Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region.
BACKGROUND
Antenatal care has a positive effect on pregnancy, both clinically and psychologically, but consensus about the optimal number of antenatal visits is lacking. This study aims to provide insight into the dynamics of the number of antenatal visits a woman receives. Independent effects of predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants are examined.


METHODS
Women were recruited in nine clinical centres in the Brussels Metropolitan region. Antenatal care use was measured prospectively. A Poisson regression model was applied to measure the independent effect of individual determinants on the number of antenatal visits.


RESULTS
Data on antenatal care trajectories in 333 women were collected. The multivariate analyses showed that women with a Maghreb or Turkish origin had 14% fewer visits compared with European (EU15) women. More highly educated women had 22% more visits compared with those with a low education. Women with a high income had 14% more antenatal visits compared with those with a low income. Fewer antenatal visits were observed in multiparae (15%), women initiating care after 14 weeks of gestation (31%), women without medical risks during the pregnancy (12%) and in women with a continuity of care index of 50% or more (12%). More visits were observed in delivering after week 37 (22% increase).


CONCLUSIONS
Predisposing and enabling factors have to be considered when antenatal care programmes are evaluated in a metropolitan area. Variations in the number of antenatal visits show that socially vulnerable women are more at risk of having fewer visits.
Beeckman
Katrien
K
Department of Medical Sociology and Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. katrien.beeckman@vub.ac.be
Louckx
Fred
F
Putman
Koen
K
D000328:Adult; D001530:Belgium; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care; D016012:Poisson Distribution; D011247:Pregnancy; D011295:Prenatal Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D019037:Urban Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D055815:Young Adult
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Mar;84(3):248-54
15715532
BMC Public Health. 2006 Jun 16;6:155
16780576
J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10
7738325
Public Health Rep. 2001 Jul-Aug;116(4):306-16
12037259
BMC Public Health. 2007 Sep 27;7:268
17900359
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Apr;56(525):269-76
16611515
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jun 05;4:12
17550622
Public Health Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug;24(4):300-10
17553019
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Sep;49(9):989-95
8780606
Res Nurs Health. 2005 Oct;28(5):408-18
16163676
J Public Health Med. 1996 Sep;18(3):321-8
8887844
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2000 Aug;100(8):485-92
10979253
Health Serv Res. 1998 Apr;33(1):29-53
9566176
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Apr;52(7):1123-34
11266054
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(10):1200-7
17068679
Med Care. 1977 Apr;15(4):347-9
859364
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Winter;51(1):95-124
4198894
Pediatrics. 2001 Dec;108(6):1263-8
11731646
Health Serv Res. 1995 Apr;30(1):43-58
7721584
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Aug 15;160(2):129-36
18585790
Clin Psychol Rev. 1998 Mar;18(2):127-42
9543622
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Aug;52(8):501-6
9876361
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Sep 1;122(1):22-32
16154036