title: Florida Red Tide Perception: Residents versus Tourists.
abstract: The west coast of Florida has annual blooms of the toxin-producing dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis with Sarasota, FL considered the epicenter for these blooms. Numerous outreach materials, including Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) cards, exhibits for local museums and aquaria, public beach signs, and numerous websites have been developed to disseminate information to the public about this natural hazard. In addition, during intense onshore blooms, a great deal of media attention, primarily via newspaper (print and web) and television, is focused on red tide. However to date, the only measure of effectiveness of these outreach methods has been counts of the number of people exposed to the information, e.g., visits to a website or number of FAQ cards distributed. No formal assessment has been conducted to determine if these materials meet their goal of informing the public about Florida red tide. Also, although local residents have the opinion that they are very knowledgeable about Florida red tide, this has not been verified empirically. This study addressed these issues by creating and administering an evaluation tool for the assessment of public knowledge about Florida red tide. A focus group of Florida red tide outreach developers assisted in the creation of the evaluation tool. The location of the evaluation was the west coast of Florida, in Sarasota County. The objective was to assess the knowledge of the general public about Florida red tide. This assessment identified gaps in public knowledge regarding Florida red tides and also identified what information sources people want to use to obtain information on Florida red tide. The results from this study can be used to develop more effective outreach materials on Florida red tide.
authors.affiliation: Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL 34236.
authors.forename: Kate
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Nierenberg
authors.forename: Margaret
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Byrne
authors.forename: Lora E
authors.initials: LE
authors.lastname: Fleming
authors.forename: Wendy
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Stephan
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Reich
authors.forename: Lorraine C
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Backer
authors.forename: Elvira
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Tanga
authors.forename: Dana R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Dalpra
authors.forename: Barbara
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Kirkpatrick
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2005 May;113(5):644-9
references.pmid: 15866778
references.citation: Harmful Algae. 2010 Jan 1;9(1):82-86
references.pmid: 20161425
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Aug;117(8):1239-43
references.pmid: 19672403
references.citation: Harmful Algae. 2006 Oct 1;5(5):526-533
references.pmid: 20357898
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Jan;20(1):107-14
references.pmid: 11351396
references.citation: Mol Pharmacol. 1986 Aug;30(2):129-35
references.pmid: 2426567
references.citation: Harmful Algae. 2004 Apr 1;3(2):99-115
references.pmid: 20411030
references.citation: Harmful Algae. 2010 Feb 1;9(2):186-189
references.pmid: 20161504
references.citation: Risk Anal. 2009 Jul;29(7):963-9
references.pmid: 19392675
references.citation: J Asthma. 2007 Sep;44(7):583-7
references.pmid: 17885863
references.citation: Chest. 2007 Jan;131(1):187-94
references.pmid: 17218574
references.citation: Toxicon. 2000 Jul;38(7):981-93
references.pmid: 10728835
references.citation: J Fla Med Assoc. 1997 Oct;84(7):441-5
references.pmid: 9360354
references.citation: Mar Drugs. 2008;6(3):431-55
references.pmid: 19005578
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2005 May;113(5):650-7
references.pmid: 15866779
references.citation: Mar Drugs. 2007 Dec 14;5(4):208-19
references.pmid: 18463727
references.citation: J Protozool. 1969 Aug;16(3):401-4
references.pmid: 5343457