title: Conservation between higher plants and the moss Physcomitrella patens in response to the phytohormone abscisic acid: a proteomics analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) is ubiquitous among land plants where it plays an important role in plant growth and development. In seeds, ABA induces embryogenesis and seed maturation as well as seed dormancy and germination. In vegetative tissues, ABA is a necessary mediator in the triggering of many of the physiological and molecular adaptive responses of the plant to adverse environmental conditions, such as desiccation, salt and cold.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In this study, we investigated the influence of abscisic acid (ABA) on Physcomitrella patens at the level of the proteome using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Sixty-five protein spots showed changes in response to ABA treatment. Among them, thirteen protein spots were down-regulated; fifty-two protein spots were up-regulated including four protein spots which were newly induced. These proteins were involved in various functions, including material and energy metabolism, defense, protein destination and storage, transcription, signal transduction, cell growth/division, transport, and cytoskeleton. Specifically, most of the up-regulated proteins functioned as molecular chaperones, transcriptional regulators, and defense proteins. Detailed analysis of these up-regulated proteins showed that ABA could trigger stress and defense responses and protect plants from oxidative damage. Otherwise, three protein kinases involved in signal pathways were up-regulated suggesting that P. patens is sensitive to exogenous ABA. The down-regulated of the Rubisco small subunit, photosystem II oxygen-evolving complex proteins and photosystem assembly protein ycf3 indicated that photosynthesis of P. patens was inhibited by ABA treatment.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Proteome analysis techniques have been applied as a direct, effective, and reliable tool in differential protein expressions. Sixty-five protein spots showed differences in accumulation levels as a result of treatment with ABA. Detailed analysis these protein functions showed that physiological and molecular responses to the plant hormone ABA appear to be conserved among higher plant species and bryophytes.
authors.affiliation: College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.
authors.forename: Xiaoqin
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Tingyun
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kuang
authors.forename: Yikun
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: He
mesh_terms: D000040:Abscisic Acid / Q000494:pharmacology*; D019068:Bryopsida / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism*; D002853:Chromatography, Liquid; D015180:Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional; D013058:Mass Spectrometry; D010937:Plant Growth Regulators / Q000494:pharmacology*; D010940:Plant Proteins / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism*; D020543:Proteome / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism; D040901:Proteomics; D015398:Signal Transduction
chemical_list: D010937:Plant Growth Regulators; D010940:Plant Proteins; D020543:Proteome; D000040:Abscisic Acid
references.citation: J Plant Physiol. 2005 Feb;162(2):169-80
references.pmid: 15779827
references.citation: New Phytol. 2000 Dec;148(3):357-396
references.pmid: 33863019
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2002 Sep;130(1):15-21
references.pmid: 12226483
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2004 May;9(5):244-52
references.pmid: 15130550
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 1998 Dec;38(6):1201-14
references.pmid: 9869425
references.citation: Mol Biol Rep. 2004 Dec;31(4):217-30
references.pmid: 15663005
references.citation: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996 Feb;6(1):43-50
references.pmid: 8696972
references.citation: Plant J. 1994 Feb;5(2):157-72
references.pmid: 8148875
references.citation: Nature. 1992 Jan 2;355(6355):33-45
references.pmid: 1731198
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Aug;1760(8):1226-34
references.pmid: 16740364
references.citation: Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000 Oct;64(10):2075-82
references.pmid: 11129578
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(8):1697-709
references.pmid: 16606633
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Mar;7(3):106-11
references.pmid: 11906833
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 1996 Feb;21(2):70-3
references.pmid: 8851664
references.citation: J Plant Physiol. 2003 May;160(5):475-83
references.pmid: 12806775
references.citation: Cell. 1992 Jul 10;70(1):21-30
references.pmid: 1623521
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001 Oct;4(5):447-56
references.pmid: 11597504
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 1990 Jan;23(1):1-27
references.pmid: 24420988
references.citation: J Biochem Biophys Methods. 1982 Sep;6(4):317-39
references.pmid: 7142660
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1997 Apr;113(4):1203-12
references.pmid: 9112773
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Dec;23(12):454-6
references.pmid: 9868361
references.citation: Planta. 2005 Jan;220(3):414-23
references.pmid: 15349781
references.citation: Planta. 2008 Jun;228(1):167-77
references.pmid: 18351383
references.citation: Planta. 1979 Jan;144(5):437-42
references.pmid: 24407387
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Jun 13;381(6583):571-9
references.pmid: 8637592
references.citation: Sci STKE. 2002 Jul 09;2002(140):re10
references.pmid: 12107340
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Apr;149(4):1739-50
references.pmid: 19211702
references.citation: Funct Integr Genomics. 2002 Nov;2(6):282-91
references.pmid: 12444421
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Oct;5(5):430-6
references.pmid: 12183182
references.citation: Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:453-81
references.pmid: 7688944
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun;50:97-131
references.pmid: 15012205
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Jan 29;391(6666):485-8
references.pmid: 9461215
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(4):1155-8
references.pmid: 2937056
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998 Aug;1(4):311-5
references.pmid: 10066598
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2000 May;5(5):199-206
references.pmid: 10785665
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):8007-12
references.pmid: 12808149
references.citation: J Proteome Res. 2008 Oct;7(10):4525-37
references.pmid: 18783262
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Apr;10(2):182-9
references.pmid: 17291824
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2004 Jan;55(395):181-8
references.pmid: 14623901
references.citation: Genome Res. 2006 Mar;16(3):414-27
references.pmid: 16424108
references.citation: Plant J. 2005 Dec;44(6):939-49
references.pmid: 16359387
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998 Jun;49:501-523
references.pmid: 15012244
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Dec;50(6):925-47
references.pmid: 12516863
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Jan;60(2):293-319
references.pmid: 16429265
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 1;89(11):4938-41
references.pmid: 1594598
references.citation: Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:437-96
references.pmid: 8122909
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1994 Jan;38(1):1-17
references.pmid: 8151709
references.citation: Planta. 2005 Jan;220(3):384-94
references.pmid: 15322883
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2006 Jan;97(1):133-40
references.pmid: 16311273
references.citation: Mol Gen Genet. 1995 May 20;247(4):444-52
references.pmid: 7770052
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:497-520
references.pmid: 16669772