Spatial hearing in echoic environments: the role of the envelope in owls.
In the precedence effect, sounds emanating directly from the source are localized preferentially over their reflections. Although most studies have focused on the delay between the onset of a sound and its echo, humans still experience the precedence effect when this onset delay is removed. We tested in barn owls the hypothesis that an ongoing delay, equivalent to the onset delay, is discernible from the envelope features of amplitude-modulated stimuli and may be sufficient to evoke this effect. With sound pairs having only envelope cues, owls localized direct sounds preferentially, and neurons in their auditory space-maps discharged more vigorously to them, but only if the sounds were amplitude modulated. Under conditions that yielded the precedence effect, acoustical features known to evoke neuronal discharges were more abundant in the envelopes of the direct sounds than of the echoes, suggesting that specialized neural mechanisms for echo suppression were unnecessary.
Nelson
Brian S
BS
Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. bsnelson@uoregon.edu
Takahashi
Terry T
TT
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000200:Action Potentials; D000818:Animals; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology; D003463:Cues; D004777:Environment; D019416:Head Movements; D008839:Microelectrodes; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D013017:Sound Localization / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology; D020305:Strigiformes / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Oct;74(4):1689-700
8989405
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Sep;118(3):325-31
15482060
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;80(3):1302-16
9744940
J Neurosci. 2003 Jun 1;23(11):4677-88
12805307
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;95(6):3571-84
16709722
J Neurosci. 1994 Aug;14(8):4780-93
8046449
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2002 Jan;187(12):937-43
11913811
J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Dec;80(6):1608-22
3794066
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;74(6):2469-86
8747207
Science. 1978 Nov 17;202(4369):778-80
715444
J Neurophysiol. 1987 Sep;58(3):562-83
3655883
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Nov;84(5):2638-50
11068005
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Sep;110(3 Pt 1):1505-13
11572361
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 01;2(7):e675
17668055
Hear Res. 1998 Apr;118(1-2):13-34
9606058
PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3598
18974886
Hear Res. 2002 Jun;168(1-2):55-9
12117509
J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 9;25(45):10446-61
16280583
J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Mar;67(3):953-64
7358920
J Comp Physiol A. 1996 Apr;178(4):499-512
8847663
J Neurosci. 2001 Jul 1;21(13):4830-43
11425910
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Aug;78(2):524-33
4031251
J Neurosci. 2008 Feb 27;28(9):2043-52
18305239
Am J Psychol. 1949 Jul;62(3):315-36
18134356
Neuron. 2009 Apr 16;62(1):123-34
19376072
J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 14;27(7):1782-90
17301185
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Oct;106(4 Pt 1):1633-54
10530009
J Neurosci. 1993 Jan;13(1):371-86
8423481
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Aug;96(2):730-45
16672296
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;92(4):2051-70
15381741
Nature. 2003 Aug 14;424(6950):771-4
12917684
J Neurosci. 1994 Sep;14(9):5170-86
8083729
Hear Res. 2006 Jun-Jul;216-217:19-30
16644160
J Neurosci. 2002 Jan 1;22(1):284-93
11756512
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1631-45
12656397
J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Jan;170(1):3-11
1573569
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 May;119(5 Pt 1):2947-64
16708952
J Comp Physiol A. 1991 Sep;169(3):281-9
1762092
J Neurosci. 1996 Jul 1;16(13):4300-9
8753891