title: Analyzing Direct Effects in Randomized Trials with Secondary Interventions: An Application to HIV Prevention Trials.
abstract: The Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa (MIRA) trial is a recently completed randomized trial that investigated the effect of diaphragm and lubricant gel use in reducing HIV infection among susceptible women. 5,045 women were randomly assigned to either the active treatment arm or not. Additionally, all subjects in both arms received intensive condom counselling and provision, the "gold standard" HIV prevention barrier method. There was much lower reported condom use in the intervention arm than in the control arm, making it difficult to answer important public health questions based solely on the intention-to-treat analysis. We adapt an analysis technique from causal inference to estimate the "direct effects" of assignment to the diaphragm arm, adjusting for condom use in an appropriate sense. Issues raised in the MIRA trial apply to other trials of HIV prevention methods, some of which are currently being conducted or designed.
authors.affiliation: University of California, Berkeley, USA.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rosenblum
authors.forename: Nicholas P
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Jewell
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: van der Laan
authors.forename: Steve
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Shiboski
authors.forename: Ariane
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: van der Straten
authors.forename: Nancy
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Padian
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD003255
references.pmid: 11869658
references.citation: J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Apr;172(2):443-465
references.pmid: 20827388
references.citation: Contraception. 2005 Dec;72(6):408-13
references.pmid: 16307961
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jan;60(2):319-30
references.pmid: 15522488
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Jul 21;370(9583):251-261
references.pmid: 17631387
references.citation: Biometrics. 2000 Sep;56(3):779-88
references.pmid: 10985216
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2006 May;17(3):276-84
references.pmid: 16617276
references.citation: Biostatistics. 2000 Mar;1(1):69-88
references.pmid: 12933526
references.citation: Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 2
references.pmid: 21969992
references.citation: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Jan;57(1):6-15
references.pmid: 7828382
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):561-70
references.pmid: 10955409
references.citation: Biometrics. 2002 Mar;58(1):21-9
references.pmid: 11890317
references.citation: Epidemiology. 1992 Mar;3(2):143-55
references.pmid: 1576220