title: Induced changes in island fox (Urocyon littoralis) activity do not mitigate the extinction threat posed by a novel predator.
abstract: Prey response to novel predators influences the impacts on prey populations of introduced predators, bio-control efforts, and predator range expansion. Predicting the impacts of novel predators on native prey requires an understanding of both predator avoidance strategies and their potential to reduce predation risk. We examine the response of island foxes (Urocyon littoralis) to invasion by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). Foxes reduced daytime activity and increased night time activity relative to eagle-naïve foxes. Individual foxes reverted toward diurnal tendencies following eagle removal efforts. We quantified the potential population impact of reduced diurnality by modeling island fox population dynamics. Our model predicted an annual population decline similar to what was observed following golden eagle invasion and predicted that the observed 11% reduction in daytime activity would not reduce predation risk sufficiently to reduce extinction risk. The limited effect of this behaviorally plastic predator avoidance strategy highlights the importance of linking behavioral change to population dynamics for predicting the impact of novel predators on resident prey populations.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Wildlife Studies, PO Box 1104, Arcata, CA 95518, USA. hudgens@iws.org
authors.forename: Brian R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Hudgens
authors.forename: David K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Garcelon
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D020307:Eagles / Q000502:physiology*; D053476:Extinction, Biological; D005589:Foxes / Q000502:physiology*; D005843:Geography; D011156:Population Density; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011235:Predatory Behavior
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2008 Nov;77(6):1092-8
references.pmid: 18624744
references.citation: Oecologia. 1995 Nov;104(3):301-307
references.pmid: 28307586
references.citation: Science. 2001 Feb 9;291(5506):1036-9
references.pmid: 11161215
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 May 22;274(1615):1237-43
references.pmid: 17360286
references.citation: J Wildl Dis. 2009 Apr;45(2):333-43
references.pmid: 19395743
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Feb;87(2):340-6
references.pmid: 16637360
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 May;22(5):229-30; author reply 230-1
references.pmid: 17300855
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 22;99(2):791-6
references.pmid: 11752396
references.citation: Evolution. 1991 Dec;45(8):1849-1868
references.pmid: 28563958
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Mar;20(3):110
references.pmid: 16701353
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Dec;21(12):674-80
references.pmid: 16879896