Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of microbial communities in the rumens of cattle fed different diets.
At present there is little quantitative information on the identity and composition of bacterial populations in the rumen microbial community. Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization using newly designed oligonucleotide probes was applied to identify the microbial populations in liquid and solid fractions of rumen digesta from cows fed barley silage or grass hay diets with or without flaxseed. Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria were abundant in both fractions, constituting 31.8 to 87.3% of the total cell numbers. They belong mainly to the order Bacteroidales (0.1 to 19.2%), hybridizing with probe BAC1080; the families Lachnospiraceae (9.3 to 25.5%) and Ruminococcaceae (5.5 to 23.8%), hybridizing with LAC435 and RUM831, respectively; and the classes Deltaproteobacteria (5.8 to 28.3%) and Gammaproteobacteria (1.2 to 8.2%). All were more abundant in the rumen communities of cows fed diets containing silage (75.2 to 87.3%) than in those of cows fed diets containing hay (31.8 to 49.5%). The addition of flaxseed reduced their abundance in the rumens of cows fed silage-based diets (to 45.2 to 58.7%) but did not change markedly their abundance in the rumens of cows fed hay-based diets (31.8 to 49.5%). Fibrolytic species, including Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus spp., and archaeal methanogens accounted for only a small proportion (0.4 to 2.1% and 0.2 to 0.6%, respectively) of total cell numbers. Depending on diet, between 37.0 and 91.6% of microbial cells specifically hybridized with the probes used in this study, allowing them to be identified in situ. The identities of other microbial populations (8.4 to 63.0%) remain unknown.
Kong
Yunhong
Y
Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J4B1, Canada.
He
Maolong
M
McAlister
Tim
T
Seviour
Robert
R
Forster
Robert
R
D000818:Animals; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D058491:Bacterial Load / Q000379:methods; D001431:Bacteriological Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D044822:Biodiversity; D002417:Cattle; D004032:Diet; D019597:Flax; D001467:Hordeum; D017404:In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence / Q000379:methods*; D015345:Oligonucleotide Probes / Q000235:genetics; D006109:Poaceae; D012417:Rumen / Q000382:microbiology*; D012820:Silage
D015345:Oligonucleotide Probes
Environ Microbiol. 2005 Apr;7(4):530-43
15816930
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul;71(7):4076-85
16000823
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Feb 25;32(4):1363-71
14985472
Environ Microbiol. 2002 Nov;4(11):713-20
12460279
Microbiology (Reading). 1999 Jul;145 ( Pt 7):1797-1807
10439419
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49:399-426
8561466
Anaerobe. 2007 Apr;13(2):57-64
17317231
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Oct;62(10):3557-9
8837410
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jun;67(6):2766-74
11375193
Bacteriol Rev. 1959 Sep;23(3):125-53
13805451
Reprod Nutr Dev. 2001 Mar-Apr;41(2):187-94
11434522
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Mar;65(3):1289-97
10049895
Anaerobe. 1998 Jun;4(3):153-63
16887636
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 May;54(5):1079-84
3389805
Microb Ecol. 1998 Jan;35(1):1-21
9459655
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):514-6
12520066
Microbiology (Reading). 2007 Dec;153(Pt 12):4061-4073
18048920
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;599:117-28
19882283
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jan 1;33(Database issue):D294-6
15608200
J Anim Sci. 1992 Jan;70(1):289-95
1374753