A Pilot Study of the Performance Characteristics of the D-dimer in Presumed Sepsis.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if a sensitive D-dimer assay can exclude progression to organ dysfunction, death, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected infection, and if increasing levels of D-dimer are predictive of those end points.


METHODS
The study took place at two academic EDs, both located in tertiary care hospitals. This was a prospective convenience sample of adult patients presenting with an infective process and at least two of four criteria for the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. We measured D-dimer levels in the participants and abstracted their records for the end points. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine if a higher cutoff would have a greater specificity for our end points.


RESULTS
We enrolled 134 patients. Twelve were excluded from analysis (10 for lack of a D-dimer, one for recent surgery, and one for complete loss to follow up). Using the cutoff of 0.4 established by our laboratories as positive, the D-dimer had a sensitivity of 94% (CI95; 76-99) for organ dysfunction in the ED, 93% (72-99) for organ dysfunction at 48 hours, 93% (81-98) for ICU admission, and 100% (63-100) for 30-day mortality. However, at this cutoff, specificity was not statistically significant. Significantly raising the cutoff for a positive resulted in a decrease in sensitivity but improved specificity.


CONCLUSIONS
This study was limited by its nonconsecutive patient recruitment and sample size. A normal D-dimer may exclude progression to organ dysfunction, ICU admission, and death and, at higher cutoff levels, could help risk stratify patients presenting to the ED with signs of sepsis.
Goebel
Phillip J
PJ
Williams
Justin B
JB
Gerhardt
Robert T
RT
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1368-77
11794169
Shock. 2005 Jan;23(1):25-9
15614127
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2003 Dec;14(8):745-8
14614354
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul 1;168(1):77-84
12702548
Crit Care. 2004 Apr;8(2):R82-90
15025782
Chest. 1993 Apr;103(4):1107-12
8131448
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1589-96
16625125
Chest. 2002 Apr;121(4):1262-8
11948062
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10
8844239
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jun;26(6):1054-60
9635655
Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1):173-8
15249459
Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):341-8
15699837
J Emerg Med. 2000 Oct;19(3):217-23
11033265
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;27(3):305-8
8599488
J Trauma. 2007 Nov;63(5):1093-8
17993956