Uniform comparison of several drugs which provide protection from noise induced hearing loss.
BACKGROUND
The ability of drugs to reduce noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) has been evaluated in diverse experimental conditions (animal species, noise intensities, durations, assessment techniques, etc), making it difficult to assess their relative efficacy. The present study was designed to provide more uniform comparisons and to allow to a better understanding of the mechanism of the NIHL.


METHODS
The drugs studied included furosemide (loop diuretic) and the antioxidants N Acetyl-L-Cysteine, vitamins A, C, E with the vasodilator magnesium. Mice were exposed to a continuous broadband noise (113 dB SPL for 3.5 hours) and the NIHL was assessed in all animals before noise exposure and 1 week after with auditory nerve brainstem evoked responses (ABR) to broadband clicks and to 8 kHz tone bursts.


RESULTS
Each of the drugs alone and in combination led to similar reductions in NIHL.


CONCLUSIONS
The loop diuretic furosemide, by reducing the magnitude of the endocochlear potential in scala media, probably depressed active vibrations of the outer hair cells and basilar membrane, resulting in reduction of free radical formation during the noise exposure. The antioxidants N Acetyl-L-Cysteine and vitamins A, C, E with the vasodilator magnesium presumably counteract the free radicals. Thus, the administration of the antioxidants to animals in which free radical formation had already been reduced by previous injection of furosemide did not have an additional protective effect on the NIHL.
Tamir
Sharon
S
Department of Physiology; Institute for Medical Research - Israel-Canada, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, POB 12272, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. haims@ekmd.huji.ac.il.
Adelman
Cahtia
C
Weinberger
Jeffrey M
JM
Sohmer
Haim
H
J Neurosci. 1991 Apr;11(4):1057-67
2010805
Audiol Neurootol. 2001 Jan-Feb;6(1):40-9
11173774
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2006 Jun;26(3):133-9
17063982
Hear Res. 2002 Mar;165(1-2):96-102
12031519
Med Sci Monit. 2008 Aug;14(8):BR159-64
18667992
Audiol Neurootol. 2008;13(4):266-72
18259079
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Apr;115(4):500-2
2923694
Hear Res. 1993 Dec;71(1-2):202-7
8113137
Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Jun;130(6):659-64
19958246
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Sep 23;335(2):485-90
16084493
Hear Res. 2000 Nov;149(1-2):138-46
11033253
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010 May;119(5):342-9
20524581
Ear Hear. 2006 Feb;27(1):1-19
16446561
Hear Res. 1992 Oct;62(2):199-205
1429263
Neuroreport. 2008 Feb 12;19(3):277-81
18303566
Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Sep;127(9):914-9
17712668
Free Radic Biol Med. 2007 May 1;42(9):1454-63
17395018
Hear Res. 2004 Jun;192(1-2):1-9
15157958
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2008 Sep;216(1):53-9
18719338