Is the flower fluorescence relevant in biocommunication?
Flower fluorescence has been previously proposed as a potential visual signal to attract pollinators. In this work, this point was addressed by quantitatively measuring the fluorescence quantum yield (Φ(f)) for flowers of Bellis perennis (white, yellow, pink, and purple), Ornithogalum thyrsoides (petals and ovaries), Limonium sinuatum (white and yellow), Lampranthus productus (yellow), Petunia nyctaginiflora (white), Bougainvillea spectabilis (white and yellow), Antirrhinum majus (white and yellow), Eustoma grandiflorum (white and blue), Citrus aurantium (petals and stigma), and Portulaca grandiflora (yellow). The highest values were obtained for the ovaries of O. thyrsoides (Φ(f) = 0.030) and for Citrus aurantium petals (Φ(f) = 0.014) and stigma (Φ(f) = 0.013). Emitted photons as fluorescence were compared with reflected photons. It was concluded that the fluorescence emission is negligible compared to the reflected light, even for the most fluorescent samples, and it may not be considered as an optical signal in biocommunication. The work was complemented with the calculation of quantum catches for each studied flower species to describe the visual sensitization of eye photoreceptors.
Iriel
Analía
A
INQUIMAE/Dpto. de Química Inorgánica, Analítica y Qca. Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón II, 1er piso, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lagorio
María Gabriela
MG
D002957:Citrus / Q000502:physiology; D003116:Color; D003142:Communication; D035264:Flowers / Q000502:physiology*; D005453:Fluorescence; D008027:Light; D031442:Ornithogalum / Q000502:physiology; D017785:Photons; D013053:Spectrophotometry
Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:471-510
11112177
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Feb;78(1):81-118
12620062
Science. 1976 Oct 15;194(4262):341-2
17738051
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Sep;190(9):759-63
15316731
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010 Mar;9(3):342-8
20221460
Science. 2009 Jan 2;323(5910):130-3
19119235
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 18;103(29):11075-80
16832053
Science. 2007 Jan 26;315(5811):481
17255504
Nature. 2005 Sep 15;437(7057):334
16163341
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001 Sep;20(5):675-703
11470455
Ann Bot. 2005 Aug;96(2):217-27
15953790
J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Jan;170(1):23-40
1573568
Biol Lett. 2007 Jun 22;3(3):265-7
17412670
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2009 Mar;8(3):337-44
19255674
Plant J. 2008 May;54(4):733-49
18476875
Science. 2002 Jan 4;295(5552):92
11778040
Science. 1975 Aug 8;189(4201):476-8
17781886
Vision Res. 1994 Jun;34(11):1415-8
8023451
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Jun;191(6):547-57
15871026
Naturwissenschaften. 2004 May;91(5):228-31
15146270
Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(20):2022-41
18590925
Planta. 2005 Nov;222(4):586-93
16177911