Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to measure the diagnostic accuracy of fracture detection, visual accommodation, reading time, and subjective ratings of fatigue and visual strain before and after a day of clinical reading.


METHODS
Forty attending radiologists and radiology residents viewed 60 deidentified, HIPAA-compliant bone examinations, half with fractures, once before any clinical reading (early) and once after a day of clinical reading (late). Reading time was recorded. Visual accommodation (the ability to maintain focus) was measured before and after each reading session. Subjective ratings of symptoms of fatigue and oculomotor strain were collected. The study was approved by local institutional review boards.


RESULTS
Diagnostic accuracy was reduced significantly after a day of clinical reading, with average areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.885 for early reading and 0.852 for late reading (P < .05). After a day of image interpretation, visual accommodation was no more variable, though error in visual accommodation was greater (P < .01), and subjective ratings of fatigue were higher.


CONCLUSIONS
After a day of clinical reading, radiologists have reduced ability to focus, increased symptoms of fatigue and oculomotor strain, and reduced ability to detect fractures. Radiologists need to be aware of the effects of fatigue on diagnostic accuracy and take steps to mitigate these effects.
Krupinski
Elizabeth A
EA
Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, 1609 N Warren, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. krupinski@radiology.arizona.edu
Berbaum
Kevin S
KS
Caldwell
Robert T
RT
Schartz
Kevin M
KM
Kim
John
J
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000377:Agnosia / Q000209:etiology; D001364:Awareness; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D019937:Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures / Q000592:standards; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal / Q000379:methods*; D005221:Fatigue / Q000209:etiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011859:Radiography / Q000592:standards*; D012890:Sleep; D013679:Technology, Radiologic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014792:Visual Acuity; D016526:Workload / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
Acad Radiol. 2008 May;15(5):556-62
18423311
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Mar;4(3):166-70
17412257
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):527-32
19620452
Radiat Med. 2008 Oct;26(8):455-65
18975046
Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):824-32
15681686
Acad Radiol. 2002 Dec;9(12):1430-3
12553355
Radiology. 2007 Mar;242(3):671-82
17229874
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Jan;21(1):124-9
10669236
Acad Radiol. 1997 May;4(5):380-9
9156236
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001 Mar;21(2):151-60
11261349
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):972-9
19011191
Acad Radiol. 2009 Aug;16(8):947-50
19406673
Edinb Med Surg J. 1843 Jul 1;60(156):73-103
30330617
Radiology. 2004 Sep;232(3):762-6
15273338
Scand J Psychol. 2000 Sep;41(3):231-41
11041305
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978 May;130(5):971-4
417603
Radiology. 1977 Oct;125(1):103-5
19811
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Sep;189(3):523-6
17715095
BMC Med Imaging. 2006 Oct 16;6:13
17042951
J Math Psychol. 1999 Mar;43(1):1-33
10069933
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Jul;5(7):827-33
18585660
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Jul;5(7):817-26
18585659
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007 Apr;28(2):85-93
17432762
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):W103-12
17242214
Acad Radiol. 2007 Jun;14(6):711-22
17502261
Hum Factors. 1999 Mar;41(1):139-45
10354810
Ergonomics. 2000 Feb;43(2):252-68
10675062
Emerg Radiol. 2007 Oct;14(5):311-6
17605056
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Feb;184(2):681-6
15671398
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1994 Jun;23(1):27-39
7844355