Evaluation of three surgical techniques for advancement of the midface in growing children with syndromic craniosynostosis.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and 1-year postsurgical stability with three different techniques of Le Fort III midface advancement.


METHODS
The records of 212 syndromic craniosynostosis patients were reviewed from the period 1973 to 2006. A total of 60 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and the mean age of the sample at surgery was 6.2 years. In group I (1977 to 1987), fixation was performed by interosseous wiring and intermaxillary fixation; in group II (1987 to 1996), fixation was achieved by only rigid plate fixation; and in group III (2000 to 2005), the patients underwent midface distraction with the rigid external distraction device. Cephalometric landmarks were identified and digitized at each of the time intervals (preoperatively, postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively).


RESULTS
The mean advancement measured at point A in group I averaged 9.7 mm; in group II, it was 10.6 mm; and in group 3, it was 16.1 mm. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of advancement between groups I and II. However, when groups I and II were compared with group III, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). No statistical significance was noted within and between all three groups at 1-year follow-up.


CONCLUSIONS
Significantly larger midface advancement was achieved with rigid external distraction (group III) compared with classic Le Fort III midface advancement with wire (group I) or plate (group III) fixation. At 1 year after surgery, the three groups showed relative stability of the advanced midface segment.
Shetye
Pradip R
PR
New York, N.Y. From the Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center.
Davidson
Edward H
EH
Sorkin
Michael
M
Grayson
Barry H
BH
McCarthy
Joseph G
JG
D002508:Cephalometry; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003398:Craniosynostoses / Q000601:surgery*; D005147:Facial Bones / Q000254:growth & development*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019340:Osteotomy, Le Fort / Q000379:methods*; D013577:Syndrome; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Gillies H, Harrison SH. Operative correction by osteotomy of recessed malar maxillary compound in a case of oxycephaly. Br J Plast Surg. 1950;3:123–127.
Tessier P. Total facial osteotomy. Crouzon's syndrome, Apert's syndrome: oxycephaly, scaphocephaly, turricephaly (in French). Ann Chir Plast. 1967;12:273–286.
McCarthy JG, Coccaro PJ, Eptstein F, Converse JM. Early skeletal release in the infant with craniofacial dysostosis: The role of the sphenozygomatic suture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;62:335–346.
McCarthy JG, Grayson B, Bookstein F, Vickery C, Zide B. Le Fort III advancement osteotomy in the growing child. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;74:343–354.
Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus B. Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillo-facial surgery. J Maxillofac Surg. 1973;1:79–84.
Shetye PR, Boutros S, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Midterm follow-up of midface distraction for syndromic craniosynostosis: A clinical and cephalometric study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1621–1632.
Fearon JA. Halo distraction of the Le Fort III in syndromic craniosynostosis: A long-term assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1524–1536.
Jensen JN, McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, Nusbaum AO, Eski M. Bone deposition/generation with Le Fort III (midface) distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:298–307.
Phillips JH, George AK, Tompson B. Le Fort III osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis imperfecta: Your choice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1255–1260.
Kreiborg S, Pruzansky S. Craniofacial growth in premature craniofacial synostosis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;15:171–186.
Kreiborg S, Bjork A. Description of a dry skull with Crouzon syndrome. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;16:245–253.
McCarthy JG, Epstein F, Sadove M, Grayson B, Zide B. Early surgery for craniofacial synostosis: An 8-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73:521–533.
Kaban LB, Conover M, Mulliken JB. Midface position after Le Fort III advancement: A long-term follow-up study. Cleft Palate J. 1986;23(Suppl 1):75–77.
Kreiborg S, Aduss H. Pre- and postsurgical facial growth in patients with Crouzon's and Apert's syndromes. Cleft Palate J. 1986;23(Suppl 1):78–90.
Bachmayer DI, Ross RB. Stability of Le Fort III advancement surgery in children with Crouzon's, Apert's, and Pfeiffer's syndromes. Cleft Palate J. 1986;23(Suppl 1):69–74.
Coccaro PJ, McCarthy JG, Epstein FJ, Wood-Smith D, Converse JM. Early and late surgery in craniofacial dysostosis: A longitudinal cephalometric study. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:421–436.
Shetye PR, Giannoutsos E, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Le Fort III distraction: Part I. Controlling position and vectors of the midface segment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;124:871–878.
Shetye PR, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Le Fort III distraction: Controlling position and path of the osteotomized midface segment on a rigid platform. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1118–1121.