title: Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Many vaginal dilator therapy guidelines advocate routine vaginal dilation during and after pelvic radiotherapy to prevent stenosis (abnormal narrowing of the vagina). The UK Gynaecological Oncology Nurse Forum recommend dilation "three times weekly for an indefinite time period". The UK patient charity Cancer Backup advises using vaginal dilators from two to eight weeks after the end of radiotherapy treatment. Australian guidelines recommend dilation after brachytherapy "as soon as is comfortably possible" and "certainly within four weeks and to continue for three years or indefinitely if possible". However, dilation is intrusive, uses health resources and can be psychologically distressing. It has also caused rare but very serious damage to the rectum.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To review the benefits and harms of vaginal dilation therapy associated with pelvic radiotherapy for cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Searches included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1950 to 2008), EMBASE (1980 to 2008) and CINAHL (1982 to 2008).
  
  
  METHODS
  Any comparative randomised controlled trials (RCT) or data of any type which compared dilation or penetration of the vagina after pelvic radiotherapy treatment for cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  The review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. We analysed the mean difference in sexual function scores and the risk ratio for non-compliance at six weeks and three months in single trial analyses. No trials met the inclusion criteria.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Dilation during or immediately after radiotherapy can, in rare cases, cause damage and there is no persuasive evidence from any study to demonstrate that it prevents stenosis. Data from one RCT showed no improvement in sexual scores in women who were encouraged to practice dilation. Two case series and one comparative study using historical controls suggest that dilation might be associated with a longer vaginal length but these data cannot reasonably be interpreted to show that dilation caused the change in the vagina.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Routine dilation during or soon after cancer treatment may be harmful. There is no reliable evidence to show that routine regular vaginal dilation during or after radiotherapy prevents the late effects of radiotherapy or improves quality of life. Gentle vaginal exploration might separate the vaginal walls before they can stick together and some women may benefit from dilation therapy once inflammation has settled but there are no good comparative supporting data.
authors.affiliation: Gynaecological Oncology, Royal United Hospital NHS Trust, Combe Park, Bath, UK, BA1 3NG.
authors.forename: Tracie
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Miles
authors.forename: Nick
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Johnson
mesh_terms: D003251:Constriction, Pathologic / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy; D004106:Dilatation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010388:Pelvis; D011878:Radiotherapy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D012421:Rupture / Q000209:etiology; D013997:Time Factors; D014621:Vagina / Q000293:injuries / Q000528:radiation effects*
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
references.pmid: 3802833
references.citation: Cancer. 1972 Aug;30(2):426-9
references.pmid: 5051667
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 May 1;38(2):373-80
references.pmid: 9226326
references.citation: South Med J. 1982 Oct;75(10):1195-7
references.pmid: 7123286
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2004 Aug;13(8):577-92
references.pmid: 15295778
references.citation: Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Sep;22(8):1227-32
references.pmid: 8532547
references.citation: BJOG. 2010 Apr;117(5):522-31
references.pmid: 20163407
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Jun;98(6):564-8
references.pmid: 1873246
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993 Nov 15;27(4):825-30
references.pmid: 8244811
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1281-99
references.pmid: 7713788
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jun 1;44(3):497-506
references.pmid: 10348277
references.citation: Br J Nurs. 1996 Feb 22-Mar 13;5(4):239-44
references.pmid: 8704455
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jun 1;65(2):404-11
references.pmid: 16542794
references.citation: Radiother Oncol. 2003 Sep;68(3):241-7
references.pmid: 13129631
references.citation: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999;11(1):46-8
references.pmid: 10194586
references.citation: Health Psychol. 1996 Mar;15(2):114-23
references.pmid: 8681919
references.citation: Int J Palliat Nurs. 2000 Sep;6(8):392-7
references.pmid: 12411851
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;50(6):683-91
references.pmid: 9250266
references.citation: BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):869-70
references.pmid: 8173361
references.citation: Radiother Oncol. 1995 Apr;35(1):11-5
references.pmid: 7569011
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;101(5 Pt 2):1125-6
references.pmid: 12738124
references.citation: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2000 Jul-Aug;29(4):413-21
references.pmid: 10929845
references.citation: Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006;27(4):356-8
references.pmid: 17009625
references.citation: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2000;12(6):347-53
references.pmid: 11202086
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1980 Sep-Oct;18(2):90-2
references.pmid: 6108259
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 May 15;119(2):181-9
references.pmid: 4856712
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1958 Apr;11(4):403-14
references.pmid: 13517747
references.citation: Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2001 Mar-Apr;5(2):59-63
references.pmid: 11899777
references.citation: J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Mar;14(1):51-63
references.pmid: 8358523
references.citation: Dan Med Bull. 1983 Dec;30 Suppl 2:31-4
references.pmid: 6673914
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD003750
references.pmid: 12535485
references.citation: Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2004 Mar;8(1):30-9
references.pmid: 15003742
references.citation: Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 May-Jun;16(3):1140-6
references.pmid: 16803497
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
references.pmid: 12958120