title: Are both parents always better than one? Parental conflict and young adult well-being.
abstract: Using data from three waves of the National Survey of Families and Households (N=1,963), we examine associations between adolescent family experiences and young adult well-being across a range of indicators, including schooling, substance use, and family-related transitions. We compare children living with both biological parents, but whose parents differ in how often they argue, to children in stepfather and single-mother families, and we assess the extent to which differences can be understood in terms of family income and parenting practices. Findings suggest that parental conflict is associated with children's poorer academic achievement, increased substance use, and early family formation and dissolution. Living in single mother and stepfather families tend to be more strongly associated with our indicators of well-being, although differences between these family types and living with high conflict continuously married parents are often statistically indistinguishable. Income and parenting largely do not account for associations between adolescent family type and later life outcomes. We conclude that while children do better, on average, living with two biological married parents, the advantages of two-parent families are not shared equally by all.
authors.affiliation: Cornell University.
authors.forename: Kelly
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Musick
authors.forename: Ann
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Meier
references.citation: Science. 1991 Jun 7;252(5011):1386-9
references.pmid: 2047851
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):674-701
references.pmid: 8255953
references.citation: Demography. 1999 Feb;36(1):135-44
references.pmid: 10036598
references.citation: Demography. 1997 Aug;34(3):311-30
references.pmid: 9275242
references.citation: Demography. 1995 Aug;32(3):299-318
references.pmid: 8829968
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Nov;107(4):686-90
references.pmid: 9830257
references.citation: Soc Forces. 2012 Sep;91(1):45-53
references.pmid: 23378674
references.citation: Demography. 1995 Aug;32(3):425-36
references.pmid: 8829975
references.citation: Future Child. 2005 Fall;15(2):13-32
references.pmid: 16158728
references.citation: Demography. 2005 Aug;42(3):447-68
references.pmid: 16235608
references.citation: Future Child. 2005 Fall;15(2):57-74
references.pmid: 16158730
references.citation: Demography. 1996 Feb;33(1):66-81
references.pmid: 8690141
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1994 Nov;116(3):387-411
references.pmid: 7809306
references.citation: Demography. 2005 Aug;42(3):427-46
references.pmid: 16235607
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Jun;43(2):125-42
references.pmid: 12096695
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 2004 Mar;45(1):81-98
references.pmid: 15179909
references.citation: Demography. 1999 Nov;36(4):535-51
references.pmid: 10604080
references.citation: Demography. 1993 Nov;30(4):701-17
references.pmid: 8262288
references.citation: Demography. 2002 May;39(2):393-413
references.pmid: 12048958
references.citation: Demography. 1999 Aug;36(3):415-20
references.pmid: 10472505
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1995 Jul;118(1):108-32
references.pmid: 7644602
references.citation: Demography. 1997 May;34(2):263-76
references.pmid: 9169282
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1990 Sep;108(2):267-90
references.pmid: 2236384
references.citation: JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):823-32
references.pmid: 9293990
references.citation: Demography. 1991 Nov;28(4):493-512
references.pmid: 1769399
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1982 Sep;92(2):310-30
references.pmid: 7146231
references.citation: Demography. 2005 Nov;42(4):621-46
references.pmid: 16463914
references.citation: Future Child. 2005 Fall;15(2):75-96
references.pmid: 16158731
references.citation: Child Dev. 1990 Aug;61(4):1112-23
references.pmid: 2209181