title: The use of alternative forms of graphical analysis to balance bias and precision in PET images.
abstract: Graphical analysis (GA) is an efficient method for estimating total tissue distribution volume (V(T)) from positron emission tomography (PET) uptake data. The original GA produces a negative bias in V(T) in the presence of noise. Estimates of V(T) using other GA forms have less bias but less precision. Here, we show how the bias terms are related between the GA methods and how using an instrumental variable (IV) can also reduce bias. Results are based on simulations of a two-compartment model with V(T)'s ranging from 10.5 to 64 mL/cm(3) and from PET image data with the tracer [(11)C]DASB ([(11)C]-3-amino-4-(2-dimethylaminomethyl-phenylsulfanyl) benzonitrile). Four estimates of V(T) (or distribution volume ratio (DVR) using a reference tissue) can be easily computed from different formulations of GA including the IV. As noise affects the estimates from all four differently, they generally do not provide the same estimates. By taking the median value of the four estimates, we can decrease the bias and reduce the effect of large values contributing to noisy images. The variance of the four estimates can serve as a guide to the reliability of the median estimate. This may provide a general method for the generation of parametric images with little bias and good precision.
authors.affiliation: Medical Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA. logan@bnl.gov
authors.forename: Jean
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Logan
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Alexoff
authors.forename: Joanna S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Fowler
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000814:Aniline Compounds; D019540:Area Under Curve; D015982:Bias; D003196:Computer Graphics; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D016018:Least-Squares Analysis; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D012015:Reference Standards; D013440:Sulfides
chemical_list: C412822:3-amino-4-(2-dimethylaminomethylphenylsulfanyl)benzonitrile; D000814:Aniline Compounds; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D013440:Sulfides
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002 Dec;22(12):1440-52
references.pmid: 12468889
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996 Jul;16(4):750-2
references.pmid: 8964817
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002 Feb;22(2):240-4
references.pmid: 11823722
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):578-86
references.pmid: 19631754
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):661-70
references.pmid: 18930830
references.citation: Ann Nucl Med. 2009 Feb;23(2):163-71
references.pmid: 19225940
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983 Mar;3(1):1-7
references.pmid: 6822610
references.citation: J Med Chem. 2000 Aug 10;43(16):3103-10
references.pmid: 10956218
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002 Oct;22(10):1271-81
references.pmid: 12368666
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008 Apr;28(4):852-65
references.pmid: 18059434
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003 Sep;23(9):1096-112
references.pmid: 12973026
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2000 Dec;41(12):2083-8
references.pmid: 11138696
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996 Sep;16(5):834-40
references.pmid: 8784228
references.citation: Stat Med. 2003 Nov 30;22(22):3557-68
references.pmid: 14601019
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990 Sep;10(5):740-7
references.pmid: 2384545
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1997 Nov;6(4):279-87
references.pmid: 9417971