Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
OBJECTIVE
Total knee replacements (TKRs) are being increasingly performed in patients aged < or = 65 years who often have high physical demands. We investigated the relation between age of the patient and prosthesis survival following primary TKR using nationwide data collected from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.


METHODS
From Jan 1, 1997 through Dec 31, 2003, 32,019 TKRs for primary or secondary osteoarthritis were reported to the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. The TKRs were followed until the end of 2004. During the follow-up, 909 TKRs were revised, 205 (23%) due to infection and 704 for other reasons.


RESULTS
Crude overall implant survival improved with increasing age between the ages of 40 and 80. The 5-year survival rates were 92% and 95% in patients aged < or = 55 and 56-65 years, respectively, compared to 97% in patients who were > 65 years of age (p < 0.001). The difference was mainly attributable to reasons other than infections. Sex, diagnosis, type of TKR (condylar, constrained, or hinge), use of patellar component, and fixation method were also associated with higher revision rates. However, the differences in prosthesis survival between the age groups < or = 55, 56-65, and > 65 years remained after adjustment for these factors (p < 0.001).


CONCLUSIONS
Young age impairs the prognosis of TKR and is associated with increased revision rates for non-infectious reasons. Diagnosis, sex, type of TKR, use of patellar component, and fixation method partly explain the differences, but the effects of physical activity, patient demands, and obesity on implant survival in younger patients warrant further research.
Julin
Jaakko
J
Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland.
Jämsen
Esa
E
Puolakka
Timo
T
Konttinen
Yrjö T
YT
Moilanen
Teemu
T
D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000601:surgery*; D011379:Prognosis; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012042:Registries; D012086:Reoperation; D012307:Risk Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):315-8
11716402
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6):803-8
16950030
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:44-8
16906110
Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Oct;72(5):433-41
11728068
Acta Orthop. 2009 Apr;80(2):205-12
19404805
Acta Orthop. 2005 Feb;76(1):28-41
15788305
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Mar;90(3):360-3
18310761
J Arthroplasty. 1999 Dec;14(8):969-75
10614889
Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Oct;72(5):503-13
11728079
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1991;241:27-30
2014738
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Sep;88(9):1158-63
16943464
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Nov;(356):22-7
9917663
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May;446:45-50
16672871
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Feb;84(2):171-7
11861721
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Apr;79(4):575-82
9111404
J Arthroplasty. 2000 Feb;15(2):166-70
10708080
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Nov;(380):85-90
11064977
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jul;89(7):893-900
17673581
Acta Orthop. 2005 Feb;76(1):85-8
15788313
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Dec;89(12):1608-14
18057361
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Oct;88(10):1321-6
17012421
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:83-7
17589362
Knee. 2007 Jan;14(1):9-11
17169563
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Apr;(421):162-8
15123942
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct;20(7 Suppl 3):12-6
16213997
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2160-70
18829914
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Feb;85(2):259-65
12571303
Acta Orthop. 2008 Apr;79(2):230-4
18484249
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jul 11;347(2):81-8
12110735
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 May;84(5):770-4
12004019