided tears. Conversely, both articular- and bursal-sided tears were overestimated as full-thickness tears. Inter-observer agreement was excellent for the diagnosis of articular-sided tears (k = 0.70), moderate (k = 0.59) for bursal-sided tears, and fair (k = 0.34) for both articular- and bursal-sided tears, respectively. Intra-observer agreement for the interpretation of articular- and bursal-sided tears was excellent and good, respectively, whereas intra-observer agreement for both articular- and bursal-sided tears was moderate.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  MR arthrography is a useful diagnostic tool for partial-thickness rotator cuff tears, but has limitations in that it has low sensitivity in bursal- and both articular- and bursal-sided tears. In addition, it shows only fair inter-observer agreement when it comes to predicting both articular- and bursal-sided tears.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. ka1000@catholic.ac.kr
authors.forename: Kyung Ah
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Chun
authors.forename: Min Sung
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Young Joo
authors.initials: YJ
authors.lastname: Kim
mesh_terms: D001182:Arthroscopy; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003287:Contrast Media; D005260:Female; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D000070636:Rotator Cuff Injuries; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA
references.citation: Skeletal Radiol. 2004 Mar;33(3):136-41
references.pmid: 14513293
references.citation: Radiology. 1995 Mar;194(3):831-5
references.pmid: 7862988
references.citation: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):271-8
references.pmid: 16679225
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan;192(1):86-92
references.pmid: 19098184
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2002 May;12(5):1211-7
references.pmid: 11976869
references.citation: Radiology. 1995 May;195(2):497-500
references.pmid: 7724773
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct;187(4):881-6
references.pmid: 16985129
references.citation: Skeletal Radiol. 2009 Oct;38(10):967-75
references.pmid: 19294377
references.citation: JBR-BTR. 2007 Sep-Oct;90(5):338-44
references.pmid: 18085187
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2000;10(2):242-9
references.pmid: 10663753
references.citation: Am J Sports Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):437-41
references.pmid: 17267769
references.citation: Acta Radiol. 2010 Mar;51(2):194-201
references.pmid: 20001474
references.citation: Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1997 Aug;18(4):278-90
references.pmid: 9285996
references.citation: Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):99-103
references.pmid: 17932406
references.citation: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Nov-Dec;8(6):574-9
references.pmid: 10633891
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87 Suppl 2:81-8
references.pmid: 16326727
references.citation: Am J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1405-17
references.pmid: 16127127
references.citation: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun;19(4):609-16
references.pmid: 20171904
references.citation: J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999 Jan;7(1):32-43
references.pmid: 9916188
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2007 Feb;17(2):491-8
references.pmid: 16969638