Modular femoral sleeve and stem implant provides long-term total hip survivorship.
BACKGROUND
A femoral implant with a modular sleeve and stem has been designed to allow independent and complete metaphyseal-diaphyseal fit and fill as well as independent rotation to accommodate anteversion at the time of THA.


OBJECTIVE
In a prospective study we asked whether such a modular femoral sleeve and stem implant used during THA could provide (1) high long-term survivorship; (2) radiographically stable implants without radiolucencies, stress shielding, or osteolysis; and (3) high clinical scores in patients 15 to 20 years after a primary THA.


METHODS
We prospectively evaluated 31 hips that underwent a primary THA using a modular femoral component for clinical outcome (Harris hip score) and radiographic outcome (implant stability, femoral loosening, osteolysis and stress shielding) at a minimum followup of 15 years (mean, 17 years; range, 15-20.2 years).


RESULTS
There were no femoral revisions for aseptic loosening; all hips had radiographic evidence of bone ingrowth. Two well-ingrown components were revised for late hematogenous infection. Some degree of proximal femoral disuse atrophy from stress shielding occurred in 23 hips (74%) but was nonprogressive and did not result in any failures or complications. Femoral osteolysis occurred in 18 hips (58%), but we cannot definitively determine whether or not the modular junction contributed to this.


CONCLUSIONS
These data suggest this modular femoral stem can provide long-term survivorship with no cases of aseptic loosening at 15 to 20 years after primary THA. However, it may be prudent when using this femoral stem to consider an articulation with an alternative bearing or, if the modularity is not needed to address femoral anteversion and metaphyseal-diaphyseal mismatch, to consider a nonmodular femoral stem.


METHODS
Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Le
David
D
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue #B5159, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada.
Smith
Karen
K
Tanzer
Dylan
D
Tanzer
Michael
M
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000601:surgery*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010014:Osteolysis / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure / Q000209:etiology; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D055815:Young Adult
Orthopedics. 2005 Sep;28(9 Suppl):s1117-24
16190049
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Apr;90(4):430-5
18378914
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Dec;16(8 Suppl 1):64-70
11742453
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Oct;24(7):1143.e1-5
18835691
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Aug;(257):107-28
2199114
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Dec;81(12):1707-16
10608382
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan;24(1):159.e19-24
18534401
Orthopedics. 2008 Mar;31(3):220
19292254
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Jun;21(4 Suppl 1):89-92
16781438
J Arthroplasty. 1996 Apr;11(3):332-4; discussion 337-8
8713914
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jan;22(1):140-2
17197322
Int Orthop. 1999;23(6):325-9
10741515
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Dec;24(8):1193-9
19369026
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Feb;72(2):161-8
2303502
J Arthroplasty. 1993 Jun;8(3):239-43
8326303
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55
5783851