title: Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Clinical Change, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. julie.ratcliffe@finders.edu.au
authors.forename: Julie
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ratcliffe
authors.forename: Leah
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Couzner
authors.forename: Terry
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Flynn
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sawyer
authors.forename: Katherine
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Stevens
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Brazier
authors.forename: Leonie
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Burgess
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D011788:Quality of Life / Q000523:psychology; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D015203:Reproducibility of Results