title: Survival and prognostic analysis of adjacent segments after spinal fusion.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To examine the survival function and prognostic factors of the adjacent segments based on a second operation after thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
  
  
  METHODS
  This retrospective study reviewed 3,188 patients (3,193 cases) who underwent a thoracolumbar spinal fusion at the author's hospital. Survival analysis was performed on the event of a second operation due to adjacent segment degeneration. The prognostic factors, such as the cause of the disease, surgical procedure, age, gender and number of fusion segments, were examined. Sagittal alignment and the location of the adjacent segment were measured in the second operation cases, and their association with the types of degeneration was investigated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One hundred seven patients, 112 cases (3.5%), underwent a second operation due to adjacent segment degeneration. The survival function was 97% and 94% at 5 and 10 years after surgery, respectively, showing a 0.6% linear reduction per year. The significant prognostic factors were old age, degenerative disease, multiple-level fusion and male. Among the second operation cases, the locations of the adjacent segments were the thoracolumbar junctional area and lumbosacral area in 11.6% and 88.4% of cases, respectively. Sagittal alignment was negative or neutral, positive and strongly positive in 47.3%, 38.9%, and 15.7%, respectively. Regarding the type of degeneration, spondylolisthesis or kyphosis, retrolisthesis, and neutral balance in the sagittal view was noted in 13.4%, 36.6%, and 50% of cases, respectively. There was a significant difference according to the location of the adjacent segment (p = 0.000) and sagittal alignment (p = 0.041).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The survival function of the adjacent segments was 94% at 10 years, which had decreased linearly by 0.6% per a year. The likelihood of a second operation was high in those with old age, degenerative disease, multiple-level fusion and male. There was a tendency for the type of degeneration to be spondylolisthesis or kyphosis in cases of the thoracolumbar junctional area and strongly positive sagittal alignment, but retrolisthesis in cases of the lumbosacral area and neutral or positive sagittal alignment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul Sacred Heart General Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
authors.forename: Dong Ki
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Ahn
authors.forename: Hoon Seok
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Dae Jung
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Choi
authors.forename: Kwan Soo
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Seung Jin
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Yang
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011379:Prognosis; D012086:Reoperation; D013122:Spinal Diseases / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D013123:Spinal Fusion; D016019:Survival Analysis; D013904:Thoracic Vertebrae / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20;33(12):1337-43
references.pmid: 18496346
references.citation: Neurosurg Rev. 2008 Apr;31(2):189-96
references.pmid: 17906883
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):685-90
references.pmid: 17413475
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1995 Dec;8(6):464-73
references.pmid: 8605420
references.citation: Neurosurg Focus. 2007 Jan 15;22(1):E11
references.pmid: 17608332
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1999 Apr;90(2 Suppl):163-9
references.pmid: 10199244
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Nov 15;28(22):2546-50
references.pmid: 14624093
references.citation: Acta Orthop. 2007 Dec;78(6):834-9
references.pmid: 18236192
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Oct 15;19(20 Suppl):2256S-2265S
references.pmid: 7817240
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 1;33(15):1701-7
references.pmid: 18594464
references.citation: Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1999 Jun;28(6):336-40
references.pmid: 10401898
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jul;21(5):305-9
references.pmid: 18600137
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jul;73(6):802-8
references.pmid: 2071615
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2001 Aug;10(4):295-300
references.pmid: 11563614
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jul 15;29(14):1535-40
references.pmid: 15247575
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1999 Feb;12(1):27-33
references.pmid: 10078946
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Mar 1;20(5):526-31
references.pmid: 7604320
references.citation: Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2008 May;99(5):107-13
references.pmid: 18788454
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jul;86(7):1497-503
references.pmid: 15252099
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jul 15;23(14):1550-8
references.pmid: 9682311
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1996 Oct;9(5):392-400
references.pmid: 8938607
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Mar;12(2):97-104
references.pmid: 2954220
references.citation: J Orthop Sci. 2005 Sep;10(5):490-5
references.pmid: 16193361
references.citation: Neurol India. 2005 Dec;53(4):499-505
references.pmid: 16565543