Neural signatures of intransitive preferences.
It is often assumed that decisions are made by rank-ordering and thus comparing the available choice options based on their subjective values. Rank-ordering requires that the alternatives' subjective values are mentally represented at least on an ordinal scale. Because one alternative cannot be at the same time better and worse than another alternative, choices should satisfy transitivity (if alternative A is preferred over B, and B is preferred over C, A should be preferred over C). Yet, individuals often demonstrate striking violations of transitivity (preferring C over A). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to study the neural correlates of intransitive choices between gambles varying in magnitude and probability of financial gains. Behavioral intransitivities were common. They occurred because participants did not evaluate the gambles independently, but in comparison with the alternative gamble presented. Neural value signals in prefrontal and parietal cortex were not ordinal-scaled and transitive, but reflected fluctuations in the gambles' local, pairing-dependent preference-ranks. Detailed behavioral analysis of gamble preferences showed that, depending on the difference in the offered gambles' attributes, participants gave variable priority to magnitude or probability and thus shifted between preferring richer or safer gambles. The variable, context-dependent priority given to magnitude and probability was tracked by insula (magnitude) and posterior cingulate (probability). Their activation-balance may reflect the individual decision rules leading to intransitivities. Thus, the phenomenon of intransitivity is reflected in the organization of the neural systems involved in risky decision-making.
Kalenscher
Tobias
T
Department of Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tobler
Philippe N
PN
Huijbers
Willem
W
Daselaar
Sander M
SM
Pennartz
Cyriel M A
CM
J Neurosci. 2007 Nov 14;27(46):12500-5
18003828
Biol Lett. 2007 Aug 22;3(4):365-7
17535792
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Aug;7(8):887-93
15235607
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Feb;9(2):148-58
18209732
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 May;27(9):2213-8
18445214
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):95-102
18066060
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):545-56
18545266
Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1075-80
17546027
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Feb;2(2):176-85
10195203
Nature. 2008 May 15;453(7193):406-9
18418380
Curr Biol. 2005 Apr 12;15(7):594-602
15823531
Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):503-7
15486304
J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 14;26(24):6469-72
16775134
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Nov;18(3):389-401
16811633
Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):443-7
15486290
Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):365-78
15473973
J Neurosci. 2008 May 28;28(22):5623-30
18509023
Neuroimage. 2001 Jan;13(1):91-100
11133312
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267-72
13713775
J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 25;29(12):3833-42
19321780
J Neurosci. 2007 Sep 12;27(37):9984-8
17855612
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66
16811440
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;8(4):402-17
19033238
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 15;48(1):249-57
19560546
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1220-7
16116449
Neuron. 2009 Jun 11;62(5):733-43
19524531
Nature. 1999 Apr 22;398(6729):704-8
10227292
Neuron. 2009 May 28;62(4):593-602
19477159
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Mar;31(3):410-23
19777556
Science. 2004 May 21;304(5674):1167-70
15155951
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Dec;10(12):1625-33
17982449
Neuron. 2002 Oct 10;36(2):265-84
12383781
Science. 1998 May 1;280(5364):747-9
9563953
Science. 2009 May 1;324(5927):646-8
19407204
Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):409-32
16637767
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983 Oct;9(4):676-96
6227682
Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(4):347-58
19466680
Neuron. 2008 Jul 10;59(1):161-72
18614037
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Oct 15;58(8):597-604
16095567
Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):1163-70
18992349
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202
11283309
Neuron. 2006 Mar 2;49(5):765-75
16504951
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 6;102(36):12950-5
16150703
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 28;106(17):7185-90
19369207
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1621-32
17122317
Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15;44(2):600-9
18804540
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1472-84
18042401
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Nov;18(11):1924-36
17069482
Nature. 2006 May 11;441(7090):223-6
16633341
Prog Neurobiol. 2008 Mar;84(3):284-315
18207301
Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1782-7
15205529
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;179(4):643-53
17216152
Nature. 1999 Jul 15;400(6741):233-8
10421364
J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 21;30(16):5498-507
20410103
Science. 1999 Jun 18;284(5422):1979-81
10373114
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):655-66
12154366
Front Behav Neurosci. 2009 Oct 30;3:43
19893764
Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Nov;18(9):2627-37
14622165
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1255-62
16116457
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997 Apr;7(2):198-208
9142755
Neuron. 2002 Oct 10;36(2):309-22
12383784