title: Value-based cleft lip-cleft palate care: a progress report.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The health care debate in the United States centers on a concept that is fundamental to any service-based profession yet minimally integrated into the health care community: value creation. Value in health care has been defined as outcome achieved per dollar spent, and focuses on the patient. Many of the new strategies proposed to restructure health care delivery in the United States aim to study and improve both components of this equation. Indeed, it is a near guarantee that providers will soon be responsible for reporting their outcomes and resource use and will be benchmarked by these metrics. In addition, patients have a right to understand the value they receive from their care providers.
  
  
  METHODS
  In this report, the authors evaluate the current state of preparedness for the assessment of value in care delivery in the field of cleft lip-cleft palate based on literature review.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There has been important progress in the definition and assessment of basic outcomes in cleft lip-cleft palate care, largely through formation of intercenter collaborations. However, many fundamental challenges face the cleft community, especially in North America. Standardization of data collection and outcomes measurement and reporting are particularly lacking. In addition, few data exist regarding the cost of cleft care.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The weight of the evidence reveals that the cleft community is not prepared to assess, and thus improve, the value offered to patients. The authors address key challenges and outline future directions.
authors.affiliation: Boston, Mass. From the Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital, and the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary.
authors.forename: Megan M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Abbott
authors.forename: John G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Meara
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002971:Cleft Lip / Q000191:economics / Q000601:surgery*; D002972:Cleft Palate / Q000191:economics / Q000601:surgery*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care
references.citation: Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining Health Care. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2006.
references.citation: Starfield B. Is US health really the best in the world? JAMA. 2000;284:483–485.
references.citation: Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM. The patient-centered medical home: Will it stand the test of health reform? JAMA. 2009;301:2038–2040.
references.citation: Greene SE, Nash DB. Pay for performance: An overview of the literature. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24:140–163.
references.citation: Fisher ES, Staiger DO, Bynum JP, Gottlieb DJ. Creating accountable care organizations: The extended hospital medical staff. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w44–w57.
references.citation: Porter ME. Value-based health care delivery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:503–509.
references.citation: Chung KC, Swanson JA, Schmitz D, Sullivan D, Rohrich RJ. Introducing evidence-based medicine to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1385–1389.
references.citation: Forrest CB, Shipman SA, Dougherty D, Miller MR. Outcomes research in pediatric settings: Recent trends and future directions. Pediatrics 2003;111:171–178.
references.citation: Shaw W, Semb G, Nelson P. Strategies for improving cleft care. In: Losee JE, Kirschner RE, eds. Comprehensive Cleft Care. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2009.
references.citation: Kasten EF, Schmidt SP, Zickler CF, et al. Team care of the patient with cleft lip and palate. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2008;38:138–158.
references.citation: Strauss RP. The organization and delivery of craniofacial health services: The state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:189–195.
references.citation: Clancy CM, Eisenberg JM. Outcomes research: Measuring the end results of health care. Science 1998;282:245–246.
references.citation: Davis Sears E, Burns PB, Chung KC. The outcomes of outcome studies in plastic surgery: A systematic review of 17 years of plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:2059–2065.
references.citation: Forrest CB, Simpson L, Clancy C. Child health services research: Challenges and opportunities. JAMA. 1997;277:1787–1793.
references.citation: Shaw WC, Brattstrom V, Molsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, Roberts CT, Semb G. The Eurocleft study: Intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 5: Discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42:93–98.
references.citation: Shaw WC, Dahl E, Asher-McDade C, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:413–418.
references.citation: Bearn D, Mildinhall S, Murphy T, et al. Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom—the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 4: Outcome comparisons, training, and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:38–43.
references.citation: Long RE Jr, Deacon SA. Assessment of orthodontic outcomes in patients with clefts. In: Losee JE, Kirschner RE, eds. Comprehensive Cleft Care. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2009.
references.citation: Mars M, Plint DA, Houston WJ, Bergland O, Semb G. The Goslon Yardstick: A new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24:314–322.
references.citation: Tulloch J, Antczak-Bouckoms A. A methodologic approach to outcome assessment. In: Turvey T, Vig K, Fonseca R, eds. Facial Clefts and Craniosynostosis: Principles and Management. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996.
references.citation: Henningsson G, Kuehn DP, Sell D, Sweeney T, Trost-Cardamone JE, Whitehill TL. Universal parameters for reporting speech outcomes in individuals with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45:1–17.
references.citation: Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charges. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:102–109.
references.citation: Rogowski J. Measuring the cost of neonatal and perinatal care. Pediatrics 1999;103 (1 Suppl E):329–335.
references.citation: Boulet SL, Grosse SD, Honein MA, Correa-Villasenor A. Children with orofacial clefts: Health-care use and costs among a privately insured population. Public Health Rep. 2009;124:447–453.
references.citation: Cassell CH, Meyer R, Daniels J. Health care expenditures among Medicaid enrolled children with and without orofacial clefts in North Carolina, 1995-2002. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008;82:785–794.
references.citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hospital stays, hospital charges, and in-hospital deaths among infants with selected birth defects–United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:25–29.
references.citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Economic costs of birth defects and cerebral palsy–United States, 1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995;44:694–699.
references.citation: Fishman PA, Hornbrook MC. Assigning resources to health care use for health services research: Options and consequences. Med Care 2009;47(7 Suppl 1):S70–S75.
references.citation: Hunink M, Glasziou P, Siegel J, et al. Constrained resources. In: Hunink M, Glasziou P, eds. Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001:250.