Utero-placental Doppler ultrasound for improving pregnancy outcome.
BACKGROUND
Impaired placentation can cause some of the most important obstetrical complications such as pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction and has been linked to increased fetal morbidity and mortality. The failure to undergo physiological trophoblastic vascular changes is reflected by the high impedance to the blood flow at the level of the uterine arteries. Doppler ultrasound study of utero-placental blood vessels, using waveform indices or notching, may help to identify the 'at-risk' women in the first and second trimester of pregnancy, such that interventions might be used to reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and/or mortality.


OBJECTIVE
To assess the effects on pregnancy outcome, and obstetric practice, of routine utero-placental Doppler ultrasound in first and second trimester of pregnancy in pregnant women at high and low risk of hypertensive complications.


METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (June 2010) and the reference lists of identified studies.


METHODS
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of Doppler ultrasound for the investigation of utero-placental vessel waveforms in first and second trimester compared with no Doppler ultrasound. We have excluded studies where uterine vessels have been assessed together with fetal and umbilical vessels.


METHODS
Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. We checked data entry.


RESULTS
We found two studies involving 4993 participants. The methodological quality of the trials was good. Both studies included women at low risk for hypertensive disorders, with Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries performed in the second trimester of pregnancy. In both studies, pathological finding of uterine arteries was followed by low-dose aspirin administration.We identified no difference in short-term maternal and fetal clinical outcomes.We identified no randomised studies assessing the utero-placental vessels in the first trimester or in women at high risk for hypertensive disorders.


CONCLUSIONS
Present evidence failed to show any benefit to either the baby or the mother when utero-placental Doppler ultrasound was used in the second trimester of pregnancy in women at low risk for hypertensive disorders. Nevertheless, this evidence cannot be considered conclusive with only two studies included. There were no randomised studies in the first trimester, or in women at high risk. More research is needed to investigate whether the use of utero-placental Doppler ultrasound may improve pregnancy outcome.
Stampalija
Tamara
T
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Children's Hospital "V. Buzzi", Via Castelvetro 32, Milano, Italy, 20154.
Gyte
Gillian Ml
GM
Alfirevic
Zarko
Z
D001241:Aspirin / Q000008:administration & dosage; D005260:Female; D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage; D006801:Humans; D010920:Placenta / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D010975:Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / Q000008:administration & dosage; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D011262:Pregnancy Trimester, Second; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012039:Regional Blood Flow; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal; D055988:Uterine Artery / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*
D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents; D010975:Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; D001241:Aspirin
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995 Aug;74(7):526-9
7618450
BJOG. 2003 Jun;110(6):593-7
12798478
Hum Pathol. 1996 Feb;27(2):201-6
8617465
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;9(1):6-13
9060122
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;102(11):853
9063864
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD007529
20091637
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;193(2):429-36
16098866
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Feb;100(2):130-3
8476803
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):359-62
1876365
Gynakol Rundsch. 1991;31 Suppl 2:139-40
1790902
Early Hum Dev. 1996 Jul 19;45(3):203-14
8855394
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;29(2):128-34
17149788
Obstet Gynecol Annu. 1972;1:177-91
4669123
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Oct;98(10):956-63
1751442
Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2004 Dec;93(446):26-33
15702667
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1992 May;87(5):289-94
1626175
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22(8):1053-7
9004429
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 May;49(3):161-8
8405630
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;96(4):559-64
11004359
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Nov;100(11):989-94
8251470
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;27(1):13-7
16374755
Placenta. 1988 Jul-Aug;9(4):427-50
3062616
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;18(5):441-9
11844162
Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3443-57
16345038
BJOG. 2001 May;108(5):510-8
11368138
Lancet. 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):501-2
8094528
Radiol Med. 1993 May;85(5 Suppl 1):3-16
8332812
Lancet. 1992 Nov 28;340(8831):1299-303
1360032
Placenta. 2001 May;22(5):405-11
11373150
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
9310563
CMAJ. 2008 Mar 11;178(6):701-11
18332385
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):137-159
19381330
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jan;182(1 Pt 1):198-206
10649179
Prenat Diagn. 2010 Apr;30(4):293-308
20166149
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 1993;33 Suppl 1:118-9
8118238
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1366-71
12748513
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 04;(8):CD001450
20687066
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Aug;100(8):733-41
8399011
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;170(2):555-9
8116712
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;7(3):182-8
8705410
Lancet. 2004 Dec 4-10;364(9450):2038-44
15582061
Lupus. 1998;7 Suppl 2:S81-5
9814679
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Apr;104(4):431-5
9141579
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991 Jul;115(7):722-5
2064534
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;18(6):583-6
11844193
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Oct;97(10):909-16
2223682
Lancet. 1992 Oct 17;340(8825):936-40
1357349
Lancet. 2007 May 26;369(9575):1791-1798
17512048
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Jul;81(7):642-8
12190839
Am J Perinatol. 1995 Nov;12(6):437-8
8579657
BJOG. 2003 May;110(5):485-91
12742333
Lancet. 1987 Jan 24;1(8526):188-90
2880017
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;30(5):742-9
17899573
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;170(2):625-34
8116724
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Feb;101(2):114-20
8305384
J Perinat Med. 2006;34(6):447-58
17140293
Lancet. 2005 Feb 26-Mar 4;365(9461):785-99
15733721
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Oct;193(4):1486-91
16202744
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Apr;104(4):419-24
9141577
Lancet. 1993 Oct 9;342(8876):887-91
8105165