title: Associations of parental and peer characteristics with adolescents' social dominance orientation.
abstract: Studies with adults of social dominance orientation (SDO), a preference for inequality among social groups, have found correlations with various prejudices and support for discriminatory practices. This study explores the construct among adolescents at an age when they are beginning to recognize the social groups in their environment, particularly adolescent crowds. The relationship of SDO and perceptions of parents' responsiveness and demandingness were also investigated. Subjects were in grades 9-12 (N = 516, 53% female, 96% White). Mother's and father's responsiveness significantly predicted adolescent's SDO scores, with greater perceived responsiveness associated with lower SDO. To analyze the multiple crowd memberships of the 76% belonging to more than one crowd, two-step cluster analysis was used to identify patterns, resulting in 8 clusters of distinct, heterogeneous composition. SDO differed significantly among males in different clusters, but not females. The importance of membership was positively associated with SDO among high-status crowds and negatively associated with SDO among the academic and normal crowds. The findings have implications for prejudices that may be developing in adolescence and indicate a need for further research into the social context of SDO and its development.
authors.affiliation: Center for Gifted Education, The College of William and Mary, PO Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA 23187, USA. jrcross@wm.edu
authors.forename: Jennifer Riedl
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Cross
authors.forename: Kathryn L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Fletcher
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D010290:Parents; D010379:Peer Group; D012930:Social Dominance
references.citation: Child Dev. 2006 Jul-Aug;77(4):847-60
references.pmid: 16942493
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jan;52(1):47-55
references.pmid: 3820077
references.citation: Child Dev. 2005 Mar-Apr;76(2):451-66
references.pmid: 15784093
references.citation: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005 Mar;34(1):49-61
references.pmid: 15677280
references.citation: New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 1999 Summer;(84):37-54
references.pmid: 10393669
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):67-81
references.pmid: 17201543
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2000 Jul;11(4):315-9
references.pmid: 11273391
references.citation: Child Dev. 1991 Oct;62(5):1049-65
references.pmid: 1756655
references.citation: Child Dev. 2008 May-Jun;79(3):529-46
references.pmid: 18489411
references.citation: Child Dev. 1990 Dec;61(6):1905-14
references.pmid: 2083504
references.citation: Addict Behav. 2007 Aug;32(8):1602-27
references.pmid: 17188815
references.citation: Child Dev. 2006 Jan-Feb;77(1):44-58
references.pmid: 16460524
references.citation: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2002;67(4):i-vii, 1-119
references.pmid: 12557595
references.citation: Psychol Addict Behav. 2000 Jun;14(2):192-6
references.pmid: 10860118
references.citation: Health Psychol. 1994 Nov;13(6):496-506
references.pmid: 7889904
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1040-50
references.pmid: 17547487
references.citation: Child Dev. 1993 Apr;64(2):467-82
references.pmid: 8477629
references.citation: New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 1999 Summer;(84):7-20
references.pmid: 10393667
references.citation: J Youth Adolesc. 1992 Aug;21(4):439-50
references.pmid: 24263973
references.citation: J Youth Adolesc. 2009 Jul;38(6):747-64
references.pmid: 19636778