Optical tomography method that accounts for tilted chest wall in breast imaging.
The chest wall underneath breast tissue distorts light reflection measurements, especially measurements obtained from distant source-detector pairs. For patients with a chest wall located at a shallower depth, the chest-wall effect needs to be considered in the image reconstruction procedure. Following our previous studies, this work systemically evaluates the performance of a two-layer model-based reconstruction using the finite element method, and compares it with the performance of the semi-infinite model. The results obtained from simulations and phantom experiments show that the two-layer model improves the light quantification of the targets. The improvements are attributed to improved background estimation and more accurate weight matrix calculation using a two-layer model compared to the semi-infinite model. Fitted two-layer background optical properties obtained from a group of ten patients with chest walls located less than 2 cm deep are more representative of breast tissue and chest-wall optical properties.
Ardeshirpour
Yasaman
Y
University of Connecticut, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-2157, USA.
Zhu
Quing
Q
D000465:Algorithms; D001940:Breast / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D041622:Tomography, Optical / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*
J Biomed Opt. 2004 May-Jun;9(3):541-52
15189092
Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):571-80
15128998
Appl Opt. 1997 Jan 1;36(1):386-96
18250686
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Mar;108(1):9-22
17468951
Radiology. 2007 May;243(2):350-9
17400760
Opt Express. 2001 Mar 26;8(7):447-51
19417840
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009 Aug 13;367(1900):3073-93
19581256
Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):57-66
16183924
Appl Opt. 2003 Jun 1;42(16):3170-86
12790468
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8828-33
16731633
Opt Express. 2007 Mar 19;15(6):3301-11
19532571
J Biomed Opt. 2005 Mar-Apr;10(2):024033
15910106
Invest Radiol. 2005 Jun;40(6):328-35
15905718
J Biomed Opt. 2004 May-Jun;9(3):464-73
15189083
Appl Opt. 1995 Dec 1;34(34):8026-37
21068901
J Biomed Opt. 2004 Nov-Dec;9(6):1152-60
15568935
Neoplasia. 2003 Sep-Oct;5(5):379-88
14670175
Acad Radiol. 2005 Aug;12(8):934-47
16023382
Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):1128-39
15895597
J Biomed Opt. 2009 Nov-Dec;14(6):064004
20059242
Phys Med Biol. 2002 Aug 21;47(16):2847-61
12222850
Appl Opt. 2006 Jul 10;45(20):5027-36
16807614
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Jun 7;50(11):2559-71
15901954
Appl Opt. 2005 Jul 10;44(20):4255-64
16045213
Appl Opt. 1998 Feb 1;37(4):779-91
18268653
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Jun 7;50(11):2429-49
15901947
Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(6):279-85
16457705
J Biomed Opt. 2009 Jul-Aug;14(4):044005
19725717
J Biomed Opt. 2008 Nov-Dec;13(6):064029
19123675
Opt Express. 2005 Mar 7;13(5):1570-9
16044624
J Biomed Opt. 1996 Jul;1(3):330-4
23014733
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Jun 7;50(11):2489-502
15901950
Appl Opt. 2005 Apr 10;44(11):2140-53
15835360
Neoplasia. 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4):347-54
12082551
J Biomed Opt. 2004 Nov-Dec;9(6):1137-42
15568933
Acad Radiol. 2005 Aug;12(8):925-33
16023383
Acad Radiol. 2008 Jul;15(7):859-66
18572121
Appl Opt. 1998 Nov 1;37(31):7401-9
18301574
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Aug;5(4):365-80
16866567