title: Antennae in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) mediate abdominal flexion in response to mechanical stimuli.
abstract: Flying insects rely on the integration of feedback signals from multiple sensory modalities. Thus, in addition to the visual input, mechanosensory information from antennae is crucial for stable flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. However, the nature of compensatory reflexes mediated by mechanoreceptors on the antennae is unknown. In this study we describe an abdominal flexion response mediated by the antennal mechanosensory input during mechanical body rotations. Such reflexive abdominal motions lead to shifts in the animal's center of mass, and therefore changes in flight trajectory. Moths respond with abdominal flexion both to visual and mechanical rotations, but the mechanical response depends on the presence of the mass of the flagellum. In addition, the mechanically mediated flexion response is about 200° out of phase with the visual response and adds linearly to it. Phase-shifting feedback signals in such a manner can lead to a more stable behavioral output response when the animal is faced with turbulent perturbations to the flight path.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1800, USA. ahinterw@uw.edu
authors.forename: Armin J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Hinterwirth
authors.forename: Thomas L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Daniel
mesh_terms: D000005:Abdomen / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D057506:Arthropod Antennae / Q000502:physiology*; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D005426:Flight, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D018402:Manduca; D008465:Mechanoreceptors / Q000502:physiology*; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D010812:Physical Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D014110:Touch / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Exp Cell Res. 1958;14(Suppl 5):426-39
references.pmid: 13586303
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008 Oct;194(10):887-97
references.pmid: 18751714
references.citation: Rev Oculomot Res. 1993;5:239-63
references.pmid: 8420551
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1986 Dec;159(6):849-57
references.pmid: 3806441
references.citation: Bioinspir Biomim. 2008 Sep;3(3):034001
references.pmid: 18591738
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Mar 12;458(7235):165-71
references.pmid: 19279630
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3840-5
references.pmid: 20133721
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 Nov;204(Pt 21):3693-702
references.pmid: 11719533
references.citation: Science. 2007 Feb 9;315(5813):863-6
references.pmid: 17290001
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 May 29;354(1385):903-16
references.pmid: 10382224
references.citation: Vision Res. 1999 May;39(9):1611-30
references.pmid: 10343855
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2003 Jan;206(Pt 2):295-302
references.pmid: 12477899
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2006 Aug;209(Pt 16):3114-30
references.pmid: 16888060
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 22;277(1683):853-60
references.pmid: 19906663
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2007 Dec;210(Pt 23):4092-103
references.pmid: 18025010
references.citation: Science. 1999 Jun 18;284(5422):1954-60
references.pmid: 10373107
references.citation: Cell Tissue Res. 1997 Feb;287(2):425-33
references.pmid: 8995213
references.citation: Kybernetik. 1968 Jun;4(6):199-208
references.pmid: 5731498
references.citation: Nature. 1970 Mar 28;225(5239):1263-4
references.pmid: 5435363
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Jan 30;167(2):127-39
references.pmid: 17854905
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2004 Jan;207(Pt 1):133-42
references.pmid: 14638840