Measuring near-induced transient myopia in college students with visual discomfort.
OBJECTIVE
Visual discomfort is a common problem, and our previous research indicated that 17% of college students experience moderate to high levels of discomfort when reading or studying. There have been several visual factors associated with visual discomfort, and in this study, we focused on measuring the near-induced transient myopia response in a group of college students with significant visual discomfort.


METHODS
Visual discomfort was evaluated with a survey developed by Conlon et al. (Conlon et al., Visual Cogn 1999;6:637-663). Twelve college students with high visual discomfort (scoring 1 SD higher than the mean value) and 12 college students with low visual discomfort (scoring within 0.5 SD of the mean value) participated in the study. All students had 20/25 or better visual acuity, no strabismus, and no significant uncorrected refractive error. All refractive error and accommodative measurements were made with the WAM-5500 autorefractor. A pretask distance refraction at 6 m was taken for 60 s, and then the students read a story for 10 min at 20 cm. After reading the passage, the posttask distance refraction was measured for 2 min at 6 m. Values for the pre- and posttask measures were averaged in 10-s blocks of time.


RESULTS
A mixed analysis of variance comparing discomfort group by pre- and postnear work distance refraction showed a significant interaction (p = 0.05). Comparing the means of the pre- and posttask distance refraction indicated that the high discomfort group showed no change in refractive error, but the low discomfort group showed a myopic shift of 0.13 diopter.


CONCLUSIONS
A near-induced transient myopia response is not associated with high visual discomfort experienced by college students when reading or doing near work.
Borsting
Eric
E
Southern Californi College of Optometry, Fullerton, California 92831, USA. eborsting@scco.edu
Tosha
Chinatsu
C
Chase
Chris
C
Ridder
William H
WH
D000065:Accommodation, Ocular; D000293:Adolescent; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D009216:Myopia / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D009907:Optometry / Q000379:methods*; D011932:Reading; D013334:Students; D014792:Visual Acuity; D055815:Young Adult
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 Sep;22(5):372-9
12358305
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Jul;30(7):1435-44
15210220
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jul;86(7):883-9
19521268
Optometry. 2003 Jan;74(1):25-34
12539890
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Sep;15(5):481-7
8524579
J Am Optom Assoc. 1985 Apr;56(4):286-90
3989210
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;84(8):745-51
17700337
Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;80(12):832-8
14688547
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994 Jul;14(3):265-77
7970741
Optom Vis Sci. 1991 Jan;68(1):49-53
2023716
Optom Vis Sci. 1995 Jul;72(7):506-10
8539015
Optometry. 2002 Mar;73(3):173-81
12365701
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Sep;24(5):384-90
15315652
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Feb;49(2):836-41
18235035
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994 Oct;14(4):428-32
7845704
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999 Mar;19(2):134-50
10615449
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987 May;64(5):333-43
3605301
Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Nov;80(11):732-9
14627938
Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Apr;80(4):320-4
12692490
Curr Eye Res. 2003 Dec;27(6):363-70
14704920
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct;29(10):1878-88
14604706
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Mar;24(2):142-7
15005679
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 Sep;39(10):1797-803
9727402
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Jan;81(1):56-61
14747762
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Mar;83(3):190-4
16534461
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Sep;84(9):879-87
17873774
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999 Mar;19(2):159-64
10615451