title: Whether drainage should be used after surgery for breast cancer? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
abstract: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate whether patients benefit from the suction drainage after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer surgery. RCTs of drainage versus no drainage after ALND in women with breast cancer were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Chinese Biomedical database. Two authors independently assessed the quality of included trials and extracted data. Odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes were presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 1115 titles were indentified from the databases; 1109 obvious irrelevant studies were excluded by examining the titles, abstracts, full texts because of duplicates, no RCT, different modality of drainage, drain for lymphedema, application of fibrin sealant and so on. And then, only 6 RCTs to compare drainage with no drainage after ALND in breast cancer surgery were included in the systematic review and a total of 585 patients were included in the pathological diagnosis of breast cancer in women before surgery, management by ALND with or without addition surgical procedures. The study demonstrated that insertion of a drain in the axilla after breast cancer surgery resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the rate of seroma (OR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.81, P = 0.01), the volume of aspiration (MD = -100.10, 95% CI, -174.36 to -25.85, P = 0.008), or the frequency of seroma aspiration (MD = -1.03, 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.71, P < 0.00001), but prolonged the length of hospital stay (MD = 1.52, 95% CI, 0.36 to 2.68, P = 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of wound infection (OR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.32, P = 0.25) between drainage group and no drainage group. Based on the current evidence, insertion of a drain in the axilla following ALND in breast cancer surgery effectively decreased seroma formation, volume of aspiration as well as the frequency of seroma aspiration without increasing the incidence of wound infection, but extending their stay in hospital.
authors.affiliation: Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, No 199 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China. hxdls58@163.com
authors.forename: Xiao-Dong
authors.initials: XD
authors.lastname: He
authors.forename: Zhi-Hui
authors.initials: ZH
authors.lastname: Guo
authors.forename: Jin-Hui
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Tian
authors.forename: Ke-Hu
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.forename: Xiao-Dong
authors.initials: XD
authors.lastname: Xie
mesh_terms: D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*; D004322:Drainage; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008197:Lymph Node Excision / Q000009:adverse effects; D008408:Mastectomy / Q000009:adverse effects; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D049291:Seroma / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control
references.citation: Breast. 2005 Apr;14(2):103-7
references.pmid: 15767179
references.citation: Am J Surg. 1991 May;161(5):584-8
references.pmid: 2031542
references.citation: Eur J Surg. 1993 May;159(5):263-5
references.pmid: 8103359
references.citation: Breast. 2009 Apr;18(2):109-14
references.pmid: 19289285
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2003 Sep 1;21(17):3357-65
references.pmid: 12847142
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1985 Jul;72(7):542-4
references.pmid: 4016536
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1999 Aug;230(2):194-201
references.pmid: 10450733
references.citation: ANZ J Surg. 2002 Jul;72(7):488-90
references.pmid: 12123509
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1988 Dec;75(12):1211
references.pmid: 3069178
references.citation: Eur J Surg Oncol. 1993 Apr;19(2):143-6
references.pmid: 8491318
references.citation: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Apr;90(3):263-71
references.pmid: 15830140
references.citation: ANZ J Surg. 2006 Dec;76(12):1088-95
references.pmid: 17199696
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
references.pmid: 8721797
references.citation: J Surg Oncol. 1997 Jan;64(1):27-31
references.pmid: 9040797
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2006 Jul;93(7):820-4
references.pmid: 16775817
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1992 Feb;215(2):146-9
references.pmid: 1546900
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 10;24(14):2137-50
references.pmid: 16682732
references.citation: Breast. 2000 Apr;9(2):90-2
references.pmid: 14731706
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):663-94
references.pmid: 11304107
references.citation: Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Jun;30(5):526-30
references.pmid: 15135481
references.citation: Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 May;162(5):418-20
references.pmid: 3704892
references.citation: Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Apr;152(4):517-27
references.pmid: 7010645
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1990 Mar;125(3):378-82
references.pmid: 2407228
references.citation: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Apr;108(3):319-31
references.pmid: 17530427
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):54-60
references.pmid: 14716794
references.citation: Am J Surg. 1999 Jun;177(6):450-3
references.pmid: 10414691
references.citation: Breast J. 2000 Jan;6(1):31-33
references.pmid: 11348332
references.citation: Breast Cancer. 2005;12(4):288-93
references.pmid: 16286909
references.citation: Ann Surg Oncol. 1998 Apr-May;5(3):227-31
references.pmid: 9607623
references.citation: Stat Med. 1998 Dec 30;17(24):2815-34
references.pmid: 9921604
references.citation: Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 Nov;29(9):711-7
references.pmid: 14602488
references.citation: Breast J. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):393-6
references.pmid: 12968960
references.citation: Singapore Med J. 1998 Sep;39(9):412-5
references.pmid: 9885721