title: Modification of existing human motor memories is enabled by primary cortical processing during memory reactivation.
abstract: One of the most challenging tasks of the brain is to constantly update the internal neural representations of existing memories. Animal studies have used invasive methods such as direct microfusion of protein inhibitors to designated brain areas, in order to study the neural mechanisms underlying modification of already existing memories after their reactivation during recall [1-4]. Because such interventions are not possible in humans, it is not known how these neural processes operate in the human brain. In a series of experiments we show here that when an existing human motor memory is reactivated during recall, modification of the memory is blocked by virtual lesion [5] of the related primary cortical human brain area. The virtual lesion was induced by noninvasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation guided by a frameless stereotactic brain navigation system and each subject's brain image. The results demonstrate that primary cortical processing in the human brain interacting with pre-existing reactivated memory traces is critical for successful modification of the existing related memory. Modulation of reactivated memories by noninvasive cortical stimulation may have important implications for human memory research and have far-reaching clinical applications.
authors.affiliation: Human Cortical Physiology and Stroke Neurorehabilitation Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
authors.forename: Nitzan
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Censor
authors.forename: Michael A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Dimyan
authors.forename: Leonardo G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Cohen
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D011597:Psychomotor Performance
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Nov;11(11):1264-6
references.pmid: 18849987
references.citation: Nature. 1995 Sep 14;377(6545):155-8
references.pmid: 7675082
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 Sep 30;44(1):93-100
references.pmid: 15450162
references.citation: Neurology. 1997 May;48(5):1398-403
references.pmid: 9153480
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):722-6
references.pmid: 10963596
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):224-34
references.pmid: 19229241
references.citation: Neuron. 2010 Apr 29;66(2):198-204
references.pmid: 20434997
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Sep;17(9):1460-70
references.pmid: 16197699
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1979 Sep;86(5):1054-83
references.pmid: 386401
references.citation: Science. 2004 May 7;304(5672):839-43
references.pmid: 15073322
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):640-4
references.pmid: 11807497
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 6;25(27):6372-8
references.pmid: 16000627
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Apr 24;58(2):261-72
references.pmid: 18439410
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Oct 9;425(6958):616-20
references.pmid: 14534587
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Aug;91(2):79-92
references.pmid: 7519144
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Sep;10(9):1206-13
references.pmid: 17694051
references.citation: Science. 2000 Jan 14;287(5451):248-51
references.pmid: 10634773
references.citation: Science. 1997 Aug 8;277(5327):821-5
references.pmid: 9242612
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 22;99(2):1017-22
references.pmid: 11805340
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Jul 3;35(1):205-11
references.pmid: 12123620
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1590-5
references.pmid: 19164589
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Jul 18;382(6588):252-5
references.pmid: 8717039
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002 Nov;78(3):553-64
references.pmid: 12559834
references.citation: J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9
references.pmid: 10990547