title: An experimental test of noise-dependent voice amplitude regulation in Cope's grey treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
abstract: One strategy for coping with the constraints on acoustic signal reception posed by ambient noise is to signal louder as noise levels increase. Termed the 'Lombard effect', this reflexive behaviour is widespread among birds and mammals and occurs with a diversity of signal types, leading to the hypothesis that voice amplitude regulation represents a general vertebrate mechanism for coping with environmental noise. Support for this evolutionary hypothesis, however, remains limited due to a lack of studies in taxa other than birds and mammals. Here, we report the results of an experimental test of the hypothesis that male grey treefrogs increase the amplitude of their advertisement calls in response to increasing levels of chorus-shaped noise. We recorded spontaneously produced calls in quiet and in the presence of noise broadcast at sound pressure levels ranging between 40 dB and 70 dB. While increasing noise levels induced predictable changes in call duration and rate, males did not regulate call amplitude. These results do not support the hypothesis that voice amplitude regulation is a generic vertebrate mechanism for coping with noise. We discuss the possibility that intense sexual selection and high levels of competition for mates in choruses place some frogs under strong selection to call consistently as loudly as possible.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities.
authors.forename: Elliot K
authors.initials: EK
authors.lastname: Love
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Bee
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2008 Aug;122(3):283-8
references.pmid: 18729656
references.citation: Neurosci Res. 1997 Dec;29(4):283-9
references.pmid: 9527619
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Feb;103(2):1190-8
references.pmid: 9479771
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Mar 22;272(1563):651-6
references.pmid: 15817440
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2004 Jan;207(Pt 3):443-8
references.pmid: 14691092
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2008 Sep;76(3):845-853
references.pmid: 19727325
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2003 Mar 3;14(3):521-4
references.pmid: 12634516
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009 Oct;195(10):923-34
references.pmid: 19672604
references.citation: Am Nat. 2006 Apr;167(4):E88-101
references.pmid: 16670990
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1999 Mar;57(3):529-536
references.pmid: 10196042
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2008 Feb 23;4(1):19-22
references.pmid: 18029296
references.citation: Am J Primatol. 2006 Dec;68(12):1183-90
references.pmid: 17096420
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):107-13
references.pmid: 9710467
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Nov;126(5):2788-801
references.pmid: 19894854
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1975 Aug;58(2):412-4
references.pmid: 810506
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2008 May;75(5):1781-1791
references.pmid: 19412318
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2008 Aug;122(3):235-51
references.pmid: 18729652
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Mar 16;440(7082):333-6
references.pmid: 16541072
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Mar;117(3 Pt 1):1486-92
references.pmid: 15807036
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):EL27-32
references.pmid: 19173379
references.citation: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2010 Oct 1;64(10):1695-1709
references.pmid: 21170157