Commitment of chondrogenic precursors of the avian scapula takes place after epithelial-mesenchymal transition of the dermomyotome.
BACKGROUND
Cells of the epithelially organised dermomyotome are traditionally believed to give rise to skeletal muscle and dermis. We have previously shown that the dermomyotome can undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and give rise to chondrogenic cells, which go on to form the scapula blade in birds. At present we have little understanding regarding the issue of when the chondrogenic fate of dermomyotomal cells is determined. Using quail-chick grafting experiments, we investigated whether scapula precursor cells are committed to a chondrogenic fate while in an epithelial state or whether commitment is established after EMT.


RESULTS
We show that the hypaxial dermomyotome, which normally forms the scapula, does not generate cartilaginous tissue after it is grafted to the epaxial domain. In contrast engraftment of the epaxial dermomyotome to the hypaxial domain gives rise to scapula-like cartilage. However, the hypaxial sub-ectodermal mesenchyme (SEM), which originates from the hypaxial dermomyotome after EMT, generates cartilaginous elements in the epaxial domain, whereas in reciprocal grafting experiments, the epaxial SEM cannot form cartilage in the hypaxial domain.


CONCLUSIONS
We suggest that the epithelial cells of the dermomyotome are not committed to the chondrogenic lineage. Commitment to this lineage occurs after it has undergone EMT to form the sub-ectodermal mesenchyme.
Wang
Baigang
B
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Goettingen, Kreuzbergring 36, 37075 Goettingen, Germany. baigang.wang@medizin.uni-goettingen.de
Pu
Qin
Q
De
Raja
R
Patel
Ketan
K
Christ
Bodo
B
Wilting
Jörg
J
Huang
Ruijin
R
D000818:Animals; D002356:Cartilage / Q000166:cytology / Q000196:embryology; D002642:Chick Embryo; D002645:Chickens; D019902:Chondrocytes / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism; D004848:Epithelium / Q000196:embryology*; D008648:Mesoderm / Q000166:cytology / Q000196:embryology*; D011784:Quail / Q000196:embryology*; D012540:Scapula / Q000166:cytology / Q000196:embryology*
J Clin Invest. 2009 Jun;119(6):1438-49
19487820
Anat Embryol (Berl). 2002 Jan;205(1):1-6
11875659
Dev Dyn. 2005 Aug;233(4):1386-93
15973735
Development. 1993 Nov;119(3):649-60
8187635
Differentiation. 1996 Oct;61(1):13-23
8921581
Dev Dyn. 2007 Sep;236(9):2502-11
17685490
Dev Biol. 1999 Jun 1;210(1):15-29
10364424
Development. 2003 Nov;130(21):5103-11
12944424
Development. 2006 Aug;133(15):2897-904
16818447
Development. 1988 Sep;104(1):15-28
3253056
Anat Embryol (Berl). 2004 Sep;208(6):411-24
15338303
Development. 2000 Feb;127(3):527-32
10631173
Dev Biol. 1999 Dec 15;216(2):507-20
10642789
Anat Embryol (Berl). 2004 Sep;208(6):431-7
15338302
Dev Biol. 2004 Nov 15;275(2):315-24
15501221
Nat Cell Biol. 2006 Dec;8(12):1398-406
17072303
Anat Embryol (Berl). 1995 Apr;191(4):297-310
7645756
Development. 2000 Sep;127(17):3789-94
10934023
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Feb;7(2):131-42
16493418
Dev Biol. 2003 Mar 1;255(1):30-47
12618132
Anat Embryol (Berl). 2004 Aug;208(5):333-50
15309628
Dev Dyn. 1992 Dec;195(4):231-72
1304821
J Anat. 2010 Apr;216(4):482-8
20136669
J Anat. 2010 Jan;216(1):3-15
19929907
Dev Biol. 2005 Nov 1;287(1):11-8
16202988
Anat Embryol (Berl). 1995 May;191(5):381-96
7625610
Development. 2005 Sep;132(17):3895-905
16100089
Pathol Res Pract. 1998;194(10):701-4
9820866
Methods Cell Biol. 1996;51:219-35
8722478
Development. 1994 May;120(5):1109-21
8026324