title: Isolation of adult progenitor cells with neuronal potential from rabbit corneal epithelial cells in serum- and feeder layer-free culture conditions.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To isolate progenitor cells from rabbit corneal epithelial cells (CEC) in serum- and feeder layer-free culture conditions and to compare the self-renewal capacity of corneal epithelial progenitor cells obtained from the central and limbal regions of the cornea.
  
  
  METHODS
  Tissue samples of New Zealand white rabbit corneas were dissected from the limbal and central regions to obtain CEC for sphere-forming culture, in which the cells formed spheres in serum-free medium containing growth factors. The number of primary and secondary sphere colonies and the size of the primary spheres were compared between the limbal and central regions. To promote differentiation, isolated sphere colonies were plated in dishes coated with poly-L-lysine (PLL)/laminin. The expression of epithelial, neural, and mesenchymal mRNAs was examined in the sphere colonies and their progeny by immunocytochemistry and/or the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Adherent differentiated cells from the sphere colonies were also examined morphologically.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Primary spheres were isolated from both the limbal and central regions of the cornea. The rate of primary sphere formation by CEC from the limbal region (55.6+/-10.6/10,000 cells) was significantly higher than that by cells from the central cornea (43.1+/-7.2/10,000 cells, p=0.0028), but there was no significant difference in the size of primary spheres derived from both regions. The self-renewal capacity of cells from the limbal region was higher than that of cells from the central region, as evidenced by the significantly higher secondary sphere formation rate of limbal cells (38.7+/-8.5/10,000 cells) in comparison with that for central cells (31.3+/-5.7/10,000 cells, p=0.013). The primary sphere colonies expressed bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), a 63-kDa protein (p63), p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75(NTR)), and nestin, whereas their progeny expressed cytokeratin 3, cytokeratin 12, vimentin, alpha-smooth muscle actin, microtubule-associated protein 2, and neuron-specific enolase on immunocytochemical analysis. These markers were confirmed by RT-PCR.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our findings indicate that limbal CEC contain more progenitor cells with a stronger self-renewal capacity than cells from the central region. These progenitor cells differentiate into the epithelial lineage, and can also produce neuronal protein.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. mimurat-tky@umin.ac.jp
authors.forename: Tatsuya
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Mimura
authors.forename: Satoru
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Yamagami
authors.forename: Saiko
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Uchida
authors.forename: Seiichi
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Yokoo
authors.forename: Kyoko
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ono
authors.forename: Tomohiko
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Usui
authors.forename: Shiro
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Amano
mesh_terms: D053687:Adult Stem Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism; D000818:Animals; D002469:Cell Separation / Q000379:methods*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D016895:Culture Media, Serum-Free / Q000494:pharmacology*; D004847:Epithelial Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000187:drug effects; D019573:Epithelium, Corneal / Q000166:cytology*; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D008297:Male; D009474:Neurons / Q000166:cytology* / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism; D011817:Rabbits; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D018874:Spheroids, Cellular / Q000166:cytology / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D016895:Culture Media, Serum-Free
references.citation: Nat Med. 2003 Oct;9(10):1293-9
references.pmid: 12949502
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Oct;44(10):4230-6
references.pmid: 14507866
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;103(1):49-62
references.pmid: 2424919
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3128-35
references.pmid: 16123411
references.citation: Exp Cell Res. 2004 Apr 15;295(1):194-203
references.pmid: 15051502
references.citation: Science. 2000 Feb 25;287(5457):1433-8
references.pmid: 10688783
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983 Oct;24(10):1442-3
references.pmid: 6618809
references.citation: Exp Eye Res. 2008 Jan;86(1):34-40
references.pmid: 17980361
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 1983 Jul;81(1 Suppl):121s-7s
references.pmid: 6190957
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Aug 10;560(2):281-99
references.pmid: 380653
references.citation: Surv Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov-Dec;48(6):631-46
references.pmid: 14609709
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Oct;46(10):3645-8
references.pmid: 16186345
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Jan;33(1):143-52
references.pmid: 1730535
references.citation: Stem Cells. 2006 Dec;24(12):2714-22
references.pmid: 16888282
references.citation: Science. 2000 Mar 17;287(5460):2032-6
references.pmid: 10720333
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 May;46(5):1653-8
references.pmid: 15851565
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982 Jul;23(1):73-80
references.pmid: 7085223
references.citation: Dev Biol. 2002 Oct 15;250(2):317-31
references.pmid: 12376106
references.citation: Stem Cells. 2005;23(1):63-73
references.pmid: 15625123
references.citation: Stem Cells. 2004;22(3):355-66
references.pmid: 15153612
references.citation: Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Sep;3(9):778-84
references.pmid: 11533656
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 May;46(5):1620-5
references.pmid: 15851560
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;46(6):1957-65
references.pmid: 15914609
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Jun;32(7):2086-95
references.pmid: 1711516
references.citation: Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1707-10
references.pmid: 1553558
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 May;46(5):1626-31
references.pmid: 15851561
references.citation: Mol Vis. 2003 Dec 08;9:635-43
references.pmid: 14685149
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Oct;46(10):3637-44
references.pmid: 16186344
references.citation: Science. 1982 Mar 5;215(4537):1239-41
references.pmid: 7058342
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1997 Jun;16(2):184-7
references.pmid: 9171831
references.citation: Exp Eye Res. 2005 Feb;80(2):227-33
references.pmid: 15670801
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5130-5
references.pmid: 14638708
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Mar;47(3):909-16
references.pmid: 16505023
references.citation: Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010 Aug;16(4):803-12
references.pmid: 19852617
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1999 May 1;19(9):3287-97
references.pmid: 10212288
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Sep;21(3):434-41
references.pmid: 7024181
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 13;98(6):3156-61
references.pmid: 11248048
references.citation: Development. 2000 Dec;127(24):5487-95
references.pmid: 11076768
references.citation: Stem Cells. 2008 Jul;26(7):1743-8
references.pmid: 18436866