title: Projected loss of a salamander diversity hotspot as a consequence of projected global climate change.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Significant shifts in climate are considered a threat to plants and animals with significant physiological limitations and limited dispersal abilities. The southern Appalachian Mountains are a global hotspot for plethodontid salamander diversity. Plethodontids are lungless ectotherms, so their ecology is strongly governed by temperature and precipitation. Many plethodontid species in southern Appalachia exist in high elevation habitats that may be at or near their thermal maxima, and may also have limited dispersal abilities across warmer valley bottoms.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We used a maximum-entropy approach (program Maxent) to model the suitable climatic habitat of 41 plethodontid salamander species inhabiting the Appalachian Highlands region (33 individual species and eight species included within two species complexes). We evaluated the relative change in suitable climatic habitat for these species in the Appalachian Highlands from the current climate to the years 2020, 2050, and 2080, using both the HADCM3 and the CGCM3 models, each under low and high CO(2) scenarios, and using two-model thresholds levels (relative suitability thresholds for determining suitable/unsuitable range), for a total of 8 scenarios per species.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  While models differed slightly, every scenario projected significant declines in suitable habitat within the Appalachian Highlands as early as 2020. Species with more southern ranges and with smaller ranges had larger projected habitat loss. Despite significant differences in projected precipitation changes to the region, projections did not differ significantly between global circulation models. CO(2) emissions scenario and model threshold had small effects on projected habitat loss by 2020, but did not affect longer-term projections. Results of this study indicate that choice of model threshold and CO(2) emissions scenario affect short-term projected shifts in climatic distributions of species; however, these factors and choice of global circulation model have relatively small affects on what is significant projected loss of habitat for many salamander species that currently occupy the Appalachian Highlands.
authors.affiliation: DB Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America. milanovichj@warnell.uga.edu
authors.forename: Joseph R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Milanovich
authors.forename: William E
authors.initials: WE
authors.lastname: Peterman
authors.forename: Nathan P
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Nibbelink
authors.forename: John C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Maerz
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D017753:Ecosystem; D057232:Global Warming; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D013997:Time Factors; D014562:Caudata
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 May 7;274(1614):1167-73
references.pmid: 17327208
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Jan;38(1):280-7
references.pmid: 15996487
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 21;101(38):13820-5
references.pmid: 15365171
references.citation: Cladistics. 2005 Apr;21(2):194-202
references.pmid: 34892864
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2007 Dec;56(6):907-23
references.pmid: 18066927
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Apr;12(4):334-50
references.pmid: 19292794
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Apr 11;416(6881):626-9
references.pmid: 11948349
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2007 Jan;98(1):53-60
references.pmid: 17006531
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):843-5
references.pmid: 10706267
references.citation: Am Nat. 2010 Jul;176(1):40-54
references.pmid: 20497055
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Jan;22(1):42-7
references.pmid: 17011070
references.citation: Evolution. 2005 Sep;59(9):2000-16
references.pmid: 16261737
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2006 Mar 22;2(1):135-9
references.pmid: 17148347
references.citation: Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):234-42
references.pmid: 10821284
references.citation: Evolution. 2001 Nov 11;55(11):2287-302
references.pmid: 11794788
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2005 Sep;8(9):993-1009
references.pmid: 34517687
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jan 8;427(6970):145-8
references.pmid: 14712274
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106 Suppl 2:19729-36
references.pmid: 19822750
references.citation: Genetica. 2001;112-113:183-98
references.pmid: 11838765
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2007 Dec;56(6):924-42
references.pmid: 18066928
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2009 Jan;19(1):181-97
references.pmid: 19323182
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2006 Apr;20(2):538-48
references.pmid: 16903114
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19903-7
references.pmid: 18077422
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 May;27(2):197-211
references.pmid: 12695085
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2006 Jun;20(3):913-7
references.pmid: 16909583
references.citation: Evolution. 2004 Dec;58(12):2809-22
references.pmid: 15696758
references.citation: Environ Entomol. 2010 Feb;39(1):42-9
references.pmid: 20146838
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Apr;47(1):143-53
references.pmid: 18337126
references.citation: Am Nat. 2004 Aug;164(2):201-13
references.pmid: 15278844
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Dec 22;3(6):695-8
references.pmid: 17711816
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17836-41
references.pmid: 19001274
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jan;78(1):52-62
references.pmid: 18771502
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Jan 16;3(1):e1439
references.pmid: 18197250
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 May;90(5):1301-13
references.pmid: 19537550
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2003 Apr;12(4):969-84
references.pmid: 12753216