title: Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. ocan@medicine.ankara.edu.tr
authors.forename: Ozlem S
authors.initials: OS
authors.lastname: Can
authors.forename: Ali A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Yilmaz
authors.forename: Menekse
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hasdogan
authors.forename: Filiz
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Alkaya
authors.forename: Sanem C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Turhan
authors.forename: Mehmet F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Can
authors.forename: Zekeriyya
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Alanoglu
mesh_terms: D000043:Abstracting and Indexing / Q000592:standards*; D000776:Anesthesiology / Q000592:standards*; D015706:Bibliometrics; D057189:Checklist / Q000592:standards; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D035081:Editorial Policies; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000592:standards; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000592:standards; D017408:Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D011786:Quality Control; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000592:standards*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D013997:Time Factors