title: Nest desertion is not predicted by cuckoldry in the Eurasian penduline tit.
abstract: Engagement in extra-pair copulations is an example of the abundant conflicting interests between males and females over reproduction. Potential benefits for females and the risk of cuckoldry for males are expected to have important implications on the evolution of parental care. However, whether parents adjust parental care in response to parentage remains unclear. In Eurasian penduline tits Remiz pendulinus, which are small polygamous songbirds, parental care is carried out either by the male or by the female. In addition, one third of clutches is deserted by both male and female. Desertion takes place during the egg-laying phase. Using genotypes of nine microsatellite loci of 443 offspring and 211 adults, we test whether extra-pair paternity predicts parental care. We expect males to be more likely to desert cuckolded broods, whereas we expect females, if they obtain benefits from having multiple sires, to be more likely to care for broods with multiple paternity. Our results suggest that parental care is not adjusted to parentage on an ecological timescale. Furthermore, we found that male attractiveness does not predict cuckoldry, and we found no evidence for indirect benefits for females (i.e., increased growth rates or heterozygosity of extra-pair offspring). We argue that male Eurasian penduline tits may not be able to assess the risk of cuckoldry; thus, a direct association with parental care is unlikely to evolve. However, timing of desertion (i.e., when to desert during the egg-laying phase) may be influenced by the risk of cuckoldry. Future work applying extensive gene sequencing and quantitative genetics is likely to further our understanding of how selection may influence the association between parentage and parental care.
authors.forename: René E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: van Dijk
authors.forename: Lidia A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Mészáros
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: van der Velde
authors.forename: Tamás
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Székely
authors.forename: Akos
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pogány
authors.forename: János
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Szabad
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Komdeur
references.citation: Genetica. 2008 Sep;134(1):147-58
references.pmid: 17973192
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Nov 22;274(1627):2865-71
references.pmid: 17785270
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Feb;55(2):319-29
references.pmid: 9480700
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Jan;20(1):33-8
references.pmid: 16701338
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 22;268(1473):1287-91
references.pmid: 11410156
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 May;8(3):692-4
references.pmid: 21585873
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Mar;19(3):127-34
references.pmid: 16701243
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2001 May;10(5):1301-8
references.pmid: 11380885
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(5):1099-106
references.pmid: 17305863
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Sep 23;401(6751):368-71
references.pmid: 10517633
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jan 22;267(1439):147-50
references.pmid: 10687819
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2009 Oct;22(10):2020-30
references.pmid: 19678863
references.citation: Evolution. 1999 Aug;53(4):1259-1267
references.pmid: 28565537
references.citation: Evolution. 2004 Sep;58(9):2037-48
references.pmid: 15521460
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Aug 7;271 Suppl 5:S290-2
references.pmid: 15503997
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):714-7
references.pmid: 14562103
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2010 Feb;23(2):271-81
references.pmid: 20487130
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):341-50
references.pmid: 11958702
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 7;268(1480):2021-7
references.pmid: 11571049
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Jun 30;9:147
references.pmid: 19566922
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 7;272(1564):759-67
references.pmid: 15870038
references.citation: Am Nat. 2005 May;165 Suppl 5:S26-37
references.pmid: 15795859
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2008 Jun;17(11):2566-80
references.pmid: 18452517
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 22;265(1395):489-95
references.pmid: 9569667
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 May 16;9:104
references.pmid: 19445699
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1263-9
references.pmid: 12065043
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Jan;62(1):145-56
references.pmid: 18053073
references.citation: Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):384-7
references.pmid: 7123238
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 May 12;19(9):792-7
references.pmid: 19409787
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Sep;16(17):3679-88
references.pmid: 17845440
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2008 Jul;21(4):919-48
references.pmid: 18462318
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):351-62
references.pmid: 11958703
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):337-45
references.pmid: 18812289
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2007 Sep;20(5):1739-44
references.pmid: 17714291
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2002 Dec;11(12):2467-74
references.pmid: 12453232
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Jan 3;415(6867):71-3
references.pmid: 11780118
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2008 Jun;17(12):2975-84
references.pmid: 18494765
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 7;268(1476):1559-65
references.pmid: 11487402