Part 2: evidence evaluation and management of potential or perceived conflicts of interest: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
In summary, the evidence review process has attempted to provide a systematic review of the scientific literature using a priori defined methods. The details and steps of the literature review are transparent and replicable. External opinions and community critique are highly valued, and the final products represent the combined labor of hundreds of participants.
Michael R
MR
Sayre
Robert E
RE
O'Connor
Dianne L
DL
Atkins
John E
JE
Billi
Clifton W
CW
Callaway
Michael
M
Shuster
Brian
B
Eigel
William H
WH
Montgomery
Robert W
RW
Hickey
Ian
I
Jacobs
Vinay M
VM
Nadkarni
Peter T
PT
Morley
Tanya I
TI
Semenko
Mary Fran
MF
Hazinski
D000572:American Heart Association; D002309:Cardiology / Q000941:ethics / Q000592:standards; D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Q000941:ethics* / Q000592:standards; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D004632:Emergency Medical Services / Q000941:ethics / Q000592:standards; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000941:ethics* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D010465:Perception; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards; D014481:United States