title: Prevalence of heavy metal resistance in bacteria isolated from tannery effluents and affected soil.
abstract: In the present study, a total of 198 bacteria were isolated, 88 from the tannery effluents and 110 from agricultural soil irrigated with the tannery effluents. Tannery effluents and soils were analyzed for metal concentrations by atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The tannery effluents and soil samples were found to be contaminated with chromium, nickel, zinc, copper, and cadmium. All isolates were tested for their resistance against Cr(6+ ), Cr(3+ ), Ni(2+ ), Zn(2+ ), Cu(2+ ), Cd(2+ ), and Hg(2+ ). From the total of 198 isolates, maximum bacterial isolates were found to be resistant to Cr(6+ ) 178 (89.9%) followed by Cr(3+ ) 146 (73.7%), Cd(2+ ) 86 (43.4%), Zn(2+ ) 83 (41.9%), Ni(2+ ) 61 (30.8%), and Cu(2+ ) 51 (25.6%). However, most of the isolates were sensitive to Hg(2+ ). Among the isolates from tannery effluents, 97.8% were resistant to Cr(6+ ) and 64.8% were resistant to Cr(3+ ). Most of the soil isolates were resistant against Cr(6+ ) (83.6%) and Cr(3+ ) (81.8%). All isolates were categorized into Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In a total of 114 Gram-positive isolates, 91.2% were resistant to Cr(6+ ) followed by 73.7% to Cr(3+ ), 42.1% to Zn(2+ ), 40.4% to Cd(2+ ), and 32.5% to Ni(2+ ). Among Gram-negative isolates, 88.1% were found showing resistance to Cr(6+ ), 75.0% to Cr(3+ ), and 47.6% were resistant to Cd(2+ ). Majority of these metal-resistant isolates were surprisingly found sensitive to the ten commonly used antibiotics. Out of 198 isolates, 114 were found sensitive to all antibiotics whereas only two isolates were resistant to maximum eight antibiotics at a time. Forty-one and 40 isolates which constitute 20.7% and 20.2% were resistant to methicilin and amoxicillin, respectively.
authors.affiliation: Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202 002, India. mohdzubairalam@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Mohammad Zubair
authors.initials: MZ
authors.lastname: Alam
authors.forename: Shamim
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ahmad
authors.forename: Abdul
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Malik
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000633:toxicity; D001419:Bacteria / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000302:isolation & purification; D018407:Bacterial Physiological Phenomena; D024881:Drug Resistance, Bacterial; D007220:Industrial Waste / Q000032:analysis*; D019216:Metals, Heavy / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D012989:Soil Pollutants / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity; D013633:Tanning; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D007220:Industrial Waste; D019216:Metals, Heavy; D012989:Soil Pollutants; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical
references.citation: Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Aug;30(2):177-82
references.pmid: 17524624
references.citation: Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Sep;34(3):220-5
references.pmid: 19427174
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Sep 30;127(1-2):37-42
references.pmid: 18632174
references.citation: Biodegradation. 1997;8(2):113-24
references.pmid: 9342884
references.citation: Microbiol Res. 2008;163(6):671-83
references.pmid: 17207985
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2005 Sep;96(13):1518-21
references.pmid: 15939281
references.citation: Environ Int. 2005 Aug;31(6):805-12
references.pmid: 15979146
references.citation: Arch Med Res. 2003 Mar-Apr;34(2):130-6
references.pmid: 12700009
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2003 Jan;86(1):7-13
references.pmid: 12421001
references.citation: Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(1):43-50
references.pmid: 11980269
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Sep;3(9):722-32
references.pmid: 16138100
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2007 Feb;66(2):258-66
references.pmid: 16466660
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Jun;27(2-3):313-39
references.pmid: 12829273
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994 Aug;14(4):369-74
references.pmid: 7917423
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2009 Jul;25(7):317-23
references.pmid: 19540613
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92 Suppl:65S-71S
references.pmid: 12000614
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2007 Jun;68(2):360-7
references.pmid: 17276484
references.citation: Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jun 1;34 Suppl 3:S85-92
references.pmid: 11988878
references.citation: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1998 Aug;61(2):261-8
references.pmid: 9702365
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 May;65(5):2256-9
references.pmid: 10224032
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000 Jun 15;187(2):185-8
references.pmid: 10856655
references.citation: J Hazard Mater. 2009 May 15;164(1):322-8
references.pmid: 18818017
references.citation: Curr Microbiol. 2003 Jan;46(1):1-5
references.pmid: 12432455
references.citation: J Basic Microbiol. 2008 Oct;48(5):416-20
references.pmid: 18759228
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Sep;69(9):5536-42
references.pmid: 12957943
references.citation: Environ Res. 2005 May;98(1):100-3
references.pmid: 15721889
references.citation: Curr Microbiol. 2002 Mar;44(3):178-83
references.pmid: 11821925