title: Satisfaction and use of personal emergency response systems.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Despite a wide distribution, little is known about the relationship between subscriber satisfaction and the extent of use or non-use of personal emergency response systems (PERS).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine the degree of satisfaction with PERS, the wearing time and its use in case of a fall.
  
  
  METHODS
  Telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted with 52 elderly community-dwelling PERS users.
  
  
  RESULTS
  PERS subscribers were very satisfied with their device; however, 24% of the participants reported that they never wear the alarm button, and only 14% wear it 24 hours each day. After falls PERS was not activated by 83% (n=11) of the subscribers who fell alone and lay on the floor longer than 5 minutes. None of the five different satisfaction measures and only the subscriber's estimation of relevance of the PERS showed to be a significant predictor of PERS use in daily life.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  High rates of non-use of PERS in everyday life and after falls can be found. Subscribers' estimation of relevance but not satisfaction predicts the usage of PERS in everyday life. Further research is needed to better understand the reasons not using a PERS.
authors.affiliation: Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Heinbüchner
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hautzinger
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Becker
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Pfeiffer
mesh_terms: D000058:Accidental Falls / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000368:Aged; D004631:Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016330:Frail Elderly; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D014600:Utilization Review
references.citation: Mt Sinai J Med. 1995 Sep;62(4):293-7
references.pmid: 7565852
references.citation: Assist Technol. 1996;8(1):3-13
references.pmid: 10159726
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 1981 Spring;16(1):65-80
references.pmid: 6453110
references.citation: Home Health Care Serv Q. 2007;26(3):1-21
references.pmid: 17804350
references.citation: Med J Aust. 1999 Nov 15;171(10):518-21
references.pmid: 10816699
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jul;47(7):873-8
references.pmid: 10404935
references.citation: Assist Technol. 2005 Spring;17(1):82-8
references.pmid: 16121648
references.citation: J Aging Health. 1996 Nov;8(4):554-75
references.pmid: 10182386
references.citation: J Telemed Telecare. 1996;2(2):71-80
references.pmid: 9375066
references.citation: Manag Care Q. 2000 Winter;8(1):38-43
references.pmid: 11009732
references.citation: Assist Technol. 2000;12(2):96-105
references.pmid: 11508406
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Nov 17;337:a2227
references.pmid: 19015185
references.citation: Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):771-81
references.pmid: 12218768
references.citation: South Med J. 1995 Sep;88(9):917-22
references.pmid: 7660208
references.citation: Assist Technol. 2002 Winter;14(2):130-9
references.pmid: 14651251