Functional genome annotation by combined analysis across microarray studies of Trypanosoma brucei.
BACKGROUND
Functional annotation of trypanosomatid genomes has been a daunting task due to the low similarity of their genes with annotated genes of other organisms. Three recent studies have provided gene expression profiles in several different conditions and life stages for one of the main disease-causing trypanosomatids, Trypanosoma brucei. These data can be used to study the gene functions and regulatory mechanisms in this organism.


RESULTS
Combining the data from three different microarray studies of T. brucei, we show that functional linkages among T. brucei genes can be identified based on gene coexpression, leading to a powerful approach for gene function prediction. These predictions can be further improved by considering the expression profiles of orthologous genes from other trypanosomatids. Furthermore, gene expression profiles can be used to discover potential regulatory elements within 3' untranslated regions.


CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that although trypanosomatids do not regulate genes at transcription level, trypanosomatid genes with related functions are coregulated post-transcriptionally via modulation of mRNA stability, implying the presence of complex regulatory networks in these organisms. Our analysis highlights the demand for a thorough transcript profiling of T. brucei genome in parallel with other trypanosomatid genomes, which can provide a powerful means to improve their functional annotation.
Shateri Najafabadi
Hamed
H
Institute of Parasitology, McGill University, Ste Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Salavati
Reza
R
D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D017125:Genes, Protozoan; D023281:Genomics; D046228:Microarray Analysis; D015800:Protozoan Proteins / Q000502:physiology*; D020871:RNA Stability; D014346:Trypanosoma brucei brucei / Q000235:genetics*
D015800:Protozoan Proteins
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005 Oct;143(2):125-34
15993496
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007 Dec;156(2):93-101
17765983
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Apr;37(5):1387-99
19129236
Eukaryot Cell. 2008 Nov;7(11):1994-2003
18776036
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 20;102(51):18297-302
16352721
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(18):5312-24
17012283
Mol Cell. 2003 May;11(5):1291-9
12769852
Science. 2005 Jul 15;309(5733):404-9
16020724
BMC Genomics. 2009 Oct 26;10:495
19857263
Mol Cell. 2007 Oct 26;28(2):337-50
17964271
BMC Genomics. 2008 Jun 23;9:298
18573209
BMC Genomics. 2009 Oct 19;10:482
19840382
Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4:180
18414481
Proteomics. 2009 Dec;9(24):5497-508
19834910
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D457-62
19843604
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007 Dec;10(6):569-77
18177626
Genome Res. 2009 Nov;19(11):1953-62
19797678
BMC Genomics. 2009 Sep 11;10:427
19747379
Genome Biol. 2008;9(7):R115
18638379
PLoS Pathog. 2009 May;5(5):e1000436
19436713
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2009 May;165(1):32-47
19393160
Proteomics. 2009 Jan;9(2):434-50
19105172
Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):249-55
12934013
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30
10592173
J Biol Chem. 1998 Jul 24;273(30):19025-9
9668083
Science. 1997 Oct 24;278(5338):680-6
9381177
BMC Genomics. 2009 Aug 04;10:355
19653906