title: Moving from data on deaths to public health policy in Agincourt, South Africa: approaches to analysing and understanding verbal autopsy findings.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Cause of death data are an essential source for public health planning, but their availability and quality are lacking in many parts of the world. Interviewing family and friends after a death has occurred (a procedure known as verbal autopsy) provides a source of data where deaths otherwise go unregistered; but sound methods for interpreting and analysing the ensuing data are essential. Two main approaches are commonly used: either physicians review individual interview material to arrive at probable cause of death, or probabilistic models process the data into likely cause(s). Here we compare and contrast these approaches as applied to a series of 6,153 deaths which occurred in a rural South African population from 1992 to 2005. We do not attempt to validate either approach in absolute terms.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The InterVA probabilistic model was applied to a series of 6,153 deaths which had previously been reviewed by physicians. Physicians used a total of 250 cause-of-death codes, many of which occurred very rarely, while the model used 33. Cause-specific mortality fractions, overall and for population subgroups, were derived from the model's output, and the physician causes coded into comparable categories. The ten highest-ranking causes accounted for 83% and 88% of all deaths by physician interpretation and probabilistic modelling respectively, and eight of the highest ten causes were common to both approaches. Top-ranking causes of death were classified by population subgroup and period, as done previously for the physician-interpreted material. Uncertainty around the cause(s) of individual deaths was recognised as an important concept that should be reflected in overall analyses. One notably discrepant group involved pulmonary tuberculosis as a cause of death in adults aged over 65, and these cases are discussed in more detail, but the group only accounted for 3.5% of overall deaths.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There were no differences between physician interpretation and probabilistic modelling that might have led to substantially different public health policy conclusions at the population level. Physician interpretation was more nuanced than the model, for example in identifying cancers at particular sites, but did not capture the uncertainty associated with individual cases. Probabilistic modelling was substantially cheaper and faster, and completely internally consistent. Both approaches characterised the rise of HIV-related mortality in this population during the period observed, and reached similar findings on other major causes of mortality. For many purposes probabilistic modelling appears to be the best available means of moving from data on deaths to public health actions. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
authors.affiliation: Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden. peter.byass@epiph.umu.se
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Byass
authors.forename: Kathleen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kahn
authors.forename: Edward
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Fottrell
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Collinson
authors.forename: Stephen M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Tollman
mesh_terms: D001344:Autopsy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D002423:Cause of Death / Q000639:trends; D006291:Health Policy / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000379:methods; D015233:Models, Statistical; D010819:Physician's Role; D011640:Public Policy / Q000639:trends; D012424:Rural Population / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013019:South Africa / Q000453:epidemiology; D013223:Statistics as Topic / Q000379:methods; D014705:Verbal Behavior
references.citation: Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:38-55
references.pmid: 20203105
references.citation: Scand J Infect Dis. 2010 Apr;42(4):281-7
references.pmid: 20100113
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Sep 13;372(9642):893-901
references.pmid: 18790312
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 2010 May;15(5):547-53
references.pmid: 20214760
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 2000 Nov;5(11):824-31
references.pmid: 11123832
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000155
references.pmid: 19956675
references.citation: Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(1):26-31
references.pmid: 16449041
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Feb;15(2):241-50
references.pmid: 19961564
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Mar;84(3):164
references.pmid: 16583068
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jan;58(1):18-22
references.pmid: 20122037
references.citation: S Afr Med J. 2006 Sep;96(9 Pt 2):964-8
references.pmid: 17077926
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2009 Feb 24;9:67
references.pmid: 19236726
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Mar;84(3):204-10
references.pmid: 16583079
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Jul;13 Suppl 1:31-43
references.pmid: 18578810