title: APTIMA assay on SurePath liquid-based cervical samples compared to endocervical swab samples facilitated by a real time database.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Liquid-based cytology (LBC) cervical samples are increasingly being used to test for pathogens, including: HPV, Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) using nucleic acid amplification tests. Several reports have shown the accuracy of such testing on ThinPrep (TP) LBC samples. Fewer studies have evaluated SurePath (SP) LBC samples, which utilize a different specimen preservative. This study was undertaken to assess the performance of the Aptima Combo 2 Assay (AC2) for CT and GC on SP versus endocervical swab samples in our laboratory.
  
  
  METHODS
  The live pathology database of Montefiore Medical Center was searched for patients with AC2 endocervical swab specimens and SP Paps taken the same day. SP samples from CT-and/or GC-positive endocervical swab patients and randomly selected negative patients were studied. In each case, 1.5 ml of the residual SP vial sample, which was in SP preservative and stored at room temperature, was transferred within seven days of collection to APTIMA specimen transfer tubes without any sample or patient identifiers. Blind testing with the AC2 assay was performed on the Tigris DTS System (Gen-probe, San Diego, CA). Finalized SP results were compared with the previously reported endocervical swab results for the entire group and separately for patients 25 years and younger and patients over 25 years.
  
  
  RESULTS
  SP specimens from 300 patients were tested. This included 181 swab CT-positive, 12 swab GC-positive, 7 CT and GC positive and 100 randomly selected swab CT and GC negative patients. Using the endocervical swab results as the patient's infection status, AC2 assay of the SP samples showed: CT sensitivity 89.3%, CT specificity 100.0%; GC sensitivity and specificity 100.0%. CT sensitivity for patients 25 years or younger was 93.1%, versus 80.7% for patients over 25 years, a statistically significant difference (P = 0.02).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results show that AC2 assay of 1.5 ml SP samples transferred to APTIMA specimen transfer medium within seven days is sufficiently sensitive and specific to be used to screen for CT and GC. CT sensitivity may be somewhat reduced in samples from patients over 25 years. SP specimens retained in the original SP fixative for longer time intervals also may have decreased sensitivity, due to deterioration of RNA, but this was not assessed in this study. The ability to tap the live pathology database is a valuable tool that can useful to conduct clinical studies without a costly prospective clinical trial.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cytopathology, Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Samer N
authors.initials: SN
authors.lastname: Khader
authors.forename: Kathie
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Schlesinger
authors.forename: Josh
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Grossman
authors.forename: Richard I
authors.initials: RI
authors.lastname: Henry
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Suhrland
authors.forename: Amy S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Fox
references.citation: Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):371-3
references.pmid: 15459404
references.citation: MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002 Oct 18;51(RR-15):1-38; quiz CE1-4
references.pmid: 12418541
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(8):2355-8
references.pmid: 17537943
references.citation: J Reprod Med. 2001 Mar;46(3):237-42
references.pmid: 11304865
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Oct;43(10):5295-7
references.pmid: 16208001
references.citation: Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Sep;36(9):581-3
references.pmid: 19661842
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(8):2434-8
references.pmid: 17581931
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr;41(4):1507-11
references.pmid: 12682137
references.citation: J Virol Methods. 2006 Oct;137(1):58-62
references.pmid: 16828171
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2002 May;40(5):1749-54
references.pmid: 11980955
references.citation: Diagn Cytopathol. 2005 Sep;33(3):177-80
references.pmid: 16078250
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Feb;44(2):400-5
references.pmid: 16455891