Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies.
Despite the prevailing emphasis in the medical literature on establishing evidence, many changes in the practice of surgery have not been achieved using proper evidence-based assessment. This paper examines the adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) into regular use for the treatment of cholecystitis and the process of its acceptance, focusing on the limited role of technology assessment in its appraisal. A review of the published medical literature concerning LC was performed. Approximately 3000 studies of LC have been conducted since 1985, and there have been nearly 8500 publications to date. As LC was adopted enthusiastically into practice, the results of outcome studies generally showed that it compared favorably with the traditional, open cholecystectomy with regard to mortality, complications, and length of hospital stay. However, despite the rapid general agreement on surgical technique, efficacy, and appropriateness, there remained lingering doubts about safety, outcomes, and cost of the procedure that suggested that essential research questions were ignored even as the procedure became standard. Using LC as a case study, there are important lessons to be learned about the need for important guidelines for surgical innovation and the adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques into current clinical and surgical practice. We highlight one recent example, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and how necessary it is to properly evaluate this new technology before it is accepted as a safe and effective surgical option.
Allori
Alexander C
AC
Leitman
I Michael
IM
Heitman
Elizabeth
E
D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Q000639:trends*; D004724:Endoscopy / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000639:trends; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000639:trends*; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000639:trends*
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Sep;64(3):428-34
16923495
Ann Chir. 1990;44(3):206-5; discussion 205-6
2344143
Respiration. 2000;67(2):153-8
10773786
Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Sep;64(9):583-7
8085969
Aust Clin Rev. 1992;12(1):23-7
1534007
Br J Surg. 1991 Feb;78(2):150-4
1826622
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1996 Sep;25(5):744-7
8924020
Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr;20(4):583-6
16437283
Ann Surg. 1996 Jan;223(1):1-3
8554409
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1992 Dec;2(6):277-80
1489991
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1995 Feb;5(1):63-4
7766932
Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7(2):67-70
16643332
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Feb;180(2):136-45
7850045
Milbank Q. 2009 Jun;87(2):339-67
19523121
Endoscopy. 1989 Dec;21 Suppl 1:373-4
2532596
Health Econ. 1993 Dec;2(4):303-12
8142992
Ann Surg. 1990 Jan;211(1):60-2
2294845
Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):385-7
1825763
Ann Surg. 1992 Dec;216(6):617
1466613
Arch Surg. 2005 Dec;140(12):1178-83
16365239
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25(3):241-8
19619341
Surg Endosc. 1990;4(1):1-5
2138361
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Mar;65(3):510-3
17321257
Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Sep;64(9):588
8085970
Br J Surg. 2005 Jan;92(1):44-9
15584058
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):699-707
9032837
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct;70(4):740-7
19560766
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007 Jul;17(3):595-604, viii
17640585
Ann Surg. 2001 Dec;234(6):741-9
11729380
Med J Aust. 1994 Jan 17;160(2):58-62
8309369
JAMA. 1999 Nov 17;282(19):1865-9
10573279
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):52-7
1669378
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jul;60(1):114-7
15229442
Ann Surg. 1992 Dec;216(6):618-26
1466614
Arch Surg. 2007 Sep;142(9):823-6; discussion 826-7
17875836
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Feb;63(2):199-203
16427920
Klin Khir. 1991;(11):10-3
1839634
Z Gastroenterol Verh. 1991 Mar;26:204-6
1714149
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Summer;14(3):544-66
9780541
Bull Acad Natl Med. 1995 May;179(5):1059-66; discussion 1066-8
7583458
Health Econ. 1994 May-Jun;3(3):157-68
7921059
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2008 Apr;18(2):387-95; xi
18381178
Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):329-33
16402290
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1991;:416-23
1838946
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Dec;13(12):2292-301
19727976
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Feb;65(2):312-8
17173916
Endoscopy. 1992 Nov;24(9):754-8
1468391
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1992 Spring;8(2):335-58
1628915
Surg Endosc. 2006 Mar;20(3):522-5
16432652
Urology. 2002 Mar;59(3):446-50
11880100
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):449-53
15758923
JAMA. 1993 Feb 24;269(8):1018-24
8429583
Chirurgie. 1992;118(1-2):92-9; discussion 100-2
1306433
Int J Med Inform. 1999 Dec;56(1-3):97-105
10659938
Rev Prat. 1992 Jun 15;42(12):1497-500
1411174
Arch Surg. 2008 Apr;143(4):371-7; discussion 377-8
18427025
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1981 Summer;59(3):374-411
6912389
Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1294-300
17516122
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Jun;1(2):82-4
1669387
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Jun;1(2):77-81
1669386
JAMA. 1990 Jul 11;264(2):235-40
2355445
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Aug;62(2):287-92
16046997
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;23(5):550-5
17762562
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995 Fall;11(4):685-94
8567200