title: An evaluation of mercury concentrations in three brands of canned tuna.
abstract: There is widespread concern over the presence of Hg in fish consumed by humans. While studies have been focused on determining the Hg concentration in sport fish and some commercial fish, little attention has been directed to canned tuna; it is widely held that concentrations are low. In the present study, the amount of Hg present in canned tuna purchased in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, was examined, and the brand, temporal variation, type, and packaging medium impacts on Hg concentrations in tuna were explored. A significant (p < 0.001) brand difference was noted: Brand 3 contained higher Hg concentrations ($\bar x$ standard deviation (SD) (0.777 +/- 0.320 ppm) than Brands 1 (0.541 +/- 0.114 ppm) and 2 (0.550 +/- 0.199 ppm). Chunk white tuna (0.619 +/- 0.212 ppm) and solid white tuna (0.576 +/- 0.178 ppm) were both significantly (p < 0.001) higher in mean Hg than chunk light tuna (0.137 +/- 0.063 ppm). No significant temporal variation was noted, and packaging had no significant effect on Hg concentration. In total, 55% of all tuna examined was above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA) safety level for human consumption (0.5 ppm), and 5% of the tuna exceeded the action level established by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) (1.0 ppm). These results indicate that stricter regulation of the canned tuna industry is necessary to ensure the safety of sensitive populations such as pregnant women, infants, and children. According to the U.S. EPA reference dose of 0.1 microg/kg body weight per day and a mean Hg value of 0.619 ppm, a 25-kg child may consume a meal (75 g) of canned chunk white tuna only once every 18.6 d. Continued monitoring of the industry and efforts to reduce Hg concentrations in canned tuna are recommended. Environ.
authors.affiliation: School of Community Health Sciences, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA.
authors.forename: Shawn L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Gerstenberger
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental Studies, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA.
authors.forename: Adam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Martinson
authors.affiliation: School of Community Health Sciences, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA.
authors.forename: Joanna L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Kramer
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005506:Food Contamination / Q000032:analysis* / Q000517:prevention & control; D005519:Food Preservation; D006801:Humans; D008628:Mercury / Q000032:analysis*; D017747:Seafood / Q000032:analysis*; D014413:Tuna; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis*
chemical_list: D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D008628:Mercury
references.citation: Burger J, Gochfeld M. 2004. Mercury in canned tuna: White versus light and temporal variation. Environ Res 96: 239-249.
references.citation: Egeland GM, Middaugh JP. 1997. Balancing fish consumption benefits with mercury exposure. Science 278: 1904-1905.
references.citation: Shim SM, Dorworth LE, Lasrado JA, Santerre CR. 2004. Mercury and fatty acids in canned tuna, salmon, and mackerel. J Food Sci 69: C681-C684.
references.citation: Inskip MJ, Pitrowski JK. 1985. Review of the health effects of methylmercury. J Appl Toxicol 5: 113-132.
references.citation: Clarkson T. 1990. Human health risks from methylmercury in fish. Environ Toxicol Chem 9: 957-961.
references.citation: Dellinger J, Kmiecik N, Gerstenberger S, Ngu H. 1995. Mercury contamination of fish in the Ojibway diet. 1. Walleye fillets and skin-on versus skin-off sampling. Water Air Soil Pollut 80: 69-76.
references.citation: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Fact Sheet: Mercury Update: Impact on Fish Advisories. EPA-823-F-01-011. Office of Water, Washington, DC.
references.citation: Bjornberg KA, Vahter M, Peterson-Grawe K, Glynn A, Cnattingius S, Darn PO, Atuma S, Aune M, Becker W, Berglund M. 2003. Methyl mercury and inorganic mercury in Swedish pregnant women and in cord blood: Influence of fish consumption. Environ Health Perspect 111: 637-641.
references.citation: Nriagu J, Becker C. 2003. Volcanic emissions of mercury to the atmosphere: Global and regional inventories. Sci Total Environ 304: 3-12.
references.citation: Morel FMM, Kraepiel AML, Amyot M. 1998. The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29: 543-566.
references.citation: Kamps LR, Carr R, Miller H. 1972. Total mercury-monomethylmercury content of several species of fish. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 8: 273-279.
references.citation: U.S. National Research Council on Methylmercury: Committee of the Toxicological Effects. 2000. Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
references.citation: Diez S. 2009. Human health effects of methylmercury exposure. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 198: 111-132.
references.citation: Hightower JM, Moore D. 2003. Mercury levels in high-end consumers of fish. Environ Health Perspect 111: 604-608.
references.citation: Oken E, Wright RO, Kleinman KP, Bellinger D, Amarasiriwardena CJ, Hu H, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW. 2005. Maternal fish consumption, hair mercury, and infant cognition in a US cohort. Environ Health Perspect 113: 1376-1380.
references.citation: Hajeb P, Selamat J, Ismail A, Abu Bakar F, Bakar J, Lioe HN. 2008. Hair mercury level of coastal communities in Malaysia: A linkage with fish consumption. Eur Food Res Technol 227: 1349-1355.
references.citation: Tollefson L. 1989. Methylmercury in fish. In Paustenbach D, ed, The Risk Assessment of Environmental and Human Hazard. Wiley, New York, NY, USA, pp 845-867.
references.citation: Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F, Araki S, Yokoyama K, Murata K, Sorensen N, Dahl R, Jorgensen PJ. 1997. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol 19: 417-428.
references.citation: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1999. Toxicological Profile for Mercury. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA.
references.citation: McDiarmid MA, Gehle K. 2006. Preconception brief: Occupational/environmental exposures. Matern Child Health 10: 123-128.
references.citation: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 1977. Food and Drug Administration Rules and Regulations, Part 161. Fish and Shellfish. Subpart B-Requirements for specific standardized fish and shellfish. Fed Regist 47: 464-471.
references.citation: Shimshack JP, Ward MB, Beatty TKM. 2007. Mercury advisories: Information, education, and fish consumption. J Environ Econ Manage 53: 158-179.
references.citation: Safrina C. 1998. Song For a Blue Ocean. Henry Holt, New York, NY, USA.
references.citation: Yess NJ. 1993. U. S. Food and Drug Administration survey of methylmercury in canned tuna. J AOAC Int 76: 36-38.
references.citation: Forsyth DS, Casey V, Dabeka RW, McKenzie A. 2004. Methylmercury levels in predatory fish species marketed in Canada. Food Addit Contam 21: 849-856.