Force of cochlear implant electrode insertion performed by a robotic insertion tool: comparison of traditional versus Advance Off-Stylet techniques.
OBJECTIVE
Robotic cochlear implant electrode array insertion offers substantial potential advantages, namely repeatability and minimization of insertion forces, leading to decreased intracochlear trauma. Using such a robotic insertion tool, we sought to analyze force profiles during deployment of stylet-containing electrode arrays using either traditional insertion, in which the stylet is withdrawn after complete insertion of the electrode, or Advance Off-Stylet (AOS) insertion, in which the stylet is withdrawn simultaneous with electrode array insertion.


METHODS
Prospective.


METHODS
Tertiary referral center.


METHODS
A robotic cochlear implant insertion tool coupled with a force-sensing carriage was used to perform electrode array insertions into an anatomically correct, three-dimensional scala tympani model during either straight insertion (n = 4) or AOS insertion (n = 4).


METHODS
Both insertion techniques begin with a 7-mm straight insertion during which forces were similar averaging approximately 0.006 N. For insertion from 7 to 17 mm, traditional insertion forces averaged 0.046 ± 0.027 N, with a peak of 0.093 N, and AOS insertion forces averaged 0.008 ± 0.006 N, with a peak of 0.034 N. Beyond 9.74 mm, the difference between traditional and AOS insertion forces was highly significant.


CONCLUSIONS
With the use of a robotic insertion tool, which minimizes operator variability and maximizes repeatability, we have shown that cochlear implant electrode insertion via AOS is associated with lower average and maximum insertion forces compared with traditional insertion. These findings support the use of AOS over traditional, straight insertion.
Schurzig
Daniel
D
Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA. daniel.schurzig@vanderbilt.edu
Webster
Robert J
RJ
Dietrich
Mary S
MS
Labadie
Robert F
RF
D019929:Cochlear Implantation / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D006801:Humans; D008953:Models, Anatomic; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012371:Robotics; D012533:Scala Tympani / Q000601:surgery*
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Jul;54(7):1247-55
17605356
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2007 Apr;197:2-24
17542465
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jan;31(1):58-63
19707168
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5593-6
19163985
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Oct;29(7):920-8
18667935
Otol Neurotol. 2005 Nov;26(6):1161-70
16272935
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1995;519:78-82
7610897
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010 Mar;5(2):173-81
20033522
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009 May;4(3):273-80
20033593
Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130(1):31-6
19484593
Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):75S-79S
17496653
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jan;31(1):94-9
20019561
Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:27-33
17063008
IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2012 Apr 1;17(2):381-389
23482414
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010 Mar;5(2):163-71
20033518