title: Ward nurses' use of wound dressings before and after a bespoke education programme.
abstract: A survey of ward nurses in medical, surgical, orthopaedic and rehabilitation specialties in relation to their care of wounds and their choice and use of wound dressings was carried out in May and August 2009 at St Mary's Hospital. Isle of Wight, UK. The objectives were to find out the distribution of wound types, and their characteristics, that were treated by ward nurses in the hospital, and to assess clinical practice in the use of wound dressings, before and after a bespoke programme of education and training. A visual framework to aid the ward nurses in the choice of dressings and frequency of change was introduced after the May 2009 survey. Following the nurses' education and training programme a repeat survey, using the same methodology, was conducted in August 2009. In the initial survey, 172 wounds were included (mean number of wounds per patient 1.64) and in the repeat one, 159 (mean number of wounds per patient 1.54). In both phases of the survey, the most common wound type was pressure ulcers, followed by surgical wounds; over 60% of the wounds were pressure ulcers, of which around half were category 1, and one-third were category 2. No category 4 ulcers were recorded. About one-third of the wounds had a duration of more than 21 days. On average, wound dressings were left in place for between two and three days, with 35% of dressings being changed on a daily basis. The mean cost of dressings per wound per week was observed to be lower in the repeat survey than in the initial one (£9.02 and £11.23 respectively). The number of undesirable reasons for changing the dressing was lower in the second phase than the first. The methodology of the surveys provided meaningful and valuable results over a short timescale, and increased understanding of wound types, their characteristics, and clinical practice. The surveys showed that data that can be collected in a short period using a simple tool can yield complex and revealing data trends. They also showed that an education programme followed by a re-survey can improve practice and reduce the costs of wound care.
authors.affiliation: St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wright, UK. Glenn.Smith@iow.nhs.uk
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Greenwood
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Searle
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001458:Bandages / Q000191:economics / Q000600:supply & distribution; D003363:Cost Control; D003663:Decision Trees; D004509:Education, Nursing, Continuing / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D009730:Nursing Assessment; D009731:Nursing Audit; D015402:Nursing Education Research; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000193:education* / Q000523:psychology; D018579:Patient Selection; D057184:Practice Patterns, Nurses' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015397:Program Evaluation; D017592:Skin Care / Q000191:economics / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000451:nursing*; D006113:United Kingdom; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000145:classification / Q000451:nursing*