Economic comparison of multiple techniques for recovering leaf protein in biomass processing.
Leaf protein concentrates (LPC) can be used as a valuable co-product to cellulosic biofuel production and can also mitigate the food versus fuel controversy. Two major approaches have been considered for LPC production: a well-characterized mechanical pressing method and a less studied method involving aqueous extraction with recovery using ultrafiltration. Experimental results with switchgrass extracts show low protein recovery after filtration, particularly if protein is recovered after cellulose hydrolysis. Economic modeling suggests that aqueous extraction costs less than mechanical pressing, but due to lower protein yields and lower quality, overall profit is higher for mechanical pressing versus aqueous extraction ($26/Mg feedstock vs. $14/Mg). If modest improvements can be made in extraction yields, filtration recovery, and protein quality, then the profitability of the aqueous extraction approach can be increased to $37/Mg feedstock. This study suggests that aqueous extraction is a viable alternative for LPC co-production in a biorefinery if key improvements can be made in the process.
Biomass Conversion Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan 48910, USA.
Bryan
B
Bals
Bruce E
BE
Dale
D018533:Biomass; D001709:Biotechnology / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*; D005591:Chemical Fractionation; D008897:Panicum / Q000737:chemistry*; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000737:chemistry*; D010940:Plant Proteins / Q000302:isolation & purification* / Q000378:metabolism*
D010940:Plant Proteins