Extracting binaural information from simultaneous targets and distractors: effects of amplitude modulation and asynchronous envelopes.
When different components of a stimulus carry different binaural information, processing of binaural information in a target component is often affected. The present experiments examine whether such interference is affected by amplitude modulation and the relative phase of modulation of the target and distractors. In all experiments, listeners attempted to discriminate interaural time differences of a target stimulus in the presence of distractor stimuli with ITD=0. In Experiment 1, modulation of the distractors but not the target reduced interference between components. In Experiment 2, synthesized musical notes exhibited little binaural interference when there were slight asynchronies between different streams of notes (31 or 62 ms). The remaining experiments suggested that the reduction in binaural interference in the previous experiments was due neither to the complex spectra of the synthesized notes nor to greater detectability of the target in the presence of modulated distractors. These data suggest that this interference is reduced when components are modulated in ways that result in the target appearing briefly in isolation, not because of segregation cues. These data also suggest that modulation and asynchronies between modulators that might be encountered in real-world listening situations are adequate to reduce binaural interference to inconsequential levels.
Stellmack
Mark A
MA
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Byrne
Andrew J
AJ
Viemeister
Neal F
NF
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D001301:Audiometry, Pure-Tone; D001306:Auditory Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D001307:Auditory Perception; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011571:Psychoacoustics; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D013997:Time Factors
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 May;91(5):2894-902
1629482
J Acoust Soc Am. 1974 Jun;55(6):1299-303
4846726
Hear Res. 1989 Oct;42(1):37-45
2584158
J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
5541744
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Apr;87(4):1709-19
2341675
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Jul;98(1):155-63
7608395
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Nov;124(5):3088-94
19045794
J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Feb;63(2):511-23
670548
J Acoust Soc Am. 1976 Mar;59(3):634-9
1254790
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Feb;121(2):1070-6
17348529
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Sep;96(3):1465-70
7963010
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar;101(3):1600-10
9069628
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Jan;99(1):579-87
8568045
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Apr;87(4):1683-94
2341672
J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Apr;75(4):1201-6
6725770
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jan;111(1 Pt 1):309-19
11833537
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 May;93(5):2933-47
8315157
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Oct;90(4 Pt 1):1894-900
1755878
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Oct;100(4 Pt 1):2352-64
9480301
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Nov;88(5):2159-70
2269732
J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Aug;68(2):446-54
7419802
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jan;123(1):EL1-7
18177063