[Psychotherapy research in the German-speaking community--a bibliometric analysis of three journals].
OBJECTIVE
Psychotherapy research has often been considered a neglected topic in clinical psychology, psychosomatic medicine, and psychiatry because of its massive organizational and financial demands. However, it is unclear whether this assumption actually reflects the research activities in the field.


METHODS
We conducted a bibliometric analysis of the annual volumes for 2008 and 2009 of three clinical journals published in German. All publications referring to facets of psychotherapy research were analysed.


RESULTS
About 30% of the publications dealt with issues of psychotherapy research. Outcome and process studies were about equally distributed. Process research frequently focused on patient variables as outcome predictors. Outcome studies most often presented effectiveness studies with rather small sample sizes.


CONCLUSIONS
Psychotherapy research is a well-represented and multifaceted field in the German speaking research community. However, the traditional distinction between efficacy and process research among the various schools of psychotherapy research may be hampering further developments in this branch. The government-funded research networks may turn out to be promising approaches to overcoming some of the obstacles of classic psychotherapy research.
Petermann
Franz
F
Zentrum für Klinische Psychologie und Rehabilitation ZKPR, Universität Bremen. fpeterm@uni-bremen.de
Schüssler
Gerhard
G
D015706:Bibliometrics; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012106:Research / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*