title: How common is ecological speciation in plant-feeding insects? A 'Higher' Nematinae perspective.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Ecological speciation is a process in which a transiently resource-polymorphic species divides into two specialized sister lineages as a result of divergent selection pressures caused by the use of multiple niches or environments. Ecology-based speciation has been studied intensively in plant-feeding insects, in which both sympatric and allopatric shifts onto novel host plants could speed up diversification. However, while numerous examples of species pairs likely to have originated by resource shifts have been found, the overall importance of ecological speciation in relation to other, non-ecological speciation modes remains unknown. Here, we apply phylogenetic information on sawflies belonging to the 'Higher' Nematinae (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) to infer the frequency of niche shifts in relation to speciation events.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Phylogenetic trees reconstructed on the basis of DNA sequence data show that the diversification of higher nematines has involved frequent shifts in larval feeding habits and in the use of plant taxa. However, the inferred number of resource shifts is considerably lower than the number of past speciation events, indicating that the majority of divergences have occurred by non-ecological allopatric speciation; based on a time-corrected analysis of sister species, we estimate that a maximum of c. 20% of lineage splits have been triggered by a change in resource use. In addition, we find that postspeciational changes in geographic distributions have led to broad sympatry in many species having identical host-plant ranges.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our analysis indicates that the importance of niche shifts for the diversification of herbivorous insects is at present implicitly and explicitly overestimated. In the case of the Higher Nematinae, employing a time correction for sister-species comparisons lowered the proportion of apparent ecology-based speciation events from c. 50-60% to around 20%, but such corrections are still lacking in other herbivore groups. The observed convergent but asynchronous shifting among dominant northern plant taxa in many higher-nematine clades, in combination with the broad overlaps in the geographic distributions of numerous nematine species occupying near-identical niches, indicates that host-plant shifts and herbivore community assembly are largely unconstrained by direct or indirect competition among species. More phylogeny-based studies on connections between niche diversification and speciation are needed across many insect taxa, especially in groups that exhibit few host shifts in relation to speciation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland. Tommi.Nyman@uef.fi
authors.forename: Tommi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nyman
authors.forename: Veli
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Vikberg
authors.forename: David R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Jean-Luc
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Boevé
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004463:Ecology; D007313:Insecta / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics; D010802:Phylogeny; D010944:Plants / Q000469:parasitology*; D013045:Species Specificity
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2006 Jul;19(4):1314-26
references.pmid: 16780532
references.citation: Evolution. 2009 Oct;63(10):2595-610
references.pmid: 19500148
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Apr;51(1):94-9
references.pmid: 18588992
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6221-6
references.pmid: 11353840
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Jan 17;451(7176):279-83
references.pmid: 18202643
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jul;24(7):394-9
references.pmid: 19409647
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Sep 27;363(1506):3071-81
references.pmid: 18579479
references.citation: BMC Biol. 2007 Jan 26;5:3
references.pmid: 17257412
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 Dec;60(12):2604-21
references.pmid: 17263120
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2008 Oct;57(5):758-71
references.pmid: 18853362
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Jan 18;6:4
references.pmid: 16420707
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106 Suppl 1:9955-62
references.pmid: 19528639
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Nov 27;9:273
references.pmid: 19941669
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Jun;22(6):298-307
references.pmid: 17324485
references.citation: Science. 2007 Dec 21;318(5858):1913-6
references.pmid: 18096805
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2004 Feb;53(1):120-7
references.pmid: 14965907
references.citation: Evolution. 2000 Apr;54(2):526-33
references.pmid: 10937229
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 27;106(43):18103-8
references.pmid: 19805134
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 18;103(29):10947-51
references.pmid: 16818884
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Nov 21;9:268
references.pmid: 19930590
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 Nov;60(11):2311-28
references.pmid: 17236423
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 27;106(43):18054-61
references.pmid: 19815508
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):696-9
references.pmid: 17687325
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):391-399
references.pmid: 11403872
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 22;277(1697):3131-8
references.pmid: 20504811
references.citation: Am Nat. 2000 Apr;155(4):419-434
references.pmid: 10753072
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10(10):977-94
references.pmid: 17855811
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 5;106(18):7495-500
references.pmid: 19380742
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2009 Nov;18(21):4450-62
references.pmid: 19793353
references.citation: Science. 2007 Mar 9;315(5817):1420-3
references.pmid: 17347442
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2000 Jan;87(1):67-75
references.pmid: 10636831
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 29;357(1420):471-92
references.pmid: 12028786
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 08;7:214
references.pmid: 17996036
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 28;106(17):7083-8
references.pmid: 19365072
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 Aug;60(8):1622-37
references.pmid: 17017063
references.citation: Science. 2000 Jun 30;288(5475):2349-50
references.pmid: 10875916
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817-8
references.pmid: 9918953
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 27;106(43):18062-6
references.pmid: 19706441
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 28;103(9):3209-13
references.pmid: 16492742
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Aug;12(8):735-43
references.pmid: 19558515
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references.pmid: 12912839
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):145-56
references.pmid: 19185951
references.citation: Science. 1999 Aug 20;285(5431):1265-7
references.pmid: 10455053
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Nov;23(11):619-30
references.pmid: 18823678
references.citation: Syst Biol. 1997 Dec;46(4):722-47
references.pmid: 11975339
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13875-9
references.pmid: 19667210
references.citation: Evolution. 1998 Dec;52(6):1744-1759
references.pmid: 28565322
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):381-390
references.pmid: 11403871
references.citation: BMC Biol. 2007 Nov 01;5:49
references.pmid: 17976232
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Jun;11(6):624-36
references.pmid: 18384363
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 May;85(2):393-411
references.pmid: 20002390
references.citation: Evolution. 2007 Jul;61(7):1641-60
references.pmid: 17598746
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):8013-6
references.pmid: 10393939
references.citation: Evolution. 2001 Dec;55(12):2503-22
references.pmid: 11831666
references.citation: Evolution. 1997 Dec;51(6):1699-1711
references.pmid: 28565128
references.citation: Nature. 2006 May 11;441(7090):210-3
references.pmid: 16467788