title: Fatigue of zirconia and dental bridge geometry: Design implications.
abstract: Zirconia is currently used as a framework material for posterior all-ceramic bridges. While the majority of research efforts have focused on the microstructure and corresponding mechanical properties of this material, clinical fractures appear to be largely associated with the appliance geometry.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this study was to estimate the maximum stress concentration posed by the connector geometry and to provide adjusted estimates of the minimum connector diameter that is required for achieving 20 years of function.
  
  
  METHODS
  A simple quantitative description of the connector geometry in an all-ceramic 4-unit bridge design is used with published stress concentration factor charts to estimate the degree of stress concentration and the maximum stress.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The magnitude of stress concentration estimated for clinically relevant connector geometries ranges from 2 to 3. Using previously published recommendations for connector designs, adjusted estimates for the minimum connector diameter required to achieve 20 years of clinical function are presented.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  To prevent clinical fractures the minimum connector diameter in multi-unit bridges designs must account for the loads incurred during function and the extent of stress concentration posed by the connector geometry.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA.
authors.forename: G D
authors.initials: GD
authors.lastname: Quinn
authors.forename: A R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Studart
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hebert
authors.forename: J R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: VerHoef
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Arola
mesh_terms: D016734:Dental Clasps; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D003779:Denture Design; D003830:Denture, Partial, Fixed; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D015019:Yttrium; D015040:Zirconium
chemical_list: C499362:yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D015019:Yttrium; D015040:Zirconium
references.citation: J Dent Res. 2003 Mar;82(3):238-42
references.pmid: 12598556
references.citation: Quintessence Int. 1996 Oct;27(10):701-6
references.pmid: 9180408
references.citation: J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Dec;31(12):1208-17
references.pmid: 15544658
references.citation: J Oral Rehabil. 1989 Nov;16(6):603-11
references.pmid: 2689617
references.citation: Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Jul;51(3):713-27, viii
references.pmid: 17586152
references.citation: J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Apr;32(4):273-8
references.pmid: 15790382
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2007 Jun;28(17):2695-705
references.pmid: 17337047
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 2002 May;87(5):536-42
references.pmid: 12070517
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2008 Aug;24(8):1077-82
references.pmid: 18282595
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2005 Oct;21(10):930-7
references.pmid: 15923031
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jun;81(6):721-8
references.pmid: 10347362
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2007 Jan;23(1):106-14
references.pmid: 16473402
references.citation: J Dent Res. 1995 Jun;74(6):1253-8
references.pmid: 7629333
references.citation: Artif Organs. 2008 Apr;32(4):283-91
references.pmid: 18370942
references.citation: Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996;7(2):134-43
references.pmid: 8875028
references.citation: Int J Prosthodont. 2001 May-Jun;14(3):231-8
references.pmid: 11484570