Investigation of optimal viewing size for detecting nodular ground-glass opacity on high-resolution computed tomography with cine-mode display.
We evaluated the effect of the displayed image sizes on observers' ability to detect nodular ground-glass opacity (n-GGO) on CT and investigated the optimal viewing size for soft-copy reading at CT screening for lung cancer. A total of 46 patients' high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images (22 patients with one GGO; 24 without GGO) were displayed on a monochromatic liquid crystal display monitor at a resolution of 1,200 × 1,600. HRCT was presented on the screen with cine-mode display. We compared two viewing sizes (original size, i.e., the image displayed with a zoom factor of 1 in which each pixel value in the image is displayed as one pixel on the display: 13 cm × 13 cm; fit size, i.e., by zooming the captured image until it occupies the entire screen: 30 cm × 30 cm) in terms of radiologists' performance for detecting n-GGO on HRCT and the viewing times required for soft-copy reading decisions. Observer performance was analyzed in terms of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A statistically significant improvement was found with the original size in the average area-under-the-ROC curve values for the accuracy of diagnosis and the viewing times compared to the fit size (P < 0.05). The original size with cine-mode display leads to increased lung GGO detection at CT screening for lung cancer, and the reduced time spent performing the diagnosis offers cost savings.
Yamaguchi
Michihiro
M
Department of Radiology, Osaka Prefectural Medical Center for Respiratory and Allergic Disease, Osaka Prefectural Hospital Organization, 3-7-1 Habikino, Habikino, Osaka, 583-8588, Japan. yamami@iris.eonet.ne.jp
Bessho
Yuichi
Y
Inoue
Tatsuro
T
Asai
Yoshiyuki
Y
Matsumoto
Tomoshige
T
Murase
Kenya
K
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019540:Area Under Curve; D005260:Female; D005898:Glass; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012372:ROC Curve; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*; D055815:Young Adult
Radiology. 2004 Sep;232(3):762-6
15273338
Eur Radiol. 2005 Dec;15(12):2487-96
16132924
Acad Radiol. 2009 Aug;16(8):940-6
19446475
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Dec;80(3):845-50
20462717
Acad Radiol. 2006 Apr;13(4):409-13
16554219
Invest Radiol. 1994 Feb;29(2):141-6
8169087
Chest. 2002 May;121(5):1464-7
12006429
Radiology. 1992 Jul;184(1):77-81
1609106
Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):1205-25
15895604
Ann ICRP. 2007;37(1):1-79, iii
18069128
Radiology. 1998 Mar;206(3):617-22
9494475
Acad Radiol. 1997 Apr;4(4):298-303
9110028
Radiology. 2002 Dec;225(3):673-83
12461245
Radiology. 1995 Dec;197(3):753-8
7480751
Radiat Med. 2006 Dec;24(10):653-8
17186319
Eur Radiol. 2005 Jan;15(1):14-22
15526207
J Digit Imaging. 1989 Feb;2(1):39-41
2488151
Radiology. 1995 Oct;197(1):73-8
7568857
J Digit Imaging. 1997 Nov;10(4):147-51
9399167