title: [Ethical basis of priority setting in healthcare].
abstract: The debate about priorities in healthcare has also started in Germany. Because of the special moral significance of health and healthcare, priority setting in healthcare also involves ethical issues. After clarifying the relationship between priority setting and rationing, I first discuss whether it is ethically acceptable or even mandated to set priorities in healthcare. If this first question is answered with "yes", the following question is how the priorities can be determined in an ethically defensible way. I will try to show that it is impossible to justify priorities in healthcare within a liberal theory of justice that is neutral towards substantive conceptions of the good life. We rather need a deliberative decision process about how we want to live in the face of illness, suffering, and death. Only by reference to a substantial concept of a good life is it possible to define and justify healthcare priorities. A national priority-setting commission could play an important role in stimulating this deliberation and developing general recommendations according to which criteria and procedures priorities should be set in the German healthcare system. The application of this general framework requires the cooperation of medical scientific and physician organizations.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen. georg.marckmann@uni-tuebingen.de
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Marckmann
mesh_terms: D001675:Bioethics; D017046:Cost Savings / Q000941:ethics; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics; D005858:Germany; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics*; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics; D006801:Humans; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics*