[Evaluation of the vital emergency action plan at the Navarre Hospital (Spain)].
BACKGROUND
Healthcare organizations are placing great emphasis on the care of patients with cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) since interventions based on the scientific evidence can decrease both the mortality rate and sequelae. Nevertheless, there are limited comprehensive assessments covering all the resources and interventions required when a vital emergency arises.


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of the vital emergency action plan at the Navarre Hospital by analyzing a panel of 70 indicators.


METHODS
Structure and process indicators were assessed in 25 clinical units at the Navarre Hospital from April to June 2008. The structure and review process of CPR carts were analyzed, defibrillators were tested and 40 simulations involving 144 professionals were evaluated.


RESULTS
Nonconformities were found in 86% of the indicators evaluated. The percentages of compliance in the indicators of structure ranged from 39.6% to 100%. In the evaluation of process, conformity ranged from 2.5% to 100%. The percentages of simulations meeting time standards varied between 17.5% and 45%. In 37.5% of the simulations, at least 50% of trained staff were present in the unit. In 32.3% of the simulations, the standard for the number of people in the unit who participated in the simulations was achieved.


CONCLUSIONS
This study identified problems in the structure and process of a vital emergency action plan without, at this stage, evaluating patient outcomes.
Tirapu
Belén
B
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Gestión de la Calidad, Hospital de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain. btirapul@cfnavarra.es
Rodrigo
Isabel
I
Gost
Javier
J
Aranguren
María Isabel
MI
Ezcurra
Paz
P
D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Q000592:standards*; D004638:Emergency Treatment; D006323:Heart Arrest / Q000628:therapy*; D006761:Hospitals; D006801:Humans; D013030:Spain