Computerized provider order entry systems - Research imperatives and organizational challenges facing pathology services.
Information and communication technologies (ICT) are contributing to major changes taking place in pathology and within health services more generally. In this article, we draw on our research experience for over 7 years investigating the implementation and diffusion of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems to articulate some of the key informatics challenges confronting pathology laboratories. The implementation of these systems, with their improved information management and decision support structures, provides the potential for enhancing the role that pathology services play in patient care pathways. Beyond eliminating legibility problems, CPOE systems can also contribute to the efficiency and safety of healthcare, reducing the duplication of test orders and diminishing the risk of misidentification of patient samples and orders. However, despite the enthusiasm for CPOE systems, their diffusion across healthcare settings remains variable and is often beset by implementation problems. Information systems like CPOE may have the ability to integrate work, departments and organizations, but unfortunately, health professionals, departments and organizations do not always want to be integrated in ways that information systems allow. A persistent theme that emerges from the research evidence is that one size does not fit all, and system success or otherwise is reliant on the conditions and circumstances in which they are located. These conditions and circumstances are part of what is negotiated in the complex, messy and challenging area of ICT implementation. The solution is not likely to be simple and easy, but current evidence suggests that a combination of concerted efforts, better research designs, more sophisticated theories and hypotheses as well as more skilled, multidisciplinary research teams, tackling this area of study will bring substantial benefits, improving the effectiveness of pathology services, and, as a direct corollary, the quality of patient care.
Georgiou
Andrew
A
Health Informatics Research & Evaluation Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney 1825, Sydney, Australia.
Westbrook
Johanna
J
Braithwaite
Jeffrey
J
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009 Jun;133(6):933-7
19492886
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jun;32(6):1306-9
15187511
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Sep-Oct;9(5):529-39
12223505
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;:150-4
14728152
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Apr;(132):1-71
17627328
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Aug 3;141(3):196-204
15289216
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):746-55
17712083
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):1130-5
18638034
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Jan;78(1):1-9
18930696
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Mar-Apr;75(3-4):268-81
16169771
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Feb-Mar;76(2-3):157-68
16854617
Methods Inf Med. 2009;48(2):211-5
19283321
Milbank Q. 2009 Dec;87(4):729-88
20021585
Top Health Inf Manage. 1999 May;19(4):47-61
10387655
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):41-7
17068352
Am J Clin Pathol. 1996 Apr;105(4 Suppl 1):S1-2
8607455
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Nov;121(11):1176-82
9372745
Proc AMIA Symp. 2002;:230-4
12463821
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Aug;76(8):583-91
16702022
Clin Biochem Rev. 2006 May;27(2):79-87
17077878
Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 Nov;124(5):672-4
16203280
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38
15755945
J Clin Pathol. 2006 May;59(5):533-6
16461564
Am J Med. 1999 Feb;106(2):144-50
10230742
Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(4):376-84
14534637
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1261-3
15755949
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):65-75
17068345
Clin Chim Acta. 2002 May 21;319(2):87-100
11955484
Int J Med Inform. 1999 Dec;56(1-3):51-60
10659934
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):623-8
15964780
Clin Lab Med. 2004 Dec;24(4):913-43, vi
15555749
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;130:121-32
17917187
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:527-31
19745367
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;11(11):1112-3
15528572
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Jul;76(7):514-29
16567121