Randomized, comparative analysis between two tracheal suction systems in neonates.
OBJECTIVE
To quantify and compare variations in oxygen saturation throughout the suctioning procedure (before, during, and after) using two endotracheal suction systems: open suction system (OSS) vs. closed suction system (CSS).


METHODS
A prospective randomized controlled study was carried out with 39 newborn infants of gestational age ≥ 34 weeks using pressure-limited, time-cycled, continuous-flow mechanical ventilators. The infants were classified into two groups according to ventilatory parameters: Group I was ventilated using positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥ 5 cm H2O and mean airway pressure (MAP) ≥ 8 cm H2O; and Group II using PEEP < 5 cm H2O and MAP < 8 cm H2O.


RESULTS
No statistically significant differences were observed when OSS and CSS were compared in both groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in post-procedure oxygen saturation in both groups.


CONCLUSIONS
Both endotracheal suction systems can be used with no drawbacks of OSS in relation to CSS, provided the sample is similar to that of the present study.
Paula
Lúcia Cândida Soares de
LC
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Ceccon
Maria Esther Jurfest
ME
D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007442:Intubation, Intratracheal; D008297:Male; D010092:Oximetry; D010101:Oxygen Consumption; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012121:Respiration, Artificial; D013396:Suction / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*