Generally objective measurement of human temperature and reading ability: some corollaries.
We argue that a goal of measurement is general objectivity: point estimates of a person's measure (height, temperature, and reader ability) should be independent of the instrument and independent of the sample in which the person happens to find herself. In contrast, Rasch's concept of specific objectivity requires only differences (i.e., comparisons) between person measures to be independent of the instrument. We present a canonical case in which there is no overlap between instruments and persons: each person is measured by a unique instrument. We then show what is required to estimate measures in this degenerate case. The canonical case encourages a simplification and reconceptualization of validity and reliability. Not surprisingly, this reconceptualization looks a lot like the way physicists and chemometricians think about validity and measurement error. We animate this presentation with a technology that blurs the distinction between instruction, assessment, and generally objective measurement of reader ability. We encourage adaptation of this model to health outcomes measurement.
Stenner
A Jackson
AJ
MetaMetrics, Durham, NC 27713, USA. jstenner@lexile.com
Stone
Mark
M
D056808:Biostatistics; D001831:Body Temperature; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011932:Reading