title: Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patient radiation exposure and consumption of contrast medium are considered major risks of diagnostic coronary angiography (CA). Rotation of the C-arm during CA could provide similar diagnostic accuracy and lower radiation exposure and contrast medium consumption.
  
  
  METHODS
  To compare feasibility, safety, diagnostic accuracy, patient radiation exposure, and consumption of contrast medium of rotational CA with the invasive standard technique, intraindividual comparisons of the results obtained by both techniques were performed in 235 patients with an indication for first-time elective CA. In addition to conventional angiography, we performed 2 isocentric radiographic coronary spins with cranial and caudal tilts by 20 degrees around the left coronary artery and 1 strict posteroanterior rotational spin around the right coronary artery.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In 16 patients, rotational CA was not performed because of safety concerns. In a further 12 patients, image quality of rotational scans was considered inadequate. In the remaining 207 patients, both modes of CA were proven suitable for anonymized, separate analysis by 3 independent cardiologists. Intraindividual comparison of both CA modes revealed a high degree of diagnostic agreement (Cohen (K) >0.8 for all cardiologists and for each coronary segment). Contrast medium volume during rotational CA and conventional CA amounted to 31.9 +/- 4.5 mL versus 52.2 +/- 8.0 mL (P < .001) and patient radiation exposure amounted to 5.0 +/- 2.6 Gy × cm(2) versus 11.5 +/- 5.5 Gy × cm(2) (P < .001), respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Rotational CA represents a safe and feasible method in clinical routine. Whereas diagnostic accuracy is similar to the usual conventional mode, consumption of contrast medium and patient radiation exposure are significantly reduced.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany. empen@uni-greifswald.de
authors.forename: Klaus
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Empen
authors.forename: Eberhard
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Kuon
authors.forename: Astrid
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hummel
authors.forename: Chris
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gebauer
authors.forename: Marcus
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dörr
authors.forename: Raik
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Könemann
authors.forename: Wolfgang
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Hoffmann
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Staudt
authors.forename: Kerstin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Weitmann
authors.forename: Thorsten
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Reffelmann
authors.forename: Stephan B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Felix
mesh_terms: D015897:Comorbidity; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage; D017023:Coronary Angiography / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D023921:Coronary Stenosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000453:epidemiology; D004867:Equipment Design; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005471:Fluoroscopy; D006801:Humans; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D015641:Radiography, Interventional; D051437:Renal Insufficiency / Q000453:epidemiology
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media