Comorbidity in aging and dementia: scales differ, and the difference matters.
BACKGROUND
Accurate assessment of the effect of dementia on healthcare utilization and costs requires separation of the effects of comorbid conditions, often poorly accounted for in existing claims-based studies.


OBJECTIVE
To determine whether two different types of comorbidity and risk adjustment scales, the Chronic Disease Score (CDS) and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G), perform similarly in older persons with and without dementia.


METHODS
All subjects in the community-outreach diagnostic program of the University of Washington Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Satellite were included (N = 619). Subjects' mean age was 75 ± 9 years; 40% were cognitively normal, 17% were cognitively impaired but not demented, and 43% were demented. CDS and CIRS-G scores (neuropsychiatric disorders excluded to reduce colinearity with group) were examined across strata of age, education, and cognitive classification by using analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and linear regression.


RESULTS
CIRS-G scores were sensitive to factors known to be associated with chronic disease burden, including age (F = 21.3 [df = 2, 616], p <0.001), education (F = 6.6 [df = 3, 614], p <0.001), and cognitive status (F = 40.5 [df = 2, 616], p <0.001), whereas the CDS was not. In the subset of persons with CDS scores of 0 (40% of the total sample), CIRS-G scores ranged from very low to high burden of disease and remained significantly different across age, education, and cognitive status groups. In regression analyses predicting CIRS-G score, CDS score and cognitive status interacted (β = -0.10, t = 1.9 [df = 1, 609], p = 0.06). After controlling for age, the amount of variance shared by the CIRS-G-13 and CDS differed by cognitive group (>32% for normal and mildly impaired groups combined, 17% for dementia).


CONCLUSIONS
Different methods of measuring and adjusting for comorbidity are not equivalent, and dementia amplifies the discrepancies. The CDS, if used to control for comorbidity in comparative studies of healthcare utilization and costs for persons with and without dementia, will underestimate burden of comorbid disease and artificially inflate the costs attributed to dementia.
Borson
Soo
S
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Satellite, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195-6560, USA. soob@uw.edu
Scanlan
James M
JM
Lessig
Mary
M
DeMers
Shaune
S
D000368:Aged; D000375:Aging / Q000523:psychology*; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015897:Comorbidity; D003704:Dementia / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis*; D005260:Female; D015577:Geriatric Assessment / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012720:Severity of Illness Index
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;15(8):716-24
17567931
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1968 May;16(5):622-6
5646906
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jul;47(7):864-9
10404933
Psychiatry Res. 1992 Mar;41(3):237-48
1594710
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;46(10):1075-9; discussion 1081-90
8410092
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Nov;53(11):2001-6
16274386
Alzheimers Dement. 2007 Jul;3(3):204-10
19595939
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Sep;47(9):1065-71
10484247
CMAJ. 1991 Oct 15;145(8):947-52
1913428
Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1):84-99
12544546
J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Apr;10(4):187-93
7790979
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Oct;56(10):1926-31
18811613
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Mar;56(3):221-9
12725876
Epidemiology. 2002 May;13(3):340-6
11964937
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Feb;45(2):197-203
1573438
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
3558716
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 22;8:108
18498638
Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr;43(2):714-32
18370975
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Apr 6;140(7):501-9
15068977
Int Psychogeriatr. 2001;13 Supp 1:137-42
11892960
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;54(7):694-701
11438410
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;57(10):1040-8
15528055
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Feb;52(2):187-94
14728626
Conn Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;72(10):581-4
19097458
Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Sep;4(5):361-7
18790463
Med Care. 1995 Aug;33(8):783-95
7637401