title: Nutrient density of beverages in relation to climate impact.
abstract: The food chain contributes to a substantial part of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and growing evidence points to the urgent need to reduce GHGs emissions worldwide. Among suggestions were proposals to alter food consumption patterns by replacing animal foods with more plant-based foods. However, the nutritional dimensions of changing consumption patterns to lower GHG emissions still remains relatively unexplored. This study is the first to estimate the composite nutrient density, expressed as percentage of Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNR) for 21 essential nutrients, in relation to cost in GHG emissions of the production from a life cycle perspective, expressed in grams of CO(2)-equivalents, using an index called the Nutrient Density to Climate Impact (NDCI) index. The NDCI index was calculated for milk, soft drink, orange juice, beer, wine, bottled carbonated water, soy drink, and oat drink. Due to low-nutrient density, the NDCI index was 0 for carbonated water, soft drink, and beer and below 0.1 for red wine and oat drink. The NDCI index was similar for orange juice (0.28) and soy drink (0.25). Due to a very high-nutrient density, the NDCI index for milk was substantially higher (0.54) than for the other beverages. Future discussion on how changes in food consumption patterns might help avert climate change need to take both GHG emission and nutrient density of foods and beverages into account.
authors.affiliation: Unit for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
authors.forename: Annika
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Smedman
authors.forename: Helena
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lindmark-Månsson
authors.forename: Adam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Drewnowski
authors.forename: Anna-Karin Modin
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Edman
references.citation: J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Dec;20(6):599-608
references.pmid: 11771675
references.citation: Proc Nutr Soc. 2010 Feb;69(1):103-18
references.pmid: 20003639
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 May;89(5):1704S-1709S
references.pmid: 19339402
references.citation: J Nutr. 2009 Aug;139(8):1549-54
references.pmid: 19549759
references.citation: J Nutr. 2003 May;133(5):1308-15
references.pmid: 12730415
references.citation: Public Health Nutr. 2010 Aug;13(8):1178-85
references.pmid: 20105388
references.citation: Eat Behav. 2009 Dec;10(4):237-46
references.pmid: 19778754
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1095S-1101S
references.pmid: 20181811
references.citation: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jun;64(6):553-60
references.pmid: 20216562
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97(4):667-75
references.pmid: 17329656
references.citation: J Nutr. 2009 Jun;139(6):1198-202
references.pmid: 19339707
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Oct;82(4):721-32
references.pmid: 16210699
references.citation: Public Health Nutr. 2010 Mar;13(3):304-13
references.pmid: 19545472