title: Phonological decisions require both the left and right supramarginal gyri.
abstract: Recent functional imaging studies demonstrated that both the left and right supramarginal gyri (SMG) are activated when healthy right-handed subjects make phonological word decisions. However, lesion studies typically report difficulties with phonological processing after left rather than right hemisphere damage. Here, we used a unique dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approach to test whether the SMG in the right hemisphere contributes to modality-independent (i.e., auditory and visual) phonological decisions. To test task-specificity, we compared the effect of real or sham TMS during phonological, semantic, and perceptual decisions. To test laterality and anatomical specificity, we compared the effect of TMS over the left, right, or bilateral SMG and angular gyri. The accuracy and reaction times of phonological decisions were selectively disrupted relative to semantic and perceptual decisions when real TMS was applied over the left, right, or bilateral SMG. These effects were not observed for TMS over the angular gyri. A follow-up experiment indicated that the threshold-intensity for inducing a disruptive effect on phonological decisions was identical for unilateral TMS over the right or left SMG. Taken together, these findings provide converging evidence that the right SMG contributes to accurate and efficient phonological decisions in the healthy brain, with no evidence that the left and right SMG can compensate for one another during TMS. Our findings motivate detailed studies of phonological processing in patients with acute or long-term damage of the right SMG.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany. Gesa.Hartwigsen@gmx.de
authors.forename: Gesa
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Hartwigsen
authors.forename: Annette
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Baumgaertner
authors.forename: Cathy J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Price
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Koehnke
authors.forename: Stephan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ulmer
authors.forename: Hartwig R
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Siebner
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001307:Auditory Perception; D001931:Brain Mapping; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D010296:Parietal Lobe / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012660:Semantics; D050781:Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Jan;24(1):57-69
references.pmid: 19557656
references.citation: J Physiol. 1992;453:525-46
references.pmid: 1464843
references.citation: Cortex. 2009 Oct;45(9):1091-6
references.pmid: 19232583
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Nov;10(11):480-6
references.pmid: 16997610
references.citation: Acta Neurol Belg. 2008 Dec;108(4):161-6
references.pmid: 19239047
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006 Sep;26(9):1122-7
references.pmid: 16757978
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Dec;94(6):4520-7
references.pmid: 16135552
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;108(1):1-16
references.pmid: 9474057
references.citation: J Neurol. 2009 Sep;256(9):1461-7
references.pmid: 19363625
references.citation: Cortex. 2006 Jul;42(5):774-81
references.pmid: 16909638
references.citation: Brain. 2006 Jun;129(Pt 6):1371-84
references.pmid: 16638796
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1999 Feb;37(2):125-35
references.pmid: 10080370
references.citation: J Physiol. 2006 Aug 1;574(Pt 3):917-28
references.pmid: 16581858
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1453-74
references.pmid: 16571375
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jul;18(7):1147-55
references.pmid: 16839288
references.citation: Cortex. 2009 Oct;45(9):1035-42
references.pmid: 19371866
references.citation: Lancet Neurol. 2003 Mar;2(3):145-56
references.pmid: 12849236
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2001 Sep 17;12(13):2785-90
references.pmid: 11588577
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Feb;79(2):1102-7
references.pmid: 9463466
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Mar;31(3):365-77
references.pmid: 19777554
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):727-33
references.pmid: 23964595
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):71-84
references.pmid: 12590844
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 1994 Nov 21;182(1):25-8
references.pmid: 7891880
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 31;25(35):8010-6
references.pmid: 16135758
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Mar;16(2):289-300
references.pmid: 15068598
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15;44(2):563-8
references.pmid: 18848630
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Oct 1;6(10):416-421
references.pmid: 12413574
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jun;19(6):1474-85
references.pmid: 18987393
references.citation: Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):67-99
references.pmid: 15037127
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2008 Feb;14(1):119-27
references.pmid: 17911215
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
references.pmid: 5146491
references.citation: J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:501-19
references.pmid: 8120818
references.citation: Stroke. 2007 Apr;38(4):1286-92
references.pmid: 17322084
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(3):293-303
references.pmid: 12457755
references.citation: J Neurol Sci. 1998 Feb 5;154(2):182-93
references.pmid: 9562309
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Mar;1191:62-88
references.pmid: 20392276
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Dec;17(12):2841-52
references.pmid: 17337745
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Mar;16(2):178-88
references.pmid: 15068590