Construction of a high-density composite map and comparative mapping of segregation distortion regions in barley.
Segregation distortion can negatively impact on gains expected using selection. In order to increase our understanding of genetic factors that may influence the extent and direction of segregation distortion, segregation distortion analyses were conducted in four different doubled haploid (DH) populations. A high-density composite map of barley was then constructed by integrating information from the four populations. The composite map contained 2,111 unique loci, comprising RFLP, SSR and DArT markers and spanned 1,136 cM. In the four populations investigated, the proportion of markers with segregation distortion ranged from 15 to 38%, depending on the population. The highest distortion was observed in populations derived by the microspore culture technique. Distorted loci tended to be clustered, which allowed definition of segregation distortion regions (SDRs). A total of 14 SDRs were identified in the 4 populations. Using the high-density composite map, several SDRs were shown to have consistent map locations in two or more populations; one SDR on chromosome 1H was present in all four populations. The analysis of haplotypes underlying seven SDRs indicated that in three cases the under-represented haplotypes were common across populations, but for four SDRs the under-represented haplotypes varied across populations. Six of the seven centromeric regions harboured SDRs suggesting that genetic processes related to position near a centromere caused the segregation distortion in these SDRs. Other SDRs were most likely due to the methods used to produce the DH populations. The association of the SDRs identified in this study and some of the genes involved in the process of haploid production described in other studies were compared. The composite map constructed in this study provides an additional resource for the barley community via increased genome coverage and the provision of additional marker options. It has also enabled further insights into mechanisms that underpin segregation distortion.
Li
Haobing
H
Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research and School of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 54, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia. Haobing.Li@csiro.au
Kilian
Andrzej
A
Zhou
Meixue
M
Wenzl
Peter
P
Huttner
Eric
E
Mendham
Neville
N
McIntyre
Lynne
L
Vaillancourt
René E
RE
D002874:Chromosome Mapping; D020090:Chromosome Segregation; D032461:Chromosomes, Plant; D008040:Genetic Linkage; D005819:Genetic Markers; D006239:Haplotypes; D001467:Hordeum / Q000235:genetics*
D005819:Genetic Markers
Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):321-30
9872970
Science. 2009 Nov 20;326(5956):1115-7
19965431
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3580-3
16593702
Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Dec 20;249(6):600-8
8544825
Genome Res. 2000 Oct;10(10):1509-31
11042150
Plant Physiol. 2002 Dec;130(4):1598-605
12481043
Science. 2007 Jul 20;317(5836):338-42
17641193
Theor Appl Genet. 1989 May;77(5):701-4
24232804
Genome. 1996 Apr;39(2):379-94
18469901
Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Oct;105(5):660-665
12582478
Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):397-412
10628998
Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Nov;47(11):1457-72
16990291
BMC Genomics. 2009 Dec 04;10:582
19961604
J Hered. 2008 Mar-Apr;99(2):232-6
18222930
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Aug;107(3):568-73
12761620
Genome. 2005 Jun;48(3):378-90
16121235
Genetics. 1926 Sep;11(5):423-55
17246465
Genetics. 1957 May;42(3):326-35
17247701
Curr Biol. 1995 Jul 1;5(7):737-9
7583118
Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Jun;90(7-8):1028-34
24173058
Genome. 1995 Jun;38(3):525-33
18470186
Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Oct;87(1-2):278-87
24190225
Mol Genet Genomics. 2007 Aug;278(2):187-96
17520291
Genome. 1994 Apr;37(2):236-43
18470074
Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1997-2005
11102390
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Feb 15;29(4):E25
11160945
Genetics. 1966 May;53(5):989-1020
17248306
Genome. 1990 Dec;33(6):927-36
2086355
Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2003 Oct;30(10):913-8
14669507
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Feb;118(4):793-800
19066841
Theor Appl Genet. 1992 Aug;84(5-6):544-54
24201339
Genetics. 2006 Feb;172(2):1251-61
16299389
Theor Appl Genet. 2010 Oct;121(6):1071-82
20535442
Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Jul;86(6):705-12
24193780
Theor Appl Genet. 1988 Dec;76(6):815-29
24232389
Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Sep;105(4):622-628
12582513
Theor Appl Genet. 1991 Oct;82(5):636-44
24213346
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Mar;118(5):903-10
19130031
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010 Jan;23(1):91-102
19958142
Genome. 1995 Jun;38(3):516-24
18470185
Genome. 1994 Feb;37(1):61-71
7910147
Genetics. 2006 Nov;174(3):1671-83
16951074
Mol Gen Genet. 1997 Feb 20;253(5):535-45
9065686
Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2107-16
14704190
BMC Genomics. 2006 Aug 12;7:206
16904008
Genetics. 2003 Nov;165(3):1551-68
14668402
Theor Appl Genet. 1991 Dec;83(2):250-6
24202366
Science. 2010 Jan 1;327(5961):92-4
20044577
Genetics. 2001 Jun;158(2):787-809
11404342
Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Nov 1;249(1):65-73
8552035
Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):409-17
8878704
Theor Appl Genet. 1991 Apr;81(4):487-92
24221313
Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2235-47
14704199
Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Feb;114(3):487-500
17115126
Genetics. 1966 Jan;53(1):85-96
5900610
Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721-6
2902517
Genetica. 2003 Jan;117(1):27-35
12656570
Genetics. 2000 Feb;154(2):823-35
10655233
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 29;101(26):9915-20
15192146
Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):737-40
19661427
Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:511-57
1812815
Mol Cells. 2009 Jan 31;27(1):21-37
19214431
Genome. 1995 Feb;38(1):45-59
18470151
Genetics. 2008 Jun;179(2):985-95
18505875
Theor Appl Genet. 1992 Apr;83(6-7):919-24
24202772
Genetics. 1995 Oct;141(2):721-31
8647405
J Hered. 2002 Jan-Feb;93(1):77-8
12011185
Genetics. 1942 Jul;27(4):395-407
17247049
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Dec;112(1):30-40
16228189
Genome. 1996 Apr;39(2):359-66
18469899