title: Stimulus design is an obstacle course: 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor.
abstract: Despite the ubiquity and importance of metaphor in thought and communication, its neural mediation remains elusive. We suggest that this uncertainty reflects, in part, stimuli that have not been designed with recent conceptual frameworks in mind or that have been hampered by inadvertent differences between metaphoric and literal conditions. In this article, we begin addressing these shortcomings by developing a large, flexible, extensively normed, and theoretically motivated set of metaphoric and literal sentences. On the basis of the results of three norming studies, we provide 280 pairs of closely matched metaphoric and literal sentences that are characterized along 10 dimensions: length, frequency, concreteness, familiarity, naturalness, imageability, figurativeness, interpretability, valence, and valence judgment reaction time. In addition to allowing for control of these potentially confounding lexical and sentential factors, these stimuli are designed to address questions about the role of novelty, metaphor type, and sensory-motor grounding in determining the neural basis of metaphor comprehension. Supplemental data for this article may be downloaded from http://brm.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, 3 West Gates, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. eica@mail.med.upenn.edu
authors.forename: Eileen R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Cardillo
authors.forename: Gwenda L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Schmidt
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kranjec
authors.forename: Anjan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Chatterjee
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D032882:Comprehension; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D019365:Metaphor; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D021641:Recognition, Psychology / Q000502:physiology; D012016:Reference Values
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jun;17(6):905-17
references.pmid: 16021798
references.citation: Cortex. 2004 Jun;40(3):479-90
references.pmid: 15259328
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2005 Apr 25;16(6):649-52
references.pmid: 15812326
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(8):1305-14
references.pmid: 16504224
references.citation: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):451-86
references.pmid: 20957580
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1739-53
references.pmid: 19642889
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1552-61
references.pmid: 15601518
references.citation: Science. 1996 Oct 4;274(5284):114-6
references.pmid: 8810246
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Aug;20(3):395-402
references.pmid: 15268917
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2005 Mar;92(3):221-33
references.pmid: 15721955
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 3;96(16):9379-84
references.pmid: 10430951
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1498-517
references.pmid: 16989551
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Sep 1;42(3):1185-95
references.pmid: 18582580
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90
references.pmid: 19897807
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jan;20(1):170-81
references.pmid: 17919080
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2007 Feb;100(2):208-20
references.pmid: 16487581
references.citation: Brain Res. 2007 Aug 29;1166:92-102
references.pmid: 17662699
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):193-216
references.pmid: 15631593
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;15(2):272-93
references.pmid: 12676064
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 15;42(2):973-87
references.pmid: 18554928
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1995 Nov;33(11):1485-510
references.pmid: 8584182
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):112-24
references.pmid: 14741648
references.citation: J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):35-9
references.pmid: 18472250
references.citation: J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):80-94
references.pmid: 18486456
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):11-21
references.pmid: 15109993
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2002 Mar;80(3):510-35
references.pmid: 11896655
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2007 Feb;100(2):142-9
references.pmid: 16677700
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2008 Dec;107(3):194-202
references.pmid: 18692890
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(4):375-83
references.pmid: 1692980
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2003 Nov;87(2):217-26
references.pmid: 14585291
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):226-34
references.pmid: 15010254
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(9):1607-21
references.pmid: 16516934
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(14):2084-100
references.pmid: 16243053
references.citation: Cognition. 2000 Apr 14;75(1):1-28
references.pmid: 10815775
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(1):62-70
references.pmid: 14615076
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(3):280-92
references.pmid: 12457754
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2358-68
references.pmid: 19016600
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Feb;7(2):92-96
references.pmid: 12584028
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1968 Jan;76(1):Suppl:1-25
references.pmid: 5672258
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2007 Feb;100(2):115-26
references.pmid: 16290261
references.citation: Brain. 1994 Dec;117 ( Pt 6):1241-53
references.pmid: 7820563
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Jun;33(2):307-16
references.pmid: 2359271
references.citation: Brain Lang. 1987 Nov;32(2):265-77
references.pmid: 2446699
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Dec;17(12):1855-70
references.pmid: 16356324
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1542-55
references.pmid: 17714015
references.citation: Laterality. 2009 Jan;14(1):30-54
references.pmid: 18608849
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2007 Feb;100(2):150-62
references.pmid: 16165201
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12 Suppl 2:35-51
references.pmid: 11506646
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):281-9
references.pmid: 17081771
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2005 Jan 3;373(1):5-9
references.pmid: 15555767
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 May 15;36(1):222-31
references.pmid: 17428685
references.citation: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Jan;16(1):1-5
references.pmid: 19765354
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Sep;27(3):677-93
references.pmid: 15921937
references.citation: Semin Speech Lang. 2008 Aug;29(3):226-38; quiz C6
references.pmid: 18720319
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):151-3
references.pmid: 15551484
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2001 Mar;11(3):223-37
references.pmid: 11230094
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jul;6(7):576-82
references.pmid: 15959465
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Jun;35(3):626-37
references.pmid: 1608254
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 15;29(2):536-44
references.pmid: 16165371
references.citation: Brain. 1977 Dec;100(4):717-29
references.pmid: 608117
references.citation: Brain Lang. 1984 Jul;22(2):253-65
references.pmid: 6204711
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2006 Dec;16(12):1709-17
references.pmid: 16400163
references.citation: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7
references.pmid: 15641430
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):1950-63
references.pmid: 17892384