Why did incorporation of acrylonitrile to a linear polyethylene become possible? Comparison of phosphine-sulfonate ligand with diphosphine and imine-phenolate ligands in the Pd-catalyzed ethylene/acrylonitrile copolymerization.
Palladium-catalyzed coordination-insertion copolymerization of ethylene with acrylonitrile (AN) proceeded only by using phosphine-sulfonate (P-SO(3)) as a ligand among the neutral and anionic ligands we examined, those are phosphine-sulfonate (P-SO(3)), diphosphine (P-P), and imine-phenolate (N-O). In order to answer a question that is unique for P-SO(3), theoretical and experimental studies were carried out for the three catalyst systems. By comparing P-SO(3) and P-P, it was elucidated that (i) the π-acrylonitrile complex [(L-L')PdPr(π-AN)] is less stable than the corresponding σ-complex [(L-L')PdPr(σ-AN)] in both the phosphine-sulfonato complex (L-L' = P-SO(3)) and the diphosphine complex (L-L' = P-P) and (ii) the energetic difference between the π-complex and the σ-complex is smaller in the P-SO(3) complexes than in the P-P complexes. Thus, the energies of the transition states for both AN insertion and its subsequent ethylene insertion relative to the most stable species [(L-L')PdPr(σ-AN)] are lower for P-SO(3) than for P-P. The results nicely explain the difference between these two types of ligands. That is, ethylene insertion subsequent to AN insertion was detected for P-SO(3), while aggregate formation was reported for cationic [(L-L)Pd(CHCNCH(2)CH(3))] complex. Aggregate formation with the cationic complex can be considered as a result of the retarded ethylene insertion to [(L-L)Pd(CHCNCH(2)CH(3))]. In contrast, theoretical comparison between P-SO(3) and N-O did not show a significant energetic difference in both AN insertion and its subsequent ethylene insertion, implying that ethylene/AN copolymerization might be possible. However, our experiment using [(N-O)PdMe(lutidine)] complex revealed that β-hydride elimination terminated the ethylene oligomerization and, more importantly, that the resulting Pd-H species lead to formation of free N-OH and Pd(0) particles. The β-hydride elimination process was further studied theoretically to clarify the difference between the two anionic ligands, P-SO(3) and N-O.
Nozaki
Kyoko
K
Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan. nozaki@chembio.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Kusumoto
Shuhei
S
Noda
Shusuke
S
Kochi
Takuya
T
Chung
Lung Wa
LW
Morokuma
Keiji
K