Isolation of adult progenitor cells with neuronal potential from rabbit corneal epithelial cells in serum- and feeder layer-free culture conditions.
OBJECTIVE
To isolate progenitor cells from rabbit corneal epithelial cells (CEC) in serum- and feeder layer-free culture conditions and to compare the self-renewal capacity of corneal epithelial progenitor cells obtained from the central and limbal regions of the cornea.


METHODS
Tissue samples of New Zealand white rabbit corneas were dissected from the limbal and central regions to obtain CEC for sphere-forming culture, in which the cells formed spheres in serum-free medium containing growth factors. The number of primary and secondary sphere colonies and the size of the primary spheres were compared between the limbal and central regions. To promote differentiation, isolated sphere colonies were plated in dishes coated with poly-L-lysine (PLL)/laminin. The expression of epithelial, neural, and mesenchymal mRNAs was examined in the sphere colonies and their progeny by immunocytochemistry and/or the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Adherent differentiated cells from the sphere colonies were also examined morphologically.


RESULTS
Primary spheres were isolated from both the limbal and central regions of the cornea. The rate of primary sphere formation by CEC from the limbal region (55.6+/-10.6/10,000 cells) was significantly higher than that by cells from the central cornea (43.1+/-7.2/10,000 cells, p=0.0028), but there was no significant difference in the size of primary spheres derived from both regions. The self-renewal capacity of cells from the limbal region was higher than that of cells from the central region, as evidenced by the significantly higher secondary sphere formation rate of limbal cells (38.7+/-8.5/10,000 cells) in comparison with that for central cells (31.3+/-5.7/10,000 cells, p=0.013). The primary sphere colonies expressed bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), a 63-kDa protein (p63), p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75(NTR)), and nestin, whereas their progeny expressed cytokeratin 3, cytokeratin 12, vimentin, alpha-smooth muscle actin, microtubule-associated protein 2, and neuron-specific enolase on immunocytochemical analysis. These markers were confirmed by RT-PCR.


CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate that limbal CEC contain more progenitor cells with a stronger self-renewal capacity than cells from the central region. These progenitor cells differentiate into the epithelial lineage, and can also produce neuronal protein.
Mimura
Tatsuya
T
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. mimurat-tky@umin.ac.jp
Yamagami
Satoru
S
Uchida
Saiko
S
Yokoo
Seiichi
S
Ono
Kyoko
K
Usui
Tomohiko
T
Amano
Shiro
S
D053687:Adult Stem Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism; D000818:Animals; D002469:Cell Separation / Q000379:methods*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D016895:Culture Media, Serum-Free / Q000494:pharmacology*; D004847:Epithelial Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000187:drug effects; D019573:Epithelium, Corneal / Q000166:cytology*; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D008297:Male; D009474:Neurons / Q000166:cytology* / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism; D011817:Rabbits; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D018874:Spheroids, Cellular / Q000166:cytology / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism
D016895:Culture Media, Serum-Free
Nat Med. 2003 Oct;9(10):1293-9
12949502
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Oct;44(10):4230-6
14507866
J Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;103(1):49-62
2424919
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3128-35
16123411
Exp Cell Res. 2004 Apr 15;295(1):194-203
15051502
Science. 2000 Feb 25;287(5457):1433-8
10688783
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983 Oct;24(10):1442-3
6618809
Exp Eye Res. 2008 Jan;86(1):34-40
17980361
J Invest Dermatol. 1983 Jul;81(1 Suppl):121s-7s
6190957
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Aug 10;560(2):281-99
380653
Surv Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov-Dec;48(6):631-46
14609709
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Oct;46(10):3645-8
16186345
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Jan;33(1):143-52
1730535
Stem Cells. 2006 Dec;24(12):2714-22
16888282
Science. 2000 Mar 17;287(5460):2032-6
10720333
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 May;46(5):1653-8
15851565
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982 Jul;23(1):73-80
7085223
Dev Biol. 2002 Oct 15;250(2):317-31
12376106
Stem Cells. 2005;23(1):63-73
15625123
Stem Cells. 2004;22(3):355-66
15153612
Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Sep;3(9):778-84
11533656
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 May;46(5):1620-5
15851560
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;46(6):1957-65
15914609
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Jun;32(7):2086-95
1711516
Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1707-10
1553558
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 May;46(5):1626-31
15851561
Mol Vis. 2003 Dec 08;9:635-43
14685149
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Oct;46(10):3637-44
16186344
Science. 1982 Mar 5;215(4537):1239-41
7058342
Nat Genet. 1997 Jun;16(2):184-7
9171831
Exp Eye Res. 2005 Feb;80(2):227-33
15670801
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5130-5
14638708
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Mar;47(3):909-16
16505023
Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010 Aug;16(4):803-12
19852617
J Neurosci. 1999 May 1;19(9):3287-97
10212288
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Sep;21(3):434-41
7024181
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 13;98(6):3156-61
11248048
Development. 2000 Dec;127(24):5487-95
11076768
Stem Cells. 2008 Jul;26(7):1743-8
18436866