[Online support groups for localized prostate cancer: qualitative analysis of decision making].
BACKGROUND
In localized prostate cancer individual treatment decisions cannot be reached relying exclusively on medical data. Therefore, social interaction is of considerable importance and online support groups allow us to get to know a facet of this communication.


METHODS
We investigated 82 thematically relevant threads representing 5% of the largest German online support group on prostate cancer (http://forum.prostatakrebs-bps.de). Two independent investigators used methods derived from grounded theory and linguistic conversation analysis to characterize the sample.


RESULTS
Users report on personal experience and provide subjective recommendations. At the same time those seeking advice are encouraged to weigh the information and to decide for themselves. Some urologists contribute to the discussion and seem to have a corrective influence, but their involvement is judged diversely. As mainly lay people with different levels of knowledge are involved in the discussion, a tentative language style is frequently used. The disease itself appears to be a linguistic taboo. Besides treatment recommendations, emotional support is of major concern. Being personally affected establishes a sense of unity, which adds to the subjective value of the communication.


CONCLUSIONS
Patients readily receive information, advice and emotional support in online support groups. Knowledge of such online services is useful in ensuring good counselling for our patients.
Huber
J
J
Urologische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Deutschland. johannes.huber@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Peters
T
T
Kessler
A
A
Ihrig
A
A
Huber
C G
CG
Hadaschik
B
B
Pahernik
S
S
Hohenfellner
M
M
D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D034742:Electronic Mail / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009862:Online Systems; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D012657:Self-Help Groups / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
Cancer. 2005 Oct 1;104(7):1381-90
16080181
Comput Inform Nurs. 2008 Jan-Feb;26(1):49-58
18091621
BJU Int. 2007 Jan;99(1):68-71
17026599
Psychooncology. 2007 May;16(5):379-400
16986205
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):10-24
17904782
Psychooncology. 2000 Jul-Aug;9(4):273-82
10960925
BJU Int. 2004 May;93(7):965-9
15142144
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 17;10(4):e42
19017584
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):307-14
20124521
BJU Int. 2000 Aug;86(3):191-4
10930912
J Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;12(1):103-14
17158844
Soc Sci Med. 2006 May;62(10):2577-90
16361029
Soc Work Health Care. 1994;20(1):77-95
7855710
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2005;23(4):81-102
16618689
Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008 Aug;5(8):426-33
18682718
Qual Health Res. 2005 Mar;15(3):325-45
15761103
Urologe A. 2009 Apr;48(4):399-407
19352607
Psychooncology. 2003 Sep;12(6):557-66
12923796
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Apr;53(1):57-64
15062905
BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1166
15142921
J Behav Med. 2004 Oct;27(5):491-505
15675637
J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2106-31
17509297
J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1311-3
15371830
Eur Urol. 2008 Jan;53(1):68-80
17920184