Quality of life after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review.
This study was a systematic review of the available evidence on quality of life in patients after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. A systematic review was performed of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared laparoscopic with open colorectal surgery. Study selection, quality assessment and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers. Primary endpoint was quality of life after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery, as assessed by validated questionnaires. The search resulted in nine RCTs that included 2263 patients. Short- and long-term results of these RCTs were described in 13 articles. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 2 d to 6.7 years. Due to clinical heterogeneity, no meta-analysis could be conducted. Four RCTs did not show any difference in quality of life between laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. The remaining five studies reported a better quality of life in favor of the laparoscopic group on a few quality of life scales at time points ranging from 1 wk to 2 years after surgery. In conclusion, based on presently available high-level evidence, this systematic review showed no clinically relevant differences in postoperative quality of life between laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sanne A L
SA
Bartels
Malaika S
MS
Vlug
Dirk T
DT
Ubbink
Willem A
WA
Bemelman
D003107:Colorectal Surgery; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011184:Postoperative Period; D011788:Quality of Life; D016896:Treatment Outcome