Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but are task specific.
It has been suggested that cognitive conflicts require effortful processing and, therefore, are aversive (Botvinick, 2007). In the present study, we compared conflicts emerging from the inhibition of a predominant response tendency in a go/no-go task with those between incompatible response activations in a Simon task in a within-subjects design, using the same type of stimuli. Whereas no-go trials elicited reduced skin conductance and pupillometric responses, but prolonged corrugator muscle activity, as compared with go trials, incompatible and compatible Simon trials were indistinguishable with respect to these parameters. Furthermore, the conflict-sensitive N2 components of the event-related brain potential were similar in amplitude, but showed significantly different scalp distributions, indicating dissociable neural generator systems. The present findings suggest the involvement of different emotional and cognitive processes in both types of cognitive conflicts-none being aversive, however. In addition, the N2 findings call into question claims of common monitoring systems for all kinds of cognitive conflicts.
Schacht
Annekathrin
A
Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. schachta@hu-berlin.de
Dimigen
Olaf
O
Sommer
Werner
W
D000328:Adult; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003265:Contingent Negative Variation / Q000502:physiology; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005712:Galvanic Skin Response; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012016:Reference Values; D055815:Young Adult
Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb;19(2):103-8
18271855
Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70
2186425
Psychol Res. 2009 Nov;73(6):843-56
19030874
Brain Res. 2006 Jun 30;1097(1):167-80
16725124
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 2;45(4):617-29
16962146
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):593-602
12126500
Psychol Res. 2003 Nov;67(4):266-79
14634814
Biol Psychol. 2009 Feb;80(2):246-50
19022336
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jun;78(6):447-55
1712280
Psychophysiology. 2008 Jul;45(4):602-7
18282202
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Dec;28(6):1345-63
12542132
Biol Psychol. 2007 Mar;74(3):347-57
17052833
Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):377-95
2200076
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12321-31
19793991
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Mar;3(1):17-26
12822595
J Exp Psychol. 1966 Feb;71(2):241-8
5903011
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):343-353
14979809
Psychophysiology. 1996 May;33(3):282-94
8936397
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980 Jun;48(6):609-21
6155251
Psychophysiology. 1993 Nov;30(6):547-58
8248447
Brain Res. 2008 Jun 18;1215:147-59
18474363
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(5):701-11
10689046
Psychophysiology. 2003 Sep;40(5):776-85
14696731
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 May;16(3):309-22
12706212
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983 Jun;9(3):360-70
6223976
Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):165-76
15518933
Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959
15482068
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):215-222
10827444
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 May;62(3):203-8
2581760
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
5146491
Psychol Sci. 2009 Dec;20(12):1473-7
19906127
Brain. 1995 Feb;118 ( Pt 1):279-306
7895011
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
11488380
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):356-66
18189009
Neuroimage. 2005 Oct 1;27(4):885-95
15996878
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999 Apr;101(2-3):267-91
10344188
Psychophysiology. 2008 Jan;45(1):152-70
17850238
Psychophysiology. 1986 Sep;23(5):567-89
3809364
Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):164-71
16466425
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98
12934687