title: Assessing the influence of gender, learning style, and pre-entry experience on student response to delivery of a novel veterinary curriculum.
abstract: We investigated whether a novel veterinary curriculum was biased toward a particular gender, learning style, or pre-university experience (entry following undergraduate degree or direct entry from secondary school). We found no significant difference (p>0.05) in overall performance of first-year male, female, graduate-entry, or school-entry students. Students rated live-animal practical classes and facilitated problem-based learning as the most favored method of teaching, and this response was not biased by gender or pre-vet school experience. Men rated multiple-choice question (MCQ) assessment more highly than women, but there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in male or female performance on MCQ examinations. Men and women also performed comparably well in essays (both knowledge based and critical), suggesting that the retention of knowledge and depth of understanding was not gender biased. However, men performed significantly (p<0.05) better on critical essays compared with knowledge-based essays, and this trend was shown for both graduate-entry and school-entry students alike. We found no significant difference (p>0.05) in performance between groups of students with multimodal, kinesthetic, or reading-writing learning styles. Students with an auditory preference consistently performed less well in all types of assessment (p<0.05), but the number of students in this group was very small. Students whose learning style could not be specifically determined by Visual, Auditory, Read/write, Kinesthetic (VARK) tests consistently performed better than other groups, but this finding was not significant. Our results indicate that the Nottingham veterinary course does not bias for or against any of the variables we investigated.
authors.affiliation: School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, UK. n.foster@nottingham.ac.uk
authors.forename: Neil
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Foster
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Gardner
authors.forename: Julia
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kydd
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Robinson
authors.forename: Mandy
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Roshier
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003479:Curriculum; D004520:Education, Veterinary / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D011287:Prejudice; D013336:Students, Health Occupations / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom