Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of age-related aneuploidy in oocytes.
Aneuploidy arising early in development is the leading genetic cause of birth defects and developmental disabilities in humans. Most errors in chromosome number originate from the egg, and maternal age is well established as the key risk factor. Although the importance of this problem for reproductive health is widely recognized, the underlying molecular basis for age-related aneuploidy in female meiosis is unknown. Here we show that weakened chromosome cohesion is a leading cause of aneuploidy in oocytes in a natural aging mouse model. We find that sister kinetochores are farther apart at both metaphase I and II, indicating reduced centromere cohesion. Moreover, levels of the meiotic cohesin protein REC8 are severely reduced on chromosomes in oocytes from old mice. To test whether cohesion defects lead to the observed aneuploidies, we monitored chromosome segregation dynamics at anaphase I in live oocytes and counted chromosomes in the resulting metaphase II eggs. About 90% of age-related aneuploidies are best explained by weakened centromere cohesion. Together, these results demonstrate that the maternal age-associated increase in aneuploidy is often due to a failure to effectively replace cohesin proteins that are lost from chromosomes during aging.
Chiang
Teresa
T
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018, USA.
Duncan
Francesca E
FE
Schindler
Karen
K
Schultz
Richard M
RM
Lampson
Michael A
MA
D000375:Aging / Q000235:genetics*; D000782:Aneuploidy; D000818:Animals; D002503:Centromere; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D051379:Mice; D009865:Oocytes / Q000166:cytology*
J Cell Sci. 2009 Aug 1;122(Pt 15):2686-98
19625504
Dev Biol. 2008 Apr 15;316(2):397-407
18342300
PLoS Genet. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000263
19008956
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111(3-4):193-8
16192694
Nature. 1968 Apr 6;218(5136):22-8
4230650
Nature. 2009 Apr 16;458(7240):852-8
19370027
J Genet. 2009 Apr;88(1):9-14
19417539
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jul;61(1):23-32
9245981
Biol Reprod. 2009 Oct;81(4):768-76
19553597
Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Jun;6(6):555-62
15146193
Nat Genet. 2005 Dec;37(12):1351-5
16258540
Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Oct 15;16 Spec No. 2:R203-8
17911163
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111(3-4):250-5
16192701
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12776-81
19617567
J Cell Sci. 2005 Oct 15;118(Pt 20):4621-32
16176934
Curr Biol. 2006 Aug 8;16(15):R579-80
16890511
Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):143-58
18084010
Nat Cell Biol. 2009 Sep;11(9):1103-8
19684578
Hum Genet. 2003 Feb;112(2):195-203
12522562
Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Jan;16(1):103-12
18252055
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr;2(4):280-91
11283700
Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11(10):2217-22
8943533
Trends Genet. 2005 Jul;21(7):405-12
15946764
Hum Reprod. 2006 May;21(5):1172-8
16410329
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:753-77
11687503
Hum Reprod. 1998 Jan;13(1):154-60
9512249
Nature. 1999 Jul 29;400(6743):461-4
10440376