Surgical procedures for evacuating incomplete miscarriage.
BACKGROUND
Incomplete miscarriage is a major problem that should be effectively managed with safe and appropriate procedures. Surgical evacuation of the uterus for management of incomplete miscarriage usually involves vacuum aspiration or sharp curettage.


OBJECTIVE
To compare the safety and effectiveness of surgical uterine evacuation methods for management of incomplete miscarriage.


METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (July 2010).


METHODS
Randomized trials where different surgical methods were used to manage incomplete miscarriage were eligible for inclusion.


METHODS
We extracted population characteristics, settings, and exclusion criteria, in addition to outcomes such as complications of the procedure, duration, need for re-evacuation, blood transfusion, and analgesia/anesthesia.


RESULTS
Two trials (involving 550 women) were included. Vacuum aspiration was associated with statistically significantly decreased blood loss (mean difference (MD) -17.10 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) -24.05 to -10.15 ml), less pain during the procedure (risk ratio (RR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.90), and shorter duration of the procedure (MD -1.20 minutes, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.87 minutes), than sharp metal curettage, in the single study that evaluated these outcomes in 357 women. Serious complications such as uterine perforation and other morbidity were rare and the sample sizes of the trials were not large enough to evaluate small or moderate differences.


CONCLUSIONS
Although the review indicates that vacuum aspiration is safe, quick to perform, and less painful than sharp curettage, and should be recommended for use in the management of incomplete miscarriage, the results are based on data from only one study. Analgesia and sedation should be provided as necessary for the procedure.
Tunçalp
Ozge
O
Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, USA, 21205.
Gülmezoglu
A Metin
AM
Souza
João Paulo
JP
D000027:Abortion, Incomplete / Q000601:surgery*; D004107:Dilatation and Curettage / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014619:Vacuum Curettage / Q000379:methods
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1970 Nov;77(11):1047-8
5483417
Rev Saude Publica. 1997 Oct;31(5):472-8
9629724
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 25;353(8):761-9
16120856
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1976;14(6):481-6
20343
Contraception. 1983 Jan;27(1):63-8
6839759
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1997 Mar;65:101-6
9190351
Cent Afr J Med. 1971 May;17(5):91-6
5112599
BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1268-71
19459859
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994 Jul;46(1):27-32
7805979
Minn Med. 1971 Mar;54(3):225-8
5547093
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Dec;16(10):1429-36
18062758
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD007223
20091626
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1975;13(1):33-8
259
East Afr Med J. 1990 Nov;67(11):812-22
2076683
East Afr Med J. 1996 Sep;73(9):598-603
8991242
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1979;101(5):320-7
463401
Lancet. 1973 Nov 17;2(7838):1114-6
4128013
Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jun;36(11):1443-53
8511632
East Afr Med J. 1995 Apr;72(4):248-51
7621761
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969 Sep;76(9):834-6
5823684
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1970 May;77(5):464-6
5427607
S Afr Med J. 1993 Jan;83(1):13-5
8424190
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994 Jun;45(3):261-7
7926246
Ann Emerg Med. 1982 Dec;11(12):652-8
7149355
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Dec;99 Suppl 2:S186-9
17961569
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(1):CD001993
11279744