The importance of phylogeny to the study of phenological response to global climate change.
Climate change has resulted in major changes in the phenology--i.e. the timing of seasonal activities, such as flowering and bird migration--of some species but not others. These differential responses have been shown to result in ecological mismatches that can have negative fitness consequences. However, the ways in which climate change has shaped changes in biodiversity within and across communities are not well understood. Here, we build on our previous results that established a link between plant species' phenological response to climate change and a phylogenetic bias in species' decline in the eastern United States. We extend a similar approach to plant and bird communities in the United States and the UK that further demonstrates that climate change has differentially impacted species based on their phylogenetic relatedness and shared phenological responses. In plants, phenological responses to climate change are often shared among closely related species (i.e. clades), even between geographically disjunct communities. And in some cases, this has resulted in a phylogenetically biased pattern of non-native species success. In birds, the pattern of decline is phylogenetically biased but is not solely explained by phenological response, which suggests that other traits may better explain this pattern. These results illustrate the ways in which phylogenetic thinking can aid in making generalizations of practical importance and enhance efforts to predict species' responses to future climate change.
Davis
Charles C
CC
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Ave, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. cdavis@oeb.harvard.edu
Willis
Charles G
CG
Primack
Richard B
RB
Miller-Rushing
Abraham J
AJ
D000818:Animals; D001717:Birds / Q000254:growth & development*; D057231:Climate Change; D017753:Ecosystem; D035264:Flowers / Q000502:physiology*; D008404:Massachusetts; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010802:Phylogeny; D063245:Plant Development; D012044:Regression Analysis; D006113:United Kingdom
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 22;275(1641):1441-8
18367443
Science. 2000 Oct 13;290(5490):344-7
11030654
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 17;96(17):9701-4
10449757
Ecology. 2008 Feb;89(2):332-41
18409423
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S109-22
16922307
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11549-55
18695216
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 May;22(5):243-9
17296242
Plant Cell. 2001 Apr;13(4):935-41
11283346
Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):57-60
12511952
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 26;5(1):e8878
20126652
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 15;99(21):13379-81
12370424
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 20;104(12):4979-83
17360396
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 21;105(42):16195-200
18849475
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 4;105(44):17029-33
18955707
Int J Biometeorol. 2000 Aug;44(2):82-7
10993562
Ecol Lett. 2007 Aug;10(8):710-7
17594426
Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):81-3
16672969
Sci Total Environ. 2000 Nov 15;262(3):253-61
11087031
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 28;97(7):3753-8
10716723
Plant J. 2001 Dec;28(5):545-53
11849594
Mol Ecol. 2009 Feb;18(4):572-92
19037898
J Theor Biol. 2002 Sep 21;218(2):175-85
12381290
Am Nat. 2004 Jun;163(6):823-43
15266381
Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 15;24(18):2098-100
18678590
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2211-20
11674868
Am Nat. 2004 May;163(5):654-71
15122485
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 4;105(44):17012-7
18971334
Science. 2002 May 31;296(5573):1689-91
12040195
Science. 2002 Aug 23;297(5585):1292-6
12193777
Oecologia. 2007 Nov;154(1):11-21
17647021
Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95
11919621
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2561-9
16321776
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jul;19(7):391-8
16701291
Ecol Lett. 2008 Oct;11(10):995-1003
18673385
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Mar 22;275(1635):649-59
18211875
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Apr;14(4):135-139
10322518
Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):37-42
12511946
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 22;268(1483):2383-9
11703879
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11;103(15):5841-5
16581902
Ecol Lett. 2009 Jul;12(7):693-715
19473217