title: Government influence on patient organizations.
abstract: Patient organizations increasingly play an important role in health care decision-making in Western countries. The Netherlands is one of the countries where this trend has gone furthest. In the literature some problems are identified, such as instrumental use of patient organizations by care providers, health insurers and the pharmaceutical industry. To strengthen the position of patient organizations government funding is often recommended as a solution. In this paper we analyze the ties between Dutch government and Dutch patient organizations to learn more about the effects of such a relationship between government and this part of civil society. Our study is based on official government documents and existing empirical research on patient organizations. We found that government influence on patient organizations has become quite substantial with government influencing the organizational structure of patient organizations, the activities these organizations perform and even their ideology. Financing patient organizations offers the government an important means to hold them accountable. Although the ties between patient organizations and the government enable the former to play a role that can be valued as positive by both parties, we argue that they raise problems as well which warrant a discussion on how much government influence on civil society is acceptable.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. vandebovenkamp@bmg.eur.nl
authors.forename: Hester M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Van de Bovenkamp
authors.forename: Margo J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Trappenburg
mesh_terms: D003255:Consumer Organizations; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000266:history / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005381:Financing, Organized; D006076:Government; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006801:Humans; D009426:Netherlands; D010358:Patient Participation
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008 Dec;33(6):1031-55
references.pmid: 19038869
references.citation: Health Expect. 2008 Mar;11(1):85-94
references.pmid: 18275405
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Jun;24(3):599-625
references.pmid: 10386328
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug 15;55(4):676-80
references.pmid: 16874772
references.citation: Aust Health Rev. 2004 Nov 8;28(2):228-37
references.pmid: 15527403
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Nov 30;325(7375):1263
references.pmid: 12458240
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 2003 Aug;28(4):715-46
references.pmid: 12956521
references.citation: Health Policy. 2002 Aug;61(2):213-36
references.pmid: 12088893
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Feb-Apr;30(1-2):189-209
references.pmid: 15943393
references.citation: J Health Organ Manag. 2007;21(4-5):460-9
references.pmid: 17933376
references.citation: Health Care Anal. 2009 Sep;17(3):198-216
references.pmid: 19101804
references.citation: BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):519-23
references.pmid: 11230065
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Sep;30(6):929-43
references.pmid: 18761512
references.citation: Health Expect. 2010 Mar;13(1):73-85
references.pmid: 19719537