title: The effect of volume-of-interest misregistration on quantitative planar activity and dose estimation.
abstract: In targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT), dose estimation is essential for treatment planning and tumor dose response studies. Dose estimates are typically based on a time series of whole-body conjugate view planar or SPECT scans of the patient acquired after administration of a planning dose. Quantifying the activity in the organs from these studies is an essential part of dose estimation. The quantitative planar (QPlanar) processing method involves accurate compensation for image degrading factors and correction for organ and background overlap via the combination of computational models of the image formation process and 3D volumes of interest defining the organs to be quantified. When the organ VOIs are accurately defined, the method intrinsically compensates for attenuation, scatter and partial volume effects, as well as overlap with other organs and the background. However, alignment between the 3D organ volume of interest (VOIs) used in QPlanar processing and the true organ projections in the planar images is required. The aim of this research was to study the effects of VOI misregistration on the accuracy and precision of organ activity estimates obtained using the QPlanar method. In this work, we modeled the degree of residual misregistration that would be expected after an automated registration procedure by randomly misaligning 3D SPECT/CT images, from which the VOI information was derived, and planar images. Mutual information-based image registration was used to align the realistic simulated 3D SPECT images with the 2D planar images. The residual image misregistration was used to simulate realistic levels of misregistration and allow investigation of the effects of misregistration on the accuracy and precision of the QPlanar method. We observed that accurate registration is especially important for small organs or ones with low activity concentrations compared to neighboring organs. In addition, residual misregistration gave rise to a loss of precision in the activity estimates that was on the order of the loss of precision due to Poisson noise in the projection data. These results serve as a lower bound on the effects of misregistration on the accuracy and precision of QPlanar activity estimate and demonstrate that misregistration errors must be taken into account when assessing the overall precision of organ dose estimates.
authors.affiliation: Division of Medical Imaging Physics, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Song
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: He
authors.forename: E C
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: Frey
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D008954:Models, Biological; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1999 Feb;40(2):37S-61S
references.pmid: 10025848
references.citation: Med Phys. 1996 Nov;23(11):1919-28
references.pmid: 8947907
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1994 Apr;39(4):719-34
references.pmid: 15552080
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1995 Aug;36(8):1489-513
references.pmid: 7629599
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Aug;24(8):969-76
references.pmid: 16092329
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 7;50(17):4169-85
references.pmid: 16177538
references.citation: Med Phys. 2000 Mar;27(3):608-15
references.pmid: 10757612
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1998 Apr;43(4):857-73
references.pmid: 9572510
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1985 Aug;30(8):799-816
references.pmid: 3840265
references.citation: Med Phys. 1976 Jul-Aug;03(04):253-5
references.pmid: 958163
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2002 Jul;43(7):972-82
references.pmid: 12097471
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2006 Aug 21;51(16):3967-81
references.pmid: 16885618
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1997 Jun;42(6):1133-42
references.pmid: 9194133
references.citation: Med Phys. 1993 Mar-Apr;20(2 Pt 2):569-77
references.pmid: 8492765
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2003 Sep;44(9):1541-3; author reply 1543
references.pmid: 12960205
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1991;10(3):408-12
references.pmid: 18222843
references.citation: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986 Jul-Aug;10(4):654-63
references.pmid: 3488338
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Aug;21(8):867-77
references.pmid: 12472260
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1984 Aug;25(8):893-900
references.pmid: 6611390
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2001 Nov;42(11):1713-21
references.pmid: 11696644
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2005 Apr 21;50(8):1791-804
references.pmid: 15815096
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1998 May;39(5):904-11
references.pmid: 9591599
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1985 Apr;26(4):390-4
references.pmid: 2984364
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(4):601-9
references.pmid: 18218538
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1999 Dec;40(12):2014-20
references.pmid: 10616879
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2001 Feb;42(2):237-47
references.pmid: 11216522
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1994 Mar;39(3):509-30
references.pmid: 15551595
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jun 21;55(12):3535-44
references.pmid: 20508323
references.citation: Med Phys. 1984 Mar-Apr;11(2):189-92
references.pmid: 6328238
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Aug;22(8):986-1004
references.pmid: 12906253
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1998 Aug;39(8 Suppl):14S-20S
references.pmid: 9708566