Preservation and modulation of specific left hemisphere regions is vital for treated recovery from anomia in stroke.
The location and extent of brain changes that support recovery in chronic stroke is probably related to the structural integrity of the remaining cortex. However, little is known about the specifics of this relationship and how it influences treatment outcome in chronic stroke. To examine this issue, the current study examined frank brain damage and changes in cortical activation as predictors of language-treatment outcome in patients with chronic aphasia caused by stroke. Twenty-six patients received multiple MRI sessions before and after 30 h of aphasia treatment targeting anomia, an impairment in the ability to name common objects. Improved naming was associated with increased brain activation in the anterior and posterior regions of the left hemisphere, whereas damage to the posterior portion of the left middle temporal lobe and the temporal-occipital junction had a particularly negative effect on treatment outcome. Specifically, patients whose brain damage included regions commonly associated with lexical retrieval and phonological processing (e.g., Brodmann's areas 37 and 39) were less likely to show treatment-related improvement in correct naming compared with cases where the same areas were intact. These findings suggest that brain changes associated with improved naming ability in chronic aphasia rely on preservation and recruitment of eloquent cortex in the left hemisphere. In general, it seems likely that a similar relationship between cortical preservation and recruitment may also pertain to recovery from other functional impairments in chronic stroke.
Fridriksson
Julius
J
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA. jfridrik@sc.edu
D000368:Aged; D000849:Anomia / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology* / Q000628:therapy*; D001037:Aphasia / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000473:pathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D020127:Recovery of Function / Q000502:physiology; D011999:Recruitment, Neurophysiological / Q000502:physiology; D020521:Stroke / Q000150:complications / Q000473:pathology* / Q000628:therapy*
Adv Neurol. 1984;42:263-76
6209951
Nat Neurosci. 2003 May;6(5):448-50
12704393
Neuroimage. 2008 Nov 15;43(3):540-53
18718872
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1299-318
19413476
Brain. 1977 Mar;100 Pt 1:1-18
861709
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2010 Mar;23(1):29-38
20299861
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:385-94
19673813
Stroke. 2003 Apr;34(4):987-93
12649521
Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19
15501092
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):1052-63
14568475
Behav Neurol. 2000;12(4):191-200
11568431
Arch Neurol. 1973 Aug;29(2):130-1
4717723
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 May;79(5):530-4
17846113
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 9;45(8):1812-22
17292928
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1081-8
17583985
Curr Opin Neurol. 2007 Dec;20(6):667-73
17992087
Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56
11516708
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Sep;13(5):846-53
17697416
Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1229-36
20395612
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Aug;30(8):2487-98
19294641
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1732-47
15050594
Cereb Cortex. 2010 May;20(5):1013-9
19687294
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):885-93
19733673
Stroke. 1979 Nov-Dec;10(6):663-70
524406
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008 Nov;8(6):497-502
18957187
Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1403-12
16766207
Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):73-85
19811814
Brain Lang. 2005 Apr;93(1):95-105
15766771
Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):29-41
15109995