title: Randomized, comparative analysis between two tracheal suction systems in neonates.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To quantify and compare variations in oxygen saturation throughout the suctioning procedure (before, during, and after) using two endotracheal suction systems: open suction system (OSS) vs. closed suction system (CSS).
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective randomized controlled study was carried out with 39 newborn infants of gestational age ≥ 34 weeks using pressure-limited, time-cycled, continuous-flow mechanical ventilators. The infants were classified into two groups according to ventilatory parameters: Group I was ventilated using positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥ 5 cm H2O and mean airway pressure (MAP) ≥ 8 cm H2O; and Group II using PEEP < 5 cm H2O and MAP < 8 cm H2O.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No statistically significant differences were observed when OSS and CSS were compared in both groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in post-procedure oxygen saturation in both groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both endotracheal suction systems can be used with no drawbacks of OSS in relation to CSS, provided the sample is similar to that of the present study.
authors.affiliation: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
authors.forename: Lúcia Cândida Soares de
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Paula
authors.forename: Maria Esther Jurfest
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Ceccon
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007442:Intubation, Intratracheal; D008297:Male; D010092:Oximetry; D010101:Oxygen Consumption; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012121:Respiration, Artificial; D013396:Suction / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*