title: Errors and electronic prescribing: a controlled laboratory study to examine task complexity and interruption effects.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine the effect of interruptions and task complexity on error rates when prescribing with computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, and to categorize the types of prescribing errors.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two within-subject factors: task complexity (complex vs simple) and interruption (interruption vs no interruption). Thirty-two hospital doctors used a CPOE system in a computer laboratory to complete four prescribing tasks, half of which were interrupted using a counterbalanced design.
  
  
  METHODS
  Types of prescribing errors, error rate, resumption lag, and task completion time.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Errors in creating and updating electronic medication charts that were measured included failure to enter allergy information; selection of incorrect medication, dose, route, formulation, or frequency of administration from lists and drop-down menus presented by the CPOE system; incorrect entry or omission in entering administration times, start date, and free-text qualifiers; and omissions in prescribing and ceasing medications. When errors occurred, the error rates across the four prescribing tasks ranged from 0.5% (1 incorrect medication selected out of 192 chances for selecting a medication or error opportunities) to 16% (5 failures to enter allergy information out of 32 error opportunities). Any impact of interruptions on prescribing error rates and task completion times was not detected in our experiment. However, complex tasks took significantly longer to complete (F(1, 27)=137.9; p<0.001) and when execution was interrupted they required almost three times longer to resume compared to simple tasks (resumption lag complex=9.6 seconds, SD=5.6; resumption lag simple=3.4 seconds, SD=1.7; t(28)=6.186; p<0.001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most electronic prescribing errors found in this study could be described as slips in using the CPOE system to create and update electronic medication charts. Cues available within the user interface may have aided resumption of interrupted tasks making CPOE systems robust to some interruption effects. Further experiments are required to rule out any effect interruption might have on CPOE error rates.
authors.affiliation: Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. f.magrabi@unsw.edu.au
authors.forename: Farah
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Magrabi
authors.forename: Simon Y W
authors.initials: SY
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Richard O
authors.initials: RO
authors.lastname: Day
authors.forename: Enrico
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Coiera
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D050316:Medical Order Entry Systems; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital; D008508:Medication Errors / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis
references.citation: BMJ. 1998 Feb 28;316(7132):673-6
references.pmid: 9522794
references.citation: Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;65(2):230-7
references.pmid: 17662088
references.citation: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Feb 15;63(4):353-8
references.pmid: 16452521
references.citation: Yearb Med Inform. 2006;:20-5
references.pmid: 17051290
references.citation: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):958-62
references.pmid: 17911857
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1197-203
references.pmid: 15755942
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19(4):304-12
references.pmid: 20378621
references.citation: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Sep 15;64(18):1969-77
references.pmid: 17823111
references.citation: Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):R516-21
references.pmid: 16277713
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Dec;14(4):299-313
references.pmid: 19102614
references.citation: Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996;:17-21
references.pmid: 8947619
references.citation: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Sep-Oct;7(5):453-61
references.pmid: 10984464
references.citation: AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06;:257-61
references.pmid: 18998968
references.citation: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):104-12
references.pmid: 14633936
references.citation: Int J Med Inform. 2009 May;78(5):293-307
references.pmid: 19081295
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Dec;14(4):314-28
references.pmid: 19102615
references.citation: Int J Med Inform. 2009 Apr;78 Suppl 1:S69-76
references.pmid: 18786852
references.citation: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Feb 15;62(4):416-9
references.pmid: 15745896
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Feb;135(1):103-15
references.pmid: 16478319
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):683-90
references.pmid: 20421552
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25;169(10):982-9
references.pmid: 19468092
references.citation: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 1):784-8
references.pmid: 20841793