title: The European multicenter trial on the safety and efficacy of guided oblique lumbar interbody fusion (GO-LIF).
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Because of the implant-related problems with pedicle screw-based spinal instrumentations, other types of fixation have been tried in spinal arthrodesis. One such technique is the direct trans-pedicular, trans-discal screw fixation, pioneered by Grob for spondylolisthesis. The newly developed GO-LIF procedure expands the scope of the Grob technique in several important ways and adds security by means of robotic-assisted navigation. This is the first clinical trial on the GO-LIF procedure and it will assess safety and efficacy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Multicentric prospective study with n = 40 patients to undergo single level instrumented spinal arthrodesis of the lumbar or the lumbosacral spine, based on a diagnosis of: painful disc degeneration, painful erosive osteochondrosis, segmental instability, recurrent disc herniation, spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. The primary target criteria with regards to safety are: The number, severity and cause of intra- and perioperative complications. The number of significant penetrations of the cortical layer of the vertebral body by the implant as recognized on postoperative CT. The primary target parameters with regards to feasibility are: Performance of the procedure according to the preoperative plan. The planned follow-up is 12 months and the following scores will be evaluated as secondary target parameters with regards to clinical improvement: VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, short form - 12 health questionnaire and the Swiss spinal stenosis questionnaire for patients with spinal claudication. The secondary parameters with regards to construct stability are visible fusion or lack thereof and signs of implant loosening, implant migration or pseudarthrosis on plain and functional radiographs.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This trial will for the first time assess the safety and efficacy of guided oblique lumbar interbody fusion. There is no control group, but the results, the outcome and the rate of any complications will be analyzed on the background of the literature on instrumented spinal fusion. Despite its limitations, we expect that this study will serve as the key step in deciding whether a direct comparative trial with another fusion technique is warranted.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Clinical Trials NCT00810433.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Munich, Grosshadern Campus, 81377 Munich, Germany. doctor-b@web.de
authors.forename: Christof
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Birkenmaier
authors.forename: Olaf
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Suess
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pfeiffer
authors.forename: Ralf
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Burger
authors.forename: Kirsten
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Schmieder
authors.forename: Bernd
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Wegener
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011859:Radiography; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D055009:Spondylosis / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2006 Sep;59(3):641-50; discussion 641-50
references.pmid: 16955046
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18 Suppl 1:151-5
references.pmid: 19444490
references.citation: Int J Med Robot. 2006 Jun;2(2):114-22
references.pmid: 17520622
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Mar 15;19(6):710-5
references.pmid: 8009337
references.citation: Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Mar 15;20(3):E7
references.pmid: 16599423
references.citation: JAMA. 1983 Apr 1;249(13):1743-5
references.pmid: 6827763
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 1996;5(4):281-5
references.pmid: 8886744
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2004 Jan;100(1 Suppl Spine):62-5
references.pmid: 14748576
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Apr;16(2):144-9
references.pmid: 12679668
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1135-41
references.pmid: 12782981
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Oct 15;26(20):2227-34
references.pmid: 11598513
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2003 Apr;12(2):178-89
references.pmid: 12709856
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2002 Dec;11(6):594-8
references.pmid: 12522719
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2001 Jul;95(1 Suppl):105-7
references.pmid: 11453407
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):392-8
references.pmid: 19214099
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 15;27(6):E161-8
references.pmid: 11884921
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):E111-20
references.pmid: 17268254
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jan;15(1):11-4
references.pmid: 2326693