Gender, division of unpaid family work and psychological distress in dual-earner families.
BACKGROUND
Epidemiological studies have only recently begun to address the consequences of unpaid family work (ie., housework and child rearing) for mental health. Although research is suggestive of an association between the division of unpaid family work and psychological health, especially for women, additional research is required to clarify the conditions under which such a relationship holds. The purpose of the present study was to examine more nuanced relationships between the division of family work and psychological distress by disaggregating the family work construct according to type (housework/child rearing), control over scheduling, and evaluations of fairness.


METHODS
Analysis of data obtained from a cross-sectional telephone survey conducted in a Canadian city. Analyses were based on 293 employed parents (182 mothers and 111 fathers), with at least one preschool child, living in dual-earner households. Several multiple linear regression models were estimated with psychological distress as the outcome, adjusting for confounders.


RESULTS
For mothers, more perceived time spent in child rearing (particularly primary child care) and high-schedule-control housework tasks (e.g. yard work) relative to one's partner, were associated with greater distress. For fathers, perceived unfairness in the division of housework and child rearing were associated with greater distress.


CONCLUSIONS
Although methodological limitations temper firm conclusions, these results suggest that the gendered nature of household work has implications for the psychological well-being of both mothers and fathers of preschool children in dual-earner households. However, more longitudinal research and the development of theoretically-informed measures of family work are needed to advance the field.
Tao
Wenting
W
Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Janzen
Bonnie L
BL
Abonyi
Sylvia
S
J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55
9805280
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Mar;54(5):783-98
11999493
J Health Soc Behav. 1994 Jun;35(2):179-91
8064124
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Dec;32(6):443-62
17173201
Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(10):1869-87
15020005
J Health Soc Behav. 1991 Jun;32(2):114-29
1861048
J Vocat Behav. 2008 Dec;73(3):414-425
19430546
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Mar;54(5):677-92
11999486
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Mar;58(6):1007-24
14723898
Environ Res. 2006 Jun;101(2):149-62
16709471
J Fam Psychol. 2004 Mar;18(1):225-36
14992623
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Mar;54(5):799-810
11999494
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9
12578436
Am Sociol Rev. 1982 Apr;47(2):216-27
7091930
Am J Public Health. 2007 May;97(5):860-6
17395852
J Health Soc Behav. 1999 Mar;40(1):32-45
10331320
Psychol Med. 2003 Feb;33(2):357-62
12622315
Health Rep. 2009 Mar;20(1):21-8
19388365
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(8):1501-9
14759693
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Dec;61 Suppl 2:ii39-45
18000116
Am Sociol Rev. 1983 Dec;48(6):809-23
6666885
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004 Aug;77(6):401-8
15338225
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):851-7
16166358
Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76
12214795