Separating DNA with different topologies by atomic force microscopy in comparison with gel electrophoresis.
Atomic force microscopy, which is normally used for DNA imaging to gain qualitative results, can also be used for quantitative DNA research, at a single-molecular level. Here, we evaluate the performance of AFM imaging specifically for quantifying supercoiled and relaxed plasmid DNA fractions within a mixture, and compare the results with the bulk material analysis method, gel electrophoresis. The advantages and shortcomings of both methods are discussed in detail. Gel electrophoresis is a quick and well-established quantification method. However, it requires a large amount of DNA, and needs to be carefully calibrated for even slightly different experimental conditions for accurate quantification. AFM imaging is accurate, in that single DNA molecules in different conformations can be seen and counted. When used carefully with necessary correction, both methods provide consistent results. Thus, AFM imaging can be used for DNA quantification, as an alternative to gel electrophoresis.
Jiang
Yong
Y
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southeast University, Jiangning, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, People's Republic of China. yj@seu.edu.cn
Rabbi
Mahir
M
Mieczkowski
Piotr A
PA
Marszalek
Piotr E
PE
D002138:Calibration; D004247:DNA / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D004278:DNA, Superhelical / Q000737:chemistry / Q000302:isolation & purification; D004587:Electrophoresis, Agar Gel / Q000379:methods*; D018625:Microscopy, Atomic Force / Q000379:methods*; D010957:Plasmids / Q000737:chemistry / Q000302:isolation & purification
D004278:DNA, Superhelical; D004247:DNA
Anal Biochem. 1992 Feb 14;201(1):80-6
1320349
Chem Biol. 2002 Mar;9(3):345-50
11927259
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jan 4;97(1):103-8
10618378
Med Phys. 1995 Sep;22(9):1369-75
8531861
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1996;25:395-429
8800476
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2001;52:71-92
11326059
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 19;102(29):10058-63
16009942
Biophys J. 2007 Sep 1;93(5):1758-67
17483180
Mol Biotechnol. 2004 Mar;26(3):249-61
15004294
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2004;41(1):75-98
15371641
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2002;99(1-4):143-5
12194267
Biophys J. 2009 Feb;96(3):1151-8
19186150
Ultramicroscopy. 2003 Oct-Nov;97(1-4):279-87
12801681
J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2000 Jul 10;44(1-2):31-40
10889274
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:609-43
7919794
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Nov 15;31(22):e137
14602930
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 20;91(26):12927-31
7809148
J Mol Biol. 2005 Jan 28;345(4):695-706
15588819
Science. 1992 May 22;256(5060):1180-4
1589799
Mutat Res. 2003 Oct 29;531(1-2):93-107
14637248
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 21;94(2):496-501
9012812
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 9;100(25):14822-7
14634210
Ultramicroscopy. 2003 Oct-Nov;97(1-4):263-70
12801679
Radiat Res. 2004 Jul;162(1):84-95
15222798
Anal Chem. 2002 Jun 15;74(12):2851-62
12090669
Nature. 2005 Sep 15;437(7057):440-3
16163361
J Struct Biol. 1999 Oct;127(3):240-7
10544049
Radiat Res. 2005 Dec;164(6):755-65
16296881
J Mol Biol. 2001 Oct 19;313(2):295-307
11800558
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004 Jun;14(3):380-5
15193320
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1997 Oct;1(3):370-7
9667876
Nature. 1997 Apr 10;386(6625):563
9121578
Mutagenesis. 2005 Jul;20(4):245-54
15899933
Radiat Res. 1998 Dec;150(6):612-8
9840180
Science. 1989 Jun 2;244(4908):1063-4
2727694
Math Biosci. 1999 Jul;159(2):165-87
10414032
Small. 2008 Feb;4(2):288-94
18247386
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13765-70
16954188
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jun 15;30(12):2686-91
12060686