title: Increasing community capacity to prevent childhood obesity: challenges, lessons learned and results from the Romp & Chomp intervention.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Obesity is a major public health issue; however, only limited evidence is available about effective ways to prevent obesity, particularly in early childhood. Romp & Chomp was a community-wide obesity prevention intervention conducted in Geelong Australia with a target group of 12,000 children aged 0-5 years. The intervention had an environmental and capacity building focus and we have recently demonstrated that the prevalence of overweight/obesity was lower in intervention children, post-intervention. Capacity building is defined as the development of knowledge, skills, commitment, structures, systems and leadership to enable effective health promotion and the aim of this study was to determine if the capacity of the Geelong community, represented by key stakeholder organisations, to support healthy eating and physical activity for young children was increased after Romp & Chomp.
  
  
  METHODS
  A mixed methods evaluation with three data sources was utilised. 1) Document analysis comprised assessment of the documented formative and intervention activities against a capacity building framework (five domains: Partnerships, Leadership, Resource Allocation, Workforce Development, and Organisational Development); 2) Thematic analysis of key informant interviews (n = 16); and 3) the quantitative Community Capacity Index Survey.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Document analysis showed that the majority of the capacity building activities addressed the Partnerships, Resource Allocation and Organisational Development domains of capacity building, with a lack of activity in the Leadership and Workforce Development domains. The thematic analysis revealed the establishment of sustainable partnerships, use of specialist advice, and integration of activities into ongoing formal training for early childhood workers. Complex issues also emerged from the key informant interviews regarding the challenges of limited funding, high staff turnover, changing governance structures, lack of high level leadership and unclear communication strategies. The Community Capacity Index provided further evidence that the project implementation network achieved a moderate level of capacity.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Romp & Chomp increased the capacity of organisations, settings and services in the Geelong community to support healthy eating and physical activity for young children. Despite this success there are important learnings from this mixed methods evaluation that should inform current and future community-based public health and health promotion initiatives.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ANZCTRN12607000374460.
authors.affiliation: WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.
authors.forename: Florentine P
authors.initials: FP
authors.lastname: de Groot
authors.forename: Narelle M
authors.initials: NM
authors.lastname: Robertson
authors.forename: Boyd A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Swinburn
authors.forename: Andrea M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: de Silva-Sanigorski
mesh_terms: D002675:Child, Preschool; D019058:Community Networks / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D009765:Obesity / Q000517:prevention & control*; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D011340:Problem Solving; D015397:Program Evaluation
references.citation: Public Health Nutr. 2003 Sep;6(6):599-605
references.pmid: 14690041
references.citation: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Aug;15(8):1908-12
references.pmid: 17712105
references.citation: Public Health Nutr. 2009 Aug;12(8):1031-8
references.pmid: 18940028
references.citation: Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jul;32(7):1060-7
references.pmid: 18542082
references.citation: Can J Public Health. 2002 May-Jun;93(3):181-2
references.pmid: 12050983
references.citation: Health Educ Behav. 2009 Feb;36(1):24-8; discussion 29-30
references.pmid: 19238698
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):831-40
references.pmid: 20147472
references.citation: Health Educ Behav. 1998 Jun;25(3):258-78
references.pmid: 9615238
references.citation: Health Educ Behav. 2005 Apr;32(2):195-207
references.pmid: 15749966
references.citation: Health Policy. 1997 Jan;39(1):29-42
references.pmid: 10164903
references.citation: Health Promot Int. 2009 Dec;24(4):311-24
references.pmid: 19759046
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1189-208
references.pmid: 10591279
references.citation: Int J Pediatr Obes. 2006;1(1):11-25
references.pmid: 17902211
references.citation: Nutr J. 2005 Sep 02;4:24
references.pmid: 16138930
references.citation: Health Promot Int. 2008 Dec;23(4):328-36
references.pmid: 18820261