Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profiles.
The point spread function (PSF) method is currently the one predominantly used to determine the modulation transfer function (MTF) of an X-ray CT system. However, the image examined with the PSF method must have a very high contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); it must also be reconstructed with a fine pixel pitch using a zooming reconstruction. Therefore, the PSF method is often inappropriate for describing the MTF of clinical operating conditions when image linearity is not guaranteed. The edge spread function (ESF) method requires no zooming reconstruction, but its susceptibility to image noise is no better than that of the PSF method. We describe a technique for rendering the ESF method robust to image noise. We smooth out the noisy ESF through multiple stages of filtering. Invariably, the line spread function (LSF) obtained from the smoothed ESF is blurred, and the MTF obtained from the LSF is incorrect. However, because the filtering that has been applied is known, much of the LSF blurring can be corrected. An estimate of the true LSF is obtainable from the blurred LSF, assuming that the true LSF is not very different from either a Gaussian or a composite of multiple Gaussians. For an image reconstructed with a kernel for soft-tissue imaging, the MTF obtained by our method is sufficiently consistent with the theoretical MTF, even when the CNR is as low as 2.
Mori
Issei
I
Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan. imori@mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp
Machida
Yoshio
Y
D016011:Normal Distribution; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
Med Phys. 2003 Sep;30(9):2323-31
14528954
Med Phys. 1985 Jul-Aug;12(4):437-42
4033588
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2006 Jul 20;62(7):971-8
16874286
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11(1):34-9
18218354
Med Phys. 1992 May-Jun;19(3):569-73
1508091
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jul;17(7):1885-91
17219145
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1977 Oct;1(4):429-36
615221
Med Phys. 1987 Jul-Aug;14(4):533-7
3626992
Phys Med Biol. 1987 May;32(5):565-75
3588670
Med Phys. 2001 Mar;28(3):356-60
11318317
Med Phys. 1976 Jul-Aug;3(4):233-6
785200
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979 Feb;3(1):85-91
422797
Radiology. 2003 Jul;228(1):257-64
12750460
Phys Med Biol. 1979 Nov;24(6):1079-106
394162