title: The reliability, stability, and concurrent validity of a test of gaze stabilization.
abstract: The gaze stabilization test (GST) is a computerized test of the vestibulo-ocular reflex that reports maximum head velocity while maintaining fixed visual acuity. The GST thus assesses the vestibulo-ocular reflex differently from the dynamic visual acuity test (DVAT). The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability, stability, and validity of the GST in a healthy young and older population. Forty subjects (20 older adults with mean (SD) age of 76.3 (5.3) and 20 young controls with mean (SD) age of 25.2 (3.2)) performed the GST and DVAT assessments. The version of the GST used in this study has a tunneled mirror system to ensure a consistent participant distance of 4 m from the computer screen. All subjects repeated trials within 30 minutes of initial testing. Twenty subjects (10 from each age group) returned 7-10 days later to repeat the GST and DVAT assessments. Vestibular symptoms were assessed before and after GST and DVAT assessments. The mean (SD) GST scores for the older group were 123 (33) deg/s in the yaw plane and 108 (27) deg/s in the pitch plane. For the young group, mean (SD) GST scores were 157 (34) deg/s in the yaw plane and 141(25) deg/s in the pitch plane. There was a significant between-group difference for GST scores in both yaw and pitch planes (p< 0.01). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for GST scores performed on the same day was 0.75 in the yaw plane and 0.69 in the pitch plane. The ICC including the 20 subjects who repeated the GST within 7-10 days was 0.59 in the yaw plane and 0.54 in the pitch plane. In general, GST was more stable than DVAT. GST was more stable in younger vs. older subjects whereas DVAT was more stable in older vs. younger subjects. Concurrent validity, determined by Spearman correlation coefficients between GST and DVAT loss results were -0.62 in the yaw plane and -0.38 in the pitch plane (p< 0.02). These results suggest that the gaze stabilization test (GST) has good same-day test-retest reliability and stability in healthy young and older adults. The moderate correlation between same-day GST and DVAT loss scores suggest the two tests may be measuring similar, but different constructs.
authors.affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
authors.forename: Bryan K
authors.initials: BK
authors.lastname: Ward
authors.forename: Maha T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Mohammad
authors.forename: Susan L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Whitney
authors.forename: Gregory F
authors.initials: GF
authors.lastname: Marchetti
authors.forename: Joseph M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Furman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012027:Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014724:Vestibular Function Tests / Q000592:standards*; D014722:Vestibule, Labyrinth; D014787:Vision Tests; D014792:Visual Acuity; D014796:Visual Perception
references.citation: Arch Neurol. 2003 Jun;60(6):835-9
references.pmid: 12810488
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2001 Mar;137(1):12-25
references.pmid: 11310166
references.citation: Otol Neurotol. 2007 Sep;28(6):809-13
references.pmid: 17577127
references.citation: BMJ. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):527-31
references.pmid: 17347239
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):500-7
references.pmid: 18295629
references.citation: J Vestib Res. 2001-2002;11(6):365-70
references.pmid: 12446962
references.citation: J Vestib Res. 1990-1991;1(1):49-59
references.pmid: 1670137
references.citation: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Aug;129(8):819-24
references.pmid: 12925338
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 1966 Dec;50(6):460-6
references.pmid: 5978038
references.citation: Gait Posture. 2009 Feb;29(2):194-8
references.pmid: 18815040
references.citation: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Dec;7(4):329-38
references.pmid: 16810569
references.citation: Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jan;28(1):68-73
references.pmid: 17106431
references.citation: Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):790-6
references.pmid: 9831156
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1990;82(1):97-106
references.pmid: 2257917
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1989 Jul;62(1):264-72
references.pmid: 2754477
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1988;70(3):470-6
references.pmid: 3384048
references.citation: Otol Neurotol. 2008 Oct;29(7):982-8
references.pmid: 18667938
references.citation: Otol Neurotol. 2002 May;23(3):372-7
references.pmid: 11981398
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1990 Mar;5(1):138-43
references.pmid: 2317293
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2006 May;86(5):735-43
references.pmid: 16649896
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Oct;942:210-9
references.pmid: 11710463
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Mar;34(3):464-70
references.pmid: 11880811
references.citation: Acta Otolaryngol. 1987 Mar-Apr;103(3-4):273-9
references.pmid: 3577760
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Oct;152(3):383-92
references.pmid: 12920495
references.citation: Am J Otol. 1994 May;15(3):340-7
references.pmid: 8579138