Molecular analysis of the diversity of vaginal microbiota associated with bacterial vaginosis.
BACKGROUND
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is an ecological disorder of the vaginal microbiota that affects millions of women annually, and is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes including pre-term birth and the acquisition of sexually transmitted infections. However, little is known about the overall structure and composition of vaginal microbial communities; most of the earlier studies focused on predominant vaginal bacteria in the process of BV. In the present study, the diversity and richness of vaginal microbiota in 50 BV positive and 50 healthy women from China were investigated using culture-independent PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and barcoded 454 pyrosequencing methods, and validated by quantitative PCR.


RESULTS
Our data demonstrated that there was a profound shift in the absolute and relative abundances of bacterial species present in the vagina when comparing populations associated with healthy and diseased conditions. In spite of significant interpersonal variations, the diversity of vaginal microbiota in the two groups could be clearly divided into two clusters. A total of 246,359 high quality pyrosequencing reads was obtained for evaluating bacterial diversity and 24,298 unique sequences represented all phylotypes. The most predominant phyla of bacteria identified in the vagina belonged to Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Fusobacteria. The higher number of phylotypes in BV positive women over healthy is consistent with the results of previous studies and a large number of low-abundance taxa which were missed in previous studies were revealed. Although no single bacterium could be identified as a specific marker for healthy over diseased conditions, three phyla - Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Fusobacteria, and eight genera including Gardnerella, Atopobium, Megasphaera, Eggerthella, Aerococcus, Leptotrichia/Sneathia, Prevotella and Papillibacter were strongly associated with BV (p < 0.05). These genera are potentially excellent markers and could be used as targets for clinical BV diagnosis by molecular approaches.


CONCLUSIONS
The data presented here have clearly profiled the overall structure of vaginal communities and clearly demonstrated that BV is associated with a dramatic increase in the taxonomic richness and diversity of vaginal microbiota. The study also provides the most comprehensive picture of the vaginal community structure and the bacterial ecosystem, and significantly contributes to the current understanding of the etiology of BV.
Ling
Zongxin
Z
State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China.
Kong
Jianming
J
Liu
Fang
F
Zhu
Haibin
H
Chen
Xiaoyi
X
Wang
Yuezhu
Y
Li
Lanjuan
L
Nelson
Karen E
KE
Xia
Yaxian
Y
Xiang
Charlie
C
D000328:Adult; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D058645:Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis; D005260:Female; D018628:Gene Dosage / Q000235:genetics; D014644:Genetic Variation; D006801:Humans; D054892:Metagenome / Q000235:genetics*; D008875:Middle Aged; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA; D013045:Species Specificity; D014621:Vagina / Q000382:microbiology*; D016585:Vaginosis, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics* / Q000382:microbiology*; D055815:Young Adult
D004269:DNA, Bacterial
Hum Reprod. 2001 Sep;16(9):1809-13
11527880
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Apr;47(4):1181-9
19158255
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 12;105(6):2117-22
18252821
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006 Jan;273(4):195-202
16208476
PLoS One. 2007 Feb 14;2(2):e197
17299583
BMC Microbiol. 2008 Mar 06;8:43
18325110
Cell. 2006 Feb 24;124(4):837-48
16497592
Science. 2006 Aug 25;313(5790):1126-30
16931762
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Aug;70(8):4800-6
15294817
Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):811-8
17943117
J Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 15;198(8):1131-40
18717638
J Infect Dis. 2005 Apr 1;191(7):1129-39
15747249
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Mar;71(3):1501-6
15746353
Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1027-31
17183312
J Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;180(6):1950-6
10558952
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 2000 Sep 1;7(5):181-185
11025268
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD000262
17253447
J Med Microbiol. 1996 Aug;45(2):120-6
8683547
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jun;20 Suppl 2:S271-5
7548573
Science. 2009 May 29;324(5931):1190-2
19478181
PLoS One. 2009 Jun 29;4(6):e6074
19562079
BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 07;7:128
17986357
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
19801464
J Nutr. 2007 Sep;137(9):2128-33
17709453
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2002 Dec;4(6):514-519
12433327
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Aug;74(15):4898-909
18487399
ISME J. 2007 Jun;1(2):121-33
18043622
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar;45(3):1016-8
17202272
J Dent Res. 2008 Nov;87(11):1016-20
18946007
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):297-301
1706728
Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1022-3
17183309
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;184(5):845-53; discussion 853-5
11303191
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 07;7:371
16893466
BMC Genomics. 2006 Mar 20;7:57
16549033
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
17586664
Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Sep-Oct;12(5):856-72
2237129
Lancet. 1997 Aug 23;350(9077):546-50
9284776
Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Apr;34(4):197-202
17179772
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1955 May;69(5):962-76
14361525
Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Jun;16 Suppl 4:S273-81
8324131
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Feb;67(2):229-37
3003634
Microbiology (Reading). 2004 Aug;150(Pt 8):2565-2573
15289553
Nat Methods. 2008 Mar;5(3):235-7
18264105
J Infect Dis. 2006 Sep 15;194(6):828-36
16941351
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12115-20
16880384
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008 Oct;11(5):442-6
18817891
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Aug 1;37(3):319-25
12884154
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;104(2):267-72
15291998
J Infect Dis. 1983 Nov;148(5):817-22
6631073
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2007 Nov;9(6):485-500
17999885
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):3145
17652481
ISME J. 2010 Jan;4(1):1-16
19587773
Nature. 2005 Sep 15;437(7057):376-80
16056220
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 1;36(5):663-8
12594649
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 20;104(8):2927-32
17293459
Cell. 2008 Mar 7;132(5):721-3
18329356
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 1):682-92
16150261
J Infect Dis. 1997 Feb;175(2):406-13
9203662
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):114-20
17197596
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 31;102(22):7952-7
15911771
J Infect Dis. 2007 Dec 1;196(11):1692-7
18008255
Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):804-10
17943116
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Sep;73(18):5731-41
17644631
Annu Rev Med. 2000;51:349-56
10774469
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Mar;59(3):695-700
7683183
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 May;75(9):2889-98
19270139
ISME J. 2010 May;4(5):642-7
20090784
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Oct;36(18):e120
18723574
Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;5(12):786-94
16310150
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2000 Feb;2(1):14-17
11095832
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191(4):1130-2
15507931
Nat Protoc. 2008;3(2):267-78
18274529
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 28;333(26):1737-42
7491137
N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 3;353(18):1899-911
16267321
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Mar;79(3):369-73
1738516
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 1;47(1):33-43
18513147
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999 Oct;49 Pt 4:1573-6
10555338
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(19):e130
17932070
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17994-9
19004758
ISME J. 2007 Aug;1(4):283-90
18043639
Am J Med. 1983 Jan;74(1):14-22
6600371
Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1635-8
15831718
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2009 Mar;11(2):143-7
19239805
Cell. 2005 Jul 15;122(1):107-18
16009137
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar;74(5):1656-9
18203860
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 1;39(7):990-5
15472851
Science. 2006 Jun 2;312(5778):1355-9
16741115
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Feb;27(2):251-6
2915019