title: Temporal recalibration of vision.
abstract: Our sense of relative timing is malleable. For instance, visual signals can be made to seem synchronous with earlier sounds following prolonged exposure to an environment wherein auditory signals precede visual ones. Similarly, actions can be made to seem to precede their own consequences if an artificial delay is imposed for a period, and then removed. Here, we show that our sense of relative timing for combinations of visual changes is similarly pliant. We find that direction reversals can be made to seem synchronous with unusually early colour changes after prolonged exposure to a stimulus wherein colour changes precede direction changes. The opposite effect is induced by prolonged exposure to colour changes that lag direction changes. Our data are consistent with the proposal that our sense of timing for changes encoded by distinct sensory mechanisms can adjust, at least to some degree, to the prevailing environment. Moreover, they reveal that visual analyses of colour and motion are sufficiently independent for this to occur.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, , Brisbane, QLD 4055, Australia.
authors.forename: Derek H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Arnold
authors.forename: Kielan
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Yarrow
mesh_terms: D003118:Color Perception; D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D013016:Sound; D013997:Time Factors; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 22;269(1491):579-83
references.pmid: 11916473
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Oct;43(23):2403-12
references.pmid: 12972391
references.citation: Nature. 2004 May 20;429(6989):262
references.pmid: 15152242
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2008 Jan 10;430(2):130-4
references.pmid: 18055112
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jul;7(7):773-8
references.pmid: 15195098
references.citation: Perception. 1998;27(8):889-935
references.pmid: 10209632
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2002 Mar 5;12(5):359-68
references.pmid: 11882286
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Dec;22(1):32-5
references.pmid: 15561498
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;181(1):173-81
references.pmid: 17431598
references.citation: Biophys J. 1979 Jun;26(3):499-506
references.pmid: 318064
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 Jul;1(4):133-9
references.pmid: 21223886
references.citation: Vision Res. 1981;21(6):815-24
references.pmid: 7314459
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Aug;43(17):1793-8
references.pmid: 12826102
references.citation: Vision Res. 2005 Nov;45(24):3015-26
references.pmid: 16102796
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Apr;77(4):1906-23
references.pmid: 9114244
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1407-14
references.pmid: 9364780
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;185(2):347-52
references.pmid: 18236035
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 1999 Jan-Feb;16(1):1-14
references.pmid: 10022474
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):875-7
references.pmid: 16732276
references.citation: Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):96-107
references.pmid: 11690606
references.citation: Science. 1988 May 6;240(4853):740-9
references.pmid: 3283936
references.citation: Brain. 1983 Jun;106 (Pt 2):313-40
references.pmid: 6850272
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Feb 20;17(4):366-72
references.pmid: 17291762
references.citation: Nature. 1978 Aug 3;274(5670):423-8
references.pmid: 97565
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):393-9
references.pmid: 9107055