Learning to diminish the effects of proactive interference: reducing false memory for young and older adults.
Results from two experiments revealed that prior experience with proactive interference (PI) diminished PI's effects for both young and older adults. Participants were given two rounds of experience, with different materials, in a situation that produced PI. Comparisons with a control condition showed that the effects of PI on accuracy and on high-confidence intrusion errors (false memory) were reduced on the second round, as compared with those on the first. Also, the ability of confidence to diagnose accuracy of responding improved across rounds. Effects of prior experience with PI depended on feedback given at the time of test (Experiment 1). At least in part, the diminishment of PI resulted from participants' allocating more attention to interference items during study in the second round than in the first (Experiment 2). Implications of the results for interpreting age differences in PI and false memory are discussed.
Jacoby
Larry L
LL
Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. lljacoby@artsci.wustl.edu
Wahlheim
Christopher N
CN
Rhodes
Matthew G
MG
Daniels
Karen A
KA
Rogers
Chad S
CS
D000368:Aged; D000375:Aging / Q000523:psychology*; D001288:Attention; D030141:Feedback, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007721:Knowledge of Results, Psychological; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011334:Proactive Inhibition; D011337:Probability Learning; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D055815:Young Adult