title: Conditions under which genome-wide association studies will be positively misleading.
abstract: Genome-wide association mapping is a popular method for using natural variation within a species to generate a genotype-phenotype map. Statistical association between an allele at a locus and the trait in question is used as evidence that variation at the locus is responsible for variation of the trait. Indirect association, however, can give rise to statistically significant results at loci unrelated to the trait. We use a haploid, three-locus, binary genetic model to describe the conditions under which these indirect associations become stronger than any of the causative associations in the organism--even to the point of representing the only associations present in the data. These indirect associations are the result of disequilibrium between multiple factors affecting a single trait. Epistasis and population structure can exacerbate the problem but are not required to create it. From a statistical point of view, indirect associations are true associations rather than the result of stochastic noise: they will not be ameliorated by increasing sampling size or marker density and can be reproduced in independent studies.
authors.affiliation: Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. alexander.platt@usc.edu
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Platt
authors.forename: Bjarni J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Vilhjálmsson
authors.forename: Magnus
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Nordborg
mesh_terms: D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000235:genetics*; D016477:Artifacts; D003198:Computer Simulation; D018745:Genome, Plant / Q000235:genetics*; D055106:Genome-Wide Association Study / Q000379:methods*; D005843:Geography; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010641:Phenotype; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Q000235:genetics
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Jun 3;465(7298):627-31
references.pmid: 20336072
references.citation: Genetics. 2006 Jul;173(3):1665-78
references.pmid: 16582435
references.citation: Science. 1994 Sep 30;265(5181):2037-48
references.pmid: 8091226
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2010 Apr;42(4):348-54
references.pmid: 20208533
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):98-101
references.pmid: 18758442
references.citation: Am Nat. 2004 Apr;163(4):489-504
references.pmid: 15122498
references.citation: Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):997-1004
references.pmid: 11315092
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 1994 Feb;72 ( Pt 2):175-92
references.pmid: 8150657
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2010 Feb 12;6(2):e1000843
references.pmid: 20169178
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9
references.pmid: 16862161
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2010 Jan 26;8(1):e1000294
references.pmid: 20126254
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2006 Feb;38(2):203-8
references.pmid: 16380716
references.citation: Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1211-22
references.pmid: 1459438
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2004 Apr;36(4):388-93
references.pmid: 15052270
references.citation: Ann Hum Genet. 1969 Jul;33(1):23-9
references.pmid: 5821316
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jul;67(1):170-81
references.pmid: 10827107
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 1992 Dec;85(4):480-8
references.pmid: 24197463