Effects of signal level and background noise on spectral representations in the auditory nerve of the domestic cat.
Background noise poses a significant obstacle for auditory perception, especially among individuals with hearing loss. To better understand the physiological basis of this perceptual impediment, the present study evaluated the effects of background noise on the auditory nerve representation of head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). These complex spectral shapes describe the directional filtering effects of the head and torso. When a broadband sound passes through the outer ear en route to the tympanic membrane, the HRTF alters its spectrum in a manner that establishes the perceived location of the sound source. HRTF-shaped noise shares many of the acoustic features of human speech, while communicating biologically relevant localization cues that are generalized across mammalian species. Previous studies have used parametric manipulations of random spectral shapes to elucidate HRTF coding principles at various stages of the cat's auditory system. This study extended that body of work by examining the effects of sound level and background noise on the quality of spectral coding in the auditory nerve. When fibers were classified by their spontaneous rates, the coding properties of the more numerous low-threshold, high-spontaneous rate fibers were found to degrade at high presentation levels and in low signal-to-noise ratios. Because cats are known to maintain accurate directional hearing under these challenging listening conditions, behavioral performance may be disproportionally based on the enhanced dynamic range of the less common high-threshold, low-spontaneous rate fibers.
Reiss
Lina A J
LA
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. reiss@ohsu.edu
Ramachandran
Ramnarayan
R
May
Bradford J
BJ
D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats; D003056:Cochlear Nerve / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009412:Nerve Fibers / Q000502:physiology; D009622:Noise; D013017:Sound Localization
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;70:135-68
16472634
Hear Res. 1983 Aug;11(2):157-89
6619003
J Neurophysiol. 1984 Jun;51(6):1326-44
6737033
J Comp Neurol. 1991 Nov 8;313(2):240-58
1722487
Hear Res. 1987;30(2-3):239-52
3680067
J Acoust Soc Am. 1979 Aug;66(2):470-9
512208
Audit Neurosci. 1996 Mar 1;2(3):275-288
23599659
Hear Res. 1981 Nov;5(2-3):337-42
7309647
J Neurophysiol. 1990 May;63(5):1191-212
2358869
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11780-6
11050209
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Apr;79(4):1755-67
9535945
J Neurophysiol. 1987 Apr;57(4):1002-21
3585452
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Dec;98(6):3223-34
8550947
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Oct;118(4):2458-69
16266167
J Neurophysiol. 1967 Jul;30(4):817-32
6035692
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Dec;70(6):2533-49
8120597
J Acoust Soc Am. 1970 Oct;48(4):950-65
5480390
Ann Biomed Eng. 2002 Feb;30(2):157-68
11962768
J Acoust Soc Am. 1968 May;43(5):1120-8
5648103
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Feb;87(2):757-81
2307774
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006 Apr;288(4):331-44
16550550
Hear Res. 1989 Aug;41(1):61-9
2793615
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Aug;100(2 Pt 1):1070-80
8759960
J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Mar;75(3):908-18
6707320
Brain Res. 1979 Sep 7;173(1):152-5
487078
Hear Res. 1988 May;33(2):97-113
3397330
Hear Res. 1992 Mar;58(2):132-52
1568936
J Neurophysiol. 1983 Jul;50(1):27-45
6875649
Hear Res. 1988 Sep 15;35(2-3):165-89
3198509
Hear Res. 1988 Aug;34(3):267-74
3170367
J Comput Neurosci. 1994 Aug;1(3):167-94
8792230
J Comp Neurol. 1990 Nov 15;301(3):443-60
2262601
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jul;90(1):525-30
12843315
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Mar;97(3):1764-76
7699158
J Comp Neurol. 1983 Feb 1;213(4):448-63
6300200
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jun;101(6):3602-16
9193048
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2002 Sep;3(3):362-73
12382109
J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Feb;63(2):442-55
670542
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Aug;70(2):655-66
8410165
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May;130(5):660-4
15148194
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 May;101(5 Pt 1):2705-19
9165726