Evaluation of spatial anisotropy by curvature analysis of elliptical targets.
Spatial relationship perception (SRP), defined as the function able to detect the difference between the perceived extent of a shape along the x/y cardinal coordinates, has been investigated in 42 eyes of 21 emmetropic subjects by means of a psychophysical test conceived on purpose. Aiming to the highest sensibility and since curvature detection is reckoned as an hyperacuity, elliptical stimuli have been chosen to measure the spatial relationship anisotropy (SRA) in the visual system. Observers turned out to be able to detect curvature differences along the elliptical contour as low as 33.6 sec arc, which in terms of SRP means an aspect ratio (i.e. the ratio between the height and the width of the ellipse) as low as 1.0022-1.0035. By comparing these results with those obtained in previous investigations from other curvature discrimination tasks, it is argued that recognition threshold is conditioned by the amount of space anisotropy of the visual system. Indeed, in about half of the recruited subjects, vertical/horizontal anisotropy is found to a certain extent and such SRA correlates with the recognition threshold (r= 0.69, p<0.01). There is direct evidence of visual spatial distortion and in particular increased anisotropy in neuro-ophtalmological diseases such as hemianopia and around scotomatous regions in the visual field. Thence, apart from theoretical considerations in physiological field, results collected in this study may be regarded as normative data for future clinical investigations.
Aleci
Carlo
C
Department of Ophthalmology, Gradenigo Hospital, C.so R. Margherita 8, 10153 Turin, Italy.
Piana
Giulio
G
Anselmino
Franco
F
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Jul;37(8):919-25
10426517
Exp Brain Res. 1986;63(1):113-24
3089831
Vision Res. 1997 Sep;37(17):2325-30
9381668
Vision Res. 1984;24(3):251-3
6719839
Vision Res. 1993 Feb;33(3):329-41
8447105
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jan 29;335(1273):3-10
1348134
Vision Res. 1998 Oct;38(19):2933-47
9797989
Vision Res. 1993 Nov;33(16):2215-24
8273288
Invest Ophthalmol. 1975 Aug;14(8):570-2
1150397
Vision Res. 1982;22(4):449-60
7112945
Am J Ophthalmol. 1953 Jun;36(6 2):139-43
13050707
Vision Res. 1992 Oct;32(10):1845-64
1287983
Vision Res. 1999 Oct;39(26):4354-60
10789429
Vision Res. 1973 Mar;13(3):599-620
4693407
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Oct;42(11):2737-42
11581223
Vision Res. 1996 May;36(10):1411-9
8762760
J Res Read. 2005 Aug;28(3):332-349
16601822
Cortex. 2002 Apr;38(2):179-200
12056688
Psychol Rev. 1954 May;61(3):183-93
13167245
Vision Res. 1978;18(6):615-9
664348
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Winter;3(1):1-8
23964801
Curr Biol. 1995 Jan 1;5(1):85-9
7697353
J Vis. 2009 Apr 17;9(4):14.1-18
19757923
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Mar;161(3):276-84
15490134
J Opt Soc Am A. 1989 Jan;6(1):106-15
2921650
Vision Res. 1998 Nov;38(22):3555-68
9893789
Vision Res. 1991;31(12):2149-84
1771797
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Jul;2(7):1191-9
4020515
Neurology. 1999 Jun 10;52(9):1845-52
10371533
Can J Psychol. 1967 Nov-Dec;21(6):521-5
6076673
Spat Vis. 1986;1(3):219-30
3153780
Vision Res. 2003 Mar;43(5):519-30
12594998
Vision Res. 1995 Sep;35(17):2503-22
8594817