Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
It is disputed whether onsets capture spatial attention either in a purely stimulus-driven fashion or only when they are contingent on one's attentional set. According to the latter assumption, interference from irrelevant onsets may result from nonspatial filtering costs. In the present study, we used inhibition of return (IOR) as a marker for spatial attention. IOR occurs mainly for locations that attention has visited before. Participants searched for a red object among white objects. An attentional set for redness was demonstrated by a spatial validity effect of red cues on response times. However, a stronger validity effect was found for irrelevant white onsets, which slowed responses when the onset contained a distractor, but speeded them when the onset contained a target. Most importantly, this onset benefit for targets turned into a deficit at longer SOAs, indicating IOR. We conclude that onset distractors capture spatial attention regardless of the observer's attentional set.
Schreij
Daniel
D
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. dbb.schreij@psy.vu.nl
Theeuwes
Jan
J
Olivers
Christian N L
CN
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003118:Color Perception; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011930:Reaction Time; D013028:Space Perception; D055815:Young Adult