title: The association between money and opinion in academic emergency medicine.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Financial conflicts of interest have come under increasing scrutiny in medicine, but their impact has not been quantified. Our objective was to use the results of a national survey of academic emergency medicine (EM) faculty to determine if an association between money and personal opinion exists.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a web-based survey of EM faculty. Opinion questions were analyzed with regard to whether the respondent had either 1) received research grant money or 2) received money from industry as a speaker, consultant, or advisor. Responses were unweighted, and tests of differences in proportions were made using Chi-squared tests, with p<0.05 set for significance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We received responses from 430 members; 98 (23%) received research grants from industry, while 145 (34%) reported fee-for-service money. Respondents with research money were more likely to be comfortable accepting gifts (40% vs. 29%) and acting as paid consultants (50% vs. 37%). They had a more favorable attitude with regard to societal interactions with industry and felt that industry-sponsored lectures could be fair and unbiased (52% vs. 29%). Faculty with fee-for-service money mirrored those with research money. They were also more likely to believe that industry-sponsored research produces fair and unbiased results (61% vs. 45%) and less likely to believe that honoraria biased speakers (49% vs. 69%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Accepting money for either service or research identified a distinct population defined by their opinions. Faculty engaged in industry-sponsored research benefitted socially (collaborations), academically (publications), and financially from the relationship.
authors.affiliation: New York Methodist Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooklyn, NY.
authors.forename: Robert H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Birkhahn
authors.forename: Andra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Blomkalns
authors.forename: Howard
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Klausner
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Nowak
authors.forename: Ali S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Raja
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Summers
authors.forename: Jim E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Weber
authors.forename: William M
authors.initials: WM
authors.lastname: Briggs
authors.forename: Alp
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Arkun
authors.forename: Deborah
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Diercks
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 26;356(17):1742-50
references.pmid: 17460228
references.citation: CMAJ. 1993 Nov 15;149(10):1401-7
references.pmid: 8221424
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 1992 May;21(5):556-8
references.pmid: 1570913
references.citation: Am J Bioeth. 2003 Summer;3(3):39-46
references.pmid: 14594489
references.citation: JAMA. 1989 Dec 22-29;262(24):3448-51
references.pmid: 2585690
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Aug 1;59(5):1477-83
references.pmid: 15275735
references.citation: JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):684-9
references.pmid: 8309031
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1990 Apr 15;112(8):624-6
references.pmid: 2327679
references.citation: JAMA. 1991 Jan 23-30;265(4):440, 442
references.pmid: 1985222
references.citation: J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995 Nov-Dec;8(6):457-64
references.pmid: 8585404
references.citation: Perspect Biol Med. 2007 Winter;50(1):7-17
references.pmid: 17259672
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Jan 19;283(3):373-80
references.pmid: 10647801
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Feb;22(2):184-90
references.pmid: 17356984
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Oct 17;298(15):1779-86
references.pmid: 17940234
references.citation: JAMA. 1991 Jan 23-30;265(4):501
references.pmid: 1985237