title: Survival of commercial yeasts in the winery environment and their prevalence during spontaneous fermentations.
abstract: Inoculation of active dry yeasts during the wine-making process has become a common practice in most wine-producing regions; this practice may affect the diversity of the indigenous population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the winery. The aim of this work was to study the incidence of commercial yeasts in the experimental winery of Estación de Viticultura e Enoloxía de Galicia (EVEGA) and their ability to lead spontaneous fermentations. To do this, 64 spontaneous fermentations were carried out in the experimental cellar of EVEGA over a period of 7 years. Samples were taken from must and at the beginning, vigorous and final stages of fermentation. A representative number of yeast colonies was isolated from each sample. S. cerevisiae strains were characterised by analysis of mitochondrial DNA restriction patterns. The results showed that although more than 40 different strains of S. cerevisiae were identified, only 10 were found as the dominant strain or in codominance with other strains in spontaneous fermentations. The genetic profiles (mtDNA-RFLPs) of eight of these strains were similar to those of different commercial yeasts that had been previously used in the EVEGA cellar. The remaining two strains were autochthonous ones that were able to reach implantation frequencies as high of those of commercial yeasts. These results clearly indicated that commercial wine yeasts were perfectly adapted to survive in EVEGA cellar conditions, and they successfully competed with the indigenous strains of S. cerevisiae, even during spontaneous fermentations. On the other hand, autochthonous dominant strains that presented desirable oenological traits could be of interest to preserve wine typicity.
authors.affiliation: Estación de Viticultura e Enoloxía de Galicia (EVEGA), Ponte San Clodio s/n, Leiro, Ourense, 32427, Spain. evegalab@cesga.es
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Blanco
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Orriols
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Losada
mesh_terms: D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D017753:Ecosystem; D005285:Fermentation; D005516:Food Microbiology; D012150:Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification* / Q000378:metabolism; D014920:Wine / Q000382:microbiology*
chemical_list: D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Sep;58(9):2948-53
references.pmid: 16348768
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 1998 Nov;85(5):779-89
references.pmid: 9830113
references.citation: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2006 Apr-May;89(3-4):351-7
references.pmid: 16779631
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2004 Dec;5(3):237-45
references.pmid: 15556085
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2004;96(1):76-83
references.pmid: 14678161
references.citation: Syst Appl Microbiol. 2002 Aug;25(2):287-93
references.pmid: 12353885
references.citation: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2004 Feb;85(2):159-64
references.pmid: 15031657
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2005 Jul;5(10):959-69
references.pmid: 15975857
references.citation: Food Microbiol. 2007 Jun;24(4):403-12
references.pmid: 17189766
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Aug 15;103(1):49-56
references.pmid: 16084265
references.citation: Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006 Mar;42(3):248-53
references.pmid: 16478512