The effect of volume-of-interest misregistration on quantitative planar activity and dose estimation.
In targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT), dose estimation is essential for treatment planning and tumor dose response studies. Dose estimates are typically based on a time series of whole-body conjugate view planar or SPECT scans of the patient acquired after administration of a planning dose. Quantifying the activity in the organs from these studies is an essential part of dose estimation. The quantitative planar (QPlanar) processing method involves accurate compensation for image degrading factors and correction for organ and background overlap via the combination of computational models of the image formation process and 3D volumes of interest defining the organs to be quantified. When the organ VOIs are accurately defined, the method intrinsically compensates for attenuation, scatter and partial volume effects, as well as overlap with other organs and the background. However, alignment between the 3D organ volume of interest (VOIs) used in QPlanar processing and the true organ projections in the planar images is required. The aim of this research was to study the effects of VOI misregistration on the accuracy and precision of organ activity estimates obtained using the QPlanar method. In this work, we modeled the degree of residual misregistration that would be expected after an automated registration procedure by randomly misaligning 3D SPECT/CT images, from which the VOI information was derived, and planar images. Mutual information-based image registration was used to align the realistic simulated 3D SPECT images with the 2D planar images. The residual image misregistration was used to simulate realistic levels of misregistration and allow investigation of the effects of misregistration on the accuracy and precision of the QPlanar method. We observed that accurate registration is especially important for small organs or ones with low activity concentrations compared to neighboring organs. In addition, residual misregistration gave rise to a loss of precision in the activity estimates that was on the order of the loss of precision due to Poisson noise in the projection data. These results serve as a lower bound on the effects of misregistration on the accuracy and precision of QPlanar activity estimate and demonstrate that misregistration errors must be taken into account when assessing the overall precision of organ dose estimates.
Song
N
N
Division of Medical Imaging Physics, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
He
B
B
Frey
E C
EC
D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D008954:Models, Biological; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
J Nucl Med. 1999 Feb;40(2):37S-61S
10025848
Med Phys. 1996 Nov;23(11):1919-28
8947907
Phys Med Biol. 1994 Apr;39(4):719-34
15552080
J Nucl Med. 1995 Aug;36(8):1489-513
7629599
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Aug;24(8):969-76
16092329
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 7;50(17):4169-85
16177538
Med Phys. 2000 Mar;27(3):608-15
10757612
Phys Med Biol. 1998 Apr;43(4):857-73
9572510
Phys Med Biol. 1985 Aug;30(8):799-816
3840265
Med Phys. 1976 Jul-Aug;03(04):253-5
958163
J Nucl Med. 2002 Jul;43(7):972-82
12097471
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Aug 21;51(16):3967-81
16885618
Phys Med Biol. 1997 Jun;42(6):1133-42
9194133
Med Phys. 1993 Mar-Apr;20(2 Pt 2):569-77
8492765
J Nucl Med. 2003 Sep;44(9):1541-3; author reply 1543
12960205
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1991;10(3):408-12
18222843
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986 Jul-Aug;10(4):654-63
3488338
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Aug;21(8):867-77
12472260
J Nucl Med. 1984 Aug;25(8):893-900
6611390
J Nucl Med. 2001 Nov;42(11):1713-21
11696644
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Apr 21;50(8):1791-804
15815096
J Nucl Med. 1998 May;39(5):904-11
9591599
J Nucl Med. 1985 Apr;26(4):390-4
2984364
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(4):601-9
18218538
J Nucl Med. 1999 Dec;40(12):2014-20
10616879
J Nucl Med. 2001 Feb;42(2):237-47
11216522
Phys Med Biol. 1994 Mar;39(3):509-30
15551595
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jun 21;55(12):3535-44
20508323
Med Phys. 1984 Mar-Apr;11(2):189-92
6328238
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Aug;22(8):986-1004
12906253
J Nucl Med. 1998 Aug;39(8 Suppl):14S-20S
9708566