Axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.
Axial strain imaging has been utilized for the characterization of breast masses for over a decade; however, another important feature namely the shear strain distribution around breast masses has only recently been used. In this article, we examine the feasibility of utilizing in vivo axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. Radio-frequency data was acquired using a VFX 13-5 linear array transducer on 41 patients using a Siemens SONOLINE Antares real-time clinical scanner at the University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Center. Free-hand palpation using deformations of up to 10% was utilized to generate axial strain and axial-shear strain images using a two-dimensional cross-correlation algorithm from the radio-frequency data loops. Axial-shear strain areas normalized to the lesion size, applied strain and lesion strain contrast was utilized as a feature for differentiating benign from malignant masses. The normalized axial-shear strain area feature estimated on eight patients with malignant tumors and 33 patients with fibroadenomas was utilized to demonstrate its potential for lesion differentiation. Biopsy results were considered the diagnostic standard for comparison. Our results indicate that the normalized axial-shear strain area is significantly larger for malignant tumors compared with benign masses such as fibroadenomas. Axial-shear strain pixel values greater than a specified threshold, including only those with correlation coefficient values greater than 0.75, were overlaid on the corresponding B-mode image to aid in diagnosis. A scatter plot of the normalized area feature demonstrates the feasibility of developing a linear classifier to differentiate benign from malignant masses. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve utilizing the normalized axial-shear strain area feature was 0.996, demonstrating the potential of this feature to noninvasively differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses.
Xu
Haiyan
H
Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Rao
Min
M
Varghese
Tomy
T
Sommer
Amy
A
Baker
Sara
S
Hall
Timothy J
TJ
Sisney
Gale A
GA
Burnside
Elizabeth S
ES
D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D054459:Elasticity Imaging Techniques; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D018226:Fibroadenoma / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D006801:Humans; D010173:Palpation; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D012372:ROC Curve; D014159:Transducers; D016217:Ultrasonography, Mammary / Q000379:methods*
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Dec 21;50(24):5983-95
16333168
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8469-76
16293877
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Dec;62(6):1457-65
19859936
Radiology. 1997 Jan;202(1):79-86
8988195
Cancer. 1999 Aug 1;86(3):449-62
10430253
Eur Radiol. 2010 Feb;20(2):318-25
19727753
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):952-9
16177414
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Mar;77(3):450-6
19773141
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1999;213(3):203-33
10420776
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009 May;9(2):131-6
19485945
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(3):241-6
2194336
Radiologe. 2003 Oct;43(10):850-5
14605701
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 7;53(17):4809-23
18701768
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Apr;184(4):1260-5
15788607
Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):357-68
16864666
Phys Med Biol. 2007 May 7;52(9):2615-33
17440256
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jan;170(1):109-14
9423610
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21(9):1153-62
8849830
Ultrasonics. 2000 Mar;38(1-8):400-4
10829696
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998 Oct;24(8):1183-99
9833588
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Nov;35(11):1794-802
19767139
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001 Nov;27(11):1461-9
11750744
Acta Radiol. 2010 Feb;51(1):9-14
19929254
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Feb;160(2):263-5
8424330
Ultrason Imaging. 1991 Apr;13(2):111-34
1858217
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Dec;23(12):1479-89
15575406
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003 Mar;29(3):427-35
12706194
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003 Oct;29(10):1387-96
14597335
J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Feb;24(2):161-7
15661946
JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63
18477782
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 Feb;140(2):369-75
6600356
Radiographics. 2002 Mar-Apr;22(2):269-80; discussion 280-1
11896217
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jan 21;52(2):389-401
17202622
J Ultrasound Med. 2007 Jan;26(1):47-53
17182708
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Jan;25(1):75-87
10048804
Ultrasound Clin. 2009 Jul;4(3):323-338
20798841
Radiology. 1999 Dec;213(3):889-94
10580971
Radiology. 1995 Jul;196(1):123-34
7784555
Cancer. 1995 Apr 1;75(7):1619-26
8826919
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 Jan;33(1):57-66
17189047
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1998;45(2):491-503
18244199
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1987 Spring;24(2):1-8
3295197
Ultrason Imaging. 1997 Jul;19(3):195-208
9447668
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75
12355001
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;23(2):188-93
14770402
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008 Sep;34(9):1373-86
18395961
J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-7
20040770
Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):425-37
16436810
Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):401-10
17940302
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21(6):745-51
8571462