[The acceptance of personal responsibility as a criterion in assigning health care benefits. An empirical study].
In order to accomplish broad acceptance of priority setting in healthcare, a public debate seems essential, in particular, including the preferences of the general public. In Germany, objections to public involvement are to some extent based on the perception that individuals have an inherent personal bias and cannot represent interests other than their own. The following excerpt from a more comprehensive study reports on the acceptance of personal responsibility as a criterion for prioritizing. A mixed-methods design is used for combining a qualitative interview study and a quantitative survey representative of the German public. Both the interview study and the survey demonstrate that behavior that is harmful to one's health is generally accepted as a criterion for posteriorizing patients, mostly regardless of self interest. In addition, the interview study shows reasons for acceptance or refusal of the self-inflicted behavior criterion.
Diederich
A
A
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Integrated Social and Cognitive Psychology, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen. a.diederich@jacobs-university.de
Schreier
M
M
D002755:Choice Behavior; D003256:Community Participation / Q000191:economics*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000191:economics; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D005260:Female; D005382:Financing, Personal / Q000191:economics; D005858:Germany; D015438:Health Behavior; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000191:economics*; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D008019:Life Style; D008297:Male; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics*; D011639:Public Opinion; D012648:Self Care / Q000191:economics* / Q000523:psychology; D012941:Social Responsibility