Individual behaviour in firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus).
The concept of animal personalities has recently become of major interest as researchers began to wonder why animals within a given population show consistent behaviour across situations and contexts, what led to the evolution of such behavioural inflexibility and what mechanisms might underlie the phenomenon. A recent model explains individual differences in a population as the result of trade-off between present and future reproduction. We tested this model on the two wing morphs, i.e. short-winged (brachypterous) and long-winged (macropterous) specimens of the firebug (Pyrrhocoris apterus). Since it has been already demonstrated that the two wing morphs differ in their life-history strategies, this species is an ideal subject to test whether the specimens with different life-history strategies have different personalities as well. The results show that individuals behave consistently over time and across contexts, meaning observed bugs do have personalities. We also have found that in females, the two wing morphs have different personalities supporting the theoretical predictions, i.e. winged ones, which are supposed to have lower future reproductive value, are braver and more exploratory. We found no difference between the morphs in males. Differences in reproductive investment might explain this discrepancy between the sexes.
Gyuris
Eniko
E
Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Evolutionary Zoology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4010, Hungary. eniko.gyuris@vocs.unideb.hu
Feró
Orsolya
O
Tartally
András
A
Barta
Zoltán
Z
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D020062:Heteroptera / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D010551:Personality / Q000502:physiology*; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D014921:Wings, Animal / Q000002:abnormalities / Q000033:anatomy & histology
J Insect Physiol. 2006 Mar;52(3):231-9
16388820
Anim Behav. 1998 Oct;56(4):927-936
9790704
Theor Popul Biol. 1998 Dec;54(3):195-201
9878599
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):291-318
17437562
Psychol Bull. 2001 Jan;127(1):45-86
11271756
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999 Nov;23(7):925-35
10580307
Nature. 2007 May 31;447(7144):581-4
17538618
Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:207-30
15012313
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1571-9
20071380
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 7;275(1640):1305-11
18331983
Evolution. 1986 Sep;40(5):1009-1020
28556224
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jul;19(7):372-8
16701288