title: Plant physiology and proteomics reveals the leaf response to drought in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).
abstract: Despite its relevance, protein regulation, metabolic adjustment, and the physiological status of plants under drought is not well understood in relation to the role of nitrogen fixation in nodules. In this study, nodulated alfalfa plants were exposed to drought conditions. The study determined the physiological, metabolic, and proteomic processes involved in photosynthetic inhibition in relation to the decrease in nitrogenase (N(ase)) activity. The deleterious effect of drought on alfalfa performance was targeted towards photosynthesis and N(ase) activity. At the leaf level, photosynthetic inhibition was mainly caused by the inhibition of Rubisco. The proteomic profile and physiological measurements revealed that the reduced carboxylation capacity of droughted plants was related to limitations in Rubisco protein content, activation state, and RuBP regeneration. Drought also decreased amino acid content such as asparagine, and glutamic acid, and Rubisco protein content indicating that N availability limitations were caused by N(ase) activity inhibition. In this context, drought induced the decrease in Rubisco binding protein content at the leaf level and proteases were up-regulated so as to degrade Rubisco protein. This degradation enabled the reallocation of the Rubisco-derived N to the synthesis of amino acids with osmoregulant capacity. Rubisco degradation under drought conditions was induced so as to remobilize Rubisco-derived N to compensate for the decrease in N associated with N(ase) inhibition. Metabolic analyses showed that droughted plants increased amino acid (proline, a major compound involved in osmotic regulation) and soluble sugar (D-pinitol) levels to contribute towards the decrease in osmotic potential (Ψ(s)). At the nodule level, drought had an inhibitory effect on N(ase) activity. This decrease in N(ase) activity was not induced by substrate shortage, as reflected by an increase in total soluble sugars (TSS) in the nodules. Proline accumulation in the nodule could also be associated with an osmoregulatory response to drought and might function as a protective agent against ROS. In droughted nodules, the decrease in N(2) fixation was caused by an increase in oxygen resistance that was induced in the nodule. This was a mechanism to avoid oxidative damage associated with reduced respiration activity and the consequent increase in oxygen content. This study highlighted that even though drought had a direct effect on leaves, the deleterious effects of drought on nodules also conditioned leaf responsiveness.
authors.affiliation: Unitat de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain. iker.aranjuelo@gmail.com
authors.forename: Iker
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Aranjuelo
authors.forename: Gemma
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Molero
authors.forename: Gorka
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Erice
authors.forename: Jean Christophe
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Avice
authors.forename: Salvador
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Nogués
mesh_terms: D055864:Droughts; D000455:Medicago sativa / Q000201:enzymology / Q000378:metabolism*; D009591:Nitrogenase / Q000378:metabolism; D010788:Photosynthesis; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000201:enzymology / Q000378:metabolism*; D010940:Plant Proteins / Q000378:metabolism; D040901:Proteomics; D014867:Water / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D010940:Plant Proteins; D014867:Water; D009591:Nitrogenase
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Apr;137(4):1389-96
references.pmid: 15778462
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jun;47:509-540
references.pmid: 15012299
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1991 Aug;96(4):1228-36
references.pmid: 16668324
references.citation: Planta. 1981 Dec;153(4):376-87
references.pmid: 24276943
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009 Dec;22(12):1565-76
references.pmid: 19888822
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2000 Jul;51(348):1309-17
references.pmid: 10937707
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 Oct;145(2):539-46
references.pmid: 17720761
references.citation: Proteomics. 2009 Jul;9(13):3580-608
references.pmid: 19609964
references.citation: Proteomics. 2003 Jul;3(7):1299-302
references.pmid: 12872230
references.citation: Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Mar;30(3):239-264
references.pmid: 32689007
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2005 Sep;56(419):2551-61
references.pmid: 16061503
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2000 Oct;124(2):823-32
references.pmid: 11027730
references.citation: Planta. 1991 Jan;183(2):178-84
references.pmid: 24193618
references.citation: Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
references.pmid: 942051
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(3):665-73
references.pmid: 16415332
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Jul;147(3):1437-49
references.pmid: 18467460
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2009 Feb;103(4):581-97
references.pmid: 18552366
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 Jun;144(2):1104-14
references.pmid: 17468213
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Feb;39(3):395-405
references.pmid: 10092169
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2008;59(7):1605-14
references.pmid: 18212026
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2002 Jun;89 Spec No:925-40
references.pmid: 12102518
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Mar;41(3):335-43
references.pmid: 10805597
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2009 Feb;103(4):551-60
references.pmid: 18662937
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Jan 29;391(6666):485-8
references.pmid: 9461215
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Aug;147(4):1830-44
references.pmid: 18552235
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1987 May;84(1):456-60
references.pmid: 11539766
references.citation: Electrophoresis. 2003 Jul;24(14):2369-75
references.pmid: 12874872
references.citation: J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1995 Mar 10;665(1):15-25
references.pmid: 7795786
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2003 May;54(386):1321-33
references.pmid: 12709478
references.citation: Planta. 1991 Dec;186(1):58-69
references.pmid: 24186575
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2009 Feb;103(4):561-79
references.pmid: 19155221
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 1990 Sep;25(3):173-85
references.pmid: 24420348
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Jan;48(1-2):133-41
references.pmid: 11860206
references.citation: Biochem J. 1954 Jul;57(3):508-14
references.pmid: 13181867
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2002 Jun;89 Spec No:895-905
references.pmid: 12102515
references.citation: J Plant Physiol. 2004 Nov;161(11):1189-202
references.pmid: 15602811
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 1993 Oct;38(1):15-26
references.pmid: 24317826
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2004 Nov;55(407):2365-84
references.pmid: 15475377
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):275-294
references.pmid: 11841670
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1992 Apr;98(4):1429-36
references.pmid: 16668811
references.citation: Funct Plant Biol. 2007 Jun;34(6):526-549
references.pmid: 32689382
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 5;267(4):2810-6
references.pmid: 1733975
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2002 Jun;89 Spec No:907-16
references.pmid: 12102516
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 Feb;143(2):876-92
references.pmid: 17158588
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2008;59(7):1615-24
references.pmid: 17975207
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Jun;5(3):193-8
references.pmid: 11960735
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2002 Jun;89 Spec No:833-9
references.pmid: 12102509
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2002 May;53(372):1321-9
references.pmid: 11997378
references.citation: Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005 Sep;43(9):828-35
references.pmid: 16289945
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1999 Jul;120(3):727-38
references.pmid: 10398707
references.citation: Biochem J. 1996 Jan 01;313 ( Pt 1):229-34
references.pmid: 8546688
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1997 Jul;114(3):937-946
references.pmid: 12223754
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1986 Sep;82(1):90-5
references.pmid: 16665029
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun;50:601-639
references.pmid: 15012221
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2008;59(7):1569-80
references.pmid: 18436543