A reexamination of the factor structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: is a one-factor model plausible?
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is one of the most widely used measures of depressive symptoms in research today. The original psychometric work in support of the CES-D (Radloff, 1977) described a 4-factor model underlying the 20 items on the scale. Despite a long history of evidence supporting this structure, researchers routinely report single-number summaries from the CES-D. The research described in this article examines the plausibility of 1-factor model using an initial sample of 595 subjects and a cross-validation sample of 661. After comparing a series of models found in the literature or suggested by analyses, we determined that the good fit of the 4-factor model is mostly due to its ability to model excess covariance associated with the 4 reverse-scored items. A 2-factor model that included a general depression factor and a positive wording method factor loading only on those 4 items had fit that was nearly as good as the original 4-factor model. We conclude that although a 1-factor model may not be the best model for the full 20-item CES-D, it is at least plausible. If a unidimensional set of items is required (e.g., for a unidimensional item response theory analysis), by dropping 5 items, we were able to find a 1-factor model that had very similar fit to the 4-factor model with the original 20 items.
Edwards
Michael C
MC
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. edwards.134@osu.edu
Cheavens
Jennifer S
JS
Heiy
Jane E
JE
Cukrowicz
Kelly C
KC
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Q000592:standards; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D055815:Young Adult
Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):58-79
17402812
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Apr;35(4):373-80
9134792
Psychiatry Res. 1989 Feb;27(2):137-48
2710862
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80
26794479
Psychol Rep. 1995 Feb;76(1):40-2
7770591
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1989 Oct;177(10):581-92
2677237
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 May;116(2):313-28
17516764
J Clin Psychol. 1988 Sep;44(5):739-46
3192712
J Pers Assess. 1995 Jun;64(3):507-21
7760258
Psychiatry Res. 1993 Dec;49(3):239-50
8177918
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1990;20(3):259-77
2265888
Psychiatry Res. 1981 Oct;5(2):171-81
6945612
Psychiatry Res. 1980 May;2(2):125-34
6932058
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1992-1993;16(4):503-17
1305529
Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(1):85-94
2740931
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1984 Aug;172(8):449-57
6747614
Med Care. 1994 Apr;32(4):341-56
8139299
Ethn Health. 2001 May;6(2):137-44
11488294
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):163-72
26794478