"The lobbying strategy is to keep excise as low as possible" - tobacco industry excise taxation policy in Ukraine.
BACKGROUND
Tobacco taxes are one of the most effective ways to reduce tobacco use. Transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) claim they wish to develop and secure excise systems that benefit both governments and the profitability of the companies themselves. The objective of the paper is to use the case of Ukraine, with its inconsistent history of excise tax changes in 1992-2008, to explore tobacco industry taxation strategies and tactics, and their implications for governmental revenues.


METHODS
Details of tobacco industry policy on tobacco taxation in Ukraine were obtained by searching tobacco industry internal documents and various published reports.


RESULTS
Even before entering the market in Ukraine, TTCs had made efforts to change the excise system in the country. In 1993-1994, TTCs lobbied the Ukrainian Government, and succeeded in achieving a lowering in tobacco tax. This, however, did not produce revenue increase they promised the Government. In 1996-1998, Ukrainian authorities increased excise several times, ignoring the wishes of TTCs, caused significant growth in revenue. Due to TTCs lobbying activities in 1999-2007 the tax increases were very moderate and it resulted in increased tobacco consumption in Ukraine. In 2008, despite the TTCs position, excise rates were increased twice and it was very beneficial for revenues.


CONCLUSIONS
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control includes provisions both on tobacco taxation policy and on protection of public health policy from vested interests of tobacco industry. This paper provides arguments why tobacco taxation policy should also be protected from vested interests of tobacco industry. TTCs taxation strategy appears to be consistent: keep excise as low as possible. Apparent conflicts between TTCs concerning tax structures often hide their real aim to change tax structures for competing interests without increasing total tax incidence. Governments, that aim to reduce levels of tobacco use, should not allow tobacco companies to influence the development and implementation of tobacco taxation policy.
Krasovsky
Konstantin S
KS
Alcohol and Drug Information Centre (ADIC-Ukraine), Vishnyakovskaya Str,, 13-212, Kyiv, 02140, Ukraine. krasovskyk@gmail.com.
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1:I62-72
11893816
Tob Control. 2008 Oct;17(5):351-6
18687706
Tob Control. 2007 Jun;16(3):202-6
17565141
Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):2001-9
17138915
Tob Control. 2004 Jun;13(2):136-42
15175530
Tob Control. 2005 Dec;14(6):368-76
16319359
Tob Control. 2004 Jun;13(2):143-50
15175531
Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12(4):414-23
14660780
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2003 Dec;11(4):223-8
14768787
Tob Control. 2005 Feb;14(1):13-21
15735295
Tob Control. 2004 Jun;13(2):151-60
15175532