title: Theoretical study of excited states of pyrazolate- and pyridinethiolate-bridged dinuclear platinum(II) complexes: relationship between geometries of excited states and phosphorescence spectra.
abstract: Dinuclear platinum(II) complexes [Pt(2)(μ-pz)(2)(bpym)(2)](2+) (1; pz = pyrazolate and bpym = 2,2'-bipyrimidine) and [Pt(2)(μ-pyt)(2)(ppy)(2)] (2; pyt = pyridine-2-thiolate and Hppy = 2-phenylpyridine) were theoretically investigated with density functional theory (DFT) to clarify the reasons why the phosphorescence of 1 is not observed in the acetonitrile (CH(3)CN) solution at room temperature (RT) but observed in the solid state at RT and why the phosphorescence of 2 is observed in both the CH(3)CN solution and the solid state at RT. The S(1) and T(1) states of 1 in the CH(3)CN solution are assigned as a metal-metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MMLCT) excited state. Their geometries are C(2v) symmetrical, in which spin-orbit interaction between the S(1) and T(1) excited states is absent because the direct product of irreducible representations of the singly occupied molecular orbitals (SOMOs) of these excited states and the orbital angular momentum (l) operator involved in the Hamiltonian for spin-orbit interaction does not belong to the a(1) representation. As a result, the S(1) → T(1) intersystem crossing hardly occurs, leading to the absence of T(1) → S(0) phosphorescence in the CH(3)CN solution at RT. In the solid state, the geometry of the S(1) state does not reach the global minimum but stays in the C(1)-symmetrical local minimum. This S(1) excited state is assigned as a mixture of the ligand-centered π-π* excited state and the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer excited state. Spin-orbit interaction between the S(1) and T(1) excited states operates to induce the S(1) → T(1) intersystem crossing because the direct product of the irreducible representations of the SOMOs of these excited states and the l operator belongs to the "a" representation. As a result, T(1) → S(0) phosphorescence occurs in the solid state. In 2, the S(1) and T(1) excited states are assigned as the MMLCT excited state. Their geometries are C(2)-symmetrical in both the CH(3)CN solution and the solid state, in which spin-orbit interaction between the S(1) and T(1) states operates to induce the S(1) → T(1) intersystem crossing because the direct product of the irreducible representations of the SOMOs and the l operator belongs to the "a" representation. Thus, T(1) → S(0) phosphorescence occurs in both the CH(3)CN solution and the solid state at RT, unlike 1.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan.
authors.forename: Ken
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Saito
authors.forename: Yoshihide
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Nakao
authors.forename: Keisuke
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Umakoshi
authors.forename: Shigeyoshi
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sakaki
mesh_terms: D008163:Luminescent Measurements; D056004:Molecular Dynamics Simulation; D009944:Organoplatinum Compounds / Q000737:chemistry*; D011720:Pyrazoles / Q000737:chemistry*; D011725:Pyridines / Q000737:chemistry*; D011789:Quantum Theory; D013438:Sulfhydryl Compounds / Q000737:chemistry*
chemical_list: D009944:Organoplatinum Compounds; D011720:Pyrazoles; D011725:Pyridines; D013438:Sulfhydryl Compounds