Perceptual learning beyond retinotopic reference frame.
Repetitive experience with the same visual stimulus and task can remarkably improve behavioral performance on the task. This well-known perceptual-learning phenomenon is usually specific to the trained retinal- or visual-field location, which is taken as an indication of plastic changes in retinotopic visual areas. In previous studies of perceptual learning, however, a change in stimulus location on the retina is accompanied by positional changes of the stimulus in nonretinotopic frames of reference, such as relative to the head and other objects. It is unclear, therefore, whether the putative location specificity is exclusively retinotopic or if it could also depend on nonretinotopic representation of the stimulus, which is particularly important for multisensory and sensorimotor integration as well as for maintenance of stable visual percepts. Here, by manipulating subjects' gaze direction to control spatial and retinal locations of stimuli independently, we found that, when the stimulated retinal regions were held constant, the improvement with training in motion-direction discrimination of two successively displayed stimuli was restricted to the relative spatial position of the stimuli but independent of their absolute locations in head- and world-centered frame. These findings indicate location specificity of perceptual learning beyond retinotopic frame of reference, suggesting a pliable spatiotopic mechanism that can be specifically shaped by experience for better spatiotemporal integration of the learned stimuli.
Zhang
En
E
Beijing Normal University, China.
Li
Wu
W
D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012160:Retina / Q000502:physiology*; D014785:Vision, Ocular
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Feb;10(2):249-55
17195842
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Dec;78(6):2889-94
9405509
Science. 1982 Nov 12;218(4573):697-8
7134968
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:57-86
11283305
Sci Am. 1962 May;206:62-72
14457820
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jul;10(7):903-7
17589507
Nat Neurosci. 2001 May;4(5):519-25
11319561
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;12(12):466-73
18951831
Neuron. 2002 Jan 3;33(1):143-9
11779487
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Aug;6(8):877-81
12872128
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4966-70
2052578
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1738-55
17093130
Psychol Res. 1987;49(4):221-7
3441580
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jun;7(6):651-7
15156149
J Physiol. 2009 Jun 15;587(Pt 12):2743-51
19525560
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Sep;9(9):1083-4
16936766
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 19;99(6):4026-31
11904446
Vision Res. 2008 Mar;48(8):1014-7
18314156
J Neurophysiol. 1983 May;49(5):1127-47
6864242
J Neurosci. 2008 May 14;28(20):5218-28
18480278
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):147-53
20189870
Nature. 1997 Oct 23;389(6653):845-8
9349815
Nature. 1989 Sep 7;341(6237):52-4
2770878
Science. 1985 Oct 25;230(4724):456-8
4048942
Vision Res. 1987;27(6):953-65
3660656
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):423-5
17369824
J Physiol. 2005 Jul 1;566(Pt 1):29-35
15845586
Cereb Cortex. 2007 May;17(5):1164-72
16818474
J Neurosci. 1997 May 1;17(9):3201-14
9096154
J Vis. 2008 Oct 23;8(14):2.1-17
19146303
Curr Biol. 2005 Oct 11;15(19):1745-8
16213821
Science. 1992 Jan 24;255(5043):419-23
1734518
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Dec;17(12):2914-32
17389630
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Sep;3(9):741-7
12209122
Vision Res. 1973 Apr;13(4):877-80
4706358
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jun;77(6):3267-72
9212273
J Neurophysiol. 1984 Dec;52(6):1106-30
6520628
Vision Res. 2006 Jun;46(13):2110-21
16483629
Nature. 1998 Aug 27;394(6696):887-91
9732870
Neuron. 2008 Feb 7;57(3):442-51
18255036
Science. 2008 Sep 12;321(5895):1502-7
18787171
J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10654-62
18923041
Science. 1992 Jan 3;255(5040):90-2
1553535
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;102(4):2435-40
19692506
Nature. 1999 Mar 18;398(6724):239-42
10094046
Am J Psychol. 1966 Sep;79(3):443-50
5968481
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Feb;77(2):944-61
9065860
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:331-54
12626696
Cereb Cortex. 1995 Sep-Oct;5(5):457-69
8547792
Vision Res. 2003 Mar;43(6):639-49
12604100
Prog Brain Res. 2002;140:165-80
12508589