[Normal or pathological? - The view of Georges Canguilhem (1904-1995)].
Normal or pathological? - The distinction between normality and pathology is discussed on the basis of the views expressed in the work of the medical doctor and philosopher, Georges Canguilhem (1904-1995). Canguilhem shows that the distinction cannot be made at a biological or statistical level. In essence, pathology seems to be irreducibly qualitative. Personal suffering, dysfunction and limitations play a central role in pathology and are clearly linked to an inability to change and adapt in a flexible and creative way. Furthermore, Canguilhem shows that a biological, psychological or behavioural abnormality cannot be separated from the experience and valuation of the individual as a whole from his or her situation in a particular context. Some implications of Canguilhem’s work for psychiatry will be discussed.
Verhoeff
B
B
Universiteit van Groningen. B.Verhoeff@ggzingesst.nl
D004194:Disease; D005602:France; D006262:Health; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D010336:Pathology / Q000266:history*; D010686:Philosophy, Medical / Q000266:history*; D011570:Psychiatry / Q000266:history*