title: Impact of translational selection on codon usage bias in the archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis.
abstract: Patterns of codon usage have been extensively studied among Bacteria and Eukaryotes, but there has been little investigation of species from the third domain of life, the Archaea. Here, we examine the nature of codon usage bias in a methanogenic archaeon, Methanococcus maripaludis. Genome-wide patterns of codon usage are dominated by a strong A + T bias, presumably largely reflecting mutation patterns. Nevertheless, there is variation among genes in the use of a subset of putatively translationally optimal codons, which is strongly correlated with gene expression level. In comparison with Bacteria such as Escherichia coli, the strength of selected codon usage bias in highly expressed genes in M. maripaludis seems surprisingly high given its moderate growth rate. However, the pattern of selected codon usage differs between M. maripaludis and E. coli: in the archaeon, strongly selected codon usage bias is largely restricted to twofold degenerate amino acids (AAs). Weaker bias among the codons for fourfold degenerate AAs is consistent with the small number of tRNA genes in the M. maripaludis genome.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
authors.forename: Laura R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Emery
authors.forename: Paul M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Sharp
mesh_terms: D019843:Archaeal Proteins / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D003062:Codon; D019848:Gene Expression Regulation, Archaeal / Q000502:physiology*; D020745:Genome, Archaeal; D017017:Methanococcus / Q000235:genetics*; D009154:Mutation; D014176:Protein Biosynthesis
chemical_list: D019843:Archaeal Proteins; D003062:Codon
references.citation: Comput Appl Biosci. 1985 Sep;1(3):167-72
references.pmid: 3880341
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13-34
references.pmid: 3916708
references.citation: Q Rev Biophys. 1984 Feb;17(1):45-82
references.pmid: 6484121
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 17;102(20):7303-8
references.pmid: 15883368
references.citation: Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):897-907
references.pmid: 1752426
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D93-7
references.pmid: 18984615
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Sep 24;32(17):5036-44
references.pmid: 15448185
references.citation: Gene. 1990 Mar 1;87(1):23-9
references.pmid: 2110097
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1986;24(1-2):28-38
references.pmid: 3104616
references.citation: Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006 May;5(5):868-81
references.pmid: 16489187
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):1281-95
references.pmid: 3547335
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2004 Oct;186(20):6956-69
references.pmid: 15466049
references.citation: Gene. 1999 Sep 30;238(1):143-55
references.pmid: 10570992
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 27;365(1544):1203-12
references.pmid: 20308095
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2010 Jan 15;6(1):e1000808
references.pmid: 20090831
references.citation: Genome Res. 2004 Nov;14(11):2279-86
references.pmid: 15479947
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Jan;24(1):10-2
references.pmid: 17038449
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Feb 23;33(4):1141-53
references.pmid: 15728743