Amino acid composition in endothermic vertebrates is biased in the same direction as in thermophilic prokaryotes.
BACKGROUND
Among bacteria and archaea, amino acid usage is correlated with habitat temperatures. In particular, protein surfaces in species thriving at higher temperatures appear to be enriched in amino acids that stabilize protein structure and depleted in amino acids that decrease thermostability. Does this observation reflect a causal relationship, or could the apparent trend be caused by phylogenetic relatedness among sampled organisms living at different temperatures? And do proteins from endothermic and exothermic vertebrates show similar differences?


RESULTS
We find that the observed correlations between the frequencies of individual amino acids and prokaryotic habitat temperature are strongly influenced by evolutionary relatedness between the species analysed; however, a proteome-wide bias towards increased thermostability remains after controlling for phylogeny. Do eukaryotes show similar effects of thermal adaptation? A small shift of amino acid usage in the expected direction is observed in endothermic ('warm-blooded') mammals and chicken compared to ectothermic ('cold-blooded') vertebrates with lower body temperatures; this shift is not simply explained by nucleotide usage biases.


CONCLUSIONS
Protein homologs operating at different temperatures have different amino acid composition, both in prokaryotes and in vertebrates. Thus, during the transition from ectothermic to endothermic life styles, the ancestors of mammals and of birds may have experienced weak genome-wide positive selection to increase the thermostability of their proteins.
Wang
Guang-Zhong
GZ
Bioinformatics group, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lercher
Martin J
MJ
D000596:Amino Acids / Q000737:chemistry*; D000818:Animals; D001831:Body Temperature; D010802:Phylogeny; D011387:Prokaryotic Cells / Q000378:metabolism*; D014714:Vertebrates / Q000145:classification / Q000378:metabolism*
D000596:Amino Acids
Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):564-77
17654362
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 20;104(8):2767-72
17307883
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jun;21(6):984-90
14963104
Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 15;24(18):2098-100
18678590
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 6;102(36):12742-7
16120678
J Mol Evol. 1997 Jun;44(6):632-6
9169555
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 30;96(7):3578-83
10097079
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Jan 12;3(1):e5
17222055
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2007 Jul;147(3):616-639
16950637
J Mol Evol. 2006 Jul;63(1):120-6
16786438
J Biol Chem. 2003 May 9;278(19):17198-202
12600994
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Jul;2(7):549-55
11433361
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Mar 08;8 Suppl 1:S15
17430559
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Mar 7;268(1466):493-7
11296861
Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
14530136
J Theor Biol. 2008 Jan 7;250(1):156-71
17950361
Gene. 2002 Sep 4;297(1-2):51-60
12384285
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1986;47(2):113-57
2424044
Genet Mol Res. 2003 Dec 30;2(4):383-93
15011142
Bioinformatics. 2007 Sep 1;23(17):2231-8
17599925
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2007 Aug;25(1):55-9
17676938
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Apr 1;29(7):1608-15
11266564
Genome Biol. 2004;5(10):117
15461805
J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 20;275(42):32383-6
10940293
Science. 2006 Mar 3;311(5765):1283-7
16513982
PLoS Genet. 2008 May 09;4(5):e1000071
18464896
Extremophiles. 2007 Jul;11(4):585-96
17429573
RNA. 2008 Aug;14(8):1492-500
18567811
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
15034147