That which must not, can not be... A reply to the EChA and EDF responses to the REACH analysis of animal use and costs.
Johns Hopkins University, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Baltimore, USA.
Thomas
T
Hartung
Costanza
C
Rovida
D000826:Animal Testing Alternatives / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D000827:Animal Welfare; D000818:Animals; D002617:Chemical Industry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D003257:Consumer Product Safety / Q000592:standards*; D005062:European Union / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006078:Government Programs / Q000458:organization & administration*; D033161:Government Regulation; D015386:Hazardous Substances / Q000633:toxicity; D012042:Registries; D018570:Risk Assessment; D014116:Toxicology / Q000592:standards
D015386:Hazardous Substances