Population coding of interaural time differences in gerbils and barn owls.
Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the primary cue for the localization of low-frequency sound sources in the azimuthal plane. For decades, it was assumed that the coding of ITDs in the mammalian brain was similar to that in the avian brain, where information is sparsely distributed across individual neurons, but recent studies have suggested otherwise. In this study, we characterized the representation of ITDs in adult male and female gerbils. First, we performed behavioral experiments to determine the acuity with which gerbils can use ITDs to localize sounds. Next, we used different decoders to infer ITDs from the activity of a population of neurons in central nucleus of the inferior colliculus. These results show that ITDs are not represented in a distributed manner, but rather in the summed activity of the entire population. To contrast these results with those from a population where the representation of ITDs is known to be sparsely distributed, we performed the same analysis on activity from the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus of adult male and female barn owls. Together, our results support the idea that, unlike the avian brain, the mammalian brain represents ITDs in the overall activity of a homogenous population of neurons within each hemisphere.
Lesica
Nicholas A
NA
Division of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Martinsried, Germany. n.lesica@ucl.ac.uk
Lingner
Andrea
A
Grothe
Benedikt
B
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005849:Gerbillinae / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D013017:Sound Localization / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity; D020305:Strigiformes / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors
J Neurosci. 2004 Aug 11;24(32):7110-7
15306644
J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 15;19(8):3146-61
10191328
J Neurosci. 2003 Aug 13;23(19):7438-49
12917380
Trends Neurosci. 2003 Jul;26(7):347-50
12850430
Neuroscience. 2005;131(1):1-11
15680687
J Neurosci. 2007 Apr 11;27(15):4191-200
17428997
Trends Neurosci. 2007 Feb;30(2):70-8
17188761
Behav Neurosci. 1988 Jun;102(3):422-8
3395452
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1948 Feb;41(1):35-9
18904764
J Physiol. 2005 Jul 1;566(Pt 1):21-8
15760940
J Neurosci. 2003 Jan 15;23(2):716-24
12533632
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001 Mar;2(1):1-21
11545146
Neuroscientist. 2002 Feb;8(1):73-83
11843102
J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 16;23(15):6345-50
12867519
J Comp Neurol. 2006 Apr 10;495(5):511-28
16498677
J Neurosci. 2008 Jul 2;28(27):6914-25
18596166
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Jul;4(7):540-50
12838329
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Apr;4(4):396-401
11276230
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):872-86
16158644
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 18;1220:47-57
18343357
J Neurophysiol. 1990 Aug;64(2):465-88
2213127
Nature. 2003 Aug 14;424(6950):771-4
12917684
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:31-55
14527266
J Comp Neurol. 1993 May 8;331(2):245-60
8509501
Science. 1978 May 19;200(4343):795-7
644324
Nature. 2002 May 30;417(6888):543-7
12037566
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Nov;84(5):2638-50
11068005
J Neurosci. 2008 May 21;28(21):5412-21
18495875
Brain Behav Evol. 1997;50(4):198-212
9310195
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 20;98(24):14050-4
11707595
Nature. 2004 Aug 5;430(7000):682-6
15295602
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Feb;119(2):1029-36
16521765