title: Long-term reductions in anthropogenic nutrients link to improvements in Chesapeake Bay habitat.
abstract: Great effort continues to focus on ecosystem restoration and reduction of nutrient inputs thought to be responsible, in part, for declines in estuary habitats worldwide. The ability of environmental policy to address restoration is limited, in part, by uncertainty in the relationships between costly restoration and benefits. Here, we present results from an 18-y field investigation (1990-2007) of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) community dynamics and water quality in the Potomac River, a major tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. River and anthropogenic discharges lower water clarity by introducing nutrients that stimulate phytoplankton and epiphyte growth as well as suspended sediments. Efforts to restore the Chesapeake Bay are often viewed as failing. Overall nutrient reduction and SAV restoration goals have not been met. In the Potomac River, however, reduced in situ nutrients, wastewater-treatment effluent nitrogen, and total suspended solids were significantly correlated to increased SAV abundance and diversity. Species composition and relative abundance also correlated with nutrient and water-quality conditions, indicating declining fitness of exotic species relative to native species during restoration. Our results suggest that environmental policies that reduce anthropogenic nutrient inputs do result in improved habitat quality, with increased diversity and native species abundances. The results also help elucidate why SAV cover has improved only in some areas of the Chesapeake Bay.
authors.affiliation: National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Henry A
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Ruhl
authors.forename: Nancy B
authors.initials: NB
authors.lastname: Rybicki
mesh_terms: D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D017753:Ecosystem; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D005618:Fresh Water; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D008396:Maryland; D012623:Seawater; D014768:Virginia; D014876:Water Pollution / Q000032:analysis / Q000266:history / Q000517:prevention & control*
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 27;104(9):3273-7
references.pmid: 17360637
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 28;106(30):12377-81
references.pmid: 19587236
references.citation: Science. 2009 Aug 28;325(5944):1121-4
references.pmid: 19644076
references.citation: Science. 2001 Jul 27;293(5530):629-37
references.pmid: 11474098
references.citation: Science. 1983 Oct 7;222(4619):51-3
references.pmid: 17810089
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2008 Dec;147(1-3):351-75
references.pmid: 18214699
references.citation: J Environ Qual. 2001 Mar-Apr;30(2):303-20
references.pmid: 11285890
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2006 Aug;38(2):163-78
references.pmid: 16788855
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10(10):995-1015
references.pmid: 17845298
references.citation: Science. 2009 Aug 28;325(5944):1124-8
references.pmid: 19644073
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5246-51
references.pmid: 12702773