Generalization lags behind learning on an auditory perceptual task.
The generalization of learning from trained to untrained conditions is of great potential value because it markedly increases the efficacy of practice. In principle, generalization and the learning itself could arise from either the same or distinct neural changes. Here, we assessed these two possibilities in the realm of human perceptual learning by comparing the time course of improvement on a trained condition (learning) to that on an untrained condition (generalization) for an auditory temporal-interval discrimination task. While significant improvement on the trained condition occurred within 2 d, generalization to the untrained condition lagged behind, only emerging after 4 d. The different time courses for learning and generalization suggest that these two types of perceptual improvement can arise from at least partially distinct neural changes. The notably longer time course for generalization than learning demonstrates that increasing the duration of training can be an effective means to increase the number of conditions to which learning generalizes on perceptual tasks.
Wright
Beverly A
BA
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders and Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3550, USA. b-wright@northwestern.edu
Wilson
Roselyn M
RM
Sabin
Andrew T
AT
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005793:Generalization, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
Nature. 1993 Sep 16;365(6443):250-2
8371779
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Mar;201(3):441-51
19902196
Learn Mem. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):162-71
15054131
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 14;100(21):12492-7
14530407
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7358-62
8692998
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Feb;50(1):25-40
17344546
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 12;364(1515):285-99
18986968
J Mot Behav. 2003 Mar;35(1):33-40
12724097
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun;91(6):2551-67
14749307
Vision Res. 1996 Nov;36(21):3487-500
8977015
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):188-94
19170481
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jun 3;161(1):8-17
15904705
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4966-70
2052578
Learn Mem. 2007 Jul 10;14(7):472-9
17622649
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):861-8
9448252
Trends Neurosci. 1999 Oct;22(10):464-71
10481194
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):853-60
9448251
Psychol Rev. 2005 Oct;112(4):715-43
16262466
Spat Vis. 1996;10(1):51-8
8817771
J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
5541744
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Aug;15(8):1089-102
15616134
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Apr;58(3):387-419
16025755
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):505-13
18327253
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Dec;5(1-2):39-48
9049069
Learn Mem. 2002 May-Jun;9(3):138-50
12075002
Learn Mem. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):141-7
12663752
J Neurosci. 1997 May 15;17(10):3956-63
9133413
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 10;95(23):13988-93
9811913
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;180(4):727-36
17333009