title: Scientific research and the public trust.
abstract: This essay analyzes the concept of public trust in science and offers some guidance for ethicists, scientists, and policymakers who use this idea defend ethical rules or policies pertaining to the conduct of research. While the notion that  public trusts science makes sense in the abstract, it may not be sufficiently focused to support the various rules and policies that authors have tried to derive from it, because the public is not a uniform body with a common set of interests. Well-focused arguments that use public trust to support rules or policies for the conduct of research should specify (a) which public is being referred to (e.g. the general public or a specific public, such as a particular community or group); (b) what this public expects from scientists; (c) how the rule or policy will ensure that these expectations are met; and (d) why is it important to meet these expectations.
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Box 12233, Mail Drop CU 03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. resnikd@niehs.nih.gov
authors.forename: David B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Resnik
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D011639:Public Opinion; D012586:Science / Q000941:ethics*; D035502:Trust
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Sep;18(9):939-42
references.pmid: 10973211
references.citation: Br Med Bull. 2009;89:7-22
references.pmid: 19056723
references.citation: Health Educ Behav. 2004 Dec;31(6):684-97
references.pmid: 15539542
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):1996-2001
references.pmid: 17018826
references.citation: Risk Anal. 2007 Feb;27(1):59-69
references.pmid: 17362400
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):860-6
references.pmid: 18386101
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2006 Sep;32(9):542-7
references.pmid: 16943338
references.citation: JAMA. 1989 Aug 11;262(6):803-12
references.pmid: 2664241
references.citation: Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1649
references.pmid: 15576574
references.citation: Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Feb 1;146A(3):297-304
references.pmid: 18205141
references.citation: Am J Law Med. 1993;19(4):369-451
references.pmid: 7942864
references.citation: Science. 1994 Dec 9;266(5191):1660-1
references.pmid: 7992048
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Aug 5;400(6744):499
references.pmid: 10448847
references.citation: Environ Health. 2007 Nov 22;6:36
references.pmid: 18034882
references.citation: Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):1048-53
references.pmid: 17063137
references.citation: Sci Eng Ethics. 1995 Oct;1(4):403-16
references.pmid: 11657785
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Jan 10;297(2):205-8
references.pmid: 17213404
references.citation: Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Sep-Oct;26(5):25-9
references.pmid: 8891706
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Nov 1;284(17):2237-8
references.pmid: 11056597
references.citation: Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 May-Jun;38(3):8-9
references.pmid: 18581928
references.citation: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Dec;3(4):35-47
references.pmid: 19385755
references.citation: Acad Med. 2003 Feb;78(2):225-36
references.pmid: 12584106
references.citation: Risk Anal. 2000 Apr;20(2):195-203
references.pmid: 10859780
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2:145-8
references.pmid: 11929722
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Oct 11;413(6856):565
references.pmid: 11595911