Mini Stare-HI: guidelines for reporting health informatics evaluations in conference papers.
BACKGROUND
To improve the quality of reports of health informatics evaluations we recently devised and published a guideline named STARE-HI, now formally endorsed by IMIA.


OBJECTIVE
To develop a prioritization framework of ranked items (a mini-STARE-HI) to assist authors when reporting health informatics evaluation studies in a restricted space conference paper.


METHODS
We invited 111 editors of health informatics conference proceedings and reviewers and authors of health informatics evaluation studies to score 106 reporting items on a scale ranging from "0 - not necessary" through to "10 - essential" by a web-based survey.


RESULTS
The response rate for the survey was 63% (70 out of 111). The most important items (score >9) were "Interpret the data and give an answer to the study question", "Whether it is a laboratory, simulation or field study" and "Description of the outcome measure/evaluation criteria". Four items had a mean score <6.


CONCLUSIONS
It has been possible to produce a ranking of reporting items from STARE-HI according to their prioritized relevance for inclusion in space-limited conference papers. We believe that this prioritization framework can improve quality and utility of conference papers on health informatics evaluation studies.
de Keizer
Nicolette F
NF
Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.f.keizer@amc.uva.nl
Talmon
Jan
J
Ammenwerth
Elske
E
Brender
Jytte
J
Nykanen
Pirkko
P
Rigby
Michael
M
D003226:Congresses as Topic; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D008490:Medical Informatics; D014956:Writing / Q000592:standards*