title: Selection of direct transesterification as the preferred method for assay of fatty acid content of microalgae.
abstract: Assays for total lipid content in microalgae are usually based on the Folch or the Bligh and Dyer methods of solvent extraction followed by quantification either gravimetrically or by chromatography. Direct transesterification (DT) is a method of converting saponifiable lipids in situ directly to fatty acid methyl esters which can be quantified by gas chromatography (GC). This eliminates the extraction step and results in a rapid, one-step procedure applicable to small samples. This study compared the effectiveness of DT in quantifying the total fatty acid content in three species of microalgae to extraction using the Folch, the Bligh and Dyer and the Smedes and Askland methods, followed by transesterification and GC. The use of two catalysts in sequence, as well as the effect of reaction water content on the efficiency of DT were investigated. The Folch method was the most effective of the extraction methods tested, but comparison with DT illustrated that all extraction methods were incomplete. Higher levels of fatty acid in the cells were obtained with DT in comparison with the extraction-transesterification methods. A combination of acidic and basic transesterification catalysts was more effective than each individually when the sample contained water. The two-catalyst reaction was insensitive to water up to 10% of total reaction volume. DT proved a convenient and more accurate method than the extraction techniques for quantifying total fatty acid content in microalgae.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Bioprocess Engineering Research, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Griffiths
authors.forename: R P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: van Hille
authors.forename: S T L
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Harrison
mesh_terms: D001671:Biochemistry / Q000379:methods*; D002384:Catalysis; D005591:Chemical Fractionation / Q000379:methods; D002755:Choice Behavior; D002849:Chromatography, Gas / Q000379:methods; D004526:Efficiency; D004951:Esterification / Q000502:physiology*; D005227:Fatty Acids / Q000032:analysis* / Q000378:metabolism; D057230:Limit of Detection; D058086:Microalgae / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014867:Water / Q000494:pharmacology
chemical_list: D005227:Fatty Acids; D014867:Water
references.citation: J Lipid Res. 1984 Dec 1;25(12):1391-6
references.pmid: 6530596
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1963 May;85:1039-44
references.pmid: 14043992
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1957 May;226(1):497-509
references.pmid: 13428781
references.citation: J Biosci Bioeng. 2006 Feb;101(2):87-96
references.pmid: 16569602
references.citation: Lipids. 2001 Nov;36(11):1283-7
references.pmid: 11795862
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2009 Sep;100(17):3921-6
references.pmid: 19362823
references.citation: Mar Biotechnol (NY). 1999 Nov;1(6):580-587
references.pmid: 10612683
references.citation: J Chromatogr A. 2009 Apr 17;1216(16):3501-7
references.pmid: 19022451
references.citation: J Lipid Res. 1986 Jan;27(1):114-20
references.pmid: 3958609
references.citation: J Chromatogr A. 2002 Jun 14;959(1-2):191-201
references.pmid: 12141545
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2009 Dec;100(23):5988-95
references.pmid: 19560349
references.citation: Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959 Aug;37(8):911-7
references.pmid: 13671378
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Nov;65(6):635-48
references.pmid: 15300417
references.citation: Lipids. 2000 Nov;35(11):1167-77
references.pmid: 11132176
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2003 Dec;81(12):3250-4
references.pmid: 14677882