[Nasotracheal intubation using GlideScope videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope by novice laryngoscopists].
BACKGROUND
We compared the performance of GlideScope videolaryngoscope with that of the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation by non-anesthesia residents.


METHODS
Forty patients requiring nasal endotracheal intubation for surgical convenience were allocated to intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope. Each intubation was performed by non-anesthesia residents.


RESULTS
The time to secure the airway was shorter with GlideScope laryngoscopy than with the Macintosh laryngoscopy. Magill forceps were not needed for any patient during GlideScope videolaryngoscopy, while Macintosh laryngoscopy required Magill forceps utilization for 75% of the patients.


CONCLUSIONS
The unobstructed view of the glottic opening on the video monitor helped the laryngoscopist performing the nasal endotracheal intubation while an assistant provided laryngeal manipulation to improve the coordinated effort. GlideScope seems to facilitate nasotracheal intubation for individuals training in airway management.
Shimada
Mami
M
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke 329-0498.
Hirabayashi
Yoshihiro
Y
Seo
Norimasa
N
D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D007442:Intubation, Intratracheal / Q000295:instrumentation*; D020704:Laryngoscopes; D007828:Laryngoscopy / Q000193:education; D008875:Middle Aged; D014741:Video Recording