Dose verifications by use of liquid ionization chamber of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).
In this study, we examined the ability of an L-EPID to verify rectangular and irregular fields and to measure the transmitted exit doses. With respect to the beam profile of rectangular and irregular fields and the doses transmitted through an inhomogeneous phantom, the L-EPID dose obtained from the L-EPID measurement was compared with the conventional dose measured by use of a 0.12-cc ionization chamber and a 3D water phantom. In the comparison of the rectangular and irregular fields, the difference in the off-center ratio (OCR) between the L-EPID dose and the conventional dose was approximately 3% in the steep-dose-gradient region (penumbra regions, >30%/cm) and approximately +/-0.5% in the gentle-dose-gradient region (5%/cm). On the other hand, the dose differences between the L-EPID and the measured doses were less than approximately 2% in the gentle-dose-gradient region. In addition, in the steep-dose-gradient region, the maximum difference was 30%. However, the differences in the distance-to-agreement (DTA) were less than approximately +/-1 mm and were unrelated to the dose gradient. These results suggest that dose verification by L-EPID is very useful in clinical applications.
Tateoka
Kunihiko
K
Radiation Oncology, Imaging and Diagnosis, Division of Organ Function and Therapeutics, Molecular and Organ Regulation, Sapporo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. tateoka@sapmed.ac.jp
Oouchi
Atsushi
A
Nakata
Kensei
K
Hareyama
Masato
M
D000465:Algorithms; D004581:Electronics / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D010315:Particle Accelerators / Q000295:instrumentation; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D011874:Radiometry / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D050397:Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry
D014867:Water
Med Dosim. 1997 Summer;22(2):101-5
9243462
Phys Med Biol. 1995 Nov;40(11):1943-55
8587942
Med Phys. 1995 Jul;22(7):1101-6
7565384
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Mar 1;34(4):931-41
8598373
Radiother Oncol. 1992 Sep;25(1):67-72
1410593
Med Phys. 1994 Sep;21(9):1447-54
7838056
Radiother Oncol. 1993 Dec;29(3):336-40
8127984
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Dec 1;33(5):1265-72
7493851
Med Phys. 1999 May;26(5):737-42
10360535
Med Phys. 2005 Oct;32(10):3095-105
16279061
Med Phys. 1992 Jan-Feb;19(1):1-16
1620036
Med Phys. 1996 May;23(5):685-93
8724741
Radiother Oncol. 1993 Nov;29(2):237-43
8310151
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990 May;18(5):1173-81
2347724
Med Phys. 2001 Oct;28(10):2121-8
11695774
Med Phys. 1998 May;25(5):656-61
9608475
Radiother Oncol. 1991 Dec;22(4):285-9
1792322
Med Phys. 1991 Jul-Aug;18(4):692-702
1921873
Med Phys. 1995 Jul;22(7):1089-99
7565383