Encoding pitch contours using current steering.
This study investigated cochlear implant (CI) users' ability to perceive pitch cues from time-varying virtual channels (VCs) to identify pitch contours. Seven CI users were tested on apical, medial, and basal electrode pairs with stimulus durations from 100 to 1000 ms. In one stimulus set, 9 pitch contours were created by steering current between the component electrodes and the VC halfway between the electrodes. Another stimulus set only contained 3 pitch contours (flat, falling, and rising). VC discrimination was also tested on the same electrodes. The total current level of dual-electrode stimuli was linearly interpolated between those of single-electrode stimuli to minimize loudness changes. The results showed that pitch contour identification (PCI) scores were similar across electrode locations, and significantly improved at longer durations. For durations longer than 300 ms, 2 subjects had nearly perfect 9-contour identification, and 5 subjects perfectly identified the 3 basic contours. Both PCI and VC discrimination varied greatly across subjects. Cumulative d(') values for VC discrimination were significantly correlated with 100-, 200-, and 500-ms PCI scores. These results verify the feasibility of encoding pitch contours using current steering, and suggest that identification of such pitch contours strongly relies on CI users' sensitivity to VCs.
Luo
Xin
X
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, 500 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA. luo5@purdue.edu
Landsberger
David M
DM
Padilla
Monica
M
Srinivasan
Arthi G
AG
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D012048:Correction of Hearing Impairment / Q000523:psychology*; D003463:Cues; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008144:Loudness Perception; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019986:Persons with Hearing Disabilities / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D010898:Pitch Perception; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013067:Speech Perception; D013997:Time Factors
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Jul;82(1):106-15
3624633
Hear Res. 1983 Aug;11(2):157-89
6619003
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jan;105(1):347-57
9921661
Hear Res. 2002 Dec;174(1-2):101-6
12433401
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Feb;29(2):203-7
18223448
Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):141-53
18501539
Experientia. 1951 Apr 15;7(4):128-34
14831572
J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Oct;68(4):1115-22
7419827
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):EL23-9
20136174
Hear Res. 2009 Aug;254(1-2):34-41
19383534
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Aug;88(2):680-97
2212292
Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):302-19
17485980
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Oct;98(4):1987-99
7593921
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):629-36
17667771
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):623-6
16158620
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jul;96(1):155-62
8064018
Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Dec;127(12):1266-72
17851932
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Jan;117(1):319-27
15704424
Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):301-15
18003871
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Oct;78(4):1286-95
3840500
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Mar;95(3):1559-69
8176059
Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):169-77
19194297
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):1061-74
9714925
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):336-51
18344873
Trends Amplif. 2004;8(2):49-82
15497033
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jun;87(6):2592-605
2373794
Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):247-58
20090533
Ear Hear. 2008 Dec;29(6):957-70
18818548
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jul;120(1):EL1-6
16875252
Ear Hear. 2008 Dec;29(6):853-64
18633324
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Feb;30(2):146-52
19106769