title: Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: a case study using primary open-angle glaucoma.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To test the feasibility of a framework for prioritizing new comparative effectiveness research (CER) questions related to management of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using practice guidelines and a survey of clinicians.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  Members of the American Glaucoma Society (AGS).
  
  
  METHODS
  We restated as an answerable clinical question each recommendation in the 2005 American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Patterns (PPPs) regarding the management of POAG. We asked members of the AGS to rank the importance of each clinical question, on a scale of 0 (not important at all) to 10 (very important), using a 2-round Delphi survey conducted online between April and September 2008. Respondents had the option of selecting "no judgment" or "research has already answered this question" to each question in lieu of the 0 to 10 rating. We used the ratings assigned by the Delphi respondents to determine the importance of each clinical question.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ranking of importance of each clinical question.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We derived 45 clinical questions from the POAG PPPs. Of the 620 AGS members invited to participate in the survey, 169 completed the Round 1 survey; 105 of 169 also completed Round 2. We observed 4 response patterns to the individual questions. Nine clinical questions were ranked as the most important: 4 questions on medical intervention, 4 questions on filtering surgery, and 1 question on adjustment of therapy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our theoretical model for priority setting for CER questions is a feasible and pragmatic approach that merits testing in other medical settings.
authors.affiliation: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. tli@jhsph.edu
authors.forename: Tianjing
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Ann-Margret
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Ervin
authors.forename: Roberta
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Scherer
authors.forename: Henry
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Jampel
authors.forename: Kay
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Dickersin
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000592:standards; D057186:Comparative Effectiveness Research; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003697:Delphi Technique; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005902:Glaucoma, Open-Angle / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy*; D006292:Health Priorities; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009885:Ophthalmology / Q000592:standards; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000592:standards; D012955:Societies, Medical / Q000592:standards; D014481:United States
references.citation: Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:511-38
references.pmid: 8724238
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):325-8
references.pmid: 19567828
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;80(5):389-93
references.pmid: 8695555
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2008 Dec;115(12):2125-6
references.pmid: 19041472
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):288-98
references.pmid: 12585826
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):203-5
references.pmid: 19567618
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Nov 29;4:14
references.pmid: 17134481
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):273-87
references.pmid: 12585825
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Summer;23(3):310-5
references.pmid: 17579932
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1997 Aug 1;127(3):210-6
references.pmid: 9245227
references.citation: Fam Pract. 2003 Oct;20(5):545-51
references.pmid: 14507796
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):451-2
references.pmid: 15078660
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 Feb 20;318(7182):527-30
references.pmid: 10024268
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):532-8
references.pmid: 15078671
references.citation: J R Soc Med. 2007 Apr;100(4):187-90
references.pmid: 17404342
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Sep 13;284(10):1290-6
references.pmid: 10979117
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7
references.pmid: 16488940