title: Speed-accuracy trade-offs during foraging decisions in the acellular slime mould Physarum polycephalum.
abstract: Speed-accuracy trade-offs (SATs) are thought to be a fundamental feature of biological information processing, yet most evidence of SATs comes from animals. Here, we examine SATs in the foraging decisions of an acellular, amoeboid organism: the slime mould Physarum polycephalum. Slime moulds were given a simple discrimination task: selecting the highest-quality food item from a set of three options. We investigated the effect of two stressors, light exposure and hunger, on the speed and accuracy of decision-making. We also examined the effect of task difficulty. When given a difficult discrimination task, stressed individuals tend to make faster decisions than non-stressed individuals. This effect was reversed in plasmodia given easy discrimination tasks, where stressed individuals made slower decisions than non-stressed individuals. We found evidence of SATs, such that individuals who made fast decisions were more likely to make costly errors by selecting the worst possible food option. Our results suggest that SATs occur in a wider range of taxa than previously considered.
authors.affiliation: Behaviour and Genetics of Social Insects Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences A12, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. tanya.latty@sydney.edu.au
authors.forename: Tanya
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Latty
authors.forename: Madeleine
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Beekman
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D008027:Light; D016839:Physarum polycephalum / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors
references.citation: Science. 2010 Jan 22;327(5964):439-42
references.pmid: 20093467
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2457-63
references.pmid: 14667335
references.citation: Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):22-7
references.pmid: 20380191
references.citation: Science. 1973 Aug 10;181(4099):574-6
references.pmid: 17777808
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Nov 7;271(1554):2305-10
references.pmid: 15539357
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Sep;190(9):759-63
references.pmid: 15316731
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2010 Jan;33(1):10-6
references.pmid: 19819033
references.citation: Res Microbiol. 2001 Nov;152(9):767-70
references.pmid: 11763236
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65
references.pmid: 17014301
references.citation: Oecologia. 1987 Jun;72(3):360-365
references.pmid: 28311130
references.citation: J R Soc Interface. 2009 Nov 6;6(40):1065-74
references.pmid: 19324679
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2004 Mar;27(3):161-8
references.pmid: 15036882
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2000 Jan;51(2-3):173-99
references.pmid: 10686365
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 9;107(10):4607-11
references.pmid: 20142479
references.citation: J Math Biol. 2006 Aug;53(2):273-86
references.pmid: 16770610
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jul;24(7):400-7
references.pmid: 19409649
references.citation: J Vis. 2005 May 02;5(5):376-404
references.pmid: 16097871
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Jan 11;100(1):018101
references.pmid: 18232821
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Sep 28;407(6803):470
references.pmid: 11028990