Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research.
Genetic research can produce information that is beyond the aims of the research study yet may be of clinical or personal interest to study participants. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 44 researchers who were asked to describe how they would respond to a hypothetical vignette regarding the disclosure of findings with unanticipated clinical significance to research study participants. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using content and thematic analyses. Researchers' decision-making processes about whether to disclose incidental findings were governed by potentially conflicting duties in three primary domains: information quality, adherence to rules, and participant welfare. There are several actions researchers can take to prepare for incidental findings, including: adding specific language in informed consent documents to state clearly how investigators will handle disclosure; exploring how prepared participants might be during the consent process to make decisions about how they would like to be approached in the event of incidental findings; developing procedures for appropriately communicating individual results and providing follow-up support based on participant preferences; and, in genetic research, having an awareness of the range of traits expressed by the genes under study.
Meacham
Meredith C
MC
University of Washington's Institute of Public Health Genetics Master of Public Health program, Seattle, WA 98195-7120, USA.
Starks
Helene
H
Burke
Wylie
W
Edwards
Kelly
K
D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics; D030881:Disclosure / Q000941:ethics*; D005260:Female; D036281:Genetic Research / Q000941:ethics*; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D033162:Incidental Findings; D008297:Male; D011340:Problem Solving; D036301:Qualitative Research; D014481:United States