Dysfunction of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty.
OBJECTIVE
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is typically carried out either with retention (CR) of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) or with sacrifice of this ligament and implantation of a posterior stabilised (PS) prosthesis. This paper investigates a comparison of PCL function in knees treated for osteoarthritis with TKA where the PCL is preserved to those knees treated with TKA and posterior stabilisation.


METHODS
One hundred and sixty-eight patients (232 knees) who had undergone TKA with either a PS or CR implant were included in the study. Clinical assessment included antero-posterior (AP) laxity and posterior sag assessment with an arthrometer.


RESULTS
The mean AP laxity at 90° of flexion for CR TKAs was 6.5 mm (±3.1) and was the same [6.5 mm (±2.4)] as in the PS group. However, 56% of the PCL-preserved knees had a posterior sag of over 3 mm compared to 18% of the knees in the PS group. The American Knee Society Scores for either group showed that, although the mean function score was the same, the knee score was superior in the PS group (77 vs. 84). The range of motion was also superior in the PS group (111° vs. 105°).


CONCLUSIONS
The use of the PS prosthesis for TKA provides a more predictable outcome with regard to posterior sag and a better maximum flexion than a CR implant.
Arbuthnot
James Edmund
JE
Good Hope and Solihull Hospitals, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK. jamie.arbuthnot@heartofengland.nhs.uk
Wainwright
Olwyn
O
Stables
Gareth
G
Rathinam
Manickam
M
Rowley
David I
DI
McNicholas
Michael J
MJ
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000601:surgery; D010147:Pain Measurement; D016119:Posterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology*; D012016:Reference Values; D018570:Risk Assessment; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D016896:Treatment Outcome
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jun;89(6):766-71
17613501
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Apr;91(4):753-60
19339558
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):450-6
15125137
J Arthroplasty. 1998 Oct;13(7):763-7
9802661
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):37-57
14646738
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4):484-9
12066280
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD004803
16235383
J Clin Pathol. 2001 May;54(5):381-4
11328838
J Orthop Res. 2005 Nov;23(6):1399-403
16084050
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Nov;89(11):1457-61
17998181
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1046-50
17785743
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov;(404):214-25
12439263
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct;23(7):1057-67
18534487
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 May;(410):131-8
12771823
Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Oct;74(5):652-8
19058700
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 May;87(5):646-55
15855366
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Sep;(366):169-73
10627731
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Feb;69(2):233-42
3805084
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Nov;(356):39-46
9917666
J Arthroplasty. 1994 Dec;9(6):569-78
7699369
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Jul;85(5):671-4
12892188
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 May;(410):35-43
12771815
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 May;(410):69-81
12771818
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Feb;85(2):259-65
12571303
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998 May-Jun;6(3):176-87
9682080
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Jul;(364):182-93
10416408