Selecting instruments for assessing psychological wellbeing in Afghan and Kurdish refugee groups.
BACKGROUND
Afghan and Iraqi refugees comprise nearly half of all those currently under United Nations protection. As many of them will eventually be resettled in countries outside the region of origin, their long term health and settlement concerns are of relevance to host societies, and will be a likely focus for future research. Since Australia and New Zealand have both accepted refugees for many years and have dedicated, but different settlement and immigration policies, a study comparing the resettlement of two different refugee groups in these countries was undertaken. The purpose of this article is to describe the instrument selection for this study assessing mental health and psychological well being with Afghan and Kurdish former refugees, in particular to address linguistic considerations and translated instrument availability. A summary of instruments previously used with refugee and migrant groups from the Middle East region is presented to assist other researchers, before describing the three instruments ultimately selected for the quantitative component of our study.


RESULTS
The Kessler-10 Psychological Distress Scale (K10), General Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (GPSE), and Personal Well-Being Index (PWI) all showed good reliability (Cronbach's alphas of 0.86, 0.89 and 0.83 respectively for combined language versions) and ease of use even for pre-literate participants, with the sample of 193 refugees, although some concepts in the GPSE proved problematic for a small number of respondents. Farsi was the language of choice for the majority of Afghan participants, while most of the Kurds chose to complete English versions in addition to Farsi. No one used Arabic or Turkish translations. Participants settled less than ten years were more likely to complete questionnaires in Farsi. Descriptive summary statistics are presented for each instrument with results split by gender, refugee group and language version completed.


CONCLUSIONS
This paper discusses instrument selection for Farsi and Arabic speaking refugee participants from the Middle East and Afghanistan, concluding that the Kessler-10, GPSE scale and PWI were suitable for use with these groups. Suitable language translations are freely available. Our experience with these instruments may help inform other studies with these vulnerable groups.
Sulaiman-Hill
Cheryl Mr
CM
Centre for International Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth WA, Australia. tabuk@actrix.co.nz.
Thompson
Sandra C
SC
Disasters. 2003 Sep;27(3):185-206
14524045
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Dec;25(6):494-7
11824981
Psychol Rep. 2002 Feb;90(1):67-70
11899015
JAMA. 2002 Aug 7;288(5):611-21
12150673
Transcult Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;43(3):445-61
17090627
J Transcult Nurs. 2006 Jan;17(1):30-9
16410434
J Immigr Health. 2004 Apr;6(2):71-81
15014224
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;42(4):328-35
17370049
Health Place. 2005 Sep;11(3):261-73
15774332
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;40(4):341-6
16620316
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;185:25-30
15231552
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001 Dec;189(12):838-45
11794577
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 May;182:376-8
12724237
Ment Health Serv Res. 2005 Sep;7(3):171-9
16194002
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33(1):93-6
11253591
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Jan;41(1):18-26
16341619
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Oct;48(2):175-86
15369498
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009 Sep;18(3):159-68
19701920
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;9(4):285-94
11202104
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Apr;60(7):1625-35
15652693