title: Neuron densities vary across and within cortical areas in primates.
abstract: The numbers and proportion of neurons in areas and regions of cortex were determined for a single cortical hemisphere from two prosimian galagos, one New World owl monkey, one Old World macaque monkey, and one baboon. The results suggest that there is a common plan of cortical organization across the species examined here and also differences that suggest greater specializations in the Old World monkeys. In all primates examined, primary visual cortex (V1) was the most neuron-dense cortical area and the secondary visual areas had higher-than-average densities. Primary auditory and somatosensory areas tended to have high densities in the Old World macaque and baboon. Neuronal density varies less across cortical areas in prosimian galagos than in the Old World monkeys. Thus, cortical architecture varies greatly within and across primate species, but cell density is greater in cortex devoted to the early stages of sensory processing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. christine.collins@vanderbilt.edu
authors.forename: Christine E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Collins
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Airey
authors.forename: Nicole A
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Young
authors.forename: Duncan B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Leitch
authors.forename: Jon H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Kaas
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000166:cytology*; D009474:Neurons / Q000166:cytology*; D011323:Primates; D013045:Species Specificity
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12138-43
references.pmid: 16880386
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2002;59(3):114-29
references.pmid: 12119531
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1997 Jul 28;384(2):312-20
references.pmid: 9215725
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1980 Jan 15;189(2):381-402
references.pmid: 6767757
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2001 Mar 5;431(2):155-67
references.pmid: 11169997
references.citation: Front Neuroanat. 2010 Feb 09;4:5
references.pmid: 20300202
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 26;105(34):12593-8
references.pmid: 18689685
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 1996 Apr 19;208(2):97-100
references.pmid: 8859899
references.citation: Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010 Jun;293(6):1033-69
references.pmid: 20201060
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2003 Mar 10;457(3):263-92
references.pmid: 12541310
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1989 Aug 22;286(4):442-55
references.pmid: 2778101
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000334
references.pmid: 19325892
references.citation: J Neurocytol. 2002 Mar-Jun;31(3-5):317-35
references.pmid: 12815250
references.citation: J Anat. 2007 Aug;211(2):164-76
references.pmid: 17634059
references.citation: Brain. 1980 Jun;103(2):221-44
references.pmid: 6772266
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2001;134:285-95
references.pmid: 11702549
references.citation: J Hirnforsch. 1967;9(3):225-52
references.pmid: 6077605
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 9;25(10):2518-21
references.pmid: 15758160
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2010 May;20(5):1071-81
references.pmid: 19726493
references.citation: Am Sci. 1975 Nov-Dec;63(6):656-63
references.pmid: 1200479
references.citation: Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2007 Mar;290(3):330-40
references.pmid: 17525948
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1989 Jan 8;279(2):228-34
references.pmid: 2913067
references.citation: Nature. 2001 May 10;411(6834):193-5
references.pmid: 11346795
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Sep 26;36(1):139-42
references.pmid: 12367512
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 27;104(9):3562-7
references.pmid: 17360682
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jun;77(6):3193-217
references.pmid: 9212268
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Nov 09;3:31
references.pmid: 19915731