Optimally interacting minds.
In everyday life, many people believe that two heads are better than one. Our ability to solve problems together appears to be fundamental to the current dominance and future survival of the human species. But are two heads really better than one? We addressed this question in the context of a collective low-level perceptual decision-making task. For two observers of nearly equal visual sensitivity, two heads were definitely better than one, provided they were given the opportunity to communicate freely, even in the absence of any feedback about decision outcomes. But for observers with very different visual sensitivities, two heads were actually worse than the better one. These seemingly discrepant patterns of group behavior can be explained by a model in which two heads are Bayes optimal under the assumption that individuals accurately communicate their level of confidence on every trial.
Bahrami
Bahador
B
University College London Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK. bbahrami@gmail.com
Olsen
Karsten
K
Latham
Peter E
PE
Roepstorff
Andreas
A
Rees
Geraint
G
Frith
Chris D
CD
D000328:Adult; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D003142:Communication; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D030141:Feedback, Psychological; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011336:Probability; D011594:Psychometrics; D035501:Uncertainty; D014796:Visual Perception
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):105-15
9705798
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):183-203
11212627
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:623-55
14744229
Nature. 2004 Jan 15;427(6971):244-7
14724638
Psychol Rev. 2005 Apr;112(2):494-508
15783295
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1432-8
17057707
Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33
11807554
Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 3;14(3):257-62
14761661
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Aug;4(8):826-31
11477429