Evaluation of optical coherence tomography findings in age-related macular degeneration: a reproducibility study of two independent reading centres.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the reproducibility among readers of two independent certified centres, the Vienna Reading Center (VRC) and the University of Wisconsin-Madison Reading Center (UW-FPRC) for optical coherence tomography (OCT) images in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).


METHODS
Fast macular thickness scans and 6&emsp14;mm cross hair scans were obtained from 100 eyes with all subtypes of AMD using Stratus OCT. Consensus readings were performed by two certified OCT readers of each reading center using their grading protocol. Common variables of both grading protocols, such as presence of cystoid spaces, subretinal fluid, vitreomacular traction and retinal pigment epithelial detachment, were compared using κ statistics. In addition, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for centre point thickness (CPT) of values re-measured manually in the presence of alignment errors.


RESULTS
The reproducibility was dependent on the variable measured with a κ value of 0.81 for the presence of cystoid spaces, 0.78 for the presence of subretinal fluid and 0.795 for the presence of vitreomacular traction. The lowest reproducibility was found for the presence of retinal pigment epithelial detachment with a κ value of 0.51. The CPT was re-measured in 29 out of 100 scans at both sites with an ICC of the re-measured thicknesses of 0.92.


CONCLUSIONS
OCT scan data are crucial in monitoring treatment efficacy in AMD clinical trials. For comparison of results obtained by different reading centers, the inter-reading center reproducibility is essential. Although the reproducibility is generally high, the reliability depends on the selected morphological parameters.
Ritter
Markus
M
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Elledge
Julee
J
Simader
Christian
C
Deak
Gabor G
GG
Benesch
Thomas
T
Blodi
Barbara A
BA
Schmidt-Erfurth
Ursula M
UM
D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D020256:Choroidal Neovascularization / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008268:Macular Degeneration / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D008297:Male; D015588:Observer Variation; D011932:Reading; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012163:Retinal Detachment / Q000175:diagnosis*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D041623:Tomography, Optical Coherence / Q000592:standards
Ophthalmology. 1996 Aug;103(8):1260-70
8764797
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;135(2):169-77
12566020
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;143(4):566-83
17386270
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;10(3):182-8
10537777
Retina. 2009 Jun;29(6):775-81
19373128
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;137(3):426-34
15013864
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;134(4):566-76
12383814
Ophthalmology. 2007 Aug;114(8):1520-5
17353052
Ophthalmology. 1995 Feb;102(2):217-29
7862410
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Aug;85(5):486-94
17655610
Retina. 2008 Jan;28(1):36-40
18185135
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2000 May-Jun;31(3):192-7
10847494
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
843571
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;144(1):37-44
17509508
Semin Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;18(2):74-81
14566626