Soft matrices suppress cooperative behaviors among receptor-ligand bonds in cell adhesion.
The fact that biological tissues are stable over prolonged periods of time while individual receptor-ligand bonds only have limited lifetime underscores the critical importance of cooperative behaviors of multiple molecular bonds, in particular the competition between the rate of rupture of closed bonds (death rate) and the rate of rebinding of open bonds (birth rate) in a bond cluster. We have recently shown that soft matrices can greatly increase the death rate in a bond cluster by inducing severe stress concentration near the adhesion edges. In the present paper, we report a more striking effect that, irrespective of stress concentration, soft matrices also suppress the birth rate in a bond cluster by increasing the local separation distance between open bonds. This is shown by theoretical analysis as well as Monte Carlo simulations based on a stochastic-elasticity model in which stochastic descriptions of molecular bonds and elastic descriptions of interfacial force/separation are unified in a single modeling framework. Our findings not only are important for understanding the role of elastic matrices in cell adhesion, but also have general implications on adhesion between soft materials.
Qian
Jin
J
School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Gao
Huajian
H
D002448:Cell Adhesion; D004548:Elasticity; D005109:Extracellular Matrix / Q000378:metabolism*; D008024:Ligands; D008954:Models, Biological; D011485:Protein Binding; D013269:Stochastic Processes
D008024:Ligands
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7757-62
20385838
Biophys J. 1985 Jul;48(1):175-83
4016207
Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Mar 12;92(10):108102
15089248
Biophys J. 2004 Dec;87(6):3665-78
15377531
J Cell Biol. 2001 Jun 11;153(6):1175-86
11402062
Nat Mater. 2003 Nov;2(11):715-25
14593396
Biophys J. 1997 Apr;72(4):1541-55
9083660
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006 Oct;18(5):572-8
16859906
Langmuir. 2008 Feb 19;24(4):1262-70
18179265
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988 Jun 22;234(1274):55-83
2901109
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 2;106(22):8818-23
19416901
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003;19:677-95
14570586
Nature. 1995 Apr 6;374(6522):539-42
7535385
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:697-715
8970741
Science. 2005 Nov 18;310(5751):1139-43
16293750
Nat Cell Biol. 2001 May;3(5):466-72
11331874
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Apr;7(4):265-75
16607289
Biophys J. 2000 Jul;79(1):144-52
10866943
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Aug;78(2 Pt 1):021909
18850867
Science. 2004 May 28;304(5675):1301-5
15166374
J Cell Sci. 2001 Oct;114(Pt 20):3583-90
11707510
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 1;102(9):3213-8
15728395
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9469-74
15972807
Biophys J. 2009 Nov 4;97(9):2438-45
19883586
J Chem Phys. 2004 Nov 8;121(18):8997-9017
15527366
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006 Oct;18(5):472-81
16930976
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 25;101(21):7851-6
15148400
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2001;30:105-28
11340054
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:189-226
11701511
Nature. 2005 May 12;435(7039):191-4
15889088
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Jan;10(1):21-33
19197329
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Mar 20;84(12):2750-3
11017316
Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2007 Feb;22(2):123-37
17347787
Cell. 2006 Aug 25;126(4):677-89
16923388
J Cell Biol. 2004 Feb 2;164(3):427-39
14757754
Science. 1978 May 12;200(4342):618-27
347575
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 10;97(21):11262-7
11005837
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 5;98(12):6548-53
11371622
Biophys J. 2006 Sep 15;91(6):L60-2
16829560
Chemphyschem. 2004 Mar 19;5(3):383-8
15067875
Science. 2007 May 25;316(5828):1148-53
17525329
Science. 1994 Apr 15;264(5157):415-7
8153628
Nature. 1999 Jan 7;397(6714):50-3
9892352
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):13661-5
9391082
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 4;101(18):6940-5
15100404
Science. 2008 Dec 12;322(5908):1687-91
19074349