title: Influence of reproductive traits on pollination success in two Daphne species (Thymelaeaceae).
abstract: Taxonomically related species can differ in a number of reproductive traits, which may translate into a differential mating system and pollination success. Here we compare two hermaphroditic insect-pollinated Daphne species (D. rodriguezii and D. gnidium) which differ in distribution (island endemic vs. mediterranean) and floral traits (long- vs. short-tube corolla). We investigated their mating system and pollen limitation by means of hand-pollination experiments and quantified the diversity and abundance of flower visitors by direct observations. Plant size and five reproductive traits (flower production, proportion of viable anthers, pollen production, flower tube length and tepal area) were studied to assess how they contribute to reproductive success, measured as proportion of pollen grains germinated per stigma and fruit set. Selfing was very low and pollen limitation existed in both species, though was higher in D. rodriguezii probably due to the scarcity of flower visitors. The low fruit set in both species suggests that most of the pollen grains found on stigmas are self-pollen. Pollinators appeared to favour some floral traits (specifically, flower tube length or tepal area) in both species, although flower crop in D. rodriguezii was the only reproductive trait influencing fruit set. In both species, the highest variability in reproductive traits and pollination success was within individuals. Our findings suggest that despite both species showed similar mating system, dependency on outcrossing pollen and selection of floral traits, pollen limitation was higher in D. rodriguezii, probably as a higher proportion of self-pollen arrives to its stigmas.
authors.affiliation: Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Miquel Marqués 21, Esporles, 07190 Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain. jvr.rodriguez@gmail.es
authors.forename: Javier
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rodríguez-Pérez
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Traveset
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D032364:Daphne / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D035264:Flowers / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000235:genetics; D005638:Fruit / Q000502:physiology; D007313:Insecta / Q000502:physiology*; D008521:Mediterranean Islands; D010641:Phenotype; D054817:Pollination / Q000235:genetics*; D012098:Reproduction / Q000235:genetics; D013045:Species Specificity
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Mar;88(3):706-15
references.pmid: 17503598
references.citation: Evolution. 1991 Sep;45(6):1468-1479
references.pmid: 28563822
references.citation: Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1558-65
references.pmid: 11108584
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2004 Jan;93(1):61-6
references.pmid: 14602664
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2005 Oct;96(5):845-52
references.pmid: 16093269
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Sep;8(9):321-5
references.pmid: 21236182
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):530-545
references.pmid: 19552694
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2005 Aug;92(8):1264-9
references.pmid: 21646147
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2001 Jun;88(6):1016-24
references.pmid: 11410465
references.citation: Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225
references.pmid: 28568501
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2004 May;17(3):642-50
references.pmid: 15149406
references.citation: Evolution. 1984 Jul;38(4):709-719
references.pmid: 28555816