title: Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: cost-utility of different screening strategies based on a woman's individual risk of disease.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The cost-effectiveness of eight strategies for screening for gestational diabetes (including no screening) was estimated with respect to the level of individual patient risk.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cost-utility analysis using a decision analytic model populated with efficacy evidence pooled from recent randomised controlled trials, from the funding perspective of the National Health Service in England and Wales. Seven screening strategies using various combinations of screening and diagnostic tests were tested in addition to no screening. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) over a lifetime.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The strategy that has the greatest likelihood of being cost-effective is dependent on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus for each individual woman. When gestational diabetes mellitus risk is <1% then the no screening/treatment strategy is cost-effective; where risk is between 1.0% and 4.2% fasting plasma glucose followed by OGTT is most likely to be cost-effective; and where risk is >4.2%, universal OGTT is most likely to be cost-effective. However, acceptability of the test alters the most cost-effective strategy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Screening for gestational diabetes can be cost-effective. The best strategy is dependent on the underlying risk of each individual and the acceptability of the tests used. The current study suggests that if a woman's individual risk of gestational diabetes could be accurately predicted, then healthcare resource allocation could be improved by providing an individualised screening strategy.
authors.affiliation: Academic Unit of Health Economics, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. j.round@medsch.ucl.ac.uk
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Round
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Jacklin
authors.forename: R B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Fraser
authors.forename: R G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Hughes
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Mugglestone
authors.forename: R I G
authors.initials: RI
authors.lastname: Holt
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D016640:Diabetes, Gestational / Q000175:diagnosis*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000191:economics*; D011247:Pregnancy; D012307:Risk Factors
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1339-48
references.pmid: 19797280
references.citation: Med J Aust. 1998 Jul 20;169(2):93-7
references.pmid: 9700346
references.citation: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jan-Feb;16(1):19-28; discussion 28
references.pmid: 15647962
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Mar;178(3):423-7
references.pmid: 9539501
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):676-82
references.pmid: 20190296
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Nov 1;141(5):491-4
references.pmid: 7294074
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Mar;48(3):331-9
references.pmid: 7781883
references.citation: J Fam Pract. 1987 Dec;25(6):569-75
references.pmid: 3681218
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2477-86
references.pmid: 15951574
references.citation: J Fam Pract. 1984 Dec;19(6):751-5
references.pmid: 6502080
references.citation: J Assoc Physicians India. 2004 Sep;52:707-11
references.pmid: 15839447
references.citation: Diabetes. 1985 Jun;34 Suppl 2:101-5
references.pmid: 3888734
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):579-84
references.pmid: 15735191
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 1997 Jul;20(7):1183-97
references.pmid: 9203460
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2000 Oct 19;343(16):1134-8
references.pmid: 11036118
references.citation: BMJ. 2010 Apr 01;340:c1395
references.pmid: 20360215
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 1998 Aug;21(8):1246-9
references.pmid: 9702428
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 1995 Jan;18(1):127-9
references.pmid: 7698033
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2005 Jun;28(6):1482-4
references.pmid: 15920072
references.citation: Acta Diabetol. 2002 Jun;39(2):69-73
references.pmid: 12120916
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(11):1-161
references.pmid: 12433317
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 2008 Mar;12(6):iii-iv, 1-270
references.pmid: 18331705
references.citation: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jan;83(1):46-51
references.pmid: 14678085
references.citation: Diabetes. 2002 Sep;51(9):2796-803
references.pmid: 12196473
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Jul 10;103(2):122-9
references.pmid: 12069733
references.citation: BJOG. 2010 Jan;117(1):69-75
references.pmid: 20002371
references.citation: Diabet Med. 2006 Feb;23(2):189-97
references.pmid: 16433718