Dendritic spikes amplify the synaptic signal to enhance detection of motion in a simulation of the direction-selective ganglion cell.
The On-Off direction-selective ganglion cell (DSGC) in mammalian retinas responds most strongly to a stimulus moving in a specific direction. The DSGC initiates spikes in its dendritic tree, which are thought to propagate to the soma with high probability. Both dendritic and somatic spikes in the DSGC display strong directional tuning, whereas somatic PSPs (postsynaptic potentials) are only weakly directional, indicating that spike generation includes marked enhancement of the directional signal. We used a realistic computational model based on anatomical and physiological measurements to determine the source of the enhancement. Our results indicate that the DSGC dendritic tree is partitioned into separate electrotonic regions, each summing its local excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to initiate spikes. Within each local region the local spike threshold nonlinearly amplifies the preferred response over the null response on the basis of PSP amplitude. Using inhibitory conductances previously measured in DSGCs, the simulation results showed that inhibition is only sufficient to prevent spike initiation and cannot affect spike propagation. Therefore, inhibition will only act locally within the dendritic arbor. We identified the role of three mechanisms that generate directional selectivity (DS) in the local dendritic regions. First, a mechanism for DS intrinsic to the dendritic structure of the DSGC enhances DS on the null side of the cell's dendritic tree and weakens it on the preferred side. Second, spatially offset postsynaptic inhibition generates robust DS in the isolated dendritic tips but weak DS near the soma. Third, presynaptic DS is apparently necessary because it is more robust across the dendritic tree. The pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms together can overcome the local intrinsic DS. These local dendritic mechanisms can perform independent nonlinear computations to make a decision, and there could be analogous mechanisms within cortical circuitry.
Schachter
Michael J
MJ
Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Oesch
Nicholas
N
Smith
Robert G
RG
Taylor
W Rowland
WR
D000818:Animals; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003712:Dendrites / Q000502:physiology*; D051379:Mice; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D062557:NAV1.6 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel; D009419:Nerve Tissue Proteins / Q000502:physiology; D011817:Rabbits; D012160:Retina / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D012165:Retinal Ganglion Cells / Q000502:physiology*; D015222:Sodium Channels / Q000502:physiology; D055366:Synaptic Potentials / Q000502:physiology*
D062557:NAV1.6 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel; D009419:Nerve Tissue Proteins; C491046:Scn8a protein, mouse; D015222:Sodium Channels
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Jun;69(6):2174-87
8350137
Neuron. 2005 Apr 7;46(1):117-27
15820698
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Oct;78(4):1935-47
9325362
Neuroscience. 1998 Jul;85(1):239-47
9607715
Vis Neurosci. 2003 Mar-Apr;20(2):141-52
12916736
J Comp Neurol. 2002 Jul 22;449(2):195-205
12115689
J Neurosci. 1999 May 15;19(10):3657-64
10233997
Nature. 2002 Aug 22;418(6900):845-52
12192402
Neuron. 2007 Jul 19;55(2):179-86
17640521
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 May;80(9):2799-802
6573680
J Neurophysiol. 1985 May;53(5):1266-86
3998809
Jpn J Physiol. 1991;41(1):35-48
1713278
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Sep;5(9):e1000500
19750211
Vis Neurosci. 1994 Sep-Oct;11(5):1019-25
7947395
J Neurophysiol. 2003 May;89(5):2406-19
12740401
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Aug;12(8):996-1002
19633666
J Neurosci. 1988 Jul;8(7):2303-20
3249227
J Neurosci. 2002 Sep 1;22(17):7712-20
12196594
Trends Neurosci. 2003 Jul;26(7):379-85
12850434
Biophys J. 1991 Dec;60(6):1511-33
1663796
J Physiol. 2005 May 1;564(Pt 3):803-15
15760941
Exp Neurol. 1959 Nov;1:491-527
14435979
J Neurosci. 1990 Jun;10(6):1728-44
2355247
J Gen Physiol. 1998 Apr;111(4):565-81
9524139
J Physiol. 1989 Nov;418:379-96
2559971
J Neurochem. 1981 Oct;37(4):867-77
7320727
J Comp Neurol. 2008 May 1;508(1):175-83
18306383
Physiol Rev. 1992 Oct;72(4 Suppl):S159-86
1438585
Vision Res. 1993 Mar-Apr;33(5-6):579-608
8351833
Biophys J. 1974 Oct;14(10):759-90
4424185
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;79(1):151-8
9425186
Neurosci Res. 1991 Sep;11(4):261-75
1661876
Science. 2000 Sep 29;289(5488):2347-50
11009420
Science. 2000 Oct 27;290(5492):739-44
11052929
Neuron. 2009 Mar 26;61(6):906-16
19323999
Bull Math Biol. 1992 Nov;54(6):905-28
1515871
J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1138-68
6055351
Neuron. 2005 Sep 1;47(5):739-50
16129402
J Physiol. 1964 Oct;173:377-407
14220259
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1990;55:69-80
1966772
J Physiol. 1965 Jun;178(3):477-504
5827909
J Neurosci. 1998 Oct 1;18(19):7613-24
9742133
J Physiol. 1995 Sep 15;487 ( Pt 3):711-25
8544133
Brain Res. 2009 Nov 3;1296:225-33
19596283
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Feb;73(2):703-12
7760129
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;81(3):1412-7
10085366
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Nov;78(5):2772-89
9356425
Vis Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;21(4):611-25
15579224
J Physiol. 1993 Dec;472:615-63
7908327
J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):613-26
1127460
J Neurosci. 2003 Mar 15;23(6):2306-13
12657689
Biophys J. 2001 Feb;80(2):729-37
11159440
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Feb;4(2):176-83
11175879
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr;81(4):1685-98
10200204
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jul 27;298(1090):227-63
6127730
J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 5;26(27):7172-80
16822974
J Neurosci. 1994 Sep;14(9):5267-80
8083735
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Sep;7(9):961-7
15322550
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Aug;88(2):1026-39
12163551
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Feb;85(2):926-37
11160523
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Mar;103(3):1357-74
20053849
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Oct;78(4):1948-64
9325363
J Neurosci. 1999 Sep 15;19(18):8049-56
10479705
J Neurosci. 1994 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):6301-16
7965037
J Neurosci Methods. 1992 Jul;43(2-3):83-108
1405746
J Comp Neurol. 2007 Jan 10;500(2):339-52
17111377