title: Growth performance and root transcriptome remodeling of Arabidopsis in response to Mars-like levels of magnesium sulfate.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Martian regolith (unconsolidated surface material) is a potential medium for plant growth in bioregenerative life support systems during manned missions on Mars. However, hydrated magnesium sulfate mineral levels in the regolith of Mars can reach as high as 10 wt%, and would be expected to be highly inhibitory to plant growth.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Disabling ion transporters AtMRS2-10 and AtSULTR1;2, which are plasma membrane localized in peripheral root cells, is not an effective way to confer tolerance to magnesium sulfate soils. Arabidopsis mrs2-10 and sel1-10 knockout lines do not mitigate the growth inhibiting impacts of high MgSO(4).7H(2)O concentrations observed with wildtype plants. A global approach was used to identify novel genes with potential to enhance tolerance to high MgSO(4).7H(2)O (magnesium sulfate) stress. The early Arabidopsis root transcriptome response to elevated concentrations of magnesium sulfate was characterized in Col-0, and also between Col-0 and the mutant line cax1-1, which was confirmed to be relatively tolerant of high levels of MgSO(4).7H(2)O in soil solution. Differentially expressed genes in Col-0 treated for 45 min. encode enzymes primarily involved in hormone metabolism, transcription factors, calcium-binding proteins, kinases, cell wall related proteins and membrane-based transporters. Over 200 genes encoding transporters were differentially expressed in Col-0 up to 180 min. of exposure, and one of the first down-regulated genes was CAX1. The importance of this early response in wildtype Arabidopsis is exemplified in the fact that only four transcripts were differentially expressed between Col-0 and cax1-1 at 180 min. after initiation of treatment.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results provide a solid basis for the understanding of the metabolic response of plants to elevated magnesium sulfate soils; it is the first transcriptome analysis of plants in this environment. The results foster the development of Mars soil-compatible plants by showing that cax1 mutants exhibit partial tolerance to magnesium sulfate, and by elucidating a small subset (500 vs. >10,000) of candidate genes for mutation or metabolic engineering that will enhance tolerance to magnesium sulfate soils.
authors.affiliation: Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
authors.forename: Anne M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Visscher
authors.forename: Anna-Lisa
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Paul
authors.forename: Matias
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kirst
authors.forename: Charles L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Guy
authors.forename: Andrew C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Schuerger
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Ferl
mesh_terms: D017920:Antiporters / Q000235:genetics; D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000187:drug effects / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000502:physiology; D027682:Cation Transport Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D005118:Extraterrestrial Environment / Q000737:chemistry*; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D018506:Gene Expression Regulation, Plant / Q000187:drug effects; D008278:Magnesium Sulfate / Q000494:pharmacology*; D018535:Mars; D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000187:drug effects / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000502:physiology; D013312:Stress, Physiological / Q000187:drug effects / Q000235:genetics
chemical_list: D017920:Antiporters; D027682:Cation Transport Proteins; D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins; C027614:calcium-hydrogen antiporters; D008278:Magnesium Sulfate
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2000 Sep;51(350):1585-94
references.pmid: 11006309
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(5):1119-28
references.pmid: 16513815
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2003 Jan 30;3:2
references.pmid: 12556248
references.citation: Plant J. 2002 Oct;32(2):139-49
references.pmid: 12383080
references.citation: J Integr Plant Biol. 2008 Dec;50(12):1530-8
references.pmid: 19093971
references.citation: J Comput Biol. 2001;8(6):625-37
references.pmid: 11747616
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2003;236:177-88
references.pmid: 14501065
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2001 Dec;29(4):389-95
references.pmid: 11726925
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2007 Mar 23;282(12):9260-8
references.pmid: 17259181
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9440-5
references.pmid: 12883005
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Jul;167(1):81-8
references.pmid: 15948832
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(5):1097-107
references.pmid: 16510518
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2003 Feb;15(2):347-64
references.pmid: 12566577
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2009 Feb 13;284(7):4605-15
references.pmid: 19098009
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2006 Nov;18(11):3235-51
references.pmid: 17114350
references.citation: Adv Space Res. 1994 Nov;14(11):403-10
references.pmid: 11540213
references.citation: Life Support Biosph Sci. 2002;8(3-4):137-47
references.pmid: 12481805
references.citation: Cell Res. 2007 May;17(5):411-21
references.pmid: 17486125
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2001 Dec;13(12):2761-75
references.pmid: 11752386
references.citation: Plant J. 2002 Feb;29(4):465-73
references.pmid: 11846879
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2004 Oct 15;18(20):2545-56
references.pmid: 15489295
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2007;8(4):R49
references.pmid: 17408486
references.citation: Science. 2005 Mar 11;307(5715):1587-91
references.pmid: 15718429
references.citation: Plant Physiol Biochem. 2008 Feb;46(2):212-8
references.pmid: 18024051
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2004 Aug;55(404):1765-73
references.pmid: 15258169
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun;132(2):597-605
references.pmid: 12805590
references.citation: Planta. 2007 Jun;226(1):125-37
references.pmid: 17310369
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Aug;138(4):2048-60
references.pmid: 16055687
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(15):4235-43
references.pmid: 17101715
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 Feb;143(2):600-11
references.pmid: 17189337
references.citation: Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1733-9
references.pmid: 15576609
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Sep;139(1):5-17
references.pmid: 16166256
references.citation: Science. 2005 Mar 11;307(5715):1591-4
references.pmid: 15718425
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):66-9
references.pmid: 16001063
references.citation: Science. 2006 Apr 21;312(5772):400-4
references.pmid: 16627738
references.citation: Biochem J. 2009 Feb 15;418(1):145-54
references.pmid: 18950291
references.citation: Biometals. 2002 Sep;15(3):309-23
references.pmid: 12206396