The impact of NEO PI-R gender norms on the assessment of personality disorder profiles.
Many personality assessment inventories provide gender-specific norms to allow comparison of an individual's standing relative to others of the same gender. In some cases, this means that an identical raw score produces standardized scores that differ notably depending on whether the respondent is male or female. Thus, an important question is whether unisex-normed scores or gender-normed scores more validly assess personality. Gender-normed and unisex-normed scores from the NEO Personality Inventory--Revised (P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992) were examined in a large clinical sample, using 2 measures of personality disorder as validating criteria. Gender-normed scores did not obtain significantly higher correlations. In fact, for 2 personality disorders (antisocial and narcissistic), gender-normed scores yielded significantly lower correlations, suggesting that personality disorder pathology relates most closely to one's absolute level of a personality trait, rather than one's standing relative to others of the same gender. Ramifications of this finding for personality research and clinical assessment are discussed.
Samuel
Douglas B
DB
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, West Haven, CT, USA. douglas.samuel@yale.edu
Ansell
Emily B
EB
Hopwood
Christopher J
CJ
Morey
Leslie C
LC
Markowitz
John C
JC
Skodol
Andrew E
AE
Grilo
Carlos M
CM
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D039721:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010551:Personality; D010552:Personality Assessment / Q000592:standards; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D010555:Personality Inventory / Q000592:standards; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012737:Sex Factors; D055815:Young Adult
Psychol Assess. 2004 Sep;16(3):310-22
15456386
J Pers Assess. 1998 Apr;70(2):197-211
9697327
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Mar;88(3):547-61
15740445
J Pers. 2001 Apr;69(2):253-76
11339798
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:401-21
16318601
Assessment. 2000 Dec;7(4):365-78
11151962
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1326-42
18708274
Psychol Bull. 1994 Nov;116(3):429-56
7809307
Am Psychol. 1983 Jul;38(7):799-803
6614626
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;48(5):681-9
1401155
Am Psychol. 1983 Jul;38(7):786-92
6614624
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Mar;61(3):323-45
15468325
J Pers Disord. 2000 Winter;14(4):291-9
11213787
J Pers Assess. 2008 Mar;90(2):105-9
18444102
Assessment. 2005 Dec;12(4):363-73
16244117
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Dec;61(12):1485-98
16173082
J Pers Assess. 1995 Aug;65(1):1-20
16367643
J Pers Disord. 2004 Jun;18(3):286-308
15237048
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1978 Dec;166(12):839-45
722306
Am Psychol. 1994 Nov;49(11):929-54
7985886
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Jul;18(5):473-85
14591444
J Pers Disord. 2000 Winter;14(4):300-15
11213788
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 May;112(2):193-202
12784828
J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Aug;110(3):401-12
11502083
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989 Apr;57(2):301-5
2708619
J Pers Disord. 2010 Dec;24(6):721-45
21158596
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
19565683
Assessment. 2002 Jun;9(2):181-7
12066833