title: Perception of a Japanese vowel length contrast by Japanese and American English listeners: behavioral and electrophysiological measures.
abstract: This study examined the role of automatic selective perceptual processes in native and non-native listeners' perception of a Japanese vowel length contrast (tado vs. taado), using multiple, natural-speech tokens of each category as stimuli in a "categorial oddball" design. Mismatch negativity (MMN) was used to index discrimination of the temporally-cued vowel contrast by naïve adult American listeners and by a native Japanese-speaking control group in two experiments in which attention to the auditory input was manipulated: in Exp 1 (Visual-Attend), listeners silently counted deviants in a simultaneously-presented visual categorial oddball shape discrimination task; in Exp 2 (Auditory-Attend), listeners attended to the auditory input and implicitly counted target deviants. MMN results showed effects of language experience and attentional focus: MMN amplitudes were smaller for American compared to Japanese listeners in the Visual-Attend Condition and for the American listeners in the Visual compared to Auditory-Attend Condition. Subtle differences in topography were also seen, specifically in that the Japanese group showed more robust responses than the American listeners at left hemisphere scalp sites that probably index activity from the superior temporal gyrus. Follow-up behavioral discrimination tests showed that Americans discriminated the contrast well above chance, but more poorly than did Japanese listeners. This pattern of electrophysiological and behavioral results supports the conclusion that early experience with phonetic contrasts of a language results in changes in neural representations in the auditory cortex that allow for more robust automatic, phonetic processing of native-language speech input.
authors.affiliation: The City University of New York-Graduate School, New York, NY 10016-4309, USA. hisagi@mit.edu
authors.forename: Miwako
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hisagi
authors.forename: Valerie L
authors.initials: VL
authors.lastname: Shafer
authors.forename: Winifred
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Strange
authors.forename: Elyse S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Sussman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D004569:Electroencephalography; D055724:Electrophysiological Phenomena; D005072:Evoked Potentials, Auditory / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D013017:Sound Localization / Q000502:physiology; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014481:United States; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Brain Res. 2008 Sep 10;1229:193-203
references.pmid: 18634759
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984 Jun;59(3):177-94
references.pmid: 6203709
references.citation: Neural Comput. 1995 Nov;7(6):1129-59
references.pmid: 7584893
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1984 Aug;36(2):131-45
references.pmid: 6514522
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2004 Sep;41(5):772-82
references.pmid: 15318883
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2008 Feb;67(2):131-43
references.pmid: 18160160
references.citation: Nature. 1997 Jan 30;385(6615):432-4
references.pmid: 9009189
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;75(4):255-75
references.pmid: 1691075
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Oct;30(8):1636-42
references.pmid: 19821835
references.citation: Lang Speech. 2011 Jun;54(Pt 2):241-64
references.pmid: 21848082
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Nov;118(5):3267-78
references.pmid: 16334698
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Mar;112(3):536-44
references.pmid: 11222977
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2544-90
references.pmid: 17931964
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2003 Nov 27;352(1):25-8
references.pmid: 14615041
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Mar 12;363(1493):979-1000
references.pmid: 17846016
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
references.pmid: 15102499
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2001 Aug 8;12(11):2467-71
references.pmid: 11496131
references.citation: J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Oct;9(4):456-79
references.pmid: 1464675
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2002 Sep-Oct;9(5):253-67
references.pmid: 12359835
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 May;16(3):492-5
references.pmid: 12706229
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2001 May;24(5):283-8
references.pmid: 11311381
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 1999 Jan;35(1):294-302
references.pmid: 9923483
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):3492-505
references.pmid: 10615689
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980 Jun;48(6):609-21
references.pmid: 6155251
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2005 Jul;131(4):510-32
references.pmid: 16060800
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Jun;118(6):1230-43
references.pmid: 17452008
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2005 Jan;92(1):26-32
references.pmid: 15582033
references.citation: Hear Res. 2004 Apr;190(1-2):128-40
references.pmid: 15051135
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2002 Oct 7;13(14):1813-6
references.pmid: 12395130
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1998 Mar;35(2):211-24
references.pmid: 9529947
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Feb;18(3):242-54
references.pmid: 14741311
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Feb 9;1072(1):175-85
references.pmid: 16426584
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Oct;30(10):3436-44
references.pmid: 19347876
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jul;12(4):635-47
references.pmid: 10936916
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2384-94
references.pmid: 15532669
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1988 Jun;26(1-3):117-63
references.pmid: 3061477
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):771-85
references.pmid: 19124031