title: Comparison of the outcome of implantation of hydrophobic acrylic versus silicone intraocular lenses in pediatric cataract: prospective randomized study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the postoperative performance of hydrophobic acrylic and silicone square-edge intraocular lenses in pediatric cataract.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective randomized study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Forty-one eyes of 41 children (age 1 month to 8 years) with congenital or developmental cataract.
  
  
  METHODS
  Children were randomly divided into 2 groups. All participants underwent phacoaspiration, primary posterior capsulotomy, and anterior vitrectomy. Group A (n = 21) eyes were implanted with acrylic hydrophobic AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses (IOLs), and those of Group B (n = 20) were implanted with silicone Tecnis Z9000 IOLs. The children were evaluated for anterior chamber reaction, IOL position, posterior capsular opacification PCO), intraocular pressure, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal status, and refractive errors.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Postoperatively, 2 eyes in each group had significant anterior chamber reaction with fibrin membrane formation. IOLs were in the capsular bag in all but 1 eye in both groups. Seven eyes in the acrylic group and 6 eyes in the silicone group achieved visual acuity of 20/40 or better. None of the eyes showed glaucoma. BCVA at 1 year was similar in both groups. In the acrylic hydrophobic group, 14 eyes needed hypermetropic correction and 7 eyes were myopic, and in the silicone group 10 eyes had myopia and 10 eyes had hypermetropia at 1 year postoperatively. PCO at 1 year follow-up was more common in eyes implanted with acrylic hydrophobic IOLs (5 eyes) than silicone IOLs (2 eyes).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both square-edge hydrophobic acrylic and silicone IOLs were found to be compatible and safe for use in pediatric cataract surgery with similar visual axis clarity and postoperative outcome.
authors.affiliation: Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh-160012, India.
authors.forename: Sushma
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Bhusal
authors.forename: Jagat
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ram
authors.forename: Jaspreet
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sukhija
authors.forename: Surinder Singh
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Pandav
authors.forename: Sushmita
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kaushik
mesh_terms: D000180:Acrylic Resins; D002386:Cataract / Q000151:congenital; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007429:Intraocular Pressure / Q000502:physiology; D019654:Lens Implantation, Intraocular; D007910:Lenses, Intraocular; D008297:Male; D018918:Phacoemulsification; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012826:Silicone Elastomers; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014792:Visual Acuity / Q000502:physiology*; D014821:Vitrectomy
chemical_list: D000180:Acrylic Resins; D012826:Silicone Elastomers