The interplay of socioeconomic status, distance to center, and interdonor service area travel on kidney transplant access and outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
Variation in kidney transplant access across the United States may motivate relocation of patients with ability to travel to better-supplied areas.


METHODS
We examined national transplant registry and U.S. Census data for kidney transplant candidates listed in 1999 to 2009 with a reported residential zip code (n = 203,267). Cox's regression was used to assess associations of socioeconomic status (SES), distance from residence to transplant center, and relocation to a different donation service area (DSA) with transplant access and outcomes.


RESULTS
Patients in the highest SES quartile had increased access to transplant compared with those with lowest SES, driven strongly by 76% higher likelihood of living donor transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70 to 1.83). Waitlist death was reduced in high compared with low SES candidates (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.89). High SES patients also experienced lower mortality after living and deceased donor transplant. Patients living farther from the transplant center had reduced access to deceased donor transplant and increased risk of post-transplant death. Inter-DSA travel was associated with a dramatic increase in deceased donor transplant access (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.00) and was predicted by high SES, white race, and longer deceased-donor allograft waiting time in initial DSA.


CONCLUSIONS
Ongoing disparities exist in kidney transplantation access and outcomes on the basis of geography and SES despite near-universal insurance coverage under Medicare. Inter-DSA travel improves access and is more common among high SES candidates.
Axelrod
David A
DA
Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Dzebisashvili
Nino
N
Schnitzler
Mark A
MA
Salvalaggio
Paolo R
PR
Segev
Dorry L
DL
Gentry
Sommer E
SE
Tuttle-Newhall
Janet
J
Lentine
Krista L
KL
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D054625:Healthcare Disparities; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D016030:Kidney Transplantation; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D012923:Social Class; D014195:Travel; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Oct;46(4):734-45
16183429
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998 Nov;9(11):2142-7
9808103
Qual Life Res. 2004 Aug;13(6):1129-37
15287279
Am J Transplant. 2009 Sep;9(9):2092-101
19645706
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;1(2):313-22
17699222
BMC Nephrol. 2008 Feb 25;9:3
18298850
Am J Transplant. 2008 May;8(5):1051-5
18416741
J Rural Health. 2006 Spring;22(2):140-6
16606425
N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 5;350(6):545-51
14762181
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Mar;131(3):423-33
2301352
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Mar;3(2):463-70
18199847
Transplantation. 2003 Nov 15;76(9):1389-94
14627922
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jun;20(6):1333-40
19339381
Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4 Pt 2):987-1002
20420648
JAMA. 1998 Oct 7;280(13):1148-52
9777814
JAMA. 2003 Nov 26;290(20):2703-8
14645312
Ethn Dis. 1991 Spring;1(2):188-99
1842533
N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 23;343(21):1537-44, 2 p preceding 1537
11087884
Am J Transplant. 2007;7(5 Pt 2):1412-23
17428289
J Natl Med Assoc. 2001 Oct;93(10):372-9
11688917
Med J Aust. 2002 Aug 5;177(3):135-8
12149081
Transplantation. 2008 Jan 27;85(2):166-70
18212619
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Aug;54(8):1794-7
19051029
Am J Transplant. 2009 May;9(5):1124-33
19422338
Am J Transplant. 2006 Oct;6(10):2470-5
16939519