title: Effects of introducing low-frequency harmonics in the perception of vocoded telephone speech.
abstract: Several studies have demonstrated that telephone use presents a challenge for most cochlear implant (CI) users, and this is attributed mainly to the narrow bandwidth (300-3400 Hz) introduced by the telephone network. The present study focuses on answering the question whether telephone speech recognition in noise can be improved by introducing, prior to vocoder processing, low-frequency harmonic information encompassing the missing (due to the telephone network) information residing in the 0-300 Hz band. Experiment 1 regenerates the main harmonics and adjacent partials within the 0-600 Hz range in corrupted (by steady noise) telephone speech which has been vocoded to simulate electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). Results indicated that introducing the main harmonics alone did not produce any benefits in intelligibility. Substantial benefit (20%) was observed, however, when both main harmonics and adjacent partials were regenerated in the acoustic portion of EAS-vocoded telephone speech. A similar benefit was noted in Experiment 2 when low-frequency harmonic information was introduced prior to processing noise-corrupted telephone speech using an eight-channel vocoder. The gain in telephone speech intelligibility in noise obtained when low-frequency harmonic information was introduced can be attributed to the listeners having more reliable access to a combination of F0, glimpsing and lexical segmentation cues.
authors.affiliation: Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, USA. huy@uwm.edu
authors.forename: Yi
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Hu
authors.forename: Philipos C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Loizou
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D001302:Audiometry, Speech; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D009622:Noise; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D010898:Pitch Perception; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013067:Speech Perception; D013689:Telephone
references.citation: Audiol Neurootol. 2008;13(2):105-12
references.pmid: 18057874
references.citation: Am J Audiol. 2006 Dec;15(2):127-32
references.pmid: 17182877
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2010 Feb;31(1):63-9
references.pmid: 20050394
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec;124(6):3947
references.pmid: 19206819
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Dec;118(6):3874-88
references.pmid: 16419830
references.citation: Laryngoscope. 2005 May;115(5):796-802
references.pmid: 15867642
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jan;127(1):427-34
references.pmid: 20058988
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):338-46
references.pmid: 19603890
references.citation: Am J Audiol. 2004 Dec;13(2):200-12
references.pmid: 15903146
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Apr;115(4):1729-35
references.pmid: 15101651
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 May;127(5):3145-53
references.pmid: 21117763
references.citation: Ear Hear. 1992 Apr;13(2):70-9
references.pmid: 1601195
references.citation: Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):303-4
references.pmid: 7569981
references.citation: Ear Hear. 1992 Oct;13(5):311-9
references.pmid: 1487091
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Mar;117(3 Pt 1):1351-61
references.pmid: 15807023
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Sep;28(3):455-62
references.pmid: 4046587
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Apr;111(4):1872-91
references.pmid: 12002871
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Mar;125(3):1658-65
references.pmid: 19275323
references.citation: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1989 Aug;142:8-11
references.pmid: 2504098
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):EL77-83
references.pmid: 19206836
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Apr;123(4):2287-94
references.pmid: 18397033
references.citation: Int J Audiol. 2004 Jun;43(6):356-62
references.pmid: 15457818
references.citation: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Dec;121(6):802-4
references.pmid: 10580241
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):489-93
references.pmid: 19546806
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Apr;119(4):2417-26
references.pmid: 16642854
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):66S-69S
references.pmid: 17496651
references.citation: Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:63-8
references.pmid: 17063013
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jun;125(6):EL236-41
references.pmid: 19507928
references.citation: Hear Res. 1990 Aug 1;47(1-2):103-38
references.pmid: 2228789
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Sep;74(3):750-3
references.pmid: 6630731
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jun;121(6):3717-27
references.pmid: 17552722