title: Smooth excimer laser coronary angioplasty (SELCA) and conventional excimer laser angioplasty: Comparison of vascular injury and smooth muscle cell proliferation.
abstract: Although the excimer laser, which utilizes 'non-thermal ablation effects', has achieved encouraging results in early clinical trials, the long-term results have failed to show any advantage over conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).A new system, Smooth Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty (SELCA), has been developed to reduce the tissue damage in the vessel wall caused by shock waves and vapour bubbles.SELCA (wavelength 308 nm, pulse duration 115 ns, repetition rate 150 Hz and energy density 50 mJ mm(-2)) lowers the amount of shock wave formation and pressure peak amplitude in the surrounding tissue by about eight times when compared to the conventional 308 nm excimer laser (ELCA). In this preclinical evaluation, this new system was compared to ELCA. Fifty New Zealand White rabbits were stimulated by repeated weak DC impulses for a period of 28 days in order to form an atherosclerotic plaque in the right carotid artery. The vessels were excised 3, 7,14 and 28 days after laser irradiation for immunohistochemical analysis.SELCA and ELCA laser treatment lead to a decrease in maximal intimal wall thickness 3 days after intervention (control: 177+/-4 microm; SELCA: 131+/-22microm; ELCA: 120 +/-33microm). In the period between 3 and 28 days, a moderate increase in intimal wall thickness was observed after SELCA treatment compared to a significant increase after ELCA (28 days after intervention: SELCA: 157+/-22microm; ELCA: 274 +/-28microm). Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was applied 18 and 12 h before excision of the vessels in order to determine the percent of cells undergoing DNA synthesis. The percent of BrdU labelled SMC in the intima (control: 13 +/- 2 cells mm(-2)) increased in both groups after 3 days (SELCA: 248 +/- 107 cells mm(-2); ELCA: 162 +/- 41 cells mm(-2)) and 7 days (SELCA: 162+/- 55 cells mm(-2); ELCA: 279 +/- 119 cells mm(-2)).The present results demonstrate that vascular wall injury and increase in intimal wall thickness following SELCA are reduced in comparison to the results achieved with the conventional technique. Further trials are necessary to assess whether these improvements will lead to more favourable long-term results after excimer laser angioplasty.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Otfried Müller Str. 10, D-72076, Tübingen, Germany.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Oberhoff
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Baumbach
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Herdeg
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hassenstein
authors.forename: D Y
authors.initials: DY
authors.lastname: Xie
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Blessing
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hanke
authors.forename: K K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Haase
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Betz
authors.forename: K R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Karsch
references.citation: Arteriosclerosis. 1986 May-Jun;6(3):312-20
references.pmid: 3707430
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 1993;13(6):618-24
references.pmid: 8295470
references.citation: Am Heart J. 1992 Apr;123(4 Pt 1):886-95
references.pmid: 1549996
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 1992;12(1):7-12
references.pmid: 1614266
references.citation: Am J Surg. 1985 Aug;150(2):220-6
references.pmid: 3839634
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Jan;17(1):94-9
references.pmid: 1987246
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Apr;5(4):929-33
references.pmid: 3838324
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 1991;11(1):26-34
references.pmid: 1997777
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 1986 Feb;3(2):284-7
references.pmid: 3944932
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 1993;13(3):263-70
references.pmid: 8515665
references.citation: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 Jul;96(1):150-6
references.pmid: 3386289
references.citation: Circulation. 1990 Jun;81(6):1849-59
references.pmid: 2344680
references.citation: Am Heart J. 1992 Apr;123(4 Pt 1):896-904
references.pmid: 1549997
references.citation: Circulation. 1991 Aug;84(2):632-43
references.pmid: 1860207
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1610-8
references.pmid: 1593058
references.citation: Am J Cardiol. 1990 Nov 1;66(15):1027-32
references.pmid: 2220626
references.citation: Lancet. 1989 Sep 16;2(8664):647-50
references.pmid: 2570901
references.citation: Lancet. 1996 Jan 13;347(8994):79-84
references.pmid: 8538345
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Nov;6(5):1102-9
references.pmid: 4045033
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Oct;26(4):939-46
references.pmid: 7560621
references.citation: Circulation. 1991 Apr;83(4):1380-9
references.pmid: 2013155
references.citation: Circulation. 1992 Nov;86(5):1575-83
references.pmid: 1423970
references.citation: Circ Res. 1990 Sep;67(3):651-9
references.pmid: 1697794
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Mar 15;17(4):978-84
references.pmid: 1999637
references.citation: Circulation. 1985 Apr;71(4):849A-50A
references.pmid: 3971549
references.citation: Science. 1986 Oct 31;234(4776):559-65
references.pmid: 3764428
references.citation: Circulation. 1992 Jun;85(6):2185-96
references.pmid: 1591835