Developmental progression of looking and reaching performance on the A-not-B task.
From a neuropsychological perspective, the cognitive skills of working memory, inhibition, and attention and the maturation of the frontal lobe are requisites for successful A-not-B performance on both the looking and reaching versions of the task. This study used a longitudinal design to examine the developmental progression of infants' performance on the looking and reaching versions of the A-not-B task. Twenty infants were tested on both versions of the task once a month from 5 to 10 months of age. Infants had higher object permanence scores on the looking version of the task from 5 to 8 months, with comparable performance across response modalities at 9 and 10 months. The same pattern of performance was found on nonreversal (A) trials: Infants performed better on looking trials from 5 to 7 months, and they performed equally on both response trials from 8 to 10 months. Overall, infants performed better on looking reversal (B) trials than reaching reversal trials. These data suggest that performance differences between response modalities early in development can be attributed to major differences in the maturation of brain circuitry associated with the actual task response.
Cuevas
Kimberly
K
Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. kcuevas@vt.edu
Bell
Martha Ann
MA
D000221:Adaptation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D000367:Age Factors; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D002657:Child Development / Q000502:physiology*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D013997:Time Factors
Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2005 Jun;35(5):481-90
16033196
Child Dev. 1996 Apr;67(2):646-58
8625732
Dev Psychobiol. 1997 Dec;31(4):287-97
9413676
Child Dev. 1992 Oct;63(5):1142-63
1446545
J Exp Child Psychol. 1995 Jun;59(3):419-56
7622987
Neuroimage. 2002 Aug;16(4):1120-5
12202098
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Oct;22(5):1059-76
8865616
Child Dev. 1988 Aug;59(4):908-17
3168629
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1997;62(4):i-v, 1-208
9421921
Exp Brain Res. 1989;74(1):24-40
2924839
Infancy. 2001 Jul;2(3):311-330
33451207
Dev Neuropsychol. 2007;31(1):21-38
17305436
Dev Psychobiol. 1989 Apr;22(3):271-94
2707496
Infant Behav Dev. 2006 Jul;29(3):435-44
17138296
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1987;51(3):1-67
3683418
Child Dev. 2005 Jan-Feb;76(1):122-36
15693762
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;608:267-309; discussion 309-17
2127511
Child Dev. 1996 Dec;67(6):2658-76
9071757
Infancy. 2004 Mar;5(2):217-238
33401790
Psychophysiology. 2002 Jul;39(4):450-8
12212637
Dev Psychol. 2004 Sep;40(5):836-51
15355170
Child Dev. 1985 Aug;56(4):868-83
4042750
Child Dev. 2008 Nov-Dec;79(6):1606-24
19037935
Cognition. 1990 Sep;36(3):255-84
2265529
Child Dev. 1987 Jun;58(3):601-22
3608641