What noseleaves do for FM bats depends on their degree of sensorial specialization.
BACKGROUND
Many bats vocalizing through their nose carry a prominent noseleaf that is involved in shaping the emission beam of these animals. To our knowledge, the exact role of these appendages has not been thoroughly investigated as for no single species both the hearing and the emission spatial sensitivities have been obtained. In this paper, we set out to evaluate the complete spatial sensitivity of two species of New World leaf-nosed bats: Micronycteris microtis and Phyllostomus discolor. From an ecological point of view, these species are interesting as they belong to the same family (Phyllostomidae) and their noseleaves are morphologically similar. They differ vastly in the niche they occupy. Comparing these species allows us to relate differences in function of the noseleaf to the ecological background of bat species.


RESULTS
We simulate the spatial sensitivity of both the hearing and the emission subsystems of two species, M. microtis and P. discolor. This technique allows us to evaluate the respective roles played by the noseleaf in the echolocation system of these species. We find that the noseleaf of M. microtis focuses the radiated energy better and yields better control over the emission beam.


CONCLUSIONS
From the evidence presented we conclude that the noseleaves serve quantitatively different functions for different bats. The main function of the noseleaf is to serve as an energy focusing mechanism that increases the difference between the reflected energy from objects in the focal area and objects in the periphery. However, despite the gross morphological similarities between the noseleaves of the two Phyllostomid species they focus the energy to a different extent, a capability that can be linked to the different ecological niches occupied by the two species.
Vanderelst
Dieter
D
Active Perception Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. dieter.vanderelst@ua.ac.be
De Mey
Fons
F
Peremans
Herbert
H
Geipel
Inga
I
Kalko
Elisabeth
E
Firzlaff
Uwe
U
D000818:Animals; D002685:Chiroptera / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D008954:Models, Biological; D009068:Movement; D009666:Nose / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*
Nature. 2004 Jun 10;429(6992):657-61
15190352
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar;101(3):1723-33
9069638
J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Jan;170(1):57-71
1573571
J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Jan;63(1):155-71
632407
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Apr;121(4):2227-35
17471736
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Dec;116(6):3701-12
15658720
J Acoust Soc Am. 1970 Dec;48(6):Suppl 2:1430+
5489909
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 May;119(5 Pt 1):2589-98
16708917
Hear Res. 2004 Nov;197(1-2):74-86
15504606
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Nov;94(5):2691-712
8270744
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Oct;124(4):2123-32
19062853
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 May;113(5):2434-41
12765362
J Exp Biol. 1993 Jul;180:119-52
8371084
Hear Res. 2003 Nov;185(1-2):110-22
14599698
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Dec;82(6):1892-900
3429728
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Nov;76(5 Pt 1):051902
18233682
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Dec;116(6):3594-605
15658710
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Mar;115(3):1033-43
15058325
Nature. 2001 Dec 13;414(6865):742-5
11742397
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Nov 24;97(21):218701
17155779
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep;100(3):1764-76
8817902
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 May;125(5):3052-9
19425648
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Nov;110(5 Pt 1):2449-55
11757934
Science. 1972 Jul 7;177(4043):82-4
4557490
Science. 1982 Oct 29;218(4571):481-3
7123247