Mathematical modeling of evolution. Solved and open problems.
Evolution is a highly complex multilevel process and mathematical modeling of evolutionary phenomenon requires proper abstraction and radical reduction to essential features. Examples are natural selection, Mendel's laws of inheritance, optimization by mutation and selection, and neutral evolution. An attempt is made to describe the roots of evolutionary theory in mathematical terms. Evolution can be studied in vitro outside cells with polynucleotide molecules. Replication and mutation are visualized as chemical reactions that can be resolved, analyzed, and modeled at the molecular level, and straightforward extension eventually results in a theory of evolution based upon biochemical kinetics. Error propagation in replication commonly results in an error threshold that provides an upper bound for mutation rates. Appearance and sharpness of the error threshold depend on the fitness landscape, being the distribution of fitness values in genotype or sequence space. In molecular terms, fitness landscapes are the results of two consecutive mappings from sequences into structures and from structures into the (nonnegative) real numbers. Some properties of genotype-phenotype maps are illustrated well by means of sequence-structure relations of RNA molecules. Neutrality in the sense that many RNA sequences form the same (coarse grained) structure is one of these properties, and characteristic for such mappings. Evolution cannot be fully understood without considering fluctuations--each mutant originates form a single copy, after all. The existence of neutral sets of genotypes called neutral networks, in particular, necessitates stochastic modeling, which is introduced here by simulation of molecular evolution in a kind of flowreactor.
Schuster
Peter
P
Institut für Theoretische Chemmie, Universität Wien, Währingerstraße 17, 1090, Wien, Austria. pks@tbi.univie.ac.at
D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009154:Mutation; D012641:Selection, Genetic
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Jul;58(1):217-24
5231602
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994 Nov;69(4):443-74
7999947
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46(34):6420-36
17634987
Science. 2000 Jul 21;289(5478):448-52
10903205
Ann Hum Genet. 1972 Nov;36(2):129-40
4656569
Q Rev Biophys. 1971 Aug;4(2):213-53
5134462
J Biol Chem. 2007 May 25;282(21):15516-27
17412690
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 9;93(1):397-401
8552647
Bull Math Biol. 1997 Mar;59(2):339-97
9116604
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):560-4
265521
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463-7
271968
Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1989 Sep 15;40(6):3301-3321
9902537
Science. 2009 Feb 27;323(5918):1229-32
19131595
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2007;58:35-55
17037977
Biophys Chem. 1987 May 9;26(2-3):123-47
3607225
Clin Chem. 1991 Sep;37(9):1482-5
1893572
Biophys J. 2004 Jul;87(1):215-26
15240459
Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:287-300
10872451
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jul;72(7):2640-3
1058479
Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jan 10;9(1):133-48
6163133
Bull Math Biol. 1985;47(2):239-62
4027436
Biochemistry. 1984 Jul 3;23(14):3186-94
6205687
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jun 10;105(23):7899-906
18524956
EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):5129-35
1281452
Bull Math Biol. 1988;50(6):635-60
3219448
J Biosci Bioeng. 2002;93(3):322-7
16233208
J Theor Biol. 2006 Feb 7;238(3):726-35
16098538
Biochemistry. 1983 May 10;22(10):2544-59
6860647
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 1;90(9):4171-5
8387212
Biopolymers. 1993 Sep;33(9):1389-404
7691201
Science. 1989 Apr 7;244(4900):48-52
2468181
Biochemistry. 1985 Nov 5;24(23):6550-60
2417621
RNA. 2003 Dec;9(12):1456-63
14624002
Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Mar 22;255(1344):279-84
7517565
J Theor Biol. 1998 Oct 21;194(4):491-515
9790826
Genetics. 1998 Apr;148(4):1667-86
9560386
J Mol Evol. 2003 Sep;57(3):299-308
14629040
FEBS Lett. 1974 Mar 23;40(0):suppl:S10-8
4605288
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006 Jun;16(3):279-87
16713707
Naturwissenschaften. 1971 Oct;58(10):465-523
4942363
J Theor Biol. 2001 Nov 21;213(2):241-74
11894994
Science. 1998 May 29;280(5368):1451-5
9603737
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 15;93(21):11558-62
8876174