Modeling the relative impact of capsular tissue effects on implanted glucose sensor time lag and signal attenuation.
Little is known mechanistically about why implanted glucose sensors lag behind blood glucose levels in both the time to peak sensor response and the magnitude of peak sensor response. A mathematical model of glucose transport from capillaries through surrounding tissue to the sensor surface was constructed to address how different aspects of the tissue affect glucose transport to an implanted sensor. Physiologically relevant values of capsule diffusion coefficient, capsule porosity, cellular glucose consumption, capsule thickness, and subcutaneous vessel density were used as inputs to create simulated sensor traces that mimic experimental instances of time lag and concentration attenuation relative to a given blood glucose profile. Using logarithmic sensitivity analysis, each parameter was analyzed to study the effect of these variables on both lag and attenuation. Results identify capsule thickness as the strongest determinant of sensor time lag, while subcutaneous vessel density and capsule porosity had the largest effects on attenuation of glucose that reaches the sensor surface. These findings provide mechanistic insight for the rational design of sensor modifications that may alleviate the deleterious consequences of tissue effects on implanted sensor performance.
Novak
Matthew T
MT
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 136 Hudson Hall, Box 90281, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Yuan
Fan
F
Reichert
William M
WM
D000818:Animals; D001692:Biological Transport; D015374:Biosensing Techniques / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D004058:Diffusion; D005947:Glucose / Q000737:chemistry / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D007700:Kinetics; D055806:Microvessels / Q000378:metabolism; D008954:Models, Biological; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D051381:Rats
D005947:Glucose
Biotechnol Prog. 1999 Mar-Apr;15(2):259-66
10194402
Fresenius J Anal Chem. 2000 Mar-Apr;366(6-7):611-21
11225773
Diabetes. 1990 Dec;39(12):1519-26
2245876
Biomaterials. 2000 Nov;21(22):2232-41
11026629
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Jun 15;81(4):858-69
17236219
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Jun;9(3):265-75
17561797
J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Jun 15;40(4):598-605
9599036
Biochem J. 1997 Oct 15;327 ( Pt 2):369-75
9359403
J Biomed Mater Res. 2001 Dec 15;57(4):513-21
11553881
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2002 Oct;6(5):633-41
12413548
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Jun;11 Suppl 1:S1-3
19469668
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Jul;17(1):91-9
2745213
Semin Radiat Oncol. 1998 Jul;8(3):164-75
9634493
J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Dec 5;37(3):401-12
9368145
FEBS Lett. 1997 Sep 8;414(2):430-4
9315734
J Control Release. 2007 Jan 22;117(1):68-79
17169457
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Jun;11 Suppl 1:S5-10
19469678
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Dec 1;87(3):792-807
18200540
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Jun 1;85(3):699-706
17876777
J Biomed Mater Res. 2001 Jan;54(1):69-75
11077404
Biosens Bioelectron. 2005 Jun 15;20(12):2388-403
15854814
Am J Physiol. 1979 Jun;236(6):E621-5
443417
ASAIO J. 1994 Apr-Jun;40(2):157-63
8003752
ASAIO J. 2000 Sep-Oct;46(5):540-6
11016503
Diabetes Care. 2002 Jan;25(1):230-6
11772919
J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Oct;52(1):183-92
10906691