Isolation of intact sub-dermal secretory cavities from Eucalyptus.
BACKGROUND
The biosynthesis of plant natural products in sub-dermal secretory cavities is poorly understood at the molecular level, largely due to the difficulty of physically isolating these structures for study. Our aim was to develop a protocol for isolating live and intact sub-dermal secretory cavities, and to do this, we used leaves from three species of Eucalyptus with cavities that are relatively large and rich in essential oils.


RESULTS
Leaves were digested using a variety of commercially available enzymes. A pectinase from Aspergillus niger was found to allow isolation of intact cavities after a relatively short incubation (12 h), with no visible artifacts from digestion and no loss of cellular integrity or cavity contents. Several measurements indicated the potential of the isolated cavities for further functional studies. First, the cavities were found to consume oxygen at a rate that is comparable to that estimated from leaf respiratory rates. Second, mRNA was extracted from cavities, and it was used to amplify a cDNA fragment with high similarity to that of a monoterpene synthase. Third, the contents of the cavity lumen were extracted, showing an unexpectedly low abundance of volatile essential oils and a sizeable amount of non-volatile material, which is contrary to the widely accepted role of secretory cavities as predominantly essential oil repositories.


CONCLUSIONS
The protocol described herein is likely to be adaptable to a range of Eucalyptus species with sub-dermal secretory cavities, and should find wide application in studies of the developmental and functional biology of these structures, and the biosynthesis of the plant natural products they contain.
Goodger
Jason Qd
JQ
School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. jgoodger@unimelb.edu.au.
Heskes
Allison M
AM
Mitchell
Madeline C
MC
King
Drew J
DJ
Neilson
Elizabeth H
EH
Woodrow
Ian E
IE
Carbohydr Res. 2010 Sep 23;345(14):2079-84
20708173
Phytother Res. 2007 Apr;21(4):308-23
17199238
Plant J. 2008 May;54(4):656-69
18476870
New Phytol. 2006;172(3):440-51
17083675
Funct Plant Biol. 2008 May;35(3):247-251
32688779
Plant J. 2008 May;54(4):702-11
18476873
Anal Biochem. 1992 Jan;200(1):130-8
1595887
New Phytol. 1988 Mar;108(3):229-257
33873942
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 14;97(6):2934-9
10717007
Phytochemistry. 2006 Nov;67(22):2415-23
16996548
Phytochemistry. 1998 Nov 20;49(6):1549-1553
11711063
Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Apr;19(4):371-4
11283597
Oecologia. 2007 Oct;153(4):799-808
17605051
Phytochemistry. 2009 Jun;70(9):1187-1194
19604527
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Dec;6(6):617-21
14611962
Planta. 2003 Feb;216(4):686-91
12569411
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Jun 12;10:106
20540781
Plant Physiol. 2001 Feb;125(2):539-55
11161012
Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Jan;17(1):31-6
9920265
Plant Physiol. 2002 Jul;129(3):1222-31
12114576
New Phytol. 2006;169(3):453-68
16411949
Plant Cell. 2008 Jan;20(1):186-200
18223037
FEBS Lett. 2006 Feb 20;580(5):1411-6
16458889
J Exp Bot. 2005 Feb;56(412):495-505
15642711