title: Intrinsic biophysical diversity decorrelates neuronal firing while increasing information content.
abstract: Although examples of variation and diversity exist throughout the nervous system, their importance remains a source of debate. Even neurons of the same molecular type have notable intrinsic differences. Largely unknown, however, is the degree to which these differences impair or assist neural coding. We examined the outputs from a single type of neuron, the mitral cells of the mouse olfactory bulb, to identical stimuli and found that each cell's spiking response was dictated by its unique biophysical fingerprint. Using this intrinsic heterogeneity, diverse populations were able to code for twofold more information than their homogeneous counterparts. In addition, biophysical variability alone reduced pair-wise output spike correlations to low levels. Our results indicate that intrinsic neuronal diversity is important for neural coding and is not simply the result of biological imprecision.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Krishnan
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Padmanabhan
authors.forename: Nathaniel N
authors.initials: NN
authors.lastname: Urban
mesh_terms: D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn; D055592:Biophysical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology*; D001703:Biophysics / Q000379:methods; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D019277:Entropy; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D051663:Kv1.2 Potassium Channel / Q000378:metabolism; D051379:Mice; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000502:physiology*; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D009830:Olfactory Bulb / Q000166:cytology*; D018408:Patch-Clamp Techniques / Q000379:methods; D013223:Statistics as Topic
chemical_list: D051663:Kv1.2 Potassium Channel
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Dec 14;99(24):248103
references.pmid: 18233494
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):563-74
references.pmid: 16791145
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):1089-102
references.pmid: 19052108
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 10;28(50):13522-31
references.pmid: 19074026
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Apr;13(4):439-49
references.pmid: 20139975
references.citation: Brain Res. 1997 Jan 16;745(1-2):189-96
references.pmid: 9037409
references.citation: Science. 2001 Feb 2;291(5505):889-94
references.pmid: 11157170
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Oct;82(4):1786-92
references.pmid: 10515968
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 May;30(2):553-67
references.pmid: 11395014
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e163
references.pmid: 16689623
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:263-97
references.pmid: 11283312
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2401-6
references.pmid: 19181842
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 May;10(5):631-9
references.pmid: 17450136
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1989 Jun;61(6):1161-77
references.pmid: 2746317
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Dec;2(12):1106-13
references.pmid: 10570488
references.citation: Science. 1997 Mar 21;275(5307):1805-8
references.pmid: 9065407
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 15;101(24):9097-102
references.pmid: 15184670
references.citation: Science. 2010 Jan 29;327(5965):587-90
references.pmid: 20110507
references.citation: Science. 2010 Jan 29;327(5965):584-7
references.pmid: 20110506
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Jul 25;382(6589):363-6
references.pmid: 8684467
references.citation: J Vis. 2006 Jul 17;6(4):484-507
references.pmid: 16889482
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 Mar 6;37(5):843-52
references.pmid: 12628174
references.citation: Cell. 1996 Nov 15;87(4):675-86
references.pmid: 8929536
references.citation: Bull Los Angel Neuro Soc. 1952 Mar-Jun;17(1-2):5-46
references.pmid: 14944970
references.citation: Science. 1995 Jun 9;268(5216):1503-6
references.pmid: 7770778
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2008 Aug;31(8):428-34
references.pmid: 18603311
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 2;98(1):319-24
references.pmid: 11120888
references.citation: Nature. 1997 Nov 6;390(6655):70-4
references.pmid: 9363891
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jan;9(1):99-107
references.pmid: 16369481
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 8;26(45):11709-19
references.pmid: 17093092
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):356-62
references.pmid: 16444270
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 21;25(38):8776-87
references.pmid: 16177047
references.citation: J Physiol. 2002 Jul 15;542(Pt 2):355-67
references.pmid: 12122137
references.citation: Science. 2000 Jan 14;287(5451):273-8
references.pmid: 10634775
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 1994 Jan;51(1):95-106
references.pmid: 8189755
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Sep;12(9):1136-44
references.pmid: 19684589
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Nov;12(11):1424-30
references.pmid: 19838180
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2002 Apr;12(4):395-410
references.pmid: 11884355
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Mar 13;84(11):2310-3
references.pmid: 11018872
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jun;2(6):515-20
references.pmid: 10448215
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jan;99(1):277-83
references.pmid: 17928562
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;89(6):3143-54
references.pmid: 12612010
references.citation: J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(2):279-314
references.pmid: 978519
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 29;29(17):5573-86
references.pmid: 19403824
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Apr;9(4):534-42
references.pmid: 16547512
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Aug;2(8):539-50
references.pmid: 11483997
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5;26(14):3646-55
references.pmid: 16597718
references.citation: Neuron. 2009 Feb 26;61(4):570-86
references.pmid: 19249277
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):80-7
references.pmid: 18084286