Is it possible to predict heart rate and range during enhanced cardiac CT scan from previous non-enhanced cardiac CT?
The effect of heart rate and variation during cardiac computed tomography (CT) on the examination quality. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether it is possible to predict heart rate and range during enhanced cardiac computed CT scan from previous non-enhanced cardiac CT scan. Electrocardiograph (ECG) files from 112 patients on three types of cardiac 64-slice CT (non-enhanced, prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated enhanced scans) were recorded. The mean heart rate, range (defined as difference between maximal and minimal heart rates) and the range ratio (defined as maximal heart rate divided by minimal heart rate) during the scans were compared. Scan time was 4.8, 4.6, and 7.3 s on non-enhanced, prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated scans, respectively (p < 0.0001). The heart rates were not significantly different (60 ± 9 beats per minute (bpm), 60 ± 9 and 61 ± 10 bpm; p = 0.64). Heart rate on the enhanced scan markedly correlated with that of the non-enhanced scan (r = 0.78 and 0.74). In contrast, the ranges of heart rate were 2 ± 5, 4 ± 8, and 8 ± 21 bpm, with different range ratios (1.04, 1.07, and 1.14; p < 0.0001). Correlation of heart rate ranges between non-enhanced scan versus prospective ECG-triggered scan was low (r = 0.27) and that between non-enhanced scan versus retrospective ECG-gated scan negligible (r = -0.027).Heart rate on enhanced cardiac CT, in most cases, can be predicted from a non-enhanced scan. Heart rate range on enhanced cardiac CT, however, is hard to predict from the non-enhanced scan.
Horiguchi
Jun
J
Department of Clinical Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan. horiguchi@hiroshimairyo.or.jp
Yamamoto
Hideya
H
Arie
Ryuichi
R
Kiguchi
Masao
M
Fujioka
Chikako
C
Ohtaki
Megu
M
Kihara
Yasuki
Y
Awai
Kazuo
K
D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D055424:Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D003287:Contrast Media; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006339:Heart Rate / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007479:Iopamidol; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012307:Risk Factors; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
D003287:Contrast Media; D007479:Iopamidol
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jan 15;97(2):173-4
16442357
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Mar;57(3):373-9
16439091
Eur Radiol. 2006 Sep;16(9):1964-72
16699752
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Sep;189(3):581-91
17715104
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jun;190(6):1583-90
18492910
Acad Radiol. 2006 Feb;13(2):173-6
16428052
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Feb;190(2):315-20
18212215
Eur Radiol. 2002 May;12(5):1081-6
11976849
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):552-7
16053973
Med Phys. 2006 Nov;33(11):4236-48
17153402
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Mar;186(3):634-8
16498089
Circulation. 2006 Mar 14;113(10):1305-10
16520411
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Oct;179(4):911-6
12239036
Invest Radiol. 2006 May;41(5):436-42
16625106
Rofo. 2006 Jun;178(6):600-4
16703495
Acad Radiol. 2008 Jan;15(1):40-8
18078905
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Oct 1;98(7):871-6
16996865
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5;46(1):147-54
15992649
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Nov 21;48(10):1919-28
17112978
Radiology. 2008 Aug;248(2):424-30
18574140
Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):2028-37
17318604
Radiology. 2006 Jan;238(1):75-86
16373760
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Dec;189(6):1326-32
18029867
Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):2196-207
17549487