A specialist-generalist classification of the arable flora and its response to changes in agricultural practices.
BACKGROUND
Theory in ecology points out the potential link between the degree of specialisation of organisms and their responses to disturbances and suggests that this could be a key element for understanding the assembly of communities. We evaluated this question for the arable weed flora as this group has scarcely been the focus of ecological studies so far and because weeds are restricted to habitats characterised by very high degrees of disturbance. As such, weeds offer a case study to ask how specialization relates to abundance and distribution of species in relation to the varying disturbance regimes occurring in arable crops.


RESULTS
We used data derived from an extensive national monitoring network of approximately 700 arable fields scattered across France to quantify the degree of specialisation of 152 weed species using six different ecological methods. We then explored the impact of the level of disturbance occurring in arable fields by comparing the degree of specialisation of weed communities in contrasting field situations.The classification of species as specialist or generalist was consistent between different ecological indices. When applied on a large-scale data set across France, this classification highlighted that monoculture harbour significantly more specialists than crop rotations, suggesting that crop rotation increases abundance of generalist species rather than sets of species that are each specialised to the individual crop types grown in the rotation. Applied to a diachronic dataset, the classification also shows that the proportion of specialist weed species has significantly decreased in cultivated fields over the last 30 years which suggests a biotic homogenization of agricultural landscapes.


CONCLUSIONS
This study shows that the concept of generalist/specialist species is particularly relevant to understand the effect of anthropogenic disturbances on the evolution of plant community composition and that ecological theories developed in stable environments are valid in highly disturbed environments such as agro-ecosystems. The approach developed here to classify arable weeds according to the breadth of their ecological niche is robust and applicable to a wide range of organisms. It is also sensitive to disturbance regime and we show here that recent changes in agricultural practices, i.e. increased levels of disturbance have favoured the most generalist species, hence leading to biotic homogenisation in arable landscapes.
Fried
Guillaume
G
INRA, UMR1210 Biologie et Gestion des Adventices, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Petit
Sandrine
S
Reboud
Xavier
X
D000383:Agriculture / Q000379:methods*; D058448:Biota; D018556:Crops, Agricultural / Q000254:growth & development; D004463:Ecology / Q000379:methods; D005602:France; D006540:Herbicides; D057685:Plant Weeds / Q000145:classification*
D006540:Herbicides
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 22;273(1601):2659-65
17002952
Oecologia. 1993 Jun;94(3):351-355
28313670
Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):741-51
17531052
Mol Ecol. 2004 Jul;13(7):1815-26
15189205
Ecology. 1971 Jul;52(4):567-576
28973805
J Environ Manage. 2001 Dec;63(4):337-65
11826719
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Nov;14(11):450-453
10511724