title: Y chromosomal variation tracks the evolution of mating systems in chimpanzee and bonobo.
abstract: The male-specific regions of the Y chromosome (MSY) of the human and the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) are fully sequenced. The most striking difference is the dramatic rearrangement of large parts of their respective MSYs. These non-recombining regions include ampliconic gene families that are known to be important for male reproduction,and are consequently under significant selective pressure. However, whether the published Y-chromosomal pattern of ampliconic fertility genes is invariable within P. troglodytes is an open but fundamental question pertinent to discussions of the evolutionary fate of the Y chromosome in different primate mating systems. To solve this question we applied fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) of testis-specific expressed ampliconic fertility genes to metaphase Y chromosomes of 17 chimpanzees derived from 11 wild-born males and 16 bonobos representing seven wild-born males. We show that of eleven P. troglodytes Y-chromosomal lines, ten Y-chromosomal variants were detected based on the number and arrangement of the ampliconic fertility genes DAZ (deleted in azoospermia) and CDY (chromodomain protein Y)-a so-far never-described variation of a species' Y chromosome. In marked contrast, no variation was evident among seven Y-chromosomal lines of the bonobo, P. paniscus, the chimpanzee's closest living relative. Although, loss of variation of the Y chromosome in the bonobo by a founder effect or genetic drift cannot be excluded, these contrasting patterns might be explained in the context of the species' markedly different social and mating behaviour. In chimpanzees, multiple males copulate with a receptive female during a short period of visible anogenital swelling, and this may place significant selection on fertility genes. In bonobos, however, female mate choice may make sperm competition redundant (leading to monomorphism of fertility genes), since ovulation in this species is concealed by the prolonged anogenital swelling, and because female bonobos can occupy high-ranking positions in the group and are thus able to determine mate choice more freely.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Human Genetics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. werner.schempp@uniklinik-freiburg.de
authors.forename: Felix
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Schaller
authors.forename: Antonio M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Fernandes
authors.forename: Christine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hodler
authors.forename: Claudia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Münch
authors.forename: Juan J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Pasantes
authors.forename: Wolfram
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Rietschel
authors.forename: Werner
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Schempp
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002874:Chromosome Mapping; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005260:Female; D014644:Genetic Variation; D008297:Male; D019974:Pan paniscus / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D002679:Pan troglodytes / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D012098:Reproduction; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal; D014998:Y Chromosome / Q000235:genetics*
references.citation: Primates. 2009 Jul;50(3):197-209
references.pmid: 19353234
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Mar;24(3):853-9
references.pmid: 17218643
references.citation: Mamm Genome. 1998 Mar;9(3):226-31
references.pmid: 9501307
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2001 May;10(5):1279-300
references.pmid: 11380884
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 15;89(4):1388-92
references.pmid: 1741394
references.citation: Nature. 1978 Oct 26;275(5682):744-6
references.pmid: 703839
references.citation: Science. 1999 Oct 29;286(5441):964-7
references.pmid: 10542153
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1999 Dec;23(4):429-32
references.pmid: 10581029
references.citation: Science. 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1193-201
references.pmid: 7915048
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2004 Nov;13(11):3425-35
references.pmid: 15488001
references.citation: Folia Primatol (Basel). 2006;77(5):364-76
references.pmid: 16912505
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Mar 26;8:96
references.pmid: 18366765
references.citation: J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1980;Suppl 28:43-57
references.pmid: 6934311
references.citation: Chromosome Res. 1997 May;5(3):167-76
references.pmid: 9246409
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 1998 Jan;7(1):97-107
references.pmid: 9384609
references.citation: Primates. 2003 Apr;44(2):191-7
references.pmid: 12687485
references.citation: Chromosome Res. 1995 Jun;3(4):227-34
references.pmid: 7606360
references.citation: Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1986;43(1-2):72-8
references.pmid: 3096642
references.citation: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Nov;128(3):630-8
references.pmid: 15861424
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2000 Mar;9(3):315-28
references.pmid: 10736029
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jun 19;423(6942):825-37
references.pmid: 12815422
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2006 Feb;38(2):141-3
references.pmid: 16444252
references.citation: Folia Primatol (Basel). 1978;29(2):86-94
references.pmid: 658843
references.citation: Hum Genet. 1983;63(2):171-4
references.pmid: 6682404
references.citation: Nature. 1981 Sep 3;293(5827):55-7
references.pmid: 7266658
references.citation: Genome Res. 2008 Jul;18(7):1030-42
references.pmid: 18445620
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 2009 Feb;68(2):134-44
references.pmid: 19142680
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2004 Nov 15;83(2):361-71
references.pmid: 15488551
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5288
references.pmid: 19404400
references.citation: Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1511-8
references.pmid: 12930756
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Sep 1;437(7055):100-3
references.pmid: 16136134
references.citation: Nature. 1997 Jul 24;388(6640):337
references.pmid: 9237749
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2006 Feb;38(2):158-67
references.pmid: 16388311
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Jan 28;463(7280):536-9
references.pmid: 20072128