A smooth and differentiable bulk-solvent model for macromolecular diffraction.
Inclusion of low-resolution data in macromolecular crystallography requires a model for the bulk solvent. Previous methods have used a binary mask to accomplish this, which has proven to be very effective, but the mask is discontinuous at the solute-solvent boundary (i.e. the mask value jumps from zero to one) and is not differentiable with respect to atomic parameters. Here, two algorithms are introduced for computing bulk-solvent models using either a polynomial switch or a smoothly thresholded product of Gaussians, and both models are shown to be efficient and differentiable with respect to atomic coordinates. These alternative bulk-solvent models offer algorithmic improvements, while showing similar agreement of the model with the observed amplitudes relative to the binary model as monitored using R, R(free) and differences between experimental and model phases. As with the standard solvent models, the alternative models improve the agreement primarily with lower resolution (>6 A) data versus no bulk solvent. The models are easily implemented into crystallographic software packages and can be used as a general method for bulk-solvent correction in macromolecular crystallography.
Fenn
T D
TD
Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford, California, USA.
Schnieders
M J
MJ
Brunger
A T
AT
D000465:Algorithms; D018360:Crystallography, X-Ray / Q000379:methods*; D046911:Macromolecular Substances / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D008954:Models, Biological; D008958:Models, Molecular; D008968:Molecular Conformation
D046911:Macromolecular Substances
J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379-400
5551392
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(11):2728-33
18007608
J Phys Chem B. 2008 Sep 25;112(38):12073-80
18754631
Science. 1996 Jan 5;271(5245):72-7
8539602
Science. 1995 Mar 24;267(5205):1813-7
7892604
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 5;96(1):103-8
9874779
J Mol Biol. 1994 Oct 14;243(1):100-15
7932732
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2005 Sep;61(Pt 9):1299-301
16131764
Biophys J. 1994 Mar;66(3 Pt 1):601-14
8011893
J Chem Phys. 2007 Mar 28;126(12):124114
17411115
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2000 Oct;56(Pt 10):1316-23
10998628
Acc Chem Res. 2000 Dec;33(12):889-97
11123888
Proteins. 1994 Jan;18(1):19-33
8146120
Acc Chem Res. 2002 Jun;35(6):376-84
12069622
J Mol Biol. 1986 Nov 20;192(2):443-56
3560222
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998 Apr;8(2):218-21
9631296
Methods Enzymol. 1986;127:162-83
3736419
Nature. 2010 Apr 22;464(7292):1218-22
20376006
J Mol Biol. 1980 Oct 5;142(4):531-54
7463482
Science. 1987 Jan 23;235(4787):458-60
17810339
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2005 Jul;61(Pt 7):850-5
15983406
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14406-11
18780783
J Mol Biol. 1975 Aug 25;96(4):721-32
1195370
Nat Struct Biol. 1997 May;4(5):396-404
9145111
J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Apr 7;126(13):4167-80
15053606
Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1977;6:151-76
326146
J Mol Biol. 1975 Jan 15;91(2):201-25
1237625
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Aug 28;98(18):10037-41
11517324
Biochemistry. 1996 Apr 9;35(14):4298-305
8605178
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002 Sep;58(Pt 9):1387-92
12198293
J Mol Biol. 1968 Apr 28;33(2):491-7
5700707
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004 Dec;60(Pt 12 Pt 1):2169-83
15572770