title: Knower-guesser differentiation in ravens: others' viewpoints matter.
abstract: Differentiating between individuals with different knowledge states is an important step in child development and has been considered as a hallmark in human evolution. Recently, primates and corvids have been reported to pass knower-guesser tasks, raising the possibility of mental attribution skills in non-human animals. Yet, it has been difficult to distinguish 'mind-reading' from behaviour-reading alternatives, specifically the use of behavioural cues and/or the application of associatively learned rules. Here, I show that ravens (Corvus corax) observing an experimenter hiding food are capable of predicting the behaviour of bystanders that had been visible at both, none or just one of two caching events. Manipulating the competitors' visual field independently of the view of the test-subject resulted in an instant drop in performance, whereas controls for behavioural cues had no such effect. These findings indicate that ravens not only remember whom they have seen at caching but also take into account that the other's view was blocked. Notably, it does not suffice for the birds to associate specific competitors with specific caches. These results support the idea that certain socio-ecological conditions may select for similar cognitive abilities in distantly related species and that some birds have evolved analogous precursors to a human theory-of-mind.
authors.affiliation: Konrad Lorenz Forschungsstelle, 4645 Grünau im Almtal, Austria. thomas.bugnyar@univie.ac.at
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Bugnyar
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning; D003163:Competitive Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D046368:Crows / Q000502:physiology*; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology; D019370:Observation
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Feb;21(1):101-14; discussion 115-48
references.pmid: 10097012
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1641-6
references.pmid: 16087417
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Nov 22;414(6862):443-6
references.pmid: 11719804
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2005 Mar 8;15(5):447-52
references.pmid: 15753039
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1999 Oct;58(4):769-777
references.pmid: 10512650
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Apr;59(4):771-785
references.pmid: 10792932
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 May;12(5):187-92
references.pmid: 18424224
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):731-44
references.pmid: 17264056
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):494-7
references.pmid: 14585446
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):369-76
references.pmid: 16909235
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 23;17(20):1804-8
references.pmid: 17949980
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 7;271(1546):1331-6
references.pmid: 15306330
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jun 16;312(5780):1662-5
references.pmid: 16709747
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2007 Oct;10(4):439-48
references.pmid: 17426993
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):139-151
references.pmid: 11170704
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Apr;7(4):153-156
references.pmid: 12691762
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):507-22
references.pmid: 17309867
references.citation: Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1903-7
references.pmid: 15591194
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2008 Apr;11(2):231-41
references.pmid: 17762942
references.citation: Science. 1966 Jul 29;153(3735):501-6
references.pmid: 5938775
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Nov;56(5):1083-1090
references.pmid: 9819322