A transformative model for undergraduate quantitative biology education.
The BIO2010 report recommended that students in the life sciences receive a more rigorous education in mathematics and physical sciences. The University of Delaware approached this problem by (1) developing a bio-calculus section of a standard calculus course, (2) embedding quantitative activities into existing biology courses, and (3) creating a new interdisciplinary major, quantitative biology, designed for students interested in solving complex biological problems using advanced mathematical approaches. To develop the bio-calculus sections, the Department of Mathematical Sciences revised its three-semester calculus sequence to include differential equations in the first semester and, rather than using examples traditionally drawn from application domains that are most relevant to engineers, drew models and examples heavily from the life sciences. The curriculum of the B.S. degree in Quantitative Biology was designed to provide students with a solid foundation in biology, chemistry, and mathematics, with an emphasis on preparation for research careers in life sciences. Students in the program take core courses from biology, chemistry, and physics, though mathematics, as the cornerstone of all quantitative sciences, is given particular prominence. Seminars and a capstone course stress how the interplay of mathematics and biology can be used to explain complex biological systems. To initiate these academic changes required the identification of barriers and the implementation of solutions.
Usher
David C
DC
Office of Educational Assessment, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. dusher@udel.edu
Driscoll
Tobin A
TA
Dhurjati
Prasad
P
Pelesko
John A
JA
Rossi
Louis F
LF
Schleiniger
Gilberto
G
Pusecker
Kathleen
K
White
Harold B
HB
D001695:Biology / Q000193:education*; D003479:Curriculum; D008433:Mathematics / Q000193:education*; D017145:Models, Educational; D013334:Students; D014495:Universities
Science. 2004 Feb 6;303(5659):788-90
14764865
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 8;105(1):124-8
18172219