title: Influence of age on practice effects in longitudinal neurocognitive change.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Longitudinal comparisons of neurocognitive functioning often reveal stability or age-related increases in performance among adults under about 60 years of age. Because nearly monotonic declines with increasing age are typically evident in cross-sectional comparisons, there is a discrepancy in the inferred age trends based on the two types of comparisons. The current research investigated the role of practice effects in longitudinal comparisons on the discrepancy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Longitudinal data over an average interval of 2.5 years were available on five abilities (i.e., reasoning, spatial visualization, episodic memory, perceptual speed, vocabulary) in a sample of 1,616 adults ranging from 18 to over 80 years of age. Practice effects were estimated from comparisons of the performance of people of the same age tested for either the first or second time, after adjusting for the possibility of selective attrition.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Increased age was associated with significantly more negative longitudinal changes with each ability. All of the estimated practice effects were positive, but they varied in magnitude across neurocognitive abilities and as a function of age. After adjusting for practice effects the longitudinal changes were less positive at younger ages and slightly less negative at older ages.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  It was concluded that some, but not all, of the discrepancy between cross-sectional and longitudinal age trends in neurocognitive functioning is attributable to practice effects positively biasing the longitudinal trends. These results suggest that the neurobiological substrates of neurocognitive functioning may change across different periods in adulthood.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, 102 Gilmer Hall, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400, USA. salthouse@virginia.edu
authors.forename: Timothy A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Salthouse
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology* / Q000523:psychology; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination / Q000502:physiology; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology; D008875:Middle Aged; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology; D014825:Vocabulary; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Apr;30(4):507-14
references.pmid: 19231028
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Sep;20(1):22-33
references.pmid: 14527567
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004 Mar;59(2):P84-97
references.pmid: 15014091
references.citation: Neurobiol Aging. 2011 May;32(5):907-15
references.pmid: 19497638
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2005 Sep;20(3):412-22
references.pmid: 16248701
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2004 Jun;19(2):243-59
references.pmid: 15222818
references.citation: Genet Psychol Monogr. 1953 Aug;48(1):3-54
references.pmid: 13095701
references.citation: Neurobiol Aging. 1991 Jul-Aug;12(4):277-82
references.pmid: 1961357
references.citation: Arch Neurol. 2003 Jul;60(7):989-94
references.pmid: 12873856
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2005 Sep;20(3):460-75
references.pmid: 16248705
references.citation: Neurology. 2005 Mar 22;64(6):1032-9
references.pmid: 15781822
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2006 Dec;21(4):774-89
references.pmid: 17201497
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2008 Nov;22(6):800-11
references.pmid: 18999354
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2005 Jul;19(4):532-545
references.pmid: 16060828
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2007 Jul;21(4):401-11
references.pmid: 17605573
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2005 Mar;20(1):3-18
references.pmid: 15769210
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Nov;47(11):1283-8
references.pmid: 10573434
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1989 Dec;4(4):443-53
references.pmid: 2619951
references.citation: Neurobiol Aging. 1991 Sep-Oct;12(5):605-7
references.pmid: 1770992
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Nov;15(11):1676-89
references.pmid: 15703252
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2005 Dec;20(4):671-82
references.pmid: 16420141
references.citation: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Sep;15(5):650-61
references.pmid: 19570312
references.citation: Behav Genet. 2005 Sep;35(5):535-49
references.pmid: 16184483
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(5):532-43
references.pmid: 11254936
references.citation: J Gerontol. 1973 Jul;28(3):328-34
references.pmid: 4709650
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2004 Sep;40(5):813-22
references.pmid: 15355168
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2003 Jun;18(2):318-31
references.pmid: 12825779
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2002 Jun;17(2):179-93
references.pmid: 12061405
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 Nov;58(6):S338-46
references.pmid: 14614121
references.citation: Intelligence. 2008;36(5):464-486
references.pmid: 19137074
references.citation: Neurobiol Aging. 2006 May;27(5):733-40
references.pmid: 15961190
references.citation: Brain. 2005 Sep;128(Pt 9):2034-41
references.pmid: 15947059
references.citation: Intelligence. 2004 Nov;32(6):
references.pmid: 24357886
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002 Sep;78(2):294-320
references.pmid: 12431419
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2002 Jan;38(1):115-42
references.pmid: 11806695
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1997 Mar;67(2):121-8
references.pmid: 9075240