title: Use of a codified medication process for documentation of home medications.
abstract: To determine the quality and completeness of the list of home medications documented by nurses using a codified process, authors conducted a comparative study of home medications using a non-codified and codified process for documentation of required data fields including drug, dose, route of administration, frequency, and schedule. Each documented home medication (DHM) was evaluated based on the ability to convert to an inpatient medication order. The home medication was classified as non-convertible if one or more of the required data fields were missing, inaccurate, or incomplete. The study compared 176 patients with 1618 DHM in the non-codified group to 94 patients with 646 DHM in the codified group. All DHM could be converted to inpatient orders for 70% of the patients in the codified group compared with 42% in the non-codified group. Based on each DHM, the codified process resulted in 92% of the DHM being able to convert to inpatient orders compared with 82% for the non-codified process. Authors conclude that use of a codified process to document home medications has the potential to increase the number of complete drug entries and in the number of patients with a DHM list in which all of the medication entries have all of the dosing information.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pharmacy Services, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. david.l.green1@us.army.mil
authors.forename: David L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Green
authors.forename: Jan A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Boonstra
authors.forename: Marlene A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Bober
mesh_terms: D004282:Documentation; D006701:Home Nursing; D006801:Humans; D050316:Medical Order Entry Systems; D008499:Medical Records; D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000145:classification*
chemical_list: D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations
references.citation: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Oct 1;60(19):1982-6
references.pmid: 14531244
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2005 Feb 28;165(4):424-9
references.pmid: 15738372
references.citation: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):104-12
references.pmid: 14633936
references.citation: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Jul;31(7):406-13
references.pmid: 16130984
references.citation: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):581-92
references.pmid: 17114640
references.citation: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Feb 15;64(4):404-22
references.pmid: 17299180
references.citation: CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):510-5
references.pmid: 16129874
references.citation: Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Jan;30(1):5-14
references.pmid: 14738031
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr;15(2):122-6
references.pmid: 16585113
references.citation: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):1027-31
references.pmid: 17911871
references.citation: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Feb;35(2):106-14
references.pmid: 19241731
references.citation: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Jan;32(1):37-50
references.pmid: 16514938
references.citation: Health Serv J. 2001 Jul 5;111(5762):35
references.pmid: 11464781
references.citation: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Aug 15;61(16):1689-95
references.pmid: 15540481
references.citation: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):679-83
references.pmid: 17911803
references.citation: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Nov 1;65(21):2047-54
references.pmid: 18945865