title: Introduction: HEC Forum special issue on privacy and commodification.
abstract: The papers in this special thematic issue of HEC Forum critically and carefully explore key issues at the intersection of patient privacy and commodification. For example, should hospitals be required to secure a person's consent to any possible uses to which his discarded body parts might be put after his treatment or should it only be concerned with securing his informed consent to his treatment? Should a hospital be required to raise the possibility of the commodification of such (patient-discarded) body parts, or should it only be required to address this issue if the patient asks about it? Should persons be paid to engage in medical research, or should they only be compensated for their time, on the grounds, perhaps, that such payment would be coercive or exploitative, for it might move some persons to agree to participate in research who otherwise would not have done? This number of HEC Forum illustrates the widespread implications of these issues upon which healthcare ethics committees are called to deliberate.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, The College of New Jersey, 2000 Pennington Road, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA. jtaylor@tcnj.edu
authors.forename: James Stacey
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Taylor
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D018594:Human Body; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D010067:Ownership; D018907:Privacy
references.citation: Rejuvenation Res. 2006 Fall;9(3):416-8
references.pmid: 16859484