Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: a propensity analysis.
BACKGROUND
Over the past decade, minimally invasive (MI) mitral valve surgery has grown in popularity. The purpose of this study was to compare both short- and long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair and replacement performed through a MI versus traditional sternotomy (ST) incision using a propensity analysis approach to account for differences in baseline risk.


METHODS
From January 2000 to December 2008, a total of 1,121 isolated mitral valve operations were performed at our institution (548 ST, 573 MI). Data were retrospectively collected on all patients, and a logistic regression model was created to predict selection to a MI versus ST approach. Propensity scores were then generated based on the regression model and matched pairs created using 1:1 nearest neighbor matching. There were 382 matched pairs in the analysis for a total sample size of 764, or 68.2% of the original cohort. Major outcomes of interest included cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross-clamp time, hospital length of stay, major in-hospital complications, and both short- and long-term survival.


RESULTS
Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 117.1 ± 2.0 minutes in the ST group and 139.7 ± 2.6 minutes in the MI group (p < 0.0001), and cross-clamp time was 79.6 ± 1.5 minutes in the ST group and 83.7 ± 1.9 in the MI group (p = 0.106). The average hospital length of stay was 9.81 ± 0.61 days among ST patients and 7.76 ± 0.37 days among MI patients (p = 0.0043). There was no significant difference in the frequency of major in-hospital complications between groups. The mean duration of survival follow-up was 4.2 ± 2.4 years. There was no significant difference in mortality at 30 days (p = 0.622) or 1 year (p = 0.599). In addition, there was no significant difference in long-term survival between groups (p = 0.569).


CONCLUSIONS
Although minimally invasive mitral valve surgery required a slightly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, there was no difference in cross-clamp time, morbidity, or mortality, and hospital length of stay was significantly shorter when compared with matched sternotomy control patients.
Iribarne
Alexander
A
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Russo
Mark J
MJ
Easterwood
Rachel
R
Hong
Kimberly N
KN
Yang
Jonathan
J
Cheema
Faisal H
FH
Smith
Craig R
CR
Argenziano
Michael
M
D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D008943:Mitral Valve / Q000601:surgery*; D057216:Propensity Score; D056346:Sternotomy / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome