Logarithmic superposition of force response with rapid length changes in relaxed porcine airway smooth muscle.
We present a systematic quantitative analysis of power-law force relaxation and investigate logarithmic superposition of force response in relaxed porcine airway smooth muscle (ASM) strips in vitro. The term logarithmic superposition describes linear superposition on a logarithmic scale, which is equivalent to multiplication on a linear scale. Additionally, we examine whether the dynamic response of contracted and relaxed muscles is dominated by cross-bridge cycling or passive dynamics. The study shows the following main findings. For relaxed ASM, the force response to length steps of varying amplitude (0.25-4% of reference length, both lengthening and shortening) are well-fitted with power-law functions over several decades of time (10⁻² to 10³ s), and the force response after consecutive length changes is more accurately fitted assuming logarithmic superposition rather than linear superposition. Furthermore, for sinusoidal length oscillations in contracted and relaxed muscles, increasing the oscillation amplitude induces greater hysteresivity and asymmetry of force-length relationships, whereas increasing the frequency dampens hysteresivity but increases asymmetry. We conclude that logarithmic superposition is an important feature of relaxed ASM, which may facilitate a more accurate prediction of force responses in the continuous dynamic environment of the respiratory system. In addition, the single power-function response to length changes shows that the dynamics of cross-bridge cycling can be ignored in relaxed muscle. The similarity in response between relaxed and contracted states implies that the investigated passive dynamics play an important role in both states and should be taken into account.
Ijpma
G
G
Institute of Biomedical Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
Al-Jumaily
A M
AM
Cairns
S P
SP
Sieck
G C
GC
D000818:Animals; D008954:Models, Biological; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D009126:Muscle Relaxation / Q000502:physiology; D009130:Muscle, Smooth / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D034421:Sus scrofa; D013696:Temperature; D014132:Trachea / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Jul;95(1):413-25
12794100
J Physiol. 1999 Sep 15;519 Pt 3:829-40
10457094
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Sep;83(3):731-8
9292457
Am J Physiol. 1988 Jan;254(1 Pt 1):C99-106
3337223
Nature. 2007 May 31;447(7144):592-5
17538621
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002 Sep;283(3):C792-801
12176736
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;159(3):959-67
10051279
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004 Nov;287(5):L1025-34
15246973
Am J Physiol. 1982 Jan;242(1):C102-8
7058873
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 May;92(5):1865-72
11960935
Ann Biomed Eng. 2007 Jul;35(7):1165-74
17380389
Biophys J. 2000 Nov;79(5):2667-81
11053139
Am J Physiol. 1988 Jul;255(1 Pt 1):C86-94
3389402
Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Oct 1;87(14):148102
11580676
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Jun;76(6):2749-59
7928910
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Dec;156(6):1752-9
9412551
Nat Mater. 2005 Jul;4(7):557-61
15937489
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 May;96(5):1600-5
14707148
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006 Jun;290(6):L1227-37
16414980
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002 Mar;282(3):C606-16
11832346
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 May;102(5):1746-55
17234807
Am J Physiol. 1997 Jun;272(6 Pt 1):C1960-7
9227425
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2003 Sep 16;137(2-3):109-24
14516720
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Jun;90(6):2306-10
11356796
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Feb;90(2):741-9
11160077