Giemsa versus acridine orange staining in the fish micronucleus assay and validation for use in water quality monitoring.
This study concerns a comparative analysis of the acridine orange and Giemsa staining procedures for the fish erythrocyte micronucleus assay. The goal was to optimize the assay in the context of field water monitoring. Fish (Carassius carassius) were exposed to a reference genotoxic agent, cyclophosphamide monohydrate 5 mg l(-1) for 2, 4, and 6 days before testing. Slides from each individual were scored using the two procedures. The results show that the assay was more sensitive when acridine orange was used. When slides were Giemsa stained, the presence of ambiguous artefacts, leading to false positives and increasing random variance, reduced the contrast between exposed and control samples. Acridine Orange staining was then applied in the context of water quality monitoring. Fish were exposed for 4 days to water sampled in two hydrological contexts: basal flow and spring flood. The results show that exposure to spring flood water in an agricultural stream can induce mutagenicity.
Polard
T
T
Université de Toulouse; INP-ENSAT, Avenue de l'Agrobiopôle, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Jean
S
S
Merlina
G
G
Laplanche
C
C
Pinelli
E
E
Gauthier
L
L
D000165:Acridine Orange / Q000737:chemistry; D000818:Animals; D001399:Azure Stains / Q000737:chemistry; D003520:Cyclophosphamide / Q000032:analysis* / Q000633:toxicity; D006054:Goldfish / Q000502:physiology*; D006540:Herbicides / Q000032:analysis / Q000633:toxicity; D015162:Micronucleus Tests / Q000379:methods*; D008856:Microscopy, Fluorescence; D009153:Mutagens / Q000032:analysis / Q000633:toxicity; D013997:Time Factors; D054928:Validation Studies as Topic; D014881:Water Supply / Q000032:analysis* / Q000592:standards
D001399:Azure Stains; D006540:Herbicides; D009153:Mutagens; D003520:Cyclophosphamide; D000165:Acridine Orange