title: Extraversion predicts individual differences in face recognition.
abstract: In daily life, one of the most common social tasks we perform is to recognize faces. However, the relation between face recognition ability and social activities is largely unknown. Here we ask whether individuals with better social skills are also better at recognizing faces. We found that extraverts who have better social skills correctly recognized more faces than introverts. However, this advantage was absent when extraverts were asked to recognize non-social stimuli (e.g., flowers). In particular, the underlying facet that makes extraverts better face recognizers is the gregariousness facet that measures the degree of inter-personal interaction. In addition, the link between extraversion and face recognition ability was independent of general cognitive abilities. These findings provide the first evidence that links face recognition ability to our daily activity in social communication, supporting the hypothesis that extraverts are better at decoding social information than introverts.
authors.forename: Jingguang
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Moqian
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tian
authors.forename: Huizhen
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Fang
authors.forename: Miao
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Xu
authors.forename: He
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Jia
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Liu
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):411-24
references.pmid: 12585813
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2005 Dec;48(5):522-7
references.pmid: 16109416
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2010 Jan 26;20(2):137-42
references.pmid: 20060296
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Feb;80(2):294-310
references.pmid: 11220447
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references.pmid: 9176953
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Apr;16(2):166-73
references.pmid: 16563738
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jun;58(6):1087-95
references.pmid: 2391641
references.citation: Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Aug 1;140(15):1617-22
references.pmid: 16817175
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 7;29(1):38-42
references.pmid: 19129382
references.citation: J Pers Assess. 1995 Feb;64(1):21-50
references.pmid: 16367732
references.citation: Scand J Psychol. 2001 Sep;42(4):335-47
references.pmid: 11547909
references.citation: J Psychosom Res. 2008 Nov;65(5):445-51
references.pmid: 18940375
references.citation: Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006 Mar;113(3):180-206
references.pmid: 16466403
references.citation: J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001 Mar;189(3):154-61
references.pmid: 11277351
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:453-84
references.pmid: 15709943
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Dec;10(12):872-8
references.pmid: 19859063
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):862-77
references.pmid: 16737378