Visual coverage and scanning behavior in two corvid species: American crow and Western scrub jay.
Inter-specific differences in the configuration of avian visual fields and degree of eye/head movements have been associated with foraging and anti-predator behaviors. Our goal was to study visual fields, eye movements, and head movements in two species of corvids: American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) and Western scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica). American crows had wider binocular overlap, longer vertical binocular fields, narrower blind areas, and higher amplitude of eye movement than Western scrub jays. American crows can converge their eyes and see their own bill tip, which may facilitate using different foraging techniques (e.g., pecking, probing) and manufacturing and handing rudimentary tools. Western scrub jays had a higher head movement rate than American crows while on the ground, and the opposite between-species difference was found when individuals were perching. Faster head movements may enhance the ability to scan the environment, which may be related to a higher perceived risk of predation of Western scrub jays when on the ground, and American crows when perching. The visual field configuration of these species appears influenced mostly by foraging techniques while their scaning behavior, by predation risk.
Fernández-Juricic
Esteban
E
Department of Biological Sciences, Lilly Hall of Life Sciences, Purdue University, 915 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. efernan@purdue.edu
O'Rourke
Colleen
C
Pitlik
Todd
T
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology*; D046368:Crows / Q000502:physiology; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D019416:Head Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology; D013045:Species Specificity; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
Brain Behav Evol. 1996;47(3):156-64
8680849
Brain Behav Evol. 2006;67(1):1-9
16219995
J Vis. 2009 Oct 14;9(11):14.1-19
20053077
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):507-22
17309867
Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1903-7
15591194
J Neurosci. 1985 Jun;5(6):1418-28
4009240
Nature. 1998 Sep 17;395(6699):272-4
9751053
Vision Res. 1984;24(12):1739-51
6533997
J Comp Physiol A. 1999 Oct;185(4):341-52
10555268
Front Zool. 2009 Jan 07;6:2
19128499
Biol Lett. 2009 Oct 23;5(5):583-5
19605383
Exp Brain Res. 1988;69(3):567-82
3371439
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):489-505
17255008
Behav Processes. 2003 Aug 29;64(1):1-12
12914988
Vision Res. 1986;26(8):1303-5
3798765
Brain Behav Evol. 1994;44(2):74-85
7953610
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008 Mar;194(3):267-82
18071712
J Comp Psychol. 1994 Dec;108(4):385-93
7813195
Science. 2002 Aug 9;297(5583):981
12169726
J Vis. 2008 Dec 24;8(14):28.1-16
19146329
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 7;271(1556):2423-9
15590591
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010 Jan;196(1):15-22
19921207
Brain Behav Evol. 1988;32(1):57-62
3191382
Brain Behav Evol. 2001 Jan;57(1):33-8
11359046
J Exp Biol. 2009 May;212(Pt 10):1568-75
19411551