title: Student measurement of blood pressure using a simulator arm compared with a live subject's arm.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare accuracy of blood pressure measurements using a live subject and a simulator arm, and to determine students' preferences regarding measurement.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a crossover study comparing blood pressure measurements from a live subject and a simulator arm. Students completed an anonymous survey instrument defining opinions on ease of measurement.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty-seven students completed blood pressure measurements on live subjects while 72 students completed blood pressure measurements using the simulator arm. There were no significant systematic differences between the 2 measurement techniques. Systolic blood pressure measurements from a live subject arm were less likely to be within 4 mm Hg compared with measurements of a simulator arm. Diastolic blood pressure measurements were not significantly different between the 2 techniques.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Accuracy of student measurement of blood pressure using a simulator arm was similar to the accuracy with a live subject. There was no difference in students' preferences regarding measurement techniques.
authors.affiliation: University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, CT, USA.
authors.forename: Jennifer J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Diana M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Sobieraj
authors.forename: Effie L
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Kuti
mesh_terms: D001132:Arm / Q000098:blood supply; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001795:Blood Pressure Determination / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003198:Computer Simulation; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D004512:Education, Pharmacy / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008953:Models, Anatomic; D013339:Students, Pharmacy / Q000523:psychology
references.citation: Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Jun 15;71(3):48
references.pmid: 17619648
references.citation: Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Apr 15;72(2):37
references.pmid: 18483603
references.citation: Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28
references.pmid: 16147767
references.citation: Med Educ. 2006 Mar;40(3):254-62
references.pmid: 16483328
references.citation: Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Jun 15;70(3):48
references.pmid: 17136169
references.citation: Nurse Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):90-5
references.pmid: 18317323
references.citation: Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Jun 15;71(3):51
references.pmid: 17619651