Modular proximal femoral replacement in salvage hip surgery for non-neoplastic conditions.
Addressing severe proximal femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery is a challenging reconstructive problem. The use of modular proximal femoral megaprostheses is one of many available options to address this. This is a retrospective review of 15 patients who had undergone limb salvage at our institution using a modular proximal femoral replacement. There were 8 males and 7 females with a mean age of 67 years (34 to 85) and a mean follow-up of 60 months (1 to 99). Indications included re-implantation for deep infection in nine patients, aseptic loosening in three, periprosthetic fracture in two and painful excision arthroplasty in one. Mean Harris hip score increased from 28 (13 to 49) pre-operatively to 69 (39 to 85) at final follow-up (paired t-test, p < 0.0001) and mean Toronto Extremity Salvage score increased from 26% (14 to 40) to 71% (35 to 82) (paired t-test, p < 0.0001). Prosthesis survival with revision as the endpoint was 87% at 5 years. There were two dislocations (14%) and there was failure to eradicate deep infection in two. Modular proximal femoral replacement provided good function and versatility with an acceptable complication rate for patients with severe proximal femoral bone loss with or without infection.
Sewell
Mathew D
MD
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
Hanna
Sammy A
SA
Carrington
Richard W
RW
Pollock
Robin C
RC
Skinner
John A
JA
Cannon
Stephen R
SR
Briggs
Timothy W R
TW
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000601:surgery*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D023821:Limb Salvage; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000601:surgery*